WEBVTT - Have US Tariffs Thwarted South Africa’s G20 Presidency?

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Finance ministers and central bank governors from the G twenty

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 2>countries met in South Africa this week, but despite the

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessett again skipping the summit, US

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 2>tariffs are still driving the agenda.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, we've taken in hundreds of billions of dollars

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 3>in tariffs, hundreds of billions, and we haven't even started yet.

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 3>And it's going to be a great thing for our country.

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 3>I think it's going to be a fair thing for

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the world. And we really haven't had too many complaints.

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 2>While South Africa wanted to focus on debt relief, climate

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:48.959
<v Speaker 2>and reform of global institutions, attention is instead firmly focused

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>on the fallout of a global trade war.

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 4>We, of course, meeting at a moment of ongoing uncertainty

0:00:55.040 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 4>in the global economy, uneven growth trajectories, elevated debt levels,

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 4>persistent inflationary pressures, and the complex implications of tightening financial conditions.

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 4>The multilateral system is being tested, and our collective ability

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 4>to respond will shape the pace of our recovery.

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 2>On today's episode of The Next Africa podcast, we'll look

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 2>at why there's only one topic dominating the agenda, and whether,

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 2>as the US continues to ignore the G twenty, President

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Zero Ramaposa has any chance to make an impact with

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>this year's presidency. I'm Jennifer Zabisajap and this is the

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Next Africa Podcast, bringing you one story each week from

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the continent driving the future of global growth with the

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 2>context only Bloomberg can provide. I'm in Zimbali on the

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Indian Ocean coast of South Africa for what was hoped

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>to be one of the flagship events for South Africa's

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 2>presidency of the G twenty. President Ramaposa had hoped he

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 2>could be the voice of the global South and push

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 2>war agreement on issues such as debt relief and also

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 2>climate finance. But instead, all of the talk this year

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 2>has been about global trade and the impact of President

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Trump's tariff policy. In a moment, we're going to be

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 2>speaking to Bloomberg's Africa economist Von Mango, but first let's

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 2>hear from some of the key figures on the fringes

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 2>of the G twenty. I spoke with Lascia Kenyajo, the

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Central Bank Governor of South Africa. How much do you

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 2>think tariffs and tariff threats really are are sort of

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 2>clouding any of these priorities that South Africa actually set

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 2>out for in this two twenty presidency.

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, the term ifs remember get imposts on the economy

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 5>that is planting that it would like to have test

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 5>it is a cost on the consumers of that country

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 5>in terms of pricing and the loot. But for all

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 5>of us are exporting to the country that imposes terriffs,

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 5>there is an impact on output and in the case

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 5>of South Africa, the biggest impacts that come through the

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 5>automative industry and the agricultural sector. The issue about also

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 5>there is these important issues with having to grapple with

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 5>what would this mean for the outlook of the USA

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 5>economy and the poster that the FED might take in

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 5>terms of monetary policy, and what did you mean to

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 5>global financing conditions. Then the problem is that there are

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 5>so many moving paths which is not clear where we

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 5>would end up. Uncertainty abound and every way we talk

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 5>about where unsettin about this, we are unsetting about that,

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 5>and many central bandst resorts to just presenting a forecast

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 5>and also have to do a scenario because we do

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 5>not know how these things will open up.

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Is the absence of Scott person and your counterpart in

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 2>the US, does that then set back the progress?

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 5>But counterpart, my counterpart was here in February. My counterpart

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 5>was in Washington, and he did indicate right at the

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 5>beginning of the year that he will do the fact

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 5>Amalary meeting, and he will do the April meeting, but

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 5>that he will not do his meeting. He will be

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 5>the FAT will be represented by a vice Chairlenge. And

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 5>at the US flag, both the treasure inside and the

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 5>fat side, there will be people. They're representing the US.

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 5>What matters is is there some way behind the flat

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 5>is able to articulate the position of profit country.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 2>That is important. Okay, so the absence of Scott Paston,

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 2>then it is not necessarily a snub. You don't see

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 2>it as a snub for US.

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 5>This is not an absence of the US. See.

