WEBVTT - Stacy Rasgon on How the Global Chip Crisis May Be Getting Even Worse

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. So, Tracy, you know,

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously all year we've been talking about inflation and supply

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>chain issues and shortages, but one of the first areas

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that we really started talking about was the head to

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>do with the disruptions and semiconductors. Yeah, I think this

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>was like our entry into global supply chain issues. Um,

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we started talking about semiconductors and this idea that there

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>was a shortage of these chips that were needed for

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of things. And I think, you know, if

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you are of a certain age or generation, you tend

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to think of semiconductors is something that goes into a computer.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But of course nowadays they show up in phones, in

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, things like refrigerators, and of course some cars

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. Just almost every major appliance now seems to

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of chip embedded in it. Right, And

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>we did like a six episode series I think, earlier

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>this year about chips. But the chip story, even though

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>we haven't talked about as much lately, it really hasn't

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>gone away. And I think I just saw last week

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>there was a story about some chip manufacturer in Malaysia

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>reducing production. They're pretty regular stories. You mentioned automobiles about

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>car companies still not being able to get an adequate

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>supply of chips and thus being forced to cut production.

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So they the issues have not gone away by any straight. Yeah,

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Toyota made a massive downgrade to its expected production.

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so this is something that I've been wondering about.

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>So on the one hand, yes, we have some COVID

0:01:54.880 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>outbreaks in Asia that have disrupted semiconductor factories or manufacturers,

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly in Malaysia where they manufactured. My understanding as they

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>manufacture some components for semiconductors or something like that. So okay,

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you have the Delta variant and that's not production to

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>some extent. But on the other hand, you know, as

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you said, this issue has been going on for quite

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>some time now, like more than a year, and the

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>big question is why aren't we getting to a better

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>place in terms of production at this point. The semiconductor

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>companies know that they need to boost production. They know

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of demand out there, so why isn't that happening. Well,

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we are going to get some answers today on

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the show. Why it is that we're now in the

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>middle of September. Uh, and we still don't have something

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>resembling like a smooth semiconductor supply chain. We're gonna be

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>going back to our first guest that we had on

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the Semiconductor series. I think he actually appeared twice already.

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>The last time was in March. We're gonna be speaking

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>with Stacy Raskin. He's managing director and senior analyst at

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Bernstein covering u S semiconductors. He's going to hopefully answer

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>all of our questions. So Stacy, welcome back to Odd Lots. Oh,

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it's great to be back. Thank you for having me again.

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So are we right? I mean, it appears not only

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>are the issues persisting like in some some in some measures,

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>things seem to be getting worse. Yeah, And so we

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>had hoped that by now things would be getting back

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 1>to some semblance of normalcy, and and you're right, they're

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>really not. It's actually getting worse, not better, in many

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>parts of the market. So we still are seeing you know,

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>production shortfalls, we're still seeing shortages. You know, We've been

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>hoping obviously that you know, COVID would be you know,

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>on on the decline at this point, it is not

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it is still causing disruptions. You mentioned Malaysia and some

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>other areas. So yeah, we're we're we're not back to

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>normal yet. We're still seeing some of the same issues

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that we've been seeing for quite a while. So what

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly is driving those disruptions then? So you know, you

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned some COVID outbreaks in parts of Asia, but it

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>seems to be you know, we might see some factory closures,

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>some isolated factory closures, but it seems like the issues

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>are sort of more endemic than just you know, an

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>outbreak at a particular factory. Yes, I mean may be

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>helpful to go back a little bit and talk about

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>what caused these shortages in the first place. And I

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about this, I think I can't remember, maybe it's

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the second time that I was on. But if we

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>if we look at the automotive sector first, that that's

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>where we're seeing some of the biggest issue. We've seen

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the biggest issues all the whole time, and you're right,

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>we're still actually seeing production costs. You mentioned Toyota. We

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>also had recently, GM and Ford and a bunch of

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>others and then it's been going so they're still seeing shortages.

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>You have to remember the issue there was initial supply

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>chain whipsaws. You know, in the in the beginning of COVID,

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>factories got shut down. Um you know, people were locked

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>in their houses. They weren't driving demand at least initially

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>for for small amount of time plummeted and remember the

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>auto vendors canceled all their orders. Demand came roaring back

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously the plan started opening up. They went back hat

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>in hand to try to get capacity, to get pret action,

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and it just didn't exist. And it was like, well,

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, get in line right, it'll it'll take time.

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>And remember what I said. You know, even if you're starting,

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>even if you have the capacity available, it takes months

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>um to make these chips from a from a dead start,

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and so that caused you know, cascading effects. I mean

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it still has, right, and you know that. The other

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>issue in the other end markets was just demand is

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>very strong and that was part of the reason we

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>saw issues in auto as well. I mean, the capacity

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that they were using got back filled in many cases

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>by other stuff. But just in general we've seemed really

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>really strong demand I mean much stronger than I think

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>anybody thought was was going to be possible in things

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>like PCs and like anything that was sort of work

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>from home, study from home, play from home. Um. I

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>think you also need to couple this with the fact

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that the industry itself, I mean, you know, remember SEMIS

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it cost billions of dollars dead capacity, and you know,

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>historically they you know, they added capacity to demand that

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>they saw and when demand was very very strong, much

0:05:58.040 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>stronger than I just didn't have, the capacity was avail.

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And because that demand is still strong, you know, we're

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>still shy, we're still short, we're still tight. Um. And

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>so now you have to layer on on top of

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>all that. Though you remember this, this stuff is never smooth,

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and when you have these kinds of problems, they do

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>cascade and they cause more issues, and it's just it's

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 1>just a big mess. I mean, it still is. And

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>so it hasn't we haven't had time to actually bring

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>enough capacity online to to alleviate things. And the demand.

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, in most parts of the market we can

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>talk about where people are worried about demand maybe starting

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to roll over a bit, but in general, demand is

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>still strong. Supply is still tight um and and we've

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>still got problems and it hasn't it hasn't alleviated yet.

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And now you throw you know, the resurgence of Delta

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>on top of us. And again you mentioned Malaysia. What

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they do A lot of Malaysia they do what's called

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>back end. It's a lot of what what's called packaging,

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So they don't necessarily they don't have like semiconductor factories

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in Malaysia. They're not making like chips. Once you actually

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>make the chip in the factory, you have to what's

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>called packaging. You have to put the electrical leads and

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>everything on it's such that you can take that chip

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and actually put it on a circuit board. So they

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>do that kind of stuff assembly and testing and other

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>things in Malaysia, and a lot of those issues were

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>impacted in a lot of that stuff is done in

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Southeast Asia and and a lot of those, uh things

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>were impacted by by COVID. So that's just something else

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>icing on the cake on top of everything else and

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>not getting better. Yeah, that was one of the things

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I remember we talked about one of our semi conductor

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>episodes with Willie she at Harvard Business school. And obviously,

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>just like in addition to the sort of technical challenges,

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>any given ship has a highly globalized supply chain. And

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>so as you mentioned, maybe it gets manufactured to wear

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.239
<v Speaker 1>in Taiwan, but then some sort of packaging happens in Malaysia,

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and so there must be to some extent issues that

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>are the sort of generalized supply chain issues that are

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>affecting more or less everything must have some having some

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>impact on semi conductors specifically, it is and so you right,

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so semis are extremely global, and I forget, I forget

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>how many different borders the average semiconductor crosses like in

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.239
<v Speaker 1>its in its lifetime, you know, from from initial production

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to actually getting sold to the end user. But but

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot, right, and you're right. They can be

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it can be a US company that's using

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the Taiwanes foundry to make it, where it gets packaged

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in Malaysia and then it goes to a distributor in China,

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and like it's it's all over the place. So there's

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of that, and there are big logistical

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>channel the challenges that we're seeing right now. Shipping costs

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>are actually getting getting much higher We've seen ports shutdowns

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in China and other places as are trying to control

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the spread of of delta um. We've seen container ships

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>like like stacking up. I think maybe I can't remember

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a fifth if the sewers canal was blocked the last

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>time we said that, I can't remember. But we're seeing

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>tons of a logistical challenges. A lot of semi conductor

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>comes in front. The other companies too, are starting to

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about this as well, like when when they talk

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>on earnings, calls and everything. We're starting to see some

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of those costs go up and some of these supply

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>chains are are are it's it's it's it's just a

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>big hot mess. I mean, the whole thing, which I

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>guess shouldn't really be a surprise is I mean, again,

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you know we had a global potential global catastrophe. You

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>know that was it was causing. I'm part of me

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is like amaze that it's been as resilient as it

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>has been. Frankly, but but it is, it is it

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>is still causing problems and and and it's funny like that. Obviously,

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the question I get the most is how long is

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it gonna last? I wish I had an answer. I don't,

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you know. And it's really funny when you when you

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>think about the stocks right and and and the companies,

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're they're still putting up monster numbers. The

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>sector right now, in terms of revenue is on track

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to grow probably twent this year and blow past five

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars for the first time in in in history.

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Um and and every quarter of the companies are putting

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>up better and better numbers. And I would say investor

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 1>conviction is getting less and less like the higher the

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>numbers go, because we've all seen this number this movie before.

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>We see this massive strong demand. Nobody really knows how

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>much of it is real and how much of it

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is phantom. We talked about double ordering and everything else

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the last time it was here. Um, you know, this

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is when when things were uncertain, they order more and

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and and so like. It's it's funny the stocks haven't

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>done much of anything, you know, even as the numbers

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>have you continued to go up and up and up,

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>because people still don't know how sustainable this, this this

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>strong demand is so stacy. This is something that I

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask you about. So you know, you mentioned

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>this cascade effect early on and you didn't mention it specifically,

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but there is this bullwhip effect that seems to be

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>at play where everyone was expecting demand to drop, companies

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>cut orders, so the semiconductor manufacturers UM sort of backed

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>off from production and then things turned out better than

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>people had expected and there was loads of demand and

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>the semiconductor companies have been trying to catch up ever since.

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>But I guess my question is, like, one, is there

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>something in particular about semiconductors and the manufacturing process that

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>makes them more sensitive to the bullwhip effect um, this

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>cascade idea. And then secondly, one of the things that

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>comes into play when there's a shortage a supply shortage

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is every when starts stockpiling, right, So it's hard to

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 1>tell what's real demand versus what's just people hoarding components

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>because they think they're not going to be able to

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 1>get them. So what's your sense of that at the moment,

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>real demand versus stockpiloting. Yeah, yeah, so let's let's address

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>the first question. They're like, why are semi's the bullwip right? Um? Yeah,

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it's there at the back of the supply chain. So

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>then you think about them and I'll take a microprocessor

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>for a PC just as a simple example, you know,

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like Intel or am D or whoever makes the processor,

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and then who does that get sold to, like a

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Taiwanese O d M maybe it's called Original Device Manufacturer

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>who builds like a notebook computer and then they stick

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it on a plane or a boat, right, and they

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 1>sell it, you know, they send it off to HP

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>or or something like that, and then HP, you know,

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>sells it to best Buy and then best Buy sells

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it to you or like. However, there's probably other steps

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in there as well. But there's a lot of points

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>within that chain where you can get inventory building or

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>bleeding or anything else. And and the fluctuations tend to

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>magnify as you work from the front of the chain back. Um.

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 1>This is a very well known that the thing you

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>see it all the time, and the semis are at

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the back of that supply chain. So small fluctuations, even

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>small fluctuations and end demand like at the customer level,

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>can propagate backwards and have corresponding a larger impact like

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the farther back you go in the chain, and the

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>semis are just at the back. And and remember I

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>think we talked about this last time. But you know

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>that the semi companies have to plan in this environment,

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and their actual my opinion at least, is that semi

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>conductor company management teams their actual visibility into what their

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>end customers are truly doing is precisely zero. They have

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>no idea. They do the best they can. I'm not

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not blaming them. It's not good or bad, right,

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it just is right. And the best companies out there,

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like A are willing to accept this and and deal

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with it. But their actual visibility is not great. But

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, companies are trying to do some stuff

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>right at you to to get to your second question

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>around potential double ordering and stock piloting and so so. Yes,

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>this this is a standard kind of behavior, and probably

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>not just in semis. I mean this is normal human behavior,

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>like when you can't get something that you need, you

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>tend to order more and again. This is a phenomenon

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>known as double ordering. And I mean a simple example.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you're making widgets and you need you know,

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred semi conductors you know whatever, right, and your

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>inventors says, okay, I can't, I'll give you ten. I

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>can supply ten and i'll give you the other you know,

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety the you need, I'll give you those in fifty weeks.

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 1>So your next step is to order a thousand semi

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>coffer from wherever you could hope to cobble them together

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>on the hope that you can build up the hundred

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of leading and then you cancel all the other orders. Right,

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>And so what semi conduct investors tend to watch for

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that this is a fundamental phenomenon as lead times like

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>how long does it take to get the product after

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you order it, and those lead times are stretching out.

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>What what what investors tend to watch for is when the

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>lead times start to pull back in because that's usually

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>when the cancelations start to happen. And so what a

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:50.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies are doing right now is they're actually

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>doing things like putting in long lead time orders non

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>cancelable orders, for example. Generally in the space historically that

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>you didn't do that, there were no penalties to cancel orders,

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>um companies. Now some companies are starting to put things

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 1>like non cancelable orders. Other companies are parsing their orders.

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, I know this, customers ordering a hundred parts,

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think they only need thirties, so I'm gonna

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>only ship them thirty. Right. We're seeing some of that

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>as well, and so the companies are doing the best

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they can in this environment to try to manage through.

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>It is their stockpilot going, undoubtedly their stockpilot. I don't

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>see how there couldn't be. Can you measure it? No,

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it's hard. So and I'll give you an example, like

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>there there are some cases where, again you go, look

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>at the auto vendors, even if they're stockpiloting, and whether

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they may be stocked by some much, but we were

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>still seeing actual production cuts. So clearly, you know, even

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>if they're they're stockpiling some parts, clearly they don't have

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>enough of what they need to build the cars that

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they want. Right, So we're still seeing some some some

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>primary examples here of situations where actual shortages, where the

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>shortages still seem to be real, because we wouldn't be

0:14:52.720 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>having actual production cuts if they didn't have actual shortages. Obviously,

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this is what you sort of described is going on

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in a range of industries. Are we gonna hit one day?

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And could this be a source of investor concerned? We're

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>like we wake up and there is just a crazy

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>blood of chips because so many entities or is it

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>so is capacity so constrained generally that it's just hard

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to imagine there ever being a point where there's a

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>huge oversupply. I mean never never say never, right, and

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the normal practices, Yeah, you'd wake up one day and

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you'd see a glut that that is normally how this

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>would happen. And again, like this is why investors are worried,

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and this is why even though the numbers are going up,

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the stocks aren't really going up all that much. Multiples

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>are coming down, and people are worried. You know that

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>we're you know, getting closer to peak, right, And I

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>guess mathematically, like by definition, we're getting close to peak

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>every day. At the same time, we could be quote

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>unquote post to peak for quite some time, right, because

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>as long as this stuff's working. Again, the other thing

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you need to remember with with this is even though

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>demand is really strong, I mean like you need, you

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>need everything. So that's the thing is like the auto values.

