WEBVTT - Equities Pull Back as Bonds Signal Warnings

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now we start struggling. A really wonderful Friday

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 2>with Sebastian Page had a global multi asset share of

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Asset Allocation Steering Committee. Tro Price acclaimed author the best

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 2>book on diversification I've seen in his new book is

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 2>out as well, The Psychology of Leadership. I want to

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 2>go to Jain's Nordvik. Damien came walking and screaming about

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 2>with exante data and the single sentence from ends into

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 2>the weekend is strategic shifts are in motion. What's in

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 2>motions page?

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, the last forty eight hours, it's about the

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 3>thirty year bond and it's gone up above five percent.

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a lot of hoopla about not much.

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 3>If I look at the long run chart, you know,

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 3>like Damien, it's a long weekend. I'm actually looking at

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 3>charts and I'm interested.

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 2>If look at the.

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.559
<v Speaker 3>Long run chart of the thirty year yield, it's actually

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 3>not that far from five percent.

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Right, Well, I mean look for me, I think Ira

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 4>Josie said it best our us SO chief rate strategist.

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 4>He said, you know, the mark to market loss of

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 4>putting a negative carried position on the thirty year. I mean,

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 4>if you think thirty years are going to go up

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 4>on austerity or whatever you're you know, whatever you're thinking.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's just it's not a profitable prese mean,

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 4>the negative tract.

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 2>This is great, But the real issue is why is

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the dollar tanking? You know, on the what does trow

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 2>price say about a new structural week dollar?

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 3>So short term on our platform, we're C two on

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the dollars. C two means we're actually bullish short term

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 3>on the dollar. But Tom, this is the question of

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 3>the hour because if you look at April right by

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 3>the way, the stock market was flat in April, or

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 3>close to flat, if you can believe it, despite what

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 3>happened during the month. But if you look at what's

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 3>been happening with the dollar, it's unusual. Because economic theory

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 3>will tell you when you put tariffs on the best

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 3>way for the exporting country to offset them is to

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 3>devalue their currency, so you cheapen their goods to make

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 3>up for the tariff that is paid at the quarter.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 3>The market work, and for a while it looked like

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 3>economic theory was working and the dollar should be stronger.

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 3>But then it's not behaving that way. And second thing

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 3>is even in the middle of selloffs I think April, third,

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 3>and fourth and huge market volatility, as Tom would say,

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 3>you know on the Vick spikes, Well the dollar was

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:50.279
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily the safe haven in all this volatility.

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, Tom, I'm disappointed, and I'll tell you why, because

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Sebastian came in this morning and it didn't bring in

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 4>LinkedIn sensation daughter Olivia, and you know, I'm disappointed that

0:02:58.400 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 4>she's not here, by the way, I know it's early.

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 4>First sherobably a school, but you know, Sebastian, you're going

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 4>to probably take Olivia to Europe. And I know one

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 4>of your trade calls right now is you're bullish on

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 4>international act I'm sorry, really European equities, let's be clear here,

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 4>and it's not because of the value component there. It's

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 4>because of the momentum of the dollar cell off.

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 2>So talk to us a little bit about that.

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 4>On a month of a month or quarter of Is

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 4>there some longevity to the styllar weakness on a quarter

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 4>of a quarter basis.

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Here Damien love that question. Love even more of the

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 3>reference to our financial education video that I've been doing

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:30.359
<v Speaker 3>with my daughter. They're all over LinkedIn loving have a look.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 3>She's really interested about compound interests. By the way, behind

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 3>the scenes, she still wants to spend more than she

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 3>probably should. Look on Europe, we're long European equities. I

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 3>think this is a shorter term view for US six

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 3>to twelve months. Longer term. We're not in the camp.

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm not in the camp of this is the end

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 3>of US exceptionalism. US tech is a force to.

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 5>Be reckoned with.

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 3>But right now there's still a valuation advantage for European equities,

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:03.279
<v Speaker 3>even if you neutralize the sector effect. You have stimulus,

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 3>you have dovish central banks. You have a banking sector

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 3>that's doing pretty well now they've escaped.

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 2>What kind of European stocks I mean, are we buying

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Nesle or we buying BMP Perry book.

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 3>So our stock pickers those that implement our slcation strategy,

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 3>like industrial healthcare and banks that banks are at one

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 3>time book one times book value. Before the financial crisis

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 3>in Europe there were two times book value. They struggled

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 3>limping out of the financial crisis and with negative interest rates,

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 3>that's not good for banks. Now we're in a positive

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 3>interest rate environment, they're still trending around one times book value.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 3>So we like those.

