WEBVTT - Franchisors Outperform as Restaurant Sales Slow

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Chopping it Up. I'm your host, Mike Halon,

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the senior restaurant and food service analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>We got a go one today. We're joined by Howard Penny.

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Howard's the managing director, consumables analysts and overall restaurant guru

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>at hedge Eye Risk Management. For those of you who

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't familiar with Hedge Eye, the firm does a great

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>job helping its clients, including institutional investors, retail investors, and corporations,

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>navigate the markets and the economy. Thanks for doing this, Howard.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Hey, thank you. Michael. Glad to be here.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, man, this is this is cool. I've been looking

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>forward to this one. Why don't you just start us

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>off by telling the listeners a bit about Hedge Eye

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and how your research differs from the traditional cell side

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>research that's out there.

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Sure. So, HEDGEI has been around for about fifteen years now.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 2>We started with four of us, basically in Keith Softas

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 2>Keith McCullough's my boss, founder of PEDGI as a consumer analyst. Right,

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 2>so we've had four consumer analysts that got together. It's

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 2>an independent research firm, so we don't manage money We

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 2>don't trade stocks. We literally get paid by providing money

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>making ideas to clients and if you know, they can

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 2>fire us every four every three months if they don't

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 2>like us, which is why what I really like about

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 2>it is because we are literally focused on picking stocks

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 2>and making money and that's you know, that's the name

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 2>of the game, frankly. And so we've got as I said,

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>we've been in business for fifteen years. We now have

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 2>what I'm a sector head that I cover as you said,

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 2>I cover consumer wolves. There are twelve of us now

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>there's seventy employee East total. H and Keith does my

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 2>boss does commodities, countries' currencies, and manages the overall business.

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a great product. And I really like what

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you said about there about picking stocks and helping your

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>clients make money. I feel like on the cell side

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that gets put to the back burner.

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, Well, it makes me independent, right, Elements of

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 2>it more important because there's a lot of times when

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 2>you you can talk to management teams and they'll tell

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 2>you one thing, and if you're trying to do a

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 2>raise the Flag tour and take them on some promotional

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 2>tour to visit clients you're going to you know, buy

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 2>into what they're saying, right and uh and not have

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, some independent thinking which allow you to come

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>to sometimes different conclusions than the traditional seal side analysts

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 2>at for sure.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So what you know, Onyce, you kick us off too

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>about you know about talking about the macro outlook at

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a hedgehie.

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 2>So, so we're pretty bearish right now on the consumer,

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's probably not I mean, I don't

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 2>know if that's out of consensus right now, but we're

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 2>pretty barissed about where the consumer's heading, especially into the

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 2>fourth quarter, in terms of you know, we're we're what

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess September one, people are starting to accrue interest

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 2>on their student loans again. October first, people are gonna

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 2>have to start making paying student loans again. I don't

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 2>know if you saw this, Michael, but McDonald's traffic mismeasured

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 2>by placer has gone through a I think a five

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 2>week sequential deceleration and is now negative for the first

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 2>time in two years, which is remarkable. And then if

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 2>you put that together with dollar general and you know

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>a few other things, what Momart's saying the low end consumer,

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I think is really struggling, and I think it's getting worse, frankly,

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 2>So we're we're pretty bearish in terms of, you know,

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 2>where the consumers headed headed, sorry for the next for

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 2>the next three months and into the first quarter. And

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 2>then when you think about the restaurant industry in particular,

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, we had the industry had a difficult period

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 2>in July and August last year because of gas prices

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 2>and what that been, the pressure that put on sales,

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 2>and we're now heading into a period where comparisons get

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 2>really difficult for the industry. So we see a lot

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.799
<v Speaker 2>of challenges ahead, especially for the consumer, and that's being

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 2>echoed with what I think companies are saying. And you know,

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Dollar General I think is probably the stock as you

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 2>are right in terms of talking about what the low

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 2>end consumer's doing. But then you have companies like Chipotle,

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 2>which completely you know, they're not seeing any of that,

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 2>and they're talking about a strengthening of the consumer, which

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 2>is a little counterintuitive to you know, what most of

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 2>the macro data is showing. But we're pretty embarrasses to,

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, pretty as to what things are going to

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 2>look like heading into the end of the year.

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I hadn't seen them Donald's data yet, but that's cure.

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting because in the second quarter they were one

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of the few restaurant chains that didn't see a deceleration

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in their four years seem star sales trend. So and

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, with fourteen thousand stores in the United States,

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a pretty good indicator maybe of where

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>things are going. And you know, in Chipotle, you know,

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that one's interesting because people give them a pass because

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>they've done so well over the last few years, but

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>their their trends and Starbucks as well, slowed pretty significantly

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in the second quarter, but they kind of got a

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>pass by the street.

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know, understandably. So, I mean, David Nicol

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 2>has done a tremendous job fixing Chipotle since he's been

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 2>in the business, or since he's been running the business,

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 2>and coming out of the pandemic, they were the best

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 2>performing chain in terms of margin improvement EBIT margin improvement.

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 2>I think their EBIT margins relative to twenty nineteen or

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 2>up some eight hundred basis points for something ridiculous like that.

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 2>So they've done a great job running the business. So

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 2>he deserves the accolades that he's had, but it feels

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 2>like that story is in evidence, not just feels like,

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 2>but there's evidence that's that story is getting a little

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 2>long in the tooth.

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, and the evaluations rich to be sure, they

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>finally fixed one of the issues I had with it,

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.600
<v Speaker 1>which was they were didn't want to franchise internationally forever

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and growth just it was non existent. So signing up

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>with All Shai in the Middle East, I think is

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a good start. Obviously, it's going to take some time

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>for that part of the business to move the needle though.

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. They well so interestingly enough, right, So, yes, they're

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 2>going to franchise parts of the you know, the international component,

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 2>but they're also beginning to invest in you know, they

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 2>do run fifty stores outside the United States and Canada,

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>so they're going to be investing in infrastructure to be

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 2>able to grow the store base. Because that's how I mean,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 2>if they're going to keep that you know, sort of

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 2>mid single high single digit unit growth story going, right

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>in two years, they're going to need an international component

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 2>to it. So spending is going up to support the

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure needed to keep that. There were two accelerate international

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 2>unit openings.

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, so I think they're planning on ten

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>new company owned stores in Canada, but i'd like to

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>see them ref you know, maybe if Canada, if they

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>have an opportunity to build stores there, that makes sense.

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>But I don't like to see them refranchise the UK

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and Germany and try to accelerate that that that growth overseas.

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, who knows, we'll see still such a

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>small piece of that business. But it's interesting, you know,

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and you talked a lot about the restaurant traffic slowing

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>here in the US. What are some of the trends

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that are causing that?

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 2>So I think there's a couple of things. Consumer I'll

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:04.239
<v Speaker 2>say consumer normalization is one. So the return to full

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 2>service restaurants. Right, You're no longer spending much as much

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 2>on large group meals through drive throughs, right, so the

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>average check, So that drove average check much higher into

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the pandemic. So as that's coming back, you're seeing a

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 2>slowing in sort of people buying singular entrees instead of

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, four people that are going with your family

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 2>for through a drive through. Independence are also coming back,

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 2>So I think there is a you know, not a

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 2>new popularity, but maybe independence are becoming more popular again.

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 2>They were very popular heading into the pandemic, but obviously

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 2>struggled into the pandemic and coming out of the pandemic.

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 2>So and you're seeing that in the case volumes for

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 2>the distributors. So you know, Cisco and some of the

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 2>other companies are showing pretty good case volume growth, you know,

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 2>low single day to case volume growth, but not like

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 2>the decline to three percent decline in traffic that you're

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 2>seeing for you know, the whether it's black Box or

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 2>an Aptrac, which are the two big companies that measure

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>sales for the industry. Price is also coming in, So traffic,

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 2>as I said, has been negative, but you're seeing menu

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 2>prices come down significantly, so which is also helping or

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 2>hurting depending on how you want to look at it.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 2>And then you know, Walmart on their most recent conference

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>called sort of mentioned specifically the consumers are stretching their

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 2>dollars further and seeking better value across more categories, right,

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 2>and they said specifically grocery staples and in home meal

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 2>options were being purchased more often. So you've got that

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 2>element to it, So, which kind of gets back to

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 2>what we were talking before about you know McDonald's right,

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 2>and McDonald's seeing a deceleration. I mean if if people

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 2>are buying you know, in home meals at Walmart, right,

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 2>which their grocery business is doing really well, that's that's

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 2>not an insignificant competitor for the restaurant industry. So and

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 2>all this is going to have you know, an impact

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 2>into the fourth quarter and into twenty twenty four for

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Morgi dollars and margin dollar growth for how that's going

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 2>to look into especially into the fourth quarter. So if

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 2>you've got you know, independence coming back, price coming down,

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 2>supermarkets are more competitive, Labor inflation is still around, right,

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 2>that's not going away. Well, there is some you know,

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 2>food costs are coming down. There could be some margin

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 2>pressure heading into the fourth quarter and certainly into twenty

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty four for a lot of these restaurant companies.

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. I guess there was two pieces of

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that that I you know, find interesting. You know, one

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>thing is how bad traffic's been, even though a lot

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of these group orders are breaking into individual orders, and

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I know some chains try to do their best to

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>count entrees on a large order, but you know, how

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>much how bad is traffic really if they're getting some

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 1>sort of a benefit there with orders fracturing, right, So.

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 2>The biggest culprit is shake check. Like they're like to me,

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 2>they're they're they're a perfect example of what you're saying, right,

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 2>because you know, I don't remember the exact numbers off

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 2>the top of my head, but they're they're saying their

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>traffic was down like one to two percent, right. But

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you look at the difference between menu

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 2>price and mix and what their traffic is, that the

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 2>traffic suggests that it's down four or five percent, not

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 2>down one to two percent. But that totally can be

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 2>accounted for the way they count for entrees, right, So

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 2>if you're one person coming in and ordering for four

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 2>four entrees, right, that's you know, one, that's just one person, right,

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 2>But but really entrees are down four percent or four

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 2>or three or four it's kind of depending on what

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 2>the number is. So they're kind of like, for me,

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the poster child for what you're talking about and the

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 2>way people really count on trees. And there's something to

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 2>do it, right, But I think and I like to

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 2>pick on Shakeshack.

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I know you do. We've been picking on Shakeshack since

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the IPO together. But yeah, we'll get back into shakeshack

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>because I asked you questions. I want to know what

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you think about, uh, the activists and stuff like that.

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>But so we'll return to that. The other thing that

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I found interesting, you know that that really resonated with

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>me with your land last answer was, uh, you know

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about the food at home versus food away from home,

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and restaurants are trying to catch up with the pricing

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, and so there's a massive delta right now

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of inflation at eating you know, in a

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>restaurant versus what we're seeing at the grocery store.

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Right Yeah, And I you know, I have I struggle

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 2>with that metric because a lot of people like to,

0:12:57.600 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, sort of look at the absolute levels in

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>place and say, okay, restaurant prices are going up more

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 2>than you know, supermarket prices the other way around, and

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 2>this is going to impact consumption when the reality of

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 2>it is, it is always significantly cheaper to go to

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>a supermarket and buy your food and bring it home

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 2>and cooking, right because you are doing the cooking, you're

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 2>doing the dishes, and you're doing the cooking. So no

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 2>matter what that stat says it's always cheaper to go

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 2>buy you can buy a dozen eggs for six bucks

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 2>and you know, and have four meals, right if you

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 2>want to eat eggs for two days. Right. So I

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 2>just don't like, I understand how people want to look

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 2>at it that way, but the fact of the matter

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 2>is it will always be and has always been cheaper

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 2>to go to a supermarket and buy a meal and

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 2>bring it home. Now.

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it was such a big talking point in

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two for all these companies like, yeah, well

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we're raising our prices, but they're not up as much

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>as the grocery stores. And it was like it was

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>like Equity Capital markets guys all over the street. We're

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>just like telling it, you know, parading this to all

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>the management teams, and then the management teams will get

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>on the call and all say the same thing, and

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you're one hundred percent right, it's always cheaper to eat

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>us myself. Yeah, okay, cool. So you think the second

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>half of the year is going to be difficult transition,

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and you talked about some of the things that are

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>going on with the macro, some of the things that

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>are going on with inflation. You know, is there anything

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>else you think that we should should should mention. You know,

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>labor inflation continues to be pretty high for the industry.

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, I mean, I think that's the you know, the big,

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the big wild card sort of into the fourth quarter,

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 2>because you don't, you know, depending on what your menu

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 2>looks like, whether you're a bee centric, chicken centric, or

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 2>seafood centric, right, you're gonna have different levels of food inflation. Right.

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 2>You're seeing red meat prices are still very inflationary. So

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 2>if I was to pick a group a menu, right

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 2>or not to pick on shakescheck again. But just think

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 2>of a ret meat centric menu that has food inflation

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 2>and labor inflation and pricing coming in. Those groups of

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 2>names are going to have the most trouble in the

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 2>fourth quarter, right because you're still seeing four to five

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 2>percent labor inflation, and that's probably not going to go lower.

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 2>It's not nine percent anymore, it's not eight percent anymore,

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 2>but there is still going to be labor inflation and

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 2>there will never be deflation right way in a wage

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 2>is always going to go up, and you're always going

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 2>to find you one concept competing and get another concept

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 2>for a restaurant manager or you know, having to pay

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 2>bonuses to lure people to come to your concept, whatever

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 2>the structure may be. But labor inflation will always be there.

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 2>So the wild card really is going to be food

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 2>inflation for some concepts into the fourth quarter, so you

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 2>got slowing sales for a number of reasons. We got

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Manu prices coming in. So then the determining factor is,

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, what what the labor inflations look like and

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 2>what the margin structure is for a lot of these companies.

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 2>And then into the first quarter of next year when

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 2>the when we're up against just insane comparisons. It just

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 2>it's really going to be a difficult time for a

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of these names. And across the board. I don't

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 2>know anybody that's not gonna that's going to do well. Frankly,

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>even even the mighty Chipotle is going to struggle into

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the first quarter.

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, we know they've raised prices a lot over

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the last you know, three years, but yeah, yeah, this

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>inflation thing is interesting. Man. So I'm a fan of

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Jim Rodgers and his book Cut Hot Commodities. I don't

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>know if you've ever read it.

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 2>No, I have not.

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You have to, you have to. He talks about the

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>history of commodity cycles and on average they last seventeen years,

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and he goes into all the details of why they last.

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's just such a great, clearly written book. And

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, throughout history, you know, we've seen it repeat

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>over and over, and the last cycle was shortened. I

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know why. Maybe I haven't he hasn't written a

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>follow up book to it. Maybe because of you know,

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>technological advances in drilling and fracking and all these different things.

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But if he's right, you know, about these cycles, and

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>if we're at the beginning of another commodity cycle, which

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>could last anywhere from ten to twenty years, you know,

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that could be troublesome for restaurants. I mean, the industry

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>has definitely benefited from very modest inflation for a very

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>long time. So that's always something I just kind of

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>keep in the back of my head. But you should

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>check that book out. I think you'd really like it.

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I will, okay, So, based on all the things that

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, all the difficulties, and you know, you know me,

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>i'mbarished with you. I couldn't agree more. Who do you

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>think is going to win? And who do you think

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to lose in this environment that we're entering.

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I just add one more thing to what

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 2>you were saying before. You know, it's surprising to see

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 2>in the second quarter the number of companies that missed

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 2>revenue estimates. Right, So they missed revenue but beat earnings, yep. Right. So,

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 2>but when you're running six, seven, eight, nine, ten, whatever price,

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 2>it's easy because that flows through at ninety nine percent

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 2>gross margin. Right, you can beat earnings, but sales are slowing.

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 2>That's going to get worse into the second quarter, right, Yet,

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 2>roll off prices are rolling off, you know, and traffic

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 2>is slowing, and the and the sell side analysts don't

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not real time like they'll wait to hear from

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 2>the management team to lower their estimates or raisor estimates

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 2>or whatever it may be. So I was surprised to

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 2>see the number of even Chipotle missed revenue estimates for

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 2>the second quarter, right, And that's only going to get

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 2>worse because we're still seeing sales slowing, right and and

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 2>as estimates are not coming down. So it's just one

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 2>of those things that I just wanted to add to

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 2>that because I was just thinking about the issues that

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be facing into the third and fourth quarter,

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 2>and certainly into the third quarter because sales continues. So

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 2>now you can ask that question again.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to win and who's winners?

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we're pretty pretty bearish. We don't have many

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 2>winners right now.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, everything's gone straight up for six months.

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we do, like we do like Dominoes. Frankly, young

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 2>young Dominoes in the big franchise companies are pretty much,

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, sort of the top of the list. I

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 2>guess you could say, but let me just check who

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 2>else do I have here? So we've got restaurant I'm

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 2>a big fan of what's going on at restaurant brands, Dominoes, uh,

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 2>you and then and then we're there's a couple of

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.959
<v Speaker 2>names that we want to buy into the downturn, uh,

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 2>that we're going to see coming into the fourth quarter,

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 2>like Darden. Taste has been on the long list for

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 2>us as well. First Watch. I think First Watch is

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 2>a really cool little company. Frankly, it's a you know,

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 2>a breakfast, brunch and lunch concept.

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>But those are one shift model.

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I love it, but those are the ones that

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of stick out to me as as the winners,

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 2>and I actually have a brinker as along as well.

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 2>I think there's some interesting things that are going on there,

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 2>but you know that's a longer tail turnaround. Mm hmm.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, cool, so let's go, I guess for the

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Winter Winners. Yeah, you know, I think we're on the

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>side seams side on most of these. Russell Wiener I'm

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a fan of, and I'm a fan of his former mentor,

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Doyle. I think restaurant bands is I think it

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>sounds like he's changing the culture over there and changing

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the focus and and and kind of got management focused

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>on the right things. So yeah, it's interesting. What are

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on on the turnaround at restaurant brands and

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing at BK and Popeyes right now?

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I think it's it's the focus on what matters,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 2>right and well, frankly three G destroyed the business, right,

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 2>so it was you know, like craft Tiants and a

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 2>couple of the other buglisers, Craft Tients and restaurant brands

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 2>are the three sort of three G companies that have

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 2>been destroyed by their you know, way of running their businesses.

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So with an iron fist, with.

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 2>An iron fist right, And they didn't care about franchise

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 2>profitability right. All they cared about was you know, sitting

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 2>on you making sure you know, the people at Burger

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 2>King were sitting on pickle buckets in Miami because they

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.479
<v Speaker 2>just cut G and A to the you know, to

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 2>the bottom. So read undoing what was what was done

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 2>in the last you know, ten years is important and

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, Patrick Doyle coming in and focusing on franchise

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 2>profitability will be you know why that stock wins. And

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 2>that can happen a couple of ways. Most importantly, sales

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 2>go up. But before that happens, you're seeing them force

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 2>franchise's out of the system. I don't know, that's maybe

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 2>not a good way to put it, but the reality

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 2>of the matter is when you look at you know,

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 2>McDonald's or Wendy's or Young you know, Taco Bell, KFC,

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 2>Pizza Hunt, any one of these big brands that have

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 2>been successful in the turnaround, it's all because they have

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 2>fixed the franchise system right, and they take the old franchisees,

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 2>they force them out. You know, whether it's a generational

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 2>thing or you know, a forced sale or closures or however,

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 2>you fix the system but that calling of the system

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 2>will immediately have an impact on what the street cares about,

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 2>and that's an improvement in franchise profitability. And as soon

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 2>as you begin to see that improvement in franchise profitability,

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Sorry about that if you can't hear that background on,

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 2>but that's what will really drive the the you know,

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 2>the stock hire is that improvement in in franchise profitability.

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's Patrick Doyle coming in, right, And that's how

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 2>you that that's that's what will ultimately be you know,

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 2>why this stock wins. And then and then you can

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 2>get to the you know, the burger King turnaround, right,

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 2>the Burger King. They sort of played lip service to

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 2>the success that Burger King has experienced here so far,

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>but the reality of it is traffic's still negative, right,

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 2>So there is no turnaround at Burger King yet. But

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 2>that's fine. You've got to you've got to fix the

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 2>franchise system first. And once you fix the franchise system first,

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 2>you close those doors. You get this door base looking better,

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 2>you get healthy franchisees in there who want to be

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 2>in there and want to run the business, and then

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 2>you'll see the traffic improved. Yep. For sure.

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And then also, you know, the unit unit economics look better,

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>fdds improve, you get a little buzz around the system,

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and then people want to start opening stores again.

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Right Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, that's that's you know, two

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 2>or three years down the road.

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but they already have strong internationals, so you know,

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.360
<v Speaker 1>there's there's other pieces of that business that that's kind

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>of going to push.

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 2>It along a little bit. This is a little inside

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 2>baseball with respect to QSR. But Patrick Doyle, who was

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 2>the ex CEO Dominoes who turned around that company. There

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 2>are I think eight or nine different master franchisees for

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Burger King that are also Dominos franchisees. So there's an

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 2>element to this story that has Dominoes all over it, right,

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 2>because you've got really healthy, strong franchisees globally, right, not

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 2>not in the US, but globally. That will allow this

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 2>company to a creep value to shareholders over an extended

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 2>period of time because they do have that international unit

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 2>growth from strong, healthy franchisees.

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Great, you mentioned Brinker. You know, we we linked up

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple months ago at the at their investor day.

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that's one of the names that you like

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>in casual dining, which is obviously not a place we

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 1>think is mostly safety play. What are your thoughts on that?

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Cool? I'm maybe I'm coming back to the world too

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 2>many times, but I'm a fan of the Chili's brand. Right,

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Applebee's is a disaster, so their biggest competitor is failing

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 2>and is a melting ice cube. So you have a

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 2>new CEO coming in. He shrinks the menu, focuses on

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 2>a few items, right, he gets better advertising, you know. There,

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 2>It's just if you look at turnaround across the restaurant

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 2>space over the years, right, this is a classic turnaround

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 2>or there's classic signposts, signed posts of a successful turnaround,

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 2>and and he's got it all. It will take time, right,

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>because it's casual dining and whatnot. But I do think

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Kevin is making all the right moves, and you will

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 2>once we get past this period of self inflicted wounds,

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 2>which we've got another quarter. We do have difficult comparisons coming,

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 2>but this is the name that the street loves to hate,

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 2>and you know, I just it feels like there's enough

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 2>going on. You can see enough going on that will ultimately,

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, be successful. And it will take time. But

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 2>this This is one where you know, if you buy

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 2>Darden today, you might make twenty percent upside, right, But

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 2>if you're buying Brinker today and the turnaround does work,

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 2>it's a double right. This is not just you know,

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 2>it's not just ten to fifteen percent upside. This is

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 2>literally a company that you could go up you know,

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 2>fifty one hundred percent over the next two years if

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 2>this works. And there's no reason why it shouldn't work, frankly,

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 2>other than the macro, because it is a tried and

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 2>true turnaround in the restaurant space that we've seen executed

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:22.400
<v Speaker 2>over and over again.

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it should be interesting. And we talked about it

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:27.959
<v Speaker 1>when I did hedge I TV with you, and one

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I forgot to mention is that

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>they have not done really anything with strategic pricing.

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 2>And so.

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 1>From what I hear is that that they've gone out

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.959
<v Speaker 1>and they're trying to find someone to help them do that,

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>and that could provide some some upside here to the

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers man, because you know, that's that's process has become

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot more scientific over the last few years, and

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it's allowed some of these chains like Popeyes to Popeyes,

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry I'm mentropol to increase their prices so much

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years while minimizing the traffic laws.

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 2>You know, this is a subject for another podcast, but

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 2>I spoke with a private company that helps install dynamic

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 2>pricing for the restaurant industry and it is hugely successful

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 2>and there's an element to you know, I know it's

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 2>you don't see any of the big change doing dynamic

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 2>pricing yet, but I do after talking to this person yesterday,

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that's coming for the restaurant industry. Like this,

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, peak times, why not raise price? Right? It

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 2>just it makes a ton of sense. Now, I think

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 2>uning is is going to be interesting. But that is

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the future of the restaurant industry, dynamic pricing, and it's coming.

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I just I believe it's coming. Young Brands is actually

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 2>working with the company to do it, so a few

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 2>of the big guys are looking at it. But I

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 2>think that this is a subject that we can go

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 2>on another time with. But dynamic pricing will hit the

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 2>restaurant industry at some point.

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. It's made such a you know, impact

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>on the travel industry and the hotel industry and things

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.479
<v Speaker 1>of that nature. Yeah, I don't think there's anything stopping it.

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about your thoughts on Kava.

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, I you know, God blessed Ron shake Right.

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 2>He buys Zoe's for three hundred million dollars, combines it

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 2>with Kava, and then all of a sudden has a

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 2>five billion dollar company. Like, there is no better CEO

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 2>in the restaurant space than Ron shake right. I just

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 2>think the guy has got the magic touch. So it is.

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 2>It's stupid, leap riced. The evaluation is just stupid, but

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 2>the performance is unreal. Yeah, and they've got you know,

0:29:54.920 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 2>they've got some really strong numbers in terms of you know,

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 2>not only just what they've posted in the past quarter,

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 2>but when you when you compare Kaba to the other

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 2>change in the space. Right, I'll just pick Sweet Greens

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 2>just because I like to pick on screen Greens and

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Chase ex But you know, two point five million averaging

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 2>the volume right in twenty twenty three with twenty three

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 2>percent restaurant level margin. That's like Chipoli's at two point

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 2>nine million, you buy with twenty six Right. So the Kava,

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 2>the numbers that Kaba are putting up are exceptional and

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 2>just to put it in perspective to Sweet Greens, which

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 2>I think is you know, A zero has two point

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 2>eight million in averaging the voyants and a's seventeen percent

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 2>re level margins. So slee Greens has significant issues. But

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Kava is just and now if you you know, Tava's

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 2>got nine to you know, six seven whatever percentage same

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 2>store sales growth and twenty five thirty percent unit growth

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 2>and you're putting up you have that kind of square

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 2>foot is growth with those kinds of full wall economics,

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 2>you get a one hundred times eed. Even now it

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 2>won't always trade there, but I love to you know,

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 2>I love to find great shorts in the restaurant space.

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 2>But this is, you know, other than valuation, which is

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 2>never a reason to short the stock. You know, this

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 2>is a really, really strong company that has you know,

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 2>a huge future ahead of it in terms of being

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 2>the growth and potential now it you know, will it

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 2>you find a few bumps in the road over time, yeah, absolutely,

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 2>but for the time being, it is you know, it

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 2>is built to succeed. Yeah.

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, It's very impressive at the store level for sure.

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And we'll see how quickly they can leverage DNA, you know,

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>hopefully it don't end up like Shakeshack, where you're like

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>eight years later still waiting for them to leverage GNA.

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, to that point, can you talk a

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the activist investor and what's going on

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>there and if that's changed your opinion about Shakeshack at all.

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 2>No, it actually reinforced my opinion. Frankly, we were short Shakeshack,

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and we're short Shakeshack because it is a poorly run

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 2>coporate company and it's poorly run because the management team

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 2>is incentive. The long term incentive comp is structured around

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 2>growing revenues and epidoc so revenue growth and EBIDC growth,

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 2>so they can just all they have to do is

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 2>just you know, take the balance sheet, open up stores,

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 2>right to grow their revenues and grow the ebadah and

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>not caring about averaging the volumes, not caring about margins,

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 2>and the CEO can get paid.

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And that is that and not operating income and operating

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>income margin inst crazy to me, insane, but that that

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>structure has led to significant inefficiencies.

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 2>So this is not a typical QSR model, right, So

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you think about you know, McDonald's, it's

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 2>got those it's got, you know, the same four walls

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 2>that it opens up. You know, across the country. Shakeshack

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 2>has a different box in Orlando than it does in Texas,

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 2>that it does in California, that it does in you know,

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 2>all these different cities. And that has led to significant inefficiencies.

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 2>And that's obvious in their margin structure of the company.

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 2>And now you have an activist coming in and they

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 2>see all these inefficiencies, right, and they're going to try

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 2>to fix it. I just don't know how they can, frankly.

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean there are some some small things they can do, right,

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 2>But if you think about you know, go back to that.

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 2>You know the number that I was with the fash

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 2>casual average un and volumes and mart restaurant level margins.

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 2>They've got three point seven million in averaging and volume

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 2>and then nineteen percent restaurant level margin, which is crazy, right.

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Tavas got two point five million and twenty three percent

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 2>restaurant level margins. How come Shakeshack is low? Well, it's

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 2>so low with that averaging volume because of the inefficiencies,

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 2>because of the food costs, because of the labor costs,

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 2>and the inefficiencies that are built in the system, so

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 2>they have to begin to try to fix that, and

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know how they could do that right now.

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the amount of money they were spending on

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:20.479
<v Speaker 1>the store builds and oh my.

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 2>God, yeah, so much waste.

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So who do you like in the fast casual

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>space and are there any other ones that you have

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:28.919
<v Speaker 1>concerns about?

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 2>So I really don't the answer your question is, I

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 2>really don't like a lot in fast casual, right. I

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 2>just the valuation. Chipotle is twenty four times NTM e

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 2>v ed badah, right, Shake Check's price right on top

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 2>of that. That's those Those are just ridiculously egregious multiples

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 2>for all these businesses, and it's heading into a slowdown, right,

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not a big fan, I think, you know.

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the only one that I positively disposed to

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 2>what we're talking about it is Cava, and I still

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't buy it. And Sweet Greens is a zero at

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:11.720
<v Speaker 2>some point like the store. The big the biggest joke

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 2>in fast casual today, right, is that Sweet Greens is

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 2>going to have robotics stores in five years? Like are

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 2>you kidding me? That is not going to happen? And

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, if you've seen the store in Naperville,

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Illinois that they open, but it's two stores, two stories,

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 2>and they claim that they're going to convert every one

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 2>of their existing restaurants into a robotics store. Well, you know,

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 2>robots breakdown, right, you know what about depreciation? Right? Yes,

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 2>you might be substituting labor costs you know for robots, right,

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 2>but you still have DNA. Right, So the restaurant level

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 2>margin is not going to twenty six percent. And just

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 2>to come back to what we've been talking about with

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 2>fast casual, the strength and those margins, right, Sweet Greens

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:09.439
<v Speaker 2>is at sixteen percent or seventeen percent level margins. They're

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 2>magically saying that a robotics store after one month of

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:15.839
<v Speaker 2>testing is going to twenty six percent. It's not going

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 2>to happen. Yeah, and even if you plug in twenty

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 2>six percent on the second quarter numbers, they're still losing money.

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 2>Are you kidding me? And you've got these self side

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 2>analysts that are buying into this nonsense that they're going

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 2>to have robotics like it is it literally is. It's

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 2>it's hilarious to watch that's unfold in the stocks, you know,

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 2>the stocks, the stock has spiked on that well whatever reason,

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, well we know why, because people are buying

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 2>into this management team thinks that they're going to have

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 2>robots serving salads.

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>It's I mean, you know, even at iPod I you

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>know what I wrote. My note was like, you know,

0:36:57.040 --> 0:37:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I hesitate to use a a price of sales mallable

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 1>to ever you know, value a restaurant stock, but since

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>they can't generate E but I have no the choice,

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, And like, call me old school, but it's

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>like I feel like you're supposed to figure out the

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>store level economics on the first unit before you build

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the second and the third and the fourth, as opposed

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to still trying to figure out the unit economics when

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you're building one hundred and twenty or whatever number.

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>So we talked a lot about the low and middle

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>income consumers and quick service and fast casual. Obviously our

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 1>companies don't have a lot of exposure to find dining.

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But the same store sales have been in decline since

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 1>March according to black Box, and now luxury retail seems

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to be slowing. You know, I just find that interesting

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:48.839
<v Speaker 1>because we've had this k shape recovery where the high

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 1>end has done well post pandemic, and the low income

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>not so much. So what are you hearing about the

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>higher income consumering.

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so same idea, right, and it's it actually slowed

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 2>faster than so if you go, I look at the

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 2>nap Steakhouse data, and it really started slowing in March,

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:17.320
<v Speaker 2>so it's slowed earlier. And there's an element to that

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 2>that's hard to know because it's a little different than

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 2>high end retail, right, because this is more T and

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 2>E based, Right, it's you know, you're not you know,

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not taking a client out to dinner this week

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 2>because whatever reason, you know, business is soft or whatever.

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 2>So it has a little bit more to do with

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 2>business spending than it does with you know, sort of consumers,

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, whether they have a job and feeling like

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 2>they can buy a Gucci purse or whatever. So to me,

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:52.760
<v Speaker 2>that's a little bit more discretionary and that that's a sign.

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:54.919
<v Speaker 2>That was one of the first signs back in March

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:59.399
<v Speaker 2>that things were slowing. And you know, not the reason

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 2>why we're going to embarrassed in the industry, but one

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons, like okay, this is you know, this

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 2>is this is not good, right, you know, the high

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 2>end stakehounsils have been slowing for a while and have

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 2>slowed and continue to slow, like it's not getting better.

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:15.880
<v Speaker 2>So it just it's it's an indicator to me that

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, businesses are getting a little bit more cautious. Yeah,

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 2>because they're not, you know, people aren't taking their clients

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 2>out to dinner as much. Cool.

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, Thanks again, Howard, that was a lot of fun.

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Where where can people find you on social media?

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 2>Had Howard Penny on Twitter? Howard W. Penny. I should

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 2>say so, but thank you Michael. This has been awesome.

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Love having you on Hedge TV and thank you for

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 2>having me on your podcast. Really love it for sure.

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Thing man, it was great and thanks to the audience

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>for tuning in. If you liked the episode, please subscribe

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>and leave a review and tune in again later this

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 1>month for a discussion with bet Oaklahom though, CEO of

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Plays Pizza. Have a good day, everybody.

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:04.960
<v Speaker 2>H