WEBVTT - Tim Buckley on Finding His Purpose With Vanguard

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with very Results on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>I am super excited about this week's Masters in Business

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Live with Vanguard Group CEO Tim Buckley. If you recall

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic, we had started doing these live events. The

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>first one was with Ray Dalio, and then we didn't

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>one with Howard Marks, and then everything closed down and

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we kind of put it on hiatus. Well they're back.

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business Live is back, and this one with

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of the Vanguard Group was really quite wonderful.

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>It was at the big E T F Exchange conference

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>in Miami that was held last weekend. I got to

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:53.279
<v Speaker 1>sit with Tim for about an hour uh and ran

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>through about forty five minutes worth of questions, and we

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>took some questions from the audience. If you remember about

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>five years ago when it was announced that he was

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be CEO, we did ten questions with Tim Buckley,

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'll link to that in the description of the podcast.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>This completes my set. I have now interviewed all four

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard CEOs from Masters in Business Jack Bogel, Jack Brennan,

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Bill McNab and now Tim Buckley. Really quite a fascinating conversation.

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>A Tour to Force with no further ado. My Masters

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in Business Live discussion with the Vanguard Group CEO Tim Buckley.

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about what we have

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>going on right now. You've been a Vanguard for over

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, you've been CEO for five years. How's it going.

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>It's been a uh, it's been a learning time and

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's been a growth time, is what I would what

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I would say, very it's been, you know, an incredible opportunity.

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>If you think about what Vanguard's all about. UM, we

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>sit there each and every day figuring out how do

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we help people retire, better, put their kids through college, um,

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>afford that dream home. And they've been a I think

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone in the audience agree, it's been a it's been

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a tough few years for investors and that's the time

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to rally, and certainly for us, that has been a

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>time to show up and answer the bell for our clients.

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And so it's it's been a rewarding time. It might

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>seem odd to say that, but a really rewarding time.

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about your unusual career path.

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>You come out of Harvard undergraduate and you essentially get

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a job as like a gopher for Jack Bogel. You're

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>his Yeah, well it's they it was Lackey to the Lackey. Um,

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it's really that he had already working for Jack, working

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for Jack's guy. Well, I was suppose you're working for him,

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>but I really was working for Jim Norris, who was

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>his his assistant. We worked together for Jack Bogel, I

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>reported to Jack Bogel. Um. I found out later I

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>had the title of chairman's intern. And uh, I found

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>out I had that title because they weren't sure I

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>was going to make it through the summer. So I

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>come out of undergrad as chairman's intern. I thought that

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>was my title for good. After the summer they changed.

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I found out, well that you made it. Oh, you

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>have a job. You have a job. I didn't know

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>what was going to happen if the intern part didn't

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>work out. Um, but it's a uh finding finding Vanguard.

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was lucky to find Vanguard. Um. Why well,

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>coming out of school and I look, I have a

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>My oldest is a is a junior in school now,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>so I'm sure he'll face this. But I was the

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>typical senior and I was a little lost coming out

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of school. Um, I'm the son of a heart surgeon,

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh I grew up with someone who had a

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>ton of purpose in his life. I mean, very like

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>saving lives on a daily basis. That gives you a

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit of purpose. And I was lost, and he Um,

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't gonna go into medicine. Look, I didn't have

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the steady hands for it. And uh I didn't have

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the stomach for hospitals. And I love business. I love

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the market, so I want to go that we better struggling,

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was trying to find a place with

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the same type of purpose and and I was thinking,

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe I need to go back into medicine. My father

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>said to me at that time, save lives or help

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>people live better lives. Anything else in your wasting your time?

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And no, no, but he said, you don't need to

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>go into medicine for that. And then he actually suggests

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>I go talk to this company, Vanguard. Really, that was

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>your father suggest He said, hey, reach out to Vanguard,

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and and uh I was fortunate to come down and

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>interview with Vanguard, and look, I love at first night.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was a company owned by its climate

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>clients with a clear purpose, um, to really give them

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a fair shake and and provide them with a better future.

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And thirty two, late thirty two years later, here we sit.

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>What was it like working for Jack Bogel right out

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 1>of school? I mean that had to be a little well, you' lee,

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard wasn't the Vanguard we know today thirty years ago,

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>but it had to be a little intimidating. Well maybe

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I should have said I was both lost and a

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>little clueless. I mean, remember this is you're coming out

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of the super Internet. I mean, Vanguard's really no one

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>knows who Vanguard is. Um, so my friends they thought

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard was an airline um, which the second yeah, a

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>second guess would have been a healthcare company. Um. And

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know I used to have to describe it as

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>as uh the Pennsylvania version of our Boston competitor. So

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>um and uh so people didn't know Vanguard wasn't the

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>firm it is today. And then Jack Bogel, like he

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the household name. So I didn't show up intimidated. Um.

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>I showed up curious. And you know what he's uh,

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I asked a ton of questions and he's a guy

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that look wanted to teach a lot, and if you

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>were willing to listen, you'd learn a lot. So Bill

0:05:56.640 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 1>McNab was the CEO during the Finance ancial crisis, and

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>when I spoke with him, he talked about how that

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>created both challenges and opportunities for Vanguard. You're the CEO

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic, COVID lockdown. What sort of challenge couple

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of bear markets? We right, let's see uh inflation at

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a forty year high, tightest labor tas labor market of

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>our lifetimes. But yeah, other than that's been easy, easy times.