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask too about monetary policy, because we

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 2>have seen inflation here in South Africa at least at

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 2>or near or below the target for the central Bank

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 2>for about eight consecutive ones I believe it's been and

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 2>yet you still say the outlook is clouded. I think

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.239
<v Speaker 2>the term that you use, yes, the outlook is cloud

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Are you confident though, that inflation is moderating and moderating

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 2>lower as the forecast did suggest over the past few months.

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 5>We are confident the deity to moderated and we actually

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 5>our basine is that we think that it really remain

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 5>throughout our focus over the next twenty four months, that

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 5>tally remain within targeting. But we do questions that the

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 5>outlook is clouded. There is uncertainty out there in the

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 5>global space in the main and I'm nott the international

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 5>confidence I had attended about by the central bands over

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 5>the past three months keeps on tammaring on the issue

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 5>of uncertainties, monetary policy in uncertain times, financial stability, implications

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 5>of the uncertain environment. Uncertainty is the word that is feminine.

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 2>To stick with me. When we come back, we'll hear

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 2>from von Mango about what's at stake in this global

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 2>trade We'll be right back. Welcome back today on the podcast,

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 2>we're discussing the G twenty finance leader's summit in South

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 2>Africa that was this week, as the world continues to

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 2>focus on growing trade tensions. Bloomberg's Africa economist von Mango

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 2>is joining me now, Yvon. We spoke with you earlier

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 2>in the year when the original tariffs were introduced. Of course,

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 2>there has been quite a number of changes that have

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 2>happened since then. Talk to us about the impact of

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 2>some of those changes over the past few months on

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:35.679
<v Speaker 2>Sub Saharan Africa.

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So the last time we spoke, the tariffs, the reciprocal

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>tariffs have just been imposed by the Trump administration. Since then,

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>there was that ninety day pause that they announced in

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>about mid April and that expired last week. Essentially, what

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>was meant to happen during this ninety day pause is

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the US, since Trade partners was supposed to approach the

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>US and negotiate lower tariffs by offering some sort of concessions.

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>We saw a president from Apausa of South Africa be

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the delegation to the United States and part of the

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>reason for that visit was to try and reach a

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>favorable agreement when it comes to trade. As you're well aware,

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>several African countries are part of what was known as

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the Africa Growth Opportunity Act. Basically that offered duty free

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>access for several African countries into the United States. So

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine coming from that duty free access to

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a high levee has significant implications. The country hardest hit

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>we touched upon this last time we spoke is Lusutu,

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>which was slapped for fifty percent tariff even within the

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety day pause period, which gave the country an opportunity

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate. We've already seen factories closed down. These factories

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>were producing garments that they exported to the United States

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and already seen jobs lost as a result. In terms

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of South Africa, the most industrialized country on the continent.

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>What we heard about ten days ago from the United

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>States is that the thirty percent reciprocal tariff would be

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>reinstated on the first of August. It did suggest that

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>there was scope in the three weeks until that date

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for the country to still have talks with the United States,

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>but we haven't heard anything as yet, and I think

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>several countries are preparing themselves to have the original high

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>levees imposed.

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Would you say South Africa is the hardest hit in

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Sub Saharan Africa, I mean we talked about a few

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 2>of the other smaller economies that are being maybe unjustly targeted,

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 2>is what i'd call it. But would you say South

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Africa is maybe going to take the hardest brunt short answer.

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>To that is no. I think a small, open economy

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like this to be harder hit. And the main reason

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is because their export to the United States accounts for

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of GDP. That's quite a big hit. We've

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>modeled the impact on South Africa's economy, so yes, the

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>US is an important trade partner. Ten percent of the

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>country's exports end up in the United States, a court

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of which she used to enjoy duty free access. That's

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>your like of your citrus products from the agriculture industry,

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>as well as the automotive industry. However, when we look

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at the actual impact on GDP, it's less than a

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 1>one percent hit. To be exactly, it's zero point three

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 1>percent of GDP that's at risk as a result of

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>these tariffs. So the impact, particularly compare to the Asian economies,

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is relatively small for Africa in general, but of course

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>for the smaller economies such as Lisutu, they're going to

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>see a much more significant repercussions as a result of

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>this trade policy.

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 2>And ivon at the G twenty summit, as we've talked

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 2>about South Africa was really hoping this would be a

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 2>year where they can focus on a lot of the

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Global South priorities. It has really become a year that

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 2>has been focused on these tariffs and towarding what many

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 2>people see as a bigger and broader trade war. Is

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 2>there anything that maybe central bank governors, finance ministers can do.

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Are there any policies in place or discussions that maybe

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 2>you're hearing to support or to offset some of the

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 2>policies of the tariffs and from the Trump administration.

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>So yes, you're right. In terms of the original objectives

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that South Africa had as the leading the presidency of

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the G twenty, this year a lot of those ideas,

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>such as addressing climate change, putting debts, the issue of

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.599
<v Speaker 1>the developing world's high indebtedness as a core issue to

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>be addressed, particularly by our developer partners, those issues now

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>have been sidelined, which is unfortunate. And as you're right,

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 1>many people are just reacting to the tariffs and how

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>they can respond to that. In terms of how policymakers

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>can react, I guess on the Monty policy side to banks,

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>if they have the room to do so, can put

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in place accommodative policy PUS as you can imagine the

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>hits that the impact of tips will be a slow

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>down in growth generally, and that's globally, So it's a

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>slower demand for our commodities and our exports, not just

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>from the United States but from the rest of the world,

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>which is also being hurt by these levees. So in

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>countries where inflation is benign and in South Africa, were

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>fortunate enough to say that that is the case at

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>this point in time. That means that cent to banks

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>can look at easy moneted policy to create a more

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>accommodative environment that will support growth and consumption in their

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>particular economies. On the fiscal side, what can finance ministers do? Unfortunately,

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the room for expansionary policy is very limited because we're

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>just it's been five years since the pandemic, and then

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>two years after the pandemic we experienced the impact of

0:11:56.400 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>commodity prices, but again the grain sides spike and that

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>led to inflation and high inflation globally, but that also

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>impacted several African countries on the fiscal side, So what

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>your face with the countries that are actually trying to

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>reduce their budget deficits and to restore their debt positions

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to more sustainable levels. So our debt was meant to

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>be such an important issue at these G twenty meetings.

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So the point I'm trying to make is there's very

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>limited scope for finance ministers to put in place expansionary

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>policies that would stimulate growth.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 2>And we heard from lesa Ya Kanyaho actually saying that

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 2>it's it's difficult to say, is what he said, if

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 2>risks are actually materializing based on the data, would you

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>agree with that?

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, yes, I think it's term the wash. He spoke

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>something about high to nightmare to forecast anything, and it's

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.559
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right. I mean, as a central bank governor when

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they're providing their rate decisions, which this African Reserve Bank

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>will do later this month, they're forward looking, they're looking

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 1>at the inflation and in this environment, it's highly uncertain,

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>as you know, policy announced on such a high frequency

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>basis and there's no guarantee that those policies that are

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>being announced will be sustained. So yes, it is quite

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>challenging in which environment in which to make policy. But

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that said, what we are seeing which is quite interesting

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>is that for now, at least outside of the United

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>States and in some emerging markets, we are seeing some

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>softening of inflation, and that's we think as a consequence

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>of the currencies doing well in emerging markets under a

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>week dollar. So of course if your currency strengthy against

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a week dollar, what it means is that it reduces

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>your important inflation. So we are seeing currencies soften on

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the back of that. It's also helping soften energy prices,

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>which we've seen in South Africa. So inflation is actually

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>cooler than many anticipated in many of our emerging markets,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>allowing for accommodated policy. So this is some of the

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>trends we're already be seeing which could help particularly intents

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of trying to lick to growth if on Mango.

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Thank you as always for joining us and for your insights,

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and you can read all of our coverage on the

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 2>G twenty on Bloomberg platforms now, including the Next African Newsletter.

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 2>We'll put a link to that in the show notes.

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 2>This program was produced by Adrian Bradley and tiwa Adebayo.

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget to follow and review the show wherever you

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 2>usually get your podcasts. I'm Jennifer's Abasaja, thanks as always

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 2>for listening.