1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:11,039 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:13,440 --> 00:00:16,560 Speaker 2: Single best idea of what we do years ago at 3 00:00:16,600 --> 00:00:22,200 Speaker 2: Bloomberg on the economy, Bloomberg Surveillance, and it's about the conversation. 4 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 2: Today was fabulous birthday greetings to Lizenne Saunders of Charles Schwab. 5 00:00:27,520 --> 00:00:32,160 Speaker 2: She emphasized, you have to be in the market looking 6 00:00:32,200 --> 00:00:36,120 Speaker 2: at the stresses of fear. You can't go up unless 7 00:00:36,159 --> 00:00:38,559 Speaker 2: you have fear. I'm a big believer in that. The 8 00:00:38,600 --> 00:00:40,280 Speaker 2: fear is there right now. I'm not saying we're going 9 00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:43,120 Speaker 2: to go up, but the fear is there centered around 10 00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:47,200 Speaker 2: this FED decision tomorrow. And Lizzie Saunders is wonderful about 11 00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:52,760 Speaker 2: participating in the market. Barbara reinhert Voya same thing by 12 00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:58,040 Speaker 2: America by quality. Maybe there's some movement internationally, but she 13 00:00:58,120 --> 00:01:01,800 Speaker 2: really stayed on the US theme and said what we 14 00:01:01,840 --> 00:01:06,000 Speaker 2: saw from Microsoft to ten percent dividend increase, reaffirmation of 15 00:01:06,040 --> 00:01:09,959 Speaker 2: a new sixty billion dollars share buyback. You look at 16 00:01:10,200 --> 00:01:15,040 Speaker 2: the ratios in the Bloomberg terminal Microsoft and you just wonder, Okay, 17 00:01:15,400 --> 00:01:16,920 Speaker 2: a year and a half, two years from now, do 18 00:01:16,959 --> 00:01:20,320 Speaker 2: they do the same thing. It's just that simple. Three 19 00:01:20,360 --> 00:01:24,160 Speaker 2: great voices today. First, Jeffrey, you in from London with 20 00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:27,880 Speaker 2: B and Y. Jeff you and what he sees is 21 00:01:27,920 --> 00:01:31,199 Speaker 2: the distinction American exceptionalism. 22 00:01:31,319 --> 00:01:34,160 Speaker 3: The America believes in its people. America has people, has 23 00:01:34,160 --> 00:01:36,039 Speaker 3: the talent and continues to track that. That is the 24 00:01:36,080 --> 00:01:39,240 Speaker 3: fundamental difference. Yes, there's a bit of a demographic argument there. 25 00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:42,840 Speaker 3: But how it fosters productivity through innovation, that's that's a 26 00:01:42,920 --> 00:01:45,240 Speaker 3: lesson you're badly need to learn. Look at the Office 27 00:01:45,240 --> 00:01:49,240 Speaker 3: of Budget Responsibilities report based on the baseline scenario right 28 00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:51,960 Speaker 3: now for UK productivity, and this is the power of compounding. 29 00:01:52,040 --> 00:01:54,680 Speaker 3: Right has UK's debt to GDP ratio in twenty seventy 30 00:01:54,680 --> 00:01:57,400 Speaker 3: five at two hundred and seventy percent. If you lower 31 00:01:57,400 --> 00:01:59,880 Speaker 3: the productivity basedline by one percentage point, it goes to 32 00:01:59,880 --> 00:02:03,160 Speaker 3: six hundred and fifty percent. If you increase the productivity 33 00:02:03,160 --> 00:02:04,920 Speaker 3: baseline by one percent in the baselines one and a 34 00:02:04,920 --> 00:02:06,520 Speaker 3: half so to two and a half, which probably the 35 00:02:06,600 --> 00:02:08,560 Speaker 3: US is not far from, then you can keep that 36 00:02:08,680 --> 00:02:11,360 Speaker 3: to GDP ratio below one hundred percent. That's what the 37 00:02:11,440 --> 00:02:12,320 Speaker 3: US has going. 38 00:02:12,160 --> 00:02:15,840 Speaker 2: For the mathematics, jeff for you there in productivity in 39 00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:20,480 Speaker 2: America churs productivity a key discussion. He was on the 40 00:02:20,560 --> 00:02:24,240 Speaker 2: United Kingdom there excuse me and the productivity of America 41 00:02:24,320 --> 00:02:27,160 Speaker 2: a key discussion and really comes down to a core 42 00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:31,680 Speaker 2: belief of moving twenty five or fifty basis points. Michael 43 00:02:31,720 --> 00:02:32,919 Speaker 2: Darta a rough. 44 00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:37,000 Speaker 4: I think what the FED is doing now is simply 45 00:02:37,320 --> 00:02:40,960 Speaker 4: hyper data dependency, which carries its own risks. Right, so 46 00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:44,640 Speaker 4: the forecasting approach blew up in the FED space with 47 00:02:44,760 --> 00:02:48,560 Speaker 4: the temporary transitory and inflation taking off and staying high 48 00:02:48,639 --> 00:02:51,359 Speaker 4: for two and a half years, and so they've sort 49 00:02:51,400 --> 00:02:55,680 Speaker 4: of receded into this this posture where they're just looking 50 00:02:55,880 --> 00:02:59,200 Speaker 4: at the data. And you know that can work as 51 00:02:59,240 --> 00:03:01,480 Speaker 4: long as you're not in turning point. The problem with 52 00:03:01,680 --> 00:03:04,680 Speaker 4: just simply being data dependent is the data is released 53 00:03:04,680 --> 00:03:07,079 Speaker 4: with a lag and then it gets revised, and when 54 00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:09,480 Speaker 4: you're at turning points, you know, you tend to get 55 00:03:09,520 --> 00:03:11,440 Speaker 4: a lot of mixed data, and right now we have 56 00:03:11,600 --> 00:03:14,560 Speaker 4: mixed data. If you look at GDP, everything looks fine. 57 00:03:15,160 --> 00:03:17,480 Speaker 4: If you look at payrolls, we're slowing. If you look 58 00:03:17,480 --> 00:03:20,360 Speaker 4: at the unemployment rate and underemployment rate, it looks like 59 00:03:20,400 --> 00:03:25,200 Speaker 4: we're in recession. And so from that perspective, hyper data 60 00:03:25,240 --> 00:03:29,040 Speaker 4: dependency can lead the Central Bank to behind the curve policies, 61 00:03:29,080 --> 00:03:31,800 Speaker 4: and you know that's really what you want to try 62 00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:32,400 Speaker 4: to avoid. 63 00:03:32,919 --> 00:03:36,360 Speaker 2: And not mentioned there is we really don't know about 64 00:03:36,360 --> 00:03:40,400 Speaker 2: productivity until a look back of three years or five years, 65 00:03:40,400 --> 00:03:43,680 Speaker 2: some would even say ten years back. The mystery of 66 00:03:43,880 --> 00:03:49,400 Speaker 2: post pandemic American productivity. There is no mystery to how 67 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:56,280 Speaker 2: ed Heiman invented modern market economics. I've always called it chart, paragraph, chart, paragraph. 68 00:03:57,080 --> 00:03:59,320 Speaker 2: Ed Heiman looked at the charts, he looked at the 69 00:03:59,360 --> 00:04:04,960 Speaker 2: paragraph of data. At Evercore ISI, he listened to his team, 70 00:04:05,000 --> 00:04:09,800 Speaker 2: including Julian Emmanuel. He says, on the recession watch, but 71 00:04:09,840 --> 00:04:13,640 Speaker 2: it hasn't happened, ed Heyman, in ten days ago. Now 72 00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:18,080 Speaker 2: he makes a shift and becomes more optimistic on the 73 00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:22,120 Speaker 2: American economic experiment Ed Hyman of Evercore. 74 00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:27,719 Speaker 5: If they don't do fifty, I'll be shocked, Okay, because 75 00:04:28,040 --> 00:04:30,799 Speaker 5: I've been at this so long and the FED picks 76 00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:35,400 Speaker 5: out somebody like Timors to communicate frankly to me and you, 77 00:04:37,240 --> 00:04:37,640 Speaker 5: this is. 78 00:04:37,600 --> 00:04:37,880 Speaker 2: Not a. 79 00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:45,160 Speaker 5: Situation where they're peddling their own view. And Timros has 80 00:04:45,200 --> 00:04:47,480 Speaker 5: said over and over the Fed is going to do fifty. 81 00:04:48,520 --> 00:04:52,960 Speaker 5: And if he's if they don't do fifty. I'm gonna 82 00:04:52,960 --> 00:04:54,400 Speaker 5: have to go back so ed. 83 00:04:54,440 --> 00:04:57,040 Speaker 2: Heymen there in the sensitivities. Let me explain this as 84 00:04:57,080 --> 00:05:01,480 Speaker 2: we go out. There's a sharp critic and I'll be honest, 85 00:05:01,560 --> 00:05:03,880 Speaker 2: my colleague John Farrell is way out front on this. 86 00:05:04,480 --> 00:05:06,400 Speaker 2: Maybe it was because they do it differently at the 87 00:05:06,400 --> 00:05:11,080 Speaker 2: Bank of England, but John Ferrell absolutely nailed this. And 88 00:05:11,160 --> 00:05:14,680 Speaker 2: the idea is that they're whispering out to select reporters, 89 00:05:14,760 --> 00:05:18,480 Speaker 2: including a wonderful Nick Timers at the Wall Street Journal. 90 00:05:18,560 --> 00:05:21,719 Speaker 2: Colby Smith's been tarden feathered in the last number of 91 00:05:21,760 --> 00:05:26,080 Speaker 2: days at the Financial Times as well. And I don't 92 00:05:26,080 --> 00:05:30,400 Speaker 2: have a strong opinion on it other than I will state, 93 00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:33,400 Speaker 2: as we heard from Michael Darta, that they are excessively 94 00:05:34,279 --> 00:05:38,000 Speaker 2: data dependent. We're dependent on giving you conversation. We'll do 95 00:05:38,040 --> 00:05:41,200 Speaker 2: that tomorrow. Of course, the FED decides at one thirty 96 00:05:41,279 --> 00:05:46,520 Speaker 2: tomorrow afternoon, before a fascinating release of the statement and 97 00:05:46,600 --> 00:05:49,359 Speaker 2: a fascinating press conference. Our Michael McKee will be leading 98 00:05:49,360 --> 00:05:53,160 Speaker 2: our coverage there. When you commute, we're on Apple car Play, 99 00:05:53,240 --> 00:05:56,640 Speaker 2: Android Auto Good Morning ninety nine to one FM Washington, 100 00:05:57,000 --> 00:05:59,960 Speaker 2: Bloomberg eleven three to zero in New York City, our Flag, 101 00:06:00,200 --> 00:06:04,400 Speaker 2: Chip Network and ninety two nine FM in Boston. On 102 00:06:04,440 --> 00:06:09,240 Speaker 2: Apple podcasts, on YouTube podcasts. This is single best idea