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>So so what sort of challenges and opportunities have the

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>past five years presented? Yeah, I think there's one of

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 1>a huge, a huge lesson for us, and it's brought

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>out in our our leadership team, the great leaders You've

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>got to embrace your reality. You can't be an optimist

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>or a pestimist. You just have to embrace the facts

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.799
<v Speaker 1>in front of you, brutal as they may be. And

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what we learned throughout this and you have to

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>plot the best path forward. And maybe if you human humor,

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll go back to kind of the first time

0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we talked, and you go back to that time, because

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Banguard had been gone through a decade of incredible success,

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>great growth, and look, our fund performance had been top

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>notch if you went back to that time, and there

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>our net promoter scores were really high, UM cash flow

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>outpacing the industry. So all signs were great. We had

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful opportunity in front of us. We looked at UM,

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we looked at a client success and we saw it

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>as hey, it was defined by the funds they hold it,

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>but also by the advice they got on those funds.

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And for forty years, like we've been hammering, hammering away

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>at the fund side that we had lowered the costs

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of investing and we had improved the quality of those

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>funds and you know, dary I say, we made a

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>change in the industry. Well, we started to think that

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe we could actually do that on the advice side,

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe we could be the vanguard of advice. Because we

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>had this this PAS group that Personal Advisor Services that

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>had some early success. So we set and said, okay,

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>like couldy build another engine of value engine one being

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>funds and engine to being advice. And if we could

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>do that, that would be wonderful. So right before doing that.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Right after we talked, we looked at h we have

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>like looking at our competitive position, do it constantly and

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we call it, hey, let's embrace the brutal facts. We

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>looked at the foundation of our position and it wasn't

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>as good as we thought of us. In fact, we're

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>low cost leader, but at that time we weren't. If

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you looked at our e t F assets UM at

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that time, less than half of them were actually would

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>have been considered lowest cost in the industry. Our NPS

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>scores are high, but they were declining UM because of

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>an antiquated digital experience. We were losing market share in

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the critical retirement, the four one K business UM. Internationally,

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we were spread too thin. We're serving clients that institutional clients,

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and that weren't core to who we are. We're all

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>about the individual investor. So looked at those said well,

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we've got to address those and we want to build

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>this new engine of value with advice. Great awesome. That

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>seemed like enough off and then COVID hit. We had

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a choice to make at that point, and the choice

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>was do we just delay everything and play defense, or

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 1>do we just add a pandemic to our list of

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 1>brutal facts. We chose the ladder and said this is

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we have no idea how long this is going to

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>go on, but we owe it to our clients to

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>emerge from it stronger and better than when we went in.

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And we had we prioritize all our strategic plans. We

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>had to figure out how to get them done while

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 1>people were remote forces to make some tough choices and

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in that time and some big investments, whether we're building

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>out our advice capabilities and building virtual teams to do it,

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>were you know, tough choices. In our retirement business, we

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>had to rebuild it soup to nuts and we partnered

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>with Emphasis, but that meant went and worked for Emphasis,

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>but it meant we could triple the resources um that

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we had, you know, focused on our retirement business. We

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.599
<v Speaker 1>looked in our our personal investor, our direct business and

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 1>said we have to organize it differently, and we have

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 1>to modernize that digital experience. And a tough decision overseas

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>basically pulled back from ation. It was all institutional clients

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and we gave back up hundred billion in assets, which

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:22.599
<v Speaker 1>most people think it's crazy, Billow. They were all institutional

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>separate accounts. That's that's not what we do here and

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>gave it back to them, and that's not not where

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>will excel. And it's just not what makes us take

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit tangent here, Like we were managing money

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>for people for basis point and a half and then

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>they were going ahead and charging seventy basis points. That's

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>not why we get out of bed, right. We want

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to see that an investor have a better return as

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a result. So maybe those tough choices and and uh,

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, five years later, we're sitting a lot better off.

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Whatever you identified as a structural fault line. How far

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>along do you feel you are on the process of hey,

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>we want to we're here, we want to end up there?

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you halfway there? Most of the way there? How

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>how do you think? And we talked about just getting started,

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it's one of those things that as

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>a leader you don't think about like, well, here's the

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>finish line and then I'm done. It's how far can

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>you push it and get the next team ready to

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>take over and continue that journey? Um. But for us,

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we measure our success in different ways.

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>We measure our success by how are our funds doing

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and we look back long term performance and right now

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you look back over ten years and our active funds,

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and we're out performing their competitive group averages sixty eight

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>percent or out performing their their benchmarks. If you look

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>at that et F Low Cost Leadership space, UM, there's

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>six percent of our assets would now be considered lowest costs.

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So we can actually have that low cost title back

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>if you will, UM, if you if you kind of

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>continue on to that advice journey that we had for us,

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it was just thankful the last time we talked to

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>me about eighty billion advised assets that sits at about

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>three out of seven point two trillion at seven point

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>two trillion, but it's growing it fifteen a year UM.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And they're they're six hundred fifty thousand clients that at

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the market last year and we're still

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>right on target with their goals. And for advice for

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>us too, is also a matter of you think about advisors,

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 1>how are we using model portfolios to make their result

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 1>results better? Um? Are we making sure that they have

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the right products from Vanguard to actually comple what they do?

