WEBVTT - Biden and Inflation, and Tesla's Stock Split

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Vallet and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Tanging in San Francisco and this

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. We

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>are live at the Port of l a after fiery

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>comments from President Biden on soaring inflation and what he

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>calls the exploitation of oil companies that spiking gas prices,

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Plus developing news out of Tesla. The company is asking

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>shareholders to authorize a three for one stock split, and

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a surprising departure from the board of directors. Plus

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a culture clash at Disney Drives the TV chief out,

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk about the future of the entertainment giant

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>undersea out Bob Cha Peck. I want to get back

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to those inflation numbers now. President Biden paying a visit

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Port of Los Angeles and talking about surging

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>prices as inflation hits a forty year high, including some

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest jumps ever in gas prices. The President

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>going after Exxon, which is seen not only record profits

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>but also a record rise in its share price. Take

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a listen to what the President had to say, Exxon

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>made more money than God this year. And by the way,

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing's changed and they're not by the one thing I

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>want to say about the old companies. They talked about

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>how we have they have nine thousands permits to drill,

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not drilling. Why aren't they drilling? Because they make

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>more money not producing more oil. Joining us now from

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the Port of l A. Bloomberg's Atlin Law, so walk

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>us through the President's message. He got pretty heated at

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>times he did, and it was interesting. He started on

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>hit port of Los Angeles is the work they've done,

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the coordination between the different tentacles of the ports system,

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the truckers, the operators, the shipping companies. But he also

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.399
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about the broader problem around supply chains,

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>which included impact from the war in Ukraine. He didn't

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>just have kind of ire for the oil companies, where

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>he basically wants oil production to increase so prices come down.

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>But he also talked about foreign shipping companies. And the

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>reason he did is that a big driver of inflation

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>has been the rate that retailers in this country, Walmart's targets,

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's pay to move goods from A to B and

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>he essentially said those rates are unpalatably high. He called

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>on Congress to do something to bring them down. But

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, we tracked this data at Bloomberg. Of course

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I do. On my Bloomberg terminal, I see that since

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>September shipping rates have come down. So he kind of

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:52.399
<v Speaker 1>did this rapid spray. Look at what's happening. The underlying message, though,

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>things here have improved them. So let's talk about the

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>role of technology here. Obviously tech companies have been acutely

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in pacted by the supply chain delays. What does this

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>all mean for check? So we're on a tech show.

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 1>You and I talked about the cutting edge of say

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>drones and and ask fishal intelligence, et cetera. But in

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>this case, it's the lack of technology. It's a very

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>manual process. A container gets lifted off a ship by

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a crane, put down on the bottom of a truck cab,

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're driven off to his destination or he gets

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>moved onto a rail. The message I'm hearing over and

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>over from executives and officials is rail is letting us

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>down because they have cranes that take the containers of

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>ships directly onto rail lines, but there are no rail

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>carts to meet them, so they just pile up and

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>left idly. A positive is Friday. Let's end on a positive.

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the sports system, the executives, I suppose to

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you throughout the day are really happy about the administration

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>getting out their checkbook putting money into the ports system

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to the tunes of billions of dollars to modernize that.

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>We can get more automation. We can have software systems

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that get all of these folks talking to one another,

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and so we prove and what we saw in the

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>lost happening eighteen months from happening again. Ludlow. Thanks, We're

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>going to see you a bit later in this show

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about the president's push for electric cars

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and the role Tesla plays in all of that. I

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>want to continue this conversation on inflation and the broader

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>market implications and bringing Tim Sullivan, the CEO of Oceanic. Tim,

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. What do you make of the

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 1>notes that the President struck today? Um? I think there's

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot more to inflation that includes monetary

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 1>policy and demand pull and cost push. I think the

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>manufactured demand by you know, strinkling five trillion dollars out

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of the economy over COVID, UH created you know, kind

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of a virtual demand. UM supply in fact diminished some

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of the things that were shut down during COVID haven't

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't restarted and and may never restart, So diminished supply

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and and manufactured demand that's now decreasing. The combination is

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>leading to inflation that's kind of at a runaway pace

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. Obviously the Feds got a lot to do.

