WEBVTT - New Overnight:  A 2ND Ransom Note Sent for Nancy Guthrie

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, folks.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 2>It is Wednesday, February fourth, and we are getting news

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 2>this morning that there is another another ransom note in

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 2>the case of Nancy Guthrie. Yes, another news outlet is

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 2>reporting it also received a ransom note, but unlike TMZ,

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 2>they decided not to make it public. And with that,

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to this episode of Amy and TJ. Robes is

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 2>one of our first thoughts when TMZ started reporting yesterday

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>they got a ransom note, like, are the police okay

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:45.279
<v Speaker 2>with that? And it sounds like they were not with

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 2>this new information we got and Robes, doesn't that make sense?

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>It does?

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 3>And look, we talked about how, yes, there is a

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 3>balance between getting out the latest information and information you

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 3>have versus protecting the integrity of an investigation.

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 4>And especially look, it shouldn't matter, but when it is

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 4>a member of your own.

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Industry, so to speak, as broadcasters, I don't know. Just

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 3>to think that perhaps, I mean, I would think Harvey

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 3>Levin knows Savannah Guthrie.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 4>They have probably been in similar circles or have yes

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 4>cross paths.

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Of course they know each other, and just out of

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 3>deference to the fact that her mother is missing and

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 3>putting something out potentially could hinder or impede the investigation

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 3>into finding her.

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 4>That takes things to a whole other level. It's beyond just.

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.479
<v Speaker 3>What the legality is, and it's more about what your

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 3>duty is as a human.

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>And we try and we really went out of our way.

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 2>We didn't want to be critical of Harvey or DMZ

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>or it's a news organization. They break plenty of news

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 2>and we know that, but this was a really tough one.

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>And now you just what was the word you just used?

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 2>What the sheriff using the word compromise? Is it going

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 2>to compromise the investigation? So let's tell you what we

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 2>are this morning. Where we are is not really much

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>of an update from authorities about their investigation into where

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Nancy Guthrie, the eighty four year old mother of Savannah Guthrie,

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Today's show host, who's been missing since well the last

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 2>scene last Saturday night. We reported missing on Sunday, so

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Roobes they gave us an update in a press conference yesterday.

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 2>And the thing that jumped out he was asked twice

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 2>about have you received a ransom demand a ransom note?

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 2>He jumped over that question really quickly in a way

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 2>that didn't make sense, and he never would say no.

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>So that stood out and started being reported on. How

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 2>long after that did we get word about.

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 4>TMZ I believe within an hour?

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, within an hour. So Harvey Levin goes on and

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 2>he posts it and he also does a video saying

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 2>we have received an email, a note demanding millions in

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin with a specific crypto curup bitcoin addressed that they

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 2>said was legitimate. Okay, fine, well here we go. This morning,

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Robes the sheriff Department put out a statement saying, we

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>are aware of those reports that are out there that

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 2>actually made sense. Well, now Robes a local affiliate, and

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Tucson is saying they got a note as well.

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 3>That's right, So this was a local CBS station and

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 3>the sheriff did confirm this that they too received a

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 3>ransom note. But they received a note on Monday, and

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 3>instead of putting it out for their viewers and publicizing it,

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 3>they turned it over immediately to the Sheriff's department. And

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 3>the Sheriff's department confirmed that and said that they did

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 3>show the note to Savannah and to the Guthrie families

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 3>that they were aware, and they asked the CBS affiliate

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 3>not to broadcast the contents of the note or even

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 3>acknowledge that the note was sent to them.

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 2>And they didn't which and they and I sitting here,

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 2>that is absolutely the right thing to do. This is

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 2>a captivating story right now, there's a national mystery, and

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 2>there is a life on the line of some naughty

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the mother of somebody that we're all familiar with. Okay,

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 2>this is where we are, and this is why it's

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 2>a big story. Robes, I know this is a big scoop,

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 2>right you got it in your hands. This is a

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 2>big story, man. We're gonna get a lot of attention,

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of clicks if we put this out. But

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 2>that local affiliate did exactly what we talked about yesterday.

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 1>You've got to just say, authorities, whatever you all.

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 3>Want us to do, because the life of Nancy Guthrie

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Trump's anything else truly in this story.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Harvey Levin and TMZ did try to not get specific

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 3>about some of the details, but they certainly released other details,

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 3>including the demands. They didn't give a specific number, but

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 3>they led enough details out that I'm sure the Sheriff's

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 3>department was not happy about.

