WEBVTT - Bengals Come to Arrowhead, TNF Preview & Nick’s Picks

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Robliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.639
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in What's Right with Nick Great Episode two sixty two,

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 2>and I Am going to do my best to keep

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>this to an hour. We have at least three hours

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>worth of topics. We have to recap our week one gambling,

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>We have to do our Week two gambling. I told

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 2>you today I was gonna wait until today to talk

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 2>about the Tyreek Kill stuff because I was hoping that

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 2>in the hours and hours taken up by the Tyree

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Kill conversation, someone else would make some of the obvious points. Unfortunately,

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm yet to see them, So I'll take that responsibility.

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 2>We have that to do. Also, funny little story before

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 2>we get started to Monsday. So, as you guys know,

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 2>laur Reys, our former social media person, got a big

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>time job and left the company, and so we have

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 2>a new social media person for this show for first

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 2>things first, for all of it. And so one of

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>the things they need because I don't post show clips

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 2>to my Instagram is my Instagram log in. Right, So

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 2>yesterday I realize I don't have my Instagram log in.

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know my Instagram password, and I it's on

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 2>my phone, but I don't know what the password is.

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 2>And for some reason, maybe because I'm verified, I don't

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 2>know that I can't go through the regular steps of

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>figuring out how to get my password back. They're like,

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 2>you got to reach out to Instagram directly.

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 2>And I was just like, you know, I don't like

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 2>it is gonna be a pain in the ass. Do

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 2>I really want? Uh? You know, do I want to

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 2>go through these things? And I'm like, no, let's go

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 2>ahead and figure it out. Uh. And so I thought,

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 2>and but then so they email Instagram. It's got to

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 2>do this. I gotta do all these other things. I

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 2>gotta come up with a new email address, I don't know.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Little did I know as I was going through that

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 2>that whatever headaches I was dealing with on Instagram, we're

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna pale in comparison to some of my sports media

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 2>colleagues and friends from yesterday. I don't even get a

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 2>silver medal for Instagram issues from yesterday. Uh shout I well,

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 2>my goodness, gracious, what a what a what a kerv fluff?

0:02:55.960 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Wile we found we find ourselves in good? You know,

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I am not I am. I have made

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 2>multiple decisions for good or for bad about this show

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>and about things we will and won't talk about. Uh.

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 2>And it doesn't always lead to the quickest or biggest

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 2>growth or no pun intended virality. But I do at

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 2>times feel like this is you know, I'm kind of

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna be the tortoise that wins the race. Like I'm

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 2>just gonna let everybody else. Oh wait, what happened? Wait?

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Why is he? Wait? Isn't it like eight in the

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>morning in Los Angeles? What's going on all right? Now

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 2>to the show? Uh, here's what missed the cut? NFL

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>breaks viewership records. The Vikings reportedly felt bad for Daniel Jones,

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 2>and I asked them to put this in their folks,

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 2>please stop asking terrible questions so they put this on

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 2>the internet. Please. This is a note to my colleagues

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 2>in sports media. So, demons, I think you will agree

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 2>with me here. So over the last eighteen to twenty

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 2>four months, sports twitter has just bec It's become even

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 2>more of a cesspool of inaccurately or unfairly clipped short

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 2>videos and then some of those faceless, nameless aggregation accounts

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 2>will post the video and be like people are saying

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 2>dot dot dot and it was. There were three things

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 2>that happened this weekend that it went viral thanks to

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 2>one of the mL Football or JKA Football or one

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 2>of these one of those faceless, nameless accounts that were

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 2>three second or less clips. One Aaron Rodgers already ignoring

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 2>that Hackett because of a second and a half of

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Hackett talking to him and Rogers looking to the side.

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Another one was is Joel Botonio. I think it was

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 2>won't accept a hand from Deshaun Watson because in the

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 2>moment of him trying, like trying to get up off

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the field, it looks like he didn't take Deshaun's hand. Oh,

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 2>and the other one was Joe Burrow can't hold a

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 2>water bottle. People are talking, Okay, all right, these are

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 2>all dumb. Here is what I need to stop happening. Folks,

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 2>stop asking the athletes about the dumb things. Fake people

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 2>on the internet turned into a story the guy on

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 2>McAfee who wears I think a cowboy hat. I don't

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 2>know his name. I think he's a Patriots fan. He

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 2>was like Aaron. People on the internet are saying you

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 2>and he are already on the outs. Aaron has to

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 2>respond to Sean, who I have no sympathy for in

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 2>a million things, but he all of a sudden has

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 2>to respond to this like, oh, people are you in

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 2>this offensive lineman? Have an issue? And Joe Burrow someone

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 2>asked Joe Burrow yesterday, can you pick up a water bottle?

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Guys stop taking these faceless, nameless aggregator accounts and bringing

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 2>them and their faux controversy for engagement farming to the

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 2>to the news conferences. I beg of you. Okay, that's

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 2>just my little medium minute for everyone out there. Just

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 2>because it's it's getting a lot of shares on Elon

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Musk's propaganda machine does not mean that Joe Burrow has

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 2>to answer whether or not he can pick up a

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 2>water bottle. The guy played a full football game. Now

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 2>is his risk one hundred percent healthy? I don't know.

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Can he throw the ball sixty yards? I don't know.

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Am I pretty confident that the guy can pick up

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 2>a water bottle with his throwing hand that I saw

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 2>him throw thirty passes with. Yeah, I'm pretty confident of that.

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 2>These people, we're just getting dumber and dumber by the day. Demons,

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 2>go ahead.

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he he did struggle to pick it up a

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 4>little bit. I'm not, oh my god, not you too.

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 2>He did not struggle pick up a water bottle. You guys,

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 2>you're just oh my god. Uh. The worst thing, one

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 2>of the worst developments over the last five years is

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 2>people being able to make money off Twitter. You thought

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 2>it'd be just like, oh, creators are gonna be able

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 2>to create content. No, I'm near. It's not like there's

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of people that were like struggling painters who

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 2>are now like painting, showed to putting up videos of

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 2>themselves painting. They're like, now I can pay rent. No,

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 2>it's none of that. Instead, it's just these faceless aggregator

0:07:56.080 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 2>accounts saying putting up a video that was like, man, uh,

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:04.679
<v Speaker 2>Jamar Chase is washed and it's a video of Tyler

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Boyd from three years ago and they just put that up.

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 2>So people are like, that's not even Jamar Chase, that's

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 2>not from yesterday, and it's so infuriating. All right, demand

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 2>speaking of Jamar Chase and the Bengals, let's get the

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs of Angles. Hey.

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so Kansas City is looking very dominant with that

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 4>new additioning Xavier Worthy. Cincinnati, on the other hand, struggling,

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Chase is still ramping up. You got Higgins hurt, and

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Burrow seems to be a little deemed up. I don't

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 4>know what's going on there. Yeah, but you.

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Know what the producers putting there. You know what the

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 2>I didn't even see this, the producers putting the script.

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 2>And Burrow can't hold a water bottle. My god, I'm

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna be the last I'm gonna be the last sane

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 2>person in America. But go ahead.

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so last week you said Cincinnati could lose Week

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 4>two to Kansas City and still feel confident in the

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 4>off season in January, but after an embarrassing loss of

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 4>the Patriots. Yeah, but after an embarrassing loss of the Patriots,

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 4>and we one, do you think that's still the case?

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it's still the case. And the Mangles are

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 2>used to going oho and two and I I'm annoyed

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 2>by the Joe Burrow coverage this week. It's folks are acting,

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I think, dumber than they are when it comes. And

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm a Chiefs guy, right, I should dislike Joe Burrow,

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 2>but I don't. I should dislike the Bengals, I kind

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>of do. But I is this guy's other than Joe Burrow?

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 2>A literally, who's the guy Yesterday's like, yes, Savy, you're worthing,

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 2>just run straight, Okay, we'll see but regardless, But folks

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 2>are acting as if it's illogical that Joe Burrow is

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 2>getting the benefit of the doubt. And I hear a

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of people saying, well, look at his numbers the

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 2>last ten games, what if it were lamar Guys. Here

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 2>is how we have always done sports talk and will

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 2>always do sports talk. If you're a guy who, in

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the biggest moments has not only come through, but has

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 2>beaten your biggest rivals, you are going to get more

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 2>margin for error than guys who haven't. Oh, keep that

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 2>same energy for Joe Burrow you would keep for Josh Allen.

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Yet we would except for the case that Joe Burrow

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 2>against Alan and Mahomes in the playoffs is two to one,

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 2>including a blowout victory over Allan and has played well

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 2>in all of those games, and Alan against Mahomes and

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Burrow in the playoffs is zero to four. That's why

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 2>we're not quote keeping the same energy. And when it

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 2>comes to Lamar, we have seen Joe Burrow be excellent

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 2>in multiple playoff runs and we've never seen it from Lamar. Now,

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the further away we get from those playoff runs, the

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 2>less that margin of error or benefit of the doubt exists.

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 2>But we are just one year removed from it. Last

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 2>year they didn't make the playoffs, he was hurt, So

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 2>we're a year in a game removed from it. So

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 2>I just I don't understand why it would be as

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 2>if let me try to think of a cross conference example.

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's say Matt Stafford started, you know, had struggled for

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 2>a month, and folks were like, man, you don't have

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.839
<v Speaker 2>to keep that same energy you have for Dak Prescott

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 2>for Matt Stafford. It's like, well, I don't know. We

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 2>saw him win a super Bowl and be awesome, and

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>we've seen the other guy struggle come the postseason, Like

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 2>that is how we do sports talk. Oh, man, keep

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 2>that same energy you have for Joe l embiid for

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Durant, Like, no, I won't, Actually I won't. I

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 2>won't keep that same energy and I won't feel badly

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 2>about it. And so this this all of a sudden

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 2>revisionist history of man, maybe Joe Burrow wasn't that good

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 2>all along? What the hell are you guys want talking

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 2>about now? Is there a legitimate concern that this super

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 2>rare wrist injury is going to change his trajectory? Demon say,

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I think you have that concern that he doesn't, that

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>he is still legitimately hurt and the great Joe Burrow

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>is not coming back certainly this Sunday or maybe not

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 2>this year. Go ahead.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, No, I saw that the injury was super were

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't think the quarterbacks ever gotten it before, so

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 4>they don't really know how to gauge it. So it

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 4>is kind of tricky so to speak.

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 2>So that to me is fair that to me of saying, oh,

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 2>should we be worried about his ability to get back

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 2>to himself this season, that's fair. But last year, and again,

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 2>sometimes I think people can't even remember the forget things

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 2>that happened a long time ago, things that happened recently.

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Last year, Joe Burrow was coming off the best season

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 2>of his career forty four hundred yards thirty five touchdowns,

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 2>or the best or second best season of his career

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 2>year two and three. He was awesome, and coming into

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 2>the season he suffered that calf injury and the first

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 2>few games of the year he was awful. And then

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 2>starting Week five, this is what Joe Burrow did, thirteen touchdowns,

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 2>four picks, a one oh seven rating, and then he

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 2>suffered the wrist injury and was done for the year.

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 2>But so last year we saw Joe Burrow not be

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent at the beginning of the year, play poorly,

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 2>and then as soon as his started trusting his body

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 2>he got a little healthier, he was excellent again. So

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 2>I again, I don't know what it means for this week.

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Wilds is you know, obviously watched that Patriots Bengals game

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 2>super close, and on Monday morning was sounding that Joe

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Burrow is hurt. Alarm now does that mean. Again, because

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 2>it's such a rare injury for a quarterback, we don't

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 2>really have a context of, Oh, it's gonna take three weeks,

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna take six weeks. I don't know. Here's what

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 2>I will tell you as a Chiefs fan, this is

0:14:54.880 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 2>a dangerous game. This team is not afraid of Kansas City,

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 2>and Burrow's not afraid of anybody. And so I think

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs will win. And I think that the Chiefs

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 2>beating the Bengals in the Ravens to start the year

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of takes a little bit of the zest out

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 2>of the AFC playoff race when in weeks one and

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 2>two the Chiefs are at such a decided edge. Maybe

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 2>it will mean the Texans Demons A your guys, CJ

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 2>will be the team that they're gonna and they do

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 2>play them later in the season. But I am I

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 2>am not looking at how the Bengals played against the

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Patriots as an indication of who they actually are going

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 2>to be this season. And I think there has been

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 2>massive overreaction to that Week one game. Go ahead, if

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 2>you go ahead, if you want to follow us on

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 2>anything there.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no, So if Kansas if Kansas City wins this week.

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Do you see them and San Francisco but being undefeated

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 4>by the time their Week seven matchup comes up?

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, So I don't think the Niners are gonna

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 2>be Let me look at the Niners schedule the I

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 2>don't think the Niners are gonna be undefeated come Week seven,

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 2>but let me see who they have. So they're at

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings this week. We'll talk about that more later.

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 2>At the Rams. That Rams game looked very tough, but

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 2>the Rams are so banged up. Home for the Patriots,

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 2>home for the Cardinals, at the Seahawks.

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 4>They could I think.

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 2>The they could be but six. Like, I think they're

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 2>probably five and one. I don't have a specific loss

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 2>to pick for you, but I think they're probably five

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 2>and one for the Chiefs. They have an early buye,

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 2>so home for the Bengals, then at the Falcons, at

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers, home for the Saints. They should be five

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 2>and zero. At the Chargers is gonna be a sneaky,

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 2>tough one because Harball is just gonna try to run

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 2>the ball forty five times and not He's not going

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 2>to fall in the track. So many people fall into

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 2>against the Chiefs which is, oh, we're down seven, now

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 2>we have to abandon the run. It's not going to

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 2>do that. He'll just keep doing it. And even though

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 2>in the Chiefs, run defense, in my opinion, is a potential.

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the Chiefs are the best team in football,

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 2>but if we were ranking their strengths, I think run

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:24.479
<v Speaker 2>defense is probably the lowest on that list. All right,

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 2>let's go to Caleb and CJ.

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 4>So Caleb's debut wasn't great. He obviously had ninety three yards.

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 4>But this week he's playing up against CJ. Stroud and

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 4>the Texans. I think he's got a lot riding on

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 4>this one. I think he needs this game. So do

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 4>you think he'll pull it off? Or well, you need

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 4>to fire up the excuses you only give Trevor Lawrence machine.

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so Trevor's in year four, so it is fair

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 2>to start holding him to just a regular standard, not

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 2>a young player, not of this like the you've got

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 2>to like Trevor is damn near. He's on his second

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 2>he just got his second contract. The you know he is.

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 2>And I if Trevor had played poorly in Week one,

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I'd have told you I thought he played well in

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Week one I thought the Jags created a way to

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 2>lose the idea that we are going to do.

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 4>Uh oh.

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 2>Huge game for Caleb in his trajectory in the second

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 2>game of his career is of course silly and ridiculous,

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 2>but I will take some ownership for it because I

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 2>did pick them to go to the Super Bowl, and

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I have been putting him on Mahomes Mountain for two

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 2>years and I'm here to tell you he's gonna play excellent.

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm a little roma doonsay is probably not gonna

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 2>play and Keenan Allen didn't practice on Wednesday, so we

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 2>do it that. We talked about how many weapons the

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Bears have. If two of their top three receivers are out,

0:18:56.080 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 2>that could be tough. But I I am really amazed

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 2>by how many people, despite watching this player in college,

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 2>after a rough first game of his career, they're like, oh,

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 2>pump the breaks. I will not pump the breaks. I won't.

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I brought this up the other day, but John Elway

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 2>in the first game of his career was one for

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 2>eight for fifteen yards with an interception no touchdowns. Peyton

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Manning in the first game of his career, threw three

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 2>picks we can go. I think Troy Aikman, and who's

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the other guy that I used as a more recent example.

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 2>I can't even think of it. I used it on

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 2>the show. But it doesn't matter. I Caleb is going

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 2>to be exceptional, and the worst game Caleb plays all

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 2>year is going to have been that Week One game.

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 2>He thought he was going to be more escapable than

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 2>he was. I think he got a little flustered. I

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 2>think there were real butterflies, which is why I am

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 2>so optimistic for this week because they won despite that,

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 2>so he didn't really hasn't really had to deal with

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 2>too much backlash for an awful Week one game because

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 2>the team won anyway, and he can learn from it.

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 2>So listen, the Texans are excellent, and this game is

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 2>in Chicago. I the weather's supposed to be good. I

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 2>think calebill have over two hundred yards. I think he'll

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 2>have a couple of touchdowns. I think he'll have his

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 2>first turnover. Like if I were to project a Caleb

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Williams stat line for this game, it would be two

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty total yards, two touchdowns, one pick or

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 2>one lost fumble, one turnover is what I would say.

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that it is fair or anything we've

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 2>ever done to even a number one overall pick quarterback

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 2>to say, hey, second game of your career playing a

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 2>guy A lot of people think is the league MVP

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 2>this year or their pick for League MVP? Go out

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 2>play them? And so now do I think it's I

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 2>was asking this yesterday on TV. Let me ask you this, Demons,

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 2>because you love CJ. But I don't think you're anti Caleb.

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 2>If only these are the only two options, So door

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 2>one or door two, there's there's no other possibilities. Caleb

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 2>duplicates what he did in Week one, just can't complete

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 2>a pass, can't nothing downfield, you know, around one hundred yards,

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 2>or Caleb outplays CJ on Sunday? What do you think

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 2>is more likely of those two?

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 4>I'd have to go with him now playing him, But

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 4>I don't think you.

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Don't think that's gonna happen, right, So that's so that's

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 2>what I purely because maybe one's a five percent chance

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 2>and one's an eight percent chance, with a vast majority

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.719
<v Speaker 2>of outcomes being somewhere between. He's better than he was

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 2>last Sunday, but not as good as CJ's going to

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 2>be this Sunday, that to me is the more likely.

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 2>But if you can only pick one of those two

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 2>and everyone wild's Brew and Greg all disagreed with me.

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 2>They act like they act like it was insane for

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 2>me to say that Caleb could do that. So I

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 2>guess we'll see. I'm super excited for it.

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 4>These are those going speaking of the comparisons, who would

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.479
<v Speaker 4>you start your franchise with? Between Caleb and Stroud?

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 2>So listen, I think this will make people mad, but

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it's totally reasonable. I would I would pick

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 2>Caleb because I think Caleb is going to be the

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 2>second best quarterback in the league behind mahone Homes in

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 2>a few years. I but that. And let me put

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 2>it like this, if you were to ask me before

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 2>the season started, if I could have Caleb or CJ

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 2>moving forward, who would I pick? I would have said Caleb.

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 2>So changing that opinion because of one game would mean

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't even actually an opinion, It's just something I said.

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 2>Like and now, So if for me, the starting a

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 2>franchise moving forward rankings, I think the top four has

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 2>to be Mahomes, Alan, Caleb, CJ in that order. That's

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 2>that's the four I would have the And the reason

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Joe Burrow is not on there is because even if

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 2>this risk injury get you know, is healed by Sunday,

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 2>he is had so many injuries and he's older that

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 2>I can't, you know, I can't have him ahead of

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 2>any of those four guys. But that's you know, that

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 2>that would be my list.

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 4>So it's.

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's just if I were starting a franchise today.

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 2>So Mahomes isn't old enough to where it's like, well,

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 2>he's the best, but how long am I gonna get him?

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna get Mahmes for another ten twelve years. Same

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 2>with Josh Allen, and then after that it gets trickier

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 2>after that, Where does Lamar fall in? Where does Trevor

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 2>fall in? For me? I understand, maybe not for others.

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, I assuredly would probably take Anthony Richardson higher

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 2>than most people because I'm just so fascinated by the guy,

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, So there's but yeah, so I to me,

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 2>CJ would be one of my top four picks, but

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 2>Caleb would be just ahead of them, all right, next.

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 4>All right, then you gave props to the Lions after

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 4>the big overtime win versus Ram. Now they've got their

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 4>playoff rematch versus Baker and the Bucks. Baker's moved ahead

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 4>of the Prince and Caleb O. Maholmes Mountain. If Baker

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 4>proves it again this week, where is his ceiling this year?

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 2>So let me say this on the front end, I'm

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>really worried about the Bucks this week because of their

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 2>secondary injuries. I mean, so they lost Antoine Winfield's hurt.

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Three corners are hurt. So I do like the Bucks,

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 2>and they played the Lions relatively tough in the playoffs

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:37.959
<v Speaker 2>last year. But whenever you have cluster injuries, it's to

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 2>what actually happened to the Rams in their game against

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 2>the Lions. They suffered these cluster offensive line injuries and

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 2>they're just cooked. The Bucks secondary concerns me now Baker.

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Baker's going on now a half season from

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 2>the second half of last year year, or this last

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 2>quarter of last year into the playoffs to week one

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 2>of a level football. Now, do I think the Bucks

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 2>can win a Super Bowl? I don't do. I think

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 2>the Bucks should be respected a little bit more by

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.959
<v Speaker 2>the general public. I do, But I think these injuries

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 2>against the Lions and a Ben Johnson offense that that

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 2>does concern me for this week, and it's one of

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 2>the reasons the Bucks plus seven and a half is

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>not going to be one of my picks, even though

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 2>I think Baker is proving to be one of the

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 2>more underrated players in the league. What's up. You look

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:37.400
<v Speaker 2>concerned about something, demands.

