WEBVTT - BP: Breaking Promises?

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Join us. Right now is Bernard Luna, his VPS CEO. Bernard,

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>let's walk through what the future there looks like. The

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>business is doing well and at the same time we're

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>leaning into the transition and investing in the VP of tomorrow.

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Performing while transforming, that's what we call it here. This

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is fundamental change, where ahead of the game. I think

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>this direction is unstoppable. I think it's an enormous opportunity.

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>We are a good company with good people. I can

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>assure you it is not greenwashing. Performing while transforming. I

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>know I sound like a broken record that we're preparing

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.919
<v Speaker 1>VP for tomorrow. I think a few people will question

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>are resolved to do that? Welcome to calling Bullshit the

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast about purpose washing, the gap between what companies say

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>they stand for and what they actually do, and what

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>they would need to change to practice us what they preach.

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host time Ontogue, and I've spent over a

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>decade helping companies define what they stand for, their purpose

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and then help them to use that purpose to drive

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>transformation throughout their business. Unfortunately, at a lot of organizations today,

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>there's still a pretty wide gap between word. Indeed, that

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>gap has a name. We call it bullshit, But, and

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>this is important, we believe that bullshit is a treatable disease.

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So when the BS detector lights up, we're going to

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>explore things that a company should do to fix it.

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>In this episode, we're gonna look at oil company BP. Recently,

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>BP CEO Bernard Looney announced a new purpose to reimagine

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>energy for people and our planet. We want to help

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the world reach net zero and improve people's lives. That's

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big shift for one of the largest current

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and historical producers of c O two in the world.

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>But the interesting thing about this story is it's not

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the first time that BP has made a bold claim

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>about reimagining energy. Is it possible to drive a car

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>and still have a clean environment. We think so. And

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>now BP, Amaco Aco and Castrol have come together to

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>try Beyond Petroleum BP. That's a commercial from way back

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and one that was part of then

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>CEO John Brown's bold rebranding of the company, claiming that

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the initials BP would henceforth stand not for British Petroleum

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>but for Beyond Petroleum. To understand just how significant the

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>idea of beyond petroleum was, we need to take a

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>quick trip back in time. B P was born in

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen o eight as the Anglo Persian Oil Company. The

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>company first staked claims on oil wells in what is

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>now Iran. In the decades to follow, b P expanded

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>their oil operations throughout the Middle East, Africa, Latin America,

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Europe and Russia. Along the way, they developed their own

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>distinct cowboy culture. B P played hard, and they played

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>for keeps. For instance, a struggle for control of the

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>company with the government of Iran resulted in the overthrow

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of democratically elected President Mosadek in nineteen fifty three. They

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>also became known as the company that took the biggest

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>extraction risks and then reaped the biggest financial rewards. As

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a result, they left a trail of environmental and safety

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>catastrophes in their wake. At nine p three a m.

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>On Saturday, March the eighteenth, the Torry Canyon, one of

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest tank as yet built, was turning the sea

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>purple with a fatal cargo. A massive explosion and fire

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>erupted at the VP refinery in Texas City, Texas. The

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>explosion killed fifteen workers and injured one hundred eighty others,

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>many of them seriously. When CEO John Brown took over

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the company in nineteen ninety five, he inherited the biggest

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>polluter with the worst safety record of the seven largest

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>oil companies in the world, known as the Super Majors.

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>But John Brown was a little different from his predecessors

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and peers. A visionary in his own way. He saw

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the perils of climate change, and he understood the oil

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>industry's culpability. I believe we've come to an important moment

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in our consideration of the environment. We need to go

0:04:56.040 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 1>beyond analysis and to seek solutions and to take action.

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It is a moment for change and for rethinking corporate responsibility.

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>BPS new CEO had become a vocal advocate for clean energy.

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 1>He committed to reducing the company's greenhouse gas emissions and

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>invested in solar power and other alternative energy. Under Brown's watch,

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>BP also broke ranks and exited the Global Climate Coalition,

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>an oil industry lobbying group of businesses that opposed action

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in oil industry terms. BP

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>had gone renegade. They had a new progressive story, and

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>they had started to make that story real through bold action,

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>but bold change in the oil industry makes enemies, in

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>some cases, really powerful enemies. In two thousand and six,

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>these enemies began a whisper campaign about John Brown's private life.

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Well uh. In two thousand and seven, I was outed

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:12.039
<v Speaker 1>by the Mail on Sunday as gay, and that was

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a big shock, I think in the way it was done,

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>not least to me. The press was relentless and fearing

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>being outed, Brown lied under oath about his sexuality and

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>was charged with perjury. On May one, two thousand and seven,

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>John Brown resigned as CEO. It's sad looking back on

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this from had John taken over only a decade later,

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>being gay wouldn't have even been an issue. After Brown's departure,

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the head of oil exploration and Production, Tony Hayward, became

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the new CEO. The company divested itself of its alternative

0:06:55.000 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>energy holdings and diverted that money to radically experimental deep

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>water drilling methods, and then on April two thousand and ten,

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>disaster struck. You have information now that this this rig

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>has gone under, It has gone onto the surface. Overnight,

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a powerful explosion rocked a giant oil rig igniting a

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>fire and launching a day long search for eleven work

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>early is a mess today because the winds shifted direction,

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>blowing this oil, this sludge into the Bayous of southeastern Louisiana.

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>The explosion was caused by a natural gas blowout a

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>mile down on the seafloor. The fail safe mechanism designed

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to stop the flow malfunctioned, and the equipment needed to

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>solve the problem was on the other side of the world.

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Eleven people died and millions of gallons of oil were

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>now gushing into the Gulf of Mexico. It was the

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>worst oil spill in history, and BP was wildly unprepared

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to respond and to make matters worse, if you can

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>imagine that was even possible. BP was actively trying to

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>play things down and play the victim. Chairman Tony Hayward,

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>speaking to Britain Sky News, I think the environmental impact

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of this disaster is likely to be very modest, and

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a week ago this there's no one who wants this

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>thing over more than I have. You know a lot

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>my life. Back Crisis managers cringed when they heard that comment.

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Any oil company would have suffered in this situation. But

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>there was a special outrage reserve for BP because they

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>claimed to be a green energy company and then wound

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>up as the culprit in the worst environmental disaster in history.

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Trust in BP was shattered. In retrospect, I'm guessing the

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>new CEO, Bernard Looney wishes that John Brown's Beyond Petroleum

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>plan had been implemented, BP would have had a twenty

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>year head start on their competitors, all of whom have

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>recently announced ambitious plans to make their own transitions to

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>low carbon sustainable energy. Instead, like the rest of big oil,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Looney has to make this transition fast, so folks. That

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 1>brings us to the main question. VP is once again

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>saying that their purpose is to reimagine energy for people

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and our planet. Is this finally true or is it

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>still a bunch of bullshit? Get out your BS detector

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and join me as we drove for answers right after

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>this before you head to the break, we'd love to

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>hear what you think about the show. Maybe you were

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>inspired to take action, maybe you disagree with today's bullshit rating.

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Either way, we want to hear about it. Leave us

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>a message at two one two five oh five five

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>or send a voice memo to CBS podcast at co

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 1>collective dot com. You might even be featured on an

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>upcoming episode Welcome back. To help me get to the

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>bottom of BP's renude commitment to cleaner energy for people

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in the planet, I first spoke with Tyson Slocum, an

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>expert in the world of petroleum, natural gas, and power markets. Tyson,

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Calling Bullshit. We're very excited to have you

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>on the show. It's my pleasure to be here. I'd

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>love it if you could start out by telling us

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about your background and the work that

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>you do. Yes, I'm the Energy program director at Public Citizen.

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Public Citizen is a national consumer advocacy group based in Washington,

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>d C. I run all of our energy policy related

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 1>work and that mainly focuses on the oversight and regulation

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 1>of petroleum, natural gas, and electric power markets. Our goal

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 1>at Public Citizen is to promote those policies that provide affordable, reliable,

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and sustainable energy for working families. Fantastic. I love that.

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's get into BP. The topic of today is

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>their energy transition goals and so just a kind of

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>level set how much c O two is BP putting

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>into the atmosphere in say an average year, a heck

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of a lot. It's difficult to quantify, but they're one

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of the largest individual emitters just because the scope of

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>their operations. They literally have a presence on every single continent.