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So are you saying that the President shouldn't just be

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>blaming X on there are other factors at play. Uh,

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely other factors at play in as far as

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Exxon goes or any of their old companies for that matter.

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>UM investments in energy over the last eight to ten

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>years have have not been what they should have been.

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>UM money has been kind of transitioned over to green

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>projects under the things. And at this time when there's

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a war in Russia and we're basically reduced by three

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>million barrels a day, the OPEC increase it's coming in

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>July four and fifty thousand barrels a day is a

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>drop in the bucket, and and we're going to obviously

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>feel that as a country. So how long do you

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>think this inflation and this general market funk is going

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to be with us? I mean, that's one of the

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>toughest questions I think out there. I personally see my market,

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 1>which is the private markets, uh, existing at least, you know,

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>through the end of the year, it being a tumultuous,

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>choppy at best, and recovery hopefully starting sometime next year.

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about what it's going to take, you know,

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>otherwise to get inflation under control. Are there are other

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>things that the administration, in your view, could and should

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>be doing to alleviate the pressure on consumers. That's a

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>tough one. I think. You know, they're using every tool

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that they can to moderate inflation, and you know, using

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 1>tightening and trying to manage the workforce and employment numbers

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>things like that. So it's, you know, it's become a

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of a whip saw right now, and inflation numbers

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>are obviously getting pretty tough. I see milk at the

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>grocery store ten dollars a gallon here in California and

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>gas over seven dollars um. It's it's gonna be tough

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people to night. I don't think

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>there's an instant panacea that the government has that they

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>can employ. You're also a venture capitalist, and I'm curious

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>what the impact is that you're seeing on the private markets. Obviously,

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>we see what's happening in the public markets. We're hearing

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that companies are having trouble raising money, doing um down rounds,

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>slashing their valuations, lay offs, hiring freezes. You know, what

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>do you think the fallout from this period of time

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to be on all of these private companies

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that were, you know, living high on the hog for

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a while there. Yeah, I mean I've seen this in

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and two thousand and eight, and uh, it's

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's kind of like, uh, one of these

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>California fires that we have. It. It's horrible and horrendous

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and and terrifying UM and a lot of companies will

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>will be absorbed in. Other companies will just disappear UM.

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>But at the end, typically a situation like this creates

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of new growth. And in the private markets,

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we are really the public markets are leading indicator for

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the private markets. So a lot of the private company

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>valuations are are pegged off of uh, you know, public

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>company valuations on future value, and if the public company

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>valuations decrease significantly, the future value of those few private

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>companies that are buying to be number one. In some

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>cases there's only two or three market leaders in the

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>private company space, they are all going to take a

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>huge hit. And so, like you said, we are seeing

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>um difficulty, challenges with financing terms that are changing, liquidation

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>preferences that are increasing, you know, from one to two

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to three to who knows what um, and and of

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>course to manage cash flow, people are gonna get laid off,

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's going to be it is going to

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>be a rough road for for everyone. Tough. Indeed, Tim Salivan,

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Oceanic, thank you for giving us your view

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>there on what we're dealing with. Thank you well. Tesla

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>shares are up in late trading as it plans for

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a three for one stock split, the ev maker joining

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>other tech companies with lofty share prices that have taken

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>similar steps to make ownership more accessible to individual investors.

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Tesla also announcing Oracle founder Larry Ellison will step down

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>from the Tesla board. Will have more on this developing

0:08:49.000 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>story later this hour. Stopping counter it luxury goods. Stock

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>x has taken a leading role in this and as

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>new data out on the rise of counterfeit items that

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>are flooding the market. Joining me now, stock x CEO

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Scott Cutler. Scott great to have you back with us.

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So just how many more of these things are flooding

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the market now? Well, just taken a step back. If

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at the trends for consumers. Consumers are inspired

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>by what they see with brands, and brands are going

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>more directly to consumer, but they're also releasing product, their

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>best product in scarce quantities and sometimes it's very difficult

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to get and so consumers are going to marketplaces to

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>actually get product that they can't get in other channels.

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>So stock x has been at the forefront of being

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a marketplace that connects buyers and sellers and we've authenticated

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>over thirty five million products that have gone through our

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>rigorous authentication process and it's a service that we provide

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to our customers to essentially ensure that they're getting access

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to great product from brands at authenticated. So what kind

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of fake stuff are you seeing more of? Well, if

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at the last twelve months alone, we have

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>protected customers by rejecting over three hundred thousand products worth

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>more than a hundred million dollars. Those products range from

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>sneakers to apparel, accessories, handbags, across a broad category of

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>goods that today consumers are defining as a next generation

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>asset class. But when we reject an item for being inauthentic,

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting When you peel back the report that we

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>put out this week, you'll realize that the most common

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>reason for us rejecting something as a manufacturing defect, it

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>could be a glue stitching, it could be the way

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that product was manufactured, damaged, boxed, use product, and then

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>fake product. So essentially we're looking at that end to

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>end experience and want to be able to deliver for

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that customer, as you know, a legitimate brand experience that

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>they quite frankly expect from us. So obviously we know

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>what stock X does to keep these kind of things

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>off the market. Is there something more broadly that you

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>think should be happening to prevent these black markets, if

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you will, from flourishing. Well, if you look at where

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>the consumer is today, as I said, going to places

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>where they can't find product, and so they're going to

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>other marketplaces that range from social networks to peer to

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>peer marketplaces. And the challenge with these marketplaces is that

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>there's a lack of quality. Uh, there's no certification around authenticity,

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and typically it's a bad user experience. And so when

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we started, we created the highest standard among the industry

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:53.599
<v Speaker 1>for marketplaces and quite frankly, revolutionized a process to authenticate

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>every single product that's sold on our platform before it

0:11:57.600 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>gets to the consumer. And so I think the cha

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>challenge and quite frankly, I think the challenge to marketplaces

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is to stand up for your consumer, authenticate that product,

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and stand by the product that's being sold on your platform,

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and take responsibility as a platform, which is what we

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>do every single day. Now, you've been in the midst

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of this ongoing legal battle with Nike. Nike suit you

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>over an n f T series based on Nike shoes

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and then more recently accused sock x of selling counterfeits.

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You know what's your response to this response to this

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>latest salvo. So from a from a legal perspective, we

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>believe the original case has no merit. The additional amendment

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>equally has no merit. We have the right to use

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>any brand's name and trademarks when selling products, and that's

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>well established under current law. I think as it relates

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to the experience, and that's the experience in the most

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>recent recent claims is just backed up by the facts

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that we authenticate one of the products that are sold

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>on our platform. And I think we have a really

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>symbiotic relationship with great brands that are releasing great product

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>because stock x you can see every single day what

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>is this great product worth and what could it be

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>traded for? And we provide an economic opportunity for those

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>sellers that hold onto those assets and then sell them

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to buyers. But we stand in the middle of that

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>transaction to authenticate every single one and so you know,

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to claim that we're not doing that is patently false.

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>But most importantly for us, it's really about ensuring that

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>user experience. So, if that's the case, what went wrong

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>with the relationship with Nike, because I assume you have

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to maintain strong relationships with a lot of brands. Well,

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>if you if you look at the platform itself, we're

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>actually intermediary between sellers and buyers. Those sellers are typically consumers. Um,

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 1>we do have relationships with brands that actually release product

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and sub product, but a vast majority of what transact

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>on the platform is not coming from a brand directly,

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's coming from consumers to get access to that

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>product over time. You know, we have partnered in so

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>many different ways with the industry on on counterfeits. In fact,

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>even Nike itself have come to us to say, we

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>think you're among the highest standards in the marketplace. Partner

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>with us with the Department of Homeland Security on other councils,

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>participating in in preventing counterfeits for getting to the market,

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and so I think we work in partnership with the

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>industry and hold ourselves to those standards. Now, you spent

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time at the New York Stock Exchange,

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious what unique perspective that gives you on

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the market turmoil that we're seeing now, and you specifically

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>oversaw listings, you know, you know, do you think this

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I p O window is shut? And what does that

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>mean for stock X, which we were expecting to go

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>public potentially soon. Well, you know, everybody is watching the

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>headlines in the markets today. What I would say is

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>for the market overall, today's headlines are rarely tomorrow's history,

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>so we will get through this time. UM. It's certainly

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult time for the consumer. UM for us specifically,

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't comment on rumors speculation about us, but we

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are focused on executing our business, growing our business during

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>these challenging times, and expanding into other exciting categories and

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>areas to attract this next generation of consumer to our platform.

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Stock X also sells collectibles like trading cars, figurines. You know,

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about your plans for non shoe alternative

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>assets and the kind of demand you see from gen

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Z and millennials, especially in the midst of a downturn.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Well in two thousand and six, team we started with

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>with this idea of creating a real time marketplace for

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>high demand consumer goods. We started with sneakers. Our second

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>category actually was in watches, and then handbags, and then

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>we got into apparel and that's expanded now and to

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>collect to bowls. It's all part of a big trend

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that I think includes digital assets, include some of these

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>physical assets where the next generation consumer gen Z jen

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>A actually looking at different things besides oil and commodities

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and even the market itself as a place to invest

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>their time, their energy, their passions, and now you have

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to actually turn that passion into an economic opportunity.

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And so it's a big trend across all the things

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that trade into our platform that these are considered assets

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>by this set of consumers. All right, Scott Cutler, CEO

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of stock X, Great to have you with us. Thanks

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Scott for stopping by. Coming up another stock split in

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the tech sector. This time it's Tesla. Why the e

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>V maker is eyeing a three for one split? Up next,

0:16:47.080 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg now today is on Tesla that broke

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>just after the US market closed, the e V company

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>saying in a proxy statement it is asking shareholders to

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 1>vote on a three for one stock split. Joining us

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.719
<v Speaker 1>now on the phone for more Bloomware, Stata Hall, who

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>covers Tesla Flora, So it works for Alphabet, it worked

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>for Amazon, giving the stocks a bit of a jump

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>when they did their own stocks. That's why is Tesla

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>doing this? Dantum, well, Tessaly the stock split a couple

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of years ago that was wildly popular with retail investors

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>because you know, fans of the company loved the company,

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>loved the stock. But as the stock price rises, it's

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>harder for them to get an entry point, and so

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Tesla wants to do this not just for retail shareholders,

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>but also for its own employees. I mean, they give

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>stock options to employees and it's a big part of

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the compensation. And um, you know, I think the last

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 1>stock split was just wildly popular and there's no reason

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>not to do it again. Meantime, Tesla also announcing that

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Larry Elson is stepping down from the board, which is

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting given that Larry is one of the big backers

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of Elon Steal to buy Twitter. What do you make

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of this? Yeah, that was a surprise. Larry has been

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>on the board since lateen He is considered an independent director. Um,

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>he just is not standing for re elections and his

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>charm is up and he's not gonna, you know, be

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>be reelected. The board is gonna shrink from eight members

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to seven. Um. You know, I don't know what is

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>behind that. Um. I mean we know that Mr Ellison

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>spends a lot of his time in Lamai, Hawaii. Maybe

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>he just didn't have time to come to all the

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>board meetings or wants to do other things. But he

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>has been a pretty instrumental player on the board. And yeah,

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously is backing Elon's bid to buy Twitter. So I'm

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>not entirely sure went what went on there. We were

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>just covering Bloomberg's big takes focused on Larry Allison and Lanni.

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>How does this change the constitution of the Tesla board

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime? Uh, well, Larry's departure just means that

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the board shrinks and um and so, you know, seven

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>people is pretty small for a company of Tesla size.

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean most boards are going in the opposite direction,

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>adding members, add more diversity. Tesla is kind of you know,

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>shrinking its numbers even though it's become this massive company.

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, we'll continue to follow your reporting on this.

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Dana Hall of Bloomberg News, who covers Tesla for us.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Dana for that update. Welcome back to Bloomberg

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Technology and Emily Chang in San Francisco. This week, the

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration announced new steps to build out the first

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>ever national network of five thousand electric car chargers along

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>US highways and in select neighborhood. This is a key

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>piece of the bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Let's get back to

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>ad Ludlow joining us down from l A, where President

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Biden spoke just a few hours ago. So I talked

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to us about these new charging stations and just how

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>much this could supercharge electric car ownership. This is a

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>case of build it and they will come right. Biden's

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>administration laid out seven and a half BI in dollars

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for charging infrastructure, and they were very specific in the

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>wording of the rules. They basically want an America where

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the standards are the same. It doesn't matter if you

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>drive yourself a Tesla, a Ford, Mustang, Marquis and Nissan

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Leaf that you should dependably be able to drive up

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to the nearest service station, plug in your e V

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and off you go. There's been skepticism that this money

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>materializes in the numbers promised. There's been skepticism that it

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>will be built in time. But there are also a

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>number of private sector players. Right you have Electrify America

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.479
<v Speaker 1>charge point and they have all gone about, along with Tesla,

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>building out these networks relatively quickly. The discussion around adoption

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is still a debate because the pre order numbers for

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the F one fifty Lightning for example, or a Riviewan

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>or even the backlog that you see in Tesla shows

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>that there's demand here in the United States, but the

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>backward looking data speaks for itself. Basically, the ev adoption

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>is just a few percentage points of all new car sales.

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>In China, it's almost twenty percent. So that's why I

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>say it's a question of building and will and will

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they come. That's what the Biden administration hopes that making

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>this infrastruction more commonplace will make EVIED option more commonplace

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>as well. Now, something really curious, and we've seen a

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>rift grow between President Biden and Elon Musk, who you

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 1>would think is a natural ally in this administration, and

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>in this push to electric cards, we've seen barbs from both,

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, in in you know, towards each other. Why

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is this? Why haven't they been able to form some

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of alliance? You know? I remember very vividly when

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I sat in l a at CODE conference or RECO

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>conference and Elon Musk sat in the chair and said

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that President Biden is leading the Russian quote Russian revolution

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in electric vehicles. We've known since early in the year

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that Elon Musk and the President don't have a direct

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>relation ship. We know that When President Biden talks about

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the electrification movement, he is kind of primarily name check

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>forward in GM's leadership in that despite Tesla dominating the

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>sale of electric vehicles in this country and globally. Frankly,

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 1>but there's the other side of the story as well.

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has an unwunusual way of doing things. Tesla

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.959
<v Speaker 1>is not a union shop. It does not have unionized labor.

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Biden is the president of the labor movement. He's very

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>open about that. And now we see this shift where

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Elon must has shifted his politics. The thing is, Elon

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Musk is the world's richest man and he himself is

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>incredibly popular, and we won't be able to quantify it,

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but it will be interesting as we approach November in

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the mid terms. Does Elon Musk take some votership away

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>from Biden. That's a question I'm going to be asking. Fascinating,

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>fascinating question. All right at Lunlow. Thank you from the

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Port of l I appreciate your reporting. Meantime, we continue

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>to celebrate pride. This month of June, Bloomberg Television is

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>focusing on a wide range of topics highlighting what equality

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>means for the economy, companies and investors. Today, we're speaking

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>with neuroscientists and entrepreneur Dr Vivian Ming, who founded SOCO Slabs,

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>which uses AI driven research to address inclusion and gender

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in business. Dr Meng, thank you so much for joining us.

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>You and I first met when I was researching my

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>book pro Topia, and I'm so fascinated by a very

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>unique perspective in this industry. Let's start with AI. How

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>can I, or AI driven research, as you say, address

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>some of these really deep seated problems. Well, let's be honest,

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>what I believe we humans could potentially solve these problems.

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>But AI is an incredibly powerful tool. I once had

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to scratch an itch what drives wage gap?

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>And we built UH. And I say we I built

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>an AI that went out analyzed websites of sixty thou

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>different companies, looked at their quarterly reports, analyzed the photos

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>of the board and the leadership team, and we found

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the single biggest UH predictor of wage gap within a

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>company all around the world was the number of male

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>faces UH in those pictures. The more women, the lower

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the wage gap. A pretty unique finding. It took one

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>day and as it turns out, one person in that sense,

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>AI can be an incredibly powerful tool to explore questions

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of inclusion. Um. Although there's some pretty notorious stories of

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a going in the wrong direction, tell us a little

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>bit about your personal story and you know this perspective

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>you have, unlike many other people, about how people in

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, for example, are treated differently. Yeah, you know,

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a funny thing. When I started my first tech

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>company was an ad tech company. This was before Corsera

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and con Academy, and we're going out, my wife and

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I together to try and his money. And I remember

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>this one case in factor was the first time we

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>had an entire partner vote from a venture capital firm

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>on us. And this one guy happened to be the

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>oldest guy in the room. Uh, No tough questions, no

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.719
<v Speaker 1>questions at all. He literally just patted me on the

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>head as I left the room and said, you should

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>be so proud of what you built. And then he

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>ended up being the one person who voted against fundings. Uh.

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, maybe this is an experience that could

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>happen to anyone. It wasn't just that I was a woman,

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>or just that I was a married women that were

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>the founders. Except this wasn't actually my first company. My

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 1>first company was years before, a film company, and I

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>was a man, and in a decade in between, I

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>had gone through transition. And let me tell you, it

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>was extraordinarily more difficult raising money as a woman, despite

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact that in the inner reading years I'd gained

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>a couple of PhD s. Uh. In the years since

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:10.959
<v Speaker 1>that I founded six companies, had five of them acquired

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I We had a good business plan. I truly believe

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>what we were trying to build. The people couldn't see it.

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And I will tell you that if you've ever wondered

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>whether it's truly different for men and women, for gay

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and straight, black and white, as someone that's seen both sides, yes,

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley can be a wildly different town. As someone

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>who's seen both sides and perhaps has one of the

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>most decorated resumes of anyone in Silicon Valley, how much

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>progress do you think has actually been made over the years.

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we had um the Me Too movement, that

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Black Lives Matter movement, Then we had the pandemic and

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>concerns about backsliding in the pandemic, Do you feel like

0:26:55.119 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we've made significant steps forward or or not? Yeah? You know,

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm a hard number scientist in the end, and so

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I like to collect data. One of the projects we

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>run at SOCO SLABS is called the Inclusion Impact Index.

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>We collaborate with crunch Base, pitch Book, the US Patent Bureau,

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Census collecting data and we look at questions

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like do lgbt founders um raised as much as straight founders,

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>how many jobs are created by women starting companies in

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 1>the Southeast, And what we clearly saw, for example, during

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic is funding of non traditional founders read UH, women,

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>ethnic minorities, lgbt Q went down substantially UM. Some of

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>that is because many of them were starting companies for

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the first time, and funding for new companies dropped dirt

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>with the uncertainty, but the drop for someone like me

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>was pronounced lee larger, So there's clearly some backsliding going

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>on UH. And that kind of data is incredibly useful

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>because I'll tell you I have never talked with a

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>VC that wasn't convinced they were the most rational person

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in the entire world. We are moving into an even

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>more tech enabled world. You know, this future of the metaverse.

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Who knows if it happens, but you know a number

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of companies are certainly trying to push us in that direction.

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Do you see this posing or presenting more challenges or

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:38.479
<v Speaker 1>opportunities when it comes to creating a more equal world? Uh?

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, let's be blunt, it's both. Uh. We look

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>at some new research on the rate of data flow,

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>how incredibly connected we are, how easy it is with

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>my phone or online for to collect any piece of

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>information I want to get, And paradoxically, it's actually slowing

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>down innovation. And so in that sense, independent of diversity,

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>technology seems to make us explore less and that's deeply problematic.

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But we can fight against that, and we can really

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>lean into technology. For example, technology I built from my

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>son who has autism, to help him understand people that

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have autism without cheering him. He's already got a superpower.

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>He sees the world different than everyone around him. He

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>just needs a little help and understanding other people. That's

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>where technology can make a difference by actually celebrating what

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>makes us different and even augmenting it, not just making

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>us all sort of boringly the same. So what do

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you see it is next here in this discussion, In

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, I know there are so many things that

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't talk about that, don't you know, we don't

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>shed enough light on what should we be talking about. Well,

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you, as was mentioned in some of

0:29:56.400 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>your earlier interviews, Uh, it's a change world in California.

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Their requirements about board representation. I have never gotten so

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>many board inquiries. I mean, honestly, a transgender women with

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a multi racial disabled family, everybody is calling me up

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and asking if I'll join their board. Um, but I

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's performative. What we really need to do is

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>see that there is value, uh, in arguable value and

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>having people that think differently about problems. Gender, race, sexuality

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>are certainly not the only ways in the world people

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>think differently, but they are powerful ones. So for the

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>last year two we've actually been looking at this fascinating space,

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the neuroscience of trust. Why it is that our brains

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>process different people differently and we just need to accept

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in the end that we're human and we're imperfect and

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's going to take extra effort to connect with

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>someone that's different. Where our brains are just not set

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>up to handle it. M Dr Vivian, men, you sharing

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>your perspective with us today is truly a gift. Thank you.

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>It is time now for our Crypto report and I

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about securing block change. Joining me now,

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Nko Sandrico, Janapolis. He is the CEO of Metrica, which

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>provides monitoring and analytics for blockchain communities. He nicos, thank

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us, So talk to us

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>about the problems that you're trying to solve with your company.

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>So Metric is trying to make blockchain networks reliable and

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>performance so that the Web three world can be built

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>on top. So think of it. We've got used to

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the resiliency and the performance of telecommunication networks. We are

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>applying and we're building the same tools in the blogsain world.

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And that is very important because if we want to

0:31:55.360 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>build applications for Web three applications that are required figher

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>operational requirements. Think of it like the next Zoom, the

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>next Facebook, the next Netflix on top of Web three.

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>We need the blockchain networks to be performing really well.

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So we were building the tools end to end monitoring, analytics,

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>operational intelligence so that anyone who runs infrastructure can run

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it reliably, and also the applications can get that visibility

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and can know how the network performs. The blockchain network

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>performed underneath our network. Allergies and attacks on the blockchain

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>more serious than they would be on other networks. I

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>think they are. I think the the assets that exist

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>on the blockchain networks are much more valuable than video

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>or voice that exists on conventional telecom networks or the Internet.

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think we're putting our banking system, we're putting nuancets,

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>We're putting digital assets on those networks. So I think

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>both security and performance are much more important than what

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it were in the in the telecom world. And I

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna see the highest value bids traversing the world,

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>uh than we saw before in the web two world

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Internet. So chat to us that about how

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the scales in the future. If you know, these kinds

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of adages and attacks are more serious for blockchain technology. Yeah,

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just to give you an example of what

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>happens today when there is when there is an outage, UM,

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone runs a note on the blocks in network and

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>they run some kind of local monitoring on those notes,

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and what happens is that everybody sees that their notice

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>down and they try to figure out is it the node,

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is it the network, is it the application that is wrong?

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Nobody knows what is going on exactly. So everybody goes

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>on social media, they go on Twitter, they go on discourt,

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and they start asking each other are you seeing the

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>same thing? Are you experiencing the same things that we see?

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And then there is a long process of coordination for

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>bringing a network back in order. So these are operations

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>in the early days that we're experiencing. Now. We need

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure like the one that Metric is building, so that

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>we can have monitoring, community monitoring, end to end visibility

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.879
<v Speaker 1>into the network, and so that those outages can either

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>be prevented or when they happen, we can very quickly

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>recover and the network can be can be back. So

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we're seeing things that as we build up

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure and as we build more tools in the space,

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>will start becoming less and less frequent. We've been talking

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the market turmoil and crypto market terminal.

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin still now below thirty dollars. What's your read on

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>where this is all headed. I think definitely. The markets

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>are in a turmoil and we're we're getting into a

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>bare market. But I think for for crypto, this actually

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>might be a good thing in the sense that people

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>will focus a lot on building. And every time that

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the past during burn markets, there is

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of infrastructure being built. The foundations of blockchain

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and crypto are being built. In a movement further along,

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say investors also kind of change their appetite

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and they become much more focused on the value of

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>what is being built rather than on financial engineering or

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>on crypt economics. And I think that's that's a healthy

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of phase that we go through. When we've seen

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that in the past, it has never stopped the progress

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 1>in building up more more things in the cryptal world.

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Metrica CEO Niko Sanrica Jannapolis, thank you for

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>joining us coming up. A clash of styles over at

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Disney led to a veteran, Peter Rice's dismissal, and it

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>took CEO Pop j Pack just seven minutes. We'll talk

0:35:49.640 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 1>about what happened next, Mrs Bloomberg. Peter Rice has one

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of the longer resumes in the entertainment industry, but when

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 1>his time at Disney came to an end. It was

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:21.919
<v Speaker 1>over in seven minutes. That is how long it took

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Disney CEO Bob J Peck to fire the head of

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 1>his TV division this week and what insiders say was

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a clash of styles at the world's largest entertainment company,

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>blooms Chris Paul Mary joins us Now to discuss. So, Chris,

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>what happened and why did it only take seven minutes?

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Ha ha ha. Well, this is one of those things

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>where we'll look back at this as a data point

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and if you know, the tenure of Bob Kause CEO

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is ultimately a successful one, we'll say, well, there's a

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 1>guy who made quick decisions and uh, you know, I

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't afraid to make hard choices. Uh If if ultimately

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>he's not successful, and you know, and it could go

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>either way at this point, Uh, people will say, oh,

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, boy, there's a guy who had really no

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>people's skills and uh, you know, didn't behave the way

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood normally behaves when it terminates very senior executives like

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Peter Rice. J Peck has obviously been facing some pretty

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>tough and kind of public battles what does this say

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>about his leadership at this point? Well, in a white

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>bigger news this week, uh than Peter Rice, was the

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Disney's Board of Directors put out a

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 1>statement on Thursday saying that Japec and his team Habits

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>have their full support. Uh. And that's significant because this

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>guy has definitely been under fire. Stocks down by more

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>than a third this year alone. Uh. He had that

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 1>pr debacle in Florida that's ongoing over the school's bill,

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and had a you know this, you know, municipal district

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>taken away from them. He had plenty of problems before that,

0:37:55.560 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>internally not popular, moving a lot of US to Florida

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Scarlett Johansson lawsuit last year. If you recall so so,

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Shafick's had more than his share of struggles. Shares are

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 1>way down. I mean, how long though, do you think

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:16.399
<v Speaker 1>the board is going to put up with this? Well? Uh,

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, his contract runs for another few months. I

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 1>would say for certainly he's given the statement that they

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>put out just yesterday, he's certainly safe this year. Uh.

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>It's coming at a time where you know, Netflix had

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>those bad subscriber numbers. The whole media sector is down

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in a big way. So Disney isn't alone. You know,

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the theme park says we've talked about before, are really

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>killing it and that's been a savior. That was where

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Speck sort of last served. And uh and and that

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>business is doing great, so uh, it's a big test time.

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>They're rolling out Disney Plus in a number of new

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>markets this summer all over the world. And and Speck

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:00.399
<v Speaker 1>has promised that the second half of the year will

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>show even stronger subscriber growth than the first half, So

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 1>those data points is still to come. Has bot Biker

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:10.879
<v Speaker 1>had at all a role in the aftermath of all

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>of this, I mean, I know there's been some speculation

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of him coming back, which he has said is totally ridiculous.

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Just curious what Eiger is up to. H He hasn't

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>publicly commented on SHAPEX leadership, but people have tried to

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>read between the lines and some of his public statements

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>um people have argued, For example, he tweeted out retweeted

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a statement from President Joe Biden on the Florida Schools

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 1>bill that's sort of in a way made people ask

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>what Disney's official position and set in motion that whole

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:47.360
<v Speaker 1>chain of events Uh. He's also commented public on on

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the decision, uh, saying essentially was a no brainer for

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Disney to oppose the bill, uh, something that SHAPEC had

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>initially been reluctant to do so. In a way indirectly,

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>he's offered his opinions on the I think so going

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>on interesting? All right, Chris Paul Mary, who covers Disney

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:07.320
<v Speaker 1>for us. We'll stay tuned for the next twist in

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>this very dramatic story. And that does it for this

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Technology. My colleague David Weston is coming

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>up next with Wall Street Week former Treasury Secretary Larry

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Summers there. He's got some harsh words for the FED,

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 1>calling them delusional on inflation. And don't forget to check

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>out our podcast wherever you get our podcasts. Have a

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>wonderful weekend. Everyone. I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco. This

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg