WEBVTT - The Moons of Uranus, Part 2

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the USS Hamlet's Father's Ghost, requesting entry into

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Uranian orbit and the Uranian satellite system. We have decelerated

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and see clearance to titanium.

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Greetings, USS Hamlet's Father's Ghost. This is Mustard Seed. Can

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 2>you state the purpose of your visit?

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 3>Roger that Mustard Seed.

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I have two hundred and fifty Shakespeare enthusiast on board,

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>just waking up for a tour of the Uranian moons.

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Our visit to the Royal Automated Uranian Theater on Titanius

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>should be registered in the lock.

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, Roger that USSHFG. I can confirm your reservation

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 2>now and docking credentials are good to go with your passengers.

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>A pleasant and safe visit to the Uranian satellite system.

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>The next automated Thespianoid performance will be let's see Ooh

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Edward the third Well, better luck next time.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, the production of iHeartRadio.

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 3>Hey you, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 2>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 2>we're back with Part two of our series on the

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 2>planet Uranus and its moons. Now in Part one, we

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 2>focused mainly on the planet itself. This time we're going

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 2>to start getting more into the moons. Maybe we'll do

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 2>all of the moons this time. I think last time

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 2>we promised it would happen. We'll see whether we can

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 2>fit it all into one episode. But I had a

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>few more core planet digressions burning a hole in my

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 2>pocket that I wanted to mention before we fly off

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 2>to the satellites. Are you okay with that? Rob, Let's

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 2>do it.

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 2>First of all, I was wondering what's the density of Uranus,

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>And it turns out that Uranus is the second least

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 2>dense planet in the Solar System at one point twenty

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 2>seven grams per cubic centimeter. The only planet less dense

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 2>is actually Saturn, the second largest planet in the Solar System.

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>You might wonder which planet is the dense baby, that's Earth.

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 3>That's Earth.

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 2>We are at five point five to one grams per

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 2>cubic centimeter, so we are the density king. But one

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 2>of the real things I wanted to return to was

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 2>a question of materials, because in the last episode we

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 2>mentioned just giving sort of an overview of the basics

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 2>of the planet, that most of the mass of Uranus

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>is thought to be a hot, dense fluid of ices,

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>probably surrounding a rocky core of some sort. And though

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 2>it might be kind of strange to hear like hot

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 2>dense fluid of ices, that almost kind of doesn't make

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 2>sense based on our definition of ice. And it's true

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of this ice is going to be

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 2>different than the kind of ice we know. So I

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 2>was reading more about this in an article by a

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 2>planetary atmospheric scientist named Amy Simon, who is a senior

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 2>researcher at NASA Goddard, and this was written for the

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>magazine of the Planetary Society. The article is called the

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 2>of the Ice Giants, and one of the questions Simon

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 2>addresses in this article is why are the planets Uranus

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 2>and Neptune called ice giants as opposed to regular gas giants.

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 2>It's because, compared to regular gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn,

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Uranus and Neptune are composed of a higher proportion of

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 2>ice forming molecules like water and methane, though much of

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 2>that so called ice is in a phase unfamiliar to

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 2>us on the surface of Earth. Cymon writes quote, ice

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 2>giants are mostly water, probably in the form of a

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>supercritical fluid. The visible clouds likely consist of ice crystals

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>with different compositions, So regarding supercritical fluid, a supercritical fluid

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't behave exactly like a liquid, gas or a solid.

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>It's an emergent state of matter occurring at temperatures and

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 2>pressures beyond what is known as the critical point for

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>each substance. And Simon has a very good paragraph clarifying

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 2>the planetary science use of the term ice, which could

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 2>help clear up any confusion there. She says that on

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Earth we usually use the term ice to refer to

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 2>just water H two O when it is frozen solid,

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 2>but planetary astronomers use the word ice to refer to

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 2>any condensable molecule in its solid form. She writes, quote,

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>these tend to be highly reflective form clouds, and unlike minerals,

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 2>can readily change between liquid, solid and gas states at

