WEBVTT - Surveillance: International Markets With Doll

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Daily

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Steve

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Shibaron has it federated. And what's so important about what

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Mr Shivaron does is he writes really important notes of

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the international balances out there and then what to do

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>with your investment at Capital. We're thrilled he could join

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>us and federated him as this morning up Steve. You know,

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I look at your note which is basically, hey, everybody,

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>wake up. The US isn't as bad as all. And

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>does that mean that you and the team at Federated

0:00:53.960 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>stay hugely US centric. No. Actually, for the first time

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in a while, we've closed some of our underweights internationally.

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that the big story that's out there in

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace, that's hiding in plain sight, but's the big driver,

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>is collectively large parts of the world are exiting recession

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to stay at home. Recession is most likely ended in

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of places, and we're entering recovery and in

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that environment, value parts of the market are likely to

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>catch up. And when you look at European in disease,

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>when you look at developed non US, there's more value

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>in those industries. So it's not a story about growth

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>rolling over and dying. It's not a story about the

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>US do importantly, but we think international can start to

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>catch up. This is so so important, Steve, you and

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about it before. Let's review it right now.

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's of such great importance. It's not about

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>tech down and vailue up. It's on a relative basis,

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just the value starts to do better. Right, Yeah, and

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>within value, right, you have to separate that between the

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>survivors and the and the dyers. Right there, almost all

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>value was a loser from the pandemic. The question is

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>which companies are going to survive, because those companies are

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>going to take share from those companies that don't survive,

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna be rerated higher when they're no longer

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>being priced for you know, pandemic and recession. And so

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 1>we think there's a lot of alphah to be generated

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>on the value side if you can engage in good

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>research and pick the right stocks. See if good morning

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to you. What is it that drive what is the

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>catalyst that drives that move into value? Then? Is it's

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine and and what will be the definitive vaccine

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>news that sort of sleepens the yield cave drives people

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>into value here in Europe. No, I think the vaccine

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is part of this, but let's make no mistake about it.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not an investment strategy to pray for a cure. All.

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:49.839
<v Speaker 1>I think any vaccine we're likely to get is more

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>flu vaccine than smallpox vaccine. I think the big catalyst

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>here is just the end of the recession. If you

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>look at p M I s, if you look at

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>retail sales, if you look at housing activity, they're all

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>showing economic recovery. Labor markets they're showing recovery. That in

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and of itself is a catalyst. Now, what will confirm

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it is if we continue to see the tenure yield

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>remain firm or firm. And that's what was different in

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>this past value run than the head fix we've gotten

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>before is you've got twenty basis points of ten year

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>bond yields up, which which you didn't get before. So

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the bond markets telling you it also thinks that things

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>are normally as is the dollar. The dollar weakening is

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a sign of normalization. You're you're taking off that safety

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>trade in large part. And we'll get to the dollar

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the dollar shortly. Perhaps I'm just looking the year to

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>dight moves on some of these big stock indexes, and

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>many in the US well, the NAZAK and the SMP

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>notably of course, have termed positive year today Europe really

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>drags behind. Is that just a function of sector exposure,

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a function of being more driven by values and growth

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>or does Europe deserve that kind of discount right now?

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>He deserves a discount. And I think you're largely because

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of the sector exposure. When you look at at the

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>SMP five, it has, you know, significantly more tech and

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>calm services. When you look at you know, the eurostocks,

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>You've got a lot more financials, you have a lot

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>more energy, you have a lot more big farm and

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's that's a part of it. But

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I also think that there have been some overhangs in

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Europe that are starting to lift. You're seeing a little

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>bit more fiscal cohesion up until you know, last day

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>or so, the virus state has been relatively well behaved.

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And then I think that dollar weekening also helps make

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, international markets a little bit more attractive for

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>US investors. So what are you actually doing to deploy capital?

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to you about a broader institutional

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>idea here had federated about what sectors actually matter now

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of participating in the market, Steve, but not

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>getting my head handed to me if I get it wrong.

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>That's that's exactly right, and it's a very it's gonna

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting answer, and it's small caps actually, uh,

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>small caps is a way of playing this cyclical rotation Shin.

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>But even if the value story doesn't materialize as much

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>as you know we think it may, small caps have

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>another way of winning. In the first year off of

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:13.119
<v Speaker 1>a recession bottom small cap equities tend to outperform large

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 1>caps by about twenty to five, which is a big boost.

