WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: What Went Right Against Detroit?

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>The following. He's a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, And so much for that.

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Wall with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleton. It is Monday, October first, twenty eighteen, Season fourteen,

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>episode number If you welcome to another edition of The Break,

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>live from the SWBC Mortgage Studios at the Star, and

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we're ready to talk to the Cowboys football. Cowboys get

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a big win yesterday. They moved to two and two

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>with a win over the Detroit Lions twenty six, twenty four,

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a game that came down to the wire. Dak Prescott

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>had a game winning drive, Brett Maher had a game

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>winning field goal. Everything in that game seemed to look

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>up for the Cowboys. So we're gonna paint that rosy

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>picture for you today. I'm sure dave some things that

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys can improve on. Just it fits with the personality, right,

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you tend to be one that kind of

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>brings brings realism back to moments when we kind of

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit ahead of ourselves, right, I want

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to argue with you, but yeah, you're right, all right,

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>good ahead. So we're gonna talk about that, and we'll

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about what went right and wrong for the Cowboys,

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll get into Nick's five plays that you

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>should not overlook. And these are the plays that were

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>otherwise not necessarily grand in and of themselves. But what

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>happened as a result of those plays or did not

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>happen to happen as a result of those plays, and

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>why they were significant to the game and the outcome.

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>So we'll do all that throughout the show. Let's first

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>jump right in, and as we do every Monday, I

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>want to hear from each of you, guys, what's the

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>storyline of this game. What's the thing do you walk

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>away from this game thinking that you know better about

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this team. We'll start first with Dave. I don't think

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I know anything about this team that I didn't already know.

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>My main storyline coming out of today is good or yesterday.

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Good things can happen when you make a dedicated effort

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to put the ball in the hands of your absolute

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>best player. Obviously, Ezekiel Elliott did whatever he wanted to

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. He's also as involved as he's ever

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>been in the passing game. Another screen passed to the

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>house to get things going, and then shocker of shockers

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>throw to the ball, throwing the ball down the field

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to set up the game winning field goal. He can

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>do those types of things. He doesn't get the chance

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>often enough. I was very happy to see that. And

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>then you know, Dak Prescott played like a good quarterback.

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 1>He played like the guy that we've seen him play

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>like for what twenty five games over the course of

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>his rookie year and part of last year. We hadn't

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>seen it to this point, and it's encouraging because I

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think he has to do that much differently to

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>be that guy. You know, it's one game, but it

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>was really encouraging to see that again. I think I

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>said yesterday, this is that's what I expected Dallas offense

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to look like in the preseason. Not a you know,

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>not this like world beating passing game, but you got

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>enough complimentary players to make plays centered around the fact

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that Ezekiel Elliott is an All Pro, best in the

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>league caliber talent. That's what it looked like amber. It

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>was encouraging. Okay, fine, sorry, jeez, let's all chill out

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>for a second ever speaking now, no um Well, not

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to take away um seek greatness, but he was playing

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>against one of the worst run defenses. But even then,

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>so basically what I'm trying to say, I'm not surprised

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that he had the kind of success that he had.

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I enjoyed like watching was

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott being able to make those throws and even

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>though he didn't make all of them, still it's good

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to see him attempt making them. And again he is

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>able to make certain throws. But just being able to

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>watch the confidence and just to be able to feel

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>okay with like risking it and throwing the pass. That

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>was exciting to see. And I want to keep seeing that.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee. They didn't have Sean Lee. They did a

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>nice job without him. They won a game without Sean

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>vander Esch looked like he was a good edition there.

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>He looks like he kept telling me that throughout the game.

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>You were like, man, that kids playing, Yeah, but they'll

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>they'll they'll get give him more tackles than what I'm

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>four or five or six. Whatever they gave him, he'll

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>give him more than that. He I thought he had

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than that. DeMarcus Lawrence. They didn't get

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>any good They didn't get a lot of pass rush,

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but he actually did. I mean, he had three sacks

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and he had some big plays, but they did. I

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think they got a lot of pass rush, but

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it certainly looked like with him. They won a game.

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Without him, their defense was if he at times, but

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>they were able to win. We're gonna get into all

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>those topics. I think the first one I want to

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>start with is Ezekiel Elliott. Obviously, he was the player

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of the game for the Cowboys yesterday, and without his effort,

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that they win that game. He was

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the first player in the n IFL this season to

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>have over two hundred yards from scrimmage. He had He

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>had a total of two hundred and forty yards total

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>from scrimmage, first to do with the NFL this season.

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>That's the third of his career, which ties him for

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the lead since twenty and sixteen of any player to

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have three in three total games where he's at over

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>two hundred yards total yardage. What was the difference yesterday.

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Was it the offensive line? Was it just as Amber

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>alluded to. Was it that you're playing a team that

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the run defense just isn't very good. Was it that

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the play calling maybe helped him because they were throwing

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the ball down feel a little bit more yesterday? What

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>do you think it was? It really helps z yesterday

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to have the stellar day that he did.

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I think ahead it was the best coaching, you know,

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>job that we've seen so far from this team. I mean,

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>they get killed all the time when they lose. They

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>did a really nice job with a lot of things

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>during the game. Yeah, down there late in the game,

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they almost lost it by not giving him the ball

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe more, But I thought for the most part, they

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>call it a good game, and you know, no one

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>wants to hear this, but they managed the game well too.

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Jason Garrett, I mean he managed the game. We only

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about it on losses, but they did a nice

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>job of doing just enough leading the clock to the

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>point where, you know, not getting in a hurry after

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Zeke play. I thought the coaching staff should get a

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 1>little bit of credit for this one combination. I mean,

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, worst run defense in the league. I don't

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>think you can look past that, which is funny because

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Dak had, you know, this nice day against the best

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>past defense in the league. I think three games is

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.239
<v Speaker 1>not a great sample size to determine who's the best.

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Three games is a pretty good sample size to determine

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're the worst. You know what I mean. I

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>mean if everybody you play can run for one sixty

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to one night. And by the way, these were not

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>premier running backs that were doing this them other than

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>this week. It wasn't like they were facing girly Isaiah Crowell,

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle and Matt Breida in San Francisco. So yeah, absolutely,

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you absolutely, you absolutely have to look at that.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Actually you gotta look at that. But having said that,

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean the commitment. I mean, he got the twenty

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>five carries. People were clamoring for him. But to go

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>back to my point, you know, sixteen rushes in Seattle's

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>not the reason why they lost. You know, if you're run,

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>if you run for one sixty, you should be able

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to win in the NFL. I still believe that. I'll

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>say it again, I'm so happy that he got involved

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in the passing game. A quote from from Dak really

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>stood out to me after the game because he's like, well,

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>we saw, we saw Zeke matched up one on one

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>with a linebacker and I'll take that match up every day.

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Well can we see it more then? Yeah? Because you can.

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>You can create that. Yeah, like you should be able to.

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's you know again, did create that? Huh? They

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>did create? Yea what I'm saying. But that's but truth,

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Like they can create. I know. That's the thing. And

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about five plays, but what's not on

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>there is the play before the thirty yard is it?

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Thirty yard passed to Zeke the last one of the

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight? Yeah, that one. The play before that, Zeke

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>lines up in the slot, does nothing, just kind of

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>does like a two yard out, turns around nothing. There's

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a pass over the middle, almost intercepted. Next play, same spot,

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>he just runs by the guy. So that was a

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>nice job of kind of setting that up a little

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>bit and go all right, we're gonna put Zeke out there.

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna do anything. And then he goes and

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>they win the game. Wait, and that's awesome, which, as usual,

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I haven't had time to rewatch the game. I plan

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>on doing that. But that's these are things that you're

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>all pro running backs should be doing on a weekly basis,

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's I don't He doesn't need to run the

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>ball thirty times to win, but he needs to touch

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball somewhere around twenty five thirty times, receiving, running

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>all that good stuff. He's that type of back and

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>with the other talent in the skill positions on this offense,

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>he has to be He needs to be this type

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of engine for this team to be good. That being said, yesterday,

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>after the game, he looked like he was beat up

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, and so it begs the question, as everybody

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.719
<v Speaker 1>expects and wants to see more of him because they

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's the necessary thing you have to do.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it practical to assume that the Cowboys can give

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>him thirty touches per game or is he gonna endo

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and him actually be able to make it through a season,

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Because he did not look good after that game. He

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>was he was limping pretty good, and it seemed like

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that was something that happened to him early in the game,

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>so obviously didn't affect his production, but over sixteen weeks,

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of pounding. It was surprising. I mean,

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you've never seen that with Zeke, where you know, he

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>was coming in and out of the game, he was limping.

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>That's not something that we're used to. But he's twenty four.

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay right now. I think he can handle it.

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Especially he hasn't been getting that kind of workload the

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>first three weeks either, so well, you know, and we

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>don't need to talk about what they're gonna do after

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>this season, but you know, there's been some talk about

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>giving him a new contract at the end of this year.

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to take this three years and make it,

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, five more years on top of that, make

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>him an eight year type player And if that happens,

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>then that's something you need to kind of think about

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>on the long haul. Now, there has been some talk

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>about getting him for five years and just see what

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>happens after that, almost running him into the ground, which

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 1>is you know, we had an argument about this on

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>our show. I think back a training camp. I don't

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>think you were on that. Nate was on that Nate.

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It was me and Nate against you, I believe, right, Yeah,

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you know which way did it line up? Nick? Nick

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>is trying to preserve him, and me and Nate were like,

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>he's twenty five or four year old running back, let's go,

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>let's do this. I mean, there's gotta be a combination

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of you know, both in the middle, but you know,

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to be limping like that and still run the you

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>know down the field and make that play. That was

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>probably his Dak's best throw though of the game, don't

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you think. I mean, because this isn't like hearns or

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>gallop that is, that's what they do. They go up

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and make plays that have to be right there. For

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>if it's a running back, you kind of have to

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>put it right there. But see, I think you have

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a really good backup in rod Smith that you're able

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 1>to give Zeke a little bit of rest and helping

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>out where you don't have to rely on Zeek and

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>put all the weight just on him. You can balance

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>it out just enough for just perfectly to where you're

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>giving him a bit of rest but at the same

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>time getting a good amount of production from rod Smith.

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>It's twenty five to six in the carries, but most

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>teams are a lot of teams are going to do

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that in the more of a twenty to eleven twenty

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to ten range. Do you do you want that at

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a rod Smith and Zeke? Because I wis fans would

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>say no. I will say this though, if if I'm

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>getting though, if I'm getting a few more touches for

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Zeke in the passing game, I'm okay with that because

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like right now they're underutilizing him in the

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>passing game. So if they give him a few more

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>touches that happen in the passing game and they take

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a few of those carries that he would normally have

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and give them a rod Smith, I'm all good. I agree,

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.079
<v Speaker 1>And you would like to think he will likely take

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>less of a pounding as a receiver as a runner,

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>which yeah, I mean, this is an awesome start. And

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you can't expect them to have eighty eight in a

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in the passing game every week, but four to

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 1>six receptions for forty to sixty yards per week is

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and can be doable. Like that's every other elite running

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>back in the league does that, um, And so I

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>hope that this is a trend that continues. You know.

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I he had a lot of different stats, a lot

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of milestone yesterday. Like you said, first one to get

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>two hundred yards in a game. But you know, I thought,

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in Cowboy's history, one hundred and fifty yards, that's a

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good day. It's not like unbelievable. It's

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a good day. One hundred and fifty yards, seventy five receiving,

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty rushing, seventy five receiving, and it's

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>never been it's never been done before. I thought that really. Yeah, yeah,

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a good one. Herschel Walker and

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>even Emmett, you know, to have a few screens and

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that door set, you know, but for one

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty you're doing your job as a runner. But then

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>also Emmy had eighty eight. It's amazing, So I thought

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that was a stat that was pretty interesting. Yeah, it's

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>absolutely phenomenal. And that's I mean, as many crazy days

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>as he's had, it says a lot that he's never

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>done something like that, But I look, but also just

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>talks about how much they haven't utilized him in the

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>passing game, which they should. And I don't mean this

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>as disrespect because honestly, I thought there were so many

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>unsung heroes in the passing game. I'm I want to

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>write something about given the small sample size of opportunities

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that he's had, I think the world of the small

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>role that Alan Hearns is playing right now. Like it

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>seems like every catch he makes is contested and it

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>converts a first down. It doesn't look I mean, he's

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>got eighty one receiving yards on the season. It's not

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>like he's heading for the Pro Bowl. But point being,

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>with these types of players in the passing game, I

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>think you need that. And that's what we've talked about

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this whole time is Zeke needs to be playing like

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>this for this offense to function, which that probably says

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>something else about you know when you do well. We

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>knew that, no, exactly, That's how he was built. It

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>was built like that. Yes, right, yes, you have something now.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna say, I looked it up from

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys sister, and you should look up NFL and

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>just see where that would have been. You know, I'm

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>sure it's happened. I'm assuming Marshall Falk has done Probably

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that was a regular stat line. LT's probably done that. Yeah, yeah,

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that's true. All right, Um, let's talk a little bit

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>about a Dak Prescott and just by the by the way,

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a little side note for you guys that are in

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.079
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas area this afternoon, Dak will actually be out

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>here at the Star and available for fans to come out,

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>take pictures, get autographs. He's going to be promoting his

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>new Dak collections, which all the proceeds will go to

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the Faith Finished Fight Foundation that he has in support

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of breast cancer awareness. So he'll be out here from

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>four to five thirty this afternoon if you're in the

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>area and want to come by. But talking about how

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>he played yesterday, he was seventeen of twenty seven, sixty

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>three percent completion rate, two hundred and fifty five yards,

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns, no interceptions, quarterback rating of one hundred and

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>eighteen point six, And I thought, really the highlight of

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>his day in my opinion, was the three downfield throws

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>he had. And the reason why was not so much

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>because obviously one of me connected on that was a

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that was a really big play for them in the

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>game to gallop and obviously the game the play to

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>probably win the game to Zeke downfield. But I was

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>just as impressed with a throw he threw Tavon in

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the end zone because all three of those throws not

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>only their downfield, but they were throws that were right

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>on the money. Even to throw the Tavon Tavon probably

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>should have caught that, it would have been a bit

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of a tough catch. But he put all those throws

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>right where they needed to be, right on the money,

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And to me, that was that started to change my

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>opinion a little bit on what I started to think

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>about Dak from the standpoint of his ability to really

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>be able to be accurate down feel how do you

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>guys feel about his performance and about the ability to

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>get the ball downfield yesterday? I don't think the question

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>has ever been can he do it? I think it's

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>more how constant can he be with it? And we've

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>seen this before. I'm not surprised to see these kinds

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of throws from him because I've seen that happen. The

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>point is how constant can you be? How much longer

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>can you keep doing this for? And to me yesterday,

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited And I was getting a lot of fans

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter last night just talking so much crap still

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>like there's always someone wanting to talk crap of all everything,

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But quit talking crap, enjoy this win. Dad, did good.

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>He made throws. The receivers have some fall and not

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>catching the ball like the table On one. But that

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>was perfect. That basically landed almost in table On sentence.

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it was perfect, but it's it

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>looked perfect. It needs it's well and that. I mean,

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it's in tight coverage. It's dac it's it's not Aaron Rodgers.

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>That's not I mean, he's not gonna just drop it

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in a bucket from forty yards out there. I mean,

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that's not the right receiver to be running that past

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, because he's too little the ball by

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the time the ball gets down to him. Anybody's go

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>up and get that ball. I mean you're five eight,

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>so by the time it comes down into your hands. Yeah,

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>all pro cornerback like Darius Slay is gonna knock it

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>out like that. To me, that's not the right play.

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Great pass, but that's a very low percentage pack. I'd

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>rather throw the ball up to. Rico didn't really knock

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it out. I mean he put his hand in there.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Put his hand, I mean he got in between the

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>player and the ball. He did, and he got it.

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Also one hundred and seventy five pound player, you know

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>who I mean, just that's not Tavon. Austin's thing is

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>to go deep and make that type of contest, to

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>play his plays open field and stuff like that. Good

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>good throw, you know where it needed to be. But

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that they thought they could still win on sleigh and

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he did a nice job of getting back in there.

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the encouraging thing for me and also baffling

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.239
<v Speaker 1>is we didn't see Dak do a single thing that

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>he's never done before. You know, he took what he threw.

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>The ball to Zeke that set up the game winner

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>might be the best throw of his career. It's certainly,

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly in the conversation. But the ball to Tavon

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>was I mean, it was where it needed to be.

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It was a good throw. It wasn't like this just

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable dime. Same thing goes for the gallot ball, like

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>he can be accurate on those throws. He's gallot ball.

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>You didn't think that was a perfect throw. I mean

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>he put it right where he had to get it. It

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a good throw. Like it's not leading Sports Center,

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 1>That's all I'm trying. It was a good throw. I

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>think to me, maybe calling it perfect comes from the

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>fact that we don't see many of this which throws

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>happening from Dak that Aaron Rodgers perfect, And of course

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>not that goes back perfect. That goes back to my point.

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Like Dak's you know, he's got to take three or

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>four of these per game, and you need him to

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>hit on probably half of him, and he did yesterday.

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>But did you okay the Zeke throw, but the gallop throw?

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Was it something you've never seen him do before? Not necessarily,

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>but like Amber said, I don't think I've done it

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>seen with consistency after these last ten, eleven, twelve games.

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the thing that yesterday I felt like for

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>all three of those downfield throws, to me, he placed

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the ball right where he needed to place it. Now, again,

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>some of them aren't going to always those those are

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>hard passes to complete, but especially when the receivers and

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in all three of those instances, except for maybe the

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Zeke one, they were they didn't have a lot of separation.

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:44.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it had to be right on point. And

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that's why I love the gallop throw because although you

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>say it wasn't like this miraculous throw. It was right

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>where it had to be and the defender was only

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>a step behind him. So if it was not placed

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>right in the perfect position, I don't know that he

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>can come up with that catch. I thought his two

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>best plays though, were an incomplete pass in a nine

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>yard throw to Beasley. You know, I thought those that

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>passed to Beasley and it's one of those five plays

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that we talked about, but it's that was a great

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 1>play for by him because he had the patience to

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>wait for Beasley to get open and then he had

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to just revert into some maybe some old baseball playing

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>days and just sidearm that thing in there like that.

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a great throw. That's the kind

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of stuff this, these these deep balls. This is what

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>we see in Patton Go. That's kind of what they do.

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Get the ball, throw it, but when things break down,

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>what can you do in the pocket like that? I

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>completely sorry, go ahead and I just say that to me.

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>The nine yard throw to Beasley to set up fourth

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and one, I thought that was really big. I completely

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't agree more. And the deep ball is in

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>a crucial element of football. You gotta be able to

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>hit him and more importantly, you got to take the shots.

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Like they didn't throw down field once against Seattle. They

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't even try. That's worth mentioning and criticizing. But like

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it's four or five throws a game. I don't care

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>about that remotely as much as I care about that

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>setting up the fourth and one to convert. And then

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, how about second and eleven where it looked

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>like it might be going south and he finds Beasley

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>for nineteen yards, Like having the the poise to hang

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in there and make those types of throw like, that's

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>what keeps this offense moving, not these deep shots. Again,

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it's important, there's a place for it, but to make

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>those types of decisions. And then yeah, I mean, I

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>can't believe we got almost twenty minutes into the show

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't talked about that throwaway. I mean, the

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>game's over if he doesn't get that ball, and even

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>if he just falls on it, the game's still probably

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>over because now it's second or third and which is

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty something, which is what I think they teach you

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to do. You know, it's fallowing the ball down there.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>We've been used to watching Tony Romo's years, so we

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>don't assume that we assume you pick it up and

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you try to make a play second and three from

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas thirty two. Dak recovers at the nineteen. So

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>if he just falls on the ball, you're talking about

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>like second and third and seventh done, you have to

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>call time out, which they're pinning there. They're pinning their

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>years back on the third down, you're just gonna have

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to throw up a prayer instead. You know, I hesitate

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to compare it to Romo because Romo did some crazy

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff in situation. Saint Louis is what comes to mind,

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>But I mean the wherewithal the game's over if he

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play that exactly the way he did, and for

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>him to have the poise to do it was incredible.

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's take our first break. When we come back, I

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 1>do want to talk about this defense. It was the

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>first time that we've seen them this season where it

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>looked like they were a little bit more on the

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>ropes than they've been so far in the first three games.

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that when we come right back. This

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 1>is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. If you're like me

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and you love I mean, if you have a thing,

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>then cutting the chord is scary. But then I found

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>out I could switch to direct TV Now and still

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>get the live sports I love. No satellite needed, no

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>bulky hardware, no annual contract, just that the live sports

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>you love. Tried direct TV Now for ten dollars a

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>month for three months. Visit DirecTV now dot com Direct

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>tv now more for your thing. That's our thing us

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>called real deal, limited time price, a little litle page

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a few months when his monthday full price currently mad

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 1>him forty dollars and less. Can Prices may change you.

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Subscribers on cancel any time. Content varies by package and

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>may be limited districts apply. Star Sports Tours is the

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 1>only official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys, offering

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>exclusive game weekend travel packages with sideline access and photo

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>ops with current players, alumni and cheerleaders. That's not all, though,

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 1>You'll get to talk xs and those with Senior Director

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of Player Personnel Will McClay and of course with yours truly, me,

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Brian broad Us. You can trust the official fan travel

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>partner of the Dallas Cowboys, and with us you'll travel

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>like a pro. Visit Cowboys Travel dot com to book

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>your travel package today. Want to use what the pros use.

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>How about the official men skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black. Right now, you can get the Jack Black Playmaker,

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks with free shipping. The Playmaker includes four Jack

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Black skincare favorites, plus a full sized Intense Therapy lip

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>bomb and a Cowboys can cooler. Go to get Jack

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Black dot com slash Cowboys and use the code word

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys The Jack Black Playmaker ten bucks free shipping. While

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a player can look good on paper, it's when he's

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>out on the field that you really find out what

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>he's made of. That's why the Cowboys rely on more

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>than stats and scouting reports when building their team. When

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 1>picking a tractor, it's why you should rely on more

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.959
<v Speaker 1>than specs and features as well. You gotta take it

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>out and put it to the test that Cowboys did

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>when they named John Deer their official tractor. To experience

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>one for yourself, visit your local Texas John Deer dealer

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>or go to my John Deer Dealer dot com slash football.

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Break Welcome Back. It is the second

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>segment of The Break Live from the s WBC Mortgage

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>studios at the Star talk about the Cowboys big win yesterday,

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty six, twenty four at AT and T Stadium over

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit Lions. We've talked about the offense quite a bit.

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's move over to the defensive side of the ball

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'll start first with the quarterback Matthew Stafford. He

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was twenty four thirty eighty percent completion rate. That's a

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>really really great number. Three hundred and seven yards, two touchdowns,

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>no interceptions, one hundred and thirty one point five quarterback rating.

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>All in all a good day. You look at his

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>three top wide receivers. Golden Tate had eight catches one

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty two yards, two touchdowns, Kenny Galladay had

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>four catches for seventy four yards, and then Marvin Jones

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>had three for fifty six. All in all, the passing

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>game for the Lions worked yesterday. That was that was

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a part that really worked. And my question for you

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>guys is what did you think of that relative to

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys secondary where so far this year we haven't

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>really seen them get carved up quite like this, but

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>they were having some struggles yesterday. Ben but don't break

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is what they try to play. They broke a few times,

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know, they the Lions made themselves, I think

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 1>one dimensional. You know, they had a thirty two yard

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>run early in the game and carry on Johnson and

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it looked like the Okay, it's gonna be tough. That

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>was their first played again. Yeah, this is gonna be something.

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, Now, Stafford's gonna have some help here, and

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they didn't. They didn't utilize that as much. I mean

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>only got nine carries overall, and so I think that,

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were somewhat one dimensional and when they

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>got they got down there, and that the Cowboys did

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a nice job of just picking their spots and getting

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>some timely sacks. I mean, it was just it was

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>just one of those shootouts, not like high scoring shootouts,

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>but it was one of those games where you know,

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback who has the ball ass is gonna win.

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And the Cowboys were probably fortunate that that touchdown came

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>with two seventeen to go and not under the two

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>minute warning. That's yeah, I mean we say that. That's

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>my biggest pet peeve, like the Cowboys leave the opposing

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterback too much time. The Lions did it yesterday. I

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It seems ridiculous that carry On Johnson only

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>had had nine carries, But I mean, I thought the

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>run defense did a good job of really buckling down

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>after I mean thirty two yards on the first play.

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>The next one goes for four, then negative one, then one,

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>then three, which no, no disrespect to him. I don't

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>know why they're trying to make la Garrett blunt a

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:54.959
<v Speaker 1>thing when they have Carrie on Johnson, like I mean,

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>unless it's like the goal line. I like that guy

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but I don't know when Maybe they just

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>when you have that match, a favorable matchup like that.

