WEBVTT - AMD Inks Chip Deal With OpenAI That Triggers Explosive Rally

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg business

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Week Daily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business finance and tech

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebek on Bloomberg Radio and

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>of course.

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Co host of Bloomberg Tech.

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now from San Francisco where he is at

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 3>open AI's developer Day. Hey, Ed, Huh, feels like we

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.959
<v Speaker 3>keep getting these big announcements. We're all getting a bit

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 3>wary of them. What feels like this circular finance that

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 3>we've talked with you about. Among those involved in the

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 3>AI spend and build out, I heard Lisa sussay a

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 3>win for AMD.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>A win for open Ai, feels like a win for everybody.

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Is it really? Do we know for certain?

0:00:58.600 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 5>She also said that she has confidence in open Ai,

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 5>and the reason she said that is I had made

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 5>the point to her that open ai still has to

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.639
<v Speaker 5>come up with the money for this. The difference between

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.199
<v Speaker 5>the open ai and AMD deal compared with the open

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 5>Ai and Video deal as the structure, so it's almost

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 5>the reverse. AMD will sign over stock to open Ai

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 5>only when they've met specific milestones, both operational and financial.

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 5>So in the first instance, open a has to fund,

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 5>finance and build one gig awad of capacity. If they

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 5>do that, AMD will give open Ai some stock, or

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 5>rather technically, open ai has the right to buy a

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 5>trantras shares at a penny apiece, but the burden is

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 5>still on them. And so the point I was making

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 5>with Lisa is have you seen into their books? Where

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 5>are they going to get the money from to fund

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 5>this to bring it online?

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 6>Is it?

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 7>Could this be weird on the circular financing thing that

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 7>you know, in Vidia couldn't have this deal that could

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 7>be worth up to one hundred billion dollars with open

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 7>Ai in videos investment five billion dollars or will invest

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 7>five billion dollars in Intel, And now you have what

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 7>does that mean that in Vidia, if they have open

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 7>Ai equity, then they're kind of an owner or could

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 7>be an owner of AMD. Exactly.

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's much more fair to say that the Nvidia

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 5>open Ai circumstance is circular financing because in Vidia commits

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 5>to making a one hundred billion dollar investment into open Ai.

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 5>We actually don't know if that's in the form of

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 5>cash or if it would be like chips in lieu

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 5>of cash, but they do take open Ai equity. In

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 5>this case, AMD passes its own shares to open Ai,

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 5>but not capital. And so if you're going to build

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 5>six gigawats of capacity over many years, you know that

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 5>is like the peak energy demand of like a major

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 5>US city. We're talking lots of money up front in

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 5>cap to expenditure, and open ay has got to do that. Now,

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 5>we pose many questions to both Lisa sou and Open

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.119
<v Speaker 5>Eye present Greg Brockman, who was sat next to her,

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 5>Will it be debt, will you issue more equity? Will

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 5>you do something else? And he basically Greg Brockman said,

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 5>we'll look at all those mechanisms and so there are

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 5>many more questions still that we don't have answers to.

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's I guess. My thing is like, why don't

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>these companies just do deals.

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 3>I'll buy you chips, I'll do my bild, I'll do

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 3>this thing the way we do it normally, rather than

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 3>all of these big announcements with a lot of questions

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 3>that feel like We don't really know that there's anything

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 3>there there.

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 5>The market is simply focused, irrespective of the mechanism for financing,

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 5>on the revenue growth that comes out the other side,

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 5>particularly like software names. And so that was the justification

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 5>that Greg Brockman made. He said, the revenue will come.

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 5>As you know, we've been writing a lot about the

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 5>debt markets underpinning this, and debt investors feel the same way.

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 5>All I say is there is also a technology story.

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 5>You know, if you're going to build a data center

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 5>and one of these providing the chips and the others

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 5>is going to use the capacity for software, it does

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 5>make sense to partner and work together to make the

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 5>engineering make sense.

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 7>If you're watching on Bloomberg TV or on youtubeer Bloomberg

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 7>Originals got this great graphic up that kind of helps

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 7>us keep up. This is by no means exhaustive, but

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 7>shows where some of the money has gone in recent months.

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 7>When it comes to the space, again, by no means exhaustive.

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 7>There it's kind of like Carol, we're connecting. We're like

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 7>out a whiteboard and we're kind of connecting pieces because

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 7>to keep these things straight is pretty difficult.

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Well yeah, I mean that's the thing, ed. You know,

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 3>we need to all be smart. We are smart, and

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 3>you know we keep seeing these deals coming at us.

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.679
<v Speaker 3>We hear people saying, well when like a Meta Reports

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 3>and some other you know, the big hyperscalers. We do

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 3>see the impact of the AI spend, but I do

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 3>wonder if it's going to carry through our economy like

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 3>everyone expects.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 5>Metas for example, they have a core legacy business that

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 5>is advertising, and in most of the most recent quarters

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 5>they've demonstrated significant top line growth and to a certain extent,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 5>bottom line growth, which is them saying we invested in AI.

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 5>AI made our ads better and more valuable, we're making

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 5>more money from it. With chat GPT, it's a lot

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 5>harder to see that. But that's why here at develop

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 5>a Day, it's really important. So the piece of news

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 5>that came out from the keynote was they now have

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 5>eight hundred million weekly users active users of chat GPT.

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 5>The data point that market participants keep hitting me over

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 5>the head with is how many of those free users

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 5>are converted to being paid subscribers. Because unless you have

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 5>that data, we can't know what the top line growth

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 5>for open AI looks like. But look in the markets

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 5>right now. I mean, you guys will have to tell me.