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 4>So, Tom, you see what Impassion's done here. He's taken

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 4>what is effectively a value call, but he's wrapped it

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 4>up in a big fat momentum swing here in euro dollargy.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I agree that right back to what you were saying,

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a huge gamble about the momentum.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's it's not right now. I mean, look

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 4>at the euro relative to and by the way, I

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 4>mean it's on the i of the beholder, right. And

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 4>if you look at emerging market currencies, for example, nineteen

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 4>of twenty one of our versus you know, the dollar

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 4>this year, but only three are up versus the Euro

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 4>this year, So you're really leaning into the factor, at

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 4>least you know your your currency strategist are leaning into

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 4>the fact that you know there may be a little

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 4>bit of like again, some legs to this euro strength here,

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 4>just because it's the best of the of the rest.

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess well Themian Bloomberg Surveillance Radio is the only

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 3>show where I can get a little bit more quantitative

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 3>and theoretical. That's why Tom is my absolute favorite host

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 3>and anchor.

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Are okay you non linear right now?

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, a lot of things are nonlinear in markets. Markets

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 3>are more nonlinear than they've been historically. If you look

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 3>at tails on both sides, the left side and the

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 3>right side, positive and negative. But what it's going to

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 3>say is valuation and momentum when they align together. Yes,

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 3>historically that is a much stronger signal than either signal

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 3>working alone, and that's been studied across markets.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 2>We welcome all of you across the nation. Good morning

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 2>on Serious XM. I was lectured, did an event with Pimco.

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 2>It's a small startup money on the West coast. Sebastian

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 2>page of t row Price. How about those orioles that

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 2>endorsements really working out this year? Anyways, folks, good morning

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 2>across this Memorial Day nation. Damien Sassar and Time, can

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 2>we welcome you. I can't say enough on a sleepy

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Friday as you get into the weekend, the markets are

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 2>not sleepy the dollar dynamics right now are extraordinary. Berry

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 2>King Green and Damien Sasa are in the eight o'clock

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 2>hour that got Ducky bumps over that on YouTube. Subscribe

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg Podcasts. Thank you for that, just growing each

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 2>in every day. Damien sas are to Sebastian.

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 4>Page, well, I just think it's about growth expectations here

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 4>in the US, right, I mean, they really are falling.

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, and so you know, the question is how

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 4>far do they go or how far before the FED

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 4>catches up and wakes up to this. So I'm just

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 4>curious to hear what you know. Your great expectations are

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 4>for the great Fed expectations are sorry through the end

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 4>of this year, but more importantly in the first half

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 4>of now next year. It's just how deep do we

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 4>think the terminal FED funds rate can go?

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 3>You have to account for the possibility of an upside

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 3>surprise and inflation when you answer that question. It's not

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 3>just about growth. That's why it's tough to be the FED.

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Right now, that's right, I'm going to stop the show, folks.

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm interviewing Damian Sassar and Sebastian Page. Horse and cart

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 2>does inflation go up as the cart because the horse

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 2>is the dollar weaker, the debt and the deficit bigger.

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 2>How's that sequence work to get higher inflation.

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'll hit that first, And it really comes down

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 4>to whether the hard data catches up to the soft

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 4>data and the resilience of the US economy and whether

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 4>or not this can all play through. And I don't

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 4>think we've really gotten a whiff of what a fourteen

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 4>and a half percent effective tariff rate, because that's what

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about exxanthy right if you talk about China

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 4>forty percent plus the sectoral and that's up.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>From two and a half percent from three to fourteen, right, right.

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 4>So I mean like, I don't I don't know what

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 4>that looks like, and I don't know what this US

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 4>economy looks like in that environment, and so what the

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 4>market I guess if I had to get asymmetric on you,

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 4>I think the asymmetry is to deeper cuts.

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 5>You know when they do.

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Come Sebastian, Damian, Sebastian, I'll get they're both the great

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 2>tie up in Quebec. Sebastian, when when I did Quebec

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 2>go for Kearney, they sort of did. Didn't that Edmonton?

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 2>They did? Good morning Prime Minister Kearney Sebastian. Very importantly

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 2>here do the Americans get more inflation because of what

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 2>we see now in currencies and with the Build Better

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 2>America BBB bill and all.

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 3>It's part of it on imports. So you're today we're

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 3>running at two point four percent inflation. If you analyze

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 3>the monthly prints, that's not too bad. The one year

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 3>swap is looking at three point three. So the expectation

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 3>is that inflation's coming up. I think there's a risk

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 3>to the upside because of commodities. Some commodities are trending up,

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 3>precious metals and soft commodities because of wages.

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 2>About thirty three dollars.