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 4>No, No, it's nothing. I didn't know they have that

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 4>many injuries in the secondary. It's just piqued my interest,

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 4>that's all.

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Was this part of maybe a Demons hit.

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 4>It might be somewhere, It might be somewhere.

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, well, all right, well it's not set

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 2>in stone yet. The bets aren't made, so maybe we

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 2>can discuss it. I'm not going to try to push

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 2>you in any direction. And I gave you bad teaser

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 2>advice last week because last week, had you listen to me,

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 2>you would have had the Bengals teas down to minus

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 2>two and a half and they lost out right, So

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean. So I gave you bad

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 2>teaser advice. Process, all right, So let's go on to

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the next thing if we can.

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 4>I'll see the Bills are going to Miami to play

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 4>the Dolphins. Buffalo or the raginning September champions. They're always

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 4>getting the dubs in September. Allen is ten and two

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 4>against the Dolphins as well. Miami's dealing with injuries and

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 4>also the unfortunate Tyreek Hill situation. You called this the

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 4>most important game for the Dolphins this year, So how

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 4>do they rally?

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.959
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that they do. And I'm actually, I

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 2>actually don't want to spend a ton of time on

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 2>this game right here, because this game is going to

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 2>be one of my picks coming up in the B block,

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 2>so I just kind of be redundant. But the reason

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 2>what I'll say is the reason I called it the

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 2>most important game on their schedule is it is very,

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.959
<v Speaker 2>very hard to believe you can win the division if

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 2>you don't at least split with Buffalo and you play

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo in their building in November. So getting them in

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 2>your building on a short week in September is as

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 2>close to a must win as you can have. Like

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Miami's path to being a real contender is the win

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 2>the division, get at least one, maybe two playoff games

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 2>in Florida, not have to deal with the snow or

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the frigid weather as much as possible, So they've got

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 2>to win this game. Now do I think they're going

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 2>to win this game? We'll discuss that in picks. But

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I said on Tuesday, I was gonna wait to talk

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 2>about the Tyreek thing, and I'm gonna try to see

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 2>if I can do this in five or six minutes,

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 2>because I tend to go too long on these things sometimes,

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 2>and I've heard a lot of people talk about this,

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 2>and not to be rude, it has felt a lot

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 2>like stuff we've already talked about and everybody knows. And

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 2>it was a little frustrating for me because I think

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 2>there are three important, noteworthy angles that either have been

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 2>totally disregarded or brushed over. So I'm gonna try to

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 2>quickly get through all three of those, and I think

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 2>I'll probably surprise some folks with where I stand on

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 2>some of this. And if we're gonna put this on

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 2>the internet, we can probably you know, start it right here,

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 2>all right. So there's three things that came to me

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 2>watching the Tyreek situation. The first one is going to

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 2>be somewhat sympathetic to the police, and the other two

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 2>are not going to be. First one is this, I

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 2>was shocked at how few people recognized or acknowledged why

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 2>cops justifiably are terrified at every traffic stop, and why

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 2>having the windows down and why tinted windows are so

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 2>scary for police officers. Part of the Tyrek thing was

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 2>actually a gun story, even though Tyreek obviously had no gun.

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 2>It is nothing like that. But we have decided as

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 2>a country, and certainly in states like Florida, that everyone

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 2>in anyone's allowed to have a pistol or more. And

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 2>so if you're an officer, walking up on a car

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 2>has to be terrifying, no matter how well trained you are,

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 2>no matter good bad are indifferent because so many people

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:22.239
<v Speaker 2>have firearms. And so I don't I am I do.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I think there is way too much you know, kind

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 2>of apologies and people let bad cops off the hook.

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 2>And we'll get to that in a moment. But I

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 2>one part that I just think people fail to think

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 2>about is it is gotta be legitimately heart racing anytime

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>an officer has pulled a car over and is walking

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 2>up to the car, particularly in places where obviously these

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 2>guns everywhere, particularly in places where it's to legal for

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 2>almost anyone to have a gun. So I I have

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 2>sympathy in those moments. And it's also why I think,

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 2>as odd as it sounds like the tinted window laws

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 2>are necessary, Like I get that, man, we have made

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 2>the choice that we're just gonna be the wild West

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to firearms. So that part, that part

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 2>I totally understand. And if it wasn't that, if it

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 2>wasn't for the proliferation of so many people having guns,

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think there would be instant at almost

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 2>any traffic violation. This real tension and almost anger and

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 2>all of that. So that part I have. I actually

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 2>have sympathy for the other two things, though one is

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 2>a math thing and the other is a uh and

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 2>the other is just how things have to work for

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 2>us to be able to have a cohesive society. The

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 2>number of people who, in their analysis made sure to

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 2>point out, well, Tyreek was rude, Tyreek could have handled

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 2>that better, Tyreek should have you know, And the number

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 2>of people who have just baked into their brains the

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 2>acceptance of, oh, if you give a cop a shitty

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 2>attitude or talk back or don't do exactly what they say,

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 2>you might get roughed up and you're kind of naive

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 2>or dumb if you don't just accept and know that

0:33:55.440 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 2>is abhorrent. We have done the opposit math on the

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 2>expectations on how police officers should treat the citizenry that

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 2>we need to do, which is we hold them in

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 2>our brain subconsciously to a lower standard than the barista

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 2>at Starbucks, when we should hold them to the highest standard.

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 2>And here is what I mean. You are not allowed

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 2>to assault someone because they're rude to you. And the

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 2>people least allowed to do that, in my eyes, are

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the people who we give the most power to. Any

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 2>cop in America has the ability to ruin any of

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 2>our days at any moment, at a minimum, ruin our day,

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and the ruin our day is the smallest thing and

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:09.959
<v Speaker 2>could for some people, you know, make them lose their job.

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 2>For some people that real violence for you know, different instances.

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 2>But they're the only people. They're the only people who

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 2>have the unilateral power to prevent you from going about

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 2>your day, detain you, arrest you, cuff you, humiliate you.

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 2>We have given them immense power that no one else

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 2>in the society has. With that power comes a ment responsibility,

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 2>and you have kind of signed up. You gotta take

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 2>more shit with a smile on your face than anyone else.

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 2>And we as a society have just decided, well, yeah,

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:56.799
<v Speaker 2>maybe that's how it should be, but we know that's

0:35:56.800 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 2>not how it works. We all kind of know. You

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.839
<v Speaker 2>talk back to the wrong cop, you don't listen to him.

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:06.839
<v Speaker 2>It's not just that you want to say you don't

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 2>listen to him, and you are gonna get coughed for

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 2>failure to listen to a lawful command. Find so be it.

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 2>But that's not what that was. It was, Well, you

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 2>don't listen to him. We all know somebody there might

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 2>put you in a choke hold, somebody there might need

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 2>you in the back, somebody there might put your face

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 2>down on the pavement, and yeah they shouldn't do it,

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 2>but we all kind of know they might. That's bullshit

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 2>and that's not how this is supposed to go. If

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 2>I go to Starbucks and I walk in there and

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:49.879
<v Speaker 2>what do you want? Moke, a frap and quick with it, toots. Look, jeez, Louis,

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 2>what do you do? What are you talking to me

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 2>like that? Yeah? I am, I am talking to you

0:36:54.400 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 2>like that? Quickly, Tom Barista, get a real job. You

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 2>know what nobody thinks is okay for that person to

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 2>come across the counter put me in a choke hold

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 2>and put me face down on the store. No, it's not,

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 2>even though in my mind, actually that would be more

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 2>acceptable than the cop doing it. That's this regular person

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 2>with a regular job. But if I walk up to

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 2>a police officer and say, hey, say some awful things,

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.959
<v Speaker 2>make fun of them, do whatever, kind of bait them,

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 2>and then that cop threw me in cups and threw

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 2>me on the ground, everyone would be like, well, you

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of had a coming. That's the opposite of how

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 2>this is supposed to go. When you are a public

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 2>servant with this type of power, there are things that

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 2>you must be better than. And so a lot of

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 2>folks are it just reflexively being like Tyrek should have

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 2>known better. Yes, sure, not his job. Not his job.

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 2>And here's the last point, and this is the one

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 2>that where I'm gonna do some math here, folks, because

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the Miami Dolphins, in their statement included these words. The

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 2>vast majority of police officers, vast majority, we hear this

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 2>all the time. Whenever there's one of these things. Everyone,

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 2>even the well, we hear two things. We hear the

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 2>police union come out and be like perfect is perfect. Stop,

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 2>I see nothing wrong and you know what I mean?

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 2>Of course, fine, But then we hear the people who

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 2>are trying to delicately and lightly criticize the cops, be like,

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 2>we know the vast majority are good, but this guy

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 2>was bad. Okay, let's just do some real statistical regressions here. Okay,

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:56.280
<v Speaker 2>what do we think? Vast majority means? Majority is fifty

0:38:56.360 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 2>one percent, So vast majority is that ninety percent? Is

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:05.839
<v Speaker 2>that ninety percent is the vast majority? Okay, let's call

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 2>it that. So I watched that video. Yeah, there were

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 2>there were escalating levels of badness by a couple officers,

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 2>but nobody stopped it, just like Scotty Shepler think nobody stopped.

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:23.799
<v Speaker 2>There's five officers there, so if the vast majority of

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 2>police would never do anything like this, but we have

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 2>five involved in doing anything. So what are the odds

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 2>of that? Well, it's ten percent chance that one of

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 2>them would. But now we got to go ten percent

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 2>of ten percent of ten percent of ten percent of

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 2>ten percent. You know what, Let's be kinder. Let's say

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 2>vast majority means eighty percent, so there's a twenty percent chance.

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 2>So let's do the math kids, one of the five

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent chance, two of the five twenty percent of

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent. Now we're down to four percent, three of

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the five twenty percent of four percent. Now we're down

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 2>to point eight percent, four of the five twenty percent

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:09.280
<v Speaker 2>of point eight Now we're down to point two percent,

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 2>five of the five twenty percent of point two percent.

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 2>So now we're down to point oh four percent. Is

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 2>that your guys experience, Is your guys experience that when

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 2>either you have had encounters or when we see these videos,

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 2>that there is a one in twenty five hundred chance

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 2>that if there's five officers around and one starts roughing

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 2>someone up, that none of them will stop it. Do

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 2>you think that to one in twenty five hundred or

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 2>is it more the other way, which is you are

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:55.879
<v Speaker 2>shocked whenever you see a video and there is one

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 2>cop who is wildly out of control and another officer

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 2>then actually comes in and stops it. And that is

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 2>where I will talk to the police directly, because no,

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't hate all cops. No I don't think all

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 2>cops are bad, no, none of that. What I do

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 2>think is this, there is a total inability for the

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 2>cops who want to do the right thing and keep

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 2>the trust of the community and treat people with dignity

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 2>and respect to publicly combat the high school bullies who

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 2>signed up for the job just to be able to

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 2>do exactly what that guy did to Tyreek Hill. There

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 2>is such a culture of protectionism and brotherhood that if

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 2>it is the vast majority wouldn't do that. Those folks

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 2>don't feel able to stop the minority, if we want

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 2>to call it that, that does it, and that is

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 2>a systemic problem. And so I, you know, I said

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 2>put this on the internet. I don't even actually I've

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:25.479
<v Speaker 2>changed my mind. We don't even have to tweet this out.

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 2>It can be on our YouTube page and people that

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:29.319
<v Speaker 2>are watching right now can hear it. I don't feel

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 2>like arguing with people. It's an election season, there's all

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the bots. I don't really feel like doing it, but.

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 2>It is really remarkable to me that we have all

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:52.239
<v Speaker 2>just kind of come to accept that what happened with

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:57.399
<v Speaker 2>Tyreek isn't that And folks are like, man, it could

0:42:57.400 --> 0:43:00.800
<v Speaker 2>have gone worse. He's lucky, likely, you know, if he

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 2>weren't Tyreek Hill. And again, general good rule of thumb

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:11.759
<v Speaker 2>treat people respectfully understand, you know, people you know have

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 2>empathy for others, recognize, oh, maybe he wants my window

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 2>down because he is scared because there is guns. He

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 2>recognized jobs are hard. That is a general good rule

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 2>of thumb to live by for all of us in

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 2>all circumstances. But it is perverse that the people we

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 2>give the biggest leeway to when it comes to getting

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 2>their feelings hurt or offended and reacting with violence are

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 2>the people who should have the least because they are

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:52.719
<v Speaker 2>the people we give the most power to. That's not

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:55.919
<v Speaker 2>the way things are supposed to go, and when they

0:43:56.000 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 2>do go that way, there should be an expert that

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 2>somebody is gonna say, whoa, whoa, whoa, that's not what

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 2>we do here. We're here to serve the public good,

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 2>and typically that's not what I see, So that, to

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 2>me should have been the conversation. Instead, we kind of

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:27.919
<v Speaker 2>had the same old conversations about race and policing, which,

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 2>by the way, I'm wearing the shoes right now. Actually,

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 2>if only there was a famous football player and once

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 2>upon a time tried to talk about race and policing,

0:44:36.160 --> 0:44:38.719
<v Speaker 2>I wonder what would have happened to his career, we

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 2>could have that, and about the respectability of well, just comply,

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:45.280
<v Speaker 2>just pay attention to the orders and everything will be fine.

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Or are we gonna have real conversation about why cops

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 2>are afraid at traffic stops understandably, about whether or not

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 2>we should hold our police officers to a lower, higher

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 2>or the same standard we would hold a salesperson at

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 2>H and M, And whether or not we we think

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:09.319
<v Speaker 2>that in order to be considered quote, one of the

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 2>good cops, you have a moral obligation to in real

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:17.839
<v Speaker 2>time step in when one of the bad cops is

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:21.280
<v Speaker 2>doing what happened to Tyreek? Just my thoughts are gambling?

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Show next, What's Right? Welcome back? In What's Driving the Great?

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Episode two sixty two, Demanse says to me during the break, Pops,

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 2>you got community noted on Twitter? So I did, so

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:40.240
<v Speaker 2>this is the So this is the I got an alert.

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 2>One of your tweets has been you know, updated by

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:47.799
<v Speaker 2>community notes, which is there for like misinformation essentially? Right? Uh?

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 2>And I'm like what the I'm like, impossible because like

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't put out fake news, Like what could I

0:45:53.200 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 2>have gotten community noted for? So I tweeted after the

0:45:57.480 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Jets opening game. I quote tweeted Wilds about how it's

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 2>now been over one thousand days in twenty four games

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:08.319
<v Speaker 2>since Aaron Rodgers threw for three hundred yards and I

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 2>wrote for context the last time Aaron Rodgers threw for

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:17.920
<v Speaker 2>three hundred yards, Dan Campbell had zero wins as the

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Lion's head coach, right, I think I even said it

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 2>on the show on Tuesday. So evidently I was wrong

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 2>by a week. So Dan Campbell got his first win

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:33.399
<v Speaker 2>December fifth, twenty twelve, and Rogers Last threw for three

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred December twelfth, twenty twelve, so or twenty twelve, sorry,

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one, but I'm gonna get you know on

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 2>my own podcast. So it was it was Rogers Last

0:46:43.320 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 2>did it December twelfth, twenty twenty one. Campbell's first win

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:51.319
<v Speaker 2>was fifth, twenty twenty one, So I got so I

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 2>got it off by a week. But of all the

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 2>things to be community noted for, and also like, yeah,

0:46:58.000 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:02.720
<v Speaker 4>They stay stickled, y'all. Now, No, no, that's fine.

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I was I put out a fact it was wrong.

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the full community note process, but I

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 2>would say is I don't think the facts and information

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:18.399
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter right now are up to a high enough

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 2>standard where you know Nick Wrights sports tweets that are

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:26.799
<v Speaker 2>ninety eight percent correct but a little bit off, you

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean? That really does feel like a

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 2>the man we have. We have cleaned this entire house

0:47:33.800 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 2>so much it's spotless. Time now to dust way when

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:43.359
<v Speaker 2>in reality you have a toilet overflowing with sewage and

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 2>you've got paint peeling off the walls. Like so, I

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know about that, but whatever, all right, let's do

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 2>our week one picks Reek ap demand before I get

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 2>to the games of the week.

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so, uh, you went two and three, just swallow five.

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:03.359
<v Speaker 4>So he's starting off all right, a little far from

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 4>five to zero. But Kansas City minus three versus Baltimore,

0:48:07.719 --> 0:48:08.920
<v Speaker 4>that was a hit winner.

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:11.440
<v Speaker 2>That was the winner, And I almost got listened. I

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:14.360
<v Speaker 2>almost got screwed on it because they were gonna go

0:48:14.440 --> 0:48:17.920
<v Speaker 2>for two if the likely touchdown counts, they go for two,

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 2>and I can't win the bet Green Bay plus two

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 2>and a half at Philly. I like my side of that,

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:26.879
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean? And I almost got really

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 2>lucky on that one because it looked like for a

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 2>moment Philly might not kick that field goal at the end,

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 2>that they might go for it on fourth down at

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 2>the one yard line, and if they don't get it,

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:41.240
<v Speaker 2>then they probably just win by two. Since DOWNTI minus

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 2>eight and a half against New England, no chance the

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:46.759
<v Speaker 2>whole time, Dallas plus two and a half at Cleveland,

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:52.080
<v Speaker 2>no chance, no doubt the whole time. And then Rams Lions.

0:48:52.719 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 2>I you know, I would like to open a sports book. No,

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 2>that's not true. I would like there to be a

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 2>sports book out there that has a policy of if

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:09.880
<v Speaker 2>you bet in the NFL an underdog of greater than

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 2>a field goal and the game goes to overtime, you win.

0:49:16.120 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Can that be a policy? I had the Rams getting points.

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I had them plus three and a half on our picks.

0:49:22.800 --> 0:49:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I had them plus four and a half in real

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:29.880
<v Speaker 2>life money. Because the line moved. It's the game's tied

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 2>at the end of sixty minutes, and I lose. So

0:49:33.320 --> 0:49:35.720
<v Speaker 2>many things had to happen for me to lose that one.

0:49:35.920 --> 0:49:39.320
<v Speaker 2>That one's painful. That one was the painful one because

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:43.920
<v Speaker 2>if the Lions just whatever, it doesn't matter. I lost.

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:46.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm two and three. Two and three was the story

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:48.720
<v Speaker 2>of last year. It's not going to be the story

0:49:48.760 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 2>of this year. Before demon's a go to my picks.

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about a couple games that were

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 2>attractive to me, but I couldn't quite pull the trigger.

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:03.400
<v Speaker 2>So the Raiders getting eight and a half in Baltimore.

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I did like the Raiders side of it, but I

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 2>also work Aidan O'Connell or Gardner Minshew, pardon me against Baltimore.

0:50:12.800 --> 0:50:14.760
<v Speaker 2>It just feels like it could get out of hand.

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 2>But I was. I was flirting with that one. The

0:50:18.280 --> 0:50:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Vikings getting five at home against San Francisco, that there's

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 2>a San Francisco on a short week, a bit of

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:33.000
<v Speaker 2>a letdown. They're traveling. There are a lot of kind

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:38.319
<v Speaker 2>of gambling principles that say the Vikings are a pick.

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:42.279
<v Speaker 2>I should make the one. This is one of my

0:50:42.440 --> 0:50:47.880
<v Speaker 2>problems with sports betting compared to poker, which is in poker,

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:53.000
<v Speaker 2>even if it doesn't feel right, if I know from

0:50:53.160 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 2>a kind of systemic standpoint, this is the right move.

0:50:57.840 --> 0:51:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Something I've got. Oh man, I got in up myself.

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of poker, I have amazing news. I have super

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:09.520
<v Speaker 2>exciting news. Did you see my tweet? Oh no, I

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:14.360
<v Speaker 2>forgot to tell you this. Oh me, I am okay.

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Let me give some background. Back in the day, poker heyday,

0:51:18.360 --> 0:51:23.400
<v Speaker 2>there was this show called The Big Game. And the

0:51:23.480 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 2>concept of the Big Game was you had five poker

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 2>pros and one just civilian who came in and played

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:35.880
<v Speaker 2>in a six handed game, and the civilian, you know,

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:39.360
<v Speaker 2>won an entry essentially and would start with a fifty

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:42.480
<v Speaker 2>grand something like that that they was given to them

0:51:42.520 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 2>as part of the win, and then whatever money profit

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 2>they made they got to keep. And it was a

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:52.840
<v Speaker 2>contest about you know, and so you play, you know,

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:54.959
<v Speaker 2>one hundred couple hundred hands whatever it is, one hundred

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:58.080
<v Speaker 2>and fifty hands against the pros. If you lose, it's

0:51:58.080 --> 0:51:59.920
<v Speaker 2>not your money. If you win, you get to keep it.

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 2>And then there was a big, season long contest all

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:05.440
<v Speaker 2>of it. So they it was such a cool concept,

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:08.319
<v Speaker 2>such a cool show. So they brought that back and

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:11.120
<v Speaker 2>you can you can watch it on the Postars YouTube page.

0:52:11.600 --> 0:52:14.840
<v Speaker 2>So they already did season one, Season two. De Monse

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Rob Gronkowski is one of the players and guess who

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:25.439
<v Speaker 2>else is? Oh yeah, me, me, buddy, moms me, I'm

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the players.

0:52:28.320 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 4>So you said he was one of the players. I

0:52:30.040 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 4>thought there was gonna be another player that you were

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:33.880
<v Speaker 4>playing with. But yes, no, I figured you would.

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Be well, no, it's yeah, so.

0:52:37.239 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 4>Is he.

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I you know what I'm guessing not, I'm guessing that's

0:52:43.200 --> 0:52:47.319
<v Speaker 2>gonna be I'm guessing that's gonna be the player I target.

0:52:48.640 --> 0:52:52.759
<v Speaker 2>And so yeah, no, So this is uh, it's November,

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:54.960
<v Speaker 2>so there's a bunch of stuff going on. So I'm

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:57.840
<v Speaker 2>doing a whole thing. I'm super excited for it. So

0:52:58.280 --> 0:53:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Rock and I will be playing against the loose cannon,

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:04.840
<v Speaker 2>which is whatever player went you know, gets picked and

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:09.560
<v Speaker 2>then other pros and people can There's a lot of

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:12.759
<v Speaker 2>cool stuff happening. Actually, uh because part of me doing it,

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:16.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing stuff with the North American Poker Tour Las

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Vegas with Poker Stars, so that from November first to

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 2>like the tenth, I think there is their main event,

0:53:24.520 --> 0:53:27.839
<v Speaker 2>and I'm gonna be giving out gold passes, which is

0:53:28.120 --> 0:53:31.840
<v Speaker 2>a pass to the main event, the which is worth

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:35.920
<v Speaker 2>over five grand flight you know, stays all this stuff

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:38.120
<v Speaker 2>to get to Vegas. I'm giving those out over the

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 2>next you know, a couple of weeks month or so,

0:53:41.200 --> 0:53:44.440
<v Speaker 2>and a chance to be the person that gets to

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:48.080
<v Speaker 2>play in that game. So this is Yeah, this literally

0:53:48.120 --> 0:53:53.839
<v Speaker 2>got announced an hour ago, so I've been I've known this. Uh.

0:53:54.000 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 2>And if you heard me say any of this and

0:53:56.000 --> 0:53:59.120
<v Speaker 2>you were like, oh, I never watched the big game there,

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure all of this on Poker Stars YouTube page.

0:54:02.600 --> 0:54:05.719
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I mean and when I play will be

0:54:06.280 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 2>in that first week in November in Vegas against Gronk,

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:14.040
<v Speaker 2>so I'll I do have to check and see is

0:54:14.040 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 2>that gonna be embargoed when I say embargoed, Like, can

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:19.959
<v Speaker 2>I come on here the very next day and say

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 2>if I crushed him? Or do I have to wait

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:23.759
<v Speaker 2>till it airs. I don't know the answer to that.

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:28.439
<v Speaker 2>I do know that if you wanna that, just I'll

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:31.560
<v Speaker 2>be tweeting more about this, tweeting and instagramming, because again

0:54:31.600 --> 0:54:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I do, I still have my Instagram, uh, tweeting and

0:54:34.440 --> 0:54:37.000
<v Speaker 2>instagramming about it. But yeah, for your a poker fan.

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:40.240
<v Speaker 2>And it's just a really cool concept because it's totally

0:54:40.239 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 2>amateur against the pros and then some celebrities, uh and

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:46.360
<v Speaker 2>then me someone that they're putting in the celebrity category,

0:54:46.360 --> 0:54:49.960
<v Speaker 2>but I'm actually in the shark poker player professional category

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 2>and I am going to crush I cannot wait. I'm

0:54:52.600 --> 0:54:55.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna win so much money. It's going to be so amazing.

0:54:55.719 --> 0:55:01.520
<v Speaker 2>What I was saying though, was, uh, you should maybe out, Yeah,

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:07.360
<v Speaker 2>you maybe meet me in Vegas. Vegas. Well, that's a

0:55:07.440 --> 0:55:10.160
<v Speaker 2>separate thing. That's for the Yeah, that's for the play.

0:55:10.200 --> 0:55:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying you should play in the main event.

0:55:13.160 --> 0:55:14.960
<v Speaker 2>What I'm saying is you should maybe come out and

0:55:14.960 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 2>hang out with me in Vegas. Yeah, regardless. Uh, what

0:55:19.800 --> 0:55:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to say was in poker, I can

0:55:23.680 --> 0:55:28.799
<v Speaker 2>kind of stick to Oh man, I don't love this,

0:55:28.960 --> 0:55:32.680
<v Speaker 2>but this is the right play. In sports betting, I

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:35.120
<v Speaker 2>have trouble with that. So I'm going to give you

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:39.759
<v Speaker 2>a great example. Teams in Week one that get blasted,

0:55:40.400 --> 0:55:44.080
<v Speaker 2>just blasted, and then are getting huge points in Week

0:55:44.120 --> 0:55:47.640
<v Speaker 2>two over the last twenty years or like something like

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:51.720
<v Speaker 2>forty eight and twelve against the spread, like an insane number,

0:55:52.160 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 2>like you know cover, I think like more than seventy

0:55:54.560 --> 0:55:57.680
<v Speaker 2>five percent of the time. The team that checks all

0:55:57.719 --> 0:56:02.240
<v Speaker 2>those boxes is the Panthers. This week, they're at home.

0:56:02.560 --> 0:56:06.600
<v Speaker 2>They're getting there. Panthers plus six at home against the Chargers.

0:56:07.160 --> 0:56:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Every sharp gambling rule says that's a must fire. And

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I just can't bring myself to do it. I just

0:56:14.800 --> 0:56:17.759
<v Speaker 2>can't bring myself to bet on them. So I know

0:56:17.840 --> 0:56:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I should, but I can't do it. All right, demanse,

0:56:21.440 --> 0:56:23.720
<v Speaker 2>let's get to the games. I actually am betting because

0:56:23.760 --> 0:56:25.360
<v Speaker 2>this show's going too long. I said it's gonna be

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:26.759
<v Speaker 2>an hour. It's already been an hour. We haven't even

0:56:26.800 --> 0:56:28.680
<v Speaker 2>done our picks yet, and we have an f one

0:56:28.760 --> 0:56:30.640
<v Speaker 2>minute and you have your teaser. We have so much

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:31.040
<v Speaker 2>to do go.

0:56:31.800 --> 0:56:34.560
<v Speaker 4>So first off, you've got Buffalo plus two and a

0:56:34.600 --> 0:56:36.680
<v Speaker 4>half at Miami.

0:56:38.360 --> 0:56:41.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, until the Dolphins can beat the Bills, I'm just

0:56:41.320 --> 0:56:45.359
<v Speaker 2>gonna you're giving me points. This is a must fire

0:56:45.480 --> 0:56:49.360
<v Speaker 2>on Buffalo. The Bills crushed them last year early in

0:56:49.360 --> 0:56:51.520
<v Speaker 2>the year when the Dolphins were rolling. They then beat

0:56:51.560 --> 0:56:54.319
<v Speaker 2>them again late in the year when the Dolphins were,

0:56:54.440 --> 0:56:56.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of falling apart. I think there's a

0:56:56.680 --> 0:57:01.160
<v Speaker 2>significant psychological edge. Yes, Miami's defense is banged up, and

0:57:01.280 --> 0:57:04.840
<v Speaker 2>of course Tyreek is terrifying, but I didn't think Miami's

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:08.080
<v Speaker 2>offense looked that good in Week one. I certain I

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:12.040
<v Speaker 2>thought Miami got there. It was very fortunate to win

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:15.520
<v Speaker 2>that football game. There's the Etsy En fumble or etn fumble,

0:57:15.560 --> 0:57:18.439
<v Speaker 2>pardon me, and then obviously the Tyreek play, which isn't

0:57:18.440 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 2>like a Fluke plays Tyreek Hill. But Allen is eleven

0:57:22.600 --> 0:57:25.160
<v Speaker 2>and twelve straight up against Miami. He's four too, and

0:57:25.240 --> 0:57:30.919
<v Speaker 2>one against the spread against to a oddly Thursday night

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:33.840
<v Speaker 2>home teams have been bad against the spread over the

0:57:33.920 --> 0:57:40.000
<v Speaker 2>last five years, and I think there is a potential

0:57:41.040 --> 0:57:44.040
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a letdown spot for Miami because last

0:57:44.040 --> 0:57:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Sunday was so it's there's the Tyreek stuff and then

0:57:47.400 --> 0:57:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the big comeback Tyreek during the week is reacting to

0:57:51.200 --> 0:57:53.840
<v Speaker 2>all that. I just I'm getting two and a half

0:57:53.880 --> 0:57:55.560
<v Speaker 2>with a team that I think is gonna win. Out right.

0:57:55.600 --> 0:57:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I'll take Buffalo plus the two and a half, all right?

0:57:59.360 --> 0:58:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Next one month.

0:58:01.800 --> 0:58:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Three at Green Bay.

0:58:05.520 --> 0:58:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, if you're laying less than a field

0:58:08.520 --> 0:58:11.320
<v Speaker 2>goal with the opportunity to bet against Malik Willis, it's

0:58:11.440 --> 0:58:14.600
<v Speaker 2>just to me, I just have to do it. Malik Willis,

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:18.840
<v Speaker 2>God God Bless him, is not can't can't throw the football,

0:58:19.480 --> 0:58:21.800
<v Speaker 2>And so I know.

0:58:21.800 --> 0:58:24.880
<v Speaker 4>That Willis is followed by God Bless him.

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:28.120
<v Speaker 2>But it's kind of well, I feel bad, tough, I

0:58:28.360 --> 0:58:33.120
<v Speaker 2>like the I I don't wanna you know, he's a

0:58:33.200 --> 0:58:37.520
<v Speaker 2>developmental player that hasn't developed that Green Bay acquired hoping

0:58:37.640 --> 0:58:41.160
<v Speaker 2>he could sit for a year, learn their system, be

0:58:41.240 --> 0:58:43.840
<v Speaker 2>in the meetings, get him in the building, and instead

0:58:43.840 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 2>of weekend, he's got to start a football game. Yeah,

0:58:47.320 --> 0:58:51.000
<v Speaker 2>and so I don't you know, this might be his

0:58:51.080 --> 0:58:53.720
<v Speaker 2>only start. The Packers are acting like Jordan Love might

0:58:53.760 --> 0:58:56.800
<v Speaker 2>play this week. Now. I don't buy that at all.

0:58:57.040 --> 0:59:01.920
<v Speaker 2>If Jordan Love plays, obviously this line shifts massively. But

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:06.240
<v Speaker 2>I also think if they officially rule him out that

0:59:06.400 --> 0:59:09.280
<v Speaker 2>the line moves against me. So I'll just lay the

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:12.520
<v Speaker 2>three right now. I think it would be insane to

0:59:12.560 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 2>play Jordan Love this week like that. Maybe you can

0:59:15.640 --> 0:59:19.440
<v Speaker 2>play him a week from now, but I think you

0:59:19.520 --> 0:59:21.840
<v Speaker 2>probably sit him the next two weeks. You have the Colts,

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:24.439
<v Speaker 2>then you have the Titans. And if there's anybody Malik

0:59:24.520 --> 0:59:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Willis can beat in a football game, it's will Levis,

0:59:26.840 --> 0:59:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the you know's former teammate. But the Colts and Anthony

0:59:30.280 --> 0:59:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Richardson minus three. I like the running game, I like

0:59:34.000 --> 0:59:37.400
<v Speaker 2>their Anthony Richardson's howartz aer of an arm. I think

0:59:37.480 --> 0:59:40.960
<v Speaker 2>green Bays defense it could be a real problem for

0:59:41.040 --> 0:59:43.919
<v Speaker 2>them this year, and we know their offense is gonna

0:59:43.920 --> 0:59:46.440
<v Speaker 2>be a problem in this game. Now, with that said,

0:59:46.800 --> 0:59:50.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe they just go huge Josh Jacobs game. I mean,

0:59:50.000 --> 0:59:52.400
<v Speaker 2>that is what they're gonna do. I still don't mind

0:59:52.480 --> 0:59:58.520
<v Speaker 2>laying the three points. And so Indie minus three is

0:59:58.520 --> 0:59:58.800
<v Speaker 2>a bet.

0:59:58.840 --> 1:00:02.280
<v Speaker 4>I like next Seattle minus three and a half at

1:00:02.280 --> 1:00:03.200
<v Speaker 4>New England.

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:09.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, so listen, I this is going to be

1:00:09.960 --> 1:00:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the square side of the bet. See, there's a lot

1:00:13.720 --> 1:00:18.160
<v Speaker 2>of just you know, there's a lot of stuff that says,

1:00:18.400 --> 1:00:20.720
<v Speaker 2>if you're gonna bet it, you gotta bet New England.

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:25.440
<v Speaker 2>It's the dreaded West Coast team going all the way east,

1:00:25.600 --> 1:00:28.840
<v Speaker 2>playing at one o'clock, so that you know, ten am

1:00:28.920 --> 1:00:33.520
<v Speaker 2>to their bodies. That part's not great. Seattle's interior of

1:00:33.560 --> 1:00:37.560
<v Speaker 2>their offensive line did just give up two sacks. Uh,

1:00:38.040 --> 1:00:41.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, two safeties in one football game. New England's

1:00:41.760 --> 1:00:46.680
<v Speaker 2>defense is good. They're the You're getting a home a

1:00:46.760 --> 1:00:50.880
<v Speaker 2>team at home getting more than three points. I understand

1:00:50.880 --> 1:00:55.640
<v Speaker 2>all of that. The reason I am on Seattle is

1:00:55.680 --> 1:01:02.160
<v Speaker 2>because I am not letting week one chain fundamentally my

1:01:02.400 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>big picture thoughts on the season.

1:01:04.600 --> 1:01:06.560
<v Speaker 4>Now, it's.

1:01:08.520 --> 1:01:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Instead, you mean, because people are gonna be overreacting to

1:01:13.080 --> 1:01:14.360
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots.

1:01:13.800 --> 1:01:18.040
<v Speaker 4>To New England beating Cincinnati last week. Yeah, so maybe

1:01:18.920 --> 1:01:21.880
<v Speaker 4>a little number for Seattle. I feel like if if

1:01:21.920 --> 1:01:25.680
<v Speaker 4>you know what Seattle is and yeah yeah.

1:01:24.920 --> 1:01:26.640
<v Speaker 2>If you no, I think you make a good point.

1:01:26.680 --> 1:01:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Listen what I was going to say there was one

1:01:29.280 --> 1:01:35.400
<v Speaker 2>of my thoughts going into the year was the Patriots

1:01:35.440 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 2>are one of the four worst teams in football. I

1:01:39.200 --> 1:01:42.120
<v Speaker 2>still believe that they are playing a team that is

1:01:42.200 --> 1:01:46.640
<v Speaker 2>going to be, you know, alive for the playoffs throughout

1:01:46.680 --> 1:01:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the year. You know what I mean. Seattle is not

1:01:48.160 --> 1:01:50.280
<v Speaker 2>a great team, but they're not a bad team. So

1:01:50.480 --> 1:01:53.320
<v Speaker 2>even though I hate the laying more than a field

1:01:53.360 --> 1:01:55.320
<v Speaker 2>goal for a West Coast team coming east for a

1:01:55.360 --> 1:01:59.760
<v Speaker 2>one o'clock game, I think Seattle is pretty good everywhere

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>sept for on the interior of their offensive line. And

1:02:04.560 --> 1:02:08.080
<v Speaker 2>while Christian Gonzalez might be able to take away one

1:02:08.160 --> 1:02:12.200
<v Speaker 2>receiving option for Seattle, Seattle's got three legitimate receiving options

1:02:12.520 --> 1:02:18.640
<v Speaker 2>in DK Jackson Smith in Jigba, pardon me, and obviously Locket.

1:02:19.000 --> 1:02:21.160
<v Speaker 2>So I'll lay the three and a half with Seattle.

1:02:21.800 --> 1:02:26.480
<v Speaker 4>Next bag cash at seventeen Chicago plus six at Houston.

1:02:26.520 --> 1:02:27.280
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean, Oh.

1:02:28.840 --> 1:02:32.760
<v Speaker 4>States cover at seventeen twenty points.

1:02:33.720 --> 1:02:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Twenty, I think definitely seventeen. Yeah, seventeen thirteen would cover there,

1:02:38.360 --> 1:02:41.640
<v Speaker 2>all right, So I've got Chicago getting six at Houston.

1:02:43.760 --> 1:02:48.520
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think these two teams are that big

1:02:48.560 --> 1:02:51.200
<v Speaker 2>of a difference talent wise. Now I gotta watch the

1:02:51.280 --> 1:02:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Chicago injury report. I understand that, but I think Chicago's

1:02:54.800 --> 1:02:59.120
<v Speaker 2>defense is better than Houston's defense. I think Houston's offense

1:02:59.240 --> 1:03:02.520
<v Speaker 2>is better than Chicago offense. I think that this should

1:03:02.520 --> 1:03:07.240
<v Speaker 2>be Houston by four. It's Houston by six. So I'll

1:03:07.280 --> 1:03:10.360
<v Speaker 2>take Chicago plus the points I think Chicago. I think

1:03:10.440 --> 1:03:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Caleb is gonna bounce back to a degree. Also, I

1:03:14.560 --> 1:03:17.800
<v Speaker 2>could be wrong. I'm gonna look this up. I don't

1:03:17.840 --> 1:03:22.000
<v Speaker 2>think CJ as great as he was last year. I

1:03:22.000 --> 1:03:24.600
<v Speaker 2>don't think they blew a lot of teams out. And

1:03:24.680 --> 1:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>I understand six points doesn't necessarily blow up, but to cover,

1:03:27.600 --> 1:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>you gotta beat teams by more than a touchdown. This

1:03:30.680 --> 1:03:34.200
<v Speaker 2>is something I should have looked up beforehand. But Houston's

1:03:35.240 --> 1:03:40.040
<v Speaker 2>wins last year were I'm just gonna go in reverse order.

1:03:41.120 --> 1:03:44.960
<v Speaker 2>They won by four, they beat Tennessee by twenty three.

1:03:45.640 --> 1:03:49.120
<v Speaker 2>They won in overtime by three against Tennessee. They beat

1:03:49.160 --> 1:03:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Denver by five. They beat Arizona by four, They beat

1:03:51.880 --> 1:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati by three, they beat Tampa by two, they beat

1:03:55.720 --> 1:03:58.439
<v Speaker 2>New Orleans by seven, and then early in the year.

1:03:58.520 --> 1:04:00.640
<v Speaker 2>To be fair, their first two games the year were

1:04:00.640 --> 1:04:03.880
<v Speaker 2>blow The first two wins were blowouts. They beat Jacksonville

1:04:03.880 --> 1:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>by twenty in Pittsburgh by twenty four. Uh, I just

1:04:08.040 --> 1:04:12.640
<v Speaker 2>think this is a twenty seven to twenty four game.

1:04:13.560 --> 1:04:16.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it is. I think that there were more

1:04:17.040 --> 1:04:22.600
<v Speaker 2>warning signs than people wanted to maybe acknowledge on Houston's

1:04:22.680 --> 1:04:26.160
<v Speaker 2>defensive side of the ball in that game against Indy

1:04:26.520 --> 1:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>when Anthony Richardson again only completed nine passes, but it

1:04:29.720 --> 1:04:32.960
<v Speaker 2>is for over two hundred yards. Indy scored I think

1:04:33.320 --> 1:04:37.280
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns on three straight second half possessions. So I'm getting

1:04:37.400 --> 1:04:41.480
<v Speaker 2>six points when I think the two teams are similar

1:04:42.160 --> 1:04:47.600
<v Speaker 2>caliber teams. I think Caleb bounces back. So here at

1:04:47.600 --> 1:04:50.640
<v Speaker 2>is Stroud three and six against the spread. As a favorite.

1:04:50.760 --> 1:04:53.720
<v Speaker 2>They win, but they don't really blow people out, you know,

1:04:53.840 --> 1:04:56.720
<v Speaker 2>since they've been this team people believe in. So I'll

1:04:56.760 --> 1:05:00.360
<v Speaker 2>take Chicago plus the six. You hate that one. I

1:05:00.440 --> 1:05:01.200
<v Speaker 2>think the month.

1:05:01.560 --> 1:05:07.200
<v Speaker 4>Correct, No I understand what you're saying. They I do.

1:05:07.440 --> 1:05:09.640
<v Speaker 4>I do think they're they're pros and cons to the

1:05:09.880 --> 1:05:13.240
<v Speaker 4>Chicago's defense, obviously in Houston's offense, so I do think

1:05:13.280 --> 1:05:16.440
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of even. So with the team getting more points,

1:05:16.520 --> 1:05:19.800
<v Speaker 4>I would be more comfortable go in Chicago plus six

1:05:19.840 --> 1:05:23.720
<v Speaker 4>than Houston minus six. So okay, cool, all right. Last one,

1:05:24.440 --> 1:05:26.800
<v Speaker 4>Atlanta plus six and a half at Philly.

1:05:28.240 --> 1:05:30.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, So this is another one where I'm not

1:05:30.200 --> 1:05:33.520
<v Speaker 2>going to overreact to Week one. I don't think Atlanta

1:05:33.640 --> 1:05:36.840
<v Speaker 2>is cooked. I don't think Kirk Cousins is just going

1:05:36.920 --> 1:05:40.120
<v Speaker 2>to be the worst quarterback in football this year. And

1:05:40.720 --> 1:05:43.439
<v Speaker 2>I think that it was a terrible Week one for them.

1:05:43.840 --> 1:05:47.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that they will be competitive, and I thought

1:05:47.480 --> 1:05:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Philly had a lot of warning signs in that game.

1:05:51.800 --> 1:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Now again, it's Kirk Cousins in prime time. I understand

1:05:55.720 --> 1:05:59.360
<v Speaker 2>nobody likes that, but I think because of that, this

1:05:59.560 --> 1:06:01.640
<v Speaker 2>is a game. I'll tell you this much to monsay,

1:06:01.880 --> 1:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>I have my picks in here today, so plus six

1:06:05.360 --> 1:06:09.160
<v Speaker 2>and a half, I will not bet this today because

1:06:09.200 --> 1:06:11.080
<v Speaker 2>if the line moves against me and all of a

1:06:11.080 --> 1:06:14.040
<v Speaker 2>sudden i'm laying I'm only getting six, I'll deal with it.

1:06:14.280 --> 1:06:16.400
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a real chance it moves for me,

1:06:16.840 --> 1:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>and I'm getting seven, which is obvious by Monday night,

1:06:20.240 --> 1:06:22.480
<v Speaker 2>which is obviously a huge, huge number.

1:06:23.000 --> 1:06:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1:06:24.080 --> 1:06:28.040
<v Speaker 2>I think Atlanta and Philly are similar caliber teams. I

1:06:28.160 --> 1:06:30.560
<v Speaker 2>know it didn't look that way in Week one, and

1:06:30.640 --> 1:06:36.400
<v Speaker 2>so this is a similar situation as the one UH

1:06:36.960 --> 1:06:40.320
<v Speaker 2>as the one that we discussed earlier.

1:06:40.360 --> 1:06:41.560
<v Speaker 4>St in New England.

1:06:41.760 --> 1:06:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Sorry no, no, no, as Chicago Houston, where I think

1:06:44.880 --> 1:06:48.080
<v Speaker 2>there's similar caliber teams and I'm getting six points, and

1:06:48.200 --> 1:06:54.360
<v Speaker 2>so the both teams, it should be noted, UH are

1:06:54.400 --> 1:06:57.800
<v Speaker 2>on Wait okay, yeah, both teams, I guess will be

1:06:57.840 --> 1:07:00.720
<v Speaker 2>on somewhat extended rest because it's Monday night. Phillies on

1:07:00.840 --> 1:07:04.000
<v Speaker 2>much more extended rest because they played Friday while Atlanta

1:07:04.040 --> 1:07:08.640
<v Speaker 2>played Sunday. Cousins oddly has played his best football of

1:07:08.680 --> 1:07:11.560
<v Speaker 2>his career against Philly. He's seven and four against the

1:07:11.600 --> 1:07:14.720
<v Speaker 2>spread against the Eagles. Now that also does date back

1:07:14.760 --> 1:07:16.680
<v Speaker 2>to his time in Houston. I understand that, but it's

1:07:16.680 --> 1:07:19.960
<v Speaker 2>also some games in Minnesota. I think Atlanta's offense gonna

1:07:19.960 --> 1:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>be able to move the ball. I don't trust that

1:07:22.520 --> 1:07:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Philly defense, and I think at this point Jalen Hurts

1:07:25.320 --> 1:07:27.919
<v Speaker 2>is in the He's gonna throw us one category, so

1:07:28.360 --> 1:07:32.040
<v Speaker 2>real quick, my five picks. I've got three dogs, two favorites.

1:07:32.600 --> 1:07:35.160
<v Speaker 2>I am going with Buffalo. I'm doing all the primetime

1:07:35.200 --> 1:07:37.240
<v Speaker 2>game is Buffalo plus two and a half at Miami,

1:07:37.560 --> 1:07:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Chicago plus six at Houston, Atlanta plus six and a

1:07:40.160 --> 1:07:42.880
<v Speaker 2>half at Philly, and then Indy minus three at Green

1:07:42.960 --> 1:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Bay and Seattle minus three and a half at New England.

1:07:47.160 --> 1:07:51.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, demon's time for your teaser. Week one didn't

1:07:52.000 --> 1:07:54.520
<v Speaker 2>go the way we had hoped, sadly, but go ahead.

1:07:55.280 --> 1:07:59.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, last week I had green Bay plus nine and

1:07:59.120 --> 1:08:01.840
<v Speaker 4>a half at Philly. Cash my god, Jordan Love got

1:08:01.840 --> 1:08:05.000
<v Speaker 4>it done. We had Washington plus ten and a half

1:08:05.040 --> 1:08:08.480
<v Speaker 4>at Tampa Bay and Baker was getting real surgical.

1:08:08.680 --> 1:08:13.880
<v Speaker 2>It's just unfortunately, Yeah, they they've got the colors wrong

1:08:13.960 --> 1:08:16.439
<v Speaker 2>on that your Green Bay was the winner. You're washing

1:08:16.680 --> 1:08:19.479
<v Speaker 2>was the loser. But that's fine. You're owen one on one.

1:08:19.560 --> 1:08:22.320
<v Speaker 2>You can deal with this week.

1:08:22.400 --> 1:08:26.280
<v Speaker 4>What what by week? So this week we've got another

1:08:26.360 --> 1:08:28.640
<v Speaker 4>with two teams seven point teaser at minus we.

1:08:28.840 --> 1:08:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Wait, hold on, I'm being wait, wait, I'm being told

1:08:32.040 --> 1:08:33.560
<v Speaker 2>you called your shots. Can we do this?

1:08:36.320 --> 1:08:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Night the teaser and guy cooked me. You know he can.

1:08:45.479 --> 1:08:46.240
<v Speaker 2>For everything.

1:08:46.840 --> 1:08:49.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I said that was unprovoked. And then yeah, he

1:08:49.920 --> 1:08:51.799
<v Speaker 4>went on to say that he wouldn't touch my teasers

1:08:51.800 --> 1:08:52.719
<v Speaker 4>with a ten foot pole.

1:08:54.280 --> 1:08:57.559
<v Speaker 2>Donovan Weber, I mean, the guy makes fair points. I

1:08:57.640 --> 1:09:02.000
<v Speaker 2>just gotta say, I mean, you got it at some point.

1:09:02.040 --> 1:09:03.479
<v Speaker 2>You gotta win for the people.

1:09:04.280 --> 1:09:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for putting the chip on my shoulder. Man.

1:09:06.520 --> 1:09:08.599
<v Speaker 4>So this year we've got I mean not this year.

1:09:08.600 --> 1:09:12.400
<v Speaker 4>This week we've got Dallas from plus from wherever they

1:09:12.400 --> 1:09:15.479
<v Speaker 4>were at plus to plus one six yeah, minus six

1:09:15.520 --> 1:09:17.559
<v Speaker 4>to plus one, and I didn't that was not what

1:09:17.680 --> 1:09:20.400
<v Speaker 4>I saw it as on my phone. And then we've.

1:09:20.200 --> 1:09:23.599
<v Speaker 2>Got so I So I'm gonna tell you what happened here,

1:09:23.680 --> 1:09:26.519
<v Speaker 2>just so you know you when you put these in,

1:09:27.400 --> 1:09:31.519
<v Speaker 2>I think both lines moved a half point in your favor.

1:09:32.200 --> 1:09:35.920
<v Speaker 2>So you got Dallas so the oh yeah, so you

1:09:36.200 --> 1:09:41.080
<v Speaker 2>now you have Dallas getting a full point and Tampa. Oh,

1:09:41.200 --> 1:09:44.559
<v Speaker 2>that's why you made getting fourteen and a half. That's

1:09:44.600 --> 1:09:47.519
<v Speaker 2>why you made those faces about their secondary one.

1:09:48.439 --> 1:09:50.840
<v Speaker 4>But at fourteen points like, there will be a lot

1:09:50.840 --> 1:09:53.160
<v Speaker 4>of allow of room for back door covering. I'm sticking

1:09:53.200 --> 1:09:55.080
<v Speaker 4>with it. I think that they'll win. I think that

1:09:55.080 --> 1:09:57.759
<v Speaker 4>they can win the game, and if they do lose,

1:09:57.880 --> 1:10:00.960
<v Speaker 4>I gotta assume that they can lose by lest two touchdowns.

1:10:01.920 --> 1:10:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Listen, if you think they can win the game, then yeah,

1:10:05.320 --> 1:10:08.760
<v Speaker 2>then this is fine. Dallas plus one. They're at home,

1:10:08.840 --> 1:10:10.759
<v Speaker 2>They've won it. If you take out the playoffs, sixteen

1:10:10.800 --> 1:10:14.759
<v Speaker 2>straight home games, I think that's good. Obviously, Tampa getting

1:10:14.800 --> 1:10:17.160
<v Speaker 2>fourteen and a half. I'm gonna give this teaser a B.

1:10:17.720 --> 1:10:19.960
<v Speaker 2>I believe in you. I think you're gonna win. I'm

1:10:19.960 --> 1:10:22.360
<v Speaker 2>glad it doesn't go against any of our picks. All right,

1:10:22.400 --> 1:10:25.080
<v Speaker 2>what's the offer this week? Quickly? Because we are way

1:10:25.160 --> 1:10:26.280
<v Speaker 2>late and I gotta get to work.

1:10:26.720 --> 1:10:29.519
<v Speaker 4>The offer this week is called the enemy of My Enemy.

1:10:30.560 --> 1:10:33.840
<v Speaker 4>You had Pittsburgh and Miami missing the playoffs. They both

1:10:33.880 --> 1:10:36.120
<v Speaker 4>started out one to zero. It would be nice for

1:10:36.200 --> 1:10:38.400
<v Speaker 4>you if they lost this week. Huh. But are you

1:10:38.439 --> 1:10:40.799
<v Speaker 4>willing to bet on the two teams you can't stand

1:10:40.840 --> 1:10:45.120
<v Speaker 4>to win a season long bet Denver plus Buffalo moneyline

1:10:45.120 --> 1:10:46.679
<v Speaker 4>parlay a plus four oh six.

1:10:46.880 --> 1:10:49.120
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not gonna take that because I'm not gonna

1:10:49.120 --> 1:10:52.519
<v Speaker 2>bet on bone Nicks. The I'm gonna stay away from

1:10:52.720 --> 1:10:54.840
<v Speaker 2>the you know from bone Knicks for now. So no,

1:10:54.920 --> 1:10:57.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna take that offer. I appreciate the offer.

1:10:57.520 --> 1:10:59.679
<v Speaker 2>We're now zero for two on me accepting this. We'll

1:10:59.720 --> 1:11:03.519
<v Speaker 2>say not taking an off here, all right, So no

1:11:03.640 --> 1:11:05.479
<v Speaker 2>I will at some point. All right, I hate to

1:11:05.520 --> 1:11:07.840
<v Speaker 2>do this once again. We're not gonna be able to

1:11:07.840 --> 1:11:09.960
<v Speaker 2>get to listener questions. Say this is what we're gonna do.

1:11:10.800 --> 1:11:13.599
<v Speaker 2>We are going to take a quick break, come back

1:11:13.960 --> 1:11:16.840
<v Speaker 2>and just play for you guys, the F one minute

1:11:16.840 --> 1:11:19.599
<v Speaker 2>from Sierra. She's back from being out of town. F

1:11:19.640 --> 1:11:22.040
<v Speaker 2>one season is in full force. But this is the

1:11:22.120 --> 1:11:25.200
<v Speaker 2>last you're gonna see for me. I'm gonna Demonse, you

1:11:25.240 --> 1:11:28.519
<v Speaker 2>are going to after you're gonna introduce the F one minute,

1:11:28.560 --> 1:11:30.759
<v Speaker 2>and then you're gonna say goodbye to the audience because

1:11:30.800 --> 1:11:32.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna be late for the TV show. Show went

1:11:32.960 --> 1:11:34.640
<v Speaker 2>so long, it's gonna be an hour. It's been an

1:11:34.640 --> 1:11:37.719
<v Speaker 2>hour and twenty minutes. Good luck to everyone with their picks.

1:11:37.920 --> 1:11:40.479
<v Speaker 2>Good luck to everyone this weekend. I will see you

1:11:40.479 --> 1:11:43.759
<v Speaker 2>guys on TV at three pm. Take quick break, Demonse

1:11:43.880 --> 1:11:45.559
<v Speaker 2>and Sierra coming back. What's right?

1:11:52.080 --> 1:11:54.160
<v Speaker 4>All right? Welcome back? It's what's right with Nick? Right,

1:11:54.360 --> 1:11:57.519
<v Speaker 4>it's Demanse Bird and it is time for Sierra's F

1:11:57.600 --> 1:11:59.360
<v Speaker 4>one minute. Let's get it.

1:12:00.640 --> 1:12:03.000
<v Speaker 3>The F one circus is back and this weekend we're

1:12:03.000 --> 1:12:06.759
<v Speaker 3>gonna be in azerbaijean Baku for another round of racing.

1:12:06.840 --> 1:12:09.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm Sierra and this is F one minute. So last

1:12:09.760 --> 1:12:12.040
<v Speaker 3>time we spoke, we were talking about the Italian Grand

1:12:12.080 --> 1:12:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Prix and it turns out Charles Lukirk won that race.

1:12:14.880 --> 1:12:17.280
<v Speaker 3>So it was a big weekend for the Defossie fans

1:12:17.760 --> 1:12:20.320
<v Speaker 3>and for the Ferrari team. The top five winners of

1:12:20.360 --> 1:12:24.360
<v Speaker 3>that weekend though, it was Charles, then oscar Lan do Norris,

1:12:25.680 --> 1:12:29.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean Carlos Signs, and then Lewis Hamilton in fifth place.

1:12:29.800 --> 1:12:32.639
<v Speaker 3>Now notice how I did not mention a ridicule name

1:12:32.760 --> 1:12:35.920
<v Speaker 3>at all. That's because Max came in sixth place and

1:12:35.960 --> 1:12:38.240
<v Speaker 3>then his team at Chucko Perez came in in eighth place.

1:12:38.280 --> 1:12:40.920
<v Speaker 3>As far as the weekend is concerned, in back who

1:12:41.520 --> 1:12:45.519
<v Speaker 3>there is faith for Ferrari. And I say this because

1:12:46.120 --> 1:12:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Charles has a very good history here. He's won pole

1:12:49.360 --> 1:12:54.040
<v Speaker 3>position consecutively since twenty twenty one, so in that regard

1:12:54.360 --> 1:12:56.639
<v Speaker 3>there's hope for them. But he's not the only one

1:12:56.680 --> 1:13:01.880
<v Speaker 3>with a reputation here because Checho Perez has won here

1:13:02.080 --> 1:13:04.800
<v Speaker 3>twice and he's the only driver to win here multiple times.

1:13:04.920 --> 1:13:07.400
<v Speaker 3>So he won in twenty twenty one and then he

1:13:07.439 --> 1:13:09.680
<v Speaker 3>won again in twenty twenty three. But that does not

1:13:09.760 --> 1:13:12.679
<v Speaker 3>mean he's going to win in twenty twenty four because

1:13:13.520 --> 1:13:16.519
<v Speaker 3>with like, Red Bull's performance is starting to dwindle here.

1:13:17.960 --> 1:13:19.720
<v Speaker 3>I just want to mention that Max has not won

1:13:19.760 --> 1:13:22.680
<v Speaker 3>a race since June and we're in September, so in

1:13:22.720 --> 1:13:25.400
<v Speaker 3>that like, they're going down and McLaren is on the

1:13:25.400 --> 1:13:27.960
<v Speaker 3>come up right about now. So with that being said,

1:13:28.040 --> 1:13:30.479
<v Speaker 3>there's no guarantee that they're going to win a race

1:13:31.000 --> 1:13:33.760
<v Speaker 3>at all this weekend. But there's also no guarantee that

1:13:33.800 --> 1:13:37.960
<v Speaker 3>they're going to win the Constructor Championship because McLaren only

1:13:37.960 --> 1:13:42.120
<v Speaker 3>needs to outscore them by a measly eight points. Now

1:13:42.160 --> 1:13:45.360
<v Speaker 3>I call this measley because at the Italian Grand Prix

1:13:45.680 --> 1:13:50.559
<v Speaker 3>they outscored Red Bull by twenty two points. So with

1:13:50.640 --> 1:13:54.519
<v Speaker 3>that being said, McLaren will be dethrowned, I mean sorry,

1:13:54.560 --> 1:13:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Red Bull will be dethroned from their first place position

1:13:58.040 --> 1:14:01.160
<v Speaker 3>in the Constructors Championship this week end, and they've been

1:14:01.360 --> 1:14:04.559
<v Speaker 3>in that spot since twenty twenty two. So so it's

1:14:04.600 --> 1:14:08.160
<v Speaker 3>gonna be a pivotal weekend for McLaren and Red Bull

1:14:08.640 --> 1:14:13.080
<v Speaker 3>because Charles has done so well for the past three years.

1:14:13.320 --> 1:14:16.439
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna do well again. And you know,

1:14:16.479 --> 1:14:19.439
<v Speaker 3>the momentum is gonna be pumping from the last race weekend,

1:14:19.600 --> 1:14:22.400
<v Speaker 3>so he's gonna be in the right mindset, you know.

1:14:22.520 --> 1:14:25.120
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna put him in third place and I'm

1:14:25.160 --> 1:14:28.400
<v Speaker 3>gonna do a double McLaren podium again, a one to two.

1:14:28.920 --> 1:14:31.800
<v Speaker 3>But here's the thing. You know, who determines who's gonna

1:14:31.800 --> 1:14:34.320
<v Speaker 3>be in one, who's gonna be in two. It's McLaren

1:14:34.760 --> 1:14:38.200
<v Speaker 3>from their team orders. That is, who's gonna determine who's

1:14:38.200 --> 1:14:39.760
<v Speaker 3>in first and who's in the second. Because if they

1:14:39.840 --> 1:14:44.000
<v Speaker 3>choose to prioritize the fact that Lando may or may

1:14:44.040 --> 1:14:47.320
<v Speaker 3>not have a shot at winning the drivers' championship, then

1:14:47.400 --> 1:14:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Lando should be winning. But if they don't and they

1:14:50.360 --> 1:14:53.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of willy nilliate and they they're like, you know,

1:14:53.600 --> 1:14:56.600
<v Speaker 3>race each other, then Auscar could be in first. I

1:14:56.640 --> 1:15:00.160
<v Speaker 3>don't know, it depends on what they choose to prioritize,

1:15:00.400 --> 1:15:03.360
<v Speaker 3>but I do see it a McLaren one too, and

1:15:03.400 --> 1:15:05.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna leave Charles at third. If you have nothing

1:15:05.920 --> 1:15:09.880
<v Speaker 3>to do this Sunday morning, you should definitely watch the race.

1:15:09.920 --> 1:15:13.160
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna be on eight am sharp Eastern time. But

1:15:13.439 --> 1:15:16.160
<v Speaker 3>until then, I'll tell to you guys another time.

1:15:17.640 --> 1:15:20.840
<v Speaker 4>All right, Well, let's go. McLaren sounds like we've got

1:15:20.880 --> 1:15:23.240
<v Speaker 4>to raise our hands coming this Sunday. Hey, you guys

1:15:23.280 --> 1:15:26.000
<v Speaker 4>for watching. Have a good Thursday. Enjoy your weekend.

1:15:29.760 --> 1:15:32.519
<v Speaker 2>Hey, thanks for watching. If you're still here, do me

1:15:32.560 --> 1:15:35.599
<v Speaker 2>a favor. Hit the subscribe button, then hit the bell

1:15:35.760 --> 1:15:38.440
<v Speaker 2>so you can be notified when we have new episodes.

1:15:38.920 --> 1:15:41.320
<v Speaker 2>After you've done that, one more favor, go to your

1:15:41.320 --> 1:15:45.080
<v Speaker 2>favorite audio platform of choice and subscribe there as well.

1:15:45.160 --> 1:15:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget we're live every Tuesday and Thursday ten thirty

1:15:49.400 --> 1:15:53.679
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern Ish ten thirty five, ten forty. It sometimes changes,

1:15:53.880 --> 1:15:55.960
<v Speaker 2>but that's why you hit the bell. You hit the

1:15:55.960 --> 1:15:59.160
<v Speaker 2>bell so you're notified. You subscribe so we can get

1:15:59.160 --> 1:16:02.200
<v Speaker 2>to two hundred thousand followers. We're right around one hundred

1:16:02.200 --> 1:16:04.639
<v Speaker 2>and fifty thousand. We'd love to get to two hundred thousand.

1:16:04.680 --> 1:16:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Get demands another plaque, so like subscribe rate, send a

1:16:08.800 --> 1:16:10.920
<v Speaker 2>rating to do all that cool stuff. Thanks guys,