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Well they even so, we are you say, they try

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>not to.

0:04:54.800 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 2>They gave millions of dollars bitcoin address said or else

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 2>in the note suggested that there was a timeline.

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>They gave a lot of switch.

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and then they said that there were details about

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 3>either what she was wearing other details about what they

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 3>left behind in the crime scene that only somebody who

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 3>would have actually been involved in this crime would have known.

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 4>That.

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 3>They gave enough specifics that it could be determined whether

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 3>or not this ransom note was legit or not coming from.

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 4>The actual suspects or suspect.

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 3>And so yes, even giving that lent it created this

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 3>notion that this was potentially a credible ransom note. So

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 3>that makes it even more concerning that it would have

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 3>been released or broadcast or any information would have been

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 3>given about it if they really did think, hey, this

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 3>legitimately could be from the person or persons who have

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Nancy Guthrie.

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 2>And the sheriff wouldn't go as far as to say

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.799
<v Speaker 2>if those details did match up. So all he pretty

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 2>much did was acknowledged the note but didn't want to

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 2>give details, and again he said he does not know.

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 2>He was asked specifically, is this going to compromise that

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, and sure, hope not, but compromised this

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>if if you think it slightly could have an impact

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 2>on whether or not that woman lives or dies, you

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 2>have to defer to police, you do on this, And look,

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess there are other arguments to be made. And again,

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Harvey and them do some great breaking news work over there.

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>So we try try try here, Ropes as best we

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 2>can with a lot of media stories, not to just

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 2>flat out criticize and go after in that way. It's

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 2>just I guess, Robes, we would have made a different decision,

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 2>and we've been a part of newsrooms that would make

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 2>a different decision. And here we are sitting in the

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 2>middle of this when the sheriff is even and Robes,

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 2>now we can give him a little bit of a break.

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 2>We were saying it before we knew about the ransom, like, hey, fine,

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 2>we want the information, but if you're telling us this

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 2>is all you can tell us to help save this

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 2>woman's life, then we'll accept it.

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I mean that's the role of the media in

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 3>this is, yes, to keep the focus on the story,

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 3>to get national attention, or at least certainly attention from

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 3>the folks who might have some real information to offer,

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 3>either through surveillance cameras or something they saw or something

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 3>they inadvertently captured. So the role of the press is

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 3>huge in a story like this because, yes, family members

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 3>want the attention, they want the focus, they want the pressure,

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 3>even on police, because time is not on anyone's side

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 3>when someone's missing. So there is a legitimate, important role

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 3>for the press to play. But then if you are

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 3>given something, and this has happened in other cases where

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 3>whoever is behind some crime somehow reaches out or leaks

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 3>something to the press, the point is, yeah, the right

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 3>thing to do is to give it to police and

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 3>let them tell you whether or not it's okay to

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 3>talk about it, it's okay to release it and look.

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 3>According to CBS, they reported that the sheriff said, this

0:07:56.120 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>is a big, big part of this, that TMZ report

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 3>on the ransom note before that organization contacted authorities.

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 4>That is really really upsetting.

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.559
<v Speaker 2>If that is true, and it's also not what Harvey said.

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Harvey said something different in the video said we reached

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 2>out to some people, but we don't know if we

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 2>got to the right place. He did not say, I

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 2>mean it sounded like we placed a phone call and

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 2>waiting to hear back or see if it makes it

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 2>up the chain or something.

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 3>He yeah, he said they had a hard time getting

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 3>in touch with the right person. Is how he phrased

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 3>it when he made this video, so it was you're right.

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 3>He kind of couched it, saying, hey, we're trying to

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 3>reach out to them, but we're not getting through or

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 3>we haven't gotten to the right person.

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 4>So we're having some trouble. But in the meantime, here's

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 4>what we have.

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 2>And the sheriff flat out said in the actual interview

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 2>on camera interview, he hoped to keep this out of

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 2>the public, and that makes sense why he was so

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 2>quick with his answers, so quick trying to move on.

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 2>He had full knowledge of this note when he stepped

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 2>in front of us yesterday.

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 4>You could actually now, of course, HEINZ twenty twenty.

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 3>You caught it immediately, and yes, it was pretty obvious

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 3>his demeanor changed. He seemed slightly panicked quickly to move

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 3>away from that question, and he just his demeanors switched

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 3>ever so slightly where he rushed and didn't say no.

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 4>He didn't want to lie.

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 3>To the press, but it was very obvious he was

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 3>keeping something. Something about that question made him quickly want

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 3>to change the subject.

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 2>And Rose not just did he know about it when

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 2>he came before camp. What time was that press coming

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 2>for no One?

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 4>It was around one one thirty Easter Yeah.

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 2>Yes, one thirty Eastern time. At that point, not only

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 2>was he aware of the note, he had shared it

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 2>and discussed it with the Guthrie family at that point

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 2>they were watching that press conference, also knowing and probably

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 2>also hoping and probably also going good. He handled it

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 2>well best he could. He was asked directly he could

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 2>have lied to the press.

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>He didn't.

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Look.

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I compare it not exactly the same.

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 2>But Rose been in situations with with the members of

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>the military to have some covert operation that media has

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 2>full knowledge of ahead of time. But if you report

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 2>on it, you're going to put the lives of soldiers

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 2>at risk. We have precedent for cooperating with police when

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 2>lives are a lot at stake.

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 3>We have precedent for cooperating with press. Pr folks embargoes.

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, this is something that the press does all

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 3>the time. We'll have information about something, even entertainment wise,

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 3>that they don't want out.

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's why they get screeners.

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Advanced screeners, but you're embargoed from talking about it beforehand

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 3>for just reasons of you know, financial success for the film,

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 3>et cetera.

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Like they don't want things getting out so on silly things.

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>You're so right, we apply for death consequences.

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 4>We hold information all the time.

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 2>So this would not be a stretch, is now what

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 2>we're saying. And again they made the decision for whatever reason.

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Don't know if they will ever think different. We're only

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 2>saying in our experience, we would have done something differently.

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Don't know if it's going to have an impact on

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 2>this case one way or another. Robes did we mention

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 2>the CBS reporter alluded to these not being two separate notes,

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 2>so not a we were worried about a copycat potential situation,

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 2>But it sounds like they believe this is the same note,

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>just sent to two different places.

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I had that question because it was a little confusing,

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 3>But that does appear to be what the case is.

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 3>And then we were trying to kind of figure out

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 3>whoever is behind these notes, whether it is the person

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 3>who actually took Savannah's mom or not.

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.719
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting as if they sent it to a.

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 3>News organization so that that news organization would publish it.

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 3>And when the CBS affiliate, good for them, just gave

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 3>it to police and did not broadcast it.

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 4>It was almost as if.

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 3>They were annoyed and then sent it to a place

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 3>where they thought might broadcast it.

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 4>That's tough, AKATMZ.

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 3>But that is where your head goes that whoever was

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 3>behind it was like, well, damn, they didn't put it out.

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'll have to try someone who will. And

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 3>that's what it seems like.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps happens if you want then that's smart or stupid. Right,

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 2>If you want to get your word out, do you

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 2>send it to the CBS affiliate in Tucson, Arizona, if

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 2>you wanted to go worldwide?

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's smaller, Maybe you think they'll jump on it.

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to send it to an ABC news

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 2>which was probably first called the FBI and then go

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 2>through maybe not? Or do you have no idea what

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>you're doing as a criminal right now? And send it

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 2>to the local station that you drive by on your

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.239
<v Speaker 2>way to and from the gas station in your neighborhood

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 2>and thought that was a good idea. What the hell

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 2>is going on? I will tell you the first thing

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 2>that started making zentthropes is that there is a ransom.

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that, because nothing else makes sense, and we've been trying,

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 3>everyone has been going through all the what could possibly

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 3>be the motive or what could possibly be the reason

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 3>someone would abduct an eighty four year old frail woman

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 3>who needs medical care.

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's not urgent day constant. That is not

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 4>a typical kidnapping target by anyone. No one wants to

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 4>be dealing with that.

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Or there's just the motivation is puzzling other than money, and.

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 2>They are telling us it's in the millions. But also

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.719
<v Speaker 2>we are getting a couple of other updates about the

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 2>investigation through video footage that was shot at Nancy Guthrie's home.

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 2>We'll explain that. Also an event playing there in the

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 2>area tonight. And we are getting an update about Savannah's

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 2>very busy, very important upcoming work schedule. We probably saw

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 2>this coming, not probably romes. We knew she would not

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>likely be going to the Olympic. Stay here, all those

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 2>updates coming. We continue here on this Amy and TJ

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 2>on this Wednesday morning, February the fourth, continuing on the

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 2>search for Nancy Guthrie of Savannah Guthrie and Ropes. The

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Olympics actually is underway. The opening ceremony has not happened,

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 2>but they start doing a lot of preliminary events. The

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Winter Olympics is going on. This is the most important

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 2>thing NBC does. We think the Olympics is every four

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 2>years or every two years you do summer, winter. It

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 2>is year round for this network. It is They pay

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 2>tons for it and they nail it on coverage. So

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 2>to have her not be a part of it is

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 2>we understand. But man, this is a big deal. It's

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 2>having impacts, That's what I'm saying.

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh.

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, You and I actually we've covered the Olympics for ABC,

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 3>but we both covered the Olympics or were with the

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Olympic team at NBC, and so we actually know what

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 3>it's like at that network, the host network of the games.

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 3>This is the planning that goes into these games and

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 3>covering these games the way NBC does is like nothing

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 3>I have ever experienced before.

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 4>It is a machine. They know how to do it.

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 3>But it takes a tremendous amount of preparation. And when

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 3>you're the host, when you're the anchor of the opening ceremonies.

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Like Savannah, You've been studying for not weeks, for months.

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 3>You've had binders upon binders of who the athletes are,

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 3>what the host countries are expected to do, and when

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 3>those opening ceremonies come, you are on your feet ad libbing.

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 4>The prep is intense. So, yes, this all is happening

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 4>on Friday.

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Savannah would have likely left probably Tuesday or Wednesday today

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 3>at the latest to head to Milan to get ready,

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 3>to get acclimated, and to be ready to put on

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 3>one of the biggest shows of the year for NBC.

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Again, obviously not the priority right now. Clearly we understand this,

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 2>but that is the timing. That's just absolutely huge that

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 2>she's not going to be there. We'll tell you we

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 2>didn't report this previously. We saw about this, but now

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 2>CBS is reporting that one of its cameras caught and

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>we've seen these images of what they believe. Nobody else

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 2>is saying this what they believe to be blood on

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 2>the front porch of that home.

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Rod.

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what to make it, because the initial

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 2>reports was that somebody got up on the.

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Porch that shouldn't have been there.

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, I mean it's private property.

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Now it's no longer a crime scene technically, because they

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 3>did say that, the sheriff did say that yesterday, specifically

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 3>that they are done processing the scene.

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 4>But it is still private property. And I have to

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 4>tell you, look.

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 3>I have.

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't even like looking. I keep looking up.

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 3>And CBS continues to put up I don't I'm curious

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 3>what the other networks are going to do putting up

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 3>that blood spatter.

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to see that.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 3>I actually wouldn't want my children to see it if

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 3>they were younger, waking up in the morning and seeing

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 3>potentially Nancy Guthrie's blood spattered on her doorstep. I just

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 3>think sometimes we get so desensitized. I just don't appreciate that.

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 3>And I'm thinking about Savannah. This is such look for anybody,

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 3>this is difficult, but she is. This is her industry,

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 3>this is her business. She covers stories like this about

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 3>other people every single day.

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 4>And I wonder how much.

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Look.

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 4>She's probably not watching that much right now.

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 3>But in hindsight, you look at this and you think

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 3>you do things differently as a journalist when you've suddenly

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 3>become the center of a media frenzy. And I just

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 3>feel for her to think about her mother's blood being

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 3>displayed potentially across networks for just for I hate to

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 3>say entertainment value, but certainly for the shock value.

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Not necessary, but they can tell necessary that you can

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 2>actually be told without showing you're right. And to the

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 2>point about being desensitized, it didn't hit me as much

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 2>until you started talking about it now, like that's a

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 2>damn shame.

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I get it.

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sure we've been on stories and had these

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 2>fight and look, just so have we look it up

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 2>and bam.

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>There it is.

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 4>They've played it more than I've seen any other video.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 4>And look, I'm just look, it's we're trying.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, it's a I don't know, it's fine.

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>I say it's fine. What I'm saying is go ahead.

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh well, I was just saying, we've been watching Rachel Good,

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 3>we've been watching Alex Pretdi get killed on this video

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 3>for the last few weeks, and we've just been.

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Airing it like it's nothing.

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we have I'm thinking ten years ago in

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 3>this business, in journalism and broadcast news, I don't.

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Think we would have aired those things.

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 3>And now maybe it's because of YouTube and all of

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 3>the access TikTok people just showing everything and everyone having

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 3>cell phone video and now we're just okay with showing

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 3>things that I don't think we would have shown.

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Is that it is years ago? Is a decision being made? Well,

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.479
<v Speaker 2>it's out there anyway, Yes, let's just put it up.

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 2>You know what that image of that, which we don't

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 2>know for sure, is blood And the authorities have not

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 2>confirmed that they have found blood. They say they found

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 2>DNA inside the home. They haven't said anything about outside,

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 2>so actually we don't even know what this is.

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes on the front is yeah, oh I'm saying yes.

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 3>The sheriff specifically said outside or inside. We cannot confirm

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 3>that we have found blood.

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 2>So that that's just but it's out that is out

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 2>there and it is rolling constantly. Would get to your

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 2>point here, now, Rope, we're sensitive about crime scene photos,

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 2>we're sensitive about showing dead bodies.

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>We're sensive about blood. Why was that? Why is that? Now?

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 2>I think this is one of those stories, Robes, and

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 2>we've been in the middle of them. When there is

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 2>a void, when there is not enough official information coming

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 2>out on a big story, everybody scrambles to get anything.

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 2>And if you got any little thing you then turn

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 2>it into a big something that maybe you would not

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 2>have reported on before. Do you think if the if

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 2>the sheriff had come out and given us that information

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 2>about a ransom, Nope, no network would have been running

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 2>out there and say, ooh we got something, let's put

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 2>this on.

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 2>He lost control of that narrative because he was choosing

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 2>what to put out and he ran up against an

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 2>organization that didn't mind putting it out.

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a really good point, and I think

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 3>that's very true.

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 4>And I think that.

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Maybe even if the sheriff had said, yes, we did

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 3>find blood, maybe people wouldn't be so quick to say, see,

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 3>here's blood. You know, you make a very good point.

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 3>When there is a vacuum, when there is a void

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 3>of information, people are desperate, especially a big story that

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 3>they know everyone wants information on, everyone wants to click

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.239
<v Speaker 3>on that they will just fill in the void with

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 3>everything and anything they get without thinking it through, without

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 3>thinking about the ethics involved.

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a look.

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Hearts go out to Savannah Guthrie and her family, and

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 2>you said, I haven't spent as much time as you

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 2>have around her, but she is a delight and I mean,

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 2>she is fun, she is energetic, she is bubbling, and

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 2>she is as sharp as attack and ropes you just

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>can't imagine, but to see now it is, it's one

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 2>of your own to a certain degree, being put through

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 2>and tested with what's happening to her family, but being

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 2>put through and tested and.

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>In some ways harmed.

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 2>I hate to say victimized by how stories like this

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 2>get covered.

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I think I think that is a fair word,

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 3>especially when you look at the comments and what people

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 3>are saying.

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 4>We talked about this yesterday. But she's going through something

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 4>that is.

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Unthinkably difficult that most of us will never have to experience.

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 3>But for those who have, and even if you haven't,

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 3>just put yourself in her position and show some respect

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 3>and just some just some acknowledgment of someone going through

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 3>a painful time.

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Don't add to it. Don't add to it with speculation

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 4>and judgment.

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 2>And folks will let you know tonight. There is a

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 2>candlelight visual planned there in the Tucson area for this evening.

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure what to expect. There are no press conferences,

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 2>at least we can tell you planned for today. He

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 2>said he wouldn't put another one on the schedule until tomorrow,

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 2>but if news breaks he will update, and if certainly

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 2>it comes out, we'll let you know as well. As always,

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.479
<v Speaker 2>top right corner of your Apple podcast app on our

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 2>show page, little button that says follow. Click that and

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 2>you can make sure all the updates that we have

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 2>have been so many breaking news updates lately, but they'll

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 2>come right to you. We always appreciate you listening to us,

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 2>but for my dear Amy Roback, I am t J.

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Holmes and we will talk to you almost m