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 2>relatively low temperatures. So we're mainly familiar with water ice

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 2>on the surface of Earth, but throughout space there are

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 2>lots of ices. There's methane, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and phosphene

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 2>pH three, and these are all condensable molecules and could

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 2>all freeze in the atmosphere of Uranus and Neptune also

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 2>for that matter, and Simon writes that most of the

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 2>cloud clouds we see in the atmospheres of these ice

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 2>giants are clouds of methane ice crystals or hydrogen sulfide ice,

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 2>So there's probably weird supercritical fluids down below, and then

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 2>an atmosphere above. The atmosphere in its gas contents, is

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 2>mostly hydrogen and helium, but that atmosphere is probably full

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 2>of traces of different kinds of ice, including not just

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 2>H two O, but things like ammonia and methane. And

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 2>speaking of methane, as we mentioned last time, the blue

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 2>color of both Neptune and Uranus appears to come from

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the presence of methane in their atmospheres, which absorbs the

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 2>red wavelengths of light from the sun and reflects only

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 2>the blue spectrum. But the question is why is Urinus

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 2>a paler shade of blue than Neptune. If you look

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 2>at Neptune, it's often kind of a royal blue, whereas

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>in true color, Uranus appears kind of a gray green blue.

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Simon writes that this is quote either because Urinus has

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 2>more haze, so more kind of a cloudy outer shell,

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.679
<v Speaker 2>but she goes on or because Neptune's atmosphere has another

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 2>unidentified constituent that absorbs longer wavelength light even more strongly,

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and of course longer wavelength light would be more red

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 2>shifted toward the red end of the visible spectrum. Okay,

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 2>so that's ice, the atmosphere, the makeup of the planet.

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 2>But there's one more thing you may have seen headlines

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 2>about regarding Urinus in Neptune that if you have seen

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>these headlines, I'm sure you're wondering about it, and that

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 2>is the claim that some experts have argued that it

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 2>likely rains diamonds on Urinus in Neptune. And from what

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 2>I can tell, this is true. Now, this is obviously

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 2>something we haven't been able to detect directly with probes

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 2>or anything, so nobody can sense this happening. Instead, it's

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 2>based on what we do know about the planets and

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 2>argue and sort of extrapolating logically from the starting facts.

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 2>So how does the logic go? Well, I was reading

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 2>about this in an article for space dot Com by

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the Sunny Stonybrook astrophysicist Paul M. Sutter, and in this article,

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Sutter explains that we know from mathematical models that the

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 2>inner mantles of ice giants probably have temperatures of about

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 2>seven thousand kelvins or over sixty seven hundred celsius and

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 2>pressure about six million times the atmospheric pressure on the

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 2>surface of Earth. Meanwhile, higher up in the mantle, things

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 2>are cooler about two thousand kelvins and only two hundred

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 2>thousand times Earth's atmospheric pressure. And we know that water, ammonia,

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 2>and methane are present within that mantle. So what happens

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 2>to those substances in those conditions, Well, these conditions of

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 2>temperature and pressure would tend to tear apart molecules of methane,

0:07:55.920 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 2>methane is H four carbon, and hydrogen. And when those

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 2>molecules get torn apart, we are left with free carbon.

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Free carbon tends to link together with other free carbon

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>to form long chains of carbon. What happens to long

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>chains of pure carbon under high pressure that gets pressed

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 2>into a diamond? These diamonds would tend to then drop

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 2>down to lower in the mantle where high temperatures vaporize them,

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.679
<v Speaker 2>and then they float back up into the upper mantle,

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 2>and then the cycle repeats, so you're left with diamond rain.

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like the name of a great alternate universe collaborative

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>sci fi movie musical between Prince and David Bowie. Wish

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I could have seen it, but it does appear to

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 2>be very likely a physical reality on Uranus and Neptune

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying that all we have to do is

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>jet out to Urinus, dip down into the atmosphere of Uranus,

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>scoop up some diamonds, then get back to Earth and

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>we're set for life.

