Speaker 1: The World Economic Forum recently held its annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland.
Speaker 1: Global leaders from around the world, business executives from around
Speaker 1: the world all gathered in one place for a series
Speaker 1: of events, parties, meetings, in secret, behind the scenes, and
Speaker 1: so many of these instances. So why should you care?
Speaker 1: How much influence to these people have over lives and
Speaker 1: what happens there in Davos, Switzerland. As their levant, founder
Speaker 1: and owner of Rebel News was there to hold their
Speaker 1: leader's fee to the fire, to hold people accountable. He
Speaker 1: was able to get interviews with people like Gretta Thunberg
Speaker 1: more or less was able to pin them down and
Speaker 1: ask them questions. But Greta Thunberg, he asked her questions
Speaker 1: about her role and really pushing pain and suffering on
Speaker 1: so many people around the world with her climate policies.
Speaker 1: He was able to interview Fighter CEO Albert Borla about
Speaker 1: misleading the public about the efficacy of Fiser's COVID vaccine.
Speaker 1: So we're going to talk to Ezra about what really
Speaker 1: goes on, what really happens behind the scenes, and how
Speaker 1: much control these people have over our lives. I hope
Speaker 1: you enjoyed this conversation with isra Levant, founder and owner
Speaker 1: of Rebel News, as our Thanks so much for coming
Speaker 1: on the show. You guys do really great work at
Speaker 1: Rebel News, so I appreciate what you do. And you're
Speaker 1: the founder and owner, so I appreciate you creating such
Speaker 1: a great news organization. Well thanks for saying that. I mean,
Speaker 1: we we have a contrarian style. Our motto is telling
Speaker 1: the other side of the story, and on some things
Speaker 1: like the World Economic Forum, it's really rare to have
Speaker 1: skeptics because the media party, as I call it, the
Speaker 1: mainstream media or the regime media, they don't seem to
Speaker 1: have any skeptical questions for the World Economic Forum, but
Speaker 1: there's a lot of questions that should be asked to
Speaker 1: that way. What's really strange is that there's this alignment,
Speaker 1: at least in America. You know, it's not really just
Speaker 1: Republican or Democrat. They're sort of we call the uniparty
Speaker 1: now because they share a lot of the similar viewpoints,
Speaker 1: especially when it comes to you know, sort of this
Speaker 1: global viewpoint of the world. And then also the media
Speaker 1: lines with them. So we're really in this place, to
Speaker 1: your point, where it's the citizens voice that isn't represented
Speaker 1: anymore in the public sphere. Yeah. Well, I mean, let
Speaker 1: me say this, there were hundreds of journalists at the
Speaker 1: World Economic Form in Davos. In fact, they had beautiful
Speaker 1: pavilions CNN, CNBC, UH New York Times. They all were
Speaker 1: there in force and had pride of place. But understand
Speaker 1: they had to pay for that status. They were there
Speaker 1: as insiders. They were there as sponsors, so by definition
Speaker 1: they were not going to ask any accountability questions. They
Speaker 1: were not going to ask any skeptical questions. They were
Speaker 1: there more too, I don't know, to to synchronize their
Speaker 1: narrative with the other oligarchs there. So it was. It
Speaker 1: was sort of ironic because Albert Borla, the CEO of Fiser,
Speaker 1: who we managed to bump into on the street and
Speaker 1: ask some prickly questions to, he had actually just come
Speaker 1: from another media interview. So if you were to ask
Speaker 1: Albert Bula, why don't you do any media, he'd say, you, Kenny,
Speaker 1: I do media all day long, and it's true, but
Speaker 1: he would do regime media, softball media. He wasn't ready
Speaker 1: for unscripted, unvetted questions that came from peasant citizen journalists
Speaker 1: like us. Well, and I want to play a clip
Speaker 1: from that because we do have it. Let's play that
Speaker 1: real question, students stop transmission? How long did you know
Speaker 1: that without saying it publicly? Answer that question? I mean,
Speaker 1: we we now know that the vaccines didn't stop transmission,
Speaker 1: but why did you keep it secret? You said it
Speaker 1: was a hundred percent effective, then nine percent, but we
Speaker 1: now know that the vaccines do not trans transmission? Why
Speaker 1: did you keep that secret? And for the footes at home,
Speaker 1: that's Ezra asking the Fiser CEO, Albert Borela, about the
Speaker 1: fact that they lied to us as there was no remorse.
Speaker 1: I mean he was baffled that it looked at you
Speaker 1: kind of like, how you know, how dare you even
Speaker 1: question me? There's been absolutely you know, no remorse, no
Speaker 1: no course correction from Fiser at all on any of this. Yeah,
Speaker 1: myself and my colleague Abby Amini peppered him with twenty
Speaker 1: nine questions in a three minute span, and some of them,
Speaker 1: I admit, were a little bit rhetorical or a little snippy.
Speaker 1: I said, what do you think about on your yacht?
Speaker 1: That was one of my questions. That's obviously just a
Speaker 1: rhetorical question. But we had a lot of real questions
Speaker 1: that I think you should have answered. Like we asked
Speaker 1: about product liability, I mean the fact that a lot
Speaker 1: of people are getting terrible side effects, including dying. UM.
Speaker 1: I asked about the efficacy of the of the acts.
Speaker 1: I mean there was a point in time they said
Speaker 1: it was a percent effective. Well, we know that's not true. UM.
Speaker 1: I asked him about the fact that Fightser once paid
Speaker 1: the largest fun in American history two point three billion
Speaker 1: dollars for deceptive marketing, And I asked him about that
Speaker 1: kind of misconduct here. Now, I'm not saying those are
Speaker 1: easy questions. I think they're all legitimate questions. Given the
Speaker 1: public nature of Viser, it really has big farmer and
Speaker 1: big government merged during the pandemic. So I think he
Speaker 1: owes us questions as any other public figure would. But
Speaker 1: why didn't he just give me his corporate bladder, Like
Speaker 1: why didn't he even just read? Like, surely he has
Speaker 1: something to say about those questions. But the fact that
Speaker 1: he chose not to say a single word, even his
Speaker 1: talking points that he would use with other journalists showed
Speaker 1: I think a contempt for citizens who weren't part of
Speaker 1: his approved jet set, and you know, part of me thought, well,
Speaker 1: why am I still asking him questions if he's not
Speaker 1: answering them. We we sort of walked with him through
Speaker 1: the streets until he finally ducked into a hotel. And
Speaker 1: I think in the end it showed that we asked
Speaker 1: real questions that the regime media really hasn't asked him
Speaker 1: in two years. So it was it was Albert Borla
Speaker 1: on trial, but in a way it was also other
Speaker 1: media on trial. Like I said, he had just come
Speaker 1: from an official UH interview at Davos, but of course
Speaker 1: they never asked him questions like that. So I think
Speaker 1: Albert Borla has a lot of answering to do. Fiser
Speaker 1: has a lot of answering to do. But the media,
Speaker 1: who gave him nothing but softballs for two years, they
Speaker 1: have a lot of answering to do. Also, well you
Speaker 1: know what they do. And of course, I mean they've
Speaker 1: made so much money off of this. I mean, their
Speaker 1: company's profits triple. He was making something he makes, you know,
Speaker 1: tens of millions of dollars in salary, and he you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of people ended up getting the vaccine because
Speaker 1: they were told these things, you know, they were told
Speaker 1: about its efficacy, they were told that it was hunder
Speaker 1: percent effective. They were told these things that ended up
Speaker 1: not being true, and they're shielded from liability in so
Speaker 1: many of these instances. You know, they are here in America.
Speaker 1: And so I appreciate you guys trying to hold his
Speaker 1: feet to the fire. You know, he deserves to beyond
Speaker 1: the receiving end of that after you know, essentially forcing
Speaker 1: this vaccine upon so many people, being dishonest about it,
Speaker 1: and then now we're saying that it's harming so many people.
Speaker 1: Remember the rationale for the vaccine mandates, and they were
Speaker 1: particularly punitive up here in Canada. They weren't quite as
Speaker 1: bad in the States, although a lot of public sector workers, military, police,
Speaker 1: fire teachers had vaccine mandates. Airlines in Canada, private citizens
Speaker 1: were not even allowed on domestic flights if you weren't vaxed.
Speaker 1: So the second largest country in the world, Canada, you
Speaker 1: were not allowed to fly even within your own country
Speaker 1: as a citizen if you weren't vacced. So these vaccine passports,
Speaker 1: these vaccine mandates, many people losing their jobs, are being
Speaker 1: banned from public places. They were all premised on the
Speaker 1: idea that the vaccine stopped you from transmitting the disease.
Speaker 1: As in, if you said, well, I'm willing to risk
Speaker 1: my own health by not having the vaccine, that's a
Speaker 1: libertarian choice, that's a personal choice. The answer by the
Speaker 1: state was always, well, you'll harm other people. You must
Speaker 1: take the vaccine to stop transmission. And that's why that
Speaker 1: was such an important question for me to ask Albert
Speaker 1: Brula because he knew that the vaccine didn't stop transmission.
Speaker 1: He didn't say that, and you know, for a year
Speaker 1: because he loved these vaccine mandates. What better way to
Speaker 1: sell a product than to have it forced on people
Speaker 1: on pain of them losing their jobs. But he knew
Speaker 1: the entire premise was false, but he didn't care because
Speaker 1: he's got that because he's got that private chet and
Speaker 1: he's a salesman. He's not he's not even a medical doctor,
Speaker 1: by the way. He's a veterinarian, which is odd. But
Speaker 1: he became extremely wealthy personally. Feiser became an incredibly profitable
Speaker 1: company based on the fact that no one asked him
Speaker 1: tough questions and how many people out there were forced
Speaker 1: to take the job to keep their jobs or lost
Speaker 1: their jobs because they stood on principle, this guy has
Speaker 1: a lot of answering to do that. I did not
Speaker 1: get it and made that very publicly known. And the
Speaker 1: only reason I had ever contemplated getting it, because I
Speaker 1: was never at risk, was because of that whole Oh
Speaker 1: you want to protect the people you love. And then
Speaker 1: when I started seeing all these quote unquote breakthrough cases happening,
Speaker 1: I was sort of, you know, put two and two
Speaker 1: together and realized that it wasn't stopping the spread, you know,
Speaker 1: and then ultimately said, you know, I you too, you know,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden and all these people trying to force it
Speaker 1: on me. Take a quick commercial break more with Ezra Levant.
Speaker 1: Did you watch I don't know if you saw the
Speaker 1: Project Veritas video recently with the fiser's director of research
Speaker 1: and development talking about how their thought process is potentially
Speaker 1: mutating the vire has. Let's play that. I want to
Speaker 1: get your thoughts, and then we'll move on to Greta
Speaker 1: Fightser ultimately is thinking about mutating COVID. Well, that is
Speaker 1: not at least say to the public, know that was
Speaker 1: only one building. You have a public have publish talk
Speaker 1: about we're exploring like no, you know, the virus chose commutating. Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: one of the things we're exploring it is like why
Speaker 1: don't we just mutating art so we could work only
Speaker 1: development vaccines, right, So we have to do that and
Speaker 1: we're going to do that, though there's a risk, like
Speaker 1: as you could imagine, no one wants to be having
Speaker 1: a pharmer company dings. It could be like very controlled
Speaker 1: to make sure that those virus and you you take
Speaker 1: it create something like itsells everywhere, something crazy. Just the
Speaker 1: way that the virus started moving on to be honest,
Speaker 1: like it would be no sense of because I was
Speaker 1: talked out of nowhere, like yeah, I charch director of
Speaker 1: Research and Development, Strategic Operations and the m R and
Speaker 1: Day Scientific Planner talking about a potential desire to mutate
Speaker 1: the virus. I mean, we're sort of in this weird
Speaker 1: realm now where there's just such a loss of faith
Speaker 1: in government, in public health and all of it. And
Speaker 1: why can we trust them when you have people like
Speaker 1: him saying this when he thinks he's behind the scenes,
Speaker 1: he thinks he's in private. Yeah, I saw that it.
Speaker 1: I think it's the most stunning revelation that Project Veritas
Speaker 1: has done in years, and I deeply admire Project very
Speaker 1: Tasks and James O'Keeffe, and they certainly look like they've
Speaker 1: done their homework here. But I have to say, it's
Speaker 1: such an insane thing to say, such an such a
Speaker 1: doctor evil like Bond villain thing to say that. Part
Speaker 1: of me is thinking, surely that guy was just was
Speaker 1: just talking like a fabulous Surely he was indulging in
Speaker 1: in some fiction. Because I, although I completely trust James
Speaker 1: O'Keefe and Project VeriTest, that is so insane, part of
Speaker 1: me thinks I just can't believe it. It's too crazy.
Speaker 1: I don't know. Maybe maybe I uh, I just can't
Speaker 1: even believe how insane that is. If that's true, we
Speaker 1: are in deep trouble, pretty dark these days. Was just
Speaker 1: watching uh you know, the way that these people behave.
Speaker 1: And then also just from the fact that you know
Speaker 1: COVID is obviously COVID from gain of function having been
Speaker 1: released from Wuhan. Obviously you know they were working on
Speaker 1: bat coronavirus is it escapes, So it's sort of how
Speaker 1: this all originated to begin with. So you would think
Speaker 1: it's ill advised to continue trying to play god with
Speaker 1: these things. Particularly if it's for profit. You know, you
Speaker 1: had also had time, You guys were able to find
Speaker 1: Greta Thunberg as well. Let's play this clip and then
Speaker 1: I want to talk to you about the exchange and
Speaker 1: what you learned from it afterwards. Kind of would you
Speaker 1: say you're a child actor? Are you a child actor
Speaker 1: or expert? How would you describe yourself? How can we
Speaker 1: never protest Saudi Arabia or Russia? You only protest Western energy?
Speaker 1: Why have you never criticized bloatom and Putin or OPEC? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I've never done that. Never will you do so? Now?
Speaker 1: Will you condemn OPEC energy? Sorry? Why doesn't she, you know,
Speaker 1: condemn Saudi Arabia or Russia? Why is it always these
Speaker 1: the Western nations? Yeah? I mean, if you take progressives
Speaker 1: at face value, the reason they care about the way
Speaker 1: energy is made is because of their liberal values. They
Speaker 1: they're worried about environmental responsibility. They're worried that oil profits
Speaker 1: will be used for violence, either war or terrorism. They
Speaker 1: say they care about workers, are they being well paid?
Speaker 1: And finally they say they care about human rights? Civil rights?
Speaker 1: How do you treat minorities? How do you treat women
Speaker 1: and gay people and indigenous people. So if those are
Speaker 1: your progressive values, environmental responsibility, peace, the treatment of workers,
Speaker 1: and civil liberties, you would naturally favor oil made in
Speaker 1: ethical jurisdictions like the United States and Canada and the
Speaker 1: North Sea and places like that. You would favor ethical
Speaker 1: oil over conflict oil from places like Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Venezuela, Nigeria, etcetera. So,
Speaker 1: until we don't need oil anymore, and by the way,
Speaker 1: we're gonna need it for the foreseeable future. But until
Speaker 1: that happy day comes where we don't need oil anymore,
Speaker 1: you're gonna have to get it from somewhere. And they
Speaker 1: don't make oil in Switzerland or Belgium or the chocolate
Speaker 1: making superpowers, you know. I mean, those are wonderful little countries.
Speaker 1: But I don't know what God was thinking when he
Speaker 1: gave out oil, But he gave it to all the
Speaker 1: world's bastards. Why does Greta only condemn energy in the West,
Speaker 1: in the free democracies? Why does she never not even
Speaker 1: rhetorically criticized conflict oil? And I asked her another question, Um,
Speaker 1: I mean, there are so many questions that we put
Speaker 1: almost a hundred to her. I mean, really, how would
Speaker 1: what she say be any different of what Vladimir Putin
Speaker 1: would say? Actually asked that of another protester, like if
Speaker 1: if Vladimir Putin had his way, Greta would only criticize
Speaker 1: ethical oil and never criticize Russian oil, because that's really
Speaker 1: Putin's weapon, it's the oil weapon. That's how he can
Speaker 1: inform his invasion of Ukraine is oil and gas. So
Speaker 1: it just seems odd to me that Greta only criticizes
Speaker 1: our oil. And that's why I asked her, are you
Speaker 1: an expert? Are you just a child actor? Let me
Speaker 1: say one more thing least, this is very important to know.
Speaker 1: Greta Tundberg looks like a little girl, but she's twenty.
Speaker 1: She's twenty years old now she I think she's maybe
Speaker 1: developmentally arrested or something, because she really is extremely short
Speaker 1: and she looks like a twelve year old. And I
Speaker 1: think it's been the source of her power. She looks
Speaker 1: like a an old Testament prophet, like a child prophet,
Speaker 1: you know, condemning us and warning us. I really actually,
Speaker 1: in the course of our twenty minute interview with her,
Speaker 1: she giggled probably thirty times instead of answering. She gave
Speaker 1: sarcastic answers. I don't think she gave one serious answer.
Speaker 1: I came away from my time with Greta thinking she's
Speaker 1: either completely ignorant, which you might expect from a high
Speaker 1: school dropout. That was her whole thing, striking in high school.
Speaker 1: Don't go to school kids, let's go on a school strike,
Speaker 1: or she's just a puppet for some other force. I
Speaker 1: asked her who her pr agency was. She didn't give
Speaker 1: me a straight answer. She said, I wish I had one. Well,
Speaker 1: we sort of know she does have one, So I
Speaker 1: in conclusion, I think that Greta Tunberg is sort of
Speaker 1: an empty vessel, like an actor who reads lines given
Speaker 1: to her by someone who wrote the script. She's twenty
Speaker 1: years old, so she's not a baby, but she's not
Speaker 1: a scholar. She's not that well informed. She just reached
Speaker 1: her lines, and for that twenty minutes we were with her,
Speaker 1: she didn't have her lines handy exchange and the questions
Speaker 1: that were asked to her. And I got the same
Speaker 1: impression as you did in the sense of and what's sad, though,
Speaker 1: is that this is someone who is treated as a
Speaker 1: serious person. I mean this is someone who has access
Speaker 1: to world leaders. This is someone who is purported to
Speaker 1: be an expert by the media. And when you watch
Speaker 1: the exchange with her, which is probably why she doesn't
Speaker 1: ever do any oppositional interviews, there was no substance there.
Speaker 1: She she knew nothing to your point, she was an
Speaker 1: empty vessel. But she's shaping world policy. It's like you know,
Speaker 1: and that's the thing. She's got to pick a lane. Uh.
Speaker 1: I mean, either she is an authoritative source of information
Speaker 1: and argument who must be listened to by the United Nations,
Speaker 1: by presidents and even by royalty. Either she is that
Speaker 1: authoritative and we must hang on her every word, or
Speaker 1: she's just a young person, as she said to us
Speaker 1: with giggles, saying, oh ha, I don't take anything seriously,
Speaker 1: So you can't keep switching from one foot to the other,
Speaker 1: depending on if you want to be serious or not.
Speaker 1: Um And there was an amazing thing that happened. It
Speaker 1: wasn't just rebel news reporters. We had three reporters on
Speaker 1: our team rotating asking her questions, but there were a
Speaker 1: couple of reporters from the regime media who were along too,
Speaker 1: and they had a few questions which I thought were
Speaker 1: very weak. One of them was, Greta, how's your trip
Speaker 1: to Dabos going so far? Okay, that's not exactly an
Speaker 1: accountability question. Another one said, hey, are you going to
Speaker 1: have any protests while year? Okay, that's sort of interesting,
Speaker 1: but you've got Greta Tunberg and and that's what you're
Speaker 1: gonna ask her. Like it was so weak, And after
Speaker 1: a while, these other regime journalists, they were irritated by
Speaker 1: our accountability style questions. They started answering our questions for Greta.
Speaker 1: One of my colleagues said, Greta, who are your advisors?
Speaker 1: Who do you take your guidance from? That's a really
Speaker 1: good question, by the way, because she's only a twenty
Speaker 1: year old young woman, and she didn't have a good answer,
Speaker 1: so other journalists piped up and answered for her. There
Speaker 1: was a moment when other journalists told us to shut up,
Speaker 1: called us stupid or idiots, and by the way, maybe
Speaker 1: we are stupid and maybe we are idiots, but isn't
Speaker 1: that for Gretta to say? And by the way, she
Speaker 1: didn't say that. She thanked us at the end of
Speaker 1: the interview, which was sort of courteous of her. But
Speaker 1: one of the most interesting things, and this relates to
Speaker 1: my point about Albert Burlap. No one ever asked that
Speaker 1: Albert Burla, the CEO of fies her a tough question
Speaker 1: in his life, and then we hit him with twenty
Speaker 1: nine and them and it had him. Really, I don't
Speaker 1: think Greta has ever had a adversarial interview in her life.
Speaker 1: She didn't really know what to do. But the other media, uh,
Speaker 1: they actually did know what to do. Their job was
Speaker 1: run interference for Greta. They were not there as journalists.
Speaker 1: They were there as magnifiers and propagators and um narrative
Speaker 1: boosters for Greta. It was really revealing. Again, I learned
Speaker 1: as much about the media as I learned about Greta
Speaker 1: Economic Forum and what you're sort of underscoring and making
Speaker 1: these points is that they were part of this protected class.
Speaker 1: And it doesn't that kind of get to the heart
Speaker 1: of the World Economic Forum, that it's this group of
Speaker 1: elites who believe that they know better than us, They
Speaker 1: believe they know better than the average citizen, and they
Speaker 1: want to be the ones dictating and controlling how we
Speaker 1: live our lives. Oh yeah, I mean I heard about
Speaker 1: the private jets, and so we actually went to a
Speaker 1: private jet airstrip UH called Alterheim, which is nothing but
Speaker 1: private jets. No commercial jets fly there. Every ten minutes
Speaker 1: another private plane landed with a W E F delegate
Speaker 1: and then they went into a quickly went into a
Speaker 1: helicopter to take them the last UH leg of the journey,
Speaker 1: and then they got into a black suv with tinted
Speaker 1: windows to drive them where they were going. So private
Speaker 1: jet to alter him, helicopter to Davos, and then black
Speaker 1: tinted window suv. There were a few green vehicles. There
Speaker 1: were a few Tesla's there that Uber had as sort
Speaker 1: of a promotional stick. Hey we're Uber, check out Uber Green.
Speaker 1: But it was just a fun thing, like a like
Speaker 1: a promotion. Every v I p at Davos was getting
Speaker 1: around in big black tinted window Mega SUVs and there
Speaker 1: were I heard there were one thousand private jet flights
Speaker 1: into alter Had. I believe it. When I was there,
Speaker 1: it was literally every ten minutes another jet came um.
Speaker 1: And the reason I tell you this is not that
Speaker 1: I'm anti jet or that I'm anti prosperity, or that
Speaker 1: I don't think people should be able to get rich.
Speaker 1: I think all those things are fine, but these people
Speaker 1: are the ones who say to you, not only should
Speaker 1: you not fly, you should drive less. You should heat
Speaker 1: your house less. You shouldn't eat meat because it's too
Speaker 1: carbon intensive, you should eat synthetic meat, or even bugs.
Speaker 1: And as that famous W. E. F. Slogan goes, you'll
Speaker 1: own nothing and you'll be happy. So how can you
Speaker 1: be a private jet center and then say, oh, you
Speaker 1: little people, you peasants, should eat bugs. By the way,
Speaker 1: one of our reporters bumped into John Kerry, the former
Speaker 1: Secretary State who is now Biden's Climate envoy, him and
Speaker 1: asked him how he could fly there on a private jet,
Speaker 1: and John Kerry looked him right in the eye and said,
Speaker 1: I fly exclusively commercial. Well, we know that's not true.
Speaker 1: I mean, unless he just decided that that morning. We
Speaker 1: know that John Kerry has flown probably on more private
Speaker 1: jets than any and other than I supposed to President
Speaker 1: of the United States. But obviously he's sensitive to that
Speaker 1: charge of hypocrisy. You should never take advice from people
Speaker 1: who are doing the exact opposite. And this was a
Speaker 1: meeting of billionaires and oligarchs. Alex Soros was there um.
Speaker 1: Bill Gates was not there this time, but Larry Fink
Speaker 1: of Black Rock was there. These are some of the richest,
Speaker 1: most powerful people in the world telling you to have
Speaker 1: a poorer life. They want you to have fuel poverty,
Speaker 1: energy poverty, food poverty. There's something really creepy about them. Look,
Speaker 1: anyone can have their own opinions, but these folks are
Speaker 1: trying to actually change world policy. They're actually trying to
Speaker 1: change the law under which people around the world lived.
Speaker 1: They have this concept called global citizenship. Well that sounds
Speaker 1: sort of cool, but what does it mean. I know
Speaker 1: what being an American citizen or a Canadian citizen means.
Speaker 1: You have certain rights, you have the constitution protect you,
Speaker 1: you can kick out your leaders if every four years.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of things that being a citizen of
Speaker 1: America or Canada or the United Kingdom give you. But
Speaker 1: the World Economic Form wants to replace that with what
Speaker 1: they call global citizenship, which means run by a group
Speaker 1: of technocratic you know, experts, them who you can never
Speaker 1: get rid of, never escape, never switched to another country
Speaker 1: because they run the world. And you don't have rights.
Speaker 1: You don't You are just a subject. You are a consumer.
Speaker 1: And that's their future, that's what they want from you.
Speaker 1: You know, if people listening like, oh, why should I care?
Speaker 1: You know, why should I? But you really just laid
Speaker 1: out why they should care and why this is all
Speaker 1: important and why we're having this discussion and why you
Speaker 1: guys were there covering it as well. You know, there
Speaker 1: are so many panels that they did, in conversations that
Speaker 1: were had. If you had to pick one, what disturbed
Speaker 1: you the post about what you saw or what you
Speaker 1: heard while being there. Well, I saw a lot of
Speaker 1: high value politicians. I saw Mark Kearney, the former Bank
Speaker 1: of England governor, also former Bank of Canada governor, who's
Speaker 1: who people say we will likely run for prime minister
Speaker 1: of my country Canada. I saw Brian Camp the Republican governor.
Speaker 1: I saw a lot of powerful people. And then I
Speaker 1: saw Albert Boulla Fiser and John Kerry. And here's what
Speaker 1: I thought. Their meeting in secret. They have all these
Speaker 1: secret meeting rooms UM called bilateral meeting rooms where you
Speaker 1: can book them. It's like a it's like a cabana
Speaker 1: on a beach or something, um and all these secret
Speaker 1: meetings going on. Why does that bother me? Because If
Speaker 1: they were meeting in Washington, d C. They would register
Speaker 1: with the Lobbyist Registry. People who come and go from
Speaker 1: the White House have to log in. All of that
Speaker 1: information is disclosable. Donations are recorded by uh, you know,
Speaker 1: the FEC. There are all sorts of checks and balances
Speaker 1: on how government is done in a democracy. There's an
Speaker 1: opposition party, there's a media, there is the congressional record.
Speaker 1: There are all sorts of foreign uh you know, if
Speaker 1: you're a foreign agent, you have to register. None of
Speaker 1: that happens at the World Economic Form. It is a
Speaker 1: free for all with none of the accountability mechanisms, none
Speaker 1: of the checks and balances that exist in national legislatures.
Speaker 1: Your congress are parliament. So it's like what happens in
Speaker 1: Davos stays in Davos. They can cut any deal, have
Speaker 1: any meeting, take any cash, and like I say, it's
Speaker 1: a pay to play place, um to get to get
Speaker 1: in on the inside. Depending on what position or status
Speaker 1: could be a quarter million dollars, four thousand dollars could
Speaker 1: be more than a million dollars to pay Klaus Schwab's
Speaker 1: private company to get in. And that's hears me when
Speaker 1: I see government officials at this sort of anything goes
Speaker 1: we'll keep no records. Uh. I won't quite call him
Speaker 1: a secret society, but most of their work is done
Speaker 1: in secret. Quick break more with the founder and owner
Speaker 1: of Rebel News. People are waking up around the world
Speaker 1: and just realizing that so many of our leaders don't
Speaker 1: care about us and in factor or trying to make
Speaker 1: our lives more difficult, as you mentioned, make us poorer.
Speaker 1: We we don't own anything, trying to make the quality
Speaker 1: of life less than what our parents had. So I
Speaker 1: do think that people are waking up. I hope they
Speaker 1: continue to wake up as well. Yeah, well, I hope So.
Speaker 1: I mean I enjoyed being there to do our contrarian thing.
Speaker 1: I mean, our motto at Rebel News is telling the
Speaker 1: other side of the story, and these days that's not
Speaker 1: even uh, that's not even universally accepted. I mean a
Speaker 1: generation ago, the idea of having more than one one
Speaker 1: of view was taken for granted, not just in journalism,
Speaker 1: but frankly in medicine. You know, can I get a
Speaker 1: second opinion? Now? If you are not part of the
Speaker 1: official narrative, they'll try and cancel you. Even doctors I
Speaker 1: saw the other day in California they were trying to
Speaker 1: pass the rule that a doctor could not have a
Speaker 1: second opinion on matters like vaccines. And I'm not obsessed
Speaker 1: with vaccines. I'm just saying it was incredible how they
Speaker 1: abridged our civil liberties to sell those jobs. And I'm
Speaker 1: worried that journalism has been so totally co opted and
Speaker 1: the censorship of you know, all these so called fact checkers,
Speaker 1: they're not fact checking powerful people. They're fact checking critics
Speaker 1: of powerful people. They're holding the opposition to account. I
Speaker 1: never see Reuters fact check or AP fact check going
Speaker 1: after the government. They're always going after critics of the government,
Speaker 1: and that's not how it should be. I really feel
Speaker 1: like you're seeing a merger of big business media, big tech,
Speaker 1: and I think for ordinary people it means higher prices
Speaker 1: for things, more regulations, more social engineering like eat your bugs,
Speaker 1: and less free speech and diversity of opinion. That's why
Speaker 1: I'm worried about all right, you know, I I share
Speaker 1: your concerns, which is why I believe the work you're
Speaker 1: doing at Rebel News is so important. So, as a
Speaker 1: relevant founder and owner of Rebel News, thank you so much.
Speaker 1: For taking the time and thank you for the work
Speaker 1: you do. I really do believe it's really important to
Speaker 1: actually hold or leaders accountable. A novel concept, right so,
Speaker 1: but people are doing it in the media and you
Speaker 1: are so thank you for that. Well my pleasure. And
Speaker 1: if folks want to see all our work from Davos,
Speaker 1: we we've put a special compilation page. We did about
Speaker 1: forty little videos and news stories. It's just at w
Speaker 1: e F Reports dot com if you're interested. I thought
Speaker 1: it was a very interesting week. I had never been before.
Speaker 1: I'm sure I'm going to go back next year if
Speaker 1: I'm allowed into the country. So thanks for having me.
Speaker 1: I appreciate the opportunity that was Ezra Lavront, the founder
Speaker 1: and owner of Rebel News. I've been following their work
Speaker 1: for a while. We've had a couple of the Rebel
Speaker 1: News guys on the podcast. They do really great work,
Speaker 1: and I appreciate what they do because they are actually
Speaker 1: interested in holding our leader's feet to the fire and
Speaker 1: holding them accountable, which is what the media doesn't really
Speaker 1: do anymore these days. I want to thank you guys
Speaker 1: at home for listening. I want to thank John Casting
Speaker 1: and my producer for putting the show together, leave us
Speaker 1: a review, give us a rating. On Apple Podcast every
Speaker 1: Monday and Thursday, but you can listen throughout the week
Speaker 1: until next time.