Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest from Bucket buck
Speaker 1: Sexton dot com. All the crises we see playing out
Speaker 1: with this bid administration, and one part of it that
Speaker 1: you have to remember is that they have no plan
Speaker 1: to deal with any of this. Right, they're not good
Speaker 1: at fixing things. Not only are they causing the crises,
Speaker 1: but they don't respond well to the crises. What's the
Speaker 1: answer to we're worried about inflation, Oh, don't worry, It'll
Speaker 1: just be a little temporary inflation. Oh how are you
Speaker 1: going to stop people from flooding across the border? Oh, no,
Speaker 1: big deal. We'll just build more facilities for all the
Speaker 1: people illegally crossing and then release them even faster in
Speaker 1: the United States. Right when you understand that they don't
Speaker 1: view the end state here the same way you do,
Speaker 1: it all becomes so much more clear. I am worried
Speaker 1: about the economy these days, and you know that, But
Speaker 1: there's also so still a lot of opportunity out there,
Speaker 1: especially if you're in the markets. I've got friends who
Speaker 1: are talking about a melt up thesis where you're in
Speaker 1: the last months of a crazy frenzied run and you
Speaker 1: can make a lot of money in that right, Well,
Speaker 1: you've got to talk to my buddies at Carnivore Trading.
Speaker 1: All you have to do is sign up and you'll
Speaker 1: see what the several key indicators are that make them
Speaker 1: think that some of the biggest profits are going to
Speaker 1: come in Wall Street sectors that a lot of experts
Speaker 1: are missing. Carnivore Trading is an elite squad of strategists
Speaker 1: and they influence major Wall Street investors. I'm getting text
Speaker 1: messages from them all day long, and I'm taking action
Speaker 1: based upon what I know these guys at Carnivore are doing.
Speaker 1: I want the best, and so that's why I go
Speaker 1: with Carnivore. I mirror their trades with my discount broker.
Speaker 1: You can do the same. Remember a lot of their
Speaker 1: trades crush the S and P five hundred. It's pretty
Speaker 1: routine for them to do. So. They guarantee you'll earn
Speaker 1: five times your monthly subscription or double your money back.
Speaker 1: It's just a subscription. You pay it. They text you
Speaker 1: their trades that they're making. You follow their trades, you
Speaker 1: get that upside five extra monthly fee is what they
Speaker 1: guarantee just by mirroring their trades. The market looks to
Speaker 1: be on the verge of a big upswing. Here, get
Speaker 1: off the sidelines and mirror carnivorous trades today. You can
Speaker 1: get two weeks of this service free. Just go to
Speaker 1: get our Trades dot com and use promo code buck.
Speaker 1: That's get our Trades dot Com promo code buck. See
Speaker 1: website for guarantee terms and conditions. Pass performance not a
Speaker 1: guarantee of future earnings. When the Trump administration negotiated the
Speaker 1: Remain in Mexico agreement, the numbers plummeted. Now, the Remain
Speaker 1: in Mexico agreement didn't magically end poverty in the Northern Triangle.
Speaker 1: The Remain in Mexico agreement didn't magically cause the cartels
Speaker 1: they're committing horrific acts of crimes in the Northern Triangle
Speaker 1: to disappear. What the Remain in Mexico policy did is
Speaker 1: it was an agreement with the government of Mexico that
Speaker 1: people acrossed illegally, primarily from the Northern Triangle from Central
Speaker 1: America through Mexico, that they would remain in Mexico while
Speaker 1: their US asylum cases were proceeding. And it was an
Speaker 1: incredible success. Frankly, the success exceeded any reasonable expectations. The
Speaker 1: numbers plummeted, and they stayed low. They stayed low, month
Speaker 1: after month after month after month. It was a success.
Speaker 1: Now you suddenly see the numbers skyrocketing. It wasn't suddenly
Speaker 1: poverty returned to the Northern Triangle. It wasn't suddenly these
Speaker 1: vicious murdering cartels rediscovered. They were vicious murdling cartels. What
Speaker 1: happened is Joe Biden put his hand on the Bible
Speaker 1: and put his right hand in the air and repudiated
Speaker 1: the policies that we're working, ripped that international agreement to shreds,
Speaker 1: and that caused the spike. That is the one and
Speaker 1: only cause Biden cause and effect. Friends, when we're talking
Speaker 1: about the border, it couldn't be more clear. And the
Speaker 1: senator from Texas, Senor Cruz san Fuego, he gets it,
Speaker 1: he sees it, he knows, he understands as a Texan
Speaker 1: and as a constitutional lawyer and senator, actly what happened here.
Speaker 1: But anybody who's been paying attention, anyone who's honest about this,
Speaker 1: knows that the Biden administration is the reason why We
Speaker 1: had close to one hundred and eighty thousand people apprehended
Speaker 1: last month at our southern border. One hundred and eighty
Speaker 1: thousand people. Remember, there are also all the gotaways, hundreds
Speaker 1: and hundreds a day, sometimes a thousand a day, and
Speaker 1: those are individuals who are just getting across the border
Speaker 1: and not getting caught that we know about. Think about
Speaker 1: the smuggling that goes on, Think about the human trafficking,
Speaker 1: the cartel activity that border patrol and I don't even
Speaker 1: know about that's also going on. It's a mess. It's
Speaker 1: a disaster, and it is the clear and direct result
Speaker 1: of the Biden administration essentially ringing the dinner bell in
Speaker 1: America and saying who wants free food? We all see it,
Speaker 1: we get it, we know what happened here. Skip the
Speaker 1: immigration line, claim asylum at the border. It works. It
Speaker 1: works for people who cross illegally, those who don't want
Speaker 1: to go through our actual process, and so they're going
Speaker 1: to keep doing it. Cause and effect. This is reality.
Speaker 1: This is what is happening. Why did the remain in
Speaker 1: Mexico policy work so well? See, this goes to the
Speaker 1: heart of the essential, the fundamental lie that democrats weren't
Speaker 1: telling during the Trump administration about what was happening at
Speaker 1: the border. Their narrative was, these are all asylum seekers
Speaker 1: and they know if they go home they will be
Speaker 1: subject to political or criminal persecution, violence, And essentially it's
Speaker 1: a question of safety right. Asylum exists for people who
Speaker 1: if they don't get access into a place like the US,
Speaker 1: are likely to face severe harm and or be killed,
Speaker 1: and perhaps their families as well. So it's really a
Speaker 1: sacred thing. It's really goes through the core of our
Speaker 1: humanitarian impulse for our fellow human beings. Asylum in these
Speaker 1: cases is being abused. And you have to understand that
Speaker 1: the people who are claiming asylum, who are sometimes even
Speaker 1: reading off a sheet of paper, I have a credible
Speaker 1: fear of violence in my home country of insert the blank.
Speaker 1: They are posing as those who would jump off a ship,
Speaker 1: you know, within sight of America, knowing that if they
Speaker 1: were taken back to their home country they may be
Speaker 1: tortured and killed. They're posing as those people and they
Speaker 1: are not those people. There is no reason for them
Speaker 1: not to go through our legal immigration system other than
Speaker 1: it's arduous, it's annoying, it's time consuming, but if everybody
Speaker 1: just decides they're not going to do it, we don't
Speaker 1: have an immigration system anymore. So why did the remain
Speaker 1: in Mexico policy work so well? The numbers make this
Speaker 1: very clear. It's because the moment you took out this
Speaker 1: loophole policy that was started really just four kids who
Speaker 1: are at the border that you will take people in
Speaker 1: and they can claim defensive asylum and say, oh, no,
Speaker 1: I know I crossed in your country illegally, but if
Speaker 1: I go home, I'm going to be subject to persecution
Speaker 1: and violence. They said that's what was going on. It
Speaker 1: was not true. In hundreds of thousands of cases, they
Speaker 1: were just economic migrants seeking better job opportunities and stuff.
Speaker 1: And I always say this, I do not begrudge people this.
Speaker 1: I understand why they want this, and that they you know,
Speaker 1: that doesn't make anybody worthy of criticism or thinking any
Speaker 1: any less of them. But we can't have everyone just
Speaker 1: breaking our laws and forgetting that we have an immigration process,
Speaker 1: or else do we even have sovereignty as a country.
Speaker 1: You know, if Democrats really want to keep going down
Speaker 1: this pathway, which I think unfortunately they do, they're going
Speaker 1: to have to eventually argue for why do we even
Speaker 1: have an immigration system. What's the point of it? If
Speaker 1: everyone gets to stay, why do we pretend that anyone
Speaker 1: doesn't get to stay? Remain in Mexico made it so
Speaker 1: that you could not, and the Trump administration figured this out.
Speaker 1: You could not immediately gain access into the US by
Speaker 1: crossing illegally at the southern border and then gain the
Speaker 1: system by either not showing up or just or you
Speaker 1: can show up and then not show up for your
Speaker 1: next hearing. I mean, there's all these different phases gaming
Speaker 1: this system did not get you what you wanted. If
Speaker 1: once we're made in Mexico, rent went into effect, because
Speaker 1: now you actually had a entry into the US foreign
Speaker 1: asylum hearing, and if it did not go the way
Speaker 1: of the individual who wanted asylum, they were immediately subject
Speaker 1: to deportation back across the southern border. So it took
Speaker 1: out the loophole. Essentially, real assilees sure they would they
Speaker 1: could be granted the right to stay in the US forever.
Speaker 1: I mean people that you know we're speaking out against
Speaker 1: MS thirteen in a newspaper in Honduras or something. I mean,
Speaker 1: there are people who should get asylum under our laws,
Speaker 1: but those with phony asylum claims, no longer were able
Speaker 1: to exploit a week seam in the system. What do
Speaker 1: the Biden team do when they came in? Kick that
Speaker 1: week seam as hard as you can break it wide open.
Speaker 1: And this is the result. And Ted Cruz knows it.
Speaker 1: You know it, I know it. Play nineteen. Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: has been to the Canadian border as Vice president, but
Speaker 1: not the southern border. The last I check, we don't
Speaker 1: have a crisis of thousands of Canucks coming south across
Speaker 1: the border. This is a dereliction of duty. It is deliberate,
Speaker 1: and they don't intend to fix it. They don't intend
Speaker 1: to fix it because they have promised the radicals they
Speaker 1: will have open borders and they will not enforce our laws.
Speaker 1: And that is endangering the people of my home state
Speaker 1: of Texas. It's endangering people all across the country. It
Speaker 1: is unacceptable, it is inhumane, and it's wrong all true.
Speaker 1: This is the kind of fire in the belly that
Speaker 1: we need from Republicans on this issue, on all the
Speaker 1: swirling crises now around the Bide administration. They want people
Speaker 1: to think that everything's under control. They want you to
Speaker 1: believe that good old Amtrak. Joe is the engineer and
Speaker 1: we just have to sit on the train and he'll
Speaker 1: make the choo choo go in the right direction. That's
Speaker 1: just not the case. He was never up for this job.
Speaker 1: He's not up for this job. He won't be up
Speaker 1: for it. But they were able to use him in
Speaker 1: the moment for their purposes of achieving power and defeating Trump,
Speaker 1: and now we are stuck with the result. The Left
Speaker 1: doesn't want the border to be secure. They don't even
Speaker 1: talk about border security anymore. That was just a talking
Speaker 1: point they used in the past to pretend that there
Speaker 1: was some common ground so they could continue the incremental
Speaker 1: chipping away of our actual border security and get us
Speaker 1: to this point where now we have a de facto
Speaker 1: open border. And they know that over the long run
Speaker 1: this has enormous political implications that benefit the Democrat Party.
Speaker 1: So that's why this is happening. We have to first
Speaker 1: understand the fundamental reality of these situations, and particularly of
Speaker 1: the southern border, before we can get back to how
Speaker 1: about fixing it. Senator Martha Blackburn of Tennessee has introduced
Speaker 1: the reinstating essentially the Trump policies, the Trump era migrant
Speaker 1: protection protocols. She's saying, let's do it. The Migrant Protection
Speaker 1: Protocols Mandatory Act is what it is called. This bill
Speaker 1: would require migrants without proper documentation to stay in Mexico.
Speaker 1: This is just bring back remain in Mexico. This would
Speaker 1: fix the problem. There would still be unaccompanied miners. See
Speaker 1: I actually know how this works. There would still be
Speaker 1: uncompanied miners coming across the border, but not the family units,
Speaker 1: not the individuals who are claiming defensive asylum. So you
Speaker 1: would cut this down dramatically. You'd see an eighty ninety
Speaker 1: percent reduction in the first month or two, in my opinion,
Speaker 1: of the reintroduction of reintroduction rather of this protocol. And yet,
Speaker 1: who wants to place a bet whether the Biden administration
Speaker 1: will do this or not. They will do nothing to
Speaker 1: secure the border. They're going to keep on waving in
Speaker 1: as many people who break our laws as they can
Speaker 1: until the midterms really get in sight, and then they'll
Speaker 1: pose as reasonable to avoid the judgment of that same
Speaker 1: center of America that is still persuadable that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: is an ignorant old buffoon. It look in the little
Speaker 1: over one hundred days we went from a secure border
Speaker 1: to crisis. We went from energy independence two lines at
Speaker 1: the pump, and now we went from peace in the
Speaker 1: Middle East to hundreds of rockets fired by terrorists on
Speaker 1: our best ally, actually over a thousand rockets being fired
Speaker 1: on our best ally, Israel. This is exactly what happens,
Speaker 1: as you said, when we project weakness from the Oval Office.
Speaker 1: It is not a good situation. But the American people
Speaker 1: see it for what it is, and that's why they're
Speaker 1: demanding change. And I think as we look ahead, frankly,
Speaker 1: you're going to see the Republicans take back the House
Speaker 1: next year because of all the turmoil they see coming
Speaker 1: as a result of this administration's policies. I hope Jim
Speaker 1: Jordan is right about what will happen. He's certainly right
Speaker 1: about his assessment of what is happening in terms of
Speaker 1: the Biden administration. And it's not Remember, these are not
Speaker 1: just crises that it seems like the Biden team can't handle,
Speaker 1: but they're also in some cases clearly either caused by
Speaker 1: the Biden decision making apparatus, which is not just Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: as you know, they are all these puppeteers around him
Speaker 1: who make the little Marionette or the old kind of
Speaker 1: decrepit marionette dance around. But also in response to just
Speaker 1: Biden being the president, all right, that's certainly pushing for example,
Speaker 1: some of the wolves around the world, terrorist organizations, the Iranians,
Speaker 1: what we see going on now with a moss pushing
Speaker 1: them to take more action than they would under a
Speaker 1: Trump administration. As I've said all along, there's something to
Speaker 1: be said for a guy who is a little bit unpredictable.
Speaker 1: I'm always reminded of the line in Tombstone where they
Speaker 1: say where they say, let's keep Doc meeting Doc holiday
Speaker 1: on the street, Howitzer the shotgun. They'll be a little
Speaker 1: less jumpy that way. Essentially, you want to give your
Speaker 1: guy thet You want your machine gunner to be somebody
Speaker 1: who isn't afraid to use it, you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: And with Trump you have a situation where or you
Speaker 1: had a situation where enemies recognized an unpredictability and also
Speaker 1: an aggressiveness that could have been an aggression that could
Speaker 1: have been an issue for them had they transgressed against America.
Speaker 1: With Biden, you know, he wants to get us back
Speaker 1: in deep with the Iranians. You know, he wants to
Speaker 1: create a phony phony Iran deal pox Rania, which is
Speaker 1: not going to actually work out in our favor in
Speaker 1: the long run. But nonetheless, they don't know how to
Speaker 1: fix these things. And in fact, on the gas crisis
Speaker 1: another thing that's come up this week, it's more the
Speaker 1: response from the Biden team than it is anything they've
Speaker 1: they did to get us to the point, although they
Speaker 1: did cancel the Keystone XL pipeline, which goes to the
Speaker 1: mentality of fossil fuel is somehow bad. And here is
Speaker 1: what Here is what Biden says about this gas crisis,
Speaker 1: play seventeen. I'd also point out that I think what
Speaker 1: this shows is that I think we have to make
Speaker 1: a greater investment in education as it relates to being
Speaker 1: able to train and graduate more people proficient in cybersecurity. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's a that's a really good answer to the crisis.
Speaker 1: Let's let's have an initiative to have more cybersecurity people
Speaker 1: graduating from schools. Look, it's very likely that however this uh,
Speaker 1: this intrusion came about, it was probably probably engineer social
Speaker 1: engineering of some kind or a usage of human error
Speaker 1: to get access into the system. I don't think that's
Speaker 1: going to solve it. But you know what the government
Speaker 1: could do is have greater redundancy and and essentially understand
Speaker 1: that our energy infrastructure is fossil fuel based. See, they
Speaker 1: don't want to accept that. They want to take us
Speaker 1: to a place where we're we're phasing out pipelines, we're
Speaker 1: phasing out fossil fuels, natural gas, all these things because
Speaker 1: they believe, oh, by twenty fifty, we're gonna be you know,
Speaker 1: carbon neutral whatever I mean, the dates come on, the
Speaker 1: dates will change a million times between now when when
Speaker 1: we actually get the twenty fifty, all the numbers will shift.
Speaker 1: That's what they'll have to do because it will not
Speaker 1: be what they say. It's not going to work the
Speaker 1: way they say it will work. And yet what is
Speaker 1: their approach to all of this to talk about how
Speaker 1: we need investments in green energy and to say that
Speaker 1: we need more help with cyber I have to tell you,
Speaker 1: I think this is absurd. But get ready for this
Speaker 1: administration to have all the support of the hack journal
Speaker 1: media that spent three years give or take, because really
Speaker 1: they then they focused on COVID more and blaming Trump
Speaker 1: for all that on the Russia collusion lies. Anytime you
Speaker 1: see Democrats changing the subject to something that it's that
Speaker 1: they don't really care about and has something to do
Speaker 1: with Trump, just remember they still suffer from Trump't arrangement syndrome.
Speaker 1: Here's Claire McCaskill put twenty one. You know, and I'm
Speaker 1: going to tell you the truth. If none of these
Speaker 1: Republicans has the nerd to talk about cancel culture with
Speaker 1: what they're doing to Liz Cheney, I would use such
Speaker 1: an unladylike word right now if I could. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, I mean, what about that they want a
Speaker 1: lectures about doctor Seusan the canceled culture, and they are
Speaker 1: canceling her. They are canceling Liz Cheney because she has
Speaker 1: the audacity to tell the truth. Shame on all of them.
Speaker 1: I mean, she's a moron McCaskill's. She's actually just not
Speaker 1: very smart. Canceled culture isn't when people take a voice
Speaker 1: vote to remove you from a leadership position in Congress,
Speaker 1: but you still keep your job. No one says that
Speaker 1: you know, you should be kicked out of all society.
Speaker 1: No one calls you a racist, no one says you're
Speaker 1: a big at it that's cancel culture. But notice that
Speaker 1: they don't even know what it is that they're so
Speaker 1: used to just wielding it against their political opponents. Oh
Speaker 1: and Jen Saki is really upset about it too. Play fifteen.
Speaker 1: Let's start with the facts. More than eight h judges
Speaker 1: across the country throughout lawsuits attempting to overturn the outcome
Speaker 1: of the election, and on January sixth, this moment in history.
Speaker 1: We're looking at their hearings on Capitol Hill about the
Speaker 1: events on January sixth. Our nation's capital was attacked, Our
Speaker 1: democracy was attacked, and six people lost their lives. So
Speaker 1: it's disturbing to see any leader, regardless of party, being
Speaker 1: attacked for simply speaking the truth. And as the President
Speaker 1: said last week, it's hard to understand, but our belief.
Speaker 1: His belief is that the American people will have to
Speaker 1: make their own decisions about whether the reaction by the
Speaker 1: people they elected to represent them should be embracing and
Speaker 1: elevating conspiracies and attacks on our democracy, or whether it
Speaker 1: should be standing up for ideals that have historically been
Speaker 1: owned by both Democrats and Republicans representing the country throughout history.
Speaker 1: I cannot let this go We're going to dive into
Speaker 1: now Jensaki's smears, lies and propaganda about Liz Cheney and
Speaker 1: the insurruction. You know what's at the top of mine
Speaker 1: to do list this week and the one thing I'm
Speaker 1: really looking forward to having some filet mignon that's going
Speaker 1: to be the most tender, juicy, flavorful meat I've had
Speaker 1: in a long time, courtesy of Monk. That's right. I
Speaker 1: just take them out of my freezer and I know
Speaker 1: that I have the best grass fed and grass finished
Speaker 1: beef you can get anywhere, plus lamb, pastured pork and chicken.
Speaker 1: This is top quality. I mean, I'm so thankful that
Speaker 1: whenever it's time to make some really good protein for myself,
Speaker 1: I've got the delicious stuff from Moink the best. Their
Speaker 1: animals are raised outdoors, their fish swim wild in the ocean,
Speaker 1: and Monk meat is free of antibiotics, hormone, sugar and
Speaker 1: all the other junk you find in the meat aisle
Speaker 1: that's prepackaged. Monk was founded by an eighth generation farmer
Speaker 1: who's actually featured on Shark Tank. Host Kevin O'Leary said
Speaker 1: it's the best bacon he's ever tasted. And I totally agree.
Speaker 1: And Jamie Simmonoff, creator of the Ring video Doorbell, invested
Speaker 1: in moink All right, so this is an independent, not
Speaker 1: big agra family farms. You need to support them and
Speaker 1: have the best meat, best chicken, best beef you'll get anywhere,
Speaker 1: have it delivered right to your door in a box.
Speaker 1: It's so easy and straightforward. Join the monk movement today.
Speaker 1: Go to monkbox dot com slash buck right now and
Speaker 1: listeners to the show get free ground beef for a year.
Speaker 1: That's one of the best deals you're going to get anywhere.
Speaker 1: This is amazing, amazing ground beef. M o I n
Speaker 1: k box dot com, slash buck that's moinkbox dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck for I will do everything I can to
Speaker 1: ensure that the former president never again gets anywhere near
Speaker 1: the Oval office. We have seen the danger uh that
Speaker 1: he continues to provoke with his language. We have seen
Speaker 1: his lack of commitment and dedication to the Constitution, and
Speaker 1: I think it's very important that we make sure whomever
Speaker 1: we elect is somebody who will be faithful to the Constitute.
Speaker 1: Why is Liz Cheney playing into the hands of the left,
Speaker 1: the socialist, the authoritarians, increasingly just the straight up commies
Speaker 1: in the Democrat Party and the media and across the country.
Speaker 1: Why do this? Why give them what they want? I
Speaker 1: think you can come up with a number of plausible
Speaker 1: answers ego, bitterness, desire for power. It might sound crazy,
Speaker 1: but in an error where we just had President Trump
Speaker 1: come out of seemingly nowhere in the political world and
Speaker 1: become the actual president of the United States, doesn't it
Speaker 1: feel like anything's possible. Maybe in Liz Cheney's warped mind,
Speaker 1: even she would get further than even Dad did as
Speaker 1: VP to become the full on president of the United States. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's possible, isn't it. I had mentioned before Jensaki as
Speaker 1: the White House Press secretary. They pretend that this is
Speaker 1: the administration that's all about truth. And I have to
Speaker 1: tell you this when they say that six people died
Speaker 1: in the Capitol Hill riot, which as we know, was
Speaker 1: was largely comprised of and I'm talking about the people
Speaker 1: that actually broke the law, destructured a destruction of some
Speaker 1: federal property. They didn't go around, you know, slashing priceless
Speaker 1: painting somebody, you know, they broke some doors and windows,
Speaker 1: which is not okay, And I'm never going to say
Speaker 1: that's okay, you can't do that. That's a criminal act
Speaker 1: and trespassing and selfie taking, which is not a crime,
Speaker 1: but I'm just saying that's the kind of stuff that
Speaker 1: went on. They were not armed. There was no use
Speaker 1: of lethal force against law enforcement. There was the use
Speaker 1: of lethal force against the protester shot in the neck
Speaker 1: through a door. You imagine, imagine if imagine if a
Speaker 1: cop in Portland, one of those federal officers when there
Speaker 1: was that deployment last summer, a federal law enforcement by
Speaker 1: Trump to Portland when the anti FA lunatics were trying
Speaker 1: to burn down a federal courthouse. That's what they were
Speaker 1: trying to do. But imagine if if a cop from
Speaker 1: twenty feet away, as a guy was, you know, banging
Speaker 1: on the door of the courthouse or you know, trying
Speaker 1: to set a Molotov cocktail a light and throw it
Speaker 1: against the side of the building, a cop just just
Speaker 1: shot him right in the neck or right in the
Speaker 1: head twenty thirty feet away through a door. I think
Speaker 1: the media would be very would have a very different
Speaker 1: feeling about that. It's inexcusable though that Jensaki says that
Speaker 1: six people lost their lives in the Capitol Hill riot.
Speaker 1: People died of heart attacks from a day later, people
Speaker 1: that had nothing, nothing to do with actual violence on
Speaker 1: the side of the protesters. That thats to death. We've
Speaker 1: we've been through this. Officer sick, Nick had an aneurysm
Speaker 1: from stress. Well, cops deal with a lot of stressful situations. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's not murder when a cop has an aneurism a
Speaker 1: day after they're doing riot control. Do you think they
Speaker 1: would say at a BLM riot that you know, got
Speaker 1: out of hand. Well, all riots right of hand, but
Speaker 1: you see what I'm saying, a BLM protest that got
Speaker 1: out of hand. Do you think they would say that
Speaker 1: it's murder if an officer had a stroke a day later?
Speaker 1: Six people, six people died. Jen Psaki says, Oh, this,
Speaker 1: this is the bloody shirt they wave around. It's all
Speaker 1: a lie. The only person killed as a result of
Speaker 1: violence and the Capitol Hill riot was Ashley Babbitt. And
Speaker 1: yet they continue with this. And this is also tied
Speaker 1: directly to their obsession with Liz Cheney. She's been canceled.
Speaker 1: She When you are being used as a club to
Speaker 1: bludgeon your own side in politics. There's clearly a problem.
Speaker 1: That's what we're seeing. She has absolutely no interest in
Speaker 1: it seems what the long term ramifications of this are.
Speaker 1: Cheney just is on this jihad against Trump and she's
Speaker 1: not going to let it go, which then brings me
Speaker 1: to what this really is about. They there's an obsession,
Speaker 1: particularly from from CNN and from some people in this
Speaker 1: White House, an obsession with keeping the January Insurrection as
Speaker 1: an issue that people are thinking about and concerned about it.
Speaker 1: Just recently this week, there was some some testimony about
Speaker 1: how you know white supremacy. This was on Capitol Hill.
Speaker 1: White supremacy is the biggest national security threat we face
Speaker 1: or something. This is the people who tell you that
Speaker 1: are brainwashed and trying to create grounds for further authoritarianism
Speaker 1: in America. That's a stupid, nonsensical thing to say, but
Speaker 1: you'll you'll have you know, FBI directors who say it.
Speaker 1: You'll have all these individuals who work for the government
Speaker 1: because they know who is in charge right now. And
Speaker 1: the narrative of white supremacy as this imminent threat of
Speaker 1: overthrow of the government of a coup is so satisfying
Speaker 1: to the Democrats. It excuses all of their excesses, their viciousness,
Speaker 1: their insanity, their overreach. It excuses all of it. It
Speaker 1: justifies all of it. Sorry, we have to do this.
Speaker 1: We have to treat you, the opposition, the Republicans, the
Speaker 1: Trump supporters, we have to treat you like you are
Speaker 1: a clear and present danger to America because you are.
Speaker 1: We have to treat you like you're not really human,
Speaker 1: You're not really our fellow Americans, because you are. That's
Speaker 1: the attitude the left has about all of this, and
Speaker 1: they're looking to justify it. That's the attitude they have
Speaker 1: about why there's no good faith extended from the other
Speaker 1: side really on any issues these days. They want to
Speaker 1: control you, they want to shut you down, they want
Speaker 1: to cancel you. And Liz Cheney plays right into it.
Speaker 1: She continues to scratch at the scab of the January
Speaker 1: sixth riot, and Democrats are saying, great, keep doing it,
Speaker 1: keep it going, because it justifies the power grab that
Speaker 1: we are seeing that we're going through right now as
Speaker 1: a country. You know, we talk about freedom allott as conservatives,
Speaker 1: we talk about liberty on the right. We have gone
Speaker 1: through twelve months of the greatest intrusions on liberty, on
Speaker 1: constitutional guarantees of our individual rights in my lifetime, and
Speaker 1: it's not even close. And the media and the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party who perpetrated all of this are hoping that we
Speaker 1: don't ever really wake up, or that enough of us
Speaker 1: don't wake up to what they've done and what it
Speaker 1: means for this country going forward. And Liz Cheney unfortunately
Speaker 1: has allowed herself to become a weapon of the oppressive
Speaker 1: tyrant on the left. And it's shameful and it's sad.
Speaker 1: Reality is finally starting to set in for some of
Speaker 1: the lockdowners about masks. It's no longer possible to be
Speaker 1: a reasonable, rational person who's constantly wearing two mass I'm
Speaker 1: gonna wear two massa. I'm gonna a bike out in
Speaker 1: the woods by myself. And what if the COVID finds me.
Speaker 1: The COVID is like a heat seeking this all. It'll
Speaker 1: find me from wherever I need to hide. I need
Speaker 1: to hide from the COVID. You know there are people
Speaker 1: who are writing serious articles these days. I'm telling you
Speaker 1: the truth about pandemic PTSD. What have I been telling
Speaker 1: you for six months? There is a mass psychological disorder happening.
Speaker 1: I've been saying this, it's true, it's clear, and now
Speaker 1: finally there are people who are you know, mds and
Speaker 1: experts and all the rest of it who are saying,
Speaker 1: you know what, turns out that there is really an
Speaker 1: issue here. There's an article in the Atlantic, which is
Speaker 1: usually a left wing trash journal. Lucy McBride, who's an
Speaker 1: MD in washing DC, wrote, I tell my patients not
Speaker 1: to mask their kids outside. For most young people, the
Speaker 1: social and emotional benefits of taking off masks outdoors greatly
Speaker 1: outweighed the personal and public health advantages of keeping them on.
Speaker 1: This is central, This is central to what I've been
Speaker 1: saying for a year now. They have pretended that everything
Speaker 1: was a binary either or you take the virus seriously
Speaker 1: or you don't, when every decision they were making for us,
Speaker 1: mandated with the force of law, the force of the
Speaker 1: state behind it, was a judgment call based upon highly
Speaker 1: imperfect information that was supposed to be waging competing goods,
Speaker 1: competing upside and downside. And yet everything in the lockdown,
Speaker 1: everything in the pandemic, according to the Fauciites and the Democrats,
Speaker 1: because we know this was deeply politicized Remember they were
Speaker 1: used to pretend mask wearing is not a political statement.
Speaker 1: Bull crap. We all know it is, we've all known
Speaker 1: it is. But remember when you know, early on they
Speaker 1: were acting like they listened to the science. No, no,
Speaker 1: they don't. They absolutely do not listen to the science.
Speaker 1: Because that's why they have problems. Now, that's why there
Speaker 1: are issues with their ability to see the statements made
Speaker 1: by the CDC and say, okay, finally we'll calm down.
Speaker 1: One in five people, according to this article, one in
Speaker 1: five people experienced post pandemic PTSD, especially those who were infected,
Speaker 1: or it's higher than that for those who were infected
Speaker 1: or quarantined. I've been telling you that this is a
Speaker 1: mass hysteria, and I've been using those words intentionally, clearly
Speaker 1: and knowing what I'm what I'm really trying to imply.
Speaker 1: I meant it. People have gone nuts. You see it,
Speaker 1: you know it. It's all over the place. This broke
Speaker 1: a lot of people emotionally and psychologically. And that's why
Speaker 1: they were clinging to Fauci's little lab coat. That's why
Speaker 1: they were begging that little stalinist smurf, please please tell
Speaker 1: me it's all gonna be okay, because they were suffering
Speaker 1: from a form of mental illness. That's what we've seen.
Speaker 1: And it's scary, isn't it to think that our country
Speaker 1: could fall into that so quickly. It's scary to think
Speaker 1: that at a clinical level of an MD writing in
Speaker 1: the Atlantic about just this and how in other pandemics,
Speaker 1: it's the same thing. People lost rationality, lost the ability
Speaker 1: to calculate real risks, and we all suffered as a result.
Speaker 1: Because the neurotics on the left made this an anti
Speaker 1: Trump statement very early on. And also I believe, and
Speaker 1: now this gets into a deeper psychological level, that if
Speaker 1: you are generally, if you're an atheist with tremendous faith
Speaker 1: in this state, you were a lockdowner and all out
Speaker 1: lockdowner because you believe that the government, the experts in
Speaker 1: the government, we're going to keep you alive, and that
Speaker 1: all we had to do was give up all of
Speaker 1: our rights, give up all of our decision making to
Speaker 1: people who work in the government, and we'd be safe.
Speaker 1: Because the notion of living your life and accepting that
Speaker 1: we are all on borrowed time, a lot of leftists
Speaker 1: have a tremendous difficulty with that, and it goes to
Speaker 1: their look, there's an existential angst, There's no question about
Speaker 1: it for people who don't believe that anything comes after
Speaker 1: this life. You see in a lot of the Red States,
Speaker 1: the attitude was among people, including much older people, including
Speaker 1: those who are at high risk, was I don't have
Speaker 1: that much time, and I don't have that much time left.
Speaker 1: I want to live my life. Remember that in the
Speaker 1: early days, you know, back last April, last May, people
Speaker 1: were saying, yeah, I can't give up. You know, I'm
Speaker 1: in my late seventies. I don't want to give up
Speaker 1: a year or two of my life locked away in
Speaker 1: isolation from my children, my grandchild. I don't want to
Speaker 1: do that. That was shouted, Oh no, you shut up.
Speaker 1: The government's gonna take control of the government's in charge.
Speaker 1: People talk about post pandemic PTSD. I have post fauci
Speaker 1: PTSD at some level. I mean, I don't think I'm
Speaker 1: actually suffering from a mental illness because of it, but
Speaker 1: I do think that this is something that's really stuck
Speaker 1: with me. And I know for some of you, you know,
Speaker 1: we've covered this issue a lot on the show, and
Speaker 1: I get your messages where you say, you know, okay,
Speaker 1: we get it with masks, we get it with your
Speaker 1: ear disdain for Faucci. This is central, and it's about
Speaker 1: much more than just masks and foucy, don't you see.
Speaker 1: This is about your underlying relationship between citizen and state.
Speaker 1: This goes to the heart of whether or not you
Speaker 1: have any actual rights, any real protections from the state
Speaker 1: and freedoms as an individual that the government cannot transgress.
Speaker 1: What we saw in this last year is that for
Speaker 1: a lot of people the answer is no, that the
Speaker 1: government can decide it has a right to do effectively
Speaker 1: anything that should be very troubling to you. And it's
Speaker 1: a reminder that even in America, with all of our
Speaker 1: fancy gadgets and our incredible prosperity and our ability to
Speaker 1: start companies sitting on the couch that become worth millions
Speaker 1: or billions of dollars, all all these things that are
Speaker 1: going on that seemed just unfathomably amazing in so many ways,
Speaker 1: we could have a turn toward tyranny that destroys the
Speaker 1: most essential characteristics of our society, and it can happen
Speaker 1: in the blink of an eye. That's why I've been
Speaker 1: saying that this was all ultimately an advertisement for an
Speaker 1: armed population and the Second Amendment. Let me let me
Speaker 1: explain to you why I feel that way. We had
Speaker 1: a virus that had a less than one percent fatality
Speaker 1: rate in this country, and people were there was mass hysteria,
Speaker 1: there was pandemic trauma, and that made it psychologically impossible
Speaker 1: for a lot of people to make reasonable decisions. And
Speaker 1: the government was shutting down churches, the government was telling
Speaker 1: people that had to stay in their homes, and there
Speaker 1: was there were even considerations among some There were people
Speaker 1: who were experts who were saying we should have full on,
Speaker 1: you know, Chinese or Australian style lockdowns where you're forced
Speaker 1: to stay in your home for weeks and weeks at
Speaker 1: a time. That was for a virus with a less
Speaker 1: than one percent fatality rate. The actual fatality rate for
Speaker 1: the Spanish influenza of nineteen eighteen was more like five percent.
Speaker 1: And in the second wave it went after specifically when
Speaker 1: after twenty to forty year olds, and they never even
Speaker 1: really understood why, but people would die. They would get
Speaker 1: the Spanish flu. They would die in a matter of
Speaker 1: hours from the onset of symptoms. Young healthy people, how
Speaker 1: hysterical and tyrannical. Do you think the lockdowners would get
Speaker 1: if we were faced with anything even close to that?
Speaker 1: Do you think they would hesitate to lock you in
Speaker 1: your home and not understand why that's just not their right?
Speaker 1: You think they would hesitate from using the force of
Speaker 1: the state, using armed men paid by the government to
Speaker 1: make you comply, to take away your freedom, to lock
Speaker 1: you in a cell, to lock you in quarantine, to
Speaker 1: maybe even use lethal force if you refused. We've been
Speaker 1: through a stress test with this pandemic as a people,
Speaker 1: and not all of us, but a big portion of
Speaker 1: the American people failed. We need to be honest about that.
Speaker 1: When you spend a lot of time in the great outdoors,
Speaker 1: you know mother nature doesn't always play nice. SA Company
Speaker 1: has all the protective gear you need to brave the
Speaker 1: elements and explore more every day like they're multi use
Speaker 1: face shields UPF thirty, lightweighted, breathable. They come in dozens
Speaker 1: of eye catching designs for the entire family, perfect for
Speaker 1: your next outdoor adventure. Look the say face shields have
Speaker 1: such cool patterns. I've got one that's got an American
Speaker 1: flag design. I love it, and they're meant for outdoor activity. Friends, understand,
Speaker 1: this is not about COVID. This is about making sure
Speaker 1: you keep dust stole. This is about having a gator
Speaker 1: that's really comfortable, that looks cool, that you can wear
Speaker 1: anytime at the range, out in the woods. We're just
Speaker 1: walking around outside doing work. Right. There are over ten
Speaker 1: ways to put this to use. Facemask, bandanna, neckgator, so
Speaker 1: many more. So have have you been wearing yours? Well,
Speaker 1: you gotta get one first, right Say company also gives
Speaker 1: back to the men and women who put themselves in
Speaker 1: the front lines every day. Through their partnership with Operation Gratitude.
Speaker 1: Say company has donated over one hundred thousand face shields.
Speaker 1: With every order they donate one face shield to first responders.
Speaker 1: Right now, say companies offering an insane deal. Buy one
Speaker 1: face shield, get four free, one hundred and fifty dollar
Speaker 1: value for just twenty four ninety nine. That's buy one,
Speaker 1: get four free. Just go to sa phishing dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck to get five face shields for the price
Speaker 1: of one, plus a lifetime warranty and free returns. That's
Speaker 1: s a phishing dot com slash buck. We'll speaking of that.
Speaker 1: June fifteenth, Big deal paint a picture. What does that
Speaker 1: look like June fifteenth. Well, we're right now one percent positivity.
Speaker 1: It's been the lowest in the nation. It's been that
Speaker 1: way for almost two and out three weeks. We're seeing
Speaker 1: this blueprint where the vast majority of counties are in
Speaker 1: orange and yellow, and we're gonna move beyond the blueprint
Speaker 1: on the fifteenth of June. So just in a number
Speaker 1: of weeks, and that world looks a lot like the
Speaker 1: world we entered into before the pandemic. We're not wearing
Speaker 1: face coverings. We're not We're not, you know, restricted in
Speaker 1: any way, shape or form of doing the old things
Speaker 1: that we used to do, save huge, large scale indoor
Speaker 1: convention events like that where we'll use our common sense.
Speaker 1: But look, our vaccine numbers are still holding five hundred
Speaker 1: thirty three thousand shots in the last forty eight hours,
Speaker 1: or thirty two almost thirty three million. So we keep
Speaker 1: that going, we're gonna hear a lot of horns of
Speaker 1: enthusiasm because we'll get out the other side by June fifteenth.
Speaker 1: Not wearing face coverings. They're saying in California, people are
Speaker 1: finally saying enough is enough. I think it's so interesting
Speaker 1: too that they say face covering. It has to be
Speaker 1: a mask, friends, if you're going to be even remotely
Speaker 1: and as you know, look, is there anybody that you've
Speaker 1: heard that is more that is basically more anti mask
Speaker 1: than me? It has been all along. There's a handful
Speaker 1: that are as anti this nonsense as I am. But
Speaker 1: the point is if you think that, you know, having
Speaker 1: a like loosely draped handkerchief over your mouth is really
Speaker 1: doing a lot epidemiologically, I just don't even know what
Speaker 1: to say, Like, we're just this is absurd. Airflow going
Speaker 1: above it, airflow going below it, spreading out of the
Speaker 1: air around you. There's no filtration, there's anyway though it's
Speaker 1: so oh, it's also people are also But like I said,
Speaker 1: it's not only is it's so dumb, but there's a
Speaker 1: there's a lunacy involved here. There's pandemic PTSD. It's real.
Speaker 1: And why is Gavin Newsom taking this position now? Though ah, yes,
Speaker 1: this is important, it's not because Gavin Newsom is such
Speaker 1: an honorable fellow who understands that he was being a
Speaker 1: lockdown lunatic for so many months. It's that recall, baby,
Speaker 1: we all know that Newsome's not long for the governor's
Speaker 1: mansion if this continues. So, what's a good way to
Speaker 1: get people to stop thinking you're an authoritarian psycho putting
Speaker 1: in place or removing after having in place the strictest
Speaker 1: mandates in the country. That, I mean, he should feel
Speaker 1: like an idiot. He should feel like a fool, because
Speaker 1: he is. He's a fool. They shut down outdoor dining,
Speaker 1: my friends, after telling people outdoor dining will always be fine.
Speaker 1: They shut down outdoor dining in California. No benefit, no
Speaker 1: benefit from it whatsoever, none, zero that they can point to.
Speaker 1: And then, as we know, Gavin Newsom went to French
Speaker 1: laundry and did his whole thing. I mean, he's he's
Speaker 1: such a perfect politician for California. He's like, you know,
Speaker 1: I look goodness suit and I kind of just have
Speaker 1: this kind of gravelly, breathy thing going on and a
Speaker 1: lot of gel in my hair, and I'm just here
Speaker 1: to tell the great people of California that this is
Speaker 1: my best angle. You know. Is so this guy really
Speaker 1: should be like a soap opera actor, but instead he's
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom. I know, it's it's remarkable to see his
Speaker 1: fall from Grace. It's great. Though it's great. I can't
Speaker 1: tell you how happy I am that this clown he's
Speaker 1: going through what he's going through right now, because it
Speaker 1: shows that even in California, which has been overrun by
Speaker 1: leftist lunacy, there is still some albeit small, some hope
Speaker 1: of accountability for bad decision making. Is there any in
Speaker 1: this White House? Not yet, but people are start the
Speaker 1: figure out that there's some funky stuff going on. Andy Slavit,
Speaker 1: for example, is out there being an asked. He's a
Speaker 1: senior advisor on COVID response this White House and journals
Speaker 1: are asked. I actually think some of the journals are
Speaker 1: curious about this because they're now finally able to put
Speaker 1: it together. Oh my gosh, Biden and a lot of
Speaker 1: these senior Democrats, masking really is the maga hat for them,
Speaker 1: For the left, Masking really is a symbol of politics
Speaker 1: to them. You know, they were ignoring it in the past,
Speaker 1: or they couldn't believe, they couldn't bring themselves to believe it.
Speaker 1: It's very much true. Andy Slavit asked about this play too,
Speaker 1: and you're the vaccine guy. You're not the mask guy.
Speaker 1: But part of getting people vaccinated is to tell them
Speaker 1: their lives will be different, changed better if they get
Speaker 1: the vaccine. There is this Oval Office meeting yesterday with
Speaker 1: the President and the leaders of Congress. Everyone in this
Speaker 1: room has been vacci needed. So why were they all
Speaker 1: wearing masks? And what message is that set? Well? Look,
Speaker 1: I think people who've been vaccinated are starting to get
Speaker 1: a little bit impatient with um, what can I do?
Speaker 1: You know, can I go indoors? Gonna take masks off? Etc.
Speaker 1: And I think the CDC is getting their step by
Speaker 1: step so right now you can do pretty much everything
Speaker 1: outdoors without a mask. You can do everything indoors if
Speaker 1: you're around vaccinated people without a mask. So why are
Speaker 1: they all wearing masks in there? Yes, I don't think that.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure sure that the president is the average person.
Speaker 1: I personally think there's a lot of protections around the president.
Speaker 1: Why does he need lots of Secret Service agents? Why
Speaker 1: does he Why do they you know, belt and suspender
Speaker 1: everything with the president? Because there's a very important person.
Speaker 1: And I think you shouldn't take your mark just by
Speaker 1: what you see in the Oval Office. I think most people,
Speaker 1: if you're indoors around other people, that are vaccinated. The
Speaker 1: cd says it's okay, and I think you should listen
Speaker 1: to the CDC on that. What the heck was that?
Speaker 1: Did you hear this? More on? I mean, just I'm
Speaker 1: playing the audio for you. You could hear yourself. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, the president of Secret Service protection. So yeah,
Speaker 1: that's to stop lunatics from trying to assassinate the president.
Speaker 1: Has nothing to do with COVID, right. The Secret Service
Speaker 1: is not trying to karate chop viral particles in the air.
Speaker 1: They're not carrying around submachine guns because of the possibility
Speaker 1: of sub spittle from an aid, you know, becoming aerosolized
Speaker 1: and finding its way into Biden's you know, nasal farringal
Speaker 1: whatever you call it, nasal farynx. I believe, yeah, one
Speaker 1: has nothing to do with the other. But he doesn't
Speaker 1: have an answer because you know what the real answer is,
Speaker 1: because I think Biden himself might be suffering from some
Speaker 1: degree of pandemic PTSD. I think for a lot of people,
Speaker 1: this the face covering was a security blanket for them,
Speaker 1: and it was a symbol to them, and they could
Speaker 1: wear this thing and think I'm a good, smart person
Speaker 1: who listens to the thalliance, and that was after a while,
Speaker 1: not only something that they they needed, but they enjoyed.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna say it, I think there are libs
Speaker 1: out there who enjoy this craziness. They like not not
Speaker 1: the pandemic, but they like mask conformity. It's a show
Speaker 1: of mass solidarity with government mandates and policy. If we
Speaker 1: can get everybody to wear masks, we can get everybody
Speaker 1: to lessen their CEO two footprint. If we can get
Speaker 1: everybody to wear masks, we can get everybody to hand
Speaker 1: in their firearms or else. Right, collective action, the moral
Speaker 1: equivalent of war. Take it all the way back to
Speaker 1: the origins, the earliest days of mass propaganda in America,
Speaker 1: with the advent of Yes Radio in World War One,
Speaker 1: and you have a very clear connection and the messaging
Speaker 1: of the moral equivalent of war. Everyone has to move
Speaker 1: together and do what the state says, and we're all
Speaker 1: in this, and you know, don't be don't be questioning,
Speaker 1: don't be an outsider. There's a lot of comfort, far
Speaker 1: too much of it among Democrats on this issue, and
Speaker 1: they I think they've really acclimated themselves to a world
Speaker 1: in which the government can restrict your physical comfort and
Speaker 1: freedom in whatever way it deems necessary, just based upon
Speaker 1: the fact that you're a human being who needs oxygen.
Speaker 1: And that's why Andy Slavitt, who's supposed to be an
Speaker 1: expert on what's going on with COVID response and the vaccine,
Speaker 1: specifically bumbles like a moron on National TV when he's asked,
Speaker 1: why is old Man Biden vaccinated? Surrounded with the vaccinated
Speaker 1: and still wearing a mask indoors? Why is he doing it? Well,
Speaker 1: it's the same answers you get when they ask why
Speaker 1: is man Biden wearing a mask outside even though he's vaccinated.
Speaker 1: The chance of him getting COVID and it being a
Speaker 1: severe event even if you were to get it is
Speaker 1: is something that should be ignored. But he won't do
Speaker 1: it because it was never about listening to the science.
Speaker 1: It was always about controlling you. If you were going
Speaker 1: into a completely crowded situation where people are essentially falling
Speaker 1: all over each other, then you wear a mask. But
Speaker 1: any other time, if you have vaccinated in your outside,
Speaker 1: put aside your mask, you don't have to wear it.
Speaker 1: Put aside your mask, Fouchi says, under those specific circumstances,
Speaker 1: finally starting to say it. Take the damn mask off,
Speaker 1: lib loons, take it off. Stop if you're unvacced, I mean,
Speaker 1: if you're a vaccinated and outside and unvaccinitent outside, if
Speaker 1: you're alone or your family. That's the actual CDC guidance.
Speaker 1: But I want to let you know we found, courtesy
Speaker 1: of comedian Tyler Fisher fic h R, we found some
Speaker 1: very important additional Fauci guidance that we wanted to share
Speaker 1: with you. Here very important Fauci guidance on how to
Speaker 1: avoid the COVID from our friend Tyler Fisher. Here's Fauci
Speaker 1: sort of play three. Look. I rarely admit I'm wrong,
Speaker 1: but I was wrong about children needing masks outside. They
Speaker 1: do not need a mask outside if they have a
Speaker 1: plastic bag over the head. Toss a clear bag over
Speaker 1: your kid's dome piece, duct tape around the neck so
Speaker 1: no droplets can come in or out. Poke a couple
Speaker 1: holes so they could breathe. Then. Heck, if they get hunger,
Speaker 1: you can even throw a couple of Graham crackers in there. Now,
Speaker 1: it's not going to offer the perfect protection, so I'd
Speaker 1: even go ahead and dip your kids in a vat
Speaker 1: of boiling hot wax. It'll dry and sort of make
Speaker 1: a protective covid shell. Two straws in the nose so
Speaker 1: they could Breathe toss them in a crawl space of
Speaker 1: the attic, and then in three to nine to twenty
Speaker 1: five years you can pull them out, crack the shell,
Speaker 1: and they can get back to a normal life, playing
Speaker 1: and going to school. It just makes common sense. It's gy.
Speaker 1: Tyler Fisher is amazing. He's really the only fauci that
Speaker 1: that might even exceed my own. I gotta say, he's
Speaker 1: doing a great job, really is. So you can you
Speaker 1: can follow if you want. He will actually make a
Speaker 1: well before I before I get into that, Before I
Speaker 1: get into that, let's just say you should definitely follow him.
Speaker 1: You can go to Tyler Fisher dot com as his
Speaker 1: website and tie the fish fi sch tie the fish
Speaker 1: and it's Tyler Fisher fi sh e r that's how
Speaker 1: you spell his name. So he does great stuff, and
Speaker 1: his stuff is really really funny. I've actually well, it
Speaker 1: turns out, folks, we went deep into the vault, and
Speaker 1: it's maybe a big surprise to you. There is some
Speaker 1: specific Foucci advice out there about me. Buck Sexton about me,
Speaker 1: you know, and how you shouldn't listen to me when
Speaker 1: it comes to protecting yourself from droplets. Here is more
Speaker 1: fake fauci play for Okay, so I'm gonna be doing
Speaker 1: a very special COVID safety protocol for the anti science
Speaker 1: Dare I say, master Buck Sexton, who claims this virus
Speaker 1: was drummed up, made up in a lab somewhere and
Speaker 1: we got a serious safety problem on this show. And
Speaker 1: I'm mostly doing this to protect your listeners. For starters,
Speaker 1: I don't see any protection on that very long, weird, gray,
Speaker 1: phallic looking microphone. I would put a mask on it.
Speaker 1: Better yet four masks, or even based on the shape,
Speaker 1: you could throw a condom on it. And I'll say,
Speaker 1: I'm less concerned about you catching COVID from somebody else's
Speaker 1: droplets on that microphone. I'm actually more concerned that the
Speaker 1: microphone is gonna catch your virus, which is disinformation that
Speaker 1: you are spreading at a viral rate. You're like the
Speaker 1: hydroxycloroquin of podcasts untested and very dangerous. I'd say probably
Speaker 1: the only real thing on this podcast is your hairline,
Speaker 1: which I'm a bit jealous of. This guy's great oh Man,
Speaker 1: Tyler Fisher folks uh F I s h e R
Speaker 1: Tyler Fisher dot com. And he will our favorite fake Faucci.
Speaker 1: He will do a cameo personalized Faucci impression for you.
Speaker 1: The cameo app you could go and you know, for
Speaker 1: a for a nominal fee, he'll do a little Faucci
Speaker 1: impression for you. So great thing to make to you know,
Speaker 1: send you a friend, maybe have a Faucci birthday message
Speaker 1: sent to a friend or whatever. So he's doing he's
Speaker 1: doing a really good job. We appreciate it. I don't
Speaker 1: remember how, but Tyler um it seems like a really
Speaker 1: really nice guy. He knew that I played one of
Speaker 1: his clips earlier on the show. I guess it was
Speaker 1: last week, and he reached out and I said, I said, buddy,
Speaker 1: you're amazing. Your impressions are fantastic. He actually does a
Speaker 1: few very good impressions. And so he's a comedian and
Speaker 1: a good guy. You can check out his stuff there.
Speaker 1: We really enjoyed that, though, droplets. That's he see. It's keywords,
Speaker 1: you know, like think like when I always talking about mitigation.
Speaker 1: You know, Fauci loves talking about mitigation. But he does
Speaker 1: always he always falls back of the droplets. You know,
Speaker 1: there are certain words that the Stalinist smurf uses that
Speaker 1: you need to just remember. Anyway, onto the reality here
Speaker 1: of of masks and where we are with all this.
Speaker 1: You have even CNN's doctor Sanjay Gupta um when it
Speaker 1: came to Susan, So here's what happened. I think yesterday
Speaker 1: I play this for you. Susan Collins center of Collins,
Speaker 1: Oh Hash talked of never heard of perfect who Hash
Speaker 1: who is in the Senate and sort of talks like this.
Speaker 1: But Susan Collins, you know, she said that she doesn't
Speaker 1: really trust the CDC when it comes to the way
Speaker 1: they're expressing their guidance. Even Sanjay Gupta is like, yeah,
Speaker 1: as CDC has been losing some points Blade twelve. It
Speaker 1: pains me to say this, but I see where she's
Speaker 1: coming from a senator columns on this. I mean, I
Speaker 1: think for a long time the concern was a CDC
Speaker 1: was providing guidance you know, at the beginning of the
Speaker 1: pandemic that was not scientifically based. As a result, we
Speaker 1: didn't do things that we should have done in this
Speaker 1: country that could have greatly mitigated what has happened here,
Speaker 1: and now I think it's almost a little bit of
Speaker 1: the reverse problem. The science is not necessarily being followed
Speaker 1: to the same extent, and as a result, we're probably
Speaker 1: doing things that we don't need to be doing. So,
Speaker 1: you know, in the end, the CDC needs to be
Speaker 1: just a science based organization. What does the science say
Speaker 1: you don't need to wear a mask outside. It's just
Speaker 1: one of these things that you know, again, we've known
Speaker 1: this for some time. We didn't know in the beginning.
Speaker 1: We've all learned a lot over the past year, but
Speaker 1: now we know it's not clear that there's really been
Speaker 1: any cases of outdoor transmission, to be a couple of
Speaker 1: cases throughout the last year in the entire world that
Speaker 1: have really been documented. So indoor masking, if you're vaccinated,
Speaker 1: I don't think you need to wear mask indoors either.
Speaker 1: So this is what the science is sort of showing,
Speaker 1: and I think the CDC just needs to probably say
Speaker 1: that they're airing on the side of caution. I get it,
Speaker 1: you know, I think we've all been traumatized here, but
Speaker 1: I think, you know, at this point it has to
Speaker 1: be very clear what the science shows and what you
Speaker 1: can do as a result of that. Yeah, the lockdown
Speaker 1: Libs have been super traumatized because they've gone crazy over
Speaker 1: this because they weren't being rational and reasonable and this
Speaker 1: all got wrapped up with their anti Trumpist area early on,
Speaker 1: and then they couldn't separate the things, and we've all
Speaker 1: had to deal with their where where's your mask? Or
Speaker 1: we're outside and you walk thirty feet away from me.
Speaker 1: We've been dealing with this for far too long as
Speaker 1: it is, So get a grip, Libs, take off your
Speaker 1: dumb mask. Our friend Pedro Gonzalez back in the mix.
Speaker 1: He's a senior writer at American Greatness. Go to American
Speaker 1: Greatness am greatness dot com. That's am Greatness dot com
Speaker 1: for his latest piece. Pedro always going to have you, hey,
Speaker 1: but going to be here. So we have Liz Cheney out,
Speaker 1: which is so sad for the Democrats because now it's
Speaker 1: one less excuse to keep talking about the insurrection. But
Speaker 1: we're being told that at least Stephonic is being put
Speaker 1: forward by GOP leadership to take over. And everybody that
Speaker 1: I know that I trust on these issues who follows
Speaker 1: the Congress and the GOP within the Congress very closely,
Speaker 1: has got not even questions concerns. What do you see here? Well, basically,
Speaker 1: I think that the whole row over Cheney and Stephonic
Speaker 1: and the way that it's being framed as this is
Speaker 1: a victory for the populists and that the establishment has
Speaker 1: been dealt with, well, I think it's completely wrong, and
Speaker 1: it's actually frustrating because I'm seeing a lot of people
Speaker 1: that I think are I respected, who are smart, kind
Speaker 1: of go all into this, like, Okay, great, we got
Speaker 1: rid of Cheney. That's one rhino down, It's hold on,
Speaker 1: do you know who Stephonic is? Have you actually looked
Speaker 1: at Stephonic's record? And this is not a win really, Like,
Speaker 1: I'm not defending Cheney. I think she's terrible. I think
Speaker 1: that the Cheney name, just like the Bush name, should
Speaker 1: only be spoken to spite it and mock it. But
Speaker 1: it doesn't make any sense that you're replacing Cheney with
Speaker 1: with someone who's actually worse than her. And the only
Speaker 1: redeeming factor about Stephonic in the eyes of some people,
Speaker 1: I guess, is that she has rhetorically been very pro Trump,
Speaker 1: But if you look at her voting record, that like
Speaker 1: the deep irony of this is that Cheney has voted
Speaker 1: more consistently in line with Trump than Stephonic ever did.
Speaker 1: And that's just really the tip of the iceberg here
Speaker 1: With Stephonic, I just feel like it's it's too much
Speaker 1: to add ask at this point, Pedro, for people who care,
Speaker 1: who still care about the Republican Party in its future,
Speaker 1: to just let it go that it seems only rhinos
Speaker 1: get to be in leadership, you know, McCarthy, who's bunk
Speaker 1: mates with Frank Luntz and all that stuff. I mean,
Speaker 1: can we get somebody that feels like they're you know,
Speaker 1: the leadership on the left in the Democrat Party is
Speaker 1: actually in leadership right? I mean, Nancy Pelosi is a
Speaker 1: limousine liberal and a big fake and doesn't actually care
Speaker 1: about the poor and minorities and all the rest of it.
Speaker 1: But she does deliver on left wing agenda items for
Speaker 1: them and does mouth the required talking points of a
Speaker 1: progressive always never deviates from it. On the right, why
Speaker 1: don't we get McCarthy, We get Chainey and other Saint Stefonic.
Speaker 1: Can we get somebody that we get, you know, Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell is the Senate Minority leader. Can we get somebody
Speaker 1: that actually wants to fight. Well, no, that's the message
Speaker 1: GPS sending. You know, you don't get that. And this
Speaker 1: and this is actually nothing new. It predates Trump. This
Speaker 1: we were talking about going back probably a few decades.
Speaker 1: This is what the GOP does. It takes the anger
Speaker 1: of its voters. It takes their their anger, their money,
Speaker 1: their time and attention, and it says, well, we'll offer
Speaker 1: you a real solution, we'll offer you an alternative to
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party. And then also we're going to clean
Speaker 1: up our own party. And then you vote for them
Speaker 1: and you give them power and then they stab you
Speaker 1: in the back. And this is historically the one thing
Speaker 1: the GOP has been very good at is this is
Speaker 1: taking popular anger at the political establishment, at the uniparty
Speaker 1: and essentially assimilating it into that establishment by dressing it
Speaker 1: up as change, like this is it, this is the
Speaker 1: this is finally it. We're really going to get rid
Speaker 1: of the rhinos, We're really going to beat the Democrats.
Speaker 1: But you don't you get the same thing every single time,
Speaker 1: and in fact, the GOP tends to lurch left like
Speaker 1: on all the really important issue they over time, they
Speaker 1: just tend to drift left while still retaining the pro
Speaker 1: business aspect of you know, like tax cuts and deregulation
Speaker 1: and things like that. And I think it's easy to
Speaker 1: miss all of this because because the Democratic parties is
Speaker 1: so deranged and rhetorically so out of control. But like
Speaker 1: you said, a lot of this is fake. Like Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi's limousine Liberals, she lives in a gated community. She
Speaker 1: doesn't have to deal with any of the felons that
Speaker 1: she wants to release from prison or to deal with
Speaker 1: the consequence of mass immigration. Her neighborhood doesn't change, in
Speaker 1: other words, as a result of her policies. But like
Speaker 1: you said, at least people on the left, Democratic voters,
Speaker 1: they tend to get more bang for their buck, whereas
Speaker 1: what Republican voters get is they get stabbed in the
Speaker 1: back and they get lied to. And so right now
Speaker 1: there's like I said, there's a lot of people that
Speaker 1: are buying into this whole like, oh, great, Stephonic is
Speaker 1: a real change, and it's something like they're going to
Speaker 1: realize inevitably, like oh, we were lied to again, Great,
Speaker 1: they stabbed us in the back again. We're speaking of
Speaker 1: Pedro Gonzalez go to am Greatness American Greatness dot Com
Speaker 1: for his latest pieces where he's a senior writer. Pedro,
Speaker 1: you brought this story to my attention. I just I
Speaker 1: want to give everyone listening a little bit of background
Speaker 1: on it before we talk about how really troubling this is.
Speaker 1: This is the Washington Post, folks, so this is a
Speaker 1: liberal newspaper, and you know this isn't coming from some
Speaker 1: blog somewhere. Get rid of Confederate rock or risk cult
Speaker 1: custody of multi racial daughter, court tells woman. Here's here's
Speaker 1: some of this. This piece by Timothy bella quote a
Speaker 1: rock near a woman's driveway in upstate New York could
Speaker 1: affect the custody case of her multi racial daughter. But
Speaker 1: it is not the rock itself that is potentially risking
Speaker 1: a mother's custody of her child. It is what's decorated
Speaker 1: on the rock, the Confederate flag. Appella Justice with the
Speaker 1: New York Supreme Court on Thursday ordered a Tompkins County
Speaker 1: woman to remove the Confederate flag painted rock or risk
Speaker 1: a change in circumstances to the child custody case of
Speaker 1: her young daughter. Justice Stanley Pritzker wrote in the unanimous
Speaker 1: five o decision that while the woman identified only as
Speaker 1: Christie B. B was protected under the First Amendment to
Speaker 1: display the Confederate Flag, the rocks presence through June one
Speaker 1: would force the court to reconsider the joint custody she
Speaker 1: has with the girl's father. Just one more thing here,
Speaker 1: pedro quote. Given that the child is of mixed race,
Speaker 1: it would seem apparent that the presence of the flag
Speaker 1: is not in the child's best interests, as the mother
Speaker 1: must encourage and teach the child to embrace her mixed
Speaker 1: race identity rather than thrust her into a world that
Speaker 1: only makes sense through the tortured lens of cognitive cognitive dissonance.
Speaker 1: Judge Pritzker wrote for the Supreme Courts Third Department in
Speaker 1: New York State, what the heck? This is a judge
Speaker 1: telling you how to decorate your house, what political views
Speaker 1: to have, and how to raise your kids. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's what it boils down to. And I think it's
Speaker 1: it's for a lot of people. They're going to read
Speaker 1: this story, They're they're going to see the Confederate flag thing,
Speaker 1: and they're probably gonna feel, maybe instinctively, like, oh, I
Speaker 1: you know, maybe there is something wrong about this about
Speaker 1: the Confederate flag or like that, they'll focus on the
Speaker 1: tech curation part. In other words, but that's I think
Speaker 1: that's actually a huge miss. That's not. The important part
Speaker 1: of the story is not the Confederate flag. It's the
Speaker 1: fact that there's here's a judge saying that the political
Speaker 1: views and opinions of the parent of the parents are
Speaker 1: harmful to the children without actually having to demonstrate any
Speaker 1: actual harm, and then threatening you to change your your
Speaker 1: views and if you don't change your views, change the
Speaker 1: way that you've actually arranged your personal belongings, or we're
Speaker 1: going to take away your kid. I don't understand why
Speaker 1: this is not a huge story. It should be, because
Speaker 1: the first thing that came to my mind is because
Speaker 1: I'm a little bit sarcastic, was, oh, thank god, at
Speaker 1: least we don't live in a repressive country like China,
Speaker 1: where unelected managers can just arbitrarily tell you how to think,
Speaker 1: how to speak, what opinions to have, and how to
Speaker 1: decorate your house. It's amazing, I mean, it's stunning you
Speaker 1: brought this to my attention. I was just I thought, well,
Speaker 1: what do you mean? And sure enough, there's some news
Speaker 1: coverage of this. But I want to say, where are
Speaker 1: conservatives on this? And I'll just say this outline. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm not somebody who you know tends to you know,
Speaker 1: over I try. I should say not to overreact to
Speaker 1: government overreach, right, because it But if they if they
Speaker 1: can do this given the realities of discourse on the
Speaker 1: left these days about how we live in an entirely
Speaker 1: white supremacist society, and how far is this from a
Speaker 1: court saying, you know, you are a parent who objected
Speaker 1: at one of these recent uh you know, pta meetings
Speaker 1: to a critical race theory and you have a multi
Speaker 1: racial child, you know, so we might have to actually
Speaker 1: affect your custody of that child because you don't support
Speaker 1: critical race theory. I don't see how that's not a
Speaker 1: logical conclusion from this, right, And in states like Tennessee
Speaker 1: right now, where you have attempts to ban critical race theory,
Speaker 1: teachers are just rejecting it. Like in other words, it's
Speaker 1: okay for you to break the law when when the
Speaker 1: law is actually written as such, when when you're doing
Speaker 1: it from a kind of left wing position. But on
Speaker 1: the other hand, if if the judge that you're dealing
Speaker 1: with is himself a leftist, like the rules don't apply
Speaker 1: that way, Like you can't if you basically if you
Speaker 1: try to do the same thing from the right, like, well,
Speaker 1: I'm going to ignore what this judge says, You're gonna
Speaker 1: lose your kid. It doesn't. This only goes one way
Speaker 1: in other words, And I think that this is actually
Speaker 1: cause for concern. And I'm like you, like I try
Speaker 1: not to get too worked up about the news because
Speaker 1: if I did, I would go insane, and especially government
Speaker 1: over each because this is the world that we live
Speaker 1: in now. But this is definitely, I think, a new
Speaker 1: step in the wrong direction. And in the background you
Speaker 1: also have an Attorney General, Merrick Garland saying that domestic
Speaker 1: extremism of the white variety is the greatest danger of
Speaker 1: this country faces. So you have a kind of a
Speaker 1: new kind of legal system that is emerging that is
Speaker 1: going to i think normalize this kind of thing where
Speaker 1: if you have the wrong opinions, if they smell wrong,
Speaker 1: if you're not towing the line, like the ideological line
Speaker 1: that everyone is bowing to, which is I think encapsulate
Speaker 1: by the critical race theory narrative, which is America's bad
Speaker 1: white people are bad, America's racist, Then you're actually going
Speaker 1: to start not just seeing things like people losing their jobs,
Speaker 1: but you know, are you like, what could happen to
Speaker 1: your family? I don't want to get I guess two
Speaker 1: ahead of it, but I think the threat of this
Speaker 1: is real. A court just threatened to take away someone's
Speaker 1: kid because of basically their political opinions are on display.
Speaker 1: That's not an exaggeration to be deeply concerned about that, Pedro.
Speaker 1: I wonder what it will take. I wonder what it
Speaker 1: will take for the Republican Party to finally have really
Speaker 1: a unified message about going on offense. When it comes
Speaker 1: to school curriculum, critical race theory, and speech, it feels
Speaker 1: to me like we're still in this zone of we
Speaker 1: want to preserve a neutral public square where we don't
Speaker 1: want to tell people, you know, we don't want to
Speaker 1: you know, teach patriotism, or we don't want to tell
Speaker 1: people to love there. We just want everyone to be
Speaker 1: able to And it feels like that has been a
Speaker 1: losing strategy to the point now where we are defending,
Speaker 1: so to speak, on the football field, on the goal line.
Speaker 1: When it comes to free speech, when you see what's
Speaker 1: going on in this story and so many others. Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: I don't actually know if the Republican Party can do
Speaker 1: this because the Party, it's kind of like a zombie.
Speaker 1: It doesn't seem to change no matter what it gets
Speaker 1: hit with or what comes at it. It just keeps
Speaker 1: strudging along and absorbs whatever happens and finds a way
Speaker 1: to kind of exist in that space. But for my part,
Speaker 1: I think that we should actually take the gloves off.
Speaker 1: And if we ever do, and we hopefully will have
Speaker 1: another shot at the White House and another shot at
Speaker 1: having control of both the White House and the Congress,
Speaker 1: I think that we should actually take up what would
Speaker 1: be considered radical measures right now with the GOP. One
Speaker 1: example that I've had on my mind is the National
Speaker 1: on Downland for the Humanities. This is an agency that
Speaker 1: supports research, education, and public programs and the humanities. In
Speaker 1: other words, this is an institution that helps cultivate taste
Speaker 1: and opinion. Right, So, organizations institutions like this, they're all
Speaker 1: controlled by the left. And what does that mean. But
Speaker 1: it means that the curriculum, the arts, things like that,
Speaker 1: they're all influenced by these left wing currents and So
Speaker 1: the the GOP the right wings position right now is that, well,
Speaker 1: these institutions shouldn't exist and we should totally smash it
Speaker 1: and like decentralize everything. Is that really the solution. Do
Speaker 1: you think that getting rid of organizations like this would
Speaker 1: make critical race her to go away? I think it
Speaker 1: would actually probably just make it worse. People would just
Speaker 1: teach whatever they want. And in other words, like we
Speaker 1: think we're creating we basically think we're creating neutral space,
Speaker 1: but we just create power vacuums. Even if we get
Speaker 1: our way, that will be filled by some other note
Speaker 1: of power. I was yeah, I was about to say
Speaker 1: nature hates a vacuum, and that's that's what you would have.
Speaker 1: You would have a vacuum and surprise who would fill it?
Speaker 1: You know who? So I think that the things that
Speaker 1: we should think about is we should actually take a
Speaker 1: page out of the Left book and we should want
Speaker 1: to take control of organizations like the National endown the
Speaker 1: hand Humanities and use them to actually support research, education
Speaker 1: and public programs that make patriotic citizens, make people who
Speaker 1: don't hate their country and don't hate their ancestors. Why
Speaker 1: is this radical? I don't know why the GOP thinks
Speaker 1: this is so radical. It's this position of like, hold on,
Speaker 1: if we'll think about it, If we use government, what
Speaker 1: happens of our enemies use government? Are you kidding me?
Speaker 1: Your enemies are using government to crush you right now?
Speaker 1: I don't like, when are you going to get the
Speaker 1: memo that it's not that you're losing, You've already lost.
Speaker 1: And if you're not willing to do things that are
Speaker 1: that radical and then go the next step, like I
Speaker 1: also think that we should consider abolishing tax exemption subsidies
Speaker 1: and federal contracts for academic and professional institutions that support
Speaker 1: the basic narrative of like critical race theory. If you're
Speaker 1: not willing to take these radical steps, then you're just
Speaker 1: basically playfighting. Pedro Gonzalez am Greatness dot com for his
Speaker 1: latest writing, Pedro always insightful. My friend talked to you soon.
Speaker 1: Thank you buck Well. In this case, this was an
Speaker 1: issue about how a cyber attach impact is a pipeline
Speaker 1: that's there. I'm not sure it really speaks to the
Speaker 1: number or quantity of pipelines or their throughput. I do
Speaker 1: think it reminds us that we need to make sure
Speaker 1: that we have the most resilient and flexible infrastructure for
Speaker 1: the future, especially when it comes to something like energy.
Speaker 1: We've now had. You could argue two major wake up
Speaker 1: call experiences, one in Texas and now one here, each
Speaker 1: with a different cause, but both reminding us about the
Speaker 1: work that we have to do as a country. Some
Speaker 1: truth they're from our transportation secretary, Buddha judge, Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 1: This guy is in fact a cabin official about how yeah,
Speaker 1: we need we need more redundant and more durable infrastructure.
Speaker 1: But they're going to want to make it windmills, folks.
Speaker 1: That's the problem. They don't they don't take the right
Speaker 1: lessons from the reminders that we have here. They're not
Speaker 1: going to move in the right direction. This, This is
Speaker 1: part of the problem. We can't even agree on the
Speaker 1: basics of how to address challenges with things like infrastructure
Speaker 1: with the Democrats. I also note that it's reporting today
Speaker 1: out there that Colonial paid a five million dollar ransom
Speaker 1: for for whever this Russian hacker collective is. It's gonna
Speaker 1: say it right now, folks, getting ready for a lot
Speaker 1: more ransomware attacks all over the place. You know they're
Speaker 1: gonna be coming after us. They're gonna be coming after
Speaker 1: everything they can now with this. So that's this could
Speaker 1: lead to some really really big issues. And I don't
Speaker 1: think the Biden team is I don't think they're on it.
Speaker 1: I think that's fair to say. They don't make me
Speaker 1: feel safe and warm at night. All right, it's time
Speaker 1: for some truth bombs from our friend, Colonel Kirk. That's right,
Speaker 1: Kurt Selector, everybody's senior writer at townhall dot com. And yes,
Speaker 1: as he has had to explain to me full bird colonel,
Speaker 1: that lieutenant colonel stuff for our friend Kurt, how are
Speaker 1: you doing, buddy, Well, I didn't want to be associated
Speaker 1: with ah, that's right or as or as I believe.
Speaker 1: I believe one of my old old colleagues from the
Speaker 1: from the community referred to him as lieutenant colonel pork
Speaker 1: chop was I think, but was paying shared for for
Speaker 1: a while. So tell me tell me this man. I
Speaker 1: it's like this week is is what all of a
Speaker 1: sudden I feel look bad for the country, but good
Speaker 1: for reality. Right, bad things happening, but reality for those
Speaker 1: of us who still try to live it into setting
Speaker 1: in that we have a clearly deteriorating not up for
Speaker 1: the job. Mediocrity even twenty years ago in Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: who is not able to handle crises and in fact
Speaker 1: is cause with decisions major problems in the country, whether
Speaker 1: it's the economy, the border, or energy, all kinds of things.
Speaker 1: At least, the truth is coming out, Kurt, despite the
Speaker 1: best efforts on the other side. Well, the truth is
Speaker 1: coming out, Buck. The truth is that the one American
Speaker 1: who's happy about the president Asterisk administration is Jimmy Carter,
Speaker 1: because now he's not the worst president of the last century.
Speaker 1: You think Jimmy Carter, though, I feel like Carter is
Speaker 1: smarter than Joe Biden. Carter went to Naval Academy. You know,
Speaker 1: I think he had bad ideas, but I feel like
Speaker 1: he's a sharp guy. I actually think Joe Biden is,
Speaker 1: you know, as really dumb as a doornawn. I don't
Speaker 1: know what else to say. I mean, I know, he
Speaker 1: mouths the right talking points and he sort of plays
Speaker 1: the part of politician. But it's like we've got this
Speaker 1: this actor who should have been long retired, who's actually
Speaker 1: the commander in chief, and and it's a disaster. It's
Speaker 1: a disaster on every level. From the new standard is
Speaker 1: paying off foreign bandits who shut down our infrastructure, abandoning
Speaker 1: our allies. We got gas lines back. Inflation's coming. Hey,
Speaker 1: everything's proving, And Kurt, what is it that it's gonna
Speaker 1: What do you think has to happen here for it
Speaker 1: to become more apparent? I guess because because here's my thesis.
Speaker 1: Let's just take a few of these crisis I want
Speaker 1: to work through a handful of them with you. The border.
Speaker 1: One hundred and eighty thousand people apprehended last month. Almost
Speaker 1: all of them are just showing up and surrendering themselves
Speaker 1: to the border, which means, hey, here, I am border patrol,
Speaker 1: Get me a sandwich, Start processing me so I can
Speaker 1: be let free in the United States. That's what it
Speaker 1: actually means for people who may or meta. Maybe they're
Speaker 1: held for a few days maximum a week or two,
Speaker 1: but then they're in the US and there and they're
Speaker 1: good to go, and they're they're actually waving down and saying, hey,
Speaker 1: border patrol, come get me. And they don't cuff them
Speaker 1: or anything. They're just moving them in buses to facilities.
Speaker 1: You're trying to make nice all the time. Biden does
Speaker 1: not want to fix this. I think That's what people
Speaker 1: don't really get yet as the degree they need this
Speaker 1: is this is what he's poor. And there's going to
Speaker 1: be you know, and of course there's going to be
Speaker 1: consequences because at some point we're going to have a
Speaker 1: president to Santas or other one who's going to say, okay,
Speaker 1: time to go. But but but the dreamers, No, no,
Speaker 1: we're not doing that, and it's going to be much
Speaker 1: much worse. But yeah, you know, you gotta understand that
Speaker 1: the deep down, people like Joe Biden hate this country
Speaker 1: and hate the people who make it up, and they
Speaker 1: think some of themselves as different. They're better the rest
Speaker 1: of us. You know, we just need to be you know,
Speaker 1: diluted with foreigners and others who will elect Democrats forever.
Speaker 1: That's their plan. They'll tell you that. On the economy,
Speaker 1: we're speaking of Kerchlicht, your senior writer at townhall dot com.
Speaker 1: On the economy, we had almost eight hundred thousand jobs
Speaker 1: short of expectations last month, which, you know, eight hundred
Speaker 1: thousand jobs here, a million jobs there that don't materialize
Speaker 1: starts to feel like real jobs numbers, right, It starts
Speaker 1: to feel like this is an indicator of some kind
Speaker 1: the consumer price index up what was a four point
Speaker 1: two percent? I think the most recent, most recent numbers.
Speaker 1: Inflation is starting to hit, and the Biden team is
Speaker 1: basically still talking about spending four trillion more dollars and
Speaker 1: setting up a whole lot of electric charging stations and windmills. Well, look,
Speaker 1: I mean, you know it's his constituents to drive the Tesla's.
Speaker 1: I hear your Tesla. Hey, but I'm just gonna tell you,
Speaker 1: I actually know some right wingers who like Tesla's. Well,
Speaker 1: they say they're pretty cool. I mean, the Prius is
Speaker 1: the ugliest, and for those listeners, if you listen to
Speaker 1: the show you driver Prius, I'm sorry, we still love you.
Speaker 1: The Prius is the ugliest vehicle ever designed. But it
Speaker 1: was a great platform to signal how much you love
Speaker 1: the earth. I actually think some of the tests look
Speaker 1: pretty cool. You have your co Exist bumper sticker on
Speaker 1: the back, the arm with her, or the I hate
Speaker 1: test fosterone. Yet it's a great car. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: it's up there with the Subaru in terms of nobody
Speaker 1: has to guess your politics when you're driving around, like
Speaker 1: there's no there's no Subaru drivers who are like, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm on my way to the range after you know,
Speaker 1: working with my hands all day at my small business,
Speaker 1: and you know, really I could do push ups. Um,
Speaker 1: you know, I think normal Americans would be a lot
Speaker 1: happier to have highways that weren't falling apart and gas
Speaker 1: that didn't cost six plus a gallon, which is hitting
Speaker 1: in LA. Isn't that also something that's supposed to result
Speaker 1: in people getting you know, there's there's always a talk
Speaker 1: people who will crunch the numbers on this. Uh, they
Speaker 1: will be frustrated with whatever the government in charge may
Speaker 1: be when gas prices go up. Yet there's also the
Speaker 1: media telling us sixty three percent approval in the most
Speaker 1: recent ap whatever whatever play favorite. No, there's just no way.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, Now, how do they think that we're supposed
Speaker 1: to expect that? You know that mister McGoo Biden is
Speaker 1: actually now getting effectively thirteen percent of Republicans to be like, yeah,
Speaker 1: doing a great job. Yeah, that's uh, you know, that's
Speaker 1: quite a stretch. But of course, when your sample size
Speaker 1: is like four Republicans and three hundred Democrats, and maybe
Speaker 1: maybe you can come up with that the fact is
Speaker 1: that most normal people don't really listen to the media.
Speaker 1: They do notice when they walk out of the grocery
Speaker 1: store or drive away from the gas station considerably poorer. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I lived through this before, and Jimmy Carter s I
Speaker 1: was a little kid, you know, I lived through it before.
Speaker 1: It takes a while, but but it builds, and I
Speaker 1: think I think twenty twenty two is going to be
Speaker 1: a slaughter for Democrat. I mean, I think you just
Speaker 1: get get wiped out. I certainly hope that that's where
Speaker 1: we're heading. But I also wanted to get your opinion, because, well,
Speaker 1: Colonel Kurt is our army vetter. You're still are you still?
Speaker 1: National Guard? Now? By retired retire? Okay, right, so Colonel
Speaker 1: Kurt's fully outfully retired. Now. He's a veteran, but also
Speaker 1: a lawyer, and you understand some of the legal realities
Speaker 1: that would come into play with this. I don't even
Speaker 1: know if you saw the story, didn't ask about it beforehand.
Speaker 1: Palm Beach police have reportedly discussed Trump's possible extradition to
Speaker 1: New York if he's indicted. What is going on here?
Speaker 1: I think I think that's a very dangerous game that
Speaker 1: they're playing. I could see Governor de Santa saying no,
Speaker 1: which he can do under Florida law. I think you
Speaker 1: really push things to a point of crisis by attempting
Speaker 1: to imprison the your your opponent in the next election potentially.
Speaker 1: And uh, I think they're stupid enough to try it.
Speaker 1: You think they might actually do it. You think that
Speaker 1: you think that cy vans to be the forever hero
Speaker 1: to the resistance and the Libs and the left would
Speaker 1: drop an indictment on Trump and demand his arrest and
Speaker 1: extradition from Florida to New York to stand trial for it.
Speaker 1: You know, we all would probably be some accounting Trump
Speaker 1: organization thing, right, that's what they're trying to get him on.
Speaker 1: I mean, the most mickey mouse nonsense possible. Yeah, this
Speaker 1: is really dangerous. And the Supreme Court, when it allowed
Speaker 1: some of this idiocy to go forward, did no one
Speaker 1: any favors, uh, you know, attempting to protect the legitimacy
Speaker 1: of the institution. It's going to cause a considerable considerable harm. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm worried about it because I think the the Libs
Speaker 1: are crazy. The Libs are crazy, that's for sure. Our
Speaker 1: friend kurtch looked at everybody townhall dot com for his
Speaker 1: lady's Kurt, thanks so much, thanks for having me. Joe
Speaker 1: Biden keep saying that he doesn't think he's supposed to
Speaker 1: answer questions. I understand that we're gonna be told by
Speaker 1: the press, by all the people protecting Biden all the time.
Speaker 1: I don't mean secret Service protection, I mean his journalist protectors,
Speaker 1: that this is just his way of you know, he's folks,
Speaker 1: are Joe, you know, he's He's just you know, oh gush,
Speaker 1: oh gee, golly, gush. You know, if I just keep on,
Speaker 1: if I just keep on pretending like I'm just all shucks.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm just one of the guys from Scranton.
Speaker 1: You know, write amtrack, you know, I do all the
Speaker 1: I'm on the chew chew, you know, just lunch pale,
Speaker 1: Joe just showing up to DC for over forty years
Speaker 1: working in the Senate. But you know, don't worry about
Speaker 1: any of that. I'm I'm just like you. They figure
Speaker 1: that if Joe can keep that charade up, it means
Speaker 1: that the criticism against him will be somewhat muted. But
Speaker 1: here's how it goes. When Joe decides to get off script,
Speaker 1: get away from his handlers and actually answer some questions.
Speaker 1: Thank you? Which one? Which one of the twelve I've
Speaker 1: had introductors? And you guys are bad. I'm not supposed
Speaker 1: to be answering all these questions. I supposed to leave,
Speaker 1: but I can't resist your questions. UM. I came away encouraged,
Speaker 1: and but I want to make it clear to you
Speaker 1: I'm encouraged not just because of a solid meeting with UM,
Speaker 1: with uh the Republican leader in the House, and with
Speaker 1: with Mitchell or Sandon McConnell, who I've known a long
Speaker 1: long time and work with. I've been meeting with bipartisans
Speaker 1: leaders for a long time now. I've met with gosh
Speaker 1: knows how many, I mean, And there's more more than
Speaker 1: one single group. There's bipartisan orging to you know, groups
Speaker 1: and made up of ten or twenty members. There's been
Speaker 1: groups that I met with. For example, I met with
Speaker 1: yesterday with Kristen Cinema. I thought that was a and
Speaker 1: she purported and I believe her to speak for some
Speaker 1: of the bipart of her friends who are Does this
Speaker 1: sound like the leader of the free world? Do you?
Speaker 1: I mean? Does this sound like a person who has
Speaker 1: a vision for the country and has the dynamism and
Speaker 1: the leadership skills to take us through some stormy times,
Speaker 1: because I gotta tell you, I think we're heading into
Speaker 1: those stormy times right now. It should be easy for
Speaker 1: Biden and this administration relatively speaking. I know, being president
Speaker 1: the hardest job in the world. Actually, don't think that's true.
Speaker 1: You know those guys that do the fishing off the
Speaker 1: coast of Alaska, Well, if you're like me and you
Speaker 1: get c sick, that's that's got to be the hardest
Speaker 1: job in the world. That just brutal, beyond words. I
Speaker 1: don't know how anybody does that, Honestly, I know they
Speaker 1: make pretty good money, But to me, it's just unthinkable
Speaker 1: that it's the hardest job. Anyway, we always hear the
Speaker 1: presidency is the hardest job all Joe Biden. The Democrats
Speaker 1: really had to do here. All they had to do
Speaker 1: was get out of the way of the American people,
Speaker 1: the American economy. But they have an authoritarian democrat socialist view.
Speaker 1: They have emotionally and psychologically internalized the idea, the central
Speaker 1: premise that the government always needs to be doing something
Speaker 1: to make everything better, whether it's the economy or the
Speaker 1: fight against COVID or whatever it may be. That government
Speaker 1: action is always the answer, and you need more of it,
Speaker 1: just like you need more government spending. You know, they've
Speaker 1: got a fever and the only prescription is more government spending,
Speaker 1: as we've already seen, and this results in some pretty
Speaker 1: obvious but bad stuff. The inflation that's already taking up
Speaker 1: the challenges that are are already apparent. With what should
Speaker 1: be a boom in the economy, we should be rocking
Speaker 1: and rolling with the economy. Instead, people are really worried,
Speaker 1: you know, gas prices that they're trying to hide behind
Speaker 1: the fact that yes, the colonial pipeline cyber attack that
Speaker 1: has occurred here has we don't even know what that's
Speaker 1: going to do to gas prices. We just know that
Speaker 1: there are gas lines, that it's a disaster, that it's
Speaker 1: it's a very unfortunate circumstance for those folks in the
Speaker 1: southeastern United States who currently can't get fuel for their vehicles.
Speaker 1: But we all we know that the gas prices were
Speaker 1: already going up across the country well before this. About
Speaker 1: fifty increase in the average gas price is what I've
Speaker 1: seen for last month in April. That's really substantial. Gas
Speaker 1: prices are flying up per gallon, and it's attributable. You
Speaker 1: can see it. It's attributable to Biden policies, Biden approach,
Speaker 1: the printing of money, and just the general the anti
Speaker 1: anti fossil fuel mania that motivates so much of the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party today. But but here's buying again, unscripted off
Speaker 1: the cuff. No, I gotta I gotta answer some more questions.
Speaker 1: So here I am. You know, no joke, folks, I
Speaker 1: just I just want to answer more questions. No, no joke,
Speaker 1: both sides of the aisle about how to deal how
Speaker 1: to go forward with infrastructure. So I'm generically, I'm encouraged
Speaker 1: that there is room to have a compromise on a
Speaker 1: bipartisan bill that's solid and significant and the means by
Speaker 1: which to pay for it without dropping all of the
Speaker 1: all of the burden on middle class and working class people. Look,
Speaker 1: what's the one thing people are concerned about with a gas?
Speaker 1: Gasoline price is going up? Exactly right, Yeah, what's the
Speaker 1: what's the one thing? You know, the price the price
Speaker 1: of the gas goes up. What goes up must must
Speaker 1: come down. But not when I'm in office, because it's
Speaker 1: just going to keep going up. And it matters if
Speaker 1: you make forty thousand dollars a year, It matters if
Speaker 1: you're two family person that making eighty ninety thousand dollars,
Speaker 1: two family, two way journeys. It matters. And what I
Speaker 1: don't want to do, and this will be another discussion
Speaker 1: we didn't get into today, is how to pay for it.
Speaker 1: And if everything is paid for by a user fee,
Speaker 1: well then you know, the burden falls on working class
Speaker 1: folks who are who are having trouble. We're getting them
Speaker 1: out of They're coming around. But it has this has
Speaker 1: to be a burden shared across the spectrum anywhere. It's
Speaker 1: got to be shared, shared across the spectrum. Yeah, good
Speaker 1: old amtract. Joe. Yeah he's got he's got you on
Speaker 1: his mind. Sure he does. Yeah, I know. The whole pretense,
Speaker 1: the whole Biden routine gets very old, very quickly, doesn't it.
Speaker 1: It's the same thing all the time. No, I'm just
Speaker 1: here for the folks, you know, I'm just here for
Speaker 1: the working class folk. Joe Biden has a three million
Speaker 1: dollar mansion I think in Delaware that he lives in
Speaker 1: his house in DC. In the past was a twenty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars a month rental. It was actually in McLean, Virginia.
Speaker 1: I think it was He's worth, you know, fifteen million
Speaker 1: dollars or something like that. The guy has never had
Speaker 1: to worry about a mortgage payment in his life. Because
Speaker 1: the guy's been working as a senator for decades now.
Speaker 1: They make a decent salary. He's got plenty of other
Speaker 1: ways to pat his income, as you know, books, speaking, engagements,
Speaker 1: that kind of stuff, which is really just the way
Speaker 1: that corporate America in a lot of cases launders money
Speaker 1: to politicians. That's right. What do you think they were
Speaker 1: doing with Hillary Clinton? Halloa? Hillary? Remember her, She's still
Speaker 1: out there somewhere lurking. She's not done. I'll still be president.
Speaker 1: Hillary still thinks that she has a chance. Don't think
Speaker 1: that she doesn't. She's just waiting for the opportunity. But anyway,
Speaker 1: what do you think all those one hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: two hundred and fifty thousand dollars an hour speeches were about.
Speaker 1: I think it's because people really love hearing Hillary's voice
Speaker 1: so much. I mean, you know, my impersonation of it
Speaker 1: really captures the essence, if not an exact likeness of
Speaker 1: her voice, and it was a way for companies to
Speaker 1: get in good with somebody they thought was going to
Speaker 1: be a future president of the United States. Well, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's had plenty of ways to make money. His son
Speaker 1: has had plenty of ways to make money. That's right,
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, as we know. But I just I can't
Speaker 1: stand this populism bullcrap that he's pulling here, because you know,
Speaker 1: if it matters when there's higher prices, if it matters
Speaker 1: when there's you know, more pain at the pump for
Speaker 1: American workers, his policies and the decisions that the Democrat
Speaker 1: left are making are what's causing those problems, right, They
Speaker 1: bemoan issues, whether it's they don't talk about crime very
Speaker 1: much because they haven't figured out how to spin it really,
Speaker 1: but you know, they either on crime. What they do
Speaker 1: is they just distract. They talk about cops and police
Speaker 1: violence when they should be talking about how to stop
Speaker 1: violence in cities across the country from continuing to rise.
Speaker 1: But with the economy, it's just always emotion. It's oh,
Speaker 1: you know, I feel your pain. I mean, that's that's
Speaker 1: what they do with economic activity. But what they should
Speaker 1: or economic policy. What they should be saying is Wow,
Speaker 1: we are managing to stall out. I mean, the economy
Speaker 1: is on a launchpad because we have an artificial government
Speaker 1: created recession as a result of COVID and the lockdowns.
Speaker 1: It's ending. We should see a boom and we'll probably
Speaker 1: see you know, expansion and GDP growth and everything, but
Speaker 1: it's not going to be what it should be, not
Speaker 1: even close because of Biden. And once that boom goes,
Speaker 1: you know, or rather once that phenomenon plays out, I
Speaker 1: think it's going to be not much of a boom.
Speaker 1: Then you'll see the real impact of the inflation and
Speaker 1: the other challenges here. So this is this is my concern.
Speaker 1: Biden is just he's not up for it, folks. He
Speaker 1: never was set no party like a Team Buck party,
Speaker 1: because a Team Buck party don't stop. It's time for
Speaker 1: roll call. Roll call everybody, Facebook dot com, Slashbuck, Sexton
Speaker 1: Teambuck at iHeartMedia dot com if you want to email
Speaker 1: us broucer Mark. Though, before we get to the roll call,
Speaker 1: there's something that we have to share with everybody, something
Speaker 1: truly amazing, something mind blowing in all the worst possible ways.
Speaker 1: Would you please share with everybody build Blasio trying to entice,
Speaker 1: trying to seduce New York into getting vaccinated. Get vaccinated? Um,
Speaker 1: I got vaccinated. You're saying I could get this? You
Speaker 1: delicious rife? Why Matt? But there's also a burger element
Speaker 1: to this. Let me let me check what Bill needs heart?
Speaker 1: Is it too early in the day to to just
Speaker 1: could be breakfast? Okay? I want you to look at
Speaker 1: this and think about again. Some people love hamburger. Some
Speaker 1: don't really want to respect all ways of life. But
Speaker 1: if this is appealing to you, just think of this
Speaker 1: when you think of vaccination. M doccinated from right. I'm
Speaker 1: getting a very good feeling about vaccination right this moment.
Speaker 1: I've never been so h disgusted at the notion of
Speaker 1: having a medical procedure of any kind done to me. Mark?
Speaker 1: Why is he so gross? Why is the mayor of
Speaker 1: New York so horrible? The videos even better? Just search
Speaker 1: it on Twitter if you want to see it for
Speaker 1: the listeners. I don't know a buck if you've seen Ayet,
Speaker 1: but he's literally just shoving the burger down his face.
Speaker 1: How did Shakeshack approve this? Even Shakeshack will be you know,
Speaker 1: I'm sure, there's a their left leaning company, but still
Speaker 1: nobody wants to build a Blasio shoving one of their
Speaker 1: burgers down their mouth. There's this war you can do
Speaker 1: when your vaction act. Yeah, it's just so oh gosh,
Speaker 1: he's such as de Blasio. You you barbarous savage, you
Speaker 1: oh my gosh crazy. That guy is the worst. It
Speaker 1: really is the worst. And producer Mark, I'm gonna tell
Speaker 1: you something else that I gotta share it through right
Speaker 1: now because I'm telling you this. Uh, I'm telling you
Speaker 1: this in real time, buddy, Okay. As you know, um,
Speaker 1: I live pretty high up in New York. My apartment,
Speaker 1: while very small, is pretty pretty high up in the sky.
Speaker 1: Which the only nice thing is that while I'm doing
Speaker 1: radio all day long, it feels like I at least
Speaker 1: have some pretty good views. But right now I am
Speaker 1: as I talk to you, I am staring at a
Speaker 1: because there's another it's a tall building near me, and
Speaker 1: it's right it's right next to me, and there is
Speaker 1: clearly a guy, one of my neighbors, in the next
Speaker 1: building over who thinks that it's only office buildings which
Speaker 1: are basically all empty right now around him, because he
Speaker 1: is wandering around his rooftop, but naked and now his
Speaker 1: leg oh gosh, just laying out and sunbathing. And I'm like,
Speaker 1: I'm not trying. I'm obviously not trying to look at all.
Speaker 1: I can't see any detail other than when he's back
Speaker 1: is turt like he's far enough away that I you know,
Speaker 1: I can't really see anything. But what is back is earned.
Speaker 1: The rear view makes it fair, makes it very clear
Speaker 1: that he is going full moon here, buddy. You know,
Speaker 1: he's given us the full we're getting. We're getting both
Speaker 1: both cheeks view from the from the elevated position. I'm in, Oh, man,
Speaker 1: I don't know. Pleasant Yeah, you know, it's like one
Speaker 1: of these things you can't unsee. I mean it was
Speaker 1: I thought just by the way, you know, he went
Speaker 1: up there, and I'm like, this guy, is he about
Speaker 1: to do the the Is he about to start naked
Speaker 1: sunbathing on his roof because you know, and and he's
Speaker 1: got a little dog that's following him around too. Anyway, Yeah,
Speaker 1: a private rooftop like the yes, yes, yes, no, it's
Speaker 1: it's like the penthouse of a nearby building and it's private.
Speaker 1: So he thinks that because there really are there's only
Speaker 1: a couple of buildings around that are taller than his building,
Speaker 1: and so he's like mister penthouse guy with the outdoor
Speaker 1: roof deck. And the other two buildings are commercial office
Speaker 1: buildings and like no one's in them. But I'm in
Speaker 1: my building, and I gotta tell you I didn't need
Speaker 1: to see what I just saw, all right, I'm just
Speaker 1: putting it out there. Cover up, buddy. You know, tan
Speaker 1: lines aren't the end of the world. That this sounds
Speaker 1: like one of the worst parts of living in Manhattan, though,
Speaker 1: I can't believe. I can't imagine it's very common. Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: it's it's a remarkable circumstance. I mean, I'll just tell
Speaker 1: you either he's either no, no, it's I was gonna say,
Speaker 1: maybe he's wearing a flesh colored bathing suit. No, I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't think so. Actually turns around. Yeah, oh gosh,
Speaker 1: I can't. No, no, but I can't see the front view.
Speaker 1: You know that I can't really, but I but the
Speaker 1: cheeks from behind are pretty apparent. So I'm by the way,
Speaker 1: just for everyone. I'm not looking at this anymore. I'm
Speaker 1: just I was I saw for a second here I
Speaker 1: am doing a radio show trying to be a professional
Speaker 1: and you know it. Just folks, this is a PSA.
Speaker 1: If you're in your yard or whatever, just understand your
Speaker 1: site lines. You know what I'm saying. You know, if
Speaker 1: you want to avoid tan lines. I know we all
Speaker 1: want more outdoor time, just know your lines a site
Speaker 1: from your neighbors, because you know, we need to be civilized.
Speaker 1: We need to be civilized because there are some people
Speaker 1: who can walk around naked. They look good enough to
Speaker 1: do that. Then there's people like me and you who
Speaker 1: should know. I'm not a nude beach guy. I mean,
Speaker 1: have you I will a true story Proucer Mark. This
Speaker 1: is when the this is when the confessions come out
Speaker 1: on the show. I have been to a nude beach.
Speaker 1: I did not go nude. Like guy was like, not
Speaker 1: not happening, Not happen. Yeah, they're very common in Europe.
Speaker 1: I've been to a nude beach. I did not go.
Speaker 1: I was like, I don't, I can't, I can't, I
Speaker 1: can't do this. I just this is not it wasn't
Speaker 1: keep it. There are other there were other people wearing
Speaker 1: bathing suits. It was clothing optional kind of a beach,
Speaker 1: you know, because I feel like if everybody else is
Speaker 1: going he's going nude beach, then you're like the weirdo
Speaker 1: who actually has a bathing suit on, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. I don't think I could ever bring myself
Speaker 1: to do that. Yeah. So anyway, and then what was
Speaker 1: my other my other observation in this believe it or not,
Speaker 1: there is a there are still athletic clubs that are
Speaker 1: in New York City where they have nude swimming in
Speaker 1: the pool. It's true, there are a couple of them left.
Speaker 1: There used to be a lot of them when I
Speaker 1: this is the New York Athletic Club when I was
Speaker 1: growing up, you some of the adults would would swim
Speaker 1: songs clothes because it was kind of been part of
Speaker 1: the spa and everything else. They would they would go,
Speaker 1: they would swim in the in the Olympic sized pool there. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I don't know how we started talking about nuderty so
Speaker 1: much today, but it is, you know, well I know
Speaker 1: I do know because I got the full moon. As
Speaker 1: I'm trying, I'm trying to do a high quality, family
Speaker 1: friendly radio show and I don't need these kinds of
Speaker 1: visual distractions in New York City. Sir I will have,
Speaker 1: you know, more reasons to move to Florida. Yeah, well there,
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, there you get a lot of
Speaker 1: a lot of people walking around that you know, they
Speaker 1: don't wear a lot of clothing, and you're like, wow,
Speaker 1: you must work out, you know. Yeah, but at least
Speaker 1: they work out and look good, That's what I'm saying. Yeah,
Speaker 1: at least, you know, here in New York we get
Speaker 1: a lot of people like me or Pasty, you know,
Speaker 1: and spend a lot of time at a desk. All right,
Speaker 1: let's get into actual roll call now before I continue
Speaker 1: to go down this uh on this rabbit hole here. Um,
Speaker 1: we have producer Mark. We're just going to expect going
Speaker 1: forward that you will give us any update on Marks
Speaker 1: Mark's moving trials and tribulations. Because my theory here is
Speaker 1: that moving is something that everybody it's it's one of
Speaker 1: those things that sucks so much that moving we can
Speaker 1: all relate to it, you know, true, And I would
Speaker 1: love to know what I'm moving to a book that
Speaker 1: it's news to me at this point. Yeah, we know
Speaker 1: it's we know it's to happen soon. We know it's
Speaker 1: gonna happen soon. Um, and I just picture missus Mark
Speaker 1: like pointing at things and saying like move that, and
Speaker 1: you're like, okay, honey, you know, because that's the way
Speaker 1: it would be for me. So that's how that works,
Speaker 1: all right, sal First up here, hey Buck, check it
Speaker 1: in again. I've got two questions for you in regards
Speaker 1: to Liz Cheney. I have problems with her ego and
Speaker 1: obvious power grab, but other than that, I think it's
Speaker 1: important to realize how often she voted alongside Trump, which
Speaker 1: Stefanic hardly ever did. Liz has infuriated me with her
Speaker 1: hypocrisy and what should be done with her Onto question two.
Speaker 1: In my mind, I believe the Democrats will fully federally
Speaker 1: legalize marijuana to try and create an influx of money
Speaker 1: to pay for all the trillions of dollars they seem
Speaker 1: to spend every month. Am I crazy? Or do you
Speaker 1: think that is likely? Looking forward to the Siege of
Speaker 1: Malta Part two, Shields High Um so uh yeah, man,
Speaker 1: A couple of things here. First of all, Um, her hypocrisy, yes,
Speaker 1: I understand, and Stefanic. I do believe that with with
Speaker 1: Stefanic there's a big look we talked about on the
Speaker 1: show today, it's a big concerning I mean, she's not
Speaker 1: particularly conservative. She says good things about Trump, but her
Speaker 1: voting record is pretty pretty weak centrist. So that's and
Speaker 1: that's not what we want for leadership within the GOP.
Speaker 1: Democrats fully federalized, fully legalizing marijuana at the federal level. Um,
Speaker 1: do you think that's likely? I look, I think Democrat.
Speaker 1: I think they probably could do it. I think that
Speaker 1: the country is ready for it. I think that federally
Speaker 1: legalizing U marijuana could could happen. And um, yeah, that's
Speaker 1: what I would say. I think the federally legalizing marijuana
Speaker 1: is something that is likely to happen, and it so
Speaker 1: that that's for real. I think that could will that
Speaker 1: pay No, then federally. So here's the thing about legalizing marijuana.
Speaker 1: Marijuana is not that hard to grow, not that I know.
Speaker 1: All right, before anybody goes whoa book, he man, he's like,
Speaker 1: good the weed predc market. Yeah, he's just like meek
Speaker 1: you know, you know, no, we don't. We're not weed
Speaker 1: guys here. Um, but it's not hard to do. And
Speaker 1: so when the if you're not going to go to
Speaker 1: prison for growing marijuana, a lot of people are going
Speaker 1: to be growing marijuana, so and then that means it's
Speaker 1: not going to really be taxable, right think about it.
Speaker 1: It's it's one thing like like my parents will grow,
Speaker 1: you know, they'll grow like tomato vines and herbs in
Speaker 1: their little patio garden, and you know that's what. That's
Speaker 1: nice and it's you know, very it's nice to do,
Speaker 1: it's fun and it's tastes good. But you know, weed
Speaker 1: is very expensive. I mean, if you could, if you
Speaker 1: were somebody who really wanted marijuana and you could grow
Speaker 1: it and save yourself hundreds and hundreds of dollars by
Speaker 1: doing it, depending on how much we do you smoke,
Speaker 1: I guess people will do it. So I don't think
Speaker 1: that it's the huge uh, you know, it's not going
Speaker 1: to pay for the trillions of dollars of spending. Nowhere
Speaker 1: even near that, I mean not even in the universe
Speaker 1: of that. As for Siege of Multi part two, Yes,
Speaker 1: planning to tape it this weekend. That is the plan
Speaker 1: south So now I'm hoping to deliver on that. All right,
Speaker 1: two weekends in a row that the plan was to
Speaker 1: record Cigeremalta. Wait, what two weekends in a row that
Speaker 1: your plan was to record part two. Yes, it's a
Speaker 1: it's an extensive plan. I'm just I'm backing up the
Speaker 1: listeners a lot of people, right, No, I understand. But
Speaker 1: you know, it's kind of like the Siege Itself producer Mark,
Speaker 1: which had a tremendous unpredictability and went longer than expected.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm just if I publicly shame you for
Speaker 1: you actually do it. So that's what I'm doing. I'm
Speaker 1: helping the listener. That is true. Yes, Mark, Mark is
Speaker 1: the listeners. Ms. Budsman. By the way, I'm actually I
Speaker 1: actually am starting to I'm actually starting to think that
Speaker 1: uh that rooftop man. He's wearing like a like like
Speaker 1: a pink man KINI anyway, I'm not but I'm not looking.
Speaker 1: I'm not looking. I'm just anyway, all right, I'm not
Speaker 1: look I caught it. I'm trying to look at my
Speaker 1: computer and it just sort of, you know, it just
Speaker 1: was good. It's this guy's walking around. He's Mark. He's
Speaker 1: right in my field. Division. You know what you're gonna do.
Speaker 1: You're gonna go across the street, call in and finish
Speaker 1: the show that way, and we'll do an interview with you.
Speaker 1: I'd be like, hey, buddy, we think you're the naked
Speaker 1: rooftop guy. Welcome to an actually syndicated radio show. Are
Speaker 1: you actually naked? Are you just wearing a a very
Speaker 1: very small bathing suit as a guy as it could
Speaker 1: be either one? All right, Um, where where? Where the heck?
Speaker 1: We're oh no, we're gonna come back into more roll
Speaker 1: call here in just a second. Don't go anywhere, all right,
Speaker 1: continuing with roll call, ready to finish things up here,
Speaker 1: Let's get to it. We have our friend. Um, let's
Speaker 1: see here, Jeremiah Buck. I agree with you one hundred
Speaker 1: percent about Trump not running in twenty twenty four. I
Speaker 1: like the guy, and he was a great president. He
Speaker 1: proved that low tax, free market economic values, and strong
Speaker 1: America First foreign policies work. I also loved how he
Speaker 1: fought back instead of backing down like Republicans usually do.
Speaker 1: But unfortunately he's now damaged goods. I believe he turned
Speaker 1: off a lot of people before the election with his
Speaker 1: abrasive personality, and turned off even more with his post
Speaker 1: election actions, especially after January sixth. Whether he was right
Speaker 1: and justified as irrelevant enough people turned their backs on
Speaker 1: him after that. I don't think he can recover. He
Speaker 1: needs to use his clout and power to get behind
Speaker 1: someone younger and with maybe a little more tack. Thanks
Speaker 1: Buck and producer Mark love the show Shields High. Yeah, Jeremiah,
Speaker 1: you know, I just I don't think Trump is going
Speaker 1: to run for a variety of reasons. I think that
Speaker 1: the age factor, and also I just think that, you know,
Speaker 1: the possibility of think about what he look he gave
Speaker 1: us four years and a political movement. I think now
Speaker 1: we take the movement and we build on it, and
Speaker 1: we take it to the next level. If we lose,
Speaker 1: you we lost when he was an incumbent, that's one thing.
Speaker 1: If we lose while he's an incumbent and then we
Speaker 1: lose again a re election effort, that is going to
Speaker 1: be something that really stains his legacy, and I think
Speaker 1: people would rightly have real questions about that. So that's
Speaker 1: kind of where I am on it, all right, Alex Hey,
Speaker 1: bucking Mark, there are two questions I have Right around
Speaker 1: when Biden was elected, you thought he was going to
Speaker 1: resign before the mid terms. I agreed with you, But
Speaker 1: now he seems a lot more coherent than I thought
Speaker 1: he would be. And I'm having doubts that he will resign. Second,
Speaker 1: do you still think that desantists will run for president
Speaker 1: and win? After Trump had said he is one percent
Speaker 1: considering running and will consider DeSantis as a vice Thank
Speaker 1: you for reading. Keep doing a great job by u,
Speaker 1: or great job guys, Alex. Yeah, Look, Biden's probably he's
Speaker 1: gonna make it through the midterms in office, and that
Speaker 1: I think that's not a surprise at all. I do
Speaker 1: think that he is not gonna want to run for reelection,
Speaker 1: and he's even said stuff like that himself in the past,
Speaker 1: so that that doesn't seem to me to be a
Speaker 1: stretch at all. So we'll continue to do what we
Speaker 1: can here, will continue to focus in on what what's
Speaker 1: likely to happen with his Biden administration and try to
Speaker 1: be early on the trends. But yeah, I don't know, man,
Speaker 1: no one. As I was telling you, nobody can predict
Speaker 1: the future. Nobody knows. So everybody, please pass the Buck,
Speaker 1: tell friend, share the show with them, Text or email
Speaker 1: is best. Anywhere you listen to podcasts, you you can
Speaker 1: download and share the Buck Sexton Show. Please do back
Speaker 1: tomorrow's same time and place Shield's high