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 4>Just the towers alone, right, it's you know, you would

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 4>know better than I. Just what is the impact of

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 4>these terror I mean, what is it going to do

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 4>to inflation? To prices here? I mean Walmart cost conounts,

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 4>is earnings next week? I mean we're not going to

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 4>get any look, but they're certainly going to, you know,

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 4>talk around some of that stuff. And it's just going

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 4>to be interesting to see you right in the especially

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 4>the input prices I mean and you know, all that

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 4>stuff is starting to trend to act.

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So Tom, this is like we're having our mini

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 3>asset allocation committee here, because in our ass location committee

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 3>we have bulls and bears, and we have debate, and

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 3>now we're neutral or close to neutral between stocks and bonds.

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 3>But now Damien is sounding a bit bearish here, so

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to give Devil's advocate the other side of it.

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Earnings growing thirteen percent this quarter relative to the same

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 3>quarter last year. The FED more interested in cutting than hiking,

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 3>and growth, yes, is slowing, but most of it is

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 3>in the soft data. There's been a massive drop in

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 3>the soft data. But if you want to look at

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 3>one data point on hard data, I would look at claims,

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 3>and claims are still in the low two hundreds. People

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 3>are not getting fired, right.

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 2>We've heard this this week. I really can't say enough,

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 2>folks about the anecdote that we see that America is

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 2>vibrant and busy. At least the upper third of people

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 2>consuming is they can. There's a wonderful book out now,

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 2>The Psychology of Leadership by Sebastian Page. This comes after

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 2>his tour de force on All the Traps and pitfalls

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 2>of diversification for parents at home falling apart because the

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Brady kids are getting ready for summer. What is the

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 2>psychology of leadership for parents to get through this summer

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 2>with teenagers?

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 3>You know I have two teenagers, so that question hits home.

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Tom. I'll say to that question, I'll.

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 3>Say this, people underestimate how important it is to have

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 3>long term goals, to think long terms. And I think

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 3>that applies to the younger.

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 2>You got to give your kids the gift.

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Of long term, the long term goal and thinking long

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 3>term and and guiding your actions day to day based

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 3>on what you're trying to do long term.

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 2>Is it okay that the older teenager walks in, says

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 2>nothing and closes the bedroom door discuss.

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, for me and my experiences, when you come

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 4>down to the kitchen and your daughter's they're eating, and

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 4>I say, oh, hey, what you eat and then she

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 4>goes stop badgaming me and she just runs out the door.

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 4>So I understand what you're talking about. And she's beautiful anyway,

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 4>don't get me started. But we all have our experiences there.

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 4>I think we have to take this back to the

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 4>job market, because you make a really, really really good point.

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 4>What will it takes a bashing page for payrolls to

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 4>come off here in the US? I mean what I

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 4>mean what and when? I mean like, when do you

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 4>if it were going to happen and we had to

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.439
<v Speaker 4>play that scenario out, what should we be looking for?

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 5>What are the first indicators there?

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 3>So of the lagging labor market indicators, the least lagging

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 3>is the claims. So I would look at claims and

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 3>right now they're holding in.

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a statistic on claims? Was a tip point?

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Is it two sixty to eighty?

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Look the long run app riche on claims is three fifty.

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 3>I know, so they can go higher. They can go higher,

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 3>But that is potentially the least lagging of the lagging

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 3>labor marketing. Edvans and oilers bullish on the Oilers, Sebastian

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 3>page of Quebec and sure book, thank you so much.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 2>He is the t road price.

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Barry King Green at Berkeley Professor Ike and Green, thank

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 2>you so much for joining Bloomberg this morning. Barry, I've

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 2>got to go back to you start just staying in France,

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 2>and you must read for any kid getting into the game.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Exorbitant privilege is Donald Trump furtthering away. Our exorbitant privilege.

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 6>Is I think the dollar has been tarnished significantly since

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 6>Liberation Day. It's safe haven status is eroding more quickly

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 6>than before. I've long thought that the dollar would have

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 6>to share the international stage with other currencies. I didn't

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 6>think that would that process would accelerate so grammatically this year.

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 2>What is so important here, Barry, is a legacy back

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 2>to the nineties of the unexpected. I was with you

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 2>at a G seven meeting in Singapore, hugely historic, a

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 2>lifetime ago. Then we were worried about the shadows in

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 2>the unexpected. Now Here in twenty twenty five, what is

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 2>the unexpected? You're studying at Berkeley. What's the surprise out

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 2>there that concerns you well?

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 6>I think that the markets have responded to the ninety

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 6>day pause in the UK deal by thinking that the

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 6>period of elevated uncertainty is over. And exactly as you

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 6>said before, a few minutes ago. Tom, the uncertainty and

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 6>the spike in the VIX continue. We haven't really seen

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 6>that spill over into distress in financial markets, but I

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 6>think that distress could be coming. I think what's happening

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 6>in the cryptosphere could spill over and to mainstream financial markets.

