WEBVTT - Licking, Part 3

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Joe McCormick. And today we're back with the

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 2>third part in a series on lick licking with the tongue,

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 2>which we began before the week we were recently out

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 2>for the holiday. We thought we might end the series

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 2>after the second part. We got some great listener mail

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 2>on this subject and decided we'd like to come back

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 2>and talk about it for at least one more episode,

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 2>so to refresh on the previous two episodes. In part one,

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 2>we talked about licking in the context of ancient Egyptian

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 2>ritual magic, where licking could bestow healing and divine blessings.

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 2>For example, in the Licks of the Cow goddess Hathor

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 2>who is described licking the limbs of Pharaoh Hatchupsot to

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 2>give her life and kingly power, and licking could also

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 2>be a vehicle for curses and magical violence, like the

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 2>danger described in the Book of the Dead of the

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 2>danger of being licked by the demon Crocodile in the afterlife,

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 2>where the lick is some kind of attack understood is

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 2>removing protective magic from the dead person's soul. We briefly

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:22.279
<v Speaker 2>talked about some research on at what age children start

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>to get the idea that food or eating utensils can

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 2>be contaminated by being licked by other people. And we

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 2>also talked about the surprisingly interesting question how many licks

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 2>does it take to get to the center of a

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 2>TUTSI pop? That question kind of well, it starts from

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 2>a classic candy commercial. If you haven't seen it, where

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 2>have you been? Look it up? But also that sort

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>of moved from the commercial to a bunch of laboratory experiments,

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>empirical testing, and then I think you could say, finally

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 2>winds up in the mind of the philosopher or the

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 2>philosopher of science, prompting us to think about think about

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 2>the ways that assumptions are often hit in seemingly mundane

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>empirical questions and how that should affect the way we

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 2>try to answer them.

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we got some good listener mail about the tussy

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Rall topic as well.

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely addressed in the listener mail episode from earlier

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 2>this week on Tuesday, So if you haven't heard that,

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 2>check it out after this In part two of the

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Licking series, we talked about wound licking behavior in animals,

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 2>especially in mammals, and the difficult trade offs involved. In effect,

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the licking of wounds comes with both benefits and dangers biologically,

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>so there's a balancing of risk and reward underlying the

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 2>evolution and preservation of that behavior. Though fortunately humans have

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 2>come up with a technological replacement for wound locking, which

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 2>is washing wounds with clean water or clean water and soap,

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 2>which gives us most of the same benefits while eliminating

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 2>most of the risks. We also talked about the specific

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 2>qualities of the cat's tongue and its roughness and function,

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 2>and self cleaning, and some prevailing theories about what it

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 2>means when a cat licks of human. After this, we

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 2>got into eye locking, especially self eye looking in geckos

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 2>and in a few alleged cases, I guess, some verified

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>cases in humans with extraordinarily long tongues. And we're back

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 2>today to do another episode.

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so let's start with bears. So this is the one.

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>This is the reason that we're doing a part three,

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>though not everything that we're going to be discussing here

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to relate directly to bears.

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, So I wanted to begin with an email we

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 2>received after the first two parts from listener Elena. Elena says, hello,

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Robert and Joe. I really enjoyed the episodes on licking.

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 2>They made me think of a medieval belief about bears.

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 2>People thought that bears gave birth to shapeless blobs of

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>flesh and only through licking the mother would give them

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 2>the physical characteristics of a bear cub. Elena, that's the

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 2>whole message, So thank you, Elena. I actually did not

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 2>know that. That was really interesting to me, and it

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 2>made me want to do a whole segment here. But

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 2>I have to also mention that with this email, Elena

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 2>attached a medieval illustration of an adult bear licking. I

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 2>guess what's supposed to be an unformed lump of flesh.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 2>It is like a three lobed little pink ham, just

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 2>a little kind of three three hump thing. And I

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 2>didn't know where this was from. Elena did not include

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 2>that information in the email, but I did a reverse

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 2>image search and figured out that this is originally from

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 2>a twelfth century text called the Aberdeen Bestiery, which has

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 2>been held by the Aberdeen Library in Scotland. Since the

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 2>mid sixteenth century. The bear entry in this bestiary actually

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 2>shares a page with the entry for the monoceros, a

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 2>legendary one horned creature sometimes equated with the unicorn, or

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe a different creature than a unicorn, but sharing a

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of the same characteristics. Rab I went back and

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 2>I got a picture of the whole page for you

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 2>to look at here, so you can get bear licking

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 2>the three and the one horned unicorn or non unicorn

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 2>type creature right above it.

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, I certainly can't read any of the text, but

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the mere fact that the bear image is on the

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>same page with the unicorn image lets me know that

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I can trust its accuracy. Right.

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 2>The University of Aberdeen Collections website hosts a full scan

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 2>of the text, so you can actually go look at

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 2>it yourself if you'd like to. It's worth the look.

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty interesting. They've also got sort of interpretation materials

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>beneath each page of the text, as well as their

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 2>own translations of the Latin. I believe it's in Latin,

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 2>but there are modern English translations. First of all, I

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 2>have to say that the best Eieri entry on the

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 2>bear is full of awesome twelfth century bear facts varying accuracy.

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to come back to the claims about the

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 2>unformed newborn bear in a bit, but first I just

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 2>wanted to talk about a few other things said in

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 2>this text, especially since a few of them end up

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 2>connecting in interesting ways. Back to the bear's tongue. The

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 2>first thing that this book says, apart from some claims

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 2>about bears being unformed at birth, is quote, the bear's

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 2>head is not strong. Its greatest strength lies in its

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>arms and loins. For this reason, bears sometimes stand upright.

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know, I think it's kind of hilarious

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 2>to imagine somebody in the twelfth century looking at a

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 2>bear and saying, not a very strong head.

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. I feel like I've seen plenty

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of bear footage where I'm thinking long and hard about

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>how strong and terrifying the head is.

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 2>To be fair, I think this might not be an

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 2>inaccurate original observation. Probably a lot of the facts in

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 2>this bestiary are not direct observations by the author, but

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 2>there are things being repeated from other texts going back

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 2>into classical times.

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that kind of game of telephone, And I don't know,

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could. You know, you can probably imagine

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>certain interpretation of the basic form of the bear, and

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe in some cases, with some bears particularly, I'm thinking,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>like you know, black bears, you could maybe interpret the

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>head as being smaller than the body. Like, you know,

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a way of looking at, say a black bear,

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>where you might interpret this. I can sort of see

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>where they're maybe coming from.

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, so there's a way in which you could say.

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 2>This is kind of true, but not as stated. It

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 2>is not fair to say that bears have weak heads.

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 2>A brown bear, for example, has an extremely powerful skull

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 2>with powerful bones and jaw muscles, powerful neck muscles, with

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 2>a bite capable of crushing bones. What is true, however,

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 2>is that when you compare the bite force to the

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 2>body mass in a factor that's called bite force quotient,

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 2>that's how strong the bite is compared to how big

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 2>your body is. Even brown bears tend to have a

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 2>smaller bite force quotient than many other carnivores, like less

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 2>than half of that of standouts like the Tasmanian devil,

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 2>which has an incredibly high bite force quotient and still

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 2>significantly lower than that of a jaguar very high bite

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 2>force quotient. So it's a huge body and a very

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 2>powerful jaw. But you can say that its jaw is

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 2>not especially powerful for its body size, but its body

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 2>size is enormous.

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 2>I also thought it was interesting how the text claims that,

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 2>so it doesn't have a strong head, its greatest strength

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 2>lies in its arms and loins. For this reason, bears

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 2>sometimes stand upright. That actually got me wondering why do

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 2>bears usually stand upright when they do? We've seen bears

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 2>doing this, you know, what are the most common reasons?

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 2>I was reading around. It seems that people with a

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of experience with bears emphasize that the most common

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 2>reasons bears seem to do this is for information gathering purposes.

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 2>So the head contains the sensory array the eyes, the ears,

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 2>and the nose, and by standing up and placing the

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 2>head higher, bears allow themselves a longer viewing horizon, seeing

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 2>over obstacles, better ability to use directional hearing, and the

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 2>ability to isolate smells wafting from a distance as opposed

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 2>to what's coming up from right around the ground where

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 2>you are. Bears might also stand up to reach objects

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 2>high up or to manipulate objects with their forelimbs. So

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 2>there is some truth here. Bears do tend to have

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 2>more forelimb dexterity than many other carnivores, though not as

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 2>much as most primates. That dexterity comes from a number

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 2>of things, in part, like the way that bears are

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 2>able to rotate their arms with a greater degree of

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 2>freedom than animals like dogs, whose fore limb movement is

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 2>more restricted to the backward forward motion parallel to the

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 2>length of the body. There are also differences in the

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 2>bear's posture, like walking flat footed versus walking on the digits,

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 2>which some carnivores do, having more separated digits independently movable digits.

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Things like that, and these things make bear arms and

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 2>bare four paws more versatile than like a dog's fore

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 2>legs and four paws, which are built with more focus

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 2>on running speed.

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I guess something to keep in mind in

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>all of this, too, is that in general, when we're

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 1>talking about bears, especially modern bears, you're mostly dealing with

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a varied omnivorous diet. Of course, there are outliers on

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>either end, you know, considering polar bears and panda bears.

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>But for the most part, you're dealing with a bear

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that like one. Depending on what's available in the season,

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>it might be eating a bunch of vegetation. It might

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>be eating a part of a dead whale. It might

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>be eating honey, it might be eating the contents of

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a refrigerator. You know, it's going to depend and it

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>needs to have the abilities to shift between these different

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>sources of food.

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 2>The diet is more varied. Therefore, the bear's behavior needs

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 2>to be more general as opposed to more specific, and

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 2>so as a generalist, it has to have more freedom

0:10:58.040 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 2>to do different kinds of things with its bot.

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Another interesting claim from this book is about bear sex.

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 2>It says bears and we have to assume here that

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 2>this is talking mainly about brown bears, you know, for

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 2>geographical historical reasons. It says they do not mate like

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 2>other quadrupeds, but embrace each other when they copulate, just

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 2>like the couplings of humans.

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I didn't have time to see what else

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Plenty had to say about sexual positions for humans, but

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it almost sounds like he's saying for humans, only two

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>sexual positions are known, and this is how bears stack,

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>or maybe just one.

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, so it says, yeah, it says that they

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 2>embrace one another. I can't say for sure that bears

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 2>never face each other during copulation. I can't like rule

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 2>out that that happens. But after some extensive kind of

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 2>awkward googling, it seems to me that the standard what's

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.719
<v Speaker 2>called the dorso ventral position, which you see in other

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 2>quadrupedal mammals, the male mounting from behind, that is also

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the norm for bears, at least most of the time.

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 2>What is definitely true, however, and what may have inspired

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 2>this claim, is that male and female bears engage in

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 2>extensive courtship rituals, lasting for days or even weeks at

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 2>a time. And these courtship rituals, while the bears are

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 2>sort of getting to know one another, they can include

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of things that could be mistaken for face

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 2>to face copulation. So this can include face to face

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 2>wrestling and play fighting, which does sometimes look like embracing,

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 2>as well as just lots of sniffing each other and

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>nuzzling and body rubbing of various sorts. So bears go

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>through extensive courtship rituals, and you could think how somebody

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 2>seeing this from a distance could think that this was

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 2>actually the act of mating.

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that makes sense.

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Another interesting claim here is the entry says when sick,

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 2>the bear eats ants. Now bears do eat ants, though

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't find any evidence that they do so, especially

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 2>when they're sick. It just seems ants are part of

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 2>a bear's omnivorous repertoire, especially it seems with black bears.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I was reading up on this and I discovered that

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 2>bears are not usually interested in eating adult ants. Instead,

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 2>when they go ant hunting, they are looking for what's

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 2>called the ant brood, the plump little insect sausages that

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 2>are the ant colonies young. This would be the larvae

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 2>and the pewpe These are little grub like juveniles that

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 2>are packed with protein and fat, and they are especially

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 2>prized as a nutritious food source by black bears. And

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 2>in fact, to come back to the subject of licking,

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>have you ever seen a black bear's tongue, rob, I.

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Don't think I had until you shared this image here,

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and it is. Oh, it is extensive. This is a

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>creature that I'm not saying it could. It could of

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>its own power, own eye but the tongue is long

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>enough to at least with help reach the eye of desire.

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Certainly. I've got one image here in the outline, and

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 2>it looks like a whole can of bubble tape hanging

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 2>out of the bear's mouth. It's just this long, long,

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 2>pink thing. So a black bear's tongue is quite long, flexible,

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 2>and sticky, and a major reason for it to be

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that way is to help the bear attack difficult to

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 2>reach food sources. And this this can be I don't know,

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>reaching up to get berries and other stuff. It's not

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 2>limited to ants, but ants are a big part of this,

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 2>attacking ant broods inside nests. So the bear wants to

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 2>get the ant larvae and the pupet inside the cavities

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 2>of a rock crevice or a hollow log or a

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 2>piece of wood. Might chew, you know, chew at a

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 2>rotten log or piece of wood to get some holes

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 2>in it, and then kind of stick the tongue in

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 2>trying to get the ant brewed out. And so I

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 2>was reading about black bears attacking ant colonies to get

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 2>at the brood, and I came across a fascinating hypothesis

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 2>about that on a fact page for the North American

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Bear Center. This is relating to the chemical warfare that

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 2>goes on during these black bear versus ant raids. And

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 2>so the North American Bear Center page says, quote, when

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 2>researchers experimentally put their faces next to the bears faces

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 2>at logs, First of all, that's funny. The researchers jerked

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 2>away from the acrid cloud of formic acid. Okay, so

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 2>the ants are producing this formic acid to repel the

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 2>attacking bear that's trying to steal all their children. But

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 2>then this goes on to say, quote, they stood amazed

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 2>that the bears could keep working. Formic acid is probably

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 2>and again I want to emphasize this is just a hypothesis.

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 2>This is not proven. But they say formic acid is

0:15:55.480 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 2>probably a reason bears sometimes bite into insulated snowmobile seats,

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 2>hot tub covers, and refrigerator walls. Huh, what's going on there? Well,

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 2>they explain these items all produce formic acid when the

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 2>formaldehyde in the insulation breaks down, making them smell like

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 2>ant colonies.

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Huh. That is fascinating.

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, some industrially produced foams and insulating materials apparently

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 2>do release these these scents that are reminiscent of the

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 2>scent of ant chemical warfare. So what the ants would

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>be producing in order to repel and attacking animal like

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 2>a bear, it and you know, to a hungry enough

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 2>bear that probably just smells like, well, you know, there's

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 2>something in there that's good to eat. Another thing that

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 2>is mentioned in this Besteria entry is quote they attack

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 2>beehives and try hard to get honeycombs. There is nothing

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 2>they sees more eagerly than honey. This one I rule

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 2>partially true. Hard to say, hard to actually rank the

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 2>food sources or say, there's nothing that bears like more

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 2>than honey, but honey is and especially energy dense food,

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 2>and black bears and brown bears will aggressively pursue honey

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 2>resources in their environment. They are partially protected from beastings

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 2>by their thick fur coat, though they will just also

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 2>put up with a lot of stings on the face

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 2>to get at the honeycomb, which it's worth emphasizing is

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 2>rich with both the sugar dense honey and the fat

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 2>and protein dense bee broods. So once again we're back

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 2>to the hymenopter and brood. Those insect young are like

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 2>little arthropod sausages, but unlike the ant sausages, which are

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 2>retrieved through a cloud of chemical warfare, these sausages come

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 2>preloaded with their own thick sugar syrup. So it's like

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 2>even better.

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, So the bear appreciation for honey is it's

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a little different compared to the human appreciation for honey.

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>We maybe shouldn't lean too much on Winnie the Poof

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>for understanding it.

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, when humans look for honey, they're actually looking

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 2>usually just for the honey. They're not as much interested

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 2>in trying to eat the bee broods. Yeah yeah, but okay,

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 2>we want to come back to the idea of licking

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the newborns, the stuff that Elayna mentioned in that original email.

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 2>So here I'm going to read a couple of passages

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 2>directly from the Aberdeen Library's online translation of the entry

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 2>on the bear. First passage says the bear is said

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 2>to get its name because the female shapes her newborn

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 2>cub with her mouth or a giving it so to speak.

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 2>It's beginning or sus ford is said that they produce

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 2>a shapeless fetus, and that a piece of flesh is born.

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 2>The mother forms the parts of the body by licking it.

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 2>The shapelessness of the cub is the result of its

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 2>premature birth. It is born only thirty days after conception,

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.719
<v Speaker 2>and as a result of this rapid fertility, it is

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 2>born unformed. And then later the entry says, repeating some

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 2>of the same ideas it says among bears, the time

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 2>of gestation is accelerated. Indeed, the thirtieth day sees the

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 2>womb free of the cub. As a result of this

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 2>rapid fertility, the cubs are created without form. The females

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 2>produce tiny lumps of flesh, white in color, with no eyes.

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 2>These they shape gradually, holding them meanwhile to their breasts,

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 2>so that the cubs are warmed by the constant embrace

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 2>and draw out the spirit of life. So, to review

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 2>the claims here, the bear's pregnancy lasts only thirty days.

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 2>Newborn bear cubs are shapeless pieces of flesh, white in color,

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.719
<v Speaker 2>with no eyes. And then the mother licks the flesh

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 2>lump into shape, giving it limbs, giving it a head,

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 2>and all the other parts of the body, forming it

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 2>with her tongue like a sculptor mold clay. I think

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 2>most of you can guess correctly that this is not true,

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 2>but it is interesting to compare to reality because, while

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 2>literally incorrect, it taps into the spirit of some true

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 2>facts about bear birth, about dinning, and maternal care in

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.719
<v Speaker 2>several different bear species. So one of the ideas mentioned

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 2>here is that the bear cubs are born as these

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 2>limbless flesh lumps after a mere thirty day pregnancy. That

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 2>is not correct, but it does tap into something. So

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 2>the total pregnancy time for a bear varies bear to

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 2>bear in species to species, but generally it's going to

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 2>be a lot longer than thirty days. Nevertheless, bears actually

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 2>do have an interesting adaptation called delayed implantation, which means

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 2>that a fertilized embryo will pause its development for months

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 2>at a time, only implanting in the uterine, lining, and

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 2>continuing growth if certain timing and metabolic conditions are met.

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 2>For example, in the North American black bear, mating typically

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 2>happens in the spring or early summer, and then you

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 2>will get a fertilized egg inside the body that will

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 2>just kind of float in the uterus and it will

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 2>temporarily halt or at least dramatically slow down its development.

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Shortly after fertilization at the blasticist stage, and it doesn't

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 2>implant and begin differentiated cell growth until late fall or

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 2>the onset of wintertime, and only then if the mother

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 2>has reached a sufficient body weight so that she will

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 2>have the energy resources to survive and sustain a pregnancy

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 2>and provide milk for offspring born over the winter in

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 2>the mother's den. The actual period of embryonic development after

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the pause, again, it varies. It might be like, you know,

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 2>two months or something. Maybe maybe up to three months,

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 2>so like two to three months or something, but the

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 2>total time between mating and birth is a lot longer,

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.719
<v Speaker 2>might be more like six to nine months, though it

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 2>is true, and I don't know if this is the

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 2>reason for the initial claim that's repeated in the bestiary here.

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 2>It is interesting that the actual time between the resumption

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 2>of development here from the blastocyst stage until birth is

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 2>quite short. It's still longer than thirty days, but it

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 2>happens pretty fast. Interesting, and I was just talking about

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 2>black bears. A similar overall pattern occurs in brown bears,

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 2>with a few different slight timing differences. Now coming to

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the idea of the flesh lump, of course, that's not

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 2>literally correct. Newborn bears of all species do actually have

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 2>limbs and heads and fully formed individual body parts. But

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the grain of truth in the flesh lump legend is

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 2>that newborn bear cubs are highly altricial and extremely small

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 2>compared to adults of the same species. Rob, I've got

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 2>a picture of some grizzly bear cubs for you to

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 2>look at at here that are adorable, But they're also

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 2>just so tiny compared to the adult. And they also

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 2>look I don't know, you know, they're very cute. There's

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 2>that signal of helplessness in what cuteness is. In a way,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 2>so animals that are highly altricial are at one end

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 2>of a spectrum known as altriciality and precociality. This refers

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 2>to how independent an animal is after birth. If a

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 2>newborn animal is independent, able to use its senses and

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 2>move around and feed itself shortly after birth, that species

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 2>is precocial. If the newborn is relatively helpless and needs

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of parental care to survive, that species is altricial.

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 2>And it's not a binary, it's a spectrum. You know,

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 2>you can be somewhere along the spectrum toward one one

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 2>end or the other. Megapode birds like brush turkeys are

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 2>known for being highly precocial. Almost immediately after hatching. The

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 2>newborn chicks can run around and even fly a bit,

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 2>They can feed themselves, and they can basically make it

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 2>on their own. Bears are on the altricial end of

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 2>the spectrum. They are highly altricial, with tiny, helpless newborns

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 2>with extremely limited mobility and limited senses. Their eyes are

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 2>closed for some time after birth, and so bear cubs

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 2>need a lot of maternal care to survive. This reality

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 2>of altricial helplessness lends itself in a way to the

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 2>idea of a newborn bear as a tiny, formless lump,

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 2>and the way they look really helps with that as well,

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 2>because while they are born with limbs and differentiated body parts,

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 2>their skin and fur tends to be much paler than

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 2>that of an adult of the same species. The bestiary

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 2>text says that they're born as white lumps. They're typically

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 2>not white, but they might be more kind of a

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 2>pale gray or a paler gray brown, so they're paler

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 2>than the adults. Their eyes are closed, and they must

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 2>nuzzle against their mother for warmth and for nursing. So

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 2>even if you could somehow see them right after birth,

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 2>which that takes place inside the mother's winter den, it's

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of hard to see that in nature without some

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.719
<v Speaker 2>really special circumstances arising. If you could see them, they

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 2>would not be up and roaming around on their own.

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 2>They would be huddling close for warmth and trying to nurse.

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Some other realities probably contributing to the licking the formless

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 2>lump myth. Mother bears do lick and then usually eat

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 2>the birth membrane almost immediately after the cub is born.

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Mother bears of multiple species also do lick the cubs

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 2>right after birth. They've been observed licking the cubs themselves

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 2>after parturition, and this is a common maternal behavior, not

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 2>just in bears, but across lots of mammalian species. And

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 2>I think we can infer some probable survival motivations that

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 2>would drive the selection of this behavior. First of all,

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 2>licking after birth helps clean the cubs fur of the

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 2>wet residual amniotic fluid after birth. So why would this

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 2>be important cleaning the amniotic fluid off of the fur

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 2>and skin. A big reason, probably the biggest reason is thermoregulation.

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Newborn bear cubs are incredibly tiny compared to adults. Like

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 2>newborn brown bears are typically at most around a one

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 2>to five hundredth of the body mass of their mother,

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 2>and thus they have a very high surface area to

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.439
<v Speaker 2>body mass ratio. The smaller you are, the harder it

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 2>is for your body to retain heat to keep the

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 2>heat inside. So these babies, these baby bears lose heat

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 2>much faster than an adult bear. Also, they're usually born

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 2>in winter during cold weather. Also, they have much less

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 2>heat insulation in the form of subcutaneous fat and body fur.

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.199
<v Speaker 2>They've got a lot less fur when they're born than

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 2>adults have. So newborn bears are at great risk of

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 2>hypothermia from the moment that they're born. Being coated in

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 2>amniotic fluid obviously makes that risk a lot worse. By

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 2>keeping the fur wet and matted down, it makes the bear,

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the bear cub subject to evaporative cooling. You know, when

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 2>you're wet that the the evaporation steals energy from the

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 2>surface of your body. And to the extent that the

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 2>newborn bear has any fur, this very some of the

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 2>different bear species, but they're not going to have a

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 2>lot of fur, but what fur they have is going

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 2>to be matted down and matted down and wet, and

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 2>when it's matted and wet, it's not really going to

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 2>work very well as insulation against the cold. So by

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 2>licking the newborn clean, the mother is actually increasing the

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 2>cub's ability the cub's ability to retain body heat. A

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 2>second big thing that I see mentioned in the literature

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 2>about mother bears licking their newborns is in addition to

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 2>cleaning cleaning the body, licking of the perenneal or anogenital

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 2>region is important because that is thought to help stimulate

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the cubs to urinate and defecate. In some cases, newborn

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 2>bears apparently can't poop or pee without external stimulation of

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 2>the ans and genitals, and at the very least, the

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 2>licking seems to make that easier. So the mother will

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 2>lick the nether regions to make the cubs poop and pee,

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll often eat the feces after the cubs

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 2>poop and the den. I thought that was interesting, so

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I was investigating, like, why eat the poop? This seems

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 2>to be often explained as a den hygiene behavior. I

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 2>can't prove this, but I wonder if a reason for

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 2>this is that it would help prevent the den from

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 2>having an excess of smells that would attract predators.

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was thinking about the smell issue earlier, just

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of say the ambiotic fluid, thinking of non

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>bear mamalion creatures that in which part of the the

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>young's protection is that they are sometimes described as being

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:08.479
<v Speaker 1>perhaps smell neutral or having a much less pronounced odor.

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>It could alert predators to their presence.

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I was thinking about that as well. This

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 2>is something that again that I have not found proof of,

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 2>but I was just wondering if smells associated with birth

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 2>I think would usually signal to predators if they're present,

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 2>that you are in a vulnerable state and that they're

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 2>a vulnerable newborns present. And so this did come up.

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 2>This wasn't in bears, but I was looking at another

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 2>study about maternal licking behaviors in mammals in general. Actually

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 2>this was more about not just licking but general postparturition

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 2>maternal bonding behaviors, and one of the things that was

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 2>looking at was licking. And this study reported in the

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 2>context of rodents that the presence of predator smells. If

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 2>you pipe in some smells of a predator, that actually

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 2>increased licking behavior in mother with newborns.

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh fascinating.

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So that did make me wonder if that it

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 2>does have something to do with trying to remove smells

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 2>that might signal prey vulnerability.

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it seems possible, at least to me, that

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the consumption of the feces here by the mother would

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>perhaps factor into that, because I've read about the reverse

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the offspring's consumption of the mother's feces in some animals,

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>perhaps having to do with the transfer of the microbiome

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. But obviously that wouldn't to my understanding,

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>be the case here.

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, going the other way, it's harder to see why

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 2>that would be necessary.

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The only other option that immediately comes to mind

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is remaining nutrients that are still within the fecal matter

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of the newborns. But ye, which is something you also

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>see in this kind of behavior.

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, overwintering in the den is also a resource conservation time. Yeah,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 2>and there could be other motivations as well, Like in

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 2>lots of mammals, licking and mutual grooming behaviors promote social bonding.

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 2>We're already talking about that in part two of the series,

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 2>and so that might be another thing. There is just

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 2>part of a social bonding behavior that strengthens the emotional

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 2>connection between mother bear and offspring in some animal. In

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 2>some animals, maternal licking might stimulate autonomic survival functions like

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 2>breathing and blood flow. So maybe something like that is

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:31.719
<v Speaker 2>going on here. But what's absolutely clear is that the

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 2>mother bear does lick the baby bear. At least part

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 2>of this seems to be related to stimulating urination and defecation,

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 2>and a big part of it, I think it's fair

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 2>to say, is motivated by cleaning the baby bear to

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 2>help it thermoregulate, help it retain heat.

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but there are a number of things that are

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>just not online yet with the newborn bear, they eventually

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>come online, and part of the process, at least as

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a observed, is the licking by the mother. Yeah.

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I was actually reading about licking behaviors in bears in

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 2>a study that was like a this was really interesting.

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a.

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Wild den camera study. This was published in the journal

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Animals in the year twenty twenty by Lynn Rogers and

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of co authors. The title was behavior in

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 2>free living American black bear dens, parturition, maternal care, and

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 2>cub behavior, and the authors explain their method here. They say, quote,

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 2>we report here some of the major findings on the

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 2>behavior of black bear mothers and cubs in their dens

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 2>in the wild, based on observations in the state of Minnesota, USA.

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Wild female bears were outfitted with radio callers and their

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 2>dens located as they prepared for hibernation in the fall.

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Cameras were installed in the dens and events in the

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 2>den recorded until they and their cubs finally abandoned their

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 2>dens in the spring. So this is amazing. They actually

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 2>were able to get cameras into wild dens so they

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 2>could see what the bears were doing in the dens

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 2>in the wild. This is something that normally is really

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 2>hard to see. Obviously, you can study captive bears, but

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 2>captivity might alter the bear's behavior. It often does, so

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 2>this study looked at a bunch of different things, but

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 2>I was interested in the licking behaviors observed. So one

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 2>thing they documented was the licking of cubs right after birth,

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 2>started almost immediately, and it does seem to be related

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 2>to a period where the mothers are trying to warm

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 2>and stimulate their newborns. So, to read from the author's results,

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 2>quote activities were sufficiently visible for three litters born in

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty ten Lily, twenty eleven Lily, and twenty twelve Jewel.

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 2>These are bear names to determine that the mothers began

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 2>licking embryonic membranes from the first born cubs within nine

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 2>sixteen and eighty five seconds of parturition. On the twenty

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 2>second of January twenty two twelve, when it was negative

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 2>eight degrees celsius outside, Jewel licked her first born seventy

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 2>seven times per minute for six point five minutes before

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 2>assuming the ventrally recumbent warming position and placing the cub

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 2>under her sparsely furred chest and belly. In that position,

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 2>with her head tucked under her chest and her crown

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 2>against the den floor, she continued licking the cubs dry

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 2>while warming them with her breath. So this seems to

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 2>me to be associated with a licking, clean, drying, and

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 2>warming behavior after birth, where the mother bear is trying

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that the cub is sufficiently kept warm

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:42.280
<v Speaker 2>and it's also adorable. The idea of warming her warming

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 2>the cub with her breath.

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:48.280
<v Speaker 2>The study also does document another thing I talked about,

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 2>the licking of the perineal region in what the study

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 2>calls toilet licking. Okay, that's the name for it. It

0:34:56.480 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 2>says in this process they lick, but also the mother's

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 2>quote ingest the urine and feces to avoid fouling their

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 2>living quarters. And it says that Lily and Jewel routinely

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 2>did this, often in response to their cubs cries. And

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 2>then finally they document one more thing that it seems

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 2>like actually totally different. This is not like licking of

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 2>newborn cubs. But they say, in our quote previous studies

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 2>in northeastern Minnesota, we have seen cubs, juveniles, and adults

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 2>touch tongues and engage in reciprocal tongue licking in apparent

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 2>signs of friendship, but we have not seen these behaviors

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 2>reported for bears in dens. Reciprocal tongue looking involves bears

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 2>simultaneously touching and or entwining tongues as they lick each

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 2>other in and around the mouth. And then they say

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the webcams revealed Lily's licking Hope's mouth without Hope reciprocating

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 2>when Hope was thirty nine, forty one and fifty one

0:35:56.040 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 2>days old. However, on March seventeenth, twenty ten, fifty four

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 2>day old Hope vocalized the pulsing home of suckling for

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty four seconds during a thirty seven second session of

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 2>reciprocal tongue licking. So, first, mom is trying to do

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 2>reciprocal tongue licking with the cub. First few times the

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 2>cub does not lick back, but then finally the cub

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 2>does start. They they're now reciprocal tongue licking, and it

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 2>mentions a couple other examples too. But I don't know,

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was interesting. That seems to be maybe

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 2>another just social bonding thing. I don't know if there's

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.439
<v Speaker 2>an established reason why they're licking each other's tongues other

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 2>than just some form of play or bonding.

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it does sound like it could just be bonding.

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So that's what I've got on bear locking of

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 2>newborns for now. But Elena, thank you for writing in

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 2>on this subject.

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, absolutely. After I read this email and we

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>decided we were going to discuss this on the show,

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>I picked a bear book off of my bookshelf here.

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 1>It's one that I've referenced in the show before by

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Wolf Dieter Storrel. He's a German American cultural anthropologist and ethnobotanist.

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 1>But he has some interesting little bits about this. He

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>does briefly refer to this idea that we've been discussing about,

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the bear licking this this this mass into form, and

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>he notes the Franco, German and otherwise Northern European proverbial

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>expression an unlicked bear, which was apparently used historically to

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>describe an unrefined person, like, oh, look at there, whatever

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, you know, in breach of etiquette, that person's

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>an unlicked bear. Also, the idea licked into shape apparently

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:50.919
<v Speaker 1>also stems from this idea as well, which is which

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>is one that certainly I'm more familiar with. Loked into shape.

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 1>That's I mean, that's exactly what we're talking about the

0:37:56.719 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>bear doing electually. All right, I want to return to

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of animals that we've already talked about and

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>get into some various beliefs and traditions surrounding them, Starting

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:22.240
<v Speaker 1>first with cows, as we discussed in our previous licking episodes.

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Cows are big liquors, and when they lick humans, it's

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes perceived as auspicious or even some manner of good luck.

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>This seems to especially be true in cultures where cattle

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.319
<v Speaker 1>enjoy sacred status. There's a particular account of how the

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>cattle gathered around fifteenth and sixteenth century Hindu saint Chaitanya Mahapruvu,

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:49.280
<v Speaker 1>founder of the Godhea Vishnuism Hindu religious movement, and licked

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:52.720
<v Speaker 1>his body as an act of love. Accounts of cows

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 1>licking Krishna are also important, I understand in the Hadi

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Krishna movement or the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, which

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is itself a modern expression of Godia Vishnuism. Now, in

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioning cowlix, I'm sure a number of you also were

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>instantly reminded that, hey, that's what we call this weird

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>part in our hair that may be difficult to comb

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.399
<v Speaker 1>into shape. I have one of these. This is one

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of the prime reasons I eventually gave up on combing

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>my hair and keep up a more sort of I

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know, ruffled style, if you will, because the cowlick

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:33.760
<v Speaker 1>itself is so difficult to manage. The cowlick, of course,

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is just a pattern of follicle disruption on the human scalp.

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Sort of like going in the opposite direction of the

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 2>follicles around it.

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it kind of looks like I grew up

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>hearing this word cowlick, which I have to made it

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>feel all the more silly and undesirable to have one,

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>because the idea of being lickd by a cow, for me,

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it felt rather foolish. I think it's a good name, though,

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 1>because you look at a cow lick a very pronounced

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>cowl like and it does kind of look like some

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of big wet tongue reached out and kind of disrupted.

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 1>It kind of made like a crop circle.

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 2>In your hair.

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, I do wonder how I might have felt

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>about it if I'd been raised in a culture that

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>saw the actual look of a cow as a potentially

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>auspicious thing unknown. But I was looking around and reading.

