WEBVTT - Making Bitcoin A Currency People Use

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of The Odd Blocks podcast.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenfal and I'm Tracylliwin Tracy, here's something funny. Um,

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I'm laughing. Sorry, no, uh, we

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>actually we're kind of have a little bit of a

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>theme going here because on today's episode we're going to

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>be talking about the same thing we talked about last week,

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin and making and losing a lot of money off

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin. Yeah, pretty much, pretty much exactly that. You

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>know what's funny, Like a like a year and a

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>half ago or a couple of years ago, when bitcoin

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 1>and other cryptocurrencies were like surging to the moon all

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the time. I remember people complaining to us, They're like, oh,

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you should do more bitcoin episodes, because we actually didn't

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>do very many in uh, and now bitcoin and others are,

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the toilet price wise, the bubbles over

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and now we have two in the rows. So maybe

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>we're contrarians, or maybe our sense of timing is just

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>completely off on what the market wants. Maybe having done

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the podcast for two years almost at this point, we

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>are simply running out of ideas. Yeah, that's it's just

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be bitcoin, Bitcoin, episodes from here on out, But

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:31.559
<v Speaker 1>this time I think it's gonna be a little different.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So last time, last week, we talked to a trader

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>who wrote the bubble all the way up and then

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>all the way down, And this time we're going to

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.479
<v Speaker 1>be talking to someone who's also still very active in it,

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>but more on the development side and some of the

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting technological innovations that are happening in the bitcoin world,

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>even amid uh the Bitcoin winter, so to speak, the

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin winter. I like that. But the general theme is

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>similar to the last episode in that we are talking

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to someone and who still very much believes in the

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>future of bitcoin and who is in fact actively working

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>to make bitcoin work. Is that right? Yeah, exactly, So

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>another die hard bitcoiner who has been with it a

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>long time. And one of the things I want to

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 1>explore on this one is, you know, people, even during

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the ups and downs, people are like, when are people

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>actually gonna use bitcoin? When will people use it to spend?

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>When will it become a medium of transaction? And that

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is something that our guests UH this week is working

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>on directly in terms of building out the technologies and

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the layer on top of the sort of core bitcoin

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>blockchain to actually make it a useful currency for spending.

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>So it should be an interesting conversation. Great, I'm looking

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>forward to it all. Right. On that note, our guest

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>this week is Pierre Rochard. He is at Bitcoin Advisory,

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>which is a firm he launched to help investors do

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>their due diligence when buying bitcoin, and he is also

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>involved in bitcoin development. So, Pierre, thank you very much

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Thanks for having me on, Joe and Tracy. So,

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>before we get started, how long if you you know,

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I follow you on Twitter. I have for a long time.

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>You're one of a hardcore bitcoin maximalist. You don't double

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>another cryptocurrency. You've had a consistent pro bitcoin message for

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a very long time. You weren't just someone who got

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>in the party in seventeen. So tell us a little

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>bit about your history and background with bitcoin. Sure, So

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>late two thousand twelve, I was wrapping up my master's

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>degree and accounting at the University of Texas at Austin.

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Hook Them, Hook Them, and at that point I was

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I was hanging out with crazy libertarians, as you know,

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Michael Goldstein and Daniel crewis there on Twitter as well. Uh,

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and we were. We were debating fractional reserve banking as

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>libertarians do. Uh, and I at the time, I was

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a gold bug, sound money, a hundred percenters are banking

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>type person. Hopefully we won't get into that debate today.

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And to get skip nail fast forward and I as

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>part of our debate, bitcoin came up. And I had

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:09.839
<v Speaker 1>heard about bitcoin in the context of the Silk Road,

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't really think much of it. But in

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this context we started we were talking about bitcoins, you know,

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty one million bitcoins, it's a monetary policy quinquin, and

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that that captivated my imagination and I went down the

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>rabbit hole at that point. So Joe described you as

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin maximal list, which means that you sort of

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in other um cryptocurrencies or coins. What's the

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>attraction for bitcoin? Is it a sort of first mover

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>adoption advantage or is it something about the underlying technology

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>what attracts you to it? Yeah? So, uh, at first,

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it was really that I had in high school. I'd

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>been interested in Linux and open source free software, and

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>when I opened up bitcoin, I realized that this is

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 1>in the same vein as as that, and it really

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 1>spoke to the authenticity of it, essentially, which was that

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the person who created this was a not someone trying

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to get rich quick. They were actually trying to build

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>a piece of software that would lead to a money

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in payment system that was decentralized. And that I found

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to be fascinating because that's kind of the only guarantee

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that we have for for for bitcoin maintaining its properties.

