WEBVTT - Apple Weighs Using Intel, Samsung Processors

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:17.319
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Though in San Francisco.

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Apple holds exploratory talks with Intel and Samsung to build

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 3>their processes for its US devices plus alphabet. Microsoft and

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Xai have agreed to give the US government early access

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 3>to their models for review before a public release, joining

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 3>Open Ai and Anthropic and Pinterest shares jumping after posting

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 3>strong results and revenue forecast. We speak exclusively with the CEO,

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Bill Ready, let's come in and have a look at

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 3>what's happening in terms of these markets.

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 2>A little bit of a tech issue and the start.

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Of this tech show, but we dig into what's happening

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 3>in terms of really the key story that was a

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>huge scoop overnight the fact that Apple is starting to

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 3>have conversations with getting production closer to home when it

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 3>means for their own in house chips.

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 2>They designed them, then who fabricates them?

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Maybe less so TSMC, Maybe it's a move more to

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Intel up thirteen percent on this news, looking at Samsung

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Electronics also up eight percent as we understand Apple executives

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 3>have started to look at their production out of Texas.

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's get to the man who helps break down all

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 3>these sorts of bits of news, Mark Goverman's with us.

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Mark talk to us about how Apple is rethinking its

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:26.199
<v Speaker 3>supply chain.

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, we've known for the last few years now that

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Apple is increasingly looking to do more in the United States.

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 4>They've put out multiple announcements. They did a six hundred

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 4>billion dollar investment alongside the Trump administration into the US,

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 4>and now they're looking for secondary suppliers to its work

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 4>on manufacturing its main processors. These are the SoCs, the

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 4>engines that powered them back, the iPhone, the iPad, you

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 4>name it. As you know, for well over a decade

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 4>they've designed those processors in house, and they've relied on

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 4>CSMC to produce them in Taiwan. They've been shifting some

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 4>of that manufacturing to a TSMC fab in Phoenix, but

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 4>additional fabs have been slow to come online, even though

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Apple says they'll have one hundred million chips out of

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 4>the area by the end of this year. But they

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 4>also need additional suppliers. Obviously, there's geopolitical tensions there's supply

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 4>chain issues, and there's just the idea that it's not

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 4>smart to have all your eggs in one basket, in

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 4>one geography and in one supplier. So they've had early

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 4>discussions with both Intel and Samsung about using new fabs

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 4>that they're opening the United States to potentially down the

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 4>road produce these A series and M series chips for Apple.

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Does it have to make sense that it's the AI

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 3>hardware that the US SORRY hardware that this goes into,

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 3>because is there going to be margin pressure here by

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 3>making them in the United States.

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 2>This is also sort of more of a political gamut.

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, in some cases there are politics involved here,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 4>right Working with Intel will give Apple a better relationship

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 4>or even better relationship they have already with the Trump administration,

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 4>given they've sort of taken ownership through the US government

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 4>of a stake of Intel, and obviously, you know Donald

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Trump has been touting Intel significantly in recent weeks, including

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 4>its stock price and their investment growth given their recent

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 4>market cap. So definitely there's a political factor here. But

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 4>I think the biggest thing is concerns over what happened

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 4>in Taiwan. If there's a situation with China. Obviously geopolitically

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 4>it's not great. Many months ago there were concerns for

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 4>Apple related to tariffs and needing to do more chips

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 4>in the US to avoid those tariffs.

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 5>But I think the.

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 4>Bigger picture overall is wanting additional suppliers for perhaps the

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 4>most critical component in the entire supply chain, even for

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 4>things like displays or speakers. You see Apple using several

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 4>different suppliers to offset supply chain issues. To not have

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 4>all of their eggs in one geo or one basket.

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 4>You never know what could happen. So it's really for

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 4>Apple only smart business to have a backup here. If

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 4>they're not able to get the chips they need out

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 4>of Taiwan, they're not going to have a very good year.

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 4>It's actually probably the biggest risk factor for Apple right

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 4>now is getting all their chips out of Taiwan. So

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 4>expansion from the silicon front is necessary because without the

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 4>silicon the Apple products don't work.

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 3>And it's not just Apple, the entire world relies upon Taiwan.

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>About ninety percent of all chips made out of that

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 3>extraordinary reporting As always, thank you Mark German. Now away

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 3>from chips AI heavyweights including Alphabet, Microsoft, and Xai, have

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 3>agreed to give the US government.

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Early access to their models before public release.

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Now, the deal allows the Commerce Department to conduct pre

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 3>release reviews in advance.

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's get more with Bloomberg's Maggie Eastland and Adam Washington.

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Now this builds on where we were already going with

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 3>open AI and Anthropic, right.

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 6>So open ai and Anthropic have already had agreements since

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty four with specifically the Center for AI Standards

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 6>and Innovation. That's an office within the Commerce Department that

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 6>knows how to evaluate models. So now you see three

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 6>more firms agree to allow the US to access their

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 6>models early. Now, this does signal that there is at

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 6>the very least appetite from US officials to know what

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 6>these models are capable of before they reach a wider audience.

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 3>We have seen more relationships, well more formalizing, more updated

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 3>relationships being signed between the likes of Alphabet and the

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 3>US government. We know XAI has been working within it,

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 3>and we're starting to see it really being deployed in

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 3>the departments of War or Defense, which, of a way,

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.919
<v Speaker 3>termit Maggie, well, broadly, how different is this from the

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 3>way that they operated before. Is this just a formalization, Well,

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 3>it's certainly an expansion of the firms that have agreed

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 3>to allow this center to evaluate their models.

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Now I should note this center it.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 6>Doesn't do any sort of regulation. So separately, there have

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 6>been reports from the New York Times and the Wall

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 6>Street Journal that the White House is weighing a cybersecurity

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 6>executive order that would include some sort of oversight mechanism.

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 6>Now this news, these agreements could be part of the

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 6>evaluation piece, but it's unlikely to be part of any

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 6>sort of oversight mechanism, even though, of course more evaluation

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 6>of models could pave the way for, at the very

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 6>least new enforcement of existing laws.

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Even most Maggie Eastland always with the latest, Ala Washington

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 3>for us, we appreciate it. Let's look as wels as

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 3>moving in the tech markets. We hire more broadly, and

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 3>that's not one hundred and one point three percent. Guess what,

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 3>yet another record high. But look at the socks. This

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 3>is all about semiconductors continuing to fly higher. We're up

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 3>three point seven percent, yet another record high. We want

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 3>to dig into just the insatiable demand. It feels like

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 3>for tech stock and the bounce back. Lauren Webster's with

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 3>us managing director of Investment Banking focused on technology at

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 3>pypersanla and just break down what is amid geopolitical tensions,

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>amid concerns over Iran and the conflict, we're still seeing

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 3>tech managing to catch.

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 2>A bid today.

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a real turnaround from what we saw to

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 7>start the year in terms of the massive sell off

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:09.239
<v Speaker 7>driven in part by uncertainty from the introduction of AI

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 7>what that would do to traditional software companies, traditional software stocks.

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 7>In April we really saw the first constructive tape for

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 7>the software indices and moving higher, still lower than the

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 7>broader market, but performing quite nicely. I think this is

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 7>really where we're going to start to see a shift

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 7>from kind of AI panic and uncertainty into AI execution

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 7>and more discernment among investors around who's really going to

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 7>be the winners the beneficiaries from AI and who may

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 7>struggle to perform as we go into this new era.

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting we have earnings still coming thick and fast,

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 3>and when we're thinking about Paneteer has been the EI

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 3>of the storm in many ways of whether or not

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 3>it's a software exposed stock and AI is going to

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 3>manage to upset it in terms of competition coming from

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 3>the front end model makers or if they're able to

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 3>pass and look, the numbers were again extraordinary, but the

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 3>earnings of down was seeing shopify also LOA. How are

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 3>you discerning who is able to retain a mote?

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So there's there's a few things that I look for.

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 5>First is.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 7>Enterprise adoption, So are you selling more to the SMB

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 7>are you selling more to the enterprise? And enterprise software

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 7>rip and replace is hard to do. These are projects

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 7>that have been budgeted, budgeted years in advance. Implementation timelines

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 7>take a long time. You have a lot of services

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 7>wrapped around that, so you can't rip that overnight. Things

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 7>that are easier to deploy, you may be able to

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 7>turn on a dime a bit more adopt some of

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 7>the newer technology that's coming out of the foundational labs.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 2>So that's one.

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 7>The second is you mentioned palent Heer, and there's a

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 7>real rotation into the defense tech sector, particularly those names

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 7>that have a software angle to them. So what is

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 7>you know defense tech hardware now software getting a lot

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 7>of focus and I expect will continue to see a

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 7>lot of tailwinds there, given where you start in kind

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 7>of the geopolitical landscape and the money that is pouring

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 7>international security and particularly a new way of doing business

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 7>in defense technology.

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the other theme about as we see

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 3>more efficiency being sought by these companies, Unfortunately that often

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 3>means job cuts. Some of it comes with the view

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 3>that it's because of AI that we're disrupting the labor force.

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Do you believe when we're hearing the latest out of

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 3>coinbase fourteen percent of workers to go, PayPal going to

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 3>be letting go thousands of workers?

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Is this AI washing?

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Is this just a different kind of focus from fintech

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 3>for example.

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 7>You know, there's a couple interesting trends going on there. One,

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 7>you definitely see investors pushing more towards profitability. The ratio

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 7>of growth the profitability has changed over the past year,

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 7>with a focus on profitability matter mattering more than ever

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 7>and certainly looking for ways to make cuts that drive

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 7>that profitability. Businesses are going to do that regardless of AI.

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 2>But yes, AI is also.

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 7>Going to displace certain types of tech workers. But there

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 7>is going to be a new opportunity that opens up.

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 7>One area that I'm really bullish on is the services

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 7>sector that is going to emerge around AI adoption implementation projects. Again,

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 7>some of these are hard to figure out. How do

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 7>I want to put those in place? What are the

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 7>security measures I need to have when I'm implementing AI?

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 7>And that's where you're going to see a big services

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 7>push and that requires some labor to do as well.

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 3>On Webster, PYPASANLA, maybe some music to some of us

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 3>in laborers out there, we appreciate it.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 2>Now, let's talk about Anthropic.

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 3>It's unveiling new AI agents designed to handle a broader

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 3>mikes of financial services tasks. It's part of the company's

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 3>push to win over wool Street. Now CEO Daria Amide

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 3>will join Jamie din of JP Morgan and an Anthropic

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 3>event in New York today to discuss the move. As

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 3>part of the new offerings, Anthropics says it also is

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 3>enabling claud to work better across third party software like

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Excel or PowerPoint or Outlook from Microsoft, and integrate data

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 3>from partners in the financial services industry such as Dunham,

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Bradstreet or Moody's Coming up. We're here from the CFO

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 3>of GRABS Southeast Asia's leading right hailing and delivery app.

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 3>It's a super app. Sublue Magtech Southeast Asian super ad

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 3>grab top first quarter estimates and shares a jumping after

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 3>a quick dip. This morning, Cfop de Uey joins us

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 3>from Singapore to paint the full picture. What we have

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 3>seen is we're twenty four percent growth in GMV, that

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 3>sort of record. You just seeing that similar sort of

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 3>run rate from revenue growth as well. You've got record

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 3>high users, Peter. What drives that both.

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 8>A lot of very exciting things Caroline. There was what

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 8>usually is Q one a very soft quarter for us,

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 8>just because of Ramadan, the lunar New Year. We saw

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 8>the opposite. It was a very strong quarter. And this

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 8>is despite some of the ad macro economic fuel prices

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 8>that you're seeing towards the March period. But overall it

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 8>was very strong on food, very strong on mobility, and

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 8>also our financial services also where we've clipped over a

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 8>billion dollars in loan dispersal. It was a very just

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 8>strong quarter. And a lot of that Caroline comes to

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 8>just a product that we've been rolling out and affordability

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 8>has been really a critical piece that's really opened up

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 8>the funnel for us that continues to grow the MTUs,

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 8>the users on our platform. We have fifty two million

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 8>monthly transacting users. One in thirteen Southeast Asians are using

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 8>our product now, which is great to see. And this

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 8>has really helped for us to really penetrate the market

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 8>more and more.

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about trying to penetrate the market more and

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 3>more when you're also seeing some pressure coming from say

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 3>fuel prices. At the moment, you are a very hard

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 3>a mobility company. How is that going to impact longer terms?

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 3>You think can you do to offset?

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 8>If you look at the markets that we're operating, we

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 8>operated eight markets in Southeast Asia, not all of them

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 8>are equal. Where certain markets, say the Philippine has been

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 8>the hardest hit where fuel prices has been up two x,

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 8>three x in some cases, when you have the other extreme,

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 8>say Malaysia, Indonesia, where the increase has been very nominal,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 8>hardly any because just the way the structural macro has

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 8>worked there from a fuel subsidy perspective. So it's very

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 8>different markets to markets. But overall, we're pitching in, we're

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 8>leaning in, and we're helping the drivers. How are we

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 8>doing that we've been In March, we activated a number

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 8>of initiatives where the it's fuel fuel voluchers helping them

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 8>getting discounts at the pump, working with the oil refineries,

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 8>the oil companies. We've also deployed multiple lending programs for

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 8>drivers if they needed. But also at the same time,

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 8>we're continuing to accelerate ev adoption. Actually, it's a great

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 8>opportunity for us to accelerate ev adoption in two wheels

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 8>and four wheels in our markets, and this is now

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 8>an opportunity is to continue to pick up the pace.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Talking about well picking up the pace, what's been interesting

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 3>is the pace of regulatory change keeps shifting and we're

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 3>seeing that over in Indonesia.

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Could you seem to soothe the.

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Market a lot about what has been a very recent

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 3>change to basically the maximum amount of commission you're able

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 3>to take over in Indonesia to just eight percent. How

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 3>are you able to upset that and still drive for

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 3>ultimate profitability?

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So it's putting the perspective our Indonesia, which is

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 8>where the government announced over the weekend the commission structural changes.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 8>It's roughly about less than six percent of our mobility

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 8>GMB business. Overall, this is for the two Wheels Indonesian

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 8>business and with the changes which we understand where it's

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 8>coming from unexpected. Also at the same time we'll work

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 8>with the government to roll it out. We're still getting

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 8>clarity of what the mechanics are and working with our industry.

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 8>PEE is also across the platform. But if you look

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 8>at what we've been doing with our drivers there, we've

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 8>always been giving benefits. We have medical insurance. We've also

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 8>have incentives for our drivers, so we have a number

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 8>of levers that we could use to actually help neutralize

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 8>some of that. Now it does mean that we need

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 8>to recalibrate some of the business model of two Wheels

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 8>in Indonesia or worth of fair structure. But we want

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 8>to make sure also that we're not just passing on

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 8>to the consumers. That's the last thing we want to do.

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 8>We want to make sure the marketplace can choose to

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 8>be very healthy, but the drivers also benefiting. So we

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 8>have enough leavers in the business Caroline to be able

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 8>to upset this.

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 3>We need to remember your big and fintech. How is

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 3>the consumer feeling right now?

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 8>Briefly, so far, the credit quality in the first quarter

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 8>has been very strong. We haven't seen any impact.

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:15:55.640 --> 0:16:00.239
<v Speaker 8>Having said that, we're also very cautious with this macroeconomic situation,

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 8>so we're doing a lot of stress testing. We're putting

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 8>a lot of new variables into the input into the

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 8>model itself, where there it's fuel prices increase, potential inflation,

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 8>also the pot unemployment. All those factors are putting in

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 8>so that we are a little bit more cautious and careful.

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 8>But so far, actually we haven't seen any from the

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 8>stress testing anything that's actually detrimental to the loan quality

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 8>of our book. If anything, the loane disperson continues to

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 8>be very healthy. But also we're very cautious also in

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 8>certain countries where we might tie up the funnel a

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 8>little bit more also just to make sure that our

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 8>risk appetite continues to be very balanced.

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 2>We alwaso balanced with us.

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 3>It's very light late or say early in the morning

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 3>for you that we appreciate you live from Singapore.

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 2>CFO of GRAB coming up.

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 3>We speak with the Pinterest CEO Bill Ready after the

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 3>company beats quarterly sales estimates.

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 2>To this is bring back tack.

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Chess Pinterest best day in a year. We're currently up

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 3>eleven percent. The company reporting first quarter sales the top

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 3>down assessments and forecast revenue exceeding all street expectations too. Already,

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 3>pinterest CEO joins us now exclusively.

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 2>It's great to speak with you, Bill. What's driving the growth?

