WEBVTT - Startup Shares Trading at 61% Discount Lure VC

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business. Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>What else you want to go? That way?

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 3>All right? So check it out. Everybody check you calendar.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 3>It's been ten years since Google now Alphabet bought Ways

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 3>for one point fifteen billion. That was back in twenty thirteen.

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Oil Levine, of course, co founded a Ways. He's also

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 3>an investor and move it. Intel bought that one for

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 3>a billion back in twenty twenty. And last time around

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 3>he joined us. We talked about his new book, fall

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 3>in Love with the Problem, Not the Solution, a handbook

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 3>for entrepreneurs. So delighted to have ARII back with us

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 3>here in our Blueberry Interactive Brokers studio. Hello, Hello, we

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 3>weren't dissing you as you walked in, and so forgive us.

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>How are you do it?

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Do it okay? Trying to make sense of all the

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 3>creeze when it comes to AI, Can I just jump

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 3>in with you? Because I feel like when you were

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 3>in February.

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 4>I just wanted can I just say thank you? Because

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 4>I was using Ways yesterday all on my way to

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 4>City Field, and it got me there in a timely manner.

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 3>I drove a cab driver crazy earlier this week because

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 3>he was following something else. I'm like, I'm on Ways

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 3>and here's what you're gonna do talk to us about.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 3>First of all, do you ever regret selling it?

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:38.279
<v Speaker 5>No? I you know, people have regrets of the stuff

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 5>that they haven't done.

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 3>I think we might have talked about this, but you don't.

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 5>You just you know, I moved on. I left after

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 5>the acquisition so I can build more startups and and

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 5>I am very happy with the decision back then. And

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 5>at the end of the day, look, when you're making

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 5>a decision, it's the right decision, the right decisions, or

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 5>no decisions. And this is it.

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 3>So you got a T shirt on is fall in

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Love with the problem not the solution? So those on

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 3>our streaming service and YouTube can see this. You've also

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 3>got a book out with that title. AI. Is it

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 3>a problem? Is it a solution? Is it both?

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 5>Is it yet to be determined? But it's definitely a solution.

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 5>We just not clear what is the problem.

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 4>Yet, Well, as a startup guy, you've got to look

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 4>at the technology like that and automatically start thinking of applications,

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 4>right of ways to use it for progress or profits.

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 4>What do you think about the potential of AI?

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 5>So, in general, my approach would we start with the problem, right,

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 5>start with the use case, and only then build a solution.

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 5>I mean this key is because the generative language is

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 5>very powerful. Right then if we ask one hundred people

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 5>on the street have you tried that? Then probly all

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 5>of them are going to say yes. The challenge is

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 5>that if you're going to ask them are you still

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 5>using it? And very few are going to tell you yes,

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 5>which basically means that we are not a product market yet,

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 5>or it's not applicable for the for the consumer market,

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 5>for the mass market. Yet there are some cases that

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 5>I would say this is awesome, right, So if you

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 5>are if you are in the business of generating content,

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 5>this is going to be very helpful to you can

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 5>generate way more content based on that.

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 3>Or are you investing in it?

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 5>Nope, not yet. Many of my companies are actually using AI,

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 5>but not that generating language yet.

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 3>Why not?

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 5>Because you know it was not available until recently. And

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 5>now I have one company in the medical space that

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 5>is actually having the knowledge and requires the language generation

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 5>for that, and this is going to be a leapfrog

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 5>for them.

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Do you still think about I know Ways was ten

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 4>years ago, but do you still think about navigation and

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 4>the possible the possibilities that AI could help in in

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 4>that space. I mean, my first thought when I heard

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 4>your name and AI was I wonder if this could

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 4>help me avoid speeding tickets more often? Because that's one

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 4>of the benefits of Ways is that I can see

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 4>where others have pointed out that the costs.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 5>Because at least are waiting.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 4>So do you think AI could help at all in

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 4>making you know, Google Maps a better product for example?

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 5>So so Ways is based in a lot of cases

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 5>on crowdsource on one hand, than AI on the other hand. Right,

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 5>and so we can understand right contry, we can use

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 5>the they you know, we can look at different users

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 5>and from their behavior understand what is going on. And

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 5>so we have built the AI system before we even

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 5>knew how to say that, right, And I think that

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 5>many companies have built an AI capabilities into their product

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 5>before we actually had the region or the generation of

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 5>the language.

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you think of generative AI as akin to some

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 3>other tech development? I mean, I don't know. I think

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 3>folks are been talking about the creation of the Internet.

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, how do you think about it?

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 5>People are saying that this is, uh, the biggest revolution ever, right,

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 5>and I would say, no, no, no, wait a minute,

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 5>It's not there yet. It's definitely not as big as

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 5>the Internet itself. It's definitely not as big as the

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 5>mobile phone itself. It's definitely not as big as the smartphone. Right, yeah,

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 5>the PC yet?

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 4>Is it a yet?

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 5>Or is it might be yet? But because at the

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 5>end of the day, what all the other tools that

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 5>I've mentioned did is that they interconnect people and they

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 5>enable people to become better, better, to communicate, better, to

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 5>access the information better for anywhere, anytime, anywhere, And this

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.119
<v Speaker 5>increased the abilities of the people. Now we are looking

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 5>into a system that may be able to generate content

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 5>by itself, but less likely to be creative.

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, if you're talking about falling over the problem.

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 4>All of the things that we just talked about, the Internet,

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 4>the mobile phone, the PC, right, they were solving the

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 4>problem of I guess connectivity in some ways, but now

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 4>those things are the problem, or connectivity is the problem.

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 4>I have how many email accounts? I have three cell phones,

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 4>I have you know, ib and Facebook, and I want

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 4>to be less connected. So for me, the problem that

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 4>AI could solve is helping me deal with all of

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 4>this connectivity that I have.

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, I agree. Right, So what you're basically saying is

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 5>that I'm overwhelmed with information and I would like something

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 5>to you know, scan out from this information and figure

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 5>out what is really important and bring that to me

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 5>in a better way.

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Just the signal no more noise please?

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 5>Yes? Definitely yes. And is that something that the current

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 5>engine can do, probably with enough training, definitely yes. Is

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 5>that the use case that we will end up with?

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 5>Maybe yes?

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 3>So would you say, and I'm thinking about our audience

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 3>and investing audience, you know, who have just watched this

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 3>AI euphoria and we've seen something like an Nvidia, but

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 3>some other names just go kind of off the charts.

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 3>Would you say it's too early to make that investment play?

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 6>No.

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 5>I think that if you don't play in this game,

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 5>then definitely you are going to.

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Lose, right, So it's not too early to go into.

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 5>Some of these, it's not too early. And to a

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 5>certain extent, what I would like to also mention is, look,

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 5>we look at it and we say, okay, wait a minute,

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 5>that chat GPT just appear in our life about six

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 5>months ago. Right, So you look at it and you say,

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 5>in six months it's done so much. Right, Wait a minute.

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 5>Open AI is seven years old. It takes a lot

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 5>of time to create value. And the first part of

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 5>this value or the value generation journey was about creating

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 5>the technology, and now we are looking for the use

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 5>case that will make it valuable. In some cases it's

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 5>already there, but in some cases it's not there yet.

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 4>Do you have an overarching investment strategy?

0:07:57.920 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you've.

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Created and sold two billion dollar businesses. Probably people come

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 4>to you with pitches left and right.

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 5>All the time.

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Is there one kind of overarching strategy that you use

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 4>to drive your investments?

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 5>I do, right, because at the end of the day,

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 5>my mission in life is to create value, and I

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 5>can create value through different ways. One of them is

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 5>you building solutions to a problem that will help you

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 5>to become better. And so this is ways or movie

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 5>or pont Era or Zumka or C three or Fairfly

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 5>or many of my startups, and that other one is

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 5>through guiding and mentoring and teaching others, right. And the

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 5>book is about fulfilling my destiny of creating value as

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 5>sharing the know how. And to a certain extent, when

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 5>you share the know how, when I go into a

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 5>company and I help them, at the end of the day,

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 5>what happens is that they sign up to my know

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 5>how and that increased their likelihood of being successful. So

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 5>my methodology is not about guessing what's right, is creating

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 5>what's right.

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 3>So for entrepreneurs, you might grab your book and kind

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 3>of get, you know, fall into your philosophy and benefit

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 3>from it. I do wonder or what you think is

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 3>one of our biggest problems today that needs solving.

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 5>You know, we can look at many problems, right. So

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 5>a lot of us are speaking about, wait a minute,

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 5>we are way too much connected.

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 5>You look at the younger generation and they are connected

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 5>into social media in the levels that are beyond imagination, right,

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 5>and in some cases they're not happy. Right, And so

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 5>happiness of younger generation is a challenge. You look at

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 5>medical services, right. Medical services in the US are five

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 5>times more expensive than they are in Germany.

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Now, it's not to live in Germany, he talks about

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 3>all the time.

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 5>And it's not that they're better in Germany. In here

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 5>that in Germany. Right, it's simply five times more expensive.

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 5>So you look at it and say, okay, wait a minute,

0:09:58.080 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 5>this is waste of free sources.

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 5>We started weighs in two thousand and seven in order

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 5>to help people to avoid traffic jams. There are more

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 5>traffic jams today than the work in two thousand and seven, right,

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 5>So obviously this problem is not done yet and we

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 5>will need to address that as well. And so there

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 5>are a lot of big problems that needs to be addressed.

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 5>And I think that at the end of the day,

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 5>it's the entrepreneurs that are going to change the world.

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 5>And yeah, our role is to encourage it.

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, love it and love when you come in so great. Uri,

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much, Olivine, co founder of Ways.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Of Course.

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Check out the book fall in Love with the Problem,

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Not the Solution.

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, catch

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Business app or wants us live on YouTube.

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 3>A Bloomberg News team of Pema Parmer, Lin, Ley Lynn

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 3>and Sarah McBride reporting today that secondary market, you know

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 3>where backers of postal health startups can sell their stakes

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 3>to other investors, are drawing increasing interest from venture capital

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 3>and other money managers that are really looking to snap

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 3>up chunks of private companies on the cheap. It's a

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 3>sign of the times, Matt.

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Well, I mean I've seen this sign of the

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 4>times before, so it's a sign of the times again.

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 4>The warning warning. Well, no, I mean, for example, before Facebook,

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 4>iPod you know, secondary markets were all the rage at

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 4>the time, and if you've gotten this dock then you'd

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 4>have had a lull, but you would be very wealthy

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 3>No, it's a really good point, so let's get into it.

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News hedge fund reporter Hemla Palmers here and Javier

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Avolosi is co founder and CEO of Caplit joining us

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 3>and they are a provider of pre IPO class market data.

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 3>And he is with us on zoom from San Francisco. Heima,

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 3>set up your story, give us the background.

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, So there's a few things that are going on

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 2>right now in the market. We're seeing founders, employees, investors

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>of startup companies really under pressure right now, a lot

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 2>of them seeking liquidity, and so they're looking to get cash,

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe because the job market is difficult, maybe

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 2>because interest rates are arising. There's fewer exits for employees

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 2>now if there's not as many IPOs, and so they

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 2>need cash, and so they're looking to increasingly in this

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 2>environment sell their shares on the secondary market, or firms,

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 2>hedge funds or venture firms maybe looking for liquidity as

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 2>well for the similar reasons, also looking for liquidity selling

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 2>those shares on the secondary The other side of that

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 2>is that there's great opportunity to buy stuff because the

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 2>prices are incredibly attractive in this environment as valuations have fallen.

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 4>So, Javier, is your company then kind of like a

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg for private companies.

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 7>I think that's the exact right way to characterize it. Matt, So,

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 7>first of all, thank you for having me on, Carolyn

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 7>Matt and Himma for including us in the article. What

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 7>we do is we really work to aggregate a lot

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 7>of the market activity that's happening in the secondary market

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 7>and bring transparency to the market by centralizing this pricing

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 7>activity into one place. So when him or others want

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 7>to shine a light through the form of media, cap

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 7>like can be a resource in terms of saying what

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 7>the pricing of these private companies is based on what

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 7>we see in secondary trading.

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 4>So do secondary markets then use your data in order

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 4>to make the transactions more transparent.

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 7>That's exactly right. So the biggest users of the Caplite

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 7>platform are actually brokers who have a responsibility to their clients,

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 7>as Hima described. In some cases that's employees or founders.

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 7>In other cases that's institutional investors who are looking to

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 7>sell their stock pre ipo for whatever reason. We would

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 7>serve the broker who is then building that client relationship

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 7>and effectively helping them to buy or sell something.

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 3>So what your data is actually what Emma said, is

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 3>that valuations have gone down a lot, correct, And this

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 3>is why you know, whether it's a hedge fund or

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 3>other private investors, they're saying, wait, here's an opportunity for

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 3>me because these are really distressed it seems like assets.

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 7>That's exactly right, Carol. So and to quantify that a bit.

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 7>On average, we see pre IPO Unicorn type companies trading

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 7>at about a fifty percent discount from where the VC

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 7>that invested in them last valued them, and that discount

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 7>has been increasing for the past twelve months and is

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 7>finally starting to stabilize. So there's an old adage in

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 7>the private markets that private markets tend to lag what's

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 7>going on in the public markets, and that has played

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 7>out almost exactly in this latest cycle, where private company

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 7>data is about a quarter maybe a little bit more

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 7>lagging behind publics. And so when we saw the public

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 7>market turn in October and start to rally, private markets

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 7>are following that trend very closely, just in a quarter

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 7>or two delay.

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 2>So as we see the buying that's increasingly prominent in

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 2>the space, how do we tell whether someone is buying

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 2>because they believe in the company and they think that

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 2>they can get it at a very attractive price, or

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 2>are we if we're seeing some buying of companies where

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 2>the firm is I invested in over so long that

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 2>they just really can't afford to have that company struggle.

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Therefore we'll want to buy more shares and provide them

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 2>with liquidity or something.

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you are right to point out it's absolutely a

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 7>function of both. So we have seen quite a bit

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 7>of existing investors snapping up shares, especially back in Q

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 7>three and Q four, mostly Q four and leading into

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 7>Q one of this year, where investors who are already

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 7>on these companies cap tables who have full information into

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 7>how these companies are performing, saw the fifty percent drop

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 7>that had been happening over the past couple of quarters

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 7>and saw that as a perfect entry point to kind

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 7>of start building on exposure that they already owned. But

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 7>our market is pretty thematic, and so when I think

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 7>about answering this question of what are investors looking for,

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 7>how are they picking the right ones? Oftentimes they're playing

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 7>certain themes. This is not dissimilar than the public markets.

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 7>A massive theme that is being played on right now

0:15:56.360 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 7>is regenerative AI, right, and so a lot of what's

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 7>pushing the public markets up is also pushing private markets up.

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 7>So you have companies like Open AI or Anthropic or

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 7>data bricks or salonists who are sort of benefiting from

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 7>these tailwinds that are pushing the markets up.

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 4>More broadly, we've seen a couple of times xavier where

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 4>private markets have gotten secondary markets have gotten really big

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 4>As I mentioned before the Facebook IPO, when there were

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 4>so many unicorns out there, we saw that as well,

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 4>employees just looking at cash in buy a big house

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 4>or whatever before they went public. What do you think

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 4>is driving it right now? Is it just the valuation

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 4>drop and the fact that there's a lack of exits.

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 7>So I think that lack of exits piece is a

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 7>point that probably deserves more attention. This might sound like

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 7>crazy to say than it's already received, and a sort

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 7>of a loser in that situation that is not often

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 7>talked about is the employee or even some of the

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 7>very earliest investors like investors, These are folks who expected

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 7>an exit event to happen in late twenty twenty one

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 7>or early twenty twenty two, and for really market driven

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 7>in macro reasons, their company, their private company, shelved that

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 7>offering and have sort of like basically put it on

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 7>hold indefinitely. And so what's been driving a lot of

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 7>liquidity seekers to the market is you have in your

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 7>head that you're about to receive a very large payout

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 7>for work that has been happening for years, and suddenly

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 7>that's delayed indefinitely. Now you're turning to the private markets

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 7>to help get you some of that cash that you

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 7>had already sort of mentally been budgeting for the reason

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 7>so that's kind of where the cell side comes from.

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 7>The reason the buyside is coming back very strongly is

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 7>that IPO window is starting to crack open. So every

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:52.239
<v Speaker 7>time you have an article talking about Klavio filing or

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 7>Rubric hiring bankers to row, refreshing a registration statement for

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 7>a public offering, these are bits of news that get

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 7>pre IPO investors really rushing back into the space to

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 7>help clean out some of the supply that's being that's

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 7>being added to the market by employees, founders, and early investors.

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Heavier in terms of what you're seeing and these depressed valuations,

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 3>but obviously investors finding some opportunities. What it does it

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 3>give you any kind of clues about the broader market

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 3>environment as we are kind of in this funny place

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 3>where I feel like every day we're debating what, you know,

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 3>a FED speaker says, or Jay Powell says, or what's

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 3>going on with the economic environment. So I'm just curious

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 3>if it gives you any clues about kind of the

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 3>health of this overall financial market.

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 7>It does. I mean, I really think about the pre

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 7>IPO and private markets generally as a proxy for risk appetite.

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 7>And so, you know, when we start to see the

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 7>bid to ask volume ratio at Caplight starting to flip

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 7>towards more of equilibrium between the amount of buy interests

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 7>that's in the market and the amount of sell interest

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 7>and that that's the closest it now is the closest

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 7>time we've been to that equal really since twenty twenty one.

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 7>That starts to give me confidence in the broader rally

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 7>that's happening across capital markets. You know, I think we've

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 7>worked with private company CEOs CFOs to help them kind

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 7>of understand when they should even be thinking about raising

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 7>additional primary capital and or if they should be thinking

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 7>about a public exit for the first time in twelve

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 7>or twelve or so months. And so, in a way,

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 7>the adage that I referenced earlier that said private markets

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 7>lags public markets. While that is true from a pricing standpoint,

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 7>the risk taking sentiment that happens in our market can

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 7>sometimes be predictive of when companies are going to come

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 7>out and raise primary rounds or even potentially listed on

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 7>the public markets.

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 2>On that point about the bit ask spread, you know,

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.479
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing not as many deals actually done compared to

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity. I'm curious what you think it'll take for

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 2>the transactions to actually increase.

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 3>And just got about thirty seconds half of here.

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 7>Of course. Yeah, So keeping it brief, the biggest necessity

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 7>was a reduction in valuations, and now that that has happened,

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing more bids come into the market, larger bids

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 7>come into the market. And whenever we see these three

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 7>factors reducing prices, more bids and larger bids, we tend

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 7>to see closed transactions. So I actually and we ourselves

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 7>are seeing a lot of these through our platform. So

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 7>I actually think this next quarter Q three of twenty

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 7>twenty three is going to be a pretty active quarter

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 7>in terms of reporting out closed secondary transactions.

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Really cool perspective, Very cool.

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, agreed, Very awesome.

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Javier, Thank you so much. Javier Avalos, co founder and

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 3>CEO Caplit, joining us on Zoom from San Francisco courtesy

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 3>of our own Hema Palmer. Thank you so much. Thank

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 3>you Marie bringing us Javier. Here's she, of course's hedge

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 3>fund reporter at Bloomberg News.

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App and YouTube. You can also listen

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 3>As we continue to explore our world where equality and

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 3>diversity inclusion are lacking, today, we're going to look at

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 3>it mat from the perspective of small business and diversity.

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 3>You and I talk about it in a million times.

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if we had a buck for every time

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 3>we cite the McKenzie study and diversity and the importance

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 3>and how it, you know, impacts the financial bottom line.

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 3>This should have been solved years ago.

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no, absolutely, But you know, one of the problems

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 4>is the structural impediments to wealth creation for black and

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 4>other minorities in this country have really held them back from,

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 4>for example, home ownership, you know, or small business ownership.

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 4>And that's what we're gonna focus on right now.

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Tina Ashley is with us, president of the Insight Center

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 3>over at Capital One. She is with us on zoom

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 3>in DC. Sheina, nice to have you here. Tell us

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 3>a little about the program, this stuff that you guys

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 3>recently did.

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 8>Yes, great to be here, Matt and Carrol, thank you

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 8>so much for having us. We took a study, a

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 8>deep dive into sort of looking at this question. There

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 8>are a lot of efforts right now that are focused

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 8>on small business ownership as a pathway to addressing the

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 8>racial wealth gap, but it's a very much understudied topic

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 8>in that we haven't had a lot of research out

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 8>there in the field that really looks at the returns

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 8>to wealth for the business owner himself or herself from

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 8>owning that business. And over history, we have seen for

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 8>the average business owner that business owners generally have greater

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 8>wealth than non business owners. But that's looking at the

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 8>average American and that's typically looking at the white business owner.

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 8>So we wanted to disaggregate the data look very specifically

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 8>at black and Hispanic business owners. And while others have

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 8>looked at this question nationally, we wanted to take a

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 8>place based blens on this and we went into a

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 8>mid size city in Richmond to see that at that level,

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 8>do we still see patterns of which business owners yield

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 8>a wealth return from their business ownership. And what we

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 8>found was a bit surprising that business owners actually had

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 8>half the wealth of non business owners through the time

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 8>period from the study. So looking between twenty seventeen and

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty two, non business owners had greater wealth gains

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 8>than business owners, and that enrichment we think though that

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 8>some of that could be the academic Yeah, definitely, yeah, definitely.

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 8>You know, this was a time where there was just

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 8>a lot of government support to non business owners and

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 8>also the business owners too, but business owners were trying

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 8>to pour a lot more of that capital back into

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 8>their business so that they could just survive, and so

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 8>the business owners may not have been looking to capture

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 8>some of that for their own wealth building.

0:23:58.680 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 5>What is the.

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 4>What is the difference between black owners and white business

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 4>owners in terms of the wealth effects.

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so even in the study where we did see

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 8>some black and Hispanic business owners really thrive and build

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 8>the kind of wealth that we want to see, thirty

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 8>five percent of business owners in the study gained at

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 8>least one hundred and eighty eight thousand dollars of return

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 8>from their business. And that number is significant because it's

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 8>the difference in the racial wealth gap on average between

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 8>black and white people in this country. But even those

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 8>that had that high level of wealth gain, it was

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 8>still only twenty five percent of the wealth gain that

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 8>a white business owner in Richmond had, So the racial

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 8>wealth gap still persists.

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 8>What we found though, that for those that were able

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 8>to actually make wealth gains, it was under the right conditions.

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 8>So there's access to capital, which is number one a

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 8>condition that helps business owners thrive. But more importantly, what

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 8>we found in this study was that social capital and

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 8>knowledge capital were essential, and so access to the kind

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 8>of networks and incubators and sponsors and mentors that really

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 8>help business owners understand when it's the right time for growth,

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 8>how to price their products, how to tap into new markets.

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.679
<v Speaker 8>We found that those business owners, regardless of race, that

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 8>had that kind of access to networks and knowledge were

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 8>those who were able to succeed.

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:36.479
<v Speaker 4>So what do we do about it?

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Then?

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, we hear these kind of statistics all the

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 4>time and they're disturbing to say the least, depressing probably

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 4>is a better word.

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 3>But the persistence of it right that we're yeah, we

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 3>continue to talk about it and doesn't change that.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 4>But what can be done to create you know social

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 4>knowledge networks if you will, for black and Hispanic you

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 4>know potential business owners so that they can reap bigger benefits.

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 8>That is a great question. Yes, this is a not

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 8>a study to highlight the problems once again, but want

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 8>to seek solutions. And one of the things that we

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 8>were interested in because this is a time of massive

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 8>public investment in small business the historical levels of funding

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 8>coming out of treasury and out of the private sector

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 8>to support small business owners and their growth. Much of

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 8>that is going directly to small business owners themselves through

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 8>the form of grant and different kind of capital. But

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 8>what this study raises as a different solution that we

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 8>also need to think about in addition to the capital

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 8>that's going directly to the business owner is support to

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 8>create an ecosystem that will provide that kind of network

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 8>effect and the access to knowledge and insight and expertise

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 8>that the business owners need not just to start a business,

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 8>but to continue to grow and expand that business over time.

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.400
<v Speaker 8>And so what we're calling for is just greater investment

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 8>in technical assistance and more use of technology to be

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 8>able to bring that technical assistance to the business owner

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 8>in real time. We saw that black and Hispanic business owners,

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 8>even though they're in communities like Richmond, which are so

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 8>rich in these resources. There are accelerators and incubators and

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 8>CDFIs all who exist within the community, but black and

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 8>Hispanic business owners aren't tapping them at the same rate

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 8>as white business owners. And part of that is because

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 8>it's not offered online in a virtual environment where you

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 8>could work on it at different hours of the day,

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 8>or tailored from a cultural competency perspective so that it

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 8>really reaches them in the way that they want. And

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 8>so we think this is a time for increased investment

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 8>in technical as systems that draws on technology to be

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 8>able to deliver expertise in real time and democratize access

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 8>to that information.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, good insight and fun to get some

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 3>time with you you and and really shed some light

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 3>on this. Sheena Ashley, president of the Insight Center over

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 3>at Capital One, joining us on Zoom from Washington, d C.

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 3>I agree with you, though, Matt, like I feel for

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 3>everyone who's trying to make this better because I just

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 3>feel like we have to do this a long time,

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 3>and we feel like the problem just continues to persist.

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 4>I was just looking up Robert Smith, for example, you know,

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 4>the billionaire at Vist Equity Partners. But of course he

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 4>went to MI I T and at Columbia University and

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 4>he builds that kind of network.

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:33.479
<v Speaker 5>Also, both of his parents are doctors.

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, you are listening and watching Bloomberg Radio, brother

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Marc a journal How about you.

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 4>Let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no, who's going to honey?

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Please gravel?

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 3>I want to drive.

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 5>It's a good question.

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the clues for th Well

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>brid on Bloomberg Radio.

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, everybody just got about seventeen eighteen minutes left

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 3>in today's trading session. Are you yawning?

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 4>Are you can come on?

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 3>All right, everybody's watched on YouTube in Bloomberg originals. That

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 3>was a yawn.

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 4>I was just refreshing my lungs because I only got

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 4>about five hours of sleep.

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 3>So okay, what did your daughter say to you this morning?

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Daddy? Are you tired?

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 6>Yes?

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, I feel like the markets are a little tired

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to the bounce that we've seen in

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 3>a big way. Right on the equity side of things.

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 3>We've got, as Charlie mentioned, a little bit of a

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 3>gain on the S and P Nasdaq really the opperformer

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 3>once again, I'll eat tens of a percent down a

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 3>little bit lower. But as Romaine said earlier, it really

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 3>does seem like it's a rat story again.

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 6>With J.

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Powell back up on Capitol Hill, did have some economic news,

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 3>so let's get to it. A really cool guest, Veronica Clark, economist,

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.479
<v Speaker 3>Everett City Group. She's with us on Zoom in New

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 3>York City. Veronica, I love that we have you here

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 3>as we count down to the close, because I really

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 3>feel like in terms of equity markets or financial assets,

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 3>we really have to have a good understanding about the

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 3>economic backdrop to kind of understand maybe where financial assets

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 3>go from here, where they should go from here based

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 3>on the fundamental economic backdrop. So where are we?

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it is a really confusing backdrop right now. Unfortunately,

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean we're all waiting for this recession that still

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 6>is not happening. And of course, you know, with that

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 6>recession not happening, we're not getting the slowdown in spending

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.479
<v Speaker 6>or activity, and that means inflation is still high, that

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 6>means the Fed is still raising rates. It is a

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 6>very confusing, confusing backdrop. But of course we had Powell

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 6>today and yesterday. This is still a FED that's focused

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 6>on on raising rates and slowing activity a bit more.

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 4>So, what kind of rate increases do you expect going forward?

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Are we going to see the two that were indicated

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 4>in the dot plot, or as Raphael put it, or

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 4>we're going to see passive tightening that doesn't include actual

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 4>rate hikes, but just a reduction of inflation to bring

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 4>the real rate up.

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, those we're a bit dubbish comments from Bostic, but

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 6>I think you know, we are with most of the

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 6>FOMC members right now with the committee and seeing two

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 6>more rate hikes. We'd actually seen that even ahead of

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 6>last week's meeting, you know, had been penciling in potentially

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 6>that they could have even raised rates last week. Of

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 6>course we didn't get that, but we've been penciling in

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 6>a five fifty five seventy five terminal rate for this

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 6>year for a while. Of course, the median dot last

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 6>week did come up to that range. So we are

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 6>still penciling in two more hikes right now, thinking that

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 6>they'll be in July and September, but of course a

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 6>lot of variability on when we might get them. But yeah,

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 6>still think that the rates are rising a bit more

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 6>just because you know, inflation is still pretty persistently high.

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 3>How often do you guys say, maybe J. Powell might

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 3>get this right, or how many times do you say

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 3>he might just get this wrong?

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, I think the Fed is is doing

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 6>the right thing here. You know, they were, you know,

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 6>potentially a bit behind the curve, you know, when we

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 6>had inflation coming up, but you really, you know, I

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 6>think it does need to be. Inflation is still the

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 6>number one focus, and we heard that from him, you know,

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 6>today and yesterday they have met their you know mandate.

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 6>On the employment side, you know, we have a very

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 6>low unemployment rate. We're still running you know, monthly job

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 6>gains that surprise to the upside every month, you know,

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 6>three hundred and thirty nine thousand in the last report.

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 6>But we are not there on the inflation side of things,

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 6>and we do still have persistently high inflation. So I

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 6>think they're they're doing the right thing, and that that

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 6>has to be your focus right now.

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 4>I got an email from Torsten Slock this morning over

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 4>at Apollo showing the average new mortgage payment across the country,

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 4>and it is a shocking chart. I had a messag

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 4>him to make sure the data is correct, because we

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 4>average between one thousand and fifteen hundred dollars over the

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 4>last twenty years, and now we're looking at a three

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 4>thousand dollar or average monthly payment for a new home purchase.

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Is this an environment in which the consumer is going

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 4>to be able to keep up? Yeah?

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 6>It is. It is pretty incredible. I mean, housing affordability

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 6>is not good right now. Obviously that's partly due to

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 6>higher mortgage rates, but it's also because home prices, you know,

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 6>they they did come down a little bit, but not

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 6>that much, especially relative to the last three years of

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 6>you know, really substantial home price increases. We of course

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 6>had some existing home sales data out this morning. Those

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 6>median prices on a seasonally adjusted basis are actually really

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 6>rising again. We saw that in the May data. I

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 6>think it's just an issue of yeah, housing is still

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 6>very unaffordable. But you know, if you did lock in

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 6>a lower mortgage rate over the last couple of years,

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 6>which a lot of people did, then you're not going

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 6>to sell that home. You're not going to sell your home,

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 6>You're not going to give up that rate. So supply

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 6>of housing is still really constrained, which of course we

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 6>know from the last years of supply is constrained. That

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 6>means upward pressure on prices.

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and we've done a bunch of stories. I think

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 3>everybody has right this. Yeah, here's a US home resales

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 3>barely rises, inventory constraints worsen. I mean we now, I know,

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 3>I have a lot of relatives or they're not leaving

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 3>their homes because they've.

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 4>Got really low rates.

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Having said that, Fronick, I'm curious what's more important though,

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:23.760
<v Speaker 3>in terms of economic growth. Is it that the labor

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 3>market stays strong and people keep on working, or is

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 3>it that people are buying homes?

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it is. It is really fundamentally going to come

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 6>down to what happens with the labor market. You know,

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 6>we we've been surprised, I think on you know, the

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 6>degree of excess savings that was built up over the

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 6>pandemic that you know, how much that's been able to

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 6>come out and support spending come out into the economy.

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 6>But the main thing that you know, will continue to

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 6>drive you know, spending, will continue to have people wanting

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 6>to buy homes, you know, to at least in an extent,

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 6>is if people still have a job. That is, you know,

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 6>the number one issue is, you know, as long as

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 6>the labor market is still just as strong, then there's

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 6>really not a lot of that downward pressure on inflation

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 6>at least, you know, and that's a bit of a

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 6>worry for the Fed, you know, they of course, you

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 6>see inflation and labor market as very linked.

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:13.280
<v Speaker 5>We have seen.

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 4>The initial jobless claims finally kind of jump up. I

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 4>know that they keep being revised down, so the first

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 4>readings are always like above two fifty, and then they

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 4>get revised down significantly. What do you think the chances

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:31.359
<v Speaker 4>are that the labor market cracks here? And if so,

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 4>how fast can it go? Veronica?

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:36.439
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's that's really what we're all looking for now.

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think you know, we are included in this.

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 6>We have an expectation, a lot of people do, for

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:44.399
<v Speaker 6>you know, a mild recession later this year. Have been

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 6>expecting it for a while, been expecting the labor market

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 6>to slow. I do think that claims data, you know,

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 6>is probably the best leading signal of that. But you know,

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 6>it would be if we saw initial jobas claims trending

0:35:57.160 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 6>higher week after week, for you know, a number of weeks.

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 6>If the increase in claims was broad based across states,

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 6>that's really not.

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, That's what I wanted to ask you of Veronica, right,

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 3>because the run up has been concentrated in just a

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 3>handful of states. So I'm just nationally the U States,

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 3>the claims remain below the twenty nineteen average. So if

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 3>we start to see a broad now that's more worrisome.

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I would think. So, you know, we've seen claims

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:25.760
<v Speaker 6>higher in California. Of course, we know about tech playoffs.

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 6>We've seen that in other data, so that's not too surprising.

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 6>It's still there. Of course, we know maybe a month

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 6>or so ago had this increase in Massachusetts that turned

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 6>out to be fraud. It looks like maybe that could

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:40.839
<v Speaker 6>be some issues in some other states the last couple

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 6>weeks of claims, and maybe even more so in the

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 6>next couple of weeks. We did get a law change

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 6>in Minnesota where education workers are able to file for

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 6>unemployment over the summer break. Yeah, so that actually is

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 6>a you know, an idiosyncratic you know, it's not layoffs,

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:58.280
<v Speaker 6>but could mean that claims are a bit harder to interpret.

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 6>So yeah, I really do want to look at detail.

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Scott It you'll see where it is. We got to

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.880
<v Speaker 3>run Veronica Clark over at Citygroup. Citygroup. Excuse me, an

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 3>economist there on zoom in New York City. This is

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Radio.

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Journal