WEBVTT - How to Survive Digital Media with Kin Community's Michael Wayne

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of the Variety podcast Strictly Business,

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>where we talk to some of the brightest minds working

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in the media business today. I'm Andrew Wallenstein, co editor

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in chief of Variety. There's no shortage of digital content

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>companies these days trying to carve out audiences for themselves,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>but few have innovated the sector's business models as much

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>as Kin Community and it's co founder and CEO, Michael Wayne,

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>my next guest. The talent he works with, for one thing,

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>isn't just the usual digital native stars, and the revenue

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't just cuts of advertising and subscription dollars. Michael, thanks

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>for coming in. Let's let's walk through some of the

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>different things that you're doing. And but first just explain

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>what Kin is, the brand, the demographic you got it.

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me, Andy, pleasure to be here. Kin

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is a lifestyle entertainment company, simply put, So what does

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that mean exactly? What we do A number of things. Uh,

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we have a studio that produces content. We have, like

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, a network of digitally native influencers. We have

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>owned and operated channels. Uh. That exists across YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, Amazon, Prime, Twitter,

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every social platform. The newest part of our business,

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>which we launched about a year ago, is working with

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>more traditional TV talent like a timor Um who who

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>do we know Tia from? Yeah. Timre Is is a

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>good example of the type of talent we're working with.

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>She had a show in the late nineties called Sister Sister.

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It was a big show, was on ABC, she and

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>her twin sister, tamoraw uh. And then since then she

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>has had a really broad career in entertainment. She was

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>on a show on E with her sister. She had

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple shows on the network. She's had a cookbook. She's

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>done a lot of different things, but but a lot

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of which is in the women's lifestyle space. Uh. And

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.399
<v Speaker 1>she was pitched to us a couple of years ago

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>by U t A. And at that point in our

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>company's history, we hadn't really worked with traditional TV talent.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>We were focused early on on working with bloggers and

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>then YouTubers and instagrammers. But there was something interesting about

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 1>her one the fact that she was more or less

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a household name. She had been in the public consciousness

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>for twenty years. She had twelve million social followers um

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and she was very passionate about women's lifestyle. So we

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of scratched her head and said, you know, maybe

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten to the point in time where the distance

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>between a digitally native social influencer and a TV personality

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>who has large social following, but also connects directly with

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>an audience, UH, isn't very far apart. Maybe maybe these

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of ships are starting to pass in the night.

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So we said, what if we started a new own

0:02:56.040 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and operated channel where she was the focus of it.

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And we created a brand called Timris Quick Fix, and

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>we launched it simultaneously on YouTube and Facebook and Instagram

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon Prime. And that was almost a year ago

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's been extremely successful. So she's the model for

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>what you're she is. We we still have a studio

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>business that produces channels like Tmris Quick Fix, as well

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>as working with brands to do brand content. We still

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>have a great network of digitally native influencers, but we

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>are now building the Kin network, which we've called recently

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a neighborhood, which we can talk about why we're calling

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it a neighborhood, but um of really like minded talent.

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>So we have since launched now five channels in this model.

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>The tmri E quick fix model, and we plan on

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>launching We'll have seven by the end of the year

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully next year. By the end of two thousand nineteen,

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>about twenty of these channels driven by traditional TV talent.

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So what was wrong with the model that was more

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>based on the traditional influencer You've got eyes were pretty

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>active on that front for quite a while. We are

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that that space has changed pretty dramatically since we got

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>involved in it. Um described that change. Yeah, I think

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it goes back even before the YouTubers. So

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>when we started our company was in what year which

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>was two thousand seven, which is like the nineteenth century

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>for incial media. But we started the company in two

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven, and we always had the idea of

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>building brands I P video brands if you will. Back then,

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>uh talent. We we had this belief that we wanted

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to work with digitally native talent. But in two thousand seven,

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that meant bloggers. Because there's really really at the very

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>beginning of YouTube in general, so the whole social influencer

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>thing hadn't really started from a video standpoint, but bloggers, Uh,

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of the social influencer of of that time.

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So we were doing video series working with bloggers, and

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we learned a lot back then. One that blogging is

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>very different than video. Two. At the time, there weren't

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of video platforms. In fact, that that time,

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>YouTube was just doing user generated content, so we didn't

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>even really think of it as a as as a

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>video platform like we do today. Um we created websites

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>so that people could come watch these video series in

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight, and that's really hard to get people

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to a website to watch video, let alone just get

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>them to a website. Period. Brands weren't quite ready to

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>do all that. But but what we did learn back

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>then was that when you have open platforms that you

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>can very quickly commoditize talent. So we were working with

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the best bloggers at the time, the best mom bloggers,

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the best food bloggers, but we were What we were

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>seeing is that large blog networks were forming and pretty

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>much anyone who throw up a blog was part of

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a blog network. And that created a lot of problems

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 1>because all of a sudden, the ad dollars had to

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>be spread around not hundreds of bloggers, but thousands, tens

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of that millions of bloggers. It was hard to navigate

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>what are the good bloggers, what are the bad bloggers.

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>It just got very crowded very quickly, and very commoditized,

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and we were like, oh, we don't we don't want

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to do that. That's not interesting for us. So when

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube started really getting behind their their stars, their creators,

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>we kind of realized and actually make our studio and

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>folks like that started aggregating tens of thousands of channels

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>we got. We we had some pause there because we

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>had seen what it looked like in the blog space,

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and so we said, hey, if we're going to curate

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a network, let's make sure it's the biggest and the

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>best uh channels in our categories, which were food and

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>home and d I y and style and beauty and

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>things like that. So we only focused on about a

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred YouTubers at the time, and for a few years

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>we were the place where brands would come to work

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>with those influencers. But as you know, in fact I

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>wrote an op ed pe or an opinion piece for

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Variety many years ago about the problems with with the space.

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>It got also very crowded very quickly. Lots of um

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>other you know, the market was flooded with YouTubers, agents, managers, MCNs,

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>social influencer networks that could go on and on. All

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>started to figure out that there was a growing business

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>here and they wanted to get in the middle of it.

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>So we we realized probably a few years ago that

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this was going to get pretty crowded pretty quickly, and

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>realized that UM also at the end of the day,

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>we didn't We don't own our influencers channels. They own it,

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>So we are in a sense, Uh, it's almost like

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a manager or an agent to them. And that's really

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>never why we got in the business in the first place.

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>We wanted to be a content business that owns I

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>P and that builds video brands, and so it's still

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a part of our business, but uh, it's not uh

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the growing and most valuable part of our business. I

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>would say it is. It is, Uh, it is one

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of many parts of our business. So you're working with

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a higher level of talent. What kind of deals can

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you offer them, because I would assume they've got options.

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a great question. So I think the

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting part of our model right now is that while

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>digital influencers were building their brands, UM everyone started building

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>their social as well. That you me variety uh a

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>TV talent, And over the last five years, you've seen

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of TV talent build social followings as big

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>as a YouTuber and Instagram who started as digital native, right.

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.439
<v Speaker 1>But there's a little bit different to someone who's built

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years or ten years of their career

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>being a TV star. One. They probably aren't likely to

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>want to pick up their iPhone and start shooting videos

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>every week and putting it on YouTube. That's probably not likely, uh,

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>what they're gonna want to do. Um. They might not

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>want to hire a whole production team also to come

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>out every week and spend the money on doing a show. Um.

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>They want it probably to look really good. They've been

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>on TV their whole career, they've gotten to a level

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of success. They probably want content that's going to look

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>as good, if not better than what they've been doing

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 1>on TV. They also probably don't want to build a

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>whole data and strategy team and become experts on how

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>these platforms work day in and day out. So as

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we've talked to UH some of the more traditional talent,

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what we find is there they've been successful on television.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>They've built large social followings, but then taking the next

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>step into video isn't so easy. They're not just going

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to start from scratch like a YouTuber might have UM

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>who made YouTube kind of their primary career, if you will.

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So we come in and we say listen, we want

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to work with you care natively. But we have all

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure. We have all the camera equipment, we have

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>all the producers, we have all the editing facilities. We

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>have a strategy and data team that's really really smart

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>about how you should think about your you know, a

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>content brand with us UM. But ultimately we're not there

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to create the only digital video opportunity for these stars.

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>We believe we want to create a show with them,

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a series with them, not unlike they might go to

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a TV or a cable not a TV company to

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>cable company and create a show on cable. So we

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>really focus on just what swim Lane we think would

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>be fun and profitable to build out with them. So

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>with Tia, it was quick Fix, it was d I Y,

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it was how can she help young women who may

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>or may not have young children get through the day

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>with easy quick tips that X we have a show

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>with Adrian Balion called All Things All Things Adrian, which

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is really focused on style and beauty. Um you know,

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we just launched a show with Jordan's sparks. Jordan's Sparks

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 1>one American idol ten years ago. She has a passion

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 1>for baking, so we have a show called Heart of

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>the Batter with Jordan's Spigs and jordan Sparks. So so

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that is a swim lane. Will Jordan do other things? Absolutely?

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I think last night she had a show on Lifetime

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that launched um or or a one hour series, one

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>hour documentary on Lifetime. She has her albums that she's

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna She'll have plenty of other things to do. But

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in this one swim lane, we want to be a

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>partner and we really want to build an asset that's

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>valuable that can you know, thrive over the hopefully years

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and years come. And so how do doing deals with

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 1>these types of people? How do you make that economical?

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Because I would imagine cost control is the name of

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the game here. It is, and that's that's what's exciting,

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you o this. I've been involved in digital

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.719
<v Speaker 1>and in particular digital video really from the beginning in

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 1>launch media in the late nineties, and so I was

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>there when the first bits of video started streaming over

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, and I've always been fascinated with how it's

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>evolved of the last twenty plus years, and I'm I'm

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>very excited about it now, more than I ever have

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>because of a number of reasons. One is, I think

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>there are more video platform scaled video platforms now than

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>there ever have been. So you have you've had YouTube

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>really was the only game in town for a long time. Now, Facebook,

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>then Instagram, obviously Amazon Prime is there and some of

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the other platforms, but there there are multiple places now

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>when you create a piece of content you can monetize it.

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And I don't just mean like doing brand integrations, but

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just just running pre rolls and mid rolls. Now you

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 1>can do that across multiple platforms. Our company has always

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>been focused on high quality, premium, premium content, and the

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>platforms now are focused more and more on building clean,

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>well lit neighborhoods. It's one of the reasons we've called

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>what we're building a neighborhood. And so what we're seeing

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is as we put our videos across all these platforms,

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they're getting higher and higher CPMs again, this is just

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>low touch programmatic. And so what we're finding is is

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that we can actually cover most of our production costs,

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in some cases all of our production costs with just

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>distributing our content across those platforms. Now, we're still doing

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>brand integrations, and we're doing e commerce, and we're going

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to do licensing of our of our content. All of

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that's going to come into play. But I think for

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the first time, you're now able to on a unit

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:41.959
<v Speaker 1>economic basis, we have a show with a particular production cost,

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in a particular you know, set of economics, we can

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>pay that off now across platforms with low touch, as

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>opposed to hiring dozens of salespeople to hopefully sell branded

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>integrations to pay off this content. Well, that's really saying

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>something where we are because a year or so ago,

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the notion that there was more than one game in

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>town YouTube would really be a stretch. So sort of

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>review the rest of the pack there. How do you

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 1>like the evolution of let's call it the monetization opportunities

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram all that. So our audience, uh,

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't bring this up before, but is really

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>women and there they tend to be women from about

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty five to forty four. That's the core, and we

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>even within women four it's really to thirty four is

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the core core of our audience. We call them builders,

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that's our our name for them because they're entering in

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>their mid twenties a different stage of life where they're

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>focusing on their home, their physical home. Uh, they're focusing

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>on their career. It's no longer just a job. There

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>actually think about their career. They're focusing on their family,

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>which could be a significant other. It could be uh,

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a husband or a wife at that point,

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it could be young children. So they're building really their

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>lives and that Uh. If you think about our content historically,

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>even going back to two thousand seven and two thousand

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and eight, we've always focused on that demo and um

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in our content is both entertaining but also helpful and

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>informational and in some ways educational to those women going

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>through those uh, those ages and stages. It's not surprising

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>platforms like Facebook and Instagram lend themselves very very well

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to our demographic. In fact, I think ten years ago,

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>um or even five years ago on Facebook. Uh when well, actually,

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>let's see when it was it In two thousand eleven,

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>YouTube as part of their first original funding program when

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they funded their their first channels. They actually partnered with

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>us to start kin as a brand, and they wanted

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to create a women's lifestyle brand on YouTube. But even

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eleven, it was a little early. Like

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube as a platform or I'm still skews fairly, fairly young.

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say there's a much higher concentration on Facebook

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram of our audience than there is on YouTube,

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>or at least primarily on YouTube. Right. I think they're

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's two billion people on YouTube, so they

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>cover everyone. But but really the heart of their audience

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>tends to be pretty young, under eighteen. So when we

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>launched Ken in two thousand eleven, it was slow growing

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>as a as a channel, um, And it wasn't really

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>un till Facebook a couple of years ago where we

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>started to really focus on Facebook, that we started to

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>see our audience scale. To answer your question specifically, though

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>YouTube has been in the game of selling mid roles

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and pre roles and working with content creators with brand

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>integrations for years. Facebook, Um, it's fairly new. It's really

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Facebook Watch is a year old. Uh, you know, selling

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>pre rolls and mid selling mid roles is probably about

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that long. I you don't want to speak for Facebook.

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know exactly how long, but it's fairly recently

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>selling pre roles even more recently. So we're very bullish

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, and we're excited Instagram now is launched Instagram TV,

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully we'll monetize. But um, I think what we're

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing is growth on Facebook and Instagram, a faster growth,

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and even from a monetization, faster growth. But but YouTube

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>is a mature platform and the way you monetize it

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>is mature. So uh, my instinct is is that Facebook

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram will probably outpace uh YouTube as a monetization

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>platform for us over the coming months and years. What

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>about Amazon, because you're you distribute there, and my god,

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>I guess there's just so much buzz about even what

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>they're doing from an ad perspective. Now, that's right, I mean,

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we're It's funny, we've been for the last couple of weeks.

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking about their new platform that's going to

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>be AD supported and making sure that we're from and

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>center on it. We we've worked with Amazon for years

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and in multiple capacities. We've we've produced programming with them,

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>UM and different types of programming with them. We were

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>part of a program, still are part of a program

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>where they've selected UM a handful of digital companies that

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>they thought had really high quality digital content to be

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>part of Prime. So you can actually find our content

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Prime behind a paywall, so if you're a

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Prime subscriber, you can get it. And we're able to

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>post our content onto pot Prime on a regular basis.

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Now that's not ad supported, so that I just want

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, that's different than that their new product,

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>or at least what we've read in the papers, their

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 1>new ad supported product that's coming out that when we

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>post our content to Prime, we get paid like any

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>content provider to Prime, we get a piece of the

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>subscription revenue. Obviously, most people go to Prime to watch

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>movies and TV. So I would say the digital partners

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of Prime are probably a little lower down the totem pole,

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>but we still we still partner with them on that

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and and uh, we think Amazon is a great platform

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>for us for a lot of reasons. We also have

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a relationship with them where a lot of our content

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>has have stores so today you can go to UH

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to some of our new channels and on videos click

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>through to buy some of the merchandise, all things Adrian

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned with Adrian Bellion it's a style and beauty

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>channel and UH you can click through and buy the

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>makeup that might be in her video or by the

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>swimsuit she might be showing off this this past summer.

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And so that's a really cool part of our relationship

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>with Amazon as well. So it's it's both the e

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>commerce side and the content side that it's interesting to

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>hear you even talk about that as a viable revenue stream.

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>It's typically companies like yours, it's all about advertising, maybe

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>something in subscription. So how meaningful is this? I think

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>they're all meaningful. I think, getting back to my original

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>point about where we are and kind of the video landscape,

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I think there's been for the last few years this

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>um this feeling like you need to have a very

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>large ad sales team to sell big and its sponsorships

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>or big brand brand content to get these video series made. Um,

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're you know, the running joke at the

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>New Front was you get presented with a lot of content,

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>but like you never know what was gonna get made

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:14.919
<v Speaker 1>or what wasn't going to get made because brands had

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>to come in and subsidize that. And I think now

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>what is really exciting is there is this sustainable, repeatable

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and profitable model where low touch revenue can support high

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>quality video. And so we talked about programmatic being one

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>form of that. I think e commerce is is the

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>other low touch way of doing that, and we're doing

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that with Amazon across our channels. Uh it's meaningful. It's

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>not as meaningful, I'll be honest, it's not as meaningful

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>yet as advertising, whether that's um pre role mid role

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>branded integration, but it's becoming more meaningful. I think where

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it gets really exciting for us is not just where

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>we're linking to an Amazon or linking to another e

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>commerce platform, but where we're creating our own products around

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>our channels. So I think that to me is is

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>where UM we get into licensing our brands, creating bespoke

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 1>products around Uh some of the brands were building with

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>our talent. I think that that we haven't gotten there yet.

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>So there's no no, no imminent announcement there, but I

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's going into two thousand nineteen going to be

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a real focus for us. What else in is you

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>look Ahead is sort of top of mind for you

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in the business. Yeah, well, I think for us, we're

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>really excited about UM how our audience is engaging with

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>our content and just consuming our content. So we've partnered

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>with Nielsen UM to rate our content. Thank you and

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I have talked about this before, uh, and we have

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>found that on a regular basis, our shows, whether it's

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>TM or Quick Fix or other shows, are getting cable

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>size audiences on a weekly basis. In fact, he is

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Tia Moore's Quick Fix has multiple times been quite literally

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the number one cable show, even though it's not on cable,

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it's across digital platforms in women eighteen to thirty four

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>or in total viewership. So what we're excited about is

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>now that we have five of these channels, going to

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>seven by the end of the year, going to twenty

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>by the end of next year. We truly believe we're

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to compete on a cable network basis.

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>We we really think of ourselves as a next generation

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>cable network. We're building a next generation cable network brand

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>with KIM and we will have audiences in the US

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and without a question, internationally bigger than cable audiences today

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 1>on television. So to me, that's that's really the exciting

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>thing going into next year, the promise of building the

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>brand of Kim now. But when you are comparing to

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>cable audiences, you are making a truly apple to apple comparison.

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Because a lot of people have died on these shows,

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>they have tried to make these comparis so and I'm

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I look forward to refining this. So Nielsen

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>cannot Today they have something called dc ARE and Digital

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Content ratings and they have TV ratings, And what we

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>have done is tried as close as we can to

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>compare the two. Some people have just said, oh, the

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>digital content ratings and the TV ratings, you can compare

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>apples to apples. We we've actually tried to go much

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>deeper than that. We've said, if we're going to get

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>close to apples to apples, then let's do not just Live,

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>let's do Live plus seven, and not only Live plus seven,

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>but let's aggregate all the airings of the shows during

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>that week. So you know, you might go to a

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>cable network and they might have a show that they

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>air twenty times in a week. So we're saying, okay,

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>if you do Live plus seven plus an aggregation of

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>all the airings during that week of a show, and

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>then compare it to our show, it's still not exactly

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>apples to apples, but it's about as close to apples

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>as apples as you're gonna get. And so we can

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>say in a week Timore's Quick Fix at eight point

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>eight million total US viewers watch her show in a week,

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and then compare it to what I just described Live

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>plus seven plus an aggregation of all the viewership of

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the airings of that show on that network.

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>We feel very confident that that's pretty that's that's close,

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and and that not only is it close, but our

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>viewership is so much bigger than most of these shows

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's I think, very compelling to audience, is

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>very compelling to brands, very compelling to partners that we're

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>working with. So you guys have been out there, going

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>back to your days when you were known as Decca

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>for over a decade, and you've been an independent all

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the while picking up rounds of funding here and there.

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>The name of the game, though in the sector more

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and more people are talking about though, is consolidation, that

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>everything is going to have to come together to get scale.

0:24:56.560 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So where's your attitude there? Are you looking for where

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:04.959
<v Speaker 1>the exits or where is your head at right now? Uh? Well,

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I think my head is the same place it was

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 1>eleven years ago, which is I am focused and even

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>before eleven years ago, because we've talked about it, I've

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>been in the space for over twenty years. I've always

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>been interested in how do you create value in the

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>space and something sustainable. So you know, some some entrepreneurs

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe look for opportunities that exploit it and then let

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.360
<v Speaker 1>someone else worry about the value. I've always looked at

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>what we are doing as a continuum. It's an evolution.

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.360
<v Speaker 1>People sometimes go, oh, you've pivoted from this to that.

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>To me, I've always looked at everything we've done is

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>just an evolution of the space. Now, clearly we live

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in a time where fang you know, Facebook, at Apple, Netflix,

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Google or Facebook? Is it? What is it is? It's Facebook,

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:52.959
<v Speaker 1>But there's Amazon has got to be in there too.

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there you go, it's a Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Uh,

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>clearly the world I mean their their global platforms their

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>technology companies fundamentally UM, and they've truly disrupted everything. Right.

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>We're a small company, but we're very very attuned to

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>how these platforms work, and we have expertise and really

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>super bright people internally who understand the ins and outs

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of how these platforms work. And so for us, we

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's super valuable. Being able to create a repeatable,

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>uh scalable, profitable model around high quality content with really

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>really talented people we think is very very valuable. So

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>I guess, long story short, my feeling is that we

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>continue to create value in the space, especially in a

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>space where platforms need higher quality content, they need brand

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>save content, they need content partners who understand their platforms.

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>Brands are looking for this in the marketplace. We're going

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to continue to grow. If we were to find partners

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 1>or a partner who really believes in the long term

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>vision of Kin as a brand and as a value

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>proposition in the marketplace, I think we would always be

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 1>open to entertaining how do we partner to get there quicker?

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>How do we partner to get there more efficiently or

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 1>effectively or more powerfully? Um And along the way we

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>have partner we haven't been acquired. We haven't really talked

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to anyone about being inquired, but we have partnered with

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>people who have invested in our company or who have

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 1>been strategic partners who have helped us accelerate our business.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>So I guess at the end of the day, I

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>don't really look at it as we're looking to go

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>get acquired. I think we're out in the marketplace creating value.

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>We're building a great brand. We have a great mission

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>as a company. We have an awesome team who are

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>building this brand. Is someone want to help us with

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that great like we're we're open to We're open to

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>talk to them and see if there's a fit. We

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>will see what brands we'll see. Thanks for coming in, Mike,

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Andrew. I appreciate it. This has been another

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 1>episode of Strictly Business. Tune in next week for another helping,

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>accintillating conversation with media movers and shakers, and please make

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>sure you subscribe to the podcast to hear future episodes.

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Also leave a review in Apple podcast let us know

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>how we're doing.