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>They benefit from low rates, and we think they'll benefit

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>when the Fed ultimately announces average inflation targeting. They benefit

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>from a cyclical pickup um and we think longer term

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>they benefit from a manufacturing renaissance in the center of

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States. So we've moved overweight to small caps,

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly on the value side. We've closed our underweight internationally

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and we remain overweight equities. Those are the three big

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>calls that we're implementing or suggesting the clients implement through

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>their portfolios. And Steve, what drives that manufacturing renaissance in

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>this in the center of the United States that you

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>refer to in your notes ahead of our conversation, you

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>talk quite a lot about population dynamics. And not to

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>sound too MALFUSI in a bouncing it, I'm either simple

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>as that or or or does that not play well

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>with our E s G. Credentials means to find other

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>investment things other than just where is the population going

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to grow? Most? No, but I think population is a

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>big driver. It's not the only one. I think in

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the long run the drivers of economic growth are in

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>fact population growth and innovation. And and remember companies went

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to China primarily for cheap labor, you know, ten twenty

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>years ago. But when you're when your factory is more

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>technology and less labor in terms of input costs, which

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you're left within China or higher shipping costs, higher energy costs,

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>not enough intellectual property protection, uncertainty on the GEL on

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the Korean peninsula. Hong Kong's gone from the financial capital

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of Asia to a state of rebellion, and there have

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>been some transparency issues at least around the beginning of

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. By contrast, when you look at the center

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of the United States, and I would include Mexico here

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and parts of Canada as well, but the center part

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of North America, you have easy shipping routes to great

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>end markets, one of the lowest tax rates in the world,

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>abundant and ergy, geopolitical stability, even in these kind of

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>crazy political times. Um and we think that for a

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of reasons, that becomes an attractive emerging market. And

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I think policymakers on both sides of the political divide

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>are gonna are going to encourage that. Steve, and thank

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with Steve Schavaroni or federated

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>or miss with us this morning now with p JUM

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and I should say, the award winning PI JAM and

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>fixed Income Robert Tip joins us their chief investment strategists.

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>What do I make of the real yield Robert Tip,

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>other than John Farrell's show is award winning? What do

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I make of the inflation adjusted yield in America right now. Yeah,

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>let's it's the difficult time for people to figure out

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>their bonds and there's no doubt the yields are allowed

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the real yield or negative and trying for people to

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>wrap divines around what that means. I can focus on

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the normal yield, and I think that looking inside they

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that those are likely to remain where they are. If

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the said is going to succeed, that is going to

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>be measured in terms of they're pushing up inflation expectations.

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Have a colleague kish line. He likes to think in

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of the real yield. Well, he would say that

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Tom is that if they succeed right now, break evens

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>are below two percent, and the said, once you target

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a PC of two, the CPI, which is what break

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>evens trade off of, you're gonna have to go with

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>me one second, right still involve CPI is usually higher

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>than the PC. So the fens PC is going to

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>be to the CPI has got to be above two.

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>If the CPI is above two, and the market beliefs

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that your ten your real yield, which is at minus one,

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be at minus one and a half

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>or less. So really yield a negative and one sign

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Feds going to said success it's gonna be

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Does the market believe inflation is going to go to target?

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>It didn't believe it, or this crisis it doesn't believe it. Now,

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>well you just heard their folks. Is an adult conversation

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>on bonds. We've heard this across the show. I can't

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>say enough the value of John writing at Breen Capital

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and what you're hearing from Mr Tip of Pigeum. The

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>way this is reported and fixated on in the media

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>is wrong. I don't know what else to say. It

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>was literally the first project I did for Matt Winkler

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg. You take the nominal yield, as Mr Tip

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>just did, and then you look at the inflation expectations

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and the residual is the real yield. So with that said,

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Robert Tip, what would you suggest nominal yields will do?

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>So my my comments here have been that the friend

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of the curve like just five years and then a

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit expensive, that they're gonna stay down here. The

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>statins is beating a drum, and we make that a

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a w type recovery, a little bit

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of a step back on growth acceleration. The middle part

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of the curb. The tenure is going to be in

0:09:55.720 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>this forty eight range. Think how whether people acknowledge at

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>w or seeing it, or whether they're getting a little

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>more optimistic. And they pushed up to eighty the back

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the curve again diving back inside of the

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>yolk curt Come on, sorry, those forward rates that you love,

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>what's priced in in terms of where treasuries are going

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to be ten, fifteen, twenty years from now, are way

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>too high. They're in the mid to high two percent area.

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>They were above, you know, and we had a correction

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a few months back, but they're back pushing two percent,

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>which does your your bond yield is too high. So

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for a stable to flatter yields on average,

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>which means treasuries are gonna be outperforming cash. And that's

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>before you even get to spreads and spread product is

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>training ahead of the economy. It's gotten very optimistic, it's

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>priced that in, but that's probably going to be the

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>case on balance and next trawl to twenty four months.

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So this is the bottom market that looks sick, you

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>know to people from the outside, But when you dive

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>inside of it. You look at what's going on in

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy with the trajectories like the to be uh,

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, zero cash is gonna be a low hurdle

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for the bond market the next point four months. So

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>what but you expect a stop good morning. You expect

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a steeper curve. What is the biggest threats of that view?

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Does a vaccine change that? What would be the definitive

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>bit of vaccine news that might threaten sorry, you expect

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a flatter curve? What would what would change that from

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine perspective? Absolutely? So that is uh. You know.

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>The thing is when you have that burst of optimism

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>on a vaccine, you know web and if that hits

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we get to the far side of this, then you know,

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>CRITC ten shoot up to one percent to one thirty

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>or even higher depending on how effective, how quickly thinks

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>to normalize and so on. Um. But if the at

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the end of it, right now, we've had uh, you know,

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>not even you know fifty recovery in employment and in

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>comes are being sustained by benefit payments and what we

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 1>know from past recessions. Even in this case, if it's

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>more rapid, it's gonna take a very long time to

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>get incomes elevated. And right now consumption is at a

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>record level. We printed record retail sales, but incomes are

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>quite depressed, and that, you know, speaks to a gap

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be filled by some falling back. So

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it will be a lot of back and forth. We've

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of rapid fluctuations in the market. I

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>think that you can't have births of optimism that will

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>temperate poor shields up. But in the long run, the

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>world we were in before this crisis get Let's say

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 1>that's what the world looks like with AVA being you

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>are looking at sub price and inflation in the treasury

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 1>market that needed to be a few cans higher. You know,

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the market is going to believe, so you're gonna need

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine, and you may need something like a like

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a renewables boom on an energy platform the US maybe

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>joining Europe and then push for green and declbinization, something

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, rightly or wrongly, whether you like it or not,

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that gets you a why two K hype economic boom

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to get your sustainably over one percent and the tendu

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the treasury. Otherwise you're not going to see it, it's

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be a stable to gladder curve grinding as

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the secular dynamics of demographics, you know, keep these yield well,

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>keep bond return. Okay, so we came from a low

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>yield environment, that that that the virus hasn't changed that

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily we go back to still a low yield environment.

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>But when as we look for this news flow surrounding

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine Robert from the from the perspective of the

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>bond market, should we see this as a very binary thing,

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>like here's some good news on a vaccine that works

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>from a Western drugs developer and that perhaps will be

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>seen positively by investors. Or should we get a bit

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>more granular than that, dig down into you know, how

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>long is it going to be effective for? And there'll

0:13:58.160 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of questions, won't there as soon as

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we see that needs you that's right, that's why you

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>want to give that nightmare to people like you to

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>follow and for for me to try and trade, because

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the underlying dynamics dot long term secular backdrop is going

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to remain unchanged, and in fact, if anything, it's worse

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>than as we've gone through this crisis and it's going

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to continue to the deceleration workforces. Those things are just

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>really beginning, so that dynamic is going one way. In

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the short term, you're going to get these pops and

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>optimism and they're going to provide training opportunities. But I

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to change your secular environment being below

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the tenure in all likelihood. Robert Tiff,

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for tak that discussion of nominal

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>less inflation expectations deriving the real yell Mr Tip with Pigam.

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Robert Dawle is an interesting guy. He's a guy who

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is smart, smart, smart on framing the why of optimism

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>And like our Gina Martin Adams of Bloomberg Intelligence, Robert

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>daw of Nouvene is one of those people that gives

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you courage to stay in the market. So maybe you

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>can make some money with Home Depot, Bob Donk. You

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>know that you have a stock and they sort of

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>hang out and then they go up off news or something.

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you identify companies like Home Depot or Apple

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that just every quarters seemed to do it and every

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>quarters seemed to go up thankfully on both stocks. Tom

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>these are companies First of all, they have products that

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>are interesting. Second of all, they manage their business well,

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and third of all, they generate a bunch of cash.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>If you can find companies do those three things rather consistently, generally,

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be in good shape on those stocks. I mean,

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Home DuPont news, the Walmart news, they really good news.

