WEBVTT - Trump Steering Economy To An Outdated Model: Joe Stiglitz

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg pim L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa A. Brahmowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p and

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox, and it is my pleasure to welcome

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>our next guest, Joseph Stiglitz. Professor Stiglitz was born in Gary,

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Indiana in nine Of course, he is a Nobel Laureate,

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics along with two colleagues

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>in the year two thousand and one. He is the

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>author of many books, including Globalization and Its Discontents, and

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>he joins us here in studio. Professor Stigletz, thank you

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>very much for being here, and wonder if we could

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>just start with a kind of anecdotal question having to

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>do with Gary, Indiana, and we were just talking offline

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>just a moment ago. Do you believe that growing up

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 1>in Gary, Indiana influenced your perspective and your ultimate goal

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>in learning about the way the world works oh very

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>much so, uh, and I've actually written about that. UM.

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I became an economist because of what I saw growing

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>up in Gary, Indiana. I had thought I was going

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a physicist, uh, theoretical physicist. But as I

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>continued in my studies, what I had seen growing up,

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>this enormous inequality, discrimination, episodic unemployment, labor strife kept gnawing

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>at me, and I finally decided, Uh, I wanted to

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>understand that better. I wanted to come to an understanding

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of how we could do better about these problems. And

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>so that was really what drove me into economics. And

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I feel, you know, as I've studied economics, the perspectives

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that I bring are so different from those who grow

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>up in a more privileged life in a rich suburb. UM.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>One of the standard views and economics is that markets

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>work very well, everybody uh is well off, trickle down

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>economics para to optimality. Concepts like that and UH sort

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of Pollyonish view of that uh of of the world.

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And I could never share that Pollyanish view because I saw,

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>UH it wasn't working for the people that surrounded me.

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>When I was growing up in as far as you

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>were able to take that experience and then use it

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in your understanding of economics, you helped to pioneer something

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that has been described as asymmetrical information. In other words,

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>how do you take information that may produce dissidence or

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a lack of conformity in its result? And I'm wondering

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>if you could talk a little bit about how you

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of square the circle, so to speak, or or

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you reconcile a lot of those uh inconsistencies.

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>The key issue that I faced as I began my

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>research was too trying to understand, uh, the difference between

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the standard view of economics at that time Adam Smith,

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the market's invisible hand, uh, every pursued of self interested leagues,

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the world to be as if society's well being was

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>being maximized, um with what I saw growing up. And

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that led to ideas about situations where artics don't work

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>well and uncovering that there had been an implicit assumption

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that economists hadn't really recognized for two hundering some years,

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>which was uh the idea that information was perfect and

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that a world in which information is very imperfect, whereas

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>some people know things that others don't. Is totally different

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>from uh, a world which information is perfect. It's a

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit like in physics. Uh. We we talked about

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a frictionless world and then a world with friction. And

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you would never construct an airplane based on a theory

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of a frictionless world. Uh. It just wouldn't make any sense.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 1>And yet we were trying to construct an economy based

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on a frictionless world and it wasn't working very well.

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you then take that perspective and speak to us

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>about the current state of let's say, trade negotiations or

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>trade relationship between the United States and the world. I mean,

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>we can talk China, you can mention Mexico, Canada, and

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>so on. But I wonder if you could use that

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to describe what do you believe is the current feeling

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>about these trade negotiations, that they really headed somewhere intelligent

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>or is this just a political game? Well, I think

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the trade negotiations are not going well, uh for anybody.

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And the reason that's true is that is really the

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.799
<v Speaker 1>blame is I I put in the United States that

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>uh Trump does not have uh any conception about what

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it is that he's trying to do. What is the

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>problem facing the United States now? He says the problem

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is that we import more than we export. We have

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>a trade deficit, and he attributes that to unfair trade

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>UH that are taking advantage of us. But the basic

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>inside of economics is that trade deficits are not UH

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>based on trade um with any particular country, what we

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>call multilateral UM. If we buy a little bit less

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>clothes from China, will buy a little bit more from

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Malaysia or Indonesia, and UH it won't make much difference

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>for anybody. UH. If we buy from somebody that's not

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the cheapest, our costs will be a little bit higher. UH.

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>It will make a difference for Indonesia, but not for

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the American UH producers. UH. What determines the overall trade

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>deficit is we call macro economics. That is spirity between

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>what we invest inside the United States and what we

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>save inside the United States. And if we aren't saving

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>enough to finance the investment, we have to borrow from abroad.

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And that borrowing from abroad results in our exchange rate

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>going up, and that leads to correspond to that will

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>be a trade deficit. So the problem in the United

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>States is that we've been borrowing a lot from abroad.

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>And the tax bill in December two thousand seventeen and

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the increase in expenditures in January two eighteen, UH really

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>blew a hole in our fiscal position. A lot of

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>people talked about how we're going to have to borrow

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that much more from abroad and what does that mean?

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>That means we will have an even larger trade deficit.

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's true. No matter what the outcome of any

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>trade negotiations are, those outcomes will determine which countries we

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>buy from, but not our overall trade deficit. So no

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>matter what his negotiators do, uh, it won't affect that

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>basic economics. Now, where the negotiations do make a difference

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is uh particular countries exporting particular goods or importing particularly goods. Now,

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this is another area where Trump is really very misconceived

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>in his economics. Modern economics recognize that we are a

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>service sector economy. Uh. We are are vibrant sectors are

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>financial sector, actucation sector, or health sector. Um. These are

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>among the areas where we're making you know, where we're

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:09.719
<v Speaker 1>really successful. There are other areas where uh, we've moved on. Uh, automobiles, UM,

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>natural resources. UH. You know, take the presidents talked about coal. Uh.

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>In all of the extractor sectors together, including coal, UH,

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.239
<v Speaker 1>there are about half the number of workers as professional

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>sports people. So if you say we want to have

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a cold policy, you ought to say we ought to

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>have a sports policy. And you know, if you're talking

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>about jobs, there twice as many in those areas. There

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>are five times as many jobs in solar install panel

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>installation than in the coal industry. So this was not

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the case in nineteen fifty sixties. We didn't have a

0:09:55.840 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>solar panel. He's keeping looking back at the world as

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it was seventy five years ago, next, not where we

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>should be going. We should be going towards the century.

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>So his focused on the old world, on the industrial

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>world of the nineteen fifties, means that we're not reshaping

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:23.719
<v Speaker 1>our economy towards the century. Is there a political obstacle

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to get these kinds of things done that you describe,

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it be the shift from coal and the jobs

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that were in the coal industry to let's say solar

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>just as an example of solar industry, Is there a

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>political obstacle? Because you've also written about the money that

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>influences elections very much. So um. Uh the problem is

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the existing interests. UH don't want to give them up.

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And UH they looked to government for subsident ease, for

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a monopoly power. Uh. We need There is an important

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>role for government, but it's for facilitating a transition to

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the new economy. Uh. It's for helping people get the

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>skills that they're going to need in the new economy.

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>You know. That's the role of the government has traditionally played.

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Back after World War Two, we had to move from

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>agriculture to a manufacturing economy. And after World War Two,

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>we had the g I Bill, which said that everybody

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>who had fought in the war, which was virtually every

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>young man and a lot of women, could get as

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>much education as they were qualified for. That was essential,

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>not only as a basic sense of opportunity, but it

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>was actually essential for the transformation from the of the

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>United States from agriculture to manufacturing. Today, we need to

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>do a similar transformation for manufacturing to a new service sector, innovative,

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>non leach based economy, and government isn't there to help us.

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the trunk government is focusing on back on

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>coal and all those other industries that we ought to

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>be moving away from. UH. So we need the help

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of the government not to protect the old industries, but

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to help us move into the more dynamics sectors where

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>will be a lot more prosperous and a lot healthier.

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to give you the opportunity to speak about

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the essential environmental industries that could be created or are

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>being created, because this is a topic that you've done

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work on. Yeah. Well, I, as I mentioned,

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>solar panels have the opportunity potential creating so many more

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>jobs than the coal industry. And at the same time,

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>we know what coal does to our health, the particular

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>till it matter, the pollution, UH, not to speak of

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the global warming, and the impacts of global warming we

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>are now realizing are much greater than when I began

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>studying that matter twenty five years ago. I was on

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the Governmental Panel and Climate change UH and UH we

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>looked at the climate change at that point we said

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it's really serious. But we made a mistake. We did

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>not anticipate how fast things were going to change and

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>how bad they were going to be. The dimensions of

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 1>this the extremes of weather. UM, you know, the United

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>States lost about one to two percent of GDP just

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>last year in the hurricanes. These are weather related events,

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's absolutely no doubt that climate change global warming

0:13:55.360 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>is leading to more severe weather events, whether it's the

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>hurricanes or the drawings, the fires that have affected afflicted California. Uh,

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>we're already paying an enormous price for that. So if

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we can make a little bit of investment in moving

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to these more dynamic, pro environmental green policies, I think

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it will stimulate our economy, but it will also help

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>protect us against the ravages that we are already beginning

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to face. In about thirty seconds, what would you like

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>young people to take away from your perspective about economics

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and what they can achieve. I think they should take

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>away that, Uh, we can have as prosperous a world

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in the future as we had in the past, but

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it will not be done by the market on its own.

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>We are going to have to have an active government policies,

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>progressive policy UM and the strategy of blaming others, whether

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it's immigrants or foreign trade or UH, that is not

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>going to bring America prosperity. What is going to bring

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>American prosperity is investing in our future, not our past,

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but our future, and UH creating the kind of progressive

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>environment that says, UH what we tried to achieve seventy

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago. UH. Secure retirement, housing for all, healthcare, education

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>for our children, jobs for all. These are all things

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that are within our grasp. We are a much wealthier

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>country than we were seventy five years ago. The question

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is can we deploy that wealth in ways that will

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>benefit all of us? Thank you very much, Thank you

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>very much for being with us. UH. Professor Joseph Stiglets,

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Lauria, Professor of economics at Columbia University and the

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>author of Globalization and Its Discontent. Thank you very much

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>for your time. Thank you. The topic now is Sears.

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Sears Holdings, hundred and twenty five year old retailer filed

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>for bankruptcy protection. It has been settled with billions of

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars in debt, this as it struggled to adjust to

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>shifts in online consumption. Noel Hibbert, our director of credit

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>research for Bloomberg Intelligence, joins us now to tell us

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>how did this happen and what's next? Alright, No, I

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>have an idea how it happened. But I want you

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to explain how did it happen that Sears ended up

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>saddled with all this debt, never mind the strategic issues

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>having to do with competition in the retail world. How

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>did it end up financially in this position? Boy, I

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>think those two items are definitely not mutually exclusive, right,

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think you know when not to go too

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>far back into the way back time machine. But when

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Eddie had kind of brought Kmart out of bankrupt you're

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>talking about Eddie Lampert, the fund manager who basically owns

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Sirius correct so vias e s L investment fund. He

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>had brought Kmart out of bankruptcy and then leverage that

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>series back in oh five, and back then he had

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>a new way to run retail, which was basically to

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>not invest in it, right, So, don't invest in capital expenditures,

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>try and cut back on employees, and do all these

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>things to basically maximize cash flow, which is a great

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>short term strategy, but it's not how retail works. Uh.

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And so through the accrual of that over years, they

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>just you know, it worked for the first four or

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 1>five years, and then they started lose money. And lose

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>more money and lose more money, and the way that

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they funded that loss was to basically borrow money. What

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>does Eddie Lampert want to do now with his holdings

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in sears given that they are in bankruptcy protection, because

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a discussion about buying a large portion of the

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>company's store base. Yea, and I think, you know, for

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>if I'm in Eddie Shoes, I think that that makes

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the most sense, right. I mean, to the degree that

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>you've got four or five stores somewhere in this you know,

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>nine plus store portfolio that are actually profitable and that

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you can build around, you start to think sort of

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the adjacent pockets of value that you're trying to maximize

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>any credits trying to maximize here, right, which is stuff

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>like Ken Moore or the services business, or the autoparts business,

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>or speaking specifically to Eddie Lamport and his DSLF fund,

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the Sritage real estate spinoff that they had a few

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 1>years back, Like, those are all things that you need

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to try and preserve the value of. And if you

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>just let this thing sort of wind its way down

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>into a liquidation, you lose that. So in order to

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of keep the value attached to some of those assets.

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>The thing you need to do is sort of find

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a store base that you can build around. No, given

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the attempts in the past to revive Sears, is this

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to just get through this holiday shopping season

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>rather than a big strategic rethink about what they do

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and how they do it. So, I think that's really

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>going to come down to how contentious the court proceedings get. Right. So,

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think if if he can't get enough creditors to

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of play along, uh, then it will be very,

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to sort of rebuild anything out of this,

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and you end up sort of in a Toys Rus

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>situation where you've just got too many conflicting interests in

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the courts. No longer it drags on the heart it

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is to resuscitate whatever is left of the retail business.

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>I think if he can leverage his position as the

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>largest creditors, so of the five billion dollars in change

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of debt that the company has, he's half of that.

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>If he can leverage that position somehow into buying or

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>securing I guess, uh, you know, sort of relie from

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>other creditors. And I think there's something he can do here,

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>because again I think it's not just about SEARS itself,

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's about sort of how do you preserve uh,

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, value. So ken Moore would be a great example,

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>whereas you know, there's some value attached to ken Moore

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>if you have a still solvent SEARS, but if you're

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in insolvency, you're only bidding for intellectual property that maybe

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>worth very very little to third parties without a SEARS. No,

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>based on what you know from these kinds of negotiations

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>between creditors and debtors in chapter eleven bankruptcy, can you

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>tell us what the tone or indeed what kind of relationship,

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>if any, do you believe would exist between those two

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>groups at this point. Well, that's going to be an

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting dynamic because I think the only real big third

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>party creditor that we know about right now is fair Home,

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>who is involved with Eddie and e S. In terms

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of both on the equity side and on the credit side.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be one of the largest creditors going in,

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>and they obviously got hurt pretty substantially, not only on

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>their equity exposure, which they've largely ex exited excuse me, um,

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:16.400
<v Speaker 1>but also in the eight percent notes, which is their

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>biggest piece, which are trading you know, call it low teens.

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's obviously paper that they owned at par right,

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So they're pretty substantially impaired. So figuring out where they're

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be in this is going to be a

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>big part of it. If they choose to make it contentious, um,

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>then this this will probably have a pretty challenged ND.

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Is this why they couldn't reach a resolution out of court? Well?

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, I guess there's probably a different number

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of different ways to sort of play that one my

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, tea leaves or you want to phrase it,

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>would be that it more came down to you need

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>assets to restructure around. So if you think back to E.

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>S L's proposal from a few weeks back, which basically

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>envisioned recapitalizing the entire balance sheet, um, but it also

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>meant moving a lot of the assets that remain off

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet. Uh. You know, the board is probably

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at that and saying, if we're going to restructure

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>around anything, we can't do it without ken More, we

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>can't do it without the real estate, etcetera. Uh. And

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 1>so you know they might have been having a half

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>an eye towards their own liability if this thing went

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>into a chapter eleven and what happened if they had

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>just pretty much shipped all the valuable assets off the

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet and into E S l um so. So

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a couple of dynamics that play there.

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you very much for sharing your

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>information and experience with us. Noel Hebert is our director

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of credit research for Bloomberg Intelligence. Speaking about Sears Holdings

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>filing for bankruptcy, President Donald Trump said that he is

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>sending U S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to meet

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 1>with Saudi King Salmon to discuss the fate of a

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Saudi dissident journalist who disappeared after entering the Saudi consulate

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in Istanbul. Here to tell us more about the situation

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>is Ali al Ahmed. He is the founder and director

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Institute for Gulf Affairs based in Washington, d C.

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>And joining me here in studio is Toby Harshaw, Bloomberg

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Opinion editor. Gentlemen, thank you very much for being here.

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Ali al Ahmed. Maybe you could just describe what do

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we know at the moment, what we know the moment

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>is that the Turkish government has the fault proof that

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Mr was killed inside the consulate, and we know the

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>identity of the killers H. And it's absolute no doubt

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that the Saudi team, the fifteen member team, including two

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>members of the conference bodyguards, were involved in the crime. UH.

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And the Turks are waiting to negotiate some kind of

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a deal between them and the Saudis. And I think

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 1>you meet the Americans because this is now becoming an

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>international incident and the King's nephew and governor of Mecca

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>is an Ancora beating with President Arregon to come to

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a solution or two an exit out of this UH,

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>out of this crisis. MR is dead and he was

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>killed in a very horrifle commander, I would say, is

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>the style murder. So we'll see what happens. Hang on

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>just a second because I want to bring in Toby Harshaw,

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion editor, to comment on this. Toby, why should

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Americans pay attention to the disappearance of a Saudi dissident journalist? Well,

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>I think we should pay attention to the disappearance of

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>all journalists. UM. I think that given the tremendous support

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump administration, particularly the President and Jared Kushner,

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>have given to the Saudis, which UH many people saw

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>as them giving the green light, for example, to their

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>attempts to isolate Cutter, Um to continue prosecuting this disaster

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of a war in Yemen. Um that you know and

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and support for for Mohammed bin Salman, the Prime Prince

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>really runs the country. UM that we need to look

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>at that policy and think about whether we have to

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>be more critical. Well Ali al Ahmed, the President said

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that he spoke earlier with the King of Saudi Arabia

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and described the conversation that the king denied any knowledge

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of whatever may have happened to us. He says, quote

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>our Saudi Arabian citizen, Do you believe that that is

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the contact content of that conversation? But I'm not sure.

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Obviously I was not listening in. But I would want

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to say that this is the greatest involved with him

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and of an American president ever in any issue relating

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to Saudi human rights violation. So you give Mr Trump

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>his his due. He has been the most spokes UH.

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>You might not like his position, but he has spoken

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>about it more than any American president all the Americans

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in fact combined that that's the reality. I followed all

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the Americans. The President the States was on Saudiast, So

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>this is surprising and maybe refreshingly. So I of course

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>King Salmon might not have been aware of it because

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>he's he's not he's not that healthy, especially because he

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>has a publement with his you know, amnesia son. But

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely it is done by people in the Royal Palace

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>close to him. He doesn't know, he doesn't know, but

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you cannot believe the politicians in general, especially the partic one. Uh.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>The reality is Mr Trump, I think also will use

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this to gain some some some favors with the Drawing

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>family and and or maybe in terms of having mb

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>as the conference deliver on his promises that he he

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 1>failed to do in terms of investing in certain projects

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>or delivering certain policies in the region. So I really

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>think this is going to continue because it's not about

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the killing of jamaatoc Alon, which is deserving obviously, but

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with other policies that the Mohammed

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Salman is carrying out. And I think Mohammed Salman is

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>what I call is growing his own wings. He wants

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:46.239
<v Speaker 1>to be more independent. He's carrying his own vision. He

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>wants to do things without America's support or approval. And

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that you will see that coming uh in

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the next few weeks, with maybe changing into oil production

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>and realigning his position in the region. There's ira is

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit of warnum in which the US supported from

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration time. Mr al Ahmed, just quickly, do

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>you have separate intelligence information other than what the Turkish

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>government has released or said in concerning the fate of

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Mr Kashogi. My my sources in Turkey, and he heard

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the video, he heard the audio of the killing, and

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so the collaborating videos that that puts the killers in

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>in in that space of time, in the council that

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>during the form Mr Kashov entered and after he was killed,

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>So everything there. I I know the individual who who

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>actually watched it. He is close to the government, but

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>he's a friend of Jamal Kaso and somebody I know,

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>so he actually saw it. So I'm not I have

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>no doubt my additional information separately, and I hope the

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>US government will contacts us. We have information on the

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>team that we have obtained through our own sources in

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the country through the Palace. We have more information that

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>we we have we we owned right now, Toby Harshaw,

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>just to come to you for thirty seconds, what would

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this issue due to US Saudi relationships visa v arms sales? Well,

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>as you know, the Congress has been tossing around the

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>idea of boycotting or putting limits on arms sales to

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>study Arabia based on the civilian casual Louis and Yemen.

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this could you know, obviously put to give

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>more support to that and put a lot of pressure

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on the White House to actually join in. Thanks very

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us, gentlemen, Toby Harshaw, Bloomberg Opinion

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>editor and Ali Al Ahmed, founder and director of the

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Institute for Gulf Affairs in Washington, d C. Thanks for

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>wits one. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.