WEBVTT - Your Privacy May Be at Stake as Central Banks Develop Digital Currencies

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Stephanomics, the podcast that brings the

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:12.239
<v Speaker 1>global economy to you. China is about to shrink. That

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>was the sobering message from its later census, which suggests

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the fertility rate has slowed even faster than the more

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 1>pessimistic forecasts had suggested. If it carries on like this,

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the population will start to shrink in five years, earlier

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>than previously thought, and even the mighty Chinese Communist Party

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>seemed powerless to stop it. We're going to talk about

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that and the great baby battle underway in countries across

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Asia in a few minutes. Our reporter in Spain, Jeanette Newman,

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>also has a story from Valencia on a radical experiment

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to help small businesses come through the next stage of

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, which also features my favorite bicycle helmets. So

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we definitely have variety this week. But first, there are

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>lots of things in our daily lives that are being

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>transformed by new technology. But what about money? Is bitcoin

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the future or perhaps one of the other cryptocurrencies that

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>have been causing such a speculative frenzy in recent months. Ah,

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we wake up in a few years and fine, We're

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>still fond of old fashioned dollars and cents, and that

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>talk of digital currencies was just a fad. Well, one

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>person who's been thinking very hard about all of these

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>issues is Professor prasad now Senior Professor of Trade Policy

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>at Cornell University and a senior Fellow of Brookings, but

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>previously a senior official at the International Monetary Fund, and

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>most recently author of a book about to come out

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>called The Future of Money, How the Digital Revolution is

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Transforming Currencies and Finance. Welcome Professor Prasadhwa, and thank you

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>for writing this extremely useful book. Given how much has

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>been happening, how much news we've had over the last

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>few months about digital currencies and crypto and the like,

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot to cover, but I guess we

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>should just start with the basic assertion running through your

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>book that this time really is different. You know, we

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 1>are looking at a major disruption in how we use

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>money and and even what money is. That's why it's Deephanie.

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>First of all, thanks for having me on your show,

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>and this is indeed a good time to take stock

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of what is happening in the worlds of money and finance.

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>There has of course been a lot of interest in

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and the cryptocurrency revolutions set off. But I think

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the real legacy of bitcoin is that it has come

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>at a point in time and digital payments are becoming

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>preponderant around the world, including in developing economies, and there

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is a move towards digitization, which I think is going

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to leave its mark on both money and finance. Very

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>few of us use actual cash any more physical cash,

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that is, we tend to make payments with this wipe

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of a credit card or a phone for that matter,

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're going to see a bit coin

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>leave its legacy, even if Bitcoin does not endure in

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that form, that we're going to have digital forms of payment,

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:13.279
<v Speaker 1>either through central bank digital currencies with some countries are initiating,

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>or private digital payment systems intermediated in the form of

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>these cryptical currencies. One thing you say in the book

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is that in a sense, it's not bitcoin that is

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the transformation in itself, it's the underlying technology. So just

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>explain that a little bit. So the technology is a marvel,

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's worth thinking about the origins of bitcoins. So

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bitcoin white Paper was released by a creator or

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>creator as we don't know who that is to this day,

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>right around the time of the global financial crisis is onset,

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So that was the time when trust in central banks

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and governments in traditional financial institutions was at its lowest end,

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and the notion of being able to undertake transactions in

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat anonymous way using only digital identities and without

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a central bank or a traditional commercial bank in being

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>involved was very alluring, and that is the remarkable aspect

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of the technology. When you make a payment, either using

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>cash or using a credit or debit card, either a

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>central bank or a commercial bank is involved. What bitcoin

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>turned out to do was to provide a solution whereby

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you could have transactions being validated through what is called

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a public consensus mechanism, and Bitcoin, although it is supposed

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>to be anonymous, actually provides remarkable transparency. Every transaction is

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>out there for the entire world to see on the

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin blockchain. The distributed aspect is also very important. The

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin blockchain, which is a record, public ledger of all