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 9>Thanks for having me on, So you know, we're really

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 9>encouraged by the growth on the platform. It's eleven straight

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 9>quarters of record high users, ten straight quarters of double

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 9>disser growth in users, and at the core of that

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 9>is that we've really turned Pinterest into an AI powered

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 9>shopping assistant that is really really winning with users, especially

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 9>gen Z that's now more than half our platform and

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 9>our fastest growing demographic pinteresses where gen Z goes to shop,

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 9>and that's been really great for users, and increasingly advertisers

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 9>are leaning into that and you see that reflecting our results.

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 3>So ad targeting improves, we can see more efficiency. But

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 3>look at getting eighty billion monthly searches, as you say,

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 3>record hive users. What is the AI strategy here longer term?

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.719
<v Speaker 3>Because already you're seeing the efficiency in a flywheel.

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 9>That's right. So we've shared that we have more than

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 9>eighty billion searches per month on the platform, which would

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 9>have been unbelievable to say even a few years ago.

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 9>And we've done that by really making it a visual

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 9>first platform. So much of shopping is a visual journey,

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 9>and so we are really focused on that. And I

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 9>think in the world of AI, you've had a lot

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 9>of discussion around general purpose winners, but you're also seeing

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 9>specialization play out, and you're seeing that play out and

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 9>sort of consumer versus enterprise. But even within consumer, there

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 9>are a lot of different use cases and we've been

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 9>really focused on shopping and visual search and discovery, and

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 9>we're using AI to power that really based off the

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 9>curation signal on our platform, and we're seeing that really

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 9>really resonate with users. And O those eighty billion searches

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 9>per month, more than half of them are commercial, which

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 9>is a much more significant skew towards commerciality than most

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 9>chatbots would have and that you would see in sort

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 9>of historical general purpose search. So it really has become

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 9>a great shopping destination for our users.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting those chatbots had been sort of some of

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 3>the investor anxiety that this is where competition.

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Is coming from in visual search. It is Google, It

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 2>is opening on the others. But how dependent are you

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 2>on are the frenemies?

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Shall we say, for the large language models, you're training

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 3>your own, but how much you're using underlying models.

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 9>Of others, that's right, So we primarily run our own

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 9>compact fit for purpose models. I think this is one

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 9>of the things that you will see over time is

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 9>there's been so much discussion around AGI and general purpose models,

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 9>but they can be really expensive to run, and we've

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 9>demonstrated it through our own compact fit for purpose models

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 9>as well as leveraging open source and retraining that off

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:44.959
<v Speaker 9>of our unique data set that we're able to see

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 9>comparable or better results at oftentimes less than ten percent

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 9>of the cost. And in terms of shopping, we've shared

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 9>that we're able to get to thirty percent better relevancy

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 9>of recommendations on shopping for our users than what we'd

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 9>see from leading off the shelf proprietary model, which just

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 9>really gets to the uniqueness of pinterest as a shopping destination.

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 9>And it's important to note that what makes our models

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 9>so powerful, it's not just the models themselves. The AI

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 9>doesn't have taste or style. Humans have tastes in style,

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 9>and so people come to Pinterest to figure out their taste,

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 9>to figure out how they want to put outfits together,

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 9>and we're able to learn from that and make better

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 9>and better recommendations that are aligned.

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 5>To a user's taste.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 9>And the result of that, as usually say things like well,

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 9>Pinterest just gets me. And that's something that we think

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 9>we're doing really uniquely here at pinterest and where we

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 9>just have totally different signal based on what our users

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 9>do on the platform, and that's what lets us take

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 9>much smaller but really fit for purpose models and deliver

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 9>better results for users.

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not just a signal on your platform.

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 3>Though you've been doing M and A talk to us

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 3>about TV scientific and while you're going into performance driven

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 3>sort of TV ads.

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 9>Yes, so you know we now objectively it's six hundred

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 9>and thirty million plus users, you know, in eighty billion

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 9>searches a month, more than half of them being commercial,

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 9>have one of the highest commercial intent plots forms anywhere

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 9>in the world. And so far we've been making that

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 9>a really great platform for advertisers to connect with users

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 9>here on Pinterest, but we're also looking at how we

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 9>can make it so that we can help those advertisers

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 9>meet those users in other places. Connected TV being one

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 9>of the fastest growing areas of a of ad demand.

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 9>It's projected to surpass linear TV in twenty twenty eight,

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 9>and we're able to help advertisers show more relevant ads

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 9>that deliver better returns for advertisers on TV and users

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 9>get to see things that are actually helpful and useful

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 9>to them. And we showed on this most recent call

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 9>that when we add Pinterest audience data to TV scientifics capabilities,

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 9>the company that we acquired in Q one, we see

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 9>a sixty five percent improvement in the purchases that result

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 9>from the ads that are shown, which is great for advertisers,

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 9>but also just means as a user, when you're watching

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 9>connected TV, you've actually seen more with THESA to say, oh,

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 9>that's actually a product that would be useful for me,

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 9>and so it's a great thing for users too.

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Thanks.

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting, it's almost it feels like divestification should briefly build,

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 3>but there's also this moment of gen z and teen bands.

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 3>How do you see that as your role in social

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 3>media right now?

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Briefly, yes.

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.719
<v Speaker 9>So we've talked about this before, and I've been very

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 9>out spoken on this publicly when I came into pinterests

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 9>CEO nearly four years ago. I wanted to prove that

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 9>there was a more positive business model possible in social media,

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 9>and so youth online safety has been very out in

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 9>front for us. We made pinterest private only for users

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 9>under sixteen approximately three years ago. We're the first and

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 9>still the only platform to do that, and so I

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 9>have publicly advocated for the fact that social media as

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 9>currently configured, it is not safe for users under sixteen.

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 9>So we turned off social features three years ago, and

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 9>we actually think it's quite an encouraging thing to see

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 9>regulators around the world starting to really pay attention to that.

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 2>We have to leave it there.