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>I've always said when I look at but the stars

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 2>at night, what I see is profit. Okay, but one

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 2>more digression before we get to the moons. Since part one,

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 2>we actually got a really great bit of listener mail

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 2>from Joe, not me, but a different Joe who listens

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 2>to the show, who brought to our attention some really

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 2>awesome photos of Uranus recently captured by the James Web

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 2>Space Telescope. Joe writes, quote, I've long awaited with tremulous

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 2>anticipation the resumption of your ural journey to the Heliopause

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 2>and was thrilled to see the recumbent sky King Uranus

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 2>on my podcast Feed Your Choice was timely indeed, as

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 2>the James Web Space Telescope just last month released some

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 2>spectacular visuals of Uranus. These images bost greater clarity than

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the Hubbles effort, especially of the planet's rings. I love

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 2>living under a sky that will never run out of

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 2>extraordinary things to look at and talk about, and I

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 2>appreciate when you cast your gaze upward from time to time. Joe, Well,

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 2>thank you, Joe. Because I had not seen these, I

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 2>looked them up and this is fantastic. So I saw

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 2>these within the context of a NASA press release from

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 2>April sixth, twenty twenty three that Joe shared with us Rob,

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 2>I pasted these two photos here in the outline. One

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 2>is just zoomed in on the planet from the more

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 2>zoomed out second one. I would say, from my perspective,

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 2>these images are gorgeous. They fill one with awe at

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 2>the picture of this frosty, dark recess where the Blue

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 2>God lives. And this might sound a little bit weird,

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 2>but I actually mean this in the best possible way. Somehow,

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 2>in these images, Urinus looks more like an optical artifact

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 2>than a physical object, as if the planet were like

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 2>a glint or a lens flare. And to explain what

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so the planet is pictured on its side,

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 2>because of course that's how it is. We're not seeing

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the rings laterally from the side, crossing over and behind

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 2>the planet, like we do in most photos of Saturn. Instead,

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing the rings encircling the planet in an egg

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 2>shape because we're looking roughly down toward the north pole,

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 2>which faces sideways. And in this particular photo, though this

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 2>is not exactly true color, the planet is pale blue

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 2>with a white cap, and the rings sort of fade

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 2>outward to inward from a screaming fluorescent white to a

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 2>dim blue gray as they sink toward the planet's atmosphere.

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 2>And the sunlight seems blinding in these images because we

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 2>actually see it gleaming off the edge of the planet,

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 2>which is even weirder because, as I said, the disk

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 2>of Urinus facing us looks like a glint or a

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 2>gleam itself. And in the more zoomed out of these

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 2>two photos, we can see the blue dots of the

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>larger moons surrounding it, also sending out these sort of

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 2>shafts of reflected light in these hexagonal criss crosses out

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 2>into space.

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, these images are gorgeous. It makes it look like

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Urinus is a planet designed by Japanese illustrator Hajimi Soriyama, whose,

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of course I think he worked on the design for

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the original Sony Aibo robot, but also mostly known for

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>robot pin up like really shiny, silvery robot pin up models.

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>This artist is on my mind because the movie we're

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>watching Friday in for Weird House Cinema, this artist is

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>credited like deep down in the credits because there's a

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>character in the movie that has some of this art

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>up on his workstation. But this kind of but there's

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a certain aside from like the female robot bodies in

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>his art, there is this kind of like glimmering, like

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>silvery perfection to things. And that's what that's what I

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of get from this image of Urinus. And if

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you're into planets, like I mean, put it on a calendar.

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>It looks it looks nice.

