WEBVTT - Apple’s $113 Billion Problem & The BOE’s Quick Pivot

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>DAYBAC podcast, available every morning on Apples, Spotify or wherever

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you listen. It's Friday, the twenty second of March in London.

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hepke and I'm Lizzie Verdon.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Coming up today.

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Apple's value dropped by more than one hundred and ten

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars as the tech giants legal challenges.

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Mount, the Bank of England inches closer to rate cuts

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>as the Hawks retreat.

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Plus Reddit pops Shares in the social media firm rise

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 3>by forty eight percent as investors embrace their AI pitch.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with a raundup of our top stories.

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 3>Apple's value has dropped by one hundred and thirteen billion

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 3>dollars as regulators in the US and EU accused the

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 3>tech giant of abusing its market dominance. Once the world's

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:57.639
<v Speaker 3>most valuable firm, with a market cup of more than

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 3>three trillion dollars, Apple has under formed both the Nasdaq

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 3>and the SMP five hundred this year. The latest slide

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 3>in the tech firms share price comes after US Attorney

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 3>General Merrick Garland sued the company, accusing it of blocking

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 3>rivals from accessing hardware and software features on the iPhone.

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 4>We allege that Apple has employed a strategy that relies

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 4>on exclusionary anti competitive conduct that hurts both consumers and developers.

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 4>For consumers, that has meant fewer choices, higher prices and fees,

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 4>lower quality smartphones, apps and accessories, and less innovation from

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Apple and its competitors.

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Merrick Garland's US Justice Department's lawsuit has been strongly refuted

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 3>by Apple, who called it wrong on the facts and

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 3>the law. The iPhone maker also faces a competition probe

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 3>by the EU, which could lovey penalties of up to

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 3>ten percent of global annual revenue. Earlier this month, Apple

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 3>was hit by a one point eight billion euro penalty

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 3>from the Block of releegations that it shoulds out music

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 3>street rivals on its platforms now.

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>The Bank of England took a big step towards cutting

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>interest rates at its March meeting. Although the central Bank

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>kept interest rates on hold yesterday, none of its policymakers

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>are now voting full rate rises, and the Central Bank

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>governor Agie Bailey says that the Bank of England can

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>cut rates before reaching its two percent inflation target.

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we don't have to actually get inflation all the

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 3>way back to target sustainably to cut rates, for instance,

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 3>what we have to do is be convinced that it

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 3>is going to go there.

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 2>We should act ahead.

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Of time in that sense, because we have to be

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 3>forward looking.

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Reacting to those words from the Governor Ajie Bailey, markets

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>moved up their expected first rate cut to June Bailey's

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>comments bring the Bank Viglin more in line with the

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Fed and the ECB.

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 3>And staying in the UK, we brought you the retail

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 3>sales numbers. UK consumers are the most confident they've been

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 3>about their personal finances in years. This is according to

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the GfK measure, which tracks the way people feel about

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 3>their finances. It rose to plus two in the latest survey,

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 3>as the first positive reading since December twenty twenty one.

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 3>The figures indicate personal budgets remained strong even as the

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Bank of England chose to hold interest rates at that

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 3>sixteen year high.

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Chinese authorities are examining the role of PwC in Evergrand's

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>accounting practices after the developer was accused of a seventy

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollar fraud. The move ramps up pressure on

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the global accounting giant that order to a slew of

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese property firms before the sector's melt down. Evergrand's alleged

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>forward dwarfs that of Enron and has added fuel to

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>concern about how widespread such accounting issues are in China.

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Shares in the social media company Reddit have soared by

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 3>forty eight percent after its USIPO. Investors appear to have

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 3>embraced the company's vision of profiting from the growth of

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence. The COO, Gen Wong, says the AI revolution

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 3>is at the center of reddits value proposition.

