WEBVTT - Combatting Hiring Bias: Recruiting a Diverse Workforce with Intelligent Automation

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tex Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>This season of Smart Talks with IBM is all about

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>new creators, the developers, data scientists, c t o s

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and other visionaries creatively applying technology in business to drive change.

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>They use their knowledge and creativity to develop better ways

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of working, no matter the industry. Join hosts from your

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite Pushkin Industries podcasts as they use their expertise to

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>deepen these conversations, and of course Malcolm Gladwell will guide

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>you through the season as your host and provide his

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>thoughts and analysis along the way. Look out for new

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Smart Talks with IBM on the I Heart

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and learn more at IBM dot com slash smart talks. Hello, Hello,

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Smart Talks with IBM, a podcast from Pushkin Industries,

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio and ib AM. I'm Malcolm Gladmow. This season,

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to new creators, the developers, data scientists, c

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>t o s and other visionaries who are creatively applying

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>technology in business to drive change. Channeling their knowledge and expertise,

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>they're developing more creative and effective solutions no matter the industry.

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Our guest today is Angela Hood, founder and CEO of

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>This Way Global. Angela's mission is to eliminate discrimination in

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the hiring process. Angela is a serial entrepreneur who saw

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the potential to use automation technology as a way to

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>combat the human biases that lead to unfair hiring practices

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:48.559
<v Speaker 1>and a less diverse, less competitive workforce. On today's show,

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you'll hear how automation makes it easier than ever to

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>connect businesses with the right candidates, why automation is such

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a powerful tool to mitigate bias, and how Angela's own

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>experiences with discriminatory hiring inspired her to take action. Angela

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>spoke with Jacob Goldstein, host of the pushkin podcast What's

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Your Problem and former host of nprs Planet Money. Jacob

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>has been a business journalist for over a decade, reporting

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for NPR, The Wall Street Journal, the Miami Herald, and

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>is the author of the book Money, The True Story

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of a Made Up Thing. Okay, let's get to the interview.

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell me just you know we're gonna get

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>into it a lot, but very briefly, what is this

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>weay Global? So our technology is built specifically to match

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>all people to all jobs without bias. And the last

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>part is the hardest part and also the most important.

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 1>And where did the idea for the company come from?

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a female engineer, and um, you know, I'm

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>going out into the workforce after graduating, and I think

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that just like everyone else, I can just put my

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>name up at the top of my resume and submit

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>this to companies and they'll know entertain me for an interview.

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And what I found was because of the type of

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>engineering role I was looking for, which is in the

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>construction industry, that was not the case. The recruiters and

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>also the hiring managers at these companies would see my

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>name and think, well, I don't think that we want

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a woman, or we don't think that she really understands

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the job because it's out in the field. And so

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a mentor of mine said, why don't you use your initials,

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>which are conveniently a L. And so I would submit

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>my resume as a L hood and people thought I

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>was a man. And so then at the same company,

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>for the same job, I would get interviews. And that

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>was the first moment where I realized there was a

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of bias in the market and turns out that

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more biases, and we work to correct

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>for all of them. It's funny that kind of story

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be shocking, right, Like I know that I shouldn't

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>be shocked by it, and yet I still kind of am.

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>So clearly there's a tremendous amount of bias in the world,

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and bias in recruiting. And you know, we're familiar with

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>these kind of stories of human bias, but but now

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>there's this new problem, right, which is algorithmic bias. What

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is that tell me about algorithmic bias? A lot of

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>algorithms are underpinned by machine learning, and machine learning very

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>simply can happen kind of two different ways. You study

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>what has happened in the past, and you try to

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>duplicate that faster and more efficiently, and so that in

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this context would be called supervised learning, and that seemed

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>like the logical place for nearly every recruiting technology to

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>start the problem with that is that there's been so

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>much historical bias that all you would really be doing

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is capturing that company or that hiring manager recruiters bias

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and duplicating it really fast, very efficiently. So you would

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>just be expanding bias much much faster than how a

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>human could. The flip side is something that's called unsupervised.

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>So this is where you build a system essentially a

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>black box. It's doing all types of calculations and decisions internally,

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and then it's not biased in theory, but you have

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>no idea what it's basing its opinions on, so it

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>can kind of create bizarre results. Also, it's not explainable,

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and so then you get caught in this catch twenty

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>two of I don't want to do bias at scale,

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>but I need to be explainable. So what do you do?

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>After thirteen failures, we finally figured out a way to

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>do this. The methodology that we finally found that innerrated

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the results that run biased was not ever allowing the

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>math model or the computer to see the information that

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>causes bias. So we had to not let gender enter

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>into the system, ethnicity couldnot enter into the system, things

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>like that, and so then the logical question is, okay, well,

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>so if you don't allow those pieces of information to

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>come in, how can you then enable qualified people that

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>are also diverse to surface without bias? And the answer

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is when you remove these factors. It happens naturally, and

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>we learned this by testing. We've had fifteen and a

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>half trillion matching events go through our system and almost

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it's been now almost a decade, and through this we've

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>learned a lot. People are very diverse. If you will

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>just remove your own bias, you'll start seeing them. So

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's an automated version of what you as

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>an individual did, uh before you started the company, when

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>you switch from putting your full name on your applications

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to just your initials, effectively hiding your gender. Yeah, it

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>started with that. What we also learned though, is even

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>if you conceal your name, there are words where maybe

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>someone is a waitress in a previous job, and so

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>then the persons like, ah, that's a female, right, So

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>then we had to go one step further. We had

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, now we have to neutralize these gender specific

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>words inside resume so that a person cannot look at

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the document and still sus out ethnicity, gender and other

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>biasing attributes. It's remarkable that after hiding prejudicial information from

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the computer like a candidate's gender or ethnicity, a qualified

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>diverse workforce assembled naturally as a result, for the overburdened recruiter.

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>That means there are huge advantage is to using intelligent automation.

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a win win. As the conversation continues, Angela explains

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>how IBMS technology enabled her to simplify her customers hiring processes,

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and she also shed some light on how far intelligent

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>automation has come in the past few years. How does

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>intelligent automation look different today than it did, say, five

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago, it actually works, as the first thing. The

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the level of innovation that has taken place is absolutely incredible.

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And here's the thing about it is people have had

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>some negative interactions with things that said that they were

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>automated and they're now they're like, I don't want to

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>use it. The level of innovation that has happened is

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>absolutely incredible. And for them to not try something because

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>they tried something a decade ago and it didn't work,

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 1>that it's just completely the wrong approach. We're going to

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>see massive innovation over the next five to ten years too,

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and you don't want to miss that. You don't want

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to say, oh, I said on the sidelines because I

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>had a bad experience a decade ago. So I think

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>if you know, if you're anywhere involved in technology or

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>business growth, you need to be part of this. This

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is your economy in play a role. So what is

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a digital employee? Right? So our partnership with IBM, Watson

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Orchestrate is around the DIG. So D I, G. E.

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Y is a DIG who's a digital employee And I

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>always think of it honestly, is more of a concierge.

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>You can have all of your job descriptions living inside

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of Box, for instance, and so there's all the job

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>descriptions and you're like, oh, I need to find someone

0:09:54.440 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>for this job. Watson goes into Box, grabs the odd

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>description and then sends that into this way system and

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this way automatically surfaces up to three hundred qualified people

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>from diverse organizations. Right, so now the recruiter has not

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>had to figure out where are they going to source

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 1>these people from. They haven't had to sort out how

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to reach out to diverse organizations because we

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>have partners. And so now that part has been taken

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>care of, and then Wat's an organestrate does the next step,

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>which is sends out communication to the candidates that you

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>are interested in automatically, and then you get to sit

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and wait for these people to respond back to you

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of their interest in discussing something with you. Now all

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of this has been automated, and essentially what I just

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>described could easily take a person three weeks to go

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and identify all the talent. So you take three weeks

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and you put this down to roughly three or four minutes.

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Now it's absolutely incredible, and I think it gives recruiters

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the time to do what they really want to do,

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>which is talked to people. How did you decide that

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>automation was the right tool to fight bias? That was

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a journey, be as I think a lot of entrepreneurship

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is an innovation. When we hire technology, we're hiring technology

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to do a job for us. So what is the

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>job to be done here? It is to identify qualified

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>talent without bias. So when you start breaking this down,

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you realize that if humans could do it, we would

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>have already done it. There's been a desire to have

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>this happen for many, many years, and we were not

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>successful at it. And the reason why is bias is

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>not discrimination. These things get confused all the time. Bias

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is a product of our survival mechanism. We are always

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>going to survive as humans, and so we we need

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>these survival skills. That's part of bias. So we're not

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>going to get rid of it, and it's not a

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>character flaw. Bias is just inherently human and we are human.

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 1>And the best purpose that I think technology can serve

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that it can do some things that

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we can't do. We have to be very careful about

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>how we engineer it. Our own technology was engineered with

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>removing bias is the priority. But we can really have

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>technology make us better humans because it can do things

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 1>we can't do. Despite the potential to vastly improve the

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>way we hire, most companies still think automation is inaccessible,

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a luxury to aspire to in the future, but

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we live in a time when companies are hungrier than

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>ever to fill positions quickly. Jacob asked Angela what automation

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>can deliver for businesses today and how a companies creative

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>It is linked with its diversity. How prevalent is intelligent

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>automation in talent acquisition workflows today? So our data says

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:17.199
<v Speaker 1>that in enterprise that roughly seven percent have adopted some

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>level of truly automated technology. But when you look at

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the job market in toll like, you know, if you

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the millions of employers we have, it's you know,

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 1>less than three percent have adopted automation. These are companies

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that have a smaller workforce to do a great amount

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of work. They're recovering from a pandemic, they need help,

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and they think that automation is expensive, and it's actually

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. It's not expensive at all. And so I

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>would encourage businesses that are mid market in small businesses

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to embrace technology in a way that they haven't done. So,

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's one more piece of sort of what's

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>going on now that seems really interesting in the context

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 1>of what you do, and that is the incredible demand

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>for workers right now. Right there's I don't know, ten

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>million plus job openings, there's the great resignation, and so

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious how automation is helping both companies and workers

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>through this process. Now, there's never been a job market

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>like we are living in right now, and so we

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>have to think of as employers, we have to think

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of how do I attract this talent. The other thing

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>about the volume of jobs that are open. Is if

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you just do the simple math, there's two jobs for

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>every one person looking for a job. Okay, so that

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is astounding to begin with. But of the jobs that

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>we have available in the market, most people do not

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>have the skill set required to fill those jobs. Inside

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the talent pool that is actively looking for a job.

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So now you have to go out and you need

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to be looking for passive talent. You need to be

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>cultivating a relationship with the people that do have the

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>skills you need. When you go to them, you need

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to be able to say two things. You need to

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to say, we use the best technology to

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>identify you because you were special, and we really want

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you to come to work for us. That's number one.

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Two you need to say. And when you get here,

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going to help you automate those parts of your

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>job that you've never really enjoyed before, because we want

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you to be able to dig in in the areas

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you're passionate about, because you're gonna be happier and you're

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a better work life balance. That is how

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you win talent in this market. Yeah, what have you

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>heard back from recruiters about about this? You know, increased

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>integration of technology. So one of the things that I

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>think has been maybe the most surprising is that it's

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>really opened up the communication between hiring managers and recruiters

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>inside the same company. And there has long been a

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>silo of hiring managers putting out job descriptions and saying recruiters,

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, go find people that make this. And then

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the recruiter needs additional support because they're getting questions from

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the candidates or there's some questions around what are the

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>real job specific requirements, and they have trouble getting those

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>answers from the hiring manager. Hiring managers very busy and

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>they have their own job to do. So by making

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this more efficient, you start getting much better interactions between

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the entire company. And in this current market, companies are

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>truly desperate to find the talent that they need. The

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>people want to be found, and now the technology is

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>there to help make this seamless. So that's the automation piece.

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the diversity piece sort of you know,

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>landing here right. So on the diversity side, how does

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>how does a diverse workforce help make a business more creative?

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the big consulting firms have dug in

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>for the last decade and said is there really an

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>R O I around diversity, And uniformly the answer has

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>been yes. There is increased profits, a more consistent workforce,

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>meaning people don't want to leave. There's not the same

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>level of attrition when the workforce is more diverse, and

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>better recruiting numbers. So all of that is like the outcome.

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>But I think the key thing to understand is the

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>why behind this. The why is that when you're diverse,

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you come to solutions and you come to questions and

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>challenges from a different perspective. And when you have a

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 1>diverse workforce that is collaborating and bringing their creativity to

0:17:56.560 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>the market and you are using their insight to develop

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.479
<v Speaker 1>better solutions, You're going to create better solutions. You're going

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to get those solutions to market faster. You're going to

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>understand positioning of your value proposition inside the market. All

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of these things happened with far more clarity when you

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>have a diverse workforce. You mentioned earlier that you failed

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>was it thirteen times? And I'm curious if sort of

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>getting through those failures and working your way to success

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>was a place where you did some creative problem solving.

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>I would say that would be an understatement at moments. Uh,

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>there are times where you know, I just say, like

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>thirteen failures kind of in passing. But there were times

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>where I felt like I was close to breaking as

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 1>an innovator, and the fact that was, like, there's just

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>non solution for this. The thirteen failures is incredibly gut wrenching.

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>But I was fortunate. I had very supportive and susters

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and so we got through it. Uh, And I'm very

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>proud of the company we are today because of those failures.

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>So just to to wrap up, let's let's talk a

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the future. We've done the past, we've

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>done the present. Let's talk a little bit about the future.

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do you think the hiring process will

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>look in the future, whatever, five years, ten years, And

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in particular, what role will will automation, intelligent automation, augmented intelligence,

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>what role will will all that play? Well, if you

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>look back in decades ago, there were people that would

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>work for the same company for ten twenty years, and

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that was, you know, not that unusual. Now very uncommon,

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and in the future, I think it will be absolutely rare.

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we're looking more likely at people that will

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>work for multiple companies. We're seeing that with the rise

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of the gig economy, we obviously are seeing people love

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to work remote. I know when we have an active

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>job that goes out into our marketplace and if it

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is remote and also prioritize diversity, you will have twenty

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to thirty times more applicants. So I think that we're

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>going to start seeing companies really investing in those two attributes,

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to keep as many jobs remote as possible, just

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 1>because it attracts talent that companies are really struggling to

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>find right now. And I think the level of automation

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue to increase, that will continue to

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>increase an investment over the next five to ten years.

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>In twenty years, I think we will all look back

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and say, why did we all do these crazy parts

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of our job? Why didn't we automate those It's because

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 1>we were waiting for technology like Orchestrate provides. Do you

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have any specific advice for businesses that want to incorporate

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>technology and automation in their in their business and their work.

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say, realize that you use automation every day,

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>You use AI every day. So when you're using Google

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Maps or something like that, you're you're using your smartphone.

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>You're accessing this kind of technology as a consumer, as

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>an individual, there's no reason why you should worry about

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>adopting it as a business, and don't feel intimidated by it.

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>You are absolutely ready to use it and your business

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>is ready to benefit from it. Just don't have that fear.

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>We certainly is a company work with companies of all sizes.

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>We have companies that have five to tend employees only,

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and we have some that have hundreds of thousands employees.

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a great thing about automation is it doesn't care

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the size of your company. It will work for you.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Angela's fun to talk to you. Thank you for your time,

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>congratulations and making it through to thirty And if you

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>really think about that, that's a It's a really impressive

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>level of persistence. Like I could imagine failing a few times,

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>but I would have given up at nine or something

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>at seven. At seven, I was like, I'm a crazy person.

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>It is vitally important to get hiring right. What could

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>be more essential to an organization's success than deciding which

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>human beings make up that organization. If we let our

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>biases go unchecked, we end up excluding qualified candidates, leaving

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 1>our workforce is less diverse and therefore less competitive because

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>of it. Angela made an interesting point earlier that I

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to. She said that bias is

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>not a character flaw, it's a survival instinct, and that

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 1>the best purpose technology can serve is to make us

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>better humans by doing things for us that we can't.

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Bias is in human nature and we'll never truly get

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>rid of it, but the first step to minimizing its

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>impact is to acknowledge it's a problem we need help with.

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Intelligent automation can make hiring more efficient. When we allow

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>computers to mitigate our biases, better hiring is the result.

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes to build the best team possible, we have to

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>know when to listen to our human instincts and when

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to set them aside. On the next episode of Smart

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Talks with IBM, how to use data creatively in order

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to solve novel problems, We talk with YouTube content creator

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and IBM's senior Data science and AI technical specialist, Nicholas Renaud.

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM is produced by Matt Romano, David

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>jaw Royston Deserve and Edith Rousselo with Jacob Goldstein were

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>edited by Sophie Crane. Are Engineers are Jason Gambrel, Sarah

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Bragair and Ben Tolliday. Theme song by Granmascope. Special thanks

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to Carlie mcglory, Andy Kelly, Kathy Callaghan and the eight

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Bar and IBM teams, as well as the Pushkin marketing team.

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM is a production of Pushkin Industries

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and I Heart Media. To find more Pushkin podcasts, listen

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>on the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts. I'm Malcolm Gladwell. This is a

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>paid advertisement from IBM.