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>It is beautiful. And I will say the blue in

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 2>this photo, as I alluded to, is not exactly true

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 2>color from the visible spectrum. I think it's approximate. So

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the image is from the webs near infrared camera combining

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 2>data from two filters. According to the press release, it

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 2>was one point four and three point zero microns, and

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 2>then the article explains these are coded out to blue

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 2>and orange respectively. Now I mentioned the white cap that

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>we see on Uranus in this photo. The article explains

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 2>that this is known as the polar cap, and it

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>seems to manifest when the pole of the planet goes

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>into direct sunlight during its long polar summer, which, again,

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 2>as we talked about last time, lasts many earth years

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 2>at a time, and then the cap seems to disappear

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 2>in the fall when it starts to turn away from

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 2>the sun. As far as I could find, we aren't

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 2>sure exactly what causes this, or maybe if somebody knows,

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 2>I just didn't dig that up. But so regarding the

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 2>beautiful rings in the picture, Urinus has thirteen known rings,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 2>and you can see eleven of them in this photo,

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 2>though some of them are so bright that they bleed

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 2>together in the image. There are nine major rings and

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 2>then there are two kind of faint dusty rings that

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 2>were discovered during the approach of Voyager two in nineteen

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 2>eighty six. But speaking of those, rings and moons. Rings

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 2>and moons sometimes have an interesting origin story, so I

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 2>was wondering where do experts generally think they came from

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 2>in the case of Uranus. Going back to that Planetary

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Society article by Amy Simon, Simon writes that the medium

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 2>sized moons of Uranus probably formed in place at the

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 2>same time or after whatever event it was that left

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Uranus tilted on its side. And as we talked about

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 2>last time, it seems likely that Uranus was probably knocked

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 2>on its side and left colder than all the other

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 2>planets because of an impact with a large object, maybe

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 2>like an Earth sized planet billions of years ago. And

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>so what we're left with is that the moons orbit

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Urinus on its equatorial plane, so like the planet itself

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 2>and like its rings, the moons are tilted at a

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 2>roughly ninety degree angle to the rest of the Solar System.

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 2>In general, the moons of Urinus are made of ice

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 2>and rock, usually slightly more ice than rock, and they

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 2>show some interesting surface features, like patterns of darkening on

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 2>their surfaces that are caused by some unknown material. Spectral

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 2>analysis reveals the presence of frozen carbon dioxide on a

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of the moons. Meanwhile, the origin of the rings,

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 2>the consensus seems to be that they are created by

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 2>the shattering into dust and fragments of formerly solid moons.

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 2>And as we've seen with other planets, the sudden or

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 2>gradual smash up of moons can happen a number of ways,

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 2>by lots of little collisions with meteoroids or other objects,

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 2>or by tidal breakup due to gravity, in any case,

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 2>turning former larger satellites into smaller satellites and rings of

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 2>little fragments.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's fascinating. How from our human perspective we look

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>up at our moon, we consider the moons of other worlds,

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's a certain certain stability to them, you know.

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 3>But if you look at.

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Any planets, moons or moon, generally, you're looking at a

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>more violent relationship over the vast history of a given planet.

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing peaceful about it. All right, Well, let's begin,

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>at least begin to dip into the moons of Uranus.

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, we originally set out to do them all.

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we won't do them all. Maybe we'll get part

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>way through the journey and we'll come back on Tuesday.

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Who knows, Maybe we'll just we'll just get we'll finish

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>them up, and then we'll go right into Neptune.

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 3>There are no rules. We can do what we want.

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with the inner moons of Uranus thirteen

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>total known. All right, We're going to start with a

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>pair of moons, Cordelia and Ophelia. These are named for

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the youngest daughter of King Lear and of course Hamlet's

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>tragic beloved, respectively. The main significance of these moons is

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that both Cordelia and Ophelia are shepherd moons, as their

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>gravity keeps Uranus's epsilon ring from dispersing.

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, I thought this was interesting, so I was looking

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:41.159
<v Speaker 2>up how exactly it is that shepherd moons work. What

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 2>does the shepherd moon do? These little small moons, how

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 2>do they keep a ring? Essentially, they keep a ring

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 2>in tight formation around the planet and clear these gaps

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 2>between the rings. And it seems that essentially it works

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 2>like this. So you've got a small moon and it's

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 2>orbiting planet. And imagine at first it's orbiting the planet

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 2>along with a bunch of other small particles sort of

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 2>within the lane of that small moon's orbit. Particles that

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 2>are ahead of the small moon will be attracted by

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 2>gravity to it, meaning if they're orbiting ahead of it,

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 2>they will naturally want to slow down in their orbit,

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 2>right because they're getting pulled toward this moon. But slowing

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 2>down in their orbit actually causes them to lose energy

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 2>and fall down closer to the planet that they're orbiting.

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 2>So these like dust and particles and things in the

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>ring actually end up sorting down into lower orbit rings.

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 2>And then meanwhile, things that are orbiting along the same

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 2>lane as this moon, that are behind it in its

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 2>orbit are attracted to it and thus sped up. And

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 2>as they get sped up trying to chase after this

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 2>moon by the force of gravity, that acceleration actually causes

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 2>them to have greater energy and to ascend in their

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 2>orbit and end up going into outer rings beyond that

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 2>little moon.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.959
<v Speaker 1>So again we have the Shepherd moons here. They were

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>discovered by Voyager two in nineteen eighty six. Like the

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of Uranus's inner moons, they appear to be roughly

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:23.239
<v Speaker 1>equal split of water, ice and rock. They're small. Of

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>note to Cordelia is the closest to the planet, and

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess we should also point out or come back

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that yes, these are both Shakespearean references.

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>There are going to be a lot of shakespeare references

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>as we go through the moons of Uranus, and these

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>are just the first two.

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 2>It seems that a lot of the names of these

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 2>satellites for some reason were chosen either from the works

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 2>of Shakespeare or from the works of Alexander Pope.

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, predominantly Shakespearean, but definitely there's some key Alexander Pope

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>references as well. So as we go through it, we

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>can probably talk a little bit about some the namesakes here.

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, this was something I was wondering. I don't know

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 2>about the origin exactly, like what people had in mind

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 2>when they were naming these, But so I think, like,

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 2>is there some significance to the innermost minor moon here

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 2>being called Cordelia, because Cordelia is a very poignant character.

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Cordelia is the youngest daughter of King Lear in the

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 2>play King Lear. If you don't know the play or

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 2>need refreshing, the very beginning of it, the first scene

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 2>is King Lear is this old king. He comes out.

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 2>He decides that he will divide up his kingdom between

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 2>his three daughters, Goneril, Reagan, and Cordelia, and he's going

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 2>to give the largest portion to the daughter that loves

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>him most. So Goneril and Reagan give these speeches where

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 2>they overwhelm their father with absurd insincere flattery about how

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 2>much they love him. And then when it's Cordelia's time

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 2>to speak, she finds that she cannot put into words,

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 2>She cannot express her love for her father to herself.

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 2>She says that she knows her love is richer than

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 2>her tongue. And then when it's her time to speak,

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 2>she says, unhappy that I am. I cannot heave my

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 2>heart into my mouth. I love your majesty according to

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 2>my bond, no more nor less. And I think he

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 2>gives her a chance to amend her statement. She doesn't really,

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 2>and then so Lee gets furious at this decides to

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.719
<v Speaker 2>disinherit her. He gives nothing to Cordelia, splits his kingdom

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 2>between the other two daughters, Goneril and Reagan, who secretly

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 2>think he is a fool and they will go on

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 2>to betray him once they come to power. And of

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 2>course it's a tragedy, so things just get worse and worries.

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Basically everybody ends up dead but you know, it's a

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 2>very meaningful character and something I think, I don't know.

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 2>That moment in the first scene is something that always

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 2>got me, something I can really relate to, Like the

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 2>feeling of worrying that you don't express positive feelings because

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 2>you're afraid that you can't phrase them in the sincerest way,

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 2>like you don't know how to put them to words.

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 2>So then you worry that like you're perceived as not

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 2>wanting to say a positive thing at all. I don't

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 2>know if that makes sense.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no, I mean, certainly with the example

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>here from the play, absolutely.

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 2>But she's the daughter that truly loved him. She just

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 2>didn't want to give a big, insincere speech.

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Anyway.

