1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:12,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane 2 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: Jay Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 3 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,480 Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:35,240 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg Julian 5 00:00:35,280 --> 00:00:37,560 Speaker 1: EMMANUELA b t I G or all we got is 6 00:00:37,560 --> 00:00:40,440 Speaker 1: a stupid hat. Uh, tell us about bt I G 7 00:00:40,600 --> 00:00:42,800 Speaker 1: Charity Day first, So you have us twenty seconds. So 8 00:00:43,200 --> 00:00:45,400 Speaker 1: you guys raised a ton of money. Yeah, we've raised 9 00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:48,599 Speaker 1: forty five million dollars since two thousand and three. And 10 00:00:50,200 --> 00:00:53,280 Speaker 1: the belief is that when Steven Starker and Scott Cavalk 11 00:00:53,360 --> 00:00:56,600 Speaker 1: founded the firm, they wanted to really, you know, create 12 00:00:56,760 --> 00:01:00,200 Speaker 1: a spirit of giving, a culture of giving. And we 13 00:01:00,240 --> 00:01:02,760 Speaker 1: have this day once a year where the firm donates 14 00:01:02,880 --> 00:01:07,200 Speaker 1: all its commissions to charity designated by the clients and 15 00:01:07,360 --> 00:01:11,920 Speaker 1: our celebrity guest traders again Mike Bloomberg and luminaries from 16 00:01:12,600 --> 00:01:16,119 Speaker 1: sports and so on. So John Farroll, I gotta get 17 00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:21,119 Speaker 1: through the month. Charity is one of the donors. Congratulations 18 00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:23,880 Speaker 1: on a on a massive effort, Junio, and good luck today. 19 00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:27,120 Speaker 1: Thank you. Let's talk about the equity markets. Dollars strongth 20 00:01:27,240 --> 00:01:29,920 Speaker 1: is that good or bad for stocks? It's good and 21 00:01:29,920 --> 00:01:33,480 Speaker 1: and people misinterpret it. Um. You know, there's this this 22 00:01:33,560 --> 00:01:36,960 Speaker 1: thing that we call in recency bias. So we saw 23 00:01:37,280 --> 00:01:42,400 Speaker 1: the stock market rise consistently in seventeen alongside a week 24 00:01:42,480 --> 00:01:45,319 Speaker 1: or dollar, and there's this sort of mental dislocation that 25 00:01:45,480 --> 00:01:48,840 Speaker 1: investors have right now that they don't really fully buy 26 00:01:48,880 --> 00:01:52,360 Speaker 1: into the fact that stocks can rise with a strong dollar. 27 00:01:52,480 --> 00:01:55,480 Speaker 1: In fact, the strong dollar is going to increase the 28 00:01:55,800 --> 00:01:59,440 Speaker 1: fled the FEDS flexibility and put a lid on inflation. 29 00:01:59,600 --> 00:02:02,120 Speaker 1: So let's think about the big sector. Where we got 30 00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:04,160 Speaker 1: the leadership from in the in the equity market over 31 00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:06,440 Speaker 1: the last year or so. It came from tech. Tech 32 00:02:06,640 --> 00:02:10,280 Speaker 1: is a growth story. It's also a very international story. 33 00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:13,280 Speaker 1: And the weaker dollars certainly helped down tech over the 34 00:02:13,360 --> 00:02:16,400 Speaker 1: last year. Is it not a headwind for the big 35 00:02:16,440 --> 00:02:18,720 Speaker 1: sector that's led most of this run so far over 36 00:02:18,760 --> 00:02:22,079 Speaker 1: the last year. It is, There's no question about it. 37 00:02:22,120 --> 00:02:24,600 Speaker 1: And that's that's why it's actually neutral for for US 38 00:02:24,639 --> 00:02:27,160 Speaker 1: at b T I g UM. But it isn't an 39 00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:31,080 Speaker 1: unequivocal negative because the flip side of that story is 40 00:02:31,120 --> 00:02:34,960 Speaker 1: that with the stronger dollar, yields on the long end 41 00:02:35,200 --> 00:02:38,960 Speaker 1: seemed to be very tame. The fact that treasury volatility 42 00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:42,000 Speaker 1: is near its all time lows. Imagine if the VIX 43 00:02:42,040 --> 00:02:44,760 Speaker 1: were back to nine or ten, that's the equivalent of 44 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:48,640 Speaker 1: where treasury volatility is right now. That's a positive for 45 00:02:48,760 --> 00:02:51,920 Speaker 1: high multiple technology. So it's your basic argument that this 46 00:02:51,960 --> 00:02:55,840 Speaker 1: will keep financial conditions looser than that otherwise would be 47 00:02:55,840 --> 00:02:58,919 Speaker 1: because the FED won't have to go that quickly. Yes, 48 00:02:59,320 --> 00:03:01,400 Speaker 1: it's it's gonna be one of those ones where the 49 00:03:01,480 --> 00:03:06,400 Speaker 1: FED gets more leeway to react to incoming data in 50 00:03:06,440 --> 00:03:10,720 Speaker 1: a manner as we heard from Powell earlier today, that 51 00:03:10,800 --> 00:03:13,800 Speaker 1: the markets will be able to anticipate. What did you 52 00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:16,200 Speaker 1: think of the space from Sham and Poal today, The 53 00:03:16,240 --> 00:03:21,920 Speaker 1: idea that people overstate the Fed's influence on global financial conditions. 54 00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:25,160 Speaker 1: I think some people might take issue with that. I 55 00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:29,120 Speaker 1: think that was a bit of modesty. The fact is 56 00:03:29,120 --> 00:03:31,560 Speaker 1: is that the FED has always been a critical player 57 00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:35,280 Speaker 1: in the evolution of financial conditions when you look at 58 00:03:35,400 --> 00:03:39,280 Speaker 1: how the world recovered in two thousand and nine. But 59 00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:43,040 Speaker 1: also the flip side is that history shows that recessions 60 00:03:43,040 --> 00:03:45,960 Speaker 1: start because the FED tightens too much. Well, but how 61 00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:48,680 Speaker 1: far away from too much? I mean, acting is an economist, 62 00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:52,080 Speaker 1: You're gonna tell me we're way way way away from 63 00:03:52,120 --> 00:03:55,560 Speaker 1: too much. Well, we are. And and to the Fed's credit, 64 00:03:56,000 --> 00:04:00,040 Speaker 1: this cycle began with core pc, you know, closer to 65 00:04:00,160 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 1: one and a half, then you know, having to react 66 00:04:03,640 --> 00:04:06,600 Speaker 1: to core PC trading to one nine or two where 67 00:04:06,640 --> 00:04:09,520 Speaker 1: we are now. So we've already started building in the 68 00:04:09,600 --> 00:04:13,800 Speaker 1: preconditions for the recovery and growth to continue. Real rates 69 00:04:13,840 --> 00:04:16,360 Speaker 1: are still pretty much negative. This is a still this 70 00:04:16,400 --> 00:04:21,520 Speaker 1: is an accommodative Federal reserve. Still how much longer? Full? Uh? 71 00:04:21,960 --> 00:04:24,239 Speaker 1: You tell me when the ECB is going to start 72 00:04:24,320 --> 00:04:27,080 Speaker 1: hiking and and I'll tell you when the Fed can 73 00:04:27,120 --> 00:04:31,039 Speaker 1: get less accommodative. Um it is. It's a global picture, 74 00:04:31,520 --> 00:04:34,400 Speaker 1: um And and there are still players out there that 75 00:04:34,480 --> 00:04:38,560 Speaker 1: are creating the conditions for monetary accommodation. So for the 76 00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:41,200 Speaker 1: year end story, Julian, has anything changed for you guys, 77 00:04:41,200 --> 00:04:43,880 Speaker 1: Because I saw a note come across my desk yesterday 78 00:04:43,920 --> 00:04:46,320 Speaker 1: that had a three handle for the SMP five hundred 79 00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:49,520 Speaker 1: you're looking for three thousand. We are, and and that's 80 00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:51,800 Speaker 1: been our base case the entire year. But when we 81 00:04:51,839 --> 00:04:54,920 Speaker 1: looked at the view was that we were going to 82 00:04:55,040 --> 00:04:58,560 Speaker 1: get a lot more volatility than we've gotten in twenty seventeen. 83 00:04:58,680 --> 00:05:01,359 Speaker 1: So by those rights, the correction that we've had for 84 00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:04,480 Speaker 1: the last several months is not a surprise. And in fact, 85 00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:07,480 Speaker 1: what we're doing by this correction, what we're doing by 86 00:05:07,640 --> 00:05:10,799 Speaker 1: sort of the negativity surrounding things like a stronger dollar 87 00:05:11,240 --> 00:05:14,400 Speaker 1: and obsession with inflation and so on, is creating the 88 00:05:14,520 --> 00:05:18,240 Speaker 1: conditions for the wall of worry that stocks always climb 89 00:05:18,320 --> 00:05:21,560 Speaker 1: and that got destroyed in January for higher prices. In 90 00:05:21,600 --> 00:05:24,479 Speaker 1: the second what is the distinctive? We gotta go, darn it? 91 00:05:26,600 --> 00:05:30,839 Speaker 1: Have a charity day, morow Tom. There's a clock on 92 00:05:30,880 --> 00:05:33,280 Speaker 1: your screen, a clock. It's my first day. What can 93 00:05:33,320 --> 00:05:35,960 Speaker 1: I say? Julia, Emmanuel, thank you so much? Into all 94 00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:40,280 Speaker 1: at bt I G. Does Greenfield show up at this thing? Oh? Absolutely, 95 00:05:42,240 --> 00:05:45,920 Speaker 1: Rich is a presence at bt I G. Rich Greenfield, 96 00:05:46,040 --> 00:05:49,160 Speaker 1: bt I G with Walter and a guy named Emmanuel 97 00:05:49,400 --> 00:06:03,080 Speaker 1: is a great team b T I G. Charity Day. 98 00:06:05,800 --> 00:06:08,280 Speaker 1: Who do right now? Folks? We're Sril de Jacques or 99 00:06:08,279 --> 00:06:13,159 Speaker 1: so with us with clear view energy partners. Jacques, you 100 00:06:13,200 --> 00:06:16,799 Speaker 1: have a telling note. Forget about I ran forget about 101 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:20,239 Speaker 1: the dollar. Forget about all this other bologna. You lead 102 00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:26,400 Speaker 1: with Venezuela. Start with our listeners, coast to coast. Do 103 00:06:26,520 --> 00:06:31,480 Speaker 1: we really care about Venezuelan oil? Why is that? Well, 104 00:06:31,720 --> 00:06:34,080 Speaker 1: oil is such a global market that you really need 105 00:06:34,160 --> 00:06:38,200 Speaker 1: to follow where the supply is coming from. And Venezuela 106 00:06:38,240 --> 00:06:40,960 Speaker 1: has historically been one of the larger supplies of oil 107 00:06:41,000 --> 00:06:43,520 Speaker 1: in the world, and and that started to change, and 108 00:06:43,560 --> 00:06:47,840 Speaker 1: we've seen a significant reduction in overall supply from Venezuela 109 00:06:48,240 --> 00:06:51,280 Speaker 1: and that's causing a major impact on the market right now. 110 00:06:52,040 --> 00:06:54,960 Speaker 1: Are we ready for a pullback in Iranian crude as well? 111 00:06:56,360 --> 00:07:01,039 Speaker 1: Iran is definitely a different situation because because there actually 112 00:07:01,080 --> 00:07:04,080 Speaker 1: hasn't been any volumes of oil taken off the market 113 00:07:04,120 --> 00:07:06,240 Speaker 1: from Iran, and we don't know if there will be 114 00:07:06,640 --> 00:07:08,919 Speaker 1: a lot of new information will come out when the 115 00:07:08,920 --> 00:07:12,160 Speaker 1: President talks later today, and what you should be watching 116 00:07:12,240 --> 00:07:16,360 Speaker 1: for is the level of European cooperation in what the 117 00:07:16,440 --> 00:07:20,040 Speaker 1: U S announces. So with the United States announces that 118 00:07:20,080 --> 00:07:23,040 Speaker 1: they won't extend the waiver on oil sanctions, what will 119 00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:27,440 Speaker 1: that ultimately mean for you, Jack, Well, just by itself, 120 00:07:27,480 --> 00:07:29,680 Speaker 1: that doesn't really mean much. We're going to need to 121 00:07:29,720 --> 00:07:33,440 Speaker 1: know a lot more of the details as to who 122 00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:36,280 Speaker 1: else is going to be involved in which past the 123 00:07:36,320 --> 00:07:40,720 Speaker 1: President is going down in terms of of sanctioning um Iran, 124 00:07:40,920 --> 00:07:45,720 Speaker 1: because there definitely could be a lot of different outcomes. Now. Initially, 125 00:07:45,920 --> 00:07:48,640 Speaker 1: if you look back a few years um, there was 126 00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:51,120 Speaker 1: over a million barrels per day of Iran supply that 127 00:07:51,160 --> 00:07:53,640 Speaker 1: came off the market, and that is not We're not 128 00:07:53,720 --> 00:07:55,400 Speaker 1: in the same game as that as we were a 129 00:07:55,440 --> 00:07:57,960 Speaker 1: few years ago. Well, I know Jenn wants to continue this, 130 00:07:58,000 --> 00:07:59,920 Speaker 1: but I want to be rooting cutting because this is 131 00:08:00,040 --> 00:08:05,840 Speaker 1: so critical this afternoon. Can the President cut off Iranian oil? 132 00:08:06,440 --> 00:08:09,480 Speaker 1: Because he probably wants to say that, but can he 133 00:08:09,600 --> 00:08:14,640 Speaker 1: really do that? Uh No? I mean Iran exports over 134 00:08:14,680 --> 00:08:17,160 Speaker 1: two million barrels per day of oil to Asia and 135 00:08:17,200 --> 00:08:21,000 Speaker 1: that that supply is unlikely to change. There's about six 136 00:08:21,440 --> 00:08:24,240 Speaker 1: thousand barrels per day that goes to Europe and that 137 00:08:24,320 --> 00:08:28,160 Speaker 1: could potentially change, but not right away. That's something that 138 00:08:28,200 --> 00:08:31,040 Speaker 1: could be later in the year, next year, or even 139 00:08:31,080 --> 00:08:33,040 Speaker 1: not at all. And so that's what we need to 140 00:08:33,040 --> 00:08:35,600 Speaker 1: figure out from what the President says today. What's your 141 00:08:35,640 --> 00:08:40,360 Speaker 1: base case today, Jack, I think that the European Union 142 00:08:40,559 --> 00:08:43,960 Speaker 1: is unlikely to cooperate with what the President is coming 143 00:08:43,960 --> 00:08:46,839 Speaker 1: out with. So I think you're going to see the 144 00:08:46,960 --> 00:08:50,840 Speaker 1: us UM allow the waiver to lapse on May twelve. 145 00:08:51,240 --> 00:08:53,840 Speaker 1: But initially that's not going to cause any sort of 146 00:08:53,880 --> 00:08:57,680 Speaker 1: supply disruption. So what can the president do ultimately that 147 00:08:57,760 --> 00:09:00,280 Speaker 1: pleases both allies in the Middle East, the likes of 148 00:09:00,320 --> 00:09:02,400 Speaker 1: Israel and Sally Arabia that would like the President to 149 00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:04,600 Speaker 1: pull out of this deal, and at the same time 150 00:09:04,800 --> 00:09:07,160 Speaker 1: appease European allies that wanted him to stay in. Is 151 00:09:07,160 --> 00:09:10,600 Speaker 1: there any middle ground, Jack, That's that's a great question, 152 00:09:10,679 --> 00:09:13,000 Speaker 1: and I think, um, we're going to have to get 153 00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:15,640 Speaker 1: our policy. Analyst Kevin booked on to go through the 154 00:09:16,240 --> 00:09:19,880 Speaker 1: um complex maze of outcomes that could take place here. 155 00:09:20,600 --> 00:09:23,600 Speaker 1: But from my perspective, looking at supply demand, I do 156 00:09:23,679 --> 00:09:26,800 Speaker 1: not expect any supply to come off the market this 157 00:09:26,920 --> 00:09:29,160 Speaker 1: year from iron Well, that's a really important point, and 158 00:09:29,160 --> 00:09:30,880 Speaker 1: I guess we can sort of take that point and 159 00:09:30,960 --> 00:09:32,640 Speaker 1: draw out our thoughts on what we think is going 160 00:09:32,679 --> 00:09:35,680 Speaker 1: to happen ultimately with the deal. Jack, looking at oil 161 00:09:35,720 --> 00:09:40,079 Speaker 1: prices right now through seventy on w t I yesterday, 162 00:09:39,840 --> 00:09:42,560 Speaker 1: a move that we hadn't seen in many, many years, 163 00:09:42,600 --> 00:09:44,480 Speaker 1: And I'm just looking at the situation the all market 164 00:09:44,520 --> 00:09:47,199 Speaker 1: and trying to work out is this a supply disruption 165 00:09:47,280 --> 00:09:51,840 Speaker 1: story with a geopolitical risk premium injected back into the market, 166 00:09:52,200 --> 00:09:55,240 Speaker 1: or are we under appreciating the demand side to this 167 00:09:55,440 --> 00:09:59,040 Speaker 1: rally over the last year. That's a great question, and 168 00:09:59,280 --> 00:10:01,440 Speaker 1: there's definitely the opponents of all of those that are 169 00:10:01,440 --> 00:10:04,800 Speaker 1: involved in the market um with the OPEC supply cut. 170 00:10:05,000 --> 00:10:06,760 Speaker 1: I think the way I'd like to think about this 171 00:10:07,040 --> 00:10:11,240 Speaker 1: is if Venezuela was producing at its normal quota level, 172 00:10:11,600 --> 00:10:15,120 Speaker 1: the oil market would be balanced, supply equals demand, and 173 00:10:15,160 --> 00:10:17,600 Speaker 1: I think oil price would probably be twenty dollars lower. 