1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:02,080 Speaker 1: Seven and a half minutes past there. Let's get to 2 00:00:02,120 --> 00:00:05,200 Speaker 1: our first guests on the show today, Charo Chan, market 3 00:00:05,240 --> 00:00:09,080 Speaker 1: strategist at Saxo Capital Markets. Charo, A bad year for 4 00:00:09,160 --> 00:00:12,879 Speaker 1: risk assets just got a lot worse. Does this, in 5 00:00:12,920 --> 00:00:16,800 Speaker 1: your mind bring into the picture now the June lows? 6 00:00:16,880 --> 00:00:19,119 Speaker 1: And in fact, how likely do you think it is 7 00:00:19,160 --> 00:00:21,920 Speaker 1: that we not only test those lows but actually take 8 00:00:21,960 --> 00:00:25,840 Speaker 1: them out to the downside. Good morning, brand, Thank you 9 00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:28,560 Speaker 1: for having me. And absolutely I'm gonna look at you know, 10 00:00:28,680 --> 00:00:31,320 Speaker 1: the stock market declines we've had yesterday and that was 11 00:00:31,400 --> 00:00:34,159 Speaker 1: just a one day effect. Uh certainly, I mean, you know, 12 00:00:34,200 --> 00:00:37,120 Speaker 1: the macro headwinds are really on the rise, and and 13 00:00:37,240 --> 00:00:40,159 Speaker 1: we've been calling for higher for longer inflation and certainly 14 00:00:40,200 --> 00:00:43,360 Speaker 1: that has been proved to be the case yesterday. So 15 00:00:43,560 --> 00:00:46,440 Speaker 1: of course, not just um the June lows, but lower 16 00:00:46,560 --> 00:00:50,600 Speaker 1: lows ahead for equity markets in this environment. And I 17 00:00:50,640 --> 00:00:54,400 Speaker 1: mean I do think these will come with pair market rally. 18 00:00:54,480 --> 00:00:57,160 Speaker 1: That's not going to be a straight path down, uh, 19 00:00:57,200 --> 00:01:00,920 Speaker 1: you know, because market expectations for the Fed obviously gotten 20 00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:04,120 Speaker 1: a bit to aggressive. So these will keep a little 21 00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:06,080 Speaker 1: bit of a volatility there in the picture, and we 22 00:01:06,160 --> 00:01:09,120 Speaker 1: might continue to see some were market trallies, but overall 23 00:01:09,120 --> 00:01:11,320 Speaker 1: the trend will remain down and we will see lower 24 00:01:11,400 --> 00:01:14,720 Speaker 1: lowise ahead. It seems that the baby was thrown out 25 00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:16,479 Speaker 1: of the bath water. And you know, we were hearing 26 00:01:16,480 --> 00:01:19,320 Speaker 1: from somebody from JP Morgan Asset Management suggesting that, hey, 27 00:01:19,360 --> 00:01:21,840 Speaker 1: hang on a second, it is down. The inflation is down. 28 00:01:22,200 --> 00:01:25,959 Speaker 1: You know, let's not just think that it's all going wrong. 29 00:01:25,959 --> 00:01:28,880 Speaker 1: It's just a bit slow the progress and perhaps anticipated. 30 00:01:30,600 --> 00:01:32,800 Speaker 1: Um no, absolutely, yes, I mean it's down from the 31 00:01:32,840 --> 00:01:34,959 Speaker 1: eight and a half percent her last one to eight 32 00:01:35,000 --> 00:01:37,399 Speaker 1: point three percent if you call that down. But we 33 00:01:37,480 --> 00:01:39,360 Speaker 1: have to keep the reference in mind, which is the 34 00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:42,960 Speaker 1: FATS two percent target, right so uh, and right now, 35 00:01:43,040 --> 00:01:45,840 Speaker 1: the terminal rate pricing, even though it has been revised 36 00:01:45,920 --> 00:01:48,520 Speaker 1: much higher yesterday after the print, we're still at a 37 00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:51,320 Speaker 1: terminal rate pricing of about four point three percent next 38 00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:53,880 Speaker 1: day in terms of the FATS funds rate. So what 39 00:01:53,960 --> 00:01:56,160 Speaker 1: does that mean that that still leaves uh, you know, 40 00:01:56,280 --> 00:01:59,280 Speaker 1: real rates in negative territory for us. Uh. So, of 41 00:01:59,320 --> 00:02:01,840 Speaker 1: course that remains a concern, and that does mean that, 42 00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:04,440 Speaker 1: you know, we will continue to see the impact of 43 00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:07,400 Speaker 1: that in businesses and markets and stuff. So, um, you know, 44 00:02:07,440 --> 00:02:10,359 Speaker 1: I mean, I think it's not about the peak inflation. 