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a very meaningful character. So I'm wondering, is there

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 2>some similarly at play here in the selection of the

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 2>name for this moon? Maybe not so, Like it's a

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 2>very small satellite, it's the closest to the planet of these.

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 2>It is one of the shepherd moons that sort of

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 2>guides the Epsilon ring and keeps it tight in formation.

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>By the end, I mean, she does show great discipline

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 2>because she comes back with an army to try to

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 2>to fight on her father's side against her cruel, duplicitous sisters.

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, maybe not. I don't know if it fits,

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 2>but I was wondering.

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>No, I think it's natural to try and read some

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of sense into the naming.

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Though.

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Of course, as we'll discuss it, it's different people at

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 1>different times coming up with these names. You know, some

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>are maybe probably a little more up on the works

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.959
<v Speaker 1>of William Shakespeare than others. Sometimes there's there seems like

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 1>something they could be getting, at other times not. And

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>also some of these kind of slip by on a technicality,

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>so they're kind of all over the place. All right,

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>let's let's go into the next one. There's a Bianca

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>named after Kate's sister in the Taming of the Shrew.

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>This one does nothing really else that I think is

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>significant about it, and it was also discovered by Voyager two.

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, after that, we have Cressida. This is the

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>title character from Troylus and Cresida. Again, nothing other else

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>it's really significant about this moon it was also discovered

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>by Voyger two. I know some of your probably wondering

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>when's Voyager six is going to show up in all this?

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>But I guess Voyger six just shot right out there, right.

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I was unsure, but what you're for di vigure here? Right?

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Voyager six doesn't actually exist except in the world

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of Star Trek, okay, specifically Star Trek the motion picture,

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the most riveting of all of them, that was pinned

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>by Alan Dean Foster. Oh wait, was he the one

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>who wrote.

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 2>The novelization of Halloween three or something like that?

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>He wrote the novelization of most films? Yes, all right.

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>The next moon of note here is Desdemona. This one's

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>named after the wife of Othello. No other real significance,

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>once again discovered by Voyager two. All right, now we're

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>moving on to another one. This is Juliet or Juliet

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 1>right if you're depending on how you're what line from

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the play using sometimes you got to hit two syllables

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>instead of three on that. This is of course, named

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>after the title character from Romeo and Juliet. Romeo, meanwhile,

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>is nowhere to be found amid the moons of Uranus.

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>It is kind of interesting that there's a part in

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Romeo and Juliet where Romeo is swearing his love up

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and down the universe and Juliette specifically asked him not

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to swear by the moon. She says, quote, oh, swear

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>not by the moon, the inconstant moon that monthly changes

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>in her circle orb less that thy love prove likewise variable.

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Changes in her circle? Orb What does that refer to,

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 2>like the like waxing and waning of the moon or

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe I'm not sure I know.

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 3>What that means.

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I take it to me and yeah, it's

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>like there are different faces of the moon, Like like

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>if your love is like the moon Romeo, then I

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>don't you know, it's like what am I going to

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>get today? I mean it seems like if it is

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>like the moon, she could chart it out and then

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>she'd have a really good idea of what she's gonna get,

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, phase by phase. But yeah, she's like, I

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>need consistency.

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, your love should not wax and wane. We shouldn't

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 2>have a new moon of your love. Yes, it's were

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 2>wolf night every night.

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, Aside from these thoughts, juliet nothing else than literally

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>significant once again discovered by Voyger. Two, then we have Portia.

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>This one is named after the heroine from the Merchant

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>of Venice. This one. I guess the main significance is

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that it orbits Urinus in less than one earth day,

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and it.

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Was discovered by Voyger two. All right.

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Up, next we have Rosalind. Rosalind is one of the

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Duke's daughters in As You Like It. That's the namesake.

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Nothing else really significant to discuss here.

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 3>This one was also discovered by Voyager two. All right.

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>The next one is Cupid. This is this one? This

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>one is is a tough one to fit in, but okay.

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Cupid is, of course the Roman god of.

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Love, famously invented by William Shakespeare.