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 6>There's a lot to worry about that hasn't materialized yet.

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 2>As very King Green looks at the long term, we

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 2>must consider the data check is Professor Eiching Green states

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 2>of vix's out now four big figures twenty four point

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 2>five four, the SPX futures in negative ninety three now

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 2>futures negative six twenty six, and dollars weaker. Barry a

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 2>privileged to bring you, Damien SaaS Hour of Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 2>truly expert on the interior dynamics of em currencies, Damien.

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Professor Eicken Green, you discussed this world of international capital mobility,

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 4>and you know you talk about US its ability to

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 4>run trade deficits in order to provide foreign reserves to

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the world. You know, just how much

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 4>longer can it continue to do that? I mean, and

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 4>what other currency might serve that role if the dollar

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 4>is no longer you know, as you rightly point out,

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 4>the world reserve currency.

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 6>We're accelerating toward the cliff where the appetite for US

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 6>free use abroad begins to cry up. I think we're

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 6>already seeing hints of that in financial markets, at which

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 6>point there will be a reluctance to acquire and hold

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 6>and use dollars by secral banks and other investors around

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 6>the world. But the answer to your second question, Damien,

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 6>who can step up to provide that international liquidity if

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 6>not the United States? The answer for the moment is

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 6>no one. That there aren't enough high quality eurosecurities available

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 6>to the rest of the world. China is still a

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 6>small player financially, despite all the chatter about it growing role.

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 6>Non traditional reserve currencies like the Aussie dollar and the

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 6>Canadian dollar too small to make a difference. So I

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 6>think we're staring down into the abyss of a global

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 6>liquidity shortage.

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 4>Professor I can Green. The dollar bulls would argue that

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 4>the US military comes into play when you're thinking about

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 4>the dollars reserve status. Talk to us about you know,

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 4>the fact that the last seventy five years we've been

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 4>free of war, there's been global financial security in the

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 4>form of dollar reserve assets. Talk to us about the

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 4>case for dollar bulls. Does it still hold up well?

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 6>For the last seventy five years, our alliance partners have

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 6>held and used dollars, partly as a show of thanks

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 6>of goodwill, partly because they believe the US will be

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 6>a reliable steward of their balances. Those alliances have been

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 6>called into question. When and whether the US military will

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 6>be deployed to defend our security partners is now up

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 6>in the air, so is the appetite for dollars.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Agreeing with us at Berkeley here on Global FX, I'm

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 2>going to turn to the US debt and deficit here

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 2>in a moment off of his iconic twenty twenty one

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 2>book on our Public Debt. But Barry, first, I have

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 2>to ask you, and I'm not going to say what's

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 2>a question you would ask god Besson. It's far beneath

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 2>you to act like a journalist. If you were at

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 2>the White House today or at Treasury, if you were

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.439
<v Speaker 2>sitting there with a Secretary Treasury, what advice would you

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 2>give him? Given the president that he serves well.

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 6>Number one definitively takes some of the more hair brained

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 6>ideas off the table, taxing foreign holdings of US securities.

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 6>Number two get more serious about addressing the deficit problem,

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 6>which is getting worse rather than better. And number three

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 6>camp down the uncertainty around crede policy.

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 2>The golden fetters, globalizing cap I love Hall of Mirrors,

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 2>the Great Depression, Great Recession, and the uses and misuses

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 2>of history. But the book very I can greed to

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 2>stop me cold complete tangent. I thought in defense of

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 2>public debt. Everyone of every political persuasion is apoplectic right now.

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 2>It's the very log linear growth of our deficit and

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 2>our debt. Are we becoming japan Like? Are we reaching

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 2>a tipping point of too much debt, too much interest expense?

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 6>Yes, the tipping point is coming. That book made the

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 6>point that public debt can be useful in an emergency,

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 6>in a financial crisis, in a war, in a pandemic,

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 6>when you have to mobilize all available resources. But when

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 6>the emergency passes, you want to restore the government's capacity

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 6>to borrow in the future. And we did the first part.

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 6>We did not do the second.

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Professor I can Green, my chief USA interest rate strategists,

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 4>Ira Jersey, and we were just talking, and he discusses

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 4>this new class of bond vigilantes that they're taking the reins,

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 4>that they're rebuking fiscal large ass that the psychology of

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 4>global government bond investors has shifted, and rather abruptly at that.

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 4>What are your thoughts there?

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 6>I think your interest rate strategists are exactly right. I

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.719
<v Speaker 6>think the US government has had a lot of leewaight

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 6>incur debt to run deficits, the backdrop being that it

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 6>is going to remain financially reliable and prudent in the

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 6>longer run, and there is no evidence of the latter.

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 6>There is no strategy for stabilizing the debt to GDP

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 6>ratio and bringing down the deficits. So I think investors

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 6>are really looking at treasuries in a very different way

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 6>than they have in the past.

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Professor Aiki, We've got to move to the markets of

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 2>folks who are blowing up the show. Given everything we see,

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I can grieve driving the vix out to a five

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 2>handle twenty five point one four, the dowdown six hundred

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 2>and thirty points. Barry Ike and Green and Ken Rogoff

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 2>mentions you in my book of the Summer our dollar

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 2>your problem. He mentions Ike and Green, like two thirds

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 2>of the way through the book, where did our moral

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>compass go, the calvinistic heritage of this nation to at

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 2>least try to pay our bills in God's name? Barry,

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Ike and Green, where did that drift to? Well?

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 6>I think it's drifted into the land of non facts,

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 6>where everyone can any everyone can assert what they want

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 6>about the state of the national finances. The Congressional Budget Office,

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 6>which states the truth or the closest to reality we have,

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 6>doesn't carry the weight on Capitol Hill or in the

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 6>White House that it deserves that it should.

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Verry, I can mean honored to have you today. Thank

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 2>you so much for joining Bloomberg, and we are fortunate

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 2>to have you on this today of market crisis. Professor

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Eichingreen at the University of California at Berkeley.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Cocklay and Android

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.479
<v Speaker 2>We try to find a sense of calm with Emily Rowland.

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 2>She agreed to come on if I wouldn't mention the

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Boston Red Sox, where thrilled she could join us from

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the John Hancock Company. This morning, Emily, the panic here

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend at kitchens at barbecues is going to

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 2>be sell US big stocks like Tariff, Layden, Apple. You disagree.

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 7>You know, when we think about what's going on with

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 7>markets right now, Tom, investors are really trading on feelings

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 7>and not facts. This is a sentiment driven market, whether

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 7>it's sell everything US, whether that's stocks, bonds, dollars. But

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 7>when you look underneath the hood at the facts, earnings

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 7>growth most importantly to US and the US. We just

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 7>saw Q one earnings come in at fourteen percent. Nine

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 7>percent is what analysts are penciling in for the year.

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 7>You look over at Europe, earnings growth this quarter was

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 7>negative eight percent, and analysts are revising down earnings estimates

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 7>to around three percent in Europe. You look at the front,

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 7>the macro backdrop, and the United States growth is holding

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 7>in the city economic Surprise index is actually perking up.

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 7>The hard data is coming in positive. We're seeing the

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 7>opposite happen in Europe as their data is coming in.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 7>Weaker growth is struggling overseas. Yet you've seen this massive

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 7>capital rotation out of the US into Europe. We would

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 7>fade it and use those proceeds to invest in the

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 7>United States.

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 2>It's so opposite. So many of the actually think she

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 2>actually thinks the reds sucks are going to win ten

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 2>in a row in August.

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, And I got to ask you, and I

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 4>just said it before. Two to three cuts are pricing

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 4>before the end of the year by the Fed. And

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 4>the Fed's made no secret about its asymmetric view on

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 4>policy rates and inflation. Is there a possibility that the

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 4>Fed can move more aggressively before the end of this year.

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, I probably not, especially given some of the fiscal

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 7>developments that we've seen. I think one reason that the

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 7>bond market is repriced for fewer rate cuts this year

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 7>is because now we may have this fiscal thrust coming

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 7>through as a result of this big, beautiful bill that's

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 7>potentially coming through Washington. So the more fiscal stimulus you

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 7>need to do, are that your plan to do the

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 7>less monetary policy stimulus that you need to do. So

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing a big shift on that front, and I

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 7>think that probably pushes out the FED to later in.

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 2>The year and the big beautiful Bill. Margaret Brennan of

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 2>CBS still scheduled to be with us at the top

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 2>of the nine o'clock. Our Craig Moffatt on Apple will

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 2>be with us. He's been canscious. Mike Green will join us.

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Some simplified asset management as well. Damien, please to Emily.

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Rowland, Emily, US GDP growth expectations have fallen off a cliff.

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean talking looking just at Q four our year

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 4>over year, I mean, my goodness, I mean it just

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 4>fell off a cliff here. And so I'm just curious

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 4>to hear your thoughts about the dollar. I mean, what

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 4>are your thoughts on the dollar here? I mean, what

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 4>are you guys seeing on a forward basis? I mean,

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 4>is the end of the dollar's hege money at risk here?

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 7>No, we don't believe in the death of the US dollar.

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 7>That narrative does tend to resurface every few years. The

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 7>dollars still the world's reserve currency. We've seen this really

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 7>notable dynamic where yields have backed up at the same

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 7>time that the dollars weekend. That almost never happens, and

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 7>I think it is a result of the sentiment around

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 7>sell everything America.

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 5>With the US.

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 7>I'm not saying we're great, but we're sort of the

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 7>cleanest shirt and the dirty laundry. From an economic growth

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 7>perspective here, that should actually bring a flood of dollars

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 7>onto our shores. Other central banks are cutting the US

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 7>is on hold for now. All of those traditional dynamics

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 7>that we look at suggest that the dollar should not

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 7>be experiencing weakness, and that line.

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 2>That optimism is like what you would hear from Bill Gross,

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 2>the founder of PIMCO. He used to love to talk

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 2>about the cleaner shirt. And the other thing I would say,

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Emily to your Boston college is one Pte Lynch at

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Fidelity years ago said you have to stay the course,

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 2>explained people petrified or bewildered or confused, how to not

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 2>panic and take the four to oh one k to cash.

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 7>It's so important. Peter Lynch lives right down the street

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 7>from me here, and another great investor, of course, Warren Buffett,

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 7>said recently, just don't bet against America. When you think

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 7>about the incredible innovation that these companies in the United

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 7>States have. We have a massive overweight to high quality companies.

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 7>A lot of those are found in the US technology space.

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 7>And when we think about what really drives markets over time,

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 7>I think one of the most important things to remember

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 7>is stock prices follow profit. We are investing in companies,

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 7>not countries, and we want to think about where can

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 7>you find that earnings growth engine. And as we look

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 7>across the world, we're still finding in the US. Yes,

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 7>sentiment can be a powerful force over time. Momentum can

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 7>be a powerful force over short periods of time. We

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 7>do not use momentum and sentiment in our investment process.

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 7>We use cycle analysis, we use fundamental analysis, and right

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 7>now we want to gravitate to those high quality companies,

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 7>most of them are found in the United States.

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Emily Roland, thank you so much.

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple, Colock Play, and

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business Up. You can also

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal.

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 6>We get a.

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Huge response when Joel Lavorgna joins us. There's just no

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 2>other way. Thank you so much for thanking time this morning. Short,

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 2>did you speak to the president last night?

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 5>I have not.

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 8>No, I haven't, but thank you for having me, and.

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 5>We have a lot to talk about.

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 2>We have a lot to talk about. Help me here,

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Joe Lavorna, with the presumption of our global Wall Street

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 2>listeners worldwide across this nation, that Besson will walk back

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the president's enthusiasms. Is that a strategy.

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 8>The president has a negotiating strategy which I would argue

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 8>has been largely successful.

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 5>We probably will disagree on this.

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 2>Ratings folks not known CNN had this. Thank you CNN.

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 2>His ratings have gone up in the last ten days.

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, I'll actually you know me, well, I will say

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 8>something else. If you look at the polling Tom polling

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 8>that's been good in sixteen, twenty and twenty four take

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 8>Rafts Mussin for example, Pauling as of last night had

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 8>the economy moving in the right direction at its highest

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 8>reading in sixteen years.

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 5>So there's a lot of good stuff here.

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 8>So I don't think there's a you cried, Well, this

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 8>is a negotiation and the intent and desire is to

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 8>read on shore and manufacturing high value out of here,

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 8>So that will ultimately be the President's the president's decision,

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 8>and Secretary Best will follow that.

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Joe, Damian wants to get inbod I got to follow

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 2>that up as well. So we have a negotiating tactic

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 2>the Secretary Treasure with David Weston here in exactly two hours.

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 2>And then do you just presume there'll be some make

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 2>nice nice delay where we get a sixty day ninety

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 2>day delay.

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 8>Maybe, or there'll be a deal tom there'll be a

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 8>deal that come on. Well, let me say a framework,

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 8>because people talked about the deals.

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 5>I got all this pushback to President's not going to pivot.

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 5>You can't get a deal done. It's a framework for

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 5>a discussion.

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 8>I'm optimistic that it will be resolved in the US's advantage.

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Should I define framework for you? A framework is where

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 2>you're in negotiations to get afterthought, to empty the dishwasher.

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 2>That's what a framework is.

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 4>Joe, I'd love to get your opinion on the dollar

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 4>as the world reserve currency. And the reason I ask

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.719
<v Speaker 4>it is this. I actually had long been a proponent

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 4>of the thing that you know, the dollar. It's almost

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 4>a bad thing for the Fed. It almost makes the

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 4>Fed have to make decisions that are not necessarily based

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 4>on the US economy alone, but the rest of the

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 4>world writ large because of the dollars influenced the world's

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 4>reserve currency. Now that it seems to be and again

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm not calling for the end of king dollar, but

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, some of the shine seems to be rubbing

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 4>off of it. Here do we think does the president

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:22.959
<v Speaker 4>does the administration think that a weaker dollar is good

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 4>for America?

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 8>The administration does not want to lose this reserve status,

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 8>and certain instances the dollar is artificially high visa these

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 8>certain countries, but in general no. I think if strong

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 8>dollar is reflective of the fact the US is basically

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 8>the strongest industrial economy in the world from a GDP perspective. Perspective, however,

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 8>your Bloomberg audience and Tom Kean will love this. The

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 8>problem with the FED is this abundant reserve approach to

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 8>operating monetary policy.

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 5>We've got abundant reserves.

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 8>I would move away from that and go back to

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 8>the older system with the balance sheets smaller.

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Joeli Varna with this with SMBC Nico Securities part of

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 2>the Sumatoma Group of Japan, I can talk about Jamands

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 2>here in with this Damien Sasa this morning. Welcome across

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the nation. The doubt negative. My eyes are family, Damon, Yeah,

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it's negative three thirty seven.

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 4>Right now, DJ, I mean we have to ask you

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 4>about Japan, the boj's role in the global financial system,

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 4>the systemic risk of it being the net creditor to

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the world. And you know now what

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing with inflation ticking up in Japan. Do you

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 4>think there's any real risk that a lot of that

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 4>those offshore holdings are going to need to be repatriated

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 4>on shore now now?

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 8>And you don't see I mean, because well we were

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 8>worried about Taiwan a few weeks ago. It's a nice

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 8>Bloomberg article. I give you guys a plug. And how

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 8>long did that last? There was issues last summer, was

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 8>on why we had a big move in the nick

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 8>I and JG B eials. By the way, j G

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 8>B eyals had been leading this recent rise higher, but

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 8>it's also been globally, which is also like want to

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 8>push back against the narrative that the market's selling off.

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 8>By the way, the market's exactly where it was a

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 8>week ago before the Moody's downgrade.

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 5>The surprise downgrade.

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 8>But this isn't about the budget being big and causing

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 8>the market to sell off. So again the narrative I

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 8>think is incorrect. But no, I'm not worried about systemic issues.

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 2>And why are we worried about the budget then.

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 8>Because that's just that's just the easy, low hanging fruit,

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 8>simple narrative that people don't really have to think.

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Center GDP, I mean we on equivalent debt and deficit.

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 8>The well, the thing is the numbers that are coming

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 8>from CBO. Moodies apparently use CBO's numbers. Citizens sure it

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 8>can be for a responsible budget. They all use the

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 8>same numbers. I don't think they're correct. I mentioned this

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 8>maybe the last time in that's all.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 2>The present, that CEO's data is not correct.

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 8>That the forecasts are unbelievably pessimistic assuming one point eight

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 8>percent GDP growth the next ten years.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 2>So as Malpass would say, it's the growthiness that's not

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 2>in there. Granted you can't predict the growthiness, but you're

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 2>saying we're going to have a sustained growth rate to

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 2>get us through.

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, let's say let's say we had growth at say

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 8>two and a half percent. That's I think we could

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 8>be three, but let's say two and a half. That's

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 8>an extra two trillion revenue to tariffs. They're going to

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 8>raise two hundred billion this year. That's going to account

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 8>for something over the next handful of years that won't

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 8>even be in the numbers because it's not part of

0:31:58.240 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 8>the official scoring.

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:02.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to say, everybody listening, whatever your political persuasion,

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 2>this is a really, really valid study away from the

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 2>debt gloom. Do you grow your way out of the

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 2>problem that's worked for a few decades to.

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 5>Say it worked in the late nineties.

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Damien.

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 4>Well Joe, I mean I have to ask you about

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 4>the disconnect between the alt from the hard data here

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 4>in the US and whether or not you think there's

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, something coming around the next corner. Do you

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 4>know what I'm saying there? I mean, I know, this

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:29.239
<v Speaker 4>US economy has been exceptional, it really has been. I

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 4>know it's resilient, it really has been. Earnings have been

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 4>super resilient, and I agree with all of it, and

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 4>it can continue. But I mean, you know the whispers

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 4>that the hard data is going to catch up to

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 4>this drop in sentiment. I mean, do you believe in

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 4>that or do we have it reversed? I mean it's

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 4>the yeah, so I would say. So what I did

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 4>is I went back and looked.

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 8>Because the weak data was telling us recession in twenty

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 8>two and twenty three, it didn't happen. And then some

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 8>of the data recently has suggested the same. I remember that,

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 8>so of course, so I what I did is I

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 8>went back to look, let's look at some of the harder,

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 8>high frequency data. How did that perform in twenty two

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 8>and twenty three. What's it look like now? Is saying recession?

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 8>No change to our sales are strong, motor vehicle gasoline

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 8>demand is strong.

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 2>We've heard this joke.

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 5>Yes, you've heard this claim. So no, I don't.

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 8>The hard data will turn sorry the week data.

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 5>The soft data rather will turn up. Hard data will

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 5>stay firm.

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 2>On a Friday for Global Wall Street, a great lineup

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 2>in the back half of our Joelivorna with us with

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 2>SNBC Nico.

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on applecar Play and Android

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 2>With Lisa Mateo.

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 9>The newspapers, Okay, let's switch gears.

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 8>Totally.

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, this one's in the Wall Street Journal. So you guys,

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 9>we've heard a lot of stories about college players making

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 9>big money playing sports like basketball, football, right, but not

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 9>sports like golf, tennis. Softball is a big one.

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 6>Okay.

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 9>We now have softball's first million dollar pitcher.

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 6>Wow getting paid.

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>She's getting million?

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 5>No, I wish, but it could.

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 9>Be the last one. So let me get so. Her

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 9>name is Niejerray Kennedy. I hope I'm not mispronouncing that.

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 9>I'm sorry if I am. She was pitching for Stanford

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:19.919
<v Speaker 9>but transferred to Texas Tech, who's booster collective paid her

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 9>one million dollars.

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 2>I believe.

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 9>But here's it could be the last because there's this

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 9>new set of rules that could restrict how much boosters

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 9>can pay college athletes. It's likely to come in the

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 9>coming days, but it's for for low priles profile sports.

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business Stores. Damian comment on this, With all the

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 2>work you do with Scarlett.

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 4>The average NBA WNBA player gets paid one hundred and

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 4>forty seven and fifty dollars a year. That's a w

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:49.760
<v Speaker 4>NBA professional basketball player. And you're telling me this college

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 4>wonderful softball.

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Tillion dollars just tied into Vanderbilt in Miami. Do you

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 2>see name image like this school like Vanderbilt absolutely everywhere.

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the rumors are Cooper Flagg got paid, you know,

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 4>a couple million dollars to play for Duke last year.

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 4>You know, we got get Paul Sweeni back in here.

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 4>But you know that's that's what you're up, the endorsement kind.

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.919
<v Speaker 2>Of we're going to interrupt newspapers right now. Lisa, you're

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.479
<v Speaker 2>living this in real time for our audience across this nation.

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 2>You have a gifted daughter. You're living it. Do you

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 2>think this trickles down from ten famous schools like Texas

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Tech and Stanford to one hundred and two hundred and

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 2>three hundred other schools.

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 9>I've just seen like the pressure on the young kids,

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 9>like all the pressure they have now, like oh, I

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 9>have to perform, Like I got to post this on

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 9>social media.

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:35.879
<v Speaker 5>I gotta post this.

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 2>You have a batting in your backyard?

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 5>I do, yeah, I know, I know.

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:44.280
<v Speaker 9>All the extra coaching sessions.

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I know, I know.

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 9>Okay, happy Hour, It's Friday, right, Okay, memorial.

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Were coming up? Continue?

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.919
<v Speaker 9>Okay, So in these stories of people drinking less more,

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 9>people ordering mocktails, Okay, that's the hot new thing. But

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 9>a lot of those people are starting to go plane.

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 9>There's just too much. They're paying fifteen dollars for juice

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 9>and soda and sero, and they're saying, what's going on?

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 9>And I get it because we go to the bar,

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 9>the restaurant and I order a mocktail for my daughter.

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 9>I'm paid fifteen dollars for it. My drink costs lesson

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 9>and had alcohol in it.

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 2>What's going on?

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't think my wife would like me very much

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.799
<v Speaker 4>if I participated and drive you liar sober October? Are

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 4>you really doing? I don't think she'd be able to

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 4>put up with me.

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Can slip one more? I can?

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 9>So the Mission Impossible Final Reckoning that comes out today,

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 9>too big, you know, movie weekend for the holidays. Tom

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 9>Cruise actually really did get an aircraft carrier for the mission.

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 9>The Pentagon granted him his crew access to the USS

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 9>George H. W.

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Bush.

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 9>For the movie, they spend like three days on it,

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 9>so it's a really incredible.

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Easter, and on Bloomberg dot com,

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the bloom Business app.

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:04.240
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal