WEBVTT - Private Credit, Silvergate, Apple, and the Latino Vote

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. If you want to

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>talk Wall Street, why not? That's one of my favorite topics.

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>We can roundtable this seing at this A lot going

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>on the street as always, and we want to bring

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>together some of the smartest minds we have on all

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>things Wall Street. We do that with Shanalie Bassett Bloomberg

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>News and Alison William She's a senior banks analyst at

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. Shanali joins us here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio, and Alison joins us on the phone. SHINALI

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of news coming out of the street over

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the last few days. I want to focus just on headcount.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>What are the banks doing these days? I mean, deal

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>flow in twenty twenty two very tough to come by.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Trading better, but deal flow tough to come by. Same

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of year to date. I'm kind of surprised I

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen bigger layoffs. What are you hearing from your

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>context on the street? Listen, A lot of these bankers

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>say that there's pent up demand. Big corporations want to

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>do strategic things, but they're strapped on money, number one,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're also strapped on the ability to make these

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>really big strategic decisions in the middle of so much uncertainty,

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly with a pace of interest rate increases in the

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>United States. So with that uncertainty, they don't want to

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>lay people off because things would come back, but they

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>have not. They don't look like they're going to come

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>back in full force anytime soon. So they're finding other

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>things to do because they expect that things like activism

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>will force spinoffs. Remember places like Elliott Paul Singer has

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>raised record amounts of money, so there's a chance that

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>they can do other things. You know. I don't even

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>know where to begin on the Wall Street beat, just

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like this week has been literally drinking

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>out of a fire hose or attempting to at least

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Wall Street story. But one of the most

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>read on the Bloomberg terminal stories today is JP Morgan

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and blaming Just Staley for their tides with Epstein, demanding

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>eight years of pay. Walk us through the story. Of course,

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>it's of interest a lot, not just for Wall Street audience,

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>but everyone that's been following the story. Yeah, and this

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.839
<v Speaker 1>has been going on for a while, but really it's

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>hit a new climax, if you will, where you have

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan suing Jeff Staley, who is a former Jamie

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Diamond protege, a star banker, former CEO of Barclays. JP

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Morgan itself was sued a couple of times over the

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Epstein debacle because Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein, was a client of

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the bank. And now what you have Jamie Diamond and

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan really doing now is really separating themselves from

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Staley's own actions within the bank. And I would

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>say that Just Staley himself has really denied a lot

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of the allegations against him. The suit spot forward against

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan were from the US Virgin Islands, which has

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>been leading a lot of this litigation when it comes

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to Just Dally and Jeffrey Epstein, as well as a

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>woman identified by Jane Doe who says she was a

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>victim of Jeffrey Epstein so very closely watched Saga and

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Tokuti's point, a lot of money at stake. Yeah, absolutely.

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>As Alison Williams Bloomberg Intelligence, what are your thoughts, Allison,

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>as you talk to all these big banks that you've

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.239
<v Speaker 1>covered for for decades, what did they think about twenty

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. Is there going to be any meaningful rebound

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in activity there? I know the trading business has been

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty solid, but the advisory business and some of the

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>capital raising business has not. Yeah, that's been I think

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the disappointment to start the year. And to Hinali's point,

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that most of the banks were sort of

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>bank or hoarding. I guess, as we say, not willing

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to let go of all the bankers after they had

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to quickly do all these hires in twenty twenty one,

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and so they're a little bit reticent to start doing cutbacks.

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of hope, and I think the

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>disappointing thing is that even though the markets were sort

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of have had a strong rally or had a strong

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>rally going, you know, starting at the end of last

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>year into January, the IPO issuance has still been really dismal.

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>M and A is really dismal, and so I think

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that's why you're starting to see some things bubble up.

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>This is normally the strongest seasonal quarter, and I think,

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, what we really need is clarity on the

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>macro environment. So even though the stocks have rallied, some

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>of the expectations for those who want to come to

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>market are still a little bit too high, and they've

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>been and they've been hazard into sort of execute. So

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the pipelines are still there, but equity M and A disappointing.

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>The one bright spot, if you will, has been in

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the debt capital markets business. We heard from City Group

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>yesterday they're expect you know, the industry while it's down

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 1>about forty percent in the first quarter. So that's that's

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>better than the down fifty percent that we've been seeing,

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but only modestly and has to do with comparisons. But

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the one bright spot is the debt issuance. We have

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>seen some companies coming to market, especially on the investment rate.

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>I want to piggyback off of what Alison is saying

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>because there's one deal that's being talked about today that

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is kind of hot, and that is the Uber leverage loan. Remember,

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley is really leading that. Uber's a long time

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>client and Morgan Stanley it's trading at thirty four dollars

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 1>to share, remember when public closer to forty. So really

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>this has been a tough trade. But Morgan Stanley, you know,

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>as a lead underwriter and now is helping bring a

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>leverage loan offering back to the table. They had a

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>leverage loan offering last month that had seemingly high demand.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>You can see it, Paul, investors are still searching for yield.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I am dying to know how this plays out. But

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>remember Morgan Stanley is also hung with a lot of

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that Twitter debt, so it's meaningful to watch them come

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>out in the market again with a company like Uber.

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Can we just take a moment to appreciate Uber and

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the Uber news today because in this story, Ridehilling Company

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>looking to raise seven hundred and sixty million dollars from

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that sale, and that's separate from them considering to spend

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>off their freight logistics division. So interesting stuff going on

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>over at Uber. Well, let's bring it back to the

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>banks if we can. Allison tell us a little bit

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 1>about the trade here, because it feels fairly intuitive that

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>if you were looking at higher rates for the economy,

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>six percent, I believe is now the base keys for

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of economists out there, not the consensus yet,

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>but we're getting there. Does the automatic translation for the

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 1>bank sector simply mean more interest profit? So that's what

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it's meant so far. So rising rates has been really

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a boon to the net interest income. But I think

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the damper that we're going to see in twenty twenty

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>three is that the cost side of the equation now

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is starting to go up. So in the early days

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>rising from zero interest rates, that we got the lift

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>on the yield side of the equation, and that's really

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>been strong, and bangs really haven't had to sort of

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>lift their deposits rates because we were coming off of

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>such a low base. But now we are seeing that.