0:04:56.120 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>the transactions using bitcoin, is maintained on multiple puters around

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the world, so hacking a particular computer or even a

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>set of computers, or having some computers go down is

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to affect the system. So in that sense,

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the technology is going to really set off a revolution

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in itself. So, just to be clear, you could have

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of cash but still not have this kind

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of structural change in how money works that you're talking

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>about for bitcoin and other things. What is really crucial

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>here is what role the government and central banks are

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.799
<v Speaker 1>going to have, and bitcoin provided the allere of getting

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>away from all of that, essentially democratizing finance by making

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>finance available to anybody with no restrictions, with no censorship,

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and without a trusted third party involved. That creates a

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of risks, even while it does have certain benefits. Well,

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it's funny you say, the allure of getting rid of

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the role of the central bank or this kind of

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>central authority. Of course there will be there will be

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who would consider that to be

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>deeply attractive, that you don't have government somehow involved in

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>inherently at the center of finance, and of course many

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>other people who would say, hang on a minute, isn't

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>is a rather frightening world that you have no central figure. Um,

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the kind of relationship of trust that

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you have with a central bank. So you talked about

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>how some central banks and if Sweden is thinking about

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>having the e Krona, have talked about having central bank

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>digital currencies. What's what's the thinking behind that and how

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>would that be different from what we have now. Many

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>central banks that on the world are initiating their own

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>digital currencies are central bank digital currencies CBDCs. That is,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 1>UM and CBDCs are being instituted in some economies because

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>they provide easy access to households and businesses to a

0:06:56.400 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>low cost digital payment system. In countries such as sweet

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>even there is a concern that having the entire payment

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>system in the hands of the private sector may be

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>good for efficiency and bring down costs, but it could

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>leave concerns about financial stability. At a time of financial panic,

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you could have the entire payment system shutting down if

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the government has no role in it. In a country

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:25.239
<v Speaker 1>like China, there is a concern that the major digital

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>payment providers like Ali pay and which I Paid are

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>dominating the payment's market and making central bank money irrelevant.

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think central banks ce UM CBDCs as a

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>tool for promoting financial inclusion, providing a backstop to the

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>private payment system, and creating a more level playing field

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>for other payment innovators rather than just a major players

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>who would also start providing efficient payment services. So what

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>would if if you live in a country where the

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>central bank is going down this route? What does that

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>look like in practice? Would you you would know when

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you were using a central bank digital currency? I mean,

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>how would it be different. Technology now exists for each

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>household in an economy or each business to have an

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>account with the central bank and use central bank money

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>through that account. That could drive banks sort of business,

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and you don't want to be in a position where

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the central bank is now allocating credit in the economy.

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So countries such as China and Sweden that are experimenting

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>with Serie dicis are going with a two tier system

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>where the digital wallets in which the central bank digital

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>uh dollars or you and reside are actually maintained by

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the commercial banks side by side with their own intersparing

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>deposit accounts. So the CBDC is just like cash would

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>not be interstparing instruments, but now with the central bank

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 1>digital currency being in the form of token that can

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be used across different payment platforms. So basically you could

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>use your central bank money across a variety of payment platforms,

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>again with the swipe of her phone. Um, so it

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>would be observation equivalent to using any other payment system,

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>except you would now be using central bank money. But

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>this also creates one issue that we may need to

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>consider the societal level. Do we really want to live

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in a world where anytime I buy you a cup

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of coffee, Stephanie, either a payment private payment provider, or

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the government is going to know about it. Um, that's

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be a slightly dystopian world we live in.

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Central banks are going to great lengths to make the

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>case that they're going to have privacy protections in place,

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>but in my view, ultimately anything digital is going to

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>be traceable, and every central bank wants to make sure

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it's money is not used for illegal purposes, so there

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>will be auditability and traceability. So whatever limited privacy we

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have at this stage might very soon vanish well. And

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of course that's why any self respecting criminal has always

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>used cash, because you don't have you don't have that

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of traceability. I just want to come back to

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you talked about the democratization of finance or than the

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>potential for this to do that. I mean historically, of course,

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we have had periods where financial innovation have has brought

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>easier forms of financing to more and more people. We've

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>had sort of waves of that running through societies at

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 1>different times. And though it has made it possible for people,

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>say to buy their own homes who might not otherwise

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>have been und to do it, or have access to

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>borrowing at all that they might not have had, it

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>has tended to also leave a lot of those sort

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of newly financially enfranchised people with a lot of risk

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and have it blow up in a crisis of some sort.

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if that's a risk here, how how can

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 1>we guard against that? There is a significant list. Stephanie're

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>right that the democratization of finance, while it is very

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>part sative sounding concept, does carry certain risks, and those

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>risks arise for a couple of reasons. In particular, digital

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>access is still quite unevenly distributed in many countries, and

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>financial literacy is certainly not prevalent, especially among the economically disadvantaged,

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and we see that phenomenon even among people who ought

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to be better informed. Um, the recent saga with Game Stop,

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>where there was a speculative frenzy that was fueled by

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the robin Hood trading platform, which in principle made it

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>much easier for retail investors to be able to trade

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>both the stock and derivatives of this game stop company.

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Certainly led to a speculative frenzy. And the problem in

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that speculative frenzy, as in most others, is that retail

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>investors who came late to the party are the ones

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>who got burned. And of course we know we didn't

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>have to go far back. We only go back to

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight to find very sophisticated, often very

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>senior members of the financial sector not understanding some of

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the risks they were taking. So this is something that, um,

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen again and again. Finally, you've mentioned it a

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>few times already in this interview and in the book.

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>You keep coming back to trust as the basic glue

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of the financial system and something that has also traditionally

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>supported any effective currency. Um, what's the future of of

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of trust in this world and in this in this

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>new world that you paint m Are we going to

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>put the same kind of trust into these digital platforms

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 1>that we used to put into central banks, or are

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we going to potentially end up with government actually more

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 1>involved in our lives, as you said, and more aware

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of what we're doing. The great promise of bitcoin was

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>that it would replace trust in government institutions and traditional

0:12:55.600 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>financial institutions by essentially creating a public and census mechanism.

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I think what we have seen in the last few

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>years is that ultimately the government is still going to

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>have a crucial role. Cryptocurrencies and even stable coins, which

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>have their values linked to existing fear currencies, all actually

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>seemed to do a lot better when they get the

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>im perimeter of the government in some implicit form or

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the other. Bitcoin actually did a lot better once um

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the US Internal Revenue Service actually recognized it as a

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>financial asset that could be taxed. Bitcoin earners, we're not

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>happy about the taxes, but certainly were very happy that

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this implicit government recognition actually helped the bitcoin community flower.

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately you're going to need regulations for investor protection,

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>but also for these markets to move forward in a

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>stable way. Moreover, if you think about the promise of

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>decent allized finance and the ability to conduct transactions just electronically, still,

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>where the digital world meets the real world, you still

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 1>need the government to enforce property and contractual rights. Now,

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the risk, of course, is that bitcoin may have set

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>up a set off a revolution which ends up, as

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you suggested, Stephanie, with the government playing even more intrusive

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>roles in our lives. If central bank digital currencies do

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>take hold, we could lose any last vestige of privacy

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to the government, and that would be a certainly a

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>dystopian future um and one that we should be very

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>concerned about. It's not obvious that private payment systems and

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>providers will be displaced by the government, but certainly one

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>can see this happening in a society, and we should

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>guard against that. This is such a I mean, it

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>is such a complicated and fast moving area, and you

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>have been such a calm and lucid guide to it.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, issue a product. It's been my pleasure, Stephanie.

