WEBVTT - Five Things About the 2023 PGA Championship with Ryan Lavner

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my ball in.

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>A bride egg, Frida egg, the dreaded Frida egg, Frida Egg,

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>bride egg.

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Lie, I'm about ready to run off the golf course.

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to another edition of the Frida Egg Podcast.

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Today's episode is with Ryan Laughner. Ryan works at Golf Channel.

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 3>You've seen his writing, he's been there for a while.

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 3>He's uh, he's a writer. He's on air, he's on

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 3>live from will be prominently featured in the upcoming NCAA

0:00:54.440 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Championship telecast, the National Championships for men's and women's golf,

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 3>and he will be on the ground at Oak Hill

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 3>as well as he does podcasts. He's got the Golf

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 3>Channel podcast with Rex and Lav, so he came on

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 3>to talk do our Five Things podcast with about the

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 3>PGA and Okill. I thought it was a fantastic conversation,

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 3>but I'm obviously biased. You guys can listen, but I

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 3>was really excited to talk to him. He is a

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Western New York native, so he's going a bit of

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 3>a homecoming and really excited to just talk okill in

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the PGA.

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 3>It's awesome that our second major's here. And without further ado,

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 3>here is Ryan Lavner. I'm excited to be joined here

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 3>by one of the I can I call you a

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 3>founding resident of Nakty No?

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>No, oh, you certainly can't. Like it was definitely established

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>before I moved here.

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 2>When was it established? What year?

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Probably a decade or so ago. I

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>think it was just a swamp, Like we're three miles

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>from the ocean, so yeah, I think it was a

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>swamp until it was inhabited ten fifteen years ago.

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 2>And then somebody had a dream of turning into town.

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, turning it into like the Truman Show, and now

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it's and now it's and I was just flourishing.

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 3>So you're a little town there, South Panavidra. You can

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 3>you could just do. You can ride a golf cart around.

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like a wonderful place. The most is it

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 3>would you make an argument that it's the most convenient

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 3>town in America.

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Most convenient town certainly where I'm located. Like, if you've

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>ever been to TVC Sawgrass, we're like fifteen minutes from there.

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And if you're coming from ninety five, you probably went

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>on this road called two ten and you drive past

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>its Publix, and so it's like downtown Nakati. I live

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>walking distance from that public so like I never get

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in the car unless I'm driving to like home, depot

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>or target or something like that. Otherwise I'm just like

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>cruising around in my golf cart. Like it's a great,

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>great place to raise kids.

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 2>You can and then you can take your kids to

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 2>school in the golf cart.

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, daycare is literally a block and a half away.

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable. I was running late. I was running late

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and just like Floorida and was there in twelve seconds.

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 3>That's my hometown. I'm close. I'm close to downtown and

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 3>I can walk. I rarely get in my car when

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm home. It's like once you know, I have to

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 3>be venturing out somewhere to get to get in the car.

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 2>I can do every task. It's so underrated.

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's such an inconvenience having to get into

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the car. Like I had to start my car recently

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.839
<v Speaker 1>to like make sure it still works. Like I never

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>ever fill up.

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing, wonderful.

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 3>One way one way to to say, you know to

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 3>to reduce your emissions, your your gas emissions.

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just next year, next year's Players Championship. You're coming over.

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll grow out in the backyard. I'll take you to

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the water park. I'll get you a three dollars beer.

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>We can get some chicken tenders at food. There's a

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of hard time. Yes, we live a half mile

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>from a water park. Two of them, not just one.

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Two of them like legit designed by like the Disney engineers.

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>But they're so legit.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 2>All right, Ryan, you're on When do you head up

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 2>to Rochester?

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 1>I fly on Monday morning. So although Nakati is my

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>current home, Rochester, New York is my old home. My

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>dad lives about three miles from there. I grew up

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in Canadagua, which is one of the Finger Lakes, about

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes south of Oak Hill. So this is a

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>much anticipated home game for me, to be honest.

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.559
<v Speaker 2>Ah, that's delightful. You stay in with your dad.

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I am staying with my dad.

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 2>What a wonderful week for you. I had.

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I know I needed to secure one of those parking

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>passes where I can actually park on property, and I

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>have to go through the rerouting that I think every

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>other meat member is going to have.

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 3>What's your what's your favorite part of that area? Give

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.559
<v Speaker 3>us a little bit of a insight here. I didn't

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 3>plan this, but I would love you know some Upstate

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 3>New York. Uh, you know what, what's the best part

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 3>about Upstate New York.

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>First of all, it's Western New York.

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Western.

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. We take actually great exception when people say it's upstate.

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Could it be western slash upstate?

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It couldn't. It could Nope, Okay, most it most certainly

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>could not. I love it. I miss it. Obviously. The

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>best part is the seasons, and now living in Florida,

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that's that's kind of been eliminated for the most part.

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's nothing better than than fall golf. That's

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>when we played our high school golf with you know,

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the leaves falling and you're putting on pullovers and pants

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's just a great time to be up there.

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Football games I miss like August to October working at

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the golf course, like yeah, obviously, the winters, the winter suck.

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>We lived near Bristol Mount which was a ski resort,

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so that was something fun to do. But like the

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>spring's pretty miserable, and that's why I'm like, I'm super

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>curious to get up there. And I looked at a

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>long rage forecast, like I was kind of hoping that

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we were going to get the typical Western New York weather,

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 1>like you know, where it's eighty five one day and

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>then it's forty five and like possible sleep the next.

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look like we're gonna get that, which somewhat disappointing.

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, it looks like sixty five degrees and like

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>partly cloudy, Like that is not the That is not

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the Western New York that I remember. Like I remember

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.239
<v Speaker 1>pitching a high school game early June, so like the seasons,

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it was the same for you in Chicago,

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>like your school year goes into June. Like I was

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>pitching and my fingers were bleeding because the laces were

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>so firm and so sharp from the cold, Like that's

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>just kind of what I was used to it. I

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's not gonna be the same if it's

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>just like sixty five and pleasant, Like what is that nonsense?

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Also, like for since really since the PGA moved to May,

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 3>how many years ago was that like almost like five

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 3>now four, so.

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it was. I think oak Hill was was

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>awarded this PGA in twenty fifteen, and then either a

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>year or two later is when they're like, oh yeah,

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we move move this thing from August

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to May. Good luck.

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 3>So you know, it's been like the most fun little

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 3>story to bat around every just like in passing, like

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 3>every you know, every few months. Oh yeah that May

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 3>major in Rochester, New York. And of course now we

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 3>get here and it's pretty nice weather, and I think

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 3>the springs beender. I'm in Chicago right now and I'm

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 3>just shocked at how many leaves are on the trees.

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 3>So I'm guessing something similar there. Like you know, I

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 3>remember I was there. I was there last fall and

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.559
<v Speaker 3>I was asking, you know, some of the oak Hill staff.

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 3>I was like, how are we feeling on trees? They're like, oh,

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 3>they're they're gonna be bear. They're gonna be bear. But

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 3>I think they're actually gonna have some foliage, which should

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 3>help a ton with the with the coverage.

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:58.559
<v Speaker 2>Is there is there a meal?

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Is there a restaurant that you where you're anticipating, eagerly

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 3>excited to return to at home or is it mostly

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 3>just going to be hanging out at the house.

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a lot of it's gonna be hanging

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>out with the house. I haven't seen my parents all

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that much since, unfortunately, since I went to school. I

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>will say we're going to dinosaur barbecue on Monday when

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I first get in, like Rex Hoggard and I March

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>label from ESPN, my dad, my step moomb We're going

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to go out to barbecues. I think that'll be great.

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 1>And then the rocks that's in the rock. Yeah, it's

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen minutes from Oak Hill. And then I've actually

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>made the mistake before Andy of getting what's called a

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>garbage plate.

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Before I barbecue.

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no, this is this is different. So

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a separate entity. Getting a garbage plate, which

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is pretty famous in Western New York. It's like everything

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that you could possibly imagine on one plate. There's like

0:08:55.360 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>hot dogs, hamburgers, mac and cheese just like all thrown

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 1>on this one plate. And I made the mistake of

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>hopping on a flight about an hour and a half

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>after I had one. It was pretty epic adventures. So

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna have to duplicate that just for

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>just for some hashtag content.

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 3>So so you're gonna get a garbage plate that sounds,

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, sounds like an eight year old's dream.

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 2>A garbage plate.

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty, it's pretty popular, it's pretty grotesque. But I

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>think anyone who who visits visits that area will have

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to snag one.

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, I think I think there should be

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 3>a challenge to some you know, willing golf journalists to

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 3>find the best garbage plate. It seems like something you

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 3>might find at golf dot com nowadays. I go over

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 3>that website and I find like, hey, here's a great

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 3>guacamole recipe. I'm like, oh, that's that's what I was

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 3>looking for.

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna have to text Claire Rogers and be like,

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, I want to see like a garbage plate challenge.

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Let's go Yeah, all right, let's uh, let's do our

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 3>our ceremonial five things here. I you know, I again,

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Hey is my guest here. You have to come up

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 3>with five things. I came up with five.

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Things, very very very unique format.

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, it's the it's the I thought long

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 3>and hard about it. I'm glad I was able to

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 3>innovate in the space and come up with a five

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 3>story lines podcast.

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>It was a great honor of mine.

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>We're actually we're gonna count this down in like true TV.

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>You're te guys, right, so this is good.

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>You know the TV guy when they're desperate to be

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>very clear.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Oh, don't sell yourself short. You got that CIA's coming up.

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 3>That's that's usually your time to shine.

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I do events double as up coming up. I had

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to had to beg my way back into the coverage

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>very much looking forward to get into Greyhawk for the

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>final time where I can stop getting a sock tand

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>like it's so freaking hot on that set that like

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>my ankles get burned. So the La Costa, La Costa

0:10:58.160 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>here we come, twenty twenty four.

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 3>You'll be in uh, you'll be in Arizona to see

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Illinois first national championship in golf.

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited for you.

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>That'd be wonderful. I mean the storylines are a plenty,

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>like the like the individual racist year is is insane,

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna begin lud big Ayberg's march towards the

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Roder Cup twenty twenty three. He would come at ntaa's.

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get into it. What's it? What's your

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 2>number five?

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 3>I didn't really, I didn't number them, so mine are

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 3>gonna be all out of order. But I love that

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 3>you've got a countdown, So you're your number five.

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh for for number five? For me, Andy and I

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're gonna be outdated on this when this

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>comes out on Sunday. But for me, the fifth biggest

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>storyline is jordan' Speed's injury, Like is he going to play?

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>How severe is the is the ailment that he's dealing with?

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I was. I was super alarmed when he put

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>out that tweet on Monday of Nelson Week. Like he

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't say that he had discomfort, He didn't say that

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>he had no bagging pain. He said like quote severe

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>pain in my left for rists. So there's so many

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>alarm bellows that go off. It's not just the left

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for rists, it's the use of the word severe. It's

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he said that he's weak to week.

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I made the point with Rex earlier this week, like

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you can miss time in October, you could miss time

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>in January, Like this is just a dreadful period in

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>the golf calendar to be suffering something like this, right,

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to let it one hundred percent heal, And

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>so I'd be really surprised if we see Jordan Speed

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>tieda this week at Okhall, which I think is a shame.

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's playing the best golf he has since

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>since twenty seventeen. He hasn't had the greatest history at

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Championship, and so just to kind of have

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity missed, most likely in the prime of his

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>athletic careers is certainly is certainly disappointing from a golf

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>fans perspective.

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, obviously, you know the career Grand Slam is the spot.

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Okill was really a great spot for him.

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 3>But he's playing really good golf, and risk injuries are

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 3>terrifying for a golfer like that is I mean, when

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 3>you talk about what are the worst injuries a golfer

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 3>can have, like I think wrist and hand can risk

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 3>is like right there with back. Right, So in terms

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 3>of this, and you know, you know that it has

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 3>to be pretty serious. Outside of the majors, the players

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 3>like the events that Jordan Speces least likely to miss

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Are the two at and T events.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Right, obviously his biggest, biggest sponsor outside of under Armour

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 3>and uh a big PGA Tour sponsor. So those are

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 3>the events that he is locked in for his hometown

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 3>at and T event and uh and so yeah, I agree,

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 3>this is a terrible time to have an injury.

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Why is why is? Why is okill not a great

0:13:58.320 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>course for him?

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 3>I just I think it's gonna skew power. I think

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna skew I think it's I don't think it's

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 3>gonna be full Beth Page, but I think it's gonna

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 3>skew that way.

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 2>You know T three, Jordan's.

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Beef T three at the Beth Page pg A.

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 2>That's it's the most it's the most irrelevant T three, And.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was he was like nine back, but hey,

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it looks it looks good on Wikipedia.

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Nine back and he's five years later. He had like

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 3>a historic puttig week. It was like one of the

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 3>one of the greatest putting Major Championships weeks of all time,

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 3>and like, you have a great putty week and you

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 3>still are nine back or whatever he ended up. It's

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 3>uh so, anyways, I think it's gonna skew a little

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 3>bit bomber just with uh.

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 2>This was one of my things, so I can just

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 2>roll right into it.

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it number five or is it?

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not number five. I don't know what it is. See.

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 3>It was the first thing that I wrote down, just

0:14:58.200 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 3>because that's usually where my brain go.

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Two.

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 2>It is golf course.

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna we're seeing early videos. I've got

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 3>some insight from the ground from somebody very intimate with

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 3>the grounds at Oak Hill that the rough is is

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 3>very lush, which I think was like.

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>It's been great growing conditions. Andy, it's been warm, it's

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>been warm, and now it's been wet for the past

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks.

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 3>I think that was the biggest concern with this, with

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 3>hosting at this time of year, was like, how are

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 3>you gonna how's the grass gonna be? And it seems

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 3>like they've had a great, great uh spring.

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 2>So the rough is super lush.

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 3>It's like super thick grass, Like the actual grass is

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 3>really thick.

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 2>It's a thick strain of grass.

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 3>So I think we're gonna see, you know, with these

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 3>narrow fairways that can't in different directions, Like it's just

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 3>gonna be really hard to hit fairaways. And when that happens,

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 3>it it becomes who can hit it the furthest up

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 3>and there's some elevated greens out there, so that's the

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 3>other thing. You have to hit it high and are

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 3>and so you start to look at it, it's you know,

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 3>I think you're you're starting the field of who's going

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 3>to contend shrinks down to ten fifteen players.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting because that was my number four was the

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>golf course. I remember playing it, you know, back in

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>high school. It seemed kind of forgettable, Like every there

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>was just so many trees I didn't like like being

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like Harbor Town right where you can

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>be in the fairway, but but you can be blocked out,

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and that was that was certainly frustrating. I didn't find

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it particularly memorable, at least for vast stretches of the

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>golf course. You guys an amazing job, but I would

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I would strongly encourage anyone who hasn't checked it out

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to see the history of Oak Hill and kind of

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>what they've done with the restoration. Like I'm super excited

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to see how this golf course plays now after the restoration.

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Going back to the Donald Ross greens like you guys

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>illustrated so well, like the bunker shaping is so dramatic.

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Like I think, I don't think this is going to

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 1>be a pushover by any stretch of the imagination. Like

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're going to see those the very

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>low scoring PG championships that we've seen in the past.

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Okill typically plays tough and with the density of the

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>rough like you talked about, like, yeah, you've got to

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>have this thing on an absolute rope. And so if

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, if you need a guy who hits

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.719
<v Speaker 1>it far, hits it high, is able to stop it

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on firm greens like who Who's players to you that

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that fit that profile as well as you know currently.

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Informed twenty twenty Bryson.

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>He was he was too erratic.

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 3>I think I think it's gonna be about like hitting

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 3>it far. It's gonna be a big thing. But you

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 3>obviously automatically go to that Beth page like Brooks DJ.

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 3>I think rom obviously I thinks just like brawny, big

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 3>burly dudes, I think will be a good one, you know,

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 3>like the I always say, like the thing about Shuffler

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 3>is if you're really good at everything.

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Every course is a fit, right.

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the things to watch, like, I

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 3>think you hit the nail on the head with scoring.

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 3>If we're going to just talk about the course a

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 3>little bit here, and I think, like I was thinking

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>about this, it's like four to six is probably gonna

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 3>be the winning score if I had to guess.

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Stuff was like, I think ten and that was the

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:27.479
<v Speaker 1>lowest score ever. It'll kill if I'm not mistaken. Obviously

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that was in August. Yeah, I was thinking like eight.

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Ish, I get yeah, I could see eight. Eight would

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 3>be I think on the on the upper end. Obviously,

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 3>PGAs tend to be around saddy, you know. I think

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.239
<v Speaker 3>the the thing is like what I'm really curious too

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 3>about is like morning versus afternoon wave because I think

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 3>it'll be consistent looking at the weather, but like the morning,

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be cold, and the balls just.

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Not gonna be go forties. Yeah, the forties in the mornings.

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 3>And the ball doesn't go anywhere in that out there

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 3>at that time of year when it's cold like by this,

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 3>even if it's like sixty five, you get that kind

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 3>of spring cool air breeze and the ball's it's gonna

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 3>play so long.

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious with the club.

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the things where you could have

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 3>a higher end of scores, like the higher range, like

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 3>where you get to the eights, the nines, the tens

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 3>is if they're like very conscientious of the uh of

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 3>the club pros and they set it up a lot

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 3>shorter because there are some te's. It's nuts how far

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 3>back some of these teas are, like you're you know

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 3>thirteen the par five with the Hill of Fame.

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 2>That thing can play so long.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 3>I think it's like six six hundred plus for the

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 3>back te You know, you have these par threes on

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 3>three and couplets, aren't there three and eleven? I think

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 3>once two thirty, once two forty five. It's like those

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 3>are just beasts of holes. I mean remember remember the

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 3>guy I forgot his name maybe it was last name,

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 3>was Haul at the at the the PGA pro who

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 3>was like sixty five at Harding Park, who was hitting

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 3>driver three wood.

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>You think we're gonna see a repeat?

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean like one of these.

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 3>And so I think that they have to be somewhat

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 3>conscientious of of the PGA pros, right, And that's where

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 3>you could get a little bit.

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's one hundred and fifty six guys the daylight,

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.199
<v Speaker 1>like they're not they're not fully stretched out yet like

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>big long golf course. You gotta get them all around. Like, yeah,

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>I could see them. I could see them being gentler,

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>I guess over the first two days and then just

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely putting the screws to them on the weekend. I

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's custom right for the PGA to not cut

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the rough after Monday, Monday or Tuesday, so I could

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly see that being the case.

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 3>So h that's golf course talk. Was that your number

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 3>four was the golf course?

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>It was those my number four. Look at this, which

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I probably if it if it wasn't the Friday podcast,

0:20:58.400 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure i'd have the golf course down. But

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>like I watched the video and I got I got

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>super Jazz to be at oak Kill next week.

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 3>I think, like what you said, just to kind of

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 3>close this, like what you said about playing in No

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 3>for I do think like the restoration has done a

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 3>wonderful job of like you're gonna have a much more

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 3>memorable course. Yeah, because like you said, like when you

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 3>have just like trees everywhere for eighteen holes. They all

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 3>feel the same because it's like now they have just

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 3>really great I mean the trees out there are majestic.

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Those oak trees, they really are.

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I hope, like I think actually, like personally I'm

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 3>in a place right now where like the oak trees

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 3>are budding. It's more I think that are the most

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 3>beautiful at that time and in late fall, so you

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 3>could they could look really cool with just like the

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 3>buds and everything and give you a little bit more

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 3>sight lines there. They're gorgeous trees and I think there's

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 3>some it's opened up some of the really nice topography

0:21:58.520 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 3>at the place.

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Get like what was the memorable line in the video,

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>like they planted more than thirty thousand? He lost count

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>after thirty thousand trees? And how many? How many did

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you did you remove the right number?

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Like yeah, he I don't. I don't think they did

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>anything by just happenstance or guesswork.

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Garrett cut out the history and went on about the

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 3>trees Fred Belts and he said he said he was

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 3>like he lost count at thirty thousand, and the estimate

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 3>is that he planted seventy thousand.

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Which is just outrageous, like you could lose, you could

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>lose five hundred, you could lose a thousand.

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 4>And not even notice. Well, the thing about it, I'm

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 4>looking forward to getting up there. He grew He grew

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 4>them in coffee cans. Where did he get seventy thousand

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 4>coffee cans?

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't Folger's headquartered around there?

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Was he just bulk ordering coffee?

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Can't if you guys want, if you guys wanted to

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>do Big Jay journalism, you would have asked, this would

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>have been this should have been like an extra segment.

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Well you can ask.

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Now there could be a story on Golf Channel where

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 3>he got all the all the all the coffee cans.

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 2>I think people would love to hear that.

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly whould run it.

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 3>Now for a quick word from our sponsor, Club Champion.

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Club Champion is is the way I get new golf

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 3>clubs outside of rummaging around finding retro sets. The way

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 3>I get new golf clubs is via Club Champion. I

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 3>have my fitting set. I'm sure I've talked about this

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 3>in the ad reason in the past.

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm so excited.

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I have my fitting set for Wednesday this week. I'm

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 3>gonna go get fit, and it's pretty cool. They sent

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 3>me an email a little questionnaire from the location from

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 3>the guy that's doing my fitting, asking me about goals

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 3>and different things. That's the kind kind of the personal

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 3>touch that you get from Club Champion.

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 2>On top of.

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 3>The great stuff that they offer, which is like every

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 3>major manufacturer, every major shaft, you are able to test

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 3>drive everything and find the exact type of clubs that

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 3>are going to work best for you. They have state

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 3>of the art fitting technology, state of the the best

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 3>fitters in golf, and what they're going to do is

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 3>get you really dialed in. You're going to gain yardage,

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 3>You're probably going to tighten up your dispersion from getting

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 3>fit by Club Champion. So if you use the promo

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 3>code fried Egg, you will get fifty percent off your

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 3>fitting costs with the purchase of a club. So if

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 3>you if you go get fit, you'll get fifty percent

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 3>off you're fitting when you purchase a club. One thing

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 3>I would actually recommend if you're like really trying to

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 3>get better, something that you don't get fit very often

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 3>that could make a big difference is wedges. That's something

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 3>that people don't think about, but getting your wedges dialed in.

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 3>If you can pick up, like, you know, a couple

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 3>feet of you know, dispersion tightness with your wedges and

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 3>you can be a little bit more consistent with distance control,

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 3>that's gonna make like a massive impact on your game.

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 3>So that's something I would I would check out and

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.479
<v Speaker 3>thank you to Club Champion for their ongoing support. And uh,

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 3>next time you hear from me about Club Champion, you'll

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 3>probably be hearing about my new sticks. So I'm excited.

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 3>And now back to Ryan Lavner. All right, here's my

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 3>number four. I'm talking about a couple of major list guys,

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Xander and Can't.

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I did some research. I was just curious.

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 3>I was like, these guys have been in the top

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 3>ten for a really long time, like perennial top ten players.

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 3>So I looked at number of weeks in the top ten.

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 3>So Xander's got one hundred and eighty seven weeks. Can't

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Lee's got one hundred and eighty five. They're obviously best friends.

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of humorous to me that they're like that

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 3>close in weeks in the top ten. Off the bat

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 3>it's almost four years. Yeah, it's an insane number. So

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 3>they've spent one hundred and eighty seven, one hundred and

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 3>eighty five weeks in the top ten. That's thirty ninth

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 3>and forty first all time. Obviously, the OWGR I think

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 3>started in eighty six about then, So thirty nine and

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 3>forty first pretty crazy, like that high already in weeks

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 3>in the top ten. By you know, by the end

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 3>of the year, they'll be up to like thirty four

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 3>and thirty six in they're four and five. They aren't

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 3>falling out of the top ten this year, so they're

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 3>gonna just keep going up.

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 2>So active players that are ahead of.

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 3>Xander and Cantley are Phil Rory Sergio, Adam Scott, DJ

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Westy Stenson, J t rom Day, Speith, Donald Luke, Donald Fowler,

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 3>and Bubba Watson all right. Of the people ahead of

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 3>them that have not won a major, there's only six

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 3>guys Monty Westy, Steve Stricker, Luke, Donald, Ricky Fowler, and

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:13.479
<v Speaker 3>Jumbo Ozaki.

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 2>And that nuts.

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>So what you're saying is there in rarefied air and

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have much to show for.

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 3>It, exactly Like so much like these guys need to

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 3>be talked. They're they're entering that like you know it

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 3>doesn't feel like it. But they're entering the greatest player

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 3>to never win a major?

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Discussion, Ah, they're probably they're probably a dozen or two

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>wins behind behind you know, Westy for that discussion, But

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I see where you're going.

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 3>Like we've been in this era of like I felt

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 3>like for a while, like once Ricky fell off, we

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 3>lost and Westy you know, got old. For a couple

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 3>of years, we've had not a lot of discourse around, hey,

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 3>who's the great player that hasn't won a major because

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 3>they're too young? But can't Lay and Xander at this

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 3>point cannot be. They are, without a doubt, in the

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 3>in the crosshairs of this.

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the difference though, is Xander and Can't Lay

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially have been out there for five years, right Like

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Xander didn't didn't break out on tour until the twenty

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 1>seventeen US Open at Aaron Hills, and Can't Lay Can't

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>was the exact same effect, Like he missed. He missed

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>three years because of a debilipating, abilitating back injury. Didn't

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>know if he was going to be fine. So they've

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>had five opportunities. He's five years of opportunities, which is

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty majors. Like, that's not a it's not a huge

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>sample size to get it done, particularly when you still had,

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the emergence of other place. I'm with you,

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I've picked Xander to win a major at least

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>one per year over the last four years, and he

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>hasn't gotten it done. They're they're you look statistically like

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>they're they're basically the same prototype player. Like obviously Xander

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>is is longer than Patrick is, but like they do

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>everything well. Yes, Like there's no there's no weaknesses in

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>their game. Now Scotty is a tick better, Like we

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about Scotty being a really complete all round player,

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Like Scotty's.

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Is better.

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, exactly. But like these guys are way too

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>consistent across the board to not have given themselves more

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to get it done. I mean, what was their

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>best what was the best chance? I think back Xander

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that USTI yeah, Xander twenty nineteen masters. Can't they had

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a chance there too, Like they really haven't gotten their

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>heartbroken all that many times, which I think is even

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>more frustrating that they haven't, Like they haven't been squarely

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in the mix with a couple holes to go.

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm I'm intrigued.

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 2>What's your next thing?

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I've lost track. I do have John Rahm

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>written down because because we have not talked about the

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>world number one in like genuine world beater.

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 3>See I didn't put him on my pretty story to

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 3>because how was he?

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 2>How was he not have him?

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 3>I need if you weren't, if you were, if you

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 3>didn't have him, I would have plugged him bin and

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 3>just brought him up, you know, as one of my

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 3>last ones.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I would have kicked out one of my other ones.

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 3>See this is a hotel enough. But like, you can't

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 3>not talk about him right.

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Like, so I find him really hard to write and

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about. I think his I think his upbringing is

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is super interesting, like with the with the club foot

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and then the transition to college golf was obviously very interesting,

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:40.719
<v Speaker 1>not knowing a lick of English, and now I'd put

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>him as as perhaps the most eloquent player on the

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour. But I find him hard to write about

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>now because over the past four or five years, like

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just been a linear trajectory to get to this point,

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Like there hasn't been much adversity, like the the the

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>issues that he had a year ago was like moving

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>into a new house and and kind of dealing with

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the with with the fatherhood and now Kelly's pregnant again.

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Like that's that's kind of the challenges that he has had.

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>But he's such unexceptional golfer that it's but I but

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't find him resonating yet well like the general

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>with the general public, which is unfathomable to me. Like

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I find him super interesting as a player, Like if

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I was if I was a golf fan who's going

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>out to Oak Hill, like he would easily be a

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>top three guy that I wanted to watch, just because

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>like seeing him he's seeing him hit a power fade

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is is like one of the best sights in golf,

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>right and and obviously the passion flows through him, the

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>energy flows through him. I find him compelling. But but man,

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>he's he's he's tough to he's tough to write about

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>because he's just so damn good and he just wants

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it so damn much.

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that's like the challenging thing that like one

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 3>of the things that makes golf so j fun sport

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 3>to watch, as everybody has weaknesses and everybody has these

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 3>like holes and things to overcome, Like what he.

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't have frailties. There's like no frailties in John Rock exactly.

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just like a relentless force.

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 3>And I'm I'm curious with this year and what he's

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 3>putting together. Does the discourse start to become easier when

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 3>he as he keeps winning, like he's in this weird

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 3>in between spot where he's having historic year. But you

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 3>could make a comp to another player. But if he

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:39.959
<v Speaker 3>gets to eight nine wins this year, which is in

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 3>the realm of possibilities, it's you know, which is crazy

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 3>to say that, but it's in the realm of possibilities,

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 3>he could win three more times, right, Yeah, Then all

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden you get into where does this year

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 3>rank all time? And it's in the VJ you know,

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Tiger Woods level of discourse, right, And I think that's

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 3>where he gets easier to write if he gets another major,

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 3>like if he wins this or LACC if he gets

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 3>the three majors all of a sudden, I don't think

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 3>because Tiger Tiger, for all of his thing, he was

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 3>never I don't think he's probably similar in the sense

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 3>of like there wasn't that much interesting stuff to write

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 3>about Tiger until it became like this is history.

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he needed to be like so overwhelmingly dominant that

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that was that that was the story. If it's if

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's if it's Rom winning five times and Scotty winning

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>four times, then Rory, you know, picking up two or

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>three on his own, Like it's hard to it's hard

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to separate those sorts of personalities in storylines. But if

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>he drops seven, eight, nine wins that then yeah, you're

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about a historic year.

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 3>So the other thing is like if Scotty picks this

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 3>one off, right, then all of a sudden, Rom and

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Scotty both become I think I have struggle the same

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 3>way with Scotty, right, Like there's there's not a ton

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 3>to talk about outside of like he's really freaking good.

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's not like dynamic as a personality. I

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 3>think he's underratedly funny. I think he's got like some

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.799
<v Speaker 3>you know, very interesting aspects of his personal life that

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 3>with golf and how how it relates to a sport

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 3>that's like so brutal on your mental side of the game.

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 3>But the thing with Scotty, I think Scotty and Rom

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 3>almost need each other because that's I think Scotty and

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Ram have you know, and Rory I would put in

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:35.879
<v Speaker 3>the same bucket. I think those are I think those

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 3>three guys probably only think about the other two guys

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 3>really when they think about like there, I think those

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 3>guys are the clear a different echelon of play.

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you if if if you beat Scotty

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and Rory in a tournament, there's a very good opera,

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a very good probability that you're that you're gonna

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:55.959
<v Speaker 1>win it, right.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or Rom for that matter.

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 3>So like those three guys when you put I think

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 3>like Rory's obviously hasn't played great the last ten weeks,

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.399
<v Speaker 3>but that's the way golf works, right, you go through

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 3>dry spells and heat heaters. Right, So with that, like

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 3>those three guys are have like a really interesting ability

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 3>to elevate a sport that has been void of like

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 3>true stardom. Like how many big threes have we had

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:29.240
<v Speaker 3>in the last eight years, Like remember the the Rory

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 3>DJ Ricky Speith big four, you know, so we've had.

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>These, but Brooks was in there, JT was in there.

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 3>So we have like these two guys, especially Scotty and

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 3>and rom are having have the potential to have like

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 3>the greatest two player year in a really long time

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 3>from like really since like I mean Speath and Day

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 3>and at Whistling Straits and Chambers that was like a

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 3>great year of two guys, right, But these guys, if

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 3>they pick off multiple majors, I think they're in that

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 3>class because of what they've done already on the PGA

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Tour in big time events.

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And like we haven't seen a player win the first

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>two majors of the year since since Speef doing the

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 1>double dip back in twenty fifteen. Like I would put

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>John Rams as the favorite obviously for this week at

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Oak Hill. He's had two weeks off now, right after Mexico.

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Like and to your point about looking at a potentially

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>historic year, like had he been able to chase down

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Tony Fee now it hadn't been done since I think

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy four of win that many times before the

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:39.720
<v Speaker 1>calendar turns to May, Like this is this is absolutely

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>crazy stuff. And so let's let's say, let's let's look

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 1>at Chris, but let's say John Rahm win's it ok

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.399
<v Speaker 1>kill first in eight years to win the first two

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>majors of the year, like US Open traditionally has been

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>his best major championship. Okay, then you turn the page

0:36:55.480 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to Open Championship, Like he has a great history links

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 1>golf courses. He has all the shots. Uh, there's there's

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:06.840
<v Speaker 1>no like. The way that he drives the ball is

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>putting him in great position. His his short game is

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it certainly can be Sevey esque at times, like boy,

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Like the conversation really changes if John rom wins at okill,

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Scott he's going to factor prominently in that

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:23.760
<v Speaker 1>right and like we'll get to that, but but he's

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>he's the favorite, and if he wins it, like wow,

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the temperature just got turned up.

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean I thought it was like clear as day

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 3>from the first tournament that he teed it up on

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 3>the PGA Tour that he was going to be a

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 3>great player, just because.

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember talking. I remember talking to Tim Michelson. This

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:45.800
<v Speaker 1>was the Oregon inc Double. Is that twenty sixteen.

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was like that was the NCAA's that Illinois

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:50.800
<v Speaker 3>got completely robbed, completely jobbed.

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's what that's what everyone remembers from that. But Tim,

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Tim Michelson John Ram's college coach told me that that

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>John Ram is essentially Phil Mickelson, but a better driver

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of the golf ball. And so you look at Phil's

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>skill set, which is otherworldly. You look at Phil's career,

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>which you know, it's already legendary when of the top

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>ten all time had tigered up in there, like god knows,

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 1>who knows what he could have accomplished, Like that's what

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.839
<v Speaker 1>they were talking about John Robin College, and he has.

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 1>He has fulfilled all that monster potential, which is just

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 1>wild to think about. Like I think we're looking at

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 1>quite possibly the greatest European golfer of all time and

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:34.399
<v Speaker 1>a player who, over the course of his career could

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:35.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly win the career Grand Slam.

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Well you brought up Phil. Natural segue to my next thing,

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the Live boys.

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>That was my next one, All right, perfect?

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 2>We got seventeen guys, I counted, is that right?

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right? Seven or is it eighteen? It's either seventeen

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 1>or eighteen.

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 3>I went through and hand counted, so I might have

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 3>missed one. You know, some of those guys, some of

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 3>those names on Live are pretty obscure.

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>And Dean Burmester is in the field.

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 2>I got.

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 3>I got him. I would never ever miscounting Dean mean,

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Dean my guy. But they kind of popped at the Masters.

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.279
<v Speaker 3>I think, like, you know, they had what was it,

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 3>three of the top six players the Masters, the top

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 3>six yep. I think if you really look at who's

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 3>in the field, who's who's like a potential winner. And

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to discount Phil, but I just don't

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 3>think this is the golf course for Phil.

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Phil was out there scouting early, I know, scouting early

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and then having lunch with Amy.

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 3>It's I you know, as much as he won, it's

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 3>insane to me to think that he won two years ago.

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 3>We were watching the final round together. I watched you

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 3>get enveloped by the swarm of people on eighteen and

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 3>the and the cop and the cop regressive.

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 1>I was riding him like a Bronco all the way

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 1>to the green.

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.799
<v Speaker 3>So anyways, I U, I mean, it's insane they won

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 3>two years ago. But really I zero in on on DJ,

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 3>who hasn't done anything, but like, I still have to

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 3>put him in the in the discussion just because of

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:10.479
<v Speaker 3>other worldly talent, and I think this is a great

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 3>course fit for him. And then camp Smith, but like

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:16.439
<v Speaker 3>this is not I don't think this is a camp

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Smith golf course.

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not a camp Smith golf course.

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 3>But he's a top ten player in the world without

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:24.760
<v Speaker 3>a doubt. So you know, I just don't is he still?

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Is he still? Like?

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 2>What is he?

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 1>What has he shown you over the past five months

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that he's still a top ten player?

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean he hasn't shown a lot because he hasn't

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 3>played a lot, and I haven't tuned in to Live

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 3>Thailand and you know and such, right, So like I don't,

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 3>I you know, I just I can't discount a guy

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 3>that was arguably the best player in the world last year, right,

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 3>and say he's not a top ten player this year

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 3>just because we haven't seen me.

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Cam cam Smith was my player of the Year last year.

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Like you look at the totality of his year. I

0:40:58.120 --> 0:40:59.280
<v Speaker 1>think he played the best golf.

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 3>I agree, like, and who knows what happens in the

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:05.919
<v Speaker 3>FedEx Cup playoffs if he's not like going to live

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 3>and had that weird WD and you know, it was

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 3>just kind of like I can't imagine playing in the

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 3>playoffs when everybody knew you were leaving was very easy mentally.

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, very very very awkward, you know.

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 3>So to me, like, and this is the thing is,

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:27.280
<v Speaker 3>like Paul Casey's in the field, right, he might finish T. Twelve,

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 3>That's not He's not going to have a chance to win.

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:32.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean I might get burned by this, but Paul

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Casey's not going to win a major championship, right. And

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 3>that's that's why I'm saying, like, guys have legitimate chances

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 3>to win this week.

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there are a ton of them.

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I would certainly agree with that. I mean, Brooks's Brooks

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is to be a top five favorite regardless of what

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 1>tour he's on, regardless of what tournament he's playing. I

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 1>think the way that he played through fifty four holes

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>at the Masters was was no fluke. I mean that

0:41:56.520 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>was that was peak Brooks Kepka, playing, nishing, calculating really

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.760
<v Speaker 1>smart golf. And I think there's little reason to suggest

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>why he can't continue to do that. He's he's played

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>well in the inner in the in the intermittent time

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>between those two major championships. But like when you go

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 1>down the list and you mentioned like three of the

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>top six at the Masters where live players like this

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is not gonna be a great place for a Bannster.

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>This is not gonna be a great place for like

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a Woakee Neman. I know Mito had an opportunity to

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 1>win PJ last year, but like, is has he done

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>enough this year just to suggest that, you know, that

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:42.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just kind of like a one off. This feels

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>like a yeah. I feel like Thomas Peters could play well.

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like with Patrick Reid scrambling, although he's highly inaccurate,

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Like if this is going to be a slog fest, right, Like,

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at a winning score between five and

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 1>ten under par, that's kind of right up Patrick Reid's

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>alley the player. So I think Brooks has a like

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate chance to win. I'm very curious a about DJ,

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>who was the undisputed number one player last year on Live,

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 1>like thirty five million dollar man, and he hasn't done anything.

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much the time off affected him

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:22.240
<v Speaker 1>right between the end of the LIP season and starting

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>up again. I don't know how much the back injury

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:28.279
<v Speaker 1>before the Saudi event has affected him. But he hasn't

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>done anything. Yeah, he didn't play well with the Masters.

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:33.720
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't played particularly well against forty eight man fields

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 1>on live, so he's of interest to me, and like

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the man of the moment, Taylor Gooch is Taylor Gooch's

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>time to shine. And we're recording this spoiler alert, not

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:48.439
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. We're doing this on Friday. The live event

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:51.879
<v Speaker 1>has not started. Like it would not surprise anyone if

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Gooch by Sunday evening is like one three consecutive, be.

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:59.920
<v Speaker 2>The first first three time winner and live history too.

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>That's right, it would be a it'll be a historic achievement.

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But like he's he's the man of the moment, Like

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 1>there's there's so much dialogue about how good Taylor Gooch is,

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>how live players are being disrespected, how there's collusion between

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>these all these establishers. If you're a great player, show

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>up at the PGA Championship and show it like this

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is the best form you've ever been in in your

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 1>entire career. Let's see how you do it against the

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>strongest field the major championship golf. Like that's that's really

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 1>what I want to see.

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:32.080
<v Speaker 3>I think there's not a it's not a crazy world

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:34.839
<v Speaker 3>to look at Taylor Gooch and think if he had

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:37.280
<v Speaker 3>stayed on the PGA Tour, if he would be thought

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 3>of in a similar vein to Maxhoma. They were on

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:45.319
<v Speaker 3>a very similar trajectory. Taylor Goosh was a player that

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 3>continued to improve, and if you looked at like, you

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 3>know what he was really good at, it translates really well.

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 3>He's an unbelievable ball striker, right, he's great t degree

0:44:56.880 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 3>and that really translates well to major championships. And I

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:03.399
<v Speaker 3>think that's the thing that's like, it's a hard thing

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 3>with live and what it presents for players like Taylor

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Gooch Joaque Neeman is that it's it's it's unfair because

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 3>there we don't there's no context around it, right, you

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:17.720
<v Speaker 3>don't know how to describe it, like, Okay, you went out.

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Just they're just playing. They're playing in a vacuum essentially.

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you went out and beat forty seven guys like

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:26.720
<v Speaker 3>he probably would have won a couple PGA Tour events

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 3>and he was playing like you know when he left

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 3>the best golf of his life on the PGA Tour.

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 3>So it's just a it's a tricky thing because like,

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:38.360
<v Speaker 3>is there a world where Taylor Gooch like he qualified

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 3>for Eastlake and he didn't play half the year. Like,

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 3>is there a world that he finished fifth on the

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 3>FedEx Cup last year?

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Absolutely?

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, Oh totally.

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 3>Is there a world that he is the top ten

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 3>player in the world right now if he didn't go

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 3>to Live Absolutely probably, Like I think he would be

0:45:56.040 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 3>a top fifteen player in the world. Like if you're

0:45:58.840 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 3>if you're talking like very you know. I just think

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 3>that he was on this arc that was really similar

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 3>to Maxhomer.

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:08.280
<v Speaker 2>They were their friends.

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Like if you look at his stats and what was happening,

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 3>he was becoming a world class player before our eyes.

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 3>And then he went to Live right, and it's uh,

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 3>and now he's won twice, he's coming in. He should

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 3>be in the US Open field. I think that that

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of stinks that he's not. And I'm glad he's

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:26.839
<v Speaker 3>going to be in the field this week.

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So like the Masters, I think kind of unfairly felt

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:35.400
<v Speaker 1>like a referendum on the whole live experience, right, Like

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a rough ferendum on the the

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the time off in between seasons, the early schedule, Like

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 1>was that going to be enough time and an opportunity

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:50.319
<v Speaker 1>for these guys to get major championship sharp and you

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 1>look at through the top six and the lead board

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the Masters, like I think that that kind of dismissed that.

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I think this is actually a greater indication of what

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>these guys can do. This is a prototypical major championship test,

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and and Live has has sent these guys to what Australia, Singapore.

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Now they're in Tulsa like they're there's it's They're not

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.879
<v Speaker 1>making it an opportunity for these guys to go if

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:18.680
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to practice ahead of time at oak Hill.

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be coming in hot On on Monday now,

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:27.799
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not as optimistic that the lift players will

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:30.680
<v Speaker 1>play as well this week at Okol, which I think

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is very interesting because had the inverse happened right at

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the Masters, had they not have three of the top six,

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 1>if it was just like it was a if it

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:40.880
<v Speaker 1>was last year. If if it was last year and

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the guys completely no showed, then I think the dialogue

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>heading into this year's championship is much more intense than

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>it is. I think it actually took a lot of

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:50.240
<v Speaker 1>pressure off those guys.

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Now for a quick break from our other sponsor CLUBTFE.

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:05.799
<v Speaker 3>This is a great week to join CLUBTF. That is

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:10.440
<v Speaker 3>our membership program for the frieda Egg. Really what it is,

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:14.760
<v Speaker 3>it's additional content. You're getting about five new blog posts

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 3>a week. We have a monthly member hangout. We do

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 3>these in depth course profiles every week, and then we

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 3>also have a monthly member video this week. This month's

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 3>member video is about Okill East. I break down an

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:32.400
<v Speaker 3>architectural feature that I'm keen to see on every hole

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 3>at Okilleast. So that will be up early Monday, I think,

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 3>is the plan. So you can go join CLUBTF at

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Thefridagg dot com it's right across the bar to one

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:46.360
<v Speaker 3>hundred and twenty dollars.

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 2>For the year.

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:49.439
<v Speaker 3>A great way to support what we're doing and really

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 3>help us continue to elevate and do more content if

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:57.880
<v Speaker 3>you're interested in that. So thank you guys for the support.

0:48:57.920 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 3>And now back to Ryan Labner. All right, you what

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 3>do you have one left?

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:08.759
<v Speaker 1>I have one left?

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:11.000
<v Speaker 2>All right? I got two left? I will I'll go

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:11.800
<v Speaker 2>through this quick.

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm starting to uh, I'm starting to like Adam Scott

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:17.880
<v Speaker 3>is a little bit of a dark horse.

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 2>This week. So the last six we're in this sixty.

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:24.479
<v Speaker 1>That's that's sixty three at the Nelson. Really got you going, huh.

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, he played really well last week too.

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like you feel like we're due for

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:30.399
<v Speaker 1>an over seventy over over thirty seven year old winner.

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think we're due for like an older winner, right,

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:34.760
<v Speaker 3>We've had We've had a run of young winners.

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 2>There hasn't been an old winner since Phil.

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And which was like the fluke of all flukes.

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, fluke of all flukes.

0:49:42.560 --> 0:49:44.880
<v Speaker 3>But you had Tiger, you had Sergio, you have like

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 3>you have these guys, pop them, you get them still

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:50.360
<v Speaker 3>like they're still good enough to win if they have

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 3>a great week and you know, he's starting to play well.

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:57.399
<v Speaker 3>DJ and Adam Scott feel like, really the only two

0:49:57.480 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 3>guys right now thirty seven plus that I would I

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:05.360
<v Speaker 3>would say, like, can win a major Jason Days thirty

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:07.440
<v Speaker 3>five for like the record, you know, you start to

0:50:07.480 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 3>think about, but like, there's nobody else really in that bracket,

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 3>that bucket that I would be like, oh, yeah, they

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:17.319
<v Speaker 3>could go win it. Sergio's not in the field. It

0:50:17.360 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 3>also just feels like, all right, this guy has had

0:50:20.239 --> 0:50:22.840
<v Speaker 3>such a crazy career, such a great career.

0:50:24.600 --> 0:50:25.959
<v Speaker 2>He has to get number two.

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 1>It feel it would feel wrong if a player of

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Adam Scott's longevity and Adam Scott's talent level only had one. Like, yeah,

0:50:37.400 --> 0:50:40.719
<v Speaker 1>he also won a Players Championship, but that was you know,

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:43.279
<v Speaker 1>that was a different lifetime ago. I'm with you. I

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:47.319
<v Speaker 1>honestly have not thought about it much. Who who over

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the thirty seven year old set could could win a

0:50:49.960 --> 0:50:53.400
<v Speaker 1>major championship. I do like the way that he's playing, obviously,

0:50:53.480 --> 0:50:56.960
<v Speaker 1>like he's he's trending heading into this golf course. The

0:50:58.040 --> 0:51:01.800
<v Speaker 1>putter that has kind of been bugaboo for the majority

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of his career, Like it's actually kind of short up now,

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Like that's not a it's not a predominant narrative when

0:51:07.600 --> 0:51:09.959
<v Speaker 1>it when it looks to to Adam Scott, it's more

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 1>can he can he not have the round where he

0:51:14.600 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 1>where he falls off.

0:51:15.640 --> 0:51:18.640
<v Speaker 3>It's like he shoots a seventy four on Saturday, that's

0:51:18.680 --> 0:51:21.480
<v Speaker 3>what happens so like to me, one of the things

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:23.680
<v Speaker 3>that could play in his hands is if this Major

0:51:23.800 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 3>ends up being like a minus six, like I think

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 3>when the Major, when the score gets to ten under

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:33.400
<v Speaker 3>in a Major, that's that's trouble for him. Right if this,

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:38.160
<v Speaker 3>if this stays around six under, and it's like becomes, oh,

0:51:38.200 --> 0:51:42.880
<v Speaker 3>he could go sixty eight, seventy two, seventy two, sixty

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:45.960
<v Speaker 3>eight and win, or you know something along that lines,

0:51:46.040 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Like I guess that would be wrong, that'd be even

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 3>par at par seventy. But you know what I'm saying,

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Like if all of a sudden that range of scores

0:51:53.800 --> 0:51:57.399
<v Speaker 3>comes condensed and like a winner can shoot seventy three

0:51:57.840 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 3>to sixty eight every day and win that I think

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 3>that's like the thing with him because he can make

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:04.960
<v Speaker 3>a ton of parts. He can ball strike this place

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 3>to death, and he's great, great around the greens.

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Like it just always becomes can he make enough putts?

0:52:10.440 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 3>But if it's that hard, you know, the putter doesn't

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:16.520
<v Speaker 3>become that big of a you know of a deal.

0:52:18.000 --> 0:52:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Like if you ask me who's gonna have a better

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 1>finish at the PGA Championship, this could certainly come back

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to bite me. But like I would say, Adam Scott

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:28.160
<v Speaker 1>over DJ Like I would I would take those those

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:31.319
<v Speaker 1>two players head to head, like Adam Scott traditionally has

0:52:31.320 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 1>fared pretty well all things considered at the PGA Championship. Obviously,

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>varying tests, but like he's got a number of top

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 1>tens over you know, roughly twenty appearances or so, so

0:52:45.600 --> 0:52:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I would I would take him head to head. I'm

0:52:47.800 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 1>curious to see how this weekend goes if he can

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 1>avoid kind of that slip up. TBC Craig Branch has

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:56.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta be a different test, right then then than than Oakhill,

0:52:56.719 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you're gonna have to shoot twenty five thirty under park.

0:52:58.760 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 3>They followed the TPC Summerlan model, so it's harder this

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:04.320
<v Speaker 3>year because they reduced the par by one shot.

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:08.840
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. But yeah, I haven't, honestly have not

0:53:08.880 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>given that much thought about it. And it's very curious

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>to me that this is your number two storyline.

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:15.160
<v Speaker 2>It's not my number two though. That's I didn't number

0:53:15.200 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 2>them like.

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 1>You so was. So is this your number five? Can

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:21.839
<v Speaker 1>can an old timer win? Are we due for an

0:53:21.840 --> 0:53:22.799
<v Speaker 1>old old?

0:53:23.120 --> 0:53:26.920
<v Speaker 3>Should honestly be like my fifth storyline, this wouldn't have

0:53:26.960 --> 0:53:29.840
<v Speaker 3>been a storyline if I put Scheffler or rom in

0:53:30.320 --> 0:53:32.759
<v Speaker 3>that I figured you would put Scheffler and ram in, So,

0:53:33.120 --> 0:53:34.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, smart.

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>That's very it's very forth thinking podcasting.

0:53:36.200 --> 0:53:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Is that number one? Well, that's what that's what the

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:39.240
<v Speaker 2>host does here.

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have not talked about this guy, so

0:53:40.880 --> 0:53:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I would assume that he is your number one as well.

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And like the player, I'm most intrigued by Rory next

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:48.480
<v Speaker 1>week at all kill.

0:53:48.400 --> 0:53:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Macro, it's not my number one?

0:53:52.000 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>How how is he not your number one? How is

0:53:54.040 --> 0:53:57.399
<v Speaker 1>he not the most fascinating player in golf right now?

0:53:57.680 --> 0:53:59.759
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts on on Rory heading into year

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:00.440
<v Speaker 1>second major?

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:03.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know.

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 1>I know that's that's that's like a great part. I

0:54:07.320 --> 0:54:08.439
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what's going to happen.

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:10.799
<v Speaker 2>I think like this golf course will set up very

0:54:10.800 --> 0:54:11.439
<v Speaker 2>well for him.

0:54:11.560 --> 0:54:13.920
<v Speaker 3>This is going to be a This is a Rory

0:54:14.160 --> 0:54:17.200
<v Speaker 3>type golf course, a Rory type major. You would not

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 3>be surprised to see him win here like this. This

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:23.000
<v Speaker 3>is a this is a golf course that plays right

0:54:23.040 --> 0:54:24.400
<v Speaker 3>into what he does well.

0:54:24.680 --> 0:54:26.919
<v Speaker 2>Hand, he hits it high, he hits it far.

0:54:27.680 --> 0:54:30.640
<v Speaker 3>He like is one of the players with enough speed

0:54:30.760 --> 0:54:33.399
<v Speaker 3>that he can fight through rough he can you know,

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:36.440
<v Speaker 3>he has a great short game. His putter has been

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:40.240
<v Speaker 3>pretty good. But like you know, I just think, uh,

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:40.840
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:54:40.640 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 2>This is great.

0:54:41.280 --> 0:54:45.279
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, there's the big The big storyline is gonna be

0:54:45.320 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 3>it's a home game for Rory.

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:48.280
<v Speaker 2>He's an honorary member member.

0:54:48.400 --> 0:54:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's kill He's probably played it like

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 1>three times.

0:54:51.200 --> 0:54:52.959
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's played it very much.

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, do you think do you think he's Do

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you think he's paying his dues?

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:58.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he if they charge him dues.

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:00.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, this is like this is like the Jason

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 5>Day Mierfield Village, Jory Lane, Like the guy never plays there,

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:07.799
<v Speaker 5>but but sure he's a he's a member and he

0:55:07.800 --> 0:55:09.240
<v Speaker 5>has all this intimate course knowledge.

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Like I do not think that I don't think he's

0:55:11.560 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 3>played there very much. I doubt, I would doubt. I

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:16.880
<v Speaker 3>don't think he likes to do the big prep. It's

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:20.319
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting because like I talked to him Riviera week

0:55:20.440 --> 0:55:22.440
<v Speaker 3>and I asked him if he was going over to

0:55:22.560 --> 0:55:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Lacc at all, and he's like, no, I'll go there

0:55:25.719 --> 0:55:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the week of which is interesting because then you know,

0:55:28.280 --> 0:55:28.600
<v Speaker 3>for the.

0:55:28.560 --> 0:55:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Master means that means you and I have played Lacc

0:55:32.000 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 1>more than Roy McRoy.

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, how about that?

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:34.760
<v Speaker 1>It's shocking.

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:37.560
<v Speaker 3>And then for the Masters this year, he did the

0:55:37.600 --> 0:55:40.839
<v Speaker 3>big prep. I think like he's stuck where he's trying

0:55:40.840 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 3>to figure out how to prepare for majors. It's it's

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 3>this funny thing with golf, right, Like majors were probably

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:49.400
<v Speaker 3>felt so easy for him in his younger years. I

0:55:49.400 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 3>mean just rattle off four and and then all of

0:55:52.719 --> 0:55:55.640
<v Speaker 3>a sudden it's like, yeah, now they're hard again, right,

0:55:56.200 --> 0:56:00.200
<v Speaker 3>and he doesn't know how to prepare for him And listen, like,

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:02.799
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of it is like a bounce here,

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:05.400
<v Speaker 3>abounce there. I think that gets in people's head. Like

0:56:05.440 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 3>I remember I had Luke Donald on the podcast years ago,

0:56:09.640 --> 0:56:11.440
<v Speaker 3>and it was like the end of the podcast, it

0:56:11.520 --> 0:56:14.319
<v Speaker 3>was a total throwaway question. I asked him, like, do

0:56:14.360 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 3>you have any regrets from your career and it was like, yeah,

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:19.319
<v Speaker 3>I played. I played in the final group of the

0:56:19.360 --> 0:56:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Marion US Open, and I watched Justin rose Winn and

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:25.359
<v Speaker 3>I played bad, and I completely blew up my golf

0:56:25.400 --> 0:56:27.120
<v Speaker 3>swing because I said, I need to be.

0:56:27.080 --> 0:56:27.719
<v Speaker 2>More like him.

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:31.160
<v Speaker 3>And these things, like these small moments where like you

0:56:31.239 --> 0:56:34.000
<v Speaker 3>just don't have it a day, become overblown and you

0:56:34.040 --> 0:56:36.600
<v Speaker 3>think you need to rework the whole way you do everything.

0:56:36.840 --> 0:56:39.040
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's where Rory is right now is

0:56:39.080 --> 0:56:42.400
<v Speaker 3>like he doesn't. It's really weird because he wins all

0:56:42.480 --> 0:56:45.560
<v Speaker 3>these other tournaments, but he doesn't know how to approach majors.

0:56:45.760 --> 0:56:48.200
<v Speaker 3>He's trying to make them feel like normal events. That

0:56:48.280 --> 0:56:51.160
<v Speaker 3>seems what like the mental work he's doing with Rotella

0:56:51.200 --> 0:56:53.719
<v Speaker 3>when he's talking about it, it seems like he's just

0:56:53.880 --> 0:56:57.480
<v Speaker 3>like attempting to make this a normal event, but it's.

0:56:57.320 --> 0:56:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Not, and he can't do that.

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Like as much self talk talk as you give yourself,

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:05.560
<v Speaker 3>he's a guy that's very conscious of what's going on.

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:09.440
<v Speaker 3>He's not like and that's the trouble of being conscious,

0:57:09.560 --> 0:57:12.359
<v Speaker 3>right of Like as much as you tell yourself it's

0:57:12.440 --> 0:57:15.879
<v Speaker 3>just another event, it's not, you know, but he's been.

0:57:16.320 --> 0:57:19.920
<v Speaker 1>But he's been. He's been fighting that battle, particularly it

0:57:19.960 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to Augusta, Nashville and the Masters, I mean for

0:57:22.520 --> 0:57:25.640
<v Speaker 1>for years. He's like he I remember, he tried to

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:27.240
<v Speaker 1>play his way into it. He tried to take a break,

0:57:27.240 --> 0:57:28.760
<v Speaker 1>he tried to put his phone away, he tried to

0:57:28.840 --> 0:57:31.800
<v Speaker 1>juggle dive dive into yeah, like yeah, he got he

0:57:31.800 --> 0:57:34.720
<v Speaker 1>got into the juggling phase, which which apparently did not

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:36.600
<v Speaker 1>last long. He was reading like self help books, like

0:57:36.640 --> 0:57:40.120
<v Speaker 1>he's literally tried everything. But that's why that's why he

0:57:40.280 --> 0:57:44.040
<v Speaker 1>like the Master's performance was so mystifying to me because

0:57:44.080 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it actually seemed like he turned a corner. Yes right

0:57:48.480 --> 0:57:53.360
<v Speaker 1>last year he like he described the fun around sixty

0:57:53.360 --> 0:57:57.400
<v Speaker 1>four Augusta. Last year's like cathartic and a breakthrough. You

0:57:57.400 --> 0:58:00.240
<v Speaker 1>look at the way he played the Major champi in

0:58:00.360 --> 0:58:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Chips the last three of twenty twenty two, like what's

0:58:04.040 --> 0:58:07.040
<v Speaker 1>what's kind of dogged him right over over this dry

0:58:07.080 --> 0:58:10.280
<v Speaker 1>spell as he's he started poorly. You know, his his

0:58:10.400 --> 0:58:13.520
<v Speaker 1>opening round scoring average is so much higher than the

0:58:13.560 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 1>other three rounds, which suggests some sort of stage fright

0:58:18.080 --> 0:58:22.160
<v Speaker 1>or conservative approach or just sort of timid play before

0:58:22.200 --> 0:58:24.520
<v Speaker 1>he can finally get his way into it. By that point,

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it's too far behind.

0:58:25.680 --> 0:58:29.240
<v Speaker 2>But you look, I think he I think, yeah, like

0:58:29.680 --> 0:58:30.880
<v Speaker 2>y jitimate like he's.

0:58:30.720 --> 0:58:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Just like feeling his way out when when a Scottier

0:58:33.040 --> 0:58:35.480
<v Speaker 1>ram is like going to going to grab this thing

0:58:35.800 --> 0:58:38.640
<v Speaker 1>by the throat. And so he was. He was consciously

0:58:39.160 --> 0:58:41.200
<v Speaker 1>aware of that for the final three majors of the year,

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and he started great, like he shot sixty six, sixty six,

0:58:43.960 --> 0:58:46.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven or something like that for the final three

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Majors of the year. He goes into the Masters this year, like, yeah,

0:58:50.200 --> 0:58:52.400
<v Speaker 1>he missed the cut at the Players, but like played

0:58:52.400 --> 0:58:55.800
<v Speaker 1>great at the match play on Wednesday of Masters week,

0:58:56.640 --> 0:58:58.680
<v Speaker 1>he thought, like, I'm gonna win this thing. Like he's

0:58:58.760 --> 0:59:02.080
<v Speaker 1>he's hitting it, he's hitting it great. And so to

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to play as poorly as he did clearly in effect

0:59:07.560 --> 0:59:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they had been a deep way because he knew he

0:59:09.600 --> 0:59:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was going to cost himself three million dollars by skipping,

0:59:12.400 --> 0:59:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and he kind of did the calculus and said that

0:59:14.400 --> 0:59:16.720
<v Speaker 1>this is it worthwhile for me. That had to have

0:59:16.800 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>shaken him to his core in such a way that

0:59:20.520 --> 0:59:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what to expect this week at

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the PGA, because that was such a bewildering, mystifying, like

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it had to create some sort of existential crisis.

0:59:34.240 --> 0:59:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't know what all happened after the Masters.

0:59:37.760 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, you know, if it was.

0:59:39.760 --> 0:59:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Just play or if there is something that happened personally,

0:59:42.600 --> 0:59:44.640
<v Speaker 3>which you know, I tend to think it might have

0:59:44.680 --> 0:59:47.240
<v Speaker 3>been a combination of both of them. Yeah, I agree,

0:59:48.680 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 3>But I do think what's fascinating is we have an

0:59:52.400 --> 0:59:57.160
<v Speaker 3>all time great player. Really it feels like a little

0:59:57.200 --> 1:00:01.160
<v Speaker 3>bit hit bottom in terms of like, which is crazy,

1:00:01.200 --> 1:00:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Like his bottom isn't like anybody else's bottom, right, it.

1:00:06.400 --> 1:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Feels a more dramatic.

1:00:08.120 --> 1:00:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it feels like a kind of like a rock

1:00:11.200 --> 1:00:14.520
<v Speaker 3>bottom situation. And it's because of this major drought, and

1:00:14.600 --> 1:00:17.360
<v Speaker 3>it's not just about the Masters anymore. That's the thing.

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:20.200
<v Speaker 3>It was the Masters because it was the one he

1:00:20.240 --> 1:00:24.160
<v Speaker 3>didn't have. But now we're now it's any major. I mean,

1:00:24.200 --> 1:00:27.440
<v Speaker 3>he's so he's so far removed from winning one. I

1:00:27.440 --> 1:00:29.640
<v Speaker 3>mean he's he said to himself like I'm approaching this

1:00:29.680 --> 1:00:31.280
<v Speaker 3>like I'm trying to win my first again. Yeah, like

1:00:31.360 --> 1:00:34.560
<v Speaker 3>it's nine years ago. So it's almost like he's in

1:00:34.600 --> 1:00:37.480
<v Speaker 3>this camp of Xander and can't Ley and players who

1:00:37.520 --> 1:00:40.160
<v Speaker 3>don't have a major, which is a wild thing because

1:00:40.200 --> 1:00:43.120
<v Speaker 3>we're on I don't know what chapter of the Rory

1:00:43.160 --> 1:00:47.320
<v Speaker 3>McElroy career we're on, but we're in this like, I mean,

1:00:47.360 --> 1:00:50.680
<v Speaker 3>that's it is. It's why I think, like, you know,

1:00:50.800 --> 1:00:53.520
<v Speaker 3>obviously he took like an outfront role with the Live thing,

1:00:53.640 --> 1:00:55.960
<v Speaker 3>and he's gotten more press than he's ever gotten really

1:00:56.040 --> 1:00:58.560
<v Speaker 3>in his career. There's been more attention on Rory than

1:00:58.640 --> 1:01:01.680
<v Speaker 3>ever before. And I think think like with general fans,

1:01:01.720 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 3>there is like a little Rory fatigue because, like.

1:01:04.360 --> 1:01:06.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, he's been so front and side, it's been

1:01:06.560 --> 1:01:07.360
<v Speaker 2>so front and center.

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:10.680
<v Speaker 3>But at the same time, this is maybe arguably, you know,

1:01:11.920 --> 1:01:15.480
<v Speaker 3>outside of his coming out party and like coming of age,

1:01:15.560 --> 1:01:17.800
<v Speaker 3>is an all time player, this is probably the most

1:01:17.840 --> 1:01:19.520
<v Speaker 3>fascinating aspect of his career.

1:01:20.640 --> 1:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I wouldn't. I wouldn't disagree at all. Like I

1:01:23.320 --> 1:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>think from a from a writing perspective, like he and

1:01:26.520 --> 1:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Jordan are are are by far the most interesting players

1:01:30.520 --> 1:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to write about. It. It's they're easy to emotionally invest in,

1:01:33.800 --> 1:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think because they are so open and accessible, like

1:01:37.160 --> 1:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>they let you inside their their their mental fortress, and

1:01:40.960 --> 1:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>we're we're kind of along for the ride, right, And

1:01:43.640 --> 1:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>so that when you when you look at at Rory

1:01:47.240 --> 1:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and the explanation that he gave after or excuse me

1:01:52.360 --> 1:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>before Quail Hollow, like it was easy to understand, like, yeah,

1:01:57.200 --> 1:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the toll of the past year finally caught up to me.

1:02:00.680 --> 1:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd play my way through it. Everyone thought, Wow, this

1:02:02.840 --> 1:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>is amazing that this guy has taken on this dual responsibility, right,

1:02:06.640 --> 1:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Like he's he's playing some of the best golf statistically

1:02:09.240 --> 1:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of his entire career. And he's also on like eight

1:02:11.320 --> 1:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>hour conference calls and is literally literally reshaping the PGA tour,

1:02:16.720 --> 1:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>like how do you do it all? Well, it turns

1:02:18.480 --> 1:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>out that that's a burden, that's that's eventually going to

1:02:22.480 --> 1:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>crush even even the greatest player. And so like we're

1:02:26.720 --> 1:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we're we're riding this wave with him. I'm just as

1:02:31.800 --> 1:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it pertains to like next week. I'm just curious if

1:02:34.600 --> 1:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>if one week is enough to re establish an equilibrium,

1:02:40.760 --> 1:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>tighten up a ball like a ball striking performance that

1:02:44.640 --> 1:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>was that was really poor by his standards at at

1:02:48.000 --> 1:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Quell Hollow, And can he get himself now in a

1:02:51.480 --> 1:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>frame of mind with three majors across the next two months,

1:02:56.760 --> 1:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like to get to get himself across the line in

1:03:00.200 --> 1:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the tournaments that he covets the most.

1:03:02.240 --> 1:03:05.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would say, I think golf is such an

1:03:05.720 --> 1:03:10.120
<v Speaker 3>expectation game and it's I think what Rory's got going

1:03:10.160 --> 1:03:12.440
<v Speaker 3>on is similar to what we saw from Brooks in

1:03:12.920 --> 1:03:15.520
<v Speaker 3>full swing, where he was talking about when he was

1:03:15.520 --> 1:03:18.400
<v Speaker 3>talking about Scottie and he's like, I mean that guy's

1:03:18.480 --> 1:03:19.600
<v Speaker 3>not thinking about anything.

1:03:19.640 --> 1:03:22.120
<v Speaker 2>He's just going out and shooting sixty five and.

1:03:22.040 --> 1:03:24.640
<v Speaker 3>He's kind of and I think one of the things

1:03:24.680 --> 1:03:25.720
<v Speaker 3>that but like we're like.

1:03:25.840 --> 1:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>But we're two or three months removed from Rory winning

1:03:29.520 --> 1:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>in Dubai. Well that's last year he was the number

1:03:31.960 --> 1:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>one player in the world. Like, he's not that far

1:03:34.200 --> 1:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>removed from from that player. So I'm not quite I'm

1:03:36.840 --> 1:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>not quite with you that like he's at he's at

1:03:38.840 --> 1:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>rock bottom now. I think it's I think it's easy

1:03:41.160 --> 1:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to dismiss dismiss the Master's performance as as kind of

1:03:46.880 --> 1:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>this curious one off. I think I'm most curious to

1:03:49.480 --> 1:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>see if it if it lingers through the entire major season,

1:03:52.280 --> 1:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>which I think would be quite alarming.

1:03:54.120 --> 1:03:56.360
<v Speaker 3>I think the thing about golf is like when you

1:03:56.480 --> 1:03:59.200
<v Speaker 3>don't have it, you feel like you're never gonna get

1:03:59.200 --> 1:04:02.280
<v Speaker 3>it back. And I think that the Masters he just

1:04:02.400 --> 1:04:04.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't have it and it's scary and you don't see

1:04:04.920 --> 1:04:07.960
<v Speaker 3>it on Wednesday, Yeah I know Wednesday, I know, and

1:04:08.200 --> 1:04:10.720
<v Speaker 3>you don't feel and he played bad Aquoil Hollow. But like,

1:04:10.800 --> 1:04:14.000
<v Speaker 3>one of the beautiful things about that with pertain to

1:04:14.120 --> 1:04:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Rory is like Rory can get it back in a second.

1:04:17.800 --> 1:04:20.040
<v Speaker 3>And one of the things I think that the Masters

1:04:20.080 --> 1:04:23.360
<v Speaker 3>could do that could be A huge positive is that

1:04:23.400 --> 1:04:26.880
<v Speaker 3>it resets expectations and all of a sudden he comes

1:04:26.920 --> 1:04:30.440
<v Speaker 3>into this and I think, like people, the general public

1:04:30.640 --> 1:04:33.360
<v Speaker 3>expects a lot less out of Rory this week than

1:04:33.400 --> 1:04:36.240
<v Speaker 3>they did if he had finished fifth in the Masters,

1:04:36.560 --> 1:04:39.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, which it shouldn't really have any bairers.

1:04:39.320 --> 1:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the general public always think a lot of

1:04:41.000 --> 1:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Roy McRoy, like expect a lot of them.

1:04:42.600 --> 1:04:43.280
<v Speaker 2>I think they do.

1:04:43.400 --> 1:04:46.479
<v Speaker 3>But like I think that, like the the golf Van,

1:04:47.200 --> 1:04:51.840
<v Speaker 3>their expectations for Rory now are so much lower because

1:04:51.840 --> 1:04:54.640
<v Speaker 3>of what happened to the Masters. Then if he had

1:04:54.640 --> 1:04:57.600
<v Speaker 3>finished T eight, you know, if you'd you know, a

1:04:57.640 --> 1:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>non competitive T eight, right, people will be like, oh,

1:05:01.640 --> 1:05:04.360
<v Speaker 3>he's got to be your first page favorite, And really

1:05:04.400 --> 1:05:07.320
<v Speaker 3>the reality is like missing the cut and finishing non

1:05:07.320 --> 1:05:10.840
<v Speaker 3>competitive T eight really isn't that much different, right, It's

1:05:10.840 --> 1:05:13.200
<v Speaker 3>like you played okay, you played good, like there's some

1:05:13.280 --> 1:05:17.040
<v Speaker 3>things to take away, but you never really felt it right. So, like,

1:05:17.120 --> 1:05:19.200
<v Speaker 3>to me, one of the beauties, if I was going

1:05:19.280 --> 1:05:21.480
<v Speaker 3>to turn this whole thing and spin it as positive,

1:05:22.160 --> 1:05:26.520
<v Speaker 3>is that he's coming into Okhill with like way less expectation.

1:05:26.640 --> 1:05:29.720
<v Speaker 3>He's your number one storyline. But the storyline is like,

1:05:30.120 --> 1:05:32.800
<v Speaker 3>what is he going to play well? It's not is

1:05:32.840 --> 1:05:34.920
<v Speaker 3>he going to win? Is he going to finally end

1:05:34.920 --> 1:05:37.680
<v Speaker 3>the drought? It's more like, is he going to play well?

1:05:37.880 --> 1:05:39.920
<v Speaker 3>And one of the beautiful things when you're when you're

1:05:39.920 --> 1:05:43.040
<v Speaker 3>a player like Rory McElroy is is the bottoms never

1:05:43.320 --> 1:05:46.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, never, like his bottom is better than he doesn't.

1:05:46.480 --> 1:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't say, he doesn't stay down for long exactly,

1:05:49.160 --> 1:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's not like a prolonged slump so to speak.

1:05:52.560 --> 1:05:56.200
<v Speaker 3>In the last four weeks could completely reset expectations and

1:05:56.240 --> 1:05:59.360
<v Speaker 3>bring them in to the right mental framework to win

1:05:59.400 --> 1:06:01.360
<v Speaker 3>a major, because because it's not like I need to

1:06:01.400 --> 1:06:04.800
<v Speaker 3>win this. It's like it's a weird thing with golf,

1:06:04.840 --> 1:06:07.840
<v Speaker 3>like expectations are just crazy, and this could be a

1:06:07.880 --> 1:06:09.960
<v Speaker 3>great thing for his expectation management.

1:06:10.960 --> 1:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I mean, he has the preeminent mental guru

1:06:14.160 --> 1:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>like in his stable with Bob Rotella, Like I'm assuming,

1:06:17.920 --> 1:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know for fact that over the past month

1:06:20.160 --> 1:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they've they've had some some some pretty in depth conversations

1:06:23.320 --> 1:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to try to get him on the right track to

1:06:25.280 --> 1:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to salvage what is left of the major season. Obviously,

1:06:28.800 --> 1:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>wants to win the Masters more than a the other major,

1:06:30.440 --> 1:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>But like, at this point, let's just get one man, Like,

1:06:32.920 --> 1:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>let's let's let's get number five and continue rolling. He's

1:06:36.360 --> 1:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>still thirty four years old, like there's so much good

1:06:39.160 --> 1:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>golf and so many prime years left for him. I

1:06:43.480 --> 1:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>do agree with your point that, like next week, the

1:06:47.520 --> 1:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>conversation isn't necessarily can this be the one that he

1:06:51.480 --> 1:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that he wins. It's more like, which rory are we

1:06:54.160 --> 1:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>going to see? Are we going to see the rory

1:06:56.360 --> 1:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that we grew accustomed to last year who figured prom

1:07:00.080 --> 1:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Le in every single tournament? Or is it the one

1:07:02.560 --> 1:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>who's kind of like a leaf blowing in the wind

1:07:04.840 --> 1:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>right now and doesn't have a direction? Seems a little

1:07:08.080 --> 1:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>bit lost, seems a little bit forlorn, Like I'm really

1:07:11.800 --> 1:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>curious to see what he does next week, which is why?

1:07:16.200 --> 1:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Which is why?

1:07:16.600 --> 1:07:20.120
<v Speaker 3>And this isn't my number one, This is just one

1:07:20.120 --> 1:07:22.840
<v Speaker 3>of my five, all right. I don't like ranking things.

1:07:23.200 --> 1:07:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm more of a bucket guy. So this is all

1:07:26.200 --> 1:07:29.560
<v Speaker 3>the things I'm watching for my last one er.

1:07:29.920 --> 1:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Number Number one is club pros, isn't it? Is it?

1:07:32.240 --> 1:07:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Club pros? Now? No?

1:07:33.760 --> 1:07:36.280
<v Speaker 3>I wanted you know, the one I was most proud

1:07:36.320 --> 1:07:38.520
<v Speaker 3>of was the can't lights chople, I think because it

1:07:38.600 --> 1:07:42.240
<v Speaker 3>was it required a little research research, Yes, yes, so

1:07:42.360 --> 1:07:44.640
<v Speaker 3>I felt I felt a little bit like justin Ray there.

1:07:45.000 --> 1:07:50.040
<v Speaker 3>So So anyways, my last one is MLR ball. We've

1:07:50.040 --> 1:07:54.400
<v Speaker 3>heard every organization talk about this, the PGA tours kind

1:07:54.400 --> 1:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>of doing their own research. Augusta was pretty strongly behind it. Obviously,

1:08:00.040 --> 1:08:02.000
<v Speaker 3>you've got a U, S, g A, and Harnae coming

1:08:02.040 --> 1:08:04.560
<v Speaker 3>out with this ball. So you look at the all

1:08:04.600 --> 1:08:07.160
<v Speaker 3>the entities, it's PGA week. We're going to see where

1:08:07.200 --> 1:08:10.360
<v Speaker 3>they fall. Do they join in. If it's all the

1:08:10.400 --> 1:08:13.600
<v Speaker 3>major championships that are behind this MLR ball, it puts

1:08:13.640 --> 1:08:16.680
<v Speaker 3>the PGA Tour in a really weird situation. If they

1:08:16.760 --> 1:08:19.200
<v Speaker 3>say they're kind of more in the shoes of the

1:08:19.200 --> 1:08:21.559
<v Speaker 3>PGA Tour and they're going to listen to players and

1:08:21.560 --> 1:08:24.200
<v Speaker 3>and you know, and do their own research and think

1:08:24.200 --> 1:08:26.400
<v Speaker 3>about this, then it makes it a little awkward for

1:08:26.439 --> 1:08:27.800
<v Speaker 3>the US G A, RNA.

1:08:27.880 --> 1:08:30.479
<v Speaker 2>So it's just a it's a fascinating little rinkle to

1:08:30.560 --> 1:08:30.920
<v Speaker 2>the week.

1:08:31.200 --> 1:08:35.120
<v Speaker 3>See where the PGA stands on this issue, and it

1:08:35.160 --> 1:08:40.040
<v Speaker 3>could really dictate how how the MLR MLRR ball discourse

1:08:40.200 --> 1:08:41.040
<v Speaker 3>goes from here.

1:08:42.280 --> 1:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I think as soon as Augusta came out and said

1:08:44.680 --> 1:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that they essentially would support a rollback, Like I think

1:08:48.439 --> 1:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it's over, you think that's that's that's the majority of

1:08:51.600 --> 1:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the majors. The PJ really has little choice but to

1:08:54.479 --> 1:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>fall online. The PGA Tour as a as a byproduct

1:08:58.560 --> 1:09:01.479
<v Speaker 1>that has little choice to fall line. And if I'm

1:09:01.479 --> 1:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the tour, I'd be spinning it totally differently than how

1:09:04.320 --> 1:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>they're doing it, because well, we don't know this for

1:09:07.320 --> 1:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>a fact, Like it would not surprise me if liv

1:09:10.800 --> 1:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>comes out on the side of like where the entertainment product,

1:09:14.160 --> 1:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>like if you want to see guys hit three hundred

1:09:15.840 --> 1:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and fifty yard bombs, like this is this is the

1:09:17.760 --> 1:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>tour for you. And I think in everything the tour

1:09:21.000 --> 1:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>has done over these past six nine months to kind

1:09:26.040 --> 1:09:29.839
<v Speaker 1>of restake its claim right as like the number one circuit,

1:09:29.840 --> 1:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>like the destination tour in golf, I don't think they

1:09:33.600 --> 1:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>have a choice but to fall in line with the

1:09:36.200 --> 1:09:38.519
<v Speaker 1>rest of the major championships. Like if you're serious, if

1:09:38.560 --> 1:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you're a serious golfer, if your aspirations are to be

1:09:41.960 --> 1:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the number one player in the world, if you want

1:09:43.960 --> 1:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to play the most major ready regular season golf, right

1:09:49.120 --> 1:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>then we're going to play the ball that you're doing

1:09:51.960 --> 1:09:55.599
<v Speaker 1>it the major championships. I think that's where the divide

1:09:55.640 --> 1:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>can go, like one's entertainment and one is strictly serious

1:10:01.560 --> 1:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>golf only. And so I don't think the PGA will

1:10:06.000 --> 1:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>come out in overwhelming support, but I think it's I

1:10:10.680 --> 1:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's pretty clear as soon as Augusta and Fred

1:10:13.000 --> 1:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the Ridley came out last last month with their stance,

1:10:16.240 --> 1:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't think there's I don't think these other

1:10:18.800 --> 1:10:20.599
<v Speaker 1>organizations have any choice but the fall on line.

1:10:21.400 --> 1:10:26.880
<v Speaker 3>See, I'm I'm naturally skeptical, So I'm sitting on pins

1:10:26.880 --> 1:10:28.800
<v Speaker 3>and needles because I kind of think I could see

1:10:28.800 --> 1:10:31.559
<v Speaker 3>the PGA is zigging when everybody else is zagging.

1:10:31.680 --> 1:10:33.920
<v Speaker 2>But like that's just you know, probably me.

1:10:34.439 --> 1:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Who's what about the ecosystem? These these these entities have

1:10:37.800 --> 1:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>never been closer.

1:10:38.720 --> 1:10:41.479
<v Speaker 2>I know. It's Well, that's why it's on my list

1:10:41.560 --> 1:10:43.200
<v Speaker 2>of things that I'm fascinated about.

1:10:43.479 --> 1:10:46.519
<v Speaker 3>Like it's the last it's really the last big party

1:10:47.280 --> 1:10:50.040
<v Speaker 3>in golf that has to hear from yeah, and and

1:10:50.040 --> 1:10:53.880
<v Speaker 3>and it will shape how like if they support the

1:10:54.000 --> 1:10:56.280
<v Speaker 3>MLR ball without a doubt.

1:10:56.760 --> 1:10:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the PGA Tour has a choice. They

1:10:59.280 --> 1:11:01.200
<v Speaker 2>have to go. They have to do even if.

1:11:01.080 --> 1:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like tepid support for the ball.

1:11:05.240 --> 1:11:07.760
<v Speaker 3>If they don't support it though, if they kind of

1:11:07.800 --> 1:11:10.400
<v Speaker 3>give a PGA Tour statement.

1:11:10.800 --> 1:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Then which is get which is what gather? We want

1:11:13.280 --> 1:11:16.559
<v Speaker 1>to gather more information and see what the feedback periods? Like, like,

1:11:16.600 --> 1:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is that what you're if we hear that.

1:11:19.240 --> 1:11:21.599
<v Speaker 3>Because then all of a sudden, like it's like, hey,

1:11:21.960 --> 1:11:26.559
<v Speaker 3>well you know, obviously the PGA Tour and players kind

1:11:26.600 --> 1:11:29.760
<v Speaker 3>of consider the players a major, right is that fair

1:11:29.800 --> 1:11:30.799
<v Speaker 3>to say, yeah.

1:11:30.720 --> 1:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>No, it's the it's the it's the it's their biggest tournament.

1:11:33.080 --> 1:11:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so they consider that, and then all of a

1:11:34.800 --> 1:11:37.479
<v Speaker 3>sudden they can make the argument of like, hey, two

1:11:37.520 --> 1:11:42.439
<v Speaker 3>fifths of the majors in our eyes, say no to

1:11:42.479 --> 1:11:45.280
<v Speaker 3>this ball, or like we need to figure it out,

1:11:45.320 --> 1:11:48.040
<v Speaker 3>we need to come together and like the in two

1:11:48.080 --> 1:11:50.320
<v Speaker 3>fifths of the other half of the majors are the

1:11:50.560 --> 1:11:53.040
<v Speaker 3>are the people trying to institute this only one?

1:11:53.160 --> 1:11:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Like it's one versus one, right.

1:11:56.320 --> 1:12:00.719
<v Speaker 3>Like I just think that it's a super important statement.

1:12:01.479 --> 1:12:05.120
<v Speaker 3>See where it falls from everything kind of I've heard.

1:12:05.200 --> 1:12:08.479
<v Speaker 3>I think, I don't know. I I feel like it's

1:12:08.520 --> 1:12:11.879
<v Speaker 3>going to be more PGA Tour than than Master's support.

1:12:11.960 --> 1:12:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it'll be as defiant because I think

1:12:15.400 --> 1:12:18.200
<v Speaker 3>one of the big things is like the PGA members

1:12:18.680 --> 1:12:21.240
<v Speaker 3>the PGA membership, I don't know how they feel. And

1:12:21.280 --> 1:12:24.560
<v Speaker 3>there's you know, the PGA is in an interesting situation

1:12:24.720 --> 1:12:28.320
<v Speaker 3>much like the PGA Tour. The PGA has constituents, and

1:12:28.360 --> 1:12:33.000
<v Speaker 3>those constituents are are very tied in with the equipment manufacturers.

1:12:33.360 --> 1:12:35.679
<v Speaker 3>Like you know, you go to your local pro shop,

1:12:35.720 --> 1:12:38.920
<v Speaker 3>you understand they're tied in, right they you know, they

1:12:38.960 --> 1:12:41.479
<v Speaker 3>interface with these guys. So like that's that's kind of

1:12:41.520 --> 1:12:44.320
<v Speaker 3>my my uh. One of the things that it's just

1:12:44.360 --> 1:12:47.200
<v Speaker 3>something I'm I'm really fascinated about. And it's an early

1:12:47.200 --> 1:12:50.040
<v Speaker 3>week thing. It'll be done by whatever day Seth.

1:12:49.800 --> 1:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Wall probably Wednesday, Yeah, yeah, probably Wednesday. So yeah, like

1:12:52.680 --> 1:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I would I would be I would be surprised if

1:12:55.320 --> 1:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>it was anything other than like tepid support. I could

1:12:58.479 --> 1:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>even see basically a non answer answer whether they're still

1:13:03.080 --> 1:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>in the information gathering phase and and and we'll get

1:13:07.160 --> 1:13:09.519
<v Speaker 1>we'll get back to you guys with a more concrete

1:13:09.520 --> 1:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>answer by the time the feedback period is ending, right,

1:13:13.360 --> 1:13:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Like I could I could definitely foresee that scenario.

1:13:15.840 --> 1:13:18.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what has to happen to advance this discourse

1:13:19.320 --> 1:13:22.520
<v Speaker 3>and like we're in this weird phase, is like somebody's

1:13:22.520 --> 1:13:25.720
<v Speaker 3>got to go play with one of these balls, Like

1:13:26.320 --> 1:13:28.599
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what the USG is doing, Like they

1:13:28.800 --> 1:13:30.000
<v Speaker 3>have to get a freak.

1:13:30.200 --> 1:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what the match should be.

1:13:31.320 --> 1:13:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, they have to get a ball in one of

1:13:34.880 --> 1:13:39.320
<v Speaker 3>the best player's hands that's supportive of it, which isn't

1:13:39.360 --> 1:13:41.639
<v Speaker 3>a lot of them. So you could probably figure out

1:13:41.680 --> 1:13:44.640
<v Speaker 3>who who the guys are that would do this, But

1:13:44.880 --> 1:13:46.519
<v Speaker 3>you have to get the ball in one of their

1:13:46.560 --> 1:13:49.800
<v Speaker 3>hands and be like, hey, can you go play with

1:13:49.880 --> 1:13:52.160
<v Speaker 3>this and tell everybody this guy's not falling.

1:13:52.600 --> 1:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:13:53.280 --> 1:13:56.519
<v Speaker 1>I want to see like a Rory JT Fried Egg

1:13:56.600 --> 1:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>match roll back ball versus versus JT's ball of choice.

1:14:02.240 --> 1:14:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, Jay C's personally rolled back this year. It seems

1:14:05.439 --> 1:14:08.720
<v Speaker 3>like he's he's lost a few few miles an hour

1:14:08.800 --> 1:14:09.960
<v Speaker 3>on Yes, I think.

1:14:10.080 --> 1:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's going he's going the opposite direction. Unfortunately, we

1:14:13.840 --> 1:14:16.599
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked about JT. I think JT the defending champion.

1:14:17.960 --> 1:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>If if if the aim point, if you can, if

1:14:20.840 --> 1:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you can get the thing dialed in if he can

1:14:22.280 --> 1:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>get to you know, the number of digits right he's

1:14:26.920 --> 1:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>he's hashtag trending a little bit as well.

1:14:29.000 --> 1:14:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that Quail Hollow I thought was really promising because

1:14:31.800 --> 1:14:32.759
<v Speaker 3>he hasn't done anything.

1:14:32.760 --> 1:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I agree he has he has not done he has

1:14:34.400 --> 1:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>not done much over the past three months. But the

1:14:37.000 --> 1:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>way he played for at least fifty four holes of

1:14:38.960 --> 1:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Quail Hollow I thought was very encouraged.

1:14:40.360 --> 1:14:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would agree.

1:14:41.120 --> 1:14:43.439
<v Speaker 3>I like, I think like he's he's going to be

1:14:43.800 --> 1:14:45.479
<v Speaker 3>a very discounted player.

1:14:45.520 --> 1:14:46.439
<v Speaker 2>That's worth a look.

1:14:46.560 --> 1:14:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Like when you think about like, hey, he hasn't been there,

1:14:49.200 --> 1:14:53.120
<v Speaker 3>he hasn't been around. But like I mean again, like

1:14:53.120 --> 1:14:56.439
<v Speaker 3>like Rory, you're when you're that level of a player,

1:14:56.560 --> 1:15:00.360
<v Speaker 3>you're never far away from being great again.

1:15:00.680 --> 1:15:03.400
<v Speaker 2>It just takes one little thing to.

1:15:03.680 --> 1:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Iron play is just slightly regressed this year, but he's still,

1:15:07.640 --> 1:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, top a top thirty iron player. It's I mean,

1:15:10.640 --> 1:15:13.639
<v Speaker 1>it just comes down to the putting, the the ROMs,

1:15:13.640 --> 1:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the Scotti's, the Rory when he's in top flood obviously,

1:15:16.280 --> 1:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the cam Smith and Anders the can't is like all

1:15:18.280 --> 1:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>those guys putt better right now than JT does. But

1:15:22.280 --> 1:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not to say he can't do it for for

1:15:24.240 --> 1:15:25.479
<v Speaker 1>four days next week, it'll.

1:15:25.320 --> 1:15:28.400
<v Speaker 3>Kill Yeah, who's your pick to win? Then we'll get

1:15:28.400 --> 1:15:28.960
<v Speaker 3>you out of here.

1:15:31.280 --> 1:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Pick to win selfishly, Selfishly, I'd love to see a

1:15:38.760 --> 1:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Brooks win.

1:15:40.040 --> 1:15:40.679
<v Speaker 2>It'd be fun.

1:15:41.920 --> 1:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Realistically, I think it's Scotty. Yeah, realistically, I think Scotty

1:15:48.160 --> 1:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Scheffer's gonna win.

1:15:49.600 --> 1:15:53.320
<v Speaker 3>That'd be great win too. For the discourse, I'm gonna

1:15:53.360 --> 1:15:57.479
<v Speaker 3>take Ram going out on back to back, going back

1:15:57.479 --> 1:15:57.880
<v Speaker 3>to back.

1:15:58.400 --> 1:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>You just want to I mean I think, like any

1:16:00.080 --> 1:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>one at this point, like I want to see I

1:16:02.160 --> 1:16:04.559
<v Speaker 1>want to see like a historic rom page. I want

1:16:04.560 --> 1:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to see like seven eight nine wins, two three majors,

1:16:07.479 --> 1:16:10.719
<v Speaker 1>like just just to full out Ram assault.

1:16:10.880 --> 1:16:13.200
<v Speaker 3>I feel I feel like I'm chasing right now, and

1:16:13.280 --> 1:16:16.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't like this pick because of that. But like

1:16:17.080 --> 1:16:20.000
<v Speaker 3>somehow I talked myself out a rom for the Masters,

1:16:20.160 --> 1:16:22.760
<v Speaker 3>like after like after Riviera was like, I mean, I

1:16:22.760 --> 1:16:25.280
<v Speaker 3>don't know how you pick anybody else other than ROMs.

1:16:25.320 --> 1:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and then I was blowing I mean he

1:16:26.680 --> 1:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>was blowing chunks at TBC sawgress. He didn't play great

1:16:29.040 --> 1:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>at the match play, Like yeah, there was there was

1:16:30.800 --> 1:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there was a little bit of reduction in value.

1:16:33.120 --> 1:16:36.559
<v Speaker 2>And then I talked myself into Rory, you know, and

1:16:36.600 --> 1:16:37.400
<v Speaker 2>since then I've.

1:16:37.280 --> 1:16:39.599
<v Speaker 1>So apparently and apparently so did Rory.

1:16:39.720 --> 1:16:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:16:40.400 --> 1:16:43.719
<v Speaker 3>So so at this point now I'm I'm going Rom.

1:16:43.800 --> 1:16:46.400
<v Speaker 3>I've set on it, and you know, I can't be

1:16:46.479 --> 1:16:48.960
<v Speaker 3>moved off the position I am.

1:16:49.120 --> 1:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>But we're staking our claim to the top two players

1:16:51.360 --> 1:16:51.679
<v Speaker 1>in the world.

1:16:51.880 --> 1:16:54.000
<v Speaker 3>We're going out on limbs. You know, that's what people

1:16:54.040 --> 1:16:57.040
<v Speaker 3>are coming here for, is the bold prediction. I'm taking

1:16:57.160 --> 1:16:59.800
<v Speaker 3>John Ram If he wins, I'm gonna I'm gonna cut

1:16:59.800 --> 1:17:02.479
<v Speaker 3>this clip out and I'm going to celebrated like I was.

1:17:02.640 --> 1:17:04.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, I was the first guy on the board

1:17:04.360 --> 1:17:06.559
<v Speaker 3>with Rom and everybody else fell line.

1:17:06.760 --> 1:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Picked the number one player in the world.

1:17:10.200 --> 1:17:13.719
<v Speaker 3>Hey, everybody can read your writing at golf channel dot com.

1:17:13.760 --> 1:17:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Everybody can uh can listen to you and uh in

1:17:17.880 --> 1:17:21.120
<v Speaker 3>the Great Rex Hoggard on your podcast Golf Channel Podcast

1:17:21.160 --> 1:17:23.920
<v Speaker 3>with Rex and laugh and UH, they can see you

1:17:23.960 --> 1:17:24.360
<v Speaker 3>on TV.

1:17:24.479 --> 1:17:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Too. Are you gonna be doing any live.

1:17:25.880 --> 1:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>From just early week shows? Uh, that's when we have

1:17:30.720 --> 1:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>eight or nine hours to fill. They bring on. They

1:17:33.000 --> 1:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>bring us on to kill a segment with our various storylines,

1:17:36.920 --> 1:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>news and notes. We always have a lot of fun,

1:17:38.840 --> 1:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, just just Tuesday and Wednesday and then I

1:17:40.920 --> 1:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>get to kick back and enjoy this Western New York

1:17:43.280 --> 1:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>PGA championship.

1:17:44.320 --> 1:17:45.599
<v Speaker 2>Hey, enjoy going home.

1:17:45.840 --> 1:17:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I look forward to hearing about the meals and look

1:17:49.280 --> 1:17:52.400
<v Speaker 3>forward to seeing you at LACC in a couple couple

1:17:52.439 --> 1:17:54.320
<v Speaker 3>of weeks. So thanks so much for coming on.

1:17:54.439 --> 1:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Ryan, absolutely and I'd love to do it.

1:18:07.479 --> 1:18:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for listening to another episode of the Friday Podcast.

1:18:12.439 --> 1:18:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Today's episode. I don't know who's going to be edited

1:18:15.000 --> 1:18:17.360
<v Speaker 3>by at the point of recording this. It will either

1:18:17.400 --> 1:18:19.519
<v Speaker 3>be Matt Rus's or Meg Atkins.

1:18:19.560 --> 1:18:20.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure.

1:18:21.360 --> 1:18:23.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm lean there's probably gonna be Meg. I know Matt's

1:18:23.840 --> 1:18:28.240
<v Speaker 3>traveling right now, So thank you to whomever. They're both

1:18:28.280 --> 1:18:31.800
<v Speaker 3>great with, both wonderful people. As a quick reminder, we

1:18:31.840 --> 1:18:34.519
<v Speaker 3>are going to be cooking in Club TF this week.

1:18:34.880 --> 1:18:39.760
<v Speaker 3>As I mentioned earlier, we have a my favorite architectural

1:18:39.800 --> 1:18:43.479
<v Speaker 3>feature at every hole at Oakhill maybe not my favorite,

1:18:43.520 --> 1:18:47.800
<v Speaker 3>but like a notable architectural feature on every hole at

1:18:47.800 --> 1:18:50.720
<v Speaker 3>oak Hill East. It's a video that we're putting up

1:18:50.720 --> 1:18:54.439
<v Speaker 3>in Club TF. That's our membership program. So it is

1:18:54.479 --> 1:18:57.679
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and twenty dollars a year and you get

1:18:57.720 --> 1:19:00.360
<v Speaker 3>a ton of content. You get a weekly course file

1:19:00.400 --> 1:19:03.839
<v Speaker 3>which is a very in depth review with photography and everything.

1:19:04.160 --> 1:19:07.519
<v Speaker 3>Major weeks we'll have a Donald Ross roundtable with a

1:19:07.840 --> 1:19:11.000
<v Speaker 3>with a few architects that will also be up there

1:19:11.120 --> 1:19:12.320
<v Speaker 3>all about Donald Ross.

1:19:12.600 --> 1:19:13.760
<v Speaker 2>So if you're.

1:19:13.560 --> 1:19:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Looking for more content from us, if you're looking for

1:19:16.840 --> 1:19:19.479
<v Speaker 3>a way to support our content, this is really the

1:19:19.479 --> 1:19:22.920
<v Speaker 3>best avenue you can join at the fridagg dot com.

1:19:23.080 --> 1:19:25.439
<v Speaker 3>It's right across the top bar it says Club TFB

1:19:25.600 --> 1:19:29.839
<v Speaker 3>joined CLUBTFF there and you'll get all of our backdated content.

1:19:30.000 --> 1:19:32.560
<v Speaker 2>So we're now up over twenty golf.

1:19:32.280 --> 1:19:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Course reviews, so you could spend a good couple of

1:19:34.920 --> 1:19:36.240
<v Speaker 3>days reading through those.

1:19:36.880 --> 1:19:38.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, the.

1:19:37.760 --> 1:19:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Illustrations that Cameron Hurtis does are really top notch in there,

1:19:41.400 --> 1:19:44.599
<v Speaker 3>so I think they are alone worth the price of entry.

1:19:44.720 --> 1:19:48.320
<v Speaker 2>So join there and thank you guys for the support.

1:19:48.439 --> 1:19:52.160
<v Speaker 3>We also in CLUBDF have a PGA Championship cool bone,

1:19:52.520 --> 1:19:56.120
<v Speaker 3>so it's a way to when cash and the Frida

1:19:56.120 --> 1:20:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Egg Pro shop. But yeah, really really appreciate all this sport,

1:20:00.400 --> 1:20:03.040
<v Speaker 3>and thank you for listening to another edition of the

1:20:03.080 --> 1:20:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Friday Podcast.