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, he is technically a character in Shakespeare's what is

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it timin Timon of Athens. I'm not familiar with this play.

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anything about that one. This may be

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the more obscure ones. I don't remember studying

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>this one in school. But the discovery of it is

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting because it was discovered by m R

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Showalter in JJ Lissauer using the Hubble space telescope in

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three. It was too small and too

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>dark for Voyager two to spot. And I was thinking

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>about this. It's tempting to try and spin this one out.

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And think of like, Okay, here we have Cupid as

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>this dark, near invisible shadow press presence, you know, reminding

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>us of past discussions about how Cupid was sometimes said

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to shoot lead and arrows. So it's you know, he's

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>not only dealing out love with his projectiles, but also

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 1>some of the ramifications of love, and maybe even the

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>tragic ramifications of love. But again, this one, this one

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>seems to sort of slip by on a technicality in

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 1>terms of its naming. All right, the next one is Belinda,

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And this is one where we have to just have

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to ask Shakespeare to move over, because this one is

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>named after the character whose lock of hair is stolen

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>in Alexander Pope's Rape of the Lock.

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, this is an unfortunately titled poem because it doesn't

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 2>mean what it sounds like. That the poem by Pope

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 2>is an older definition of the word rape, which is basically,

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 2>in this context it means like theft or snatching. So

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the poem is a mock heroic satire. It narrates like

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 2>a social scandal in which a lord of some sort.

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I did read this in school, and I forget a

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of the details, but he steals a lock of

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 2>hair from a young woman. But it's written like in

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 2>the style of the Iliad, to be mocking of the like,

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 2>oh hoho, this is actually insignificant. I think Pope's point

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 2>is best summarized in one of its lines, where he says,

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 2>what mighty contests rise from trivial things? Though I don't know,

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 2>thinking on it now, there are obviously much worse crimes,

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 2>but stealing somebody's hair is pretty weird.

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Plus hair has magical connotations. They could be stealing

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it to work some sort of magic. Maybe that's explored

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>in the poem. I don't know. I have a degree

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in English, and I somehow managed to never read this poem.

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I remember that, you know the course. I'm familiar with

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the author's name and his popularity and importance in English literature,

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>but I remember this title would come up and I

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>would think, Oh, that doesn't sound like something I want

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to read, not realizing that it's about hair theft Alexander Pope.

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Everything I recall that he wrote is basically satirical in nature.

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure he must have written serious poems, but like

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the other main thing I remember he wrote is something

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 2>called the Dunceiad, which is a sort of an epic

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 2>poem about stupidity.

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Hmm.

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 2>He was like, it seems like he was just really

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 2>into not suffering fools.

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Though.

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 2>I feel like if that's your main vibe, you really

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 2>open yourself up to scrutiny, don't you.

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>All Right, well, we'll come back to Pope's work in

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit, because there are more moons named after him.

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>The next one is Perdita, and this is the daughter

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of Leontes and Hermione in William Shakespeare's The Winter's Tail.

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>This one's discovery is actually pretty interesting because Voyger two

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is involved in its discovery, but it wasn't recognized till

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three. Basically, University of Arizona's Eric Karkoshka

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>discovered it by comparing Voyger two imagery with Hubble imagery

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.959
<v Speaker 1>and sort of working out its existence based on these

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>two different streams. All right, up next, we have Puck Is,

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, named after the sprite from A Midsummer Night's Dream.

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Tucci played him in the nineteen ninety nine film adaptation,

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>which had a great cast. I do remember seeing this

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>film when it came out, and I imagine I've seen

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>multiple it seems like Midsummer Night's Dream is just one

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of those plays that if you're just going to fall

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>into seeing it, even if you don't set out to

0:30:58.400 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>watch Shakespeare in life.

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Puck's a great character, great mischief maker, the mischief maker

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 2>who brings wisdom, whether on purpose or not.