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>We started to see that sort of late last year,

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and we think we're going to continue to see that

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>this year. I think that's sort of well understood at

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>this point in terms of the expectations for a net

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>interest income. But it's really you know, the credit losses

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>side of the equation, the long growth side of the

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>equation that investors are focusing on and then you know,

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at interest rates, I think that you know, what

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>we've heard from managements is we really do need the

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>FED to stop hiking, to get sort of more economic,

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to get a little bit more certainty on where the

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>economy is going. You know, Alison, if I were starting

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>my career overget on Wall Street as a young person,

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd go right the private equity That's just where I

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>think some amazing returns can still be had. What's your outlook,

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, give us a kind of for the private

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>equity business, and then over the next twelve to eighteen months. Yeah,

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>so private equity, you know they have I mean, the

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>amount of money they have raised has been incredible, Even

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>those managements have become you know, a little bit more hesitant.

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's really I mean within private markets, it's really

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the private credit side where we've seen some of the

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest boom in turns of fundraising, and we expect that

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to continue this year. To your point, a little bit

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>more activity going on on that side of things versus

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>versus the trading desks, where we're expecting to see lower

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>revenue again compared to last year. All right, good stuff,

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>A little Wall Street round table. There. We do that

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>with Shinali Basset of Bloomberg News and Alison Williams and

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. She covers the banks. She's been doing that

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>for decades here Bloomberg and then before that at Morgan

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Investment Management where they were big shareholders a lot

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of the big financial institutions. So we'd love to get

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>her perspective here. Well, we're just talking to Alison Williams

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Intelligence since she was talking about deal flow

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>really being slow, and I guess that happens when interest

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>rates rise, it gets a little bit more expensive to

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>get deals done. Let's talk to somebody who's actually right

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>in it, Hip Deep Randy Swimmer. He's co head of

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>senior Lending and senior managing director Churchill Asset Management, and Randy,

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>we like to talk to you about kind of what's

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>going on in the deal flow world. You know, mid

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>market deals, not necessarily the ones the big blockbusters, but

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the bid market deals that really rely

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>on senior lending, leverage, lending, all that kind of stuff

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 1>that you guys do. There's a bunch of private credit

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>folks out there that are putting money into the space,

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of tough to get deals done, I guess

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>when interest rates aren't zero. So talk to us about

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing in the marketplace. So, yeah, January was

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>actually a busy month. We actually led ten deals. That

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>was the most of any direct lender in January. Now

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it was one month February busy as well, having gotten

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the final numbers. Yet, what we're seeing is that general

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>flow to your point in M and A is off

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>from last year at this time, part because of what's

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>going on with interest rates, in part because of the

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>lack of a straight line at the FED. I. You know,

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we all got thinking, hey, seventy five, fifty twenty five,

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>they're going to do twenty five again and then maybe

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>hold off all of a sudden years floating fifty basis points.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a little bit of a surprise. Maybe he's just

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to be job on the market down. But generally speaking,

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in private credit and private equity, the capital is long term,

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and these private equity sponsors that we work with, and

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in general indirect lending have raised capital over a long

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>period of time with strategies that are not short term.

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So they have in their pipeline deals that they've been

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>working on for months and months and months, and they're

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>coming to us increasing numbers now as they get the

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>sense that the economy is strong. Because one of the

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 1>things that people are missing is how strong businesses are

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that are in defensive sector. So healthcare, technology, software. Our portfolio,

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>which is mostly defensive, is up revenue wise the entire

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>portfolio thirty percent over last year, cash flows a little

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>less twenty nine percent. What's driving that is these businesses

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that are more to be are in a very different

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>slip stream than consumer focused high cap acts in some

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>areas with high commodity costs or high wage costs. Those

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>businesses are really driving the economy right now. They're driving

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>job growth as we've seen with wage pressures. And I

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>think in general that part of the business defensive sectors

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the private equity sponsors are focused on is going to

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>be very active this year. Now. M and A flow

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>will be short of what it was last year because

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>last year, a year ago, we had zero interest rates.

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Amazingly right we kid hadn't started raising yet. But I

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>think the other thing that's going on is the sellers

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of these companies are looking just like if you're going

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>to sell your apartment and you're looking at the right price.

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>They're saying, you know what, get all the papers ready,

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>get my mortgage papers ready to get it all ready

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to go, and then if I've seen opening, I'm going

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to go for it. So I think the second half

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of the year is poised for a huge rebound. Well,

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>how does that kind of square with say M and

0:11:57.880 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>A activity, for example, it feels like a lot of

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the price deals lately have been driven by acquisitions. Yes,

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>and I think that is a tried and true technique

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that private ape sponsors have to build these businesses up.

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>The M and A flow, as I mentioned, is slower,

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>but I think what's going on is there's a sense

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>of what can we need, what we need to do

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>if we have to finance these businesses. Paul, to your

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>question about interest rates, So let's say they raise another

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis points. That gets you to five and a

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>quarter from four to seventy five. You know, the average

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 1>FED funds rate of the last sixty years was five

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half, so even we're not even at the

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>at the average yet June of two thousand and seven

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it reached five and a half percent, so we're not

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>quite at that point, I don't think. And by the way,

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the economy is in much better shape today than it

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>was back then, and the banks are in much better shape.

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's the other thing that's going on. The private sector.

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Direct lenders are taking huge share from the banks right now.

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>We just did the numbers, sixty one by ratio of

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>sixty one to four, direct enders are doing more deals

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>than the banks are doing year to date. That's a

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to one margin, okay. So what it means is

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>for the deals that are getting done, even though the

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>volume is half, folks like Churchill are doing them. So actually,

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>our investors and by the way, I've done the tour

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in the last month since I saw you last of

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>these sort of capitals of the world, so as in

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Tokyo's in Munich and last week this past week, I

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>was in Baltimore, Okay. And our clients are seeing two things.

