WEBVTT - Erdogan Wants His Power Entrenched, Rahman Says

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Daily

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg lots

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk about here. We're gonna stay on the markets.

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>But miss roman joins now from your Raisier group and

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>uh we gave us great perspective earlier in this uh

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Monday morning, and we'll do it again, Miss Ramen. Over

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the weekend there was a headline that basically said, the

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 1>United States has a big old air force base in Turkey,

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and Turkey is not happy with our big old air

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>force base in Turkey, and that's creating a lot of tension.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Give us briefing right now and that real visceral thing

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for Arijuan and Trump, which is a huge US presence

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>in southern Turkey. Thanks for having me, Tom, Yeah, I

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>think look that the context here is a quickly deteriorating

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>relationship between Turkey and the US where absolutely everything is

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in play, from air bases to US sanctions on how Bank,

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to corporation in Syria, to US funding of Turkey's current account.

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the relationship is really on the precipice, and

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why we still assume some degree of

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>rationality on the side of Rod And I do think

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>he will signal a commitment this week to release the pastor,

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>as well as some decisive action by the Central Bank,

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise he's looking at much much more difficult choices

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that could undermine his political mega project back home. Which

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>what underpins your confidence that that will happen, both in

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of the relations of the pastor and the actual

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>move to do what's needed domestically higher interest rates, perhaps

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>tied the fiscal policy. What gives you confidence that's about

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen. It's it's really looking at the alternative. So

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>what's what's the counter factual? If Dan does not allow

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the central Bank to move decisively this week, if this

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>row with the US is not de escalated, Essentially he's

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at two options capital controls, which for a country

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>as dependent on foreign exchange as Turkeys, would be absolutely disastrous,

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a massive blow to investor confidence, far more than we've

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 1>seen over the course of the last few weeks. Or indeed,

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'm a stand by agreement because he will need

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>external funding for the current account, and of course that

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>would come with conditions and constraints that would undermine a

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>large part of Rodan's political narrative. Remember, he has made

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 1>political hay of the fact he was the leader who

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>kicked the I M s our and return full sovereignty

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to Turkey. So to now have to accept an I

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 1>m F program with all of the conditions that that

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>would impose on him, I think would be a massive

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.959
<v Speaker 1>humiliation for him, and I just I find those two

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>options so unpalatable for him that although we moved by

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the Central Bank would be difficult, it's far easier than

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the alternative. I'm just wondering, though, whether he has no choice,

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>whether he's been completely overtaken by events now and something

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that might have worked a week two weeks ago, we'll

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>just no longer work. That the highest short term interest

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>rates and time of fiscal policy won't regain confidence to

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>this market, and they'll have to institute the emergency measures

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that you just pointed out, Mitch Well, I I think

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>there is a precedent for the dynamic that we're currently seeing.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Back in May, I think you could see a very

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>decisive rate hike by the central Bank, let's say five

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>d to thousand basis points, five to tentage points, that

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of number, and then every one would say, look,

0:03:58.400 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is not what I support. But the

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>sun Traw Bank is independent. I think that would stop

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the immediate bleeding. And then you're right. We would need

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to see alba Iraq being able to demonstrate he's a

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>positive influence on Araduan by coming forward with a much

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>broader and comprehensive strategy of economic reform that includes the

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>consolidation is one of his legs. Now, is that likely?

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I think highly, highly questionable. But again the alternatives I

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>think are so impalatable, both economically and politically. I think

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we are going to see some fairly decisive action this

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>week in our time. Fox for a Monday dumb question

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Day, I'll ask it, But the midge, what

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>does Mr arad One want? I mean, I understand he's

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>pushing back against the US first set of reasons, and

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a traditional German Turkish relationship. I get all that,

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>But what's it really want with allies and non allies?

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Tom Ultimately, we we've seen it crystallized on

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the back of the presidential election. I think he wants

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to ultimately institution analize and entrench his power and those

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>around him. And anything that could potentially complicate or undermine

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the institutionalization of power, I think he will. He will

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>be a threat. He has his presidential system in place,

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>he has his preferred successes now all around the cabinet table,

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately wants, I think, to to move that mega

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>political project of his forward. Now being dependent on foreign capital,

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>having to raise interest rates, having to be dictated to

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>eventually by external actors of the markets, I think undermines

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that that that mega project that he is that he

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is so desperately seeking to implement. Does Germany? Does Germany

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>come in the next couple of days, I mean, just

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>want to final question, Madge if we could. I mean,

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Germany has an historic and unique relationship with the people

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of Turkey. Does chance or miracle coming unilaterally and try

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to fix this in terms of the politics. So there's

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely something to this. There is a state visit between

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Aridoan and Merkel at the end of September, and I

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>think that will be used as a vehicle to try

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and pass diplomatic messages onto the Turks around what the

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Germans think Turkey needs to do. I think, like the US,

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>they think the plan the government's presented does not fit

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>for purpose. It's largely cosmetic. That a structural crisis was

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>likely returning the economy because of all of the rule

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of law violations and the undermining of investor confidence we've

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>seen over the last two years. So I think there

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>will be that there is a context for Germany to

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>try and influence actions in Turkey. And of course that's

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a big concern in Germany at least because they're implementing

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>an agreement that is stemming the flow of migrants into Germany,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, in fifteen was massively important for

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>angler Merkell survival. So the Europeans are watching this closely.

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Miss thank you so much for Raman with the international

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>relations update that overlays and the finance that economics and

0:06:54.680 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the investment. We're looking. What John and I try to

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>do in the modern media is we always cite everything,

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and what you don't see is we and our great

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>team are scrambling to separate out from like legitimate news organizations. John,

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we just walked through that twenty minutes ago. With the

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>market moving tweet. Yeah, fact is the tweet moved the market.

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>The tweet did move the market to some extent. We

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>saw some Turkish lera come in, we saw euro dollar

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>flat on the session, and we saw US futures past

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the early losses. It was a tweet essentially

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>communicating on Twitter, which has now been completely unconfirmed. Um

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the US Anchor Embassy official speaking to Reuters saying they

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't issued a statement regarding the US pastor Brunson. This

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is from Ruyters, This is from anchor. This is the

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>reporting coming from Roy. So is this after a tweet

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>suggested that the pastor Andrew Branson, who was facing espionage

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and terrorism allegations related to that fail and ultimately is

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that the epicenter of the spat between the US and Turkey.

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>There was a tweet suggesting he would be released. And

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>now we are seeing, according to Routers Reuters that the

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Anchor Embassy is saying, nah, we haven't said anything about it.

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And to show you the market reaction, we have to

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>live with. Lower numbers are stronger Lira. We weren't from

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>about seven o two exploded down to six point six zero,

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>six point five zero, and now we've come about eight

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>five back to six point man, this is the danger

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>of getting unverified news on Twitter. It moves markets. People

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>make stuff up. It's unconfirmed reports, and we're seeing it again.

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to speculate about the why that that

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>tweet came out. I'm just going do you know what

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we did learn from that tweet? Though? That the market

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is assigning great importance to the to the poster and

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>his release. Um, yeah, yeah, there's there's yes. I think

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that's true. I want to bring Georget Boll, a b

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>n am Ro Bank currency and commodity strategist joining us now, Georget,

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>great to have you with us on the program. I

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>would have thought the more important piece of this puzzle

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>was getting a real domestic response higher rates kind of

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy. But off the back of an unconfirmed turning

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 1>out to be false tweet that the pastor would be released,

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw a sizeable market move. Is it that important

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 1>the US side of this story, Georget, Yeah, yeah, that's right.

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>The thing is just that if you look at this

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of volatility in the market, marketers relatively thin and

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of people want to be in the

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Turkeys clear in the current environment on the other hand,

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>you know they are also afraid to be caught on

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the wrong side of the market. If you get like, yeah,

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>now I had an exponential weakening off the lira. Um

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>if you now get an kind of communication that may

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 1>be despat between the US and Turkey, may be cooling

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>down or into calming or on the other hand, if

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you were to get an announcement with sounds a bit credible,

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>could be a combination of interest rate higher or anything else,

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>then you can also see a quite recovery of the

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>lira because people say, okay, we were negative, let's skal

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit back. So this is quite a dangerous market.

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, you get volatility like this because the factor

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>is barely a market Georgia, what is your call on end?

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>If that's the global proxy, deepest market, stronger yen fear

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in the market one tense sixty. Clearly we're seeing that

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>his A, B and EMMO. Do you have a call

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>on end and if you have to change it in

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the last two trading days, Yes, we have a call

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>on end and we have not changed in the last

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>two trading days for the end of the third quarters,

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>at the end of September, any end of the year,

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 1>we have one ten in dollar yen. You know, the

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>nervousness you see currently in the market is more visible

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in Urian because there is some kind of nervousness about

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the Euro as well. We don't completely share that nervousness,

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but it is something you see in market. So Urian

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.959
<v Speaker 1>is the one which is more slid down for the day.

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And there's also something we yeah, in terms of possible

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>quantation risk reflected in market jury and it's more than

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>one to watch than Dolian as well as yours with

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>at amoment which is making a low again. So so overall, yeah,

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>on quotation, I would look at Urine and euroswizz gold

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is less for good indicator at the moment um. And

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, Dolly and you have effect two currencies which

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>are the most liquid in which all both qualify for

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 1>a safe haven which are the dollar in the end,

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So there the the the effect is not that visible.

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Some big calls coming in on euro dollar this morning

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>on this program, John Jet, we caught up with Kitchukes

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of Socken about thirty minutes ago looking for euro dollar

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to strike one ten um. What's your call on you're

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>a dollar now and has it changed in the last

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks and why no. We have, in fact,

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>for for quite some time already want ten um And

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 1>it was a bit yeah questioning because one fifteen was

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>a quite crucial level. And then because of the nervousness

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>about Turkey and possible spill over to Europe, Yeah, it

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>becomes more likely to effects one then and that for

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>us would be the lowest points because I see towards

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year and next year you're straightening

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>or recovering again, because you also expect that the dollar

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>will pick around those levels. So so we have one

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>tim poo the end of September. George Broll, thank you

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us across all of our Bloomberg

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>platforms of the A, B and AM world timely to

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>say this is the right guy to talk to, Stephen Gandell.

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It's made a career of being testy and asking the

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>right questions. There's different kinds of journalists, phim and then

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>there's journalists that come from the Washington Universe city of St.

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Louis and they make people squirrel. Then let's go. So

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a squirm back away streets of Wall Street

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 1>and watching the bubble pop. Yeah, well the bubbles for

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Mr Musk. Tell me. That tell me the squirm factor

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of Mr Musk now secured financing and yet the deals

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>going forward. Right, So I think the squirming factors a

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>lot on the board, right, because they seemed clear from

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the statement the next day that they were kind of uh,

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the dark. Maybe they had a conversation,

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but they did no way knew this tweet was coming

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>from Wall Street right there. Squirming. And and now if

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>possibly the Sawdies or someone was going to uh you know,

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>had secured funding for this deal, right, was going to

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>fund it. The fact that now Musk is under investigation

0:13:55.840 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>by the SEC, it's gonna make anyone really scorm me.

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the scormiest person right now. Whoever, if

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>there was someone who was going to fund this deal,

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>why why? I mean if they're already in with with

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk. This is not the first time that Elon

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Musk has done something that has upset the status quo

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and the way the companies are either rush, but this

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is the first time that's put him himself in jeopardy

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>as as the CEO, because the SEC could based on

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>this and it's it's potentially market madulation. They could bar

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>him from being an officer, and he this company is

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>so entwined with him, right, You're not just investors. Let

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>me just push back on that, because that is something

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that is true. Whether he did this tweet for four

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars go private transaction or not. Every investor had already

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>bet the farm on Elon Musk running the company. Correct. Yes,

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>but when you make a deal with Elon must to

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>take his company private, you take the biggest risk right

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>away in this stuff, which is that he says something

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>stupid that moves the stock. Right. If you're thinking, Okay,

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do a deal with him, I'm gonna get

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>him private, I'm gonna remove this risk. Now the risk

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is even biggo, it's even bigger the elephant in the

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>room for me. What you're gonna write for for Bloomberg Opinion,

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Steven get dealt with this is. Musk has notified Tesla

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>board August two on wanting to privatize. But that could

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>have been like August two at nine pm versus reruns

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of Azie and Harriet. I mean, we don't know if

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>he even got out in front on this tweet and

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>told the board. I mean, we don't know, do we.

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, boards have a lot of discussions. Uh So

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>he had discussion with um soft Bank, which didn't you know,

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>go very far. So people have these kind of discussions, right,

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and he can kind of use that for cover, But

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it does not sound like they had the type of

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>discussions that usually have before you make a tweet like

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>this or before you uh make something public. And there

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>was no press release, there was no filing with the

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Securities in Exchange commissioned, there was nothing. There's a lot

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of potential conflicts of here. Any reasonable board would have

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a special non conflicted you know, panel or group to

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>investigate this. Okay, but that they're just drawing up the

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>special group now agreed. But I go back to the

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>original point, which is that Tesla is a company run

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>by a gentleman who doesn't use any rule book, right,

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>And you do that, I agree, But you it wasn't

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>necessarily run by someone who's under investigation by the SEC

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>who could be removed, right, And so I don't know

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>how you put seventy billion dollars in the company that way.

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying the SEC and that really goes

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>after him and he can say we had these discussions

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and funding secured. Was was a loose term, and you know,

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's been well established that CEOs can use Twitter.

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure the ses after him. But at

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the very least, the biggest risk of this deal is

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>now the fact that he's he's created this sec investigation.

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with that. But is it the biggest risk

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>media is it's somebody lost report at one point seven

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>billion because he didn't want to use the rule book

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that this bar at General Motors would have to use,

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>meaning that so got killed, right, and so there's lawsuits coming.

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>It's that you're saying that to me, it's almost I'm

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>not saying it's a bigger risk. But it's a huge distraction,

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. It's a it's a huge distraction because it

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>puts Musk at legal risk. I think you know, the

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>money they if if they get fine, I mean they'll

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>have to they'll have to have some class action lawsuits

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>and they'll be It's it's a big distraction. But I

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>think the bigger issue for the deal is that it

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>puts Muske at risk. But you know, I mean, the

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>bigger issue could because it's it's kind of a dumb

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>transaction too. I mean, there are we're relatively good public company.

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't assure you that it's a good stock, but

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a better public company than is a

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 1>private company because stock pairs are paying what hundred and

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>forty times two years out earnings. If you're James Murdoch,

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you're on the board, you've been there for less than

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>two years. What kinds of conversations are you're having with

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:11.959
<v Speaker 1>your own counsel or maybe you don't have counsel. UM,

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you're I don't I don't know what legal

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>risk he has other than UM. I mean, I think

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>he's on the board because I would guess that he's

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 1>on the board because he sees this as the future,

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and I would think that he'd be on the board

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>UM and and sees Musk as a visionary. So I

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I think it's probably he's probably like

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the Tesla shareholders who are just you know,

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>they they believe in this vision. Thanks very much for

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>being with us, Stephen Gandel Bloomberg opinion on Tesla. There

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>has been any number of topics in this really interesting August.

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 1>We could start with Turkey. We could end with the

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>politics of the nation, but one of them has been Tesla,

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and a Bloomberg survey carefully done show that to seven

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>five of the people talking about Tesla PIM have never

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>been into Tesla, and that would include me. Should we

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to someone who actually has a Tesla owner Tesla driver?

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And I gotta say, I did test drive at Tesla

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and I was completely bowled over. It was an amazing experience.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>It's like the center of gravity has shifted, and the

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>stock has done done so poorly forty two point five

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>percent per year from inception, and it's down a little

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>bit from two thousand seven. Matthew Winkler with US emeritus

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 1>editor in chief of Bloomberg News and Tesla owner. When

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you hear the Tesla gloom and Doom crew, as a

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>car guy, which you are, how do you respond on So,

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>first of all, thank you very much for that. I'm

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 1>not a car guy. Um. You know, before I had

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a Tesla, I had a thirteen year old Toyota Avalon

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>and that was solely because it has a great back seat.

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 1>And when I tested my Tesla, the one that I

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>have now, which I bought in two thousand fourteen, it

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 1>was because of its back seat. They are all kinds

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.959
<v Speaker 1>of other things. Of course they come with it. But

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>but the answer to your question is, uh, you shouldn't ask,

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>actually me, Um, you should ask the people actually own

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>the shares of Tesla, who, according to data compiled by Bloomberg,

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>which all of our users can access, shows um a

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>greater loyalty and commitment to Tesla than is seen in

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>any other automaker, which is astounding to me. In other words,

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the people with the most at stake, who are the

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>investors who are following Tesla and following Tesla's experience with

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>its owners and I'll get to that in a second,

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>have made Tesla the most lucrative, as you said. But

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>also here's the here's the real surprise. The least volatile

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 1>UM share among automakers major competitors. Why is that. Partly

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>it's because of the sales growth of Tesla, which is

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>an exponential multiple of the sales growth of other carmakers.

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And you could say, okay, they're starting from a very

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>low base, but that is also in the context of

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>at some point, so many more of us, a multiple

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of us, are going to be driving electric vehicle. So

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Tesla is the only carmaker that is fully committed to

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>doing that. And then finally, if you just went to

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Reports, which everybody can do, and see what do

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the people like me think about Tesla. You know, the

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Models is the highest rated car in the world according

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to Consumer Reports, and the Model three, which is meant

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a vehicle for everybody, every man, every woman,

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.239
<v Speaker 1>has the highest owner satisfaction. So you didn't do this

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>just because you wanted your kids to think you were cool. Actually,

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the appeals of the Tesla was that I

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>could put two grandchildren there. You go in the in

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the back seat and they've got and they've got you

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>know this whatever five point seat belt system, so it's

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>totally safe, and that was cool. It was really cool

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that I could do that. Well, okay, I'm just gonna

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>throw some some issues at you and you can tell

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>me what you think. A hundred years ago, the vehicles

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>on the road in the United States were electric that

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out. There was a lot of money spent,

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cheering, a lot of people lost money.

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>In addition, if you go on forums online and you

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>read what Tesla owners say about getting very minor parts

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:00.479
<v Speaker 1>in order to fix their cars that have been minor

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>fender benders. People wait two three months at a certain point,

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>do you think that patients is exhausted after they've spent

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand dollars for an automobile? Um? Well, according

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to the data, apparently not, because, uh, the sales growth

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>continues unabated. So nobody is perfect, obviously, but putting that

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in context, the sales growth is unabated. To your question

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>about electric vehicles, way back when, you know, it was

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Edison himself, Thomas Edison who thought, uh, that was the future. Ironically,

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>it was Thomas Edison who dismissed Nicola Tesla is at

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>one point colleague rival you could say, uh, and his

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>invention of the alternating uh current motor um as impractical.

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And of course we all we all embrace a C today.

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So I would say Nicola Tesla, who um, you know,

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>did so many things anticipating the twenty one century, including

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, uh you know, moving pictures and audio

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>video and all that that all comes out of Nicola Tesla.

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>He did that. So you know, if you go back

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in time, the electric vehicle was the right idea. It's

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>where we should have gone Edison in fact said as much.

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 1>He was very disappointed that we wound up with a

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>internal combustion engine. For as long as we have, well

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you wonder world be in ten years. I've got to

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>cover this man because it's so important. You were truly

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the leaders within journalism on regge f D.

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>You led the charge. And we've seen all sorts of

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff about Mr Musk the litigation. We've done three interviews

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>today on it as well. And this folds into the

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>fact does this guy get a different rule book? Does

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>he does? Does does an executive at this firm, entrepreneur, owner,

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>et cetera played by a different rule book than the

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Colgate just as one example? And this goes

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>into disclosure, doesn't it. Yeah, I mean I think it's

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a hard question to answer. I mean, obviously there are,

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 1>to say the least idiosyncrasies and to say the worst

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe irregularities. Um, but in the age of Twitter, which

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>we're all in, all kinds of things are happening with

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>respect to disclosure that were unimaginable when we did the

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>coverage of selective disclosure back in the nineties of Bloomberg News,

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>which led to, as you say, the reg f D regulation.

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.239
<v Speaker 1>We need to go back to that or do we

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>need to find something new given modern digital distribution. I mean,

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:43.239
<v Speaker 1>if you ask me, greater transparency is always preferred, and

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we should do everything we can uh in our public

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 1>markets to perpetuate and accentuate transparency. So anything that gets

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in the way of that, I guess I'm in the opposition.

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Matt Winker, think you so much as emeritus editor in

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>chief and writing intelligently on Tesla actually going down the

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>silent world. Grand Chors. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.