174 00:10:18,080 --> 00:10:20,720 Speaker 1: But because we've seen such a massive amount of oil 175 00:10:20,760 --> 00:10:24,200 Speaker 1: from Venezuela leave the market, that is what's causing the 176 00:10:24,320 --> 00:10:27,520 Speaker 1: major problem and the spike and oil. This is just fascinating. 177 00:10:27,559 --> 00:10:29,800 Speaker 1: You're telling me we'd be a you know, not to 178 00:10:29,800 --> 00:10:32,840 Speaker 1: take it to a dollar, but we'd be at fifty 179 00:10:33,040 --> 00:10:37,239 Speaker 1: it's fifty five or fifty eight dollar West Texas Intermediate 180 00:10:38,080 --> 00:10:42,880 Speaker 1: X Venezuela exactly. This is a significant amount of oil. 181 00:10:42,960 --> 00:10:45,600 Speaker 1: They've taken more oil off the market than Saudi Arabia 182 00:10:45,679 --> 00:10:48,320 Speaker 1: has So this is a big number, and then you 183 00:10:48,400 --> 00:10:50,679 Speaker 1: have to say, when is this actually going to get 184 00:10:50,720 --> 00:10:53,839 Speaker 1: any better? All the data flow coming out of Venezuela 185 00:10:53,920 --> 00:10:58,400 Speaker 1: continually gets worse. So do you model eight eight five 186 00:10:58,440 --> 00:11:01,840 Speaker 1: dollar oil? Can you even twenty four months back to 187 00:11:01,880 --> 00:11:04,880 Speaker 1: a hundred dollars a barrel? No? I don't think we 188 00:11:04,920 --> 00:11:07,360 Speaker 1: will get up that high. And so the way you 189 00:11:07,440 --> 00:11:10,240 Speaker 1: have to think about it is there's a significant amount 190 00:11:10,280 --> 00:11:13,280 Speaker 1: of oil that's voluntarily being taken off the market, and 191 00:11:13,320 --> 00:11:16,000 Speaker 1: as prices drift up, a lot of that oil is 192 00:11:16,040 --> 00:11:18,640 Speaker 1: likely to start to move back onto the market and 193 00:11:18,679 --> 00:11:20,880 Speaker 1: then flipping over to the demand side of the equation. 194 00:11:21,040 --> 00:11:24,920 Speaker 1: As oil prices rise, we do see a sensitivity and 195 00:11:24,960 --> 00:11:27,240 Speaker 1: the demand starts to go down. So there's there's a 196 00:11:27,320 --> 00:11:29,760 Speaker 1: natural balancing that occurs. Jack, I want to spend a 197 00:11:29,800 --> 00:11:31,840 Speaker 1: little bit of time talking about the politics of OPEC 198 00:11:31,880 --> 00:11:34,520 Speaker 1: at the moment and begin with the question on Saudi Arabia. 199 00:11:34,800 --> 00:11:37,280 Speaker 1: If the Saudis could pick an oil price right now, 200 00:11:37,800 --> 00:11:41,079 Speaker 1: what would it be. Well, that's a good question. Um, 201 00:11:41,120 --> 00:11:42,960 Speaker 1: you know the numbers that have been thrown out in 202 00:11:43,080 --> 00:11:46,200 Speaker 1: the media or somewhere in the neighborhood of eighty dollars 203 00:11:46,200 --> 00:11:49,360 Speaker 1: a barrel. The I m F has put out a 204 00:11:49,440 --> 00:11:52,520 Speaker 1: number of thaying that their budget is balanced a dollars 205 00:11:52,520 --> 00:11:55,320 Speaker 1: a barrel, So I think that's the direction they want 206 00:11:55,360 --> 00:11:57,960 Speaker 1: to go. Um. The way I think about it is 207 00:11:58,040 --> 00:12:01,120 Speaker 1: that they want to keep oil prices relatively high for 208 00:12:01,200 --> 00:12:04,640 Speaker 1: the Saudia, Ramco I p O. That is probably going 209 00:12:04,679 --> 00:12:06,680 Speaker 1: to take place in about a year from now from 210 00:12:06,920 --> 00:12:10,800 Speaker 1: media reports I've heard. So that's the direction they're moving towards. 211 00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:13,080 Speaker 1: Felt that into the politics of OPEC at the moment, 212 00:12:13,120 --> 00:12:15,720 Speaker 1: because as far as I understand, the Iranians are quite 213 00:12:15,720 --> 00:12:17,960 Speaker 1: sensitive about the oil price getting too high on what 214 00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:21,920 Speaker 1: that could mean for for demand. Jack and the Saudi's 215 00:12:21,960 --> 00:12:24,160 Speaker 1: on their own pushing for a higher role price and 216 00:12:24,160 --> 00:12:27,600 Speaker 1: can they take the rest of OPEC with them. Well, 217 00:12:27,640 --> 00:12:30,079 Speaker 1: if you think about where the oil is actually coming 218 00:12:30,120 --> 00:12:34,720 Speaker 1: off the market, h Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Russia, Mexico, that 219 00:12:34,840 --> 00:12:37,760 Speaker 1: comprises the bulk of the oil that's actually been removed 220 00:12:37,760 --> 00:12:41,040 Speaker 1: from the market. So Um, I think the other people 221 00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:44,679 Speaker 1: are mostly along for the ride and had made minor adjustments. 222 00:12:44,720 --> 00:12:48,320 Speaker 1: So I don't think you could see a big boom 223 00:12:48,320 --> 00:12:51,480 Speaker 1: and supply coming out of different parts of OPEC. I 224 00:12:51,559 --> 00:12:55,880 Speaker 1: just triangulated John the extrapolation of oil to a hundred 225 00:12:55,880 --> 00:12:58,440 Speaker 1: dollars of barrel. And you know, it's a real rough thing. 226 00:12:58,440 --> 00:13:00,160 Speaker 1: I'm not going to put it out across to or 227 00:13:00,160 --> 00:13:04,520 Speaker 1: from Bloomer Radio, but it's autumn of two thousand. If 228 00:13:04,520 --> 00:13:08,960 Speaker 1: the trend continues autumn of two th November of two 229 00:13:08,960 --> 00:13:12,480 Speaker 1: thousand nineteen, is is where you get too hundred dollars barrel? 230 00:13:12,559 --> 00:13:14,760 Speaker 1: When you say they take the oil off the market, 231 00:13:15,040 --> 00:13:18,040 Speaker 1: what do they do with it? Oh, they just lower 232 00:13:18,080 --> 00:13:21,520 Speaker 1: their production levels, so just not making it. So you 233 00:13:21,600 --> 00:13:24,280 Speaker 1: have to question. There's always the question is how much 234 00:13:24,320 --> 00:13:26,839 Speaker 1: of this could come back on and how fast? In 235 00:13:27,040 --> 00:13:29,839 Speaker 1: general thinking is that Saudi Arabia is the one that 236 00:13:29,960 --> 00:13:33,040 Speaker 1: has the spare capacity that could put put a significant 237 00:13:33,080 --> 00:13:36,080 Speaker 1: amount of oil back onto the market, you know, upwards 238 00:13:36,120 --> 00:13:38,480 Speaker 1: of half a million to a million barrels per day. 239 00:13:38,920 --> 00:13:41,680 Speaker 1: The other players are fairly small. Do you one final question, 240 00:13:41,720 --> 00:13:44,600 Speaker 1: do you have a dollar barrel amount where Saudi pulls 241 00:13:44,600 --> 00:13:46,520 Speaker 1: a trigger on that? I mean there's got to be 242 00:13:46,600 --> 00:13:50,000 Speaker 1: a point where they throw in the proverbial towel. No. 243 00:13:50,240 --> 00:13:53,160 Speaker 1: I think they look at it as um In case 244 00:13:53,240 --> 00:13:56,280 Speaker 1: of emergency. So if if we did see some sort 245 00:13:56,320 --> 00:14:00,400 Speaker 1: of massive drop and supply somewhere else, then they could 246 00:14:00,480 --> 00:14:03,000 Speaker 1: put some of their oil back on the market. But 247 00:14:03,440 --> 00:14:05,599 Speaker 1: as we mentioned before, I think the key thing for 248 00:14:05,720 --> 00:14:08,800 Speaker 1: them is to keep oil prices high for the around 249 00:14:08,840 --> 00:14:11,719 Speaker 1: co I p O brilliant Juckers, So thank you so much, 250 00:14:11,760 --> 00:14:26,840 Speaker 1: clear View Energy of Partners with us A let us beginner. 251 00:14:26,960 --> 00:14:30,560 Speaker 1: This is a important conversation because it goes to the 252 00:14:30,640 --> 00:14:33,400 Speaker 1: mid term elections and where we go from here. We've 253 00:14:33,400 --> 00:14:36,160 Speaker 1: been talking a lot on the around announcement today, John 254 00:14:36,280 --> 00:14:40,720 Speaker 1: Hudeck with US with Brookings Institution working in governance but 255 00:14:40,840 --> 00:14:44,960 Speaker 1: also working and how we do our elections. John, if 256 00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:46,520 Speaker 1: you were to have a cup of coffee with one 257 00:14:46,600 --> 00:14:49,960 Speaker 1: of our global audience today, how would you describe the 258 00:14:50,160 --> 00:14:55,280 Speaker 1: mid term election process in America? The midterm election process 259 00:14:55,320 --> 00:14:59,480 Speaker 1: in America is extremely complicated. It's multi tiered in the 260 00:14:59,560 --> 00:15:04,320 Speaker 1: sense there are multiple different uh times and places that 261 00:15:04,520 --> 00:15:07,560 Speaker 1: people will vote. I think most people across the world 262 00:15:07,600 --> 00:15:10,880 Speaker 1: are actually shocked at how often Americans end up voting. 263 00:15:11,560 --> 00:15:14,680 Speaker 1: But it also is determinative of what the next two 264 00:15:14,840 --> 00:15:18,560 Speaker 1: years of Washington politics and policy will be like. So 265 00:15:18,680 --> 00:15:24,040 Speaker 1: it's tremendously important. Is it normal that whoever the president is, 266 00:15:24,240 --> 00:15:28,360 Speaker 1: the other party does better in a mid term. Yeah. 267 00:15:28,440 --> 00:15:31,200 Speaker 1: Since the nineteen fifties, that rule has been true in 268 00:15:31,280 --> 00:15:35,120 Speaker 1: every mid term except two of them, around the time 269 00:15:35,160 --> 00:15:38,760 Speaker 1: that Republicans were working to impeach President Clinton. Uh, and 270 00:15:38,920 --> 00:15:42,000 Speaker 1: in two thousand two, just um, you know, fourteen months 271 00:15:42,040 --> 00:15:46,000 Speaker 1: after the September eleventh terrorist attacks. But otherwise, the out party, 272 00:15:46,200 --> 00:15:48,360 Speaker 1: the party that it does not hold the White House, 273 00:15:48,840 --> 00:15:51,640 Speaker 1: picks up seats in mid terms. How is the out 274 00:15:51,720 --> 00:15:56,400 Speaker 1: party doing this time around? Right now? There's really two 275 00:15:56,520 --> 00:15:58,880 Speaker 1: stories to tell. In the in the House the U 276 00:15:59,000 --> 00:16:02,240 Speaker 1: S House, UH, the Democrats are looking good. That every 277 00:16:02,440 --> 00:16:07,720 Speaker 1: indicator and every UH sort of signal and UH data 278 00:16:07,800 --> 00:16:12,800 Speaker 1: bit that political scientists look at show good things for Democrats. 279 00:16:12,920 --> 00:16:16,320 Speaker 1: Republicans are retiring. There are a lot of Republicans who 280 00:16:16,520 --> 00:16:22,400 Speaker 1: are holding seats in districts that Hillary Clinton one enthusiasm 281 00:16:22,520 --> 00:16:25,400 Speaker 1: is on their side. The general a generic ballot numbers 282 00:16:25,480 --> 00:16:27,840 Speaker 1: on their side, and so it looks good in the House. 283 00:16:28,200 --> 00:16:31,200 Speaker 1: The Senate is a different story because the numbers are 284 00:16:31,480 --> 00:16:34,960 Speaker 1: more difficult for Democrats in the Senate because there are 285 00:16:35,000 --> 00:16:39,840 Speaker 1: a lot of UH seats held held in states that 286 00:16:40,160 --> 00:16:42,720 Speaker 1: Donald Trump did quite well and held by Democrats and 287 00:16:42,800 --> 00:16:45,120 Speaker 1: states donald Trump did quite well, and so they're on 288 00:16:45,200 --> 00:16:47,840 Speaker 1: the defensive in the Senate. John, you explore this concept 289 00:16:47,920 --> 00:16:52,040 Speaker 1: of nominating the embarrassing versus nominating the electable. Walk me 290 00:16:52,120 --> 00:16:54,520 Speaker 1: through that concept and perhaps to find what is embarrassing 291 00:16:56,840 --> 00:17:00,720 Speaker 1: well embarrassing inen is the type of ended it who 292 00:17:01,440 --> 00:17:04,399 Speaker 1: we're seeing right now in West Virginia. A candidate who's 293 00:17:04,520 --> 00:17:08,720 Speaker 1: injecting racial slurs into his rhetoric. Who is um a 294 00:17:08,800 --> 00:17:12,720 Speaker 1: convicted felon responsible for the deaths of twenty nine miners 295 00:17:13,000 --> 00:17:17,040 Speaker 1: in UM an accident UH in West Virginia which the 296 00:17:17,119 --> 00:17:20,480 Speaker 1: company cut corners around UM. That is not the type 297 00:17:20,520 --> 00:17:23,960 Speaker 1: of individual who most people would want to see running 298 00:17:24,080 --> 00:17:26,439 Speaker 1: for the United States Senate or sitting in the United 299 00:17:26,480 --> 00:17:30,199 Speaker 1: States Senate. And we have a variety of different uh 300 00:17:30,920 --> 00:17:34,720 Speaker 1: hues of that kind of embarrassing and Republicans have fallen 301 00:17:34,800 --> 00:17:37,280 Speaker 1: victim to these types of candidates before, and it's a 302 00:17:37,359 --> 00:17:40,880 Speaker 1: real problem. Part of your study of governance, John, who 303 00:17:40,920 --> 00:17:42,919 Speaker 1: Deck with his folks with Brookings and were the real 304 00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:46,560 Speaker 1: focus on governance is I believe about money as well? 305 00:17:47,440 --> 00:17:50,399 Speaker 1: Is everybody got money up to the eyeballs this time around, 306 00:17:50,640 --> 00:17:54,240 Speaker 1: or is one of the parties are selected races running 307 00:17:54,320 --> 00:17:57,199 Speaker 1: on fumes, or they just don't have the million dollars 308 00:17:57,280 --> 00:18:00,880 Speaker 1: you need. Well, the parties are well funded um, depending 309 00:18:00,920 --> 00:18:03,720 Speaker 1: on which campaign accounts you're looking at. In some places, 310 00:18:03,800 --> 00:18:07,000 Speaker 1: Democrats are doing quite well. In other places, Republicans are 311 00:18:07,040 --> 00:18:11,240 Speaker 1: doing quite well. Candidates are raising money um exceptional levels. 312 00:18:11,280 --> 00:18:15,639 Speaker 1: In fact, we have UH an unprecedented number of Democrats 313 00:18:15,760 --> 00:18:19,239 Speaker 1: running for congressional seats in this midterm election, and an 314 00:18:19,359 --> 00:18:23,960 Speaker 1: unprecedented number of those as a percentage, are raising significant 315 00:18:24,000 --> 00:18:28,000 Speaker 1: sums of money. And while UH, money doesn't always determine 316 00:18:28,040 --> 00:18:30,159 Speaker 1: the outcome, that is, it's not always true that the 317 00:18:30,200 --> 00:18:33,760 Speaker 1: person who raises more money wins. You do need some 318 00:18:34,040 --> 00:18:36,520 Speaker 1: level of funding to be legitimate. You're not going to 319 00:18:36,640 --> 00:18:39,440 Speaker 1: be if you're running against someone who has five million 320 00:18:39,480 --> 00:18:43,040 Speaker 1: dollars in the bank and you raised five thousand dollars, Yeah, 321 00:18:43,040 --> 00:18:45,639 Speaker 1: you're probably not going to win that race. But but 322 00:18:45,880 --> 00:18:48,560 Speaker 1: money is being raised hand over fist in American elections 323 00:18:48,640 --> 00:18:50,560 Speaker 1: this time, John, let's talk about the message on the 324 00:18:50,800 --> 00:18:53,920 Speaker 1: campaign trail. The lazy sort of one oh one kind 325 00:18:53,960 --> 00:18:57,600 Speaker 1: of approach to Trump journalism is to look at whatever 326 00:18:57,680 --> 00:18:59,520 Speaker 1: he does or whatever he's about to do and say, 327 00:18:59,800 --> 00:19:02,360 Speaker 1: this is about playing to the base. Um, we see 328 00:19:02,400 --> 00:19:04,640 Speaker 1: that with Iran at two pm today, this is about 329 00:19:04,680 --> 00:19:06,880 Speaker 1: playing to the base. Does the base really care about 330 00:19:06,960 --> 00:19:11,000 Speaker 1: the j c pl A. Uh No, they really don't. Um. 331 00:19:11,240 --> 00:19:14,800 Speaker 1: What the base cares about, oftentimes is what the President 332 00:19:14,920 --> 00:19:17,520 Speaker 1: tells them they should care about. Because for a lot 333 00:19:17,600 --> 00:19:19,600 Speaker 1: of them, that's not a criticism of those voters. For 334 00:19:19,640 --> 00:19:22,680 Speaker 1: a lot of those voters, they truly believe that the 335 00:19:22,800 --> 00:19:25,439 Speaker 1: direction the President has led them so far has been 336 00:19:25,480 --> 00:19:28,520 Speaker 1: a good one. And while they don't care, like you 337 00:19:28,600 --> 00:19:30,359 Speaker 1: said about the j c p o A, they do 338 00:19:30,600 --> 00:19:35,280 Speaker 1: care about America winning, America, cutting better deals, America positioning 339 00:19:35,320 --> 00:19:38,119 Speaker 1: itself better in the global setting than it has in 340 00:19:38,200 --> 00:19:41,560 Speaker 1: the past. And what the President is conveyed to those 341 00:19:41,640 --> 00:19:44,120 Speaker 1: voters is that the Iran deal is bad for them 342 00:19:44,280 --> 00:19:47,080 Speaker 1: and something different will be better. What will you look 343 00:19:47,160 --> 00:19:50,960 Speaker 1: for tonight at ten p m. Well, I think all 344 00:19:51,040 --> 00:19:54,080 Speaker 1: eyes are on West Virginia. UM. West Virginia has an 345 00:19:54,119 --> 00:19:58,960 Speaker 1: opportunity tonight to end this Senate race and deliver that 346 00:19:59,200 --> 00:20:03,840 Speaker 1: race to the incumbent democrat. If West Virginia voters UM 347 00:20:04,240 --> 00:20:08,879 Speaker 1: nominate blanket shift. It will be a disaster for the party. 348 00:20:09,240 --> 00:20:12,000 Speaker 1: It will be a missed opportunity for the party UM 349 00:20:12,080 --> 00:20:15,600 Speaker 1: to really challenge a vulnerable Democrat, and it will be 350 00:20:15,880 --> 00:20:19,280 Speaker 1: I think a signal to other Republican voters in the 351 00:20:19,400 --> 00:20:23,120 Speaker 1: country that there are consequences for voting for just bad, 352 00:20:23,320 --> 00:20:28,240 Speaker 1: outrageous candidates. John, Thank you so much. John Hudak withings 353 00:20:28,680 --> 00:20:32,320 Speaker 1: here on the midterm elections. Kevin Surley, I know, is hugely, 354 00:20:32,480 --> 00:20:49,600 Speaker 1: hugely focused on that as well. This is a joy 355 00:20:50,440 --> 00:20:53,320 Speaker 1: and it is a joy because as we talked to 356 00:20:53,440 --> 00:20:56,040 Speaker 1: people like and Richards of M ANDG and London, or 357 00:20:56,160 --> 00:20:59,920 Speaker 1: Sally Crawcheck, where there was steam work at Sanford Bernstein 358 00:21:00,080 --> 00:21:03,240 Speaker 1: years ago in securities analysis, it is one thing to 359 00:21:03,400 --> 00:21:08,960 Speaker 1: speak on employment and diversity with someone with first order 360 00:21:09,320 --> 00:21:13,879 Speaker 1: academic chops. Barbara why is out of the prestigious combine 361 00:21:14,119 --> 00:21:19,080 Speaker 1: of the South Carolina University University of Carolina Electrical Engineering. 362 00:21:19,160 --> 00:21:22,080 Speaker 1: You were double e back there and one day you 363 00:21:22,280 --> 00:21:26,920 Speaker 1: wandered into essentials of physics one p H Y S 364 00:21:27,000 --> 00:21:29,360 Speaker 1: two eleven and you how lonely were you? How many 365 00:21:29,440 --> 00:21:32,680 Speaker 1: women were in physics one at South Carolina a few 366 00:21:32,760 --> 00:21:36,760 Speaker 1: years back, so not very many. But what I'll say 367 00:21:36,920 --> 00:21:39,440 Speaker 1: is I grew up in the Carolinas, in a tiny 368 00:21:39,520 --> 00:21:43,520 Speaker 1: little dirt road town near Myrtle Beach, and I had 369 00:21:43,600 --> 00:21:46,920 Speaker 1: five brothers and young as of eight kids, two sisters. 370 00:21:47,560 --> 00:21:49,800 Speaker 1: Uh So, I entered into Carolina with a lot of 371 00:21:49,880 --> 00:21:54,800 Speaker 1: courage and strength just surviving dinner with all those I 372 00:21:54,800 --> 00:21:57,240 Speaker 1: don't like, the Brussels Strouds. Good I'll lead them good bye. 373 00:21:57,440 --> 00:22:01,680 Speaker 1: Exactly so, uh So, I would say my my parents, 374 00:22:01,840 --> 00:22:05,199 Speaker 1: neither of whom graduated from high school, yet they had 375 00:22:05,280 --> 00:22:09,600 Speaker 1: instilled in us that education was the path to empowerment. 376 00:22:09,840 --> 00:22:12,440 Speaker 1: Is the loneliness you know as a woman at South 377 00:22:12,520 --> 00:22:16,720 Speaker 1: Carolina double E the same as the loneliness today in engineering, 378 00:22:17,080 --> 00:22:19,399 Speaker 1: I would suggest there's not much change. Even with all 379 00:22:19,400 --> 00:22:21,800 Speaker 1: the efforts. We got a long way to go where 380 00:22:21,840 --> 00:22:24,679 Speaker 1: women are inclusive in stem So, I would say, if 381 00:22:24,720 --> 00:22:29,359 Speaker 1: you look at women and underrepresented minorities in engineering today, 382 00:22:29,800 --> 00:22:32,320 Speaker 1: we haven't made a ton of progress. And this is 383 00:22:32,359 --> 00:22:34,960 Speaker 1: why the diversity and inclusion initiative work that Intel is 384 00:22:35,119 --> 00:22:38,560 Speaker 1: driving is so paramount to really move in the needle. 385 00:22:39,320 --> 00:22:42,320 Speaker 1: And what I will say is our CEO, Brian Krezana, 386 00:22:43,040 --> 00:22:46,880 Speaker 1: he announced a three dred million dollar initiative to really 387 00:22:47,040 --> 00:22:50,879 Speaker 1: drive critical progress in this area. UM, and since that 388 00:22:51,880 --> 00:22:56,080 Speaker 1: launch of the initiative, we've reduced our market availability gap 389 00:22:56,800 --> 00:23:02,840 Speaker 1: by a yet let me tell you, I'm excited to 390 00:23:02,880 --> 00:23:05,520 Speaker 1: tell you all about it. So, uh, you mentioned this 391 00:23:05,640 --> 00:23:09,120 Speaker 1: in terms of representations, So we know women roughly represent 392 00:23:09,200 --> 00:23:13,040 Speaker 1: about of the workforce today, but not all those women, 393 00:23:13,080 --> 00:23:16,399 Speaker 1: to your great point, are entering into STEM careers. So 394 00:23:16,640 --> 00:23:20,200 Speaker 1: Intel's goal and the metric is around the market that 395 00:23:20,359 --> 00:23:23,280 Speaker 1: is available with women in STEM careers as well as 396 00:23:23,440 --> 00:23:27,280 Speaker 1: African Americans, Hispanics and Native Americans. And we desire to 397 00:23:27,400 --> 00:23:31,919 Speaker 1: be at that market availability metric are higher and willing 398 00:23:32,240 --> 00:23:36,080 Speaker 1: as we increase our initiatives and investments earlier in K 399 00:23:36,200 --> 00:23:40,400 Speaker 1: through twelve in college. As that market availability number increases, 400 00:23:40,720 --> 00:23:44,719 Speaker 1: we want to increase with that. Now, Barbara, you're here, uh, 401 00:23:45,119 --> 00:23:46,920 Speaker 1: not only just to speak with us, but also to 402 00:23:47,000 --> 00:23:51,240 Speaker 1: attend Bloomberg's Equality Summit and Diversity in the Workplace. What 403 00:23:51,400 --> 00:23:54,800 Speaker 1: do you want people to take away from your presentation? 404 00:23:55,280 --> 00:23:58,320 Speaker 1: So two things I would highlight, uh for you about 405 00:23:58,400 --> 00:24:00,760 Speaker 1: this diversity inclusion work. And I know we're in New 406 00:24:00,840 --> 00:24:05,159 Speaker 1: York and this is UH Congress Roman Shirley Chisman World, 407 00:24:05,560 --> 00:24:09,080 Speaker 1: and she said boldness is required, and you need the 408 00:24:09,240 --> 00:24:11,800 Speaker 1: same level of boldness in doing this kind of work. 409 00:24:11,840 --> 00:24:15,520 Speaker 1: I believe as the first person that decided to eat oysters, 410 00:24:16,400 --> 00:24:18,960 Speaker 1: you need just that level of courage to do diversity 411 00:24:19,000 --> 00:24:21,880 Speaker 1: and inclusion work and drive the progress that you need. 412 00:24:22,480 --> 00:24:24,800 Speaker 1: The second thing that I think is important that Intel 413 00:24:24,840 --> 00:24:28,680 Speaker 1: has gotten right is this work is a performance metric 414 00:24:29,200 --> 00:24:31,480 Speaker 1: that is measured by what has done and as a 415 00:24:31,520 --> 00:24:35,040 Speaker 1: part of our employee bonus structure, I think far too 416 00:24:35,119 --> 00:24:38,919 Speaker 1: often people uh set goals, but they aren't held accountable 417 00:24:38,960 --> 00:24:41,680 Speaker 1: to those goals. So what we're trying to drive inside 418 00:24:41,720 --> 00:24:43,639 Speaker 1: of the Intel culture is no different than what I 419 00:24:43,680 --> 00:24:45,760 Speaker 1: would be doing if I was on an engineering project 420 00:24:45,840 --> 00:24:49,280 Speaker 1: for Intel with the deadline. We set goals, we try 421 00:24:49,320 --> 00:24:51,600 Speaker 1: and achieve those goals, we hit them, and then we 422 00:24:51,680 --> 00:24:55,600 Speaker 1: set bigger goals. As someone who's a veteran of Silicon Valley, 423 00:24:56,160 --> 00:24:59,640 Speaker 1: you've often heard about goals that Silicon Valley company set. 424 00:24:59,760 --> 00:25:01,560 Speaker 1: But and when you take a look at those people 425 00:25:01,600 --> 00:25:05,440 Speaker 1: who are actually running the companies, does it make you 426 00:25:05,720 --> 00:25:09,480 Speaker 1: feel that it is really an uphill battle. Yeah. I 427 00:25:09,560 --> 00:25:11,920 Speaker 1: can't really speak to the other companies, but what I 428 00:25:11,960 --> 00:25:14,600 Speaker 1: can tell you about Intel is this has been a 429 00:25:14,720 --> 00:25:18,520 Speaker 1: very serious commitment for us. Is very much integrated into 430 00:25:18,720 --> 00:25:22,080 Speaker 1: all of the systems and our leadership processes. We have 431 00:25:22,200 --> 00:25:26,359 Speaker 1: strong commitment from our senior leaders, are middle managers, and 432 00:25:26,520 --> 00:25:29,159 Speaker 1: my employees. They hold me accountable. But I want to 433 00:25:29,200 --> 00:25:31,399 Speaker 1: get down to the nitty gritty here. We think New 434 00:25:31,520 --> 00:25:34,800 Speaker 1: Jersey Institute of Technology, which has been a huge support 435 00:25:34,840 --> 00:25:38,119 Speaker 1: of our STEM report here at Bloomberg Surveillance. How do 436 00:25:38,200 --> 00:25:42,879 Speaker 1: you get a woman in fifth grade or first grade, 437 00:25:43,119 --> 00:25:48,679 Speaker 1: or eighth grade or whatever to sustain the social pressure 438 00:25:49,600 --> 00:25:52,800 Speaker 1: of getting through math. You go through LP calculus, you're 439 00:25:52,840 --> 00:25:56,000 Speaker 1: doing well, and then you get into Calculus one itself Carolina, 440 00:25:56,240 --> 00:26:01,600 Speaker 1: how do we handle that social negativity upon women? It's tangible. Yeah, 441 00:26:01,840 --> 00:26:03,840 Speaker 1: I'm gonna live an example of that. So I would 442 00:26:03,880 --> 00:26:06,040 Speaker 1: say the key things if I had to extract out 443 00:26:06,640 --> 00:26:09,879 Speaker 1: what was so important for me to start at the 444 00:26:10,000 --> 00:26:15,040 Speaker 1: University of South Carolina, attend uh an electrical and engineering program, 445 00:26:15,600 --> 00:26:19,240 Speaker 1: pursue a Masters in Business administration, and now I'm currently 446 00:26:19,280 --> 00:26:22,240 Speaker 1: working on a PhD. The key things that are important 447 00:26:22,280 --> 00:26:29,480 Speaker 1: there is good question. First, females and unrepresented minorities need 448 00:26:29,600 --> 00:26:35,080 Speaker 1: access and exposure. So the quota, get him in the classroom. 449 00:26:35,800 --> 00:26:40,280 Speaker 1: Then you also need sponsorship as well as role models, 450 00:26:40,359 --> 00:26:42,840 Speaker 1: because it's difficult for you to be what you can't see. 451 00:26:43,200 --> 00:26:45,840 Speaker 1: And this is the role that my siblings played so 452 00:26:46,680 --> 00:26:49,760 Speaker 1: critically important with in my life because I could look 453 00:26:49,800 --> 00:26:52,440 Speaker 1: at an older brother who's major in chemistry and say, hey, 454 00:26:52,880 --> 00:26:55,520 Speaker 1: I can do that as well. Can you come back? Okay, 455 00:26:56,080 --> 00:26:58,359 Speaker 1: we're run out of time. We've got to have you 456 00:26:58,440 --> 00:27:00,640 Speaker 1: back as well. You'd love to come that we look 457 00:27:00,680 --> 00:27:02,520 Speaker 1: forward to. Can you bring a slide roll? Next up? 458 00:27:02,560 --> 00:27:10,080 Speaker 1: You're too young to Intel Corps, said Chief Diversity Inclusion 459 00:27:10,160 --> 00:27:14,240 Speaker 1: Officer Vice President Human Resources, attending Bloomberg's Equality Summit and 460 00:27:14,359 --> 00:27:23,600 Speaker 1: Diversity in the Workplace. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg 461 00:27:23,680 --> 00:27:29,600 Speaker 1: Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 462 00:27:30,000 --> 00:27:34,199 Speaker 1: or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at 463 00:27:34,280 --> 00:27:38,480 Speaker 1: Tom Keane before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide. 464 00:27:39,000 --> 00:27:40,040 Speaker 1: I'm Bloomberg Radio.