WEBVTT - Big Tech Unlikely To Truly Challenge Wall Street: Ex-OCC Chair

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa A. Bramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Over the past twelve months, there's been increasing discussion about

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>perhaps whether Google and Amazon and other big technology companies

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>will become the next Wall Street. Here to talk about

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>that with us is Keith Norika. He's a partner in

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the financial institution's practice at Simpson Thatcher and Bartlett. He's

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>also former Acting Controller of the Currency from May fifth

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>November of last year. Keith, thank you so much for

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>winning us. During your tenure, there was discussion that the

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>o c C would be open to some kind of

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>fintech charter, allowing the Googles and Amazons of the world

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to UH act more like banks. Can you talk a

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what future you envision for big tech

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>as as as banks? Well? Sure, Thanks Lisa for having

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>me today. UM. During my tenure, UM we continued UH

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in a initiative by my predecessor, Tom Curry, UH that

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>dealt with a fintech charter, which was a limited purpose charter.

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 1>UM that would allow UH institutions to get a bank

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>charter to undertake one of the core elements of banking,

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>taking deposits, lending money, or or processing payments. And and

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, there was a concern UM of that,

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that that large companies like Amazon or Google could get

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a charter. Now. UM, in my own view, UM, I

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily see UM that that may be the case.

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there that they're sort of a superficial allure

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of that charter for those companies. But on the other hand,

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of regulation comes with getting a bank charter. UM.

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>And UH, these companies right now, UM, these large tech

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>companies have a good position in the market. They're heavily

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>engaged in commerce as we see UM and UM. Obviously UM,

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a part of commerce involves processing payments to pay for commerce.

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>UH and I think that UM, what we're seeing is

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they're they're trying to take advantage of everything up to

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the up to the line of being a bank without

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>actually having UH to bear the responsibilities of being a bank.

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And banks have a lot of obligations and regulations that

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>come with them and compliance obligations. Uh And at the moment,

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>at least, I think the model is more of them

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>trying to capture as much as they can of the

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>non bank um sort of financial market, uh, but still

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>having to ultimately use banks to process and clear payments

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>and and to do all the compliance obligations that come

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>with them. And uh so while there, you know, may

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in the future be some type of limited purpose bank

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>charter available to them, just as there has been in

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the past for big industrial companies. That's that's our history,

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>uh and tradition in this country to allow certain limited

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>purpose banking charters to large industrial companies and tech maybe

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the the new um sort of industry that that may support. UM.

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't foresee them becoming the new Wall Street, so

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to speak, because there's a lot of regulation that just

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>necessarily comes from processing and clearing payments and from really

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>handling the type of risks that come from, uh, from

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>from that type of activity. Well and Keith, that's what

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask when you were the acting o

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>c C chair in your conversations with executives at Google

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon and other big technology companies. Was there the

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>desire to get further into this territory and and be

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>processors of payment systems? Well, first, I guess start with

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the premise of the question. I actually never had any

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>conversations with any executives from those companies, and I think

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, that may tell you a lot right there,

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Um that there wasn't that desire to pursue that. Now,

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're starting to see some limited interest in

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the traditional limited purpose charters, like uh, you know, Square

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:36.559
<v Speaker 1>has filed an application for an industrial loan company. That's

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>usually the way, um that that these type of commercial companies,

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>if you will get into a limited purpose bank charter,

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>or traditionally has been that case. The fintech charter is

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat new, it's never been used. Uh, and we'll

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>see how that goes. That's obviously something for my successor

0:04:56.320 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to deal with rather than me. But I think that, um,

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, there there wasn't yet the sort of interest

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that I saw of those large companies, even even in

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>our even in the o c c S proposed limited

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>purpose charter. Can you just tell succinctly what does the

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>controller of the currency do? What is that person's specific responsibility.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Sure UM the controller of the currency charters and supervisors

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the national banks in this country, which hold approximately seventy

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.679
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of the banking assets UH in the United States.

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's UH. It's a UM an office that date

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>dates back to the Civil War as a means to

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>provide a national currency for the country. The currency function

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>was later transferred to the Federal Reserve in nineteen thirteen,

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>but the the office remains as an independent bureau of

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury Department UH to supervise UM really UM the

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>money center banks, but also many community banks across the country. Okay,

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>so then what would it What would be the requirements

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to start your own community bank. Well,

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>if you want to start your own community bank, you

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>have to satisfy the chartering requirements UH that you have

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.239
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable prospect for success, you have a good management team,

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you have a business plan. UH. The O c C

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>has to have confidence in you to grant that charter.

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>But then most of the times UH in this country,

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you also will need to go get f D I

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>C insurance. That's a separate application to the f D

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I C UH. And if you want to have any

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of controlling investor. If your company, you need to

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>become a bank holding company and get permission for that

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>from the from the Federal Reserve Board. So given the

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>fact that the o C oversees the monetary supply, what's

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>your take on bitcoin and all of these cryptocurrencies that

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>are getting increasingly popular. Well, look, I think there is

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of interest in this, and I would say

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>my um my agency only dealt with a very small

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>part of this. I think we're seeing, uh, certain securities

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>issues come into into play here where the sec maybe

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>take king the lead with the Treasury Department because of uh,

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, any type of any terrorism, type of or

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>money laundering concerns. But generally, um, I am. You know,

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe that people should be able to order their

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>affairs in a way that makes the most sense for them.

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And if there's a certain unit of value that they

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>wish to base their transactions on, uh, then you know,

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>they should be free to do that, but they need

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to be fully aware of the risks that may come

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>from that. And just to come full circle, when we

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>were talking about fintech charters, which firm do you think

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is sort of most positioned to engage in more bank

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>like activities that we should pay attention to. Well, look,

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I think to me, the big challenge was finding a firm.

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I think in my own view, I was open to

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>granting such a charter, but there wasn't necessarily a good

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>match at the time of during my tenure of a

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>company that was willing to adhere to sort of bank

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>like restricts and have sort of bank like um prospects

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of success. And so, you know, when you look at

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the smaller companies, a lot of these fintech companies are

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.119
<v Speaker 1>more tech like in the sense of they're more try

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and see how it works. Maybe it'll work, maybe it won't.

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>That that's not really the way the O c C

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>charters banks in this country, or any bank regulator for

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that matter. There has to be sort of they're sort

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of a reputational element um. And so so I'm i

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I we didn't find one during my tenure. So I

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna have to see, all right, we gotta

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>leave it there, Thanks very much, Keith Norieka. He is

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a partner in the financial institutions practice of Simpson Simpson

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Thatcher and Bartlett cell Gene is spending a lot of

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>money they have announced that they're going to be spending

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>nine billion dollars for Juno Therapeutics. Also Santa Fee spending

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>about eleven and a half billion dollars for bio Verative.

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Here to help us understand this merger activity is Max

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Neeson Our Bloomberg, Gadfly, Columis. He covers healthcare, biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. Max,

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at your most recent column that you just

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>put out, and you are skeptical about the price that

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the companies are paying for this. You say that perhaps

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this just is a case of being forced to do mergers.

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Why is that so? Both companies are under a good

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>deal pressure to do a sizeable deal for for a

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of different reasons. Celgene last year cut their long

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>term revenue forecast ended up really doing a big hit

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to the share price. And then Santa Fee. Um, you know,

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>it's involved heavily in the diabetes business with some aging

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>products and a lot of price competition. It also kind

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of swung and missed on on two big deals over

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years, so as really looking to

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>get something done, and um, I do think that that

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>pressure might have played a role in moving these companies

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to do deals that definitely have risks. Okay, so let's

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about those risks. First of all, why don't you

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>start with the deal that you think holds the most risks?

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And interestingly, both cell Gene and Santa Fees shares both declined,

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>uh and perhaps that had to do with the price

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that they were paying for their acquisition target. I definitely

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think so, I'd say, if I had to pick one

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that has the biggest kind of downside risk, it's it's

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>probably Santa Fees deal. Um it's for a company Biovariative

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that focuses on hemophilia, and um it sells kind of

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>prophylactic treatments that you take ahead of time to reduce

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood of a bleeding event. Um And and make clear,

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>hemophilia is when your blood can't close. Yeah, it's a

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>clouding disorder exactly gion etique. But there are a bunch

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>of companies that are working on kind of gene therapies

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that that potentially offer um one time effective cures for hemophilia.

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>They're very early stage. We still don't know if they're

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna kind of work and last, and they're gonna be

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>really expensive, but that's kind of an existential threat to

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>this company's business model. And they're working on the same

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>thing but really early stage, their way behind some of

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>these other firms. So you know, this is gonna be

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a near term burst boost for their sales and earnings,

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know it really could go pretty badly. Cell

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Gene um, you know, they're making a bet on these

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of new cell therapies that offer a potential cure

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>for blood cancers. But um, it's a company it's a

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit late to the first generation of these treatments

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and um, so that means that this is a big

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>bet on the future generations the kind of more advanced

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and safer versions of these therapies. And there are a

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies involved in that. Um. You know, it's

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>unclear if if Juno and Celgene are gonna come ahead,

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>so so they're risk with that as well. Now. Bio

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Verative based in Waltham, mass home to Bloomberg one six

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>one Boston, New Report, and thirty in Metro West and

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the South Shore. We of course welcome all of our listeners.

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>If had three four hundred employees, I mean this is

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>not a I'm just saying this is a through eleven

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half billion dollar deal. They do they have

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>something so special for hemophilia and blood disorders that would

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>create this kind of premium. And if you've got four

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred employees and someone spending eleven and a half billion dollars,

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you better have something. Yeah. So that that's the thing

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that I And if it was so great, why did

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>bioge and spin them off? Exactly? I mean, so I

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>think Biogen's motivation was that they're trying to become more

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>narrowly focused on um on neurology, on on disease of

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the brain, and this was kind of ancillary to that.

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know that that is the thing that's troubling.

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>They're paying a big premium for that kind of near

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.599
<v Speaker 1>term growth boost. There are some you know, longer term

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 1>prospects for for growth that more people are going to

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>move to this sort of prophylactic treatment from kind of

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the acute treat No, no no, no, I understand that on

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the on the on the medical side, but I mean,

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>this company is it's a nine million dollar revenue company,

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, is there a metric? Is there some

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of magic formula that they ended up coming up with?

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>This eleven and a half billion dollar price tag. You know,

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>with with biotech, it's always a little bit of the

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the kind of on market growth. You have

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to pay a premium for that because there's just not

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that many companies with kind of recently approved in growing drugs.

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the fact that you put some premium

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.599
<v Speaker 1>on the pipeline, which you know is always an exercise

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and in kind of shaking a magic eight ball. Um,

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you do your best based on the science and you know,

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>evaluating similar treatments that are actually on the market, but

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you really have no idea until they hit the market

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and start selling. How are these companies planning to pay

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for their acquisitions? How are they going to pay for them?

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>To centerfes leveraging up to some degree, I think, Um,

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>but you know they both have a ton of cash.

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 1>You know, these are really high margin business of the

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>drug business in general, you're always going to have money

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to make acquisitions the builder to finance them. But um,

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you know the type of return you're going to generate. Um,

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more variants than in just about any

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>other business. Making an acquisition. You could have you know,

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>no return or very little, very easily. All right, So

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>real quick, which company do you think will be the

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>next to announce a big acquisition in the biopharmaceutical space? UM,

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I would guess if it's anyone, it's gonna be m

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>gen early enormous cash pile hasn't made a deal in

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in some time, and um, you know all of that

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>overseas cash coming, and they have a particularly large chunk

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of it. UM, I'd say they're they're probably next up.

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, Max Neison, thank you so much for joining us.

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Max Neson is biotic, pharma and healthcare calumnist with Bloomberg

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.359
<v Speaker 1>gad Fly, joining us here in our eleven three oh studios.

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>A I G certainly getting our attention today. It is

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>starting to reverse course after years of retrenchment. Here to

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about the latest moves that this insurance behemoth made.

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Adams joins us now. He's senior insurance and industry

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>analyst who joins us for Bloomberg Intelligence from Princeton. Jonathan,

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. So A

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I G is buying validus put this into perspective for us.

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>How big of a deal is this for A I G.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And is it it the right move. It's a five

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>point six billion dollar deal and not huge in terms

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of UM what types of transactions we've seen in the

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>industry over the past. UM. It increases their commercial lines

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>premium by about ten percent a little bit over UM.

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>In terms of whether it is strategically a good move, UM,

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a It's quite a and UH it's

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>moving into the reinsurance business at a time when that

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>business has faced some difficult pricing pressure. Not only that, UH,

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you may recall that A i G posted three billion

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars of catastrophe losses in the third quarter, and that

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>was due to significant exposure they have in their property

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>lines business. They said at the time they were looking

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>for opportunities to lower the volatility in that business and

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that they would lower their exposure to property risk. This

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:38.359
<v Speaker 1>deal adds that exposure because that's a primary business for Validus.

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure it ultimately will complete UH some

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of the strategic moves that the company wanted to UH

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to do. So why do this deal? Well, UH CEO

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Brian Duperl has UH said that he wanted to expand

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>A I G. And he wanted to make an acquisition

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and that would help the company grow. UM. This certainly

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>UH fits in that category to some degree. UH. It

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>adds some new lines of business. Validus has a crop

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>business that the A I G does not participate in

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>that in that business, so it helps them there, and

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it also helps them in their specialty lines business. So

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>there are some areas where they could generate some premium growth.

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>And it does UM add to earnings UH and their returns.

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>But again, UM, I think at at a very constantly

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>price that actually slightly dilutive to their tangible book value.

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure this would be the first deal

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I would UM I would look towards. Well, Jonathan, I'm

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>confused because a lot of people have been calling for

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>A I G to break up further into its parts.

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>It was of course pummeled during the two thousand and

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>eight credit crisis UM, and it has stripped down its

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>business quite a It is this sort of signaling that

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it's now going to embark on bulking back up and

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>going in the opposite direction of what a lot of

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>people are saying. It certainly looks that way. And although

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>I admire valid as his management team, it's certainly a

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>good group of individuals. I'm not sure the business offers

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the types of return that UM really investors would would

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>want to see UM when A I G returns to

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the expansion mode, which obviously it's done, and I think

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the signals they'll continue to do so. But again I'm

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>not sure this is leading with your uh strongest foot

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>just I mean, this is just you know, uh speculative, Jonathan.

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>But five and a half billion dollars, there's a lot

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of money. Why wouldn't they just increase the dividend? Well,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that goes to the CEO's philosophy and the

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 1>importance that he puts on signaling to the market ages.

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Downsizing is over and it's time to look to new

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 1>industries and to expand. I think that couldn't names I mean,

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and and clearly I'm not I don't want to put

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you in the position of having to, you know, offer

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>your A I G. There the perspective, But for five

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>and a half billion dollars, couldn't they have built their

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 1>own agriculture insurance business. The agriculture business is UM very

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 1>much of a regulator business, so that maybe isn't the

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>best example. But in terms of expanding their specialty lines, yes,

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>they certainly could add more underwriters and and have expanded

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in that area um even though they chose to acquire

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>so UM. From my point of view, I think what

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>they're probably would say to you is, look, we've got

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a great management team and valid Is. We think they've

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 1>done well in diversifying their own business. We like how

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they assess risk. To my point about their desire to

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>reduce risk and volatility, they would probably say, what better

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>way than to bring in the expert team from a

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>reinsurer that knows how to handle that risk, and that

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>expertise is what we're going to use. I think that's

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>what they tell you. Again. My concern is that they

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>still are bringing in a lot of exposure in risk

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>onto the books as they do that. Thanks very much.

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Adams is our senior insurance industry analysts talking about

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a i G spending five and a half billion dollars

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>for Validus, the future of General Electric, what do we

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>see as the future of the industrial conglomerate. Karen yubile

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Heart is our industrials analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, and she

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>has the enviable task of watching what happens with ge Karen,

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>what can you tell us about their actual strategy get

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>into the details of a sort of potential aircraft engine. Uh,

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of deal in a moment. But what is actually

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>the strategy for g E as laid out by management. Well,

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it is evolving. Uh. You know. The event last week

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>was on the insurance problems on that call um setting

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>aside money because of long term care policies that were

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>sold about a decade ago. Yes, but for the first

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>time the CEO did suggest that he, you know, might

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>get go for selling parts of business. Has been more

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>aggressive moves which people really were looking for, because which

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>businesses could they or should they sell that would generate

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>the biggest premium, the biggest price, Well not totally, butchering

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the core of the company that that's the good businesses

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>or healthcare and aviation. I don't think they'll let go

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of them. They need the earnings, they need the cash flow.

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>You know. The most immediate one would be Baker, Hughes

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and a couple of the smaller businesses, which inaggregate would

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>actually help solve the problem if they put all the

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>cash toward debt in their pension, they would solve a

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>go a long way. Bank of America Mary Lynch coming

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>out today with the downgrade of the shares um perhaps

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit late. I mean the shares trading it

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>around sixteen dollars right now lost since December two thou

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and eleven. You should say, yeah, okay, good footnote there.

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's also a report that General Electric supply the

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>engines for the A three eight superjumbos that Emirates has

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 1>ordered from Airbus. Would that be enough to really change

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the perception of aviation business? The perception of the aviation

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>business is really good. It's it's it's you know, it's

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>an eighty four billion dollar business. It's got twenty seven

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>ebit margins um you know, mid twenties, just a bit margins,

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>very well positioned, high you know, a lot of parts annuity.

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>But they don't do it all right, I mean they

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>do it in conjunction with Pratton Whitney. I believe well

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that those are the two engines, those are the two

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>major engines. And then also they got the deal with Saffran.

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes that's a j V. Yeah, So I mean, why

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>not spin off the aviation business? Uh? That would materially,

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess because it's one of the I mean it

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is a standalone It would make some sense. However, they

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>would lose a lot of the earnings while they have

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a credit crunch and cash is you know,

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I um, and then they'd have an earnings problem. But

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it would make some sense in it is

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a round jewel. Okay, this might be a really basic question.

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>But how will ge go about trying to solicit offers

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>or solicit you know, some estimates of what other companies

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>would pay for their businesses right now without undermining their value. Well,

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>they're in a weakened state. Uh no, no doubt right.

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've done to some of the parts valuation

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that does show there is you know, a decent amount

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of value um low twenties um equity value. However, they're

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>going to take haircuts on selling these businesses because as

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a stock, you know, weekends and people get liquidity fear,

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>fair fears, um, they're not going to get those full values.

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So uh, you know they're gonna have to They're gonna

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>shop the baker Use. They can just start selling down

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>now they have a restriction, but that can be dealt with.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 1>They have to go to baker Use Conflict Committee, which

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is part of the board and and you know, asked

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to get out early because they they are not legal.

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>They the deal is they can't sell down till July. UM.

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, so that that step one. But that's a

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of value that they could get out of

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that UM. So that would be one fast move they

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>could do without having to you know, they have to

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:52.360
<v Speaker 1>get permission of course, but they don't have to look

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>for the market setting the value. So that's that. Okay,

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's Baker hues. What about the Alls Tom acquisition?

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Could they are they gonna write that off? Do you

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's the latest that people are um speculating on.

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that they're going to take a big

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>right off in power yet. Uh. You know, in the

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter you have to take a look at all

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 1>your assets. That's why that issue is coming up for discussion.

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>It's possible, I think that they will hold on to

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>that UM at its current value at this point. Do

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a sense of what the time frame is

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that g is following with the asset sales? Well, I

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 1>don't know that they have any specifically underway so I

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>but I know that with the liquidity concerns, that it's

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be sooner, sooner than later they haven't. I

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>mean the the that's the first time he really talked

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>about it. I think he's seeing the seriousness of we've

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>got to do something bigger. So I think you're gonna

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>You're definitely going to see something, uh, you know sometimes

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this year. In my opinion, I you know, I wouldn't

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if they noun something on Baker use in

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the short term. Actually, Karen, you will, Heart. Thank you

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Karen evel Heart is industrials

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 1>analyst for Bloomberg is joining us here in our eleven

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>three oh studios. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.