WEBVTT -  Truly Odious Positions

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Jettide and now he Armstrong and Jetty. Not

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 2>just New York.

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 3>There are other races around the country where these socialists

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 3>candidates are coming to. The four obviously remain to be

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 3>seen if they can win the election in a falls.

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 3>They most certainly are likely to in New York because

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 3>the districts in which these three candidates prevailed were pretty

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 3>hard left districts to begin with. Where the siren song

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 3>of socialism may have some appeal. It happens, I guess

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 3>at least once every generation, and these are young voters

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 3>who turned out I guess to support these three candidates,

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 3>some of whom are maybe having trouble finding jobs.

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>The sirens Song of socialism.

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 4>How popular is it for average Americans? I don't know.

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 4>Maybe lanhe Chen does. He's the director of Domestic Policy

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Studies at Stanford University. Lannie, thanks for joining us today.

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 4>Appreciate your time.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 5>Great to do with you.

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 4>Jack. Yeah, you're younger than me, But I thought that

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 4>that whole issue of whether or not we would ever

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 4>want to be a socialist country was dead and buried

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 4>and not an argument we needed to have, but apparently

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 4>we do well.

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 6>I think it kind of is a little bit consistent

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 6>with some of the populist sentiment that we have right now.

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 6>You know, I think that there are these ideas that

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 6>socialist candidates promote that you know, if the siren song

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 6>that was brit Hume, who you had on earlier, that

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 6>really is the right way to describe it, because you've

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 6>got all these policies that people just sort of say, well, gosh,

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 6>that sounds pretty good.

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean, why don't we take from one group that

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 5>has a lot, Why don't we know, give that to

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 5>everybody else.

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 6>Why don't we think about increasing the size of government

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 6>so that government can do more. All of these ideas

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 6>to those probably who have a slightly more popular streak,

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 6>might at first glance seem attractive, And I think there's

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 6>a consistency to the success of socialist candidates, particularly in

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 6>urban areas like New York. And we didn't even talk

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 6>about LA, but in LA you're going to have a

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 6>socialist running against someone who's incompetent.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 5>But really, that is.

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 6>One of the things I think that is appealing to

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 6>people is just look, it seems like a really easy

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 6>solution to what is a really difficult set of economic problems.

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 6>So I kind of see the socialism, the rise of

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 6>socialism in America as consistent with the broader kind of

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 6>populus streak we see across our politics.

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 4>How big a problem is it for the Democratic Party?

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 4>Are they going to get steamrolled by the socialists or are

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 4>they going to be able to keep them at bay?

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think that's a huge question, particularly as they

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 6>look ahead to twenty twenty eight. I mean, putting aside

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 6>whatever happens in the midterm elections this November, how these

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 6>candid to do in places like New York and California.

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 6>The big question, I think is what what does the

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 6>heart and soul of the Democratic Party look like? And

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 6>those kinds of questions, by the way, Jack, you know,

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 6>these are the kinds of questions that only get resolved

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 6>during presidential election years, and I think the Democrats are

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 6>going to have to resolve what kind of party are

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 6>they going to be? Are they going to be a

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 6>party that tries to put together a governing coalition that is,

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, left center left, or are they going to

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 6>become the Party of AOC Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders,

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 6>And that question was put off for a couple of

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 6>years by the Biden administration. It was put off by

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 6>the crowning of Kamala Harris. And now they're going to

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 6>have to resolve that question as they go to.

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 5>Twenty twenty eight.

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 6>And I don't know where they're going to come out,

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 6>because I think if they come out on the side

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 6>of the socialists, it will doom them to not being

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 6>able to win a national election in my view for

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 6>several cycles, right, And it's gonna be a big problem

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 6>for him.

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've been li likening it to the Tea Party

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 4>back in the day in two thousand and ten. Joe

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 4>and I got pretty involved in the Tea Party and

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 4>liked a lot of the stuff they stood for. But

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 4>then you had some candidates that put Tea Party next

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 4>to their name and they were whack jobs. Yeah, But

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.839
<v Speaker 4>because they had Tea Party next to the name, they won,

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 4>and it kind of discredited the whole movement. And and

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.799
<v Speaker 4>then some of them, you know, discredited the entire Republican Party.

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 4>And I'm looking at some of these people that won

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 4>the other night, this one woman because we're learning more

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 4>about them after they won this one woman she demanded

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 4>the total eradication of Western civilization at one point.

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, I mean, look, the more that we dig

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 6>in to the records of various people who have been successful,

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 6>who are part of this democratic socialist movement, the more

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 6>we're going to discover things that are not just out

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 6>of step with where most Americans are, but that are

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:54.799
<v Speaker 6>truly odious policy positions, I mean truly offensive policy positions,

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 6>ones that people look at and remind them of why

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 6>Democratic socialists are out of step with frankly, most voters

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 6>in this country. So it will be very interesting as

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 6>we go on.