45 00:02:10,480 --> 00:02:12,560 Speaker 1: But what we really need to be concerned here is 46 00:02:12,600 --> 00:02:15,079 Speaker 1: how fast it comes down to the two to three 47 00:02:15,080 --> 00:02:18,680 Speaker 1: percent levels that we should ideally see and how you know, 48 00:02:19,280 --> 00:02:21,320 Speaker 1: I mean how fast it will get there and then 49 00:02:21,960 --> 00:02:24,200 Speaker 1: how long that will take? Right, so so so do 50 00:02:24,360 --> 00:02:27,240 Speaker 1: that I think really points of reference. This really could 51 00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:31,000 Speaker 1: change the mindset here on this number. Would would you 52 00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:34,120 Speaker 1: agree that there now are much higher risks that the 53 00:02:34,120 --> 00:02:37,720 Speaker 1: Fed goes too far, that it will slam the economy 54 00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:44,680 Speaker 1: into recession, and that you know that it's almost to 55 00:02:44,760 --> 00:02:49,320 Speaker 1: be expected. I'm in the situation if you do compare 56 00:02:49,480 --> 00:02:52,240 Speaker 1: to what happened in the seventies, you know, and it 57 00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:54,520 Speaker 1: was a very similar situation, and of course we did 58 00:02:54,600 --> 00:02:57,520 Speaker 1: see a deep recession at that point of time. And 59 00:02:58,320 --> 00:03:00,800 Speaker 1: after yesterday's print as well, I mean, we've been seeing 60 00:03:00,800 --> 00:03:03,560 Speaker 1: calls for a hundred basis points rate high for September, 61 00:03:03,600 --> 00:03:05,520 Speaker 1: and you know, like I said, a much higher terminal 62 00:03:05,639 --> 00:03:07,960 Speaker 1: rate as well. But that being said, I mean from 63 00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:11,080 Speaker 1: what I've seen, you know, with Probble's messages in the 64 00:03:11,160 --> 00:03:14,960 Speaker 1: last few months, we might see a big hike, but 65 00:03:15,080 --> 00:03:17,880 Speaker 1: it is generally toned down a little bit with a 66 00:03:17,880 --> 00:03:21,520 Speaker 1: little bit of a softer commentary around it. Uh So, 67 00:03:21,600 --> 00:03:24,240 Speaker 1: I think, you know, the response from Proble will certainly 68 00:03:24,280 --> 00:03:27,200 Speaker 1: be different from what we've seen from Paul Foulker in 69 00:03:27,520 --> 00:03:31,400 Speaker 1: UM nineties seventies. I won't be as aggressive. I think 70 00:03:31,440 --> 00:03:33,760 Speaker 1: we are a little bit more cognizant of the fact that, 71 00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:36,640 Speaker 1: you know, growth is going to slow down, but we 72 00:03:36,680 --> 00:03:39,120 Speaker 1: hopefully should not be seeing a big crash. And I 73 00:03:39,120 --> 00:03:41,960 Speaker 1: think obviously a little bit more cognizant of mine would 74 00:03:41,960 --> 00:03:45,680 Speaker 1: be those that are calling for less aggressive FED because 75 00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:49,400 Speaker 1: they're concerned about recession. Right. Well, we've got this CPI 76 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:51,960 Speaker 1: read out of the way here. Um, does it move 77 00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:54,840 Speaker 1: the dial really in any meaningful way with regards to 78 00:03:54,880 --> 00:03:56,440 Speaker 1: the FED, because it did seem as that they're going 79 00:03:56,480 --> 00:03:58,920 Speaker 1: to do seventy five basis points on September the twentieth, 80 00:03:58,960 --> 00:04:02,760 Speaker 1: no matter what. Yes, exactly, I think the seventy five 81 00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:05,600 Speaker 1: basis points was baked in, but I think now we're 82 00:04:05,600 --> 00:04:07,440 Speaker 1: getting above that, and there are some calls for a 83 00:04:07,520 --> 00:04:11,520 Speaker 1: hundred basis points more. I would usually I think, ignore that. 84 00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:13,760 Speaker 1: But I think the most interesting part there was the 85 00:04:13,760 --> 00:04:16,520 Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal. You know, reporter Tim Arouse who was 86 00:04:16,560 --> 00:04:21,440 Speaker 1: actually considered as the FEDS voice, especially in backout blackout periods. 87 00:04:21,920 --> 00:04:25,560 Speaker 1: He also actually hinted, uh, you know that at least 88 00:04:25,640 --> 00:04:28,560 Speaker 1: the seventy five basis points rate high in September is warranted. 89 00:04:29,000 --> 00:04:32,279 Speaker 1: Uh So I think there is some expectation that it 90 00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:34,279 Speaker 1: could go beyond every time, but I wouldn't bet my 91 00:04:34,360 --> 00:04:36,560 Speaker 1: life on it. Actually, I think what is more relevant 92 00:04:36,600 --> 00:04:38,919 Speaker 1: here is you know how high it can go, and 93 00:04:38,960 --> 00:04:41,480 Speaker 1: were now actually looking at the terminal rate of four 94 00:04:41,520 --> 00:04:43,920 Speaker 1: point three percent, So so that's that's a pretty good 95 00:04:43,960 --> 00:04:47,400 Speaker 1: number above four percent already potentially could go up a 96 00:04:47,440 --> 00:04:50,320 Speaker 1: little bit more. But I think I think that's that's 97 00:04:50,320 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 1: more important. I think we need to push out the 98 00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:55,000 Speaker 1: easing expectations from next year as well. That's well, let's 99 00:04:55,080 --> 00:04:57,000 Speaker 1: let's talk about the counter to that. Because I mentioned 100 00:04:57,000 --> 00:05:00,560 Speaker 1: that Jeff Gunlock was one, there may be others. Gun 101 00:05:00,600 --> 00:05:02,960 Speaker 1: Like said he'd only do twenty five basis points at 102 00:05:02,960 --> 00:05:06,040 Speaker 1: the meeting because he thinks the FED hasn't paused long 103 00:05:06,160 --> 00:05:09,200 Speaker 1: enough to see what the what sort of affect the 104 00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:12,320 Speaker 1: rates that have already been done will have. Um. Do 105 00:05:12,400 --> 00:05:15,920 Speaker 1: you think there's much resonance for that for you? Um? 106 00:05:15,960 --> 00:05:19,039 Speaker 1: And I think the FED pretty much has an idea 107 00:05:19,080 --> 00:05:22,080 Speaker 1: that whatever they've done is really not sufficient to get 108 00:05:22,120 --> 00:05:25,160 Speaker 1: inflation down to levels where they want to see it. 109 00:05:25,800 --> 00:05:28,520 Speaker 1: Uh So, I mean, of course there's been you know, 110 00:05:28,680 --> 00:05:32,200 Speaker 1: some cartnage in the markets, and businesses will see an impact, 111 00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:35,280 Speaker 1: but of course that's not their focus right now. Uh So, 112 00:05:35,320 --> 00:05:37,800 Speaker 1: of course they will slow it down from here at 113 00:05:37,839 --> 00:05:41,200 Speaker 1: some point um and start taking into account, you know, 114 00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:43,680 Speaker 1: how things are shaping up. But right now I think 115 00:05:43,760 --> 00:05:45,680 Speaker 1: it's still the time where they need to do a 116 00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:49,039 Speaker 1: lot more, and they pretty much understand that, Charon. The 117 00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:51,480 Speaker 1: thing is, it's a different situation when you look at 118 00:05:52,160 --> 00:05:56,120 Speaker 1: the rates landscape in the US compared to let's say Europe. 119 00:05:56,600 --> 00:06:00,440 Speaker 1: Europe you've got also acutely high inflation, but you also 120 00:06:00,480 --> 00:06:03,400 Speaker 1: have an energy crisis which is much deeper, and one 121 00:06:03,440 --> 00:06:06,480 Speaker 1: which is sending bill soaring, which in itself is an 122 00:06:06,480 --> 00:06:09,479 Speaker 1: interest rate hike. Do you think that these two different 123 00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:14,880 Speaker 1: scenarios are playing worse for Europe? Um? Absolutely, if you 124 00:06:14,960 --> 00:06:17,040 Speaker 1: look at it in the relative sense. I mean, I 125 00:06:17,040 --> 00:06:20,560 Speaker 1: do see that they had winds um far more in Europe, 126 00:06:20,720 --> 00:06:23,320 Speaker 1: especially in terms of you know, the recession concerns or 127 00:06:23,320 --> 00:06:27,520 Speaker 1: the staculation concerns, even though inflation concerns are pretty much similar. 128 00:06:28,320 --> 00:06:30,400 Speaker 1: So what that means is, I'm in last week, you know, 129 00:06:30,800 --> 00:06:32,640 Speaker 1: towards the end of the week when we started seeing 130 00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:34,839 Speaker 1: the dollar take a turn lower, and that was because 131 00:06:34,880 --> 00:06:38,240 Speaker 1: e c B was being a little bit more hawkish 132 00:06:38,279 --> 00:06:40,520 Speaker 1: than expected. I mean, it did go for a seventy 133 00:06:40,520 --> 00:06:42,960 Speaker 1: five basis points, but the outlook was also pretty much 134 00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:45,120 Speaker 1: more hawkish than what the markets were expecting. And we 135 00:06:45,160 --> 00:06:47,760 Speaker 1: did see some positive response from the Europe But I 136 00:06:47,760 --> 00:06:49,560 Speaker 1: mean you've seen it's it's all been raised and we 137 00:06:49,560 --> 00:06:51,960 Speaker 1: are now again below parity, and that very well kind 138 00:06:51,960 --> 00:06:55,000 Speaker 1: of goes to say that the room for FED to 139 00:06:55,080 --> 00:06:58,320 Speaker 1: be relatively more hawkish than the ECB is certainly you 140 00:06:58,360 --> 00:07:01,800 Speaker 1: know higher. So let's a little bit about strategy. We've 141 00:07:01,839 --> 00:07:04,640 Speaker 1: just gone through how the US is in trouble, Europe 142 00:07:04,680 --> 00:07:07,279 Speaker 1: is in trouble, and we know that China is in trouble. 143 00:07:07,960 --> 00:07:11,240 Speaker 1: Um the bond market investing with yields up here over 144 00:07:11,320 --> 00:07:15,040 Speaker 1: four percent or so at some point probably soon for 145 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:19,520 Speaker 1: a lot of these um leading notes and and bonds, 146 00:07:19,560 --> 00:07:21,960 Speaker 1: that will attract some money, especially when you see stocks 147 00:07:22,000 --> 00:07:24,640 Speaker 1: falling like this. What's the level do you think where 148 00:07:24,760 --> 00:07:29,360 Speaker 1: buyers will come in you know, full you know, fully charged. 149 00:07:31,160 --> 00:07:33,360 Speaker 1: That's a great question, Ran. I think in terms of 150 00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:36,520 Speaker 1: you know, the US US right now, the critical point 151 00:07:36,520 --> 00:07:38,720 Speaker 1: in the tenure of EUREAU is obviously the three point 152 00:07:38,760 --> 00:07:42,880 Speaker 1: five percent, and a break above that again would see 153 00:07:42,920 --> 00:07:45,880 Speaker 1: I think a big response from the equity markets, from 154 00:07:45,880 --> 00:07:50,480 Speaker 1: the dollar as well. But I think, yeah, like you said, 155 00:07:50,680 --> 00:07:52,520 Speaker 1: and you know, given that we are at a terminal 156 00:07:52,600 --> 00:07:54,640 Speaker 1: rate of four percent plus now, there is still some 157 00:07:54,680 --> 00:07:56,560 Speaker 1: potential to go higher from there. But we as as 158 00:07:56,640 --> 00:07:59,040 Speaker 1: we approached that four percent level in the ten year, 159 00:07:59,640 --> 00:08:02,640 Speaker 1: I think that will be certainly a point where we 160 00:08:02,720 --> 00:08:07,520 Speaker 1: could start to see things turn around a speaking of years, certainly, 161 00:08:07,600 --> 00:08:10,400 Speaker 1: I think at that point, even though we might still 162 00:08:10,440 --> 00:08:13,320 Speaker 1: see some more federate taks from there. Charo always a pleasure. 163 00:08:13,320 --> 00:08:15,560 Speaker 1: Thank you so much for joining us at Charchanana their 164 00:08:15,600 --> 00:08:19,080 Speaker 1: market strategies that Saxo Capital Markets discussing the fall app 165 00:08:19,120 --> 00:08:23,000 Speaker 1: from that hotter than expected CPI reading in the United States,