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>One how's the portfolio holding up with the higher interest rates?

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And two what's going to happen with deal flow? Are

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you going to give me continue to invest my money?

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>On the deal flows side, we're saying yeah, we're actually

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>seeing based on January and early returns on February we're

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing plenty of flow on the portfolios side. What's interesting

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>is because these defensive sectors or businesses that are actually

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>doing well, we're actually seeing more upgrades in our portfolio

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>than downgrades, and the performance of these businesses continues to

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>be strong. Now, we did a proform of study of

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio if the FED goes to six percent, and

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we found that if you perform at that, interest coverage

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>still remains solid around two times. I asked my portfolio

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>menasor okay, and this was a question investor had, all Right,

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 1>how many of your companies will be below one time

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>interest coverage? And the answer was, on a perform at

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>basis only one percent. That's pretty strong, Okay. That means

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that a very small number of those companies will not

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>make their interests. Now. Of course they're going to be

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>growing the meantime, so we're not worried. But this is

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's a glass half full approach here

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're taking that we're seeing, which we're getting the

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>message out to our investors that we've actually think this

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>is a good time to be in private credit. All right,

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>So if I you know, back when interest rates for zero,

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>i'd come to Churchill Asset Management, I give you my

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>money because you guys would get me yield. Now I

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>can park my money into your treasury and get five percent.

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>What does that do to your capital raising? Yeah, you

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>can do that. You know, we don't view private credit

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>as a timing issue because we've been getting seven percent

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>year in, year out as a as an unlevered return

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>for investors for seventeen years. It's up now, no question

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. And what we're telling investors and they're asking

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>this like, you know, well if we come in now,

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, are we missing out on to your point,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>corporate investment? Great bonds? The challenge with bonds right now

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is that what happens if interest rates continue to go up?

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>What if the Fed pushes rates up higher and new

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>buy bonds. Now, the other thing that I'm hearing is

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that the risk premium is not there in a lot

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of the corporate bond market because it's if you get

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>five percent on treasuries, you're only getting six percent on corporates.

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that enough? So if you play this private credit

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>game with senior loans, it's twelve percent. You know, that's

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's floating rates. So if rates keep

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>going up, you're going to do better. Second of all,

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not correlated to the rest of the market. If

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>we have supervolatility in the second third quarter. I'd like

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to think of private credit as kind of the noise

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>cancelation headphones for the capital markets. Whatever is going on

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the markets, you're not going to feel that because these

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>are again long term capital no ratings, the marks are

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>private and so that stability is the kind of thing

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that these investors from based on my tour of those capitals,

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>are really asking for. All right, good stuff. Randy really

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciate chatting with you get a good sense of what's

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>going on out there in a private credit business. And

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we talk about private equity, but as Matt and I

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>have been saying, as we've been talking to Randy for

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a while here, the private credit space is just so

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>active and it's just amazing to me how quickly that

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>business has grown. And Randy had some good stats there.

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Randy Swimmer, he's co head of senior lending and he's

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the senior managing director at Churchill Asset Management. Private credit

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>lending to private equity firms a lot of times who

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>are getting deals done in the mid market space a

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunity that I think for a lot of

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>people maybe flies under the radar a little bit, but

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>they've been getting great returns for a long time and

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just an interesting part of the market. So we

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>like to check in with Randy every once in a a

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>while and he comes into our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Well,

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a long way to go until the next presidential election,

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>but many political organizations are already ramping up efforts. In particular,

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>some are focusing on the Latino vote and working out

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the best approach to electoral issues that matter most to

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>this growing population. Let's get more on that effort now

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and a special report from Bloomberg's Lisa Mateo. The political

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>divide among Latino voters is seeing a subtle shift to

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the Grand Old Party. Exit polls from twenty twenty two

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>showed Democrats one about sixty percent of Latino's overall down

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 1>from sixty five percent in twenty twenty, and with Latinos

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>making up more than thirty million of the country's registered voters,

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the push to capture their support continues to grow. There

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is now a microscope on our community that has not

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>existed before. Yvonne Gautierrez is managing director for Latino Victory,

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>an organization dedicated to building political power in the Latino community.

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Because in twenty twenty, we did see some small county

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and regions, you know, that did have a hired Republican

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>turnout vote, but that was not emblematic really across the board.

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Congressman Henry Kuaiyar, who recently won Texas' twenty eighth district,

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>says Republicans have been making a genuine play for the

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Latino vote. I have not seen this in the younger

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>George Boursh and then Trump and then of course the

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>National Republicans certainly did that this last election. While there

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a red wave in the twenty twenty two midterms,

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Republican Governor ron DeSantis turned heads when he won Florida's

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>heavily Latino counties of Miami, Dade, and Osciola. Ronnie Lucetto

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>National Chairman for the Republican National Hispanic Assembly says DeSantis's

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 1>stance on COVID lockdowns helped they temporarily lockdown and then

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>opened up immediately and kind of let everybody kind of

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>live their life and make their own decisions into the

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Hispanic community. Being able to make your own decisions and

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>freedom is one of the most important values that you

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>can have as an American. Teresa Kumar, co founder and

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>president of Voto Latino, says the swift reopening appealed to

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>many Latino business owners. That was for many Latino business

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>owners a lifeline because they don't have any plan B

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to fall upon. She adds that the age of Hispanic

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>voters in the Sunshine State also played a part. Lord

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is the only state where young Latino voters will never

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>eclips older Latino voters and they have a tendency of

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>being far more progressive policies. In California, Governor Gavin Newsom

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 1>was reelected with the support of sixty two percent of

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Latino voters, but still two points lower than his first

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>election in twenty eighteen, according to the Los Angeles Times.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>In Pennsylvania, Kumar says Latino support was strong for Democrat

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>John Fetterman in Fetterman's race, and this is according to

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>exip points that came out of March for Our Lives.

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Seventy nine percent of Latino youth voted for a Democrat

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in this past election and findings from research firm Equis

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>shows solid support for Democrats from Latino voters in places

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>like Nevada and Arizona in twenty twenty two. Yet still

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>representative Quaar feels the party needs to step up their game.

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Some of us, for many years have said to the

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:20.959
<v Speaker 1>nationals ADCROPO C you know, DNC, and the state parties.

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>We've said, hey, guys, we cannot take Hispanics for granted.

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, Usually the effort was, let's start after Labor Day,

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, sixty days or so before the election, and

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>then let's start pushing that Latino victories. Gautierrez says, politicians

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>need to remember that Latinos are not a monolist. Latinos

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in Texas and California and Florida are all very different

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>and have very different lived experiences in background, and therefore

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>their votes are going to be different at times. Lucetto

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>points to the topic of abortion and how the support

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>for pro life policies can vary culturally from state to state.

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 1>You have a large Mexican population in Texas and a

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 1>illegal voting population of Mexicans in Texas and in Mexico,

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>abortion was really for the most part illegal all the

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>way up until the end of twenty twenty twenty one.

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>So that's a losing battle if you're pushing a pro

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>life policy for a Mexican population. But that didn't work

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>so well when you look at New Mexico, because New

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Mexico is more of a Spanish Hispanic type of voting block.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to immigration, Latinos are torn between providing

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a path to citizenship and illegal immigration. A New York

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Times Siena College pole shows about fifty five percent of

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Latinos support Democrats on legal immigration and roughly a third

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 1>support a border wall. The same poll shows that while

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Democrats maintain a majority of Latino voters, younger male Hispanics,

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>especially in the South, appear to be drifting away from

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>the party due to economic concerns. So could a shift

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Latino vote be significant enough to change the

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>political landscape of swing states with large Latino populations. Absolutely,

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>because you're looking at purple states right now, you know,

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>bluish purple states for the most part, and you flip Arizona,

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.719
<v Speaker 1>you flipped Nevada, and you start flipping a couple of

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>little districts here and there inside of California, you start

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>making a difference, small steps that could move bigger changes

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Lisa Mateo Bloomberg Radio. Good stuff, Lisa

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Matteo from She's right here on Bloomberg in Actor Broker studio.

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>So we can ask some questions of Lisa. Lisa Mateo,

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>business correspondent from Bloomberg Radio. But those in the New

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>York market, No, Lisa, from her years at Picks eleven

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Channel eleven anchor reporter for eighteen years, also did some

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>radio gigs at CBS and iHeartMedia, so she knows what

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>she's doing out here. Lisa, thanks so much for this report.

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Is fascinating. Oh. I have to point out too from

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>yourhythme the most important part A proud graduate of Rutgers Universe. Yes,

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the state University of New Jersey. Lisa, you did this

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>report on Latino votes. It's important today, It's can be

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>really important in twenty twenty four. What I found fascinating

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is it's not a monolith, as you say, explain to

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>us kind of the differences across the country among the

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Hispanic vote. Yeah, it's also what countries you're from, but

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it also has to do with age, it has to

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 1>do with gender as well. If you think about it, age,

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's something that politicians are really going to

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>be focused on come the next election in twenty twenty four,

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>because you think about it, the ten year difference, Latinos

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>are ten years younger than the country overall. If you

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.719
<v Speaker 1>think about age wise, four and a half million Latinos

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>are going to be coming into voting age by the

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>next elections. So you see where their focus is. And

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just such an important thing because a lot of

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the younger Latinos have more progressive issues and thoughts. But

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that it also switches by gender. So

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>when you think about young male Latinos, some of those

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>are switching more toward Republican because they're thinking more economy,

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>especially in the South, but females are more progressive. So

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I think age is definitely going to be something that

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be focused on. They're going to be

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>investing more, investing earlier, starting earlier. They're already knocking on

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>doors getting more Latinos registered to vote now, so yeah,

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>what about the twenty twenty four election here, obviously this

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a major factor. Do we get

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>any insight about the next presidential election? They are on

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 1>something that was interesting too. We're talking about the next

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>president elential because you have Title forty two. You know

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be coming to expiring in a few months.

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>So immigration was a huge issue, but also something that

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing starting to shift. So it's interesting to see

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the different ways people are thinking about immigration for Latinos.

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 1>You know that New York Times pole just stuck out

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to me so much. Fifty five percent support the immigration,

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 1>but you have still have that third that is supporting

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 1>that border wall. So see you're starting to see that

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>divide there. Yet, what are the big important issues for Latinos?

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Can we boil it down to a couple I think

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>there was actually a study by vote to Latino. They

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>did a study right before the midterms, and they said

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>what issues are important to you? Number one, of course

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>was economy. Number two though, was abortion, so you see

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>how that younger generation is starting to come in there.

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 1>And number three was gun reform. So those were the

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>top three right before the midterms. And it's interesting right

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>before the midterms, But I want to talk about participation

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>from the Latino votes specifically, because these issues can matter,

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but if you're not actually shown up at the polls,

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>then those issues don't matter. It talks about you. Yeah,

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>there's thirty million registered Latino voters, so you think about it,

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>but you have to turn out to the polls. And

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>just like you're saying, so, that's why they're starting those initiatives,

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>are going door to door. They're starting to get people

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>out there to recognize their importance of their voice. And

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that's really what they're focus on. How do you reach them?

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it Univision, Telemundo, is it digital media? How did

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>these politicians try to reach this community? Well, it's funny.

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to a lot of them about that

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and they said, what they're doing now, it's rather than

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>putting a lot of the big money behind let's say

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>advertising or things like that, they're going into these smaller organizations.

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>They're going to for example, auto shows, they're going to

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, certain dances, like different things where they can

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>really get in and talk to people, shake hands, go

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>one on one, you know, rather than just a big

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>advertisement place somewhere. You know, across media, they're going into

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the communities and talking with people one on one. Fascinating.

