WEBVTT - How Celtics Dominated Game 2, Mavs T-Wolves Preview, All-NBA Decisions

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Welcoming into NBA Pulse, the production of iHeartRadio in the NBA.

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Sarahustak, NBA analyst for the Yes Network, and today

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is Friday, May twenty fourth. From our extraordinary court group

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of NBA journalists. We're joined now by NBA dot Com

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Senior writer John.

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Schuman and Oh Shoe.

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Indiana had an opportunity that they threw away in Game

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>one at Boston, and in Game two, the Celtics took

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>care of business one twenty six to one ten win

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>against the Pacers last night.

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 2>Pascal Siakam had.

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Twenty eight points for Indiana, But probably more concerning for

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the Pacers is that Tyrese Haliburton left with that hamstring injury.

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be interesting to see. We were talking about

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this just a little bit before the podcast. Actually injured

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that same hamstring against the Celtics in January, had missed

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>ten games, was on a minutes restriction when he came back.

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>That's obviously something that had been a point of just

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of conversation and observation in how he was playing

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the latter part of the season, and so steal no

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>update to this point as to what his status is,

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>but the major factor in what Indiana will be able

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>to do with or without him in the series. On

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>the other side of things, Jalen Brown was spectacular. He

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>had forty points twenty four in the first half. And

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>all NBA teams came out prior to the game, Jalen

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Brown was not on them, So whether that added a

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit of extra motivation, we'll discuss those all NBA

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>teams as you are a voter, later on in the show.

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But Boston was great and overall they did a lot

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 1>of the things in terms of balance that they needed

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>to do to take care of their home court as

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the series will now return back to Indiana. But with

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>all that being said, a Boston team that I know,

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of just thoughts perspective on how

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>they've been winning, how they've been playing, the belief in

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>them despite the fact they were so far ahead of

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the pack throughout the course of the regular season. What

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>did you take away from that win in Game.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Twotistic Statistically, it was actually a slightly worse defensive game

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 3>for the Celtics than Game one. Obviously there was some

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 3>garbage time thrown in, you know, Thursday night, but I

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 3>thought offensively they were just much more purposeful, and that

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 3>purpose was basically attacking Tyrese Haliburton, you know, from like

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 3>sort of the middle of the first quarter until Haliburton

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 3>got hurt if he was on the floor, like three

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 3>out of every four possessions, it was, you know, Haliburton's

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 3>guy setting a screen for Jason Tatum or Haliburton's guy

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 3>setting a screen for Jalen Brown, or Jason Tatum setting

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 3>a screen for Haliburton's guy, or Brown setting a screen

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 3>for haliburton guy. That was it was like basically their

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 3>offense was, all right, who's gonna set the screen? Where

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 3>are we going to set it? That's just the point

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 3>is put Tyrese Haliburton in the action, make him work.

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 3>I thought it worked pretty well. You know, he it

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 3>created some open shots for Dark White. Let's say, if

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 3>if if White was setting the screen, Haliburton would try

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 3>to you know, hedge the pick and try to scramble back,

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 3>and if he didn't scramble back in time, he had

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 3>an open three. Or if he was rotating, you know,

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 3>you could sort of attack the attack the rotation. And

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 3>I thought that was just like the main my main

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 3>takeaway from that game is they just attacked him almost

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 3>every possession down the floor. And it was on one

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 3>of those possessions, I think it was his man setting

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 3>a screen for Tatum where he hurt reinjured his hamstring.

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 3>He was trying to scramble back and I don't know

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 3>when he pivoted something, you know, he tweaked something in

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 3>the leg and so that was it. And then shoot,

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 3>when when Halibert was out, they just turned dot, So

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 3>who are we gonna pick on? Next? It was Ben

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Sheppard and then it was Doug McDermott. You know, Doug

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 3>McDermott got got in the game, and it's like, all right,

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 3>he's the guy, you know, and we're gonna start attacking him.

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 3>He's his man is going to set all these screens

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 3>and so I and I feel like that's I mean,

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 3>that's what the Celtics have been doing for years. Like

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 3>when they are seriously purposeful, it's not about like this

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 3>flowing offense. It's what, you know, what defender can we

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 3>attack with? What what matchup do we want? And and no,

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 3>it's not doesn't necessarily have to turn into an isolation

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 3>because if like it, like I said, I, if Haliburton

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 3>is sort of blitzing and then trying to recover. Well,

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 3>then the ball can move and they can drive and

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 3>kick from there and eventually get an open shot. It

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have to see, it doesn't have to be like,

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 3>all right, let's just get a switch and then isolate

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 3>and let Jay, you know, Tatum and Brown do their thing.

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Although there was some of that, I think and Brown,

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, part of Brown's performance was some some tough

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 3>shots in isolation, but I thought they were, like, you know,

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 3>they were just much more purposeful offensively in game two

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 3>than they were in Game one.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know, in saying all those things, I

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>think too, the question will be Indiana has been excellent

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>at home. They haven't lost yet at home. Shoot, you

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to Indiana. So will the Pacers be able

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to pull out some of that magic? We saw them

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>shooting extraordinary in doing so in that Game one victory

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Last night they came down to earth a little bit.

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about the Boston defense thirty eight percent from

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the three point line, fifty two from the field. Joe

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Mizoula did bring oshae Zett off the bench, facing his

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>former team and going small and in some of those

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>things trying to help along with it. But do you

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>think this series is over? Is this is going to

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>be a sweep by the Celtics.

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 3>I won't say. I won't. I will never have that

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 3>strong of opinion about stuff. Something I don't know, but

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 3>I would say, yeah, I think if you were to,

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 3>I would favor the Celtics going forward in every game

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 3>going forward, especially if Haliburton is one unavailable or two

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 3>just not himself. I mean, we saw during much of

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 3>the second half of the season where he was not

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent and his offense wasn't you know, it

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 3>just wasn't the same, and it seemed like he was

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 3>finally getting his legs back in these last you know,

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 3>in these last few weeks, and so it really stinks that,

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, he he've reinjured the same hamstring. And as

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 3>much as they picked on him on the defensive end

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 3>of the floor, the Pacers need him offensively to sort

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 3>of push the They have t J. McConnell, but they

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 3>need two of those guards basically to push the ball

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 3>up the floor and get their offense moving, you know,

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 3>pick and roll and then go from there. And so yeah,

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 3>it would be a tough task for the Pacers to

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 3>sort of Pacers offense to continue at the pace it's

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 3>been at the last few games. If Haliburton is either

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 3>unavailable or or or not you know, not himself. You know,

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 3>I think Brissette was in there because Luke Cornett got hurt,

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 3>and so yeah, I think the Celtics now were down

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 3>to you know, Al Horford being their only big, assuming

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 3>that Kristaps Porzingis is not coming back in the next game.

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 3>So there's something there, you know. I don't know if

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 3>if the Pacers can try to exploit Boston on the glass.

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Boston's been a very good defensive rebounding team in the playoffs,

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 3>but that might be their the sort of only hope

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 3>or not not only hope. But one way they can

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 3>try to make up for what they've lost is is

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 3>try to crash the glass and turn into the Knicks

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 3>almost because they could do that. Isaiah Jackson is a

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 3>really active big and really good on the glass, so

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 3>I think that's one way they could try to adjust.

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the Pacers get one at home. I think

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it from Boston. I do think that Boston

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>will ultimately take the series. I think a lot will

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>be riding on the health of Tyre's Halliburton. But I

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time thinking that the Pacers won't find

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a way, whether because of Boston or whether some hot

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>shooting in just the fast paced of prenetic nature that

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Indiana can tend to play with and find a way

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to get one back at home. But I think they

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>have been so good there and I think there's moments

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that the Celtics that level and sense of urgency and

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe understandably so, just isn't always there throughout the course

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>of the series. So I do think I would maybe

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.599
<v Speaker 1>predict a gentleman sweep off of this one. But on

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the flip side of things, I think we got a

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>long series in the Western Conference on the way Dallas

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>stealing the first game on the road at Minnesota one

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>five victory against the Timberwolves team, and it was really

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it was fun to watch these two teams going back

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and forth, but more so just the strategy behind it,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the game planning Kyrie Irving and Luka Doncic,

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>I think when that trade was made, and just kind

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of watching them and some of the injuries that played

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in the fact they didn't spend a lot of time

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 1>on the floor together last season. You are seeing the

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, kind of the ideal way of the hope

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of what they would be together. And early on in

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the game, Kyrie Irvin set the tone twenty four points

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of his thirty in that first half, Luka Doncic closing

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>things off. He finishes with thirty three, six and eight,

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of nice defensive stops to close out the game.

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But it was more about what they did to Minnesota.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota taking forty nine three point shots, making just eighteen

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of those, and Jade Daniels ended up being the leading

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>scorer for Minnesota with twenty four points. In some ways

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>kept Anthony Edwards in check and I think a lot

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of that too. Just you saw it, and he set

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it out after the game. Timber Wolves a minute after

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the game, they were tired, and they looked at they

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>looked fatigue and how they were playing. They will play

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>against nikere at Minnesota at a thirty pm Eastern on TNT.

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 1>What is your expectation of what happens here in Minnesota

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>based on what you saw in game one?

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 3>That's a good question. I I mean, yeah, I would

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 3>certainly face or favor the Wolves. I think I put

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 3>picked the Wolves to win the series at the start,

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 3>so I would favor them in Game two. I'll be

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 3>very curious to see how Rudy Gobaert defends, you know,

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 3>the pick and roll. You know, for the most part,

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 3>when they were running high pick and roll in Game one,

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 3>he was in drop coverage and it sort of worked

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 3>for the most part of the first half. Luka Dancic

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 3>wasn't hitting his his sort of mid range and short

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 3>mid range shots. Kyrie Irving kept the MAVs in that game.

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 3>In game yeah, in the first half, and a lot

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 3>of it was transition, I think. So like number one

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 3>for the Wolves is like, let's be better in transition

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 3>and try to get in front of Kyrie Irving. And

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 3>that's that's a big sort of theme with the MAVs,

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 3>is they were just a slow team prior to his arrival.

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 3>In fact, like they saw the second biggest jump in

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 3>transition points per game from last season to this season

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 3>obviously his first full season in Dallas, and a lot

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 3>of that's just him, like he's he's a guy who

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 3>will get out and go and obviously has stuff in

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 3>his bag in those transition possessions where he can if

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 3>he's if it's one on one or even one on two,

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 3>he can score. And Don has been better this season

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 3>about passing ahead. And there was one incredible in that

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 3>first half, incredible lead pass from Don Chits to Irving

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 3>on one of those breaks. So I think number was.

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>It off a make there It felt like there was

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I think I could visualize one year

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that I turned my head and I was like, I

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>don't even know how he got down the floor and

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you can see, but there was a couple that felt

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like they were off makes and Minnesota was just surprised

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>they had a nice three point shot or they had

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a big make and yeah and before you know, when

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a flash, Dallas is on the other end.

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, continue, Yeah, Number one, ye be better in transition

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 3>and they cut down, so you know, Dallas won by

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 3>three and they were I think there were plus eight

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 3>in transition points. I think it was twenty nine to

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty one. So obviously be better in transition. And then

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 3>and the drop coverage sort of it was Doncic just

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 3>started getting going in the second half with that where

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 3>he was you know, he got the screen, he was

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 3>able to keep Jalen McDaniels on his hip, excuse me,

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 3>Jaden McDaniels on his hip, and Gobert was more you know,

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 3>they got a couple of lobs behind Gobert, and so

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 3>after that he was sort of more, you know, retreating

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 3>towards the role man. And then Doncic was able to

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 3>get into you know, short step back jumpers, twelve foot

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 3>fifteen foot jumpers. They did that with Gobert, you know,

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of in the high pick and roll. They were different.

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 3>When Karl Anthony Towns was defending the pick, they blitzed

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 3>right like they had him blitz the pick and roll

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 3>take the ball out of the ball andler's hands. They

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 3>also blitzed every time when there's a pick and roll

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 3>on the sideline, and those I thought were ended up

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 3>with better results for the Wolves. You know, Doncis would

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 3>pass the ball and the Wolves turned the ball over

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot in those situations. You know, we saw a

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 3>turnover peep from PJ. Washington, town stripped him. There was

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 3>a late turnover from Derek Lively where he got the

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 3>ball on the roll. Mike Conley came late with help

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 3>and Lively traveled. That was like an adjustment like late

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 3>possession where Gobert blitzed at the top and Lively got

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the ball and traveled. So I think maybe they make

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 3>it up a little bit. I think it's a sort

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:03.839
<v Speaker 3>of a pick your poison situation. It's not like if

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 3>you blitz, the maps don't know what to do, right,

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Like they've seen everything this year, so they're they're gonna

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 3>be able to just Doncic is willing to get off

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 3>the ball. They have other guys. But I think Minnesota

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 3>has to decide, you know, do we want Doncic to

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 3>keep the ball or do we want him to get

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 3>rid of the ball. Like that's basically decision number one

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to Dallas's half court offense, and they

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 3>just have to be better. I think you just have

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 3>to be good in rotations. I think they're capable, They're

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 3>they're long. I think they're a smart defensive team, so

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 3>they are sort of capable of sort of blitzing and

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 3>then rotating from there. They just have to make sure

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 3>that the guy we if we're blitzing Luka Doncics, we're

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 3>not leaving you know, Kyrie Irving isn't the guy we're

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 3>leaving open, right, Or if we blitz Kyrie Irving. Luka

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Doncic isn't the guy we're leaving over it. They did

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 3>that once where they blitzed Irving and like two passes away,

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Luka Doncic's got a I open three. I think it

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 3>was in the first half. He missed it, but it

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 3>was like, yeah, that's not the you know, let's let's

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, let it be Derek Jones Junior and not

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Luka Doncics that we're leaving open as a result of this,

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, defensive coverage.

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, it feels it feels easier said than done, too though,

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>just with the way in which he reads and picks

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>apart things and sees things seemingly a step ahead of everything.

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Shoot, who do you got tonight?

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, I would. I would favor the Wolves

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 3>just because they're at home. I think they're a really

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 3>good team. I think they can be better defensively than

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 3>they were in Game one. They can also be better offensively.

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Like you said it, like Anthony Edwards, he just didn't

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 3>attack very much. And I think if that was fatigue,

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 3>if it was you know, him just sort of reading

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 3>the Dallas defense, and I don't, you know, I don't

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 3>think they were double teaming him, but they were shading

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 3>towards him right like if he's got the ball at

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 3>the top, they were shading and obviously very willing to

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 3>leave Kylie Anderson open. He's on the floor. I think

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 3>some other guys got some open shots, but I think

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 3>they obviously did not want him to, you know, get

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 3>into the paint and get to the basket. And so

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 3>it's as much about you know, the other defenders on

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 3>the floor as the guy who's in front of front

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 3>of Edwards, which is going to be Derek Jones Jr.

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 3>And that's you know, that's a lot of length obviously.

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think Minnesota's got to sort of find

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 3>a way to get Edwards into the paint and towards

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 3>the basket, whether that be with with scheme or just

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 3>him being a little bit more aggressive.

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm taking Minnesota tonight. I don't think they dropped

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to here at home, and I do think there's changes, tweets,

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>adjustments that they will be able to make. I'm sure

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the two they were they were riding high with a

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of emotions, and there's a lot goes into them

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>winning that game seven against Denverse. So I think with

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that turnaround. I think we're going to see a different

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>team here in Minnesota tonight. We're gonna take freak and

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>come back with the all NBA teams. Welcome back to

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the NBA, Paul, Sarah Whustak, joined by the great John

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Schuman and Shoe I'm curious how your voting ballot stacked

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 1>up with the way things shake shook out. For all

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 1>NBA had mentioned, Jalen Brown left off of it despite

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact he was on probably last year. More important

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>for him is it helped allow him to sign the

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>richest contract at the time of NBA history. But first

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>team you got Giannis Luca Sga Jokic and Jason Tatum,

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and second team Jalen Brunson, Anthony Davis, Kevin Durant, Anthony Edwards,

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and Kawhi Leonard. And then rounding out the third team

0:17:53.800 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Booker, Curry, Tyres Halliburton, Lebron James, and Demona Sibonis.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Is there any I guess different on your ballot or

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>ones that you felt strongly about that you voted for

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that weren't.

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 2>The same as how it all shook out.

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Only slight differences. I had fourteen of the fifteen guys

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 3>on my list were the same. My only difference was

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 3>I had Jalen Brunson instead of Jason Tatum on the

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 3>first team. The rest of my second team was the same,

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Davis Durant, Leonard and Edwards, and then on third team

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 3>I had Rudy Gobert instead of Stephen Curry. Ends. Okay, yeah,

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 3>you know I and I get it. I have no

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 3>problem with the way anybody else votes. But for me,

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 3>if you're the clear defensive player of the year, like

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 3>that's and you're not like a complete liability on offense,

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 3>which I don't think he is. That's thirteen All NBA

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 3>like defenses half of the game. And you know, like,

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 3>so if you're the defensive player of the year, how

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 3>are you not you know, a third team All NBA

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 3>at the least. So that that was it for me.

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 3>I didn't have Brown. I know, he was definitely one

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 3>of the you know, twenty five players I considered, and

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 3>probably was one of the very last cuts on my

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 3>list for obvious reasons. You know, just a terrific two

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 3>way player. But I think he you know, as far

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 3>as the numbers, his numbers just weren't as good this

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 3>year as they were last year. That's not necessarily his fault.

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean they had a better team. They had more,

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, a stronger sort of top you know, starting

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 3>lineup from top to bottom than they did they had

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 3>last year. You look at like Drew Holliday even like

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 3>took a huge you know cut in his numbers, you know,

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 3>his he saw like basically one of the biggest drops

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 3>in USA Drake from year to year in the league.

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 3>So that's just the way that you know, like they

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 3>were a great team. And yeah, you'd think, you know,

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 3>how did the Lakers get two guys on All NBA

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 3>and the Celtics don't, But it's just, you know, it's

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 3>basically because they had five six great players, right Like,

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 3>it was a lot of balance.

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Lakers got.

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Lakers get two guys on All NBA, Phoenix gets two

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>guys All NBA. Last quick question in regards to that

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.239
<v Speaker 1>with Boston, I think that always becomes the discussion with

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>how seemingly stacked they are and how that affects. Did

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you have you said you had Brunson ahead of Tatum

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>there in first team? What was your MVP balloting? Did

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you have Tatum ahead of Brunson in your in your

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>top five or was he on your ballot?

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 3>No, my MVP was basically the same as my first team,

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 3>so it was one.

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I like that. I like that.

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I heard from some voters that they they kind of

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>heads their bet on both of them, so they had

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Tatum ahead of Brunson for first team or for MVP

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and vice versa. Four. But yeah, it's I I tell you,

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the hard I think it shows just

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>how robust the talent and skill in level of play

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is in this league with these discussions we could have,

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>And that is one of the hardest jobs I will

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>give you of having to decide decide because it's it's

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>such small, small margins of things and details that you

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>can look at.

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's it's it's it's a you know, it's

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 3>a privilege to to to vote for these things, but yeah,

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 3>it is is work. In fact, I don't like it

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 3>when I'm asked, like three weeks before the end of

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 3>the season or four weeks for the end of season,

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 3>like who's your who's your what's your m VV fee ballot,

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 3>And I'm like, I have no idea, I have to

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.719
<v Speaker 3>I need like two or three days to sit with

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 3>it before I can like give you a list. If

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 3>I were to give you a list, it would be

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 3>very sort of shallow analysis if I do it like

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 3>three weeks before the end of the season. But if

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 3>but like at the end of the season, Yeah, you

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 3>have the opportunity to sort of sit down for a

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 3>couple of days and really think about it. And yeah,

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 3>I think for me, the criteria for MVP and First

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Team All NBA was basically the same, you know, and

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 3>I do look at value and like value to you know,

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 3>the player's team. You know, how important was that player

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 3>to his team? And that's where I think I guess

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 3>Brunson gets the edge over Tatum because he's obviously a

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 3>little bit more important to the Knicks than Tatum is

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 3>to the Celtics, just because they have, you know, so

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 3>many more players. There's so much more depth and at

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 3>least with Brown and a little bit Derek White, guys

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 3>who can replicate his skills a little bit.

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you on that. I'm with you on all that.

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 2>And shoo, we got a fun series ahead.

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, Minnesota Dallas tonight a thirty pm Eastern

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>on TNT. Tomorrow will be Game three at Indiana a

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty pm Eastern on ABC between Celtics and the Pacers.

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>H Safe travels to Indy. I don't think you're there yet.

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Safe travels to Indy.

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And we'll continue reading, watching, and of course talk with

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you really soon.

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, Thanks Sarah.

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>NBA Pulse was Sarah Cusack is a production of the

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>NBA and iHeart Radio. Please rate, review, and subscribe on

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the iHeart Radio app or wherever you get your podcast.