Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for being with us.
Speaker 2: Right down our toll free telephone number if you want
Speaker 2: to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and nine point one. Sean.
Speaker 2: Now, I've got a lot to get to and there's
Speaker 2: so much misinformation, there's so much propaganda, there's so much
Speaker 2: lying that goes on, and there's so many groups of
Speaker 2: people that and we'll get into this in detail about
Speaker 2: Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut. I mean, just just praying
Speaker 2: for the IRGC to be more successful than our own
Speaker 2: country and for the people of Iran. It's it's kind
Speaker 2: of disgusting and sickening, and there's just a I mean
Speaker 2: a complete lack of understanding. None of what the President
Speaker 2: has been able to pull off, as historic of military
Speaker 2: victory as this is bed and what Israel and the
Speaker 2: US have pulled off is just never going to be
Speaker 2: enough for people. And they don't understand nuanced, they don't
Speaker 2: understand that there are many, many things that go into
Speaker 2: to a decision such as wiping out the infrastructure of Iran,
Speaker 2: wiping out carg Island. I don't often talk about my
Speaker 2: conversations with the President, but I had one last night
Speaker 2: and it was detailed nothing that he would not be
Speaker 2: allowed to tell me. And we talked at length about
Speaker 2: that and about a number of other things. I don't
Speaker 2: usually talk about it when I talked to the president,
Speaker 2: do I, Linda, you can verify this fact? And I
Speaker 2: don't for a reason, but you know I have sources
Speaker 2: and information now what I knew from other sources that
Speaker 2: when the President announced that there's going to be a
Speaker 2: slight extension of this UH ceasefire, I came on the
Speaker 2: air on TV last night gave all the details because
Speaker 2: I needed time after the radio program to get the details.
Speaker 2: And I was told to no one's terms that it
Speaker 2: was going to be very short lived and that the
Speaker 2: President was really doing it for two very specific reasons.
Speaker 2: And I would add a third actually, but one is
Speaker 2: the Prime Minister of Pakistan pretty much was begging him
Speaker 2: to give them more time and explain to the President
Speaker 2: that they don't have regular communication ability that would that
Speaker 2: would allow for the people that had been negotiating previously
Speaker 2: in Islama Pod to be communicating with the Iranian Revolutionary
Speaker 2: Guard Corps because they can't get on a phone. Now,
Speaker 2: think about this. It may sound stupid, but it's true.
Speaker 2: It's not like any one of these these leaders at
Speaker 2: this point, or so called leaders, or anybody in a
Speaker 2: position of power in Iran is going to be too
Speaker 2: keen on getting on a phone call knowing the intercept
Speaker 2: capability of the US and wanting to have a discussion
Speaker 2: about you know what they can agree and disagree on
Speaker 2: regarding a deal or potential deal with the US. It's
Speaker 2: not something that they could pull off that easily. That's
Speaker 2: why there's been such confusion. And the President also took
Speaker 2: into account, I think, as evidenced by before Israel struck
Speaker 2: after fifty days, they had an opportunity to come up
Speaker 2: with a peace deal.
Speaker 1: They didn't.
Speaker 2: Day fifty one, the bombing began even before midnight hammer.
Speaker 2: The President offered the Iranians a path to peace. They
Speaker 2: chose not to take it then either and in this
Speaker 2: specific case epic fury. The President again offered the Iranians
Speaker 2: an opportunity to come to the table, come to a
Speaker 2: peace agreement. And when the President repeats before every one
Speaker 2: of these these conflicts begins that he wants peace, he
Speaker 2: wants piece, he wants peace. He's not saying it for
Speaker 2: the sake of just being heard that is his preferable choice.
Speaker 2: And Democrats, the liberal media mob, the isolationists, lunatics that
Speaker 2: would forever burden your children and grandchildren with a nuclear
Speaker 2: armed Iran because they're just dumb and ignorant and know
Speaker 2: nothing about history, although they claim some of them to
Speaker 2: be great historians, which I find somewhat amusing, and they
Speaker 2: would put the world at risk and they will have
Speaker 2: learned nothing from the last century.
Speaker 1: But okay, let people be stupid.
Speaker 2: I I have absolutely no inclination to listen to stupid
Speaker 2: and this president he had he's the person that ultimately
Speaker 2: makes the decision based on every bit of intelligence information
Speaker 2: available to him and what's going on on the ground,
Speaker 2: what is negotiators of telling him. And he also is
Speaker 2: somebody that reaches out and tries to get a wide
Speaker 2: variety of opinions from a lot of different people. This
Speaker 2: is what the President said to me last night, and
Speaker 2: it was as I expected. It was not a shock
Speaker 2: to me that he said this. He said, Sean, he goes,
Speaker 2: I can wipe this place out. I said, I know
Speaker 2: in fifteen minutes. He goes, no, I could do it
Speaker 2: in five. That's he actually said those words to me.
Speaker 2: I can he goes, really don't want to, because if
Speaker 2: we end up going down that road, it's not just
Speaker 2: going to be the IRGC, It's not just going to
Speaker 2: be the guys in suits that would prefer a negotiated settlement,
Speaker 2: or seemingly prefer I'm not sure if they're all coordinating
Speaker 2: or not. Well well know soon enough, and he has
Speaker 2: that option on the table, and it's a very easy option.
Speaker 2: And as I was explaining yesterday, it probably if you
Speaker 2: want to prevent the potential for the Iranians to ever
Speaker 2: reconstitute or rebuild their weapons capability, be it nuclear, ballistics,
Speaker 2: air defense systems, probably the better option in terms of
Speaker 2: preventing that fomenting terror in the region would be to
Speaker 2: just wipe them out, obliterate them. But with that comes
Speaker 2: a great cost to the ninety plus million Iranian people
Speaker 2: that desperately have been that have been living in tyranny
Speaker 2: and oppression, that want to get out from under it
Speaker 2: and want to regain their once great culture. The Persian
Speaker 2: culture was a great culture. It has a rich history
Speaker 2: of contributions to humankind, and that is also a factor
Speaker 2: in the President's mind. The president, democrats and radical leftists,
Speaker 2: what have you believe, oh, well, you know, Taco president,
Speaker 2: and in spite of all of the action he's taken,
Speaker 2: they would still make that ridiculous claim. Or they try
Speaker 2: to put him in a box and say, well, if
Speaker 2: he hits infrastructure, bridges and other places, carg Island and
Speaker 2: those are war crimes, so he can't win for losing
Speaker 2: when they're all legitimate military targets that have been used
Speaker 2: historically because they have dual purpose use, which means that
Speaker 2: the military needs the oil. Therefore, he would be well
Speaker 2: within his rights to do it. They transport their troops
Speaker 2: over bridges, he'd be within his rights to do it.
Speaker 2: Other power infrastructure that could be used to constitute a
Speaker 2: counterattack against US, all legitimate military targets. So that's what
Speaker 2: their point is. Now, yesterday we reported on this program
Speaker 2: that the President put out a truth social post requesting
Speaker 2: that the Iranians, if they want to show good faith,
Speaker 2: that they can release and stop the execution of these
Speaker 2: eight Iranian women, some of them as young as sixteen.
Speaker 2: I mean, they have the whole lives ahead of them.
Speaker 2: Their major crime is they're protesting against the tyrannical regime
Speaker 2: that oppresses women, and so the President just announced about
Speaker 2: an hour or so ago in a truth social post
Speaker 2: that very good news. I've just been informed the eight
Speaker 2: women protesters who are going to be executed tonight in
Speaker 2: Iran will no longer be killed. Four will be released immediately,
Speaker 2: four will be sentenced to one month in prison. I
Speaker 2: appreciate that Iran that's leaders respect my request as President
Speaker 2: of the United States and terminated the planned execution. I
Speaker 2: know he'll never get credit for standing up for women,
Speaker 2: Willy Linda, I don't think I've got credit.
Speaker 1: For that definitely. Now. Now, I don't know if this
Speaker 1: is going to hold.
Speaker 2: I mean, there there is this this power struggle that
Speaker 2: is ongoing within the country. I don't know if it's
Speaker 2: the hardline revolutionary guard, the guys with the guns that
Speaker 2: now run the entire government, or if the Prime Minister
Speaker 2: of Pakistan is correct in his hope and optimism that
Speaker 2: the two sides. Now, as it was explained for me
Speaker 2: from other sources now from the President, is that the
Speaker 2: plan moving forward would be that they come up with
Speaker 2: their united response to the President's proposal. That's it, and
Speaker 2: that's what we're waiting for now. The White House today
Speaker 2: was very very clear that they are giving between three
Speaker 2: and five days for this to happen. After that, all
Speaker 2: bets will be off. And as the President was saying
Speaker 2: to me, those bets will be off. That means that
Speaker 2: the President can you know, the President will will will
Speaker 2: follow through on what he's been threatening to do.
Speaker 1: That he's been hesitant to do.
Speaker 2: You know, based on the fact that the government Iran
Speaker 2: is seriously fractured, not expectedly unexpectedly so, and upon the
Speaker 2: request of the Field Marshal and Prime Minister of Pakistan,
Speaker 2: we have been asked to hold our attack on the
Speaker 2: country of Iran until such time as their leaders and
Speaker 2: representatives can come up with a unified attack on the
Speaker 2: country of Iran.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: I have therefore directed our military to continue the blockade
Speaker 2: and in all other respects remain ready and able, and
Speaker 2: therefore extend the ceasefire until such time and proposals admitted
Speaker 2: so the blockade continues. The options all on the table.
Speaker 2: The president, you know, is this, This is going to
Speaker 2: be resolved one way or the other in short time.
Speaker 2: It's I know I've been saying it, but it is
Speaker 2: really true. It's going to be the easy way, It's
Speaker 2: going to be the hard way, and there's not going
Speaker 2: to be any in between here in terms of what
Speaker 2: they do now. I understand the argument you don't want
Speaker 2: a delay victory, but I don't think three to five
Speaker 2: days is that big a delay. And the president is
Speaker 2: he taking a risk for peace sake?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Is he putting off the inevitable? Maybe that I can't
Speaker 2: I don't have a crystal ball. I can't tell you,
Speaker 2: but the deadline now has been set. He has access
Speaker 2: to the intelligence that he can't share things that we
Speaker 2: don't know. And it doesn't mean he was wrong to
Speaker 2: delay a return to active operations that is coming in
Speaker 2: short order. I don't think there'll be another delay. So
Speaker 2: if the Pakistani leaders, who have been trying very hard
Speaker 2: and putting their best foot forward, are communicating to the
Speaker 2: President that they are having a hard time, you know,
Speaker 2: internally with varying factions, and that we need to give
Speaker 2: them time to even communicate amongst themselves, our goal will
Speaker 2: remain clear. We will end the RAN's nuclear ambition permanently.
Speaker 2: We will eviscerate their conventional weapons. We've already done so.
Speaker 2: We've taken out their navy, their air defense systems, and
Speaker 2: they will no longer be able to bully their neighbors
Speaker 2: and the straight of hor moves will remain open and completely.
Speaker 2: You know, it's sort of like the president. And this
Speaker 2: is what I think he was saying to me last night.
Speaker 2: How I interpret it, He can go full Sherman. You
Speaker 2: have you heard the saying, Linda, you've heard that. Have
Speaker 2: you ever heard go full Sherman? In other words, not
Speaker 2: a colloquial, you know expression. It means like total war,
Speaker 2: you go hard, deepen the paint, use whatever analogy you want.
Speaker 2: A strategy of overwhelming, unrelenting force that will target enemy armies,
Speaker 2: economic infrastructure resources, civilian will to fight and sustain it.
Speaker 2: And it draws directly from the Union General Sherman and
Speaker 2: his campaign in the Civil War, especially his famous March
Speaker 2: to the Sea. And at that point, after capturing Atlanta,
Speaker 2: Sherman cut loose from his supply lines, led sixty thousand
Speaker 2: troops on a two hundred and eighty five miles scorched
Speaker 2: earth march across Georgia to Savannah and later Northwood, destroying railroads, bridges, factories,
Speaker 2: telegraph lines, crippling Confederate logistics, and you know, avoided major
Speaker 2: battles with Confederate forces when possible, instead focusing on breaking
Speaker 2: the South's ability to desire to continue the war. That
Speaker 2: is what it means, and that's what the President is communicating,
Speaker 2: without going into the historic precedence behind his thinking. President
Speaker 2: is far smarter than those people that have no interest
Speaker 2: in understanding him, even though he's been on the world
Speaker 2: stage for eleven years. And the President did truth out
Speaker 2: to Iranian leaders who will soon be in negotiations with
Speaker 2: my representatives. I greatly appreciate the release of these women.