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>See I'll pick on the auto vendors again, like I

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>mean they could be getting percent of everything they need,

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>but if they don't have the five percent that they

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that they need they can't chip the car, right, And

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you could have a situation where like you have auto

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>vendor A you know they have and they're they're short

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>five percent. An auto vendor V hascent what they need

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in their short five percent, but it's a different five percent, right, Um,

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>so that maybe something what we're seeing right now is

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>like I I don't know, like at some point we

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>may get a glot and now. At the same time,

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you can also argue that like post COVID, some of

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>this demand is real and so like like I'll look

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>at PCs for example, PCs right now we're incredib have

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>been incredibly strong. I mean we were doing two hundred

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and fifty to two hundred and sixty million PCs a

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>year pre COVID, Like we did three hundred million one

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>right now we're on track to do probably close to

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>three fifty, which would sort of match the peak in

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the industry, which is in and there's a big controversy

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in PC PCs. Right our PC is gonna grow next year,

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be down or like whatever. But even if

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they're down, they're probably not going back to to fifty,

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>right probably not like we I could argue that there's

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a structural case. I mean, like like whatever the normalized

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>run righted pieces ought to be, it's probably higher than

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it was pre COVID. And you can make that argument

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>about a number of event markets. And so even if

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we get a glut, some of the things we we

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>probably had pulled forward in digitization and everything pre COVID

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>or since pre COVID, and we've got more people doing remote.

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Remote work is going to be a thing from now on,

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>like whether or not, like people start to go back

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>to the office is more. Um, I could argue that

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>some structural level event things should be higher, you know,

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of capacity. I think Tracy, you asked during

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the intro, why isn't the semiconductor industry added capacity? It

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>just takes time, right, They're all trying. I mean you

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>can go look at like this the Semi cup guys

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>like like way for fab Equipment w f E is

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>is going through the roof right now, and you've got

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.959
<v Speaker 1>big forecast from from big companies, you know, throwing out

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>big numbers in terms of what they're planning on spending

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>over the next few years. Capacity probably will get added.

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>It just takes time. To get added. So the worry,

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously is that capacity comes online right when the man

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:11.959
<v Speaker 1>starts to roll off, and I don't know what it's

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>going to look like. I guess, well, this year will

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>probably be fine. Still in terms of the fundamentals and numbers,

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what two and twenty three look like. Those

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>are the kind of time frames we're probably talking about

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of supply coming on UM and we'll see

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>how well it is to well mactually is to demand

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>like when it doesn't. So I wouldn't expect this to

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>make a massive difference to the supply demand imbalance. But

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 1>what are the chances that you start to see customers,

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the people who are actually ordering chips just back away

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 1>or decide they're going to design more analog stuff, um,

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in order to avoid this problem. And I'm

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking specifically, you know, last week, Bloomberg grand an article

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>about air conditioning manufacturers dropping copper components because the price

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>of copper was so high, and they're all starting to

0:18:58.240 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>not all of them, but some of them are starting

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to switch to aluminum. So I'm wondering, like, could you

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>see a similar thing with semiconductors or is it just

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty impossible given the nature of the types

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>of electronics we're talking about. What do you mean like

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>switching away from semi connectors to something else? Yeah, I guess,

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>like I guess going analog. Right, there were like a

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>few car companies that were saying they're going to like

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>drop some of the complicated electronics in order to produce Well,

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we we are seeing some of that. So some of

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the car we seem like cars. I'll make it up,

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>but like you know, shipping without you know, the the

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>electronically controlled rear view mirror or stuff like that. Right,

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing some things because I remember, you know, if

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna ship a car, you kind of need the

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>full kid. If there's things you could leave out where

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the car is still sailable and then add them later

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>like you could do, we're seeing some of that. The

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>other thing we're seeing with like Auto that or sometimes

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is they're building the cars like everything. They're building the

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>car complete except for the stuff they have, and they're

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>parking it so that when they when they get the

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>park they need, then they can ship. I actually suspect

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.040
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing this in PCs as well. My math and

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>we published as my mass suggests that as strong as

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>PCs are right now, I think CPUs shipments, the microprocessors

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>shipments are even stronger. And we've heard like like HPS

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of talked about on ARMIS calls about building things

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>like strategic Inventor. I suspect they're building kits, you know,

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and and and sitting on the shell phone. So as

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>soon as they get the final parts that they're missing

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that they can they can ship. So we are seeing

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>some of that. So you can call that stockpiling in

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>some sense. Right, It's hard to know how widespread it

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is and everything else, but I mean it's a normal

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>behavior that we might see in cars. We are seeing,

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:29.719
<v Speaker 1>to your to your points of some of these things

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>are getting left up. But the thing with cars, you

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>can't just like like we we can't go back, you know,

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Like my first car was the Toyota Corolla. It didn't

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>have very much in the ways of semi conductors in it. Right,

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>We're we're probably not going back to something that you

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>can't all right, And in fact, some one thing we're

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing from the auto vendors, the limited supply of semis

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 1>that they do have, they're actually selling higher end cars, right,

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>They're actually prioritizing because the profits are higher, right, So

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're they're they're saving the limited semi editors.

0:20:58.040 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>They have to actually make as most money as possible

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>with them, and so in some cases we may be

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing like mix actually going up rather than rather than down.

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I've wondered about that with with with various industries,

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the degree to which, like, okay, if you have a

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>shortage of components overall. I remember we were talking about

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit. We actually did an episode several

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, like on bathtubs and appliances. But I've been

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>wondering the degree to which end users of technology or

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>raw materials are changing their mix and prioritizing the production

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of the the higher margin lines. Yeah, it's it's hard

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to know. I do think in auto we we've seen

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>that in other end marketing, and I can mention graphics

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>cards of them. I mean people you can't even buy

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a graphics card right and they're just selling everything they

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>can make right now. Um, But yeah, I do think

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.719
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing some of that us anecdotally. Um, we are

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing it. How much is you know, obviously on top

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of everything else, one is seeing this incredible crypto boom.

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>How much does that contribute at the margins too tightness

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in the semiconductor space, and how much as a professional

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor analyst does that force you to get to know

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>this sort of new industry. Well, it's it's not that

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 1>new anymore. And we've seen a number of crypto crypto

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>booms and and and busts over over the earth fair enough,

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think like so you can talk about like

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>like the crypto impact on shortages in a couple of

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>different they're just like, for example, of shortages of graphics

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:26.959
<v Speaker 1>cards and again go try to buy one. The other

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is like taking a capacity at the foundries. And I

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>remember duringen you had a lot of the bitcoin minors,

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>guys like bitmain that make custom chips to mind bitcoin.

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>I think at one point they were a ten percent

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>customer of t SMC, like for a heartbeat, right, So

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>for that was like back during the bubble. I don't

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>think we've seen anything nearer that much for for their

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for the the guys that make the custom mining chips

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this time. And I don't think t SMC has been

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>prioritizing those guys nearly as much. But in general, I mean,

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we've just got tightness all around at the leading edge,

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and certainly that's been part of the problem with with

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>graphics cards. It's been hard to get, and obviously the

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>demand has been very strong. I'd also say like even

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 1>beyond with for graphics are even beyond crypto. The gaming

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>cycle this time is much stronger. Obviously we hit we

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>had COVID, and people were trapped in their houses and

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to the video games were a good way

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to pass the time, so they wanted to buy the

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>cards and the products from both in video and A

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and D this time were actually much better than the

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>prior cycle, which was kind of like you know, second

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>half of and so there's actually a lot more I

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>think demand from gamers for the parts this time versus

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>last time where I where I do think a lot

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of that incremental demand um was from the cryptomotis. And

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>so what happened in nine when the miners stopped buying,

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the gamers didn't really want to step up and pick

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>up the slack, and so obviously we saw some fairly

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>big shortfalls, you know, the beginning of end of eighteen,

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>beginning of nineteen for for guys like in video this

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>time that their news cycle. It's called it's called amp

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>here is is the code name for it. I do

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>think actually gaming demand is quite strong for it. They

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>can't get the parts. So one hope for in videos

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>is if and when the miners stop buying that the

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>gamers will start to pick up the slack okay, and

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll see like we're we're not there yet in terms

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of the demand is still like off the charts I

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>think for for both the video and am D for

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for game for graphics cards. So let's talk about I

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>think actually the first time we had you on who

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>was about like the fall of Intel or Intel Stumble.

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>That was like the first theme and of course it

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>had a pretty rough and they had fallen behind. So

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that so then they bounced. Then they hired the new CEO,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>girl singer, and the stock rallied and people like this

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of like, oh they're gonna like reinvest in production

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>because that's the core issue that we talked about, there's

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>falling behind our productive capabilities. Now the stock has had

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a pretty rough year once again, So what is the

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>current issue. What are the big concerns right now facing Intel?

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>You bet it's a few things. So you're right with

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the day they hired Pat Elsoner, I think the stock

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>was up and I get like, I like Pat Patt

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is the guy they probably should have hired two years ago, right,

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and so he's he's the right guy for the job.

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I think now that things that he's not a magician either,

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and he has to play the a hand that he's

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>been dealt, and the hand that he was dealt is

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough. And I think I said this the first

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>time it was on But the problems that Intel's having,

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>they didn't just develop like over the last couple of quarters.

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 1>These have been ten years in the making and they're

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>not going to get fixed in a couple of course.

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>They will probably take five or ten years to to

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to fix. And so they've done a few things. Actually

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>since we chat, I think that was the last November

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>when we chatted, and and so we've we've they've done

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>a few things. Um number one, we talked a lot

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>about their difficulties at seven animeters. So they're claiming that

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>seven animeters is now fixed. They're claiming the issue was

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>they didn't they weren't using eu V what's called extreme

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>ultra Violet mothography, which is a very advanced type of

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>patterning technology to make very small features. UM and I

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>guess that that that is their their public stance on

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on what the solution was they're gonna use. They're gonna

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>be much bigger using e V and that's going to

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>fix the problem. It's also, by the way, clear probably

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>why they didn't want to use it. It's very expensive.

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Their capex this year is gonna win up to something

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>like twenty billion dollars and that's not foundry, that's their

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>their own core business. But they don't really have a choice,

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>so they they've claimed that's fixed. They've also now I

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know, a month maybe two months ago, they put

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.199
<v Speaker 1>out a roadmap and this road they did a few things.

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Number one is they adjusted their their nomin Remember we

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about the node nomenclature and how like Intel nodes

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>didn't correspond to t SMC nodes in terms of process.

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>So they've changed their nomenclature to ALIGNE. Okay, so what

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>they were talking about seven naneties before that that is

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>now Intel four for an Okay, fine, what whatever. I'm

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to knock them because they were they weren't

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>gaining anything by being a pedantic about it, so I mean, okay, fine.

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>But then the other thing is they said they're gonna

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>do kind of like five evolutions in four years. They're

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna do they're doing ten now, and they're gonna go

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to I think I can't remember what it's called ten

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Enhanced super fin or something, and then they're gonna go

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>to Intel four and then Intel three, which is like

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>like an enhanced seven, and then they're gonna go to

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>something called twenty and twenty A is like in back

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in and twenty A technology, We'll have a couple of

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>new innovations. It's gonna have something called a gate all

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>around transistor structure, which we could talk about what that is,

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>but it's a new type of structure to on the

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>transition to get higher performance and and everything. And so

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that's that's one thing. The industry, by the way, is

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>wrestling with that technology. Samsung has at the roadmap intels

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 1>now putting it on the roadmap, and they're gonna have

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>something called back backside power, which again we can talk

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>about without some innovations there. And what they're basically saying

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>is by that time frame, by that sort of like

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 1>five time frame, when we introduced this twenty A process

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>using this you know, this gate all around orchanization, we

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>will have we will have caught up and then surpassed

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>t SMC at that point. So they put up this

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>roadmap that says, in like four or four or five years,

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>we think we can close the gap with t SMC

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and and and beyond we will surpass it. So a

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of things with that number one. Even even though

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it sounds good, it's a very aggressive roadmap. Like

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I said, it's sort of four iterations in five years

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>and they're there, you know, trajectory and execution of the

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>last decade. You know, this would be a big change.

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 1>So more power to that they can do that. But

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that even if they can execute on it,

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's not a done deal, they basically came out

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and told everything, we're still gonna be behind for the

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>next four years, right, So the window is still for

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody else to attack us is still open for at

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>least like four years. So that was the was the

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>dark side of what they were saying. So even if

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>they execute on it perfectly, the windows still open for

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>four years or more. And if they don't execute on it,

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they're screwed. But he had to come out and put

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a credible, like a semi credible like like statement out

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 1>that this as we can close they got because his

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>alternatives to laid out and die right, because if they

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>can't catch up by that or whatever, they'll they'll ever

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>catch up. That that's it, right. So that's that's one

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that they're doing. Um. The other thing they're doing

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is they're they're making more use of outsourcing. And again

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>when they it's they're they're doing a lot of stuff

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in house. They're doing some more more stuff at t

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>SMC and so they're booking capacity I guess three n

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>animated capacity at t SMC and so we'll see what

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of products they make. They're actually doing some graphics

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff over there now, and they're gonna be doing some

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>other things. And then thirdly they're gonna be focusing on

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on specialized packaging. What's what's what's called chiplets where I'm

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>disaggregating the chip into various types of functionalities and making

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>each of those smaller pieces potentially different places and then

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>combining those together. And this is something we're intel things.

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>They have an advantage and they've got very good. This

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is packaging and they've got very good packaging technology, but

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>so do others. And so we'll see all this works out.

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So that that that's sort of the plan, right, and

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>then and then and then and then they're gonna be

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>building out all this foundry stuff and to do that,

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be getting subsidies. Right, So this is the

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>other the other things. So that in general that the strategy,

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>like like some simplified, is to try to stabilize the roadmap,

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>try to put out some sort of credible path to

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>catching up, and and thirdly to beg for money from

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the government, which whether it's not a dumb idea, right

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>if if anybody, if there's any time right now they

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to go get money from from governments to build out

0:29:46.920 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>sending a capacity. Now is the time. So this is

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>something that the Biden administration has been you know, specifically

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>calling out and targeting, um the idea of making the

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>US stronger in semiconductor manufacturing. Like how much of a

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>difference could that make to future supply demand balance? Well,

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>they probably I was right now. It's fifty two billion

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>dollars I think is the number on the tip, which

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>which frankly is a rounding error. Again, t SMC is

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about one single company. They're going to go spend

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty sorry a hundred billion dollars over three years one company.

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So the US right now is saying fifty two billion dollars,

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>which is manufacturing and lady in a bunch of stuff

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>over like a five year period for the entire US

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>based industry. So, I mean, it's that kind of gives

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you an idea of the scale. Um, it's probably not

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna make much of a difference, but but it's a start.

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>You gotta start somewhere. And then like I said, well

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll see like like how they get spread out between

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Intel and Samsung and TSMC. And it's funny, you know, Intel,

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like they did a paid article in police to Co

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a little while back where I mean gals was basically saying,

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>don't give the money to foreign companies, give it to

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>us because like TSMC, like they're gonna build it. They're

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>building this factory Arizona. It's five nanimeters. By the time

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they bring it online, that's gonna be lagging edge and

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna leave all the leading edge I P off shore,

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>And so you should give the money to loss effectively,

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it was saying that which which is? I personally think

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>if we're really interested in building up the US like

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>supply chain in semis, you need to make it resilient.

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he can bet on one company. I

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>think you need to spread the wealth around and guys

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>like TSMC and Sam's they already have customers, like really,

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and Intel's talked about they're gonna work with Qualcomm and

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:37.239
<v Speaker 1>some others like in like five years, like maybe we'll see, right,

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>TSMC and these other guys have customers today, So I'm

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of the opinion it would probably be better to spread

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that wealth around um and and we'll see a fifty

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollars is where it stops? Like I don't know,

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I think if we really want to make a difference,

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>we need more. But but it's a start, so we'll

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>so we'll, you know, well we'll see. You know, there's

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>some other issues with within tel. We talked about the stock.

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the strategy sounds credible, so you could ask

0:31:57.800 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this on wise of Stock been like such a dog.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that he's you know, they've been running

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>around like trying to draw up excitement for what this

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>vision could look like and I get that, but I'm

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of the opinion they're about that they have to drop

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a hammer on us because you start thinking about this

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, like what what's gonna what's gonna happen in

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of capital and capital intensit is going up, free

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>cash is going down, Gross margins next, you're way too high.

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>They need to come down. Um. They're talking about they

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>think PCs are gonna grow next year. I personally think

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're saying that because like they're screwed if PCs

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>don't grow next year. Right, Um, I think numbers need

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to need a fairly sizeable reset. And we've got they've

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>got an Animals Day coming up in November when everybody's

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of widely expecting them to give us like the model,

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>like what is the vision for what this thing looks

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>like during the transition as we go from where we

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>are now to where maybe we're going in in five

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>years or whatever. Um. And people are really hesitant to

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>do anything with the stock in front of the anialyst

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>day because we don't actually know how low things like

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>gross margins and free cash flow and everything are gonna go.

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>But you can make the case that they need to

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>go that they need to go a lot lower than

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>they're getting modeled right now. So so this sort of

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>brings back you know, even prior to so okay, during

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the last eighteen months of COVID and so forth, chip

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>industry demand has been extremely strong, and that's contributed to

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the tightness. And one of the themes that we that

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>was discussed even prior to COVID was that the chip

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>industry seemed to be getting less less cyclical overall. And so,

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, for years the eighties and nineties, I think

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>chips were seeing as this classic boom bust industry and

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>then for years going uh, you know, I don't know.

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>The last decade there's just been the secular growth in

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors overall because they get put into like everything from

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>cars to refrigerators to computers, bcs, two chairs and so forth.

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Is there any is that fundamental theme expected to continue

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that regardless of what happens, the secular growth of chips

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue, or are there concerns that at

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>some point some of these boom bust cycles might return.

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that those two things are mutually exclusive,

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and so I'll give you my own just a number one.

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's let me put the near term cyclical concerns aside

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>for a moment. Long term, I'm actually more positive on

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on Semi's coming out of COVID than I've been in

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a long time in terms of that secular growth theme.

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 1>I am. And look, you know this, the sector I mean,

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>like last year was four and forty billion dollars. And

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>off the base, even if Semis just grew five percent

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a year over the cycle, you have a trillion dollar industry.

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>By and by the way, this year, Semis are probably

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>not gonna grow five percent. They they may grow twenty

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>five percent this year off off of that four and

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>if they did, we we get pretty close to five

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>d and fifty billion dollars. And so well, we'll see

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>what things do, right, but you're gonna have a lot

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of growth this year, and so like even if we

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>go into a downturn next year, who knows, maybe we

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>we could right sure, um, you think about like that runway,

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>We're we're likely still be well over five billion dollars

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>would be my guessing, even in a downturn scenario, which

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is much higher than we were. Um and and and

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:00.839
<v Speaker 1>long term, this idea of like, is the industry someday

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a trailion dollars? I think absolutely it will be a

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>trailion dollar. And whether it's twenty thirty five or like

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>what what have you. Um I think a lot of

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 1>the trends were seeing a real this whole idea of

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of of of content increase and and and digitization and

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.800
<v Speaker 1>everything else. Some I'm a firm believer, and more so

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>than I have been. UM So I'm pretty positive long

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>term and semilies now the near term cyclical. This is

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting because you kind of mentioned like semis

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>used to be really really cyclical and then they got

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>less cyclical. What we used to see we used to

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:30.479
<v Speaker 1>see these big supply cycles where like supply would exceed

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>demand and pricing would would would follow when you get

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>these really big swings. And the last really major supply

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:38.720
<v Speaker 1>cycle we had was was the tech bubble, like two thousand,

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousand one. Mostly since then we had what we

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>are it called inventory cycles against semis are the back

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of the supply chain, and you get fluctuations in demand

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that can propagate backwards and you get bigger swings and

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and usually was inventory cycle happens when like the customers

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of the channel starts to bleed or build inventory, and

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>so they they reduced purchases of semis for a little bit,

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and they bleed out inventory where they increased purchases, and

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>they build inventory, and so semi's overship or undership demand,

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>but it's much shorter. They tend to last a quarter

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>two or three and and and they show up as

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:10.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of like resets, You sort of reset the base

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>either up or down, rather than these big swings. You

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>look what's going on right now. We're we're having a

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>good old fashioned supply cycle right now. We haven't had

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>one of these for a long long time. So I

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>don't know how this is a ladin Like Historically, they

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>tend to end badly, you know, And so we'll we'll see.

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Although I could also argue that, like I said, maybe

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the secular drivers of the industry are and

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 1>they you know, they were if you go back to

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 1>when we used to have big supply cycles, I would

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I would argue the secular growth in the US it

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>was pretty strong back then too, so maybe you have

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 1>that to try to offset it somewhat. But I mean,

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we we've we've got a supply cycle going on right now.

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:42.919
<v Speaker 1>We haven't had seen one of these outside of memory

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in a long long time. But you you can believe

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>that and be be nervous about the neartive medium from

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 1>cyclical and still have a positive long term view in

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 1>terms of like secular growth of the industry. They're not

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>mutually exclusive. Well, just stacy any other big sort of

0:36:57.160 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>thoughts things that we should watch for next. I mean,

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the Intel Analyst day, you know, like what

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>else is on your radar? We we should do like

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>a whole one of these calls somebody just probably on

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>semicap on way for fabrication equipment. That's a whole other

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the industry, right, Yeah, and I want to

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>do one on you know, the one that we never

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>did in the original series was the SML uh and

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>so maybe we got at some point we got to

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>do that one too. That's like the one big company

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:24.839
<v Speaker 1>we've never really I would I would be thrilled, Yeah,

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I would be thrilled. I don't cover a SML. I

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>have a colleague amend that is, but we can talk

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>about it. And like the semiicap industry in general, again,

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>it's it's even farther back than this supply since you

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 1>do get you get cicklicality there. But again like that,

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that's another one of these areas like long term I'm

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:41.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm like that that long term secular story on semicap

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>capital intensity going up, which has implications i'm across the

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:49.800
<v Speaker 1>value chain. Um, I think is hugely is hugely interesting.

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>That'll be uh, that'll be the next one we do.

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>You you let me know when I'll be there. We

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>can talk about it. Sounds good, Stacy, Thank you so

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>much for coming back on our lot. You met my

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 1>pleasure anytime. That was great, Thanks Stacy, Tracy. I always

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>like talking to Stacy obviously, you know, I think one

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of the interesting things that you know, he pointed out

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>which I hadn't really thought of or appreciated before. He's like,

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.359
<v Speaker 1>just how far deep in the cycle the chipmakers are

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and how little visibility they have into and demand and

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 1>so on top of everything else, you can really see

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 1>why so deep into this crisis, things aren't really smoothed

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>out yet. Yeah. Um, And also of course now you

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>have this issue of double ordering and how much of

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the demand is real versus people stockpiling. It feels like

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that's just going to cloud it up and make it

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>much more difficult in the future. And you know, it

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of reminded me of um, this is very like

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>add lots stuff. But it reminded me a little bit

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of the corporate bond market, where when there's a big

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>sale of like a bond that everyone wants to get,

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 1>people normally put in like padded orders so that they

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 1>can get quite a lot. So you know, they might

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>not actually need five million or something like that, but

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 1>they'll put in a massive order hoping that they get

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 1>some of that. You know, I kind of wonder like

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe that started because there was one really hot deal

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and then it just became normal behavior in the corporate

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 1>bond market. I kind of wonder if this is a

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 1>permanent shift for customers who are ordering semiconductors. Yeah, you

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 1>should write about that, Tracy. That's very like int essential

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Tracy analogy, the connection between the bowl whip effect and

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors and um book building in the big corporate concept

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you got you gotta I think that like I'm imagining

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the ven diagram of people who read about semi conductors

0:39:55.000 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and corporate contessential Tracy. But no, I mean I did

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>think that was really interesting. Also, like this idea that

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 1>like you know, there used to be UM free cancellations

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>or the idea that you know, and also that the

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers then try to game it the other way, so

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that if you know, if a client makes a hundred

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>million dollar order, they might only make fifty million on

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the assumption that this is really just a fifty million

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>dollar order in disguise, And so yeah, you can see

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 1>why that on top of everything else, and then of

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:33.279
<v Speaker 1>course the emergence of the delta variant, the fact that

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>chips crossed so many borders during their manufacturing just for

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 1>like the production itself and packaging and put in component.

0:40:42.880 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised or recording this septemb that we're still

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>seeing so many issues. M I mean, one thing I

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>will say is that I think the virus situation is

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>improving in Malaysia, so maybe that will help and maybe

0:40:57.120 --> 0:40:59.919
<v Speaker 1>at a minimum, as these sort of delta outbreaks start

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 1>getting under control in Asia, hopefully that will allow people

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to see how much of the current tightness in the

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:10.879
<v Speaker 1>market is driven by COVID disruptions versus the bull whip

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>effect UM that's been ongoing for like more than a

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>year now. Yeah, exactly right, well, we definitely got to

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>get Stacy back or for the semicap a SML episode,

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know this story is not over yet. No,

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it definitely isn't. All right, shall we leave it there?

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there. This has been another episode of

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the ad Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway. And I'm Joe Wiesenthal.

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 1>our guest on Twitter, Stacy Raskin. He's at s Raskin.

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Follow our producer Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson.

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca Levi at Francesca Today,

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and check out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the handle at podcasts. Thanks for listening.