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.719
<v Speaker 1>The right practices being in the advice business ourselves. We

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>can help improve their practices, justify the advice that they give, UM,

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>justify the fee, and you know, just simple things like hey,

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>the value of tax loss harvesting. How do you make

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that that apparent to people? UM, something that for us

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>save our clients about three million or four months that alone,

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 1>and our digital experience. You asked about that that one.

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you how far along we are in

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>modernizing that we're about seventy the way and doing that

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and so great change. So so you mentioned the pandemic

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit of the challenge. Everybody is working

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>remote for a long time. How do you maintain corporate

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>culture with twenty thousand, eighteen thousand employees when the vast

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>majority of them are not coming into the office. I

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's a it's tough for every company out there,

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>UM when you've hired thousands of people who have never

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.719
<v Speaker 1>set foot on a campus and you often model the

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>behavior and the culture UM. And so the first thing

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>for us is it's it's how it's in the leaders

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that you you actually select, and that's so crucial for us.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>So in our screening, you get aught interview questions. We're

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out are you purpose driven? Like are

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you actually someone who's gonna be purpose driven? But then

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>we have something that I learned from one of my

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 1>mentors that you've talked with, Jack Brennan before, a former

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 1>chairman CEO UM, and he always established this early on

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in the culture that it would be client, crew, self,

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>always in that order. And a lot of companies will

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>say that like, it will put the client first, but

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't have another choice like our client's own us.

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>We don't have anyone else to serve. And then during

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and being cleared, us like, yeah, but the

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>only way we can mess that up is if people

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>start putting themselves itselves in front of the client. And

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>so the leaders there we have to say, okay, we

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 1>have to enforce it. It's always the client first. And

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>as a leader, then that means that you have to

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>take care of the crew before yourself. So we emphasize

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that wholy that leaders are going to actually make sure

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that crew know that they care more about their success

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>than their own. So for me, it's it's more important

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to see my team's success than Tim Buckley's success. And

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing how that helps build a team if you're

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>true behind it, and it builds the collaboration on that team,

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and then down the road is somewhere where you put yourself.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>But that is a cord to our culture. We're able

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to do it in a virtual world. But now that

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>people are basically back for three days a week, it's

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot easier to reinforce it um and people to

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>see it when they're actually face to face. So back

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>three days a week, um home optional two days a week.

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>How does that structure change what you expect people to

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>do when they actually come to the office. And so

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure a lot of people have been through this

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>where they come into the office, and we had it

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>at first when people came into the office and they

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>were on teams when they're in the office. So what

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we're finding we're finally like, okay, there, they come into

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the office, they say hello to each other, they sit

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>down their desk, and they go on video all day long. Well,

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that defeats the purpose of actually those serendipitous moments you're

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>bumping into each other, trading ideas, you're sitting in a

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>conference room, you're talking to each other, building on everyone's points.

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're on teams, she said, why is that, Well,

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it was because not everyone was coming in and you

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>still had some people at home and some people or

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you didn't want to travel from building and building. We

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>have a nice campus and not everyone wanted to travel,

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and we just said no, Actually, when you're here, like first,

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone's got to be here, and then secondly, when you're here,

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we expect you'd actually interact with each other, not on teams.

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know you you want to see that that

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>teams usage drop in the middle of the week and

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>go up on the tail n This because Monday and

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Friday or the virtual days. So we actually had to

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>establish that norm that people have gotten so used to

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>using teams all the time in the middle of the week,

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>we had to move people away from it. So let's

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>stick with the leadership theme and you come to the

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>CEO row with a unique leadership background. You used to

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>describe yourself as c I O square you were Chief

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Investment Officer and chief information officer, an unusual combination, and

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>then to be elevated and CEO. How does that background

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>affect how you think about the role of chief executive officer. Yeah,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I think for every CEO you need perspective and I

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>think both the CIO jobs gave me incredible perspective. The

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>first one would have been back in if you think

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>about I became c I O right at the tail

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>end of the Internet. Craze I was on the web

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and then took over his uh Chief Information Officer, and

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that was a time of incredible hype. Right the Internet

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to change the world, Oh my gosh, will

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>change how we actually consume you know, video, how we game,

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>how we do business, and everyone is talking about that.

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>You remember that well, and then it didn't happen right

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>away and everyone ended up disappointed. We know what happened

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>over the long run, it reminded you know, back then

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>we we used to talk about something that I've tried

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to bring back for people, which is that that Gardner

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>hype cycle, if you remember it, and that Gardner hype

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>cycle is something where whenever there's a disruptive technology and

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes in, there's a lot, there's a lot of

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>hype and high expectations. So unrealistic expectations followed by something

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen, you have disillusionment. You have the troth of disillusionment,

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and people give up on it. But the true change

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>comes when hey, you know what those loyal to that

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>technological change figure out over not one, two, but three

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>five years how to drive change and how to leverage it.