Speaker 2: Now they say they're going to release the women, we'll
Speaker 2: learn lot and see if he does this, see if
Speaker 2: they do this. Rather, we will learn a lot, will
Speaker 2: learn a lot very very quickly. And I think the
Speaker 2: President I frankly applaud his decision. I'm not in a
Speaker 2: rush to destroy this country, knowing it's going to impact
Speaker 2: ninety million people. However, when measured against the ability of
Speaker 2: the Iranians to foam and terror, to also have a
Speaker 2: nuclear weapon, coupled with their very very ugly twisted, sick ideology,
Speaker 2: is just not an option for me. And by the way,
Speaker 2: in spite of oh the lowest polls ever, no President
Speaker 2: Trump's approval rating hovering in the mid to upper forties
Speaker 2: according to the actual polsters that know how to pull him.
Speaker 2: I mean it is the media is so abusively biased
Speaker 2: and corrupt. Anyway, the White House did confirm the ceasefires
Speaker 2: three to five days, and we'll see what happens and
Speaker 2: see if the Arrangeians within themselves can somehow come to
Speaker 2: an agreement. They did after Operation Midnight Hammer, remember that conflict.
Speaker 2: They ended that after twelve days. They wanted out. And
Speaker 2: if they're not able to assess how bad this is
Speaker 2: going to be, then that's going to be on them.
Speaker 2: Whatever suffering the Iranian people go through will be on
Speaker 2: them too. All right, twenty five now till the top
Speaker 2: of the hour, eight hundred and nine foot one, Sean,
Speaker 2: if you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 2: we have so much to get to today. I got
Speaker 2: so much to tell you. Anyway, I want to tell
Speaker 2: you too. The one thing that's also factoring into the
Speaker 2: President's decision here, and he telegraphed in great detail last
Speaker 2: night just before I went on the air, and it
Speaker 2: was and it was reiterated during this brief conversation I
Speaker 2: had with him yesterday. It was actually fairly extended and
Speaker 2: he said in and as he was saying, I can.
Speaker 2: I can wipe out this infrastructure in no time at all.
Speaker 2: It's an easy decision to make in terms of the military,
Speaker 2: the military aspects of it. Here's where there was a
Speaker 2: pretty good analysis I thought from the New York Post
Speaker 2: today because the ceasefire, though extended, you know, could end.
Speaker 2: It's going to end in three to five days. Iran
Speaker 2: has fired on tankers. They have played you know, fast
Speaker 2: and loose with the straight of horn moves. Uh. The
Speaker 2: Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, the IRGC, not around civilian government,
Speaker 2: is calling the shots. They have the guns. The guys
Speaker 2: in suits need to align with the guys who guns,
Speaker 2: and they need to come to an agreement and what's
Speaker 2: acceptable not acceptable, and then Donald Trump will see if
Speaker 2: you can, if there is a deal to be made here.
Speaker 2: And you know, and this is what Scott Besset was
Speaker 2: trying to say in a truth post that he put
Speaker 2: out yesterday, that the Iranians now they they are they
Speaker 2: have they're at maximum capacity in terms of storing their energy,
Speaker 2: their oil that they have, which means that their wells
Speaker 2: are going to have to be shut down, which in
Speaker 2: and of itself is a monumental task if you ask
Speaker 2: any landman or anybody that knows anything about the oil industry.
Speaker 2: And as one senior US official confirmed this week, what
Speaker 2: the numbers have shown all along, and the reason the
Speaker 2: President has known this from the beginning, is that Iran
Speaker 2: has no money. They are broke. They have a oil economy.
Speaker 2: It is ninety percent of their economy. They're broke. We
Speaker 2: know it, they know we know it. And as the
Speaker 2: New York Post is analyzing it, which is different than
Speaker 2: what I thought about until I read it, if that's true,
Speaker 2: they're believing a deal is closer than the chaos that
Speaker 2: we're hearing about hour by hour is suggesting. But only
Speaker 2: if Washington is using the right instruments. Then they go
Speaker 2: into more specific analysis to say in the air campaign
Speaker 2: produced real results.
Speaker 1: I mean, think about this.
Speaker 2: If what the Pakistani Prime Minister is saying to the
Speaker 2: President is that the IRGC and the guys that have
Speaker 2: been negotiating in Islamabad have a hard time reaching and
Speaker 2: communicating with each other because none of them dare pick
Speaker 2: up a phone for fear that they're going to be
Speaker 2: instantaneously killed by either Israel.
Speaker 1: Or the US.
Speaker 2: That shows you the magnitude of fear that we have
Speaker 2: instilled in whatever third or fourth or fifth yeer leadership
Speaker 2: that remains. And Iran's nuclear infrastructure, we know, was severely damaged,
Speaker 2: the Navy destroyed, their air defense systems destroyed. We have
Speaker 2: greatly reduced any capacity that they would have to even
Speaker 2: launch a ballistic missile, never mind their drone attacks on
Speaker 2: top of it. So those are all real significant gains.
Speaker 2: They all know that that is the truth, although they
Speaker 2: might posture differently in public. And remember a lot of
Speaker 2: this is being put out there for the audience of
Speaker 2: the Iranian people as propaganda purposes and nothing else. But
Speaker 2: this naval blockade announced by the president is cutting off
Speaker 2: ninety percent of Iran sea born trade. That means the
Speaker 2: blockade has been a success, and the Iranians have tried
Speaker 2: to disrupt it. The Iranians have tried to create chaos.
Speaker 2: The Iranians are acting as though that they think that
Speaker 2: they can control eventually the straight horn moves. But the
Speaker 2: one country that's going to need the straight of hor
Speaker 2: moves the most is going to be the Iran more
Speaker 2: than any other ones. The world is already looking for
Speaker 2: alternative roots and they're finding them in terms of safe
Speaker 2: passage for oil out of the Middle East. You know,
Speaker 2: now if you look at carg Island, they handle ninety
Speaker 2: percent of Iran's crude exports ninety percent. That's one point
Speaker 2: five million barrels of oil a day. You know that
Speaker 2: that's two hundred million dollars in revenue that they're not
Speaker 2: getting in on any given day just from that one
Speaker 2: source of revenue alone. Their defense budget channels over half
Speaker 2: of those oil revenues go straight to the military, with
Speaker 2: the IRGC taking the largest cut that money. You know,
Speaker 2: at the time they had one hundred and ninety thousand personnel.
Speaker 2: We estimate now that the down to about one hundred
Speaker 2: and thirty thousand. They've lost about sixty thousand IRGC troops.
Speaker 2: The blockade, which is different and separate from the CUTS
Speaker 2: Forces which is their real military, and the CUDS forces
Speaker 2: while larger, you know, when nobody's really heard peep out
Speaker 2: of out of where they stand on all of this,
Speaker 2: but the blockade squeezes Iran's imports and has made outbound
Speaker 2: shipments far risk. Here that's where the five hundred million
Speaker 2: dollar four hundred to five hundred million dollar figure comes
Speaker 2: from and it doesn't even touch carg islands loading terminals,
Speaker 2: their story tanks, their pipelines connecting the island to the mainland. Now,
Speaker 2: Washington has struck Carg's weapons, it has not struck Carg's
Speaker 2: wallet yet, it's not the same target. If you force
Speaker 2: ran and again this is the operation, the military operation,
Speaker 2: that would be a five minute operation for President Trump
Speaker 2: and our military if Washington strikes cargs wallet and they
Speaker 2: forced Iran to shut down production, and which now is
Speaker 2: even happening on its own because the blockade has been
Speaker 2: so successful to lack the storage of it, that's going
Speaker 2: to risk long term reservoir damage including you know, potential
Speaker 2: permanent loss and what's called water coning and formation compaction
Speaker 2: effects that could immediately and permanently reduce future output and
Speaker 2: cash flow. Now, the second lifeline is floating, the floating
Speaker 2: reserve of two hundred million barrels of Iranian crude that
Speaker 2: sits on tankers in and around you know, different areas
Speaker 2: in the Strait of Hormus and nearby areas, you know,
Speaker 2: and five months of exports supply that the IRGC stockpile
Speaker 2: before the war as a financial cushion. That's fine, and dandy.
Speaker 2: But you know, even if they had a couple of
Speaker 2: months worth, that's still not going to be enough to
Speaker 2: get them out of the economic stranglehold they're now in
Speaker 2: right at this moment, and the blockade and planned boardings
Speaker 2: do not fully neutralize this. As long as that reserve exists,
Speaker 2: the IRGC can sustain their current position. How long they
Speaker 2: can do it at most a month two months, not
Speaker 2: going to go much longer than that. So a targeted
Speaker 2: strike on CARGS loading equipment, their trucks, they're pumps, the manifolds,
Speaker 2: the loading arms that move oil from storage onto tankers.
Speaker 2: Under normal conditions, the equipment can be repaired fairly, fairly expeditiously.
Speaker 2: Under sanctions and spare parts not being available, the timeline
Speaker 2: now stretches into months, if not years, over time, depending
Speaker 2: on how bad the damage is. So these facilities directly
Speaker 2: fund the IRGC military operations. And I'm going to tell
Speaker 2: you something, as loyal as these people may seem, and
Speaker 2: as extreme as they may seem, once it impacts their life,
Speaker 2: because remember usually I r c GC members and cuts forces,
Speaker 2: they were among the highest paid inside Iran. They live
Speaker 2: the wealthiest lifestyle that this this oil money does not
Speaker 2: flow to the people of Iran, although hopefully the idea
Speaker 2: would be that if they got you know, a different
Speaker 2: form of government and got away from this you know,
Speaker 2: radical Islamic theocracy that has been oppressing its people, that
Speaker 2: that would all change.
Speaker 1: Anyway.
Speaker 2: The other, the other less conventional but potentially powerful step
Speaker 2: would be Washington could designate the entire floating reserve under
Speaker 2: IRGC sanctions and extend the blockade intercept authority to cover
Speaker 2: any tank or attempting delivery and offer China a structured
Speaker 2: escro arrangement and proceeds for Marianian crewde purchases would be
Speaker 2: held in a neutral account pending verified IRGC compliance. I mean,
Speaker 2: there's there's a lot of ways that you can structure
Speaker 2: a deal where it's a trust but verified deal, and
Speaker 2: not one where they give you their word and then
Speaker 2: five weeks later you know, we're back where we were.
Speaker 2: But anyway, there's another piece that came out to and
Speaker 2: I guess this goes directly to the heart of all
Speaker 2: of the naysayers, the radical left in this country that
Speaker 2: wants Trump to fail, the Democrats that have been saying
Speaker 2: from day one the president has failed. Meanwhile, It's one
Speaker 2: of the most successful military efforts in history, and we
Speaker 2: did so with great precision, avoiding as much you know,
Speaker 2: collateral damage as possible, targeting mill military targets, not targeting
Speaker 2: civilians the way the Iranians have been targeting civilians in
Speaker 2: Gulf States and obviously in Israel and Tel Aviv with
Speaker 2: their cluster bombs. But when Operation Epic Fury began Washington's
Speaker 2: class of foreign policy experts, they were warning that it
Speaker 2: would lead to several unintended, alarmingly negative secondary consequences. And
Speaker 2: the consensus among the quote intellectual hate Trump, elitists on
Speaker 2: the left and the Democratic Party, and then the isolation
Speaker 2: as loudmouths that haven't learned a single lesson from history.
Speaker 2: But anyway, it was that the administration was not doing
Speaker 2: the long term planning to prevent these bad outcomes. I
Speaker 2: can tell you firsthand every single thing that they have
Speaker 2: dealt with was thought about and planned for ahead of time,
Speaker 2: including the mining of the Strato Hormuz. That was not
Speaker 2: a shock to our military or to the president. It
Speaker 2: was something we thought was likely when we into this,
Speaker 2: knowing it would complicate things, but not preventing the president
Speaker 2: from achieving his ultimate goal, which is to have an
Speaker 2: Iram that doesn't have nuclear weapons.
Speaker 1: You know, is the outcome you know, really certain?
Speaker 2: Yeah, if we use the right amount of military force,
Speaker 2: the outcome will be certain and they will not be
Speaker 2: a nuclear power. What will the long term consequences be
Speaker 2: that well, that will be based on what these emerging leaders,
Speaker 2: you know, the choices that they make in the next
Speaker 2: seventy two hours, next one hundred hours or so. It's
Speaker 2: really going to be on them. And if you look
Speaker 2: at China, except for this, there's one ship that appeared
Speaker 2: to have dual purpose ballistic missile fuel. You know, they've
Speaker 2: not been anywhere near this conflict. This is the China
Speaker 2: does not like this. They get too much of their
Speaker 2: energy from that area. They don't want this to go on.
Speaker 2: They don't want this to continue. And let me see,
Speaker 2: this just came out. This is actually pretty interesting. The
Speaker 2: Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Lindsey Graham are now
Speaker 2: taking the first step to passing another reconciliation bill to
Speaker 2: fund our great border patrol ice agents. Radical left Democrats,
Speaker 2: their so called leader crying Chucky Schumer, one of the
Speaker 2: most incompetent senators in American history, will try to offer
Speaker 2: amendments during the process to divide Republicans. Republicans need to
Speaker 2: stick together. I love the idea of another reconciliation bill,
Speaker 2: I really do so. With Iran losing five hundred million
Speaker 2: dollars a day, how much longer can they survive?