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 5>Again.

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 6>I thought, you know, Britt made the right point there,

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 6>which is that these people can win elections in the

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 6>middle of New York City or the middle of la

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 6>But the problem you're going to have is that the

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 6>image of these people, what they stand for, who they are,

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 6>is going to pollute the broader image of the Democratic Party,

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 6>which by the way, isn't great right now. If you

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 6>ask Americans what they think of the Democratic Party, they

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 6>don't have an incredibly favorable impression of it. And I

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 6>think this is one of the challenges they're going to

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 6>have is if you've got more centrist Democrats, people like

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 6>John Fetterman, the Senator from Pennsylvania, who represents a more

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 6>moderate form.

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Of the Democratic Party.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 6>How is that going to work if you've got a

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 6>bunch of socialists running around who define who you are?

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 5>That's the challenge.

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 4>He actually tweeted out yesterday about some of those candidates.

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 4>He said, why am I the only Democrat in the

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 4>US Senate that refuses to excuse this or defend any

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 4>of those self identified communists? There you go, there you go.

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 6>And and by the way, Fetterman was, you know, he's

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 6>been one of the few Democrats to break ranks and

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 6>vote with President Trump and Republicans on some key issues,

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 6>some key policy issues. And you've got a few others

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 6>too who have tried to take on a more moderate tone.

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 6>But they're getting drowned out right now, Jack, totally drowned

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 6>out by these socialists. And and and the funny thing

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 6>is not the first time it's happened in the Democratic

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 6>Party in the last couple of years.

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 4>Right Well, I was wondering how much of it is

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 4>the economic stuff, the socialism part, or how much of

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 4>it is the anti Semitism. We don't, you know, free

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 4>free Palestine part.

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 6>It's all part of the same toxic stew. In my view,

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 6>it's it all gets caught up together. And this is

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 6>the really dangerous part of it for the Democratic Party

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 6>is that, you know, for many, many years, the Democratic

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 6>Party was pretty solid on issues relating to Israel and

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 6>our partnership with Israel, the important role that Israel plays

0:06:58.839 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 6>in the region.

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 5>And in the last couple of years.

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 6>This this you know, sort of pro Palestinian pro Hamas

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 6>movement that has gained power and traction within the Democratic

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 6>Party has become a much bigger definitional piece. To the

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 6>point now Jack, where you've got certain Democrats who are

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 6>using it as a litmus test. Did you get money

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 6>from Apak? Did you get money supporting Israeli and pro

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 6>Israel causes? And if you did, you are not pure

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 6>enough to be in the Democratic Party.

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that I think is a big problem for them.

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 4>I haven't heard anybody who's been accused of that because

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 4>they did take money from Apak who said, you're damn right,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 4>I did, and I'm proud I haven't heard exactly say

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 4>that they are back away.

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I did but yeah, yeah, they all back away,

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 6>they all figure out a way to cover their rear ends,

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 6>and it's shameful. I think it's just shameful. So all

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 6>of this together has created this what I would consider

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 6>a toxic stew of modern leftist politics that has become

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 6>a bigger, bigger part of the Democratic Party. And that's

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 6>why they have a definitional problem in my view as

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 6>they go into twenty twenty eight. So it doesn't matter

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 6>what you know, more mainstream candidates might say, because the

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 6>dialogue will be dominated by AOC and Nithia Rahman and

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 6>all the rest.

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 4>Yep, the way Bill Maher was able to talk about

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 4>the TA baggers and discredit the entire Republican Party back

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 4>in the.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 5>Day, Yeah, yeah, it's a very similar thing.

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of twenty twenty eight, one guy who'd like to

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 4>be president in twenty twenty eight is Gavin Newsom, governor

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:34.599
<v Speaker 4>of California. And there's a new another story in the

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 4>La Times about this investigation that the Trump Justice Department

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 4>is doing into the first couple and the First Partner,

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 4>California's first partner targeted by Trump. Newsom says, here's what

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 4>we know about her career in finances the LA Times

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 4>digging in to the finances of Gavin Newsom's wife. Is

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 4>this a real story? Does this have legs?

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it does.

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 6>I certainly do think it's there's a story here. It's

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 6>only an investigation that needs to be done. And by

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 6>the way, it's very easy, I think for the governor

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 6>to dismiss it as purely politically motivated. That keeps in

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 6>line with the predominating sort of center of Democratic Party

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 6>messaging now, which is basically anything that Trump does we

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:22.239
<v Speaker 6>don't like. And you know, rather than sort of addressing

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 6>the accusations and you know, helping people understand what is

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 6>and isn't truthful, they just sort of say the whole

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 6>thing is a smeror.

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 4>And you know the problem with.

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 5>This sort of thing is that there's a drip drip

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 5>drift to it all.

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 6>And then when the campaign actually gets started and he's

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 6>actually running, the people who are going to use this

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 6>stuff are not the Republicans, Okay, it's going to be

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 6>his Democratic opponents, the people like AOC. They're the ones

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 6>who are going to deploy it against him. So from

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 6>a political perspective, he's got to figure out how to

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 6>lance the spoil and the answer is not simply to say, well,

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 6>it's a politically motivated investigation. I think there does need

0:09:57.880 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 6>to be some substantive rebuttal and it's got to come

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 6>sometime soon.

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know a lot of people in California politics,

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 4>and you're a high road guy and not a bomb checker.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 4>But are the whispers out there that you know him

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 4>and his wife made a lot of money in ways

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 4>that ain't cool?

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 6>I mean, look that there are a lot of whispers.

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 6>I don't necessarily know what is and isn't real. I

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 6>think there needs to be that.

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 5>That's why there's an investigation, and that's why the LA

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 5>Times and other media organizations are probably going to dig

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 5>into this a little bit because there are some murmurs

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 5>and some rumors that they're going to try and chase down.

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 4>Are all of them going to be true?

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 6>Probably not, But if enough of them are true that

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 6>it casts a shadow over his candidacy and over who

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 6>he is and what he's done during his time in office.

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 6>In a competitive primary in twenty twenty eight, that could.

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 5>Be enough to ensure he doesn't get the nomination.

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 6>So he's got a political problem and potentially a legal problem.

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 6>I don't want to speak to the legal piece of

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 6>it because who knows, but politically, certainly it is a

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 6>problem for him, so they've got to deal with it.

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Mark Halpern thinks that it'll keep him from run,

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 4>and they'll decide that they just don't want to put

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 4>their fans through this.

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Well, he wouldn't be the first one to beg

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 6>off a run because there was just too much.

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, where there's where there's smoke, there's fire.

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't help that you had the Biden family and

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 4>everything they did around their money stuff, and then you

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 4>got Trump and his family doing right that It just

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 4>kind of makes everybody think, well, this is what everybody does.

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, and that's sort of the unfortunate reality

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 6>of our politics now is that people, I think have

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 6>sort of discounted a lot of people in public service

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 6>and they've said, look, these guys are all crooks. And

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 6>what it does is it really takes our politics in

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 6>our discussion down a level.

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 4>And this has been happening for a long time.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 6>Jack, It's not a recent phenomenon, but I think it's

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 6>become particularly acute now with what we've seen over the

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 6>last couple of years, and it makes me sad personally

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 6>because we should hold in public to a higher innvation

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 6>buyer stand doesn't seem you know, things happen.

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I absolutely agree with that.

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Lon heat Chin.

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 4>Appreciate you joining us today, Director of Domestic Policy Studies

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 4>at Stanford University. Always really good to get your insight.

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 4>And I too would like a return of the character issue,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 4>but I don't think it's in our future anytime soon.

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 4>You look at Graham Platner up in Maine and uh,

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's just more of a he's on our

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 4>side and we could win a seat, so we'll overlook whatever.

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 4>And that just at least for the near future of

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 4>our politics. The character issue is over. I think, man.

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 4>I grew up with the character issue being a big

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 4>deal in politics. Man, if you were a crook or

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 4>cheating on your wife or any of that sort.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Of stuff, you had to drop out.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Obviously those days are over. We got a lot more

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 4>on the way. Stay here.

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 7>Mean, awhile Brooklyn Escorts Service is charging World Cup soccer

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 7>players up to ten an hour, Why so steep a

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 7>price because it takes them two hours to score?

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 6>What happens when you can't use your hands.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 4>I heard something yesterday, was listening to some music radio.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 4>Apparently chicks are digging the soccer players and there's a

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 4>pretty big man. Those soccer players are cute sort of

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 4>thing going on among women in the country, and soccer

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 4>legs has become a thing. Soccer legs. Having soccer legs

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 4>is very popular. So I guess those would be big

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 4>beefy legs. I guess. But then you got withered, little

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 4>Tyranno source rex arms because you don't get to use

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 4>your arms. So if you want that, A bunch of

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 4>Supreme Court rulings came down. Having a chance to look

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 4>at all of them, it's just been in the last

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 4>few minutes and I've been talking to guests, but this

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 4>is a pretty big gun one. So four years ago,

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 4>the Supreme Court ruled that law abiding persons had a

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 4>right to obtain a permit to carry a concealed gun

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 4>when they left home. That's assuming you live in a

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 4>county where your sheriff will allow you get a concealed permit.

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 4>That's its own issue. But the Supreme Court also agreed

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 4>that there were sensitive places where guns may be prohibited,

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 4>such as schools, courts, and other buildings. Right, you can

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 4>carry a concealed weapon, but not schools, courts, and some

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 4>other government buildings.

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 4>In response to that, lawmakers in California and Hawaii came

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 4>up with their own list of sensitive places and they

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 4>expanded it from courts and government buildings and schools to parks, beaches, playgrounds,

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 4>places of worship, bars, restaurants, grocery stores, all kinds of

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 4>different places where you were not allowed to carry a

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 4>concealed weapon. And if you can't carry a concealed weapon

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 4>in any of those situations, there's barely any point in

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 4>having a concealed weapon. So gun owners sued. The Ninth

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 4>Circuit Court refused to block most of those restrictions, and

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 4>it ended up in the Supreme Court, and a ruling

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 4>has come down now that California had gone too far

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 4>by recort by doing that, and it's now back to

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 4>it's from an opt into an opt out, or do

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 4>I have it backwards anyway? It used to be you

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 4>couldn't carry your gun into a grocery store. Now you

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 4>can unless the owner of the grocery store decides he

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 4>doesn't want you to. So there's still a property rights

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 4>element to it, which I completely get. I own a

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 4>grocery store, I should be able to say I don't

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 4>want anybody with a gun in here. The problem with

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 4>that though, so I'm pro property rights. The problem with that, though,

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 4>of course, is all you're doing. Hey, grocery store owners,

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 4>let you know or you know whoever, is gonna put

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 4>up a sign saying no gun's allowed, no concealed weapons

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 4>allowed here. All you're gonna do is keep the law

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 4>abiding trained went through the process people from carrying a

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 4>gun in there. A bad guy who wants to come

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 4>in with a gun and shoot the place up or

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 4>is dangerous is still gonna carry his gun. Why doesn't

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 4>everybody get that the laws only have an effect on

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 4>law abiding citizens. They don't stop the bad guy. You

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 4>can put up a sign that says no gun's allowed here,

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 4>and you're not gonna get the maniac show up to

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 4>the grocery store and say, oh dang, I was gonna

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 4>shoot the place up, but you got a sign that

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 4>says no guns, so I guess I won't. However, he

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 4>goes in there with a gun and decides to shoot

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 4>the place up, and you won't have a law abiding citizen,

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 4>a good guy with a gun. To use the phrase,

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 4>who maybe could stop him because he has stopped the

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 4>law abiding citizen. But that's where we are in that ruling.

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 4>It's definitely seen as a win for the gun rights crowd,

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 4>of which I am a member, not an official member,

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 4>but I own guns and soon to be a glock

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 4>which is about to be outlawed in California. That's its

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 4>own story. Maybe I'm more on that later. Gonna talk

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 4>to our old boss, Jason Rantz coming up from Seattle.

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned, Armstrong and Getty.

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 4>How you doing, Thanks for joining us. Lots of cool

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 4>stuff to talk about. I definitely want to get to

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 4>that story about people are giving their kids the GLP ones,

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 4>which might be a good idea, but man, there ain't

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot of data out there about how it affects

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 4>kids when they're still growing and all that sort of stuff.

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Want to welcome to the Armstrong and Getty Show. Jason Rantz.

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 4>If you watch Fox you see him all the time

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 4>on there. And Jason, congratulations on your TV presence so much.

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 4>Been a radio host forever in Seattle on Seattle Read

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 4>seven seventy am. Jason was even our boss for a

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 4>cup of coffee and is a really good guy. Hey, Jason,

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 4>how you.

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Doing doing well? Thanks for having me, Yeah.

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 4>And congratulations on all your TV success. I see it

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 4>like every day.

0:17:58.200 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 5>Now, you know.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>They keep me busy. It's Fox News Nation CNN.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 4>So are you a Seattle native you've been there your

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 4>whole life?

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 8>No, so, I've been here seventeen years or so. I'm

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 8>actually so. I was born in New York, but I

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 8>grew up in Los Angeles. I ended up coming out

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 8>here about sixteen seventeen years ago.

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 4>And I first visited Seattle on vacation I don't know,

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 4>thirty years ago or something like that. And I remember

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 4>the first time I ever wont I thought, Wow, it's

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 4>like a clean San Francisco. This is awesome.

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And then something changed over the years.

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the liberal policies. I guess, yeah, government,

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what's changed.

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 8>I mean, there are parts of Seattle and certainly the

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 8>Pacific Northwest, are absolutely gorgeous. And we experienced the promise

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 8>of Seattle for the US men's National World Cup match

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 8>last Friday, where the city cleaned up like they engaged

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 8>in sweeps. There were no homeless people just loitering everywhere

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 8>smoking fentanyl. It just happened to be a gorgeous summer

0:18:55.760 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 8>day and it was glorious. It was the reason why

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 8>so many people lived here. And yet I found myself

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 8>getting a little bit upset because we realize we can

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 8>do this every day if we actually wanted to, but

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 8>they don't.

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, a similar experience they had and in San

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Francisco when President She visited it, but he's like, why

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 4>can't we have the.

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 8>Streets like this all the time? A hundred percent? And

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 8>I actually I was in San Francisco leading into that.

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 8>I just had an event that I was doing there

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 8>and I was wondering around. I was like, man, it's

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 8>so nice. All of a sudden, I was like, oh,

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 8>that's why.

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 4>Right exactly what was it?

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 4>What was the whole World Cup experience like? For Seattle?

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It was really cool.

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 8>Look, this is a soccer city that we have one

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 8>of the biggest soccer teams in the MLS, Seattle Sounders.

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 8>People were really excited, and of course we had a

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 8>whole bunch of people who were showing up to watch

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 8>the US men's national team play. So these are folks

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 8>who are primarily from the United States who are traveling here,

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:55.239
<v Speaker 8>and it felt vibrant downtown for the first time in

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 8>frankly a long time. I just went on a long

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 8>walk with my dog downtown just to see however was

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 8>going to shake up. And you felt the electricity in

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 8>the air. And as someone who actually lives in Seattle,

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 8>doesn't live on the outskirts, I felt safe for the

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 8>first time in a long time. I felt real pride

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 8>in what ended up happening on that day. And you know,

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 8>good news is we're going to keep that going probably

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 8>for the next few weeks at least until the round

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 8>of sixteen for the final men's game here at Lumenfield.

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 8>And I'm just worried about what's going to happen afterwards.

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 4>Right, cool, Well, one of the reasons we wanted to

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 4>have you is, Yeah, we've been having a lot of

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 4>fun playing clips of your new mayor, Jay Lennon Chavez

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 4>or whatever her name is, and some of the wacky

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 4>stuff she's tell us about the mayor of Seattle.

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 8>Now, yeah, So Katie Wilson, she came to this position

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 8>as an activist, not having held an actual job, certainly

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 8>nothing in politics. She worked a lot behind the scenes

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 8>in helping craft some of the legislation and taxes that

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 8>ended up forcing a bunch of businesses to either go

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 8>out of business or go across to nearby Bellevue. And

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 8>she's kind of been floundering. And in a way, there's

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 8>a positive spin I can put on that that she's

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 8>so inexperienced that some of her crazier ideas have not

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 8>even remotely started to take shape. But she's caught in

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 8>that hard place that all activists find themselves when they

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 8>take the position of mayor here, where you've got the

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 8>activist class who are demanding you not do certain things

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 8>like end homelessness and do your sweeps and stop people

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 8>from smoking fentanel. But she's also I think realizing that, yeah,

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 8>she's got a city that she needs to run, and

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 8>every position that she takes around homelessness or crime could

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 8>result in someone dying. And I think that when you're

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 8>put in a position where you're no longer just an activist,

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 8>you're actually making decisions, it gets a lot tougher for her.

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's surprising to me that Seattle hasn't had enough

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 4>of the street people and the crime, and you know,

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 4>the chazz shop and all the stuff that has happened

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 4>over the years. Because San Francisco they finally had enough

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 4>and they got a new mayor and like you said,

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 4>to start with policy matters, and San Francisco cleaned up

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 4>pretty good, at least the commercial areas. I was there

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 4>just last weekend. I saw one street person. One And

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 4>in an entire day of being around Union Square and

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 4>all the shop stuff like that it used to be,

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 4>I would have seen a thousand. I mean, so that's

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 4>a pretty major change. But Seattle's still willing to try it.

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and it's a major change still coming from a

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 8>Democrat mayor, right.

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a lot of people, and you know.

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 8>To a degree, it existed in San Francisco well before Seattle.

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 8>But there are a lot of people locally who the

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 8>idea that you might present and you know, a proposal

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 8>to clean up homelessness, and it's deemed conservative, and of

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 8>course it just dies without getting any sort of hearing

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 8>or debate. These are Democratic politicians putting in place policies

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 8>that have been written by other Democrats, and it's not political.

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 8>That's the funny thing about all of this. None of

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 8>the proposals around cleaning up our cities are truly political.

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 8>They become politicized right because they're politicians who are involved.

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 8>But it's not a Democrat or Republican thing to say, yes,

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 8>we'd like to have clean and safe streets where people

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 8>aren't smoking fentanel or taken meth on street corners and

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 8>harassing people and dying outside like these are not red

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 8>versus blue ideas. This is just common sense. And when

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 8>you start pushing away the activism and politics around it,

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 8>you start to see results and you don't have I

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 8>love when people say you got to be innovative, we

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 8>need to.

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Get an innovative look at it. No you don't.

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 8>You don't need to be an innovative on any of

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 8>these things. We know exactly what works. It's a caaren

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 8>and stick approach. It has always worked. We're seeing it

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 8>happen in San Francisco. We saw how it worked in

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 8>Austin and San Diego and other places that are quote

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 8>unquote left wing cities when they pull the politics out of.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>It and just do the basics.

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Joe Getty, the other half of the Armstrong and

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 4>Getty shows on vacation, he just called him a little

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 4>bit ago. He's just Northia and Vancouver right now, and

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 4>he is talking about seeing people shooting up on the

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 4>street and it's amazing how many these just some of

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 4>the most beautiful cities in the world, decided.

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 1>To allow this to happen.

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, this is the ideology at play. So what he

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 8>saw what so many of us see as a direct

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 8>result of two different policies. Number one is harm reduction,

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 8>which I know you've talked about before. I think you

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 8>and I have talked about this before. Harm reduction, for

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 8>those of you who don't know, is basically a policy

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 8>that says we are going to quote unquote reduce the

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 8>harm of illicit substance abuse. And that has meant giving

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 8>out clean needles, because the idea is that instead of

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 8>sharing needles where you can spread bloodborne diseases, it's clean.

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 8>You're cutting that down while you're trying to get the

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 8>person help that they need, the detox that they need,

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 8>the treatment that they need. This is true of fentanal pipes.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 8>They get passed around all these other things. The problem is, ideologically,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 8>there is this belief that if you even offer someone

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 8>services for detox quote unquote before they're ready you're stigmatizing

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 8>the addiction and then they're not going to get the

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 8>help that they need. It's total nonsense, and frankly, I

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 8>don't even care if it creates stigma. I want to

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 8>stigmatize people who are illicit drug of users because.

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 4>They've sricitize them to my kids every single day, ye

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 4>one hundred.

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 8>But they no longer offer the treatment and they no

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 8>longer have any sort of push and so what this

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 8>policy has just become is just handing out needles and

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 8>handing out pipes. The other thing is housing first policy,

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 8>which is why homelessness doesn't actually get better. Housing first

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 8>to the left is that you put them inside of

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 8>a home or a shelter, low barrier, meaning if they're

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 8>drug users, they can continue to use drugs. You want

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 8>to get them indoors first and then offer them the treatment.

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 8>But the exact same issue, they're not being offered the treatment,

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 8>they're not being compelled into treatment as a condition of

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 8>getting the free subsidized housing, and what it ends up

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 8>becoming is permanent subsidized housing, so they're still the underlying

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 8>reasons for their homelessness has not been treated. So just

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 8>allowed them to continue using inside a permanently subsidized housing

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 8>unit that eventually they will die of an overdose. Inside

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 8>it's incredibly expensive. No one gets the help that they need.

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 8>They're never going to become self sufficient. It doesn't really

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 8>make any sense.

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, I talk about this a lot on the show.

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm a sober alcoholic twenty years and I hang around

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 4>that crowd a lot, and most people don't want to

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 4>stop drinking or doing drugs. That's the problem. Most people

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 4>people want to stuff. So the idea that we need

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 4>to get them help, most people don't want help exactly.

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 8>They're so into their into the depths of their addiction

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 8>they do not know what's best for them, which is

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 8>why I would argue there's a moral responsibility for society

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 8>to step in and help, especially when we're dealing with

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 8>homeless people who don't have connection to family, don't have

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 8>friends who are able to step in, and we see

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 8>this happen all the time. If you are so deep

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 8>in your addiction that you continue to say no to

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 8>offers of help because of that addiction, and who's supposed

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 8>to step.

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>In and help these people?

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 8>Then that this idea all when they're ready, we want

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 8>them to know that we're they're never going to be ready.

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>They are never going to be ready.

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 8>If you're already homeless, living outside and you're a drug

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 8>addict and nothing has changed, you've already hit rock bottom.

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 8>So the next rock bottom that they're going to hit

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 8>is death, and I would rather us get involved before

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 8>that death happens.

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 4>What do you think we ought to do with the

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 4>people who've ruined their brains, who honestly are never going

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 4>to be productive members of society ever. Again, they probably

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 4>couldn't hold the job. They're not dead yet, but I

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 4>mean you see them on the street corners all the time.

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 4>They could never get their act together.

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>What do we do?

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Do we just bite the bullet, realize we made a

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 4>mistake and pay for them the rest of their lives.

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 8>I have no problem putting folks in permanent subsidies. If

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 8>they're in that camp. That is a small group, but

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 8>they absolutely exist. Now, you don't completely give up on them, right,

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 8>It's not just giving them, you know, free housing and

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 8>that's it. You still have to put them into treatment

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 8>as best as we can and hope that you're going

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 8>to get some sort of results. That represents a small

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 8>percentage of the people who are homeless, so the costs

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 8>associated with that I think societally is worth it. It's

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 8>everyone else who does not need to be sort of

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 8>this foregone conclusion that they're never going to get better,

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 8>that you can't get them the treatment that they need.

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 8>It might take a lot of time and effort, right,

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 8>I don't think that this happens overnight.

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it happens within a few months for

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>most people.

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 8>But I think it's worth spending the money to get

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 8>at the root cause. If the end goal is to

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.120
<v Speaker 8>truly get them clean and sober, or get their mental

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 8>health issues treated, whatever it is. Sometimes it's as simple

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 8>as getting them education and connecting them with jobs. For

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 8>some people, it's making sure they have access to a

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 8>shower so that when they show up for a job

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 8>interview that they're actually qualified for, they're not going to

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 8>immediately be dismissed. Some of it is relatively cheap in

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 8>the context of government spending. Some of it is really expensive,

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 8>but it's better than allowing these people to just die

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 8>on our streets or give up on them and say

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 8>we're never going to get them the help that they need.

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I just reject that completely.

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Before we let you go. I've been asking everybody this today.

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 4>You think the socialists are going to take over the

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Democratic Party or have they already?

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the base of the Democratic Party is being

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 8>taken over by socialists and communists, There's no doubt about that.

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 8>And you know, you had a bunch of we'll just

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 8>call them the quote unquote mainstream Democrats who decided to

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 8>embrace these folks because they're so desperate for power. Broken

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 8>by Donald Trump, they need to get power at by

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 8>any means necessary, including giving the nomination and the support

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 8>of the party to a dude with a Nazi tattoo.

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 8>And I think they're so desperate at this point they

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 8>don't realize and haven't realized what they've done. I think

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 8>they're going to find out rather quickly. Hawkeem Jeffries and

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 8>Chuck Schumer certainly will. You've got people who are taking

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 8>over the New York Democrats, and you think they're going

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 8>to just go ahead and give the thumbs up to

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 8>Hakim Jeffries as speaker with asking or demanding some sort

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 8>of concessions. There was a lot of problems with the

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 8>Republican Party when the Tea Party took over as far

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 8>as the infighting, this is going to be way worse

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 8>for Democrats, and you're dealing with people who fundamentally do

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 8>not like this country. And the only way to look

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 8>at this glass half full as an American who doesn't

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.719
<v Speaker 8>want to see our country destroyed is to say, at

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 8>least these people hate Israel more than they hate the

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 8>United States, and they might get distracted by a member

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 8>of Congress who has the Star of David around his

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 8>neck as they're walking by, so they might not destroy

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 8>the country fast in that regard. So we have some

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 8>time here, but at least we're not losing Republican seats

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 8>to all of this. We're seeing, you know, Congressman Goldman lose,

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 8>We're seeing Esplot lose. Those are progressive Democrats who are losing,

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 8>and we're probably going to pick up some seats because

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 8>these socialists do not win in swing districts.

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 4>Jason Rant's a good dude. You see him on Fox.

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 4>If you're in Seattle, you already know he's great on

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 4>the radio. Appreciate your time to day.

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Jason, Thank you so much for having me.

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's really really good and he was our boss

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 4>for a while. Just a fantastic guy. I can vouch

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 4>for him personally. I want to tell you about incognity

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 4>real quick. You get lots of calls, we all do,

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 4>or I did you know. You get a call and

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 4>you don't recognize the number and you think it's probably

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 4>a spam call or somebody trying to rip you off,

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 4>and it is a spam call, and it is somebody

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 4>trying to rip you off, and you get a lot

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 4>less of them. If you sign up with Incogny and cognate,

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 4>can get your name off of these data brokers. That's

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 4>what they do. You know, criminals can buy your phone

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 4>number and your family details from data brokers right now.

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Then they you know, if they can get a hold

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 4>of your voice or your kid's voice, or your mom's

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 4>voice or anything like that, they can hoodwink you into

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 4>giving them money. There's all kinds of horrible things that

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 4>can happen with AI. You can't stop them from cloning

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 4>your kid's voice. You can make sure that they never

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 4>get your number in the first place. And that's done

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 4>with Incogni's help, a website you can use to put

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 4>data brokers unnoticed. They use the law on their side.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 4>They contact hundreds of data brokers and force them to

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 4>delete your personal info. It costs about seven dollars a month.

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 4>It's worth every single penny use in Cogni. We're big believers.

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 4>We got a lot more on the way. I hope

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 4>you can stay here. We're gonna talk about those gop

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 4>ones for kids. Stay tuned.

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 9>He finally, a personal trainer in England recently set a

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 9>world record by eating one hundred and sixty two oreos

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 9>in five minutes. It was the record for worst personal trainer.

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 4>No kidding, thanks for that. I've been looking into this

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 4>story all day long. By the way, I'm working with

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 4>pink eye, so you should give me some cut me

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 4>some sly. Conjunctivitis is that the word for it? When

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 4>did the doctors say I had eye pain? My eye

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.719
<v Speaker 4>is not pink? About when you got pink eye? Your

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 4>eye turn pink. Had eye pain, which of course is troubling.

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 4>Your eye is not supposed to hurt. I got this conjunctivitis,

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 4>which apparently is very very contagious. Well, you gotta worry

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 4>is catching it in the other eye, So you gotta

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 4>worry about rubbing your eye with it, and then rubbing

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 4>your other eye, and then you give it to that eye. Now,

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 4>let alone to your family and friends. That's why I'm

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 4>working from home today. I didn't come into work so

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't give Michael pink eye. Then he takes it

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 4>home and gives it to his cats, and then all

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 4>ol breaks. Look, I appreciate you doing that. You wouldn't

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 4>want to give the pink eye to your cats. Speaking

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 4>of health, the Wall Street Journal about how people are

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 4>starting to use the golp ones or doctors are prescribing

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 4>them for kids, including really young kids. I got a

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 4>nine year old here opens The article opens with al

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 4>because the kids laying on the floor and getting his

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 4>regular stomach injection of the weight loss drug. My kids

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 4>are a little older than that now, but they wouldn't

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 4>have at any point really enjoyed getting a shot in

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 4>the stomach, and I wouldn't have enjoyed given it to them.

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 4>But for or parents and kids where traditional weight loss

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 4>methods haven't worked that we all know there's an epidemic

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 4>of obesity at all ages, including for kids. Even though

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 4>elementary schoolers are being put on drugs such as Wagovi,

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 4>prescribing it is somewhat controversial because they don't it's not.

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 4>The drugs aren't yet approved for obesity in patients as young.

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what approved means, but a doctor can

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:30.720
<v Speaker 4>write a prescription for it, so it's approved enough, I guess.

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Without further studies, it isn't certain that young children can

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 4>safely use the medications for weight loss without compromising a

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 4>critical period of growth for their bones and brain. Gotta

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 4>tell you, I'd be pretty hesitant as a parent to

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:46.959
<v Speaker 4>start my kids on this, given the fact that they're

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 4>so new for adults, and we have no idea what

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 4>it does to a kid who's you know, As my

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 4>doctor once said, the human body is a pretty amazing

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 4>machine that has been a evolving for a long time,

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 4>and it'll most of the time, when it's working correctly,

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 4>give you a little more of this little less that

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 4>keep every inner testosterone and your various in all your

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 4>different vital numbers and all that sort of stuff stay

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 4>in the normal range for most of us all the time. Well,

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 4>if you start injecting things like gop ones into the body,

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 4>how the body then compensates for that to try to

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 4>get back to normal in various ways your brain or

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 4>your body. We don't have the slightest idea. But then

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at a picture these two kids that they've

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 4>got here. One's eight, one nine. They're very heavy kids

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 4>and be a rough way to be for a variety

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 4>of reasons, and certainly not healthy. Well, we'll all find

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 4>out together, won't we, whether these drugs are good for

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 4>us or not, and whether or not insurance is going

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 4>to cover it and the price comes down, and all

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 4>those different issues around that. We got another hour to go,

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 4>probably take a look at some of those Supreme Court

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 4>cases that have come down that we haven't even touched

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 4>on yet. Supreme Court in June every year releases a

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.720
<v Speaker 4>whole bunch of cases before they take a recess before

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 4>coming back in October. And a bunch of rulings came

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 4>down today, a lot of them super technical stuff that

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 4>aren't that interesting, but a couple of them are, and

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 4>we'll run through those. United States plays Turkey tonight in soccer,

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 4>meaningless game but still exciting. Got a lot more on

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:22.240
<v Speaker 4>the way. If you miss a segment, get the podcast

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Armstrong and Getty on demand.

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 6>Armstrong and Getty