WEBVTT - Bloomberg Daybreak: Mortgage Rates, Denmark Election, BYD Earnings

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>top stories in the coming week from our daybreak anchors

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>all around the world. Straight ahead on the program, A

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.120
<v Speaker 1>look at what we can expect for US mortgage rates

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty six. I'm Alexis Christophers in New York.

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm Calain Hepkeahey in London, where we discussed the snap

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 2>election in Denmark shaped by the standoff with President Trump

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:23.919
<v Speaker 2>over Greenland.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm Doug Krisner looking at earnings in the coming week

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 3>for the Chinese ev Maker byd.

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 4>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 4>eleven three to zero, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg ninety two nine, Boston, dav Digital Radio, London, Sirius

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 4>XM one twenty one, and around the world on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 4>dot Com and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:57.840 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>top stories in the coming week from our day break

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>anchors all around the world. Straight ahead on the program,

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>A look at what we can expect for US mortgage

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>rates in twenty twenty six. I'm Alexis Christophers in New York.

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Good day to you. I'm Alexis Christophers. We begin today's

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>program with a look at US mortgage rates for more

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on what we can expect this year. We're joined by

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Erica Aidelberg, Bloomberg Intelligence Chief mortgage backed securities strategist.

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 5>Erica.

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you here, So glad you're on the

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>show because this is a hot topic right now. Mortgage rates.

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 1>We saw them rise last week to the highest level

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>so far this year. Big drop in refinancings as well.

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>What's going on in the mortgage market.

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 6>Hi, thank you for having me on. A Good morning

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 6>to you. Yeah, mortgages, mortgage rates in particular, are right

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 6>at that interesting cusp where there's been so many barbers

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 6>who had to take out mortgage at a higher rates

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 6>over the past four years that we're told to we

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 6>like to say, date the rate, marry the house. So

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 6>a lot of these borrowers really had to stretched to

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 6>take out these mortgage rates. And at the same time,

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 6>since these were the highest mortgage rates in about twenty years,

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 6>they were acutely aware that they were locking in relatively

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 6>high mortgage rates, were hoping to be able to refinance,

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 6>and in fact, some of them were really hoping because

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 6>they'd really stretch to take out these mortgage rates. We

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 6>saw a thirty percent drop in refinancing applications just based

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 6>on this very small shift back upwards and rates, and

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 6>we could talk about what caused that as well, and

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 6>that what that really highlights is just the huge percentage

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 6>of borrowers who are right on that cuspoer refinancing, and

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 6>a thirty percent drop one way or or increase one

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 6>way or the other could really make or break a

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 6>year for like a mortgage banker.

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 7>For instance.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 6>Sure, so what we're also saying is that mortgage bankers

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:50.839
<v Speaker 6>themselves are really intent in getting as many of these

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 6>refinancings through the pipeline as quickly as possible as they can.

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Before rates going before rates go higher for us, what

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>about fifteen year? Where is that sitting at the moment?

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Which I know that's more popular with refinancers.

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it is more popular with a lot of refinancers. However,

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 6>it encurs quite a bit of higher payment. You know,

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 6>a lot of times when that is in fact a

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 6>popular item, it's because there's been enough home price appreciation

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 6>or enough seasoning in the mortgage loans that it makes

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 6>that it makes sense. You know. For instance, I even

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 6>refinanced into a fifteen year a few years ago because

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 6>we had a thirty year mortgage and if we'd refinanced

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 6>into another thirty year mortgage, our whole stream, but our

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 6>whole interest stream, would have been higher.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Sure, is this really all about the war with Iran,

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>what it's doing to the oil markets and how that

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>can be inflationary And we've seen how that has impacted

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the ten year treasury, and the thirty year is very

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>closely tied to the ten year treasury, more so than

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>what the Federal Reserve does, of course with its overnight

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>interest rate. So is that what's behind this this rise,

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>this re rise in mortgage rates.

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 6>That's an excellent question. And just for the fun of it,

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 6>recently I was working on a note where I was

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 6>looking at the correlation between say, mortgage rates or mortgage

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 6>spreads and oil rates. Pretty much no correlation, ok, you know,

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean, you know, you can see times, but what

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.799
<v Speaker 6>really is driving this? As you said, the key here

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 6>is what it's doing to inflation expectations, and more importantly,

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 6>it's also creating a lot of uncertainty about what the

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 6>fen's going to be able to do, what direction rates

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 6>are going to be able to go. What does uncertainty mean.

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 6>Uncertainty means increases in volatility, both implied in actual rate volatility. Now,

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 6>volatility is a huge driver of mortgage spreads because mortgage

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 6>borrowers have the option is what it's called an option

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 6>to refinance or just not move any time they want.

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 6>So as a result, the higher volatility is, the harder

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 6>it is to hedge that borrower option, and the more

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 6>expense of the wider spreads need to be to both

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 6>in tract investors, but also for the rate the lenders

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 6>are willing to offer the primary rate. And on top

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 6>of that, you have added to that the fact that

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 6>if inflation is expected to increase, mortgage rates are probably

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 6>going to follow as quickly, which means long term rates

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 6>have also risen, as you pointed out, which includes ten

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 6>your treasury. So you have the actual base case rate,

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 6>the ten your Treasury rate rising, and you have mortgage

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 6>spreads widening because of this increase in volatility generated by

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 6>the uncertainty of what's going to have with oil and

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 6>the war in general.

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you thinking we might see a thirty year back

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>at seven percent again sometime soon, especially if the war

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>drags on.

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 6>You know that that would be a really tough question.

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 6>I actually didn't see the beginning above seven percent in

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 6>the first place. You know, I don't think that's certainly

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 6>the long term equilibrium. I don't have a crystal ball,

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 6>but it does seem to me that the widening of

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 6>mortgage breads that we saw that contributed to how high

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 6>mortgage rates got in twenty two twenty three was mostly

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 6>because the Fed had just started running off its portfolio.

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 6>It was still in tightening mode, which is certainly not

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 6>my base case expectation.

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh thanks to Erica Aidelberg, Bloomberg Intelligence Chief Mortgage backed

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>security strategist. Let's take a look now at some stocks

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>making news in the week ahead. I'm Alexis Christoffers with

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Tatiana dari a Bloomberg strategist for Markets Live. Tatiana, you

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>brought three names with you. Let's begin with if you're

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>a pet owner, you know them well.

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 5>Chewy Chewey exactly. Chewey will report fourth quarter earnings and

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.919
<v Speaker 5>next week, and analysts are expecting a solid profit increase

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 5>versus the year ahead. And that may come to how

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 5>the stock revive some of that momentum because it has

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 5>come under pressure this year on concerns over growth and

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 5>the profitability outlook for this year and next year. And

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 5>analysted Morgan Stanley expect this print to set the tone

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 5>for the year ahead, and they expect full year guidance

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 5>of about seven to seven and a half of revenue growth.

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 5>So remember that number because anything less than that could

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 5>come to pressure the stock again. The company you know

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 5>has named the new CFO in February reaffirmed its financial outlook,

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 5>so it has tailwinds in place. Its revenue has been

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 5>steadily climbing through the years, even as we've seen consumers

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 5>come under pressure from all prices rising elsewhere. Basically, so

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 5>it has it has a momentum there. It's just that

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 5>when people are looking ahead, they're concerned about consumers pulling

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 5>back now with high oil prices, So we sort of

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 5>need to see revenue outlook and that guidance be lifted

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 5>so that the stock investors feel more reassured.

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>That was interesting when you talk about consumer spending, because

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we'll pull back on things for ourselves, but I

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>think history has shown people don't necessarily pull back for

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>their pets. They're still going to pay for their pets. Also,

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>they have their Chewy Vet clinics that I guess are

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in stores. I understand that's going to be a bigger

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the Chewy story, I guess in twenty twenty six.

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 5>Yes, exactly a push there. And they also have their

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 5>sort of revenue or their online platform or you can

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 5>schedule deliveries, and that's also been a big focus for

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 5>the company and for the stock. But yet again, as

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 5>those growth concerns have been battering the stock, it will

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 5>be very important for them to go back to what

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 5>analysts have been saying to a beat and raise cadence right,

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 5>which they have not had in recent quarters. We have

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 5>a great function on the terminal where you could see

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 5>how results have been coming in pitted against expectations, and

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 5>five or four of the past five have not really

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 5>been great. The last one was better, which sets up

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 5>hopes that this one will come in also better than expiring.

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>And just want to add Morgan Stanley kept its overweight

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>rating on Chewy, trimming its price target to fifty dollars

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>from fifty one, saying the stock is offering a quote

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>compelling entry point following its recent decline, So Chewy on

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the move here in the coming week. Also beyond Meat,

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>which I know is dropping the name meat from its

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>from its official title, right, tell us what we can

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>expect there.

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, the maker of alternative meat product is also did

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 5>to report, but expectations here are much lower because they've

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 5>already reported preliminary revenue and it came below expectations. With that,

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 5>they also said that they will delay the filing of

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 5>their ten K annual report because the company requires additional

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 5>time to complete a review and analysis related to its

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:57.119
<v Speaker 5>inventory balances. And you know when you get messages like that,

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 5>that always books the market. And this is something that

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 5>this company did not need because if you look at

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 5>the long term chart, the stock has fallen dramatically since

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 5>it's much talked IPO in twenty nineteen. It's lost more

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 5>than ninety percent of its value since then. So it

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 5>really doesn't have a good story. It keeps getting worse,

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 5>and it doesn't have a good track record when it

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 5>comes to earnings either. Four of the past five quarters

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 5>have seen earnings really disappoint expectations and shares fall as

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 5>a result. So the bar is pretty high here for

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 5>a surprise.

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know, I know they're trying to expand

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>beyond fake meat. They're rebranding as Beyond the Plant Protein Company.

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>They're introducing these new products like high protein sparkling drinks

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and what they call simplified plant protein foods. We'll see

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's you know, that's what it takes to turn

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>things around. All right, let's squeeze Carnival in here, the

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>cruise line. How are they doing or how are they

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>expected to do?

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 5>Carnival of reports before the ball in March twenty seven.

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 5>What the street wants to know here is how much

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 5>will higher oil prices impact it's your head outlook. This

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 5>is sort of the big question when it comes to

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 5>earning forecasts just overall. In the S and P. Five hundred,

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 5>but specifically to Carnival, Morgan Stanley identified the name as

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 5>the most exposed among cruise liners to oil prices because

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 5>it does not hedge, which they reckon that this would

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 5>translate into about a forty five hit hit to its

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 5>EPs outlook, or that's about a twenty percent hit to

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 5>its overall guidance if you want to think in percentage terms. Okay, well,

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 5>if you look at the stock, that's about how much

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.599
<v Speaker 5>it has fallen since the war has started. So basically

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 5>you could argue that the market has baked that in already. Okay,

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 5>But although this is an estimate, not a confirmation from

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 5>the company, so we'll have to see if that comes

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 5>in a sort of a higher or lower than expected.

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 5>But the point is that the market has already baked

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 5>in some bad news. Now we have to see how

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 5>bad will the news actually be.

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And Carnival will have to see whether or not they

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>pass those higher fuel costs on to consumers in the

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>way that some of the airlines are doing that. I

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>know some international airlines are charging fuel surcharges, but some

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>American airlines, US based airlines, i should say, are adding

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it to the ticket price, to higher ticket prices. And

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>whether or not that's going to i mean, a slower

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>summer travel season. Right now, it doesn't look like it's

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be lots to look forward to on the

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>earnings front in the weeks ahead. We're going to leave

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it there are thanks to Tatiana Darier, Bloomberg strategist for

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Markets Live. Coming up on Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, there is

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>an election in Denmark. This week we bring you a preview.

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Alexis CHRISTOPHERUS and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak weekend, our global look ahead at the top stories

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>for investors in the coming week. I'm Alexis CHRISTOPHERUS. This

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>week brings us an election in Denmark, and Daybreak Europe

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>anchor Caroline Hepger is here with a preview.

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Caroline Alexis Metafriedrickson's party was polling at historically low numbers,

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 2>but barely a month ago the Danish Prime Minister called

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 2>a general election.

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Proportional representation means that there are more than a dozen

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 2>political parties running in this vote, with governments in Denmark

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 2>usually formed from parties within two main blocks, either the

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 2>blue block on the right or the red block on

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 2>the left. Denmark also faces many of the same issues

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 2>in this election as in many other European countries, from

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 2>housing costs to food prices, welfare inequality and immigration. But

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 2>it is President Trump's efforts to control Greenland that have

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 2>created a major foreign polity crisis. As we head into

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Denmark's twenty twenty six election, and joining me now to

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 2>discuss is our reporter in Copenhagen, sanah Vas great to

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 2>speak to you, Sanna. I just want to ask you

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 2>how important you think these elections are now for Denmark.

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 8>They're very important. Denmark is in the middle.

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 7>Of a diplomatic conflict with Donald Trump over Greenland, which

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 7>is part of the Danish Kingdom. Denmark is currently negotiating

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 7>with the US to find a solution to Trump's desire

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 7>for more control over this island, and the next government

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 7>in Denmark will have to deal with the next steps.

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 8>So our Prime Minister Matiflis and she's framed.

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 7>This vote as a decisive election because Danes in the

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 7>next election term will have to define the relationship with

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 7>the US but also the future of.

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 8>The Danish Kingdom. So it's a very important election.

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes indeed. But then why was the election called quite

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 2>a few months early?

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 8>Yes, that's right.

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean in Denmark it's the prime minister who decides

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 7>when to call an election. There is a four year

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 7>constitutional deadline, but it is quite comment to call the

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 7>election early when the.

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 8>Prime minister sees that the timing.

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 7>Looks politically favorable. And that is the case right now

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 7>for metaphy X now Prime Minister, and it's all tied

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 7>to Trump, and she performed very poorly in the polls

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 7>in December, and then she got this massive boost when

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 7>Trump he started making new threats over Greenland in early January,

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 7>and this spat it just really reinforced her image as

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 7>a disciplined and steady leader during periods of national crisis,

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 7>and that is something that she's hoping to capsulize on

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 7>with this vote.

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 2>So then the US and President Trump looming over this election.

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 2>What are people saying in Denmark and also in Greenland?

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 2>And you might explain also that there are some seats

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 2>in the parliament in Denmark, correct for Greenlandic representatives.

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Greenland elects two representatives for the Danish parliament and

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 7>and and they could definitely play a very important role

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 7>in defining uh the future Danish government and and.

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 8>For sure the future relationship with the US.

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 7>And and the future of Greenland will play it an

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 7>important will be an important question in those negotiations generally

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 7>for for both Denmark and Greenland, it's the first time

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 7>and in their modern history where geopolitics, geopolitics is really

0:16:28.240 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 7>top of mind for voters. And we've seen the topic

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 7>feature and national party.

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 8>Leader debates and and that's quite unusual.

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 7>We also saw a poll earlier in the campaign that

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 7>found that foreign and defense policy that was the number

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 7>one concern for Danes and and and and so in

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 7>a way, Trump, he really turned.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 8>Foreign policy into a domestic issue.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 7>And and voters are they're likely to assess politicians on

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 7>their leadership skills and and their capacity to handle the areknown,

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 7>and that is favoring especially the governing parties and the

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:05.959
<v Speaker 7>Prime minister.

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 2>So then tell me a bit more about who is

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 2>favored to win. According to the polls.

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 8>The Prime Minister Medphals and.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 7>Her Social Democratic Party looks set to become the biggest

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 7>party by far and that will give her the first

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 7>shot at forming at government. And looking at the polls,

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 7>she is the most likely candidate to secure my majority

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 7>backing to make her Prime Minister again. The biggest outstanding question,

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 7>I'd say is whether she will return to a traditional

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 7>left leaning red block government or look to renew the

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 7>or expand the quite unusual centrist kind of cross block

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 7>coalition that we have.

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 8>At the moment.

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 7>And one of the biggest challenges for going with renewal

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 7>of this government is that if midflex And has proposed

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 7>to introduce a wealth tax, and it's something that's drawn

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 7>sharp criticism and especially from wealthy people in Denmark.

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 8>Some are threatening to leave the country.

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 7>But also from the liberal parties who will really struggle

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 7>to enter a coalition on those terms.

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 8>But remember Denmark has.

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 7>A very fragmented political system or political landscape, and there's

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 7>twelve parties.

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 8>In the running.

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 7>That leaves the outcome very open to kind of late

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 7>shifts and alliances and policies once coalition negotiations start, and

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 7>that could really reshape the balance of power. So we

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 7>are preparing ourselves for potential surprises once talks begin.

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 8>Hm.

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Hm, that'll be interesting. What about other issues? Though the

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Danish Prime Minister is known for her tough stance on immigration,

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 2>how could the outcome of this election shape Denmark's directional

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 2>mats front?

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's right if Felexon she originally in twenty nineteen

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 7>rose to power in Denmark because she managed to steer

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 7>her Social Democratic Party towards a tougher stance on immigration,

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 7>and she in that way reclaimed working class voters who

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 7>had drifted to the right.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 8>She's also been very outspoken.

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 7>In the EU pushing for stricter border controls and tougher

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:32.719
<v Speaker 7>immigration policies, and the election could really shape Denmark's direction

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 7>on this topic in the future, especially if Felexon were

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 7>to pivot to the left to create a more kind

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 7>of left leaning majority, it could complicate her ability to

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 7>maintain this stract approach to immigration. So that's definitely something

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 7>that not just the Danes of following, but for sure

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 7>also across Europe.

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 2>So then what role do you think that Denmark wants

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 2>to play then or will all want to play in

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 2>conversations around the EU and the US.

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 7>I think it striking comment that Prime Minister Metaphlags made

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 7>in a debate on TV quite recently was that the

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 7>US is no longer Denmark's closest ally. Instead, she's called

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 7>for closer collaboration in the EU but also with other

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 7>like minded nations such as Canada for example. And we

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 7>are seeing also various ways in which sentiment in Denmark,

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 7>especially on defense and EU collaboration, it's really changing as

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 7>Denmark is adapting to new global order, I mean Denmark.

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 7>It's a very good example is the Denmark earlier this

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 7>month entered into an agreement with France and nuclear deterrence,

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 7>and that is quite a dramatic move for a country

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 7>that has long been opposed to atomic weapons. But it's

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 7>also an example of the changes that Denmark is now

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 7>seeing necessary as it realizes it can't rely on the

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 7>US for security and it needs to build deeper alliances elsewhere.

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Whoever leads Denmark next though, yes they'll be thinking about

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 2>the EU, but surely front and center will be any

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 2>possibility of a clash with the US. You've been reporting

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 2>about the idea that there were actually deeper preparations by

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:29.239
<v Speaker 2>Copenhagen for some kind of the possibility of some kind

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 2>of military confrontation with America.

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 7>We've seen new information come out this week. A Danish

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 7>broadcast that R reported quite extensively on some of the

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 7>preparations that Copenhagen had been undertaking earlier this year. In

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 7>the event of a potential US attack on Greenland, for example,

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 7>Denmark deployed troops with live and ammunition. They were prepared

0:21:56.400 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 7>to blow up airport runways in Greenland to prevent US

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 7>forces from landing if Trump chose to take the island

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 7>by force. Dr also reported that Denmark dispatched blood supplies

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 7>to treat the wounded if if fighting were to break out.

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 7>It really shows how worried Copenhagen were back in January,

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 7>when Trump was most vocal in his threats. Denmark was

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 7>extremely worried, and as Danish Prime Minister made flags and

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 7>said just this week, negotiations underway. We hope for an agreement.

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 7>But Trump's desire to take over Greenland remains intact, so

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 7>clearly that nervousness has not gone away, and a future

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 7>government may well have to have to deal with the

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 7>outcome of no deal or potential deal with Trump.

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 2>So then finally, this vote is also going to be

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 2>very into seeing tests about whether campaigning on an anti

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 2>TARP message can work. Perhaps a lot of other countries

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 2>will be watching this. What do you think that they're

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 2>going to be thinking about and looking at when it

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 2>comes to the Danish example, Yeah.

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 7>I think the Danish example is very interesting because even

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 7>though foreign security policy has taken on greater urgency, it's

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 7>unclear whether it will move votes really to swing the election.

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 7>I think in Denmark generally parties are very aligned on

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 7>foreign policy, and so it leaves little opportunity for candidates

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 7>to differentiate themselves. So parties are still they are instead

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 7>directing their energy towards more domestic issues like taxes and

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 7>pension reform and agriculture. That's where party device are clearer.

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 7>But so far Pole suggests the vote preferences have not

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 7>shifted very much during the campaign. Of course, there is

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 7>also another element of unpredictability still, and that is that

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 7>the election is very vulnerable to outside attempts to influence it.

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 7>Denmark's intelligence service warn recently that foreign powers, including Russia

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 7>but even also the US, may seek to interfere in

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 7>the vote. And there is especially a worry amongst lawmakers

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 7>running for election in Denmark that Donald Trump at any

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 7>time could post something on social media and that could

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 7>really shape the election more than he already has. So

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 7>that's for sure something that we are watching for and

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 7>that across Europe will be looking at.

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Sanah, thank you so much for being with us. Yes, well,

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 2>we look forward to hearing more from you and understanding

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the outcome of the Danish vote in the next few days.

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 2>That is Sannah vas Our, reporter in Copenhagen. My thanks.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm Kline Hebger here in London. Catch us every weekday

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 2>morning for BlueBag Daybreak Cube. That's beginning at six Am

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 2>in London. That's one Am or Wall Street Alexis.

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Caroline, and coming up on Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, we

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>preview Chinese ev maker BYD's earnings. I'm Alexis Christophers and

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. I'm Alexis Kristophers with your global look

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>ahead at the top stories for investors. In the coming week,

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Chinese ev maker BYD will report earnings. For a preview,

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Bloomberg's Doug Chrisner, host of the Daybreak

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Asia podcast.

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Alexis. Last month mark the first time BYD sold

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 3>more cars abroad than in China, and the company is

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 3>now the world's top seller of evs. Its manufacturing operations

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 3>have expanded outside of China. BYD has a new facility

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 3>in Brazil and a joint venture in Uzbekistan. For a

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 3>closer look at BYD and what we're likely to see

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 3>when the company delivers earnings, I'm joined by Bloomberg's Linda Liu.

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Linda is China Car's reporter. She joins us from our

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 3>studios in Hong Kong. Thank you for being here. Can

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 3>we start with the domestic side of BYD's business. Most

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 3>brands in China have been facing struggles, and I know

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 3>weak domestic demand on the mainland has obviously been a

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 3>major factor for quite some time. Give me your sense

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 3>of BYD's business in China.

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 9>BYD and other Chinese EV brands in China have been

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 9>facing a number of challenges. To start with, the Chinese

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 9>economy has been slowing, so you have a weak demand.

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 9>The government has been trying to stimulate retail sales in

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 9>the form of subsidies and cars had a trade in

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 9>subsidy that really promoted EV purchases, but that has started

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 9>to be scale back starting from this year. A tax

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 9>break that previously exempted about ten percent in sales taxes

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 9>has slowly to come back, starting with five percent this year.

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 9>And subsidies that had previously gone to a lot of

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 9>mass market models affordable models that which BID is really

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 9>strong and has also been reduced. So demand has really

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 9>been hard hits. In the first two months of this

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 9>year in China, you're seeing sales falling compared to last year,

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 9>so BID has a really tough time. Not to mention competition,

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 9>You've got rivals like Jili that is really chasing its tail,

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 9>essentially coming up with models that's exactly targeted at the

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 9>models that BID has offered. So I think BID is

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 9>really trying to shake off this stalemate with a launch

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 9>of new technologies such as innovations and charging as well

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 9>as battery technology.

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Over the last few years, I know there have been

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 3>some pretty intense price wars among the ev makers on

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 3>the mainland. What is the situation with that right now?

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 9>The price will has been raging now for a number

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 9>of years, coming into its third year. It's a really

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 9>tough situation in China because there's an over capacity. Essentially,

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 9>the country's carmakers are producing more cost than customers can buy,

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 9>so they really need to get sales rolling by slashing

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 9>prices keep the factories operating. But in the long term

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 9>they are really hurting themselves in margins and revenues, so

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 9>financially it's not sustainable. And actually you've seen a number

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 9>of effects on China's auto supply chain where carmakers demand

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 9>really heavy price cuts, essentially slashing prices of components from

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 9>its suppliers, so in turn they can pass some of

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 9>that price cuts onto customers. But that really is just

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 9>a lot of pressure on the entire supply chain. So

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 9>the government really is trying to reign in the price war.

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 9>They've told carmakers they need to pay their suppliers on time.

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 9>They really shouldn't be selling vehicles at a price that's

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 9>below the cost to make them, and we're starting to

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 9>see some of the carmakers start to raise prices. But

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 9>I think we're still waiting to see exactly how that's

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 9>going to play out, because the overcapacity situation hasn't changed.

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 3>And BYD has been using foreign markets as a way

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 3>to deal with that excess inventory stemming obviously from the

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 3>over capacity issue. I'm thinking of Europe in particular. Is

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 3>that still the case?

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 9>Yes, and Europe is a very attractive market for BID

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 9>as well as Chinese EV makers because the European market,

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 9>they will be able to afford more expensive Emmy models,

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 9>and the EV adoption rates in Europe, especially when you

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 9>look at countries like Norway, is very high. So Europe

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 9>is a very to market for Chinese evs. But at

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 9>the same time, Europe has its own domestic industries that

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 9>it needs to protect. So that's why you see the

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 9>European Union levying this tariff against Chinese evs to try

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 9>to slow this wave of EV exports to Europe so far,

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 9>actually it hasn't really slowed down the Chinese EV exports

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 9>that much because we're still seeing a very healthy growth.

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 9>But I think the thinking for the European Union is

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 9>that they hope the Chinese companies will consider investing and

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 9>forming joint ventures with local European partners. So the jobs

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 9>at least will you remain in Europe and maybe there'll

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 9>be job creation and technology know how transfer to really

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 9>help Europe's domestic EV making industry.

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 3>So speaking of joint ventures, as I mentioned earlier, there

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 3>is a JV in Uzbekistan, and we know that by

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 3>ideas expanding manufacturing to include Brazil. What's it work here

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the strategy.

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 9>Localizing production is quite an important step for automakers as

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 9>they expand globally. We've seen that with the Japanese automakers

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.959
<v Speaker 9>like Toyota, Honda, Nissan, as well as the Korean So

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 9>I think it's very natural for the Chinese automakers like

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 9>BID to start bringing production overseas to markets where they

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 9>can see a very sizeable volumes. That would make sense

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 9>to have localized production, And in a sense it's also

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 9>one way for these brands to really build local recognition

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 9>and goodwill. You know, if you're bringing a lot of

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 9>jobs with the factory you're building in the new market,

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 9>I think that will build you know, that would really

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 9>help propel your brand, not just among the local consumers,

0:31:57.080 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 9>but with the local governments.

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Whereas b ID when it comes to autonomous driving.

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 9>Autonomous driving is a technology that automakers are really trying

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 9>to stay on top of, especially when you look at

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 9>Tesla and Elon Musk's vision for robotaxis and autonomous driving,

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 9>because if this technology manages to reach a mass adoption stage,

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 9>that's going to change the entire consumption pattern when it

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 9>comes to cars. You know, if the vehicles can drive themselves,

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 9>does it even still make sense for an individual to

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 9>own cars anymore? Maybe you can just have a robotaxi

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 9>fleet that serves the community or that serves a city.

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 9>So the automakers, I think are also you know, trying

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 9>to have their own autonomous driving technology and thinking about

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 9>what the business model is going to look like in

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 9>the future. And now they're doing a lot of exploration.

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 9>BID is the valid ping its own smart driving technology

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 9>in house, but it's also working with external suppliers such

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 9>as Momenta. This week, we've also seen a number of

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 9>Chinese EV makers join up with Nvidia onto Invidia's latest

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 9>smart driving platform. So they trying different routes and hoping

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 9>that in the future that they will be part of

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 9>this transport disruption and won't be left behind.

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned Tesla. I'm curious when you look at the

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 3>rivalry between Tesla and BYD and China, how do they compare.

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 9>The dynamics just keep changing all the time. Tesla, for

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 9>a very long time was seen as the pioneer for

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 9>the EV industry. It was really the brand that kick started,

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 9>you know, everyday consumers kind of acceptance of EV's with

0:33:54.040 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 9>these really technological Leyden evs, you know that actually drive

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 9>for arrange without charging. You know, that's more useful for

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 9>daily lives. BYD for quite a what, for quite a

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 9>number of years was playing catch up to Tesla, but

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 9>last year it finally became the world's biggest brand in

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 9>selling EV's and Tesla, as we know, was hit by

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 9>a backlash against Elon Musk's uh you know, political views

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 9>and activities. And now I think going forward, the competition

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 9>dynamics is going to change again. Because we're seeing by

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 9>D bringing out all of these new EV charging and

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 9>EV battery technology that we I have to be honest,

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 9>I haven't really seen from Tesla so far. It seems

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 9>like Tesla and Elon Musk's priorities have shifted to robotics.

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 9>They're trying to really get their humanoid robot off the

0:34:56.560 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 9>ground as well as robot taxis. Uh So, the focus

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.760
<v Speaker 9>has changed so much for Tesla that I'm not sure

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 9>if their heart is really in the game anymore. Just

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 9>to be an EV company.

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 3>It seems like you're describing the rate at which you

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 3>can charge a Chinese EV and how that compares with

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 3>other manufacturers.

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 9>Yes, So BYD had a product launch recently in which

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 9>they claim the latest generation of their EV platform and

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 9>EV batteries allows you to charge from ten percent to

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:34.839
<v Speaker 9>seventy percent, from ten percent to seventy percent in five

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 9>minutes and nearly full charge in just under ten minutes. Now,

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:43.879
<v Speaker 9>with a charging time like that, it really changes the

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 9>whole paradigm when you come when you're thinking about EV's

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 9>as well as petrol powered cars. Essentially, now you probably

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 9>will be able to get get rid of range anxiety

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 9>if you can power up in ev in the same

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 9>amount of time you would have been able to fill

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 9>up your car with petrol. So that's BYD's goal is

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:10.879
<v Speaker 9>to essentially make evs as easy and convenient to use

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 9>as petrol cars.

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.280
<v Speaker 3>So we have earnings from BYD in the week ahead.

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Give me your sense of what the market is expecting,

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 3>what to look for and when we view the stock,

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 3>how has the stock been performing and what is it

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 3>reflecting right now?

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:33.280
<v Speaker 9>Earnings is going to be tough for BYD. They've had

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 9>a couple of quarters of falls in their net income,

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 9>so looking forward to the four year results, they may

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 9>actually have a first annual decline in profits, probably since

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:57.720
<v Speaker 9>the pandemic days. This is largely due to this whole

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 9>erosion of margins and profits in China's ultra competitive market

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 9>where you've had this price will go on, as well

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 9>as regularly scrutiny that basically forced BYD to really clean

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 9>up its balance sheets. These sales growth has also slowed

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 9>a lot, so it's facing all of these pressures for

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 9>its upcoming earnings, and in terms of stock price, it's

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 9>come down from a high, but it's still actually doing

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 9>a lot better than its rivals. Such as Julie. I

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 9>think people still see BYD as the technology pioneer in

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 9>the EV industry. But in the short term, I think

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:48.919
<v Speaker 9>there's going to be pressures on the stock price as

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 9>the whole autos and EV industry in China is facing

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 9>a lot of challenges with demand in the near future.

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Linda, thank you so very much for helping us preview

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.720
<v Speaker 3>earnings in the week ahead from Chinese EV Maker byd

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Linda lu. She is China Carr's reporter, joining from

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 3>our studios in Hong Kong. I'm Doug Krisner. You can

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 3>catch us weekdays for the Daybreak Asia podcast. It's available

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 3>wherever you get your podcast. Alexis.

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Doug, and that does it for this edition of

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at five

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>am Wall Street Time for the latest on markets overseas

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>and the news you need to start your day. I'm

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Alexis Kristoffers. Stay with us. Top stories and global business

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:32.280
<v Speaker 1>headlines are coming up right now.