Speaker 1: Now?
Speaker 2: The Iranians can't be allowed to string us along. The
Speaker 2: White House has said it's a three to five day
Speaker 2: break at the request of the Pakistani Prime Minister. And
Speaker 2: you know, if you look at under President Trump's leadership
Speaker 2: as part of economic fury, you know, the Treasury Department
Speaker 2: is continuing to follow the money and target the Iranian
Speaker 2: regime's recklessness and those who would enable it got best
Speaker 2: and put this out and the regimes being held accountable
Speaker 2: for their extortion of global energy markets and indiscriminate targeting
Speaker 2: of civilians with missiles and drones. These designations that that
Speaker 2: they have put in place, these sanctions that they have
Speaker 2: put in place now again are now bringing this regime
Speaker 2: economically to its knees. It's it's not very often that
Speaker 2: you have such a tactical advantage in war, where an
Speaker 2: economy is based on one thing, and pretty much one
Speaker 2: thing only like we're witnessing here. By the way, Linda,
Speaker 2: there's a lot of other news today. Did you see
Speaker 2: a black bear finally fell from a tree after being
Speaker 2: hit with a tranquilizer A dart in all the name you're.
Speaker 1: Not so sad?
Speaker 2: Oh my gosh, why do you over feed your cat? Okay,
Speaker 2: it's like it went to sleep. It's not a big deal.
Speaker 1: Yeah, did you feel what it felt like when he
Speaker 1: hit the ground. He's gonna feel that when he wakes up.
Speaker 2: Congress's approval now at a record low ten percent. I
Speaker 2: never thought he could get that back. You know this,
Speaker 2: this Nazi guy, the Nazi tattoo guy Platner in Maine.
Speaker 2: It looks like he may win the Democratic nomination anyway.
Speaker 1: He says.
Speaker 2: The overnight operation that took out Maduro and diverted Venezuela's
Speaker 2: oil from America's pose to its allies was uniquely stupid.
Speaker 2: How stupid is he for believing that there is You'll
Speaker 2: like this because you now have kind of reignited your
Speaker 2: Catholic faith. The world's oldest non celebrated one hundred and
Speaker 2: thirteenth birthday on Long Island. Long Island, U will God
Speaker 2: bless her. You know, I interviewed Gary Breco. We're going
Speaker 2: to drop the pod with Gary tomorrow, and he says,
Speaker 2: if you want to live to one hundred, it'll be
Speaker 2: your choice.
Speaker 1: Can you believe that? With Ai? Yeah, I choose not
Speaker 1: one hundred. That's what I choose. I'm good.
Speaker 2: I don't think I want you to live to one
Speaker 2: hundred either. We're going to get into this with Nancy
Speaker 2: Grace and Nicole Parker. I mean, there's eleven missing scientists.
Speaker 2: This is not an accident. There's something going on here.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, and I'm not a conspiracy theorist. One Florida resident.
Speaker 2: There's a meltdown video. I gotta show it to you. Uh,
Speaker 2: there are new limits for these EBT cards that people have.
Speaker 2: No sodas, no ice cream? What are we gonna do?
Speaker 2: Why don't you buy something healthy? Why don't you get eggs?
Speaker 2: And I don't know, why didn't you get eggs and
Speaker 2: some ground beef? Eat something healthy? I thought that was
Speaker 2: pretty funny. I knew you'd be upset over the bear,
Speaker 2: but you know, you act like you're all into animals
Speaker 2: and then you overfeed your cat and you killed your cat.
Speaker 1: Are you okay? I'm not okay, I'm very upset.
Speaker 2: I'm upset that the cat was, you know, seven times
Speaker 2: the size of a regular cat. Listen, everybody needs to
Speaker 2: be healthy, and that's why the EBT cards are being controlled,
Speaker 2: because they're sick of people buying all the wrong stuff
Speaker 2: on it.
Speaker 1: It's the best thing they ever did.
Speaker 2: All Right, when we come back, all right, if one
Speaker 2: person is missing, an isolated incidence. If there's two, Nancy
Speaker 2: Grace says, that's a coincidence. If it's three or more
Speaker 2: in the case of these scientists, eleven of them, no,
Speaker 2: that would be a pattern. We'll explain Nicole Parker and
Speaker 2: Nancy Grace next