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.239
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for talking to us through your

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 3>numbers and your focus. WI already Pinterest CEO. Up next,

0:22:52.280 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 3>talenteer as a Bloombag Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech,

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 3>and let's take a look at today's big number.

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 2>It's nine billion euros.

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.439
<v Speaker 3>That is a record amount that Alphabet is issuing in

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 3>euros in debt. They're also seeking up to three to

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 3>five billion dollars in Canadian dollar denominated debt too. The

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 3>proceeds of course, you know why. It's general corporate purposes,

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 3>but it's AI. This is a company that's got planned

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 3>capital expenditure bock to one hundred and ninety billion dollars.

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Now they sell debt, but the shares power to a

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 3>new record high. We're up another one point four percent.

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 3>We are inching closer to the Nvidia market cap. They're

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 3>at four point sixty nine trillion for Alphabet and videos

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 3>at four point seven nine trillion. We'll see if one

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 3>starts to eclipse the other. Let's look elsewhere in the

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 3>earning spectrum, though, because Palete is actually down some five percent,

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 3>even though they posted numbers that were better than anticipated

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 3>on most of the lines, whether it's revenue, whether it's

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 3>what they're posting in terms of earnings. But there was

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 3>perhaps a little bit of commercial weakness in the US

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 3>that's drilled down into it. With bloembat Lizette Chapman, who

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 3>covers this stop, which I might add, trades at an

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 3>extraordinary level. I mean, I think it's more than eighty

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 3>times future earnings.

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Did it need to be even more perfect?

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 10>He nailed it it, absolutely did they again, you know,

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:23.199
<v Speaker 10>be even the raised revenue guidance that they provided, and

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 10>they raised it again for twenty twenty seven, but they

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 10>didn't raise it quite as much as they had the

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 10>previous you know, previous earnings, and so it was good,

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 10>but it wasn't as great as they had done in

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 10>the past. That said, you know, carp kind of ended

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:38.959
<v Speaker 10>the conversation or it was, you know, at the end

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 10>of the analyst call, and he was asked about hiring

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 10>and about about some of the some of the other

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 10>political wins that some bears say that is one of

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 10>the factors here, and he said, Hey, nine tenths of

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 10>the world love us, one tenth professionally hate us. So

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 10>that might be what we're seeing right here as a

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 10>lot of the bears, including the short sellers coming in

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 10>to drive it down.

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Often a controversial stock off and controversial statement's coming the CEOs.

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 3>But interesting to CTO using this ton of frame, it's

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 3>a no slop zone. Now, what people have had anxiety

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 3>around is that anthropic open AI they're using for deployed engineers,

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 3>just as Palenteer has. They're starting to get into the

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 3>space and maybe prove competitive. How is Paler trying to

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 3>set itself apart?

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.719
<v Speaker 10>That's all right, and so that is a concern that

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 10>some have raised. The way that Pallenteers executives explain it

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 10>is that they've got something different, something special that they've

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 10>worked on for several decades. It's called an ontology, which

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 10>is a real time mapping of all of an organization's

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 10>data within the enterprise, across apps, across different siloed information

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 10>that they bring together in one real world view. They

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 10>do this for defense purposes or you know, in wartime

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 10>to find out where IEDs are and you know, improvised

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 10>explosive devices. And they also do it to find out

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 10>where supply chain hiccups are in things like airbus and

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 10>things like that. So that's the way they would explain

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 10>it would be that, you know, they've got something that

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 10>is a layer that goes between you know, the the

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:21.959
<v Speaker 10>enterprise and the AI large language model that the Anthropic

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 10>and some of the other ones have developed.

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 3>There's always been this idea that they do very well

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 3>in the United States.

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 2>They've built a lot of business.

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 3>I think of the NHS the United Kingdom, for example,

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 3>is that but how are they showing foreign deployment and

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 3>growth at the same paces of seeing in the US.

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's it is strong in some areas and not

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 10>as strong as others, you know, definitely United, the US

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 10>has been there their bright spot that has been called out,

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 10>especially for commercial sales and previous quarters this year, this

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 10>quarter as well. US concentration was a concerned because so

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 10>much their business does come from the US, and I

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 10>think that we talked about this yesterday and you even

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 10>flagged that, you know, a lack of international growth going

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 10>to be a worry, and it appears that that was

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 10>something that you know, could be dragging it down today

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 10>with the stock, you really never know because as you

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 10>mentioned at the top of this, it's already been trading

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 10>at such a large multiple tur forward earnings that a

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 10>lot of the growth is already baked in.

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 3>Twenty one buys on the stock though only two cells

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 3>blom Buglazett Chapman. Great to get the breakdown, Thank you. Look,

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 3>let's head actually over to the Milkene conferences on in California,

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 3>where a Paleteer executive vice president's Josh Harris is.

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm on the CEOs.

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Speaking well, some of the company leaders speaking, and a

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 3>panel focused on how builders and investors are shaping the

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 3>future seamless.

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 11>Not constantly having to re represent yourself and At this point,

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 11>we've onboarded twenty six million people in the United States

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 11>to cellbate these seamless experiences, and someone signs up on

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 11>our platform every one to two seconds, twenty four hours

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 11>a day this week.

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 5>Now, each of you, I mean, have not.

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 12>Only built businesses, but you've actually done things that.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 5>Took a long time to do.

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 12>I mean, these weren't really sort of overnight successes. And

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.959
<v Speaker 12>I think about Palenteer, which is kind of you know,

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 12>the overnight success. It took you know, you know, more

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 12>than a decade to sort of get there, and the

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 12>patient capital that was required, but more importantly really the idea,

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 12>Josh of kind of staying the course when you know

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 12>you have a good idea even if the initial traction

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 12>wasn't necessarily there.

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely, I think, first all, thank you very much for

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 13>having me.

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 5>Sorry I was late, that's okay.

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 13>The yeah, staying the course, And I think also it

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 13>does require a huge amount of sort of internal self

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 13>confidence to know that what you're working on is important,

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 13>even if you're not necessarily hearing that. In like the

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 13>broader tech echo chamber, which was very much our experience

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 13>and just for to sort of sort of coming out

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 13>with it early in the session. The only reason I

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 13>know anything about what we do pound here is because

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 13>of Aaron Preswright, who is a former colleague of mine.

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 13>I was a little too late to the game and

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 13>understanding I been of Pounds for fourteen years, but exactly

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 13>what we do, so she very kindly explained it to

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 13>me in the bottom room of a bar in Paris.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it was like two am.

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, about ten years ago, and that is pretty much

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 13>the pitch. I still use so much creditor and for

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 13>anything I say correctly here incorrectly on this panel, but yes,

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 13>staying the course and understanding that what you're doing is

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 13>right and helpful, even if it's not what it looks

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 13>like everyone else around you is doing. So it's very

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 13>interesting for all of us, I'm sure, and feels the

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 13>same way like Pounds here in this moment has a

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 13>huge amount of attention on it. It's become an example.

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 13>People are sort of taking things like FDEs, which were

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 13>concepts that you know, we used and came up with,

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 13>you know, decades ago that are now sort of commonplace

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 13>in the vernacular, the techminnacular and ecosystem, but at the time,

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 13>you know, we would go into meetings and people would

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 13>be like, you know, what do you do? This doesn't

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 13>fit into a certain box. You know this company can

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 13>do this, so this company can do that. And while

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 13>you know, talking about data integration and talking about Foundry

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 13>didn't necessarily check a box that a CTO or a

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 13>COO or a CEO was looking for when they were

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 13>talking about business transformation, we had strong conviction because we

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 13>went through the process ourselves, as you mentioned, over a

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 13>decade much longer to say this is actually what's fundamental

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 13>to allow things like a gentta gai and anything else

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 13>you want to do on top of it. You need

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 13>to have a reliable data asset that basically, you know,

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 13>you need to have a single source of.

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 5>Truth, right, which has been our thing for a long time.

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.959
<v Speaker 13>But that's a very hard concept to explain, and you know,

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 13>we had everyone and anyone against us saying that it

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 13>didn't work, it was consulting, it wasn't software, it wasn't necessary,

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 13>and now you know, people are starting to be proven wrong.

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 13>But it was very much saying the course and also making.

0:30:58.280 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Sure that our was palented.

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Executive vice president Josh Harris speaking at Milkine alongside my

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 3>colleague Romain Bostic, who's helping orchestrate that. Wilso have Erin

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Price Wright, general partner of Andrews and Horowitz. You've got

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Bombardier there along with Metropolis. So more of that conversation

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 3>you can go and check out on live go on

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 3>the terminal.

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 5>Coming up.

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 3>We're actually going back to Milkan with a conversation with

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Seth Burrows, Tom Bravo managing partner.

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 2>This is BlueBag Tech.

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Let's get back to the milkone conference serving in California

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 3>where bloommeg of an Interest anchor Danny Berger standing by

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 3>with a special guests.

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 14>Hi, Kerlein, thank you so much. I am here with

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 14>Seth Burrow, managing partner at Toma Bravo, so thank you

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 14>so much for joining.

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 5>Great to see you, Danny, thanks for having me.

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 14>And I'm really I'm always excited to talk to you.

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 14>But you oversee a lot of cybersecurity investments for Tom

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 14>brav and I feel like now is kind of your

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 14>moment to get peppered with questions about what in the

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 14>world is going on. It feels like the peace of

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 14>change is so rapid. Can you just contextualize your portfolio companies,

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 14>the industry writ large just how fast things are moving

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 14>right now.

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 5>Incredibly fast.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 15>And you know, our portfolio companies, like you mentioned, have

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 15>a deep expertise in cyber really across every facet of

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:20.959
<v Speaker 15>the cyber industry, which is a complex, very technical market

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 15>to operate in. There's a lot of deep domain expertise

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 15>there and they have been reacting over the last several

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 15>years to what we have seen coming now. The latest

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 15>model releases have expedited.

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 5>All those and.

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 15>Every other model that's going to come next, and there's

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 15>going to be a lot of them. And we're talking

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 15>about Mythos today mainly because that's the one that people

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 15>have been talking about it in the news in terms

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 15>of big cyber risk, but we see a lot more

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 15>coming and our companies are preparing for that. You have

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 15>to operate today at a speed that is different than

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 15>we've ever seen before. Companies are going to be exposed

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 15>to threats faster than they've ever seen before, and so

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 15>you need a layered security approach that our portfolio companies,

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 15>which in combination produce about eight billion of revenue, are

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 15>providing to the market. But it's a really exciting time,

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 15>but it's also one where our companies are needing to

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 15>move very quickly to put the defenses up there for

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 15>the industry and for our enterprise customers that really trust

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 15>us to protect them.

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 5>It seems like.

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 14>Moving quickly is and even enough.

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 8>Though.

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 14>If you have these models that can find zero day

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 14>vulnerabilities in minutes and see things that have been overlooked

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 14>for twenty years of human history combing through it, I mean,

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 14>how prepared are we in this world for that type

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 14>of technology to be released?

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 15>It's so true, and we're sitting in a place today

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 15>that you know, companies have not had to operate this

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 15>way before, and so we have companies like Proofpoint, for example,

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:55.239
<v Speaker 15>they have a massive network of fourteen thousand customers that

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 15>every day they see all of the malicious emails that

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 15>you know that are inbounded into those enterprises, and all

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 15>of the behavior the way that their employees interact with

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 15>those malicious emails. Those sorts of network effects give proof

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 15>Point and their customers the ability to see zero day threats,

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 15>which is what we call them, very very quickly and

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 15>then respond very quickly.

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:19.720
<v Speaker 14>Truly, not as quickly as like a mythos though.

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 15>Right the way that we see the threats is very

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.479
<v Speaker 15>quick and so of course mythos hasn't hit the market yet, true,

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 15>but now we should all expect that it is out.

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 5>There and that perhaps people are already using it.

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:34.720
<v Speaker 14>Oh, do you think any of it is just marketing

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 14>ahead of IPOs? Do you think some of it is

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 14>just whipping up excitement and obviously fear alongside of it.

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 15>I've heard that, But I'm going to take the optimistic

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.399
<v Speaker 15>view that this is much more about protecting everybody who

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 15>might be interacting with it in the future. But I

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 15>also think it's been a really good heads up for

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 15>the world, for enterprises, for consumers to see what else

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 15>is coming right, because again, it might be the anthropic

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 15>model today, but it's going to be someone else's model.

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 15>The big thing that comes out of all of this

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 15>also is that as these agents get deployed, and today

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 15>obviously we're in a world where it's very minimal agentic deployment,

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 15>although we're starting to see it pick up quite a bit,

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 15>the governance around that is going to become critical. So

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 15>what are the agents doing, what information do they have,

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 15>where's the data coming from?

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 5>What are they doing after they get the information?

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 15>Operating in the world, And that's what companies in our

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 15>portfolio like sale Point and ping proof plant in dark

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 15>trace are monitoring that environment to make sure that there's

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 15>nothing malicious going on. And then you know, acting very quickly,

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:38.879
<v Speaker 15>and you're right that this is all new.

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:40.280
<v Speaker 5>It's happening very fast.

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 15>But that's where you need incredible technologists, you know, behind

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.720
<v Speaker 15>the products that are in the market to react quickly.

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 14>By the way, you've been one of the first to

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 14>announce a partnership with one of the big llms.

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 5>In your case, it was Google.

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:56.760
<v Speaker 14>We learned yesterday that Anthropics doing a partnership with Goldman, Sachs,

0:35:57.560 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 14>H and F. Before that, there was this like Baine

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.359
<v Speaker 14>open ai JV going on. What is going on in

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 14>this industry right now? It feels like every single day

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 14>we're getting some sort of announcement of some sort of partnership.

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I mean I can speak to our partnership with Google,

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 15>which is, you know, we they approached us to engage

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 15>with us in our portfolio in terms of deploying their

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 15>full stack technologies. We have a great relationship, but then

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 15>we moved really quickly to take the portfolio there. And

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 15>then on the cyber side, we're going to work with

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 15>him to identify early any threats through our portfolio. You know,

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 15>I can't speak to the other jvs that might be

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 15>going on in the industry. I'm sure everybody has their

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 15>own reason. We are model agnostics. So we have great

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 15>relationships with Open AI, with Anthropic, We know those companies

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 15>very well. We you know, we have ongoing discussions all

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 15>the time, and certainly our portfolio companies are big consumers

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 15>of theirs also, And I think it's really just our industry,

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 15>you know, trying to understand and figure out more where

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 15>this is going, how to deploy the technology, working with

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 15>experts to help us do that, and then also again

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 15>on the cyberside, making sure that we can get as

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 15>far ahead as we can of these next models as

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 15>they get out into the market.

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 14>So I was having conversation yesterday that was talking about

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 14>how inference costs are really really high for you know,

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 14>anthropic Googles of the world, but right now they're not

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 14>passing that on that led by Google, They're trying to

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 14>offer something more cheap.

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 5>Are you preparing for a world in.

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 14>Which these you know, Google what have you start to

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 14>make their product more expensive and start to eat into

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 14>more margins how are you thinking about where the pricing

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 14>world heads for AI, which is a really expensive project

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 14>that we're undertaking.

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a great question.

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 15>I think today people don't quite understand the cost of

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 15>rolling out a lot of these solutions. And there's some,

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.720
<v Speaker 15>you know, pretty interesting research out there today that says currently,

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 15>for most higher functioning roles, it's much more expensive to

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 15>bring tokens into your organization to do it agentically than

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:57.280
<v Speaker 15>it is through a human.

0:37:57.800 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 5>That's not true for everything, and of course it's not.

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 15>Always going to be there, but I think it's unclear

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 15>today how much this will all cost. I think the

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 15>reality is, especially as you sit in the enterprise and

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 15>you have to budget for these costs, and you have

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 15>to re engineer process, all of this takes longer actually

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 15>than people realize, and that's before really absorbing you know,

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 15>what might be the true cost of deploying inference on

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 15>a daily basis. Now, what you're seeing in reaction to

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 15>that is very specific model use cases. So you see

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 15>in our companies and both in our portfolio and their customers,

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 15>they're deploying specific use case models that are much more efficient.

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 15>I think we're going to end up in a place

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 15>also where efficiency and power consumption end up being the focus,

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 15>and there's going to be a lot of innovation around that, right,

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 15>so you don't need to use for every function a

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 15>general purpose model. That's where we are today, and you're

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 15>right the true cost of what this ultimately will be

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 15>on a marginal basis for enterprise customer, it's kind of

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 15>unknown right now.

0:38:57.600 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 14>True, Seth, this has been so fascinating. Thank you so

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 14>much for winning. Appreciate your time here at the Milk

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 14>in conference.

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Caroline. With that, I'll throw back to you. That is,

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 5>of course Seth Borough.

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Of Tom Bravo.

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Fascinating discussions throughout. We so appreciate it. Danny Berge live

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 3>from Milk and coming up markets well, they are braced

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 3>for more tech earnings. I'll discuss what to expect from

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 3>AMD and Disney.

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 2>This is bloomet Tech checking in on Paramount's guideance shares.

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 2>We're lower by four point six percent, even though.

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Many were impressed that the company had beaten certain expectations

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 3>in their fiscal first quarter of results. But investors are

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 3>really looking at how the company executes its acquisition and

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Warner Brothers Bloomberg. Hannah Miller is here with us, so

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 3>we're all waiting on WBD, but there was real signs

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 3>of strength in terms of streaming in particular.

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 16>Yes, you know, Paramount's really happy with the momentum. It's

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 16>weigh it's made since the murder with s guidance, and

0:39:57.200 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 16>you know, we did see some an earning speech for

0:39:59.880 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 16>the and also a strong outlook for this year. They

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 16>think things are going really well.

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Why the stop pussure?

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, were there any flies in the ointment? Is

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 3>it more just about uncertainty looking forward?

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, there was a little bit of weakness on streaming.

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 16>They lost some subscribers due to the end of an

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 16>international streaming agreement, so they didn't see a ton of

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 16>growth there. But they're expecting, you know, that to just

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:28.320
<v Speaker 16>be sort.

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Of a blimp, even though they saw a gain and

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 3>average revenue for user and domestic subscribers.

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 2>We look as to what the streaming pitch.

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 3>For Paramount Skuydance means maybe for Disney, but Disney has

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 3>just got so much exposure to the consumer right now.

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Is that what we're all watching?

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, we know with Disney that you know, they said

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 16>that it was a tepid quarter for them in February.

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 2>You know that they weren't.

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 16>Expecting, you know, big results for what we're gonna hear

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 16>about tomorrow. But all eyes are going to be on

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 16>parks and cruises and streaming.

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 3>And all eyes are gonna be on the new CEA

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 3>exactly just tomorrow. We'll keep on how he reports in

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 3>the morning. Hannah Miller with the latest on how Paramount

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 3>performs after, of course, their numbers came out yesterday. Who

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 3>else's numbers came out yesterday? Was AMD delivering its earnings

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 3>and we're expecting that after bell today. Stock has had

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 3>its biggest one month gain two thousand and one, but

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 3>the company is facing some headwinds. Bloemgs Ian King is

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 3>here to tell us all on how much the stock

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 3>moved in April and how much it can price to perfection. Now,

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 3>if the earnings are coming out tonight.

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:32.479
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I mean that's the numbers are going to be good.

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 17>It'll just be a case of are they good enough.

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 17>You'll remember three months ago, Caroline, we had exactly the

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 17>same scenario. Tremendous run up in the stark, A lot

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 17>of strong reports around AMDA and d came in were bullish,

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:47.840
<v Speaker 17>but just not bullish enough and that's really the challenge

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 17>that this company is facing right now. Thirty percent growth

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 17>on a quarterly basis is fantastic, but maybe not fantastic

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:56.360
<v Speaker 17>enough for some.

0:41:56.920 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how does AMD basically signal that they can

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 3>capture as much total addressable market on the shift to

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 3>AI and the new trillions of dollars that are being invested.

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I mean, this is it. The management team, Lisa Sue,

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:14.839
<v Speaker 17>who obviously has spoken to you know, she is innately conservative.

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 17>She's not a kind of cheerleader. She's more of a

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 17>sort of hey, we'll execute and them we'll show you

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 17>how well we executed type person, rather than a shout

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 17>about it person.

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 5>But that's not the.

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:26.840
<v Speaker 17>Times we're living in, right. The times we're living in

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 17>is everybody talks about multiple billion dollar agreements. Everybody makes

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 17>very bullish forecasts, and that's what kind of investors are

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 17>signing up for and acht that's kind of the frequency

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 17>that they're tuned to. So if you're not saying that,

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:41.919
<v Speaker 17>if you're not doing that, then maybe you're missing out

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:44.799
<v Speaker 17>is a concern. But so far AMD has not missed out.

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 3>They certainly haven't. How have we seen anyone miss out?

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Because ultimately the Semiconductor Index again and a new record

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 3>high in Yeah.

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 17>No, I mean we're seeing Intel shares up very strongly today.

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 17>And if materially they had missed out their innings haven't

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 17>yet caught up with the overall sort of cavalry charge

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:07.440
<v Speaker 17>up and to the right. But even they just on

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:09.799
<v Speaker 17>signs of promise, on signs that they're doing better, are

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 17>being rewarded in the stock market.

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 5>So that's really the environment that AMD is in.

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 17>Expectations couldn't be any higher.

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 3>And is there, more broadly a signal that more deal

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 3>we were all worrying about circular financing in is that

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:24.399
<v Speaker 3>kind of like past tense now?

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:25.799
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 17>Jenson Lyne, the CEO of in Video, was at the

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 17>Milk and Institute yesterday and he said, look, I've put

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 17>a lot of money to work to help get this going.

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 17>Hopefully I've done enough and hopefully we don't need this

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:40.360
<v Speaker 17>going forward. Hopefully these companies are now sort of on

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 17>the gross margin bases doing much better and it kind

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 17>of become self sustaining, then hopefully it won't be necessary.

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 17>If that's a signal, then perhaps not as many deals

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:49.720
<v Speaker 17>going forward.

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Amagazine king always across those deals always across these earnings

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 3>you'll be bracing after the bell tonight.

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate it. That does it for this edition at

0:43:57.440 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Blue Bag Tech. Do not forget to check out.

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Our podcast on the terminal, as well as online on Apple, Spotify,

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 3>and i.

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Heeart from New York, This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 16>M hm

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:09.439
<v Speaker 3>Mm hmm