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, I know you're a glass half

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>full guy, But I want you to speak to the

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>people who are not Robert dal They don't have your experience,

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't have your sense of history. What do you

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>say to the people that have missed the home Depot boat?

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you get back on board with a total

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>enterprise value to But that's not in any book you

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>or I ever studied. Yes, well, first of all, you

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>have to agree that a year from now the stock

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>market is going to be hiring it is today, that's

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>my view, because the economy will be doing better and

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>earnings will be hired. Maybe we'll have a vaccine. That

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean we we'll have short term, short term bumps

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>along the way. But if that's the case, Home Depot

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>is probably gonna be higher a year from that is today.

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So dollar cost average into those stocks that you think

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>are in the stratosphere and you've missed if they have

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the propositions that we just talked about and aren't ridiculously valued.

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Home depots up a lot, but it's still not horribly expensive,

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and well, good to speak to you. I was reading

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>some research. It says a by the national or the sites,

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the National Association of Actsive Investment Manages, and he talks

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>about how even those who were previously baries, you're just

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of giving up and joining in with this bull

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>joining in with this rally. Do you sense that you've

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>got more company in or in your your bullish view

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>on where u S stocks head? So I'm commented about

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a year from now, I'm also in the camp too

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>many of us are that we're a little hell ahead

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of ourselves. In the short term, We've come a long way,

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>We've retraced the entire bear market. Earnings today are nowhere

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>near where they were when stocks are at the all

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>time high in February. So uh, and we have an election,

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.719
<v Speaker 1>we have a bill we can't seem to pass. Valuation

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>levels are not particularly cheap, so I can make the

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>cautious case I don't see big downside, but those who

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>are a little nervous. If you have a ton of cash,

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you've gotta step up and put some in uh. In

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>my view, UM, if you've been fully invested the whole

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>way and want to take a profit or two, I'm

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>fine with that as well. Um. Markets don't go straight

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>up in bull markets are straight down in bear markets,

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>as we all know. But do you like European stocks

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>at this point or is it just about the the US?

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>I asked, because I'm confused by the market reaction some

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>days during August we've got headlines of plenty about the

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>virus taking upwards in various parts of Europe, and yet

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't weigh on European stocks as if as if

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a big global liquidity story that's dominant. What what

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>do you make of Europe? You just said it, it's

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the liquidity story for equities overall. The US no longer

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>has the interest rate advantage it had versus the rest

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of the world, and the US is the most defensive

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 1>market in the world. So if you postulate that the

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>globe is gonna do a little better economically, non US

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>markets are probably going to do it better. And then

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you layer on top of that the dollar weakness we've experienced,

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think non US international stocks do a bit better.

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Europe's got a lot of long term problems, as you know,

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's fairly cheap and I think we'll continue to

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>do a bit better here in the near term. About

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Dawn Nouvine is a t I A a company, and

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that is a venerable institution looking at the long long

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>term of investment. The leadership of Roger Ferguson is no.

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you advise Mr Ferguson and others about the

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>actuarial assumption that we're all going to live with. What's

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>our actual real assumption reality? Well, you know, lifespans we

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>know are are getting longer. Um. I had a friend

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>who retired recently at sixty five, and he said, I

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>guess I should go all in bonds. I said, wait

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a minute, he's married and they're both pretty healthy. I say,

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>at least one of you is gonna lift a ninety.

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Don't don't run away from equities. There there there's no

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty five year period where stocks haven't beaten out the things.

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So we have to make sure people are aware of

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 1>those sorts of things. The other actual real assumption I

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>think that we have to think about is what's the

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>long term return for you know, the traditional sixty forty blend.

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not gonna be in the next ten years most likely,

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Tom what has been in the last fifty kind of

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>nearly ten percent. It's going to be much lower. And

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the reality of the These long term s allocation

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>programs are gonna have to pay in Bob doing those,

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just setting them up for the second question. I mean,

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the act here, folks, bobbed all. The question is

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>if that's the reality of a lower actual assumption, do

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you go more diversified or less diversified or maybe more general,

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>how do you diversify? Yeah, so you have to have diversification,

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's not just stocks and bonds. Uh, they're alternative assets,

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>um that have to be considered in portfolios. Uh, louvine

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>T I a big investor in farmland, for example, and

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that that's an area people don't even think about generally.

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But there's an area for diversification within the public markets,

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>within US equities where I've spent my career. You've got

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>investing companies that are gonna make it happen, and so

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you might want a more targeted portfolio in an environment

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>where the gains overall the market is not going to

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>lift every boat, is what I'm trying. There's some really

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>important observations there, folks, against the canon of the last

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty years and how things are changing. Robert doll is

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>always thank you. He is with now Vene. He is

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the double degree to engineer out of ann Arbor. Garland Gilchrist.

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>He is Lieutenant Governor of the state of Michigan, and

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 1>he is vice chair of the Democratic National Committee. You

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>know the math. You know it better than anybody in

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the party. Garland. You've got to get out the vote.

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 1>How are you going to get the kids out? And

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>how are you going to get blacks out from sea

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to shining Sea. Well, thank you for having me today.

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is exactly the question that Democrats are looking

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>to answer in Michigan around the country. To put it

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in perspective, Donald Trump won Michigan by ten thousand, seven

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>four votes. But Gretchen Whitmer, our governor who you heard

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>from last night from a U a W. Union hall,

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>from a manufacturing facility. Her and I won Michigan by

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>four hundred thousand votes or points. And we did that

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>by simply showing up and making sure that every voter

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>heard from us in every part of the state. And

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about black voters in particular, you know,

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden Kamala Harris are running on the most progressive

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>agenda for opportunity and racial equity that any president's ever

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>run on. And we can tell that story, as you said,

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>from she Seed to see. Well, you can do it

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>from c to Shining Sea. But let's go west to Kalamazoo, Michigan,

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>where they used to build checker cabs. Okay, it's a

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>different Kalamazoo than it was. Now, how do the Democrats

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:34.479
<v Speaker 1>win in Kalamazoo if they're gonna go progressive liberal? How

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>much do you have to shift to the center to

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>take Flint and to take Kalamazoo. You gotta stay with

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 1>you gotta never shipped, you stay with your values. And

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>even in Kalamazoo, we just saw this week, Uh, the

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>far right, neo Nazi Proud Boys were demonstrating on the

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.239
<v Speaker 1>streets to Kalamazoo and they were met with resistance from

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.439
<v Speaker 1>people who were stepping up and calling for racial justice

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and racial equity. They were stepping up for an agenda

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 1>like Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and saying no to

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the rhetoric and the division and the danger and destruction

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and depth of Donald Trump. And so I think in Kalamazoo,

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>in Grand Rapids, in Macomb County, all places where Gregion

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I one eighteen we laid out the blueprint, and I'm

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>proud that Joe Biden Kamala Harris are ready to pick

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>up where we left off and take it to the

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>next level. Lieutenant Governor, good morning from London. If if

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a new stimulus package, who will your

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>voters blame? The Republicans are the Democrats? I think that

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Michigan voters have been clear for this entire crisis that

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is not only a failure, but his failure,

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>his lack of a national strategy has led to dead

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Michiganers that did not have to die. And this is

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>personal for me. Twenty three people in my life have

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>died from COVID nineteen uh. They all have stories like

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the people whose stories we heard about last night. They

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>will hold this president accountable. And you heard Governor Woman

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>talk about responsibility. Leaders take responsibility, they don't run from it.

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what Donald Trump has been doing. And

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>he's denied, he's lied, he shirked, he shrunk away, he's

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>hid from the problem rather than stepping up and solving them.

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not worried about that. With Joe Biden and

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris and Joe Biden has showed up for the

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>people of Michigan, for the people of Detroit time and

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>time again over the years. I think it's what he's

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to do here. But if that's the

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>case and people think that's then it wouldn't be at

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>all a contested election. Do you worry that people say

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that they'll vote for Joe Biden and actually vote for

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>for you know, Trump. Do you worry that the polls

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>aren't really reflective of what people will do come November.

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that we always have to consider this to

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>be a close election because it was so close in seen.

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>We have to work hard, and as I indicated before,

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we have to talk to every voter, and the Michigan

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party and the Democratic Party across the country never

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>stopped talking to voters after twenty sixteen because we knew

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>we had a lot of work to do. And you're

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>going to see the evidence of that. In Michigan, We've

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>been able to connect with people because we knocked on

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>their doors in twenty nineteen, so when we had to

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>stop knocking doors in we could keep calling them and

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>keep text message him. Our movement is strong, and I

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>believe it's going to deliver Michigan and across the country,

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and we have to run through the finish line. So no,

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to rest on any laurels or any polls.

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna continue to work all the way through November

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>so that we have the privilege of working and leading

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of all the American people in January. Was

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that the difference the last time around. You have mentioned

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>twice in this conversation, Lieutenant Governor, the idea of showing

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>up in campaigning is a stark reality that Secretary Clinton

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>did not campaign to the greatest advantage four years ago. Well,

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that we need to focus on is how

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we can connect with that local community intelligence rather relitigating.

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 1>What I think we need to focus on is the

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that we learned a lot in ten here in Michigan.

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>For example, Governor women visited all eighty three counties of

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>our state when I came onto the ticket as her

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>running mate. I visited forty counties myself. It's about showing

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>up and about being president. And you saw with the

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>virtual convention we have to get creative about how to

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 1>do that safely in COVID nineteen and I think what

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you saw is how that creativity can lead to real

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>human connection, to elevate the stories of people and of

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>voters and of Americans. And that's what we have to

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>focus on here. We have some really creative tactics. Were

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>excited to roll out to engage voters of all stripes,

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to make sure black people maximized turn out, to make

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>sure the suburbs turn out, to make sure our Latino

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>brothers and sisters turn out. And I'm excited um that

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have record breaking turnout this year. And when

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 1>more people vote in Michigan, Democrats win and we are

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>not afraid of that. We want everyone to vote safely

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and got by mail. We look forward to further updates,

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Lieutenant Governor. Thank you so much. Mr gil Christ, of

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>course from Michigan, is a vice chair of the Democratic

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>National Committee. Karla Freeman with us right now of JOHNS Hopkins,

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the executive director of Foreign Policy Institute UH and a

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>professor of Chinese studies is well, Carla, what I find

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting about what Inbassador Bolton said there. It's not China

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>US or Russia US, but the thing we never talked about,

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 1>which is the relationship of China and Russia. You know

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in our childhoods that was a huge deal. Is the

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Russia and China is fractious as it was then,

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly become a much closer relationship in recent years.

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we we remember fears of the China Russia partnership.

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Their alliance of China's first alliance UH forged on Valentine's

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Day in nineteen fifty UH and that lasted until the

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>late nineteen sixties and was a major feature of the

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Cold War. After the split, of course, that helped create

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 1>an opening for the U. S and China relationship to develop.

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>But in recent years China and Russia have become closer,

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>even working out diverging tensions in Central Asia, which is

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the country of the region which both countries have subucbstantial

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>energy and other strategic inter US. Then Dr Freeman, we

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>talked to Dr Roach of Viale University about this Stephen

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Roach earlier this morning, let me ask you the same question.

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Is the final result of Washington policy, of Trump policy

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>or Biden policy, will they be all that much difference

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>in regards to China. That's a really compelling question. And

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that what will happen in Biden administration is

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that many of the concerns that the Trump administration has

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>raised will carry through to the Biden administration. But I

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 1>do think that the Biden administration will look for grounds

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to cooperate where uh it can with China so that

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we have uh continue to have competition, concerns about technology

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>fast and uh other other worries about China's authoritarian push

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>around the world. But we will try to find areas

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>where we can work together. There are so many global

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>issues that require us China cooperate. But Carla, you're saying

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is that the Democrats won't necessarily more be more sympathetic

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to China, but that will they'll just do it in

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a different form or do you think that there they

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>will find actually coming ground on things significant like trade. Yes,

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think that will the The Democrats come from

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a tradition that recognizes that globalization, appreciates globalization as a

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>source for economic growth, and I think that the democratic

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>administration will look for a way to restore an architecture

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for international trade, also look for ways to deal with

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>issues that are important to a democratic administration, like climate change.

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Of course, one of the first actions that the Trump

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>administration took was to withdraw the US from the Paris

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Climate Accord. So there are areas where the U. S

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And China have a work to productively. Have seen their

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>their engagement together, if you use that word, has yielded

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>significant benefits economically and and also in terms of managing

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>global threats to human security. Carla, what can you tell

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>us about Chinese vaccine? So there's a global race. Russian

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>say they have a vaccine against COVID nineteen. Where are

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>we on China? Will the Chinese even use the Russian vaccine?

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I am not not sure about whether China would use

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the Russian vaccine. There are a lot of questions about

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>whether that vaccine has gone through adequate testing. China's on

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in a big push to develop a vaccine and is

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in I think third base testing of that vaccine, and

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it will uh. It's already setting up plans to distribute

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine, it sell it widely around the world. There

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>are a number of companies in China with with with

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>hopeful signs of being able to launch a vaccine fairly

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>fairly soon. Thank you so much to Carla Freeman there

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of Johns Hopkins, and be sure to check out vr

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>US go on the Bloomberg for the latest information, and

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>tune in every day for exclusive conversations with John's Happy

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Experts for an inside look at battling COVID nineteen. Thanks

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast.

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.