WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Nvidia Earnings, G7 Meeting, Taiwan President

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend,

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>our global look at the top stories in the coming

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>week from our Daybreak anchors all around the world, and

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>straight ahead on the program, a look at the struggling

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.639
<v Speaker 1>US housing market. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm Stephen carlon London, where we're looking ahead to how

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 2>issues around trade and the war in Ukraine will feature

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>at the upcoming meeting of G seven finance ministers and

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 2>central bankers in Italy.

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 3>I'm Brian Curtis in Hong Kong. We look ahead to

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 3>the inauguration of Taiwan President elect Lyiching Da and what

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 3>it means for Taiwan, US and China relations.

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 4>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg day Break Weekend on

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Ey Look the Free Own New York, Bloomberg ninety

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 4>nine to one, Washington, d C, Bloomberg one O six one, Boston,

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg nine sixty, San Francisco, DAB, Digital Radio, London, Sirius

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 4>XM one nineteen and around the world on Bloomberg Radio

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 4>dot com and via the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 5>Good day to you.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby, and we begin today's program with home

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sales for the month of April, the heart of the

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 1>spring home buying season. We get existing home sales on Wednesday,

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>new home sales on Thursday. What will these reports tell

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>us about the health of the US housing market, about

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>housing affordability and the overall economy? For more, we're joined

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>by Drew Redding, Bloomberg Intelligence US home Building Analysts. Drew,

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks for being here.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 6>Travl me.

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, so what do you expect to see this week?

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think some context is important here. We've been

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 6>describing the housing market as a tail to markets. Existing

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 6>home sales finally broke back about four million annalyzed run

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 6>rate two months ago, and we think we'll probably remain

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 6>above those levels. But what you have to keep in

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 6>mind is the data that we're seeing now still reflects

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 6>a period where rates were in that high six percent range.

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 6>Subsequently rates rose to over you know, seven and a

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 6>half percent, So we think that date is going to

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 6>trickle in into the next couple of months. We expect

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 6>some volatility on the existing home front side, you know,

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 6>over the next couple of months and through the summer.

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 6>But big picture, you know, it's It's difficult to get

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 6>too excited about a significant rebound in existing home sales

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 6>when you have mortgage rates that are still hovering around

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 6>seven percent. We just actually fell below that for the

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.399
<v Speaker 6>first time since April. We're at about six point nine

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 6>right now, so you know that will add a little

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 6>momentum to the market. But big picture, we're not expecting

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 6>any type of significant, you know, rebound maybe until we

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 6>get to twenty twenty five and even into twenty twenty six.

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 6>Now you can trust that what we're seeing in the

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 6>new home market. Demand in the new home sign has

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 6>been a lot stronger, and that's because builders have been

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 6>successful in pulling the levers in terms of financing incentives,

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 6>closing costs, assistance, and things like that. So you know,

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 6>they've been able to make the monthly payment a little

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 6>more palatable than what you see on the resale side.

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's the problem, isn't it. Home affordability. You've got

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>rates near seven percent, You've got record high prices for

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>new and used homes. Plus you know there's just a

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>lack of homes on the market. I mean, how are

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>people affording this?

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 6>It's one hundred percent all about afford affordability is, you know,

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 6>hovering near the worst levels on record. We were looking

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 6>at some data from redfind It actually shows the medium

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 6>monthly payment is about twenty nine hundred dollars, which is

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 6>fourteen percent above last month, and that's more than double

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 6>where we were prior to the pandemic. You've had prices

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 6>which increased more than fifty percent since the beginning of

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty, and you know, depending on the index that

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 6>you look at, we're either pretty close to those levels now,

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 6>if not higher. And there's been certainly been some momentum

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 6>of late with pricing, and part of that has to

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 6>do with what you mentioned. Inventory in the resale market,

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 6>we're still at about three months of supply, which is

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 6>historically low, and that's putting a floor on the prices.

0:03:58.040 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 6>There's there's demand out there and there's not a whole

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 6>lot of inventory that's pushing prices up.

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 6>We have seen inventory in some markets start to rise,

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 6>which is something we where to keep our eye on.

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 6>You look at markets in Florida, a couple of markets

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 6>in Texas like Austin, so that could have implications for

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 6>prices should inventories continue to rise. But but you're right

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 6>at this point, it's just difficult for the consumer to

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 6>afford a house, and that's really what's held the market back.

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, this has also impacted the troubles in housing the

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>broader economy not always bad or not all bad, but

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>like home builders, home renovation still going pretty strong, but

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>people aren't buying big ticket appliances. Home Depot confirming that

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>high margin items grills, power washers, refrigerators. You know, it's

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>really impacting a lot of other businesses.

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 6>It's certainly been a challenging backdrop for the consumer. You

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 6>have to remember, you know, they're battling the cumulative impact

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 6>of inflation. So you know, even when you see inflation

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 6>coming down to three percent, it's still inflation and it's

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 6>been going on for years. So it's really the cumulative

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 6>impact that we're seeing. You're seeing credit card balances rise,

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 6>and you know, when you talk about some of the

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 6>names that we cover, like A Home Depot and A Lows,

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 6>they're really seeing it on the discretionary side and on

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 6>the big ticket products in particular. You know, they've got

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 6>a little bit of a unique situation in that, you know,

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 6>some of the products they sell are what they call

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 6>one time purchases. So if you think about, you know,

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 6>the early days of the pandemic, people loaded up on

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 6>you know, grill's patio furniture, lawn mowers and things like that,

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 6>and that's just something that you don't need to replace

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 6>as frequently. So they've been contending with that. But at

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 6>the same time, something they mentioned this quarter that was

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 6>pretty interesting is that they're seeing weakness in projects that

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 6>are typically debt financed, which goes back to that mortgage

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 6>rate or the interest rate dynamic, and that it's just

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 6>a lot more expensive to get these projects done. So

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 6>we're seeing you know, kitchens and bath projects being deferred,

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 6>or we're seeing projects, you know, kind of being toned

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 6>down in size. We've heard that from home DEEPO, We've

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 6>heard that some from a handful of the building product

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 6>manufacturers as well.

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you need a new roof, you've got to get

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a new roof, but maybe not a new kitchen. Looking ahead,

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>do you see or can you see any green shoots

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>later in the year or into twenty twenty five or

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>does it all depend on maybe what the FED does

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>with interest rates.

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, look, I think that I think Holsing Broadley

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 6>is going to continue to EBB and flow with what

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 6>happens with interest rates. That being said, I mean, if

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 6>you could call this a bright picture, I mean, existing

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 6>home sales are the lowest level they's been in you know,

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 6>two decades, so we think we've probably reached are very

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 6>close to trough levels. So we do think that if

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 6>rates start to pull back a little bit and you

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 6>get to that mid six percent range, you know, you

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 6>could start to see some growth towards the back end

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 6>of this year and as we get into twenty twenty five.

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 6>So the way we look at it now is there's

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 6>not a whole lot of downside risk with where the

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 6>economy stands now, with where employment stands now. You know,

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 6>obviously if those things deteriorate further, that's a concern, you know,

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 6>But looking ahead, we think you could start to build

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 6>a little bit momentum looking into next year. And on

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 6>the remodeling side, we think that a lot of these projects,

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 6>as we mentioned, are being deferred, So we think there's

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 6>a lot of pent up demand that starts to get

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 6>unleashed in twenty twenty five and twenty twenty six. As

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 6>rates pull back, people are able to tap that record

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 6>amount of home equity they have, and we think that

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 6>that'll ultimately support a rebound in big ticket spending.

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a painter or a drywall guide, just

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>told on tight Well our thanks to Drew Redding, Bloomberg

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence US home building analyst. We move now to big

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>tech and chip maker and Video, which has been on

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a roll, seeing its market value balloon thanks to demand

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for its artificial intelligence chips, also its data center and

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>gaming offerings. What does it all mean for the company's

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>earnings out this Wednesday. Well for more, we're joined by

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Kunjan Sobanni, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior semiconductor analyst, Konjohn Thanks for

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Why don't you start right away? What do

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you expect to see in vidious first quarter earnings?

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 7>Well, just similar to what we have been seeing for

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 7>the past almost six plus quarters, We again expect a

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 7>solid beaten race coming into this earnings. Throughout the quarter,

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 7>we have seen multiple strong demand signals, namely its largest

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 7>cloud and hyperscaled customers all upsiding their hapexpend guidance for

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 7>AI for twenty twenty four and twenty five. Second, we

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 7>have seen strong demand from outside of the cloud players,

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 7>namely Sogn, Wild Government, entities, other enterprises, large enterprises like

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 7>the deal we saw about Elon purchasing about ten billion

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 7>dollars of AI capacity from Oracle, etc.

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 6>So and all the same.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 7>Time, we have seen the h one hundred lean times

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 7>continue to shrink. What that means is supply continue to

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 7>keeps up for that product family. So the combination of

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 7>all of this gives us confidence again they will be

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 7>coming out with US Beta.

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>DACE now in video appears to be far ahead of

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of US competitors on AI. And how important

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is that for this earnings and for the company?

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it is important, and that's why you see

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 7>this level of positive sentiment around the stock and what

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 7>you've seen in the return. I mean, it still continues

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 7>to be the market leader and has a market share

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 7>in the mid nineties, which we expected to continue at

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 7>least for the foreseeable future. So that is definitely a

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 7>big part of the story right now.

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>And to keep up with that demand, How is it growing?

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Where is Nvidia expanding here in the US and worldwide?

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 7>I mean it is global at this point if you

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 7>think about it. Look, it's the only sort of almost

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 7>the only game in the town, and the town being globally,

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 7>if you want to set up a high end AI

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 7>server to train model, there's only really one go to

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 7>full tax solution right now.

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 6>We just in media.

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 7>We do have AMD, which has entered the game, but

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 7>again the scale is significantly different.

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 6>Here in Media's making is going to.

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 7>Be generating about in the sort of between fifty to

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 7>eighty billion dollars from its data center it's here, and

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 7>on the contrast, AMD is projected to generate about four

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 7>billion from its cview business. So, I mean, look, the

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 7>demand is globally now when it comes to allocation. When

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 7>it comes to where its customers are residing, a big

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 7>portion majority is in US in the West, but it

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 7>is also trying to allocate as much as it can

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 7>to most of its consider outside of US.

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, that brings me to the next point, the growing

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>trade war between the US and China. There was a

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>ban on advanced chips selling them another technology to China,

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>implemented last year. We know that President Biden just last

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>week up the nite with a whole bunch of tariffs

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>on all kinds of Chinese products. How has that impacted

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in video and the wider chip you know, semiconductor market

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>here in the US.

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it has impacted Nvidia, I would say the most.

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 7>If you actually go back almost two years back, the

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 7>very first ban in this data center space came on

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 7>in media specific chips. So from that time when China

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 7>represented about mid twenties percentage of revenue of its data

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 7>center segment, all the way to now this year, we

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 7>expected to be somewhere between mid single digit to high

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 7>single digits. So that gives you a magnitude that it

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 7>has lost the potential that it could have been shipped

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 7>in absence of these bands and billions of dollars to China.

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 7>So that's the company that has most been impacted. And

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 7>I think a lot of restrictions and bands have heavily

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 7>focused on in media chips initially. What you're seeing now

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 7>is sort of those bands get ex span, their range

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 7>getting expand As again, regulation always runs behind technology, So

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 7>what you're seeing is now out those impacting in other

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 7>players like Intel, like Caulcom and AMD, etc.

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And Vidia's the big name, and in Vidia's first quarter

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>earnings out this Wednesday. Our thanks to Kunjan Sobanni, Bloomberg

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence Senior semiconductor analyst, coming up on Bloomberg Day Break

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>weekend to look ahead to the upcoming meeting of G

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>seven finance ministers and central bankers in Italy. I'm Tom

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Busby and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break weekend,

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>our global look ahead at the top stories for investors

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Up later on our program, we look ahead to the

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>inauguration of Taiwan President elect Ley ching Da and what

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>it means for Taiwan, the US and China relations. But first,

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>G seven finance ministers meeting this week in the northern

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Italian town of Stressa as representatives to reflect on the

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>fragmentation of global trade. For more, Let's go to London

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak. Europe Banker Stephen Carroll.

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Tom, Italy's Finance Minister and Central Bank governor, will be

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 2>hosting this G seven meeting on the banks of Lake Majore.

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 2>It's a majestic setting to discuss some weighty topics, not

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 2>least the latest ratcheting up of trade tensions between the

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 2>United States and China, as well as Russia's war in

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine and the Ukrainian Finance Minister will be attending with

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 2>issues around the use of frozen Russian assets on the agenda.

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Both the United States and the European Union have struggled

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 2>to mobilize the help that Kiev needs to defend itself,

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 2>as AID has been caught up in other political debates

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>in the EU. There's also a discussion about how best

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 2>to bolster the European defense industry. Here's what European Investment

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Bank President Nadia Calvino told Bloomberg that her institution is

0:13:58.600 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 2>doing about this.

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 8>I think it's quite clear that we need to step

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 8>up our support to Europe's security and defense industry. We

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 8>need to reinforce our capacity in this area, and the

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 8>European Investment Bank is ready to play its role in

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 8>supporting Europe's defense industry.

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 9>From this point of view.

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 8>What we have done is put forward an action plan

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 8>which has been endorsed by our board last week and

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 8>this up and running since first of May, and which

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 8>will indeed allow us to finance dual use technologies and infrastructures,

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 8>removing a constraint that existed which required that more than

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 8>fifty percent of future revenues should come from the civil

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 8>use side for it to be.

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 10>Financed right, and so now it's zero percent, but there

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 10>still is this mandate of dual use. So just for

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 10>to understand better how this actually works, because this doesn't

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 10>mean that you can, for example, invest in something that

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 10>produces a ammunition, which isn't what is in high sort

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 10>of need right now for Ukraine and in Europe.

0:14:58.120 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 11>Correct.

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 8>Well, we are an investment bank and the mandate from

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 8>European leaders was cleared that we should step up our

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 8>support to europe security and defense industry while safeguarding our

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 8>financing capacity.

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 9>And this is what we have been doing. This is

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 9>what we are doing.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 8>The reaction of financial markets is confirming that we're on

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 8>the right track, and our Board of Directors endorsed our

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 8>strategy as recently as last week. And so now we

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 8>have this action plan which should allow us to speed

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 8>up with the investment of the six billion euros which

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 8>are already earmarked for this industry.

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and so those also, I mean six billion is

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 10>also quite a small proportion of the entire fund. Are

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 10>you looking at potentially boosting that over the years, just

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 10>given the scale of the need that there is in

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 10>European defense.

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 9>We have six billion euros.

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 8>Actually the program was had eight billion euros ear marked,

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 8>we have only invested two billion euros. We're focusing right

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 8>now in speeding up the investment of these six billion

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 8>euros and also getting up and running a capital investment

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 8>of one hundred and seventy five million euros in startups,

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 8>innovative startups also in this area.

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 10>And for those two billion, was it just because there

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 10>wasn't demand for the loans or is it because there

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 10>were all these rules around and you hope that that

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 10>capital can get to work well.

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 8>Obviously, we are now expanding, enlarging the scope of projects

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 8>that we can finance. We are also speeding up these

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 8>divestments with a single stop shop with a dedicated team,

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 8>and we're going to be proactively reaching out.

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 9>Actually, we have launched a call for.

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 8>Projects, and so our expectation is that in the second

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 8>part of the year there will be more projects, more

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 8>demand as you named it, and that we will be

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 8>able to step up our support to europe security and

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 8>defense industry while safeguarding our financing capacity, which is the

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 8>mandate from MARS.

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 10>When you say safeguarding your financing capacity is to do

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 10>with the credit rating, you think that could be jeopardized

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 10>by investing in these sorts of companies, what exactly is

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 10>the relationship there?

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 8>Well, obviously rating agencies, but also investors are looking carefully

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 8>at many areas that have to do with our financing capacity.

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 8>So far, as I was saying, financial markets are responding

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 8>as we had anticipated, and our Board of Directors indoors

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 8>last week our action plan which will allow us to

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:06.959
<v Speaker 8>step up our support.

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 10>And in terms of the eb's rule and rebuilding Ukraine

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 10>and funding that, how do you imagine the ib's role

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 10>in that.

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 9>Well, we're playing a very important role already.

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 8>We're probably the key financing investor partner to the Ukrainian government.

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 9>We're very close contact.

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 8>Only some weeks ago I signed a memorandrov of understanding

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 8>with Prime Minister Smichael, and I hope that in June

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 8>we will be able to already sign some specific projects

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 8>and speed up our investments on the ground in large

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 8>infrastructures energy transport, also in municipal and local projects having

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 8>to do with restoring and renovating, rebuilding schools, hospital houses,

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 8>and also supporting the private sector. Many of these projects

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 8>are already ongoing and as of the signature of the

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 8>memorandum of understanding, I think we will be able to

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 8>do more while the war is unfortunately going on. I

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 8>hope we will be able to step up our support

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 8>with the rebuilding of the country once the war is over.

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 2>That's the European Investment Bank President Nadia Calvino there speaking

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg's Oliver Crook in recent days. Now, Oliver will

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 2>also be attending the G seven meeting in Straisa along

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 2>with finance ministers and central bankers. I've been speaking to

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 2>him about it and started by asking him how much

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 2>the latest announcement of increased US tariffs on Chinese goods

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 2>will be weighing on ministers' minds.

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 10>I think it'll be weighing on their minds very very much,

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 10>in part because it's so fresh and it just sort

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 10>of dropped just you know, just before the meeting. And

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 10>then on the other side of the meeting, of course,

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 10>you're going to get the initial report from the EU

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 10>in terms of the ev probe that they're going into China.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 10>So trade is really going to be front and center

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 10>for both the finance ministers and the central bankers, who

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.719
<v Speaker 10>are both present there. For the central bankers, obviously this

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 10>is also a big question in terms of inflation because

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.719
<v Speaker 10>if we're dealing with just one off things, that's one thing.

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 10>If we're talking about basically the beginning of another kind

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 10>of trade war and tit for tat, this could have

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 10>huge implications for inflation to what degrees. So they'll be

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 10>exchanging notes, you know, it's the ec be the FED

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 10>will be there much. The FED is setting the tone

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 10>for global interest rates, and of course the question will

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 10>be will China retaliate. Biden has been quite targeted in

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 10>terms of this. These sounds like a lot of import

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 10>tariffs on the evs, you know, quadrupling, but really it's

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 10>only touching about eighteen billion dollars a trade because obviously

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 10>he's very conscious of not wanting to get those prices

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 10>going up, particularly in an election year.

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, indeed, that's a big concern for them too. Around

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the G seven table though, Ali, how much divergence is

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 2>there on the approach, the approach to China and trades.

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 10>So I think it's interesting if you look at just

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:35.479
<v Speaker 10>the United States and Europe, you know what I mean.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 10>I mean, you have them sort of singing a bit

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 10>from the same hymn sheet in terms of the sort

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 10>of general message, which is that China has engaged in

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 10>unfair trade practices. But ma Cole, for example, has really

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 10>kept the door open saying that he's not going to

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 10>be dragged in around the world by US foreign policy,

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 10>which is sort of an allusion to Taiwan and the

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 10>evidence of that. That's a message that's kind of resounded

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 10>with Hashijiping because he came to France. You know, he

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 10>came to Europe for the first time in five years.

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 10>He came to France, but he also came to Hungary,

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 10>which is another country that kind of takes us to

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 10>the within Europe question of China. You know, China has

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 10>had huge manufacturing production in Hungary. The you know, c

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 10>atl the battery manufacturer, has opened up a factory. Now

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 10>we understand byd is there the Europeans are looking at

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 10>this because Hungary is often a political outlier. Could this

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.239
<v Speaker 10>drive a further wedge within Europe and could it get

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 10>really China a seat at the table politically within there?

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 10>And there's also a disagreement even between Schultz and macohone right,

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 10>Schultz was even saying that listen, we want to put

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 10>these ev tariffs up. Okay, but let's think about the

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 10>consequences here. Half of the EV's coming into Europe from

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 10>China are not Chinese, they are Europeans.

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, I mean the Ukraine's finance minister is going to

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 2>be attending this meeting as well. What will he be

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 2>looking to hear from his counterparts?

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think a lot of it is going to

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 10>be a message of reassurance, right, and we saw that

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 10>with Blincoln when he was in Kiev saying that you know,

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 10>we're still here, We're still supporting Ukraine. And the reason

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 10>that there is you know, potentially some desire to doubt

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 10>that is because of how long that aid package took

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 10>to get to Ukraine. Remember that was stalled in the

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 10>House for six months. That sixty billion dollar package eventually

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 10>got there and that will mean you know, some military

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 10>relief and some financial relief for Ukraine, but it's cost

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 10>them very dearly on the battlefield. We've seen infrastructure behead there,

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 10>swatting very a lot fewer of the missiles out of

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 10>the skies. And the question for the G seven going

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 10>forward is how do you get the financing for Ukraine

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 10>on sustainable footing? And that will be one of the

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 10>direct and central conversations there.

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because the U ass is proposed seizing the Russian

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 2>assets that were frozen by the G seven after the

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 2>invasion of Ukraine. Is that a proposal that has much support.

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 10>So it doesn't have that much support in Europe solicited.

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 10>To be clear about what we're talking about here, What

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 10>the Europeans favor is they want to take the proceeds

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 10>from the Russian assets being sold that are kind of

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 10>accruing interests and making profits. They want to take those

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 10>and give that to Ukraine. But that's only about three

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 10>billion dollars a year. The United States is very keen

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 10>on taking the underlying assets. We're talking about three hundred

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 10>billion dollars of Russian central bank assets that are scattered

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 10>across the world that are currently being held. They want

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 10>to bring that directly to Ukraine. The Europeans have resistant

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 10>to that. What has been interesting is some of the

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 10>debates on how to maybe do it to make everyone happy.

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 10>The United States, for example, has suggested these so called

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 10>freedom bonds, you know, and putting American branding on it,

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 10>which basically is issuing bonds and using the underlying assets

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 10>as collateral, so you don't touch the underlying asset, but

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 10>you can still monetize it and get more of that

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 10>money to Ukraine.

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, central bankers, as you mentioned Oli, will be attending

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 2>this meeting as well. Of course, inflations still a big

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 2>question for these major global economies. Should we expect to

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 2>hear much about the broader issues around the path I

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 2>had for interest rights?

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 10>I would think so. I mean, wherever there are central

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 10>bankers there is a rate debate, and if Bloomberg is

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 10>there will certainly be chasing it and we may be

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 10>speaking to a few of them. I can't tell you

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 10>who exactly because we haven't confirmed it, but there will

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 10>be certainly a conversation about what the stance is on

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 10>rate policy going forward. And of course, how does this

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 10>trade question now front and center? How does that read through?

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 10>I mean, the debate forming at the ECB is not

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 10>whether or not the going to be a cut, it's

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 10>what happens after the cut. What is the default sort

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 10>of stance for the ECB? Does it have a neutral

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 10>bias or an easing bias? And you have people on

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 10>either side of that. You have Panetta from Italy who's

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 10>saying that really we should have an easing bias, maybe

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 10>pushing that for it. In the Nogle from the Bundesbag

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 10>saying no, we need to stay neutral until we see

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 10>what happens.

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's another debate that's going to be happening at

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 2>the G seven two. I mean more broadly, Oliver, is

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 2>the G seven a forum that's fit for purpose. We're

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 2>talking about some of very diverse issues being discussed at

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 2>this forum as well, but does it actually produce concrete decision?

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 10>Well, let's think about what this forum is, right, the

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 10>G seven. For a very long time, this was the

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 10>G eight, right, and now it is the G seven,

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 10>And that happened ten years ago. And I was actually

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 10>just looking at a picture of the last G eight,

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, meeting. It's sort of astounding. You see fonswau Land, Obama,

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 10>David Cameron smiling, Merkle is there and Putin is there.

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 10>And in the last sort of ten years, ever since

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 10>the sort of invasion of Crimea, we've seen a real bifurcation,

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 10>of fragmentation of global order. So there's the question of

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 10>the broader G twenty in the sort of breakoff of

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 10>the bricks, as you mentioned, you know, there's this you know,

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 10>G came to Europe and then Putin went to Beijing

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 10>saying that they're going to have a very good relationship

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 10>for generations to come. So there's a question of how

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 10>much influence the G seven has over others. But even

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 10>within the G seven there is all this talk about

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 10>sort of protectionistic policies of China, the G seven itself

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 10>within there is being protectionist itself. I mean the Inflation

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 10>Reduction Act. There's not a lot of talk going on

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 10>around it. But this hits Europe very very hard. And

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 10>you're not hearing so much about the American European relationship.

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 10>You know, post pandemic, it was all about friend shoring

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 10>and securing supply chains that way. But really even under Biden,

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 10>you're hearing a slightly more America first kind of policy

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 10>and Europe alone, and that is really hanging over this

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 10>G seven meeting.

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to our correspondent Oliver Crook, who will be bringing

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.959
<v Speaker 2>us coverage on Bloomberg Radio and television of the G

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 2>seven finance ministers meeting in Italy in the coming days,

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm Stephen Carol in London. You can count us every

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 2>weekday morning here for Bloomberg Daybreak Europe, beginning out six

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 2>am in London and what am on Wall Streets.

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom, thank you Steven, and coming up on Bloomberg day

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Break weekend, we look ahead to the inauguration of Taiwan's

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>president elect. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. I'm

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Tom Busby in New York with your global look ahead

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan's president elect Lee Ching Da will be inaugurated in

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the coming week. Let's go to Bloomberg Daybreak Asia host

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Brian Curtis and Doug Krisner for more.

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 3>Tom William Lai takes office at a critical time, with

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 3>tensions running high. In recent days, China said live faces

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 3>a choice between peace and confrontation. On Wednesday, Beijing said

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 3>that it would sanction five taiwan political commentators and roll

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 3>out a new law to punish separatists.

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 12>In addition, Taiwan finds itself in the middle of worsening

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 12>relations between the US and China. Now on the economic side,

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 12>President Biden just slapped new tariffs on Chinese imports and

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 12>accused China of cheating on trade. Then there's the political front.

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 12>China's Foreign Ministry bristled it reports on the US and

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 12>Taiwan conducting naval drills last month.

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Additionally, the US will send a delegation of former officials

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 3>to the inauguration. The fact that their former officials may

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 3>placate China to a certain degree, but Beijing still won't

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 3>be happy as such, Doug and I thought it would

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 3>be a good time to take a closer look at

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 3>the trilateral relationship and see how it might change under

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 3>the presidency of Lei ching Dug. We asked John Liu,

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Executive editor in Beijing, if Taiwan is at a crossroads.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 13>Taiwan is definitely the most dangerous flashpoint in this relationship

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 13>between the United States and China. Whether William Lae's ascendence

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 13>to the presidential office will be the spark that sets

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 13>off some sort of conflict, I think that looks relatively

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 13>unlikely at the moment. We are expecting him to stick

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 13>to the line from the previous administration of Tiing I.

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 13>He has said that publicly he plans to be a

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 13>continuity president of anything. I think the speech that he

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 13>will be giving at his inauguration will be tuned to

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 13>try and both show him and his party is defending Taiwan,

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 13>but also not to cause any upsetness in Beijing or Washington.

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Executive editor in Beijing, John Liu, Now for discussion

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 3>on this. We're joined by Bloomberg's Type A bureau chief

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 3>Samson Ellis and deputy Bureau chief Cindy Wong. So, Sam,

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:43.400
<v Speaker 3>let me go to you first. Is John Wright there

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 3>that Lai is likely to be pragmatic and push for continuity.

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 11>Those are certainly the indications we have right now. Obviously

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 11>we're speaking before he has taken power, But over the

0:27:55.520 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 11>past year he has strenuously emphasized that he will to

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 11>size previous line of being willing to talk to China,

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.719
<v Speaker 11>but only on the basis of equality, that the two

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 11>sides sit down and speak to each other as equals.

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 11>That's obviously a condition that China is very unlikely to

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 11>be able to accept. Plus he's also said that there

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.360
<v Speaker 11>will be no formal action for him to in some

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:25.360
<v Speaker 11>way formalize Taiwan's independent So I think that's his way

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 11>of signaling to the United States and to Beijing and

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 11>to the time Inese public and the world at large

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.959
<v Speaker 11>that there isn't going to be some kind of declaration

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 11>of independence during his presidency to try and put people

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 11>at ease that he's not going to be a troublemaker

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 11>throughout his term.

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 12>Cindy, from what I understand, William Lai took about forty

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 12>percent of the popular vote. When you look at a

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 12>number like that, you may conclude that the mandate that

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 12>William Lai has is not that strong. Am I right

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 12>about that?

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 14>Exactly. He only got forty percent of the vote in

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 14>the general election, and that made him the first Taiwan

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 14>president since year two thousand that didn't win an outright

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 14>majority vote, So that's relatively weak man day. And also

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 14>the Taiwanese voters just gave the majority of the legislature

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 14>to the opposition KMT, hoping that there would be some

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 14>check and balance in the government. So I think with

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 14>that challenges that that means lies any policies or reforms

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:30.479
<v Speaker 14>is going to face the legislative hurdles. So going forward

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 14>the next four years is going to be a very

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 14>daunting tax ahead for him, Cindy.

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 3>One would think that lie, given his past and sort

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 3>of leaning toward Taiwan independence, that he would be even

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 3>less popular with China than signing one was.

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, definitely. So just to give you a little bit

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 14>of contest. The ruling Democratic Progressive Party or the DPP

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 14>champion that strong sense of Taiwan identity distinct from China,

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 14>and Lai used to being for his pro independent stance.

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 14>He used to describe himself as a pragmatic worker of

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 14>Taiwan independence. Although during the presidential campaign he has been

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 14>very measured. He didn't talked about independence at all. Instead,

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 14>he said Taiwan is already a de facto state and

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 14>there's no need to declare independence. Still, the past comments

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 14>and past records made him very unpopular with China. China

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 14>revealed lie with deep suspicion and deep distrust, and China

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 14>has already labeled him as an instigator of war or

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 14>a separatist. So it is believed that going forward for

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 14>the next four years, since China has already cut off

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 14>all the communication with Taiwan since President's Hi took office

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 14>in twenty sixteen, and for the next four years, it's

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 14>unlikely that it would possibly resume any communication with Taiwan

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 14>given their dis deep distrust of life. So one important

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 14>thing to watch from lives inaugurate speed each would be

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 14>if he has any comments or new narrative about the

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 14>cross relations going forward, or if he is able to

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 14>propose any kind of framework that could break the deadlock

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 14>between China and Taiwan and resume the communication between the

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 14>two sides.

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 12>Again, Sam, the current President Sin Wing has been in

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 12>office for eight years now, two terms term limited. During

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 12>a big chunk of that period, since about twenty nineteen,

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 12>I think that we have seen a much harder line

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 12>from Beijing when it comes to Hong Kong, and I'm

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 12>curious about possible ripple effects. Has a harder line on

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 12>Hong Kong impacted the politics of Taiwan in any way.

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 11>Well, it certainly did in twenty nineteen and twenty twenty,

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 11>the last election, when Taiwan a resounding re election. You know,

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 11>at that point we were at the height of the

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 11>authorities cracked down against protesters in Hong Kong, and that

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 11>definitely engendered a sense of sympathy from voters in Taiwan

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 11>and a you know, no desire to move towards a

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 11>friendlier stance with Beijing. But then there's the long term

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 11>repercussions of that. Certainly that you know, China's offer for

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 11>Taiwan essentially as you know, the same as to Hong

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 11>Kong one country, two systems, except that you're part of

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 11>China and will let you keep your democratic system and

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 11>your way of life largely untouched. But the big lesson

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 11>from Hong Kong obviously is that they promised to keep

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 11>that for fifty years and then they didn't. They just

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 11>swooped in and they have radically changed how things are

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 11>run in Hong Kong, and that really has served as

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 11>a lesson for Taiwan as a whole.

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 3>And Taiwan people have spoken very clearly that that is

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 3>not something that they can accept. But on the other hand, Samson,

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.719
<v Speaker 3>and this is something we've talked about before. We often

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 3>hear that, you know, despite what you hear from pundits

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 3>about all of this geopolitical fear and threats, Taiwan people

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 3>are actually pretty relaxed. They've they've been dealing with this

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 3>for more than seventy years. Is that likely to continue

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 3>to think over the next four years underline?

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 11>For sure. I mean, one of the remarkable things about

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 11>being in Taiwan, living in Taiwan is seeing how much

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 11>more nervous people outside of Taiwan are than people inside Taiwan.

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 11>Will often, you know, get very worried phone calls from

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 11>Hong Kong or Singapore or London on New York people

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 11>worried of you know, is the invasion about to happen?

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 11>How worried are you? And in Taiwan life goes on

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 11>as normal, you know, people, as you say, they're very

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 11>used to these threats or these tensions with China. As

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 11>for how things will play out over the coming four years,

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 11>that that's going to be very interesting to see. Sources

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 11>do indicate to us that there's a good chance that

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 11>China slowly starts to ratchet up the tension. As you

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 11>pointed out at the beginning of this conversation, they appear

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 11>to already be doing that with new sanctions against certain

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 11>individuals in Taiwan. So these are the so called gray

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 11>zone tactics that China deploys, like a range of measures

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 11>that fall below the threshold of outright warfare that are

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 11>designed to influence and coerce Taiwan to do Beijing's bidding.

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.919
<v Speaker 11>The thinking is that we're likely to see a big

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 11>increase in these kinds of tactics over the coming four

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 11>years in an effort to stop Taiwan and voted in

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 11>particular from wanting to give the DPP another four year term.

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 12>Cindy, It's remarkable when you look at the degree of

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 12>concentration of semiconductor manufacturing in Taiwan. This is obviously a

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 12>TSMC story, but we know one of the things that

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 12>the US has been doing, to a lesser extent Europe

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 12>addressing this perhaps over concentration and trying to diversify away

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 12>from Taiwan. Is there concern about that when you look

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 12>at the economics of the island.

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, there is certainly some concerns and bait within Taiwan

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 14>about whether we should let TSMC to continue to broad

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 14>its ship plants overseas. And that's also a question that

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 14>we asked the incoming President Lighting the last August when

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 14>we had a chance to sit down with him, and

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 14>then Light said at that time that he won't stop

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 14>TSMC from building more chip plants in the US or

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 14>in other countries because he thinks Taiwan has a responsibility

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 14>to the world and the fact that TSMC is diversifying

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 14>its ship plans and building chip plants overseas, it's to

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:39.240
<v Speaker 14>show that Taiwan's economic advantage and the power of Taiwan.

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 3>That said Cindy. We spoke with Sean Darby from the

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Zuho Securities and he said that the global trend of

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 3>on shoring will actually mean that semiconductor output in Taiwan

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 3>will slow. Now it'll still be TSMC to a certain

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:59.240
<v Speaker 3>degree and other companies, but jobs in Taiwan may suffer.

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:03.760
<v Speaker 5>The irony is that the competitive part of Taiwan's semiconductors

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 5>is to some extent being hollowed out through this, you know,

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 5>sort of on shoring in the developed world, and in

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.280
<v Speaker 5>that respect, you're not going to get the same level

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 5>of output growth that you would have had in pre

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 5>proceeding cycles. You know, sometime in two or three years

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 5>from now, in fairness that time, one is going to

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 5>sort of see below trend growth from twenty twenty five

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 5>twenty six purely because they don't have that same facilities

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 5>in situ.

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 3>And Cindy, will that be a problem for a Taiwan

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 3>that some of these jobs will move offshore.

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 14>I think that's definitely something people will keep and close

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 14>eye on from incoming present. Lyes in inaugura speech, it

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 14>is believed that he will certainly talk about his plans

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 14>to boost Taiwan's economy, and also he has already previously

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 14>avowed to continue strengthening Taiwan's chip sectors. We know that

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:01.240
<v Speaker 14>before his inauguration, he's already set up meeting with representatives

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:05.359
<v Speaker 14>from the chip industry is trying to understand what would

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 14>be the best policies for the industry and for the

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 14>country as well. So we're sure that from his inaugural

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:16.240
<v Speaker 14>speech next Monday, we're going to hear more details about

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 14>his plan to beef up Taiwan's economy and how to

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 14>strengthen the chip industry going forward.

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 12>Sam and Cindy, thank you so much for joining us

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 12>and helping us set up the inauguration of Taiwan's new president,

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 12>Light ching Da that will be happening in the week ahead.

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 12>Samson Ellis is Bloomberg's Taipei bureau chief and Cindy Wong

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 12>is deputy bureau chief. In our Taipay newsroom, I'm Dereg

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 12>Krisner along with Brian Curtis in Hong Kong. You can

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 12>catch us weekdays here for Bloomberg Day Break Asia beginning

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 12>at eight am in Hong Kong eight pm on Wall Street. Tom.

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Doug, and thank you Brian. And that does

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 1>it for this edition of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>us again Monday morning at five am Wall Street Time

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for the latest on markets overseas and the news you

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>need to start your day. I'm Tom Buzzby. Stay with us.

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Top stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.