Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Radio Show podcast. So, like many of you,
Speaker 1: I have trouble sleeping. I have insomnia. No matter what
Speaker 1: I tried, it wouldn't work until I met Mike Lindell
Speaker 1: and I got my very own my pillow. It has
Speaker 1: changed my life. What makes my pillows so different is
Speaker 1: my pillows patented adjustable fill. In other words, you can
Speaker 1: adjust the patented fill to your exact individual needs so
Speaker 1: you get the support you need and want to help
Speaker 1: you get to sleep faster and stay asleep longer. Just
Speaker 1: go to my pillow dot com or called one six
Speaker 1: zero nine zero. Remember used the promo code Hannity. When
Speaker 1: you do, Mike Lindell will give you his best off
Speaker 1: forever by one pillow and get another one absolutely free.
Speaker 1: My pillow made in the US a ten year unconditional
Speaker 1: warranty and it has a sixty day no questions asked
Speaker 1: money back guarantee. You have nothing to lose. So it's
Speaker 1: time for you to start getting the quality of sleep
Speaker 1: that you've been wanting and we need. Just go to
Speaker 1: my pillow dot com or call eight hundred zero nine
Speaker 1: zero promo code Hannity, take advantage of Mike special two
Speaker 1: for one offer my pillow dot Com promo code Hannity.
Speaker 1: What an incredible these newsdays. I gotta be honest, Keeping
Speaker 1: up with all of this is a twenty four hour job.
Speaker 1: There's no rest for the weary here. By the way,
Speaker 1: not complaining in any way. I'll take busy over slow
Speaker 1: news days any day, you know, Um, I just will.
Speaker 1: It's uh, there's a lot going on here, you know,
Speaker 1: a lot has been made over my comments. I was
Speaker 1: on with Bannon last night on a serious x M
Speaker 1: on the Patriot Channel. They he hosts Bright Part News.
Speaker 1: It's on after Me and Levine and Uh. Anyway, I
Speaker 1: happened to stop by. There was a book event party
Speaker 1: last night over you know. It's at some restaurant in
Speaker 1: New York, right next to Fox. So I stopped buying
Speaker 1: I and uh, I just said hello, and and a
Speaker 1: lot of fun people there and people that I liked there,
Speaker 1: And anyway, I didn't stay very long, but I just
Speaker 1: I went in there and he's actually doing his debut
Speaker 1: show and I he asked what I think of the
Speaker 1: Republican Party, and I said, it's a dead party. It's
Speaker 1: a morally corrupt party. What do I mean by that?
Speaker 1: I mean, if you promised certain things for all these years,
Speaker 1: give us the House, Senate and and and give us
Speaker 1: the presidency and will do a B, C and D
Speaker 1: and I expect those things to get done. And it's
Speaker 1: something that it's funny how much news it's making, considering
Speaker 1: I say it here every day, and that they're weak
Speaker 1: and ineffective and visionless and lacking identity. That's all true.
Speaker 1: I'm not I don't withhold anything from any of you.
Speaker 1: And they've been they have been the greatest disappointment. And
Speaker 1: I didn't leave them. They left us, meaning we the
Speaker 1: people in this country. They've left us. And yeah, I'm
Speaker 1: I'm happy about the economic bill, the tax bill. I'm
Speaker 1: happy the middle class are getting some relief that they
Speaker 1: desperately deserve. I'm happy that corporations. Corporations never pay taxes
Speaker 1: and it's a myth if you believe they do. I'm
Speaker 1: happy the corporate rate is now going to be competitive
Speaker 1: around the world. I'm happy the president on his own
Speaker 1: has gotten rid of all of these burdens and regulations
Speaker 1: he's getting rid of. I'm happy that he has independently
Speaker 1: saved the coal industry and is moving to an all
Speaker 1: of the above energy strategy, which will create millions of
Speaker 1: high paying career jobs. I'm happy about that. I'm happy
Speaker 1: multinational corporations will now be incentivized to take their trillions
Speaker 1: parked overseas in these tax haveing countries and that they'll
Speaker 1: bring that money back in the hopes that they'll build
Speaker 1: factories and manufacturing centers and create jobs and businesses and
Speaker 1: opportunities for those people that Obama left behind for eight years.
Speaker 1: I'm really happy about all of that. You know, I
Speaker 1: do think that they could have gone further. And by
Speaker 1: going further, it's simple follow the Reagan model, the Kennedy model.
Speaker 1: The Reagan dropped the top marginal rate, seventy twenty one
Speaker 1: million new jobs, created longest period of peacetime economic growth.
Speaker 1: He doubled revenues to the government, and we had GDP
Speaker 1: growth this highest seven point four percent at one point,
Speaker 1: you know, during the Obama years one one and a half.
Speaker 1: You know, remember we even had negative growth some quarters
Speaker 1: with Obama. And since Trump has done all of this
Speaker 1: on his own, we've seen two million jobs created, We've
Speaker 1: seen you know, the best consumer confidence. In seventeen years,
Speaker 1: we've seen a seven year high labor participation rate that
Speaker 1: means people finding jobs in the job market that didn't exist.
Speaker 1: We see that he's effectively pressured in embarrassed companies into
Speaker 1: staying here in America because they were they were so quick,
Speaker 1: and there was a mass exodus leaving and going overseas
Speaker 1: where they didn't have to deal with the burdens and
Speaker 1: regulations in this country. It never was about costs. It
Speaker 1: never was about labor costs. In spite of what some
Speaker 1: people will tell you, although there are Republicans that have
Speaker 1: their you know, nose up in the air country club,
Speaker 1: Republicans that they want cheap labor, and I'm sorry, uh,
Speaker 1: if you want the best labor, if you want American workers,
Speaker 1: or you might have to pay a little bit more.
Speaker 1: And the idea that you want to take your company
Speaker 1: south of the border or put in some other places obnoxious.
Speaker 1: But in some cases government is so disincentivized corporations they've
Speaker 1: had no choice if they want to be competitive. My
Speaker 1: next air condition is gonna be a carrier. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna try to buy I buy cars that I
Speaker 1: know are made in America. That's it. I just do
Speaker 1: it because I want to support the industries. I'll hand
Speaker 1: it to your old fashioned And by the way, it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. I mean, it could be a Toyota, it
Speaker 1: could be a Honda Hyunda, you know has a plant
Speaker 1: in America. I don't care what you buy, but I
Speaker 1: want American workers to be built in those cars. That's
Speaker 1: just what. It's just good for our country. It's good
Speaker 1: for those those families. You know, we can revitalize a
Speaker 1: city like Detroit, it's possible. It can revitalize these old
Speaker 1: manufacturing centers, and we can adapt to the new economy.
Speaker 1: We don't have to be you know, it's it's obvious
Speaker 1: now that we're moving very quickly and expeditiously towards a
Speaker 1: high tech world. Means a lot of jobs in the
Speaker 1: high tech industries. And I t and you know all
Speaker 1: of those fields. But you're always gonna need people to work.
Speaker 1: And I prefer to hire American workers. And I prefer
Speaker 1: that we not be competing with people that will work
Speaker 1: for pennies on the dollar that entered this country illegally
Speaker 1: and that could be taken advantage of by other people.
Speaker 1: That happens a lot too and if there are certain
Speaker 1: industries were told that I guess, you know, out in
Speaker 1: California they have a need during you know, certain times
Speaker 1: of the years that they can't get enough American workers. Well,
Speaker 1: if we can't find them and help them get to
Speaker 1: where the work is, or they don't want to do
Speaker 1: that work, which I don't understand. If you get any job,
Speaker 1: you should take it if you don't have a job,
Speaker 1: but if you if you have to, we can arrange
Speaker 1: you know, work permits. After we met people from other
Speaker 1: countries and allow them in as a guest worker and
Speaker 1: just have to monitor them that they don't you know,
Speaker 1: skip off and try and fade into the sunset and
Speaker 1: and hope for amnesty ten years later, which you know
Speaker 1: has happened. You know, this is a pretty amazing statement
Speaker 1: by Jim Acosta. When journalists are attacked, journalists have to resist. Wow,
Speaker 1: this is CNN. You get the president gets two scoops,
Speaker 1: You only get one. Look at the inside of this
Speaker 1: dog's ear. It looks like Donald Trump. Did you see
Speaker 1: me when I play that? Oh yeah, they did a
Speaker 1: whole report on the inside of a dog's ear looks
Speaker 1: like the face of Donald Trump. It's so unbelievable. Did
Speaker 1: you put up the article yesterday on the American Thinker
Speaker 1: on our website? This person is liberal. I'm a liberal,
Speaker 1: but I agree with Hannity, journalism is dead. And then
Speaker 1: he takes a shot because I give opinion, and I'm like, well,
Speaker 1: I'm a talk show host. A talk show host are
Speaker 1: known to give opinions. There's no secrecy here. And I think, now,
Speaker 1: thirty years in radio and onenty three years on the
Speaker 1: Fox News Channel, it's not a surprise that people finding
Speaker 1: out that Hannity is not an objective journalist. I'm a journalist,
Speaker 1: but I'm a advocacy journalist. I'm an opinionated journalist. I
Speaker 1: do straight interviews a lot of times, plenty of times,
Speaker 1: but I also give opinion. All Right, we've got some
Speaker 1: breaking news I want to share with you, but I
Speaker 1: want to backtrack a little bit here, and I want
Speaker 1: to get into at length what we talked about yesterday,
Speaker 1: and that is, you know, the scandal that has now
Speaker 1: developed within the top ranks of the FBI and this guy,
Speaker 1: Peter Struck and the guy that was removed from Robert
Speaker 1: Mueller's apparently now one sided and biased team that he
Speaker 1: put together uh, this summer after it was discovered that
Speaker 1: he was sending anti Trump text pro Hillary Clinton text
Speaker 1: to another woman that apparently he was having a relationship with,
Speaker 1: and she worked as a top FBI lawyer under Deputy
Speaker 1: Director Andrew McCabe. Now since then, we've learned that the
Speaker 1: Office of Inspector General is reviewing Peter Struck's role in
Speaker 1: the Clinton email server investigation. And from what we know, Struck,
Speaker 1: you know, the guy that favors Hillary and h Trump.
Speaker 1: That this guy Hillary Clinton loving official at the FBI
Speaker 1: was intimately involved with investigating Hillary Clinton's use of a
Speaker 1: private email server. And as Katherine Harriget Fox pointed out,
Speaker 1: Struck was on the ground floor of the server investigation,
Speaker 1: and that included participating in the July interview of Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton where she was not put under oath, and he
Speaker 1: was also involved in recommending whether or not Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: should be prosecuted. This is a guy that has a
Speaker 1: political agenda and a bias and then we can't He's
Speaker 1: also the guy that changed the language of Comey's draft
Speaker 1: exoneration letter. Now, remember this was in May. They had
Speaker 1: an interviewed Clinton, they had an interviewed the main people
Speaker 1: involved in the Clinton email server scandal. And there's James
Speaker 1: Comey writing an exoneration of Hillary and he even put
Speaker 1: in the words gross negligence, which is the legal standard.
Speaker 1: Now we find out this guy Struck who hates Trump
Speaker 1: and loves Hillary, he's the one that changed it to
Speaker 1: extreme carelessness. And he also helped draft this exoneration statement.
Speaker 1: You know what that is. That's an abusively biased FBI
Speaker 1: guy that should not be investigating Trump nor Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: And what happened here is, in my view, if you
Speaker 1: want to talk about obstruction of justice, I think we
Speaker 1: gotta ask about him and Comey, because if you're not
Speaker 1: doing a full investigation and having equal justice under the law,
Speaker 1: that is, by its very definition, obstruction of justice. And
Speaker 1: then Struck lie uh sorry, led the probe into whom
Speaker 1: Aberdeen's emails that were found on Wiener's computer, and how
Speaker 1: some investigators are now saying to they believe Struck us
Speaker 1: tied to the FBI's handling of the Trump dossier, the
Speaker 1: phony Hillary paid for Boughton paid for Darsier with Russian
Speaker 1: propaganda and lies, and the and the Fiser surveillance of
Speaker 1: a Trump campaign associate. This guy's up to his eyeballs
Speaker 1: and everything as part of Mueller's team. And this is
Speaker 1: where it's getting interesting. The fix was in for Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton and the and the absolute desire to take down
Speaker 1: Trump is evidenced by this guy's own comments. And then
Speaker 1: it raises the question will eight of the sixteen people
Speaker 1: that Mueller hired, Oh, they're big Democratic donors to Clinton
Speaker 1: and Obama. Well, I don't see any of them donating
Speaker 1: to the to anybody else. That's pretty outrageous. And you
Speaker 1: got the FBI Deputy director McCabe is the key witness.
Speaker 1: You know. Congress now wants the interview about the dossier,
Speaker 1: but McCabe will not show up to testify. And he's
Speaker 1: thought to have been the FBI's key point person or
Speaker 1: handler of this British m I six agent Christopher Steele,
Speaker 1: who created the phony Russian paid for dossier, the Russian
Speaker 1: propaganda dossier. Hill learc it and paid for Darcier. And
Speaker 1: then that you have the Political Action Committee, you know,
Speaker 1: tied to the Clintons, b F Terry mccauloff. Well, they
Speaker 1: gave McCabe's wife a half a million bucks for her
Speaker 1: Senate run and she got another two hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 1: from the Democratic Party, an obscene amount of money for
Speaker 1: state race and the president. You know, he's reacting to
Speaker 1: all of this, he said, after years of Comey and
Speaker 1: the phony and dishonest Clinton investigation, He's right, the fix
Speaker 1: was in running the FBI, and his reputation is in tatters,
Speaker 1: worst in history, says he'll bring it back. Well, the
Speaker 1: President's percent right about Comey and a percent right about
Speaker 1: this guy struck and apparently struck as also one of
Speaker 1: the guys that interviewed General Flynn. This is beyond outrageous.
Speaker 1: This is not a a a fair and balanced and
Speaker 1: objective and and equal justice under the law scenario here. Well,
Speaker 1: now we've got news breaking as we come on the
Speaker 1: air here to day, and that is I keep telling
Speaker 1: you about this Andrew Wiseman. Guy, Andrew Wiseman is the
Speaker 1: one that had the nine zero Supreme Court decision against him.
Speaker 1: He's the one that through innocent people from Merrill, Lynch
Speaker 1: and jail that ended up being innocent. He's the one
Speaker 1: that came up with new laws that didn't exist. He's
Speaker 1: the guy that was involved in the Enron case and
Speaker 1: the Anderson Accounting case where tens of thousands of people
Speaker 1: lost his job. Well, it turns out that Mueller. You
Speaker 1: know again, Mueller put this whole team together. Wiseman as
Speaker 1: the most atrocious record of being unethical of all of them.
Speaker 1: So the day that Sally Yates has fired through Judicial Watch,
Speaker 1: we now find out Wiseman wrote to Yates, I am
Speaker 1: so proud, proud that Donald Trump fired her. I am
Speaker 1: in awe, thank you so much. Well, now he needs
Speaker 1: to go. It's unbelievable. Our constant tuition now is in jeopardy.
Speaker 1: If this is the Banana Republic they're creating here, I
Speaker 1: get back to that. Also, false reports about Mueller investigating
Speaker 1: Trump's finances. Jay Sekula will clarify at the bottom of
Speaker 1: the hour and exclusive interview. All right, only two words
Speaker 1: you need to remember while making your list and checking
Speaker 1: it twice this holiday season. Tommy John. They are the
Speaker 1: revolutionary men's underwear, T shirts, sock brand, and they have
Speaker 1: redefined comfort for men everywhere, including and especially me wall
Speaker 1: Tommy John underwear is crafted from the most comfortable fabric
Speaker 1: you'll ever use. It's impossible to be uncomfortable, and Tommy
Speaker 1: John plus their innovation never takes a day off of
Speaker 1: Tommy John. Even during the holidays. They're constantly thinking in
Speaker 1: new ways to give you the best product you've ever tried.
Speaker 1: Like they're patented undershirts I wear every day. Well, they
Speaker 1: stay tucked in and literally pull perspiration right off your body.
Speaker 1: And also Tommy John their underwear is backed by the
Speaker 1: best pair you'll ever wear guarantee or it's free from
Speaker 1: Tommy John dot com. So give the gift of life
Speaker 1: changing comfort for the holidays Tommy John dot com slash
Speaker 1: Hannity off your first order. That's Tommy John dot com
Speaker 1: slash Hannity. Plus you get extra savings with exclusive holiday
Speaker 1: daily deals only at Tommy John dot com slash Hannity.
Speaker 1: Hey alright, so now, well we'll get into this with
Speaker 1: Jay Sekulo and Sarah Carter and Victoria Tunsing all stopping
Speaker 1: by today other news, Bryan Ross has been banned from
Speaker 1: covering Trump. Well, if you have to do that with
Speaker 1: your investigative reporter, what is the point, you know? PJ
Speaker 1: Media raises a point today a source that they're quoting
Speaker 1: of the January interview with General Flynn. The uh FBI
Speaker 1: Deputy director had contacted Flynn by phone directly at the
Speaker 1: White House, and White House officials had spent earlier the
Speaker 1: earlier part of the week overseeing the training and security
Speaker 1: measures associated with the new roles, So it was no
Speaker 1: surprise that Flynn to Flynn that McKay had called. Well,
Speaker 1: turns out McCabe told Flynn some agents were headed over
Speaker 1: to the White House. Flynn thought it was part of
Speaker 1: routine that the FBI was doing. It wasn't until after
Speaker 1: they were already in Flynn's office he realized he was
Speaker 1: being formally interviewed. He didn't have an attorney with him.
Speaker 1: That may become an issue. And the FBI ignored congressional
Speaker 1: referrals to investigate Hillary for felony perjury. There's an exchange
Speaker 1: with Jason cha fits over that I saw him on
Speaker 1: TV earlier today. You know Pelosi, by the way, Pelosi's
Speaker 1: warning that the world is going to come to an
Speaker 1: end if the GOP tax plan becomes law really a
Speaker 1: little fearmongering here. Uh, we'll get to all of this. Also,
Speaker 1: the Trump hating FBI agent sent an urgent alert to
Speaker 1: call me on Clinton on the Clinton Lynch tarmac meeting.
Speaker 1: Let me explain this to you now. Minutes after this
Speaker 1: guy Struck learned in twenty sixteen that Bill Clinton had
Speaker 1: been caught secretly meeting with Loretta Lynch on the tarmac
Speaker 1: and Phoenix. He sent an urgent alert to the FBI
Speaker 1: Director James Comey. Shortly thereafter. Emails obtained by Judicial Watch
Speaker 1: reveal that the bureau launched a frantic attempt to track
Speaker 1: down the source of the information in a bid to
Speaker 1: quote stem any further damage. Now, Jay Sekulo is going
Speaker 1: to join us in a minute. It discussed these documents
Speaker 1: on his radio show earlier. Uh, I think it was
Speaker 1: either today or yesterday, And he said, Struck spent sent
Speaker 1: an email within eight minutes of the information hitting the
Speaker 1: d o J about the tarmac meeting. They went to
Speaker 1: people within the FBI, and eight minutes it reached James Comey.
Speaker 1: It was marked urgent and high. The talking points are
Speaker 1: still redacted. He said, there's some serious legal issues and
Speaker 1: conflicts of interest here. Now they were first obtained by
Speaker 1: Judicial Watch, and agents wanted to find the whistleblower who
Speaker 1: outed the tarmac meeting to local press. Well, that's believed
Speaker 1: to be a law enforcement official. All we'll find out
Speaker 1: what this all means. Jay Sekulo coming up next. A
Speaker 1: now toll, let's let's play. The Democrats melt down over
Speaker 1: the Republican tax bill. This is pretty funny. Democrats talk
Speaker 1: about this bill often in very acalyptic terms, but isn't
Speaker 1: really what's going on, and said, many people are getting
Speaker 1: a very modest tax cut and some people are getting
Speaker 1: a tax increase. Wall A lot of this is also
Speaker 1: joined the business. But it's not the end of the
Speaker 1: world now. It is the end of that. This healthcare,
Speaker 1: the debata on healthcare is life death. This is armageddon.
Speaker 1: This is a very big deal because you know why,
Speaker 1: there's really a very hard way to come back from this.
Speaker 1: They take us further more deeply into debt. What can
Speaker 1: you do but raise taxes. They contend that they're a
Speaker 1: gift to corporate America. A trillion and a half dollars
Speaker 1: could be up to a trillion a half dollars will
Speaker 1: be paid for by the growth it creates. And even
Speaker 1: their own people say on sense, not true, not true.
Speaker 1: So let's be truthful with the American people about that.
Speaker 1: They throw a few crumbs to the middle class, where
Speaker 1: they give with one hand, they take away in bounty
Speaker 1: with the other. And why because it is in their
Speaker 1: DNA to give tax cuts to the rich, that their
Speaker 1: purpose in coming to Palmist for many reason, it isn't
Speaker 1: the underworld is because America is a great country, and
Speaker 1: the greatness of America and the fact that God is
Speaker 1: always with us is what gives us hope. But it's
Speaker 1: very important for the American people to know how adversely
Speaker 1: they will be personally affected by all of this. Former
Speaker 1: Treasury Secretary Larry Summers responding to the tax bill and
Speaker 1: the impact that it could have on healthcare coverage, and
Speaker 1: a new opened out overnight. It's called Yes, the Senate
Speaker 1: Geop tax plan would cause thousands to die. If you
Speaker 1: want to explain your latest off ed look, I think
Speaker 1: this bill is very dangerous. There's pretty clear ab looking
Speaker 1: across different states and looking when health insurance has been
Speaker 1: phased in and out. When people lose health insurance, they're
Speaker 1: less likely to get preventive care, they're more likely to
Speaker 1: defer health care they need, and ultimately they're more likely
Speaker 1: to die. And it's very hard to quantify precisely. My
Speaker 1: piece explains why an estimate that thousands will die as
Speaker 1: a consequence of this bill is actually a very conservative estimate,
Speaker 1: done much much more carefully, based on much more rigorous
Speaker 1: evidence than the absurd claims made by some that this
Speaker 1: bill will somehow pay for itself. Doom and gloom. Republicans, Conservatives,
Speaker 1: liberals and Democrats. Libertarians, you're all going to die. Your
Speaker 1: children are going to die. Everybody's going to die, and
Speaker 1: they only exist for tax cuts to the rich. Prepare
Speaker 1: to die the moment that, in fact, this bill is past, well,
Speaker 1: then Nancy Pelosi, by the way, suggested he tells California
Speaker 1: Republicans to live and leave the state. It's sort of
Speaker 1: like what Andrew Cuomo was saying. If you're one of
Speaker 1: those conservatives and you believe in the Second Amendment, your
Speaker 1: pro life, you're not a New Yorker and you have
Speaker 1: no place in New York. If you remember that one,
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi says, I want every single California Republican to
Speaker 1: understand this. Your ideology doesn't come first, Your party doesn't
Speaker 1: come first. The people come first. If you failed to
Speaker 1: recognize that, you do not be long here. You disagree
Speaker 1: with her gone hip hip problems are they? Are they
Speaker 1: these extreme conservatives who are right to life two assault weapon?
Speaker 1: Is that who they are, because if that's who they are,
Speaker 1: and if they have the extreme conservatives, they have no
Speaker 1: place in the state of New York citizens. That's not
Speaker 1: who new Yorkers are, no place in the state. And well,
Speaker 1: I'm I don't care what people do. I'm fairly libertarian.
Speaker 1: It's your own life. But I do believe in the
Speaker 1: Second Amendment, and I am right to life. I believe
Speaker 1: that life begins a conception. That's not who New Yorkers are,
Speaker 1: and New Yorkers don't you have no way to be
Speaker 1: here in New York. Oh, he thinks he's going to
Speaker 1: be president, and he thinks he's going to be president,
Speaker 1: I'll leave, trust me, there's no point at that point.
Speaker 1: It's gone, Uh, we're gonna be trying to get Jay second,
Speaker 1: like I assume he probably got caught up in a meeting.
Speaker 1: But so you've got the Trump hating FBI urgent sending
Speaker 1: the alert on the arm MAC meeting. And now what
Speaker 1: we're finding out it's marked urgent and high and the
Speaker 1: talking points are still redacted. But what we find out
Speaker 1: is Pete Stroke was involved in that. This is unbelievable
Speaker 1: and within eight minutes of the information hitting the d
Speaker 1: o J about Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton on the tarmac. Oh,
Speaker 1: they went to people within the FBI. Comey new in
Speaker 1: eight minutes marked urgent high. There's some serious issues involving
Speaker 1: the law here in conflicts of interest. Judicial Watch Now
Speaker 1: has gotten ahold of these emails. It shows the FBI
Speaker 1: was not particularly concerned in any way with the scandalous meeting.
Speaker 1: They were only concerned about hiding the details from we
Speaker 1: the people, the public. That's unbelievable. And the FBI agents
Speaker 1: wanted to find who was who outed them on the tarmac.
Speaker 1: The whistle blow is believed to be a law enforcement official.
Speaker 1: There's just days before the decision of Loretta Lynch. FBI
Speaker 1: agents wanted to find the whistle blower. They didn't care
Speaker 1: about the meeting. FBI officials, right, we need to find
Speaker 1: that guy. What did he do wrong? The FBI Phoenix
Speaker 1: office was contacted in an attempt to stam any further damage.
Speaker 1: The fix was in. The fix was in from the
Speaker 1: get go. All right, by the way, Jay is available now.
Speaker 1: All Linda, if you're paying attention, you can call now.
Speaker 1: Would be guess I know I'm trying to get him.
Speaker 1: Thank you all right, You're very welcome. Not telling you
Speaker 1: to do your job. I just got a text I'm
Speaker 1: sharing with you anyway. Uh so we got that on
Speaker 1: the plate. Muller fired this guy, Peter Struck, you know,
Speaker 1: and he fired the mistress. By the way, he's calling
Speaker 1: my phone. I'll just tell him hang on, Lynda is
Speaker 1: calling you, shorthand there we go. Greg Jared has how
Speaker 1: an FBI official with the political agenda corrupted the investigations
Speaker 1: by Bob Muller And comey, let's get to Jay Sekulo.
Speaker 1: He is the chief council of the American Center for
Speaker 1: Law Injustice and also counsel to the President. How are you, sir,
Speaker 1: I'm good, sir, Sean, how are you. Let's go over
Speaker 1: this guy Struck that seems to be in the middle
Speaker 1: of everything now that we have um. And more importantly,
Speaker 1: he changed the words as it relates to the exoneration
Speaker 1: which was written by Comy before the investigation of Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton and email server, and he changed the words from
Speaker 1: gross negligence the legal standard or you know, reckless disregard
Speaker 1: or whatever, it was extreme carelessness. And I want to
Speaker 1: get your thoughts on this, and I want to get
Speaker 1: you if he's involved in everything, and he's hates Trump
Speaker 1: and he loves Hillary. Well, he's he's no longer involved
Speaker 1: in the in the case, uh, in the investigation, so
Speaker 1: he's been removed. But it raised, of course, it raised
Speaker 1: a really serious issue, and uh, a serious issue because
Speaker 1: if you go back to the Flynn investigation, Uh, evidently
Speaker 1: he was the agent in charge of that one as
Speaker 1: well back in January. So it's not just as it
Speaker 1: relates to this one aspect, but it's multiple uh prongs
Speaker 1: of this, the Hillary Clinton side, the the the the
Speaker 1: aspect as it relates to General Flynn. And then of
Speaker 1: course was still on the team and I think until
Speaker 1: July on bomb Mueller staff, until he was reassigned to
Speaker 1: human resources. So this is look at, these are all
Speaker 1: issues that have to be raised. They're all serious issues.
Speaker 1: And again, um, if you look at the well, can
Speaker 1: I ask you a question, I mean, when if you're
Speaker 1: writing an exoneration letter before you've done the investigation, right,
Speaker 1: doesn't that sound like the fixes in and the person involved?
Speaker 1: And I think, I mean I've said that the whole time.
Speaker 1: I mean the whole time, and James call me not
Speaker 1: only did he write the exoneration letter before he does
Speaker 1: witness interviews. Many of these witnesses god immunity that he
Speaker 1: did not interview. And he wrote this letter three months
Speaker 1: before because they knew where this was going. So the
Speaker 1: whole process is ridiculous, Sean, It's been ridiculous from the outset.
Speaker 1: We've been saying it for a year. It's still ridiculous.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure if you heard this news. This just
Speaker 1: broke with Katherine Harriage over at the Fox News channel
Speaker 1: that the deputy Mueller deputy apparently and this is Andrew Weisman.
Speaker 1: Andrew Weisman. I told the story about him, and you know,
Speaker 1: he was accused of making up laws that don't exist
Speaker 1: and pretty unethical behavior. He had a nine old decision
Speaker 1: against him in the Supreme Court. He was overturned in
Speaker 1: another case by the Fifth District Court of Appeals. Uh.
Speaker 1: This is a guy that was wrong on the Enron
Speaker 1: investigation Anderson accounting, tens of thousands of jobs were lost,
Speaker 1: Merrill Lynch employees that were innocent, innocent spent a lot
Speaker 1: of time in jail because of him. And anyway, he
Speaker 1: along with seven other Clinton Obama donors, will put on
Speaker 1: Mueller's team. Now it turns out the day that Sally
Speaker 1: Yates was fired, that he sent a email to Sally
Speaker 1: Yates the subject line, I am so proud, and then
Speaker 1: he continued end in awe, thank you so much, all
Speaker 1: my deepest respects. All that sounds like we have And
Speaker 1: just like in the case of Struck, somebody that's pro
Speaker 1: Clinton and nanti Trump. So here's the here's the situation.
Speaker 1: There are ways in which these issues are raised. And
Speaker 1: the way in which an issue is raised is initially,
Speaker 1: if there was a concern about bias or improper action
Speaker 1: the lawyers that are representing um in a situation like
Speaker 1: with Manafort, his lawyers could raise objections both within the
Speaker 1: Special Counsel's Office and with the Department of Justice, the
Speaker 1: depth the Attorney General's Office was supervising it. That's the
Speaker 1: way in which this Then there's there's another words as
Speaker 1: a process in place for those issues to be raised.
Speaker 1: Is it a problem for you that that Mueller put
Speaker 1: together a team Andrew Wiseman's background and this guy Peter
Speaker 1: I'm not let me Sean, I'm not going to comment
Speaker 1: on that because of the nature of understood, All right,
Speaker 1: move on to some thing. So I don't want to. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I can't. I can't, but I will say this, if
Speaker 1: I was representing uh, Paul Manaford or Dates and you
Speaker 1: had these issues, I think those are the kind of
Speaker 1: things you raise. What about you talked on your radio
Speaker 1: show about struck send an email within eight minutes of
Speaker 1: the information hitting the Department of Justice about the tarmac meeting. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so all of that ends up going right up to
Speaker 1: James Colby and it reached called me about within about
Speaker 1: thirty two minutes of the whole thing hitting. And this
Speaker 1: was pursuing to a Premium Information Act litigation that we
Speaker 1: were engaged in on this that resulted in documents being disclosed.
Speaker 1: All they're still redacting some big ones, which we're back
Speaker 1: while re sawing yesterday in federal court. So all that's proceeding.
Speaker 1: But yes, uh, I mean, this guy was conflicted on
Speaker 1: a hundred different ways, and I think it's created a
Speaker 1: real problem for the Department of Justice, and they're trying
Speaker 1: to rectify it by moving him too. I guess it
Speaker 1: was human resources, But at the end of the day
Speaker 1: was the number two encounter intelligence. There was a lot
Speaker 1: of news made this morning, a report by Bloomberg that
Speaker 1: in fact, Mueller had started investigating Donald Trump's finances, which
Speaker 1: I believe Deutsche Bank. Is that true? Well, I just
Speaker 1: issued a statement on that. So we've worked on. We
Speaker 1: saw that news report this morning, and the fact of
Speaker 1: the matter is, and I'll confirm it here, is there
Speaker 1: are no subpoenas that had been issued regarding the president
Speaker 1: the president's finances to Deutsche Bank. That was completely false.
Speaker 1: The media reports were false. No subpoenas have been issued
Speaker 1: or received. And we confirmed that. My colleagues confirmed that
Speaker 1: with are they are investing information? Nope, So the the
Speaker 1: whole thing was a false report, fake deuce. Yeah, well
Speaker 1: you know what it actually looks like it originated in Germany. Wow.
Speaker 1: How is it possible that Hillary Clinton escaped criminal indictment
Speaker 1: for the mishandling of these documents and the email server
Speaker 1: scandal when we have all of this evidence? And how
Speaker 1: is it possible that an FBI director is writing this
Speaker 1: exoneration before he does the investigation. Isn't that the very
Speaker 1: definition of obstruction from him? Yeah? Sean there, In my view,
Speaker 1: James Colemey has no defense what what he has acknowledged doing,
Speaker 1: whether it was leaking the information about the president, or
Speaker 1: whether it was the statement itself, as you said, writing
Speaker 1: the statement before the witnesses were interviewed, it tells you
Speaker 1: what this was politics, pure and symbol. Is there any
Speaker 1: It was not equal justice under the law. And that
Speaker 1: has been my biggest claim here. What is the best
Speaker 1: outcome when you're dealing with people that now are exposed
Speaker 1: as having political biases that what's the best way to
Speaker 1: handle that? Start over? Look, my my goal in this
Speaker 1: entire process has been that this we get a fact,
Speaker 1: fact based determination that there was no violation of the
Speaker 1: law here. And and I think that's becoming crystal clear.
Speaker 1: I mean that you had, you know, the reports I
Speaker 1: mean talking about the Deutson Banks news today two days
Speaker 1: ago was Brian Ross at ABC. I mean, and all
Speaker 1: of these stories were incorrect. So when you look at
Speaker 1: the facts and and and do you look at the facts,
Speaker 1: there's no legal violation here? Do you think that this
Speaker 1: is something We keep hearing speculation from the media that
Speaker 1: there now they're on to Jared Kushner and all this
Speaker 1: deal with Flynn. There's a lot of speculation about the deal.
Speaker 1: I read the five page agreement and they did talk
Speaker 1: about one other person at the request of one other person.
Speaker 1: The media has speculated it's Jared Kushman. Yeah, but you
Speaker 1: know what, here's the thing with that. Uh. First of all,
Speaker 1: if if General Flynn were to have had a conversation
Speaker 1: with the Russians when the president was a distinticular case
Speaker 1: was the president elect, that's not the violation of any law.
Speaker 1: And this this argument that this somehow violates the so
Speaker 1: called uh, what's not so called. It's called the Logan Act,
Speaker 1: which has been on the books in sev but never
Speaker 1: s eighteen years. Yeah. Yeah, suffer some serious constitutional problems,
Speaker 1: free speech being one of them. But also the fact
Speaker 1: that we have a Presidential Transition Act in ninety three
Speaker 1: that that governs how this all operates. So this was
Speaker 1: no wonder. Of course, there's not gonna be a Logan
Speaker 1: Act violation. You're or every president elect would be violating it.
Speaker 1: So it's it's nonsense. I think this is against speculation.
Speaker 1: General Flynn pled guilty. Entered a guilty plea as relates
Speaker 1: to lying to federal agents during the investigation. Alright, j
Speaker 1: Secular American Center for Law and Justice, Special Counsel of
Speaker 1: the President, thank you for being with you. Will join
Speaker 1: us on TV tonight. Well, we'll follow up more with
Speaker 1: Sarah Carter and Victoria Tunsey. I know I'm running late here,
Speaker 1: all right. Our to Sean Hannity's show eight nine four one,
Speaker 1: Shawn is a toll free telephone number. You want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. We have been going
Speaker 1: over this whole story involving this guy, Peter Struck, and
Speaker 1: how this guy basically had his hand in in pretty
Speaker 1: much everything as it relates to the Clinton email investigation,
Speaker 1: as it includes the dossier, as it it's everything, he
Speaker 1: has his hands it, and we find out that he
Speaker 1: hates Trump and that he loves Hillary Clinton. But yet
Speaker 1: he's involved in you know, changing the words from you
Speaker 1: know to extreme carelessness when it's gross negligence the legal standard.
Speaker 1: And now the story is getting bigger. Sarah Carter, investigative reporter,
Speaker 1: broke that story yesterday how this fi FBI supervisor was
Speaker 1: removed from the special Council. We have talked at length
Speaker 1: about half of the people that Mueller are appointed. They're
Speaker 1: all big Democratic donors, no Republican donors. Uh. Then we
Speaker 1: talked about judicial wats releasing you know, two productions of
Speaker 1: Justice Department documents showing strong support by top d o
Speaker 1: J officials for four we're Acting Attorney General Sally Yates
Speaker 1: and her refusal to enforce President Trump's Middle East Travel
Speaker 1: Band executive order, and she got fired one email. Andrew Weissman.
Speaker 1: We've told you all about him. He's the guy that
Speaker 1: had the nine zero decision reversial reversal under obstruction of justice.
Speaker 1: He was overturned by the Fifth District Court of Appeals.
Speaker 1: He's the guy that literally put innocent people in jail
Speaker 1: and made up laws and a whole bunch of other unethicable,
Speaker 1: unethical and questionable conduct that he's been involved in. On
Speaker 1: Now we find out that, in fact, he's a big
Speaker 1: supporter of Sally Yates and on the day that she
Speaker 1: got far, I'm proud of you and in awe of you.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, all my deepest respects. Wow. So
Speaker 1: now we've got another guy, top deputy hired by Mueller,
Speaker 1: the special counsel. Anyway. The Judicial Watch obtained these documents
Speaker 1: through a May seventeen Freedom of Information Shann Act lawsuit
Speaker 1: filed after the Justice Department failed to respond to a
Speaker 1: Foyer request seeking yates as emails from her government account anyway,
Speaker 1: The emails sent several sent from the Department of Justice
Speaker 1: email addresses show very strong support for Yates. It was
Speaker 1: fired for disobeying her boss, a direct order from the
Speaker 1: President of the United States. You know you have one
Speaker 1: particular guy for us. Attorney for the UH for Maine. Right.
Speaker 1: You are my hero, and you've got a career service
Speaker 1: employee in chief of the Justice Department's Special Financial Investigations
Speaker 1: Unit telling Yates that she is inspirational and heroic of
Speaker 1: Emily Grace Rice the U S Attorney for New Hampshire
Speaker 1: Obama pointee. Thank you as always for making us proud.
Speaker 1: It's truly an honor to work for you. Another Obama pointee,
Speaker 1: Barbara McQuaid, U S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan. Oh,
Speaker 1: thank you for your courage and leadership. This is wonderful news.
Speaker 1: The Department of Justice Civil Division Appellate Attorney Jeffrey Claire,
Speaker 1: Thank you, Attorney General Yates. I've been in civil appellate
Speaker 1: for thirty years. I've never seen an administration with such
Speaker 1: contempt for the democratic values and rule of law. The
Speaker 1: President's order is an unconstitutional embarrassment. I applaud you for
Speaker 1: taking a principled stand and defending it. Wow. Joining us
Speaker 1: now and welcome back. Investigative reporter Sarah Carter is with
Speaker 1: us and also with us Victoria Tunsing. She's a partner
Speaker 1: at the law firm to Jenova Tuntsing and legal representative
Speaker 1: for the informant at the center of those investigations as
Speaker 1: it relates to the uranium one issue, that guy that
Speaker 1: was six years working for the FBI and discovered the
Speaker 1: bribery and the kickbacks and extortion of money laundering. Uh, Sarah,
Speaker 1: let's start with your report and the follow up that
Speaker 1: we now have from Judicial Watch and what this means. Oh,
Speaker 1: I think it's revealing so much. I mean, think about this,
Speaker 1: Sean Andrew Weissman, you know, he plays an essential role
Speaker 1: in the Special Council. And remember it was Sally Yates
Speaker 1: that from the very beginning was the one that was
Speaker 1: pursuing Michael Flynn as well and had to go to
Speaker 1: the White House and report to him after she was
Speaker 1: privy to these tech cuts, to his unmasking, to his
Speaker 1: conversations and this relationship. I mean, it shows, according to
Speaker 1: sources that I've spoken with, real problems and conflicts of
Speaker 1: interest here and trying to be impartial. I mean, these
Speaker 1: are supposed to be people that are stepping back and
Speaker 1: just looking at the facts and trying to be impartial.
Speaker 1: And now you see that there's this behavior and it's
Speaker 1: very blatant. It's in emails. Um um. It's incredible to
Speaker 1: me that you know, they would be sending these emails
Speaker 1: after the election of the president and then you know,
Speaker 1: talking about President Trump so openly in uh, it really
Speaker 1: reveals how people was in the government that are supposed
Speaker 1: to be working on behalf of the president really feel
Speaker 1: about him. But but it's worse than that question because
Speaker 1: he's pro Hillary, he's anti Trump, and he along with
Speaker 1: come or writing an exoneration before the investigation. Yes, and
Speaker 1: there's other questions here. I mean, we now see all
Speaker 1: this information coming about about FBI supervisory Agent Peter Struck,
Speaker 1: you know, in his central role and his involvement in
Speaker 1: the Hillary Clinton email investigation, his involvement in Flynn as
Speaker 1: I reported, you know that he was one of the
Speaker 1: FBI agents who interviewed Michael Flynn as well. And you know,
Speaker 1: I've been talking to sources and they've said, well, have
Speaker 1: they spoken to the other FBI agent who interviewed Flynn,
Speaker 1: and honestly, according to everyone that I've spoken with, I
Speaker 1: can't find one person that says yes. So I don't
Speaker 1: know if the special counsel or even the grand jury
Speaker 1: even had the opportunity to hear the other agent. So
Speaker 1: this is very interesting. He took a senior position, he
Speaker 1: was a senior interviewer, so they took only his possibly
Speaker 1: his testimony. I mean, that's still I'm still investigating this,
Speaker 1: but but from what I've heard so far, they have
Speaker 1: they have not spoken to the other agent. I think
Speaker 1: that's very interesting. So now that the Inspector General has
Speaker 1: him in his sights and is investigating him, it's going
Speaker 1: to be fascinating to see what is revealed in that report, um,
Speaker 1: you know, by the Inspector General regarding Peter Struck and
Speaker 1: regarding others inside the FBI. Victoria, let me get your
Speaker 1: take on all of this. If they're writing an exoneration
Speaker 1: of Hillary Clinton and the main participants, including Hillary yourself,
Speaker 1: and not interviewed until months later, doesn't that sound like
Speaker 1: obstruction to you, Like they're obstructing the real investigation. Well,
Speaker 1: it's it's it's corrupt, John, it's a it's a corrupt
Speaker 1: way to approach any investigation. They've got a half ass
Speaker 1: backwards the first to interview the people and then you
Speaker 1: make a decision. Um. But you know, this whole sarrio
Speaker 1: that you and Sarah we're talking about points out the
Speaker 1: Trump is is great in many ways, but if you
Speaker 1: don't know the swamp, you don't know how to drain it.
Speaker 1: And Sally late Yates should not have been in office
Speaker 1: one minute after the President Trump took office. All of
Speaker 1: those people should be gone. High ranking officials should never
Speaker 1: be left in office because this just shows you that
Speaker 1: she goes out and gets all this publicity, and you know,
Speaker 1: and the U. S. Attorneys who were still in office
Speaker 1: were all being very sympathetic with her. This is not
Speaker 1: a way to run a railroad. It's not a way
Speaker 1: to run a Justice department to get your people in there.
Speaker 1: And what they still don't have an Assistant Attorney General
Speaker 1: for criminal in the Justice Department. What's wrong with the
Speaker 1: hill that they're not pushing it. I don't understand how
Speaker 1: you can draft a letter of exoneration and also change
Speaker 1: the language from the legal standard to something else. I
Speaker 1: don't understand this is the same guy that interviewed Hillary
Speaker 1: but not under oath. I can't understand that this is
Speaker 1: the guy that was involved in Flynn. I can't understand
Speaker 1: this was the guy involved in the dossier. And this
Speaker 1: guy has so much bias. And then big picture, you know,
Speaker 1: what are your thoughts on these new revelations about Andrew
Speaker 1: Weisman and all of these other people congratulating especially Wiseman
Speaker 1: with his Let me ask that about Wiseman with my
Speaker 1: kanyent who you mentioned who is the informant in the
Speaker 1: Iranium one case. I have told you that he was
Speaker 1: threatened by Thought Section lawyers that if he didn't withdraw
Speaker 1: his civil case, they would prosecute him for violating his
Speaker 1: non disclosure agreement. Guess who those lawyers reported to, Andrew Wiseman.
Speaker 1: You got it? Wow? Wow? And wasn't and and but
Speaker 1: and then McKay by. I mean, he was the key
Speaker 1: guy in the other case. What do you make Sarah,
Speaker 1: you broke this wide open yesterday. I mean, you know
Speaker 1: now that we have everybody else here and you look
Speaker 1: at his atrocious track record. Now we have to ask
Speaker 1: the question about Robert Mueller, because this is now Robert
Speaker 1: Mueller's team. These are the people. These these records were
Speaker 1: not that difficult for me to dig up. No, they're not.
Speaker 1: And I think there's a lot of concern and you're
Speaker 1: hearing a lot of chatter in Washington. What's going on here?
Speaker 1: You know, is this the witch hunt? How do you
Speaker 1: explain all these inconsistencies and problems within the Special counsel
Speaker 1: uh You know, this started out as was supposed to
Speaker 1: be UH Russia collusion. They weren't able to find that,
Speaker 1: and apparently they're going in every single direction that they
Speaker 1: possibly can. I tell you what really was disturbing was
Speaker 1: the Andrew Weissman email in that relationship he had with
Speaker 1: Sally Ates. You know, I have voyed a number of
Speaker 1: documents from the Department of Justice, and I'm still waiting.
Speaker 1: This is five months later, still waiting to get answers.
Speaker 1: But particularly with regard to Saliates her relationship with Deputy
Speaker 1: Director Andrew McCabe. We know there's been a lot of
Speaker 1: issues there as well. We've reported on that in the past, Sean,
Speaker 1: you know, dealing with Hatch Act violations, discrimination issues under
Speaker 1: Andrew mackay. But most importantly, reports that had gone from
Speaker 1: Senator Grassley had asked the I G to look into
Speaker 1: whether or not he properly disclosed all of his wife's
Speaker 1: donations that had come to her when she unsuccessfully ran
Speaker 1: uh for state office here in Virginia, and the money
Speaker 1: that had come directly from people associated and very close
Speaker 1: friends of Hillary Clinton, which was Governor Terry mccauliffe in
Speaker 1: his pat groups. So there was a lot of very
Speaker 1: public political bias associated with people that are not supposed
Speaker 1: to show that publicly. They're supposed to be, you know,
Speaker 1: very The Bureau is supposed to be above board. And
Speaker 1: when you talk to Bureau agents and people who are
Speaker 1: down on the ground that and they are working the
Speaker 1: beat and putting themselves on the line every day, they
Speaker 1: have that pounded into their heads daily. And now they're saying, look,
Speaker 1: there were two sets of rules. One set of rules
Speaker 1: for the for the officials in Washington, d C. For
Speaker 1: the suits in Washington, d C. And another set of
Speaker 1: rules for all of us grunts on the ground. We
Speaker 1: couldn't get away with what they've gotten away with, and
Speaker 1: they're getting away with it. That's my biggest point, Victoria,
Speaker 1: And my biggest point is is that America's constitution, you know,
Speaker 1: they ignored Fourth Amendment protections. In the case of General Flynn,
Speaker 1: nobody seems to remember anymore that he was illegally surveiled,
Speaker 1: he wasn't minimized, he was unmasked, and raw intelligence was leaked.
Speaker 1: And now it seems that not only we weaponizing intelligence,
Speaker 1: but we're literally now weaponizing and criminalizing political differences. Sean,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm still perplexed. And I haven't really seen a
Speaker 1: rationale given by anybody in the Abombent administration as to
Speaker 1: why somebody was going in and interviewing General Flynn prior
Speaker 1: about about events that that happened during the transition. What
Speaker 1: was it that we could have possibly have committed and
Speaker 1: what businesses? All right, we gotta take a break. Stay
Speaker 1: right there, more with the Sarah Carter and more with
Speaker 1: Victoria Tunsing. We have so many questions, sold little answers,
Speaker 1: and so little time. All right, as we continue, Sarah Carter,
Speaker 1: investigative reporter and Victoria Tunsing, who is the attorney for
Speaker 1: the FBI informant. What is the latest with the FBI
Speaker 1: informant Um, We are preparing to meet with the Congress.
Speaker 1: We're just working out some dates and talking to them
Speaker 1: in the Senate Okay, so the FBI ignored For example,
Speaker 1: there was a congressional referral and Jason Chaffits had an
Speaker 1: exchange with with James Comey Sarah about did you ever
Speaker 1: review documents where Jim Jordan's asked her specifically, and she
Speaker 1: said there was nothing more classified on my emails either
Speaker 1: Center received, and Comey says, I don't remember reviewing that
Speaker 1: particular testimony, ecetera, etcetera. Isn't the evidence here if if
Speaker 1: the fix was in, doesn't it now mean that we
Speaker 1: have to reopen that investigation? Yeah? I would think so.
Speaker 1: And I think this is part of the reason why
Speaker 1: the Justice Department right now is looking at this um
Speaker 1: and very closely. And you know, I mean it's been
Speaker 1: back and forth, We've we've heard different things. We've heard
Speaker 1: um you know, Attorney General Sessions testimony about this. But
Speaker 1: one thing I do know is that within the Justice Department,
Speaker 1: they are taking this very seriously and they're looking at it.
Speaker 1: We can only hope that once they do speak to
Speaker 1: the informant, once the informant is able to talk to
Speaker 1: Congress Victoria is is making that happen, that his information
Speaker 1: will then lead to a full investigation so that they
Speaker 1: can look at all of these look at all of
Speaker 1: these issues, and and ensure that this is not buried again,
Speaker 1: but that it's available for the public. The public should
Speaker 1: know what happened and how this happened so that it
Speaker 1: doesn't happen again. Sean don't. And the basic bottom line
Speaker 1: question is why, knowing all these bad things about the
Speaker 1: Russian company, did our government say it was okay for
Speaker 1: this bad Russian company to buy uranium one. I mean
Speaker 1: all of that is true, but I mean we need
Speaker 1: the dossier issue investigated. Hit Hillary Clinton, Boughton paid for
Speaker 1: lies from Russian influence the election? You know we that
Speaker 1: we we need now the email server, we don't know
Speaker 1: the fix was in they were writing the exoneration, didn't
Speaker 1: do an investigation. Then we got James Comey himself. I
Speaker 1: think he needs to be investigated. Loretta Lynch needs to
Speaker 1: be investigated. Then you got the whole uranium one issue
Speaker 1: that needs to be investigated. Where is the Attorney General?
Speaker 1: And Sean, I wanted to go back with what I
Speaker 1: was just saying before the Great the Break, and that
Speaker 1: is that I think Flynn was set up. He would
Speaker 1: be asked questions by comey the FBI. There was no
Speaker 1: special counsel. This was not a special counsel investigation. Everybody
Speaker 1: this was prior to that. They went into his offices,
Speaker 1: did not prepare him in ahead of time. He thought
Speaker 1: it was something else. McCabe set it up and Sarah
Speaker 1: was reporting on this. Who could do more? But I'm
Speaker 1: looking at it at it legally. On what basis were
Speaker 1: they going in to say to him? Um, did you
Speaker 1: talk to the well McCabe told Flynn PJ media reports
Speaker 1: that FBI agents were headed over. He thought it was
Speaker 1: routine work and it wasn't until laughter they were in
Speaker 1: his office that he realized this was a formal interview.
Speaker 1: But what was wrong with his talking to the to
Speaker 1: the Russian ambassador. It's like saying, Sean, did you go
Speaker 1: to his counterpart? His counterpart to be, yeah, all right,
Speaker 1: I got a role. We'll see both of you tonight.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Quick break right back. Just because someone is accused,
Speaker 1: was it one accusation? Is it too? I think there
Speaker 1: has to be. John Keyers is an icon in our country.
Speaker 1: He has done a great deal to protect women Violence
Speaker 1: Against Women Act, which the left wing right wing is
Speaker 1: now quoting me as praising him for his work on that,
Speaker 1: and he did great work on that. The allegations against
Speaker 1: Congressman Conyers, as we have learned more since Sunday, or serious, disappointing,
Speaker 1: disappointing and very credible. It's fare sad are the brave
Speaker 1: women of Camp Floyd or owed justice. I pray for
Speaker 1: Congressman Conyers and his family and wish them well. Hell ever,
Speaker 1: Congressman Conyers should resign. Nancy Pelosi's statement, which I'm sure
Speaker 1: all of you all are aware of at this juncture,
Speaker 1: calling on the congressman to resign. First of all, it
Speaker 1: is not up to Nancy Pelosi. Nancy Pelosi did not
Speaker 1: elect the congressman, and she sure as hell won't be
Speaker 1: the ones to tell the congressman to leave. That decision
Speaker 1: will be completely up to the congressman. He's not thought
Speaker 1: about that. He's thinking about his health. He's thinking about
Speaker 1: getting well. That is the main focus of the family.
Speaker 1: From eyes or diminished in any way by what we're
Speaker 1: going through. This two shall pass, and I want you
Speaker 1: to know that my I cancy will continue through my children. Uh.
Speaker 1: I have a great family here and especially in my
Speaker 1: oldest boy, John Conyers. The third, who incidentally I endorce
Speaker 1: Uh to replace me in my seat in Congress. And
Speaker 1: I am am very proud of the fact that I
Speaker 1: am the Dean of the Congress and that I will
Speaker 1: continue to Yes, I'm I'm in the process of putting
Speaker 1: my retirement plans together and I will have more about
Speaker 1: that very soon. Congressman okay, and I want to get
Speaker 1: some clarity here, and I think I do it. But
Speaker 1: for the record, for those who may not have understood
Speaker 1: I heard what you said is that you're very confident
Speaker 1: in your legacy. You are today, at this time, at
Speaker 1: this moment, in this period, preparing for your retirement, a
Speaker 1: date in which you are not prepared to announce at
Speaker 1: this moment. Yes, I thank you for helping me get
Speaker 1: the center focus. I am retiring today and I want
Speaker 1: everyone to know how much I appreciate the support, if incredible,
Speaker 1: undiminished support I've received across the years from my supporter
Speaker 1: that's John Cony, you're stepping down, recommending that his son
Speaker 1: take his place as a Congressman Anti Pelosi, of course,
Speaker 1: referring to him as an icon. Another allegation today, apparently
Speaker 1: in church, some woman claiming that he I guess put
Speaker 1: his hand on her thigh or worse. I'm just so
Speaker 1: sick of reading all this crap. UH Pastor Darryl Scott
Speaker 1: is with us, founder Senior Pastor of the New Spirit
Speaker 1: Revival Center, the Reverend Jessie Lee Peterson, founder of Rebuilding
Speaker 1: the Family, Rebuilding, the man author of the antidote Healing
Speaker 1: America from the poison of hate, blame, victimhood. Welcome both
Speaker 1: of you and UH Pastor Scott. I'll begin with you
Speaker 1: and ask you your your thoughts on you know, all
Speaker 1: of these issues in Toto and what do you do?
Speaker 1: And I was consistent. I said, Okay, he's denying the allegations.
Speaker 1: Obviously there might be something to it since since he
Speaker 1: decided to resign. I think at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: you know, maybe this is gonna be a good thing
Speaker 1: and that we're gonna see people being more respectful to
Speaker 1: everybody else in the workplace. Jesse Lee, well, you're right.
Speaker 1: When we go through in this manner, I'll most people
Speaker 1: come out on the other side and they treat each
Speaker 1: other better than do the right thing. Because sometimes pay
Speaker 1: breathe on improvement in your life. I think it's time
Speaker 1: for John Conyers to step down anyway. He's been there
Speaker 1: a long time. He's known UH for going to work
Speaker 1: in his underwears. He's also known for reading the papers
Speaker 1: upside down. And so maybe at this age it is
Speaker 1: time for him to go anyway. But what I find
Speaker 1: is hypocritical about the Black Clocks and the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: is that Nasson fellos a. Members of the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: try to defend John Cayers and and call him an
Speaker 1: icon who served for rights of women. And and while
Speaker 1: on the same hand they say that they are for women,
Speaker 1: they support women and all that, but when they come
Speaker 1: to the Democrats, they tend to support politics and support
Speaker 1: their party rather than to supporting women. And we saw
Speaker 1: that once again with Bill Clinton when he was accused.
Speaker 1: They tried to destroy the women who accused Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: what he did to them. And also there's another guy
Speaker 1: by the name of Al Green. He's a member of
Speaker 1: the UH Congressional Black Caucus, asked John cary he's one
Speaker 1: of the founders of the Congressional Black Caucus. And if
Speaker 1: this were going on, and if it's true that John
Speaker 1: Caryer has paid awful woman, why did the Congressional Black
Speaker 1: Caucus allow these two men to stay there knowing that
Speaker 1: these accusations there, especially after they paid awful women. So
Speaker 1: it's a sposed Sean. Really what the Democratic Party is
Speaker 1: all about and what the Congressional Black Caucus is about,
Speaker 1: and that is they are not for the people. Therefore
Speaker 1: politics because as long as they can keep it political
Speaker 1: and brings power and rough for them. One of the
Speaker 1: quick point about John John represents Detroyd and it is
Speaker 1: one of the world cities. In this in this country,
Speaker 1: he's not He's been just his nineties WIST three and
Speaker 1: there's no improvement in Detroit at all. Has only gotten
Speaker 1: worse rather than get it better. So if you share
Speaker 1: a step now, I think that if you replace them
Speaker 1: with someone who's going to, you know, do what's good
Speaker 1: for the people and not good for them for the representatives,
Speaker 1: you know, pastor it is. I remember covering the Duke
Speaker 1: la Cross case. I remember covering Richard Jewel in Atlanta.
Speaker 1: I remember not rushing to judgment on the Cambridge police
Speaker 1: or in the Fergusson case it turned out hands up,
Speaker 1: don't you didn't happen? Or or these cops are all
Speaker 1: gonna be found guilty in Baltimore in the Freddy Gray case,
Speaker 1: or you know, all these examples where I take this
Speaker 1: position that if somebody makes an accusation, we've got to
Speaker 1: take it seriously. You've got to give people listen closely,
Speaker 1: and you've got to give of their story credence, and
Speaker 1: you've got to give them a benefit of the doubt.
Speaker 1: I'm sure in cases people wait because of a whole
Speaker 1: variety of legitimate reasons. But on the other hand, I
Speaker 1: remember covering the Duke Lacrosse case, and you know, it
Speaker 1: turned out those boys were not guilty. And the Bible
Speaker 1: says something about bearing false witness. I mean, and and
Speaker 1: and even if say of the time people are right,
Speaker 1: I do think there's conviction by media now, and I
Speaker 1: think that's dangerous too. I think you're absolutely right. But
Speaker 1: once again, I'll look at you. You take a lot
Speaker 1: of things into consideration. You take in the uh credibility
Speaker 1: of the accusers. And you know, the Democratic Party tries
Speaker 1: to make itself the moral conscious of America unless it
Speaker 1: completes with their agenda, because in actuality, they're the moral
Speaker 1: contents of liberal America. Once again, until it conflicts with
Speaker 1: their agenda. And then you know, and I said this
Speaker 1: and I hope I'm not overstepped here on the program
Speaker 1: when I say this, but right now, white people don't
Speaker 1: have free speech in America because this race card is
Speaker 1: being played. Uh so both sipilously that if you know
Speaker 1: anyone that is white criticized this or condemned John Kanye's action,
Speaker 1: the race card is conveniently played, I think even early
Speaker 1: on in this enter, and he tried to play the
Speaker 1: race card, uh in this But I don't know people
Speaker 1: around him did. I mean there was there was a
Speaker 1: comment made by Knyer's wife, and I'll play that for you,
Speaker 1: just to remind everybody. I mean to disclose who this
Speaker 1: Curson is or whoever this is. But as I think
Speaker 1: that that you want those stocks other people's houses, didn't
Speaker 1: go to stop white people's houses. It just okay, but
Speaker 1: this is our private residence. I mean, I don't know
Speaker 1: what that means, go to white people's houses. I don't
Speaker 1: think this was about um a race issue at all.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure how to interpret that comment. They always
Speaker 1: used were black, Yeah, they always used that when they
Speaker 1: want to get away we're doing wrong. We saw the
Speaker 1: same thing with Matthew Waters was auth we're doing wrong.
Speaker 1: Her husband sat on the bank, on the board of
Speaker 1: a bank, and and Maxine did some durty stuff there.
Speaker 1: They cry racism. Another thing that the Congression Black Caucus
Speaker 1: is john, which I think is insane. They are calling
Speaker 1: for the impeachment of President Trump when they they haven't
Speaker 1: proved anything on this, on this great president. But because
Speaker 1: he speaks out, because each other true, he deal with them.
Speaker 1: He put America first, he put in the country first.
Speaker 1: He's an outsider and he is a straight white conservative
Speaker 1: Christian mel of power. They hate him because he professed
Speaker 1: them from doing what they have been doing for the
Speaker 1: last number of years to this country, and so they
Speaker 1: accused him when he was accused of harassing women, they
Speaker 1: were all over. They saw him a racist because they
Speaker 1: want him out. And so I'm glad that the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party has been exposedable what it really is. It's like, uh,
Speaker 1: hypocritical party. I'm glad that's been I'm just I'm just
Speaker 1: looking at data. Data shows that Obama's track record doubles
Speaker 1: the debt, thirteen million more on poverty, eight million more
Speaker 1: on food stamps, or or eight million more in poverty,
Speaker 1: thirteen million more on food stamps, worse recovery since the forties,
Speaker 1: lowest labor participation rate in the seventies, lowest home ownership
Speaker 1: rate in fifty one years, and and minorities in America
Speaker 1: were disproportionately impacted by his policies. And I'm looking at
Speaker 1: things turning around now and I'm thinking this is good
Speaker 1: for everybody, but his bath. The worst thing that can
Speaker 1: happen to the Democratic Party is for a white, conservative
Speaker 1: Christian president to come in and improve the lives of
Speaker 1: the citizens, and especially the lives of black Americans. Because
Speaker 1: you're right, Obama did not do it the thing to
Speaker 1: help that I posted, and they thought that he would,
Speaker 1: and they got worse. Expecting the area of employement, they
Speaker 1: got worse, rather they getting better. And I honestly have
Speaker 1: to tell you that when I travel around to the
Speaker 1: schools and the urban areas around here, the young people,
Speaker 1: they are loving the president. They love the way to
Speaker 1: peak up, They love the fact that he put the
Speaker 1: country first. They love the fact that he's deported illegal
Speaker 1: aliens and looking out for the people. And that's not
Speaker 1: what Matthew Waters and the others want to hear. You
Speaker 1: gotta take a break more with the Reverend Jesse Lee Peterson,
Speaker 1: Reverend Daryl Scott will get to your calls also have
Speaker 1: a little bit of a shootout. Austin Gul's becoming up
Speaker 1: eight hundred nine for one. Shaun as our toll free
Speaker 1: telephone number. As we continue with the Pastor Daryl Scott,
Speaker 1: founder and Senior Pastor of the New Spirit Revival Center
Speaker 1: in the Reverend Jesse Lee Peterson rebuilding the family by
Speaker 1: rebuilding the man and the author of the antidote healing
Speaker 1: America from the poison of hate, blaming victimhood. What do
Speaker 1: you both make and we'll start with you, Darryl Scott,
Speaker 1: as you sit on the President's Diversity Board, National Diversity Board,
Speaker 1: what do you make of the effort since November nine
Speaker 1: of last year to de legitimize and destroy this president,
Speaker 1: a duly elected president. Well, you know it's it's a
Speaker 1: concerted effort by the left and the Democratic Party, and
Speaker 1: you know they'll play the race card once again. As
Speaker 1: as my brother, Reverend Peterson said at convenience, you know
Speaker 1: notice something, Blacks are hesitant to criticize other blacks in public.
Speaker 1: I don't care what they do unless the Trump supporters.
Speaker 1: The only open season on criticism to black spot blacks
Speaker 1: if those Trump supporters are in line with this administration.
Speaker 1: So they're trying everything that they can. But if you
Speaker 1: look at the numbers, if you look at the statistics,
Speaker 1: I mean, I'll give an example. I had a young
Speaker 1: guy that came to my church recently, was involved in
Speaker 1: some street activity, and uh, he came in and wanted
Speaker 1: to turn his life around and found a immediately. And
Speaker 1: he said, you know what, I've been trying to find
Speaker 1: a job for years and couldn't find one. But now
Speaker 1: I'm a was able to find one. And that seems
Speaker 1: to be the story throughout America. Jobs are available now
Speaker 1: where there were no jobs. And as Reverend Peterson said,
Speaker 1: the man on the street is not anti Trump. The
Speaker 1: man on the street likes him. They like his personality,
Speaker 1: they like a swag as hoots chorhythma. It's the black
Speaker 1: leadership that's trying to convince the black laity that Trump
Speaker 1: is uh anti black. But the proopers in the putting
Speaker 1: the evidence. You know, you quote numbers a lot, Sean,
Speaker 1: And the reason you quote numbers a lot is because
Speaker 1: numbers don't lie. But you know what, it's more than that,
Speaker 1: these are real people. These are our neighbors, These are
Speaker 1: our friends. This is our American family, and it crosses
Speaker 1: all boundaries, you know what. And when Americans are suffering
Speaker 1: needlessly because of government, we've got to fix it. If
Speaker 1: we care about you, gotta fix it. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: brother Scott is absolutely right, especially when it comes to jobs.
Speaker 1: I'm driving around l A and I'm seeing UH for
Speaker 1: works and or or you know, job openings everywhere now
Speaker 1: that I haven't seen that in years. And one thing
Speaker 1: that we do at barn By Non Proportization, we help
Speaker 1: young man find jobs. People can check us out at
Speaker 1: Rebuilding the Man dot com, Rebuilding the Man dot Com.
Speaker 1: But the really wanted to get rid of this president, Sean.
Speaker 1: It's because he's put in America. First. They are shocked
Speaker 1: and they haven't gotten over the shock. Shocked that an
Speaker 1: outsider like President Trump came in. They thought he was
Speaker 1: gonna lose. You were relaxed. They had no idea that
Speaker 1: he was gonna win. And then the president and outspoken,
Speaker 1: he's tweeting he left. I've got a run. But I
Speaker 1: agree wholeheartedly with you. You know, I was going on,
Speaker 1: they want to destroy him, and he really wasn't supposed
Speaker 1: to win. And that's their shock, and we saw it
Speaker 1: on election night and every day since. All Right, thank
Speaker 1: you both the reverends for being with us. When we
Speaker 1: come back Austin Goulsby, we'll have a little bit of
Speaker 1: a handy shoot out that more straight ahead. At fifty
Speaker 1: two Republican senators, fifty one voted, and we ended up
Speaker 1: doing it. And we didn't need our great Vice president
Speaker 1: to break the time, Mike. We didn't need Mike, we
Speaker 1: didn't need anything. We voted. The Democrats left before the
Speaker 1: vote was even. Somebody said started, somebody said before it
Speaker 1: was over. I don't even care. But we got no
Speaker 1: Democrat help. But I think that's gonna cost them very
Speaker 1: big in the election because basically they voted against tax cuts.
Speaker 1: And I don't think politically it's good to vote against
Speaker 1: tax cuts. But what we're doing is, if you look
Speaker 1: at it, we're going to grow the country. We're gonna
Speaker 1: grow jobs, We're gonna be growing everything. We have companies
Speaker 1: now that are pouring back into our country. Even before this,
Speaker 1: we've just set records in so many different ways. We've
Speaker 1: set records with every conceivable. You know, if you look
Speaker 1: at it, consumer confidence at a seventeen year high, and
Speaker 1: I think it's an all time high. Consumer confidence, uh,
Speaker 1: business count finds all time high. Everything is like at
Speaker 1: an all time high, including the big one it's called
Speaker 1: the stock market at an all time high. So I
Speaker 1: was backstage taking pictures with people far greater than my
Speaker 1: business people. I love my business people, but these are
Speaker 1: what they're called law enforcement people. Okay, do we concede
Speaker 1: business people? All my businessmen? And one great gentleman came
Speaker 1: up and he said, sir, I want to thank you.
Speaker 1: I said, what did I do for you? He said,
Speaker 1: my four oh one K is up? And I never
Speaker 1: thought of it, you know, I tell you. He gave
Speaker 1: me one of the great campaign lines. It's called how's
Speaker 1: your four oh one K doing? Because I can say
Speaker 1: this if the Dems won the election in my opinion,
Speaker 1: and I feel strongly about this. The numbers right now
Speaker 1: we hit record hies every day where I think we
Speaker 1: had sixty six times now where we've hit a record
Speaker 1: high since the election, sixty six times sixty six. All right,
Speaker 1: news round up, information overload. We'll get to the issue
Speaker 1: of this corruption, this big story we're breaking today. Andrew
Speaker 1: Weissman saying, oh, I am in awe. Oh, I am
Speaker 1: so proud of you to Sally Yates after she gets
Speaker 1: fired another Muller appointment that is obviously pro Hillary anti Trump.
Speaker 1: We'll get to that in just a second, but that
Speaker 1: was the President talking about his tax package. Of course,
Speaker 1: during the Obama years, we added thirteen million Americans to
Speaker 1: the food stamp roles and eight million more Americans are
Speaker 1: in poverty. And of course he's the only president in
Speaker 1: the history of this country to never see three percent
Speaker 1: GDP growth in a single year of his presidency. Last
Speaker 1: quarter was upward, upwardly revised GDP growth at three point
Speaker 1: three percent, as the economy because of getting rid of
Speaker 1: regulation and the opportunities that the President have created now
Speaker 1: turning the economy around. And of course we had the
Speaker 1: lowest labor participation, right, We had the worst recovery since
Speaker 1: the Great Depression. We had the lowest home ownership in
Speaker 1: fifty one years. And Obama single handedly took on more
Speaker 1: debt than every other president before him combined. But you know,
Speaker 1: no point going back over old news. The good news
Speaker 1: is the year to date growth in America is now
Speaker 1: over three you know, not only is the average annual
Speaker 1: growth of rate. You know what it's It was one
Speaker 1: point four eight percent during Obama's business cycle, the weakest
Speaker 1: of any expansions in the only president never to reach
Speaker 1: three percent GDP growth. Unbelievable distinction. And Austin Goulsby was
Speaker 1: one of the president's economic advisors at the time. We
Speaker 1: don't hold it against them, but just a fact or
Speaker 1: just stating the facts. Good, when did you leave working
Speaker 1: for Obama? Look? I left in two thousand eleven. Nothing
Speaker 1: that you just said was true. But I still have
Speaker 1: a bone to pick with you, which is I'm gonna
Speaker 1: send you a bill for my stress level. I'm sitting
Speaker 1: down Sunday, I'm gonna have a may, have some tea,
Speaker 1: some seal my kids. I look at this picture. I'm like,
Speaker 1: who was the screaming maniac on this magazine? And then
Speaker 1: I look, I said, wait a minute, I know that guy. Wow,
Speaker 1: that's where you're going today. Really you look like a nut.
Speaker 1: People are like, is that guy? Well? And I don't know,
Speaker 1: are you well? How could you look like that? You know,
Speaker 1: it's really that's your liberal I went back and I
Speaker 1: looked at a lot of New York Times magazine covers
Speaker 1: and guess what, There's never been one like the one
Speaker 1: they put up. That's the worst one. That's the worst
Speaker 1: one ever I've never seen. Well, I just want to know.
Speaker 1: I mean, you saw that. Didn't take a while for
Speaker 1: you to understand it, to understand why you were yelling. No,
Speaker 1: I wasn't understand but no, But what they did, they
Speaker 1: purposely they took a thousand pictures and that's the one
Speaker 1: they chose. Why do you all, right, Austin Gulsby, why
Speaker 1: do you think that is? Maybe you were unhinged that day?
Speaker 1: How do I know? No, that's not it. It's called
Speaker 1: liberal media bias. What that is called? And by the way,
Speaker 1: you know that's true. And you know what the sad
Speaker 1: part is, you know, you know what the sad part is,
Speaker 1: mayas you made this face, okay, Because they if they
Speaker 1: cared it all about being fair, they would have picked
Speaker 1: the you know, out of a thousand pictures, they picked
Speaker 1: the one god awful one that they could put on
Speaker 1: the cover to make no, to make to make me
Speaker 1: look as evil as I can. And but I tell you,
Speaker 1: you know, unlike the anointed one who got but then
Speaker 1: they got a Nobel Peace Prize, and like yere one
Speaker 1: of his presidency. Yeah, you know, but you owe me
Speaker 1: because I've been interviewed about you, and I lie and
Speaker 1: I say nice things, y and I don't know why
Speaker 1: you did. I have no idea. I was still never
Speaker 1: gonna forgive you for that. Oh my god, you know.
Speaker 1: So did you really see it? And you didn't know
Speaker 1: it was in there? I saw, I didn't know it
Speaker 1: was in there. Then I saw a picture of you. Actually,
Speaker 1: I thought the article turned out pretty good. I was
Speaker 1: very surprised. I thought they would be a meaner tour
Speaker 1: you than they were. And there was some bird pretty
Speaker 1: on the inside. And in the article, that's right, Linda
Speaker 1: is quoted extensively. And guess who didn't agree to an interview, Linda.
Speaker 1: She didn't want to be in it. Yeah, really swear
Speaker 1: to gone all right, smart one? Yeah, she exactly. I'm
Speaker 1: an idiot. I thank you, Austen, Yeah, thank you Austin
Speaker 1: great like everybody else saying what the hell is wrong
Speaker 1: with you talking to the New York Times for Actually
Speaker 1: I thought, no, no, it was a lot of the
Speaker 1: Hannity greatest hits. I mean, Hannity said this thirty nine
Speaker 1: years ago when he started his radio career. They did
Speaker 1: have some of that, but you look like you were
Speaker 1: you could dunk. I know you can't, but you look
Speaker 1: like you could. Excuse me, Uh yeah, I can. I can't.
Speaker 1: I can't. I can't. I can on I can on
Speaker 1: that basketball Horton, Yeah, yeah, I can in real life.
Speaker 1: That was actually didn't you like the picture of me
Speaker 1: as a baby? I thought that was particularly good. I
Speaker 1: was impressed. I was like, how did they get this?
Speaker 1: Did they break into your Facebook account or something? No? No, no,
Speaker 1: they asked for pictures that went out. They asked for
Speaker 1: pictures and when I was young, and I gave him that.
Speaker 1: By the way, that's one of I know. I actually
Speaker 1: had a vote which picture the cover or my baby
Speaker 1: picture from my Christmas card this year? Why not both?
Speaker 1: Why not both? Yeah? Which was just the real Sean Hannity,
Speaker 1: I gotta talk to you about a serious matter here.
Speaker 1: So we've got some breaking news, uh now, the last
Speaker 1: couple of days, and this is this should scare the
Speaker 1: living daylights out of YouTube, even though you're a big liberal,
Speaker 1: and that is you know, we now know that Robert Muller,
Speaker 1: you know, his number one deputy in this investigation. Now
Speaker 1: he don't. He picked sixteen people to work for them.
Speaker 1: Half of them donated to Clinton and Obama. None of
Speaker 1: them donated any Republican all right, and they donated tens
Speaker 1: of thousands of dollars. Then we've got this this guy
Speaker 1: that we now learned was sending out anti Trump pro
Speaker 1: Hillary text between him and another FB eye agent. I
Speaker 1: guess they're having some affair or something together. And literally
Speaker 1: his name is Struck. And this guy hang On, hang
Speaker 1: On from the team right, fired him as soon as
Speaker 1: he found Yeah. But but here's the problem. James Comey
Speaker 1: wrote the exoneration letter of Hillary before he did the investigation.
Speaker 1: He began writing the exoneration letter months before. And this
Speaker 1: guy purposely took out the words gross negligence that is
Speaker 1: the legal standard, and put in extreme carelessness. And then
Speaker 1: it gets worse. Now we have this guy, Andrew Weissman,
Speaker 1: another top deputy of Robert Mueller. And this is the
Speaker 1: guy that was involved in the nine old decision against
Speaker 1: him in the in the case, remember with uh Merrill
Speaker 1: Lynch and Enron and Arthur Anderson and tens of thousands
Speaker 1: of people lost their job and all those people were innocent.
Speaker 1: When you ever get a nine od decision overturn on
Speaker 1: obstruction of justice. It doesn't happen, just like and then
Speaker 1: the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals with that atrocious record,
Speaker 1: Mueller put this hack on his team. And now we
Speaker 1: find out that the day that Sally Yates got fired,
Speaker 1: he sent a I am so proud email, I am
Speaker 1: in awe email and thank you so much, my deepest
Speaker 1: regrets because she got fired by that's not partisan, that
Speaker 1: that doesn't show a political alliance. Attorney general who who
Speaker 1: had feared the administration the constitute. Okay, how about we're
Speaker 1: gonna put somebody that writes to Donald Trump on your case.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm in awe and I'm so fired. But my
Speaker 1: my understanding is that as soon as Mueller found out
Speaker 1: that was the case, he fired that guy. Okay, that's
Speaker 1: the one guy, but not Andrew Weissman. And my bigger
Speaker 1: question is why did wait a minute, why did Mueller
Speaker 1: hire only Obama Hillary donors, no Republican donors. Why did
Speaker 1: he hire a guy that was overturned nine zero in
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court was accused of unethical tactics repeatedly, that
Speaker 1: was was found to have created laws that don't exist.
Speaker 1: Used every bullying, tacked out the guy. We never want
Speaker 1: any processor to computer to use against anybody. Why did
Speaker 1: he put this guy on his team? Look, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: no no no, would you want him on I'm an economist.
Speaker 1: It does seem to me. You're gonna take, You're gonna take.
Speaker 1: The Obama record has something to be proud of. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there was no depression, which he was left stopped for
Speaker 1: a second. Wait a minute, Well there wasn't a depression.
Speaker 1: It's the worst recovery since the forties. Yes, anymore. It
Speaker 1: started as that, but it has continued. What do you
Speaker 1: mean it's continued. He never had three percent growth in
Speaker 1: any year of his presidency GDP growth, the only president
Speaker 1: never to reach that. True. He added thirteen million more,
Speaker 1: thirteen million more Americans on food stamps, recovery about to
Speaker 1: become the second longest recovery in US history. And it's
Speaker 1: the tortoise and the hair. It didn't get going as fast. WHA,
Speaker 1: So you're telling you're telling me that an average that
Speaker 1: took nine years for Obama's great economic policies to kick in.
Speaker 1: How do you explain the doubling of our national debt
Speaker 1: under Obama? How do you explain the tripling of the
Speaker 1: national debt under Ronald Reagan? Actually Reagan double Wait a minute,
Speaker 1: fairness to Reagan. Did Reagan doubled revenues to the federal government.
Speaker 1: But for every new dollar he brought in the Democrats,
Speaker 1: which he had for his entire presidency, the people in
Speaker 1: control of spending, they spent a dollar thirty five every
Speaker 1: time he brought in a new dollar at all, Ronald Reagan,
Speaker 1: that's twice you called me. Ronald Reagan created twenty one
Speaker 1: million new jobs. Ronald Reagan gave us the longest period
Speaker 1: of peacetime, and that on economic growth. And Ronald Reagan
Speaker 1: got to seven point four percent GDP growth by cutting
Speaker 1: the top marginal rates from seven from seventy percent. So
Speaker 1: I'll go, I'll go figure for figure with you on
Speaker 1: Reagan any day, and you're gonna lose from Paul Foker
Speaker 1: that you're forgetting cutting the interest rate. But he did
Speaker 1: there was in charge of the economy. Right, stay right there,
Speaker 1: we have Austin Goulsby taking cheap shots at me, and
Speaker 1: that hideous picture in the New York Times magazine. I
Speaker 1: think we should just leave it up there and put
Speaker 1: a big question mark media bias on my website. Quick break,
Speaker 1: welcome back. We'll continue more with Austin Goulsby on the
Speaker 1: other All right, as they continue, he calls himself an economist.
Speaker 1: What do you do that makes you an economist? What
Speaker 1: do you how do you call yourself an economist? Well,
Speaker 1: I got a PhD in economics. I study economics, I
Speaker 1: do research. I published papers on statistics and data as
Speaker 1: it makes me an economists. And every time I point
Speaker 1: out thirteen million more Americans during Obama's presidency went on
Speaker 1: food stamps, and eight million more went in poverty, and
Speaker 1: then they went down, you always forget that part. Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm talking total throughout his presidency. Look as I tell you,
Speaker 1: if I push you out the window so you're falling,
Speaker 1: you're always thinking you're from the sounds like an occupy
Speaker 1: Wall Street leftist. You know, we want to you want
Speaker 1: to throw me out a window. That's me. Unemployment rate
Speaker 1: on the day that Donald Trump takes office. Look at
Speaker 1: it now, it's down. It's down to the wait a minute,
Speaker 1: employment rate in a half century, with all due respect
Speaker 1: and employment And how is the economy doing? Unlike you,
Speaker 1: we're losing a million jobs a month and how many.
Speaker 1: And at the end of the day, Donald Trump's already
Speaker 1: created two million jobs. How many? Has created fewer jobs
Speaker 1: this year by three hundred thousand than Barack Obama did
Speaker 1: last year. And you know, it doesn't matter what statistic
Speaker 1: I bring up. He never had three percent GDP growth.
Speaker 1: He doubled the debt, and he said, nine trillion in
Speaker 1: debt is irresponsible, and I'm patriotic. Here's a guy that
Speaker 1: that literally gave us the worst recovery since the forties.
Speaker 1: All these millions more on food stamps. That's what I'm telling.
Speaker 1: Wait a minute, but you don't count the labor partify
Speaker 1: a patient rate, now I do. We now have not
Speaker 1: the lowest ever. It went down, it has come back some.
Speaker 1: It's continued since Trump got into office and started pressuring
Speaker 1: people to come back and build their factories in America
Speaker 1: like Ford and and Carrier and all these other companies.
Speaker 1: It's continued to go down under Donald Trump. I'm explaining.
Speaker 1: And he cut and ended your buddy Obama's burdensome regulations. No,
Speaker 1: that would be an argument for why labor participation would rise,
Speaker 1: but it has continued to fall under Donald Trump. Because
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is bringing business back to America. That is
Speaker 1: the opposite and creating data. Say you have, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: have to say, Merry Christmas. What are you gonna do
Speaker 1: for Christmas? I don't know yet. You want maybe I'll
Speaker 1: go hang out with you. Where are you gonna be?
Speaker 1: Come down to Ebiline, Texas. Remember when you were you
Speaker 1: you debated moving to Texas. They want you to move
Speaker 1: to Tech. You know why, because I want to move
Speaker 1: to Texas. They don't have a state income tax. Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: you're you're friend in the White House are about to
Speaker 1: raise the taxes for a bunch of middle class cap
Speaker 1: by the way, no no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: nude no, they're raising taxes on people that live in
Speaker 1: blue states that have high state income taxes. So now
Speaker 1: let's see what the people in the blue states do
Speaker 1: because the red states aren't going to carry them anymore. Alright, eight,
Speaker 1: have Merry Christmas. We'll take a quick break, we'll come back.
Speaker 1: We got Congressman Roger Williams going to join us a
Speaker 1: much more straight a hut plays worried about what comes
Speaker 1: out of the Senate, But I think if they'll take
Speaker 1: this bill once we once we fine tune it. Uh,
Speaker 1: it will work, and I'm not we're talking. There's a
Speaker 1: lot of people talk about a phasing in the corporate
Speaker 1: tax rate. We don't need to phase it in. Let's
Speaker 1: put it in there. Let's let business grow. Let's let
Speaker 1: business take risks, get reward, hire people, put people to work.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's what it's all about. And we don't
Speaker 1: need to just get our foot foot weet. Let's jump
Speaker 1: in and create a tax a tax environment. It's good
Speaker 1: for not only us but the world. Democrats talk about
Speaker 1: the skill often very apocalyptic terms, but he's really what's
Speaker 1: going on, is it? Many people are getting a very
Speaker 1: modest tax cut and some people are getting a tax
Speaker 1: in Priest Walt. A lot of this is also joined
Speaker 1: the business. But it's not the end of the world. Now,
Speaker 1: it is the end of the word. This healthcare that
Speaker 1: Evada and healthcare is life death. This is armor head.
Speaker 1: This is a very big deal because you know why,
Speaker 1: there's really a very hard way to come back from this.
Speaker 1: They take us further more deeply into debt. What can
Speaker 1: you do but raise taxes. They contend that they're a
Speaker 1: gift to corporate America A trillion and a half dollars
Speaker 1: could be up to a trillion a half dollars will
Speaker 1: be paid for by the growth that creates. And even
Speaker 1: their own people say, nonsense, not true, not true. So
Speaker 1: let's be truthful with the American people about that. They
Speaker 1: throw a few crumbs to the middle class, where they
Speaker 1: give with one hand, they take away and bounty with
Speaker 1: the there and why because it is in their DNA
Speaker 1: to give tax cuts to the rich. That's their purpose
Speaker 1: in coming to commiss for any reason. It isn't the
Speaker 1: underworld is because America is a great country, and the
Speaker 1: greatness of America and the fact that God is always
Speaker 1: with us is what gives us hope. But it's very
Speaker 1: important for the American people to know how adversely they
Speaker 1: will be personally affected by all of this. Former Treasury
Speaker 1: Secretary Larry Summers responding to the tax bill and the
Speaker 1: impact that it could have on healthcare coverage and a
Speaker 1: new opened out overnight it's called Yes, the Senate Geop
Speaker 1: tax plan would cause thousands to die. Do you want
Speaker 1: to explain your latest off ed. Look, I think this
Speaker 1: bill is very dangerous. There's pretty clear evidence looking across
Speaker 1: different states and looking when health insurance has been phased
Speaker 1: in and out. When people lose health insurance, they're less
Speaker 1: likely to get preventive care, they're more likely to defer
Speaker 1: healthcare they need, and ultimately they're more likely to die.
Speaker 1: And it's very are to quantify precisely. My piece explains
Speaker 1: why an estimate that thousands will die as a consequence
Speaker 1: of this bill is actually a very conservative estimate gotten
Speaker 1: much much more carefully, based on much more rigorous evidence
Speaker 1: than the absurd claims made by some that this bill
Speaker 1: will somehow pay for itself. Yes, it's doom and it's gloom,
Speaker 1: and it's Nancy pelosi dire predictions that the tax plan
Speaker 1: is like death. You're going to die. Your children will die,
Speaker 1: your spouses will die. Anybody you like will be dead.
Speaker 1: The only people that will remain will be the little
Speaker 1: animals that can swim in the ocean. Otherwise you're dead.
Speaker 1: We will all die together. It's like death. Anyway, one
Speaker 1: seawn are toll free telephone number you want to, by
Speaker 1: the way, and Andy says all Americans will die, But
Speaker 1: I can't wait for that head like breaking news now
Speaker 1: all right? Joining us is uh? Congressman Roger Williams of
Speaker 1: Austin Texas is here, and he says the uh, where
Speaker 1: are we gonna go now that the House has passed
Speaker 1: their bell? The sentence passed their bell, and now we
Speaker 1: go in a conference. Where is this gonna end up? Well?
Speaker 1: I think uh, I think we hopefully. I'd like to
Speaker 1: see us get something out in the next fifteen days.
Speaker 1: I think we will. I know we will. And it's
Speaker 1: gonna be a good bill. And I will tell you
Speaker 1: the Senate bill has a lot, has some things on
Speaker 1: it that I like better and when we put out
Speaker 1: but uh and vice versa. But look at I'm a
Speaker 1: business guy, Sean, and this is gonna be great for
Speaker 1: our country. I was. I was in business when Jimmy
Speaker 1: Carter was president. I saw what the Reagan tax cuts did,
Speaker 1: the Bush tax cuts. These tax cuts are gonna put
Speaker 1: people to work. And what was dying I heard the
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi thing. What was dying was the free markets
Speaker 1: and in the American drain. This is gonna bring it
Speaker 1: back together. Risk and reward will let people begin to
Speaker 1: do some things, put people back to work. And I
Speaker 1: couldn't be more excited about what we're face. Why are
Speaker 1: Republicans seemingly afraid of across the board Reagan era supply
Speaker 1: side cuts. Look, I love the corporate tax cut, I
Speaker 1: love repatriation. I love a lot about this bill that
Speaker 1: I can I can go on in great detail. I
Speaker 1: love the middle class aspect, tax cut aspect of it.
Speaker 1: I like the energy independence aspect of it. And I
Speaker 1: like that the President removed a lot of burdens and regulations.
Speaker 1: But it seems there is fear among Republicans to go
Speaker 1: with and across the board tax cut for fear they'll
Speaker 1: be labeled as the party for the rich. Well, look
Speaker 1: at first of all, when we cut taxes, nobody understands
Speaker 1: most people understand the power of main street America. Uh,
Speaker 1: when we when we cut these taxes, the pay for
Speaker 1: is going to be economic growth. There's no question in
Speaker 1: my mind about it. And we don't need to be
Speaker 1: afraid of that. And uh so, uh economic growth will we'll, we'll,
Speaker 1: we'll bring us out of this. And if we can
Speaker 1: ever couple it with reducing the side of the federal government,
Speaker 1: then we've got a program working. But economic growth is
Speaker 1: the key and that's what we and I guarantee you
Speaker 1: that's what's gonna happen. They also punted on a state
Speaker 1: tax repeal, and they really did what years this? Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know what that means. It's never gonna happen. Well,
Speaker 1: let me tell you the estate tax. Uh. I know
Speaker 1: that Democrats want to say it's only for the rich
Speaker 1: and so forth, but it's the most unfair tax anywhere
Speaker 1: in the world. It's double taxation. Even I have a
Speaker 1: story about the estate tax out can wipe a business out.
Speaker 1: I'm not happy that we're not. It's not going to
Speaker 1: kick in fully this year, but you know it will
Speaker 1: phase out. But and I think the Senate's got doubles
Speaker 1: the threshold. But we're on the right path there. But
Speaker 1: I wish all this was happening and we don't need
Speaker 1: to put it off till nineteen like the Senate wants
Speaker 1: to do, because people, a lot of business will take
Speaker 1: off and it could stall. No, it's the House bill
Speaker 1: that repeals it. In in the Senate, there's no repeal, right,
Speaker 1: they have no repeal, but they double the exemption, right,
Speaker 1: and well, what so does the House bill? I mean,
Speaker 1: that's fine, but you know it's I agree with you,
Speaker 1: it's one of the most unjust Why can't they repeal
Speaker 1: it immediately? Well, I agree, but we get caught up
Speaker 1: Sean and these pay fors and and revenue neutral and
Speaker 1: as a business person, nobody ever uses those terms in
Speaker 1: the private sector. Revenue neutral means you're standing still. That's
Speaker 1: why we get back to economic growth is to pay
Speaker 1: for and frankly, massive cuts in the federal government. Then
Speaker 1: there's your pay for and you don't have to play
Speaker 1: all these games with adding and subtracting. And when do
Speaker 1: we start and when we don't start? What about Americans
Speaker 1: that are worried about the property tax up to ten
Speaker 1: thousand dollars uh and no income tax? What do you
Speaker 1: think of that? Well, that's salt. And of course a
Speaker 1: lot of the eastern New York, New Jersey, California are
Speaker 1: primarily the states that are complaining that they're not gonna
Speaker 1: be able to duck their state in local taxes. But
Speaker 1: one of the they're so heavily taxed. I mean, what
Speaker 1: aught to happen is they demand to their leaders that
Speaker 1: they cut taxes and let the taxpayers breathing listen, I
Speaker 1: don't I'm gonna get I'm gonna end up getting killed
Speaker 1: by this tax bell because I live in a highest
Speaker 1: tax state. I mean, I got a ten percent state
Speaker 1: income tax, three and a half percent city income tax,
Speaker 1: the highest, the second highest property tax county in the country.
Speaker 1: I live in in Nassau County in Long Island. And
Speaker 1: it's not by choice, it just is what it is.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get killed, and it's and and I keep
Speaker 1: telling my friends, well, I don't think states like Texas
Speaker 1: that live within their means, and states like Florida that
Speaker 1: live within their means and they don't have state income taxes,
Speaker 1: I don't think they should be subsidizing the tax breaks
Speaker 1: big spending states like New York, New Jersey, California, Illinois.
Speaker 1: So I don't know, we should not. We should not,
Speaker 1: of course, me being from Texas, I mean I was
Speaker 1: Secretary States sticking up for you. Well, yeah you are,
Speaker 1: and we want you to come to Texas, and I'm
Speaker 1: sure the Floridians want you to come. But in business,
Speaker 1: if you want to sell more products, you cut your prices.
Speaker 1: And they ought to be cut in taxes to keep
Speaker 1: people in their states. It's just a simple business model.
Speaker 1: That's their problem. And we shouldn't have to pay for it. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, And I gotta tell you something, you know
Speaker 1: what they're not gonna do. They're not gonna cut taxas,
Speaker 1: so you're gonna have here's my fear. I don't mind
Speaker 1: if people moved to Texas, and I know that there's
Speaker 1: great hospitality down south and in Texas and in Florida
Speaker 1: and all these southern states. But if you're gonna leave
Speaker 1: your high tax state of California and your high tax
Speaker 1: state of New York, and your high tax state in
Speaker 1: New Jersey, in Illinois, and you're gonna go to you know,
Speaker 1: the Carolinas of Florida or Texas, don't bring your liberal
Speaker 1: policies with you. Because you already destroyed your state, don't
Speaker 1: destroy other people's states. Well, that's a real concern that
Speaker 1: We've had a lot of people moving from California to Texas,
Speaker 1: and that's a real concern, and we'd like to remind
Speaker 1: them when they try to bring their liberal views to Texas.
Speaker 1: Remember why you're here. You're here because those liberal views
Speaker 1: did not work. Well. Then that's my fear is that
Speaker 1: all these people they say, oh, this is ridiculous, I
Speaker 1: can't save any money. Then they go to Texas and
Speaker 1: they're like, somebody proposes a five percent state income tax. Well,
Speaker 1: they still think that's low and I'm like, that's ridiculous.
Speaker 1: So listen, I'm standing up even though this is gonna
Speaker 1: hurt me. As long as the middle class gets their
Speaker 1: tax cut, corporate tax cuts will stimulate the economy, repatriational work.
Speaker 1: I wish you guys would fight for the end of
Speaker 1: the death tax, the biggest double taxation in history. And
Speaker 1: I just think that at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: that this is going to continue the economic growth that
Speaker 1: the President started with, you know, all the things that
Speaker 1: he's been able to do on his own. Do you
Speaker 1: think next year there's gonna be anything done on healthcare? Well,
Speaker 1: I would think so. I hope that we get this past.
Speaker 1: We can do way with the individual mandate with this
Speaker 1: tax plan we're in. But I think we need to
Speaker 1: address healthcare. I mean, I'm an employer. I've seen healthcare
Speaker 1: go up fifty percent in our business. We need to
Speaker 1: let the private sector begin to take over again, let
Speaker 1: individuals own their healthcare, not the government. So I think
Speaker 1: we need to address that. Are you a Freedom Caucus member?
Speaker 1: You know, I'm not a member of Freedom Caucus, but
Speaker 1: they're my buddies, and uh, the only thing listen, You're
Speaker 1: one of the few that I like outside of the
Speaker 1: Freedom Caucus. You know, I had to talk Louis Gohmert
Speaker 1: into becoming a member. I'm gonna have to talk you
Speaker 1: into being a member because Louis, Louis and Meadows are
Speaker 1: some of my good friends and so forth. But we
Speaker 1: think the same way. All right, Congressman, God bless you
Speaker 1: have a great holiday. Merry Christmas to You're allowed to
Speaker 1: say it again, Merry Christmas to you, Sean and all
Speaker 1: your listeners. It tries liberals crazy when you say that
Speaker 1: you're allowed to say it again? When were you never
Speaker 1: allowed to say? What do you mean? Hilarious? All right,
Speaker 1: let's get to our phone, as we said, added Greg
Speaker 1: in California thirteen and a half percent state income tax.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Jerry Brown. What's going on? Greg? How are
Speaker 1: you very christ with you you too? Sir? Hey, um my,
Speaker 1: I'm ideals, I am. I'm surprised Republicans have passed anything here.
Speaker 1: I'm glad they have, but I think that the Republicans
Speaker 1: and President Trump especially missed a great opportunity to educate
Speaker 1: the American people, and that is they lower the corporate
Speaker 1: come taxes great, but they really should have gotten a
Speaker 1: bit of it. Corporations don't pay income taxes. The people
Speaker 1: pay income taxes. And if they wanted to see the
Speaker 1: jobs come back to the United States, that they wanted
Speaker 1: to see the swamp drain, get rid of the corporate
Speaker 1: income tax. You know, when you have corereal tax that
Speaker 1: just adds to the bottom line of the business. So
Speaker 1: they either raise their prices, they lower their work hours,
Speaker 1: they lower their dividends. I've been saying this for years.
Speaker 1: Nobody wants to pay attention. Corporations do not pay taxes.
Speaker 1: All they do is pass the cost on to the consumers.
Speaker 1: But that's not our But you see, you're taking away.
Speaker 1: Government gets their power through the money that they confiscate
Speaker 1: from the American people, and then they and then they
Speaker 1: decide how to spend it. Now, look, we certainly need
Speaker 1: to contribute to roads, bridges, highways, infrastructure, a national defense,
Speaker 1: et cetera. But if there are states like Texas and
Speaker 1: states like Florida, and then a bunch of other states
Speaker 1: that either have low or no income tax, then you
Speaker 1: can't tell me that California, with its population couldn't get
Speaker 1: away with the same thing. What happens is these governments
Speaker 1: become big, powerful, greedy bureaucracies, and they decide what is
Speaker 1: best for spending people's money. And the liberals are so
Speaker 1: generous with other people's money. Here you have in California,
Speaker 1: your state, didn't Hollywood out there, and then you have
Speaker 1: liberal Hollywood out there. Well, if they're so keen on
Speaker 1: helping people, why don't all these millionaires and billionaires in
Speaker 1: bell Air, in the on the Hollywood Hills wherever else
Speaker 1: they're living, why don't they just contribute their income to
Speaker 1: people and helped save lives and and and be generous
Speaker 1: to every cause they want to be generous too. Why
Speaker 1: do I suspect they're not gonna like that idea? And
Speaker 1: California bear in mind, is the is the the government
Speaker 1: of the government employee, by the government employee for the
Speaker 1: government employee. That's what it's all about. That's like California
Speaker 1: is just in such dire straits financially. All right, thanks
Speaker 1: so much, Greg, God bless you. I mean, you pay
Speaker 1: big time living in the state of California, big time.
Speaker 1: Let's go to Chris's and St. John's, Florida next on
Speaker 1: The Sean Hannity Show, What's Up Chris how are you Christmas?
Speaker 1: Merry Christmas, sir, how are you good? Look, there's some
Speaker 1: really great questions by you and your staff being asked
Speaker 1: every day about all the stuff that's going on, and
Speaker 1: I'm upset that some of the people in Congress haven't
Speaker 1: been asking a couple of questions. In the early nineteen seventies,
Speaker 1: they've passed the Inspector General's Act that means every department,
Speaker 1: including the Department of Justice, has an i G that
Speaker 1: oversees them. The Department of Justice includes the FBI. So
Speaker 1: someone is being inappropriate from in the d o J
Speaker 1: for the FBI, that i G can convene a grand
Speaker 1: jury and have that person arrested themselves. Why no one
Speaker 1: has even asked the i G if there's any investigation
Speaker 1: going on to miss anyone acting out of order inside
Speaker 1: the FBI. We have this guy, this um stroke guy
Speaker 1: who seems to be all over the board to be
Speaker 1: curious to see if he's even part of the Petraeus investigation.
Speaker 1: Where these these same actors keep coming up and where
Speaker 1: they get this fake evidence which they obviously had to
Speaker 1: use the fake dossier to get FISA warrants. Now, when
Speaker 1: the transition team was given their computers and phones by
Speaker 1: the federal government. Did that Fizle warrant cover those computers
Speaker 1: and phones that transition team was given? Probably? And I look,
Speaker 1: I just want to know if the phony Russian dossier
Speaker 1: with salacious lies in it that Hillary and Hillary's run
Speaker 1: d n C paid for. I want to know if
Speaker 1: that was used for the Fiser warrant. I want to
Speaker 1: know if you know this. I want to know how
Speaker 1: much James Comey wanted to pay them. I wanted to know.
Speaker 1: I want to know. Look, we have so many questions.
Speaker 1: I am now convinced that their house of cards is
Speaker 1: beginning the process of collapsing in spite of what you're
Speaker 1: hearing from your liberal media. Anyway, I've got to run, Chris,
Speaker 1: I wish I had more time. Listen, Merry Christmas, God
Speaker 1: bless you appreciate the call. Alright, tonight our Hannity investigation.
Speaker 1: Why did Muller hire all the pro Clinton, anti Trump
Speaker 1: people to be involved in this witch hunt? Tom Fitton,
Speaker 1: he has new information as a result of the Freedom
Speaker 1: Information at Greg Jarrett, Charles McCuller, former Inspector General Alan Dershowitz. Tonight,
Speaker 1: Pam Bondi tonight and Dana Lash. That's all coming up
Speaker 1: Hannity nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel. Information you
Speaker 1: won't get anywhere. Thanks for being with us. We'll see
Speaker 1: you back here tomorrow. See you tonight at night