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, Tucci was perfect casting. Now significance. Here is

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the smallest of the inner moons, with a diameter of

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>about one hundred and fifty kilometers or about ninety miles,

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And it was guess what discovered by voyager two? All right,

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>up next we have Mab. It's named after Queen Mab,

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>queen of the fair Folk and English folklore. She's mentioned

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in Romeo and Juliet So and just mentioned. So it

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>just really really squeaks by on a technicality. I mean,

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those situations where I feel like

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to shout a little bit and be like, look,

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of names that are mentioned in Shakespeare,

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and there are plenty of characters. I don't know why

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Queen Mab seems like the ideal choice.

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Here is there an inner moon named Julius Caesar?

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>No, but you know you could that would have been

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a good one Caesar, right, But that's just off the

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>top of my head.

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure if there's some other.

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, I should also point out when you

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>start looking. And I didn't get into this in any

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of my note taking, really, but there are individual features

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>on some moons that are likewise named after other things.

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>So it could be a Caeesar in there somewhere, you

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>know what.

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Actually, I want to be fair, Even a lot of

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 2>the Shakespeare characters that we think of as more original

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 2>shakespeare characters are actually often from like adapted versions of

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 2>pre existing tales. Like a lot of Shakespeare's plays were

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 2>not wholly made up stories. They were based on something

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 2>from history or from an older story or another play,

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 2>or something right right, Like who would have thought of it?

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Hamlet is the guy from the Northman.

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, if you were around today, he'd be uh,

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, he'd be in the MCU somewhere working on

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a project.

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 4>Of it.

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, Mab is the moon here. This one's discovered in

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three by show Alter and Lisaur using

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the Hubble space telescope.

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Interesting in fact, I came across while reading that article

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 2>by the NASA Goddard researcher Amy Simon. She writes that

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Mab quote maybe generating a tenuous blue toned ring like

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Enceladus does for Saturn's e ring, though the source currently

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 2>remains a mystery.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know that sounds kind of fitting for the

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Queen of the fairy Folk.

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 3>So I do like that.

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm looking at the clock, and do you know

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 2>what the clock reads. It reads a promise broken because

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 2>we said we were going to do all of the

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 2>moons within part two, and I think we have failed

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 2>because we're coming up against a time limit. We got

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 2>to cap it here and we've got all of the

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 2>major moons left to talk about. So I think that's

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 2>going to have to be part three of our series

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 2>on Uranus and its satellites.

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, hopefully we didn't mess anybody up there, But I

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>think the journey will be better for breaking into three

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>parts here, and there's gonna be a lot of fun

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff to talk about, especially with the major moons of

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Uranus and then getting also into just some of the

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>additional Shakespearean.

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 3>References in the naming of these moons.

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, if you would like to catch up

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 1>on past episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, including

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>our past episodes dealing with the moons of Jupiter and

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Saturn and Mars and so forth. You'll find those in

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the Stuff to Blow your Mind podcast feed, which you'll

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>find wherever you get your podcasts. We have core episodes

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of Stuff to Blow Your Mind airing there on Tuesdays

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and Thursdays. On Mondays, we open up the mail bag

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 1>on our listener mail episodes. That's primarily where we read

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>emails from people. Occasionally we'll read one in an episode,

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>as in today's episode, you know, if it relates to

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the subject matter, but generally it's going to be in

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the Monday episodes. On Wednesdays, we do a short form

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>artifact or monster fact episode this week. Of course, it

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 1>ties into our theme of Urinus, so go check that

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>out if you haven't. And then on Fridays we set

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>aside most serious concerns just talk about a weird film

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>on Weird House Cinema. Our selection for this week does

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>not have anything to do with the planet Uranus, but

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's still.

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 3>A lot of fun. Bye God.

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 2>We'll find a way to tie it in by the

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 2>time Friday comes around. Anyway, Huge thanks as always to

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 2>our audio producer JJ Posway. If you would like to

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 2>get in touch with us with feedback on this episode

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 2>or any other, to suggest a topic for the future,

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:30.879
<v Speaker 2>or just to say hello, you can email us at

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:40.919
<v Speaker 2>contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.280
<v Speaker 4>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 4>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 2>Its West d d