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>They have a massive carbon footprint. And then what's what's

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:52.959
<v Speaker 1>important here ties also they are a large historical emitter

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>because the company has been around for such a long

0:11:55.800 --> 0:12:00.079
<v Speaker 1>time that when you look at its entire leg you

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>see footprint it's even larger, and it's going to be

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the largest single contributors to climate change. From

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a corporate standpoint, and because of climate change, most of

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>these companies have now announced their plans for so called

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>energy transition. Your opinion, how serious do you think these

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>companies are about making that transition. I think they're very

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>serious about it from a public relations standpoint, But when

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at the day to day operation and even

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>look at their capital expenditure plan going forward the next

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>five years, it is dominated by oil and gas. And

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>it's important to note here that in BP's own financial results,

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>they classify their natural gas production activity in with renewables,

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>so they consider natural gas to be a clean source

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of energy when you know it is absolutely not. I

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>did not realize that that's crazy. Yeah, so so that's

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the problem. You know, BP isn't alone here, but BP

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is desperately trying to reclassify itself as a clean energy company.

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And again tied, this isn't new. I mean it started

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago when they came up with this advertising

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>plan to be on petroleum exactly. Yeah. So BP has

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>been in this process of reinventing itself from a public

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>relations standpoint for a very long time. But in terms

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of its operational standpoint, BP is an oil and gas company. Period. Yeah. So,

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>within two weeks of taking the reins as CEO at

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>BP in February of Bernard Luny outlined a whole new

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>purpose for BP. He says, it is to reimagine energy

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>for people and our planet. We want to help the

0:13:56.160 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>world reach net zero and improve people's lives. And then

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>down in the details he lays out specific goals for

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>getting BP to net zero. He calls them aims, which

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I find kind of a weasily word. How about commitments, Bernard?

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But okay, so he says, our first goal is net

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>zero operations are aim one is to be net zero

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>across our entire operations on an absolute basis by or sooner.

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>This aim relates to Scope one and t G h

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>G emissions. So first of all, what does that mean?

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>So that just means the emissions footprint of BP and

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>its operations, not of how it's fuels are going to

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>be consumed and therefore add to climate change. And so

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, just from the very get go, their definitions

0:14:55.280 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of reaching net zero have a massive flaw. Exactly. Okay,

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So so just to to school me up, let's move

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to their aim to our aim too, is to be

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>net zero on an absolute basis across the carbon in

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>our oil and gas production by sooner. This is our

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Scope three aim and is on a BP equity share

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>basis excluding holdings in Rosineft, the Russian company run by

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Putin's number two guy, that they just announced they were

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>going to divest of. But staying with what's on their website,

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that Net two goal to be net zero on an

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>absolute basis across the carbon and our upstream oil and

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>gas production by sooner. What does that mean? So they're

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about Scope three emissions for their oil and

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>gas operations, which appears to be more comprehensive. But still

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a goal by and that isn't really that ambitious.

0:15:55.160 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at another generation or more of signifigant oil

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and gas extraction opportunities for BP, and so in terms

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of meaningful action to address the climate crisis, I don't

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>see the ambition in this, you know, net zero goal

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>by as being relevant. So you don't think it's enough

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and and and the timeline is too long? Is that

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of your take? Absolutely? And this is this is

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the challenge, right. It seems sort of silly for an

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas company, especially one as large as VP,

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about getting to real, meaningful net zero,

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>whether we're talking about five years or forty years, because

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have to transform the fundamentals of the company.

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>And I don't see where that is happening yet at BP.

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're talking about sort of nebulous goals far

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>off in the future. I don't see how those long

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>term goals are affecting to days operational priorities at BP.

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I still see capital being first and foremost allocated to

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>continued oil and gas development and and that's the big challenge.

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>And for any large oil major tie there's going to

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>be a market challenge to doing a real transition to renewables,

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:29.479
<v Speaker 1>for example, because during that transition, let's say BP has

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a real meaningful plan which I don't see but just

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>for conversation purposes to transition off of oil and towards renewables.

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>The market is just gonna want to see BP split

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>into separate companies because the market value of a pure

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>renewable play is going to be dragged down by the

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>continued operations of oil and gas, which the market is

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.719
<v Speaker 1>not going to see as having enough growth. And so

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>as long as BP remains an integrated company that is

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to get into renewables while still primarily being an

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas company, those oil and gas operations are

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>always going to drag on the value of the renewable investments.

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And so what you would see from Wall Street is

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>they would say split up the company. Interestingly, a former CEO,

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>John Brown, is recently on record saying he thinks that's

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a good idea to spin out the renewable energy assets

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>as a separate company, essentially create BP Future, which is

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>rapidly growing, less capital intensive, and valued at a premium

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>by investors, and then by default create BP past, which

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is the oil and gas assets, capital intensive, unloved by

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the market, and in decline, and then just let the

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>market decide. What do you think about that? I think

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that's how all of these oil and gas companies are

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>going to have to go. If if you're going to

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>remain a publicly traded company, off ring shares of the public,

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the only strategy that makes any sense. And the

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that BP hasn't done that split yet shows that

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>their financial and capital commitments to renewables aren't yet meaningful

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>enough to orchestrate that split. Yeah, Leoney doesn't like the

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of splitting up. He actually responded to Brown and

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>he said he wants to use the cash of the

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>high carbon business to fund the transition. He calls it,

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>what is it? He's got a catchphrase for it, performing

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>while transforming. That would be believable if that's what was

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>actually happening. But when we look at the balance sheet,

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>BP is still pouring billions of dollars every year from

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 1>its earnings on oil and gas operations into more capital

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>investment for additional oil and gas exploration and production, and

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>into dividends. Because the way that these oil companies try

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and keep their stock price attractive because they're being eclipsed,

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>all of them by companies like Tesla and renewable energy

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that just have way more growth potential. The way

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that BP markets itself to fund advisors and to other

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>big institutional investors is the lucrative dividend that they pay

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>out in cash every quarter, and so a bunch of

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.479
<v Speaker 1>the profits from their oil and gas operations are just

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>going into pumping up their stock price to make it

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>continually attractive. And so until we see a deviation from

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>big capital investment in oil and gas and the big

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>investment in dividends, this is inaccurate. They are not moving

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that profit from today's oil and gas operations into tomorrow's renewables.

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Sticking with the the aims that they have on their website,

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I just want to go through a couple more that,

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>frankly I just don't understand. Aim three is to cut

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the carbon intensity of the products that we sell by

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>by twenty fifty or sooner. What does carbon intensity? What

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? So this is talking about the relative

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>carbon emissions for energy resources. So a lot of this

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is BP and some of the other majors like Chevron,

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and Shell have been increasing their investments into natural gas,

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and so the way that they measure it is gas

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>has a lower carbon intensity than oil. It is not

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a clean resource, right, it is a fossil fuel, but

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 1>compared to oil, and so a lot of this carbon

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 1>intensity talk is really about a shift into natural gas.

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, a lot of that is because they

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>see continued market opportunities for gas in the power generation sector,

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in the industrial sector, and in the agricultural sector with

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>for utilizers and so forth. So again, this is the challenge.

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>They're using these words that sound like they're doing a

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>serious pivot into renewables, but it's not. It's just putting

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>slightly more investment into gas over oil, and they're able

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to count that as a lower carbon intensity going forward.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not, you know, going to deliver us on a

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>path to meaningfully addressing the climate crisis, right, Okay, So

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Aim four is to produce methane. It says our aim

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>force to install methane measurement at all of our existing

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>major oil and gas processing sites, by published the data,

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and then drive a fifty reduction in methane intensity of

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>our operations. So, first of all, why is this important?

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 1>What's special about methane. So, methane is a extremely powerful

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>greenhouse gas. It is many many, many times more powerful

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.160
<v Speaker 1>than carbon dioxide. It doesn't last in the atmosphere as

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>long as c O two, but methane, for the briefer

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>time that it is in the atmosphere after being released,

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is far more potent. And so the Obama administration in

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve introduced sweeping requirements and mandates to control

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>methane emissions from oil and gas operations, and BP and

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>all the other oil companies successfully fought it off. Now

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 1>we've had a change in heart, and really what what

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 1>changed was in November, a energy company that is partly

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>owned by the French government called Energy canceled a major

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>liquefied natural gas export deal with a US based l

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>en G exporter because of the lack of any meaningful

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>methane regulations on US gas production or US gas exports.

0:23:56.160 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>And that cancelation of that seven billion dollar deal was

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a wake up call for oil and gas producers everywhere

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that all of a sudden there was a emphasis on

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>controlling and measuring the carbon content of natural gas production.

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And so we have now seen a total one eight

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>where BP actually was sending out tweets in support of

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration efforts to revive federal regulation over methane emissions.

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And so this is BP trying to get out ahead

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:38.719
<v Speaker 1>of a market trend. Oil companies are uniformly against regulation

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>unless that regulation can provide market access opportunities, and in

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>this case, regulating methane emissions and documenting your ability to

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>limit fugitive emissions is seen as a market opportunity because

0:24:55.640 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>you're able to slap a label of clean methane on

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>your natural gas and make it more desirable for export

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and consumption in global markets. So it would have been

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>great if BP was making this announcement a decade ago.

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Another point that they make on the website to help

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the world get to net zero is aligning associations. Our

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>aim is to set new expectations for our relationships with

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>trade organizations around the globe. In September of September, in

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a publication called The Resilience, they point out that VP

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>still supports eight anti climate lobbying groups as of that date.

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know that's eighteen months after Bernard Looney took

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>his job, and they had plenty of time to clean

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that up by September. Are you aware of any issues

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>there and what does that make you think about BP? Absolutely,

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a huge problem. And just for a second,

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>let me just talk about trade associations in general, because

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of a fascinating, crazy situation that your listeners

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>may not be familiar with. So what a trade association.

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's take the American Patrolum Institute, which is the largest

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and probably the most successful trade association lobbying group in

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States today. It's got an annual budget in

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>excess of three million dollars a year. And so what

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>API does is it collects dues from BP and Xon

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and all the other companies and allows them all to

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>actively collaborate on influencing legislation and regulation. So, while oil

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>companies compete in the marketplace, when it comes to influencing

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>our politicians and our regulatory structures, they are actively colluding

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>because they have a shared common interest. And so you're

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right that BPS stated commitment to only joining those

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>trade associal stations that align with efforts to address the

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>climate change do not meet reality because they continue to

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.400
<v Speaker 1>pay millions and millions of dollars in dues to trade

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>associations that are actively fighting against climate solutions. Luney has

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>also made a few subsequent promises after he rolled out

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>this plan. One of them was in August he said

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to investors that VP will reduce oil and gas production

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>by within a decade, and that was two years ago,

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>so he's got eight years left, and that they would

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>stop exploring for oil and gas fields in new countries

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 1>in the same time frame. So I guess do you

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>read from that that he's saying he's prepared to leave

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>oil in the ground to make this transition work. I

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that he's realistic about those commitments. I mean,

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.959
<v Speaker 1>these are non binding commitments. First of all, they're just

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>public announcements promises, um. So without a binding commitment, the

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>company can make whatever adjustments and changes it wants. I

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>don't see this as to be very honest and meaningful commitment.

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:16.360
<v Speaker 1>BP is still committing the vast majority of its capital

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>investment into exploration and production, and and that tells me

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that BP remains an oil and gas company period. One

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we're exploring on this show is

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of a an evolved version of capitalism, let's call it.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>That includes some of the externalities that companies really like

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to ignore. So right now, for instance, there are a

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of externalities that are not priced into a gallon

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of gas, the costs of climate change, for instance, right,

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and in a way, it keeps the price of a

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>gallon of gas artificially low. For example, the New York

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Core of Engineers is proposing a sea wall that will

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>cost hundred and nineteen billion dollars to protect the city

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>from rising sea levels. Is that cost figured into every

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>barrel of oil today? Not at all. In fact, there

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is no federal regulation of carbon emissions from oil and

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>gas operations, so they're getting a free pass. And you

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>just summed it up correctly that there are large externalities

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>with fossil fuel production and consumption that are not reflected

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in the market price, and so all of society has

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to pick up that tab. Look at the infrastructure bill

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that President Biden just signed into law at the end

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of last year. It includes eleven billion dollars of taxpayer

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>money to clean up coal mines. You know, why, why

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't coal companies doing that? There's also billions of dollars

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>in there of taxpayer money to plug up old and

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>abandoned oil and gas wells. Some of those were BP's

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>old oil and gas wells. So so again, the fossil

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>fuel companies enjoy today's profit of extracting these fuels without

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>any of the long term financial obligations that their business causes.

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>That needs to change. I've read that there are a

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>number of cities and towns who have actually started to

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>sue fossil fuel companies to try to recover some of

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that money. Have any of these lawsuits succeeded so far.

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>They're all moving through the federal and state court systems,

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're using very inventive tort law. You know, tort

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>is if you sue for damages. I slipped on the

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>sidewalk in front of your business because you failed to

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>maintain it, and your failure to maintain that cause me

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>bodily injury. I am do damages for my pain and suffering.

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So this is sort of the same thing. The oil

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and gas industry new decades ago that their business was

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>contributing to climate change, but didn't do anything about it.

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's the key from a court decision that they

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>knew that their business was creating these harms and they

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>did nothing to address them. And we all are suffering

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>as a result, and I think that's part of the

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>motivation for a company like BP to try and get

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>out ahead and to say, listen, we're in favor now

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of federal action to regulate these things so that we

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>can try to get out from these tort lawsuits. And

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in fact, there's a plan that's being underwritten by some

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of the major oil companies to establish a carbon tax

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and there's a lot of merit

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to that, but when you look at the details of

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>their proposal, they want the carbon tax in exchange for

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>two big things, one evisceration of climate regulations over their

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>business and immunity from tort lawsuits. Very similar, very similar,

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>very similar to what the gun manufacturers got. That annoying

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and shades of the tobacco industry as well. You know,

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>they deny, deny, deny, deny, deny, and then you know,

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>finally events catch up with them. You know, from our

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>perspective on this show, we're looking for companies that are

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>purpose let These are companies that by and large have

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a conscience. They actually are trying to make the world

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>better and when they see a problem, they try and

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>solve it. They don't wait for the government to legislate.

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>And so when VP says they're trying to take on

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>climate change, our perspective is great, you sound like a

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>purpose led company, But is their intention pure? Do they

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.719
<v Speaker 1>really mean it? And so one of the things we

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>look for is self regulation by agreeing to a carbon tax,

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>if they're trying to get out of paying for any

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>liability for past harm, that does not clear our bar,

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>at least at this show, like we would call bullshit

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>on that. So why do you think Looney announced these

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>goals again in and why should we trust VP this

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>time around? I think the reason that he's making this

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of recommitment on a public relations scale is because

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>now there is a spotlight from large institutional investors, and

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>these institutional investors have really in just the last couple

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of years ratcheted up their pressure on companies to show

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>them the money in terms of commitments on climate change.

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And so for an oil and gas company, that's sort

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of hard to do when your business is in fossil fuels.

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And so they're seeking to sort of mollify these institutional

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>investors with a very slick public relations campaign that they're

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to rebrand BP again and and I don't know

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>how many times one company can continually rebrand itself as

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>being beyond petroleum, but that's what they're trying to do here.

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>It's difficult for them to escape their culture of non

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>compliance in terms of safety and environmental record, and they're

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>trying desperately to get back into that decision maker seat

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>where they are one of the key brokers to try

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and navigate a new climate deal, but their reputation has

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>taken such a big hit. I don't know if if

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be the ones doing it again. What

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>is the number one action that you think Bernard Luni

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>should take to actually deliver on their stated purpose to

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>reimagine energy for people and our planet. First, I would

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>exit all fossil fuel trade associations, get out of the

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>American Patrol of Institute and all of the others. Second,

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 1>commit to specific legislative climate initiatives. Because all of these

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>companies can do their unilateral goals on their websites, but

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>without some sort of buy ending operation through national governments,

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to see the kind of meaningful action

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that's required. And so I want to see BP support

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>climate initiatives without the harmful caveats like it's done on

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>carbon taxes, where it says we'll support a carbon tax

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>if we have immunity from prosecution under tort law. I

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:28.320
<v Speaker 1>think Looney needs to commit to a specific time frame

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to split off the company. If he's serious about real

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>aggressive investments in renewables, then he's got to put his

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>money where his mouth is. And and right now, when

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I look at where BPS money is, it's all in

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas. Tyson, is BP a bullshitter, an absolute bullshitter.

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>So just BP, stop the charade your oil and gas.

0:35:55.400 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Love it? Okay, last question on this show. We have

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>a tool that we call the BS scale, and it

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 1>goes from zero to one, zero being the best, zero

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>BS being the worst. Total BS. So on a scale

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of one two hundred on the B S scale, where

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>would you rate BP. They've got legitimate investments in clean energy,

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it just is minuscule in proportion to their investments in

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas. So I have to give them credit

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>for some of their genuine pivot. It's just not nearly enough.

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 1>So I love it perfect. Tyson Slocum, thank you so

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>much for being on the show. I really enjoyed it. Absolutely,

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>my pleasure Okay, folks, it's time to make the call.

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Is BP really reimagining energy for people in our planet?

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Based on what I've heard so far, we gotta call bullshit?

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Even if Luney is serious, and that's questionable at this point,

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>BP isn't taking some fairly obvious actions that would signal

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 1>that seriousness. But remember, bullshit is a treatable condition. All

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it takes is action. After the break, I'll be joined

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>by two experts in the oil business and climate change

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to help us explore the actions BP should take to

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>fix it. Stick with us, Welcome back. New CEO Bernard

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Looney is saying a lot of the right things, but

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we've now drilled into it and we struck BS. So

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 1>what are the actions that Bernard and his leadership team

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>would have to take to plug this gusher and actually

0:37:56.239 --> 0:38:00.399
<v Speaker 1>win back our trust. I've invited two experts have joined

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>me to propose the concrete actions that BP needs to take.

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Jamie hen, Co founder of three fifty dot org and

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>director of Fossil Free Media, and Duncan McLaren, Research fellow

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>at Lancaster Environmental Center with an in depth expertise in

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>climate and energy policy. Jimmie I'd love to start up

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>by just having you tell our listeners a little bit

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>about your background and the work that you're doing at

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Fossil Free Media. So I started my career in climate

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 1>activism as one of the co founders of three fifty

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>dot org, which grew into one of the largest international

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 1>campaigns on climate change, and over the decade of working there,

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:43.759
<v Speaker 1>worked on a lot of different international mobilizations and projects,

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 1>often wearing the hat of our communications director, and over

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the years, one of the things that I noticed that

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>we were trying to raise awareness about the climate crisis

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 1>and push our governments to act, was that every time

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>environmental campaigners would try and come out and spur the

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>world into action, we would face a massive of backlash

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>from the fossil fuel industry, often in the form of

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:06.720
<v Speaker 1>pr and advertising, and so as I was thinking about

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the next stage of my career at the beginning of

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I started talking with a few other colleagues and friends

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 1>about this idea of seeing if we could set up

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a operation that would both provide good communications support for

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>groups who are taking on the fossil fuel industry, but

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>also see what we could do to try and throw

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a wrench in the gears of big oils propaganda machine,

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and so out of that fossil free media and a

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 1>campaign that we're running called Clean Creatives were born. And

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>through both of those efforts we try and help environmental

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>groups do a better job of communicating to the public

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>about the energy transition that we need to see, while

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:42.720
<v Speaker 1>also calling out the work that the fossil fuel industry

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and their allies are doing to try and pollute the

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>airwaves just as they pollute the atmosphere. Love that, Professor

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Duncan McLaren. Welcome to calling BS. It's a pleasure to

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:54.799
<v Speaker 1>be with you. I'd love to have you tell our

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 1>listeners a little bit about your background and your area

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 1>of focus in the energy sector. So thanks. Well, I'm

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of on my second career now. My first was

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 1>working for environmental NGOs on a whole range of topics

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 1>from sustainable development to corporate accountability, renewables development, and of

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>course climate targets. But in twenty eleven I gave that

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 1>up for family reasons mainly, but embarked on a PhD

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at geoengineering technologies in the context of the climate

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>justice debate, and that sort of led me into ten

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:40.240
<v Speaker 1>years of working on particularly carbon removal and more broadly

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>what I call the problems of technologies of prevarication, the

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>ones that allow us to believe that we are going

0:40:48.120 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to solve the climate problem in the future with a

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 1>new technology rather than by delivering behavior change and lifestyle

0:40:56.480 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>change today. That's great, great to have you here, So

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:04.720
<v Speaker 1>let's jump right into some ideas for fixing VP Jamie,

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask you to go first, in two minutes

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 1>or less. What's the number one thing that you think

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 1>BP should do to win our trust that they really

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>mean what they say. Well, I think that there's a

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.320
<v Speaker 1>few different categories of where we need to see action

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>from BP, and I'll start with the most obvious, which

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is that they need to stop exploring for new oil

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and gas and fully begin to wind down their existing

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 1>production in line with the Paris Agreement. They've made some

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>commitments around that, but it's needless to say they're not

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 1>yet at the pace, the scale, or really the commitment

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that we would need to see if they were serious

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>about making that transition. So the nuts and bolts of

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>actually doing the work to stop oil and gas production

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that's leading to the carbon going into our atmosphere versus

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>making yet more pledges and long term targets is really

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>where we need to see action. But I want to

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>highlight a couple others in my remaining minute here. First

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>off is on the lobbying in political front. You know,

0:41:57.320 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot of rhetoric, as you said, from

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Bernard Looney and BP about how they want to aid

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the energy transition, but as I speak, they continue to

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>remain members of uh big oil trade associations and front

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>groups like the American Petroleum Institute, which is the leading

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 1>edge of the industry's attack on climate policy here in

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and BP over in Europe continues to

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 1>lobby for things like natural gas being included in the

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>European Unions standards around investments, which is obviously not renewable

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>energy is it's meant to meet the criteria. So stopping

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:34.799
<v Speaker 1>that lobbying is extremely important. And finally, along with that

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>goes stopping the sort of greenwashing and advertising that they're

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 1>doing that is very clearly meant to mislead the public

0:42:41.160 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>into believing that BP is serious about the energy transition

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 1>when the vast majority of its investments are still going

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>into oil and gas. Great, those are all very interesting,

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and we will unpack some of those in due course.

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Duncan Europe next in two minutes or less? What is

0:42:56.040 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the number one thing or things that Bernard Looney should

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 1>do to get vince all of VPS deck orders that

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:06.400
<v Speaker 1>he actually means what he said. PP needs to set absolute,

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>hard and fast production reduction targets, stop messing around with

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>intensity targets and scams about which scope of emissions are

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:21.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be covered. Set targets to reduce the amount

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 1>of oil and gas they produce, and those targets need

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:30.879
<v Speaker 1>to be matched so that there is reliable, permanent, guaranteed

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:35.320
<v Speaker 1>carbon removal on a ton for ton basis for any

0:43:35.360 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>residual production that happens let's say after and probably about

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of anything after that would get them in line with

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the Paris requirements. Why do I ask for this, Well,

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it's centrally about a climate justice case. NET zero is

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a great lobal target. It's got a lot of people

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>converging around it saying we want to do this, but

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it's ambiguous. It could mean an awful lot of emissions

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>matched by an awful lot of removals. Imagine two elephants

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:15.880
<v Speaker 1>sat on a sea saw as we call it a

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>tita totter, as the Americans call it. That's not very

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>stable or sustainable. It's likely to break. What we need

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is a narrow convergence where there are only a few

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 1>residual emissions and equal amount of carbon removal. So two

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 1>mice sat on the tita totter. That means. That means

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that you have less impacts from the residual emissions and

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>all the things associated with that, the extraction, the oil spills, etcetera.

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>These are not just climate impacts when we go digging

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:55.799
<v Speaker 1>for oil and gas, both of those are great. It's

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 1>my turn now, I submit this humbly looney need to

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>do an action that would cause me to suspend my disbelief.

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And when I think about it, my skepticism really comes

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:11.320
<v Speaker 1>from two things. Obviously, the fact that we've been here before.

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>With BP, they talked a huge game about moving in

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 1>quotes beyond petroleum and then turned around and created one

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>of the largest environmental disasters in the history of the

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 1>oil business in the Gulf of Mexico. But there's a

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:28.240
<v Speaker 1>second thing that makes me skeptical that really centers around

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 1>the expectations of existing shareholders. You know, we have this

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>financial system where investors are trained to expect quarterly reporting

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and positive quarterly results, and they're also trained to punish

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:43.399
<v Speaker 1>c e o s who don't deliver them. And this

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 1>obsession with quarterly results is a major impediment to any

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 1>CEO who is serious about transforming a company. And so

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:53.479
<v Speaker 1>my idea is that Bernard Luney should announce that PP

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to discontinue quarterly reporting, and I think he

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 1>should say that his rationale for this is that the

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>only way to create long term shareholder value is to

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 1>think and act on behalf of shareholders in the long term.