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they were doing whatever they wanted to through

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the air, so maybe they could have tried to wear

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the defense down little bit more running it. But it's

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>hard to argue against the numbers that they put up,

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>which ironically, I thought Cheeto and Byron both played really well. Yep,

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and begs the question who didn't everybody else? Everybody? I

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>think this kind of defense works against this kind of

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and this kind of passing game. Only when your

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 1>own offense he's able to help you out. I think

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 1>they can do enough to kind of stop it in

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a way. Obviously they're still going to allow certain points,

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>but it only helps you win when your office is

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>also scoring points and helping you keep the game moving.

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>But we'll see how long this offense can play like this,

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and if they keep playing better and helping out the defense,

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the team can be really good, good enough

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to get where we all want them to be at.

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>So are you concerned about the defense at this point?

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Or was this the result of maybe just a really

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>good passing offense they ran into and and they didn't

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>get I don't want to because I don't want to

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>overstate this. It wasn't like they got destroyed. In my opinion,

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought the defense played okay. It just wasn't as

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>good as what they've played maybe in some other games

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this season. But I thought they played okay. What do

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys think from a standpoint of just relatively speaking

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and big picture speaking about this defense, Well, I think

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that they're they're pretty good. They are pretty good, and

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>they've got some some playmakers there, especially with DeMarcus DeMarcus Lawrence. UM,

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. I mean, today is the first day that um,

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>David Irvinge can come back. I'm not sure exactly what

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>his role is going to be or if if he's

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>even going to be on the roster this week. I

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>believe they have a one week they do, you have

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a one week exemption. If they feel like he's not ready,

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>they can wait a week and so they don't have

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to make a move. They just he did have him

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in the building and start getting macclimated. And that's important

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>because of what happened to Antoine Woods. He's hurt and

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he'll be able to play next week.

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>He was injury, calf injury and a big guy like

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 1>that as a calf injury, that's he's ruled out of

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the game. It could be somewhat, you know, somewhat serious

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>enough for he might not play. I think Jerry even

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>said he won't play next week. He said he doesn't

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 1>know if he'll be available, doesn't know if so, well

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>for Jerry to say that, right and to say that,

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>to get Irving on the team, you're gonna have to

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>cut someone. So who do you cut? And knowing that

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to not only replace Woods, you know, I

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of it. Does it does Woods? But

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it does beg the question or Terrence Williams did not

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>play this he was not active this week, did not

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>practice at the end of last week, and this was

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>not injury related. By Butler also got a grand total

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of no snap. No, I get it. But I'm just

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>saying that the fact that that all came about at

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the end of last week and going into the game

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday, does that beg the question that maybe there's

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:01.719
<v Speaker 1>something afoot there? Maybe? Sure, it sounds good, an easy move, right,

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying it's logical at that point. Right, Well,

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we've covered this extensively, haven't we am. I don't know logical. Actually,

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not practical either. Right now, just to cut him,

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>let's see what happens. Remember he counts about three million

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>right now. If you cut him, he counts five. There's

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>no reason to do that, Capri. You do unless you're

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna you're not wrong, you're not wrong. Then make a

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>trade for who I mean, let's we can go. We

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>can going into what we've been talking about for the

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>last They could you know, they could flip a seventh

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>round pick or something like that over to uh him.

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk about that tomorrow actually, because I do

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>want to kind of wrap this whole safety thing up.

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Dave show me some numbers a day that just kind

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of blow your mind. But we're gonna talk about that tomorrow.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's save the whole safety conversation. Well, all right, let's

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>say if you want to. But I mean, I was

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, do I have to say it because the

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>safeties didn't look good yesterday? No, we I want to

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about our safety. That was actually gonna be the

0:29:57.880 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>next direction I went. But I'm talking about the other stuff.

0:29:59.840 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>You appear to have two cornerbacks who can play on

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the boundary and do a good job. I'm I don't

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>know the numbers. I know Cheeto gave up some catches.

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I defy you to tell me what he could have

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.719
<v Speaker 1>done better in most of those situations. Those are all

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>covered well Byron Jones, you know ESPN. I'm not saying

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're the end all be all. I think we

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>probably know this team much better than they do. But

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>they gave him the most improved Player in the Year

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in the League award through a quarter of the season

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Byron Yes, So I can't argue that these two corners

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>are playing really well. I don't know about literally anybody

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>else in the secondary. I've long been a defender of

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Heath. I think it is well worth pointing out

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that he's dealing with about four different injuries right now,

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>but he was still on the field. I mean, if

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you yesterday was not a good day. If you can

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>get on the field, I can't completely. I mean, I

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>get it. Everybody's fighting through injuries. I understand that, but

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>he had I mean, he was named the starter at

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the start of last season, and I think that was

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>probably his worst game in that time stretch where he

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>was named a starter. I mean, the play on the

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>sideline on Tait's first touchdown is on. I mean, it

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>sounds who's the sideline? Right? It sounds stupid, like you know,

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we're like, oh, I could have made that play, Like, no,

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't. You're not in the NFL. If a lot

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of people probably could have made that play, Like you

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>just have to shove him out of bounds. Not a

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>great day. I mean, what do you want to what

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>do you want me to say? Amber, Like, we've been

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about these safeties since March y. It looks troubling this.

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I always say Rod Marinelli's defenses are so good at

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>not giving up chunk touchdowns. They don't do it very often. Well,

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that's three in two games. That's not good. That's a

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>troubling trend. I really told you the safety doesn't really

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 1>matter clearly, I mean not at all. So that's how

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's how eighteen yard completions turn into forty

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>five yard touchdowns straight up. Well, we'll save the conversation

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on what they can do to try to address that

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>till tomorrow, because I think there's there's definitely some conversation

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>we had there about what they could have done versus

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>what's available to them now. But let's move on. Let's

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about de Marcus Lawrence. Yesterday he had eight tackles,

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>He led the team in tackles at least at the

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>initial outset, and then had three sacks. He is playing

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>phenomenally this year again after the second year, and it's

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>just to me, it's just amazing. Talk about DeMarcus Lawrence

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and what he's providing for this defensive to Well, I

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>mean they didn't, like I said, I don't think they

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>had a ton of pass for rush yesterday, but he did.

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he had an unbelievable game. I think he

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a lot of help. I think Tyrone Crawford

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>played well from the middle, but you know, we're not

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing really a lot out of Gregory Tacos okay, So

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>for him to be able to kind of do it

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>all by himself yesterday, I thought that was what was

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>really big. I mean, he's I would throw Tyrone in

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>there too. I just thought he played also too. He

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>had a really good game hidden hidden stats, you know,

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>when you played defensive tackle. I think he was disruptive,

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>But I agree with the overall point. I mean, hey,

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm guilty. I jumped on that Randy Gregory hype train

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>super hard in the preseas season and I'm so surprised,

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I keep watching and it's like he completely disappeared.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And before coming into the regular season, we were talking

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>about him like, oh my god, this beast guy is

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>just gonna come in here and kill every quarterback. Hey

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you no, we I mean we go, we go based

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>on what we see against this team, like, well, he's

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>beating Tyron Smith regularly, That's that's amazing. Well, Tyron Smith

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>has not had the best first month of his career,

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>so it's all stuff to keep in mind. Um yeah,

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think Taco has been fine. Tyrone had

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a good game, but DeMarcus Lawrence is insane. I actually

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I asked Jerry Jones last night. I was like, I

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>was like, are you starting to think about the fact

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>at all that you're probably gonna have to talk about

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>some pretty big numbers with him soon? And Jerry was like, well,

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>his number's pretty big right now. And I was like,

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you're right, And in the back of my in my head,

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I was like, it's gonna be bigger. It's gonna be bigger.

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be bigger. So it's I mean, five and

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a half sacks, he leads the league. He's got twenty

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in his last twenty games. Not to get too far

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>into that, but the good thing about that when he

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>says that his number is really big right now it's

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>seventeen million, it's because that's that's important, because it's sitting

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.240
<v Speaker 1>there on the cap. And next year, like his cap number,

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it'll say they signed him to this monster. It won't

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>be seventeen million, you know, so you have it now

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 1>you're absorbing it. It'll be less than that and you'll

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>still get a really big number. I agree, and I

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>hope you're right. It's only week four. We'll see, but

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:27.479
<v Speaker 1>I hope, I hope they don't try to play tag

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>with him again. No, get it, well, you saw it.

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 1>You saw it happened there in with the Rams. I

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>mean they did that how many times, like two or

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>three years. Yeah, and that was the best defensive player

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:38.879
<v Speaker 1>in the league. That's what I'm in the league when

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they I mean, whether it's fair or not, whether he's

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>as good as a player or not. When it comes

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:46.760
<v Speaker 1>time to talk contract with the Marcus Lawrence, he's looking

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:48.879
<v Speaker 1>like he's going to have the resume to ask for

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Leo macmoney and it's up to the Cowboys if they

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 1>want to pay that. I mean, he's done everything that

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 1>you've wanted a franchise player to be. I mean, like

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>he signed it immediately. He's not playing around. He didn't

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>he didn't know, he didn't make it make an issue

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>out of it. He's still a leader. He doesn't look

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>like he's just sitting on a one year deal. He doesn't.

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's he's upset about losing. I mean, he

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.919
<v Speaker 1>wants to win um and I just think it's it's

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 1>he's done in everything right. He's playing under he's playing well,

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that they reward him. They only only need it,

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>but he's deserved it. Talk about leadership, just the way

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>he kind of pulls that hole, oh yeah, defensive line

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>together and and creates that bond, creates that that camaraderie,

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>creates whatever it is that makes teams work. True, Like

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>he is really you can see you can see his leadership.

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>You really can't. Yeah, and that you're right about that.

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how else would we be interviewing Daniel Ross

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. I mean, like, but they're they're

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in the group. You know, they're in the club. So

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>like he's put him in there and he's and he

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>made sure, hey change your number here, or do this,

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>let's be all together. I mean, he's done it. But

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the best part is he's going out and getting three

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 1>sacks on that there we go, and that that's the

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>first stop. But we've seen guys that have produced and

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>not they weren't those kind of leaders like they could

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>produce and you could say, follow me, Marcus. I mean,

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>DeMarcus wasn't that kind of right, was a great player,

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>extremely great gay, He wasn't that kind of leader you right,

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I would even say and I don't mean this as

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a knock at all, but like Jason Witten and Sean Lee,

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they're they're tremendous leaders, they have tremendous passion, but it

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>still feels like different, Like it's like there's a respect there,

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>but they're kind of older and stuffy in a way. Like,

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, like DeMarcus Lawrence is one of the guys.

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>He's he is fun, he's one of the guys. He

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is you know, he's a guy that Antoine Woods, who's

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, barely made the team as an undrafted guy,

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Like he feels just as comfortable with him as Taco,

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>who's a first round pick. I think it's a fun,

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>different sort of leadership to see from what we've been

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>used to with guys like Witten. That's interesting that you

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>say that, because do you think DeMarcus Lawrence really wants

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Taco to have like six or seven sacks? Eight sacks?

0:36:57.160 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Be really good? Yeah? I did too, I think so

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:05.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think it never wanted Gavin escobardt or Facano

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:08.919
<v Speaker 1>mean just keep going down the list. I mean it's

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:11.879
<v Speaker 1>a different dynamic, you know, obviously because you can only

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have one well, no, you can have more than one.

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Tight end on the field. But yeah, yeah, they do

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>actually love that. Yeah, yeah, it's but those are the

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>best kind of leaders when they put themselves within the

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>group and not a little step above you. And DeMarcus

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 1>he's amazing, pure entertainment on the field off the field,

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and he has a kind of energy that is absolutely contagious.

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:38.879
<v Speaker 1>There's no way that you're around him and you're not better.

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>He's yea quote, yes, oh yeah, which the quote DeMarcus

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence does not care if there's a camera in his

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>face or not. No, he doesn't. Somebody, you know, we

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>were talking to him and somebody was like, are you

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:54.720
<v Speaker 1>keeping track? He the Lions have given up three sacks

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>this season? He had three, so we're like, you know,

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>are you keeping tracktoring the course of the game, Like, oh,

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that's two, that's three, And he's like, I don't pay

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:03.760
<v Speaker 1>attention to that. I know when I drag a person's

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>in the dirt. Except he doesn't censor himself. He never does.

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>He never does. He's been rhymes with my name. Yeah,

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:16.439
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, they drafted him thirty fourth overall, he's

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty much been good from the minute they got him.

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>He got hurt as a rookie, playoff sacks as a rookie,

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>had eight sacks when he had Greg Hardy helped him

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>out in his second year, played through injuries. But like

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>so he's been good this whole time. But like it's

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>he is a revelation on what he has become. Like

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know that I ever expected him to

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 1>be like a cornerstone type of player, but that's certainly

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>what he is. And it's not even just the defensive line.

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he takes ownership with that defense. Yeah, last

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 1>night in the locker room, latent vander Esch was over

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>giving an interview. Of course, there was a bunch of media,

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 1>so Tyrone Crawford's given him, giving him a lot of

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>flak about the fact that there's a bunch of people

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:55.839
<v Speaker 1>around him. And then him comes to Marcus. He runs

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>over there and gets behind him and he's like, way

0:38:58.239 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 1>to go, young fella. You know, it's just kind of

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 1>that you could tell there was a certain level of

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 1>respect that Leyton had for DeMarcus when he was standing

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 1>there beside him, because the question actually that he just

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 1>answered was about DeMarcus and how much DeMarcus helps the

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>rest of the defense. But there's just you. I mean,

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 1>you nailed it. You can tell that the rest of

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that defense, how much they rest. It's not just for

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the cameras, because we've seen situations where it's kind of like, yeah,

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>he's our leader, and then the cameras are off in

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the eyes kind of roll. Right, you've seen that before.

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really genuine. These guys really respect him

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, and he plays like that, and so they

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>command He commands that respect, right. All right, So let's

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 1>take our final break. Let's come back. We're gonna get

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 1>into the five plays of the game that you should

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:40.399
<v Speaker 1>not miss. Nick wrote an article as he does every

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Sunday following the game, and we'll talk about those those

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>plays when we come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Radio. Well, a player can look good on paper,

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it's when he's out on the field that you really

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>find out what he's made of. That's why the Cowboys

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 1>rely on more than staffs and scouting reports when building

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>their team. When picking a tractor, it's why you should

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>rely on more than specs and features as well. You

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>got to take it out and put it to the test.

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys did when they named John Deer their official tractor.

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>To experience one for yourself, visit your local Texas John

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Deer Dealer or go to my John Deer Dealer dot

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:18.359
<v Speaker 1>com slash football. Want to use what the pros use?

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>How about the official men skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black. Right now you can get the Jack Black Playmaker,

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks with free shipping. The Playmaker includes four Jack

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Black skincare favorites, plus a full sized intense Therapy lip

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 1>bomb and a Cowboys can cooler. Go to get Jack

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Black dot com slash Cowboys and use the code word Cowboys.

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>The Jack Black Playmaker ten bucks free shipping. Star Sports

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Tours is the only official fan travel partner of the

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend travel packages with sideline

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>access and photo ops with current players, alumni and cheerleaders.

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>That's not all, though, You'll get to talk x's and

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 1>those with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will McClay and

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 1>of course with yours truly, me, Brian broad Us. You

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:08.240
<v Speaker 1>can trust the official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and with us you'll travel like a pro Visit Cowboys

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Travel dot com to book your travel package today. A

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>man's stepson doesn't just protect him from life's elements, it

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 1>projects an unstoppable and legendary spirit, just like the men

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>wearing silver and navy on the field every Sunday. Since

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty five, Stetson hats are American made with pride

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>right here in Texas. They are still the official crown

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of all self prospecting Cowboys, and Stetson is proud to

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>be on the field with America's team. Find steps and

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>hats in the pro Shop or at Stetson dot com today.

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Back to the break Crack's time is when you've got

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 1>to stay cool, bred Maher and nobody's better at keeping

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you cool under pressure than Tommy John. Tommy John's underwears

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and moisture wicking fabrics to keep germs and perspiration at

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>bay means no discomfort, no adjustment, Tommy John, No had

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:05.320
<v Speaker 1>just been needed. Tommy John dot com Forward slash Cowboys

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 1>get twenty percent off your first order Tommy John dot

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 1>com Forward slash Cowboys go get some good underwear. Thank you, Nick,

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday wasn't a Tommy John Cowboys Day. Wasn't. I'm not

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 1>doing that anymore. That doesn't work. That's bad luck for yesterday.

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Superstitions aren't real. Just so y'all know. Yeah, they're real

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>for some people. I don't like. I don't like that anyways, though,

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 1>not doing that anymore, but just not for me. But

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>for fans do it. I love them. They felt great. Yeah,

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:37.839
<v Speaker 1>we just do it. Go go Cowboys all the way

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:41.800
<v Speaker 1>from top to bottom. Dak Prescott's performance is not determined

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.840
<v Speaker 1>by what kind of underwear you're wearing or what jersey

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you were in the game. Yes, I am positive about that.

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 1>It'll like, let your mind be free. You know, it's

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:55.839
<v Speaker 1>not so probably Okay, all right, all right, let's get

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>back into it. We gotta talk about these five plays. Nick,

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that's my sheet, leave it alone. Let's talk about these

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>five plays. Let's see if Nick can remember the five plays,

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:06.239
<v Speaker 1>you can remember the score of the Texans from two

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:09.439
<v Speaker 1>thousand and two seineteen to ten. See, one of these days,

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a challenge on this show. We're going

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 1>to just throw dates out at Nick, like Cowboys on

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>this day. Make sure they're not in the last three

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:19.359
<v Speaker 1>years because I don't know. And we'll let Nick just

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:23.240
<v Speaker 1>say the score and amazed fans. It's amazing. Go ahead,

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 1>all right. So five plays. These were the five plays

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>yesterday that you should not miss because they had a

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:30.919
<v Speaker 1>bigger impact on the game than you may have fought

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Let's start with the first one. Lions

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>failed to pin Cowboys deep. Nick tell us what happened. Well,

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it was the first drive of the game for the

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Lions. They got down inside the fifty, punted,

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>looked like they got the ball down on the one

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>yard line, and then I don't know exactly the player's name,

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>but his toe was right there on the end touchback.

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 1>How the significant is that cowboy was getting nine yards

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 1>on the next dray And if and if they're conservative

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>at the twenty, they're gonna be conservative at the one.

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be punting out of that and instead of

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 1>the Lions getting the next posession of the thirty, they

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 1>probably get it in midfield. That's that's a field goal

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 1>at least right there, just those inches right there, So

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a big one. Yep, that's a

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>huge room, all right. Next one dlog gets to Stafford

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 1>before half. They're driving right before halftime, and they you know,

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they weren't like the forty five yard line. They got

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a minute thirteen to go and a nine yard sack

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:21.319
<v Speaker 1>there just changed the whole, you know, outlook for what

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the Lions were trying to do. They had an easy

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 1>chance to go down and get a field goal and

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 1>they needed fifteen twenty more yards. By doing that, now

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you wonder did the Cowboys want to be aggressive to

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>get the ball back? It just kind of set them

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 1>on their heels a little bit. I thought that was

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>they needed a defensive stop big time there. That's one

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of the interesting things here too, is DeMarcus Lawrence. It's

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:42.320
<v Speaker 1>not just sacks, it's sacks in moments and games kindly

0:44:42.400 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>need them Like that was always one of the big

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Knox people would have for DeMarcus. He get these sacks

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 1>and it was like, was it really changed the game?

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Were you really? Were you getting sacks when you needed them?

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 1>M I kind of disagreed a little bit at the

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:55.040
<v Speaker 1>time because I thought there were some games where he

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>made some of those. But I think DeMarcus Lawrence, you

0:44:57.040 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>see that quite a bit. When you need a sack,

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>need a plus a guy that goes and get you

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 1>one deftly. Let's talk about Dak finds Beasley near the

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:05.920
<v Speaker 1>end zone, you know, third and ten on the twelve

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 1>yard line, and he's got some pressure and he's side

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:11.919
<v Speaker 1>arms to Beasley, and Beasley did a nice job too

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.879
<v Speaker 1>of stretching it out everything. He's got to get nine

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>yards and get close to that. They don't kick, they

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:19.200
<v Speaker 1>kick a field goal there. For sure. It's I think

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty to seventeen. I believe it's the school. No, no no, no, no,

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's actually thirteen to ten at that point, and

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>they're definitely gonna kick a field goal to make it

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:31.359
<v Speaker 1>sixteen to ten if they don't get that. But fourth

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>and one on the two different different possession for sure,

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Jarwin's fumble recovery actually should have been on there too,

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 1>because that was a huge fumble recovery because yes, you

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 1>don't get the touchdown, but if the Lions would have

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>got it at the touchback, so that was actually a

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 1>big player there, huge all right, and Lions penalty leads

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to field goal. It was right, it was twenty to

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen Cowboys. It was that drive that everyone you know

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 1>hates when they got down on the goal line. But

0:45:57.680 --> 0:45:59.919
<v Speaker 1>third and seven. I think, like at the forty five,

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:03.479
<v Speaker 1>I've throwed a gallop incomplete, the Lions lined off, lined

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:06.360
<v Speaker 1>up offside, Eli Harold. Now it's third and two. What

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna do with it? Zeke? First down, they drive.

0:46:09.120 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Of course they don't get the touchdown, but they still

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 1>get a field goal and take some time off the clock.

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 1>It would have been a different game because then if

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:17.719
<v Speaker 1>you don't get that field goal, I mean you're down

0:46:17.800 --> 0:46:19.799
<v Speaker 1>by four if the Lion score. So that one was big,

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:22.439
<v Speaker 1>and then the fifth one was we already talked about.

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:24.400
<v Speaker 1>It was just don't forget how important it was for

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Dak to pick up that fumble, roll out there and

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 1>may keep it at third and three. I said this yesterday,

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but it really. I mean, football is so amazing because

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, spend eight months talking about it and then

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it boils down to like sixty five snaps on a Sunday.

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And if deshan Hand comes up from that play a

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit differently and sees the ball, or if it

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:49.920
<v Speaker 1>just bounces differently hitting the ground, it not I mean

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 1>not only anything. Game's over. Cowboys are one in three.

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about how they ignored Ezekiel Elliott on the

0:46:56.560 --> 0:46:58.839
<v Speaker 1>four yard line against the worst run defense in the league,

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 1>which is still stupid. By the way, that's because they

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 1>won through Rico and through it to Rico against I'm

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 1>not against either. I'm against it in the sense that

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>if the guy can only come into the game in

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:12.440
<v Speaker 1>one scenario and the defense knows what's coming, is it

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:15.880
<v Speaker 1>really that useful. He played, Yeah, he played more no, no no, no,

0:47:15.880 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'm talking about specifically when you throw the fade

0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to him, like I just see you're telegraphing it. That

0:47:22.160 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>had some great throws. That one was not. That one

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:27.880
<v Speaker 1>was fastball that I mean, you're not going to hit

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the scoreboards it up there, And honestly, they got what

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:33.720
<v Speaker 1>they wanted. They got him isolated on a smaller player.

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what they're trying to do on that play. So

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:39.479
<v Speaker 1>the fact is the play call was the right play call.

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>The problem was they didn't connect on it. And that

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to me, when you don't connect on that kind of play,

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:46.839
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's about the fact that you obviously haven't

0:47:46.840 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 1>done that enough. That should be muscle memory. That kind

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 1>of play needs to be muscle memory to where I

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:54.279
<v Speaker 1>know when I throw it to the end zone, to

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 1>this guy, because he's bigger than the other guy. I

0:47:56.840 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 1>know exactly where to place it. He knows exactly where

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be. He can go up, he can secure

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the ball touchdown. Like to me, that's just about practicing

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that more because they got what they wanted out of

0:48:06.960 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the play. I can't go there with you, which you know,

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I even what I've heard people talk about it, like

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of Super Bowl forty nine. You know, the

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Mike the Malcolm Butler pick. The Seahawks should have run clearly,

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 1>But you can even convince me like an NFL defense

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that's geared up for that call is going to stop

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it every time. I understand it's hard, but four yard line,

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 1>worst run defense in the league. Second down, second down,

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 1>second Yeah, let's exactly. I refuse to believe it's not

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>as easy as just running it three times. You will score.

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Even if it takes till fourth down, you will score.

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not at all saying that I prefer to throw

0:48:39.000 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it to Rico over running the ball. What I'm saying, though,

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>is I don't think and this could have come in

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 1>another point in the game. My point is that when

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you get in that situation, if you've get that. If

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you get that matchup where you can isolate Rico with

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:53.959
<v Speaker 1>a smaller guy, that's still a good play call. Now, yeah,

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you're right. If you're lined up there at the four

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the way that game was going against this rush defense,

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>run the ball all day. I get second, run the

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 1>ball all day. But they're gonna be teams that are

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:04.879
<v Speaker 1>better running defenses where I think that played a Rico

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:07.799
<v Speaker 1>becomes a viable option if they can get to the

0:49:07.800 --> 0:49:13.439
<v Speaker 1>point where it is a run in practice, not nutcutting time.

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 1>To mean that second and four, that when he rolled

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>out and threw as I called it, a mini hall Mary,

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean to swam any hill Mary gallop. They're all in.

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like, what why that play? That's the one

0:49:26.040 --> 0:49:29.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't like. Third and four your higher percentage. I mean,

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:31.320
<v Speaker 1>letting the guy go up there and get a rebound.

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:32.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what we should have done, Like get up there

0:49:32.960 --> 0:49:34.640
<v Speaker 1>so we can get a rebound. But second and four,

0:49:34.760 --> 0:49:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that one, that play was bad, And you're right, if

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:39.359
<v Speaker 1>they don't win that game, that's exactly what that's what

0:49:39.400 --> 0:49:41.279
<v Speaker 1>we're reading. That's what we would have talked about for

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the first half hour instead of waiting until there's ten

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:46.160
<v Speaker 1>minutes left in the show, which but again, that's it's

0:49:46.200 --> 0:49:48.680
<v Speaker 1>so I mean, it's it's agonizing, but it's so much

0:49:48.760 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>fun because literally, if Dak doesn't feel that ball the

0:49:51.960 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 1>way he's supposed to, we're talking hot seat, we're talking

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:57.440
<v Speaker 1>play calling, we're talking like, oh, Dak was better, but

0:49:57.480 --> 0:49:59.879
<v Speaker 1>it still wasn't good enough. You know, the sky would

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent be falling on the third d or no,

0:50:03.920 --> 0:50:07.320
<v Speaker 1>after the fumble recovery by Jarwin, now it's first and

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 1>goal on the one yard line, two yard line. You

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:12.919
<v Speaker 1>know they actually went they took Rico out of the game,

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:17.239
<v Speaker 1>put in Cameron Fleming as a backup tackle to be,

0:50:17.520 --> 0:50:19.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, your third tight end, and then they throw

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it to Swim for the touchdown. So you know that

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not always Rico down. There is the third tight

0:50:24.800 --> 0:50:26.920
<v Speaker 1>end that Cameron Fleming was the third tight end. Funny

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:28.879
<v Speaker 1>this is I feel like this is something you would say,

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 1>but I just think it's funny, Like Jeff Swaims scored

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 1>his first career touchdown, but all three of the tight

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:36.960
<v Speaker 1>ends had a shot at their first career touchdown because

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought Jarwin scored on the fumble and then obviously

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Rico had a chance at that fade. So just you

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 1>did not like that rule. You're like, that's a dumb rule.

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It is a dumb it's a stupid run and get it.

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I understand, like, you know, you know, I think about

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the Jimmy Graham play that what was that like twenty ten,

0:50:53.719 --> 0:50:57.920
<v Speaker 1>yeah or twenty eleven. Yeah. I can understand the point,

0:50:57.920 --> 0:51:00.279
<v Speaker 1>but like, I don't know, it's just it seems arbitry,

0:51:00.360 --> 0:51:02.920
<v Speaker 1>like if it's fumbled backward then it's legal, but if

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it's fumbled forward then it's dead and blah blah, like

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:08.279
<v Speaker 1>that's stupid. I can just see like for instance, the

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, I don't even know if that was fourth down,

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:13.680
<v Speaker 1>probably wasn't. I'm talking about the Rams and Titans where

0:51:13.680 --> 0:51:15.719
<v Speaker 1>that guy catches a slant and he's going for the

0:51:15.800 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 1>end zone and he's tackled and it's like, fumble it

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:19.759
<v Speaker 1>into the end zone. Then it's like you know what

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course, why why can't you just do

0:51:21.600 --> 0:51:23.919
<v Speaker 1>that on third down? Well? Because but the thing about

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:26.759
<v Speaker 1>is if it's a if it's a Ford fumble, then

0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that's if he's passed a line of scrimmage, that's equivalent

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to an illegal pass, right, Well, yeah, I mean that's

0:51:32.719 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>my point, Like, that's that's probably why the rule is

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 1>But that's what I I say, that's probably why the rule

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:39.359
<v Speaker 1>is in place, probably and yeah, because I mean it

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:42.280
<v Speaker 1>can swing it like that Saints Cowboys game is crazy.

0:51:42.320 --> 0:51:45.280
<v Speaker 1>The Saints gained like forty yards on a fumble. But

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>but if that's third down, it's a touchdown by Jarwin. Yeah.

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:51.880
<v Speaker 1>But it's just it's weird that, you know, like you

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 1>should be able to go back and review like, Okay,

0:51:53.560 --> 0:51:55.920
<v Speaker 1>did he do it on purpose? No? All right? I

0:51:55.920 --> 0:51:57.879
<v Speaker 1>mean if you can review a football move, why can't

0:51:57.920 --> 0:52:00.239
<v Speaker 1>you review that like it's popped up in the I

0:52:00.280 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 1>mean talk about how bad you know, we're talking about

0:52:04.080 --> 0:52:06.759
<v Speaker 1>how Zeke last week had a really good performance, but

0:52:06.800 --> 0:52:09.480
<v Speaker 1>he had the miscuse. Yeah, you know that could have

0:52:09.480 --> 0:52:12.400
<v Speaker 1>been that could have been disastrous. It could have been disastrous.

0:52:12.760 --> 0:52:14.880
<v Speaker 1>One other thing I did want to hit on. We

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit about Sean Lee. The linebackers though

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 1>yesterday I thought played really well between Jalen Smith and

0:52:21.440 --> 0:52:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Layton vander Esh. I think Jalen had seven seven tackles,

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Layton had six. They seem to be moving around the

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 1>field really well. It didn't seem like there were a

0:52:31.640 --> 0:52:34.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of ill effects from not having Sean Lee there.

0:52:34.400 --> 0:52:37.160
<v Speaker 1>But when you think about the grant the overall perspective,

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't think the defense played as well yesterday as

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 1>they half Pitt played before. Do you think that maybe

0:52:42.480 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 1>there is a part of that is because they didn't

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>have Shaun Lee on the field. Yeah, absolutely, you don't

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 1>have an All Pro player. I mean there's only two

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 1>All pros on this defense, and Shaun Lee is one

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of them. So yeah, it's not good. And you know,

0:52:56.560 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 1>they went away from the run, as Nick pointed out,

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 1>but they were I mean they averaged five yards per carry,

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 1>so it certainly it was not an amazing effort. I Oh,

0:53:05.080 --> 0:53:07.400
<v Speaker 1>like I judge linebackers just in the flow of the

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:10.280
<v Speaker 1>game by like are you active, are you near the ball?

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Do you look like you're flowing to it and you're

0:53:12.920 --> 0:53:15.680
<v Speaker 1>not lost? And that's Jalen and Layton both looked good

0:53:15.880 --> 0:53:18.600
<v Speaker 1>from that standpoint. I'm positive there were some mistackles and

0:53:18.680 --> 0:53:21.560
<v Speaker 1>some plays they'll want back, but at least not does

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:24.359
<v Speaker 1>sink like not the disaster we've seen in the past.

0:53:24.400 --> 0:53:27.960
<v Speaker 1>When wasn't it It was an encouraging sign. It wasn't

0:53:28.080 --> 0:53:31.400
<v Speaker 1>perfect by any stretch of the imagination. There was a

0:53:31.480 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 1>point in the game, I think it was right before halftime,

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a little short pass the theoretic riddick in the left flat,

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and he had some blockers and vander esh did a

0:53:43.200 --> 0:53:45.520
<v Speaker 1>nice job of getting he kind of knife through all

0:53:45.560 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of them and just made the tackle for two yards.

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:49.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that was one that looked like he's gonna

0:53:50.000 --> 0:53:52.800
<v Speaker 1>get blocked and then it's gonna be twenty thirty yards.

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:54.640
<v Speaker 1>That was a really big tackle in the game. And

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:57.799
<v Speaker 1>that showed those instincts of Sean leelike to be able

0:53:57.840 --> 0:54:00.719
<v Speaker 1>to kind of slither here and bend here and get here,

0:54:00.760 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and it was a very Shan Lee esque play. Well,

0:54:04.680 --> 0:54:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that was a that was a big way that That's

0:54:06.040 --> 0:54:08.000
<v Speaker 1>one that's like and I think I even tweeted this

0:54:08.080 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like if this is the you know, this is the

0:54:10.080 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 1>floor and he's gonna get better, Like this is pretty good. Yeah,

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And you combine that with Jalen and how he's playing,

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:18.839
<v Speaker 1>you might have yourself something that you're working with here

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:23.000
<v Speaker 1>at linebacker, which which which is I think important? Like

0:54:23.000 --> 0:54:25.160
<v Speaker 1>when you start thinking about the future of this defense,

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:27.280
<v Speaker 1>if you can get those corners to continue to develop,

0:54:27.320 --> 0:54:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and those two linebackers continue to develop, and by some

0:54:30.000 --> 0:54:31.560
<v Speaker 1>chance you happen to go out and get a safety.

0:54:31.920 --> 0:54:35.239
<v Speaker 1>You might actually be working with something here. Derwin Derwin James.

0:54:35.239 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty good defense. That's a pretty good Derwin

0:54:38.640 --> 0:54:42.400
<v Speaker 1>James is lighting it up, he is. But I can't

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:45.080
<v Speaker 1>hate on the pick. Layton looks pretty damn good all

0:54:45.120 --> 0:54:48.000
<v Speaker 1>things considered. Ye and you and honest, honestly, if you

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:50.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't make that pick, you might be sitting here today

0:54:50.239 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>saying Cowboys need a linebacker bad because it may have

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 1>been one of those situations where you don't have which

0:54:55.120 --> 0:54:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we knew, Yeah, we knew. At some point there's probably

0:54:57.560 --> 0:54:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a good chance that Sean was going to miss a

0:54:59.080 --> 0:55:02.080
<v Speaker 1>game or two or whatever. And at that point, if

0:55:02.080 --> 0:55:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that would have happened, then they may not have had

0:55:04.080 --> 0:55:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the results where the linebackers played really well. The linebackers

0:55:06.960 --> 0:55:09.120
<v Speaker 1>could have been the problem yesterday. You also whatever day,

0:55:09.160 --> 0:55:11.719
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't have Michael Gallup, which he's not lighting the

0:55:11.719 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 1>world on fire. But the arrow, is there any third

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:18.400
<v Speaker 1>round guard that's doing well starting as a rookie, because

0:55:18.440 --> 0:55:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that's where it comes down, is like, well, because the

0:55:21.960 --> 0:55:24.240
<v Speaker 1>right You're right, Gallup's not really making a big difference

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 1>at receiver. I don't really know. I don't know how

0:55:26.600 --> 0:55:29.040
<v Speaker 1>will Hernandez is doing for the Giants. I mean they're

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:32.720
<v Speaker 1>one in three round, right, yeah, well that's what Connor

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Williams is, right. But I'm trying to oh third, third

0:55:36.120 --> 0:55:38.239
<v Speaker 1>round because because I know what I wanted to do

0:55:38.280 --> 0:55:40.520
<v Speaker 1>with me. Yeah, yeah, yeah, fifty I got you. Yeah.

0:55:40.520 --> 0:55:42.360
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing, too, is when you think about Gallop, like,

0:55:42.400 --> 0:55:44.359
<v Speaker 1>to me, that pick is not a pick for this year.

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:46.239
<v Speaker 1>When you take a wide receiver in the third round,

0:55:46.239 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 1>your expectation is not that he's going to come in

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and immediately light it for you. He's taking a couple.

0:55:50.239 --> 0:55:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so for me. I think wide receivers

0:55:52.440 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the hardest positions to adapt to in the NFL.

0:55:55.120 --> 0:55:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I expect to see him contributing a lot more next year,

0:55:57.680 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and buy a third year, that's when I expect to

0:55:59.120 --> 0:56:01.399
<v Speaker 1>see him be a guy win. With the Bronco game

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the fifty one forty eight October twenty thirteen, about a fifth,

0:56:06.400 --> 0:56:09.000
<v Speaker 1>fifth game, fifth game or six if I remember correctly,

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Terrence Williams kind of had a slower start. He was

0:56:11.640 --> 0:56:13.799
<v Speaker 1>the third round receiver, didn't do a lot. Actually, it's

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:16.120
<v Speaker 1>funny to think about that. He I don't know if

0:56:16.160 --> 0:56:17.759
<v Speaker 1>blew up is the right word, but he had a

0:56:17.760 --> 0:56:20.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty nice day in San Diego that year, which was

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the fourth game, but he fumbled trying to turn a

0:56:24.600 --> 0:56:27.680
<v Speaker 1>first down into a touchdown and it didn't like sink

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the game because they were already down by two possessions.

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:32.480
<v Speaker 1>But it was just a bone headed But it came

0:56:32.520 --> 0:56:35.120
<v Speaker 1>back against Denver, and yeah, and that's kind of led

0:56:35.200 --> 0:56:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to a decent rookie year for him. So yeah, Gallup

0:56:37.760 --> 0:56:40.600
<v Speaker 1>might be I'm not And I think when receivers typically

0:56:40.640 --> 0:56:42.600
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty good rookie year or a good year

0:56:42.680 --> 0:56:44.960
<v Speaker 1>rookie year, typically they got a great goal on the

0:56:45.000 --> 0:56:47.520
<v Speaker 1>opposite side of them. He doesn't really have that here. Like,

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not, I'm not what he's been brought in with.

0:56:50.160 --> 0:56:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not down on Michael Gallup at all, but I

0:56:52.760 --> 0:56:56.200
<v Speaker 1>am a little um I don't even want to say disappointed.

0:56:56.239 --> 0:56:58.359
<v Speaker 1>But I thought he'd be better. I thought he'd be

0:56:58.360 --> 0:57:02.200
<v Speaker 1>better quicker, but by no means closing them still, Babe,

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:04.560
<v Speaker 1>he still needs too mature. Yesterday in the locker room.

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I saw, yeah it look just look at his little face.

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:10.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like it was so cute and so such like

0:57:10.440 --> 0:57:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a kid. And yesterday in the locker room, I was

0:57:12.400 --> 0:57:15.080
<v Speaker 1>watching that. We're in a corner him and Tabon Austin.

0:57:15.440 --> 0:57:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Tabon was was helping him put on a bow tie,

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and it was the cutest thing ever, like just on

0:57:21.400 --> 0:57:23.560
<v Speaker 1>their own. And I'm like, oh my god, look at this.

0:57:23.720 --> 0:57:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Look at it. So clearly there's some some growth there

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be happening on and off the field,

0:57:29.080 --> 0:57:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's gonna be there. These guys. I wish you

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 1>guys are watching right there, see Nick nothing a job.

0:57:36.720 --> 0:57:38.400
<v Speaker 1>These guys are. I mean, there's some of the best

0:57:38.440 --> 0:57:40.560
<v Speaker 1>athletes in the world. They can do things without thinking

0:57:40.600 --> 0:57:42.720
<v Speaker 1>about it that I could never do. But like every

0:57:42.720 --> 0:57:44.400
<v Speaker 1>now and then you'll see something funny like that where

0:57:44.400 --> 0:57:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, you don't know how to tie a tie? No,

0:57:46.440 --> 0:57:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you give most of them a time. Have you ever

0:57:47.920 --> 0:57:51.640
<v Speaker 1>noticed go in the locker room everybody and having free tide,

0:57:51.800 --> 0:57:53.400
<v Speaker 1>just like they are not taking a loose and they

0:57:53.400 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 1>take it off like they're keeping it tied so they

0:57:55.040 --> 0:57:57.040
<v Speaker 1>can easily put it back. And I'm like, all right,

0:57:57.160 --> 0:58:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe my life's not just the complete disaster I think

0:58:00.400 --> 0:58:02.439
<v Speaker 1>it was. You know, I'm like I'm doing okay, right,

0:58:02.680 --> 0:58:04.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, guys, appreciate you joining us. We'll be back tomorrow.

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:07.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into some big picture talk. Like I said,

0:58:07.200 --> 0:58:10.840
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely talking safety tomorrow. Not just safety on this team,

0:58:10.840 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 1>but safety around the league and what the Cowboys maybe

0:58:13.440 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 1>should have done in the off season, looking at some

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of the guys around the league and how they're performing.

0:58:17.400 --> 0:58:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Interesting conversation with that when we come come back tomorrow.

0:58:20.000 --> 0:58:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Till then for Nick even Dave Hellma Ambergarcia on Derek

0:58:22.760 --> 0:58:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Eagles from This has been The Break live on Dallas

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a production of

0:58:29.560 --> 0:58:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.