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 5>I don't have a Bloomberg in front of me, but

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 5>I saw a pool of about a dozen stocks that

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 5>jumped in the last hour just because they got name

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 5>checked by open ai here today. And it's by association.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 5>The idea that if using chat GPT you can access

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 5>third party apps or third party company offerings, everyone's going

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 5>to make money.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.679
<v Speaker 5>The market has a pretty simple logic in that respect.

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, for those who do have Bloombergs in front of them,

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.239
<v Speaker 7>just type in NI movers into the Bloomberg terminal. Cisco

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 7>system shares up to session high during Open Air event.

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 7>Figma shares Extend gained to sixteen percent after being mentioned

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 7>at Open Ai event. Salesforce shares also jump up two

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 7>point six percent during the Open Ai event. HubSpot, Zillo,

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 7>Trip Advisor, Carol all moving higher as a result of

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 7>what was talked about at the open ai event.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 3>And this goes back to ed. You know, you were

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 3>trying to press we Sue, and you know in your

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 3>conversation and I just right, and I just think about, like,

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 3>what are the big questions that still remain for you? You

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 3>want your you know, you're reporting on these ins and outs.

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 3>You're there at this event. We think about open ai

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot. We talk about chat, GPT a lot. Who's

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 3>to say that there isn't some other s, you know,

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 3>chat that comes in and takes So I don't know

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 3>if there's just a lot going on. What are the

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 3>big questions that remain in a day when we get

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 3>this big announcement.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 2>What wasn't answered for you? Still?

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think the financing, you know, I think in

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 5>any corner of the Bloomberg newsroom, you've got to understand

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 5>the debt markets because look at the role that debt

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 5>played in previous financial crisis, the dot com bubble, what

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 5>happened with Silicon Valley Bank, what happened in Asia earlier

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.239
<v Speaker 5>in the two thousands. I wasn't around then, but debt

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 5>is a big underpinning here. And I think the signal

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 5>that Greg Brockman gave us was they'll look at all mechanisms,

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 5>including debt. So that's one part of it. On the

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 5>other hand, this is I'm a technology journalist and technology matters.

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 5>Open ai is going to use in AMD chips for inference.

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 5>Inference is where you run the model not training, you

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 5>are actually running people's queries and workloads. And if you

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 5>look at all the movers that Timless did today, what

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 5>open ai was basically saying is chat GPT is becoming

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 5>an operating system. You use it for a number of functions,

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 5>but you can also integrate it with all the other

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 5>software you're using. And actually that's a pretty clear answer

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 5>to some of the questions about will revenue be generated

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 5>from this. People use all of these platforms for hours

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 5>each day, and you know, the market seems to buy

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 5>that if they can build the capacity of AMD in

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 5>the timeline that they've said they will, they can actually

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 5>start doing things of use.

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it wild?

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 6>Though?

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Ryan Blestelica has this great story and the headline on

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 3>it is open ai is fast becoming a whale in

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 3>the stock market that it is shunned. I mean, open

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 3>ai is not a publicly traded company, and yet Tim

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 3>put down a bunch of names that are moving as

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 3>a result of this this deal. Last week we saw

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 3>open ai sending shares of e commerce companies like Shopify

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Etsy soaring after unveiling an instant by.

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 2>Option in chat GPT. I mean, it is remarkable.

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Then the market moves that are are evolving around open ai,

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 3>which again makes me say, what are we One of

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 3>the things.

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 7>That I do each day.

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, one of the things I do each day, and

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 5>I know you guys do it as well. When I

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 5>first long onto my Bloomberg, I do NI Globe rap

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 5>and I look at the market's wrap because they always

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 5>have a pretty good handle on the sentiment of the morning.

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 5>And last Wednesday or Thursday, it was equity markets push

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 5>higher on open ai enthusiasm. It was the confirmation of

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 5>open AI's five hundred billion dollar valuation in the private

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 5>markets that was driving sentiment in the public equity markets,

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 5>and that was well sourced. It's based on lots of

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 5>conversations with market participants. That is again a reflection of

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 5>the names that Tim read out today. Open Ai, a

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 5>private company, is driving all kinds of markets at the

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 5>moment with what it is saying and to an equal extent,

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 5>the activity it is doing in both hardware and software.

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, there's a lot of activity happening behind you. Ed

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 7>at the op ai Developer Day conference. In just about

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 7>an hour, we're going to hear from you again. You're

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 7>going to be speaking with open Ai COO Brad Lightcap.

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 7>You're going to have a conversation with him that I'm

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 7>sure is going to touch on a lot of these themes.

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 7>Before then, though, the reason all of these companies are moving,

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 7>can you talk a little bit about this idea of

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 7>open Ai, or rather chat GPT becoming an operating system

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 7>and how these publicly traded third party companies are starting

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 7>to use the technology to make their software to make

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 7>whatever they're offering the services better.

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, for those listening on radio and watching on TV

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 5>that are familiar with software, what OpenAI announced was very

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 5>simple API access for several third parties to chat GPT,

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 5>and they demonstrated it on stage. So you know, I

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 5>use chat GPT for hours each day. But the idea

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 5>is you link it to say, your Figma platform or

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 5>your Spotify account even and you can use some of

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 5>the features of those platforms within chat GPT. That was

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 5>a sort of direct catalyst to moving. But what they

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 5>also spoke about on stage, and Sam Altman did pretty

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 5>good job of kind of explaining it, is that chat

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 5>GPT is going to basically act much like the App

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 5>Store does on OS. Right with Apple, you have a

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 5>community of developers, those are all the people that are

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 5>here today, the thousands of them that are building applications,

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 5>and where will they publish those applications where they'll be

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 5>reviewed by open ai and they will be integrated either

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 5>as APIs or standalone applications within chat gpt. That is

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 5>how the economy around the Android play Store, the Apple

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 5>iOS store works. You have people build software, and then

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 5>you have a place a library catalog where all of

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 5>those things list. In some cases you charge an ad

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.599
<v Speaker 5>hoc subscription to use those applications. And that's kind of

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 5>what open ai is saying here that chat GPT can

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 5>be very interesting, although it's also contingent on the developer

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 5>community stepping up and doing it.

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.719
<v Speaker 2>Who needs to be worried? Alphabet? Like, who needs to

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 2>be work worried?

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 3>As we watch this unfold and everything seemed to kind

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 3>of revolve around chatchypt, open ai and as you said, like,

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 3>if this is one of the new big search engines

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>going forward, I mean Alphabet with its own search engines

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 3>and making its own pivot, do they need to be worried?

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 6>Though?

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 5>I mean you guys, I actually should have checked, and

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 5>I just didn't, But I don't know what Apple, Microsoft

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 5>or Alphabet did during that keynote. I mean, did they

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 5>get down or up?

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Alphabets right now up about two percent, so it's near

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>its highs of the session, and.

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 7>For your Microsoft's up two point four percent. Yeah, so

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 7>I had a high of the session.

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 5>All in right, Yeah, yeah, yeah, you know, I don't

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 5>know the answer to that about whether they'd be worried.

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we've done a lot of reporting on open

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 5>ai going its own way and having more independence from Microsoft.

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 5>The original idea was that Microsoft would use open AI's

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 5>underlying work in models to improve their own software capabilities.

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 5>Of course, one of the recent elements is Microsoft is

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 5>using Anthropic for its own in house software applications and

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 5>has looked at one of open AI's rivals. But you

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 5>are right, it's about open ai wanting to do more

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 5>across software.

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 5>One of the other beneficiaries in the keynote was I

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 5>think Salesforce. You can correct me to him if I'm wrong.

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 5>I saw Salesforce as one of the movers service now

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 5>as well, you know, it's just another sales channel in

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 5>some sense. You can access another person software through chat, GPT,

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 5>and you know, the market again its logic is very

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 5>simple that it drives use and that's good. You know,

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 5>when you have a partnership with open.

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 7>Ai, salesforce shares up three percent right now, up as

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 7>much as four point two percent during that keynote, Ed Ludlow,

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 7>he's at open AI's Developer Day.

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Weekdaily coming up

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 2>after this.

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast. Catch

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eastering. Listen

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 7>Let's bring in Mandy Singh, global head of Tech research

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 7>at Bloomberg Intelligency, joins us here in the Bloomberg Interactive

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 7>Brokers studio. So I just want to start with the

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 7>validation or.

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Not of AMD's technology here.

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 7>Ed reminded us that this is an inference deal, not

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 7>a training deal. But how should we look at this

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 7>in the context of Nvidia being the standout leader when

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 7>it comes to this.

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 6>Tech Look, I mean for AMD, there weren't many options

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 6>when you look at you know, Nvidia and Broadcom partnering

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 6>with all the hyperscalers. AMD clearly has just two percent

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 6>market share right now. And what do you do when

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 6>Nvidia announces a big investment in open ai to the

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 6>two zero hundred billion or multi years. And in this case,

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 6>i think AMD had to do some thing. So I'm

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 6>sure they gave a very sweet deal to open Ai

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 6>in terms of, you know, the margins they're going to

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 6>charge open Ai, the level of custom silicon work that

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 6>they are willing to do for open Ai. And open

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 6>ai has a great advantage that it can, you know,

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 6>bargain and really get these sweet deals right now with everyone.

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 7>A sweet deal meaning here's one hundred and sixty million

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 7>shares of our company at a penny apiece.

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 6>Maybe, And I look, I mean, I don't know. I

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 6>mean this is nobody can look that far out. But

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 6>the fact that Nvidia is willing to spend ten billion

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 6>dollars you know in open Ai, and AMD gave them

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 6>this option that they could buy the shares, you know,

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 6>if it hits a certain level, that just goes to

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 6>show that open ai wants to show that it has

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 6>the power, not the chip makers. And so over time,

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 6>if you look at you know, software cycles, the application

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 6>is the sticky part. It's never the chips or the architecture,

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 6>and that's what open the Eye is saying, look, guys,

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 6>we have the best models, right, we have chat cept

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 6>the application, so that's the end product, and they want

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 6>diversification in terms of the inference capacity.

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Listen, we have this chart and for those who are

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 3>on radio, it's just showing all of the deals that

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 3>open ai is doing or some different companies are some

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 3>of the deal them, whether it's Microsoft, although they've been

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 3>pulling back and like lining up other deals. You know,

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 3>I want We're trying to so hard be smart about

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 3>this because it's easy to get caught up in it,

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 3>and it does feel like.

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 2>This has become increasingly a momentum trait.

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying people aren't making money out of it,

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 3>but how do we make sense because is there a

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 3>chance that open ai and chatchept is not ultimately the

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 3>big model or the big next generation search engine for everybody?

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Like, how do we be.

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Smart about this spend because some of it potentially a

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 3>fluffy fluffy and not going to go anywhere.

