WEBVTT - Tech News: TikTok and Your Data

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you. It's time for the

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>tech news for February twenty second, twenty twenty two, otherwise

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>known as the date where you just start hitting the

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>number two until it's March. Let's get to it. So,

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>back during the Trump administration here in the United States,

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 1>we saw the US government pressure the social network platform

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>TikTok to sever ties with its Chinese parent company byte Dance,

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>citing a concern that TikTok could be siphoning personal data

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>from US citizens and sending that information back to China.

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Claimed that TikTok refuted at the time, and there were

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other issues that were tied up with

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>this as well. It was just that it was this

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>larger trade war between the US and China. But it

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 1>turns out that a pair of studies kind of justifies

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>those data concerns. A group of cybersecurity experts conducted studies

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're looking into TikTok's data collection practices and concluded

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that TikTok has been allowing byte Dance to have full

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>access to user data on the platform. The security experts

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>sent their findings to the news website The Rap and

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>The Wrap then did a very responsible thing from journalism standpoint,

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>They sought out other experts to independently confirm the findings,

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>which they did. TikTok, as of this recording, has not

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>yet responded to those reports. Further, the research suggests that

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>TikTok engineers have found a way to sidestep code audits

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>by both Google and Apple, which could also mean that

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>TikTok could potentially change the code without folks really knowing

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>about it, which brings up all sorts of issue is

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and it suggests that TikTok has found some loopholes that's

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:08.239
<v Speaker 1>exploiting while other platforms like say Facebook, continued to be

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>buffeted by recent changes to IOSS privacy and data tracking settings.

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>You might remember that was a big part of why Meta,

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the parent company to Facebook, had such a rough year

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>last year. They lost out on an estimated ten billion

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:27.399
<v Speaker 1>dollars in revenue because Apple changed it's it's data tracking

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>privacy settings. Now, according to those security experts, the TikTok

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:38.079
<v Speaker 1>application can even query things on whatever devices installed on

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>so kind of similar to the data tracking issue, where

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not just tracking your activity within the the app itself,

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>but other stuff you're doing on your down that same device.

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So essentially TikTok has been able to do what Facebook

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>used to do but no longer can do, at least

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>if you opt out. My guess is that China isn't

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>so much spying on individual US citizens to build out

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, dossiers on everyone, but they're rather you know,

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 1>selling that data to third parties that could use the

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>information for all sorts of stuff, you know, advertising being

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the obvious one, but not necessarily the only one. Anyway,

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>It'll be interesting to see if Google and Apple respond

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to this or how or if TikTok will now. Let's

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>flip over to Instagram, where the app has quietly made

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>changes to a feature that allows users to set a

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>daily time limit for their use of Instagram. So previously

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you could go into your settings and set it your

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>your daily limit to as low as ten minutes a day,

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and that would make it easier to be aware of

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>how much time you were actually spending on the platform

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and avoid getting sucked into hours of just scrolling. This

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is an opt in feature, so it's not like it's

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>on by default, but it was there. But now that

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>ten minute and fifteen minute time limit limit options, those

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>are both gone. The minimum time limit that you can

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>set now is thirty minutes. Now, I am not shocked

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to hear this. After all, Meta Again, Instagram's parent company

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>had that earnings call that revealed some pretty rough news

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to investors. Besides that ten billion dollars in lost revenue

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>or estimated lost revenue, it's really hard to, you know,

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>guarantee revenue that you lost because you didn't make it.

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.799
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, the former iron grip that Facebook and Instagram

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>had on the average person's online time is starting to slip.

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So perhaps one way the company is trying to address

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>this is to loosen the restrictions a little bit for

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that daily time limit option, saying, hey, you know, thirty

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>minutes isn't all that bad. That should probably be your

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>upper limit um and have that set as the lowest option. Now,

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>some folks who who have used the feature, we'll find

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that they will be spending more time on the platform

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>before they bump up against their daily limit. Now, to

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>be totally fair, this could just as easily be an example,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>but where Meta just saw that very few people were

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>opting in for ten or fifteen minute time limits, because

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that is a very short amount of time. So it's

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>possible that the company just said, nobody's using these settings

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>like that, it's such a tiny thing, it doesn't make

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>sense to support it, and they just dropped those options.