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:23.839
<v Speaker 1>In some cases these were just like you know, like

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>online conversations people were having about different cultural traditions. But

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:34.720
<v Speaker 1>in parts of India, having two cowlcks is considered lucky

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and or that that child may be a handful and

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I've read that this tradition like is also found in

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 1>other cultures. I was seeing threads where people of Korean

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>descent were talking about this as well, where another case

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:52.879
<v Speaker 1>in which two hair licks meant that the child would

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 1>go on to have two marriages in their life, and

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>if you had more than two, it might mean more

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>than two marriages. So I would be very interested to

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 1>hear from listeners out there if you have some insight

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:09.720
<v Speaker 1>on these, you know, you know, I think generally light

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>hearted interpretations of what a cow lick might mean for someone,

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially as scene in a child. Now, I

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>want to turn from here to Norse traditions, because there

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:24.720
<v Speaker 1>is some very important cosmic cow licking that goes on there,

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:29.280
<v Speaker 1>as detailed in the twelve to twenty work The pros

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>at A, two entities emerged from the melting of the

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 1>primordial ice in Neffelheim. The first was, of course, the

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 1>giant Yemir, but the second was the giant cow Uhumla,

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and her milk is said to have sustained Yemir. The

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:49.879
<v Speaker 1>quote translated, of course, is four milk streams ran from

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:54.879
<v Speaker 1>her teats, and she fed Yeamer. But then, while how's

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:56.760
<v Speaker 1>she going to produce this milk, she has to consume

0:41:56.840 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 1>something herself. And what she does is she the frost

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 1>covered salt stones or the salty rhymestones for her own nourishment.

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:11.400
<v Speaker 1>And as she licks them, something interesting happens. Depending on

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the actual translation, and I think how you interpret it,

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the rough action of her tongue against the salt stones

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 1>either uncovers a man, first his hair and then the

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of him, a man perhaps already within the salt stone,

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of like reaching the center of a TUTSI roll pop. Yes,

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Or she licks the salt stone into the shape of

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 1>a man, forming the man out of the stone, kind

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of carving him out of the stone with her tongue,

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>or something akin to what we were talking about with

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the bear. The licking by the mammalian mother brings form

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to the formless, And I think the latter is the

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>more popular interpretation. Yeah.

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, Yeah, I could imagine how it might be ambiguous

0:42:56.480 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 2>if it said something like the cow licked a man

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 2>out of the stone, setting one loose from the stone,

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 2>or turning the stone into a man.

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I did a quick looking around and surveying. It

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 1>seems like most scholarly works are discussing it, not in

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of revealing, like you know, the man was in

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 1>there to begin with, but she's literally forming him out

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of the stone. So either way though, the individual inside

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the stone or made from the stone, et cetera, is

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>important because it's this figure Bury or Burr grandfather of

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Odin and also grandfather of course of Odin's brothers VILLI

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and V and they become the first gods. They are

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the slayers of Yamir. And the earth, of course is

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be born out of this dead giant's bones.

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:49.720
<v Speaker 1>So again interesting once more that we have this idea

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of a mother's licking of a newborn, giving life and

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.839
<v Speaker 1>perhaps echoing the ideas concerning the bear forming the birth

0:43:56.920 --> 0:44:00.120
<v Speaker 1>mass into a cup or calf. And I included an

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>illustration of from the pros here, and you can, folks

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 1>can look this up if you look up the cow

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in question Odumla on say Wikipedia, you can see this

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 1>illustration of the big cow. You see the big tongue there,

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you see the four streams of milk. And I believe

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>we see the figure being licked from the stone here

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 1>from the salt stone.

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, that's what that is. At first, I thought

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 2>that was you.

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Mer.

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, doesn't look happy to be being licked out of

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 2>the stone. He's got a big grimace on his face, like, oh, brother,

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:37.800
<v Speaker 2>I got to live in this world.

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Didn't ask for this, But here we are, all right,

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And then I want to come back to the world

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:44.879
<v Speaker 1>of dogs. I believe we talked a little bit about

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>dogs licking and also about the idea that a dog's

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>lick would have a healing power to it, and yeah,

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>this was a widespread idea in the ancient world, and

0:44:56.640 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>we discussed it's it's use in some ma interpretations, and

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.799
<v Speaker 1>so we have another another chapter of that here to

0:45:04.880 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>discuss specifically, I want to talk about dog related rituals

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 1>attributed to the Hittites, an ancient Anatolian Bronze Age empire

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in what is now Turkey, and there's some bleed over

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:19.359
<v Speaker 1>into some related groups as well. Of note here there's

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of scholarly discussion about the relationship between

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>actual historic Hittites and the people described as Hittites in

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bible.

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Like questioning whether that's actually referring to the same people.

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I like, are the Hittites that we know

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:39.760
<v Speaker 1>from other literature and archaeological evidence. Are they the same

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 1>as the people called Hittites in the Bible? And there

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a fair amount of disagreeance that basically

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>they certainly don't line up one for one, and they

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:51.200
<v Speaker 1>may be rather disaligned. But I didn't have time to

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>get into it too deeply in my own research, I see,

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>so I looked at a couple of papers on this.

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 1>An older nineteen ninety two were titled The Puppy in

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Hittie Ritual by Billy Jean Collins, published by the University

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago's Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures, as

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 1>well as the more recent Puppy Sacrifice in Sinophagi from

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:19.359
<v Speaker 1>early Philistine tel Nickney Ekron, contextualized by livtov at All,

0:46:19.400 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>published in the journal Jamas in twenty eighteen.

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Wait, hold on puppy sacrifice and Sinophagi. That dog eating.

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so I'm not going to talk as much about

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:35.680
<v Speaker 1>dog eating, but I am going to talk a little

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>bit about puppy sacrifice. So I'm not going to get

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:40.799
<v Speaker 1>into gross details at all, and not everything I'm going

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to discuss is going to involve puppies being sacrificed outright,

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:46.879
<v Speaker 1>But I totally understand if anyone wants to go ahead

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and call it here and close this episode out. But

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:52.360
<v Speaker 1>trust me that I'm not going to get We're not

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:53.399
<v Speaker 1>going to get too gross here.

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I understand. Also my reaction is an unfair dog bias,

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 2>you know. Well, now, I mean to talk about animal

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 2>sacrifices of other kinds a lot.

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's humans have a special relationship with dogs,

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, even if you're not a dog person,

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not much of a dog person, but I of

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 1>course I don't want puppies to be sacrificed. I don't

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 1>like that idea. Puppies are cute, undeniably, and yeah, and

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>humans and dogs have a special relationship and it's, you know,

0:47:23.120 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>part of our culture and part of who we are,

0:47:25.520 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 1>whether there's one in your house or in your lap

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>or not.

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Let me steal my emotions, and we will. I want

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 2>to learn about this.

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So the recent the more. The more recent paper

0:47:36.400 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that I reference here concerns a fine in Ekron, historically

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:43.279
<v Speaker 1>a Canaanite and then Philistine city, where evidence of a

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>beheaded sacrifice dog dated to twelfth to tenth centuries BC

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>during the Iron Age are discussed, and then the remains

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 1>here are thought to be tied to the sorts of

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:58.319
<v Speaker 1>rights that we'll be discussing here, and in this case,

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:02.399
<v Speaker 1>not a funerary rite a quote, non elite domestic right,

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, not something that was just done

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:08.400
<v Speaker 1>by you know, for the king and queen, by the

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 1>king and Queen's you know, you know, wizards or priests,

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 1>but rather something that would be the part of non

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 1>elite domestic.

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:18.759
<v Speaker 2>Life, household magic. Yeah.

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So essentially this is how the issue breaks down.

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So we know from literature and archaeological evidence that the

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Hittites valued dogs as trained herders, as hunters, and as

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:34.760
<v Speaker 1>guardians guard dogs, but they also made use of young,

0:48:34.920 --> 0:48:39.240
<v Speaker 1>as yet untrained dogs, puppies, which they would have ready

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 1>access to, and they would sometimes be used in cases

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:47.719
<v Speaker 1>of magical sacrifice. You know, this kind of part of

0:48:47.760 --> 0:48:50.760
<v Speaker 1>this comes back again. This is a culture that prized dogs,

0:48:50.800 --> 0:48:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but a puppy is untrained, they're around, they're easy to acquire.

0:48:55.440 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And this also ties into some of these prevailing eyes

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 1>ideas that were present in the ancient world. Who've always

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:05.799
<v Speaker 1>that we've already referred to that dogs have some sort

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of a healing property to them. So the basic idea

0:49:09.680 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 1>here is that in specific cases of ritual is that

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the puppy would serve as a sacrifice in a transfer

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:20.720
<v Speaker 1>ritual by which the dog would lick the afflicted human

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and in doing so absorb that affliction, and then the

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 1>dog would be ritually sacrificed. So again the tradition here's

0:49:30.560 --> 0:49:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a link to others who had discussed before the idea

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that dogs heal via their licking. The ancient Greeks believed

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in this, and also, according to Collins, would engage in

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a kind of transfer ritual of their own. The dog

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:47.239
<v Speaker 1>would lick an afflicted individual, absorb the illness, and then

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the dog would be killed and examined to determine the

0:49:50.360 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 1>nature of the human malady. So in the Greek case,

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:56.600
<v Speaker 1>not a situation all right, we've driven the illness into

0:49:56.600 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the dog, and now we must kill the dog. But

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:01.279
<v Speaker 1>rather we've driven the illness into to the dog, and

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:03.719
<v Speaker 1>now let us examine the dog to see what the

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:06.760
<v Speaker 1>sickness is, so we can then treat the human. Collins

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:09.920
<v Speaker 1>also points out that among the Spartans, dogs were sacrificed

0:50:10.000 --> 0:50:13.759
<v Speaker 1>by the cult of their god of War, and that

0:50:13.800 --> 0:50:15.759
<v Speaker 1>it was thought that the lick of a dog could

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 1>cure blindness, and perhaps related, Hippocrates suggested dog meat as

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:25.439
<v Speaker 1>being good for the eyes. Like you having ailments, will

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:30.000
<v Speaker 1>cook up some dog meat that will help. Plenty the

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Elder also wrote of such uses for the puppy, specifically

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:37.239
<v Speaker 1>that a blind puppy, and this is playing off the

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:42.239
<v Speaker 1>observation that dogs are born blind much like bears are

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:44.880
<v Speaker 1>born blind. As we've discussed, you know, their eyes are not,

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, fully operational and open and so forth, and

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:51.279
<v Speaker 1>then by this view, are kind of healed by their

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:55.640
<v Speaker 1>or given sight via their mother's licking. Plenty rights that

0:50:55.680 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you could take a blind puppy press it to a

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:01.839
<v Speaker 1>sick person's abdomen for three during which the puppy would

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:07.000
<v Speaker 1>absorb the illness of the individual and die of said illness. Again,

0:51:07.800 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>nobody wants the idea of struggling up to a puppy

0:51:11.280 --> 0:51:15.080
<v Speaker 1>until it dies, but this was one idea that was

0:51:15.160 --> 0:51:18.839
<v Speaker 1>explored in the ancient world. By the way, Plenty is

0:51:18.880 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>full of eye wisdom elsewhere in the natural history as well.

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's a quote in translation. It is said that goats

0:51:25.080 --> 0:51:26.960
<v Speaker 1>can see by night as well as they can in

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the daytime, and that consequently a diet of goat's liver

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:33.279
<v Speaker 1>restores twilight's sight to persons suffering from what is called

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:34.120
<v Speaker 1>night blindness.

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, Okay, I wonder why the liver, Well.

0:51:39.840 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's where most of the goat teness is.

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, does the flavor Yeah, I mean I don't know.

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:51.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can certainly get into the health potential

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:55.920
<v Speaker 1>health benefits of eating a mammal's liver, as well as

0:51:55.920 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the health risks in some animals. So I

0:51:59.120 --> 0:52:01.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It's one of these things that without going

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:03.799
<v Speaker 1>actually looking into it in depth, you know, there might

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:05.440
<v Speaker 1>be some wisdom to it. There might be something in

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:08.960
<v Speaker 1>an animal's liver that would help people with certain maladies.

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's gonna actually help with night blindness,

0:52:11.880 --> 0:52:12.759
<v Speaker 1>but there you.

0:52:12.719 --> 0:52:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Are, public service announcement, never read a polar bear's liver exactly.

0:52:28.239 --> 0:52:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Collins also adds that there was a medieval German ritual,

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm guessing this is sort of like a folk ritual,

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 1>folk magic, very much domestic in nature, where you could

0:52:39.360 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 1>rid yourself a fever or some other ailment by placing

0:52:42.520 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a bowl of sweet milk before a dog and reciting

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the following good luck you hound, may you be sick

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and I be sound this. I think the rhyme in

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:57.120
<v Speaker 1>German would be gossooned and hooned. So the idea is

0:52:57.160 --> 0:53:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the dog drinks, then the human drinks sickness transferred to

0:53:01.520 --> 0:53:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the dog. And I love how this pre germ theory

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 1>folk ritual actually seems to invert the way that an

0:53:07.640 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>illness might conceivably be transferred between two participants.

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's interesting.

0:53:13.320 --> 0:53:16.359
<v Speaker 1>So again the Hittites, where we're not standouts in any

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>of their beliefs. Here she references the Hittite ritual of

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Zui zu Wi in this text, by which a puppy

0:53:28.080 --> 0:53:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is called on to absorb one's sicknesses. Quote, just as

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the puppy licks its own nine body parts in the

0:53:35.239 --> 0:53:38.880
<v Speaker 1>same way, let it lick up the illness in the

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:43.160
<v Speaker 1>subject's body parts. And then each part is named, including

0:53:43.160 --> 0:53:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the butt. Just go through just the whole anatomy and saying,

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just there's like a chant to it, like a very

0:53:49.640 --> 0:53:52.920
<v Speaker 1>much a ritualistic invocation to it. As the puppy then

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:55.440
<v Speaker 1>licks the different parts of the human body and brings

0:53:55.440 --> 0:54:00.760
<v Speaker 1>about healing via transference. Wow. Yeah, And I'm not. I'm

0:54:00.840 --> 0:54:04.439
<v Speaker 1>not certain that in this particular ritual the dog's death

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is inherently implied. Elsewhere in Hittite rituals and ideas presented

0:54:09.520 --> 0:54:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that the dead puppy of some sort of transfer like

0:54:12.080 --> 0:54:15.080
<v Speaker 1>this could be buried, and in doing so, you are

0:54:15.160 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>burying the illness as well. I don't know about you, Joe,

0:54:20.080 --> 0:54:21.920
<v Speaker 1>but in thinking about this, I was reminded of a

0:54:21.960 --> 0:54:24.360
<v Speaker 1>topic we've discussed on the show before, the story of

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Jesus casting the demon Legion into the pigs and then

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the pigs dying very much an act of transference.

0:54:31.800 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, always seemed interesting to me. The logic of that

0:54:34.800 --> 0:54:37.879
<v Speaker 2>in the story, that the demon can't just be removed

0:54:38.000 --> 0:54:41.480
<v Speaker 2>to go nowhere, it has to be sent into something else.

0:54:41.640 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 2>The pigs must be there to receive the demon.

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I detect a certain amount of kinship between

0:54:48.600 --> 0:54:55.359
<v Speaker 1>these two ideas. Collins also outlines a Hittite apotropaic practice

0:54:55.680 --> 0:54:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that does not involve a dead dog. We're going to

0:54:57.800 --> 0:55:00.760
<v Speaker 1>end on a nice light note here, but this practice

0:55:00.880 --> 0:55:03.799
<v Speaker 1>is a practice by which a tallow puppy, so kind

0:55:03.800 --> 0:55:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of like a soap or a candle puppy, was placed

0:55:06.920 --> 0:55:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in the King and Queen's bedchamber at night to keep

0:55:10.800 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 1>evil at bay in the same way that the adult

0:55:13.239 --> 0:55:16.520
<v Speaker 1>guard dogs, or I think the term that she uses

0:55:16.680 --> 0:55:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the dogs of the table, and I think this is

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:22.560
<v Speaker 1>also referred to in the writings of Homer as well,

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:25.319
<v Speaker 1>the dogs of the table being the dogs that hang

0:55:25.360 --> 0:55:28.160
<v Speaker 1>around you and eat food scraps that you throw out

0:55:28.200 --> 0:55:30.520
<v Speaker 1>from under the table. They're also your protectors, but I

0:55:30.560 --> 0:55:32.800
<v Speaker 1>guess they are not allowed to sleep with you, or

0:55:32.880 --> 0:55:34.759
<v Speaker 1>they're not in the bedchamber, or maybe they's just a

0:55:34.800 --> 0:55:37.720
<v Speaker 1>sleep and kind of lousy, or they can't protect against

0:55:37.719 --> 0:55:43.600
<v Speaker 1>supernatural threats, and therefore you need this magical tallow puppy,

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the soap puppy that's gonna keep the enemy at bay

0:55:47.400 --> 0:55:47.879
<v Speaker 1>at night.

0:55:48.320 --> 0:55:52.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, this also reminds me of ancient Mesopotamian traditions we've

0:55:52.280 --> 0:55:55.319
<v Speaker 2>talked about on the show before, of apotropeic figurines, that

0:55:56.000 --> 0:55:58.960
<v Speaker 2>you would have a guard figurine some kind of might

0:55:59.000 --> 0:56:01.640
<v Speaker 2>represent a dema or might represent a kind of like

0:56:01.719 --> 0:56:05.080
<v Speaker 2>strong human soldier or something like that, a figurine that

0:56:05.120 --> 0:56:07.319
<v Speaker 2>would protect you in some way, maybe around your bed

0:56:07.360 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 2>while you sleep.

0:56:08.360 --> 0:56:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, exactly, very much the same thread.

0:56:10.880 --> 0:56:15.319
<v Speaker 2>But here it's c puppy. Yes, all right. Are we

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:17.280
<v Speaker 2>done with licking for the time being?

0:56:17.520 --> 0:56:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I think so, unless we get just a really intriguing

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:23.640
<v Speaker 1>bit of listener mail, which is always a possibility, So

0:56:24.920 --> 0:56:27.920
<v Speaker 1>at least conceivably for the time being, we're going to

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and close the book on licking. Okay, just

0:56:31.000 --> 0:56:33.439
<v Speaker 1>a reminder for everyone out there that Stuff to Blow

0:56:33.480 --> 0:56:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind is primarily a science and culture podcast of

0:56:35.800 --> 0:56:39.080
<v Speaker 1>core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays, short form episodes on

0:56:39.120 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Wednesdays and on Fridays. We set aside most serious concerns

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to just talk about a weird film on Weird House Cinema.

0:56:45.560 --> 0:56:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even get to my film notes. I had

0:56:47.360 --> 0:56:51.360
<v Speaker 1>some notes about angels licking people's eyeballs and the prophecy

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:54.880
<v Speaker 1>three to learn their history, something that I think has

0:56:55.040 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 1>no real counterpart in actual folklore and mythology.

0:56:58.680 --> 0:57:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Well maybe not for history learning purposes, but we have

0:57:01.440 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 2>talked about gods licking people's eyeballs in Egyptian magic. Yes,

0:57:05.719 --> 0:57:06.799
<v Speaker 2>probably the whole deal there.

0:57:06.960 --> 0:57:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, so it could be it could be related

0:57:09.000 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to that. I just don't know that I've ever read

0:57:11.000 --> 0:57:17.040
<v Speaker 1>anything concerning angels per se. Licking eyeballs, but yeah, there's

0:57:17.120 --> 0:57:20.400
<v Speaker 1>likely a connection there. I also had some notes about

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the other prophecy movie, the nineteen seventy five Bear movie,

0:57:24.000 --> 0:57:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in which the mutant bear is essentially a partially formless mass,

0:57:29.920 --> 0:57:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and I had some notes there where I was probably

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:34.440
<v Speaker 1>reading too much into all of this, where it's like,

0:57:34.720 --> 0:57:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is it the idea that instead of the environment is

0:57:37.320 --> 0:57:40.920
<v Speaker 1>not nurtured by humans, it is polluted by humans, resulting

0:57:40.960 --> 0:57:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in mutant bears. There are also some mutant bear cubs

0:57:44.000 --> 0:57:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in that film as well, But like I say, I'm

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:49.360
<v Speaker 1>probably reaching with all of that.

0:57:49.720 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 2>One of these days, I mean have to see it.

0:57:51.600 --> 0:57:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I tried to watch it once. It

0:57:53.880 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 1>immediately begins with the death of like nine dogs, so

0:57:59.600 --> 0:58:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a more serious film than Killer Mutant

0:58:02.680 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Bear might make you think it's gonna be anyway. That's sorry,

0:58:06.680 --> 0:58:09.560
<v Speaker 1>That once again stuff to blow your mind. Find us

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:13.480
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, subscribe and listen to us

0:58:13.600 --> 0:58:14.280
<v Speaker 1>whenever you like.

0:58:15.640 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:58:19.640 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 2>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:58:21.120 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 2>with feedback on this episode or any other to suggest

0:58:23.520 --> 0:58:25.520
<v Speaker 2>a topic for the future, or just to say hello.

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:28.560
<v Speaker 2>You can email us at contact Stuff to Blow Your

0:58:28.600 --> 0:58:36.919
<v Speaker 2>Mind dot com.

0:58:37.080 --> 0:58:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio.

0:58:39.920 --> 0:58:42.880
<v Speaker 2>For more podcasts My heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:58:43.040 --> 0:59:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows

0:59:01.680 --> 0:59:03.160
<v Speaker 2>have FOCU