WEBVTT - Cleaning Up: Second Half Tips + Buys and Sells (Ep. 1089)

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, what's up friends, and welcome in to Fantasy Pros.

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>This is cleaning Up the Discord only show. I'm Chris

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Welsh joined by Joe Rico as I have an all

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>season and we are here for the final cleaning up

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of the season, all Star break. We wave goodbye to

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>just at least this show where we hang out on

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Discord with all of our besties waiting for you guys

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to produce the show and if not, we have to

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>babble on about what we want to talk about. But

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>I want you guys to remember Discord has got your

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>back in the football season, We've got Discord shows. I'll

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>be back on ericson and I will be starting up

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>our show in about probably about a month or so,

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>so it won't be long without And if you guys

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>want more, you just got to make sure to join

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the Discord and it will justify more of these awesome

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>shows with myself and Joelrico. So Fantasypros dot Com slash

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Chat that's where you sign up for the Discord tons

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of free access to it. There is a pre side

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>if you want a few of the extras, but go

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and check it out today for yourself. You make that

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>decision and come and be a part of the shows

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in our amazing community. Mister Joe Rico, there is no

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>rest for us during the All Star break, really, But

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>how are you doing?

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing very well, my friend. It's sad that this

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 2>is our last show, but it's been a good run.

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 2>I hope we get to run it back again next year.

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 2>It's been good talking to you guys, and I'll up

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 2>the chat, ask your questions and hop on stage. Be

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>on the pot of us. Because this is the final countdown.

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you. Let me start with a question

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>for you here. This positively and negatively, the All Star

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>break kind of represents, you know, the first and second half.

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But what we know is it's numerically that's not actually

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the case. There's less than half the games. But what

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it also represents is a time where you get a

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of checkouts. We're gonna have a period where there's

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a handful of teams that are gonna look

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>at themselves and they're gonna go, I'm too far out,

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm completely done. I can't do it. So you have

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>this weird dichotomy in fantasy baseball where you know there

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is still so much more to be done. This is

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>where you win your league, but you also are going

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to be battling with teams that are going to be

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>out of it, the trade market in general. FAB, What

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is your top singular or multiple piece of advice in

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the second half. Is it streaming? Is it FAB? Is

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it aggression? Is it trade market aggression? Is it actually

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe being a little bit more passive holding on to

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>your players longer. What do you think a couple keys

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to winning this second half is?

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 2>I think the big one for me is understanding your

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 2>team and the construction of it. Where you are in

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 2>the standings, and especially for roto players, look at where

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>you are and what categories you need to make up.

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 2>If you are way behind in certain categories, maybe it's

0:02:57.840 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 2>time to give up on them. If you're a very

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 2>dead last and stolen bases or home runs or certain categories,

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 2>it might be time to give up on them. There

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 2>are certain categories where you can see that there is

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 2>a path for you to make a push up the standing,

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 2>so you target those particular categories. It's really about understanding

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 2>your team. If you're in fifteenth place in a fifteen

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 2>team league and you got thirty two roto points and

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 2>you maybe don't need to devote any more time to

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 2>that league. As crappy as it might sound, you know,

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 2>people say, well, there's a something to be had for

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 2>going from fifteenth to tenth if you can move up

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 2>in the standings of this part of the year. But

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I think prioritizing those teams that actually have a shot

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:34.679
<v Speaker 2>is what makes the most sense. You spend the most

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 2>time researching those teams as opposed to trying to have

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 2>some you know, moral victory by moving up a couple

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 2>points at the bottom of the standings, really understand your teams,

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 2>understands which ones have a shot, and then I think

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 2>you give yourself the best chance to actually compete for

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 2>the league title or to finish in the money in

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 2>those spots where you actually legitimately have a chance. Just

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 2>about understanding where you have a chance. If you're in

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 2>tenth or eleventh place in a twelve time leads, it's

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 2>probably time to give up on that league.

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I like the one of really understanding, having a true

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>understanding of your team, your needs, and whether you're punting

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a strategy or going hard on a strategy like this

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is the time to do it. Whether you do it

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in the trademarket, whether you do it in the whether

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a trade market or the waiver market, whatever it is,

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>is just like really understanding the construction of your team

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>where your benefits are. Obviously rodos a little bit easier

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>because you physically look and you're like, okay, I'm in

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>this category. But it's making that understanding and coming to terms,

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're head to head being like, all right,

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I should let this go. If I'm consistently losing week

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in and week out on saves, the save market is

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of blah, and I've got maybe I drafted one

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>hero save guy and then I got it like one

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>or two other just middling, but I just consistently lose.

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it is punting that category. Maybe you can sell

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that closer to jump ahead in another spot. So I

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>think the understanding of your team is massive important, massively important,

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and kind of in the same vein as being as

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>active as you possibly can. Fantasy baseball is a grind,

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 1>and you've had a sea you feel like you've already

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>put in a full season. You've got this second half

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of a season going where your twelve team league might

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>now be eight active, or your Rodo might only be

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>seven active in that, you've got to be as proactive

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>as possible and your ability to stream pitchers if you

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 1>don't have caps, paying attention to hot turnarounds, maybe not

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>dropping too instantly a player that's been solid for you know,

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the shiny new toy, and as the season gets a

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>little bit further along, maybe having a little bit more

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>of a stomach for cutting your dead weight. That's what

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>fantasy baseball is all about, and you know all you're

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to find a trendy. Every fantasy winner has

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>like one or two guys that they probably picked up

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in August or September that's going to help carry them

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>in some capacity, whether they're the number one carrier or

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>top five on their fantasy team. So be active in that.

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>But just you know, a couple of little tricks of

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the trade for this final run here, because baseball is

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>unlike any other It just it goes long and you

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>can have those leads, or you can have this great

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>team and it can fall apart, or I have had

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>a couple instances where I was I remember I was

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a team Bog will remember this. I was a team

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that was out of it in this one league I

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>sold off and it was a dynasty I sold off,

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden, because of some of

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the pickups I made, I started winning. I squeaked into

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, and I ended up getting to the championship

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>on a team that I sold off three or four pieces,

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>just by having these like rentally waiver guys out there,

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>so you know, being proactive and understanding your team, it's

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the key key point here, mister Joe Rico.

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely yeah, And like you you kind of alluded to it,

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 2>like some of that dead weight, like you might have

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 2>been waiting for the whole season for Michael Hay to

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 2>turn it around, for Matt McClain to turn it around,

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, Brenton Doyle.

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of these.

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 2>Names, Ozzie Albi's, and it gets to a point where

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 2>it's like, well, maybe it's just not their year and

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 2>it's time to just move on from some of these

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>players as opposed to just waiting and waiting because they

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 2>were top one hundred draft picks. So I think part

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 2>of cutting that dead weight and moving on, like this

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 2>is a point of the year where it's like you've

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 2>given guys some rope, You've given them more than an

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 2>or about one hundred games at this point, and now

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 2>it's time where you can probably start to move on

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 2>from some of those guys who've been truly, truly disappointing.

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Put a pin in the Ozzie one. That's a good

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>one because at the end here we want to answer

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>some of our listener questions. But I want to talk

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>about a few guys, and I'll just tease it right now.

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Ozzy and some players. Are you comfortable

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>with them in the second half? Are you going to

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>buy into them being able to either turn it around

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in a way that's worth buying or turn it in

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>around in a way that is worth holding. And I

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>think Ozzie's maybe the first one we can talk about.

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But let's get to the audience here. Always under says,

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>hey should I pick up Zebi Junk? I was about

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to say, is that the same person? But Zebby Comma

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Junk or Schlitzler and drop Geo, Jacob Lopez or Shean.

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think about the three potential pickups

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>versus the three drops? And then I'll go on to

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the question after.

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>So Zebby, I I don't know if there's been any

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 2>like new update on him or anything, but he was

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 2>really pretty disappointing earlier on when he was pitching this year.

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that I'm going to be rushing out

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 2>to grab him necessarily. Junk and Schlitler are guys that

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I am kind of interested in at this point, specifically

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Schlitler if he's able to stick around playing for a

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 2>good team, because Junk is not gonna have a ton

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 2>of win opportunities out there in Miami. I think you'd

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 2>be all right to drop Lopez and Sheen and pick

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 2>up junkin Schlitler Dio. Assuming we're talking Lucas Giolito. I mean,

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 2>he's been really good, so I'd be holding onto him

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 2>over Zebby in this situation. But I think Junk and

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Schlitler you can you can pick him up over Lopez

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and Sheen.

