WEBVTT - TSMC and ASML's China Invasion Plan; Microsoft's New Team Co-Pilot

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 2>From Mahart where Innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, Nbon.

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlove.

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Heidel Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York.

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Ed Ludlow is off.

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up exclusive reporting that chip

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 3>giants TSMC and ASML well they can remotely shut down

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 3>the key equipment in event of an invasion to Taiwan.

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 4>Details to come.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Plus, we hear from Microsoft CEO Saty Innadella as its

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Bill Developers conference kicks off, and actress Scarlett Johansson pushes

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 3>back against open Ai and that eerily similar Sky Voice.

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 3>All that and so much more ahead. But first, that's

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 3>checking on these markets. We want to go higher. We

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>want to keep those record highs going. It seems on

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 3>the SMP. Certainly the NASDAK turns flat. I'm pushing forward

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 3>also to what's happening in crypto. We'll get back to

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 3>what the MAINNGJA benchmarks are doing at the moment, but

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 3>crypto has been a key story.

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 4>Of course.

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 3>This all eyes shifting from what we saw was a

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 3>spot bitcoin ETF now to potentially a spot ETF. But

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 3>there is the NASDAK currently just trading into positive territory.

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 3>We are on a new record high. We're a new

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 3>record high in the SMP. Not so on the stock

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 3>six hundred and over in Europe actually off by about

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 3>a quarter of a percent. But all eyes focused on

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 3>FED talk today. Raphile Bostic of course, still trying to

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 3>analyze the data many of FED talk coming to us.

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 3>But also we're seeing what's happening with the ten year

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 3>yield currently off by some three basis points. So maybe

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 3>a bit of buying into the bomb market right now,

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 3>as we also push forward to what's happening in earnings.

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Let's have a look at some of the individual movers

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 3>that we've been seeing, and Palo Alto Networks, one of

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the key forwards, is actually coming off of its lows.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 4>We're down only now four percent.

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Why cybersecurity company just posting revenue that's eleven percent, well,

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 3>thirty fifteen percent growth on.

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 4>A year on year basis.

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 3>That's not the twenty to thirty percent revenue growth what

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 3>we used to do with a cybersecurity company.

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 4>We go speaking to the CEO a little bit later,

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 4>in the show in.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Vidia trading flat ahead of its all in important earnings tomorrow.

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 3>But what's key is this relationship, of course with what

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 3>they've been talking about in ai and Taiwan, how dependent

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 3>they are on TSMC to deliver the sort of super

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 3>chips that the market is so dependent on. And a

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 3>really interesting piece of reporting therefore on ASML and TSMC

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 3>today coming from Bloomberg SML is off.

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 4>By one and a half percent.

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 3>That's as we see that exclusive reporting coming from our

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 3>colleague showing that in an event that China invades Taiwan,

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 3>both TSMC and of course the chip equipment making company

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 3>ASML could basically have a kill switch. They can remotely

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 3>disable their chip making machines. We heard about the importance

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 3>in fact of Taiwan from Nvidia's CEO Jensen one and

0:02:58.440 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 3>the Dell World conference just yesterday.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 5>Listen, Taiwan is at the epicenter of the world's technology

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 5>supply flight chain. Without Taiwan, it would be very difficult

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 5>for Michael and I to do our jobs, it would

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 5>be very difficult for us to serve Bill and his company,

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 5>And so the technology industry depends very heavily on Taiwan.

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 5>Who continues to for some time.

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>The ai juggernaut has spoken and he's saying that Taiwan

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 3>is really important as if we forgot, we'll pleased to

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 3>go join in Washington bluebags. Mike Shephard, this is an

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 3>extraordinary piece of reporting. Ultimately companies having to ease US

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 3>government concerns here, Well, that's right.

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 6>And this is actually answering with this reporting one of

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 6>the fundamental questions surrounding Taiwan, one of the big what ifs.

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 6>For years, the US government has warned that, you know,

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 6>China has its eyes on Taiwan and may try to

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 6>reunite with the island using military force. Now Beijing has

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 6>that they have no interest in doing so. They would

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 6>prefer peaceful reunification, but they have not ruled out military

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.839
<v Speaker 6>intervention at the same time, so one of the key

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 6>questions is what happens if this takes place. One of

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 6>the big questions is what happens to the semiconductor industry.

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 6>Taiwan is responsible for ninety percent of the world supply

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 6>the most advanced chips, the kind that supply and video.

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 6>We just heard from Jensen, why are you talking about that?

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 6>And it is so essential for the US we saw

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 6>during the pandemic and more recently with the earthquake in Taiwan,

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 6>the concerns about any sort of supply chain disruption.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:45.239
<v Speaker 3>Really, what's phenomenal here is that ASML is the lynchpin. Really,

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 3>it's shipped more than two hundred of these very sophisticated

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 3>EUV machines to clients outside of China. But they also

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 3>do still ship to China, but far less technically sophisticated

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 3>kinds of machines. Nevertheless, it looks as China has really

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 3>been making strides in self sufficiency here.

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 6>Michael, Well, you're right, it has, and we saw a

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 6>sample of that last year during US Commerce Secretary Gina

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 6>Raymondo's visit to mainland China, they Huawei Technologies unveiled a

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 6>brand new smartphone and May sixty that featured a much

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 6>faster semiconductor a processing chip than anybody thought they were

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 6>capable of generating and using in a consumer device like that.

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 6>It was a seven animeter chip, very very small, and

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 6>the US was taken aback by it, and it was

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 6>made in part with older generation ASML machines, but with

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 6>technology that came from other sources as well. It was

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 6>a sign that the concern is that China will be

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 6>able to catch up in terms of technological advances in

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 6>producing these semiconductors, and it requires sensitive equipment like the

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 6>kind that ASML makes. ISML is the only producer of

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 6>these machines called extreme ultraviolet machines, and they harness light

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 6>waves to create these tiny, tiny transistors that you need

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 6>a microscope to look at, and yet they do all

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 6>these powerful computations of the likes that artificial intelligence and

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 6>even military applications require. So the sensitivity of this is.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 4>Very clear.

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 6>What we're talking about though, also is a maintenance function

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 6>because these EUV machines, as they're known, they require a

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 6>lot of upkeep and the company ASML needs to be

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 6>able to turn them off remotely just for maintenance purposes. However,

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.799
<v Speaker 6>they now have a geopolitical significance too.

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Michael Shepard weaving it all together for us so beautifully,

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 3>we thank you so much, and look at has real

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 3>effects on companies' earnings.

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 7>Here.

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 3>SML has said with the latest export controls on their

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 3>ability to shift to China, they could see a revenue

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 3>impact of some fifteen.

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 4>Percent this year.

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 3>We look ahead to what's happening within video earnings yet

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 3>to come, and we know they've got exposure to China too,

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.239
<v Speaker 3>as we've all together with Christina Hooper, Investco's chief global

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 3>market strategists, and I'm just going to kick off with ultimately,

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 3>China is a headwind at the moment where record highs across.

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 4>All major benchmarks in the US. Is China much of

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 4>a headwind from your perspective, I don't think so. Clearly.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>There are always going to be geopolitical tensions, issues concerns,

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>but markets have a funny way of putting blinders on

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and focusing on what's the most important fundamentals as well

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>as monetary policy in these challenging.

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 4>Times and these unique times.

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And so I think there's a calculus that has gone

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>on that has said, yes, you know, there are a

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>number of risks out there, but we're going to keep

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>investing and we're going to continue to enjoy the earnings

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>growth that we've seen.

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 3>And talking of earnings growth, everyone waiting with baited breath

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 3>and what sort of growth in vidio does indeed post

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 3>after the bell tomorrow in excess of two hundred percent

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 3>increase in revenue is extraordinary. There is a market from

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 3>the back of reporting coming from other titles today, that

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe there'll be some sort of pocket air pocket in

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 3>between some of the more sophisticated chips that was being

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 3>made from a Grace Hopper perspective. Buy in Nvidia moving

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 3>onto the Grace Blackwell and Amazon, for example, pausing the

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 3>ones on the less sophisticated Grace Hopper. Does that ultimately

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 3>matter more the Nvidia intricacies that who's buying who's not

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 3>than say FED policy right now.

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, for the tech sector, perhaps it's in Vidia, But

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.959
<v Speaker 1>I think when we take a step back and look

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>at what is likely to help markets move forward, it's

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>rate cuts. The reality is that it impacts the tech

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>sector in particular because typically when we see higher yields,

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>when the ten years higher, that exerts downward pressure on

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>technology stocks and vice versa. The higher valuation names are

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>more sensitive. So I think that that right now is important.

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Certainly in Video's important for Nvidia, for for semiconductors, for

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the tech sector, but right now there is a weight

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on for central banks to start cutting.

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 4>We've gotten a.

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Few little cuts so far Swiss National Bank, Risk Bank,

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>but now we're ready for more.

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 4>And I look at it this way.

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>We you know, as a parent of teenagers, a son

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>who went through the college process a couple of years ago.

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.719
<v Speaker 1>He got into school off the waitlist, some kids got

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in early decision. They all wound up graduating at the

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>same time with the same degree. And so we're going

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to see probably the first mover is going to be

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the ECB, maybe the Bank of Canada given the inflation print,

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 1>but the FED will be along this year as well,

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get a few rate cuts. We'll all end

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>up pretty much in the same place, but we're going

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to see We're probably going to see others start the

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 1>ball rolling, other majors start the ball rolling before.

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 4>We see the FED. So in a way, be patient.

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Christina, should you buy into tech for all viewers now?

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 4>On the biasis of macro policy?

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm not a believer in market timing because it

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is so hard to do, but I do think starting

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to increase exposure now as we wait for rate cuts

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>to begin is arguably a very sensible strategy. Many investors,

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 1>retail and institutional, are overweight to cash, and so certainly

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>they should be taking some money off the sidelines and

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>moving it into fixed income, locking in rates on the

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>long end, but also they should be moving into equities,

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just tech. I think tech's very attractive,

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:45.680
<v Speaker 1>but for valuation reasons, European equities, UK equities, Emerging markets equities,

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of opportunities out there for different reasons.

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 4>On industry groups.

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Utility is doing very well, but also because everyone thinks

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 3>that's an AI play.

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, who would have ever thunk it. That was not

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>on my Bingo card for this year, but utilities absolutely

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 1>are ANAI play.

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 4>So do you.

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 3>Think that ultimately we should start spreading our wings from

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 3>an industry perspective as well as a geographical perspective.

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, absolutely, But we have to recognize a lot of

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the very significant earnings growth is coming from.

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 4>The tech sector especially.

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we look at at the industries within tech,

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>three of them are delivering double digit earnings growth. So

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that is a compelling place. We just have to recognize

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that valuations are higher.

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 3>This only our all eyes still on tomorrow's set of

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 3>earnings or great macro perspective. Coming from Invesco Chief Global

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Strategist Christina Hooper, we love having her hair. Let's talk

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 3>zoom video for a moment reporting as first quarter results

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 3>and they beat expectations on the prior quarter.

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 4>It's the sales forecast perhaps.

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 3>That had some people trying to understand where there's conservative

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 3>elements are lying and where the opportunities are too. Let's

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 3>talk through it all as the shares push higher with

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Kelly Steckelberg Zoom CFO to have you here in New

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 3>York with us, Kelly, and there is some concern about

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 3>perhaps a more cautious forecast. Can you talk us through

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 3>how you've seen small medium sized enterprise demand for your

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 3>products at the moment.

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 8>Sure. So, first of all, we were very pleased with

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 8>our Q one results. We beat analyst expectations across revenue, profitability,

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 8>and free cash flow, and we reported you know, Q

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 8>one revenue of one point one four one billion dollars

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 8>up three percent year every year. We did see growth

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 8>in our enterprise which was up five percent year every year.

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 8>And then turn in terms of SMB, which we've gotten

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 8>a lot of questions about. We support that segment of

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 8>our business, mostly through our online segment, and that actually

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 8>did better than we expected this quarter. So very pleased

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 8>with the results across all of our segments.

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 4>You are a numbers person.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 3>We saw the number of enterprise customs declined slightly, but

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 3>there was a reshuffling of who.

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 4>Actually fills into those gaps.

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 3>They accounting for the difference of of how you count customers.

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 4>But why are they declining? How do we digest that

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:06.119
<v Speaker 4>to climb Yeah.

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 8>What I really want to point out, as you just said,

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 8>we did transition some customers from the direct segment online

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 8>just to promote better self service. These are typically, you know,

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 8>much smaller customers. Where we continue to see growth is

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 8>in the upmarket. So when you look at customers that

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 8>contribute more than one hundred thousand dollars of trailing twelvemonth revenue,

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 8>that was actually up eight percent year every year. So

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 8>that's the segment of the business that is really helping

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 8>us drive growth and where we're really focused, you know,

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 8>on the smaller end those customers, we give them a

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 8>lot of flexibility. They come and go as they please.

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 8>They sometimes you know, turn the service off while they

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 8>take a break with their kids, and then they come

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 8>back when it serves them.

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's talk about some of the areas that you

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 3>have been pushing into to diversify. In particular, I'm thinking

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 3>of contact central workforce engagement, management of AI now city

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 3>group analysts and I know you love having analysts notes

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 3>reported back to you, but they say it find it

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 3>a bit hard to see a durable offway to reaccelerating growth.

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Paint that picture therefore, Yeah, accelerating cround.

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 8>So we talked about this a lot on the call yesterday.

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 8>We've said that we expect growth in the second half

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 8>of the year to start to reaccelerate. You mentioned contact center.

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 8>We announced yesterday we have over ninety customers now in

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 8>our contact center that are contributing more than one hundred

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 8>thousand dollars of trailing twelvemonth revenue, which highlights these are

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 8>sophisticated buyers and our products are now competing with the

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 8>top four in the Gartner Magic quadrant that you probably.

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Know all the names of.

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 8>And that combined with the strength we continue to see

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 8>with Zoom Phone work Vivo, which we were just there

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 8>was news about this last week where Meta is discontinuing

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 8>its workplace and we have been named the preferred partner

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 8>for that transition, which opens up a whole new opportunity

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 8>for us. So those are all the components that are

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 8>going to lead to reacceleration in the back half of

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 8>the year and then into FY twenty six.

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 3>And let's talk about competitors though, because Microsoft Teams is

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 3>a strong one and we understand that perhaps there's been

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 3>some regulatory conversations coming from Zoom about unfair competition.

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 4>How's that going.

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know, there's a lot that's going on in

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 8>the EU around bundling.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 4>They unbundle it there.

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 8>However, until they really get to a competitive pricing for

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 8>their products, it's not really a level playing field. And

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 8>that's what would serve everyone in this industry, we believe

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 8>the best, including customers, because having a really level playing

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 8>field for the two strongest competitors, which is of course

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 8>Zoom and Microsoft, we think is the best approach. Regulators listening, Yeah,

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 8>I guess we'll wait and see how it continues to evolve.

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, Europe's always quite busy and quite quick on their

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 3>regulatory decision making. But I'm interesting in what therefore you

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 3>are doing for an investor base who is still waiting

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 3>for this regalvanization, this reacceleration of growth. They're seeing some

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 3>of the areas that you're pushing into in products. Jeffrey's saying, look,

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 3>we want to see perhaps a little bit buyback sometimes

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 3>of shares. We're thinking about potentially strategic M and A.

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Have we've got any news for the investor base there.

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So you know, reaccelerating and top line growth is

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 8>at absolutely our number one priority. In the meantime, while

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 8>we are focused on investing there, we are also focused

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 8>on giving returns back to our shareholders. So last quarter

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 8>we announced a one point five billion dollars share buyback program.

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 8>During Q one we did buy back two point four

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 8>million shares, and we will continue to execute that over

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 8>the next seven quarters, and in the meantime also looking

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 8>for opportunities to deploy our cash if we see strategic

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 8>M and A opportunities that would accelerate top line growth

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 8>or accelerate tech development as well. Those are the two

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 8>areas that we really keep front and center.

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 4>The kind of aqua highest potentially.

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, Kenny, It's great to have you here, coming

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 3>in from Texas to be here with us in New York.

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 4>Zoom CFO Candy Stackerberg. We really appreciate it.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, coming up, I've just got to talk about crypto

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 3>for a moment, ether surging on science of momentum for

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 3>that ETF approval, will it come to spot eth US next.

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 4>I Meanwhile, we've.

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Just got to keep an eye on what's happening with

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 3>ten Cent because there has been pressure.

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 4>There has been, of.

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 3>Course, well a big new game, a blockbuster game that

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 3>everyone has been waiting for, but within an hour they

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 3>had to basically put that game on ice because the

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 3>servers were overloaded. Dungeon and Fighter Mobile has really got

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 3>everyone very excited, but clearly some server fluctuations hurt on

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the interim. We're down by two point nine percent, and

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 3>say this isn't going to be a long term impact.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 9>This is Bluebeg technology.

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.959
<v Speaker 3>Let's just talk about this rally rally in cryptocurrencies. It

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 3>is underway amid signs of pretty much a momentum for

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 3>approval of another spot ETF, but this time linked to

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 3>ETH joining us. Now, James Sift from Bloemberg Intelligence, we're

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 3>up twenty three percent in the last couple of days.

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 4>We used to volatility. But what are the tea leaves

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 4>that you're reading here? James?

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So, I mean we've had these filings just pot

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.239
<v Speaker 10>of theory metfs for months since the fall even and

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 10>nothing over the last couple months signified to us that

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 10>there was any sort of approval if you talk to

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 10>these issuers, exchanges, you name it.

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 11>No one thought it was going to happen.

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 10>And then we started hearing from different people yesterday that

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 10>the SEC reached out with comments and requesting immediate basically

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 10>responses and updates to filings.

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 11>The deadline for this was Thursday.

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 10>It's May twenty third, and the SEC was basically silent,

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 10>not interacting with anyone on these topics until yesterday, which

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 10>tells us this was a huge.

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 11>Change as far as I'm concerned.

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 10>So basically the SEC decided as of Monday when they

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.479
<v Speaker 10>reach up to issues. We don't know exactly when it started,

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 10>made late morning, early afternoon, who knows, but the SEC

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 10>basically started saying, all right, we're gonna, we're gonna, we're

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 10>likely going to approve these things and basically took the

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 10>approval odds out of the ABYSS as far as we

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 10>were concerned.

0:18:55.840 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 3>And therefore you've moved your spot ether ETF likelihood probbability

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 3>to seventy five percent from just twenty five percent.

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Is this usual?

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Is this typical to have a sudden resurgence in the drama,

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 3>shall we call it?

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 10>No, Honestly, we were thinking about lowering our odds last week,

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 10>but we were basically, we only went to ninety percent

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 10>for the spot bitcoin ETFs, even though everything was pointing

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 10>that it was going to get approved, and but the

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 10>what we left that ten percent because we heard rumblings

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 10>that the Biden White House was considering stepping in to

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 10>stop the approval of spot bitcoin ETFs, which just signs

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 10>a little bit crazy on its face. But honestly, it

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 10>seems like the exact opposite might have happened here. It

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:36.959
<v Speaker 10>seems like the SEC was likely planning to approve. There

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 10>might even be denial letters drafted up, and it might

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 10>be the Biden admin for political reasons, that came in

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 10>and basically said you need to approve these things. We

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 10>don't want to be too anti crypto.

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 4>Interesting perspective coming from you, James.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested therefore what it actually means in terms of

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 3>institutional demand. What we saw was with the Bitcoin ETF,

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 3>a whole host of new ETFs were launched and suddenly

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 3>a whole wave of money came in.

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Is the same thing going to happen for smart contract focus?

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah?

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 10>So I do think that there is going to be

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 10>a wave of ethereym ETFs that launch. We don't know

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 10>exact timing because this hasn't been planned out. The Bitcoin

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 10>ETF was planned out for months in advance. There's a

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 10>whole bunch of other filings besides this nineteen before approval

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 10>that we're now expecting this week. There needs to be

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 10>approval on the s onees or perspectuses as well. So

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 10>we do think there's going to be significant demand for

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 10>these things, but it will be probably some.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 11>Fraction of the Bitcoin ETF demand.

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 10>So if you look at the market cap at bitcoin,

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 10>etherium is about a third of that market cap. Also,

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 10>these ETFs they're not going to be allowed to stake,

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 10>which is like there's native yield in using ethereum. So

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 10>if these ETFs cannot stake, that should probably likely diminish

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 10>some of the demand. So if you take the demand

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 10>in the native crypto market and say it's about thirty

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 10>percent of bitcoin and then discount.

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 11>That a little bit, I think there will be demand.

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 10>So twenty maybe twenty five percent of the demand for

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 10>Bitcoin ETFs over the long term or at least the

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 10>near term after launch.

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 11>If you're comparing them to bitcoin, but that's still billions

0:20:59.600 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 11>of dollars.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 10>I mean thirteen We have twelve thirteen billion dollars of

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 10>influenced the spotpack coin ETFs in just four months. So

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 10>even if we get twenty five percent of that, there's

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 10>still a pretty significant chunk of change coming into new

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 10>ETFs that are potentially going to launch in the coming

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 10>weeks and months.

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 3>All lies on that May twenty third spot Ether ETF application,

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 3>James Seffert raising those probabilities.

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 4>We love having you on.

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much from Blue Megan Intelligence. Welcome back

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 3>to Blue meg Technology. I'm Caroen Had in New York.

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's get your quick check on these markets. Halfway through

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 3>this trading day, and we're seeing Look, just sensitivity, shall

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 3>we say to the markets right now, as we still

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 3>near those record highs across most benchmarks in the United States,

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:46.479
<v Speaker 3>we're just down by five points on the Nasdaq one

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 3>hundred as we digest and FED speak today, how quickly

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 3>might we see rate cuts? Raphael Postik saying, look, maybe

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 3>we're going to reanalyze really where the neutral rate lies.

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Stock six hundred currently off by two tens percent.

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 3>Europe under pressure as we wait with beta breath for

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 3>some key earnings that we'll get to win. And I'm

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 3>also having a look at what's happening in the crypto space.

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 3>We're just talking about it on the up and up

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 3>in particular, a shine a light on what's happening with

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 3>eth We're currently up more than eight percent as we

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 3>potentially start to get ourselves ready for a spot ETF

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 3>here in the United States. Move on, let's have a

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 3>look at what's happening on in individual stocks on the move.

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Amazon down by more than a percentage point. Really interesting

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.439
<v Speaker 3>story coming here being reported by the Financial Times that

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 3>maybe Amazon is putting pause on its well demand or

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 3>at least its orders for the most high rate and

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 3>most sophisticated tech chip architecture coming from in Vidia, and

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 3>instead of getting that Grace Hopper, they're waiting and they're

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 3>going for the Grace Blackwell, while in Video is still

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 3>up a tenth of a percent in spite of that,

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 3>perhaps just air pocket, as the City Group has been

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 3>talking about, we get the earnings after the bell. On Wednesday,

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft up by a more than of almost a percentage point.

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 3>They are enhancing co Pilot in particular, then racing Google.

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Remember yesterday we're.

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Hearing how they're taking on Apple with a new AIPC.

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 3>But we've got so much to hear from the leader

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 3>of Microsoft right now because they are launching the team

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 3>co Pilot and they've got a new AI feature that's

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 3>going to be helping you with your project management, fostering competition,

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 3>he says. And the chairman of CEO, Stia Nadella, sat

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 3>down with bringing Back Original's host Emily Chang, and.

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 4>They talked about just how it can help with maybe

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of drudgery and meetings.

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 7>Take a listen and everybody complains about meetings, but what

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 7>one should really complain about is not being prepared for meetings,

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 7>not paying attention in meetings, not remembering what happened in meetings.

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 7>The Meetings co Pilot helps keep the knowledge always front

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 7>and center for an organization. So the feature we are

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 7>launching is really this thing called.

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 11>Team core Pilot.

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 7>This Team core Pilot is going to be in the

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 7>meeting and everywhere your team is working on. For example,

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 7>if you're doing a project and you want project management assistant,

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 7>this team Copilot will help you and all your teammates.

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 7>It's kind of like having an AI teammate that helps

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 7>you well.

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 12>On that note, you know, for all of this to

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 12>really work, you've really got to trust your PC with

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 12>everything about you. Will it know you better than a

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 12>real assistant or a friend or a colleague.

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 4>And are we in relationship territory?

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a super important one, right, which is to me,

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 7>there are two things. One is how should one think

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 7>about privacy? How should one think about safety? And then

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 7>the third is how should we relate to AI?

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 4>All of these are important.

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 7>So let's take them even unpack them. Right on the

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 7>privacy side, that's why I think there are going to

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 7>be needs for real private information and whether it's in

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 7>the enterprise side where people say, don't train on my data.

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 7>That's the assurance we have for anybody in the cloud,

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 7>even or the new PCs we just launched yesterday, right,

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 7>which are all about keeping everything that you're doing on

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 7>the PC local. So that's on the privacy side. Safety

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 7>is another one, right, which is how do I make

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 7>sure that whatever I am doing is safe? You know,

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 7>I'm safe from adversarial attacks? And then the third is

0:24:56.560 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 7>the relationship side is I don't I believe of I

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 7>don't like anthropomorphizing AI. I sort of believe it's a tool.

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.479
<v Speaker 7>It has got intelligence if you want to give it that,

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 7>as you know, Moniker, But it's not the same intelligence

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 7>that I have, right, I think one of the most

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 7>unfortunate names is artificial intelligence.

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 4>It's a different I wish we would call it a.

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 7>Different intelligence, even because I have my intelligence. I don't

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 7>need any artificial intelligence. I just want my intelligence to

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 7>compose with this different intelligence so that I have more agency.

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Quite frankly, Microsoft Chairman CEO tier Nadella, there a blue

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 3>max Emily Chang. Now let's turn our attention to another

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 3>key company on the move and shares. Palo Alto Networks

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 3>have been under pressure. That is, the company telling us

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 3>where it's forecast is going. Fourth quarter revenue coming in

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 3>two point one five to two point one seven billion dollars.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Now we get a chance to talk through those forecasts

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 3>and where the direction of strategy is. When Nikeshiro is

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Paralo Alto Networks CEO and Nikesha's great to have some

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 3>time with you, and I thinkultimately the forecasts we used

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 3>to get the growth we have been used to of

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 3>revenue from palowel To Networks is what twenty thirty percent

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 3>year on year growth. We're now having to get more

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 3>used to potentially an eleven percent growth perspective, Is this

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 3>buyer fatigue for cyber not really?

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 2>First of all, Karen, thank you for having me here. Remember,

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 2>we are planning to deliver close to two billion dollars

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 2>of revenue in Q four. That makes us close to

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 2>an eight billion dollar company for the year and our

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 2>growth rates our forecast beteen ten and fifteen percent, So

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 2>there is no buyer fittigue in cybersecurity. We are the

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 2>first company to break the barrier and get to that

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 2>scale in cybersecurity, making us not to one hundred billion dollars.

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 11>In market cap.

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 2>So no, I think cybersecurity is a very robust market

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 2>from a demand perspective, and our teams are executing amazingly

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 2>around the world.

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about where therefore the robust among comes from

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 3>and what for You've talked a lot about ultimately sort

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 3>of being in everything, offering a platformization is what's necessarily

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 3>that's heard of the strategy, if I'm correct, the idea

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 3>that yes, you want to be able to ensure that

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 3>all parts are sophisticatedly protected, but how does that win

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 3>out versus what people have called sort of a best

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 3>in breed offering where you're focusing on one particular element

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 3>of cyber.

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the important way to think about it, Caroline,

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 2>is if you will take back fifteen twenty years ago,

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 2>we used to have a multitude of applications across an

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 2>enterprise which did customer management things. Today you don't think

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 2>about having fifteen different applications to manage your customers. You

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 2>either use Salesforce or Oracle or Microsoft Dynamics. You don't

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 2>use fourteen bestor breed applications to solve your customer problems.

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:35.479
<v Speaker 11>Take the problem in HR.

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 2>You use people systems, whether it's workday or others. So

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 2>you are getting to place where these concepts require integration

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 2>across these best bid capabilities. Otherwise, the owners of integration

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 2>goes on the customer, which means every customer has to

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 2>be able to take these best to breed, stitch them

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 2>together and create amazing security outcomes. On the other side,

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 2>you got bad actors who've changed their tactics. They can

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:59.479
<v Speaker 2>get in and out of your business in under an

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 2>hour and axtiltrat large amounts of data.

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's a.

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Problem that's stacked up against companies if they plan to

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 2>stitch this stuff together for years to come. That's why

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 2>we need to move towards and more integrated things that

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 2>work together and a more real time out from the

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 2>security strategy as opposed to the best to breed strategy

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 2>which has worked historically.

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 4>But with your shares.

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Under pressure, is the market understanding that is the market saying, okay,

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 3>I buy the platformization.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Well our shared We're done very well over the last

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 2>one year. I think these short term bumps are part

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 2>of the absorption by the market where the market needs

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 2>to go. We've done really well in the last five years.

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 2>We're done really well in the last one year. I

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 2>think the important part is to understand it is a very

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 2>strong demand market. We're executing amazingly. We are the largest

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 2>player in the market, and the number of conversation, a

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 2>number of platform deals we did this quarter far exceeded

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 2>any that we've done in history, which sets us in

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 2>the right direction to try and achieve a fifteen billion

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 2>dollar AR number, which we've targeted in the next few years.

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 2>So we think things are on track and we're executing.

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 4>You're likely AAR number.

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 3>There is a number in your metrics that you don't

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 3>like people really focusing on, and that's a billing forecast.

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 3>You say, look, it's volatile, and ultimately it's it's sort

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 3>of an artificial metric. But can you talk us through

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 3>that a little bit, because why is it artificial? You say,

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 3>it's due to payment terms changing. But it's a bit

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 3>worried about this billing forecast being the slowest since your IPO.

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think what happened is when we lived in

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 2>a zero interest rate and environment, people were willing to

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 2>pay you upfront for years of upcoming service. Today, CFOs

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 2>get involved a saying listen, I'll pay you when you

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 2>deliver service. You look at the companies your name, companies, Jurned,

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Arr business which are on an analyzed payment plan. There

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 2>they give you ar and annual values, and that seems

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 2>to work for us. People look at are you collecting

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 2>all the money upfront? So that's what billings is in

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 2>our view. The right number is RPO or remaining performance obligations.

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Our URPO grew at twenty three percent. We have a

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 2>leven point five billion dollars or the services we intend

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 2>to deliver to our customer over the next three years.

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 2>So that's an important metric. The growth is important because

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 2>that tells you how big your book of businesses that

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 2>is committed by your customers. That gives your truth understanding

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 2>of the strength of the business. I think buildings can

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 2>be a managed depending on when customers use to pay you,

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 2>So I think that becomes a less reliable metric, particularly

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 2>in a higher interest rate and environment where customers are

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 2>conscious about when they want to pay you.

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Is there need to be pressure on contract length going

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 3>forward though, and what does that say about enterprise's desire

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 3>to commit to cybersecurity protection.

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.239
<v Speaker 2>Actually things are in the opposite direction, Caroline, because if

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 2>you take along the contract you get price protection, and

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 2>in a higher interestate environment, you have the risk of

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 2>higher prices in the future. So actually you're seeing customers say,

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 2>guarantee me the price for longer because I don't want

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 2>to deal with inflationary impacts or price increases.

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 3>When you look at ultimately, what all the analysts are

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 3>saying rem versus your particular earnings, they really are saying

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 3>that this is a kneeja reaction. You got vital knowledge,

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 3>really saying the core fundamentals remain very healthy.

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 4>A lot of the.

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Analysts out there saying they believe in the leadership. Right now, Nakesh,

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 3>talk to us there for about what you believe in,

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 3>how artificial intelligence is changing your role as a leader

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 3>and changing the way in which we protect against cybersecurity.

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 3>We will talk about how much harder it's made life.

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 3>But has it really in terms of attacks?

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, Caroly, let me break that question in two parts. First,

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 2>in the last five years, our company has gone off

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 2>five times in value, so I think we've done really

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 2>well to our for our shareholders were willing to run

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 2>really well. From an execution perspective, we're you know, we're

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 2>one of the largest companies now, we have an evergreen portfolio,

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 2>like you mentioned, and we've brought the notion that large

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 2>cybersecurity companies can continue to innovate so our customers don't

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>have to. In that context, if we look at AI,

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 2>most recently we announced is ceries of AI security products

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 2>because the enthusiasm for AI, both on unfortunately the bad

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 2>actor side and the company's side is high. People want

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 2>to trial AI. You had a segment earlier. You know,

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing copilots being introduced, so everybody wants an AI buddy,

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 2>an AI assystem to make their lives more productive in

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 2>that environment, every company is raring to go out and

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 2>deploy that technology. You've got to be careful when you deployed.

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 2>It has to be secured by design. You have to

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 2>make sure these lms don't hallstenate. You have to make

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 2>sure nobody get inside, gets inside your LM, poisons it

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 2>with lots of data, and we're going to see a

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of those attempts because bad actors have also learned

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.959
<v Speaker 2>the technology. So it's very important to deliver AI in

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 2>such a way that it is secure for our customers

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 2>and their end customers. And we've already pioneered at our

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 2>essay most recently it comprehensive suite of products which we

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 2>intend to make available to all of our customers in

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 2>the next four weeks, which allows them to go down

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 2>this journey and be secured from the get go.

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Hello el to Network CEO Pikshu Or thanks to spending

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 3>some time with us on your latest results and indeed

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 3>the latest threats that you're trying to combat. I Meanwhile,

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 3>coming up, we're going to be hearing from the CEOs

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 3>of Dell and Nvidio, both of course, at the Dell

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 3>World Conference in Las Vegas, and they sat down with

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 3>their own.

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 4>And Ludloan and let's just check in on what Sodos

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 4>is doing.

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know them for speakers, Well, now they want

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 3>to get in your headphone space too.

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 4>The market they see.

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 3>For a four hundred and forty nine dollars device, it's

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 3>all part of their effort to basically go from home

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 3>speaker company to a broader maker, a consumer.

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 4>Tech nine tens five percent. This is to make technology.

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 3>The Dell World conference is still in full swing today

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 3>in Las Vegas and Ludlow He sat down yesterday with

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 3>some of the key note speakers, which included Dell chairman

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 3>and CEO Michael Dell an Nvidia CEO Jensen Juan take

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 3>a listen.

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 11>At Dell Technologies World.

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 13>We love to bring our customers and partners together and

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 13>talk about what's new and what's exciting. And you know,

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 13>this AI opportunity is really tremendous and we can never

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 13>do anything by ourselves, but this is a great example

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 13>of how you have an ecosystem of companies coming together

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 13>along with all these incredible innovations in GPUs and compute

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 13>storage and networking and the AI models and software companies

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 13>that are utilizing all this power and it's causing a

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 13>new industrial revolution.

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 14>There are five things that I would like to talk about,

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 14>the first being the relationship between the three of you

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 14>and your companies, how you work together. The second being

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 14>AI infrastructure, how durable. What's happening is AIPC. You know,

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 14>you've been talking about AIPC on social media for some time,

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 14>and officially of course as well US leadership. You know,

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 14>I reflect that I have three American CEOs that around me,

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 14>all pulling towards the same sort of goal. And finally,

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 14>increasingly people ask me to ask you about power and

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.479
<v Speaker 14>energy consumption and whether we should start talking about that.

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 14>But really, gentsen, the origin of this, and one of

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 14>the reasons I wanted to have the conversation was GtC.

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 14>I'm paraphrasing, but you said, basically, there is no one

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 14>better end to end systems at scale than Dell. You

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 14>basically said, if you want a server, you phone Michael Dell.

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 14>But why specifically, how is it that Nvidia interacts with

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 14>that part of Michael's business.

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 4>Well, this is a.

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 5>Really important time where we've re engineered and reinvented every

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 5>layer of computing from the chip, to the operating system,

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 5>to the system servers, to the way that these data

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 5>centers are put together. There's only one company in the

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 5>world that can have the ability to build the computing system,

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 5>the storage system, the networking system, all of the software

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 5>that goes along with it, and the path to the

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 5>world's enterprise. We want to bring this generative AI capability

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 5>to every company in the world, and some of them

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 5>can use it in the cloud, but many of the

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 5>applications still has to be done on prem and so

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 5>in order for us to bring them into the generative

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 5>AI revolution, we're going to have to go through a

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 5>partner that can help us take this completely new reinvention

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 5>of a computer, the data center, these AI factories and

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 5>help every customer have a you know.

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 14>Just remport Tensen. Yeah, on prem is back, just really quick,

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 14>yes or no?

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:07.240
<v Speaker 4>On prem never.

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:10.799
<v Speaker 5>Left, but on prem never left, but on prem is

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 5>on prem is you know, on Prem is cool.

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:19.399
<v Speaker 4>Again, as if it ever wasn't cool. We you thank him,

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 4>of course.

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 3>In video CEO Joseph Wang, it was Dell chairman and

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 3>CEO Michael Dell speaking, of course, along with their own

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 3>ed Ludlow and alongside the Service Now CEO Bill McDermott.

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 3>You probably caught a lot of it yesterday, but it

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 3>was a great interview. Meanwhile, let's just talk about AI

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 3>and the startups scene their scale. AI it's helping, of course,

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 3>top tech companies improve the data used to build a

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 3>eye products, basically to ensure that it's tagged in.

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 4>The right way.

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 3>It's roughly doubled its valuation to get this thirteen point

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 3>eight billion dollars and it's raising one billion in one

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 3>of the largest financing deals of the year. The round

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:55.760
<v Speaker 3>was led by Axcel, participation from mix of new corporate backers.

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 3>They're all the rage too now Amazon Meta Venture arms

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 3>from AMD Service Now and indeed Intel.

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, coming up.

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 3>We'd just been noting that Disney's saving some money. They're

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 3>continuing to do that with Pixar announcing layoffs to the

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 3>tune of some fourteen percent of the business.

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 4>Have all the details.

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Next, it's been going viral. Actress Scarlett Johansson said that

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:29.720
<v Speaker 3>she was quote forced to hire legal counsel to demand

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 3>the removal of an artificial intelligence voice for open AI's chatpot.

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 4>That sounded only like herself.

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 3>When most Rachel Metz joins us for more and basically

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 3>this is Sky and we already heard that maybe open

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 3>ai was pressing pause on the use of Sky.

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 15>Yeah. Absolutely so just the other day open Ai stopped

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.280
<v Speaker 15>using the voice at least for now, and users would

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 15>if they tried to use it within like the chat

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 15>GBT app, for instance, they would hear a different voice

0:37:57.880 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 15>called Juniper.

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 4>I do think it's And to remember.

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 15>These voices, and the Sky voice in particular, didn't just launch.

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 15>They actually launched last year in September, which Scarlett said

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:12.720
<v Speaker 15>is around when or is the same month when Sam

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 15>Martman reached out to her and asked her if she'd

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:19.399
<v Speaker 15>be interested in presenting one of these voices with her voice.

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 3>And she decided, after a lot of thought, apparently not

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 3>to provide her own voice.

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:26.439
<v Speaker 3>All of this, of course, goes back to the fact

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 3>that there was a movie years old now called Her,

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 3>where Joaquin Phoenix plays a part that falls in love

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 3>with an artificial intelligence well chatbot basically, who happens to

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 3>be voiced by Scarlett Johansson.

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 4>Interestingly, we saw Sam Altman just while the announcements of

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.240
<v Speaker 4>Chat GBT four oh were launched.

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 3>He put in a post just literally her, but he says, yeah,

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:51.760
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't based on Scarlett ju Hanson.

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I mean that's kind of tricky, right, I mean,

0:38:56.280 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 15>you're tweeting her and everybody knows what you mean by that,

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 15>and I guess you could say, oh, well, it is

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:05.799
<v Speaker 15>an homage, but it sounds like she didn't want any

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 15>part of it. So I think it's going to be

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 15>really interesting to sort of see what the next move is,

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 15>either from Open Ai or from Scarlet Johansson's camp. As

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.839
<v Speaker 15>far as what happens next, I mean, will this voice

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 15>come back? I don't know. It's another actress, but it

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 15>does sound quite a bit like her. I think a

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 15>lot of people would agree.

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 3>And to be sure, Open Ai've tried to make clear

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 3>how they found this voice, and it was found a

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 3>year ago through four hundred applications and they managed to

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:37.440
<v Speaker 3>find these five voices they eventually went with. But there

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 3>is another actress who just so happens to sound a

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 3>bit like Scotlettohnson, who now might not get paid for

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 3>the use of it within.

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 15>The app Yeah, I mean, I think we also need

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 15>to keep in mind that this is a real person's

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 15>voice that is being used to train a voice model,

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 15>So I have no way of knowing how much modification

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 15>has been done to the voice. You know, they would

0:39:57.280 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 15>have recorded probably quite a number of samples of this

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 15>person speaking, and then I'm not really sure what kind

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 15>of speaking they would have done to present the final

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 15>actual voice. So it's possible that there was some works

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 15>done there. Maybe they just need to change the voice

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 15>a little bit, Maybe they need to retire the voice.

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 15>Maybe they're going to say, you know what, this is

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 15>not her voice, so we're going to keep using it.

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 15>It'll be interesting to see what happens.

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, certainly it's highlighted that there are more voices on

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 3>chut ChiPT four, at least for many. Rachel Metz, we

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:32.360
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much for running us through what is

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 3>almost a bit of a celebrity story, but sticking with

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 3>content for a moment. Pixar, the pioneering animator that made

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 3>of course, toy story finding Nemo's cutting fourteen percent of

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 3>a staff as part of an ongoing cost cutting effort

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 3>with parent company Disney, finished Jollette here briefly for more

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:49.399
<v Speaker 3>and well, we'd anticipated that we would see cuts here.

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:53.840
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I mean, this is part of Bob Iger's broader

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 16>term to bring down costs at Disney Pixar, you know,

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 16>for years couldn't do anything wrong, just had hit after

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.879
<v Speaker 16>hit after hit. During the pandemic, they released a couple

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 16>of movies right to the streaming service. You know, their

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 16>last couple Elemental was not a big hit.

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Light Year was not a big hit.

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 16>So this has kind of been an expector for a while.

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:16.760
<v Speaker 16>They also at some point switched to you know, envisioning

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 16>doing more TV production for the streaming service, and now

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 16>they've basically decided we're going to go back to just

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 16>making movies.

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 4>So it's related to that.

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Also, is there anyway and briefly we could say that

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 3>AI is going to be doing it.

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 16>I mean, I'm sure that AI will be part of

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 16>the mix. That's not what they're crediting these cuts to.

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 16>At this point, they are pointing to the shift back

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 16>to movie production. And again there's been you know, Bob

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 16>Ayer's been looking for you know, something like eight billion

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 16>dollars worth of cuts all across Disney. So this has

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 16>been just the latest of multiple waves of people losing

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 16>their jobs.

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Felix Shudette, thank you for running us through it with Disney. Meanwhile,

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.279
<v Speaker 3>that does it for this edition of Blue meg Technology.

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget to check out the podcast. You can find

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 3>it on the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify, iHeart,

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:05.240
<v Speaker 3>wherever you get your information.

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg