WEBVTT - Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Talks New Global Tariffs 

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Just coming off that announcement from the President announcing a

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>baseline tariff around the United States as well as reciprocal

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 2>tariffs on certain trading partners. I'm joined by Treasury Secretary

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 2>Scott Bessett. Mister Bessett was Starcrati. Thank you so much

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 2>for joining Bloomberg TV. So we're going to have the

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 2>baseline tariffs come into effect perst first, then they're reciprocal

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>tariffs a little bit more of a different rate for

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 2>each individual trading partner. Are you preparing to negotiate with

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 2>some of these trading partners before that tariff freight comes

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 2>into effect on April ninth.

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think there've been a lot of discussions, but

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 3>I think we're just going to have to wait and

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 3>see what would happen. What I would say and Marie

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.919
<v Speaker 3>is I would advise none of the countries to panic.

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't try to retaliate, because as long as you

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 3>don't retaliate, this is the high end of the number,

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>and I think the market could have certainty that this

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 3>is the number barring retaliation. So we've got a ceiling

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.919
<v Speaker 3>and then we can see if there's a different floor, So.

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 2>You sound like you're ready for a negotiation. A number

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>of these partners, has the European Union, has China? Has India?

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 2>Have these countries reached out?

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, they've all reached out, But it's going to be

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 3>up to President Trump to see what he wants to do.

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 3>I think the mindset might be to let things settle

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 3>for a while. Their terrafts or non tariff barriers have

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 3>been on a long time, so we'll see where it

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 3>goes from here.

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to China, they have a much higher

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 2>rate on this list. On top of that, there's still

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 2>that twenty percent fentanyl tariff rate. Is all of this

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 2>coming together to be more than a fifty percent tariff

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 2>rate for Beijing?

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, I think it is, and I think it's

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 3>a combination of things. And again that I think China

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>said today that solving the fentanyl crisis depends on taking

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 3>off the fentanyl arraffs, and I'm pretty sure that's not

0:01:58.160 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 3>the way the sequencing is.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Going to work.

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 3>They're exporting the precursor chemicals and every day, every week,

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 3>every month, Americans are dying and it's going to.

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Have to stop.

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to places like China. The President has

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 2>mentioned he's willing to even look at things like TikTok

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 2>to potentially do a negotiation. Then, when it comes to tariffs,

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you're looking at things like the Yuwan. What's

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>on the table when it comes to this trade realignment

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 2>between Beijing and.

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Washington, Well, we haven't started anything yet. We've been busy

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 3>with the tariffs. I've been busy, as we talked about earlier,

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 3>the tax bills going very well.

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>So I think that.

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 3>We will move toward the bilateral relationship with China now

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 3>that we've done the multilateral tariffs.

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Plans for conversations or a trip to Beijing. Nothing eminent

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to this negotiation. April ninth, these tariffs

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 2>come in place. Do you plan on having negotiations before

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 2>that date?

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Again, I'm not part of the negotiation, so we'll see.

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 3>I am sure that they're going to be a lot

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 3>of calls. I just don't know if they're going to

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 3>be negotiations.

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 2>The President had this huge chart showing all of the

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 2>different rates. Canada and Mexico notably missing on that chart.

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Why is that? I'm not sure that sure?

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I imagine that has to do potentially because they're

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>ready in negotiations previously with the twenty five percent. I'm

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 2>not sure if you saw the initial market reaction. I haven't,

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 2>so equity futures slid on the news. You had talked

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 2>about how we're in a detox period. Do you feel

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 2>that we're still in that period or are you starting

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 2>to get a little bit concerned.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, the detox period has nothing to do with the terrorists.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 3>The detox period is off this incredible level of government

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 3>spending that we've had an unsustainable amount of fiscal stimulus

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 3>and looks that's got to stop.

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>That's got to stop.

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, can we continue weaning ourselves off of that?

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 3>And as we see private or public sector borrowing go down,

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 3>private sector borrowing go up, public sector jobs come down,

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 3>private sector jobs go up? Is it going to be

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 3>perfectly symmetrical? Note, but we did see an increase of

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 3>ten thousand manufacturing jobs last month, So it.

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't concern you today that during the tariff announcement, equity

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 2>futures sold off when initially they were rallying when the

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 2>President only announced a ten percent tariff base, and then

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 2>they fell when he announced the higher rates for things

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 2>like the European Union in China.

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and Marie, I've learned not to look what goes

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 3>on in after hours markets.

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but since the peaks in February, stocks are down

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 2>eight percent. I think the NASDAC from it's high most

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>recently is down twelve percent so far. Though these kind

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 2>of this kind of market downdraft so far this year

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 2>is not concerning you.

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, look in my old business, I was very concerned

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 3>about market movements, and I'm trying to be Secretary of Treasury,

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 3>not a market commentator. What I would point out is

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 3>that especially the NA NASDEK peaked on deep Seak day.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 3>So that's a mag seven problem, not a MAGA problem.

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So let's talk about what else you've been spending

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of your time doing. You have been up

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 2>on Capitol Hill constantly. You are really working on trying

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that this administration can extend the Tax

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 2>cuts and Jobs Act on top of that more tax cuts.

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 2>Right now, How are the conversations going in Congress?

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, I actually think the most underreported story in Washington,

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 3>not by Bloomberg of course, is the incredible union enemy

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 3>unity amongst Republicans. And I think it's President Trump's leadership.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 3>But Mike Johnson, with a very narrow margin, issued the

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 3>reconciliation instructions and then he also passed a clean continuing resolution.

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 3>On the Senate side, they are variant, attentive, and I

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 3>think they may have something done by this Saturday.

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 2>This Saturday, Okay, that's the start of it, though, that's

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 2>the start. You recently talked about how you think it's

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 2>not just going to be tax on tips that gets

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 2>no tax on tips that gets added to this bill.

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>You think reconciliation can include a plethora of what the

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>President has talked about, no tax on tips, no tax

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 2>on Social Security. Also recently talking about rebates if you

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 2>buy an American car, how do you get all of

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>this done?

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Deductibility of interest if you buy an American car, which

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm older than you are, but when I bought my

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 3>first car, the interest was deductible, but now it's got

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 3>to be only on American cars.

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 2>So how do you do all this at the same

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 2>time that market participants, budget fiscal hawks, budget hawks in

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Congress are concerned about the deficit. How are you going

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 2>to have this big reconciliation package?

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think as we've seen there's a lot of

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 3>room to cut spending. So I think again where Republicans

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 3>have incredible unity is on the spending cuts as we're seeing.

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 2>So when it comes to the timeline of all of this,

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 2>I do notice that now reconciliation, it seems to be

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 2>an agreement between the House and the Senate that they're

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 2>willing to consider about raising the debt ceiling. So do

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 2>you plan on getting this bill done before the X state,

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 2>which the CBO is saying could be the middle of

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 2>the summer or September.

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, and Marie, I think you just answered the question

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 3>for yourself, because if debt ceiling is solved via reconciliation,

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 3>then it has to be done before we hit the

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 3>X state, and we're going to go onto the warning

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 3>track sometime in May or June.

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 2>So that's when you plan to get this tax bill done.

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a goal.

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 2>So if we could put all both these stories together. Today,

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the Presidence comes out with tariffs you're working on the

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 2>tax plan. He talks about tariffs being revenue raisers to

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 2>offset the tax bill you're working on. At the same time,

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>you and the President also talk about a negotiation you're

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 2>willing to do to get recied Prossy becomes to other

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>trading partners. How can it be both revenue raising and

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 2>a negotiation.

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, to the extent that the tariffs are higher than

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 3>what we had, it will raise revenues. And you know,

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 3>as far as the negotiations will see and I could

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 3>tell you though, it's not going to be possible to

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 3>include the terriffs in the CBO scoring, So that will

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 3>be something running in the background. And as the President said,

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 3>we've taken in several hundred billion dollars on the China tariffs,

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 3>but those those don't get scored.

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel that you need to have enough revenue

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 2>raised from these arffs before this reconciliation package comes to

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 2>play in Congress?

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't think we have to have the revenue raise.

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 3>And look, you know we're doing two things. Tariffs are

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 3>going to raise revenues and then we're also the stamping

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 3>out waste for an abuse in the government and bringing

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 3>down the expenses and spending. And we're not going to

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 3>get credit for either of those with the CBO scoring.

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 3>So when your audience, when American people see these CBO scores,

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 3>there could be the large but there is a substantial

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 3>amount of tariff income, there's a substantial amount of savings.

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 2>While all this is happening, consumer sentiment has definitely taken

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a dive. Expectations for inflation have gone up.

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 2>Banks like Goldman are cutting their GDP forecast saying potentially

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 2>the Fed is going to have to cut rates, not

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the good kind of cuts, the kind of cuts because

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 2>they're nervous about growth. How concerned are you that the

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 2>timing of all this is going to be incredibly challenging

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 2>because of how the American consumer, how corporate America is

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 2>feeling at this moment.

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, it tells me a couple of things.

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 3>One, we got to get the tax build done quickly,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 3>so because that's a componence builder. And two, we're seeing

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 3>ciniment surveys from the American people, but we haven't actually

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 3>seen them take action.

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>If the households actually thought that.

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 3>There were going to be employee if their real inflation

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 3>expectations had increased, what would they be doing. They'd be

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 3>hoarding goods and they would be demanding wage increases, and

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 3>neither one of those has happened yet.

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 2>So at the moment, you're not concerned about some of

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the soft data we're seeing.

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>No, I see nothing.

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 3>And one of the great things, many great things about

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 3>being a Treasury is we have lots of business people

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 3>come through and everything we're seeing in the economy is

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 3>still very.

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Solid, and executives haven't voiced any of these concerns onto you.

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 3>No, there's some idiosyncratic things, but in terms of the

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 3>expectations actually turning into hard data, none of them.

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Messina jet.

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Now that you're working on the tax bill, and of

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 2>course tariffs at the moment are out of the way.

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 2>What else is on the agenda for you for the rest.

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Of the year.

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, that we have the Ukraine deal that's coming up.

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 3>We've gone to maximum pressure on Iran. A big part

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 3>of Treasury is national security, and then we are doing

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 3>a big push on deregulating in a smart, safe and

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 3>sound way the regulated financial institutions, which is going to

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 3>allow for the private sector, not the government sector, to grow.

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to international where are you with a

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine and the mineral deal.

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe we.

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 3>May have a team from Ukraine coming over as soon

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 3>as the end of this week or the beginning of

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 3>next week. Ukrainians have I believe that they've hired council,

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 3>And what we did was after the incident in the

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 3>White House on I believe it was February twenty eighth,

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.599
<v Speaker 3>we're going to sign a four page deal that with

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 3>parameters of understanding, and at Treasury we took the opportunity

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 3>to move forward to.

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>The big deal.

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 3>So this is the exact same deal that would have

0:11:56.360 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 3>resulted from the four page signature signature deal.

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>So we've just fast forwarded.

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 3>And we didn't want to lose any time because we

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 3>believe this deal is so important for the American people,

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 3>for the Ukrainian people, and for the peace process.

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 2>So it sounds like in the next two weeks you're

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 2>going to have this deal over the finish line.

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>It's ready on our side.

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to Iran, since you mentioned that, and

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 2>I know you're going to be focused a lot on

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 2>international aspects now the tariffs are done and you have

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 2>the tax deals underway. When it comes to Iran, do

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 2>you think we could see secondary tariff secondary sanctions, Well.

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 3>We've already seen sanctions. For the first time. US Treasury

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 3>sanctioned a so called teapot refinery, which is a private

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 3>sector refinery in China and they are the buyers of

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 3>the Iranian oil and we could see more of that. Wow.

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Interesting Church of Secretary Scotts Bessett. You've been very generous

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 2>at your time today. We really appreciate it here at

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg TV. Thank you so much. Good to see you.