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 3>I'd be fine with.

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>That, completely agree Schlitler say his name very carefully when

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>we say it, one hundred percent, I would move over

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>those guys. He also said also option I could drop

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>our Darvish and Edward Cabrera or Profar. I'm definitely not

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 1>dropping Cambrera. I mean, we're kind of bracing for the injury.

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think we got it like Lopez and

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>she and are fine for those two. Like I'm not

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>sold on Darvish or anything like that, but I think

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the move. Another question, and my final question, would

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>be should I drop Jacob Wilson and grab Nick Kurtz.

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I've got both of them in a couple leagues, but

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>one league, I have another good shortstop, and I have

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Sodastrom at first base. So should I grab Kurtz and

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>drop Jacob Wilson or Sodastrom or should I not add

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Nick Kurtz? What do you think?

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe that Nick Kurtz is still available is

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 2>bruly shocking. But what those options, I'd be all right

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 2>to move on from Soderstrom. I mean we haven't really

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 2>gotten much from him outside of that first run of

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the season. I mean he's been serviceable, I guess, but

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 2>really that first month was unbelievable and then Ay was

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 2>a ninety four WRC, plus June was eighty seven. He's

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 2>had a pretty decent July so far. But I think

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 2>given the options, I think I'd prefer to drop Soderstrom.

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess it really depends on that. On that shortstop situation,

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 2>and if you actually have to like sit one of

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 2>them every day, then I guess Wilson could be dropped

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>at that point. But my initial feeling here is to

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 2>drop Sodashrim for Kurtz. But Kurts being on the wire

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 2>is unbelievable.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Agreed, completely agree. I do think there's probably spots for

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Wilson, like you said, like maybe don't make sense.

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>You need like heavy counting stats and you know he's

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 1>never really playing okay, But I would just I'll take

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Kurts over Sodastrom like in a vacuum, So I think

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we're solid there. I cannot, and I agree with you.

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I cannot believe Nick Kurtz is available. Can you know

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 1>what makes me sick too? I had just the other

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>day I did look at DK's draft odds before Rookie

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Year and cam Smith had actually moved back

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>up to number one, which is great for me because

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I placed a bet. I had placed a bet on

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Christian Campbell and then before that though I had placed

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>a bet on cam Smith, great odds, very excited, but

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>because Jacob Wilson had been holding that thing. Can you

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine if you would have jumped in on Nick Kurtz,

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like a month or two, you probably got twenty to one.

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not looking at the odds right now. I

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>can look it up here in a second, but I

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>cannot imagine that you didn't get incredible odds. And the

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>al side has just completely opened up. So let me

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>see if I can find it real quick under awards

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Rookie of the Year Jacob. So they're all plus money,

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>all plus money now Jacob Wilson has the lead according

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to DK at plus one ten. Cam Smith is plus

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>one forty yo. Nick Kurtz is still three and a

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>half to one right now, Roman Anthony, if you want

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>really fun odds, just throwing it out there, twenty five

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to one as the Red Sox are winning games. But

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>like if you guys remember that was like a minus

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>like five hundred in favor of Jacob Wilson some time ago.

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So Cam Smith is in play, and Nick Kurtz, I think,

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is really in play, and I'm actually kind of shocked

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we're still getting that good of odds. It's just when

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>players on the same team they can kind of eat

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>into each other. That actually might kind of speak well

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to Cam Smith. If we're being honest, But what do

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 1>you think if you were placing If you're placing a

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>bet right now, at least you get plus money across

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the board, who would you side within the Al Rookie

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Year.

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's probably going to be kouraged the way

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 2>he's trending. The guy that's kind of interesting, honestly is

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 2>Carlos Narvaiaz in Boston, the catcher. He's playing phenomenal defense.

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 2>He's got eight home runs, he's hitting two seventy three.

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 3>He's got the.

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 2>Same war as Jacob Wilson if you're looking at fangrafts

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 2>war or the lead in the American League. So I

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 2>think that he could be a dark horse potentially playing

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 2>in Boston going to get more media.

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Love than playing in Sacramento. Potentially.

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Cam Smith is also pretty interesting because he's been phenomenal.

0:12:58.120 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Picked him up in a couple of places and he's

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 2>been a.

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Fantastic Really you want to hear this, April's say, I'm

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>so sad. This is probably gonna be just if you

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>guys remember last year. I'm very proud of this even

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>though it didn't hit. But preseason I had bet Jackson

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Merrill rookie of the Year seventeen U seventeen to one.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And if you guys remember, I have an autographed card

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>from Jackson, who inscribed my odds I got on it.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>It's one of my favorite cards. I got Camp and

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to go the same way

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I got cam Smith twenty five to one, and my bet,

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not even offering any type of payout right now.

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess because he's second. But I'm just staring at

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>this with a massive twenty five to one return and

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>he's second best odds right now, So I'm like, please,

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Cam Smith, please let Kurtz and Jacob Wilson eat into

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>each other. My luck, he'll probably finish second and I'll

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>have another year where my amazing long shot bet doesn't

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>pay off. I'm they give me a nice buyout, I

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>might consider it, So it's.

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Fine when you're working. Oh what el was Skis, wasn't it? Yeah?

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Skeens wan, Yeah, there was a legit time where Skeens

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and Merrill were going back and forth. I never got

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>offered a buyout on Meryll, and I probably would have

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>taken it if it would have been good, because he

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>had about a week or so where he was the

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>odds on favorite, but then it was like runaway skins

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was very, very sad for my book Austin

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Riley and CJ. Abrams. Is that a fair trade for

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Miserowski and Bett's ten team Rodo keeper ten keepers in there?

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So Riley Abrams for Bett's Miserowski. Which side do you like?

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 2>It feels pretty fair on both sides. Honestly, I don't

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 2>know that I have a strong preference. I guess the

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Riley side is probably safer just because Miserowski, like we've

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 2>talked about, or like Joe's talked about a lot, He's

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna eventually need to have Tommy John surgery. You can't

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 2>be throwing one hundred and two with ninety seven miles

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 2>mile and our sliders and stay healthy forever.

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, you would say.

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>That about Chris Sale, but that was I guess more

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>about his arm. It's it is a different situation.

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it was Sale throwing sliders at ninety seven.

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>No, no, That's what I'm saying, Like you're right, like

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the Sale throws more sweepy stuff, but it was it

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>was more of his arm action. But I just I

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>always remember every human being forever, which just like Chris

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Zille is gonna have Tomy John. Criszill's and have Tommy John.

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And it was just like okay, yeah, until.

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 2>He did and then Bets, I mean Bets, Bets has

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 2>had kind of a down year. He's getting older, so

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 2>there is some risk on that side. With Riley and Abrams,

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 2>You're getting two guys who are fairly young. Riley should

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 2>in an ostensibly good offense going forward in Atlanta, although

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I know that's not been true the last couple of years.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I think the Nationals offense is positioned

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 2>to be really good for the next couple of years

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 3>As much as c J.

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Abrams isn't somebody that I've always been a big fan of.

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 2>That side's probably safer, but I think value wise, it's

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 2>fair on both On both ends, I.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Think it's pretty fair. Bets is the oldest still, you know,

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't have a bounce back, it's not gonna

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>go well for his value. Abrams is really interesting. You

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>know what, I'm gonna just say, I think this is fair.

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think the Miserowski Bets side might be

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the sexiest ten team keepers. It's not quite a dynasty,

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>so all of these guys are keepers. Though I think

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>it's relatively fair. I actually might side slightly with the

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Miserowski Bets side, especially if mis Like keeps going. But

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, two really good young talents in Riley and Abrams,

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's relatively fair.

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Hal asks what do you think I was going to say?

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 3>What do you think about him in the All Star Game?

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Do you think about that?

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>It's whatever? I mean, like, personally, I do agree. I

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>agree on the side of the players here that think

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>this is lame, like Pat Murphy defended it being like, hey,

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>come on, Goods, this is entertainment, and it's like yeah,

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's also not like guys have bonuses attached to that.

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think that if he takes away Now. Thank

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>god the Phillies paid out the All Star bonus to

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Cris Sanchez, who one hundred percent should have been the guy.

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>For a guy to pitch twenty five innings and be

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in the All Star Game if there was no one

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>else that was really worthy, if there wasn't a Chris Sanchez,

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm not going to cry about it.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to like be up in arms and

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, these kids but I think Pat Murphy's

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>wrong and he's defending his guy. We can laugh that

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Hobby Bayez is the starting center fielder and what has

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>he not played center in like forty games over Buxton,

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>But that was the fans choice, and I already think

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that is moronic that we allow that to happen. This

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>was on the manager side they decided to do this.

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't just think it's a flashy like you know, goofy,

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a spectacle like it's supposed to kind of be a spectacle,

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>except players' money is attached to this, and it's kind

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of like an honor. So I think they're they're wrong

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in that aspect. But you know, like Misroowski's really cool,

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>he's awesome, He's fun to see. It'll be fun to see.

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I do agree with the the players

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in that, like Chris Sanchez should have had that spot.

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they asked Ranger Suarez and he declined. After

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>this all happened, kind of probably like in a little

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of a protest of it. But I don't know,

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>are you like a fan of this?

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 3>No? I wasn't a fan of it.

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, not that it really matters, But like you said,

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 2>when things like incentives are tied to it, when there's

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 2>big money. I mean, fifty thousand dollars to them is

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 2>not as much as it is to us, obviously, but

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 2>it's still a good amount of money. So I'm glad

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 2>the Philly's paid up. I think it should have been Sanchez.

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I've been a big Sanchez fan. But I think the

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 2>people who are like, well, this is gonna help like

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 2>grow the game.

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 3>You're getting a young, exciting pitcher.

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 2>And I think that part is bs because most people

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 2>who are casuals who may or may not tune into

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 2>the game are not going to have any idea who

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Miserowski is. Even if he throws a shutout in it,

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 2>They're not going to really care who he is. There's

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 2>casuals who are not really baseball fans necessarily, but there's

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people who didn't even know who Mike

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Trout was for a long time.

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, dude, the casuals aren't going to be like, well,

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not watching that. Wait, Mizzerrowski's in now, I'm watching Like,

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>no one's gonna do that, so give me a break.

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it'll give you a TikTok reel or something exactly.

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think it's silly. Just a reminder

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to everybody. We got the live streams, and the live

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>streams are not going away. This show does go by

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the wayside. We answer some of your questions, but guess what,

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>we still got your back. Wednesdays on YouTube YouTube dot

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>com Slash Fantasy Pros m LB. Make sure you go follow,

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 1>make sure you go put on notifications because guess what,

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Joey P and Me we're live Wednesday, four pm Eastern.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I say, I don't know. I think we're going through

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the end of this month. They got to be honest

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>with you. I'm not one hundred percent sure. There's a

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of craziness going on, but I know we're going

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>to be here this week. There's I think we're post

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>All Star break. Then there's nothing going down. Perfect time

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>to talk second half. Go and subscribe hang with Joey

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and I. Baseball Fantasy Pros MLB has been hot all

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>season long, and all of the shows on Twitch, which

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>we do twelve pm Eastern every single day Twitch dot

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Tv Slash Fantasy Pros, those go up on the YouTube,

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So make sure you're following us on Twitch for the

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>lives Joey Alrico is going to be a regular on

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the show come August once the Joey p leave, So

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're locked in there. And if you can't

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>watch live, we got you covered on YouTube, so go

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe today. Before we get the rest, we had

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>house question, but we got l TB three with the

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>hand raised coming up on the chat LTB three, what

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>is up?

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Brother?

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>If you accept the thing and come up and hang

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>with us? Right after we were talking all Star Misraowski.

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So I wonder if this is like an all Star

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>based question or if we'll even get it because he's

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>got to accept it and come up here, going once,

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>going twice, and let's see, let's try it one more time.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Did I like?

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Click it wrong?

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Sold?

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Sold?

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>If you pop back up, you just let us know, brother.

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what's going down, but let's get to

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the next one. This was how what is strategy for

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>head to head with playoffs for young pitchers? He's got

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>schemes Crochet, Burns, Miz and Bubich. What would be your

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>strategy with two absolute banger of aces and Crochet and skins?

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 1>But then you got Burns Miz and I don't know

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>how you want to associate Bubitch in that, But what

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>would be your strategy with the young guys?

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 2>So Schemes and Crochet, there's nothing to really do, I

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 2>don't think unless, like with all of these guys, there

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 2>is some risk of shutdown. It's kind of mitigated for

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 2>Crochet because he's pitching for a competitive team, whereas with

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the others it's kind of a kind of competitive Cincinnati,

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 2>I guess. I think they've been decent and they're kind

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 2>of in the mix, and since and Milwaukee is in

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 2>the mix, yes, but I don't know that they're going

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 2>to want to really risk anything with a guy like Miserowski,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 2>and I think the same thing with Burns. They'll probably

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 2>not be shut down at all, But there is a

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 2>risk with any of these young guys.

0:21:58.280 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 3>At the end of the year, teams.

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Start to get a litle bit nervous and start throwing

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 2>them like four innings, three innings. We saw it last

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 2>year with Crochet when you start to push up against

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 2>innings limits. So that's a possibility. Bubitch, I think, is

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 2>the riskiest of this whole group, just because he is

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 2>already kind of pushing up on his innings where you'd

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 2>expect him to be for the entire year, just based

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 2>on where he's been the last couple of seasons. So

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 2>Buobach is somebody like I would be trying to actively

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 2>sell the other guys varying degrees of risk. I guess

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 2>Misrowski's probably fine, but I don't know. There is some

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 2>risk with all of them. If you get a nice offer,

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 2>especially if you get offered a hitter for any of them,

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 2>or a pitcher who is on a competitive team, a

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 2>truly competitive team, I think that makes a difference.

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 3>But there is risk with all of these guys. There

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 3>really is.

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely look to consolidate, especially Misroowski. I think

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Misrowski's value is so high. He's an All star. He

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>looks incredible out there. I have to imagine there's some

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>form of a cap that's in play. I will say,

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers need him, so I would listen if someone

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is really paying up burn I don't know if Burns'

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>value is worth moving off what he potentially could provide,

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>but I'm listening. I'm paying attention to the wire, and

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm really in the market to see if there's some

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:11.719
<v Speaker 1>like big type of trade that I can pull off.

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Especially for Mizerowski specifically, and as Hall said, you know,

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the four wins for Skeens is killing it, absolutely is.

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>That's why I still hold that that Zach Wheeler bet

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that I brought up a long time ago Joe on

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pros episode we did is the play because

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>how and how can how first can Paul Skeens be

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the favorite cy Young with four wins? But also how

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>can he win the award if he doesn't cross ten

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>wins overall comparative to what like Zach Wheeler is doing

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>or you know, even if you want to get into

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 1>logan web, I just I think betting against Skeens on

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the cy Young is the best play with how bad

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 1>that team is and four stupid wins for Skins, like legitimately,

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>like what does he got maybe thirteen fourteen more wins?

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Like he has to win more than fifty percent of

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>his games to get to double digits, which is it's.

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Crazy, yeahs pro, he started twenty games and the usual

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 2>numbers thirty two sometimes thirty three starts, so yeah, he's

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 2>got to win at least fifty percent. I think that

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Wheeler is going to be the cy Young winner. I've

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 2>bet it myself. Numbers are close enough with him and

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 2>with Skins. It depends on what metrics you look at specifically,

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 2>some of them Skiings is better, some of them. Whe

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Wheeler has a better SIERRA, he's a better strike up.

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Minus walk rate.

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 2>Skeens has a higher war he has a better FIP.

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 2>So it kind of depends on which stats you look at.

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 2>But Wheeler has been here for a long time. He's

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 2>been a finalist for the award. He's thirty five years old.

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 2>I think in the minds of the voters, this might

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 2>be one of the last times and not the last time,

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 2>that Wheeler puts up a season of this caliber, whereas

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 2>with Paul Skeins, we're probably going to see ten or

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 2>twelve more seasons of this caliber. So I think the

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 2>voters are going to probably lean towards Wheeler if the

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 2>underlying numbers are the same, especially because Wheeler has nine

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.959
<v Speaker 2>wins in nineteen starts. He's probably going to finish with

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 2>he sixteen something like that.

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>He's good. The current odds on Favorite now it's moved.

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>He's minus one twenty five. But Skeins is also minus

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>money at minus one oh five, So that's how close

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>this can change last hall Ittt also said like how

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>many more starts will he go? Five or more innings?

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they're really ratcheting down his innings right now.

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll kind of pair back up. But it's

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>fair they're really babying Paul Skins right now. And you

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>know what do they have to vuy for outside of

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>him winning a cy Young which but I think don't

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>make too much into that big dances. I have at

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>least eight points in every category. Things to you guys

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>currently in first place at ninety points. Just wanted to say,

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>appreciate all the work you all put in. Oh, I

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that man that's so nice to you. And he

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>had a question below saying which spar starting pitcher would

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys keep? I've got Hunter Brown or which three

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers? Hunter Brown, Freddy Peralta, Yuri, Pez Miserawski. I'm

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>leaning towards trying to trade Miserawski for a first baseman,

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe Naylor, vinp Kurtz. So I guess the question is

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is Miserowski who's on the outs here? Miserowski or Yuri?

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're keeping three pitchers, I mean Hunter Browns hasn't

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>been pitching well, but he looks like you'd be like

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the number one.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 2>One on the outs for me, would probably be peralta

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 2>of these guys.

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to well, yeah, I think I'm kind of

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>with that one maybe, But I'm also I like the

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>idea of trading Miserowski and even in a small keeper,

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.479
<v Speaker 1>but aim higher. See if you can aim higher than

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the guys that you're looking at, that's what I think

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you should.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 3>We're going to overpay.

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 2>People are going to overpay for Maserowski right now, with

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 2>all the hype and all the people putting him in

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 2>like the top twenty pitching rankings. He's brilliant. He is

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>absolutely brilliant. But I think you'd be able to get

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 2>like a top thirty or forty overall player for him

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 2>in the right deal.

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Agreed a last one here. In my first Roadow League ever,

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I've ranked eighth in saves, fourth and homers first, and

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>stolen base eri whip first and win oh so first

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>in stolen base eri whip first and wins second, a

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>batting average third and RBI and last in saves right now,

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>but projected to be seventh in saves should I forget

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>homers and saves and focus on keeping this standing where

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm at, or maybe try to get homer and RBIs

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>up even if it drops drops to second in stolen base,

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in third and batting average. So the question is which

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>side are you going sans getting away from homers and

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>saves and try to boost up the other categories or

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of hold suit.

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 2>I'd forget about any projections for saves because it's a

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 2>complete crap shoot and anybody, even the most accurate projections

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 2>for saves are not going to be able to predict

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 2>anything there.

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I think of how many guys might become new closers

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 1>in the next three weeks. You might have three or

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>four new closers on teams that sell off relievers that

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>are in front exactly.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Bednar might not be a closer Ken who knows what's

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 2>going to happen over the next few weeks, So there

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 2>could be some opportunity on the waiver wire to kind

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 2>of make up ground in that case. So I think

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 2>you kind of have to just evaluate your league for

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 2>the next little while, see who's available, See among the

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 2>closers in the league who you might be able to

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 2>pick up, because I think you could viably just punt it.

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like it's an eight team league just based

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 2>on the way you're describing eighth and last.

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 3>So the fact that you're.

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 2>First in the other you know, in four of the

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 2>other category, second in batting average, I'm assuming you're winning

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 2>this league. So I think you do have a little

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 2>bit of leeway here to kind of see where the

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 2>market goes with saves, if there's somebody you could pick up,

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 2>if there's perhaps a trade. Because you mentioned your first

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 2>and stolen bases, maybe there's a stolen base guy that

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 2>you can trade off and try and boost up your

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 2>saves a little bit. But I think you do have

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the luxury just projecting where you probably are in the

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 2>standings to kind of just play it out until the

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 2>trade deadline and just evaluate your team over the next

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 2>couple weeks, and also just to see who becomes available.

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't add any much more to that. I think

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>that's really great analysis. Quick let's do some quick hitting

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>at the end second halfs buy or sell these players

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned Ozzie Albi's. Ozzie Albi's has just struggled on

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the year. Do you think you can trust in holding

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>onto Albi's or do you need to just let go?

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:52.959
<v Speaker 1>So even outside of just buy, I'm not gonna even

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>ask you to buy. If you're an Albi's owner, do

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you hold for a second half or are you worried

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's been so bad and this team is probably

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>selling off that you don't want any part of it.

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that I don't want any part of it,

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 2>but I think that we're getting to a point where

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 2>there's not really much to hold out hope for. The

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 2>team has been awful, and any sample size you look at,

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 2>whether you break it down by the last couple of weeks,

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 2>by the whole season, Atlanta has been miserable, miserable this year. Offensively,

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 2>they are the eighteenth ranked team of the ninety seven

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.719
<v Speaker 2>WRC plus. So the surrounding environment's not helping him, and

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 2>he's not helping you. Seven homers and seven steals. I

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 2>guess it's not the end of the world if he

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 2>finishes doubling that and it's like fifteen and fifteen. But

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 2>he's hitting two twenty his twenty nine RBI, his on

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 2>base percentage is two ninety. He's never getting on base

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 2>to be scored. You know, the data has gone in

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 2>the wrong direction in terms of the barrel rate, in

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 2>terms of the hard hit rate. If you look at

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 2>the plate discipline metrics, they're not too far off from normal.

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, zone contact, oh, swing swinging, strike rates, they're

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 2>all about normal. But he's just not making good contact.

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, a three percent barrel rate, twenty nine percent

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 2>hard hit rate, that's pretty terrible. He's barreled up eleven

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 2>balls the entire season. So I just don't know that

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 2>there's really much hope and thinking he's gonna turn around

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 2>this year. There's a good chance on buying back in

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 2>on him next year, just you know, expecting that price

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 2>to go down into probably the one fifty to one

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 2>seventy range.

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Overall.

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 2>I'll probably have a couple shares next year. But I

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 2>think this year you're most most of the listeners are

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 2>probably in ten or twelve team leagues.

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 3>You don't have to wait around anymore. I think you

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 3>can cut eight all.

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, A couple more quicker hitters Mookie Bets. Mookie Bets

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>has not been the Mookie Bets that we've known. Joe

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:39.479
<v Speaker 1>and I talked about it on the trade video. Two

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.719
<v Speaker 1>forty four eleven homers, six stolen bases. Are you a

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>buyer of a bigger seller second half on Mookie Bets,

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>or do you think we're going to get a lot

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 1>more of what we've gotten in the first half.

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 2>I am not overly optimistic the fact that he's still

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 2>in a great lineup, like he has fifty six runs,

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 2>forty five ribbi. Those are going to be fine by

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 2>the end of the year. But again, another guy who's

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 2>just not making great contact. Five percent barrel rate, thirty

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 2>five percent hard hit rate. I don't think he's gonna

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 2>be somebody that you're ever dropping. But I don't think

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 2>we're getting prime Mookie Betts probably ever again.

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 3>At this point. He's gonna be thirty three years old

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 3>pretty soon.

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Cease It is one of the worst qualified ras

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>out there. He's near the top. Expected numbers are still

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>so dramatically better than what he's putting out. Are you

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>buying or selling Dylan Ceese in the second half.

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm still buying all the expected numbers, like you mentioned,

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 2>are still good. Three sixty nine FIP is very good.

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 2>His Sierra at three forty one is the best of

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 2>his career. The walks are not a big problem. He's

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 2>giving up ten percent barrel rate, which is a problem,

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 2>but you know, just based on a lot of the numbers,

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 2>he's still getting whifts outside of the zone. The swinging

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 2>strike rate is still good. The stuff is still good.

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm a big buyer on Dylan Ceas right.

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Now buys and sells. We got the video for you

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>if you guys want to check out on YouTube as well.

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe pie Zepia and myself are talking about three buys,

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>three cells for the second half. If you're looking for more,

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're locked in to leading off twelve pm

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on our twitch Twitch dot tv Slash Fantasy Pros,

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>or of course on the YouTube YouTube dot com Slash

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros MLB, where the show drops about an hour

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>hour and a half at the most after we air

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>on the live stream plus, you can check out or yeah,

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the livestream on Twitch plus you can check out the

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>actual livestream on YouTube Wednesday's four pm Eastern where we're

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>answering your guys's questions. We still got you back on

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the back half of this season. That's going to do

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it for us. Thank you so much for hanging out

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>as you have all season long in the discord. You

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>want to check out the rest of the community, go

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasypros dot com slash chat sign up today get

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>access to all the different rooms. That's how you do

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the home run contest. By the way, upgrade to Premium

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so you've got access to everything. Talk with the amazing

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>community and be a part of the peanuts and cracker jacks.

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>For Joe Rico, I'm Chris. Well, you guys have a

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>fantastic one and we will talk to you in the

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>second half here right here on Fantasy Pros. Bye friends,

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 2>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 2>us

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify,

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at Fantasy Pros,

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>slash Fantasy Pros MLB