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>It has to remain decentralized. If it becomes centralized, then

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>all bets are often will either get shut down or

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it'll change its properties in terms of its monetary policy

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>or censoring people or whatever it is. And I'm deeply

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>skeptical that other cryptocurrencies that are being promoted will be

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>able to maintain their their properties and be remained decentralized.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>So let's just let's explore that a little bit further.

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>We talked about maintaining their properties. So you mentioned the

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that there will only ever be twenty one million bitcoin. Now,

0:05:56.040 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>theoretically that could change, the code could change, but what

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you say is that it's pretty unlikely given the origin

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and the community, but that other coins where there may

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>be a specific founder who faces political pressure or ideological pressure,

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>those properties could change over time, and so in your view,

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin maximalist view is Bitcoin has the best chance

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>of essentially staying what it is forever, right, And you

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you hit the nail on the head when you said

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that the code can be changed, because the code can

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>be changed, and lots of people have changed the code

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and either released it as their own version of bitcoin,

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, giving it a different name, or the an

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>all coin, or creating new code from from scratch. But

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimately you have to have other people run that code

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and run it on their computer and consider that code

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to be Bitcoin. And that is the biggest challenge is

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>persuading others to run your code. And the code is UM.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's called a node, a Bitcoin node, and

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>this node is going to communicate with this peer to

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>peer network and essentially the lower the cost of running

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a node, the more likely it is that people will

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>run one and thus make it decentralized. So let's talk

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>about the current price slump in bitcoin. What actually has

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>accounted for that fall? And you know you're talking about

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>this idea of UM replicating the code and the Bitcoin forks,

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>do you think that played into it at all? Honestly,

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Uh, there's the people have been creating knockoffs

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin for years now. Um, I think that what

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>accounts for the fall is that the price went up

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:46.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and uh, it went from the bull Sorry,

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the previous bear market bottomed out about two dollars and

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>from there it rocketed up to twenty dollars in a

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>period of eighteen months or a little bit longer than that.

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>But um, essentially you can't have a go straight up

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>like that and not expect a severe correction. Uh, it

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>was not at twenty dollars long enough for me to

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>get used to it. So four thousand dollars still feels

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>very rich. But there's differing views on that. All right,

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about one of the biggest criticisms of bitcoin,

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's something you're working and others are working on

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to address. As they say, Okay, obviously it's a mode

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of speculation and people like to trade it, but no

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>one actually uses it, and if they do want to

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>use it for a typical purpose, it's very difficult. It's cumbersome,

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's slow. It takes a long time to confirm that

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a transaction has even gone forth. If the network is busy,

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>then fees can be very high, which places many everyday

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>purchases completely out of reach. Um that existing payment systems

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>do very well for most of the things we want

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to buy. Um, you so are all the first of all,

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>are these criticisms in your view? Fair? Absolutely? And Uh.

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>In response to those criticisms, Uh, there's they're in a

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of a bifurcation. On the one hand, if there's

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of bitcoiners who entirely can see those

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>criticisms and say, bitcoins a store value. Uh, And so

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's more like holding gold, right was So you're

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>not transacting in gold day to day, you know, shaving

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>off scraps of gold to pay for your coffee. Um,

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a store value. And so I think the and

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that's essentially a narrative because I don't think that it

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>matches up to uh, the whole reality. It's certainly a

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>part of the reality, which is that there are a

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who hold bitcoin in the same way

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that they would hold gold, and they're not actually even

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>remotely interested in in finding out whether it's easy to

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>transact in or not. They just understand that they are

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:57.599
<v Speaker 1>able to receive bitcoin and send bitcoin. Uh. To an exchange,

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and and then the speculat sation certainly exists and it

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is a big part of the market as well. Um

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of essentially momentum traders seeing it going up or down. UM.

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a growing sense that there's a group of

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>individuals who want to transact with bitcoin and UM part

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of it is people who they see the price go

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>up to x and they want to essentially cash out. Uh.

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And you can cash out by going to an exchange,

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>or it might be more convenient for you to cash

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>out when you're, for example, using an e commerce website

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>and you're buying something and they have the option to

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>pay with bitcoin, so you say, well, I already have

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>too many bitcoin, let's lighten up my bags here and

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll use that option. So that's kind of on the

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>demand side for for making payments. On on the other side,

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you have merchants that maybe they want to be accumulating bitcoin,

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and accumulating bitcoin by accepting it in the course of

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>commerce is has more privacy and possibly a lower cost

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>than going out to an exchange and buying it, so

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that that's happening. On top of that, we have this

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon of existing payment processors censoring individuals based on either

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>political reasons or they're they're just de risking, right. Uh.

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And because they're they're complying with k y c mL

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>regulations and they don't want to be on the wrong

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>side of the regulators, so they're cutting people off even

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>though they don't have uh you know, the person has

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>not done anything wrong, you know. And it's across the

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>ideological spectrum, right, because we have people who are running

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>marijuana shops in Colorado and you know that's probably more democrat,

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, left leaning, and then on the other side,

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you have people saying politically incorrect things on the Internet

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and getting shut down, and that's sheneringly more on the right. Uh.

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think that across the ideological spectrum our our

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>politics has gotten so polarized that the corporations get dragged

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>into it and they get lobbied to kick people off

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>their platforms. Uh. And that opens up an opportunity for

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>using bitcoin in in actual transactions. So here's my question, Like,

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>if we back up to the moment when bitcoin was

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>created and you were talking about the underlying technology, if

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't supposed to be a store of value or

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a tool for speculation. Then why didn't we sort of

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>have a process embedded into it from the very beginning

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to make transactions easier, Because it's not like people didn't

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>see this idea of database sprawl or you know, a

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>really long ledger sort of hanging back and forth and

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>really bulking up transaction time is coming, right, that's correct,

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and Citaian Documento had a he had included a feature

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that wanted to be lightning, but uh, he didn't have

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it fully thought through, and so his his first iteration

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>on essentially and well, let's let's get into this right,

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>which is that bitcoin is a a global broadcast system

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>where you are having all of the nodes agree on

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the ledger and that imposes a huge amount of cost

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>on the nodes, where essentially it's a negative externality. Every

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>transaction is adding data to the ledger that everyone has

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to verify, so that doesn't scale very well. It's uh, essentially,

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>what the result is that fewer and fewer people run

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>notes and then it becomes centralized. So we needed a

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>system that allowed us to send payments without globally broadcasting

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's so so Tocia had had this in mind,

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>but uh, the way he clemented, it just didn't work.

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Before we get further, I just want to sort of

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 1>make sure people understand this concept of global broadcasting and

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>why it's so cumbersome. Because we blockchain technology. You often

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>hear people say, oh, it's really efficient and it's gonna,

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, reduce all these costs. But it's inherently, at

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>least in this version, very inefficient in the sense of

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you imagine I was sending you a text message during email.

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I think people could imagine a system in which the

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>only way I could do that is to then send

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a copy of that email to everyone who has ever

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten an email ever, so they can all see it.

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>We can all see why that's just insanely inefficient. It

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>happens to be necessary so that uh, for the decentralization purposes,

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that there's no centralized database. We all have degree on

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the emails we've sent. But as uh, you know, as

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a system that just accumulating data, extraordinary negative externalities exactly,

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and thankfully there there's an opportunity here to solve that problem.