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:20.479
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be you know, I follow this story

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of time I spent a lot of

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>time with Univision and some of the Spanish language media companies,

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's a big growing part of the population and

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>an influential one economically and politically. So it's great to

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 1>get this reporting. Lisa Matteo, she's a business correspondent for

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, joining us here live on our Bloomberg Interactive

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a broker studio with an important story. As we start

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>barreling towards that twenty twenty four presidential election, we're gonna

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>have a lot more stories like that. A lot of

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>news out there on the cryptospace, and not a lot

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of it's very good. The ripple effect from FTX implosion

0:26:57.760 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is kind of finding its way to the banks, you know,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about Silvergate Financial, Silicon Valley Bank. Lots of issues

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>out there, not many of them good. Let's check in

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>with Mike mcloone's senior macro strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence here. So, Mike, again,

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the ripple effect from FTX is kind

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of hitting some of the financial institutions here. How do

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you and others in the cryptospace read what we're seeing

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>from the banking side of the equation. Hey, Paul Well.

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a classic worn buff at the tide's

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>going out and find out who's wearing clothes. The key

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>point is I don't think we're done yet with finding

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>out who wasn't wearing clothes. So Silvergate, on the back

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of FTX, on the back of Celsius, the things, we

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>can just keep going down the line. And it all

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>predicated in the fact that markets went down, not just cryptos.

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think the greater risk here is there is

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be more contains from this. Prices are more

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>likely to go lower. But it's not just cryptos, it's everything.

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Remember the FED is still tightening, and but I think

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the good thingle commodomis will get some good, hopefully astute regulation.

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is still known as being the outsider. It's not

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>as secure, it's clear the commandity. But I'll end with this.

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>The key point is next Thursday is the one year

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>anniversary of the first rate hike, and that takes the

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>big macro here is the FET is still tightening rates.

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>It's only been a year less than the year that

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>rates are still zero, so we're seeing that trickle down

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and cryptos are the fastest horse in the race going

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>down the most, Mike, it feels like as we hear

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:23.199
<v Speaker 1>about the news coming out of Gemini, coming out of

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>silver Gate, it feels like it wasn't just FTX that

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of created this ripple effect. It goes back further

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to the three arrows capital saga as well. How many

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>more shoes are there left to drop from clearing out? Well,

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that's Critio's exact appropriate question, and my fear and just

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>being realistic, is there's probably going to be more because

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I do expect in the macro we might not have

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>put in the bottom in most risk assets. And that's

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>just by being simple and find what the fet is

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>telling us. They are still tightening. We've had this bounce

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in bitcoin from fifteen to twenty five. I did point

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>out twenty five significant resistance. If you're tactical, you should

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>boy be selling it. And if that happens, we're going

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to see more of the questions what's next. But what

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing lately is most major institutions are going out

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and claiming, you know, saying we don't not have exposure

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to the bad actors. But I'm afraid there's still more.

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just don't know how to quantify that

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it's more difficult as people who really dig in to

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>me that being the macro strategist, I point out that

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I see rolling over in most diss assets. I see

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:23.719
<v Speaker 1>something I've never seen before, that we have the bloomer

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>commandity next down twenty percent and the FED still tightening.

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>So cryptos are more likely to suffer the fastest horse

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>in the race. But one thing I'll point out too

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is the key. My key seem at the beginning of

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>years watching Ethereum a little bit in the number two cryptos.

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>The key levels that watch are A thousand to two thousand,

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's still stuck in the middle of that range,

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>just making it difficult for all of us. So my

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>gear in the self proclaimed crypto capital, at least in

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States, done that down in Miami. What's the

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>feeling in the in the community there about crypto just

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>broadly defined and maybe just some some things think things

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you're hearing. It's impressive the long term building I'm seen

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>from mostly the rational, mature people who are in it

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>for a reason and are not the young speculative type

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>who just haven't experience for the facts of fiduciary duty before.

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So I sense from most people here that okay, this

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is rough, but it's just part of any nascent crypto asset.

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you just look at the last low and bitcoin,

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it was around eighteen nineteen, around four to five thousand,

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and here we are twenty one thousand, So where is

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it going forward? And then it's just all the building

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in the space and one thing that's unstoppable. It's been

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>happening lately with this Gray Gray Scale Bitcoin Trust GBTC

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's lawsuit. With this litigation with the SEC, they

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>are much more likely to win that case now, which

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>should be the trickle down that Okay, these incumbents are here.

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>This is just the example of rap lead advancing technology

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>taking over and just kind of have to adopt it

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>or risk falling behind in the meantime though it's a

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>bear market. Well, we actually had the Gray Scale CEO,

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Michael Shnheim the one PM yesterday, a very exciting interview

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and one of the questions we asked him was are

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you worried about kind of a flow of redemptions when

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it comes to just kind of the fun flow in GBTC.

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>He didn't really give a straight answer, but Mike, are

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you worried about that. No, what I see in GBTC

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is most people are seen is somewhat is distressed debt

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>with a high probability of going back to par So

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the discount got into the extreme of around fifty percent.

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Right now it's thirty four percent. And if our when

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be an evilent, they're going

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to become an ETF. I think they almost have to

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's happening in every a lot of other countries.

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>That's going to go back to zero. This question is

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>why do you why you know so? I think it's

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>more likely GBTC is put in a low than Bitcoin

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>has because that extreme discount and the probability that they

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>will become an ETF and win this case. But that's

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a while. Mike. In addition to all the

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>crypto work you do, your day job is commodities an

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>i'll strategists here with the FED seemingly continuing to raise

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the interest race, what's the what are you talking to

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>your commodity clients about. The most of these days sell rallies.

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm enjoying and that's been you know, I was too

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>early on that last year, but it's just a key

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>fact of commodities, particularly crude oil Paul. They are the

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>world's most significantly autocore correlating assets, and when they go

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>up a lot, they basically their own enemies. And that's

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>proving proving true now. So we look at wt A,

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>crud oils down thirty percent, down in the air, natural

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>gas is dropped to the same price that traded in

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety, and the FED is still tightening, and there's

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the consensus that China the Man will bring commodies up.

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>My ruling commodities is fade to consensus because it's already

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in the market. Expect a severe normal commodity correction, Expect

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>prices to go much lower. And a key fact I

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>point out earlier it is just the fact that the

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomer Commodity index is still down twenty percent on a

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>one year basis, and the FED is still tightening I've

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>never seen. This means you should look to sell any

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of rallies in commodities, and one of the one

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that's closest to the SF five hundred copper copper if

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you if you it's basically the same price SMP five hundred,

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>if you multidivide the SP five hundred by a thousand,

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it's right about four, and I fully expect it's more

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>likely to go to three than five. We'll put this

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>into perspective orse with a copper story, because it felt

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>like with this China reopening, it was a no brainer

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that copper had this massive bowl case where did it

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>go thirty seconds exactly in creating exactly no brainers. We

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>know what that means to do the opposite, So copper

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>got a little cheap last year. It's the world's most

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>significant industrial metal, and it's heading lower. In my view,

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it's found ten percent on a one year basis. I

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's more likely to head towards three and it's

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>very unlikely to go back above five. It's got to

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>get through this recession, which is inevitable if you look

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>at the yield curve in the US. Mike mclogan clear

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>concise calls as always Mike McLoone, senior macro strategist for

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence in Miami, Florida, which is the self proclaimed

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, capital of all things crypt Though all

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this may be the conversation of the day, particularly feen

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>tech geeks out there, we're in a round table to

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing talk all things tech, focus on Apple, computer on

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Aragrana Senior Tech Annalso Bloomberg Intelligence joins us as well

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>as Mark German, reporter with Bloomberg News, and then we'll

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>talk a little tech here. And Mark, I want to

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>start with you talk to us about Apple and their

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>view of India as an opportunity here. Whenever I think

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>of Apple in India, I think, boy, don't they have

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to bring in a lower priced model. How do you

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>think they're viewing it? India, in Apple's view, could be

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the company's next China. Right If you remember, China was

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a very small market for Apple only about fifteen years ago, right,

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>But when Apple went to a larger sized iPhone with

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone six plus back in twenty fourteen, things really escalated.

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And Apple sees India in the same way. Right now,

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>China brings in about seventy five billion a here in

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.760
<v Speaker 1>revenue for Apple. That's nearly a fourth of overall annual revenues.

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>They want India to eventually be the same might take

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>ten twenty thirty years, but that's what they're t push towards.

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And so in order to do that, they're making India

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.879
<v Speaker 1>it's own dedicated sales region within the company its own

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>operational region, separating it out of Europe right in Africa

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and the Middle Eastditerranean where it was bundled before. And

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 1>they think this is really going to help push growth

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and more resources there. Hop into this conversation put some

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:22.280
<v Speaker 1>numbers on it for us, this supply chain shift. Essentially,

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you're the shift that Mark is really outlining. What kind

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of impact does that have on the fundamentals at a

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>time when I feel like Tim Cook's real legacy was

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>securing the supply chain. Oh yeah, from a supply chain

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>point of view, India, you know, will become a big

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>part of it, but that may take some time. But

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I cannot agree more with what Mark is talking here.

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:45.760
<v Speaker 1>India from a numbers point of view, should and could

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>be a very big market for Apple down the road,

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and largely because the population size is there. And the

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>only question you have to really think about is, you know,

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at what paces the middle class becoming more and more richer,

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>because frankly, I don't think Apple is going to go

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>down the value chain and come up with the lower

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>price model. I think the population in India has to

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>get richer in order to afford that, and Mark, I mean,

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess is that something that you think Apple is

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>ready to I'm not sure wait for or is that

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>something they anticipate having that India market evolved like Anoraga suggesting, Yeah,

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree with the honor Rug. Apple's not going to

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>go down market. They're not going to come out with

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 1>lower price devices for a specific market. What they are

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 1>going to do is they're going to keep coming out

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>with the new types of Spellman plans, new trade in programs,

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>other new promotions that don't change the cost to the

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>phone right per se, but makes it a lot more

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>attainable for people in markets like India. So you're going

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to see that, well, Mark, talk to us a little

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>bit again. You talked about the products as well. But

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that Apple is shifting to India up yet.

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's they're They're not the main dominant

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of product maker in that market. It's still Samsung,

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>right Yeah. Apple definitely is not the dominant player in

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>India and that gives them a big growth opportunity long term. Right.

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>The dominant players there are Samsung phones from shao Me,

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Huawei and other players. These are the Chinese brands a

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:16.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of times these phones can sell for sub four

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars, and I think that makes that much more

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>attainable combined with installment programs in a place like India,

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.399
<v Speaker 1>which is obviously an emerging market. But I do think

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple is going to do whatever it can marketing wise,

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>promotional wise in order to make the iPhone a bit

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of a better purchase in India, right, maybe bundle it

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>with other products and services and such. So I do

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>think they will eventually get it done. You know, five

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>G is just still so nascent in India, and it's

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>still you know, nascent for Apple itself. They only went

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>into the five G market two years ago. So I

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 1>do think they have a long term growth path there.

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And of course, you know, we do believe that Apple's

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>not going to go down market, but if they decided

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to sort of hit that lever can go down market.

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Release you know, a new version of the iPhone SE

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:06.840
<v Speaker 1>just for India, or a new version of the iPhone

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>SE which right now is four hundred and fifty dollars

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:13.399
<v Speaker 1>that has you know, better attributes, bigger screen, five G, etc.

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that could be successful there with the right

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 1>marketing program behind it. Hey, and Rod talk to us

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>about the air pod business for Apple. I have my

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>AirPods and the problem is they don't stay in my ear.

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So I know the product design is perfect at Apple,

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>so the problem must be my ear. But tell me

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>about the iPod business from a financial perspective. Yeah, I

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>was really intrigued with it a few days ago when

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I when I you know, am mine ended up in

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the washing machine, and you know, I ended up spending

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 1>two hundred forty nine dollars for it, plus the plan

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of twenty nine bucks. And I said, started looking at

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the numbers. Before the pandemic, the attached right foot iPhone

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 1>was about twenty percent off of the you know, currently

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>it's somewhere around thirty eight forty percent. And then in

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the most recent survey that we did for and the users,

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we saw sixty two percent attach rate. And you know,

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we are modeling that over the next seven eight years,

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the whole world moves into that rollm off close to

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a sixty percent attach rate. Wait that's the case. What

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? I mean every iPhone users? You're an

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>iPhone user, do you have a do you have an

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>air part or not? Believe me, I landed in Chicago

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 1>last Monday, and I looked around the plane. There wasn't

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>one human being in that plane that didn't have an

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.280
<v Speaker 1>air part along with it. So sixty person is probably

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>conservative in my wife. But if that happens, you know,

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>airpart become the third biggest category, you know, for for

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Apple down the road, and frank you speaking, you're gonna

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>lose them. They're gonna fall in water. Your replacement cycle

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to be far faster than an iPhone. And

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just it's just a beautiful product. Frankly

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 1>doesn't stay in my ear, So what does it say

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>about my ears? I guess that's the question. Hey, Mark,

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to get the latest reporting from you. I'm

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of what's the feeling in Cupertino about China, both

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:06.439
<v Speaker 1>as a supplier and as an end of market. What's

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the latest thinking. I think Apple is pretty confident in

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>its supply chain in China. I think they have seen

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese supply chain be pretty strong and pretty resilient

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>other than the last four years. So it's taken some

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 1>time for them to really wrap their heads around this

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>idea that this whole supply chain they spent twenty five

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>years building, you know, really has faced criticism recently, has

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>faced issues. And really you can chop it up really

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>to the tariffs issue in twenty eight, twenty nineteen, right,

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and then you can connect it to COVID as well,

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>and those two factors really with a string of bad

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>luck and COVID zero policies in China, you know, really,

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, weaken that supply chain a little bit in

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:52.799
<v Speaker 1>the eyes of investors and some And so I don't

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>think Apple is going to shift away from China as

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>people think. I think that the Chinese supply chain is

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>here to stay. But I have a big caveat whereas

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I think Apple is going to double up and really

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 1>build additional supply chains, different manufacturing final assembly facilities in India, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Cork,

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Ireland and really expand there. So if there are further

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>issues in the Chinese supply chain, they have backups in place. Mark,

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 1>let's go to a different part of the business here,

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple TV are what's the growth case for Apple TV

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>at a time when a lot of streaming companies, a

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of media giants really struggling. Yeah, the growth case

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 1>is really the price at seven dollars a month. Apple

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>is still well under the price points you're seeing of

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Netflix and HBO Max and those bundles there. I think

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>if Apple further pushes Apple TV Plus in terms of

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>bundles their Apple or One bundles they included in the

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:55.359
<v Speaker 1>price point of some of their other products, I think

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it could be Okay. One new thing they're trying is

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of building this temper very back catalog of content.

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:03.879
<v Speaker 1>So they have their originals, which is what you're paying for,

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:07.280
<v Speaker 1>but you also you get about six of these random

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:11.240
<v Speaker 1>iTunes movies, usually the same ones that are streaming on Netflix,

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>included with TV plus. So if they continue to expand that,

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 1>it makes TV plus quite a bit of a better offering.

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>They have not marketed that. They don't advertise it. It's

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>not advertised as part of the price point every month,

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's something they're testing right now. And

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 1>if they continue pulling that lever and make it a

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>bigger part of the package, I think TV plus could

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 1>be quite successful. Hey fit finished up with you here?

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 1>What's the bear case for the stock? Apple? Thirty seven

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 1>buys eight holds and only two cells. Is there a

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>bearcase for Apple? The big case is really you know,

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:44.320
<v Speaker 1>China is the biggest bearcase frankly, and then that's really

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>what you know, I get scared about. I think that's

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>one idea. But the second part also is, for the

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>long period of time, Apple's been growing sales at a

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>clip of about ten percent per year, let's say for

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the last several years. We don't think that's going to

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>happen anymore. It's going to be high single digit growth

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 1>fade stock. And as you know, I mean, you know,

0:43:04.239 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>what multiple are you going to pay for a stock

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 1>at that time? I think there is a lot of

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>discussion about valuation. We have done a lot of work

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on that area. I think those are the two areas

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that I hear the most criticism about. All Right, good stuff,

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate getting you too, smart folks together on a

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 1>rock ran A, senior tech analysts with Bloomberg Intelligence and

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Mark German, reporter for Bloomberg News covering all things technology.

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty two was a year to forget for risk

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 1>on investors at sixty forty stock portfolio nowhere to hide

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 1>This year kind of an up and down, really strong

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>januarying for some bond investors. Some of the best January,

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>they've they've ever seen and then kind of given it

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>back in February. So where do we go from here?

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's check out with Mike Smith. He's a senior portfolio

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>manager Offspring Discovery smid cap Growth Fund and for those

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>of you not in the know out there, Smith is

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of a combination between small cap and MidCap. You

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 1>put it together and it's a smid cap. So how

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:03.680
<v Speaker 1>about that? Thanks for joining us here. Let's look forward here.

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 1>How are you guys approaching this market? Are you do

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you feel like you're held hostage by the Federal Reserve

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 1>or do you still feel like there's ways to make

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:17.320
<v Speaker 1>money here and maybe add some value. Hey, Paul, good afternoon.

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me on. I think there's definitely reasons

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>to be hopeful and optimistic. You know, starting with what

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>you just said, there was a lot of damage done

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 1>last year, and we entered this year with the post

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:35.400
<v Speaker 1>year that last year's paying is this year's opportunity, and

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:37.359
<v Speaker 1>that's starting to play out a little bit. I think

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 1>it's reasonable to expect a choppy year and some ups

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and downs as we move forward. But you know, what

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 1>we see is there's a divergence and fundamentals that that

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is starting to reappear. When you look at the universe

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of growth companies that we focus on and you compare

0:44:57.360 --> 0:45:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that to the broader market, fundamentals are superior on three fronts.

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 1>The growth differential is actually as wide as it's been

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in quite some time, about two times the ten year average.

0:45:11.520 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>There's superior margins and returns, and there's also increasing evidence

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of superior resilience. The rate at which estimates are being

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 1>cut and revide lower for growth companies, you know, is

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:27.360
<v Speaker 1>less than what we're seeing for the rest of the universe.

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:32.279
<v Speaker 1>And you know, typically you pay a premium for better fundamentals.

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:35.320
<v Speaker 1>You pay a higher price for better growth, better margin,

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and more resilience. But last year that premium went away.

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And so what we think re emerges is a reward

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 1>for patient and optimistic investors who are willing to take

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>some risk and try to navigate the chop you want

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:55.839
<v Speaker 1>sat waters that we're all sailing through. So where where

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>are we are? Where are you guys in terms of

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:00.400
<v Speaker 1>your view of valuation if you want to get you know,

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>until your portfolio more towards growth companies. Where is the

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:09.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of the valuation play we think valuation overall is

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 1>about average for growth stocks, so you know, it got

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 1>quite extended. That's part of what contributed to the pain

0:46:16.239 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of last year. We're not at

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 1>all time lows, but we're at a fair value where

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you can be rewarded for investing in those superior fundamentals.

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think in terms of where you find opportunity,

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it's broad based. I think one of the most interesting

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>things that's going on is technology cycles through different industries

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:39.919
<v Speaker 1>and is adopted by all different types of businesses. It's

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 1>creating winners and losers and companies with superior growth and

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>lots of different places. So give us a sense, are

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:52.040
<v Speaker 1>there some sectors you like at the moment. Yeah, the

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>most interesting opportunities that we see are in technology, consumer,

0:46:57.560 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and healthcare. Those are the three sectors where fundamental differentials

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:06.440
<v Speaker 1>get rewarded. It's very hard in places like energy and

0:47:07.200 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>interstensitive financials to make money based on fundamentals. You get

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>paid for getting the oil price right or the yield

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:19.800
<v Speaker 1>curve right. We avoid those sectors and dive into opportunities

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 1>where the differences in the quality of the business matter.

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:27.920
<v Speaker 1>You've got a name here that you guys like Mercado Libre.

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I've heard that name before. It's a really interesting story.

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about it. Yeah, Mercado Libre is essentially both

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon and PayPal of Latin America. And you know,

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's early days in the markets where they do business

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the adoption of e commerce and digital payments,

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and the value proposition to the end user, the consumer

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is meaningfully better, you know. I regardless of the economic regime,

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 1>people pay for better, They pay for more convenience, they

0:47:57.560 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 1>pay for less friction, more safe transactions. And so the

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:05.840
<v Speaker 1>growth dynamics that they're seeing, which are quite explosive, are

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>primarily driven by that value proposition and the under penetration

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of e commerce and digital payments. So you mentioned healthcare before.

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 1>How do you guys play healthcare? Do you go into

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the services side, the pharmacide, the biotech side. How do

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys like to get exposure to healthcare? You know, again,

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it starts with the value proposition and what

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:32.399
<v Speaker 1>does each individual business enable. As we sit here today

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, We've never spent more on healthcare,

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and the system has never been more complicated and more broken.

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And so any business that brings a solution to the

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:46.960
<v Speaker 1>table that saves lives or saved dollars, we think as

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 1>a long runway for growth. And so when you look

0:48:50.320 --> 0:48:53.240
<v Speaker 1>at you know, companies like Inspire Medical Systems as an example,

0:48:54.080 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, what they enable is an alternative that's better

0:48:57.120 --> 0:49:00.359
<v Speaker 1>for the patient who wants to wear a map getting

0:49:00.400 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 1>night to deal with their sleep apnean if you don't

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:06.399
<v Speaker 1>have to, and if you get better results with less

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 1>inconvenience or at a lower cost, you know, there's wide

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:13.400
<v Speaker 1>adoption and so um, you know there are multiple examples

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:15.799
<v Speaker 1>of that throughout our portfolio. But again, it all comes

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:21.319
<v Speaker 1>back to enabling something better. That's the common denominator. So, Dan,

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 1>on the macro side, how concerned are you that that

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we are in a higher rate for longer potentially an

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 1>environment And how do you guys feel about that? At Allspring?

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:38.560
<v Speaker 1>You know it's your crystal ball is as good as

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:41.520
<v Speaker 1>mine when it comes to where rates settle and what

0:49:41.640 --> 0:49:44.319
<v Speaker 1>the FED does from here, I think it's clear there's

0:49:44.320 --> 0:49:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a commitment to kill inflation, and the BED couldn't be

0:49:48.440 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>more clear about where they stand on that. So we

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>have to be humble in processing what that means. But um,

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:57.919
<v Speaker 1>you know at the end of the day, we have

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>an amount of debt in our country. We have a

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of bad demographics in the developed economies, including the

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:08.720
<v Speaker 1>United States. Those are both two big overhangs on growth.

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:14.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's hard to see a scenario where it

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:16.960
<v Speaker 1>takes a long time to kill inflation. It takes a

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:20.320
<v Speaker 1>long time to restrain growth growth, because they're structural horses

0:50:20.320 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that are going to cause those restraints or constraints to

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:27.879
<v Speaker 1>happen anyways. So you know, I think time will tell

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:30.280
<v Speaker 1>as we moved through the year. I'm not looking for

0:50:30.640 --> 0:50:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a big upside surprise that rates have come way down,

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's quite possible. We've seen the highs

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and we just need to bide our time now to

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>get to the other side of the cycle. All right, Mike,

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:43.399
<v Speaker 1>I always appreciate get a couple of minutes of your time,

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike Smith. He's a senior portfolio manager at all Spring Discovery.

0:50:47.440 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 1>It's a smidcap growth fund, small MidCap growth and all

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Spring is a former Strong Capital which was an absolute

0:50:55.400 --> 0:50:58.239
<v Speaker 1>must stop when you want it to go to the

0:50:58.239 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Midwest and see institutional investors strong out there that the

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 1>burbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, which pound for pound, I think Milwaukee,

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin might have some of the best money managers out there.

0:51:07.800 --> 0:51:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:51:18.680 --> 0:51:21.960
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three, and I'm Fall Sweeney.

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:27.320
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.