0:14:55.280 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for having me on. Well, that

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>was all very interesting, but many businesses in the US

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and Europe haven't had the luxury of thinking about the

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>future over the past year and a half. They've been

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>mainly focused on surviving the week, and the threat of

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcy still hangs over hundreds of thousands of small businesses

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, though some bold experiments underwear in Spain and

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>France might make all the difference. Our Spain economy reporter

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Jeanette Newman went to Valencia to eat payola and find

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>out more. M that's the sound of a chef turning

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>some brath rice and sat front into a Spanish culinary

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>treat pa. I'm in La Pepica, a restaurant that has

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>been serving pa in the city of Valencia for more

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>than a century. The recipes are traditional rice with vegetables,

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>rabbit and chicken. Peppe Ballagher is the third generation to

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>run this family restaurant. When he was a boy in

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties, he remembers Ernest Hemingway coming to dine

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>after bullfights. Hemingway would walk into the kitchen to taste

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the paia or make himself as angria, and I've always

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>had the memory of this person who talked to everyone

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and was really engaging. Lapapka has thrived as a temple

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to tradition in Valencia, but some of those old ways

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>are threatening the survival of small European companies as they

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>emerge from the pandemic. I went to Valencia to learn

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>more about one of those problematic old habits companies over

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>reliance on banks for financing. That compares to the much

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>wider range of options open to businesses that are recovering

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>from the pandemic in the US, and financing is so

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>much more common, especially in continental of UM than than

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>cabin markets and markets financing, so that's a huge difference.

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>That's Katia langen Booker. She's a law professor at Frankfort University.

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>There's no reason to say bank financing is bad in

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 1>any way. It's just as always the combination of the

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>two is where we would like to go. Selling stock,

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>issuing debt to investors, and other financing options known broadly

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>as capital markets. These tools aren't as widespread on the

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>continent as they are in the US. That's a problem

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is Europe's small firms emerged from the pandemic and need

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>to invest and restructure their debts. European Union leaders have

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>talked for years about the need for deeper capital markets,

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the South and in smaller countries. They've also

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>talked for years about the need to join up those

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>disparate markets into a capital markets union, but they've never

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>got very far. Why one hurdle is that small businesses

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>themselves are sometimes reluctant to let go of tradition. They

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>don't like the idea outside investors. They feel all letting

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>an outsider in and I don't really want that, and

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it's better, you know, I know my banker, I've been

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing business with them forever. Another hurdle is

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the supply of funds. One issues that banks in Europe

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of power to turn on and off

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the financing tab I spoke to all funds, so are

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>hard from investment from Okendo Capital I Madrid. The banks

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in the US. Everything is really specialized. Here are banks

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.880
<v Speaker 1>big of credit cards. They do uh capital h leases,

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they do working capital financing, they will finance your exports,

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>they will manage your payments. To ensure those powerful banks

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>didn't cut off funding during this crisis, European government's launched

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>loan guarantee programs. The power and reach of banks has

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>been an asset, channeling cheap loans backed by the state

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to companies in need. The programs ensured that many companies

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>got the funds they needed to cover basic expenses, but

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in the end it's still dead. People are starting a

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>worry that some bankruptcies have just been delayed. What if

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>banks are willing to restructure some loans or don't lend

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>some firms that need to invest to bounce back. Banks,

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>after all, have their own balance sheets to focus on.

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to Carlos Ferrando and Valencia to learn what

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the lack of financing options means for companies emerging from

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. He runs close to the startup that makes

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>water bottles and patented a collapsible helmet. You can reduce

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the volume of the helmet like more than in less

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>than one second. No, he's collapsed. No, it's about hamlet.

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>When Carlos started his company several years ago, you've got

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a taste for how hard it can be to get financing.

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>He says. It's tough for banks to understand the startup

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>business model. The risk team from the balance is the

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>same if the sp we the startup none with a restaurant.

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It this is my This is a reality that is

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>happening here in his pain today. So turtles end up

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>stopping many startups from growing. You cannot go to other countries.

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>You cannot increase your your your your sales team, or

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 1>your marketing or your digital marketing. No, and then you

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>start to get smaller and this is a black hole.