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:12.359
<v Speaker 1>And there's precedent for this. Paul Polman did it at

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Unilever more than ten years ago, and Paul also managed

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to deliver outstanding financial results, but those results took time.

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's what Looney should do is

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 1>by himself some time by taking that one action, and

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that would signal real change at VP. It

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>would signal that the board is with him on this

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:37.439
<v Speaker 1>transformation journey that he has embarked on. It would set

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the stage for a number of additional actions that would

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:44.440
<v Speaker 1>continue to build trust, for example, publicly tracking the progress

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're making toward the goals that they've put forward,

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 1>transparently reporting on problems that they've encountered along the way

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 1>without tanking the stock necessarily. So I'll pause there. What

0:46:56.600 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts on that or any of the ideas

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>been moved forward. Well, I think it's interesting that you

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 1>brought up investors because I think a lot of what

0:47:04.640 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen out of BP is aimed at a few

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>different audiences. Right now, marketing and PR is really focused

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on the general public, but a lot of what BP

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 1>has been doing I think is best understood as trying

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to persuade their investors, and not just individual investors, but

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:23.439
<v Speaker 1>large institutional investors like pension funds and others, that they're

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:27.880
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously serious about pursuing climate action while also maintaining their

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas business. VP is trying to do this

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>awkward dance where it wants to convince it's more green

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 1>oriented investors that it's serious about climate while also showing

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that it will continue to get high profits from oil

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:41.279
<v Speaker 1>and gas. And so this dance is what I think

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we continue to see from big oil majors. Is on

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, trying to market themselves to concerned investors

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and regulators in the public as being serious about climate action,

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>while also turning around to some of their other shareholders saying,

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about all of that. We're still serious about

0:47:57.520 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas and we're going to drill, baby, drill

0:47:59.800 --> 0:48:02.359
<v Speaker 1>until the very last second. He's got a name for it,

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 1>performing while transforming, and that just to me, reeks of bullshit. Duncan.

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:11.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about it? Yeah, Yeah, to turn

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to your suggestion, ty though, of discontinuing quarterly reporting. So

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 1>quarterly reports they instill a short term is um in

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 1>corporations that goes against all we want to achieve on

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the environmental and sustainability front. But at the same time,

0:48:29.600 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the over long termism of targets like net zero

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:41.720
<v Speaker 1>by that is allowing the exploitative attitude. We need action

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:46.000
<v Speaker 1>now that cuts in missions dramatically in the next decade

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:50.000
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to be compliant with PARIS. So I

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 1>think stopping quarterly reporting could be a component of what

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 1>BP should do. They would also clearly need to improve

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the nature of a reporting so that it's properly consistent

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>with the different impacts they're having and to be accountable

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to stakeholders outside of the shareholders themselves. Yeah, and and

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I heard you both in your ideas essentially say that

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the aims that VP has put forward are soft. Even

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:28.239
<v Speaker 1>for instance, net zero by can be achieved in a

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of different ways. And I don't want to put

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:32.360
<v Speaker 1>words into your mouths, but it's you can do it

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:35.759
<v Speaker 1>by planting a lot of trees and offsetting, or you

0:49:35.800 --> 0:49:38.560
<v Speaker 1>can do it by actually not pumping oil out of

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the ground. And you are advocating for the ladder rather

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:46.919
<v Speaker 1>than the former. Is that correct. I'm definitely saying that

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>VP cannot contribute to net zero if it goes on

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:56.120
<v Speaker 1>increasing its production and emissions and believes that it can

0:49:56.160 --> 0:50:00.120
<v Speaker 1>offset all of that. So at the moment we in

0:50:00.400 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>b people fifty thousand tons of carbon offsets, it was

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:11.359
<v Speaker 1>responsible for around one point six giga tons of emissions.

0:50:11.400 --> 0:50:14.359
<v Speaker 1>So you've got to be cutting emissions. You can't just

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 1>be offsetting what is left that you might offset in

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 1>some way. You have to offset through balancing it with

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:29.279
<v Speaker 1>things that actually remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they have to remove carbon permanently or durably. Can you

0:50:33.960 --> 0:50:39.160
<v Speaker 1>explain some of those permanent carbon removal technologies? Most of

0:50:39.200 --> 0:50:44.960
<v Speaker 1>them are currently quite speculative. There are technologies though, that

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:51.440
<v Speaker 1>use renewable energy to capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 1>with a chemical agent of some sort. To expose this

0:50:56.320 --> 0:51:00.520
<v Speaker 1>chemical agent to the atmosphere, it absorbs some CEO who

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:03.880
<v Speaker 1>You then put it in an enclosed chamber, expose it

0:51:03.920 --> 0:51:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to heat or pressure. The CEO two comes off. You

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:11.120
<v Speaker 1>can pipe it off, compress it and inject it underground,

0:51:11.680 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 1>and as long as you do that in somewhere like

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a say line aquifer, it will almost certainly stay underground

0:51:18.200 --> 0:51:23.000
<v Speaker 1>for thousands of years. Another very permanent form of carbon

0:51:23.120 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 1>removal is called enhanced weathering. Again, you need some renewable energy.

0:51:28.040 --> 0:51:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You grind up basalt or other reactive rocks quite finely,

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:36.719
<v Speaker 1>spread it on the land surface, and as the rain

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 1>flows through it, it removes or effectively the calm dark

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 1>side in the rainwater reacts with the rock goes off

0:51:44.760 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in the runoff, and at least in theory, ends up

0:51:49.160 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 1>in the oceans, where it ends up as carbonate, and

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where our limestone comes from. So that's that's millions

0:51:56.200 --> 0:52:00.479
<v Speaker 1>of years. So there's a lot of these techniques. None

0:52:00.480 --> 0:52:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of them are perfect, none of them would be scalable infinitely,

0:52:05.640 --> 0:52:11.040
<v Speaker 1>but where scientists are hopeful, let's say that maybe somewhere

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 1>between two and five gigatons a year could be removed

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:18.800
<v Speaker 1>using these technologies in the latter half of the century

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>once once they've been developed. So it sounds like once

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:25.359
<v Speaker 1>again they just need to stop producing oil. I want

0:52:25.360 --> 0:52:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to pivot to Jamie. A big part of the BP story,

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Jamie relates directly to your thesis at Fossil Free Media

0:52:31.920 --> 0:52:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that AD agencies and PR companies are some of big

0:52:36.239 --> 0:52:41.040
<v Speaker 1>oils or maybe big carbons, not so secret weapons. How

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:44.360
<v Speaker 1>big a problem is the marketing industry in this equation.

0:52:44.960 --> 0:52:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a huge problem, and I think that

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:50.160
<v Speaker 1>PR and advertising and marketing have been one of the

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:53.400
<v Speaker 1>largest barriers to climate action that just because it's in

0:52:53.440 --> 0:52:56.160
<v Speaker 1>such plain sight, we often don't see it. And BP

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:58.319
<v Speaker 1>is a really interesting case study because I think that

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of all the oil majors, they have always been the

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 1>most attuned to their public image. But it's worth remembering that,

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:06.640
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned earlier, it was all the way back

0:53:06.680 --> 0:53:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in that the previous CEO of BP was making announcements

0:53:12.120 --> 0:53:13.719
<v Speaker 1>about how they were going to become a new type

0:53:13.719 --> 0:53:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of energy company, and that led to then the rebrand

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand of BP two Beyond Petroleum. Yeah, John Brown,

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean that was twenty years ago that they made

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:29.240
<v Speaker 1>this beyond Petroleum rebrand. They're not beyond petroleum twenty years later.

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that we should take that lens towards

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the commitments that they're making today, that maybe there's a

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:38.920
<v Speaker 1>higher degree of seriousness, there's more political pressure, but BP

0:53:39.040 --> 0:53:41.239
<v Speaker 1>hasn't shown in the past that it was serious about

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:44.560
<v Speaker 1>any of these claims. There's a fascinating example of this

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 1>from the current era, which is actually a leaked presentation

0:53:48.680 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that came out at the beginning of which is right

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 1>when Bernard Looney, the new CEO, is taking on BP

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and wanted to restructure the company. And the presentation was

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:01.800
<v Speaker 1>done for BP by the ad agency w P P,

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 1>which is the world's largest kind of advertising conglomerate. And

0:54:05.520 --> 0:54:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this was an effort holding company, and this was an

0:54:07.920 --> 0:54:10.160
<v Speaker 1>effort by w PP to kind of bring together some

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:12.399
<v Speaker 1>of its top people and say we're going to kind

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of do a first stab at what a new brand,

0:54:15.080 --> 0:54:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a new image, a new marketing approach for BP could

0:54:17.719 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 1>look like that they would then use in all the

0:54:20.239 --> 0:54:23.960
<v Speaker 1>advertising and all the advertising relationships that they have. And

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it's really a fascinating document because it basically walks through

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that yes, BPS, you know core businesses oil

0:54:30.520 --> 0:54:33.479
<v Speaker 1>and gas, and we're going to be expanding upstream production YadA,

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:36.080
<v Speaker 1>YadA YadA. But also, you know, we need to convince

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the public that quote, we get it on climate change, um.

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And they run through this incredible series of slides about

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:47.160
<v Speaker 1>how the world changed in because of the global climate

0:54:47.200 --> 0:54:50.120
<v Speaker 1>strikes in Grettith Thunberg and everything that had happened, and

0:54:50.200 --> 0:54:53.600
<v Speaker 1>BP was wasn't trusted on this important issue of climate

0:54:53.640 --> 0:54:55.799
<v Speaker 1>change that the public cared about. So they needed to

0:54:55.840 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 1>do something to signal that they got it on climate change.

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:02.040
<v Speaker 1>It could be part of the energy transition. Of course,

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:04.880
<v Speaker 1>nothing in the presentation was actually about concrete things that

0:55:04.920 --> 0:55:08.120
<v Speaker 1>they would do, like stopping gas production. It was all

0:55:08.160 --> 0:55:10.440
<v Speaker 1>about the ways that they would remark it themselves. And

0:55:10.520 --> 0:55:12.680
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's worth all of us, you know,

0:55:12.800 --> 0:55:15.160
<v Speaker 1>being able to see that stuff is what it is,

0:55:15.280 --> 0:55:19.880
<v Speaker 1>which is propaganda. It seems clear that the economics of

0:55:20.080 --> 0:55:23.800
<v Speaker 1>wind and solar have gotten much much better, very compelling

0:55:23.840 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 1>these days. Isn't there a strong argument for BP just

0:55:26.960 --> 0:55:32.239
<v Speaker 1>being a responsible steward for their shareholders money, investing more

0:55:32.280 --> 0:55:36.440
<v Speaker 1>money in those technologies and you know, leaving some oil

0:55:36.640 --> 0:55:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in the ground. I think the problem is that from

0:55:40.840 --> 0:55:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the shareholder perspective, from the workings of contemporary capitalism perspective,

0:55:47.239 --> 0:55:52.280
<v Speaker 1>BAPY has these huge assets that are reserves of oil

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and gas in the ground, and their corporate valuation reflects

0:55:57.160 --> 0:56:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that their ability to pay dividends or if it's that,

0:56:01.320 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 1>and as soon as they start saying, oh, we're going

0:56:05.320 --> 0:56:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to leave some of that in the ground, then yes,

0:56:07.719 --> 0:56:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they are managing a financial decline. And in a sense

0:56:13.360 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 1>it means that that certainly my challenge to to burn

0:56:17.640 --> 0:56:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a Lney to say, set targets for reducing production is

0:56:22.040 --> 0:56:25.279
<v Speaker 1>going to be very hard as a businessman for him

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to take. I just, yeah, I want to zero in

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:30.200
<v Speaker 1>on this point DU's making because I think it's so critical.

0:56:30.800 --> 0:56:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the BP and other oil majors want to

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:35.920
<v Speaker 1>convince the public that their key to the energy transition.

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:38.359
<v Speaker 1>The reality of it is that, yes, there is money

0:56:38.400 --> 0:56:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to be made in clean energy. Maybe big oil companies

0:56:40.840 --> 0:56:42.799
<v Speaker 1>aren't the best suited to do that. You know that

0:56:42.840 --> 0:56:44.680
<v Speaker 1>there are clean energy companies that should be doing that,

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and I think it raises a question for us, do

0:56:47.440 --> 0:56:50.319
<v Speaker 1>you really want BP to be controlling the energy of

0:56:50.320 --> 0:56:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the future. This is the company that has for decades

0:56:52.960 --> 0:56:56.799
<v Speaker 1>run over communities, violated international human rights laws, billed oil

0:56:56.840 --> 0:56:59.200
<v Speaker 1>into the Gulf of Mexico, failed to clean it up,

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:01.640
<v Speaker 1>failed to hate the money that it was owed. I

0:57:01.680 --> 0:57:04.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want BP running the clean energy of the future.

0:57:04.520 --> 0:57:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd much prefer that it's managed publicly, that it's in

0:57:07.239 --> 0:57:10.200
<v Speaker 1>smaller cooperatives, and we have that choice right now. To

0:57:10.239 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 1>make that transition into Duncan's point. What we need for

0:57:14.040 --> 0:57:16.680
<v Speaker 1>BP they should be held accountable for the damage that

0:57:16.720 --> 0:57:20.520
<v Speaker 1>they've gone and the ill begotten profits that they've made

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:23.720
<v Speaker 1>during a period in which we knew, and they knew

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:27.040
<v Speaker 1>from their own science, that every barrel of oil they

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:30.040
<v Speaker 1>dug out of the ground was furthering a planetary catastrophe.

0:57:30.320 --> 0:57:33.320
<v Speaker 1>They knew that last quarter when they made record profits.

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So why should they and their shareholders who also knew

0:57:36.200 --> 0:57:38.919
<v Speaker 1>that and have decided to stick with BP, why should

0:57:38.960 --> 0:57:41.960
<v Speaker 1>they be rewarded for that? So, if I may, what

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to emphasize about that is how the dynamic

0:57:47.080 --> 0:57:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of oil companies wanting to maintain the value of their reserves,

0:57:52.560 --> 0:57:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and oil companies doing political lobbying and marketing to position

0:57:58.240 --> 0:58:02.920
<v Speaker 1>themselves as part of the energy transition are both about

0:58:03.000 --> 0:58:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the modern face of climate denial. The modern face of

0:58:06.720 --> 0:58:10.840
<v Speaker 1>climate denial is about delay. It's to say, oh, yeah,

0:58:10.880 --> 0:58:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, now we're we're happily accept that climate change

0:58:14.440 --> 0:58:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is happening. We understand this is a problem. But if

0:58:17.480 --> 0:58:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we move too quickly, then we cause all sorts of

0:58:21.040 --> 0:58:26.160
<v Speaker 1>other problems, and those things all converge around them extracting

0:58:26.200 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the most profit from their asset base and continuing to

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:36.479
<v Speaker 1>prolong the climate crisis. I want to ask you both

0:58:36.520 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to suspend your disbelief for a minute, because in this

0:58:39.120 --> 0:58:44.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the show, I do want to explore actual ideas,

0:58:44.040 --> 0:58:46.880
<v Speaker 1>like if we're going to take them seriously and say, okay,

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 1>they really Meanwhile, they're really trying to do this, what

0:58:50.080 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 1>should they do? So so let me run a couple

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of ideas past both of you and just get your

0:58:55.400 --> 0:58:58.560
<v Speaker 1>get your take. So, first of all, John Brown, the

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:03.480
<v Speaker 1>former CEO of EP who actually initiated the Beyond Petroleum

0:59:03.680 --> 0:59:06.600
<v Speaker 1>rebrand and and began what I believe was at the

0:59:06.600 --> 0:59:09.880
<v Speaker 1>time a genuine attempt at a transition to being a

0:59:09.920 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 1>sustainable energy company. He recently said that he thinks that

0:59:15.280 --> 0:59:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the company should be split into to spin out the

0:59:18.400 --> 0:59:22.200
<v Speaker 1>renewable energy assets the company has as a separate company,

0:59:22.400 --> 0:59:26.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially create VP Future, which is rapidly growing, less capital

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:31.000
<v Speaker 1>intensive and valued at a premium by investors, and BP

0:59:31.240 --> 0:59:36.120
<v Speaker 1>passed the oil assets, which are capital intensive, unloved by

0:59:36.160 --> 0:59:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the market and in decline, and then just let the

0:59:38.840 --> 0:59:42.760
<v Speaker 1>market decide. So this is a former CEO saying this,

0:59:43.200 --> 0:59:46.720
<v Speaker 1>what's your take on that? Yeah, that would be interesting

0:59:46.760 --> 0:59:49.440
<v Speaker 1>if PP moved in that direction. The one thing I'd

0:59:49.480 --> 0:59:51.919
<v Speaker 1>raise on it as a challenge. I know we're trying

0:59:51.960 --> 0:59:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a bit more optimistic here, but since Duck

0:59:54.160 --> 0:59:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and I are good skeptics, it's okay. Is that the

0:59:58.680 --> 1:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>liability issue. If if BP has known for decades that

1:00:02.840 --> 1:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>their products were causing climate change, like Big Tobacco new

1:00:05.640 --> 1:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that its product was addictive and causing health impacts, what

1:00:09.520 --> 1:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of responsibility do they have to help pay for

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the damage that those products have cost. And so when

1:00:14.600 --> 1:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we talk about BP being able to spin off a company,

1:00:17.320 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you know that's often what companies do to avoid liability.

1:00:20.160 --> 1:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the question would be making sure

1:00:22.440 --> 1:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that um, you know, they're not able to kind of

1:00:24.440 --> 1:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>dodge their social responsibility by creating a dirty version of

1:00:28.480 --> 1:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>their industry and then hiding the assets there. But maybe

1:00:32.680 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to embroider the thoughts of what would be p do

1:00:36.200 --> 1:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>if they were admitting some liability, what would be the

1:00:40.440 --> 1:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of investments or spending they should do. And here

1:00:45.760 --> 1:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that the idea of a just transition and

1:00:48.800 --> 1:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>energy transition that actually pays attention to social justice in

1:00:53.040 --> 1:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of consumer need and worker need would be helpful.

1:00:57.760 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>And you may know there's been extinction rebellion spinoff campaign

1:01:02.080 --> 1:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in the UK recently called Insulate Britain. Well, I think

1:01:05.880 --> 1:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what BP should do. That they should actually do

1:01:09.680 --> 1:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the program of retrofitting good insulation in the homes of

1:01:14.560 --> 1:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>people in fuel poverty, particularly the homes of people who

1:01:17.680 --> 1:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>are in fuel poverty because of the rising gas prices.

1:01:20.880 --> 1:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>And they should go a step further, of course, which

1:01:23.120 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>is go around all those homes and install heat pumps

1:01:27.000 --> 1:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>instead of gas boilers, so that they could then cut

1:01:30.560 --> 1:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the demand for the product that they've been selling and

1:01:36.000 --> 1:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>profiting from the cost of climate change. I mean, that's

1:01:40.480 --> 1:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a really important point, and I think Duncan raises another

1:01:43.560 --> 1:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>piece of this which is interesting, which is that for

1:01:46.680 --> 1:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the transition to take place, we also have to deal

1:01:49.320 --> 1:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>with all of the oil and gas infrastructure that currently exists.

1:01:52.200 --> 1:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can't just turn it off and then

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>leave it. They're spewing methane for decades to come, and

1:01:56.640 --> 1:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>so there's an incredible amount of work that BP could

1:01:59.000 --> 1:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>be doing, and it could be engaging probably more people

1:02:01.960 --> 1:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that are currently employs to deal with all of the

1:02:04.760 --> 1:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>various oil and gas wells and infrastructure that has left behind.

1:02:08.400 --> 1:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>These in many ways, are forever liabilities that we're gonna

1:02:11.200 --> 1:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with. It's not quite so simple as

1:02:13.120 --> 1:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>plugging a well and hoping that it never admits methane again.

1:02:15.840 --> 1:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>You need people to go back and check it and

1:02:18.120 --> 1:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>verify that it's been done right, and then you know,

1:02:20.240 --> 1:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>manage that process going forward. And so there there is

1:02:23.680 --> 1:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a role in a way to kind of reimagine energy

1:02:26.520 --> 1:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>companies of the past, these oil and gas giants playing

1:02:30.240 --> 1:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a role, as Duncan was saying, and helping kind of

1:02:32.200 --> 1:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>do the retrofits and transition we need to move to

1:02:35.160 --> 1:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>clean energy, but also taking some responsibility for managing the

1:02:39.240 --> 1:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>damage that they've done and making sure that over the

1:02:41.560 --> 1:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>decades to come, we're not having big blowouts of you know,

1:02:45.720 --> 1:02:48.959
<v Speaker 1>c O two that's been pumped somewhere, or numerous oil

1:02:48.960 --> 1:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and gas wells continuing to leak methane and push us

1:02:51.320 --> 1:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>past global limits. Now tie to your question about shareholders,

1:02:56.040 --> 1:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>this may require us rethinking some of these says when

1:03:00.520 --> 1:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to capitalism, or beginning to at least put

1:03:03.280 --> 1:03:06.959
<v Speaker 1>in some interesting government incentives and doing the finance work

1:03:07.000 --> 1:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to do that. And so I think that campaigners over

1:03:09.320 --> 1:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the last few years have really begun to focus on

1:03:11.400 --> 1:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>finance as a key target, pressuring folks like Black Rock, JP,

1:03:14.920 --> 1:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Chase, you know, others to play a larger role here.

1:03:18.960 --> 1:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>We need those players to come in. BP might not

1:03:22.040 --> 1:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to do this loan. They're big, but maybe

1:03:24.360 --> 1:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not quite big enough to manage this, and so

1:03:26.640 --> 1:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>figuring out the ways to structure their debts and get

1:03:29.720 --> 1:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>government regulators involved in financed this whole transition is a

1:03:33.520 --> 1:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>really interesting process that we need people to start thinking about.

1:03:38.600 --> 1:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Pent Look, we're we're big fans of the notion of

1:03:41.640 --> 1:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>rethinking capitalism on this show, but I want to follow

1:03:44.320 --> 1:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that thread because you mentioned black Rock, and we've done

1:03:46.680 --> 1:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>enough that black Rock, and we spoke with Taric Fancy,

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>who's the former head of sustainable investing at black Rock

1:03:53.280 --> 1:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and left because he just ultimately felt like he was

1:03:57.000 --> 1:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>engaged in greenwashing there. And his take on the problem

1:04:03.160 --> 1:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is that it is I don't want to put words

1:04:05.560 --> 1:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in his mouth, but his basic thesis was that it's

1:04:08.040 --> 1:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>hopelessly naive to expect companies to essentially self regulate, and

1:04:12.480 --> 1:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>he thinks that regulation, specifically a carbon tax, is the

1:04:15.640 --> 1:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>only medicine that will solve the problem of climate change.

1:04:18.520 --> 1:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>What are the two of you think about That a

1:04:20.680 --> 1:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>carbon tax could be a very helpful tool, It alone

1:04:25.080 --> 1:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is unlikely to solve the problem because simply what we've

1:04:30.080 --> 1:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>seen in the past is that the generic incentive that

1:04:35.200 --> 1:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a carbon tax or equivalent gives is rarely enough to

1:04:39.760 --> 1:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>bring about the transformation and technologies. So I think, yeah,

1:04:44.720 --> 1:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>carbon tax good can help, not the single answer. Of course,

1:04:49.600 --> 1:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>when we're when we're talking about carbon taxes as the answer,

1:04:53.160 --> 1:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we have to remember that that BP spent thirteen million

1:04:56.080 --> 1:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>dollars in eighteen blocking a carbon tax in a divin

1:05:00.400 --> 1:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Washington State, and then afterwards just said, oh, well, it

1:05:04.680 --> 1:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the right carbon tax initiative. And my experience going

1:05:10.120 --> 1:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>back over the years is that this is a common narrative.

1:05:14.480 --> 1:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>When companies are offered taxes, they say the taxes aren't

1:05:18.200 --> 1:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>quite right and they weren't voluntary measures. When they're offered

1:05:21.120 --> 1:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>voluntary measures, they say, well, then we'll get undercut by

1:05:24.360 --> 1:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>the cowboys, so we need regulatory measures. And when they're

1:05:27.920 --> 1:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>offered regulatory measures, they say, well, this isn't really the

1:05:30.960 --> 1:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>free market. Why don't we have taxes. Yeah, we have

1:05:35.040 --> 1:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a word for that. We call it bullshit. Which brings

1:05:38.960 --> 1:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>me to my final question for both of you on

1:05:43.000 --> 1:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>calling BS. We have something called the BS index or

1:05:46.680 --> 1:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the BS scale, and it goes from zero to one,

1:05:51.160 --> 1:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>zero being the best score zero BS and a hundred

1:05:55.280 --> 1:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>being the worst total BS. I want to ask both

1:05:58.480 --> 1:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of you to read be e P on the B

1:06:01.600 --> 1:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>S scale. I'll start with you, Duncan. That's that's interesting.

1:06:09.520 --> 1:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna throw them a bone and give them only

1:06:14.160 --> 1:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a writing. Okay, you're in a good mood today. Um,

1:06:22.080 --> 1:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, thank you for that, Duncan and Jamie, Well,

1:06:25.440 --> 1:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad Duncan said a high bar. You know, I

1:06:27.880 --> 1:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about this in two ways. One is sort

1:06:29.880 --> 1:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of the only standard that really matters, which is the

1:06:32.480 --> 1:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of standard of physics and chemistry and the climate,

1:06:35.680 --> 1:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in which case, you know, maybe we'll give BP a

1:06:39.240 --> 1:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>score that relates to the amount of money they're still

1:06:41.200 --> 1:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>investing of their capex and in oil and gas, which

1:06:44.480 --> 1:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is something like a ninety six percent um, And you know,

1:06:48.000 --> 1:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's a good way to do it now, to

1:06:49.680 --> 1:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>throw them a bit of a bone, as Duncan did,

1:06:51.800 --> 1:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're trying to be charitable. I would say that

1:06:54.200 --> 1:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>BP is ahead of the other oil companies, and so

1:06:57.280 --> 1:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll drop it down to a nineties Nan was saying,

1:07:00.800 --> 1:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>because I think two bps credit. They have been the

1:07:03.680 --> 1:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>only one to really say that they do need to

1:07:05.840 --> 1:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>reduce production. They did right off seventeen billion dollars of

1:07:09.440 --> 1:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas assets by saying that those were stranded

1:07:12.040 --> 1:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and needed to be kept in the ground. And they

1:07:14.200 --> 1:07:16.919
<v Speaker 1>have talked about sort of the larger need for this

1:07:17.120 --> 1:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>transition to happen. And so you know, again, if anybody

1:07:20.160 --> 1:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>feels like we're being a little too harsh on them,

1:07:22.080 --> 1:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>just remember that they rebranded back into Fast and here

1:07:25.080 --> 1:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we are today, and so I would take everything they

1:07:27.520 --> 1:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>do with a bit of skepticism, but at the very least,

1:07:30.240 --> 1:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it's good to see them beginning to move agreed. Okay,

1:07:33.600 --> 1:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>listen this this was a great conversation. I could have

1:07:35.720 --> 1:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>spent the rest of the afternoon talking with both of you.

1:07:37.800 --> 1:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate it. So, folks, it's time to give

1:07:42.960 --> 1:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>BP our official BS score. The companies saying all the

1:07:48.000 --> 1:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>right things, but they lost massive amounts of trust when

1:07:51.560 --> 1:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they did this to us the first time, and as

1:07:54.760 --> 1:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>all of our experts have pointed out today, their actions

1:07:57.720 --> 1:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>so far are inadequate and incoherent at best. Based on

1:08:02.200 --> 1:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>what I've heard today, I'm going to give BP a

1:08:05.440 --> 1:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety five. To bring that score down, they're gonna need

1:08:09.480 --> 1:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to make some big changes. To weigh in with your

1:08:13.080 --> 1:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>own score, visit our website Calling Bullshit Podcast dot com.

1:08:17.560 --> 1:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll track BP's behavior over time to see if they

1:08:21.000 --> 1:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>can bring it down. You'll also be able to see

1:08:23.840 --> 1:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>where BP ranks on BS compared to the other companies

1:08:27.320 --> 1:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and organizations we feature on this show. And if you're

1:08:31.240 --> 1:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>starting a purpose led business or you're thinking of beginning

1:08:34.160 --> 1:08:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the journey of transformation to become one Here are three

1:08:37.760 --> 1:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>things that you should take away from this episode. One,

1:08:44.800 --> 1:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Transparency and coherence build trust. It comes up over and

1:08:49.080 --> 1:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>over again this season. BPS saying that they're pivoting to

1:08:53.360 --> 1:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>become a sustainable energy company but then also trying to

1:08:57.400 --> 1:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>convince the world that natural gas is a sustainable, renewable

1:09:01.880 --> 1:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>energy resource is just ludicrous, as is claiming that you're

1:09:06.800 --> 1:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>taking on climate change while at the same time remaining

1:09:10.360 --> 1:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a dues paying member of an industry trade group that's

1:09:14.200 --> 1:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>spreading misinformation about climate change. If your words and deeds

1:09:19.400 --> 1:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>lack coherence, then anything you say, even if it's true,

1:09:23.840 --> 1:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>will seem ridiculous. Two, show me the money. It's all

1:09:31.080 --> 1:09:34.719
<v Speaker 1>about action. If VP means it, they need to prove

1:09:34.760 --> 1:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>it through action. Today we've talked about important actions like

1:09:39.720 --> 1:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>cutting support for industry lobbying groups that are climate change deniers,

1:09:43.960 --> 1:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>or discontinuing any misleading pr or advertising, and potentially seismic

1:09:50.680 --> 1:09:54.519
<v Speaker 1>actions like actually breaking the company into to make it

1:09:54.720 --> 1:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>really clear that there is a dirty fossil fuel VP

1:09:58.600 --> 1:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of the past at a clean VP of the renewable

1:10:02.200 --> 1:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and sustainable energy future, and then letting investors choose which

1:10:06.880 --> 1:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>one they want to invest in. Your actions would undoubtedly

1:10:11.040 --> 1:10:17.879
<v Speaker 1>be different, but the point is doing is always believing. Three.

1:10:18.479 --> 1:10:21.479
<v Speaker 1>Let's forget about the oil for a minute. There's gold

1:10:21.520 --> 1:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in this episode for purpose led entrepreneurs who want to

1:10:24.680 --> 1:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>create the BPS of tomorrow. As Jamie and Duncan both said,

1:10:29.760 --> 1:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Big Oil has dragged its feet for so long that

1:10:32.840 --> 1:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>BP and the other super majors may not be savable,

1:10:37.800 --> 1:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's fine. Sometimes companies just need to go away.

1:10:42.400 --> 1:10:45.519
<v Speaker 1>But there's an opportunity here to start a green energy

1:10:45.560 --> 1:10:49.719
<v Speaker 1>company that isn't weighed down by legacy investments in fossil fuel.

1:10:50.360 --> 1:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>If nothing else, I hope this episode inspires somebody to

1:10:53.520 --> 1:10:58.839
<v Speaker 1>just go make that happen. And Bernard Looney, CEO of BP,

1:10:59.479 --> 1:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>if you, whoever want to come on the show and

1:11:01.600 --> 1:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about any of the ideas or topics that we

1:11:04.880 --> 1:11:07.519
<v Speaker 1>touch on in this episode, I want you to know

1:11:07.600 --> 1:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you have an open invitation. I'd like to thank everyone

1:11:14.360 --> 1:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>who joined us today, Tyson Slocum, Jamie Hen and Duncan McLaren.

1:11:19.760 --> 1:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>You can learn more about them in our show notes.

1:11:23.520 --> 1:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And if you have ideas for companies or organizations we

1:11:26.800 --> 1:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>should consider for future episodes, you can submit them on

1:11:30.600 --> 1:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>our website calling Bullshit podcast dot com and if we

1:11:35.280 --> 1:11:39.519
<v Speaker 1>performed while transforming you today, please let us know by

1:11:39.640 --> 1:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>rating and reviewing us on the I Heart Radio app,

1:11:42.640 --> 1:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. And thanks

1:11:48.080 --> 1:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to our production team Hannah Beal, Amanda Ginsburg, Andy Kim

1:11:53.479 --> 1:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>d s Moss, Hailey Pascalites, MICHAELA. Reid, Parker, Silzer based

1:12:00.160 --> 1:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Soaper and me John Zulu. Calling Bullshit was created by

1:12:04.880 --> 1:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>co Collective and is hosted by Me Time onto you.

1:12:08.479 --> 1:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. Before you go, we'd love to hear

1:12:20.800 --> 1:12:23.759
<v Speaker 1>what you think about the show. Maybe you were inspired

1:12:23.800 --> 1:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to take action, maybe you disagree with today's bullshit rating.

1:12:27.479 --> 1:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Either way, we want to hear about it. Leave us

1:12:30.439 --> 1:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a message at two one two five oh five to

1:12:33.760 --> 1:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Zo five, or send a voice memo to CBS podcast

1:12:37.439 --> 1:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>at co collective dot com. You might even be featured

1:12:41.000 --> 1:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on an upcoming episode.