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's been true through time. It was true whether

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it's with the internet. You can plout it with mapping

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the genome with E v S, and it's true in

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>investments or you have to look at a change. And

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, people talk today about okay, a private equity,

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>some magic elixir, if I can just get private equity

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>into my client's portfolios. It's it's not true. I mean

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>private equity there is greater return dispersion, but the returns

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>on private equity or often below the S and P

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>five hunter on average. So you've got to do your work.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>You've got to see through and say, okay, well that

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>means that I need to keep fees low and I

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have to get with the right GPS, etcetera. And so

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>you can drive you can figure out where's that long

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>term change going. So those two jobs give you a perspective.

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>So okay, avoid that hype and how do you see

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>through the long term change that you want that you

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>think should you should drive home? Um, they're probably different

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in how you embrace change, and I see the world's

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:53.360
<v Speaker 1>always changing, right, So that's the dangerous thing. Like how

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>people code, where you host, where you host something, all

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>of those things those have you know, how applications talk

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>to each those have totally totally changed since I was

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>c I O. And um, but if you think in investments,

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>certain things like there are more rules in there, like

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that proven investment philosophy of diversification. That's not going to

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>change overnight, So you have to be more careful in

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the investment world. And both of those give me a

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>balance of CEO. So Vanguard now has a hardcore tech

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>geek as CEO. How has that affected the company? How

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>has that affected how you approach the use of technology

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in the world of investment. Yeah, like, thanks for calling

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>me a tech geek. I'll think that as a compliment. Um,

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that's how it's meant. Yeah. Um, for us, it's technology

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.679
<v Speaker 1>is the embodiment of our service. We're we've always been

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a virtual company. Just used to be through the mail

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and wanting hutter number when I joined. So, um it's

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>always been that way for us. So it needs to

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>be a necessary area of investment. And I mentioned this.

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>When you lead with technology What can happen to you

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is you can if you don't continually make the investment,

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you fall behind because it gets so costly to address

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.479
<v Speaker 1>your legacy. It becomes an albatross your kind of your

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>legacy applications. They become a burden and they slow you

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>down and they slow down what you can do for

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>your clients. We we made the choice of you know what,

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to eliminate that legacy. And a few years

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>ago we said on whether you're investing directly with your dress,

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>investing through an advisor, whether you're investing through retirement plan.

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.479
<v Speaker 1>The platforms that we deal with our service infrastructure, our

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>investment infrastructure cloud native. So we've rebuilt, we're about seventy

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>four percent of the way through of rebuilding all our

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>applications to be cloud native. Now that sounds cool, Like

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>what does he give you? It builds up your your resiliency,

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>but your speed. And I'll give you an example. Um,

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe the team won't love that, I'll use this one.

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>But we we launched a mobile app last year, right

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and um it was it fell flat on its face.

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>The mobile app like it was panned. Our science hated

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the mobile app and in the past when you did that,

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>well you had to live with it, like you have

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to wait for nine months to fix the problem. But

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>because it was built cloud native, that meant you could

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>make changes to it. You can make the changes every

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 1>two three days. And so we did two hundred releases

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to it in nine months and that app has gone

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>way past the satisfaction ratings client satisfaction ratings of the

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>past one and continues to grow. And so being cloud

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.719
<v Speaker 1>native can give you incredible speed resiliency. Last year are

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>availability and you never get a good article written when

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you have high availability. You just want to avoid the

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>bad ones. We're nine seven available for our client application.

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>So um, that's a number I had seen before. So

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.479
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about fees. The Vanguard effect

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>has been well documented. Not just the spaces that you're

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>in force everybody else to be more fee competitive, but

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>even spaces you first start looking at immediately has a

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>ripple effect and fees dropped. How much lower can van

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>good push fees? Half of my portfolio? Is it three bibs?

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>How about too? Okay? But aren't you going to run

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 1>out of room eventually? Well, the way we're we're built

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>is it's the way we're being client own. It's the

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 1>way we return profits to our clients. That's the dividend.

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>That's the dividend that we pay out is to to

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>lower that expense fore issue, and it's it's how we're

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>built and it comes with those are economies of scale

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>um Every year, just like any other company, we have

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>our expenses that includes kind of the big investments for

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>making in the business, and we have our revenue one

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>and we end up you know, we've had been like

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>you'd be very profitable year after year. Well, what do

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you do with that? You can? Number one, you'll put

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it back into the business. There's plenty of capital put

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>back into the business if it with projects that will

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>meet your cost of capital. So you do that. You

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>have to make sure you have enough liquidity. You're reserves too,

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>so if you have there's a big bear market, you

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>want to protect your investments, et cetera risk event. But

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>then other companies will retain earnings, the pay a dividend

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>go to a family. What we do is you say,

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>okay with that. With the that capital, we'll give it

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>back to our clients in the form of lower expenses.

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's been a pretty powerful cycle, and that's why

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>year after year we're able to kind of lower expense ratio.

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So got UM. I mentioned Jack Brennan. I bumped into

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>him in the hall the other day. He was he

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>stepped down his his CEO in two thousand and eight

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and he said, Tim, when I joined Vanguard, our expense

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>ratio is eight eight basis points and it's you know,

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>less than a tenth of that. Now, wow, that's that's

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive. So many industries where you actually get more

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and pay dramatically less. And this has been the history

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of the firm from day one. This is a core

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of Jack Bogel's philosophy. UM. A lot of people think

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it's all about passive, but Jack began as an active manager.

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You're now about active at Vanguard. Tell us a little

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>bit about what you guys are doing on the active

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.239
<v Speaker 1>side of asset management. It's a funny fact of being there.

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Thirty two years I joined Vanguard and UM index was

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>only of our assets active active. So we were active

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>firm when when I when I joined Vanguard UM and

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's evolved over time to be to be

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a index. We firmly believe in actively firmly believe a

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>low cost active, but it's a placed in the portfolio

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>has changed if you think about for most clients, it's

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>an index at the core, and if you're going to

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>if you have the the risk app type for active,

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it's going to play much more of a satellite um

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And so as we look at it, we we look

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>towards strategies that might have well maybe it's the same

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher you'd hope for information ratio, but

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>you have a bigger risk budget standard deviation, and so

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you look for more excess excess return, so that plays

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>for a better compliment to the index portfolio. Now, how

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>do we think about active managers? People talk about yes people,

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it's philosophy and process and you'll go through all of those.

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>But we found the best way to evaluate one is

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they can tell you what their edges,

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>what is their active edge, and it has to be

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>one that can't be easily duplicated in the market because

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>in a zero sum game right where you're competing with

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>other managers, you want one an edge that nobody else has.

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 1>So you can't just say we have smart people and

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>they collaborate well with technology, right everybody's got smart people

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>and everyone's got great technology. You can't just say you

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>know what, we think differently. We want you to prove it.

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>So how do you think differently? So you've talked with

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the leaders of Bailey Gifford. Where do they hire from, Well,

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't hire from business schools, right, They'll hire military

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>intelligence officers and have them work actually I'm serious with

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the poet and with someone else, and they keep them

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>in pods of teens that they work together, but they

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 1>don't collaborate. They don't want group things. They don't let

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>them work with other groups. And then you measure do

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>they truly keep that edge of differentiated thinking? We do

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 1>it to ourselves are active fixed income group against super

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>smart people supported by great technology. But what's there? What's

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that edge that no one else could duplicate in there?

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>It comes from our structure. If you think about the

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that we have at like, we're client owned, so

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we're delivering as close to at costs as possible. We're

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lower fee than than almost everybody out there.

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>That means a low hurdle rate. What do you do

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>with that? Well, for us, that means that hey, when

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not getting paid to take risk. When spreads are

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>tight like right now, then don't take a lot. You

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have to, you don't have to make you don't

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>have to take that extra spread or go out and

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>credit quality and take extra risk there because look, you

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 1>have a low expense ratu. You can be higher quality

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and you equal or maybe you fall behind just a

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:03.919
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and you'll keep a law of dry powder.

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>And so then when you have spreads wide now you

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>have you know, dislocations in the marketplace, you have plenty

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>of dry powder, and you deploy it and with that

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>strategy you I'll perform over the long run. And I

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that ten year performance. Do you look at our

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 1>active fixed income. I believe nine percent of the funds

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 1>have outperformed their competition over the long run. So their

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>competitive group averages. So it's a and straight up the

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>numbers huge, So it's a it's a differentiated way. But

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we measured like do they truly deploy that black powder?

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>They that dry powder? Did they take advantage of it?

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned Bailey Gifford. I bet a lot of

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>people here in the States don't know them been around

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>for a century in the UK. If not longer highly regarded,

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>great track record. I want to put that in context

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>of leadership. You're reaching out to I guess not a competitor,

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>but appear saying how can we get better? How often

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>does to car What sort of strategies do you put

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>into place? How often are you saying, Hey, let's sit

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>down and talk shop with our outside managers or with

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>outside firms with you know, Bailey Gifford is a great entity.

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>They were they were managing money for one of the

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>public pensions for Yeah, So we have we have a

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>team um who are constantly out there looking for who

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>could be great outside managers, and they will look for

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that active edge and look for that differentiation, and they're

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>constantly out there so that if there's an opportunity that

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>pops up into fund or there's an idea for fund,

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that we actually have a list that we can go

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to right off of people that we respect and that

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>we could work with, and that working with Vanguard, you know,

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>one of these say one of the differentiators is that

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we're so long term. They have such a long term

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>focus that they truly can have a low turnover and

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>stick with an idea, not worry, Hey they're underperforming for

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>two years, that like we're going to move on from them,

0:28:56.680 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So we're probably a lot more patient. Um. But at

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the same time, you know, highly educated and how the

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in the questions we ask So you joined the leadership

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>team in two thousand and one, which is you know,

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>going back now, Yeah, a decade into your career. That's

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty fast advancement. I assume you were relatively young

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>compared to the rest of the leadership team. How do

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you get from that entry to senior management? What was

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the career path like from there? Yeah, I was I

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>was young and over my head really Oh yeah, definitely,

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean I was. I had been running the web

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and that was that was enough for me. Um. I

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, unfortunately, back then, our our c I O

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>UH suddenly passed away and Jack Brennan asked me to

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>step in and lead our technology group. Um. It was

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a surprise choice for everyone. It was a surprise for me,

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and I remember talking to him about it going pushing

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>back a little bit, like, you know, like I don't

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>have the I T background that other people would have,

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And he said to me, Tim, I'm not asking you

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to code, I'm asking you to lead and then he

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>went through the competencies that you would expect me to

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>bring to the table and how I could bring our

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I T division to the next level. That stuck with me.

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>A couple of things stuck with me. It was the

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>importance of competencies and developing those competencies and people and

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the importance of taking risk in the development of people.

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Another thing occurred to me probably a year later, and

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that was that, Um, and we're big believers in doing

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>three three sixties on people, so getting feedback. Every leader

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>should go out and get feedback not just from their boss,

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>but from their peers and those people on their teams.

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So I did a three sixty. And you know, it

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>always starts off with your strengths and where where you're

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>doing well, and say like, oh gosh, you know Tim's

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>strategic and he's got he's got to drive, and he

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>gets results in collaborative and love and everything. And then

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I get down to the Okay, here's what his weakness

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is when he needs to work. And you know, the

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>bottom was patients and we can come back to that

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:10.719
<v Speaker 1>some other time. Yeah, yeah, I know, UM, and it's

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>still a weakness. UM. But second from the bottom was

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>developing talent. Man. That was stung because I realized I

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>had been a taker all this time, not this, not

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a giver. And you had been mentored by Jack Brennan,

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>by Jack Brennan and Bill McNabb and Mike Miller and

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, all these people from time who had taken

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>an interest in my career, and they took an interest

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in my career, and when people asked about me, I

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>hadn't done as much. Now, there might have been one

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>or two people that said I was the best thing

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to happen to their career, but um, by and large,

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't done enough. And so I spent the next

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty two years saying okay, well how do

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I develop talent? And I would tell you that for me, um,

0:31:56.040 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>my proudest moments of Vanguard are when someone that I

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>have mentored ends up on our our senior leadership team,

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and fully half of that team I can say I

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>hand it, had a hand and mentoring them along. So

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it takes conservative effort, and for a leader, it's there's

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing more rewarding because that's your That's the way you

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>have exponential impact if you can pass on your lessons

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:20.239
<v Speaker 1>and someone else builds on them and they teach them

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to somebody else. That's that's where a leader can have

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>true impact. How does a company the size of Vanguard

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>institutionalize that sort of mentoring, leadership grooming UM bringing up

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the next generation, getting people to reach outside their comfort

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>zone and become better colleagues, workers, and eventually leaders at

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>every at every leadership level. UM. We do talent oversight

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>where we'll go through and you you should know your

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>teams and you'll know your leader. You're like, everyone knows

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>their leadership team, people in their group, where they're stronger competencies,

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>where they need to develop, and we will talk about

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>we constantly rotate talent to develop them and rotate rotate tent. Well, look,

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean the same way that I was rotated between

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what would be a corporate area to service

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>area to an I T two investments and you wrote

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you give up your best talent And it's odd most

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>companies don't. Do you want to hold on your best talent,

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but advantguard you're rewarded for give up your best talent

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.719
<v Speaker 1>and make sure they develop and how do you develop them?

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And we do what We rotate people based off of

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>their competencies we know. Think of them as buckets that

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you need to fill. And it may be okay, well

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>what someone's you know, vision and strategic thinking, And it

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>might be how well they know operations management? How good

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>are they developing crew? And these are buckets that you're

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to fill along the way. You can't fill

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>them all in one job and or with one boss.

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Some bosses will be better than others. So we do

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.959
<v Speaker 1>if we understand those about our people, then we rotate

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and we know what the next one or two or

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>three rotations will be, and we do it around their competencies.

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>As we rotate them. There's a big there's a give up.

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Someone loses there their expertise in a role. How do

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you But what they're gaining is context. They're gaining context

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and becoming a better leader, better decision maker. You just

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>have to It's a system you have to balance because

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't have everyone rotate to a new new area.

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>You have to keep institutional knowledge and really sandwich people

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>like experience on the top, experience on the bottom, and

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you kind of someone fresh in the middle. So you

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Bill McNabb, who was your predecessor as well as

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Jack Brennan, his predecessor. Those those are two rock star

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>finance ceo s. What's it like for you as a

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>CEO still having access to their expertise and experience. You

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>said you just bumped into Brennan. Always tell us a

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit about how you use the legacy former CEOs

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>who are still around and how cool it is. I

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>mean what I mean two very different leaders and um,

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>two fabulous mentors and great friends, um, both of them.

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>And they have a different way to see the world

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and see leadership. And I would encourage everyone out there

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that often people come into a role. Oh, I gotta

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>put my impromature on there. I can't talk to the

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>past leaders and look these um. Whenever I we Tay

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>make a big decision to Vanguard, and I talked about

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>some of them, I would actually talk to Bill and

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>talk to Jack first. I would understand, you know, why

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't we make this decision before? How do we get

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to this point? They would give me the historical context

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>and often give you information that oh I didn't think

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 1>about that, and you might adjust, you might not. And

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they are accessible. Um. They made us leave our phones backstage,

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>but I could text right now. You got yours. I could.

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:50.879
<v Speaker 1>I could text Bill right now and you get back

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to me in five minutes. Um. But neither of them

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>will ever reach out to me and really unsolicited advice.

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Not Kate, Tim, what are you doing? This? This is?

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.359
<v Speaker 1>This is this is one way. If I reach out

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to them, they get back to me, But they don't

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>reach out and go, hey, what are you thinking about?

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Where did you do that for? And UM, no, it's uh,

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>it's it's great. You know I mentioned that, UM, a

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>tough decision where the retirement business. Both of them said, hey,

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we should have done that earlier, and so it's reinforcing

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.919
<v Speaker 1>to have that. UM. And we're looking and they're they're

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>proud that we just became in that business number one

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in competitive NPS, so that businesses is totally shifted and

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>turned around. Um. But they were a hundred percent behind it.

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's go back one more CEO to Jack Bogel,

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Obviously you might give me some un solicited advice. Well,

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say for sure. He never was shy

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>about sharing his opinion, and clearly a lot of his

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>philosophy is in the DNA of Van Guard. Put the

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>client for us, keep costs as low as possible, always

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>try and make the investor better. But when we look

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 1>at Vanguard today, there's a lot of things that Jack

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>would have kicked and screamed about E t f s.

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>To begin with, he was not a big fan. Why

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 1>do we have to invest overseas American companies participating that?

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And then lastly, the possibility of putting private equity and

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>retirement accounts. He would be furious. I would imagine he

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 1>pushed back on me on the web and would have

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.919
<v Speaker 1>good debates on that. And I think his vision, though,

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what was so powerful, and that's what remains. This

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>this idea of putting the client first and giving him

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a fair shake. That's what you know, that's what defines us.

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 1>People want to define us as a low cost index

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>fund um, which Jack Bowood should be and was incredibly

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>proud of. I mean, he brought this this idea that

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 1>existed out there and brought it mainstream. And you know,

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>so many people have done something to so much to

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 1>extend that. But he was the visionary behind indexing for

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the main street investor, and so we want to remember that,

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>but that's not all he was. He was that vision

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of how do you put the client first. How do

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you let him keep more of their return? So we look,

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>what are other ways to do it? Because it started

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>with low cost active but how do you do it

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>through advice? You know, how do you do it directly

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>advising clients? How do you help advisors become better at

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing so people keep more of the return,

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>they have a better chance of raising the investment success

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of their clients. So that's how we define what we do.

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Private equity is just one of those that in private equity, look,

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I said, it's not an easy game. There is the

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>first the average return is typically a little bit below

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the SNP and there's a wide dispersion of returns. So

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 1>we're going into that. How do we make sure that

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>our clients are on the right side of that distribution?

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know, relative fees matter, and their access matters,

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and we had to vet all of those. That's very

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>consistent with the original vision of anger M. So let

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>me throw a quote of yours back at you and

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and let you this could be danger pursue this quote.

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Our clients should not only expect change, but demand change.

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Explain that, well, there are owners um and you never

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 1>want to be complacent as a business, so as our owners,

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they should actually demand that we get better and better.

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>And the other one is that if a company wants

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:22.439
<v Speaker 1>to lead, if if you want to lead, you don't

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>get to set the pace that you go at. Now

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>most people would think that, okay, if you're the lead,

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>you're the one setting the pace of the race. But

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the truth matter, No, it's it's it's set by like

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:34.879
<v Speaker 1>the performance of your competitors, you have to stay ahead

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 1>of them and the expectations of your clients. If our

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>clients have high expectations, we will keep our pace high

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.399
<v Speaker 1>and we have to exceed both of those year after year.

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And so we have always going to make sure we

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>have the team, the plan, and the capabilities to do

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>just that. So before we take questions from the audience,

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you. You've been at Vanguard for thirty

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>two years, you've been CEO for just over five years.

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>What's next? What comes next for the Vanguard Group? Verry,

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a what everyone could expect from us is to

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 1>continue what we'd find a straightforward but compelling strategy, and

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it's to make sure we're performed producing the top performing

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>funds that we have the top performing funds and ets

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.800
<v Speaker 1>out there, will wrap them with low cost, scalable advice

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and deliver them on a world class digitally enabled platform.

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Now it sounds simple to do, but you've got to

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>bring those all together. And if you do that well

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and you can keep improving it, you'll create value into

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the future. So let's let's good answer. Let's uh go

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to some of the audience questions. The finance industry's record

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:47.839
<v Speaker 1>on diversity is not so great. What is Vanguard doing

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to lead the industry to faster change. It's one of

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 1>those ones we put a first, You've got to have

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 1>a big goal out there. So for us, it's will

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to grow the diverse your anger, but by we'll

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 1>put the goal out there that, um, every level of

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:07.320
<v Speaker 1>leadership should look just like the rest of a Vanguard.

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:09.320
<v Speaker 1>And so we looked at and said that is a

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 1>goal that is attainable, but you need to have a

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>distinct strategy around it. So we we have chief Diversity

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Officer that works with all of our division heads to

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we have the right strategy, the right

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:25.800
<v Speaker 1>practices around how we do you know, attraction and retention,

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>but critically development. You bring people in, you've worked hard recreema,

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>but you're making sure they're developing in the way that

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>we talked about and success for success for us in

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the past five years, we've seen you know, both our

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 1>diversionary or leadership go up six percentage points. So I

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 1>like this question, what's one of the biggest lessons you

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>learned in how to develop that talent? You've you've got

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:51.839
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to be candid um and you've

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 1>got people shy from giving people feedback and it's it's

0:41:56.920 --> 0:41:59.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone wants it um. It never feels good. So you

0:41:59.880 --> 0:42:02.760
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out how will someone receive that feedback,

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to make it about getting them to

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the next level. And if I can, you can give

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:11.359
<v Speaker 1>feedback to any anybody, if they believe you're on you're

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>on their side. And so how do you put it

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:14.839
<v Speaker 1>in a way that they're going to say, Okay, well

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>this is to help you get the next level. One

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of my observations is or how can we work on that?

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And that is a great way to get someone to

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 1>receive feedback? And then my advice to other people if

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to do up yourself, something I've always done

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:28.440
<v Speaker 1>is I ask for feedback and gosh, that makes it

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 1>so much easier on a boss. And I used to

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like poor Bill McNab would do a review and say, hey,

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:35.320
<v Speaker 1>great year to me, like all right, tell me what

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I need to do better, not tell me like what

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 1>would the team say? And I would stay after him

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>until he gave me something to grow on and at

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>any level, like, I don't care what level you're at,

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you should have two or three things you can grow on.

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And you're asking for feedback even the CEO. I asked

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>for feedback, and I make sure my team, even Greg Davis,

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you could you have more accomplished ce io. Greg Davis

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is gonna hear where he's great, but he's always gonna say, Greg,

0:42:58.000 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>your next level leadership, here's what you would work on.

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>And so it's gonna be you know, it's gonna be

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that for him or for Karen Reese or for whomever

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is on the team. What was your biggest career mistake

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and what did you learn from it? Which one do

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 1>we want to choose here? I would say that, um,

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it's I got a few of them, but let's go

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:23.439
<v Speaker 1>with conviction a lesson here that um, I'll go back

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in time that you know I mentioned that that hype,

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and I was the web guy, and I was convinced

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the world was gonna change overnight and online advice was

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:35.960
<v Speaker 1>going to take off and aggregation would be a key

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>element of it. And I was selling hard and we

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:45.920
<v Speaker 1>invested a lot of money in it, and nothing happened, right.

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh remember talking to my boss at the time. He said,

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I knew that wasn't gonna work out. And I said, well,

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 1>like Jack, why don't you say something or do something?

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And uh, he said to him, you had to learn

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that just having conviction doesn't make troph It's not enough.

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:04.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not enough. And um, but I also learned all

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 1>those things that I conviction about, like there's another lesson,

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 1>there's over time you stay with it, like like digital

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 1>advice is accepted now, and those things you also you

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:16.319
<v Speaker 1>have to be You have to just because it didn't

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 1>work doesn't mean you leave it behind. You know, when

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about the things Jack Bogel wouldn't have loved.

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I meant to ask you about direct indexing. This is

0:44:26.160 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a big new push you guys are doing. Tell us

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about that. Does that fit into the

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>sphere of digital or how does that work within Vanguard,

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but directed We looked at direct indexing years ago. We

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>started thinking about it. What's the way that you you

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 1>could disrupt the E T F or or the mutual

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>fund like is there you always should be looking is

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 1>there a better way to do it? And directed nexting

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>existed for a while. It was reserved for the ultra

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:58.839
<v Speaker 1>ultra high net worth and we could see that there's

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>huge tax benef it's for a lot of investors and

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 1>using direct indexing. But we started to see customization is

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 1>people care more about the values of how they invest,

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and could you create portfolios where you're not gonna undermine

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 1>someone's retirement, but let them invest a court of their values.

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:17.759
<v Speaker 1>And we got very interested and said, rather than hope

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that it goes away or doesn't undermine, why don't we

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>embrace it and see if we can grow it and

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>see if it is a better way to do something.

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:27.319
<v Speaker 1>And we'll find out over time, but we'll be we'll

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be investing heavily in And this is our our final question.

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 1>If you could go back to your early days of

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:38.720
<v Speaker 1>senior leadership and and give yourself a piece of advice,

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 1>what would that be? I one I've learned through time,

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and UM, it's always ask more questions, UM, fewer statements,

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 1>more questions and listen, listen to the answers, and encourage

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the debate. I catch myself still doing it to a UM.

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:04.359
<v Speaker 1>I have to do it, UM. And you you're gonna

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>learn so much more if you let that team go.

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 1>And one thing I've learned, you know you've always heard

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you can like you may not be the smartest in

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the room. I grew up with this. You may not

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 1>be the smartest in room, Tim, but you'll be the

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 1>hardest working. And that's that's how I grew up. And

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I came to learn something else, which is UM. You know,

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>even if you think you're the smartest in the room,

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you're never smarter than the whole room. So in time,

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I've learned, okay that like you were not gonna be

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:33.319
<v Speaker 1>smarter than than the room. How do we bring out

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 1>the best in that room? How do we get them

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to collaborate? How do we get them build knowledge on

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 1>each other? And you'll get you'll produce great things as

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a team. Wow, that was really quite an hour of

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 1>fascinating conversation with Tim Buckley, Vanguard's CEO. If you enjoy

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 1>this conversation well, feel free to check out any of

0:46:54.320 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>our previous five D discussions we've had over the past

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>eight years. You can find that at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube,

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. Sign up from my daily

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>reading list at rid Halts dot com. Follow me on

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at rid Halts. You can follow all of the

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Family of podcasts on Twitter at podcast I would

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>be remiss if I did not thank the crack team

0:47:22.080 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that helps us put this conversation together each week. Robert

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Bragg is our audio engineer, Paris Wald is my producer.

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Sean Russo is my head of research. Latika val Bron

0:47:36.120 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 1>is our project manager. I'm Barry rid Halts. You've been

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.