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Carlos was lucky and eventually got funding from Spanish venture

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>capital firms and a bank. He sells his helmets at

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the Museum of Modern Arts design store. He sold close

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to bottles to major companies, including Google. Then the pandemic

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 1>hit and funding dried up. Closker tried to pivot and

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>sell face masks. It didn't go well. He tapped some

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>stay back loans. It wasn't enough. In mind, with such

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>a good broad with such a good producde, we were

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a thread to lose the company. Valencia's regional financing agency

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>came to the rescue. It gave close to a type

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of equity loan that isn't considered debt and bolsters the

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>firm's balance sheet that's encouraged banks to keep lending. Carlos

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>says he considered leaving Valencia until the agency helped him

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>restructure his balance sheet. I know because the support of government.

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I would love to to to pay in the present

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Texas Here in the future. The man behind

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>these clever solutions for thousands of small companies like Kloska

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and La Pepica is Manuel Uwica. He's the head of

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Valencia's finance agency. Before Manuel joined the agency, he was

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a finance professor. Now he's putting years of academic expertise

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to work to ensure that viable firms survived the pandemic.

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean we need to do it otherwise I mean

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the this, this company is gonna be bankrupt. Manuell's agency

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>has also contributed millions of euros to restructuring fund that

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 1>will be run by Okendo, the investment firm. We heard

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>all phones of talk about banks earlier. They're all putting

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>money on the on the big companies, on the best

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>performing company. So the good businesses which are struggling uh nobody,

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Nobody looks after them. And and Manuela has been quick

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to support that. There are people like us UH that

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>invest in in those types of instruments and those type

0:21:55.320 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of situation. There's an important of happening in France too,

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>on a greater scale. Frances in the process of rolling

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>out a twenty billion euro fund to provide financing too

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>small and medium sized companies. Banks will issue equity loans

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to around twelve thousand French companies. The banks will keep

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>some of those loans on their balance sheet and spin

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>off the rest into a fund. That fund is partially

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed by the French state, that makes it less risky

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>for investors. Alberto nvo Potro founded in Boni's a credit

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>rating firm for smaller businesses. His company will analyze the

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>default risk of some of those French companies. This program

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>alone twice the size of the private marketing fronts and

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and twelve thousand companies is four time more than the

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>companies that have today in France access to some sort

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>of private debt private equity. The fund is expected to

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>draw new types of investors, such as insurance companies and

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>investment firms based outside France. In the past, they haven't

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 1>been able to easily beat on the prospects of so

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>many small French companies. These are players that didn't used

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to play in this market, so they're bringing insurance companies

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>directly into this market and this is new. In the

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>short term, this fund should help provide financing the companies

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>so that they recovered from the pandemic and invest. The

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>longer term play is to shape a copy side market

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>for these compex Many hurdles remain to develop a deep

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>capital market in Europe. The pandemic, though, has triggered a

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 1>shift in places like Valencia and France. New tools are

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>important so that European startups like Closca can get off

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the ground and so traditional firms like Lapepka can last

0:23:39.480 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>another one years. Jeanette Newman, Bloomberg News m H and

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>those conhapsible bicycle hermits really are very good. My sister

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>gave me one for my birthday. Best present ever. Now.

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It's often said that demography is destiny. How quickly your

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>population is growing and how old it is can have

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>an enormous impact on what kind of country you live

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in and how fast you grow. The US and much

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of Europe has been grappling with the consequences of people

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>living longer for some time, but probably no country has

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>seen such a dramatic shift in its demographic fortunes in

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the last few years as China. The latest Chinese censors

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>brought this out very clearly, and I thought it was

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>a good opportunity to get more from our chief Asia

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>economist Chang Shu in Hong Kong and Bloomberg's senior Asia

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Economy reporter, Michelle jam Risco in Singapore. So Chang, Michelle,

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for staying up to talk to me. And there's

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>long been discussion about China's one child policy and how

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that had had put it on course for a pretty

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>challenging time demographically, we've had this this latest census changing

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>were there any surprises there? Indeed, the demographic issues in

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>China have been discussed for some time, but the latest

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>census still brought some surprises. It really shows how acute

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the demographic challenges have become. The latest censors put the

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Chinese population at one point four billions later, up from

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>a decade ago, but the growth rate was very slow,

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>point five percent on average each year in the past decades,

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>down from the previous decades. And the biggest surprise in

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the way is the fertility rate. It was estimated at

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>one point three in twenty That would place China close

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to the low fertility case in the United Nations projections.

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>In such scenario, China's population started to decline around twenty

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>five that's much earlier than the government anticipated. In a

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen and again twenty nineteen reports, government reports, the

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>population peak was put at around twenty thirty so this

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>situation is really much more serious than previously anticipated. That's amazing.

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's it's basically it's taken five years off the

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 1>forecast for when the population was gonna was going to peak,

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>from from twenty thirty to twenty five means extraordinary. Looking

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>at this as an economist, what does that mean for

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>China's growth rate? Because obviously we know that China is

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be going from this very dramatic fast growth

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>period for several decades. We know that it's going to slow.

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>But does it mean it's going to slow that much

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>more dramatically. Yes, that does mean the demographic trained well

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>turned into a negative contribution to China's growth. The working

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>population has to already started to decline. The share of

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the working age population failed to six or three percent

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>in twenty from seven percent a decade ago. If we

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>look at international comparison, China's employment growth was already slower

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>than what other major economies experienced as similar income levels.

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>This suggests the slowdown in labor growth is an increasing

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>challenge for China to break through the middle income TRAPP

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>and UM and UH. If not dealt with, that really

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>would stop China rise into a developed economy status. Now

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we know that that the government's pretty concerned about this,

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and it has changed its one child policy. In fact,

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw that it's gone from not only being able

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 1>to have too but maybe have three children. Is that

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>going to come faster to reduce the challenges you've just

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>been talking about. Yeah, I mean that might not come

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 1>fast enough. And certainly there's three child policy itself is

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>not sufficient to tend the tight The relaxation you talked

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>about in twenty sixteen to allow two children only resulted

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in a very short term post to childbirth, and birth

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>jumped to just for two years in twenty sixteen seventeen,

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>but then quickly dropped again. So the latest relaxation to

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>three children may not really move the needle much or

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>for any sustained period. The the officials at the National

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Statistics Bureau of Statistics said the average number of desired

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>children is about at one point eight certainly below too,

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>so China will have to do more, much more, all

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of france employment attacks and housing policies to reduce

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>financial and time burden for raising children, Increasing mobility and

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>raising the retirement age is really critical for the country's

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>long term growth. Out book. I mean, it's interesting because

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the same challenge that lots of countries, certainly across Europe.

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>You have. Italy has got a shrinking population now and

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.959
<v Speaker 1>has made great efforts to try and effectively bribe families

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to have more children, has not had so much success.

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>In France, they seem to have been a bit more

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>successful at maintaining the fertility rate. And I don't. They

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>often say that's because of the fine wine and fine food.

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But Michelle, I'm risk let me, let me bring you

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in here. I'm interested in whether there are other countries

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>around the region that are concerned about the fertility rates

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and whether actually COVID has done anything to change the conversation. Yes, certainly, certainly.

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think several have endured this struggle for

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>many years, even before COVID. And outside of China, so

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>South Korea, Thailand, Singapore, Taiwan, and of course Japan. I'll

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>i'll really stand out. South Korea appears to be clinging

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to the world it's lowest fertility rate, and several of

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the others are in that territory as well, and Japan's

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>population could plunge another fifteen percent by according to UN estimates,

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>so COVID, as it has on many other issues, has

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>made a bad situation so much worse. We saw a

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>lot more record lows in fertility rates last year, and

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>there is hope that some of the demographic damage of

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the past year will be temporary. But the question still

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>remains on how to tackle this long term trend that

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>was cemented even before the pandemic. I think governments are

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>finding that it's quite difficult to work against cultural and

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>behavioral norms, and they've often joked about how difficult it

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>is just to convince people to have more babies. And

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Singapore Prime Minister Lesia and Loon mentioned this in an

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>interview with our own editor and a chief a couple

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of years ago. Our Type Hay Bureau chief recalls all

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the press briefings with the former Central Bank governor there,

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>who would exhort his young reporters in briefings to to

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>go home and get married and have children. But none

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of this seems to work. It is because we've had

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>most of the time when we talk about Asia, or

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>when we think indeed about the twenty one century and

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>what it's going to look like, we've tended to think

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:10.959
<v Speaker 1>it will be the Asian century, that the march of

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Asia is unstoppable. But if Asian economies continue to face

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 1>this demographic challenge, if populations continue to shrink, I mean,

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>does that really put some of that at risk? Does

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it really stop Asia's development at some level? Well, I

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's the big question. But that's what we're starting

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to see cracks and a lot of these measurements, and

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and not just the tapline growth figures though those are

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly focused on and a lot of these discussions, but

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of long term repercussions of these aging

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>societies and low fertility rates UM. One other measure that

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we look at a lot is the dependency ratio, the

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>lack of younger residents available to care for the elderly,

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>which certainly is a strain on government pension and healthcare systems,

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>but also of course the cultural and a personal strain UM.

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Labor markets are getting a rude awakening fewer working age

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>residents and automation and not moving fast enough to fill

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the void. Some institutions, like universities that banked on certain

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>enrollment numbers will now see strains when those applicants don't materialize,

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and there's an interesting one. In South Korea, the shrinking

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>population there is a concern, especially for the military, which

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is still an arms standoff with its northern neighbor. Military

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>officials are turning to robots for help, reasoning that, you know,

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>losses of robot soldiers are less tragic anyway. But you know,

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>any of these solutions, Um, you know, as we said,

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very difficult, and these institutions and aspects of

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>society are certainly understrain. But less we think it's all

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>downhill for Asia's population. And of course we should always

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>also be reminded that you can't you shouldn't generalize about

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>such an incredibly varied continent. UM. I think you found

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of economies in Asia that are actually have

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>got too many babies. Well, that's right, and there's two

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>notable exceptions in this category, and then they're very different

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>from each other, I would say too, But that's Indonesia

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Philippine. UM. Indonesia has been a bit more

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 1>vocal recently about needing to resolve this. We we had

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a story just a few months ago about the government

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>doubling down and efforts to push later marriages. Family planning

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>enhance birth control UH officials. They're arguing that such a

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>rapid pace of population growth threatens the living standard in

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the Philippines. There are some other real cultural debates on

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>how to address the situation. Religion also comes into play there,

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>where the majority Catholic country hasn't been quick to embrace

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the thought of having fewer children per family, and birth

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>control isn't very well available or supported, so, especially among

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>lower income individuals, lack of access to birth control, healthcare,

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and education has resulted in more unwanted or unexpected pregnancies,

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>which also have spiked during the pandemic. So there's been

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>less traction than the Philippines and how to get to

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a more desirable pace of population growth. But both countries

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>are are in that different camp as as opposed to

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the majority of of these other countries we discussed, and

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>as you said, COVID sort of throwing a lot of

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>these issues up into the air in an interesting way

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>in many places. Well, Michelle dan Risco Chang Shoo. Thank

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you very much. So that's it for this episode of Stephanomics.

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Will be back next week. In the meantime, please rate

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the show and follow our economics on Twitter for more

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>news and analysis during the week from Bloomberg Economics. This

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 1>episode was produced by Magnus Hendrickson, with special thanks to

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Professor Hua Prasad, Jeanette Newman, Chang Shoe, and Michelle jam Risco.

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike Sasso is executive producer of Stephonomics and the head

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Podcast is Francesca Levy.