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Uh so you might as well, you know, ask those

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.799
<v Speaker 1>especially if you feel like you can't afford to discourage

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>people from being on your platform anyway. I suspect this

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is just one of a billion different things that the

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>company plans to do to try and reverse some concerning trends,

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>namely that some platforms like Facebook have seen a decline

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>in users or an engagement or both, and that the

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>company has had a little bit of trouble attracting younger

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>users to its platforms, which means that you know, the

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>user base will shrink over time as it ages out.

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Pro Publica and The New York Times investigated hundreds of

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>accounts on Twitter that appeared to be part of a

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Chinese propaganda campaign during the Olympics, which prompted Twitter to

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>ban three thousand accounts, and the campaign was doing pretty

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>much what you'd expect when you hear the word propaganda.

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 1>It was trying to present an overly positive portrayal of

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>China and the Olympic Games, while simultaneously ignoring or discounting

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>stories related to human rights abuses in China, of which

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>there are many. Twitter reps said that the platform banned

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>those accounts because they were violating the company's policy against

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>platform manipulation. So essentially the issue here was that these

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>accounts were all trying to feed into massive conversations about

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics and China and to steer those conversations in

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a specific positive way. And you might be familiar with

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the term sock puppet account so way back in the

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>early days of the Internet, I would spot these on occasion,

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>either in chat rooms or on forums. But this is

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>where a user creates a separate account, like they have

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>an account with whatever it is, but they create a

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:04.119
<v Speaker 1>separate account in order to achieve some sort of goal.

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>It's possible that they make the sock puppet, which is

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it's called that because it is under the control of

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>another user who's also in the same space. Uh, the

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>sock puppet might act like a hype man for the

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>primary user like oh yeah, this guy is so great yea,

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Or sometimes the stock puppet stood in as an easily

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>defeatable opponent, right, because if you're controlling both sides the argument,

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you can easily make the other side lose. So would

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>be a straw man for the primary user to to

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>tear down and look like a hero. The Twitter situation

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is similar, except instead of one fake account used to

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>push a narrative, we're talking about thousands. They were all

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>pushing to to shape this conversation online in a specific way,

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter said, yeah, you can't do that. That's manipulating

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the platform for your own purposes. That's against the rules,

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And so got to banning a remarkable with three thousand

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>accounts there, I wonder how many more are out there.

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Over in the EU, a consumer advocacy group called the

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>b e u C has called for the Digital Markets

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Act or d m A, which is slowly taking shape

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in the EU. It's set to become you know, law

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>before too long. They wanted to include the ability for

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>individual users to sue big tech companies for violations, so

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, as it is currently formed, the d m

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>A would only allow business users to sue companies that

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>violate the rules under d m A, but the b

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.719
<v Speaker 1>e u C once that extended to all EU citizens,

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>whether collectively in class action suits or individually. Now, the

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>d m A sets out the major rules that big

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 1>tech companies have to follow within the EU, and specifically,

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it's aiming at gate keepers, and the legislation defines gatekeepers

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>as large online platforms that quote have a strong economic position,

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.199
<v Speaker 1>significant impact on the internal market, and are active in

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>multiple EU countries. They have a strong intermediation position meaning

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that they link a large user base to a large

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>number of businesses, and have an entrenched and durable position

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in the market, meaning that it is stable over time

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>end quote. So companies like Google, Apple, Meta, Amazon, and

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft would qualify. The regulations guarantee certain rights to third

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>parties such as, uh, you know, if you are running

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>your business on top of another company's platform, the other

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>company whose platform it is, they can't uh promote their

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>own products over yours. So the easiest example to point

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>out is Amazon, right, because Amazon has its own brands

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and its own partners, and the company has stood accused

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>many times of promoting its own products over those of

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 1>competing vendors who are using the Amazon marketplace as a

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>place to sell their stuff. And Amazon's landed in hot

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>water all over the world for this about promoting its

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>own products over those of the customers that are using

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 1>the platform for their own online marketplace. And so the

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>d m A and the EU would make this illegal,

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and it would mean that an individual would be able

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to sue, say Amazon, if they violated or they believed

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon violated the d m A. Anyway, there's no

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>guarantee yet that we're going to see the d m

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>A expand to allow individuals to pursue claims against big

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>tech the way that businesses could if it's you know,

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>when it's finally finalized. So we'll have to keep an

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>eye out see what happens. All right, We've got some

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>more stories to go into, but before we do that,

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. You know, not too long ago,

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I did an update about the hyper loop, which was

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>originally started off at least in the public consciousness, started

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>off as a proposal that Elon Musk made two revolutionize

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>short range travel, like travel that send the hundreds of

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:13.359
<v Speaker 1>miles but not the thousands of miles distances using enclosed

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>trains typically the enclosed system would have a lot of

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.599
<v Speaker 1>the air pumped out to cut down an air resistance.

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>You're usually talking about some sort of mag lev or

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>other levitation style train. Uh Musk's version used air bearings.

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>And I talked about how various companies had come up

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to make this a reality, including one that became

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>known as First hyper Loop Technologies, than hyper Loop one,

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>then Virgin hyper Loop one, and now just Virgin hyper Loop,

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and that the story was that recently Virgin hyper Loop

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>had made the decision to pivot away from designing passenger

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>style systems and focus more on cargo. And to that end,

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>there's more news that now the company has laid off

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>more than one hundred employees as part of this, that

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>they are refocusing on cargo versus passengers, which is you know,

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly sad because it wasn't that long ago. It was

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just last summer that the company was showing off its

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>passenger capabilities. But no, looks like that's not going to

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>be at least in the near future for Hyperloop. It

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe that they'll eventually get back into that, but for

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>now it is off the table. So just a quick

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 1>update that those hundred or so folks. I think it's

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and eleven actually who lost their jobs. Hope

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>they all land on their feet. Uh, but yeah, pretty

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>disappointing if you were hoping for a revolutionary change in transportation.

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Then again, there are other hyper loop companies out there,

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I also mentioned in a different episode

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>about how the I r S and the United States

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>recently reversed its decision to require people to use video

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>selfies and a facial recognition system run by a third

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>party i D company in order to access certain I

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>r S features online. So if you are a US

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>citizen and you want to create an ir S account,

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>well you can still do that video selfie and facial

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>recognition route if you like. You are not required to,

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>but you can use that. If you don't want to

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>use that, then what you have to do is sit

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>for a live virtual interview to verify your identity. Now,

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that sounds to me like a pretty labor intensive solution.

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the I r S will be

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>providing these interviews themselves, or you know, if they'll be

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>working with another company, but yeah, it sounds like it's

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>still gonna be pretty intense to to get that. I

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>r S account established last week, a cargo ship carrying

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of luxury cars caught fire as it was heading

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>across the Atlantic from Europe to North America. The cargo

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>included cars from Porsche more than a thousand of them

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and Bentley more than a d nine of those, I believe,

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and the cause of the fire has not yet been

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>determined or at least not yet announced as I'm recording this,

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>but it appears that batteries in some of the electric

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>vehicles in the cargo played a part in making the

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>fire more difficult to extinguish. So we don't know if

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the batteries actually caused the fire, like if there was

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a short circuit, if one of the batteries was you know,

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>damaged in transportation or something and that led to it,

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>or if they just exacerbated a fire that got caused

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>by some other source. But they it definitely made the

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>fire worse. Unfortunately, all twenty two crew members of the ship,

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>called the Felicity Ace were rescued, so there were there

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>were no losses aboard, which is the most important thing.

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, we can replace stuff, we can't replace people.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's I'm sure for all the luxury car

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>lovers out there. They're shedding a tear as they think

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of the various Porsche's and Bentley's and uch uh burning

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to a crisp very sad. The United States Copyright Office

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>has answered a burning question in science fiction. Can a

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>robot hold a copyright for a work that the robot produced? No,

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they can't. Actually, to be fair, that is too narrow

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a use case. Really, The Copyright Office has said, no

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence can secure a copyright for a work that

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the AI itself creates. So all those interesting projects and

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>AI that revolve around computer systems or robots creating art

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>cannot get a copyright for any art that they produce.

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>This is still really too narrow a view because honestly,

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the Copyright Office essentially says for something to qualify for

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a copyright, it has to be the product of human authorship. So,

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in other words, if it ain't made by a human,

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it don't get no copyright. If you had an infinite

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>number of monkeys with an infinite number of typewriters and

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>one of them created the best novel ever written, that

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>novel would be in the public domain because the monkey

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>ain't no human. The same is true for AI, it

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>sounds like, and that does make an interesting note. The

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>U S Copyright Office is one of the few entities

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I know of that has already determined that artificial intelligence

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>cannot be considered equivalent to human intelligence. Now I'm being

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a little flippant here because this doesn't mean one that

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we're always going to see the Copyright Office take this interpretation.

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>That could change over time, especially as AI gets more

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, sophisticated, and to AI as it stands is incredible,

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>but still very much different from and arguably inferior to

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>human intelligence when we take intelligence as a whole, not

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>just the ability to solve problems, but when you take

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>things like creativity, innovation, out of the box thinking, associative thinking,

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff, things that humans are very

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>good at. Most machine systems are not very good at it.

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So in those respects you could argue machines are still

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>way behind us. Anyway, if you make a computer program

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that composes music or poetry or whatever, just know that

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the program will not be able to secure a copyright

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>on the work it generates. Though I guess you know,

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>depending upon how you word it, you might be able

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to get a copyright for the program itself. So that's

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>something right. And if your robot gets depressed that the U. S.

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Copyright Office refuses to acknowledge its art, well it can

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>always go apply for a job at Whitecastle. Yes, the

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>company has announced it will be installing a robot from

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>miso or Robotics called the Flippy two in one white

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Castle locations. Now, if you're not familiar with White Castle,

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.719
<v Speaker 1>that's a fast food chain here in the United States.

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Harold and Kumar like to go there. In fact, they

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 1>should do another Harold and Kumar movie and make the

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Flippy robots look like the Terminator. That would be awesome,

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a great stoner science fiction comedy movie. You're welcome, Hollywood.

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll take my check. But anyway, the Flippy robot mostly

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>looks like a robotic arm mounted to a frame that

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.959
<v Speaker 1>can move between fry stations. It does not look like

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the Terminator. So it would take some you know, poetic

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>license to make the movie that I just pitched. But

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this will allow Whitecastle to automate some of the kitchen work.

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>It is not the only fast food company that has

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>been you know, investing in AI and robotics in order

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to do this. Um, I think if it means that,

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>if it means these companies are employing fewer humans, but

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that they're paying the humans that they do employ more

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>of a living wage, I'm all for it, although I

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of course worry that it will just mean that they'll say, hey, look,

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>we got to cut all those salaries out of all

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 1>those uh those uh, those franchises, and now we get

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to keep more money for ourselves. I worry that that's

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>how it's going to go, but you know, hasn't been

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>written yet. Maybe maybe I should hold out. Hope. That's

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it for today's tech news. Please let me know if

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you have any suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff,

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a technology, a company, a trend in tech,

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. Reach out to me on Twitter. The

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>handle for the show is tech Stuff h s W

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again releases y. Tech Stuff

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.