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 6>I know there are our references to circular financing and

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 6>all that, but the best way to think about this

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 6>is the concentration that you see among the players, whether

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 6>it's you know, Nvidia being exposed to the hyperscalers, and

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 6>now the number of hyperscalers are growing because open ai

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 6>was dependent on Microsoft, like you said, now it's trying

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 6>to become an independent hyperscale vendor. In fact, they said

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 6>they may open their own data centers. They have a

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 6>three hundred billion dollar deal with Oracle now, so they

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 6>want to be a hyperscaler who does end to end

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 6>work like Google does. It had its own chip, right

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 6>it processes nine hundred and eighty trillion tokens per month,

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 6>and that's what you know. Open ai wants to get

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 6>to that they have their own chip. They use chips

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 6>from AMD and Nvidia and not just rely on one provider.

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 3>But they are still a private company. What are things

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 3>that we might not know in their financials right now.

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 6>That they have negative gross martins and so one of

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 6>the way is that they are trying to fix that

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 6>is by arbitraging against the semiconductor chip makers who are

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 6>giving them the compute capacity. And we know that this stuff,

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 6>like one of the things with Generative AI, it's very

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 6>compute intensive, right, and it's not changing even though we

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 6>have GPT five, Like, there's nothing that has changed in

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 6>terms of compute efficiency. It still requires ten times more

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 6>compute than your CPUs that were used for you know,

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 6>traditional software. So it is an expensive technology.

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 7>Okay, hold on, though, you said, you know, I don't Yeah,

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.239
<v Speaker 7>I don't want to push aside the circular financing thing

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 7>because this is kind of blowing my mind here. Yeah,

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 7>if in Vidia has a deal with or with open Ai,

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 7>that's up to one hundred billion dollars. So let's say

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 7>in Vidia gets equity in open Ai as a result

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 7>of that. Yeah, then open Ai then gets equity in

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 7>AMD as a result of this deal. Would that essentially

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 7>mean that in Vidia is an owner of AMD?

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 6>No, I think that's too far fair. I mean, think

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 6>of companies having minority stakes. So there are instances where

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 6>Google has a minority stake in Lift. You know, there's

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 6>so many instances because.

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 7>Google Ventures was an investor in it early on. In

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 7>that's Google's venture capital army. You can see that within

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 7>and in the past, within Google's maps application. It used

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 7>to suggest, if it still does, it would suggest Lift rides.

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 7>It made sense. Yeah, and so look in these competitors though.

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 6>Because the numbers are getting so big, I mean you

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 6>need financing from somewhere right now. It was the Hyperscalers,

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 6>the four Hyperscalers were the biggest buyers of AI data

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 6>center infrastructure capacity. They were the ones who were building it.

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 6>And now it's like Opening Eyes saying we want to

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 6>be in the business of building AI data centers because

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 6>they look at Google and say they're running their data

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 6>centers a lot more efficiently than we are, even though

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 6>we haven't an signs with Microsoft. So Opening Eyes big

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 6>bet is if I have more compute capacity, one, I

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 6>can undercut everyone else in terms of offering my model,

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 6>and I'll be more aggressive with pricing, and once I

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 6>have the customer on board, I can sell them more services.

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 6>But just being a model provider is not a good business.

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 6>That's what open ai is suggesting that having the best

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 6>model is not a good mode. Ultimately, everyone will catch

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 6>up in terms of their model capacity, and then they

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 6>will go across different models.

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 2>So they're evolving very quickly.

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 4>They are.

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 6>That's the big bet that they're making is if I

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 6>have my own infrastructure and I have my own application,

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 6>I'll be aggressive with pricing.

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 3>So who needs to be worried then to the hyperscalers

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 3>and their big data center built, Like who needs to

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 3>be worried here?

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 2>And Vidia and Vidia, I.

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 6>Mean clearly in Vidia having seventy five percent gross margin,

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 6>they really have the best chip out there, they have

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 6>the best system. But now that opening eyes saying I

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 6>am going to use AMD and I have incentive that

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 6>AMD does well, who does it hurt? Ultimately Nvidia has

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 6>to lower its pricing. In fact, the ten million dollar

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 6>investment is a way for Nvidia to lower its prices

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 6>for open AI. They're not doing it directly, but they're

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 6>giving a ten billion dollar debate saying, okay, you buy

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 6>a certain capacity for one gigabyte data center, will give

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 6>you ten billion dollar debate. That's lowering your growth market.

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 7>And video shares down about one percent right now, still

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 7>though a four point five trillion dollar company.

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 3>But doesn't that Nvidia open AI feel a little weird

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 3>that deal?

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 4>Why what do you mean? What do you mean?

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, because it's like they're fueling, right, like the selling

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 3>of n video chips and then getting what.

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 7>Ya feels, here's money, here's money that you are then

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 7>going to pay back to it.

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 6>And look the biggest constraint right now is powerating.

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Almost false dem which makes me a little nervous.

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 6>No, so I want to concede. Nvidia has by far

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 6>the best chip when it comes to power constraints. That

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 6>are I think the biggest limiting factor when it comes

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 6>to build out. You like we talk about lead times.

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 6>Power has the longest lead time out there out of

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.479
<v Speaker 6>all the supply chains that we have seen, it's just

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 6>not fathomable to add more gigabytt capacity takes time. It's

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 6>very long lead time. And so from that perspective, and

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 6>Vidia chips are the most performant when it comes to

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 6>the power that's available. That's why everyone buys Nvidia, and

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 6>that is a mode. But now what Opening Eye is

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 6>saying is we will help AMD customize their chip to

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 6>the extent that they can offer us a viable alternative

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 6>for inferencing. Not for training, We'll still train our models

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 6>using Nvidia because it's the best chip, but for inferencing,

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 6>we will help handhold AMD and customize their silicon so

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 6>that we can use it for inferencing.

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 4>Are you done?

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 7>Because I want to change the subject, but I want

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 7>to make sure you're But it's just satisfied.

0:22:58.000 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 2>It's just I am.

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Satisfied, but it just makes I think this market is evolving.

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 7>So Carol asked man Deep, like you should be worried

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 7>it's yours, And I thought Man Deep was going to

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 7>say all of us, all of you, everybody, because I've

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 7>been seeing what open Ai is doing with Sora over

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 7>the last few days. Have you guys seen these videos?

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 7>So in some cases you have people who are able

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 7>to use this making videos of Sam Altman going on

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 7>ice raids or Sam Altman stealing GPUs from somewhere, or

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 7>you have somebody in Hollywood showing the effect that it

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 7>could have on Hollywood. And he put like a main

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 7>character from a Netflix show copyrighted certainly in a video.

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 4>I think maybe it was with Shrek. I don't even remember.

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 7>Like the stuff looks not quite it's not quite there.

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 7>It's not quite there, but it does look like a

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 7>friend of mine can jump off a building like Superman

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 7>or Stephen Hawking in a famous case now the last

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 7>few days is in a half halfpipe at the X Games.

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 7>I mean this stuff is pretty incredible.

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.479
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean the number of creators I think will grow.

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 6>You can become a creator. You don't need a camera

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 6>or you know, a professional setup to do that.

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Scary.

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 6>It is scary. But with that being said, everyone out

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.239
<v Speaker 6>there is competing for engagement time. That's what all of

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 6>these companies are doing, whether it's meta or alphabet with

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 6>YouTube and look for Meta or TikTok, it's all about

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 6>keeping people on their platform. Now, if Sora is able

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 6>to generate good content that people are engaging with, suddenly

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 6>that attention time span shifts from Meta to Zora.

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 7>Okay, I want to paint a bleak future for us

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 7>because this.

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Is what's going through my head.

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 3>Because are we engaging with stuff that we should be

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 3>engaging with is kind of my thing.

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 7>Let's say it gets the point where the people are

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 7>getting so good at creating this stuff without actually doing

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 7>it with skills. Okay, so we're already in a low higher,

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 7>low fire environment right now. The concern is that AI

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 7>is just going to decimate some white collar jobs. Wh

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 7>meta platforms, advertisers going to be if none of us

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 7>have jobs and can afford to spend any money on

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 7>anything because AI has just displaced us.

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, I mean, look, I think, like anything else right now,

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 6>the biggest use case out there for generative AI is

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 6>coding agent.

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 7>I mean imagine the developer.

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 6>Community has always been highly sought after and they will

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.479
<v Speaker 6>have to you know, transform in terms of their jobs

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 6>changing and how they use these tools. So to my mind,

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 6>you know, customer service coding agent, these are the type

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 6>of profiles that are illustrative of the power of you know,

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 6>generative AI in terms of bringing productivity around what is

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 6>the current workflow and everyone seems to be adjusting and evolving,

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 6>and I mean everyone talks about how productive the developers are.

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 6>There every hyperscaler has said their developers are thirty to

0:25:57.359 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 6>thirty five percent more productive because of generative AI.

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 7>I mean, so that's one side of it. He's the optimist, he's.

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Always the optimis space here.

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 7>You and I are just thinking, okay, well, no one's

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 7>going to be working and everyone's going to be convinced

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 7>by deep fakes. I know you're concerned about the political

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 7>implications of something. I'm just concerned about You've seen these videos.

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 7>They're insane.

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not happy about the political videos, and I

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 3>am concerned about a society where we're just glued to

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 3>our phones watching stupid stuff. And I forgive me, Yeah,

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I can say this, but I'm

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 3>going to go there, and I just I wonder at

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 3>what point is it just too much or is that

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 3>just a small percentage.

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Of where all of this is going?

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 3>And I mean Tim and I have used chacchipeet for

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 3>work and we see the productive element of it. So

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 3>I just I wonder is all the silly videos just

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 3>a small portion?

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 6>So I want to go back to the cost comment

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 6>that I made earlier. This technology is expensive to generate

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 6>that type of video. You are spending a pretty decent

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 6>chunk of compute and it's costing you a lot. So

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 6>now I think at some point who.

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 2>Who's paying exactly.

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 6>Right subsidize electric electric Bell, Yes, you are paying true power,

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 6>They're absolutely right.

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 7>And also open AI is subsidizing.

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 6>There will be a point when they will be under

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 6>pressure to show profitability. And then you have to figure

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 6>out what are the solid use cases that you want

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 6>to continue with, right and what are the ones where

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 6>you're spending compute for an output that is not even

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 6>as good as you know, an average human produce output.

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 6>And so that's where the cost benefit analysis, I think

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 6>will weed out a lot of the use cases where

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 6>you're just throwing compute and the output may not improve,

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 6>or the curve is just too steep, right, and you

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 6>just can't keep spending more compute and consuming more power.

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 6>That is inflating a lot of things that you don't

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 6>want to see.

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 2>No, you're absolutely right. That makes a lot of sense.

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 3>I've already said to my husband, you know why our

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 3>power bills are high.

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Blame AI. It's not my.

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 7>Fault because I love turn the light off, which.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 2>He does say man deep, saying oh, thank you.

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 4>We go everywhere with them, I know what. We go

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 4>everywhere with that.

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 2>I know, I know. I mean, you're just the best.

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>As always, you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast.

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Catch us live weekday afternoons from two to five eas

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:23.199
<v Speaker 1>during Listen on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, as you know, obviously talking a lot about finance,

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 3>as we do here regularly at Bloomberg, which also means

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 3>the intersection of finance.

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Investors and sports in a big way.

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Rick Welts has been in the job as chief executive

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 3>officer of the Dallas Mavericks for a little more than

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 3>nine months. Took over as CEO of the NBA franchise

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 3>that was on January first of this year, calling sint

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Marshall's nearly seven year tenure, his career spans nearly fifty.

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Years in sports and entertainment.

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 3>He has held roles as president and CEO of the

0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 3>Golden State Warriors, president of the NBA's Phoenix Suns, the

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 3>WNBA's Phoenix Mercury, and the NBA's Senior Vice president, Chief

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Marketing Officer, and also president of NBA Properties. To say

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 3>he has seen a lot is not even fair. Let's

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 3>head to the Bloomberg News bureau in Dallas with us

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 3>is Rick Welds, CEO of the Dallas Mavericks and Bloomberg

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 3>News Texas buer chief Julie Fine, who watches and reports

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 3>and talks about this base so much. Rick is great

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 3>to have you there in Dallas with Julie. I just

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 3>want to start with that intersection of business and sports

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 3>investors in sports. Twenty minutes ago, we were talking with

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Jim Esposito, president of Citadel Securities. Every day, it seems

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 3>ore every week we have a story about Apollo Ares,

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 3>different investment.

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Firms, the money in sports.

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 3>You've been in the world for a long time, seen

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 3>the rise of money in sports and the rise of

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 3>financial firms in sports.

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Is this a good thing in your view?

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's not only a good thing. I think it's

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 8>an essential thing.

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 7>Really.

0:29:56.080 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 8>When you look at the valuations of franchises today, there's

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 8>really a smaller and smaller universe of individuals who would

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 8>either choose to or have the ability to purchase a

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 8>major league sports franchise today.

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 2>So private equities.

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 8>Involvement is going to be something that's going to be

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 8>absolutely essential going forward.

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 9>You know, Rick, when you talk about the future of sports,

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 9>I do want to get in with you the streaming rights.

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 9>You know, Dallas Mavericks, they have MAVs Television and you

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 9>actually are one of the few that also have a

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 9>local deals.

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 2>You can see all the games here as well.

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 9>But what do you see as the future of how

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 9>we watch sports?

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's unfolding right now.

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 5>The NBA's.

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 8>Entering into a brand new set of broadcast agreements for

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 8>this season. So we're adding Peacock and NBC, We're adding

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:50.479
<v Speaker 8>Amazon Prime, and we have to go where our viewers

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 8>are watching us, right and especially our younger viewers today

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 8>who are just accustomed to using streaming as their primary

0:30:57.480 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 8>platform and consuming sports.

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 9>You know, let's talk a little bit about your viewers

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 9>and your fans. They had quite a shock last year

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 9>with the trade of Luka Danchik. You start tonight, you

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 9>kick off your preseason. Do you feel that you really

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 9>managed to bridge that gap with them?

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, this is my favorite time of year,

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 8>right because there's optimism. As I checked the standings this morning,

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 8>we're undefeated. We haven't played a game, and every team,

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 8>every every team feels the same way. Right. But we had,

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 8>you know, that trade on February first, and then this

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 8>is such a crazy industry, right, one hundred days later,

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 8>on May twelfth, with a one point eight percent chance

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 8>of winning the NBA Draft lottery, somehow we came away

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 8>with the number one pick and with that Cooper flag.

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 8>And that's that's what's starting tonight, a new era of

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 8>Dallas Mavericks basketball.

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 9>Will you talk about the finances of sports last year,

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 9>you did lose some sponsors and there were some season

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 9>ticket holders that were very upset about this trade.

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 2>But where did you land now?

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 8>You know, sports is such a wondering because it can

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 8>change on a dime. And it did on May twelfth

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 8>with the drafting of Cooper Flag, you know, the most

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 8>decorated eighteen year old player in the history of basketball,

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 8>who plays his first game for the Mavericks tonight, and

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 8>really everything changes. The optimism going into this season changed

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 8>the business environment completely. We're third in the league and

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 8>new season ticket sales will finish this year ahead in

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 8>revenue and season ticket sales, which you know, I wasn't

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 8>quite sure was going to happen on February first.

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 7>So ahead of the year with season ticket sales now.

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 7>But on the business question and on the sponsors returning

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 7>to the organization, can you give us some numbers behind

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 7>sponsorships or how Flag has affected the way that companies

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 7>are interested in partnering with the mass.

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, your second point is really spot on, because the

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 8>interest around Cooper Flag and his potential All Star career

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 8>in the NBA, but here in Dallas, it's combined with

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 8>the optimism and energy around building a new arena and

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 8>entertainment district to replace American Airlines Center, where we've played

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 8>for the past twenty five years. So it's a wonderful

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 8>combination from a business standpoint because we have the optimism

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 8>of the team, but also a really exciting prospect about

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 8>what we're going to be building in Dallas, which will

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 8>be the future of our franchise.

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's where we want to go to. In terms

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 2>of what you are building.

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 3>In terms of a new arena, mads Lise is up

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 3>in twenty thirty thirty one. Rick, you share an arena

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 3>with the Dallas Stars, but you've made it clear that

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 3>the next arena that you have will be a basketball venue.

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I think the last time that we all caught.

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Up with you at Bloomberg, you said you had narrawed

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 3>it down to several sites. So what can you tell

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 3>us our feel free to announce where you guys are going.

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 7>To do it, and we love to know.

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 8>I really really wish I could do that. We're hoping

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 8>by the end of the first quarter of twenty six

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 8>that we're going to have identified a site. Listen our commitment.

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 2>We've been very clear we want.

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 8>To be in the city of Dallas, and the city

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 8>has been a great wardner to this point and helping

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 8>us identify sites. Not easy to do because we're looking

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 8>for a minimum of fifty acres to build the arena

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 8>and an entertainment district. So not a lot of fifty

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 8>acre parcels that you can even consider in Dallas. But

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 8>we have narrowed down and we're doing our due diligence

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 8>on those very complicated project. These are very complicated things

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 8>to get done. But again we're hoping by the end

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 8>of the first quarter the next year to be able

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 8>to announce where we're going to be.

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 9>Of course, the team owners, the Adolson family, they've made

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:33.280
<v Speaker 9>no secret they would like to see casino gambling in Texas.

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 9>You follow the Texas legislature. I followed Texas legislature that

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 9>did not get anywhere this year. Does that affect really

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 9>the plans and what's going to be next for the stadium.

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.760
<v Speaker 8>No, as we look forward, we don't think the prospects

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:50.919
<v Speaker 8>for that happening in Texas anytime soon or very likely.

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 8>So the project that we're going to build has no

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.479
<v Speaker 8>casino component to it. We're talking about hotels, we're talking

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 8>about retail, we're talking about restaurants, we're talking about big

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 8>gathering places in an arena. So there's no casino component.

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 9>Something you don't see that often as a team opening

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 9>their preseason, not in their arena. You will be playing

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 9>tonight in Dickey's in Fort Worth, a much smaller arena,

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:15.800
<v Speaker 9>and that's really where people will get their first vision

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 9>of Cooper flag. You know, can you talk about that

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 9>decision and what you're hoping comes out of the evening?

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well, it was really in COVID when the commitment

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 8>was made to play this game. The fact that it's

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.760
<v Speaker 8>going to be Cooper's first game in a Mavericks uniform

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 8>in our home market, and we think of Dallas Fort

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 8>Worth as our home market. I think Fort Worth looks

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 8>at the Mavericks as their NBA team. So I think

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 8>it's going to be a super exciting night. It's gonna

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 8>be the first time we'll get to see Cooper, and

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 8>I think there's a big, big, big buzz about that.

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 9>I think there's people that are interested in seeing Cooper. Globally,

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 9>speaking of global sports, the World Cup will be holding

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 9>nine matches in Dallas. That's the most in any city

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 9>in North America. You know, what does that do for

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 9>this city in terms, this whole area, in terms of

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:01.399
<v Speaker 9>being and really a sports town.

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 8>I don't think people yet realize the impact this is

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 8>going to have. This is the whole world is going

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 8>to be focused on this, and I'm I'm a huge

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 8>soccer fan, you know, maybe this far behind India basketball.

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 8>I own an ownership interest in a couple soccer clubs,

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 8>So I think what's going to unfold here is really

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 8>going to put Dallas on the map as a soccer mecha.

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 7>Hey, I want to ask a little bit of Julie

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 7>asked about gambling on site and the potential for that.

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 7>Obviously that's not going to happen anytime soon. What about

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 7>those sports gaming and the way that gaming and the

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 7>ability for people to actually wager on these games has

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 7>attracted or increased viewership, has attracted or increased engagement? How

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 7>do you measure that at the MAPS organization?

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, I think we're all tracking it and

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 8>watching this unfold in real time because you know the argument.

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 8>You know, Adam Silver was really the first of the

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 8>commissioners to come out in favor of it and really

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 8>talking about the level of engagement that it does provide

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 8>and how how people want to consume our games now.

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:05.760
<v Speaker 8>So I think it's been nothing but positive at this point. Listen,

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 8>it's not the story hasn't been written yet on how

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 8>this will completely play out. But I think it's been

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 8>nothing but additive in terms of people's interest in watching

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 8>games and staying and watching more than they have historically

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 8>in the past.

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned Adam Silver CBS News reporting last week. As

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.399
<v Speaker 3>the NBA continues to grow its presence, over sees rich

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Silver outlining a vision aboud vision for the future that

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 3>could see teams from other continents playing US based franchises

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:35.879
<v Speaker 3>in the regular season or postseason.

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 2>What do you think of that.

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:40.879
<v Speaker 8>I think it's the most exciting time in NBA history,

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 8>and I think the prospect of that for me, I

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 8>was hired in nineteen eighty two by David Stern, who

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 8>was commissioner for the NBA for thirty years. There's a

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 8>thirty fifth employee of the NBA League Office and he's

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 8>not with us anymore. But this would really be the

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 8>culmination of that dream, the path that we went on

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:01.800
<v Speaker 8>to really understand basketball is the only other sport played

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 8>worldwide other than soccer, and the NBA is a very

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 8>unique league where all the best basketball players in the

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:11.359
<v Speaker 8>world play in one league. The idea that we could

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:14.800
<v Speaker 8>have another league in Europe. What we're doing in Africa

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 8>today with our league in Africa I think it's really

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 8>the most exciting time ever for the globalization of our sport.

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Ricky seconds, are you having more fun today or are

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 3>back in nineteen sixty nine when you began as a

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 3>ball ball ball boy with the SuperSonics.

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:33.399
<v Speaker 8>I think I have the same level of excitement going

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 8>into tonight's game as I probably did that first day

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 8>I walked into a cl SuperSonics locker room.

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 2>That's a good place to be.

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much, Really appreciate your time always that

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 3>you give to Bloomberg. Then, of course was Rick Wald,

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 3>CEO of the Dallas Mavericks, and of course our thanks

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 3>as well to Julie finci Is, Texas bure chief for

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News.

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:56.239
<v Speaker 7>up after this.

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:04.839
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast. Catch

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eastering. Listen

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 1>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 7>Right now, we want to bring in Leslie Marx. She's

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 7>joining us this afternoon. Really appreciate her taking the time.

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 7>She's CIO for Equities at Mackenzie investments. The firm has

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 7>two hundred twenty eight billion dollars in assets under management.

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 7>She joins us from Toronto. Leslie, good to have you

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 7>with us on the program. Thanks for your patients for

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 7>juggling a lot of live interviews all over the country

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:38.839
<v Speaker 7>right now, so appreciate it. Look, the story that we've

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 7>been covering today has to do with everything with regard

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:46.320
<v Speaker 7>to AMD open AI OEMD shares up twenty five percent

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 7>right now, the environment with regard to the investments that

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 7>are being made in private companies and public companies.

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 4>How are you looking at it with AI?

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 10>Well, exactly, I mean, AI is definitely the dominant thematic

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 10>is driving public equity markets today. And I think that

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 10>people are looking at equities and you're hearing people talk

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 10>about you know, and I heard you and Carol both

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 10>talking about the comparisons between today and the nineteen ninety

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 10>nine two thousand era, as well as people inferring that,

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 10>you know, are we in bubble conditions here based on

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 10>some of the deals.

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.240
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I think that the people that talk about

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 10>us being in a bubble right now are those that

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 10>maybe aren't long equities or you know, or underweight equities,

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:36.240
<v Speaker 10>and so there's some you know, speaking their own book.

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:39.800
<v Speaker 10>You know, I just go back to, as an equity person,

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 10>fundamentals and the two primary fundamentals that an equity investor

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 10>needs to focus on our earnings and what do we

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 10>pay for those earnings. And that really comes a lot

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.280
<v Speaker 10>of which comes from of course sentiment, which is extremely

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 10>bullish right now, but also the outlook for interest rates.

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 10>And I think your listeners have a very good understanding

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 10>that a lower interest rate environment is generally good for multiples.

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 10>So let's spend a minute here just to talk about earnings,

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:14.280
<v Speaker 10>because earnings has been the big surprise or upside surprise

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 10>in twenty twenty five. When you look at the factors

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 10>that are driving equities, it's been primarily, of course, price momentum.

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 10>The things that are going higher are what people want,

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 10>of course, but also earnings momentum has been a top factor.

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:32.840
<v Speaker 10>And earnings momentum is a very strong fundamental that we

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 10>can really anchor ourselves on and say that actually, with

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 10>these companies reporting strong earnings, we can feel comfortable with

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 10>the higher valuations that they're trading at today.

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, So is that you saying you are comfortable

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 2>with the valuations that we're seeing today.

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 10>Yes, And I think when you look at valuations, what

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.399
<v Speaker 10>people point to mostly when they say that valuations are

0:41:55.760 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 10>stretched is evaluations today versus historical. But what you have

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 10>to think about is today the margin profile of the

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 10>S and P five hundred is much higher than it

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 10>has been historically. Ten years ago, the net margin for

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 10>the S and P five hundred was about ten percent.

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:17.280
<v Speaker 10>Today it's thirteen to fourteen percent. So you actually should

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 10>be paying more for equities today than you have historically.

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 7>That's so interesting to hear because I think there's a

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 7>lot of people who are looking around right now saying

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:31.720
<v Speaker 7>this doesn't necessarily feel like a comfortable environment to buy.

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:35.359
<v Speaker 7>And you said that, Okay, Well, people who might feel

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 7>that way maybe aren't long equities. But what would you

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:40.280
<v Speaker 7>say to somebody who does have cash deployed in markets

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 7>right now? How do you do it with valuations like this?

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 10>Well, I would say the most important thing for someone looking,

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 10>you know, to get into the market where you know,

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:51.319
<v Speaker 10>I totally understand the bias and the anchoring. If you're

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:54.800
<v Speaker 10>not there right now, why you would feel uncomfortable investing

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 10>at these levels? But there are lots of opportunities and

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.879
<v Speaker 10>you have to be thinking about diversification. You know, when

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 10>you look at what happened in Japan overnight, to see

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:08.320
<v Speaker 10>that market up over four and a half percent overnight,

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 10>that's incredible and it just highlights that there are opportunities

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 10>that go beyond the top ten names in the S

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 10>and P five hundred, and that's where investors should be looking.

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 10>They should be looking to diversify their holdings. You mentioned

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 10>that I'm sitting here in Toronto right now. In Canada,

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 10>the SMPTSX it's been an outperformer when compared with the

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 10>S and P five hundred. That might surprise people, but

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 10>gold has been a big driver of that market. When

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 10>you think about gold being at record highs, it's been

0:43:37.000 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 10>a big driver of the S and P TSX, both

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 10>on a price basis and earnings growth. So when investors

0:43:43.160 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 10>are looking at, you know, where should I invest or

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 10>should I invest today, we would say to them look

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:52.960
<v Speaker 10>at diversifying your opportunities, because there are opportunities globally. I mean,

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 10>China is going through a very exciting time here around

0:43:57.400 --> 0:44:03.279
<v Speaker 10>their technology, electric vehicles, robotics. You're seeing a lot of

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:07.239
<v Speaker 10>interest building in China, So I think that.

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, forgive, forgive, but we've got a Ryan, We've got

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 3>a closing belt just coming at us. But we really

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:16.240
<v Speaker 3>appreciate your input. Leslie Marx over at Mackenzie Investment.

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal