WEBVTT - Guest Host: Ben Weingarten

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Why pay your hard earned money to join an organization

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that fought tooth and nail for a government run healthcare system,

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:09.719
<v Speaker 1>one that scripted portions of White House speeches behind closed

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>doors to ensure the passage of the Affordable Care Act.

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>The organization that stood against tax cuts for middle class

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Americans and small business owners. You know that's AARP. Join

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>AMAC instead. The conservative alternative AMAC offers the same kinds

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of money saving benefits of AARP without the liberal agenda.

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Become an AMAC member right now at AMA dot us

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>slash buck. AMAC fights for your values, protecting our borders

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>by enforcing common sense immigration laws, supporting small business, and

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>standing up for your individual God given freedoms. AMAC is

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the way to go. Stand with AMAC as they fight

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the good fight by becoming a member today. The benefits

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>are great, but the cause is even greater. Join right

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>now at AMAC dot us slash buck. That's AMAC dot

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>us slash buck. AMAC is better, better for you, Better

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 1>for America. This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>mission or mission is to decode what really matters with

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>actionable intelligence magnor mistake American, You're a great American again.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>The buck Sexton Show begins analysts. Remember no, Welcome to

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the Buck Sexton Show. This is Ben Winegarden in four

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton coming to you live from the New York

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>branch of the Freedom Hunt, the only way Freedom Hunt

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that exists into Camio and Cuomo's New York. Thank you

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for taking this Friday night to hang with us here

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.919
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Freedom Hut. I've guest hosted before,

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but in case you didn't listen, I was senior contributor,

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>am a senior contributor of the Federalist, a Senior Fellow

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>at the London Center, and you can find me on

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at b H Winegarden. I'd also urge you to

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to my Big Ideas with Ben Winegarden podcast for

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>in depth interviews with great things, ankers and doers, folks

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>just like Buck Sexton. And I want to start by

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>thanking Buck for giving me the opportunity to fill in

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>here on a busy Friday nights. You know, Fridays are

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be the slow days, but that's when all

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the news actually gets dropped now in this twenty four

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to seven media cycle, so let's get right to it.

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about three major themes today. One

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of them national sovereignty, two, sabotage, three socialism. The three

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>ess For tonight's episode, the Border Wall is the big

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>story of the day and President Trump's emergency declaration, and

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll play some audio from that in case you missed

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it during the Your Busy Work Day from the Rose Garden,

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and he laid out sort of his case for why

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>there needs to be an emergency declaration declared on top

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of the funding that was received in the recently negotiated

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Continuing Resolution. And let's talk about that Continuing Resolution for

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a second. You know, we're more than two years into

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>this presidency. Republicans had the presidency, the House, the Senate,

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and the House and Senate did nothing to advance the

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>president's agenda really when it came to immigration period, full stop.

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>The fact that it ever had to come to this,

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>this Continuing Resolution, twelve hundred pages released at three am

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in the morning, ten pages of which were then released

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>after the fact Congressman themselves didn't even know where to

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>go for the full bill text is absurd and it's

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>really a slap in the face to the American people.

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Over about sixty three million people voted for this president

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that there was insufficient border wall funding

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the first two years, and now you have to deal

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>with this basically phony negotiation where the President had to

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>grit his teeth and say, I accept this bill, but

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I really don't like this bill. It's a travesty, and you,

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>as an American should take it as a slap in

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the face that you're supposed representatives that this is the

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>best that they could come up with. So what was

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in the bill. The bill is about more than the bill.

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>The bill is representative of the disdand that our political

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>establishment has for you and I three hundred and twenty

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollar continuing resolution with a measly one point

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars for the border wall. Now one point

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars is a lot, but in context of

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>the federal budget in a given year, where the federal

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>budgets well over three trillion dollars, probably close to four

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars at this point, it's nothing. It's nothing for

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>something as fundamental as territorial integrity, the job of the

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>government protect the homeland. That's number one. Peace and prosperity.

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>In order to have peace, you have to have a

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>secure border. So three hundred twenty eight billion dollars one

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>point four for the wall one point three seven five.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>Of course, there are strings attached to this one point

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>three seven five. And consider by the way the strings

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>attached to this versus the lack of strings attached to

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>all the other asinine things that come out of Washington,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>hidden deep within these bills that you'll never know about

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>because they are twelve hundred pages. So, first of all,

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this wall funding one point four billion dollars, it's limited

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>to the Rio Grand sector. It's not just limited to

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a fifty five mile area along the southern border in

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the Rio Grand Valley of Texas and restricted so you

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 1>can't use it in a series of other areas that

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>they lay out, other areas which need secure fencing as well.

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>But there are two strings attached that really it just again,

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>it's more than disdain. It's just spitting in your face.

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>It's like a big joke that you can have a

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve hundred page bill and have a couple provisions like these.

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Section two twenty four A. I'll read it verbatim. None

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of the funds provided by this Act may be used

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>by the Secretary of Homeland Security to place in detention,

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Remove refer for a decision whether to initiate removal proceedings

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>or initiate removal proceedings against a sponsor, potential sponsor, or

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>member of a house of a sponsor or potential sponsor

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of an unaccompanied alien child. Let me simplify that for you,

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot of sponsors in there, and this

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>is typically loyally in the way that it's crafted. This

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>is a magnet for folks coming here and not being deportable.

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what this is. You come with an unaccompanied alien

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>child referred to by the acronym UAC frequently, you can't

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>be thrown out. Think about what the incentive is there. Then,

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of course you want to be a sponsor or, a

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>potential sponsor or, a member of a household of a

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>sponsor or, a potential sponsor of an unaccompanied alien child.

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Because per section two twenty four A, you can't be

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>placed in detention, removed, or referred to a decision for

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a decision whether to initiate removal proceedings. You can't be deported.

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>That's what it's saying. Here's another piece of text layered

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>into the bill, Section two thirty two A. Prior to

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 1>use of any funds made available by this Act for

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the construction of physical barriers within the city limits of

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>any city or census designated place. Department of Homeland Security

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 1>and the local elected officials of such a city or

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>census designated place shall confer and seek to reach mutual

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>agreement regarding the design and alignment of physical barriers within

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that city or the census designated place. Translation, local officials

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to be the ones to determine where the

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>wall goes up and what kind of wall it is,

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>design and alignment of physical barriers. And oh, by the way,

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it just so happens my understanding that those areas those

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>municipalities jurisdictions in the Rio Grand Valley, well they happen,

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, be pretty much all blue districts. So what

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think is going to happen then with that funding?

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's other elements of this as well. There's

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>potentially a doubling of the amount of people in the

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>capped guest worker program hbtwo program, And you know we

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>can talk about that, and I guarantee you they're about

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a thousand other things layered into this bill that make

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you and I go crazy what it represents. Again, not

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>just a slap in the face to us and a

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>slap in the face to the president, but a total

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>dereliction of duty, a total lack of sincerity, of care,

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of faithfulness to us as the citizen. You know what

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the wall itself represents. It's not about the physical barrier. Yes,

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, a physical barrier is necessary as one element

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of having truly secure borders, because the first thing is

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>secure borders at home, and then we can worry about

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the trillions of dollars that have been spent overseas that

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't necessarily made us any safer. But it starts with homeland,

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>protecting the homeland. What does a wall represent. It represents

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>national sovereignty, priority number one essentially of a government, and

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Constitution it talks about the need for the

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>government to protect us from invasion, which we essentially have

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in which the emergency declaration today represents. It represents faithfulness

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to the citizenry, it represents strength, it represents a pact

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>with us that the government respects us and they understand

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that we are the number one responsibility, we the people,

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and if not, they should all be thrown out of office.

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what the wall represents for us for they left

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.599
<v Speaker 1>for the Robert Francis O'Rourkes of the world, because I

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>will refuse to refer to him by that moniker, the

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Beto moniker for folks like him. He says, let's tear

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>down the walls that exist today. How would that work

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>out for the country? Exactly? You know, the left makes

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the argument it's immoral. A wall is immoral. Well, what

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>could be more moral than protecting the life and limb

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of citizen ry? Okay, survival is moral, especially survival from

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the worst people in the world. These drug

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>traffickers and incidentally terrorists and the terrorist groups that work

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>with the drug traffickers and child traffickers to get into

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>this country cause lots of crime, billions of dollars in damages,

0:09:53.920 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>all the associated cultural costs. They say, that's immoral. Okay.

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 1>The wall for us represents a citizen rate. For the left,

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it represents an affront to multiculturalism and a lack of

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>concern that they have for the citizen ry because they

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>believe that everyone that there should be no borders, that

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>we're all the same, there's no differences in cultures. Well,

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>except that they know that their culture is superior to

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>deplorable culture. What they really care about at the end

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of the day, what this is really all about, of course,

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that the left wants the country overrun.

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>They at their core believe in some of them believe

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in open borders because ideologically that's really where they are,

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and they are really that deluded to think that there

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is no difference between different peoples everywhere, and that's a

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>citizenship is something that should be treated cheaply and taken lightly.

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And then for the others it is more cynical and political.

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And a little bit later today we're going to talk

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>about one of the ways in which even absence and

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>amnesty in this country, mass illegal immigration to this country

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>actually gives the left substantial political power already full stop.

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So before there is down the road, presumably some kind

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of mass amnesty, the way that things are trending in

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>our political class, already there is power to having our

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>borders overrun. And that's really the point ultimately is that

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a cynical power play from the left, though

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of it's the old Cloward Piven overload the

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>system to force a change, overload the system, where illegal

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.719
<v Speaker 1>aliens overload the system with government spending, put as much

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>power within the state as possible, doll out as much

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>our jest as possible. It all works in their favor

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're a progressive, because a bigger state means more

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>power for you. That's where the left is right now.

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But those on our side, quote unquote, we're talking about

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a percentage of a percentage that really actually believes in

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>faithfulness to the Constitution, and faithfulness and fidelity to the

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>American people, and again to national sovereignty and territorial integrity

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and citizenship itself. Citizenship itself is not a cheap word.

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>It's something to be held in very high esteem. And

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>for those immigrants who came here legally and actually had

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to work for it, as opposed to spitting in the

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>face of those who are just abrogating the system, they

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>value that citizenship a lot of times, probably more highly

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>than folks who were born here and take it for granted.

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry to say. The reality of the situation is

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's a bipartisan establishment, and that bipartisan establishment believes

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially in open borders, some of them to different degrees.

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>It's open borders on the left and on the right,

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>what is it. It's cheap labor. That's sad on both sides.

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>It should be an affront to every concerned American. It

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>really should. If we could actually go to clip ten

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Mark Meadows talking about the border wall, he speaks a

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit about this. This is a president who has

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>performed over and over and over again. He's moved the

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 1>embassy to Jerusalem. He's brought back jobs from China to America.

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>The economy is roaring. We've got a number of people

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that were hostages brought home. Every time they say he

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>won't do it, he does do it. He's going to

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>do it this time. I'm confident of that. I believe

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that he will take it executive action to make sure

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.839
<v Speaker 1>he gets the dollars that he needs to make sure

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that that wall gets built. Congress won't do his job.

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly, we could have done a lot better. We

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>could have given him the five point seven billion that

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>he requested, But instead he's having to embark on a

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>three step process that I applaud. I mean, you know,

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that I wish that the executive

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>branch would have less ability to do things on their own.

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>That was House Freedom Caucus chair, Mark Meadow, and of

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>course he called for executive action and he got it.

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 1>This is Ben Winegarden in for Buck Sexon on the

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexon Show eight four nine zero zero Buck. That's

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>two eight two five eight four four nine zero zero

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>two eight two five. Follow me on Twitter at bh

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Winegarden and apologize about that. The guys behind the glass

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>played a little joke on me before the break. We

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>now have the Mark Meadows clip. You've heard him. I

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>wholeheartedly agree with Mark Meadows. I suspect a lot of

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you do too. No one wants the executive to have

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to have the authority or to have to take a

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>measure like the President is taking, and it's clear that

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>he was very begrudgingly taking this measure as well. In fact,

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in comments today he sort of went over why a

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>national emergency here is merited and then also why he

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>knows it's going to get caught up in litigation. If

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>we could go to quip six to Trump talking about

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the national emergency in the wall, we're going to be

0:14:52.080 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>signing today and registry National emerg Agency. And it's a

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>great thing to do because we have an invasion of drugs,

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>invasion of gangs, invasion of people, and it's unacceptable. I

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>could do the wall over a longer period of time,

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't need to do this, but I'd rather do

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it much faster, and I don't have to do it

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>for the election. I've already done a lot of wall

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>for the election twenty twenty. And the only reason we're

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>up here talking about this is because of the election.

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>That was the President speaking at the Rose Garden this afternoon,

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>explaining justifying the need to call for a national emergency. Here,

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>let me say what the real national emergency is in America.

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>It's that our leaders don't represent us. The media, the

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>left they love, they love to talk about, oh, dictatorship,

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented violation of norms. They are actually the ones who

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>are violating the norms here because they don't care about

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>securing the country. We spend I mentioned before, we've spent

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>trillions of dollars overseas on engagements, and you'd be very

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>hard pressed. I'd be interested to hear from some of

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you a bit later tonight, what has been the actual

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>outcome of Afghanistan. You know, we're there seventeen and eighteen years,

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>approaching twenty years. Maybe there will be some kind of

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>negotiation to get out of there. Can you define what

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>are the three seminole achievements of our time in Afghanistan?

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>What about in Iraq? It's pretty clear that Iraq has

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>become in many ways a proxy for Iran. It should

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>have been a counterbalance for it. Now it's a proxy

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>for it. So we've wasted all of this blood and

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>treasure overseas. And I'm not saying that there aren't legitimate

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>things that we need to be doing overseas, because I'm

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>as ardent accounter g hottest as you'll find, and I

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>believe in taking it to the enemy when they pose

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a threat to US national interests. But it starts at home.

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And if we don't have home right, then everything else

0:16:55.520 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is in big trouble, big trouble. So what did the

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>President do with this invocation of his authority under the

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>National Emergency Act? Essentially he was able to identify, according

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to the White House, eight up to eight point one

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars available to build the border wall post declaration,

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>with additional funds having been reprogrammed. And so there's six

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and one million from the Treasury forfeiture fund, there's

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>up to two and a half billion from the DoD

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>funds Department of Defense funds transferred for support for counter

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 1>drug activities under Title ten and of the US Code,

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Section two eighty four. There's up to three point six

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars reallocated from the Department of Defense military construction

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>projects under the President's Declaration of a National Emergency Title ten,

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>US Code Section twenty eight O eight. And we'll talk

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>about the legal wranglings a bit later. Allow me to

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>allow me to have the President explain how he thinks

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>this is going to go down legally Quip seven, if

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>you would. Guys, we will have a national emergency, and

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>we will then be sued, and they will sue us

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Ninth Circuit even though it shouldn't be there,

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>and we will possibly get a bad ruling, and then

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.959
<v Speaker 1>we'll get another bad ruling, and then we'll end up

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Supreme Court, and hopefully we'll get a fair

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>shake and we'll win in the Supreme Court. There you

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>have it. I think that's pretty wise legal analysis from

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the President right there. In fact, the legal challenges are

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>already starting to fly this afternoon or this morning. Even

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it might have been reported that Alexandroocazio Cortez and Joaquin

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Castro are going to introduce legislation to try to block

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the president's use of a national emergency here, and actually

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the ACLU has tweeted as well that they're going to

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>be attacking it, and some folks are pointing to comments

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>from the President later on during this Rose Garden address

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>where he talks about, you know, I didn't want to

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>do it this way, we didn't need to do it

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this way, but we have to do it this way.

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And of course his words are going to be parsed

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>by the Ninth Circuit, as he mentioned, and we will

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>get into the legal wranglings of this. I do think

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>it will become very clear throughout this episode that legally

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the president is on very sound footing, and we can

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about executive power, separation of powers and the like,

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>but this is more a political question in reality than

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a legal question, and it is sad that it has

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>come to it at this point. This is Ben Winegarten

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in four Bucks Sexon on the Buck Sexton Show. Call

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>in lines are open eight four four nine zero zero Buck.

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>That's eight four four nine zero zero Buck two eight

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>two five eight four four nine zero zero two eight

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>two five. We'll be right back and talk about the

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>census citizenship question. Welcome back to the buck Sexton Show.

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>This is Ben Winegarden in four buck Sexton lines are

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>open eight four four nine zero zero two eight two

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>five eight four four nine zero zero two eight to five.

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Follow me on Twitter at b H. Winegarden. All right,

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about the President's national emergency, sovereignty, border

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>wall funding and the like. Let's hear what you have

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to say. Let's go to the phone, starting with doctor

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Rick from Silver Spring, Maryland. Hello, doctor Rick. Yes, Hi,

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.719
<v Speaker 1>good evening, and I tell you I could not be

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>more upset about this whole matter. Buck Show last night.

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he did a great job talking about all

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>the problems with the bill. I think it you know,

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree with him. I think it does more harm

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>than good, and I kind of wish the President had

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>said distinct stinks. I'm not going to say yes, and

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to shut down the government again. But I

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>want to get your take on it. Ben. Yeah, you know,

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>my opinion of it is this the bill cuts both ways. Obviously,

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>there are provisions in there that the incentive structure is terrible.

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>From the perspective of sovereignty, and it cuts against the

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>president's agenda, which is part of the reason that I've

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>argued that, look, even in getting this one point four billion,

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>which is a fraction of the five point seven billion,

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>which is a fraction of the twenty five billion, that

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>even with that, they had to fight him tooth and

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>nail through the shutdown and then put in all of

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 1>these potential poison pills, these land mines, as they've been

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>described by some within the bill. So again, I think

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a reflection of Congress and a smack in the

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>face of sixty three million Americans now in terms of

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>what would the president's best strategy have been in this scenario.

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of folks who were advocating for

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe a one or two week continuing resolution to allow

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>folks to actually examine the twelve hundred pages. God forbid,

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 1>we took more than two or three days seventy two

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>hours to look at what was actually in the thing.

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Although of course we could have all guessed that there

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>would be things in the bill that were egregious. I

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>suspect that if you were in those White House conversations

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>about strategy here, the reality was that they said, given

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the calendar and where we are relative to twenty twenty,

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and how long legal challenges would potentially take, and how

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>much time has already been wasted on this, that this

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>was probably the end of the line, and we'll take

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the one point four bill in because it's better than

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>nothing else. We'll live to fight another day. We'll get

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the incremental funding to get to over five point seven

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>billion potentially all in, and there will be a court fight.

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully the bulldozers will get rolling well before election day

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. Although it's worth noting that the President talked

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 1>about twenty twenty and the political element of this, and

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the press will say, you know, they love to say, oh,

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>this is Trump's vanity project. It's not Trump's vanity vanity project.

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It's that he made a promise to the American people

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that represents all those things that I mentioned in my monologue,

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>fidelity and faithfulness to the Constitution, and territorial integrity, and

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it is imperative that we get a

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>handle on our homeland. So that's really my opinion of it.

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any follow up to that, doctor Rick? Well,

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just so very frustrated with the political ruling class.

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, we had control of House and Senate

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and the president. They could have gotten this done. Clearly

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want to get this done. And I just

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you know the fact that so disconnected from the people

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>warned us. You know, I would love for the presidents

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>say I'm building it, I'm using the army corps of engineers,

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>sue me, stop me and just build it um and

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, to you know, to be damned with,

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, and let them try to stop it. You know,

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm that's frustrated. Well, well, thanks so much

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for the call. And and I think we're all frustrated

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>at our so called representatives that that's really what they are.

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>They represent us, they claim every midterm election, and you

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>know then for the senators when their races are up.

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>But it's a con essentially that it really is. And

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 1>again you look at it. You have basically the House

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Freedom Caucus or at least a you know, disproportionate percentage

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of the House Freedom Caucus that actually believes in the

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>things that they run on. And you have a handful

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of senators and that is pretty much it. And it's

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a very it's it's it's it's a it's a small

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>minority that speaks for the silent majority in this country.

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to Charles in Boston. Charles, you

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>are on the buck Sex and show. How are you? Sir?

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I agree with the first with the college just before me.

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm disappointed too. And uh, I don't know, and I'm

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>not really clear why the President couldn't have said, you know,

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>he said, I'm going to read the bill. I don't

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>like this. I'm going to view to it, have a

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>continuing resolution and then and then uh and then uh

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Board of Security because this is getting serious enough where

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>uh that this is getting serious enough that I almost

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>think we ought to have the military on the boarder

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>imagine find the imagine. And Israel has a wall way

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>back way back in uh and uh in the early

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>modern era. UH, Vienna had a wall to keep out

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>invading terms from the Ottoman Empire. And these people are

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>invading from South America. And I just don't know how

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this is going to turn out. And I'm just afraid

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>for our public. Basically, if we lose the twenty twenty election,

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>what happens to the country. Is the company going to

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>be worth living in? Anymore, or should we just say Okay,

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>let's you know. That's how frustrated I feel, and I

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to get your take on it, mister weinegotten

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and again I agree with it with the doctor who

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.719
<v Speaker 1>called from Silver Spring, Maryland. Okay, I'll take your answer

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>off the air, and thank you for having me on. Bye, Charles,

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank thanks so much for that heartfelt call. Look, I

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 1>share your frustration and your concern about the direction of

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the country, and this kind of gets to why Trump's

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>presidency was such a monumental act, a revolutionary act, revolutionary

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>in the sense of going back towards the people. I've

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>said this before in other forums that I believe and

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that this continuing resolution reflects the fact that

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Trump is a man alone in Washington, DC. And you

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>can read press accounts that sort of reflect this as well.

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>He holds ideas that can completely fly in the face

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of ninety percent of the folks in Washington, DC. That

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>can't be said at elite cocktail parties, that go against

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>everything you learn at elite institutions that's reinforced in popular culture,

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and it is near impossible to take on this behemoth.

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>He's one person essentially taking the swings and arrows for

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty three million of US He is when they talk

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 1>about the presidency being the loneliest office in the world,

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it really is the loneliest office in the world. When

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you hear about the internal sniping, leaking, lying, sabotage in

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch. It is one person standing up for

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty three million, but there's almost no one else in

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the political class there. It is a It really does

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>imperil our nation the fact that we don't have a

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>handle on this, and these measures are not the ideal measures,

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think the President would be the first person

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to agree on that he's taken every measure gun beyond

0:26:56.040 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>where other politicians would go. Clearly in terms of tactical

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>what should have been done in the near term, I'm

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>not sure that the continuing resolution would lead to anything

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>other than probably a worset deal. Even ultimately, it's very

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>tough sweating when your side consists of a president and

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a few other people in Congress. It's very challenging. And

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you see now that the president is using a power

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that he'd probably rather not use, that's going to be challenged.

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>That has drawn the ire of even some conservatives and

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>some libertarians. We're going to speak with one of those. Incidentally,

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to speak with John You a little bit

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>later tonight, a constitutional scholar who has studied executive power

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>versus legislative power, the ins and outs of national emergencies.

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>And look, the Department of Defense is going to be

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:44.679
<v Speaker 1>down at the border, their budgets being reallocated for these purposes.

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And look, you saw it in the face of the

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 1>caravans as well. And the caravans are part of kind

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.479
<v Speaker 1>of the series of events, the fact pattern leading up

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to the justification for declaring a national emergency. And we're

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>going to go back to kind of the legal battle

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 1>over this and a little bit of the political battle

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>as well with John Yu as I mentioned a bit

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>later in the program, But I want to talk about

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 1>another issue that has really been off the radar except

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.959
<v Speaker 1>for wonky folks in Washington, d C. But which has

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.959
<v Speaker 1>really drawn the focus of the left in a way

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that I think few anticipated. And you could sort of

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>see this and I wrote about this in The Federalist,

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and probably almost a year ago. Eric Holder, former Attorney General,

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>he came out and it's not as if he's made

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a ton of public statements or written a ton of

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 1>op eds. He came out focused on this issue of

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a census citizenship question. Now, let's start at the highest level.

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Why would you care about the census and what does

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the citizenship question have to do with this topic of

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>national sovereignty. The census is actually a vital document when

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes to political power because it is used in

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>primarily two tasks, one apportioning seats in the US House

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and two allocating upwards of eight hundred billion and perhaps

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred billion dollars a year in federal funds down

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to district. So let me say it state that again,

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the number of representatives in your given states, and thus

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the number of presidential electors that you send to the

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Electoral College, is dictated by the census numbers. That redistricting

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>occurs every ten years, and that's why the twenty twenty

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>census is so essential. And again, nine hundred billion dollars

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in federal funds are allocated. Nine hundred billion dollars, that's

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>like a third of the federal budget, maybe slightly less,

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>are allocated based upon the census. The question of the

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>census citizenship question, what is that? Well, the Trump administration

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>decided under Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, the Census Bureau fits

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>under the Commerce Department, that a citizenship question should be

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>included on the primary census. So every American, every household

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>who receives a census, Wilbur Ross and the Trump administration

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>would like the question to be asked, are you a

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>citizen of the United States. There are a few different

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>boxes relating to what your citizenship is, and then there's

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.479
<v Speaker 1>no not a citizen of the United States. That's all

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>they want to ask. You would think that that would

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty basic question that a country would want

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to know. You know, in my district, what percentage of

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>people here are citizens? What percentage are non citizens? Well,

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the backlash on the left has been massive, and here's why.

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>The census count that determines how many representatives are in

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>each state is based upon total people counted. Let me

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>repeat that total people counted, that citizens and non citizens.

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And within non citizens, there are illegal immigrants and there

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>are people here who are here illegally. So the census

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>count to determine that apportioning counts illegal aliens. So if

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you live in a state that as a disproportionate number

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of illegal aliens, You might have a disproportionate number of

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>representatives in your state. A lot of people aren't aware

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of that. Doesn't that strike you as strange that a

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>sent be political power? How many representatives you have, how

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>many electors go to the electoral college, and then what

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the nine hundred billion plus dollars that gets

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>allocated down to the district levels based upon those population

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>counts that the numbers that influence that actually include illegal aliens.

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Did you know that illegal aliens can actually dilute the

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>political power of some people, those who live in states

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>they're disproportionately citizens, and conversely creates more power for those

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>states that have more illegal aliens or more non citizens. Generally,

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this isn't talked about very often. One of the reasons

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump the reason the Trump administration wants to

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>include the question, and the reason they've argued for it,

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is that in order to enforce the Voting Rights Act,

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>something that you would think Democrats would be on board with.

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Properly enforcing provisions of the Voting Rights Act, you need

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>an accurate account of citizens versus non citizens. Otherwise non

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>citizens can dilute the political power of some artificially increase

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the political power of others. So the Trump administration puts

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>forth the census citizenship question in their proposals and immediately

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>are met with a swift backlash from all sorts of

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>leftist advocacy groups. The case that lost for the Trump

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>administration is now going to be kicked up to the

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. Today the news came out Wall Street Journal

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>headline quote, Supreme Court degree is to decide legality of

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>census citizenship question. Trump administrations seeking to ask census respondents

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>if they are US citizens. When we come back, we'll

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about the stakes of this fight,

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>about what the left is arguing. The insane arguments against

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>something is basic as you knowing what percentage of the

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>country is citizens versus non citizens in your own district,

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>what happens to your political power, Why some states are

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>going to lose representatives and some are going to gain representatives,

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Why there's more funding for some states and not other states.

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to this major legal argument that's brewing that

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>sticks to this point of national sovereignty and do we

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>defend the rights of our citizens and the political power

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of our citizens. We'll get right back to that, and

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we have an interview with someone who is supporting the

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>government's efforts to include that citizenship question at the top

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of the hour. This is Ben Weinegarden in four Buck

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Sexon on the Buck Sexon Show. Eight four four nine

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>zero zero two eight two five. That's eight four four

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>nine zero zero two eight two five beer right back.

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the Buck Sexton Show, and this is Ben

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Weinegarden in four Buck Sexton linzeropen eight four four nine

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>zero zero two eight to five, and you can follow

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at b h wine Garden. All right,

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>before the break, I was talking a bit about the

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>census citizenship question and how this question is now going

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to the Supreme Court based upon a ruling that came

0:33:56.680 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>down today and that the Trump administration had lost in

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the Southern District of New York in a federal court

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>by an Obama appointed judge. And I mentioned the fact

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that the census is such a vital, vital count because

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the census really determines how much political power each state

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 1>has and ultimately how much political power each citizen has.

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 1>But it's impacted by non citizens because the counts that

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we get out of the census total population count is

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>what matters to determine a portioning of the seats, an

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 1>allocation of hundreds of billions of federal dollars. Okay, So

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>why did Democrats hate the idea of the inclusion of

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>this question? What they state that they believe that there

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>will be an unconstitutional undercount, that non citizens will be

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>afraid to respond to a question are you a citizen

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>or not? In the census. We can walk through the

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>history of this, but this question was on the census

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>every decade from eighteen twenty to nineteen fifty, outside of

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen forty for whatever reason that was A similar question

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>has been asked of one in six households in nineteen eighty,

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety, and two thousand on the long form Census.

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>The Obama administration, I don't think they're racist targeting illegal aliens.

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 1>They asked the question of one and thirty eight households

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 1>on the document that replaced the long form Census, the

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>American Community Survey. As mentioned, the Trump administration makes the

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>case that in order to enforce the Voting Rights Act,

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>something that we can all agree on, that they need

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>an accurate account of citizens versus non citizens. But the

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Left has fearmongered about this issue, saying it's a Trump administration.

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>We can't trust them to ask this question. They're trying

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to drive down non citizen numbers, But what is their

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>real argument. At the end of the day, they will

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>lose political power. In fact, in the judge's opinion from

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>New York who wrote against the Trump administration, he said

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that the question was actually constitutional. He was fine with

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a citizenship question. He differed with Commerce Secretary Wilber Ross's

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>judgment and the way he came to his decision. And

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 1>he wrote, and I quote here, the Court finds, by

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a preponderance of evidence that the addition of a citizenship

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>question will cause, or is likely to clause etc. Etc.

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Several jurisdictions to lose seats in the next congressional apportionment period.

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's stop right there. People could potentially lose house seats

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>because of non citizens not being included. Thus the potentially

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>this all hypothetical question can't be asked. He added, a

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.280
<v Speaker 1>net under account of people live in non citizen households.

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Whilst it caused states to lose access to federal funding.

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>What does this all come down to At the end

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:25.879
<v Speaker 1>of the day, it comes down to political power. It's

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 1>not about you the citizen. It's about political power for

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>those who benefit from those states with large non citizen populations.

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we'll talk with Jay Christian Adams.

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>His legal group has actually filed an amicist CUI bief

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>brief with the Trump administration that went to the Supreme Court.

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back on the buck Sex and show.

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>You're probably familiar with AARP. You or someone you know

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>might already be a member, But did you know that

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>AARP is about left wing politics. They lobby for a

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of progressive causes. An AARP fought tooth and nail

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>for a government run healthcare system. Well, I recommend AMAC YAMAC.

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>AMAC was founded by an Air Force veteran, Dan Weber

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.359
<v Speaker 1>over a decade ago to represent not only conservative views,

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 1>but policy that's good for America. AMAC advocates for border

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 1>protection and it also advocates for fixing social security. Your

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 1>investment in AMAC also allows AMAC to act for policy

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:19.839
<v Speaker 1>good for America the AMAC difference. It's held over one

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand real face to face meetings with key decision makers

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in DC, including Senators, as well as key influencers at

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the White House. AMAC offers the same kind of money

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 1>saving benefits that AARP offers, but without the liberal agenda.

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Join AMAC, the conservative alternative. Instead, stand with AMAC as

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they fight the good fight by becoming a member today.

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>The benefits are great, but the cause is even greater.

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Tell your family and tell your friends join right now

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>at AMAC dot us slash buck. That's AMAC dot us

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 1>slash buck. AMAC is better, better for you, better for America.

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 1>We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>States under protected, undocumented, unchecked, and illegal aliens should not

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be treated the same as people who entered the US legally.

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>We must control our borders, must protect our borders. This

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>is Ben Weegarden in for Buck sexon on the Buck

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Sex and Show eight four four nine zero zero two

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.760
<v Speaker 1>eight two five Follow me on Twitter at bh wine Garden.

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And those were just some of the few disingenuous Democrats

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>who over the years have of course completely flipped on

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>this issue, proving per usual that with them and of

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 1>course with many Republicans too, it's about power, it's not

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>actually about principle and those questions, and again, this question

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of citizenship, border security and the like is really intrinsic

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to the question of census citizenship, and I think a

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 1>unique microcosm of what the political class thinks about us,

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 1>because there isn't even a question. You've probably never even

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 1>heard the question asked, mister representative of my district, why

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 1>is it that illegal aliens can take political power from me?

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Or conversely, why is it that this other district, this

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>other state has more political power by counting people who

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 1>have cheated the system. I talked a little bit about

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the historical background of the census citizenship question, the Trump

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>administration's justification for it on the Voting Rights Act, and

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats challenged to it, and I mentioned the judge

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>in the Southern District of New York, federal judge. He

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 1>shot down the Trump administration's ability to ask this question

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not on constitutional ground. I'm going to quote from his

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>opinion here the citizenship question and I quote is quote

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>not inconsistent with the Constitution unquote. I it's not the

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:48.800
<v Speaker 1>question that's an issue here, it's how the Trump administration

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:51.720
<v Speaker 1>came to their determination. And by the way, this doesn't

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>even get into the fact that the groups who brought

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>this suit to this judge, Obama appointed judge in the

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Southern district were of course leftist act VISC groups who

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 1>arguably should have had no standing, and the judge made

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 1>his argument that essentially some political power could be lost

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>among some groups if there was an undercount. But Secretary

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Ross was the person who had the power delegated to

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>him to determine what questions go on that census, since

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>he is the Commerce Secretary and the Census sits under him.

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>The judge was not delegated that power. Secretary Ross was.

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, that's a running theme that will

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>really run throughout this episode when we talk about not

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 1>just sovereignty, but everything that the president tries to do

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 1>visa via the legislative branch and vice versa. Where does

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 1>power reside. Here's what Secretary Ross said, quote Neither the

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Census Bureau nor the concerned stakeholders could document that the

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>response rate would in fact decline materially. The Census Bureaus

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:52.320
<v Speaker 1>analysis did not provide definitive empirical support for that belief.

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.319
<v Speaker 1>And then he went on, even if there was an

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>i quote here an impact on responses, the value of

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>more complete and accurate day derived from surveying the entire

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>population outweighs such concerns. Unte you know, it seems pretty

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>reasonable to me, seems common sense to me. And more importantly,

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>who is a judge to question Secretary Ross's decision making?

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>The judiciary is out of control. The legislative branch is

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 1>actually supposed to be in the most important powerful branch,

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the executive executes. The courts are there to review constitutionality,

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>period full stop. They're not there to question the judgment

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of a person, in this case, an executive branch official

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>who was delegated pretty clear authority to ask whatever questions

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>are necessary, provided there is a constitutional purpose, and here

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the constitutional purpose is enforcing the Voting Rights Act? So

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>what is the real story here? Was I mentioned? The

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.320
<v Speaker 1>judge himself admits that this is basically about political power.

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Potentially some states could lose seats in the US House

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and billions of dollars, some portion of which might be

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>allocated elsewhere, and as there was, some people might be

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>hurt by that based upon this hypothetical that people aren't

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>going to respond to a question that asks are you

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a citizen or not? And oh, by the way, if

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not a citizen, it doesn't ask are you here

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>legally or illegally? It's not asking people to self incriminate.

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:17.359
<v Speaker 1>It is a pretty basic question of a country. Are

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you a citizen? Are you not a citizen? I think

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that most Americans would probably agree. Guys behind the glass,

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>do you agree with that assertion? You should know who?

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>What percentage of Americans are citizens? What percentage of people

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in America are non citizens? Seems pretty reasonable to me

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in a country top of the list citizenship. No broader question.

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Should should the census count all people? Oppose that? Also

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 1>to you, guys, if you are here illegally, should you

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.359
<v Speaker 1>be counted in a census so that maybe you get

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>one more see it in the House of Representatives in

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:58.800
<v Speaker 1>your state? Is that fair? Is not fair? Pretty basic?

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:01.879
<v Speaker 1>But Democrats say, actually it's unfair. The other way, it's

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>actually unfair. So there are a lot of legal aliens, Well,

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 1>they use public services in your districts. You need more

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:11.959
<v Speaker 1>money now, But why is there another representative? And why

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>does a probably red state that has a lower percentage

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of legal aliens, why do they get less political power?

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And where are the Republicans. I've never heard a Republicans

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:23.400
<v Speaker 1>say a word about Oh my gosh, this is actually

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:26.719
<v Speaker 1>another magnet for illegal immigration, sanctuary cities. Have you ever

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>heard someone say, well, sanctuary cities are a magnet for

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>illegal aliens, and that's actually going to be in more

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:34.400
<v Speaker 1>power for their state. So there's actually an incentive before

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>there's ever an amnesty for open borders. I think more

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 1>than anything this week, what we found out with this

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>bill is that both parties are for open borders. I

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 1>think they both became exposed and now we both know

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 1>what they're all about. Essentially, that's the stakes, and they

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 1>can't keep lying to us about it. In twenty twenty,

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 1>this would be a fundamental question. President Trump layed out

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of what the fundamental questions are in that state

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Union. You know, if we don't have a

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 1>border wall, we don't have sovereignty, we're not a country.

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Pretty basic thing, fundamental. It really the political class. They're

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 1>up in arms. How could you ever believe in, you know,

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 1>territorial integrity because apparently they don't believe that there are

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>border lines in this country. Okay, so borders. Do you

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 1>believe in borders or not? Do you believe in defending

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 1>your citizens or do you believe that America exists for

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone in the world. Do you believe in in fanticide,

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>do you believe in socialism? Pretty basic things, and Republicans

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 1>will rally to the President's side on that. But then

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:27.360
<v Speaker 1>when push comes to shove, when you get into the

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 1>nitty gritty of policy, he's pretty much left high and dry.

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I still think probably the most telling act of this

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Congress is what was their seminole achievements with the two

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:40.800
<v Speaker 1>years under President Trump when we had all three branches?

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:43.399
<v Speaker 1>And oh, by the way, the political class always said

0:44:43.960 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 1>with respect to healthcare and probably a bunch of other

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 1>things as well, well, to do this first, we need

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the House. Okay, got the House. Well we need the Senate.

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Got the Senate. Well we need the presidency. Got the presidency.

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>We need the Supreme Court? Got Supreme Court. Who's kidding?

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Who here? Who is getting who here? And I want

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to go back to that fundamental question about people in

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the census. And this does get into a little bit

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of the legal weeds, but it really shouldn't fundamental question

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:18.439
<v Speaker 1>that Americans should be able to pose to their representatives.

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>In my view, why should non citizens, including illegal aliens,

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to increase the political power of some Americans

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 1>and decrease the political power of other Americans. So this

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>comes down to definition of people. A constitution talks about

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Congress shall set the rules for counting citizens, and we'll

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 1>use it to apportion seats. That's Article one. Section two

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Constitution calls for a citizenship, citizens census counts,

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>apportioning representatives, and directing taxes. And then the language was

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>modified after the abolition of slavery under Section two of

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the fourteenth Amendment. So of course before there were slavery provisions,

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 1>they were stricken after the abolition of slavery, so that

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 1>every American was counted. Boy, And I'll quote here from

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:04.719
<v Speaker 1>section to fourteenth Amendment, which requires that a portioning can

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be based on quote, the whole number of persons in

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 1>each state, excluding Indians, not tax The section that becomes

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:16.120
<v Speaker 1>both comes before proceeds Section two of the fourteenth Amendment.

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Section one begins all persons born or naturalized in the

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:24.760
<v Speaker 1>United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof our citizens

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:29.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you're reading that document like a normal person

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and not like a liberal lawyer, okay, first sentence defines

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:37.879
<v Speaker 1>who persons are. Second sentence references persons. Those persons are

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:42.319
<v Speaker 1>born or naturalized in the US and subject to the

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:47.799
<v Speaker 1>jurisdiction thereof that's who the whole number of persons in

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 1>each state are. And the same holds true for the

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Constitution itself, by the way, and the census count is

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 1>called for under the Constitution. The preamble of the Constitution

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>quote we the people of the United States, not as

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>constitutional scholar John Eastman puts it, we the people of

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the world, or we any foreign nationals who happen to

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>be in the United States when a census is taken.

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 1>This is pretty basic stuff. You never have heard this questions.

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I have not heard a politician with any kind of

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:22.400
<v Speaker 1>bully pulpit get up and say, why should illegal aliens

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:27.760
<v Speaker 1>dilute your vote and increase the power of another person's vote. Again,

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 1>this is minutia. This is getting into the weeds. But

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this is just as this is vital, just like the

0:47:32.080 --> 0:47:34.520
<v Speaker 1>border wall is vital. And it comes from the same

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 1>line of argumentation, which is, are we a country or not?

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Do we respect our citizens or not? And it's very

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>clear that the political quest does not. Otherwise you might

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:44.840
<v Speaker 1>have heard Republicans one time step up and actually defend

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration on including the question, even though the

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 1>question can't be proven that it's going to suppress suppress

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 1>response rates, because who should be afraid of answering the

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 1>question Am I a citizen or not? When I check

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the box not, it doesn't say yes, I'm here illegally,

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Come arrest me. So there have been legal fights on

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the definition of persons. It's been inconclusive. There's a legislative

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>solution as well. There's a representative from Ohio. His name's

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Warren Davidson. He recently reintroduced a constitutional amendment, the Fair

0:48:16.480 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Representation Amendment, that a portions representative sole we quote by

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>counting the number of persons in each state who are

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:26.319
<v Speaker 1>citizens of the United States unquote. And here's what he

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 1>says about that. He says, Ohio citizens should not have

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>their voices diminished by other states harboring illegal aliens in

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:35.720
<v Speaker 1>sanctuary cities. Many Americans don't even realize that through current

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 1>census practices, non citizens dilute the influence of citizens, especially

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>in Ohio and other states with lower non citizen populations.

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:46.879
<v Speaker 1>The status quo of awarding states greater representation for this

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 1>illegal behavior subverts our Constitution, proper census calculations are needed

0:48:53.080 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that every citizens vote counts. Now, this amendment,

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:01.879
<v Speaker 1>of course, is just going to languish in Speaker Pelosi's House,

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But here's the reality, it also languished in Republican control

0:49:05.040 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 1>at houses. Why is that the case? Why shouldn't this

0:49:07.800 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>fight be had? So I've argued, and in a piece

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that's going to come out for the Federalist shortly, I

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 1>make the case that excluding non citizens from the census

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:20.439
<v Speaker 1>might be a legal and political loser, given the state

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of today's courts and the political incentives around it. But

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's incumbent upon those of us who believe in the

0:49:26.680 --> 0:49:29.800
<v Speaker 1>rule of law and the sanctity of citizenship to challenge

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the statish quo, both in the courts and in the

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 1>legislative spheres, just as Democrats do on every single matter,

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 1>as you're seeing today, for example with the President's National

0:49:38.719 --> 0:49:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Emergency Declaration. I mean, Democrats challenge on every single playing

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:45.920
<v Speaker 1>field they possibly can. And when do Republicans put up

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:48.680
<v Speaker 1>fights and what do Republicans put up fights for? As

0:49:48.680 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned before, what do they do in two years

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 1>their seminal achievement in that in that Congress was a

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:57.360
<v Speaker 1>tax reform bill which wasn't even exactly what the president

0:49:57.400 --> 0:49:59.919
<v Speaker 1>had called for when he ran for office, and clear

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:03.959
<v Speaker 1>it was not Agenda item number one. They got their priority,

0:50:04.000 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and they ignored the priorities that the American people had

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>called for above all else. So, as I said, members

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of the political establishment who cling to the status quo

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:14.440
<v Speaker 1>should be put on record and made to answer the

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:17.359
<v Speaker 1>following question. You should demand this question of your representatives.

0:50:17.880 --> 0:50:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Why should non citizens, including illegal aliens, be able to

0:50:20.920 --> 0:50:23.920
<v Speaker 1>increase the political power of some Americans while decreasing the

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:28.799
<v Speaker 1>political power of others. This is Ben Weingarten in for

0:50:28.880 --> 0:50:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexon on the Buck Sexon Show. Eight four four

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 1>nine zero zero two eight two five. That's eight four

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:36.719
<v Speaker 1>four nine zero zero two eight two five. We'll be

0:50:36.800 --> 0:50:41.200
<v Speaker 1>right back. Global Verification Network is the only dual certified

0:50:41.320 --> 0:50:45.000
<v Speaker 1>veteran own background investigations and vetting company. It's useful if

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you're renting out a home or another space. For important

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:51.280
<v Speaker 1>decisions like these, you need a service like Global Verification Network.

0:50:51.520 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Go TOMGVN dot com or call at eight seven seven

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 1>six nine five one one seven nine. Global Verification Network

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:02.200
<v Speaker 1>is federally certified as a veteran owned small business. It's

0:51:02.239 --> 0:51:05.919
<v Speaker 1>independently certified by the National Veteran Business Development Council, which

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is the only minority spend certification recognized by the Billion

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Dollar Roundtable. Global Verification Network is headquartered in Chicago with

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 1>offices throughout the nation. They are the risk mitigation experts

0:51:16.640 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and they work with all companies from startups to fourtune

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:22.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundreds rest ashore. No data or client information is

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:26.040
<v Speaker 1>ever offshored, and all employees are located throughout the United States.

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Visit Global Verification Network at MYGVN dot com or call

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 1>them at eight seven seven six nine five one one

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:37.680
<v Speaker 1>seven nine. This has Ben wine Garden in four Buck

0:51:37.760 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 1>sexon on the Buck Sexon Show. Lines are open eight

0:51:40.760 --> 0:51:44.520
<v Speaker 1>four four nine zero zero two eight to five eight

0:51:44.520 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 1>four four nine zero zero two eight to five. You

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:50.160
<v Speaker 1>can follow me on Twitter at bh wine Garden and

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I actually just tweeted out a quick explainer on the

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Census citizenship for your reference. Or We've got a bevy

0:51:56.680 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of callers from the Mid Atlantic region out tonight. Let's

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:03.279
<v Speaker 1>go to No in Virginia Beach, Virginia. No, you're on

0:52:03.320 --> 0:52:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the Buck Sex and Show. Oh hey, then are you know, yeah,

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. Uh, yeah, that's that's about three years three

0:52:11.200 --> 0:52:13.359
<v Speaker 1>four years ago, Ched Kent did a really good, uh

0:52:13.480 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 1>exposay on what was Donald Trump or right about birthday

0:52:16.560 --> 0:52:20.320
<v Speaker 1>citizenship and it actually went into the actual the framers

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of the amendment to see what they they went because

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it was very lengthy debate on the Sun floor about it,

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and it was a very very very good expersay on it, saying,

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:32.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically that the children of illegal aliens are

0:52:32.760 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not subjects to the jurisdiction there of evidence in the amendment,

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and because they must be subduct the jurisdiction thereof and

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:44.279
<v Speaker 1>since the parents are the children are Yeah. No, it's

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:46.719
<v Speaker 1>a it's a question that's been raised in and thanks

0:52:46.719 --> 0:52:48.680
<v Speaker 1>for the call. It's a question that's been raised in

0:52:49.360 --> 0:52:52.759
<v Speaker 1>any number of pieces of litigation, and of course the

0:52:52.840 --> 0:52:55.359
<v Speaker 1>left raises great arguments. I think the arguments on our

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:59.080
<v Speaker 1>side are more compelling. You see conservative legal scholars who

0:52:59.080 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>are very split on this question, and of course usually

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the arguments are in some way former fashion sort of

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 1>tinged by their views on immigration. More broadly, these questions

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:11.680
<v Speaker 1>really strike at the heart though, of the question of

0:53:11.880 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 1>who are we as a nation. What did the language

0:53:13.880 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 1>mean at the time it was written. And I think

0:53:15.760 --> 0:53:17.759
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to make the argument that subject to

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the jurisdiction thereof doesn't mean subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

0:53:21.680 --> 0:53:24.360
<v Speaker 1>That is, if you came here and your parents weren't

0:53:24.400 --> 0:53:27.400
<v Speaker 1>citizens and you come into this country, whose jurisdiction are

0:53:27.440 --> 0:53:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you subject to? Well, temporarily, of course, you're subject to

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:34.120
<v Speaker 1>our laws, but that's not the power that typically you're

0:53:34.160 --> 0:53:37.600
<v Speaker 1>governed by. So I think it's a legitimate question. There's

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:40.799
<v Speaker 1>some great, great arguments out there. You can see on

0:53:40.840 --> 0:53:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the federalist Judge Hoe, who's a federal judge out of Texas,

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:47.319
<v Speaker 1>has written sort of the anti case on birthright citizenship.

0:53:47.680 --> 0:53:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Michael Anton has stirred up the political class in many ways,

0:53:50.880 --> 0:53:56.480
<v Speaker 1>but in particular his argument in favor of challenging birthright citizenship.

0:53:56.480 --> 0:53:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And of course the President himself has brought up the question,

0:53:59.280 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 1>perhaps to raise it as a trial balloon and see

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:03.880
<v Speaker 1>where the political wins might be. But I think it's

0:54:03.880 --> 0:54:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate question and it absolutely should be debated. All right,

0:54:07.719 --> 0:54:10.520
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Randy from Richmond, Virginia. Randy, you're on

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:15.319
<v Speaker 1>the Buck Sexton Show. Yes, it's been correct. It is.

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I got several things I want to talk about, but

0:54:18.880 --> 0:54:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I just want to want to talk about that. There.

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Mark Laman mentions a lot of times, this is like

0:54:23.239 --> 0:54:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a post constitutent republic, and I really believe that. So

0:54:26.440 --> 0:54:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're trying to do is save a republic.

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>It's already gone. It's been gone for a number of years.

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 1>We just didn't recognize that. That's the first point. Second,

0:54:34.440 --> 0:54:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like what mister Trump is trying to do

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:39.319
<v Speaker 1>it is not the way to do it. He is

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:42.160
<v Speaker 1>listening to the wrong advisers. He needs to come out

0:54:42.200 --> 0:54:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to the people and persuade the twenty and thirty million

0:54:44.760 --> 0:54:47.360
<v Speaker 1>people who have not been voting for over forty to

0:54:47.480 --> 0:54:50.879
<v Speaker 1>fifty years. You get them back on side to vote

0:54:50.920 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for liberty. Everything will change overnight, everything. But he too,

0:54:54.800 --> 0:54:57.239
<v Speaker 1>you get those of people engage, You're not We're gonna

0:54:57.280 --> 0:54:59.760
<v Speaker 1>have the other forty million balloting for having no more liberty,

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 1>others saying they want more socialist. That's what's gonna be

0:55:03.680 --> 0:55:07.040
<v Speaker 1>all with your word more not polarized like the guy

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:08.959
<v Speaker 1>with Steve Days, and I think it is. He says

0:55:09.000 --> 0:55:12.880
<v Speaker 1>we're balcan eye. That's absolutely correct. We're balcan eyed. We

0:55:12.960 --> 0:55:16.319
<v Speaker 1>have been balcanized for many, many decades, and we'll never

0:55:16.440 --> 0:55:19.520
<v Speaker 1>realized that. We're none starting to realize that only because

0:55:19.560 --> 0:55:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we're now engaged in the argument. And not to add

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:25.959
<v Speaker 1>to that, we have lost the arguments partly because we've

0:55:25.960 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 1>lost the language. We don't even know what conservative means.

0:55:29.440 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Conservative meant to be all one time preserved values, preservative

0:55:34.280 --> 0:55:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to liberty, but they wouldn't mean it actually made no

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:40.680
<v Speaker 1>because because it meants with the status quote, what is

0:55:40.680 --> 0:55:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the status quote? It's not liberty, it's tyranny. It's statism,

0:55:46.040 --> 0:55:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it's socialism. And we've had a social qualizized quas socialist

0:55:51.440 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 1>state since the time of FDR really spent the time.

0:55:55.120 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 1>But Winter Wilson when he gave to the banking institutions

0:55:58.840 --> 0:56:03.919
<v Speaker 1>control VERYCA and a COB for that the RS, why

0:56:03.960 --> 0:56:06.319
<v Speaker 1>would they do that? The gato our lives and they've

0:56:06.320 --> 0:56:08.759
<v Speaker 1>been controleing olives. So in the Federal Reserve when they

0:56:08.760 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 1>say well we'll go ahead and do this and that

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:14.279
<v Speaker 1>say they're CONTROI what our currency? How you remain in

0:56:14.320 --> 0:56:16.520
<v Speaker 1>our lives? We don't when you do that. The gam

0:56:16.600 --> 0:56:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Congress gave that over to them their authority, didn't they

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And you hear they do it again again and again

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and again. Our enemy has been more of the Congress

0:56:25.400 --> 0:56:28.040
<v Speaker 1>than anything else. But we keep voting on the same

0:56:28.120 --> 0:56:31.480
<v Speaker 1>people over and over again. Why because they give us

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:34.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff like if you're a black person, I vote for

0:56:34.160 --> 0:56:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that guy over that because they gives me stuck. The

0:56:37.680 --> 0:56:41.800
<v Speaker 1>gam Press convinced half the people the vote against anything

0:56:41.920 --> 0:56:45.120
<v Speaker 1>portunity to liberty and vote for more socialism. So they

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:48.200
<v Speaker 1>vote in more Democrats to get what more Randy We're

0:56:48.200 --> 0:56:50.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to go to break shortly. I share your passion,

0:56:50.960 --> 0:56:53.399
<v Speaker 1>and I share your outrage. And actually in the next

0:56:53.440 --> 0:56:55.640
<v Speaker 1>hour we're gonna talk a little bit about how our

0:56:55.680 --> 0:56:59.720
<v Speaker 1>constitutional liberal liberties have been eviscerated. The language is stolen.

0:57:00.040 --> 0:57:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Woodrow Wilson, of course, was the start of all this.

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:04.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Ben Weingarten in four Buck Sex and on

0:57:04.640 --> 0:57:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the Buck Sexon show. It for four zero two eight

0:57:07.480 --> 0:57:13.520
<v Speaker 1>two five. Will be right back. This is Ben weinertan

0:57:13.600 --> 0:57:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in for Buck sexon on the Buck Sexton Show eight

0:57:16.840 --> 0:57:19.800
<v Speaker 1>for four nine zero zero two eight to five eight

0:57:19.800 --> 0:57:23.360
<v Speaker 1>for four nine zero zero two eight two five. I've

0:57:23.360 --> 0:57:25.640
<v Speaker 1>been teasing this for a little bit in just a moment,

0:57:25.680 --> 0:57:28.680
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a constitutional scholar, a human trigger warning

0:57:28.680 --> 0:57:30.640
<v Speaker 1>as I like to call him, to talk a little

0:57:30.640 --> 0:57:35.000
<v Speaker 1>bit about citizenship, a bit this census question, but also

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the emergency that was declared today, and we'll talk a

0:57:38.640 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 1>bit about the legal ramifications, what the challenges are likely

0:57:43.240 --> 0:57:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to be, what the president will do to counter Potentially

0:57:48.040 --> 0:57:51.040
<v Speaker 1>this should be a fascinating legal battle to watch, in

0:57:51.080 --> 0:57:53.960
<v Speaker 1>part because it really implicates questions of separation of powers

0:57:54.000 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and checks and balances, and in this case, as we'll

0:57:56.120 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 1>get to in a moment, here, you have a president.

0:57:58.880 --> 0:58:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Some will argue taking authority from the legislative branch, but

0:58:02.000 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it's authority that the legislative branch delegated to the president

0:58:05.400 --> 0:58:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and the executive branch, and that's something that has done.

0:58:08.200 --> 0:58:11.439
<v Speaker 1>It's very commonplace, and you have constitutional conservatives who don't

0:58:11.480 --> 0:58:14.880
<v Speaker 1>like that necessarily. But what this reflects, as I mentioned

0:58:14.880 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 1>at the top of this episode, is the fact that

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the president has avowed himself of every potential possible option

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and was left with no choice by the political establishment

0:58:26.720 --> 0:58:28.960
<v Speaker 1>but to go with this route. And we'll see how

0:58:29.000 --> 0:58:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it plays out. And again I think this guest will

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:34.080
<v Speaker 1>argue in just a sec that the legal authority is there.

0:58:34.280 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 1>This is more a political question than anything else. All right, So,

0:58:37.360 --> 0:58:40.480
<v Speaker 1>without further ado, John you is a human trigger warning

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:42.760
<v Speaker 1>for Democrats everywhere. You probably know him as one of

0:58:42.800 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the George W. Bush administrations chief legal architects of the

0:58:46.080 --> 0:58:48.960
<v Speaker 1>so called War on Terror. He currently serves as a

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:52.680
<v Speaker 1>law professor at Berkeley, where I understand he's very popular

0:58:53.080 --> 0:58:55.480
<v Speaker 1>on campus. And I should mention that John and I

0:58:55.520 --> 0:58:58.040
<v Speaker 1>did an interview on a completely different topic, his book

0:58:58.320 --> 0:59:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Striking Power, How cyber robots and space weapons change the

0:59:02.400 --> 0:59:04.640
<v Speaker 1>rules for war that I think all of you will

0:59:04.680 --> 0:59:07.760
<v Speaker 1>find quite insightful. We'll tweet it out after the segment

0:59:08.000 --> 0:59:12.560
<v Speaker 1>without further ado, Professor you, thanks for joining us today, Ben,

0:59:12.600 --> 0:59:15.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. And I like this new title,

0:59:15.480 --> 0:59:18.800
<v Speaker 1>human trigger Warning. I think I should get a what

0:59:18.960 --> 0:59:20.720
<v Speaker 1>is it a called a Twitter handle or a T

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:22.960
<v Speaker 1>shirt T shirt that has that on the front. I

0:59:23.080 --> 0:59:24.800
<v Speaker 1>love it and should be a right up top on

0:59:24.840 --> 0:59:29.160
<v Speaker 1>your resume as well. All right, so let's jump right

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:31.800
<v Speaker 1>into it. John, you wrote a piece that I thought

0:59:31.880 --> 0:59:35.560
<v Speaker 1>was exceptional at National Review about a week ago where

0:59:35.720 --> 0:59:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you challenge some of the arguments about the president's legal

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:42.200
<v Speaker 1>authority to declare a national emergency and use that to

0:59:42.520 --> 0:59:46.200
<v Speaker 1>reallocate funds for purposes of building a wall and supplement

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:50.040
<v Speaker 1>this one point three seventy five billion that he procured today.

0:59:50.280 --> 0:59:52.760
<v Speaker 1>What is your best argument for why the president has

0:59:52.760 --> 0:59:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the authority to do this? Well, first, as I think

0:59:57.200 --> 0:59:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people in the media are really exactly

1:00:00.040 --> 1:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>treating what President Trump has done, of making the argument

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that it's a constitutional power grab and it's anything. But

1:00:09.680 --> 1:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a case where Congress has the law called

1:00:12.840 --> 1:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the National Emergencies Act in nineteen seventy six, and it

1:00:15.920 --> 1:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>said when the president issues a national emergency order, then

1:00:20.640 --> 1:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>he has to go through the following steps which have occurred.

1:00:24.000 --> 1:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And most importantly, Congress does not sit there and define

1:00:28.040 --> 1:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>what a national emergency is. Instead, it just recognizes that

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>has been and is the president's progative. Then step two,

1:00:37.160 --> 1:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and this is the key, is Congress has already passed

1:00:39.960 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a series of statutes that say, when there is a

1:00:44.280 --> 1:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>national emergency declared by the president, then he can reallocate

1:00:47.880 --> 1:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>funds from any military construction project to a new one

1:00:53.800 --> 1:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>so long as it supports the troops. I think it's

1:00:56.880 --> 1:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty straightforward. Actually, Then that the president has this already.

1:01:00.480 --> 1:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm afraid what you're seeing is almost a

1:01:03.040 --> 1:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump double standard. What would be normally approved, upheld, not

1:01:08.680 --> 1:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>even controversial under any other president is seen as somehow

1:01:13.760 --> 1:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>an attack on the constitution order just because the president's

1:01:17.640 --> 1:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>last name is Trump. You know. I think that's actually

1:01:21.160 --> 1:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the untold stories of this presidency is there's

1:01:25.040 --> 1:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the attack leveled. And I've mentioned this before, Oh, norms

1:01:28.280 --> 1:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>are being violated, the institutions are being threatened, the will

1:01:31.840 --> 1:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of the people is being thwarted by this president acting unilaterally.

1:01:35.680 --> 1:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Well actually relative to his predecessors. Can you think of

1:01:39.080 --> 1:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a more constrained president in the sense of judges probably

1:01:43.360 --> 1:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>overreaching and the legislative branch really not being helpful in

1:01:46.480 --> 1:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>any sense. Well, he has been, i think, challenging court

1:01:51.040 --> 1:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to a remarkable level. So you've seen cases where judges

1:01:55.800 --> 1:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>out here where I am in California, Hawaii have blocked

1:02:00.920 --> 1:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>various policies, and then you have cases where it's taken months,

1:02:07.680 --> 1:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>if not a year, for those cases to get to

1:02:09.840 --> 1:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court, so that eventually the normal standards are applied.

1:02:14.640 --> 1:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>So a good example with the travel band, which I

1:02:18.080 --> 1:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>think will I think this case about the wall will

1:02:22.200 --> 1:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>play out very similarly to the travel band case. There

1:02:25.800 --> 1:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you had courts out and why here block abuse of

1:02:29.920 --> 1:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>presidential power again given to him by Congress, that previous

1:02:33.760 --> 1:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>presidents had used regularly to regulate the flow of immigrants

1:02:38.400 --> 1:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>into the United States. And then it took you had

1:02:41.240 --> 1:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to go all Trump had to go all the way

1:02:42.560 --> 1:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to the Supreme Court to get the regular powers that

1:02:45.680 --> 1:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>presidents exercise recognized and improved. And it's worth noting, of course,

1:02:52.080 --> 1:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that in matters of national security, the president is typically

1:02:55.640 --> 1:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>provided wide latitude under the Constitution. Oh yes, and you know,

1:03:00.800 --> 1:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>as you know, Ben, you you know you interviewed peoplefore

1:03:03.080 --> 1:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>about my other books. The Constitution put aside these congressional statutes.

1:03:08.440 --> 1:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>But the Constitution created the presidency. The framers wanted the

1:03:12.560 --> 1:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>president to be a single person exactly so he could

1:03:15.880 --> 1:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>act quickly and decisively in response to emergencies. This is

1:03:21.040 --> 1:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>this is what Congress itself acknowledges when it gives the

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>president these kinds of broad powers by statute to act

1:03:27.240 --> 1:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in times of emergencies. So it's not a case where

1:03:30.000 --> 1:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the president and Congress disagree. This is a case actually

1:03:32.800 --> 1:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>where Congress has handed these powers to the president to

1:03:35.960 --> 1:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>amplify his powers and make it easier for him to

1:03:38.800 --> 1:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>act in time of emergency. Now, I'm sure there's going

1:03:42.200 --> 1:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to be some sort of absurd argument made about what

1:03:45.600 --> 1:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is the definition of an emergency? And then does a

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>judge get to overrule a president in the president's judgment

1:03:53.520 --> 1:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about what an emergency is? Is there any merit to

1:03:56.840 --> 1:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>an argument like that or do you see probably a

1:03:59.480 --> 1:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Ninth Circuit judge saying yes, there is a problem to it,

1:04:02.160 --> 1:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Supreme Court overruling that rationale. It's a great question.

1:04:07.240 --> 1:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, what you're asking is what the law is

1:04:11.960 --> 1:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and then predicting what some wild judge might do. So Unfortunately,

1:04:16.480 --> 1:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, there's scott to be one judge

1:04:18.720 --> 1:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>out there in the eight hundred federal judges in our

1:04:22.200 --> 1:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>country who will strike this down, who just like the

1:04:25.640 --> 1:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>judges struck down the travel Then I think they're going

1:04:28.280 --> 1:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to be judges who misread the law just because they

1:04:31.760 --> 1:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>want to stop Trump in any of these initiatives. But

1:04:35.520 --> 1:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>then what the actual law says is that courts aren't

1:04:39.520 --> 1:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to second guess the president in determining national emergency.

1:04:44.840 --> 1:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>The Supreme Court has never substituted its judgment for the

1:04:49.520 --> 1:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>presidents about whether a national emergency exists. The only question

1:04:54.400 --> 1:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is how much power can the president exercise if there

1:04:58.120 --> 1:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't once he declares an emergency. And there is a

1:05:01.560 --> 1:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>case from the nineteen fifties called Youngstown Sheet and Stealing Tube,

1:05:05.680 --> 1:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>where President Truman declared a national emergency occur over the

1:05:09.400 --> 1:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Korean War, but then he tried to nationalize the steal

1:05:12.760 --> 1:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>industry basically run a large sector of our economy. And this,

1:05:16.480 --> 1:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I think is very different from that. This is a

1:05:19.520 --> 1:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>case not where President Trump is claiming, oh, I can

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>run the economy because of the border. But it's what

1:05:26.880 --> 1:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>he said, congress Or Ray said, I can move money

1:05:29.280 --> 1:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>from one account to another to build military facilities. Is

1:05:32.320 --> 1:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>much narrower power, not even really involving any claim of

1:05:36.360 --> 1:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>constitutional authority by President Trump. But that said, and I

1:05:39.720 --> 1:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>expect the Supreme Court would uphold the president. That said,

1:05:43.760 --> 1:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't discount the possibility there's some trial judge in

1:05:47.640 --> 1:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco or Honolulu or Seattle who be willing to

1:05:51.960 --> 1:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>try to throw the way to the courts against the

1:05:54.800 --> 1:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>president and spark a constitutional confrontation. Yeah, it strikes me

1:05:58.680 --> 1:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>actually since you raisetown steel, which all of those who

1:06:02.160 --> 1:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>are critics of this policy ray, is that Youngstown is

1:06:05.080 --> 1:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>actually probably the right response to those who say President

1:06:07.880 --> 1:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump is creating a precedent that will allow some future

1:06:10.640 --> 1:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Democratic president to impose the New Green Deal by decree,

1:06:14.000 --> 1:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that Youngstown is actually probably a better analog for that

1:06:16.840 --> 1:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>than this case. Do you see that as well? I mean,

1:06:20.200 --> 1:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I understand the worries of my conservative friends who say,

1:06:24.040 --> 1:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't you creating a precedent for you know, President Warren

1:06:27.640 --> 1:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>or President Kamala Harris declaring a national emergency and then

1:06:31.360 --> 1:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>eliminating fossil fuel imports and forcing electrification of all and

1:06:36.960 --> 1:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the slaughter of all cowns Exactly? Well, I believe it

1:06:40.880 --> 1:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>was certain kinds of cows keep it in, as it were.

1:06:45.040 --> 1:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know the problem is that, you know, one

1:06:49.240 --> 1:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it does say emergency. An emergency does imply an event

1:06:53.360 --> 1:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>or something happening. So you couldn't declare national emergency about

1:06:56.920 --> 1:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the weather or crime levels or you know, poverty. You know,

1:07:01.400 --> 1:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not a consistent social condition. It would have to

1:07:05.080 --> 1:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be something happening, and you're responding to something happening otherwise

1:07:09.080 --> 1:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>than you're just you're not talking about an emergency. And

1:07:12.240 --> 1:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>then second, as you say, this is more like Youngstown,

1:07:14.640 --> 1:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>because again the question is what powers are you allowed

1:07:17.280 --> 1:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to exercise? Here? You're just talking about transferring money from

1:07:21.160 --> 1:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>one military construction account to another. It's kind of boring

1:07:26.360 --> 1:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>federal budget accounting in a way. You know, these people

1:07:29.320 --> 1:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>were about a green New Deal and might let me

1:07:31.040 --> 1:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>add I can't see President Harris or President Warrenson. Oh,

1:07:36.080 --> 1:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>because President Trump did not declare national emergency over the wall.

1:07:40.040 --> 1:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to restrain myself now. You know, I don't

1:07:42.880 --> 1:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>think anything President Trump does is going to act as

1:07:46.280 --> 1:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>some kind of restraint on what a future Warrant or

1:07:49.480 --> 1:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Harris presidency will do. But you know, there's a big

1:07:52.800 --> 1:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>difference because they don't have any delegated power from Congress

1:07:56.600 --> 1:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to force electrification of all of our energy and the

1:08:00.640 --> 1:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>end of use of fossil fuels and all the other

1:08:02.960 --> 1:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>wild dreams they have in the screen New Deal project

1:08:06.120 --> 1:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and the way I see it, and this is as

1:08:08.280 --> 1:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a layman talking here, you know, the delegation question is

1:08:12.360 --> 1:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>really what this all kind of comes down to in

1:08:15.000 --> 1:08:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the final analysis, So is you've described it as sort

1:08:17.680 --> 1:08:20.599
<v Speaker 1>of transferring funds from one account to another that had

1:08:20.600 --> 1:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>already been earmarked for the executive branch. Effectively, is there

1:08:24.080 --> 1:08:27.639
<v Speaker 1>an argument that certain provisions of the National Emergency Act

1:08:27.760 --> 1:08:32.479
<v Speaker 1>are unconstitutional because Congress is delegating powers It has no

1:08:32.560 --> 1:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>right to delegate. Ie. Congress exists to make laws and

1:08:35.920 --> 1:08:38.919
<v Speaker 1>appropriate funds, and it isn't the president's job to basically

1:08:38.960 --> 1:08:42.639
<v Speaker 1>be able to have that power handed to him. Again,

1:08:42.680 --> 1:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a people like I've read commentary

1:08:46.200 --> 1:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>some you know, people who are conservatives, you know, like

1:08:49.000 --> 1:08:52.519
<v Speaker 1>a Rampaul for example. I'm sorry, rand Pall, not a Rompall,

1:08:52.880 --> 1:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a Rampaul for example. I think they're completely misreading this.

1:08:56.360 --> 1:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're making this claim, Oh, the president is

1:08:58.920 --> 1:09:03.879
<v Speaker 1>seizing authority to use the power of the purse. It's anything.

1:09:03.920 --> 1:09:07.719
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if it had been like Lincoln, who

1:09:07.800 --> 1:09:09.599
<v Speaker 1>actually at the start of the Civil War went into

1:09:09.600 --> 1:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the treasuring took money out without any congressional act, then

1:09:13.240 --> 1:09:15.519
<v Speaker 1>you would have that argument. But this is a case

1:09:15.600 --> 1:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>where Congress already put money in the pot and it

1:09:20.240 --> 1:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>said spend it on military construction, billions of dollars, and

1:09:24.320 --> 1:09:27.839
<v Speaker 1>then the president said, and then Congress says, under certain conditions,

1:09:27.880 --> 1:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you can move it from one project to the next.

1:09:31.120 --> 1:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>The money's already been appropriated by Congress, the purse has

1:09:34.680 --> 1:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>already been opened, and in fact then Congress already recognized

1:09:39.280 --> 1:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the authority of a president to move it around. So

1:09:42.280 --> 1:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, these claims that the president is

1:09:44.600 --> 1:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>evading the power of the purse taking away congress urs

1:09:47.640 --> 1:09:49.919
<v Speaker 1>this is anything, But this is an area where Congress

1:09:49.960 --> 1:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted the president to have this power and gave it

1:09:52.720 --> 1:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>away willingly. One of the attacks on the president's power,

1:09:58.439 --> 1:10:00.479
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have to leave it at this question, but

1:10:00.479 --> 1:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear your take on it. One of

1:10:02.400 --> 1:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the biggest assaults on his power during this presidency has

1:10:06.040 --> 1:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>been the use of universal or nationwide injunctions, where effectively

1:10:11.520 --> 1:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>one in six hundred judges in federal courts across the

1:10:14.720 --> 1:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>country can say, my judgment overrules the president's judgment, and

1:10:19.479 --> 1:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>thus a decision some kind of executive action will be

1:10:24.439 --> 1:10:28.519
<v Speaker 1>vacated or stalled put on hold for everyone in the country.

1:10:28.560 --> 1:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So one judge who has jurisdiction in one particular area,

1:10:31.800 --> 1:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>their ruling applies to everyone nationwide. And this has of

1:10:34.920 --> 1:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>course happened with the travel ban and in series of

1:10:37.560 --> 1:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>other instances as well. In response to that travel band case,

1:10:41.360 --> 1:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Justice Clarence Thomas, one of your former bosses, challenge the

1:10:45.360 --> 1:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>notion that universal injunctions are necessarily constitutional, that there wasn't

1:10:50.240 --> 1:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>really a historical precedent for them. They're sort of a

1:10:52.640 --> 1:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>new creation, and frankly, he thinks that a president or

1:10:57.120 --> 1:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>some other party may have to challenge them to the

1:11:00.200 --> 1:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. I agree with him. Frankly, my question would be,

1:11:04.400 --> 1:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is there a way do you believe that universal injunctions

1:11:06.760 --> 1:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>can be killed? Well, first, I agree with Justice Thomas,

1:11:12.000 --> 1:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>who has I have to say, excellent taste in his hires.

1:11:15.520 --> 1:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>But I have to say, Josice Thomas, I think is

1:11:17.479 --> 1:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>right on this, and I think it's fairly straightforward. A court,

1:11:22.000 --> 1:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>like a district court like the ones here, have power

1:11:26.080 --> 1:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>only over the people who appear before in its territory.

1:11:30.400 --> 1:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Sole San Francisco's territory of its courts is only the

1:11:33.800 --> 1:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>northern part of California. They don't have, I think, the

1:11:37.040 --> 1:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>authority to tell the entire federal government. God, I'm sorry,

1:11:40.320 --> 1:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to cut it right there. We will

1:11:42.080 --> 1:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have you back, and we will finish this conversation. And

1:11:44.040 --> 1:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. This was John Yu and this is

1:11:45.920 --> 1:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Ben Weingarten in four Buck Sexon on the Buck Sex

1:11:48.400 --> 1:11:50.519
<v Speaker 1>and Show eight four four nine zero zero two eight

1:11:50.520 --> 1:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>two five will be right back. This is the Buck

1:11:56.000 --> 1:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Sexon Show and this is Ben Weingarten in four Buck

1:11:59.120 --> 1:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Sexton ones. Open it for four nine zero zero to

1:12:02.560 --> 1:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>eight to five. You can follow me on Twitter at

1:12:04.960 --> 1:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>bh Winegarden. Let's go to the phone here, Let's go

1:12:08.040 --> 1:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to Charlie in Ocean City, Maryland. Charlie, you're on the

1:12:11.720 --> 1:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sex and Show. Thanks for taking my call, Arabn.

1:12:15.680 --> 1:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm a little older senior citizen, but I

1:12:21.280 --> 1:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>followed politics pretty well and I'm a conservative, and I'm

1:12:26.960 --> 1:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>not ashamed of that. I think a lot of our

1:12:31.320 --> 1:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>supposed conservative Republicans don't really vote that way. And my

1:12:39.920 --> 1:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>question to you is, since you guys had such a

1:12:42.960 --> 1:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>big voice, why can't we public they're voting, whether it

1:12:49.680 --> 1:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>be in the Senate or into Congress and make it public.

1:12:54.479 --> 1:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Because all politicians, once they get into office, they're most

1:13:01.240 --> 1:13:07.439
<v Speaker 1>prioritize vision is reelection and if we start publishing how

1:13:07.479 --> 1:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>they vote, then they will be more aware of their voters,

1:13:13.920 --> 1:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>which is me. Charlie thanks for the cause. So I

1:13:17.040 --> 1:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>think the idea here is sort of name and shame.

1:13:19.360 --> 1:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Pull out the ten most vital votes and let's get

1:13:23.000 --> 1:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone on record, and let's put it out there. And

1:13:24.800 --> 1:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what I would suggest to you, Charlie, is,

1:13:28.960 --> 1:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>like you said, the first role of politics is win.

1:13:31.240 --> 1:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>The second role politics is win reelection. And for folks

1:13:34.120 --> 1:13:37.879
<v Speaker 1>in the House, they continue to sort of hoodwink voters.

1:13:38.040 --> 1:13:40.479
<v Speaker 1>And part of this is that who do they really

1:13:40.520 --> 1:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>answer to? Ultimately they ultimately answer to their donors. And

1:13:43.760 --> 1:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you have every once in a blue moon, you know,

1:13:46.880 --> 1:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>someone like a Dave of Brad who comes out and

1:13:48.800 --> 1:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>wins on principles and ideology. The best thing that we

1:13:51.960 --> 1:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>can do long term isn't any one particular election. We

1:13:55.200 --> 1:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>have to take back the real institutions, the institutions that

1:13:58.080 --> 1:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>build civil society. Our full sure, our schools are media

1:14:02.200 --> 1:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that should be our hundred year project. Just like the

1:14:04.360 --> 1:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Progressives had their long March, this has been Winartan in

1:14:07.280 --> 1:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>for Buck Sex and on the Buck Sex and Show

1:14:09.040 --> 1:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>eight four four nine zero zero two eight two five

1:14:12.479 --> 1:14:14.679
<v Speaker 1>eight four four nine zero zero two eight two five

1:14:19.640 --> 1:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Morning Coffee is an American institution. That's why when it

1:14:22.240 --> 1:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to starting my day, I reach for the most

1:14:24.120 --> 1:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>American coffee on the market, Black Rifle Coffee. I like

1:14:27.800 --> 1:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to load up on Black Raffle Coffee for extra ammunition

1:14:30.439 --> 1:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>two times per day. It's got a great flavor, it

1:14:32.880 --> 1:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>packs a punch, and it reflects my conservative values. Black

1:14:36.400 --> 1:14:38.519
<v Speaker 1>Rifle Coffee gives a portion of their sales to veteran

1:14:38.520 --> 1:14:41.519
<v Speaker 1>and first responder causes. Black Rifle Coffee is rose to order,

1:14:41.680 --> 1:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>guaranteeing you fresh, delicious coffee with every order. Black Rifle's

1:14:45.080 --> 1:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Coffee Club makes things easy. Just pick your plan in

1:14:47.160 --> 1:14:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the amount you want, and Black Raffles ships your coffee

1:14:49.640 --> 1:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>right to your door every month. Hassle free, wake up

1:14:52.320 --> 1:14:55.719
<v Speaker 1>with America's coffee, Black Rifle Coffee. Visit Black Rifle Coffee

1:14:55.720 --> 1:14:58.479
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash buck and receive fifteen percent off your order.

1:14:58.640 --> 1:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>That's Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck for fifteen

1:15:01.000 --> 1:15:07.759
<v Speaker 1>percent off Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash buck. Welcome

1:15:07.760 --> 1:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>back to the Buck Sexton Show. This is ben Wine

1:15:10.080 --> 1:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Garden in four Buck Sexon here at the top of

1:15:13.640 --> 1:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>our three dialing numbers eight four four nine zero zero

1:15:17.400 --> 1:15:19.439
<v Speaker 1>two eight to five, and you can follow me on

1:15:19.479 --> 1:15:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at bh wine Garden right in the past couple hours,

1:15:22.640 --> 1:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>we talked a lot about sovereignty citizenship, and I mentioned

1:15:25.640 --> 1:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that this census citizenship question is really intrinsic to the

1:15:28.840 --> 1:15:32.599
<v Speaker 1>entire broader argument, and it's being challenged in mitigation right now,

1:15:32.600 --> 1:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>which we found out today is headed up to the

1:15:35.080 --> 1:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. Jay Chrishan Adams serve from two thousand and

1:15:38.400 --> 1:15:40.519
<v Speaker 1>five to twenty ten and the Voting Section at the

1:15:40.600 --> 1:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>United States Department of Justice, so he knows a little

1:15:43.080 --> 1:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>thing or two about the Voting Rights Act and why

1:15:45.400 --> 1:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the census citizenship question is relevant to it. Today he's

1:15:48.920 --> 1:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>President in General Council of the Public Interest Legal Foundation

1:15:52.160 --> 1:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>known as PILF, which has filed amicus curi briefs alongside

1:15:55.720 --> 1:15:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the Commerce Department, both in the New York federal case

1:15:58.680 --> 1:16:00.559
<v Speaker 1>and now at the Supreme Court is where that New

1:16:00.600 --> 1:16:04.559
<v Speaker 1>York case has been punted to. Christian Adams joins us. Now, Christian,

1:16:04.560 --> 1:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>how are you, sir? I'm great glad to be here. Well,

1:16:08.120 --> 1:16:10.599
<v Speaker 1>it's my pleasure and thanks for all the great work

1:16:10.760 --> 1:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that PILF does. Let's get right to it. I think

1:16:14.120 --> 1:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that this case of census citizenship is a perfect microcosm

1:16:18.080 --> 1:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>for how the left uses lawfare to pursue its policy objectives.

1:16:22.840 --> 1:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And let's start with a very basic question about this

1:16:25.280 --> 1:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>New York federal case, which is who filed the case

1:16:28.320 --> 1:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Trump administration and did they have a right

1:16:31.040 --> 1:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to be heard? That is, did they have standing? Oh,

1:16:34.320 --> 1:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>my gracious, who filed? Well, remember, there's a whole bunch

1:16:38.160 --> 1:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of cases happening at one time. You have you have

1:16:43.160 --> 1:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a tax going on in California, in Maryland.

1:16:47.000 --> 1:16:50.679
<v Speaker 1>These obviously came out of New York. You have groups

1:16:50.760 --> 1:16:54.679
<v Speaker 1>like the Legal Women Voters, you have you have other

1:16:54.800 --> 1:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>organizations who all want to stop all want to stop

1:16:59.160 --> 1:17:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the the census, stop the Census from actually getting real

1:17:06.120 --> 1:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>scientific data about the number of non citizens who live

1:17:10.640 --> 1:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. It's it's just an astonishing You know,

1:17:15.400 --> 1:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>we hear all the time about science and how one

1:17:19.560 --> 1:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>party is the party of science. Well, here's an example

1:17:22.800 --> 1:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>where somebody doesn't want the truth about what's happening out there.

1:17:28.240 --> 1:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So let's go to the substance of the case. You know,

1:17:31.840 --> 1:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>the argument is made that by having this question essentially

1:17:35.720 --> 1:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>are you a citizen or not? And the only box

1:17:37.680 --> 1:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're in the not category is no, not a citizen.

1:17:40.200 --> 1:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, you don't out yourself as an

1:17:41.840 --> 1:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>illegal alien potentially, but more broadly, why is it imperative

1:17:46.320 --> 1:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that the government have accurate accounts of citizens and non citizens? Right?

1:17:52.640 --> 1:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>The reason that the Trump administration offered is that it

1:17:57.200 --> 1:18:00.400
<v Speaker 1>helps enforce the voting right Tack the Voting Right Attact,

1:18:00.439 --> 1:18:04.559
<v Speaker 1>of course, prevents discrimination in voting. And I can tell

1:18:04.640 --> 1:18:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you from very first hand experience that that is the

1:18:08.160 --> 1:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>truth that when you have citizenship data and you're preparing

1:18:13.320 --> 1:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a voting rights at case, you have a better case.

1:18:16.360 --> 1:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>How do I know this because I do it repeatedly.

1:18:18.880 --> 1:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I won a case in federal court very recently as

1:18:22.320 --> 1:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, in the United States District Court

1:18:25.920 --> 1:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for Guam. I'm actually in representing an Air Force retire

1:18:30.040 --> 1:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Air Force major in Guam who was denied the right

1:18:33.160 --> 1:18:36.599
<v Speaker 1>to vote because he was not a native tomorrow. And

1:18:36.680 --> 1:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we were able to prove that this law was racially

1:18:41.280 --> 1:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>discriminatory in its intent because of the senses data from

1:18:46.120 --> 1:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty and I won't trouble you with all the

1:18:49.120 --> 1:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>ins and outs of that was very important that year

1:18:51.880 --> 1:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>because that's when Guam became a territory with the people

1:18:55.280 --> 1:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>they're getting rights as citizenship. So we were able to

1:18:59.520 --> 1:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>figure out how many people were citizens and not citizens

1:19:03.320 --> 1:19:06.479
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen fifty because the census asked that question. But

1:19:06.560 --> 1:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that's only one example. When I was at the Justice

1:19:09.160 --> 1:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Department and I was bringing voting rights at cases, one

1:19:12.720 --> 1:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of the things you would put in your initial complaint

1:19:15.520 --> 1:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>was the citizen population. Now, the problem is that in

1:19:19.680 --> 1:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>most places in the country that's an estimate because you

1:19:22.680 --> 1:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have the real data. Because remember that's what those

1:19:25.200 --> 1:19:27.519
<v Speaker 1>fights all about, and so we would have to make

1:19:27.600 --> 1:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>guesses sometimes, and getting citizenship data in the next senses

1:19:32.439 --> 1:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>will help him enforce the Voting Rights Act. YEA. So

1:19:36.080 --> 1:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>this judge who Obama appointed judge in the Southern District

1:19:39.200 --> 1:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of New York, he says in his opinion that the

1:19:42.160 --> 1:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>census citizenship question is quote unquote not inconsistent with the Constitution. Ie,

1:19:48.400 --> 1:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>there's not really a constitutional argument against asking something as

1:19:51.640 --> 1:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>basic as are you a citizen or not? His beef,

1:19:54.280 --> 1:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>if I'm reading the opinion correctly, is with how Commerce

1:19:58.960 --> 1:20:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Wilber came to his decision, and then basically questioning

1:20:02.520 --> 1:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>his judgment altogether. How is it possible that a judge

1:20:06.439 --> 1:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>can substitute his wisdom for the person to whom the

1:20:10.000 --> 1:20:13.679
<v Speaker 1>power is delegated here in this case, the Commerce Secretary. Right,

1:20:13.760 --> 1:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the Congress has specifically delegated this power to do the

1:20:18.120 --> 1:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>citizenship to do all the senses questions to Commerce Secretary

1:20:22.240 --> 1:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Wilbur Ross. But you know what, the New York Immigration Coalition,

1:20:26.000 --> 1:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>who's the plaintiff in that case, doesn't like that. So

1:20:29.240 --> 1:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>what they had to do was form shop go to

1:20:31.760 --> 1:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan to find a judge who who apparently thinks that

1:20:40.160 --> 1:20:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the President can be second guest on this no matter

1:20:42.920 --> 1:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>what Congress said to the contrary. And so what the

1:20:47.920 --> 1:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>plaintiffs are saying is, hey, you didn't listen to the bureaucrats.

1:20:51.880 --> 1:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is just a pretext. You're supposed to

1:20:53.920 --> 1:20:58.599
<v Speaker 1>listen to the bureaucrats. You're supposed to basically do whatever

1:20:58.600 --> 1:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the New York Immigration Coalition once, or they're going to

1:21:00.960 --> 1:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>take you to court. And thank goodness, we have a

1:21:04.720 --> 1:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court now that is almost certainly likely to uphold

1:21:08.080 --> 1:21:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the citizenship question. Yeah, this judge in New York essentially

1:21:13.200 --> 1:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>struck down the citizenship question on the basis of the

1:21:17.040 --> 1:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>administrative Procedures Act. In other words, the way that the

1:21:20.479 --> 1:21:23.519
<v Speaker 1>Commerce Secretary came to his decision and what that decision

1:21:23.600 --> 1:21:26.599
<v Speaker 1>ultimately was. Do you think that case holds up at

1:21:26.600 --> 1:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>all when it gets to the Supreme Court. No. I

1:21:29.040 --> 1:21:32.479
<v Speaker 1>think what will happen is the Supreme Court justices who

1:21:32.520 --> 1:21:37.479
<v Speaker 1>are very familiar with the exercises, simply reading what the

1:21:37.560 --> 1:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>laws says. Right. The law says that the Commerce Secretary

1:21:42.360 --> 1:21:47.360
<v Speaker 1>has the authority to write the census questions, full stop. Okay,

1:21:47.720 --> 1:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that's all you need to decide this case is to

1:21:51.000 --> 1:21:53.839
<v Speaker 1>look at the law and see who has the power

1:21:53.880 --> 1:21:57.439
<v Speaker 1>to write the census questions under a law passed by

1:21:57.479 --> 1:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the Congress and signed by the President. That's the kind

1:22:00.920 --> 1:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of basic stuff we learned in Schoolhouse Rock. When the

1:22:04.280 --> 1:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>laws passed, it is a law and we have to

1:22:06.720 --> 1:22:09.519
<v Speaker 1>follow it. But these days up is down and in

1:22:09.760 --> 1:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>is out. And this judge sided with the New York

1:22:13.680 --> 1:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Immigration Coalition. Last question on this, and I think this

1:22:18.280 --> 1:22:21.719
<v Speaker 1>really gets to the core of a much bigger argument

1:22:21.760 --> 1:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>which hasn't been made yet, but I believe should be made.

1:22:24.320 --> 1:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to argue in a piece coming out

1:22:25.880 --> 1:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>soon at the Federalists that it must be made. The

1:22:28.880 --> 1:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>reality here is that non citizens essentially empower certain citizens

1:22:33.840 --> 1:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>politically and disempower other citizens politically, because, as I've discussed

1:22:38.720 --> 1:22:42.519
<v Speaker 1>earlier in this episode tonight, apportionment is determined based upon

1:22:42.640 --> 1:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>total population count ie citizens and non citizens, as well

1:22:47.320 --> 1:22:49.719
<v Speaker 1>as the allocation of hundreds of billions of federal dollars

1:22:49.800 --> 1:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>are dictated based upon total population count. And it goes

1:22:53.240 --> 1:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to this question of the definition of people the enumeration

1:22:57.360 --> 1:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>both in the Constitution and then in the fourteenth Amendment.

1:23:01.640 --> 1:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>In your view, is there a legal case to be

1:23:04.360 --> 1:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>made for defining people as citizens, period, full stop, and

1:23:09.000 --> 1:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>is it being made? Well, Okay, now we're talking about

1:23:12.200 --> 1:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a number of different things. Just to be clear, Apportionment

1:23:15.560 --> 1:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is how many congressional seats each state gets, Okay, and

1:23:21.080 --> 1:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>so far they've used total population. It does say people

1:23:24.920 --> 1:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Constitution, So the question is is that citizens

1:23:28.680 --> 1:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>non citizens are both. What I think is also very

1:23:32.200 --> 1:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>fascinating is when it comes to redistricting, you talk about

1:23:35.240 --> 1:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>political impacts all over the country. There are people elected

1:23:40.320 --> 1:23:45.959
<v Speaker 1>to office who are elected solely because because they're counting

1:23:46.040 --> 1:23:49.479
<v Speaker 1>non citizens for drawing the district lines for things like

1:23:49.600 --> 1:23:55.559
<v Speaker 1>school board, county council, state legislatures. Who's getting screwed by this?

1:23:55.720 --> 1:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>For example, African Americans in Los Angeles. African Americans in

1:24:00.320 --> 1:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles have been losing political power and political seats

1:24:05.600 --> 1:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on council over the last twenty years because of the

1:24:09.120 --> 1:24:13.559
<v Speaker 1>influx of illegal aliens into Los Angeles and the fact

1:24:13.560 --> 1:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that they're being counted for the purpose of drawing district

1:24:18.080 --> 1:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>lines for school board and council seats, and so what's

1:24:22.400 --> 1:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>happened is African Americans have been squeezed out. Here's how

1:24:25.479 --> 1:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that works. Let's say you need one hundred thousand people

1:24:28.080 --> 1:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in each district. Okay, it's probably more than that, but

1:24:30.960 --> 1:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll just take it. For an example, if you need

1:24:33.120 --> 1:24:36.839
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand people in a Hispanic district in Los Angeles,

1:24:37.120 --> 1:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>there might be seventy thousand citizen Hispanics and thirty thousand

1:24:41.280 --> 1:24:44.679
<v Speaker 1>non citizens. But in that African American district, where they're

1:24:44.680 --> 1:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>almost all citizens, it's going to take a hundred thousand citizens.

1:24:48.560 --> 1:24:51.719
<v Speaker 1>So Hispanic seat gets created under the Voting Rights Act

1:24:52.160 --> 1:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>because there's seventy thousand Hispanic citizens, and a African American

1:24:56.680 --> 1:25:00.479
<v Speaker 1>seat gets created only after there's one hundred thousand see

1:25:00.520 --> 1:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. It's a political subsidy to areas with

1:25:04.200 --> 1:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>high alien populations. Last question, real quick before I let

1:25:08.760 --> 1:25:10.479
<v Speaker 1>you go, because you've been doing great work on this

1:25:11.160 --> 1:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>HR one, the first bill put forth in the new

1:25:13.560 --> 1:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Democratic House. Tell our listeners what they need to know

1:25:16.120 --> 1:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>about HR one. This is Nancy Pelosi's top priority. It

1:25:20.080 --> 1:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>takes every bad idea about elections and makes it a

1:25:23.760 --> 1:25:28.679
<v Speaker 1>federal mandate. Takes all of the nonsense from California, just everything.

1:25:28.720 --> 1:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>It stripped states of their powers to run their own elections.

1:25:32.040 --> 1:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It federalizes all state elections into one centralized control. It's

1:25:38.160 --> 1:25:41.599
<v Speaker 1>their top priority. It is their number one priority. It's

1:25:41.640 --> 1:25:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a disaster Christian On that sunny note, we'll leave it

1:25:45.200 --> 1:25:47.360
<v Speaker 1>right there. Thanks so much for coming on. Appreciate all

1:25:47.400 --> 1:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>your great work. This has Ben Wangaran in for Buck

1:25:50.000 --> 1:25:52.599
<v Speaker 1>Sexon on the Buck Sexon Show eight four four nine

1:25:52.640 --> 1:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>zero zero two eight two five will be right back.

1:25:57.040 --> 1:25:59.479
<v Speaker 1>By now. You've probably heard Buck talk about snippy dot

1:25:59.520 --> 1:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>com new social media website. If you looked at snippy

1:26:02.439 --> 1:26:05.479
<v Speaker 1>dot com and left book again, thousands of Buck Sex

1:26:05.560 --> 1:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>and show listeners like you of joint snippy dot com

1:26:07.680 --> 1:26:11.360
<v Speaker 1>expressing their opinions and stirring up lively conversations. Snippy is

1:26:11.360 --> 1:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>an unbiased social media platform that's all about conversation and community.

1:26:15.400 --> 1:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Snippy not only encourages freedom of expression, but guarantees its

1:26:18.800 --> 1:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>users the ability to discuss topics freely without suppression from administrators.

1:26:23.600 --> 1:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Snippy is a place where everyone is free to express

1:26:25.960 --> 1:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>their thoughts and share their opinions. It's a real safe space.

1:26:29.680 --> 1:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Snippy is totally free to join, open to everyone. Join

1:26:32.800 --> 1:26:35.120
<v Speaker 1>us at snippy dot com and let your opinion matter.

1:26:35.479 --> 1:26:38.719
<v Speaker 1>There's no shadow banning and no suppression of conservative thought ever.

1:26:39.400 --> 1:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Now with an updated user interface and exciting new features,

1:26:42.240 --> 1:26:44.679
<v Speaker 1>also available in the Apple App Store and now available

1:26:44.720 --> 1:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for Android, Snippy your new alternative social media. This is

1:26:51.800 --> 1:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bucksex and Show, and this is Ben Wangarten in

1:26:54.320 --> 1:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>four bucksex in lines are open eight four four nine

1:26:57.920 --> 1:27:00.519
<v Speaker 1>zero zero Buck. That's eight four four nine zero zero

1:27:00.840 --> 1:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to eight two five. All right, we're gonna go to

1:27:02.840 --> 1:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the phone lines real quick, and I understand we have

1:27:05.479 --> 1:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>a one Robert Francis O'Rourke from El Paso, Texas joining us.

1:27:10.920 --> 1:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Robert Francis, You're on the Buck Sexton Show. Hello, Benn,

1:27:14.880 --> 1:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>how are you I'm well, I'm well, mister a roork

1:27:17.960 --> 1:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>how are you, sir? I'm okay then, But I just

1:27:21.080 --> 1:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>like I just don't understand, like like why don't you

1:27:23.880 --> 1:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>open your heart the way that we should open the borders?

1:27:26.360 --> 1:27:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Like I just I just want to know, like do

1:27:28.479 --> 1:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you do you just not want like your heart to

1:27:31.160 --> 1:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>be full of love and immigrants. There's room in your

1:27:33.840 --> 1:27:37.360
<v Speaker 1>honor for immigrants, So representative of ROURK, I want to

1:27:37.360 --> 1:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>ask you about that. If you were elected president, would

1:27:40.400 --> 1:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>your first act be to tear down every wall? Absolutely?

1:27:45.960 --> 1:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to tear down walls the same way then

1:27:47.800 --> 1:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to tear down the barriers between people when

1:27:50.920 --> 1:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>like it's just time to give out hugs at a

1:27:53.720 --> 1:27:57.519
<v Speaker 1>rally that like maybe has thirty or forty people down

1:27:57.640 --> 1:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the street from a Trump rally with like fifteen or

1:28:00.600 --> 1:28:04.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty thousand people. And I just also, I don't know

1:28:04.400 --> 1:28:06.360
<v Speaker 1>if you know this, man, because I know you're a

1:28:06.360 --> 1:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>conservative and you think you know things, but perhaps like

1:28:10.479 --> 1:28:13.679
<v Speaker 1>when you build walls and you're skateboarding, you can run

1:28:13.720 --> 1:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>into those walls. That's about that is a valid point

1:28:18.520 --> 1:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that now it is valid that actually it is no, no, no,

1:28:22.840 --> 1:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you to the extent to which you're

1:28:25.160 --> 1:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>not living on the streets of Brooklyn these days. Do

1:28:28.120 --> 1:28:30.599
<v Speaker 1>you have walls surrounding you when you're abode right now,

1:28:32.000 --> 1:28:34.559
<v Speaker 1>then let me explain something, okay, because when I'm the

1:28:34.600 --> 1:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>next president, I just don't want to have to go

1:28:36.640 --> 1:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>over the same ground because I'm very busy. That's why

1:28:40.320 --> 1:28:43.479
<v Speaker 1>I have to do social media while people see my

1:28:43.560 --> 1:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>root canal happening. And I just feel like it's time

1:28:46.280 --> 1:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>for people to understand that, yes, I'm maybe a mare

1:28:50.000 --> 1:28:52.559
<v Speaker 1>into a family that is worth like a cool four

1:28:52.680 --> 1:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>or five hundred million dollars, but I'm totally normal. And

1:28:57.240 --> 1:28:59.479
<v Speaker 1>the compound in which I live, like when we go

1:28:59.560 --> 1:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>see like Papa and Mama and like say, are flying

1:29:04.120 --> 1:29:07.839
<v Speaker 1>us in with helicopters? Of course there's walls, ben because

1:29:07.880 --> 1:29:11.439
<v Speaker 1>like we're really important. Now, let me ask you something,

1:29:11.439 --> 1:29:15.759
<v Speaker 1>because you went through many trials and tribuations in your life,

1:29:16.040 --> 1:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>what was the toughest thing about being a nanny on

1:29:18.720 --> 1:29:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the Upper West Side of New York following your ivlegue education. Well,

1:29:23.760 --> 1:29:26.479
<v Speaker 1>it's hard because like when you're a left wing sex

1:29:26.560 --> 1:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>symbol like I am, like you know, the people like

1:29:30.520 --> 1:29:32.759
<v Speaker 1>ladies just come over and they're like, oh my god, Pato,

1:29:33.240 --> 1:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going to stop climate change? And also I need

1:29:36.760 --> 1:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to see your washboard apps. I'd be like, excuse me, first,

1:29:40.240 --> 1:29:42.519
<v Speaker 1>are we going to bring down the climate one degree

1:29:42.600 --> 1:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>centigrade or not? And if they said yes, then obviously

1:29:46.240 --> 1:29:50.439
<v Speaker 1>they could see my abdominal bless you may be the

1:29:50.439 --> 1:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>cause of global warming yourself. Actually, I think that's a

1:29:54.400 --> 1:29:57.600
<v Speaker 1>fair point. And I just also want to say, band man, congratulations,

1:29:57.640 --> 1:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll do it a great show, my friend, thank you

1:29:59.360 --> 1:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>so much for hope. The team is loving it, and

1:30:01.800 --> 1:30:03.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm let you get back to it, all right. I

1:30:03.760 --> 1:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. But I was going to ask you, you know,

1:30:05.439 --> 1:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think that the claim that Beato is cultural

1:30:08.240 --> 1:30:11.599
<v Speaker 1>appropriation holds any water. I'm curious to see your thoughts

1:30:11.600 --> 1:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>on that. Uh is the cultural appropriation for millennials or

1:30:16.200 --> 1:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is a cultural creation for a guy that uses a

1:30:18.880 --> 1:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Hispanic nickname because he thinks it makes him sound cool.

1:30:21.080 --> 1:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, when he's running against the Cuban.

1:30:24.960 --> 1:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I leave this stuff to you. I have a great rest.

1:30:28.160 --> 1:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm flying up the lines. You got people in the

1:30:29.800 --> 1:30:31.599
<v Speaker 1>team calling in. Let me, let me let you get

1:30:31.600 --> 1:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>back to you with my friend thank you so much

1:30:33.200 --> 1:30:35.439
<v Speaker 1>for all your great work. Brother. I'll talk to you soon. Well,

1:30:35.439 --> 1:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you for letting me fill your big shoes, Buck

1:30:37.400 --> 1:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and I appreciate it. And that's a hell of a

1:30:38.920 --> 1:30:41.519
<v Speaker 1>Beato impression, folks. He may be more likable than the

1:30:41.520 --> 1:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>actual Robert Francis O. Rourke. All Right, we're gonna go

1:30:44.760 --> 1:30:46.559
<v Speaker 1>take one quick call and then we're gonna have to

1:30:46.600 --> 1:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>hit a break. Let's go to Don in Mobile, Alabama.

1:30:50.120 --> 1:30:52.559
<v Speaker 1>Don you want to talk about the new Green Deal something.

1:30:52.600 --> 1:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Beata L. Rourke surely is a fan of you. Are

1:30:55.120 --> 1:30:58.519
<v Speaker 1>on the buck sex and show. Yeah, absolutely, Ben and

1:30:58.760 --> 1:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>uh let buck No, we need to start saying shields higher.

1:31:02.680 --> 1:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, yeah, I've got a little, a little

1:31:06.160 --> 1:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>quick thing. I want to run by everybody. Magnetic propulsion

1:31:10.680 --> 1:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>train system from San Diego to probably somewhere around Brownsville,

1:31:14.880 --> 1:31:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Texas runs along the border of the US Mexican border.

1:31:19.560 --> 1:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats can start their pilot project for the Green

1:31:22.400 --> 1:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>New Deal. Let Trump have his money to build his

1:31:26.520 --> 1:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>steel magnetic propulsion system. They can put their bullet train

1:31:33.240 --> 1:31:37.519
<v Speaker 1>on top of it and they can travel from San

1:31:37.560 --> 1:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Diego to Brownsville, and then they could start their oversea

1:31:41.920 --> 1:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>probably I don't know, maybe Costa Rica. You know, the

1:31:46.360 --> 1:31:48.559
<v Speaker 1>train system they're talking about. They must have some kind

1:31:48.600 --> 1:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of technology that we just don't know about yet, about

1:31:51.280 --> 1:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>doing away with aircraft and automobiles, and you know, I

1:31:54.720 --> 1:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just thought that might be something we could, you know,

1:31:57.000 --> 1:31:59.439
<v Speaker 1>ask Buck about what do you think? Well, yeah, and

1:31:59.439 --> 1:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably for less than seventy seven billion dollars

1:32:02.160 --> 1:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>as well, which, oh, by the way, in California they

1:32:05.439 --> 1:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>failed to build a train from La to San Francisco.

1:32:09.720 --> 1:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>You know what, though, your your idea though, Yeah, I'm sorry,

1:32:14.120 --> 1:32:18.479
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, don there, Yeah, you know your your idea though.

1:32:18.520 --> 1:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>There's definitely merit to because you see all the people

1:32:21.479 --> 1:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>fleeing in droves from California to Texas. So I think

1:32:24.800 --> 1:32:26.479
<v Speaker 1>you might have a business plan there. You should probably

1:32:26.479 --> 1:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>talk to Elon Musk about that. Yes, sir, might make

1:32:31.120 --> 1:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>me a millionaire. Huh exactly. We sall know how to vote, brother,

1:32:35.560 --> 1:32:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Shields high, Shields higher. I appreciate the call of Don.

1:32:38.920 --> 1:32:41.719
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk a little bit in the last little

1:32:41.760 --> 1:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>remaining time that we have a bit about economics and

1:32:45.520 --> 1:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the New Green Deal, so called Green New Deal rather

1:32:48.880 --> 1:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and what that's all about. You know, part of the

1:32:51.080 --> 1:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>argument that has not been leveled. But and maybe it's

1:32:54.280 --> 1:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>because people aren't taking it seriously, but they really should

1:32:57.400 --> 1:33:00.719
<v Speaker 1>given how many members we're talking at least around seventy

1:33:00.760 --> 1:33:03.799
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress that the Senate and the House, including

1:33:03.840 --> 1:33:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a number of announced presidential contenders on the Democratic side,

1:33:08.160 --> 1:33:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Given how many folks are actually supporting this thing, it's

1:33:11.680 --> 1:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>probably worth taking a closer look at. And I think

1:33:14.280 --> 1:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>what you really see is that the Democrats are scared

1:33:17.000 --> 1:33:19.479
<v Speaker 1>because all the energy in their party is really with

1:33:19.920 --> 1:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the Okazio Cortez Rashida twayib ilhan Omar caucus. That is

1:33:25.320 --> 1:33:27.559
<v Speaker 1>where the power is. You saw it with Bernie Sanders,

1:33:27.560 --> 1:33:30.759
<v Speaker 1>and this is just the young generation version of Bernie Sanders,

1:33:30.760 --> 1:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>because the progressives have dominated at our institutions for the

1:33:33.840 --> 1:33:36.439
<v Speaker 1>last forty or fifty years. So Bernie is old, but

1:33:36.560 --> 1:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>his ideas are new. They're blooming right now, except that

1:33:39.600 --> 1:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they've been tried repeatedly throughout history and failed and left

1:33:42.800 --> 1:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>people in poverty, misery, starvation. And we'll talk a little

1:33:46.280 --> 1:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>bit about that in our last half hour. But I

1:33:49.439 --> 1:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>also want to talk about the fact that what is

1:33:51.680 --> 1:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the Green New Deal, Well, was the first New Deal

1:33:54.439 --> 1:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>itself such a smashing success. Did it actually lead us

1:33:59.120 --> 1:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to prosper Did it get us out of the Great Depression?

1:34:03.400 --> 1:34:06.559
<v Speaker 1>Words matter when we talk about the success of the

1:34:06.560 --> 1:34:08.360
<v Speaker 1>New Deal. So a green new deal is going to

1:34:08.400 --> 1:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>be even better? Why challenge that assertion? And anyone who

1:34:11.840 --> 1:34:14.679
<v Speaker 1>loves liberty, and anyone who's honest should challenge that too.

1:34:14.920 --> 1:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>This has ben Winegarden in for Buck sexon on the

1:34:16.840 --> 1:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sex and Show eight four four nine zero zero

1:34:19.120 --> 1:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>two eight two five eight four four nine zero zero

1:34:21.280 --> 1:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>two eight two five. Medicare for All would save the

1:34:27.920 --> 1:34:31.679
<v Speaker 1>American people a very large amount of money. Why aren't

1:34:31.680 --> 1:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we incorporating the cost of all the funeral expenses of

1:34:35.160 --> 1:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>those who die because they can't afford access to healthcare.

1:34:38.240 --> 1:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>We look at these figures and we say, oh, unemployment

1:34:40.520 --> 1:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is low. Everything is fine, right, Well, unemployment is low

1:34:43.720 --> 1:34:46.839
<v Speaker 1>because everyone has two jobs. I need to occupy every airport,

1:34:46.920 --> 1:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>We need to occupy every border, we need to occupy

1:34:49.880 --> 1:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>every ice office. If we work our butts off to

1:34:53.240 --> 1:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we take back all three chambers of Congress,

1:34:56.600 --> 1:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>rather all three chambers of government, the Presidency, the Senate,

1:35:00.040 --> 1:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the House. You use the term the occupation of Palestine.

1:35:03.600 --> 1:35:08.760
<v Speaker 1>What did you mean by that? Oh? Um? I think

1:35:09.040 --> 1:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>what I meant is like the settlement. Just last year,

1:35:12.880 --> 1:35:16.439
<v Speaker 1>we gave the military a seven hundred billion dollars tack

1:35:16.600 --> 1:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a budget increase which they didn't even ask for, and

1:35:20.479 --> 1:35:23.360
<v Speaker 1>we're like, the world is going to end in twelve

1:35:23.439 --> 1:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>years if we don't address climate change. And your biggest

1:35:26.200 --> 1:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>issue is your biggest issue is how are we going

1:35:33.240 --> 1:35:35.479
<v Speaker 1>to pay for it? No, I think it is a

1:35:35.520 --> 1:35:39.559
<v Speaker 1>green dream, and I think that it is it is.

1:35:40.479 --> 1:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>This is ben Winegarden and this is the Buck Sexton

1:35:42.920 --> 1:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>show that was Alexandrocazio Cortez. I'm just speechless listening to

1:35:47.240 --> 1:35:50.519
<v Speaker 1>that montage. Follow me on Twitter at b h Wine

1:35:50.520 --> 1:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Garden and we started with that little montage because I

1:35:53.720 --> 1:35:56.519
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk a little bit about the Green New

1:35:56.640 --> 1:36:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Deal and what it's all about. And Occazio Cortez as

1:36:00.120 --> 1:36:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a freshman congresswoman from New York. Her counterpart in New York,

1:36:04.880 --> 1:36:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the Governor Cuomo, recently made some remarks and I think

1:36:08.680 --> 1:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that this all sort of fits together here. Now. Acasio

1:36:12.280 --> 1:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Quartez recently in New York helped kill Amazon coming to

1:36:15.920 --> 1:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>New York, and she didn't make the arguments on chrony

1:36:17.960 --> 1:36:20.640
<v Speaker 1>capitalism grounds, which might have been a legitimate argument. You know,

1:36:20.720 --> 1:36:23.959
<v Speaker 1>should a city like New York or a state provide

1:36:24.160 --> 1:36:28.240
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of incentives several hundred million dollars in essentially

1:36:28.640 --> 1:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>giveaways and then taxes that would not have to be

1:36:32.160 --> 1:36:35.439
<v Speaker 1>paid down the road. Well, regardless, twenty five thousand jobs

1:36:35.439 --> 1:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>went up in smoke, and I think that's a pretty

1:36:37.160 --> 1:36:39.839
<v Speaker 1>good start to where the Green New Deal is. Actually

1:36:40.160 --> 1:36:44.599
<v Speaker 1>they would rather their impose their dream quote unquote green dream,

1:36:45.040 --> 1:36:48.760
<v Speaker 1>then actually see prosperity. She made the comment about, oh, well,

1:36:48.760 --> 1:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone has two jobs and that's why unemployment is solo,

1:36:51.240 --> 1:36:53.920
<v Speaker 1>which is not how unemployment is calculated. Of course. I know,

1:36:53.960 --> 1:36:56.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, during the Obama years, when they tried,

1:36:56.479 --> 1:37:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, a fraction, just a mere the smallest percentage

1:37:01.320 --> 1:37:04.240
<v Speaker 1>possible relative to what the Green New Deal is talking about,

1:37:04.280 --> 1:37:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we had declining unemployment rates only because millions of people

1:37:07.840 --> 1:37:10.240
<v Speaker 1>were falling out of the workforce. There is now a

1:37:10.320 --> 1:37:13.599
<v Speaker 1>much higher percentage of people in the workforce and actively

1:37:13.640 --> 1:37:16.840
<v Speaker 1>looking for jobs. It's completely different scenario because the policies

1:37:17.080 --> 1:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>have completely flipped. In any event, Acasio Cortez against Amazon,

1:37:22.240 --> 1:37:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Cuomo and others for Amazon, and why was Cuomo for

1:37:25.960 --> 1:37:30.519
<v Speaker 1>Amazon being here? Well, he complained recently that essentially all

1:37:30.560 --> 1:37:33.679
<v Speaker 1>of the wealthy taxpayers are fleeing New York and going

1:37:33.760 --> 1:37:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to Florida. Gee, can you imagine that A guy who

1:37:37.360 --> 1:37:40.760
<v Speaker 1>said conservatives are not welcome in this city, A guy

1:37:40.800 --> 1:37:45.240
<v Speaker 1>who believes in infanticide and celebrates it, a guy who

1:37:45.240 --> 1:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>believes in taxing and spending ad infinitum. Why would people

1:37:50.360 --> 1:37:52.280
<v Speaker 1>want to leave a place where your tax rate could

1:37:52.280 --> 1:37:54.800
<v Speaker 1>be over fifty percent all in and go to a

1:37:54.800 --> 1:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>place where there's no state income tax and better weather

1:37:57.880 --> 1:38:01.720
<v Speaker 1>for that matter. Well, the numbers are actually in, and

1:38:01.720 --> 1:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the big winners you'll be shocked in net domestic migration

1:38:04.800 --> 1:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in the past year include Florida plus one hundred and

1:38:07.600 --> 1:38:10.559
<v Speaker 1>thirty two thousand, six hundred and two, Arizona plus eighty

1:38:10.600 --> 1:38:13.479
<v Speaker 1>three thousand, two hundred and forty, and Texas eighty two thousand,

1:38:13.520 --> 1:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and sixty nine. What states are losing New

1:38:16.760 --> 1:38:19.320
<v Speaker 1>York negative one hundred and eighty thousand, three hundred and six,

1:38:19.400 --> 1:38:22.400
<v Speaker 1>California negative one hundred and fifty six thousand and sixty eight,

1:38:22.479 --> 1:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Illinois negative one hundred and fourteen thousand and one fifty four,

1:38:25.520 --> 1:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and what do all these states have in common. It

1:38:29.720 --> 1:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>answers itself. It really answers itself. Okay, So then you

1:38:34.240 --> 1:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>have people like aoc Alexandriacazio Cortez. You know, she's celebrating,

1:38:38.960 --> 1:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>she tweeted anything as possible. Today was the day a

1:38:41.160 --> 1:38:43.599
<v Speaker 1>group of dedicated every day in New Yorkers and their

1:38:43.600 --> 1:38:47.439
<v Speaker 1>neighbors defeated Amazon's corporate greed. It's worker exploitation and the

1:38:47.479 --> 1:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>power of the richest man in the world. Good good

1:38:49.880 --> 1:38:52.679
<v Speaker 1>luck getting the Washington Post indorsement anytime soon, by the way,

1:38:52.760 --> 1:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>when you're attacking Jeff Bezos's company. But beyond that, yeay,

1:38:56.600 --> 1:38:59.439
<v Speaker 1>down with jobs twenty five thousand jobs gone for a

1:38:59.439 --> 1:39:03.840
<v Speaker 1>New Yorker, it's an amazing argument. But there's something that

1:39:03.920 --> 1:39:08.320
<v Speaker 1>links both Acasio Quartez and Cuomo, and that is Cuomo

1:39:08.439 --> 1:39:11.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to see people fleeing his state because he's

1:39:11.680 --> 1:39:15.360
<v Speaker 1>afraid there's actually competition. There's federalism in this country. There's

1:39:15.360 --> 1:39:18.479
<v Speaker 1>still a concept of states being laboratories of experiment. And

1:39:18.560 --> 1:39:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if my state has a much more favorable business climate,

1:39:21.240 --> 1:39:25.240
<v Speaker 1>tax climate, other areas, you know, more freedom and education,

1:39:25.400 --> 1:39:29.280
<v Speaker 1>educational choice than the like politicians to represent their values.

1:39:29.400 --> 1:39:32.479
<v Speaker 1>People can still get up and walk, and the federal government,

1:39:32.479 --> 1:39:34.559
<v Speaker 1>no matter how much power it has taken, there is

1:39:34.560 --> 1:39:37.720
<v Speaker 1>still a difference between these states. What AOC wants to

1:39:37.760 --> 1:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>do is help solve Andrew Cuomo's problem by federalizing everything

1:39:42.200 --> 1:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>so that there is no difference and there is no

1:39:44.080 --> 1:39:46.800
<v Speaker 1>state to escape too. Just like America is the last

1:39:46.840 --> 1:39:49.320
<v Speaker 1>fashion of freedom in the world, there's no other country

1:39:49.320 --> 1:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to escape to when things get bad here. What the

1:39:52.479 --> 1:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>left wants to do is say, all of our states

1:39:55.120 --> 1:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>are struggling New York, Illinois, California, these progressive as the

1:40:00.720 --> 1:40:03.280
<v Speaker 1>places where everything should be wonderful all the time, and

1:40:03.320 --> 1:40:05.559
<v Speaker 1>they want to federalize the very policies that are at

1:40:05.560 --> 1:40:08.040
<v Speaker 1>those states, so you can't go anywhere. And oh, by

1:40:08.080 --> 1:40:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, the productive states have to subsidize the unproductive states.

1:40:15.680 --> 1:40:20.519
<v Speaker 1>There is another element of this, and that ultimately comes

1:40:20.600 --> 1:40:24.519
<v Speaker 1>down to the fact that the New Green Deal Green

1:40:24.600 --> 1:40:27.840
<v Speaker 1>New Deal quote unquote, what it is really all about

1:40:28.520 --> 1:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is socialism with a smiley face of environmentalism on it.

1:40:32.320 --> 1:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>It creates a facade of legitimacy based upon the fact that,

1:40:35.920 --> 1:40:39.200
<v Speaker 1>according to Alexandriocazio, Cortez, the world is going to end

1:40:39.320 --> 1:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in twelve years unless we massively redistribute wealth and power

1:40:44.040 --> 1:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to Washington, DC. And oh, by the way, Washington DC

1:40:47.160 --> 1:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the one creating all the jobs

1:40:49.000 --> 1:40:51.719
<v Speaker 1>by imposing the same policies that let's say, let's see

1:40:52.240 --> 1:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven billion dollars wasted in California to do a

1:40:55.000 --> 1:40:57.479
<v Speaker 1>high speed train that they can't get between Los Angeles

1:40:57.520 --> 1:41:02.799
<v Speaker 1>and San Francisco. But Accazio Cortez wants to do it intercontinental. Vermont,

1:41:02.920 --> 1:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that's another progressive bastion. It's very small. You would think

1:41:06.040 --> 1:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that if you were going to be able to have

1:41:07.160 --> 1:41:09.679
<v Speaker 1>socialism anywhere, it would be in Bernie Sanders's home state.

1:41:10.040 --> 1:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Guess what. Vermont ha to ditch single payer healthcare several

1:41:13.080 --> 1:41:15.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago because it just didn't work. The costs were

1:41:15.400 --> 1:41:19.479
<v Speaker 1>rising too high. That's in little Vermont. Now, people on

1:41:19.479 --> 1:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the left, they'll tell you, well, look at the Scandinavian countries. See, yeah,

1:41:23.439 --> 1:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>they're not Venezuela. We don't believe in that sort of socialism.

1:41:26.360 --> 1:41:28.439
<v Speaker 1>We believe in the Scandinavian kind. We'll look at the

1:41:28.479 --> 1:41:30.519
<v Speaker 1>statistics and what you'll see is that besides the fact

1:41:30.600 --> 1:41:33.599
<v Speaker 1>that the Scandinavian countries are small and they have relatively

1:41:33.640 --> 1:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>homogeneous populations that get along well. It's very cohesive culturally

1:41:37.479 --> 1:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in the like, so you don't have any issues there.

1:41:39.520 --> 1:41:42.240
<v Speaker 1>They actually have very free market economies and based upon

1:41:42.320 --> 1:41:46.240
<v Speaker 1>some ratings, actually are more liberalized than the US is.

1:41:47.520 --> 1:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>So yes, they have generous welfare states, but they have

1:41:50.240 --> 1:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>societies that can deal with the downsides of them, first

1:41:53.080 --> 1:41:55.639
<v Speaker 1>of all, and second, second of all, they're very restrictive

1:41:55.640 --> 1:41:58.719
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their immigration. They want productive people coming,

1:41:58.920 --> 1:42:02.559
<v Speaker 1>people who believe in the ethoses that animate those nations.

1:42:02.680 --> 1:42:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And third, they have relatively free market economies that are

1:42:05.320 --> 1:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>able to underscore and overwhelm the largest that's doled out

1:42:09.040 --> 1:42:13.360
<v Speaker 1>by the government. My question to all the green New

1:42:13.439 --> 1:42:16.360
<v Speaker 1>dealers is how many experiences with central planning do we

1:42:16.400 --> 1:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>have to have before we realize the disastrous consequences everywhere

1:42:20.200 --> 1:42:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they're tried, And how many times are people going to

1:42:22.320 --> 1:42:24.839
<v Speaker 1>be duped by the fact that, except for the truest

1:42:24.840 --> 1:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of true believers, what these policies are really about is

1:42:28.479 --> 1:42:32.479
<v Speaker 1>more power in Washington, DC over your life. All you

1:42:32.520 --> 1:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>have to do to look at how this works out.

1:42:34.200 --> 1:42:36.519
<v Speaker 1>You can look at Venezuela. For starters, you can go

1:42:36.520 --> 1:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>back to the founding of the United States, Flymouth Governor

1:42:39.800 --> 1:42:42.240
<v Speaker 1>William Bradford back in Plymouth, we're talking in the sixteen

1:42:42.280 --> 1:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>twenties year prior to Thanksgiving, they essentially had communism, in

1:42:45.680 --> 1:42:49.080
<v Speaker 1>his own words in his diaries, communism, and they almost

1:42:49.160 --> 1:42:53.839
<v Speaker 1>literally died off when they implemented private property rights. Suddenly

1:42:53.880 --> 1:42:56.559
<v Speaker 1>there was bounty and that led to the Thanksgiving that's

1:42:56.560 --> 1:43:00.759
<v Speaker 1>been depicted. There are many other examples in real time

1:43:00.840 --> 1:43:04.639
<v Speaker 1>in the real world recent years. East Germany versus West Germany.

1:43:05.520 --> 1:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>That was a real example of the exact same nation,

1:43:08.040 --> 1:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>essentially the same people, the same starting point, the same infrastructure.

1:43:11.760 --> 1:43:14.400
<v Speaker 1>One was governor under the iron curtain of communism, the

1:43:14.439 --> 1:43:17.800
<v Speaker 1>other was free. How did that turnout? North Korea versus

1:43:17.840 --> 1:43:22.759
<v Speaker 1>South Korea today? Again, we can't get a high speed

1:43:22.840 --> 1:43:26.479
<v Speaker 1>rail line in progressive California. You can't do socialized medicine

1:43:26.520 --> 1:43:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in Vermont. What the Left wants to do that was

1:43:28.960 --> 1:43:31.760
<v Speaker 1>make sure that these policies are imposed everywhere. They want

1:43:31.800 --> 1:43:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to take these failures and put them on steroids. The

1:43:36.120 --> 1:43:38.760
<v Speaker 1>size and scope of the Green New Deal would cover

1:43:38.920 --> 1:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>every aspect of your life. It wasn't just in the

1:43:41.439 --> 1:43:43.519
<v Speaker 1>fact sheet that came out that they then had to

1:43:43.560 --> 1:43:45.680
<v Speaker 1>pull back and claim it was a gaff or a

1:43:45.760 --> 1:43:49.720
<v Speaker 1>doctor document created as some kind of right wing conspiracy. No,

1:43:50.000 --> 1:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the size and scope says that the aims are what

1:43:52.320 --> 1:43:55.720
<v Speaker 1>was in FDR's sort of square deal in effect or

1:43:56.040 --> 1:43:59.760
<v Speaker 1>his second Bill of Rights rather, and those weren't rights,

1:44:00.040 --> 1:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we're services. You have the right to great healthcare and

1:44:03.240 --> 1:44:05.519
<v Speaker 1>affordable cost. You have the right to a job. You

1:44:05.560 --> 1:44:08.800
<v Speaker 1>have the right to all manner of things that are

1:44:08.800 --> 1:44:11.599
<v Speaker 1>created in a free world that government cannot decree. They

1:44:11.600 --> 1:44:15.839
<v Speaker 1>cannot buy Fiat rain down from the heavens. Here are jobs,

1:44:16.040 --> 1:44:19.439
<v Speaker 1>here is wealth, and the New Deal itself is a

1:44:19.479 --> 1:44:21.800
<v Speaker 1>great example of that. And when we come back, we'll

1:44:21.840 --> 1:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>do a little history lesson to show that the New

1:44:24.200 --> 1:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Deal was terrible. The Green New Deal will be ten

1:44:27.040 --> 1:44:30.080
<v Speaker 1>times as disastrous. This is Ben Winegarden in for Buck

1:44:30.120 --> 1:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Sexon on the Buck Sex and Show. Eight four four

1:44:32.320 --> 1:44:34.240
<v Speaker 1>nine zero zero two eight two five eight four four

1:44:34.360 --> 1:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>nine zero zero two eight two five. This is the

1:44:39.640 --> 1:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexon Show. And this is Ben Weingarten in for

1:44:43.080 --> 1:44:46.599
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexon All right, before we close up shop tonight,

1:44:46.960 --> 1:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>As I was mentioning when I hear green New Deal

1:44:50.320 --> 1:44:54.400
<v Speaker 1>raised words matter what was the New Deal? And the

1:44:54.439 --> 1:44:56.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that we have to go through this history lesson

1:44:56.520 --> 1:45:00.400
<v Speaker 1>every time socialism is brought forth really gets tiring, frankly,

1:45:00.439 --> 1:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But it cannot be said enough. The New Deal was

1:45:03.120 --> 1:45:05.720
<v Speaker 1>not some panacea that did not get us out of

1:45:05.760 --> 1:45:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the Great Depression. It's a myth. A couple of economists

1:45:09.840 --> 1:45:13.720
<v Speaker 1>proved this pretty well. Harold Cole of the University of

1:45:13.720 --> 1:45:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania and Leohnian of UCLA wrote back in two thousand

1:45:16.920 --> 1:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and nine, and this was during the financial crisis, when

1:45:19.160 --> 1:45:21.559
<v Speaker 1>there were all sorts of arguments for we need essentially

1:45:21.600 --> 1:45:23.479
<v Speaker 1>a second New Deal, and we got part of the

1:45:23.479 --> 1:45:26.320
<v Speaker 1>way there. They did an article and they showed that

1:45:26.400 --> 1:45:29.760
<v Speaker 1>actually the New Deal impeded the recovery. Why did it

1:45:29.840 --> 1:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>impede economic recovery? Because it implemented all sorts of collectivists

1:45:33.600 --> 1:45:37.400
<v Speaker 1>measures that hampered the free market's ability to adjust after

1:45:37.439 --> 1:45:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the dislocation of the economic crash. If it didn't work,

1:45:40.240 --> 1:45:42.479
<v Speaker 1>then after a crash, when your recovery is supposed to

1:45:42.520 --> 1:45:45.720
<v Speaker 1>be quite strong because you're getting back to normal, why

1:45:45.760 --> 1:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>would it work now? Why would we take a booming

1:45:48.160 --> 1:45:51.639
<v Speaker 1>economy and destroy it. Here's what they said in an

1:45:51.720 --> 1:45:54.840
<v Speaker 1>article in the Wall Street Journal about their research. Quote here,

1:45:55.080 --> 1:45:57.320
<v Speaker 1>there was even less work on average during the New

1:45:57.360 --> 1:46:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Deal than before FDR took office. Total hours worked per

1:46:00.880 --> 1:46:05.559
<v Speaker 1>adult including government employees, were eighteen percent below their nineteen

1:46:05.560 --> 1:46:09.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine level between nineteen thirty and nineteen thirty two,

1:46:09.240 --> 1:46:12.519
<v Speaker 1>but we're twenty three percent lower on average during the

1:46:12.560 --> 1:46:14.960
<v Speaker 1>New Deal in nineteen thirty three to nineteen thirty nine.

1:46:15.080 --> 1:46:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Private hours worked. We're even lower after FDR took office,

1:46:18.000 --> 1:46:21.240
<v Speaker 1>averaging twenty seven percent below their nineteen twenty nine level

1:46:21.560 --> 1:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>compared to eighteen percent lower between nineteen thirty and nineteen

1:46:25.840 --> 1:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty two. Total hours worked per adult in nineteen thirty

1:46:29.080 --> 1:46:32.439
<v Speaker 1>nine remained about twenty one percent below their nineteen twenty

1:46:32.520 --> 1:46:36.080
<v Speaker 1>nine level, So hours worked twenty one percent lower. Ten

1:46:36.160 --> 1:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>years after we actually had the crash. Per capita consumption

1:46:41.160 --> 1:46:43.559
<v Speaker 1>did not recover at all. It remained twenty five percent

1:46:43.600 --> 1:46:46.360
<v Speaker 1>below its trend level throughout the New Deal. So why

1:46:46.360 --> 1:46:49.599
<v Speaker 1>did this all happen? They write in this paper about

1:46:49.600 --> 1:46:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it was the new Deal that hampered

1:46:52.920 --> 1:46:55.720
<v Speaker 1>any recovery. The new Deal is the answer, and I'll

1:46:55.800 --> 1:47:00.519
<v Speaker 1>quote here, anti market policies choked off powerful recover reforces

1:47:00.520 --> 1:47:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that would have plausibly returned the economy back to trend

1:47:02.880 --> 1:47:05.479
<v Speaker 1>by the mid nineteen thirties. Most damaging were those at

1:47:05.479 --> 1:47:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the heart of the recovery plan, including the National Industrial

1:47:07.920 --> 1:47:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Recovery Act, which tossed aside the nation's antitrust acts and

1:47:10.880 --> 1:47:15.120
<v Speaker 1>permitted industries to collusively raise prices provided they shared their

1:47:15.160 --> 1:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>newfound monopoly rents with workers. By substantially raising wages well

1:47:19.080 --> 1:47:24.360
<v Speaker 1>above underlying productivity growth, that is collusion, government incentivized collusion

1:47:24.520 --> 1:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>in the economy. The NIRA, that's the National Industrial Recovery Act,

1:47:28.560 --> 1:47:31.759
<v Speaker 1>covered over five hundred industries, ranging from autos and steel

1:47:32.000 --> 1:47:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to ladies, hosiery, and poultry production. Each industry created a

1:47:35.960 --> 1:47:38.840
<v Speaker 1>code of fair competition quote unquote, which spelled out what

1:47:38.880 --> 1:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>producers could and could not do, and which were designed

1:47:41.120 --> 1:47:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to eliminate quote excessive competition that FDR believed to be

1:47:44.640 --> 1:47:47.479
<v Speaker 1>the source of the depression. These codes distorted the economy

1:47:47.520 --> 1:47:51.879
<v Speaker 1>by artificially raising wages and prices, restricting output, and reducing

1:47:51.880 --> 1:47:55.320
<v Speaker 1>productive capacity. By placing quotas on industry investment in new

1:47:55.320 --> 1:47:58.120
<v Speaker 1>plants and equipment, and on and on. That is basically

1:47:58.160 --> 1:48:01.559
<v Speaker 1>what the New Green Deal New Deal Rather would do

1:48:01.760 --> 1:48:05.360
<v Speaker 1>on steroids. At the end of the day, what did

1:48:05.400 --> 1:48:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Henry Morgan thou Roosevelt's Treasury secretary say in nineteen thirty nine,

1:48:10.520 --> 1:48:14.839
<v Speaker 1>after all of these different government interventions were tried, Quote,

1:48:15.000 --> 1:48:17.719
<v Speaker 1>we are spending more than we have ever spent before,

1:48:17.760 --> 1:48:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and it does not work. I say, after eight years

1:48:20.439 --> 1:48:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of this administration, we have just as much unemployment as

1:48:23.120 --> 1:48:27.280
<v Speaker 1>when we started, and an enormous debt to Boot New

1:48:27.320 --> 1:48:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Deal disaster, Green New Deal disaster on steroids, President Obama

1:48:31.880 --> 1:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>so called stimulus and the other widespread government regulation and

1:48:35.080 --> 1:48:39.679
<v Speaker 1>intervention after the financial crisis, including Obamacare. We the weakest

1:48:39.680 --> 1:48:43.240
<v Speaker 1>recovery of any from any recession that we've had since

1:48:43.320 --> 1:48:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the Great Depression. So why would this time be any different?

1:48:46.280 --> 1:48:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Why would Alexandrocazio Cortez somehow have this divine knowledge that

1:48:50.479 --> 1:48:53.200
<v Speaker 1>this time central planning is going to work. You know,

1:48:53.240 --> 1:48:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the greatest economic stimulus we could ever have is for

1:48:56.120 --> 1:48:59.760
<v Speaker 1>every citizen to read Bastiat and Hayek and Milton and

1:49:00.360 --> 1:49:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Milton Freedman Rather and the founding Fathers. That would be

1:49:03.439 --> 1:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the greatest economic stimulus. It would be a heck of

1:49:05.560 --> 1:49:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot cheaper than a green new deal that's going

1:49:08.320 --> 1:49:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to cost fifty times what our federal government budget is

1:49:11.720 --> 1:49:16.360
<v Speaker 1>every year. Democrats will resist attempts to challenge this agenda,

1:49:16.360 --> 1:49:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of course, because for them, this is all about power.

1:49:19.800 --> 1:49:22.439
<v Speaker 1>And while we're on that topic of power, before we

1:49:22.520 --> 1:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>close up tonight, a reminder that this week we celebrated

1:49:26.680 --> 1:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a sad anniversary, the fourtieth anniversary of the Islamic Revolution

1:49:31.280 --> 1:49:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in Iran, which took a relatively dynamic and free, prosperous

1:49:35.200 --> 1:49:39.280
<v Speaker 1>country authoritarian, yes in terms of its leadership, but relatively

1:49:39.280 --> 1:49:42.760
<v Speaker 1>European and booming and secular, and turned it into what

1:49:42.800 --> 1:49:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we have today, which is the world's leading state sponsor

1:49:45.320 --> 1:49:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of jihad, with total restrictions on basically every possible liberty

1:49:49.680 --> 1:49:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and economic basket case, and full on, truly totalitarian rule.

1:49:54.880 --> 1:49:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So also the thirtieth anniversary of Salmon Rushti's book The

1:49:58.120 --> 1:50:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Satanic Verses, leading to him having a fatua put on

1:50:01.720 --> 1:50:05.560
<v Speaker 1>his head by the Supreme Leader in Iran. Why is

1:50:05.560 --> 1:50:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Iran relevant? Well, Iran took a place that was relatively

1:50:09.080 --> 1:50:14.559
<v Speaker 1>dynamic at the time, imposed their theocratic creed Islam, dominant

1:50:14.640 --> 1:50:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Islam and tried to export it throughout the world and

1:50:18.360 --> 1:50:21.919
<v Speaker 1>restricted all manner of freedom, freedom of speech, you can't

1:50:22.080 --> 1:50:26.000
<v Speaker 1>criticize or in any way threatened, essentially the ruling creed there.

1:50:26.439 --> 1:50:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest to you that America is free, but

1:50:29.479 --> 1:50:32.240
<v Speaker 1>where progressives want to take us is to a state

1:50:32.760 --> 1:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of anti religious, theocratic totalitarianism, where you can't have dissenting

1:50:38.200 --> 1:50:41.080
<v Speaker 1>opinions or you'll get thrown out of social media or

1:50:41.120 --> 1:50:44.200
<v Speaker 1>fired from your company, and where you also have control

1:50:44.439 --> 1:50:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of government over every aspect of your life. It's not

1:50:47.760 --> 1:50:50.599
<v Speaker 1>because you don't subscribe to Islam, it's because you don't

1:50:50.640 --> 1:50:54.200
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the state religion of progressivism. And if you

1:50:54.360 --> 1:50:58.439
<v Speaker 1>dissent your livelihood, your freedom, all of it will be

1:50:58.479 --> 1:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>taken away, and those bad corrosive ideas can have an

1:51:01.040 --> 1:51:03.880
<v Speaker 1>immediate impact. It's destroyed Venezuela, and the same thing could

1:51:03.880 --> 1:51:07.240
<v Speaker 1>happen here faster than ever before in history. This is

1:51:07.280 --> 1:51:09.519
<v Speaker 1>Ben Weingarten. I've been filling in for Buck Sexon tonight.

1:51:09.560 --> 1:51:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank Buck Sexton for the opportunity to

1:51:11.880 --> 1:51:13.840
<v Speaker 1>fill his big shoes, and I want to thank you

1:51:13.920 --> 1:51:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for spending your Friday night with me. Have a great

1:51:16.800 --> 1:51:24.759
<v Speaker 1>weekend and look forward to having yon next time. Global

1:51:24.840 --> 1:51:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Verification Network is the only dual certified veteran own background

1:51:28.160 --> 1:51:30.920
<v Speaker 1>investigations and vetting company. It's useful if you run a

1:51:30.920 --> 1:51:34.080
<v Speaker 1>business or are looking to hire for important decisions like these,

1:51:34.320 --> 1:51:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you need Global Verification Network. Go to MYGVN dot com

1:51:38.040 --> 1:51:40.479
<v Speaker 1>or call them at eight seven seven six nine five

1:51:40.800 --> 1:51:44.679
<v Speaker 1>one one seven nine. Global Verification Network is federally certified

1:51:44.720 --> 1:51:47.920
<v Speaker 1>as a veteran owned small business. It's independently certified by

1:51:47.960 --> 1:51:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the National Veteran Business Development Council, which is the only

1:51:51.080 --> 1:51:55.519
<v Speaker 1>minoritady spend certification recognized by the Billion Dollar Roundtable. Global

1:51:55.640 --> 1:51:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Verification Network is headquartered in Chicago with offices throughout the nation.

1:51:59.800 --> 1:52:02.840
<v Speaker 1>They are the risk mitigation experts and they work with

1:52:03.000 --> 1:52:06.080
<v Speaker 1>companies from startups to Fortune one hundreds. And with Global

1:52:06.160 --> 1:52:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Verification Network, you can rest ashore that no data or

1:52:08.600 --> 1:52:12.200
<v Speaker 1>client information is ever offshored. Plus, all employees are located

1:52:12.240 --> 1:52:16.800
<v Speaker 1>throughout the United States. Visit Global Verification Network ATMGVN dot com.

1:52:16.800 --> 1:52:19.960
<v Speaker 1>That's MYGVN dot com or call them at eight seven

1:52:20.080 --> 1:52:22.799
<v Speaker 1>seven six nine five one one seven nine