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 5>Large language models need data to train on, and when

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 5>you look at riddit's corpus nineteen years of human experience

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 5>organized by topic with well in moderation and relevance. That's

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 5>incredibly important to building both a chat capability and the

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 5>freshness of information. So that's an area where you know,

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 5>we see opportunity.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Read it's Gen Wong, they're speaking to Bloomberg.

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 3>The firm also says it's in the early stages of

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 3>allowing third parties to license access to data on the platform.

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>After six and a half years in exile, the man

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>who tried to break up Spain is making a comeback.

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Carls Pouche demon led the Catalan independence movement and caused

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Spain's worst political crisis since it became a democracy. He

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is now planning to run for his old job as

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>President of Catalan in the May elections.

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 6>I'm not looking for what is most comfortable and less

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 6>risky on a personal level. Not explain to myself after

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 6>having spent six and a half years its defending the

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 6>presidency in exile, now that we have an opportunity to

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 6>restore the presidency, I think that was unjustly illicitly an

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 6>illegally destitute by Article one five to.

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Five Prisdom while speaking there via a translator and referring

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>to Article one fifty five that is the controversial law

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>that the Spanish government used in twenty seventeen to force

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the regional Catalan administration to obey national law after an

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 1>illegal independence referendum.

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.479
<v Speaker 3>Finally, there are signs of progress towards a possible Guards

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 3>of Peace agreement at the same time as Israel is

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 3>threatening to invade Raffa. This is as the US Secretary

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 3>of State Anthony Blincn is in the Middle East attempting

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 3>to help breaker a deal between Humas and Israel.

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Blomberg's Ed Baxter explains.

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 7>Delegations from Israel, the US, Cutter, and Egypt will meet

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 7>today to try to draw up a plan so that

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 7>the invasion doesn't have to happen. But Israel's Minister for

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 7>a Strategic Affairs, Ron Dermer, on a US podcast says,

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 7>Hamasha infrastructure remains in Rava.

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 8>Which you saw in October seventh, was a genocidal force

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 8>that wants to wipe out all the Jews. And it's

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 8>the first program that we've had since the birth of

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 8>the State of Israel. We have the ability to defend ourselves.

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 7>He says. If there is not a piece deal, the

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:26.239
<v Speaker 7>assault will happen. Ed Baxter, Bloomberg Radio.

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>We're going to delve into the story around Apple and

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the share price drop in just a moment. But there's

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting piece on the Rumberg terminal from Dave Lee.

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Now Dave I've known for many, many years, and he

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>writes on all things technology, and he's always just got

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>such a great turn of phrases, one of our opinion columnists,

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's saying, look, you can't back Apple into a

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>corner that is not what the US should be doing

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>this after the case from the DOJS of looking into

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 1>anti competitive behavior. He's saying that actually Apple's authoritarianism is

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>what makes an iPhone iPhone and not an Android. He

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:06.559
<v Speaker 1>talks about you know, fans of Android, you know, saying

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that their phones can do everything that iPhone can do,

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>but they ignore that Actually the experience on an Android phone,

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>as Dave puts it, is a hot mess.

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm of the Holy Trinity of Apple myself. I'm just

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 3>going to put it out there. I guess what you're

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 3>saying is that androids are clunky. That's what Apple loyalists

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 3>would say. And yeah, Dave puts it really well. He

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 3>says that you don't want the US to force Apple

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 3>to make a worse iPhone.

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Through all this regulation.

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 3>If you level the playing field, it means adding complication

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 3>and friction and insecurity to a device, he says, whose

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 3>success is based on getting rid of those things. So

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 3>this is completely against the very best of the iPhone.

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Well that's one perspective. Should we get the other perspective,

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>which is around the regulation. Shares in Apple Yesterday's slid

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>by more than four percent, so wiping out that Hunter

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>thirteen billion dollars off of Apple's market cap. Investors do

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>seem to be spooked by another US lawsuit, also a

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>European probe after a big EU fine. Let's bring in

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Oliver Crook, who's been following all of this for US.

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that's not the perspective of the Europeans who

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>want to regulate Apple a bit more thoroughly. But firstly,

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>what about this Justice Department lawsuit the Biden administration getting

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit tougher on tech.

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, this is very interesting because and there's a meaningful

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 9>set because it's coming out of the United States itself.

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 9>It's perhaps less of a shock to have regulation coming

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 9>out of Europe and having that happen to hit in

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 9>your US firms, as we've seen a lot of that

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 9>in the past, but now it's coming directly from the

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 9>heart of the United States and the DOJ. So this

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 9>is all looking at how you can access hardware and

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 9>software for their iPhone, distributing apps for developers, but also

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 9>harder for people who use the phone to switch it.

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 9>Of course, Apple is firing back, has a very different

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 9>view of thing that they're wrong on the fact, and

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 9>the laws has standardous precedent. They don't want the government

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 9>to get involved in, you know, designing of tech. But again,

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 9>you know, I think the Europeans would argue in a

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 9>number of people in tech is that our very concept

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 9>of how this technology work, our very concept of its experience,

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 9>what we think in our minds of its limits, are

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 9>actually governed by these companies and we, you know, we

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 9>need to be a little bit more expansive in the

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 9>way that we think about these things. The App Store

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 9>is a great example. This is at the heart of

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 9>the European probe and this for Margarete a Vesta here

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 9>is going to be front and center in her attack

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 9>of both yes, Apple, but also potentially Google.

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you say, it's less surprising that the EU would

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 3>crack down on big tech. But it's not just Apple

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 3>that's for bearing the brunt to this, it's also Google.

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 3>What exactly is the EU trying to pin them down

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 3>on to find them?

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so this is very interesting. So in burnas separate

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 9>this into kind of two different categories. So you remember

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 9>the fine we got about three weeks ago for Apple,

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 9>which is one point eight billion euros, right, and that

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 9>was about the App Store and Spotify and a complaint

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 9>that they had leveled. Since then, you have the Digital

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 9>Markets Act, which is a new regime of regulation coming

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 9>out of that has come into power. That came into

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 9>power in fact that week, the week that we spoke

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 9>to Margaret's investor, who is the architect of it. And

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 9>this gives all kinds of new rules in terms of

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 9>how to govern big tech to deal with exactly some

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 9>of these issues, the anti competitive behavior. And what's interesting

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 9>on this is it also gives us very clear consequences

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 9>if you violate this. They're talking about potentially ten percent

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 9>of international sales on the first violations, up to twenty

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 9>percent if you're a repeat violator. And they're also talking

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 9>about potentially breaking up these companies. So now we understand

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 9>that under the digital market sector, which again we've had

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 9>no legal action for yet from the EU, we understand

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 9>that both Google and Apple are in the crosshairs and

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 9>a lot of this is going to focus on the

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 9>apps and again their dominant position in the market.

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, And so this is I suppose what investors

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>are most concerned about. I mean, how significant is the

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>share price drop and the worry about Apple's performance? Yeah?

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean, well, Listen, we still can't take away

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 9>from the fact that context of Apple and its absolute

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 9>size and its performance over the last you know, many

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 9>many years, and that is you know, so it's coming

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 9>up from a high base. But it's saying because if

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 9>you do take a step back and you look at Apple,

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 9>what's going on. More broadly, Europe and the US are

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 9>increasingly important markets for Apple because a there's sort of

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 9>much more concern about tech supremacy and China wanting to

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 9>develop its own tech, pushing its own iPhones. And we

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 9>saw that report out earlier this month or last month

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 9>about Apple sales the iPhone down twenty five percent in

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 9>China in just the first few months of the year.

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 9>That is absolutely huge. So that puts the focus on

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 9>Europe and the United States and if they're going to

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 9>be coming under intense regulatory scrutiny in both of those markets,

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 9>which are increasingly important, investors are going to pay attention

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 9>to that and clearly to the tune of over one

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 9>hundred billion dollars worth of market gap yesterday.

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, Oliver, thank you so much for being with

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>us this morning and take us through then the Apple story,

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the European perspective, in more blue bags Oliver Crook there,

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so that's one key story. But then also want to

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>think a bit about the Bank of England what happened

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>yesterday sort of moving closer to interest rate cuts?

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Is there not in London?

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I know you in Dubai, but it doesn't mean that

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you haven't kept to be on Governor Andrew Bailey.

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 2>So he gave a.

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Short sort of clip interview to TV stations yesterday, there

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a full press conference and he's also there's a

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>piece in the Ft this morning from him too. He

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>did talk about and told broadcasts in the UK that

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Rake huts and the UK's on the way to winning

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>its fight against inflation, so Rake cuts maybe on the way.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>What did you make of the Bank of England decision yesterday?

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought that it wasn't as devish as he did.

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>We did lose two Hawks in the form of Catherine

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Mann and Jonathan Haskell, but it was still a hold

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and the majority of the committee voted to hold. What

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought was interesting in terms of the signaling that

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>you ask about, was that you had Andrew Bailey saying

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>the bank could cut rates and still be restrictive. So

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you might say maybe that's not so surprising rates are high,

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>but actually I think that suggests that rates are coming soon.

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the ft interview with the Governor saying that

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>rate cuts are in play at future meetings, reiterating the

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>point that inflation doesn't need to be at target to cut.

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 1>For me, that acknowledges the point that's been made by

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Swatty Dinger at the Dove on the Committee time and

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>time again that there's this lag in monetary transmission. You've

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>got to wait for people to refinance their cars, re

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>mortgage on their houses, for interest rates to transmit to

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the real economy. That suggests you've got a lag. You

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>need to get ahead and you need to cut rates

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>sooner rather than later.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, And I remember speaking to the M and S

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>chairman who was saying, look, you know, if a company,

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you think about that read across, if

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a company doesn't have big debts, it's not going to

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>be you know, rate hikes or rate cuts that then

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>get passed through to the price of pasta, you know,

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in his view straight away. So it does, you know,

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it does take time. On the other hand, the Bank

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of England looks to be versus yesterday pre the decision

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>actually closer to the FED now, doesn't it?

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, more so now, But by comparison, both of them

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.719
<v Speaker 3>pretty boring compared to all the other central banks out

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 3>there that surprised US overnight. So you had that quarter

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 3>point cut from the SNB, the Bank of Mexico with

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 3>its first quarter point cut this cycle, Turkey and Taiwan

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 3>with a five hundred basis point and a twelve and

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 3>a half basis point height, respectively. So all of those

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 3>This is why I think that the BOE is a

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 3>bit of a nothing burger.

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Caroline.

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Look, speaking to strategists, they flag the risk that the

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 3>FED lags European central banks in easing this year, and

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 3>HSBC was already warning that the pounds increasingly vulnerable even

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 3>though it's been the strongest in the G seven this year,

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 3>because it could be that the BOE seems dubbish by comparison.

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Our economists conclusion here at Bloomberg Economics and the r

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 3>wise Head is that yes, the data justify a may

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 3>cut from the BOE, but the Military Policy Committee is

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 3>going to be very cautious and it's not going to

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 3>want to cut first of its major central banking pick.

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 2>They didn't get the credit going first.

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 3>On the way in, so they're not going to rush

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 3>to be the first on the way out. This is

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Daybreak Europe, your morning brief on the stories making

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 3>news from London to Wall Street and beyond.

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Look for us on your podcast feed every morning on Apple, Spotify,

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts.

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 3>You can also listen live each morning on London DAB Radio,

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg Business app, and Bloomberg Park Flagship New York station.

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Is also available on your Amazon Alexa devices. Just say

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. I'm Caroline Hepka.

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Lizzie Burden.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Join us again tomorrow morning for all the news you

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 3>need to start your day right here on Bloomberg Daybreak

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Europe