WEBVTT - Businessweek Extra-Chris Fenton

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. I'm Jason Kelly,

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to the Bloomberg Business Week Extra. It's where

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the entire conversation that we had with

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>one of our favorite guests from the week this week,

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Chris Fenton. He's a trustee over at the US Asia Institute,

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a Hollywood producer. He's got a new book. It's called

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Feeding the Dragon, Inside the Trillion Dollar Dilemma facing Hollywood,

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the NBA, and American business. A must read right now

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>as tensions unbelievably continue to escalate between the US and China.

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Check it out. Great to be back, and I'm glad

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Scarlett's here too, because I know she's a fellow Cornellian.

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I know, I feel like we could this whole interview

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>could just take a turn with you guys just doing

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:49.160
<v Speaker 1>something very well. Start talking about hockey and Lina Rank

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know exactly Gorges and all of that stuff,

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff, all right, talking talking about the big

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>red of China here too a little bit. Yeah, I

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>see what you did there. You're a creative guy, Chris Fenton.

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Um so put the book in some context for us,

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 1>because the title is so intriguing, and Scotan and I

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>were talking about it throughout the day and sort of

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>trading notes, and I mean, it's very much as our

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>colleague Tom King would say in the Zeitgeist in many ways,

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and a reminder that it's not all just trade wars

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>and sort of obscure things like soybeans and whatnot. We're

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about pop culture, we're talking about sports and so

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>many different things. Remind us what you set out to

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>do with this book. Yeah, what's sort of amazing. I UM.

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I was in the process of meeting with publishers last

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>time I was on the show, which was in October,

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>just after Darryl Moorey, the GM of the Houston Rockets,

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>sent out that tweet supporting the hues of the Hong

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Kong protesters, and we we talked quite deeply about the

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>NBA's issues. And then Lebron James had just landed back

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in the US and he had um issues explaining exactly

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>where his point of you was on it. And it's

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>amazing because the book, Yes, the timing of having a

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>book like this is fantastic, um in regards to selling books.

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>But if it's a little bitter sweet because UM, we're

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>also facing probably one of the worst relationships the two countries,

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the U S And China have had in the last

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>forty years. So it's a bit concerning, But yes, UM,

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it has to do a lot more

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>than with than just with commodities or tech. UM. I

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>was in the middle of definitely the cultural and commercial

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>exchange between the two countries, and the culture between us

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is really a very strong glue, whether that's in the

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>sports industry or or in the movie business. Basically you're

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about soft power. I mean the NBA, Hollywood movies.

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>That's America's soft power, and that's what people in China

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of fell in love with, and um, it's one

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of our most powerful ways of influencing the rest of

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the world. How much did that get hot up in

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the trade war, the trade discussions or was it something

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on the side, Well, it's it's funny because you you have,

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>UM a lot of hawks that want to decouple completely

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>from the relationship. And I argue to the hawks that UM,

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the most powerful, if you want to say

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the words weapons are our products in the cultural business,

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>because not only can we monetize that market, because there

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is a large demand in the consumer market of China

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for things like movies are television program and our sports

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>um are sports industry um. But on top of it,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>there is real money to make from those products and

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>services too. So every time a kid puts on a

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>pair of Nike shoes, or every time they watch a

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Transformers movie, or they see an episode of Game of

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Thrones or House of Cards, they're getting a little seepage

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of Western democracy into that market. So there's this soft

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>power influence that comes even with the money that we're generating.

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of a two handed sword. So let's talk

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>more about that because and and I'm glad you alluded

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to that time that we talked in October, because it

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>was a banana's time to use a very technical term,

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>because of what was going on with the n b A,

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, with everything else that's happened in the world,

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that issue with Daryl Morey and Lebron James's response to

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it has largely faded, although with the Lebron issue it

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of came up again with the Hong Kong protests,

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, heating up again and everything that's happened between

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Beijing and Hong Kong since then. But remind us kind

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of where the NBA sits in all of this, because

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the estimates for the money lost around that freakas as

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>it were, was measured in I think a couple of

0:04:55.920 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars. Yeah. Well, the NBA's issues are still ongoing.

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously Covid has has caused other issues with

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the NBA, but um, up to now, they are still

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>not broadcasting the games in China. Um, there are still

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of merchandise, definitely from the Houston Rockets,

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>but various other teams that aren't even sold over there. Um,

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:25.239
<v Speaker 1>there are some games that are delayed streamed on various platforms,

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of that the lion share of the

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>revenue that NBA was generating out of that market is

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>non existent right now, and they're having a real hard

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>time trying to get it back. So Um. Part of

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that has to do obviously with the Darryl Morey situation

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>back in October, which by the way, seems like ten

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>years ago at this point. But then the the the

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>second thing is just that the relationship between the two

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>countries is so fraid right now it's very difficult to

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>make any progress. Um. In the in the correct path

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>that the NBA has to go at this point. You know,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about the NBA in China, I can't

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>help but think about Joseph Tie who's a co founder

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of Ali Baba, and how he's an owner of the

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey Nets or is it New York Nets. I'm

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>showing my age here. That's a that's a callback Starlett

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it is. Um, how critical is that to mending some

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of the damage from between the NBA, between China and

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>and kind of putting the best foot forward for both

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the league and the country. Well, I'm a little torn

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>on that issue. I'm glad you brought him up. Um.

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know him personally, but I think, Um,

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he labeled what Darryl Moorey brought up

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and brought to the attention of Americans, Um, he called

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it a third rail issue and wants to keep it

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a third rail issue. I think is really a poor

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>UM decision and a poor influence that he's trying to

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>put through. We really need to put this stuff on

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the front burner and make it part of the national

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>discussion right now. Mean, what happened in Hong Kong what's

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>happening with the weakers, what's happening in various unfair trade

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>balance issues, UM, quotas, protectionist policies, forced j vs UM,

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>text swaps, and intellectual properties, um, you know, protection issues.

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>These all need to be brought up, talked about buy

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>our legislators, um, by our business leaders. And we need

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to construct a proper path forward. Um. The time of

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of putting our ostrich heads in the sand is

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>over and and quite frankly, if we figure out the

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>right way to engage China moving forward, where it's a

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>much more balanced relationship and we're addressing things that are

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>American values and principles in the right way, so we

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>feel good about it, the bilateral relationship is going to

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>get repaired. In the process. It will be disruptive and

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a little messy in the interim, but will come out

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the backside of it in a much better situation where

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, they'll be strategic compel editors and and partners, um,

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>just simply because we both need each other. So Chris,

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Hollywood, uh, and the movie business and

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the entertainment business, because you have sat right at that

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>nexus between the US and China. And if the NBA's

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>relationship with China is complicated, I feel like the entertainment

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>industry's relationship with China is ten times more. So. What

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>are the issues? But everyone needs a lot of therapy? Seriously,

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>what break down the key issues for us and how

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you navigated them? Because you did UM in your former

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.719
<v Speaker 1>job over at DMG Entertainment. Yeah, well, I mean the

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 1>micro issues UM are is varied. As for instance, when

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we when we get a movie into that market, um

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>our share of that that that receipt from that film

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is of the overall box office, whereas the global norm

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>is closer to They also have a quota there where

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>only thirty to to maybe thirty five movies internationally which

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>includes Bollywood and Europe in that mix, are allowed into

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the market. And then on top of it, they have

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>strict censorship rules, very strict marketing and distribution rules, etcetera, etcetera.

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>UM that all needs to be figured out, and obviously

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that sits behind a lot of other big macro trade issues.

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But then there's things that really affect all Americans and

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>just essentially what makes us UM the people that we're

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>proud of, And one of those is our freedom of speech.

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>And what Senator Ted Cruz and various other members of

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Congress that brought up is this cross border censorship that

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>has been um such a big issue right now between

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>US and China, whether it's them trying to silence Darryl

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Morey outside of their borders and talking on behalf of

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong protesters wore a jacket that Tom Cruise is

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>wearing in top Gun, where not only do they want

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to censor in their country, but they want it censored

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>when it showed in Argentina, Germany or in pure Illinois.

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's something that we need to address because quite frankly,

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we need to protect that right of free speech. And

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in China they can fire wall that from their populace anyway,

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So they're really imposing on us what they want the

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world to think in their narrative. And

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>how do we deal with that right now? Is it

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>just kind of ad hoc? We we it's case by case.

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny, it's not an ad hoc situation.

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>If it's one filmmaker and one film studio taking a stand,

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it will become a sacrificial lamb and almost a whack

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a mole situation where say Paramount takes a stand and says, no,

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna allow the Taiwanese flag on Tom Cruise's jacket

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the world to see. Well, then

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that slot in those movie slots for Paramount will go

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Universals and the Disneys, etcetera. It essentially has

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a united front where everybody is on board

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>with what are rules of engagement are with China, where

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>we all abide by those same rules and principles, and

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we have a leverage situation because they do. They know

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>their consumer wants Hollywood product, they know their consumer wants

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>NBA and sports product out of our country. They know

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>their consumer wants Starbucks and Apple and Nike. So if

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we can actually figure out what we're okay with in

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>engaging that country and cultural and commercial exchange and abide

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>by those principles, will have the leverage to be a

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>will make this a much fairer situation. But if it's

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>just left up to one CEO or one studio or

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>one filmmaker or one basketball player, we're just not going

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to get anywhere. So Chris, I hear you say, we,

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>which is a noble idea. There's not a lot of

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we going on in the United States right now. There's

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them and a lot of us. And

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder who does this ultimately come down to?

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it the industry getting together? Is it those CEOs

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that you described as is happen have to happen on

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the federal level from the administration? Does it have to

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>happen via Congress? Like? How does this get if not

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>solved at least with some progress being made? You know,

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a great question. I'm I'm advising a

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of members on the China Task Force for Congress

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>right now, and they've asked those questions of me and

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>much smarter people than myself, and and some of the

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>things that I come up with is is literally like, look,

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys have certain pressures from your constituents that make

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you sit up on a soapbox and say Lebron James

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>do this, or David's you know, or you know, Bob

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Iger do this. But there are pressures on Lebron and

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and Bob Iger from investors, shareholders, uh, sponsors that endorse them, etcetera.

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's got pressures. Essentially, what you have to do is

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>know where those pressures are coming from and figure out

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>how to abate them on both sides. There are there

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>has to be a ven diagram where the circles have

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>some sort of overlap, and we need to figure where

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that is. You know out where that is, and and

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>be okay with the fact that there will be some compromise.

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>There will be human rights issues that we do not

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>agree with in China. There will be political issues we

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with in China. There will be national security

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>issues we don't agree with with China. But some of

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that stuff we're gonna have to agree to disagree with

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>because that market means so much potentially to our GDP

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>two jobs here and to our efforts over time to

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>influence them through our soft culture. Is soft power of

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>our culture and our aspirational qualities of democracy. So, Chris,

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>he's become known as an expert at negotiations with China.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the single most important strategy or tactic when negotiating

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>with China? You know what, There's there's probably much more

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>uh much more depth experts out there than myself. But um,

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>if I just go by a typical rule of engagement,

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean number one is to really understand where they're

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>coming from and what their point of view is and

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>where their pressures are themselves. I mean, the Chinese are

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>human just like us, but they definitely have big issues

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that they're dealing with. And a lot of the times

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you're not just dealing with a private sector company or

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a consumer base or something that seems very relevant to

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>what we deal with here in the US. A lot

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of times it's the government. And if you look at

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the most top layer part of that onion, they need

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to keep one point four billion people just happy enough

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that they don't revolt and have another Tienamen square situation.

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>That means you need to provide them middle class jobs,

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>create that aspiration that they will get into the middle class,

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and create the messaging that you're continuing to build upon

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that because they've brought six million out of poverty into

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the middle class, but there's one point four billion people there. Yeah, alright, Chris,

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not to make you sing the alma mater, but

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you are a graduate of Cornell University. You went to

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the engineering school. I believe, how on earth did you

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>end up in media and movies in Hollywood and writing?

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>That's not a yeah, Well, it's it's a it's a

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>good question. I actually I saw Kurt Vonneguet speak when

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I was at Cornell. He was a physics major, and

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>he said the only reason he was able to write

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a book is that he had no idea whether he

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>was any good at good or not at writing, whereas

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>all his English majors said, every time they read, you know,

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>wrote three pages, they would look at it and trash

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it and throw it away. So he finished books simply

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't know if he was good or not.

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So I took a swing at it and and had

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>one that was actually uh. I wrote in college that

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Fox bought to make a movie out of it. Never

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>got made, but um, I was always very interested in

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the writing career. Uh. And I ended up getting into

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the mail room at William Morris and worked my way

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>up as a literary agent in the movie business and

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of learned the craft of of writing screenplays from

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>great clients that I represented, And then ultimately I just

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>lived a really colorful journey that I fell into the

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>middle of between the US and China for twenty years,

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, wow, that's great fodder. The right that

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lewis type of memoir and here I am today.

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just been sort of a lucky chain of events.

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And that was Chris Fenton, trustee of the US Asia Institute,

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>on his book Feeding the Dragon Inside the trillion dollar

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Dilemma facing Hollywood, the NBA, and American business. And what's

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>so interesting is it just came out already on reading

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>lists for lots of colleges and business schools across the world.

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>We need to understand all of us, these tensions between

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.119
<v Speaker 1>the US and China and what the economic and consumer

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>implications are. Well, you've been listening to Bloomberg business Week Extra,

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>be sure to tune into Bloomberg Business Week Radio Live

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Monday through Friday, starting at two pm Wall Street Time

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>on Boomberg Radio. I'm Jason Kelly, and this is Bloomberg