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>With a paper that was released back in two thousand

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>fourteen describing what's called the Lightning network today and the

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Lightning network essentially says Okay, let's let's use this global

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>broadcast system as a a system of last resort, essentially

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>as a supreme court. And when when you're doing business, uh,

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't take your contract to court every time that

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you are relying on that contract. UH. You only take

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it when there's a dispute uh to the court. Uh.

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's otherwise it would be a completely unmanageable uh

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>judicial system. So that's the idea behind lightning, is that

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you only go on chain when there's a dispute about

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the state of your what's called a lightning channel. And UH,

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this lightning channel, you you open it up by doing

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>an on chain transaction and once it's open, now you

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>can send value back and forth and you can be

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>routing value around without having to trust your counterparties and

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>while maintaining a lot of the same properties of of bitcoin.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>There are trade offs, but we can get into it, well,

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>so what are the tradeoffs exactly? And you know, if

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I could be cynical about it, it sounds like you're

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of creating an additional layer on top of a

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>system that has at various times already been criticized for

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>being sort of unwieldy in various ways. Yeah. Absolutely. So

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the main trade off today is that you have to

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>keep your bitcoins online, and there's been a lot of

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>user education about not keeping your bitcoins online and putting

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>them into what's called cold storage, right, which is either

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a hardware wallet. Uh. There are a few popular ones,

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>including a treasure and ledger, or just printing it down

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>on a piece of paper, writing down your mnemonic seed

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and putting it into a bank safe deposit box, which

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is also a little uh iron But so with with Lightning,

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you're you're asking users to keep their funds on their

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>computer or on their phone, and really there it's just

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 1>about managing ricks. So it's I think of it as

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a checking account. You wouldn't put your entire fortune on it. Uh,

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.679
<v Speaker 1>it's just so a way of being able to have

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>some walking around money. Um. Now, in terms of the

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>complexity from the user's perspective, that's a fair criticism. And

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's there's a lot of energy within

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the Lightning community into having a very seamless user experience,

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>so that you don't even know that you're you're on Lightening.

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>It's all abstracted away, so it feels like you're on

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>on Venmo or on a square cash app. Does that

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>exist currently or is that what you're working on? Essentially,

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I know that the Bitcoin core software is probably

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>unrealistic for most people to download and run on their computers.

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Is the software to run eatening so that I could

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>theoretically one day go into a Starbugs and pull up

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>my phone and scan a QR code and make a

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>payment for a two dollar coffee and it would instantly

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>take it out of some bitcoin wallet that I have.

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that going to be easier and less cumbersome? Yes,

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we have a very clear path to that, and it's

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of executing on it. So at this

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 1>point in time, you do need to be running a

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin node that then connects that you're lightning, so you're

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>running two notes, a Bitcoin node and a Lightning note.

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's the software I've been writing to to help

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>with that. And uh, the software I have called the

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>node Launcher works on desktop and laptops And essentially the

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:45.959
<v Speaker 1>main drawback there is that you have to download two

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>gigabytes of data. You don't necessarily have to store it,

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>but you've got to download it. And here in New

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>York city. That's fine because we have fiber and everyone

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>has a good internet connection, But once you get into

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>rural parts, even in America, uh, that that's just not

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>even an option. They can't download transer giarbytes. Thankfully, we

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>have a an innovation that has been worked on for

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a long time now that's going to be out this year.

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>It's called Neutrino, and Neutrino allows you to not have

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to download the entire two untrigearbytes uh. And it will

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>make it so that you can use lightning on your

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>mobile wallet without using a bitcoin note per se. So

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I have a sort of existential question which is, let's

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>assume that you you figure out a way, um, you

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>know that this way of transacting and bitcoin is more efficient,

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 1>it is easier for people to use. Does that end

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>up solving the speculative problem which we've seen for bitcoin

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>um And by that I mean, you know, a reluctance

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of people to use it in day to day transactions

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>because they think that the price is going to shoot

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>up to the moon at some point. And there's a

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>specific example that I have in mind, which is, of course, um,

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the infamous pizza a. You know, like I think it

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>was eight or nine years ago or something when we

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>had one guy who paid for pizza using a bunch

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoins that, you know, a year ago would have

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>been worth millions of dollars, and it's kind of funny,

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>but people also sort of made fun of him about

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it and said, Oh, I can't believe you did that,

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and you wasted so much money. How do you overcome

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.479
<v Speaker 1>that problem? So I think Lightning is going to make

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that problem worse because ultimately people's anticipation or their projection

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of where the bitcoin price is going is based on

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the technology and the fundamentals that are going to be

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>driving the adoption that would cause the price to go

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>to that level. And so if if we with Lightning,

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>if we demonstrate that it's going to be a very

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 1>efficient system that's going to attract a lot of adoption,

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>then we can expect the price to to go up

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>even more than it otherwise would. So I think that

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it makes the problem worse in that regard. And really

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that the solution is just going to be time.

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And what I've seen is that people who have owned

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 1>bitcoins for a while, they are essentially overexposed to bitcoin,

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're always looking for ways to spend bitcoin. UH.

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>So I think that will will see essentially, the people

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>who bought it twenty thousand dollars in two thousand seventeen,

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>they might be in the hottele mindset for another decade UM.

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>But people who who bought it five dollars or a

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars, uh, they might be thinking about how how

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>to uh you know, buy a hard drive on on

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>online to um or. And the other aspect of it

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is that, um, you people who even who are buying

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>it today, UM, they want to experiment. They are fascinated

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>by the technology, uh, and they they're very bullish on

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the price, but they're also interested in educating themselves and

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>improving their under standing of bitcoin. And uh, I have

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who are very new to bitcoin

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>who um want to learn more about lightning because they

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>just find the idea of a decentralized payment system to

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.479
<v Speaker 1>be fascinating. So I think that you'll have people who

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>both are hoddling bitcoin and also transacting in it in

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>an experimental way but on some level. And I think

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of implicit in what you're saying and when

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you describe the people who use it now using bitcoin

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't a way as a means of transacting, even if

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it were really smooth, it's still a sort of um,

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of a medium of exchange of last resort. In

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>other words, if all you're doing is going to Starbucks

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and buying a coffee, even if it were incredibly simple, Uh,

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, just scanning your phone across a thing, and

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it's still like, there's not much reason to do it

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for transaction like that, even in the most simplistic scenario. No,

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>there isn't. You could make arguments about privacy. For example,

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, do you want visa knowing that you go

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to Starbucks every day? I think that most people don't

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 1>care about that at all. Um, And yeah, that's that's

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. It is a I think that the most

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>underrated aspect of bitcoin is optionality, right, and owning a

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit of bitcoin and having a little bit on

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>your phone gives you an extra option. Uh. And it's

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's that it's kind of a form of insurance from

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.959
<v Speaker 1>a payment system perspective. I want to go back to

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>something you just said about You say, people are um

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>who are getting into bitcoin now it feels like obviously

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>interest in bitcoin is significantly less than it was a

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>year ago. I think it's safe to say. But in

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>your world of people who are super into the technology

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and hacking away at lightning and building this out, do

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you still see growth in that community? Yes, to my surprise,

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>I do. I hope stay podcast the noted Bitcoin podcast,

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I joked that we're not getting any new listeners,

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and then on Twitter the next day I got a

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>d M of Hey, I'm a new listener, so keep

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 1>it up. Um, So there's definitely there's new developers and

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>new users coming in all the time, and I'm still

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>accumulating followers on Twitter to my surprise. But um, I

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a a sense, you know, we just

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>had Bitcoin's tenth birthday, and uh, there's a growing sense

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that like this isn't going away, and this is here

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>to stay and it will at least be here for

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>another decade. So there's a surprising amount of continued interest

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>in it, even at the depths of what people see

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>as a bear market, even though I still feel like

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>we're in a bull market. So what would it take

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>for you, as a bitcoin believer, bitcoin maximalist in fact,

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>what would it take for you to sort of lose

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>faith in bitcoin and change your mind. Yeah, I think

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the if h if bitcoin became um centralized enough to

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the point where people were making changes to it that

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought were unwise, and um that that almost happened

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand seventeen. We almost had a hard fork

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 1>that I thought was misguided. Um. And if if that

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>hard fork had succeeded, then I I would have likely

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>lost faith in in bitcoin. Uh. Thankfully it did. It

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>failed miserably, So Uh, that was a moment of victorious joy. Um.

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's not a guarantee that it won't happen in

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the future. So there's that aspect of it. Um. And

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>then from from the price perspective, I think that I

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>would question, uh, my, my understanding of what is driving adoption.

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>If the price got down to you know, below a

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars for an endless period of time, you know,

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years or something, then I would

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I would question if the adoption drivers that I had

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>analyzed had disappeared or I was under you know, a

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>euphoric case. Well, uh, we'll come back and have you

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>back on the podcast. If bitcoin is stay, does stay

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>for under a thousand dollars for a while and uh,

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if you've reassessed your euphoricques. Pierre Rochard, thank

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you very much for joining us, Thanks for having me out.

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Pierre. That was great, Tracy. I really like that conversation.

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, what I felt was my favorite part

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>was actually the analogy between contracts and the court system.

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I've never really thought about that before. That all businesses,

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 1>all transactions have some sort of contract, and the there

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is the implicit backing of the court system saying yes,

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>this is who's on the right and wrong side of

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the contract. But if we had to actually have the

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>courts adjudicate every contract, um, it would never work. And

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a really interesting analogy that I

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that makes a lot of sense in this context that

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I just never thought about before. Yeah, I really like

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that one too. But I guess my the one question

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I have having listened to that conversation is there's so

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>much effort being put into bitcoin and other crypto related projects,

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>either you know, to roll them out in terms of

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>adoption or to make transaction easier, And sometimes I just

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>wonder why, right, Like, why why put all this time

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and energy and money into a project to create a

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 1>decentralized form of money, and you know, Pierre sort of

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>touched on the libertarian arguments there, and then I start wondering, well,

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, if bitcoin did actually take off, is there

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>not a point at which governments do actually revolt against

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>it and crack down anyway? Anyway, those are my thoughts,

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 1>shower thoughts on crypto. Yeah, on the flip side, I

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>do think it's very interesting that I think when a

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, and I would say certainly the media

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and speculators and Wall Street in particular, have sort of

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 1>given up on bitcoin or lost interest, and you certainly

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>don't hear very much about institutions wanting to buy in

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>anymore these days, that there is this community that continues

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>to grind away at the core project of building out

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the technology and making it more usable and making it

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>more decentralized. And I think that it's sort of very

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>um and I don't I don't mean, not bullish in

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the price sense, but bullish in the longevity of the project,

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>since that regardless of the price swings, they're just the

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>people who are still building it out. Yeah. Absolutely, I

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>mean that this is basically what we've been talking about

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>for two episodes now there are very dedicated crypto believers,

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's a very dedicated crypto community. And you and

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I both remember at this point, I think twice now,

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven and two house and thirteen, we did

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have a big run up in the bitcoin price on

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a relative scale and a big drop, and each time

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we had a bunch of people saying, Oh, this was

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of it, this is the end, It's going

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to die, and yet it continues on and people still

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>really really have faith in it. Yeah, And to your

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>question about, like, well, one, what happens when there is

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the real government crackdown and they really get aggressive about

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to stamp it out. In theory, the technological work

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that's being done now to make it more robust and

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>more decentralized and more able for people to run their

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>own nodes will make that that eventual crackdown even harder

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to execute. Yeah, Joe, do you have bitcoins that you

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>can use to buy me pizza? Uh? Why would you?

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Why would you want to have pizza? But um, there's

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>got to be something better to buyan pizza? Right, that's true,

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>That's very true. When I'm in New York next Okay,

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, this has been another episode of the

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Odd Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe wi isn'hal.

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwarts, and

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you should follow our guests on Twitter. Pierre Rochard, He's

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>at Pierre Underscore Rochard, and you should follow our producer

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter tofur Foreheads. He's at foreheads T, as well

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>as the Bloomberg head of podcast Francesco lead at Francesco Today.

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.