WEBVTT - Market Volatility, EV Outlook, Housing Market

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Today's focus on fixed

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>income is brought to you by Pimco, a global leader

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and active fixed income. Learn how Pimco creates opportunities for

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 1>investors at pimco dot com slash bonds. All investments contain

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>risk and may lose value. Consult your investment professional before investing.

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, So Lisa Bramwinz long ago told me I

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>need to pay attention to these treasury auctions and before like,

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>really do I have to? Apparently there was a two

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>year treasury auction yesterday that saw some week demand. I

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>think a five year one is on deck here. So

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Ira Jersey, he's our chief US indust rate strategist. He's

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna tell us why don't we need to pay attention?

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I had a producer, um Tim Andreacchi. He

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>was always freaking out about the treasury auctions because our

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>show was at one o'clock and they always come out,

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean what, they rarely tell you anything, don't they ira,

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>So they they tell you where demand is at that moment,

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>right And and I think that the reason why the

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>treasury auctions are so important right now is because they

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>give you a hint as to who's willing to take

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>risk and if investors are willing to take risk or not.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And and the last couple of months you've seen a

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>significant reduction in demand by particularly foreigners and domestic investment

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>funds for for treasuries at auction, and and it just

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>shows you that, like you know it, it proves a

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>level when when when you think about the fixed income

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>market UM, it's not as as homogeneous as saying the

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>equity market is in general. So you have multiple bonds

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>with different maturities, so you have a lot of different

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>instruments at play. And by having a new issue, whether

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's in the in the corporate world or in the

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>UM or in the treasure remarket UM, you you get

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the gauge real demand for that new supply. And you've

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>seen that even though the sizes of the treasury auctions

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>are getting smaller. You're seeing demand go down even faster.

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's the reason you've seen a lot of softness

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in some of these these issues. So why are the

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 1>international buyers, Why are they not there? Maybe like the

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe how they used to be well, but partially because

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there is a preference for cash right now.

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Because if if you're even if you're a foreign buyer

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>where you know yields in the US or you know,

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>multiples of what they are in your your home jurisdiction,

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>if you think that interest rates are going to keep

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>going up, you you don't want to be buying a

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>bond because then you'll wind up losing money on on

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the price side, um you know. So so as as

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to your treasury yields, if they go up from you know,

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>four percent to five percent, you're gonna lose UM. You're

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose a couple of percent in UM in terms

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity cost uh and and the price of that

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>instrument will go down. So I think that's the that's

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the A couple of the big reasons is that you

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have the um you know, massive demand you also

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>have on the other side, and this is this is

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>part of The issue I think with with the foreign

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>investors and in terms of central banks, is that central

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>banks want to uh, you know, want want to prop

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>up their own currencies because their own currencies are slipping

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>very quickly against the dollar. And if they go out

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and they go buy two year treasuries, they also have

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to buy dollars on top of that, which will just

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>weaken their currency even further. So there's so foreign exchange

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>managers aren't going to be involved in these auctions like

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they sometimes. I'm just surprised that Japanese. I mean, you're

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>if if you're looking at a situation where there's no

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>reason for the end um go down. Well, well, let's

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>say this, if you're looking at a situation where the

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>finance ministry is defending the end and um, you know

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>your interest rates on the ten year or zero point

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>two percent versus you know, four percent in the US,

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't you want that? Well no, because again you have

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to buy dollars then, and you're just weakening the end

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>versus buying versus the dollar. And and if you're trying

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to defend your currency and trying to stop your currency

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>from falling further, you want to actually be selling uh

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar denominated assets and buying the end denominated assets. And

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the that's the reason why you have those foreign

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>foreign reserves, and and and that is one of the

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>dynamics that you're seeing in some of these auctions. Now, unfortunately,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what exactly what happened yesterday because this

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>data comes out after the the auction settle and we

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>get all of the other data. But the allotment data,

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>when you look at it from the August auctions certainly

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>showed that there was a slowdown in demand from foreign

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>investors and a lot of the different issues across the curve.

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>And I think that isn't part because of this idea

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that they don't want to strengthen their own currency. Now. Now,

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, if if they have a maturing bond, they

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>might participate in the auction just to roll over that bond.

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>They're not buying new dollars or just rolling over the

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>old dollars. Um But but you know, no new money

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to come in. And and you know, even

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>though even though you know, interest rate dynamics are going

0:04:55.960 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to matter here because eventually this might turn very significant

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>because once the once the Fed's done hiking, I think

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen is that other central banks are gonna

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>be catching up, and that's when you're going to see

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a significant turn in the dollar. And once you see

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that turn in the dollar, those all of those flows

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>could wind up changing very quickly. Um. Now, I don't

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to happen until three but um, but

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 1>it is something to look out for because the FED

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is ahead of the curve here. Well, I can't see

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the head of the curve that other central banks in

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>its hiking cycle, right, so therefore it probably will stop

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>before the other central banks are done. The FED is

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the curve. Now FED has the curve just a quick

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds. Kind of a plumbing issue, dude. The dealers

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>buy does the JP Morgan's of the world in the

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Goldmen Sex? Do they buy for their own account? At auctions?

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>They have to Yeah, yeah, they have to bid for

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>pro rata amount, so it's twenty primary dealers. They each

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>have to bid for five percent of the auctions. That's

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>one reason why in the US you won't ever have

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a failed auction um where you have less bids than

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>you have issued. But so so they do buy for

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>their own account, but they've been getting much smaller over

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years in favor of money managers

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>who are much more active and really the incremental price

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>setters at a lot of these auctions. See, so I just,

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know, step up and buy him.

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>See these auctions. See they're important. I just learned something that. Yeah, well,

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how important is an auction where you have

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of giant banks that are that are

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>required to bid. Yeah, but you want him to bid aggressively,

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>so you gotta put some competition out there, all right,

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Ira Jersey uh covers interest rates. He's a strategist Bloomberg Intelligence. Also,

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>we didn't get to talk to about soccer, but he

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>follows soccer religiously. He's also a part owner and some

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think a minor league I think is a way

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to term it um soccer team professional soccer team in

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>central New Jersey. So go figure how many strategies you

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>know that owns a soccer team. I mean, he's just

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>like these big players. Next is gonna be the premier league.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Some Americans have to care, Matt. There are a lot

0:06:59.920 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of electric vehicle companies out there. Just seems like I

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>saw a Lucid Air the other day. You know, I

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>told my wife, I said, there's a lucid She said,

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking about? Said lucid Air said, I

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>still don't know what you're talking about. Um. It was

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.239
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool, all right. Peter Wine, he's the CEO of Centro.

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>What I love about There's a lot of things I

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>like that's coming. One of it's based in Freehold, New Jersey.

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>You know who came from Freehold, New Jersey, Grover Cleveland. Jeez, Peter,

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>can you help him out? Who else is? They came

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>from Freehold, New Jersey, between New York and the Pennsylvania

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Philadelphia and being good stuff. All right? Peter

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>talked to us about Central. What do you guys do there?

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>What's talks about your business? Your company? Sancho's visue actually

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>beginning in twenty thirteen, and that desired to transform the

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>commercial see industry, which to like pseudo mission vehicles. Yeah,

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that has and the remains are so and singer of focus. Yeah.

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>We grow from one low speed vehicle in twenties Penteam

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and the two a full product line that the currently

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>will include a commercial vehicles and the seven for industry

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>use with multiple variations and the one for off road use. Yeah.

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So so our our mission is really try to lead

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the transformation in this automotive industry, and they try to

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>become a leader in the electrical commercial vehicle sector. That's

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. So who's who's your who's your customer?

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Who's that a typical customer for one of your vehicles? Yes,

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly it's the free operators and also the municiples.

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>They provided the local service and which is basically for

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the commercial user morally. Right now, it's like a percent

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of our our customers for steady deliver and the like

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>urban services. So, um, how much traction are you getting?

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's your revenue growth look like? And how

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>are your projections? Yeah, we are already finished the face

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>for the vehicle development and the way are looking for

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the first growing in the revenue and in the deliver delivery,

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and we are building our distribution and UH and the

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>aftermarket support network in America and the Europe and something

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 1>in Asia. So you've already you've already got what four

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>or five thousand vehicles out yes, so far, Yeah, we

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>already have more than I think more than five thousand

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>already being add to the market. So who do you

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>compete against in that part of the market world. You

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>know obviously familiar with the consumer automobile segment, the Tessil's

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and and now all the other O E M is

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>getting in there, But who do you typically compete against?

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Who do you think you will compete against in this segment?

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you know the company like uh like a workhorse,

0:09:55.920 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's our primary competitor, and all they're living

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and because the living they produce the pickups, they also

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>uh makes deliver van. So that's our I think the

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest main competitor the market now. And I think you know,

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>with the all the the product and ready, I think

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>we are kind of like a leading the sector at

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>this moment. So let me just finally ask you about

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain and the chip management that you've been

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>able to do. What does your supply chain look like

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and how is your access to microchips? Yeah, that was

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 1>our you know, last years of struggling. So so it's

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>just like everybody is struggling for the supply chain and aware.

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we are in the very good position right

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>now because you know, some of the r O E

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>M is a tier one manufacturer and from from China

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and the previous we have a little bit of shipping problem,

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and but now we see all the shipping price school

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>going down and that we are not able to get

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the container. I think, you know, we are strongly positioned

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and very well developed our supply chain base. I think

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>away in the supply chain we're doing. I think we're

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>doing very good, all right, Peter, Good stuff interesting story here, Peter,

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>when he's the CEO of Centro making electric vehicles for

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the commercial commercial vehicle segments. So interesting, you know, segment

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>there that likely will be addressed there with a lot

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of competitors. Stuff there. What I'm very much focused on

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is in this space, but more of a consumer vehicle segment.

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Harley Davidson. Today is down on the New York Stock Exchange. UM.

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Today is the day that they merge their live Wire

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>electric motorcycle unit with UM. The spack. The spack name

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is a E. A. Bridges Impact Corps. Hopefully, dear goodness,

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>they change that name. UM, so it's going to be

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess called live Wire now so you can get

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>an electric Harley Davidson. Yes, Pounds Sterling steady here today

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>one spot zero seven seven, but it has been under

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>siege with mounting bets that it may below drop below

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>one dollar, the old parody thing. Let's bring in Stephen Gallo.

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>He's had of European FIC strategy for BEMO capital markets. Stephen,

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>is is parity for sterling? Is that a reasonable possibility?

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I think anything that reasonable possibility or this in this

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>ethics environment, with this type of volatility, in these types

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 1>of swings, UM, we'd like to say the bottom for

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the cycle is in. UM. We're kind of hoping that

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the bottom for the cycle is and the thing goes

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>for the top in the US dollar. UM, but I'd

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 1>say we have moderate confection the view at this stage. UM,

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the dollar side of the equation, we're

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty confit in at this stage that most of what

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the FET is signaling is now priced in. Uh So,

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the transmission of set policy to the FX market via

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>interest rate differentials, we think that has largely when it's

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>called course. But what we're less what we're more concerned about,

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>unless unless certain is finished, is the extent to which

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the FX market prices in a higher global recession probability,

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>as well as the the lingering effect or the ongoing

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>effect I should say, of quanticative heightening from the fet Uh.

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>These concern us a loss for non dollar currencies. Uh.

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>If you think most of the Fed rate hikes are

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>priced in, where do you see the terminal rate? Well,

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:50.319
<v Speaker 1>the BEMO house is uh, you know, around four point

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>six issue give or take for the effective set funds rate.

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's what he said basically at the press conference. Yeah, so,

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, rough roughly in line with that, um, the

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>effective that things are made. Um, we've got them going

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>twice more uh in in two dozen twenty two and

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>then hiking once again at the first meeting of two

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 1>dozen and twenty three. But the you know, the main

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the main point here is that that is largely the

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>old that he reflected, and then some just find a

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit uh into the dollar O I ask her. So,

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if if we start to see um, you know,

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>core inflation showing clear signs of decelerating in the United

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>States and we get one or two months of negative

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>job prints, that that will definitely be a big helping

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>hand for um, this dollar peach story. But on the

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>other side of that, UM, we have to get through

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>this issue of how bad the global and or US

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>recession is going to be and we probably haven't gotten

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to the peak pricing for global recession risk just yet. Um,

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and until that happens, it's going to be harder for

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the dollar to fall sharply. Until we're confirmed that is so,

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the FED does a major pivot, it's going to be

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>hard for the dollar to fall sharply. Well, you know,

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a question that Paul has been asking for

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks now, and UM, we haven't really

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>heard anyone say yes, Is there any bearer case for

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the US dollar? Is there a bearer case for the

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>US dollar? Is there any bearer case at all in

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the in the medium to long term, potentially in the

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>short run. Uh, it's tough to see it. Uh, it's

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>tough to see the dollar following system. I mean just look,

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if the FED word to engineer some type

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of the pivot and were to confirm that it's not

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that we're starting to see a clear science that core

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation pressures are rolling over and going in the set

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for a direction United States. The labor market is well,

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you still have all of these structural issues ongoing geopolitical

0:15:56.160 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and structural issues on the capital flow side, uh, for

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:05.479
<v Speaker 1>a number of major European currencies, for Asia ex japan currencies,

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Japanese en. UM, that that defect pivoting to

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a neutual policy stand is not simply going to make

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>go away. It might help the healing process beginning for

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>those structural um claws and those currencies. UM, but it's

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>not gonna make no way. UM. You know, when we're

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>moving from an environment or an era of globalization, UM

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>where we got very used to ultra low interest rates,

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>quantitative easing, high asset valuations, to an on the binding

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of that. Um, it's very hard for non dollar currencies

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to really sustainably uh. So UM, that's the picture. Unfortunately, Stephen,

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you've been in this FX game a long time. What

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>did you make in the actual trading of pounds sterling

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of days? Pretty pretty wild moves there. Well, UM,

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm a strategist, so I don't I don't

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>have to write, but I mean, it's just just just

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the movements. What what what was that market, Telly, and

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>just the market was just really give us an adjective.

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that we've seen a very here,

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>but probably in my view, a long overdue repricing of

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>UK risk premia um because of the fiscal picture, because

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of the good picture, because of the balance of payments picture.

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.199
<v Speaker 1>And I think that caught up with the currency and

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the guilt market this week and last week. And what

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you saw basically was a liquidity event, a low lack

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 1>of liquidity in both the FX market and the guilt market,

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>which made the price action ten times worse than it

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>would have been. Uh with that to be there, um

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>so um. You know, we're getting into a situation now

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>where risk premia are adjusting, but they're not adjusting an

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 1>orderly fashion. All right, good stuff, appreciate it as always

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Stephen gal Bmo Capital Market. So we didn't even get

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to the end. We didn't even get to the end.

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But that was it seems like ancient history, but that

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>was just last week that the Finance Ministry intervened in

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese end to defend the currency for the first

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>time since that was twenty four years ago. Remember it. Well,

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>good year. Look at the housing market. We had new

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>home sales data came out today, came in better than expected,

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>uh six eighty five thousand verses consensus A five thousand,

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher than last month, which was revised higher.

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But certainly they're housing sales are coming down from the

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>peak of the pandemic. Question is can this housing market

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>and engineer a soft landing or will it be ugly?

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Can it serve five rates? Rates? And what did you

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>say that mortgage races today six point seven that's a

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>long way from you know, three and a quarter from

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>just you know, a year ago. Sam Dunlap ce Io

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>at Angelo Capital, join just Sam, love to get your

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on kind of the register, you know, the residential

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>real estate market here, how do you how do you

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>characterize the last few years? And and then maybe where

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we are right now. Thanks for having me on a

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>great question, you know, the to your point on you know,

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Cannon housing achieve a soft landing and given the pace

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of appreciation we saw and home prices really post pandemic um,

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's clearly very difficult to sustain those type of levels.

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And and as you all know, you know, case Shiller

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>came out this morning and uh it was below expectations

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>and one of the more swift declines we've seen in

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the index um, you know, rising six on a year

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of a year basis, but we expect you know, home

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the home pace of a home price appreciation clearly cannot

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:49.719
<v Speaker 1>sustain the current levels. But you know, the housing market

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>was really benefiting from you know, this historic supplying to

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>man mismatch that market participants have been identifying for years.

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>But the extraordinarily a little mortgage rates fueled surging home prices,

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly during COVID. While that's not sustainable. Uh, you know,

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we do expect the very favorable supply and demand dynamic

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in US housing supporting home prices, but the pace of

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>appreciation clearly cannot cannot keep up. But what is um,

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>what what does it look like in terms of US

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>housing that makes you feel like it's supportive in terms

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of the supply and demand? Right? Is there just not

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>enough land? Our builders UM still having trouble getting Uh,

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>construction materials are is labored? The problem? What's the issue

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>on the supply side? You know, on the supply side

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>is you know, we just historically underbuilt really after the

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>global financial crisis and that that really has not changed.

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>And very similar to the dynamics that we saw in

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the not late nineteen seventies with the baby boomers, you know,

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they were forming households at a very brisk pace. We're

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>still seeing that from the millennials, you know, on annualized

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>pace of approximately one point two mill and household formations

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>today and that's very supportive. Is is you know, the

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>demand for single family shelter, particularly coming out of COVID,

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>still remains strong. But affordability has really been the challenge

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>here as the FEDS is inflicted as as Chairman Powell

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted a lot of pain clearly on the economy, and

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the initial transmission mechanism has definitely been surging mortgage rates

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 1>as you pointed out, and that's really hurt the affordability aspect,

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>but the underlying demand UH and lack of supply and

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and just the fact of how underbuilt the US housing

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>as we think, you know, achieves that soft landing for

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for US housing and not the you know, extreme downturn

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that we saw really coming out of the financial crisis.

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing in your fund? Sam? You manage

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:50.719
<v Speaker 1>the Angelo Multi Strategy Income Fund, the Strategic Credit Fund,

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the Core Impact Fund, um Multi Strategy Income You see

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>I T S fund. I don't even know what you

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>see I t S means, But what are you doing

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in those funds right now. Yeah, So you know, the

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>mortgage market, like all areas fixed income, has been under

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of pressure this year, just given the

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>swift pace of tightening and a complete revision of of

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>fat expectations. But uh, mortgages have been particularly sensitive to

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>what we're describing is really a volatility shock. So you know,

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we we went through the first phase of the inflation shock.

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Is inflation with parabolic this year, as we all um

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>know very well at this point. But also you saw

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>rates clearly repriced very swiftly, and volatility surging and the

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>interest rate world to historic highs. And from a volatility perspective,

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we're really at a crisis like levels from a from

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>an historical standpoint, and uh, that presents an extraordinarily favorable

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>time for mortgages in particular, is uh we view, you know,

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>this near term event is not necessarily a credit event

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>where you know, mortgage credit is is frankly pristine and

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the best that we've ever seen seen it. Um,

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the underwriting standards of an extraordinary unemployment remains very very low,

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and we still have a very brisk labor market. But mortgages,

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>given the volatility and rate shock that we've seen have

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>have really widened out from a spread perspective, both agency

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:19.479
<v Speaker 1>and non agency mortgages. UH prevent a present and our

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>view an extraordinarily favorable opportunity here UH to lock in

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, equally like returns and and very high quality

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>areas of fixed income. UH. And we think that you know,

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>patient investors will will be rewarded. Um. You know in

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>this amidst this volatility shock, we're currently in SAMA about

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds. But where does demanded destruction come in from

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a motor's rate perspectives here? Well, I think you're starting

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to see that demand destruction UH pretty significantly just given

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:49.959
<v Speaker 1>the deterioration that we've seen an affordability. But as as

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>mortgage investors, UH, you know, it's not necessarily contingent on

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the pace of housing activity. We definitely expected to slow

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>down and housing activity. But what's important clearly is more

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of the delinquencies and what that actual home price is

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>if you actually have a default particularly nod agen see mortgages,

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and what that ultimate recovery value is and so uh,

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you think about the LTV of the

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>US housing market today at approximately thirty we've never seen

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>this much equity in the housing market. So we think,

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the resiliency of of the underlying asset class

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>will will hold up quite well. But there is a

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of demand destruction just given the surge that

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in mortgage rates. UH. And and again activity

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>will continue to slow. All right, Sam, good stuff. Really

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>appreciate getting uh the review update on the mortgage market,

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>housing market. Sam Dunlap see io at angel Oka a

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Capital talking about the housing market here, such a surgeon

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>early part of the pandemic. Coming back down to reality.

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Hurricane Ian, it made landfall in Cuba. Now it's got

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>his sights on Florida. It looks like the west coast

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of Florida is going to get the brunt of it.

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that brings into question and Tampa. When you

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>think about big, big metro cities, you think about, you know,

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>some of the insured losses are and what that means

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>for some of the big insurance companies in addition to

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the good folks on the ground. Matthew Palazola, Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Senior Annals covering property and casualty insurance. He joins us

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>here in a Bloomberg Interactive broker Studio. Tampa is a

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>big market, big insured market. What are some of the

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>estimates here potential damage? And apparently it's not a place

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 1>that gets hit by hurricanes. A lot does not get

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>hit by hurricanes often. Uh. There were some analogs in

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen hundreds, the forties, the fifties, um, but nothing

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:39.479
<v Speaker 1>directly hitting Tampa. Lloyd's of London has a scenario, not

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>for this storm specifically, but for a direct hit on Tampa,

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>which could be a hundred billion dollars of damage. Now

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>that's big, right, that is big. That would be the

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest insured loss ever. I don't know if it would.

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>This storm is probably not getting to that level. But

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>if we're talking about insured value in the region, that's

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're looking at. Uh. It's gonna miss the

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>oil rigs, right, so it's not gonna go Brian Sullivan

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>was telling us yesterday, it's probably not gonna be west

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>enough to hit the oil production hubs. That is correct.

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's really focusing more more east. So the

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>models come out every six hours and they've been shifting.

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Initially they were all the way from Louisiana to Florida,

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>but they've been moving more and more east to the Florida.

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So how far is it right now from the Florida coast?

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's about forty eight hours from from landfall in Florida,

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>and we still don't know. The latest run literally just

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>came up minutes before I came in. Here was a

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>little more south of Tampa. So a little bit better

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of a forecast from an insured lost point of view,

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a category one to two versus a two to three

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>uh and south of Tampa, okay, So what are some

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of the companies that maybe have exposure there? From an

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>insurance perspective, So it's interesting what's going on is the

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>reinsurance companies will definitely have exposure. There's a name is

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>like so reinsure insure insurance company exactly. Those guys are

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the altar risked bearers, right, the reinsurers. Well, so the

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>primary insurer retains a lot of the risk and then

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>they give some to the resations, not not all of it.

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And ess interesting what's happening in Florida now anyway, is

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>reinsurance companies don't want to be there. There's rampant fraud

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in the state. Aside from the risk of these hurricanes Florida. No, yes,

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>very much so. So they've been stepping back to begin with.

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>So before any of this is even happening, Uh, primary

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>companies are having a lot of trouble getting reinsurance to

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the point where someone are leaving the state or actually

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>going insolvent. Interesting, So who are the biggest reinsurers? Are

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>we talking about munich Re or International? Yeah, so the

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>biggest reinsurers in the world are this, munich Re, Swiss Ree, Um,

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't cover them. The companies I cover based out

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of Bermuda, their names like Renaissance Ree, everest Ree, they

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>probably have. They will definitely have some exposure, probably less

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>than than the bigger companies though. So how about some

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.479
<v Speaker 1>of the primary insurers that might have some risk. I mean,

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I just think of all those gleaming office towers that

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 1>all the Wall Street terms are taking up now on

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 1>the law firms. I mean, it is a major skyline,

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 1>it is a major city, man. I just some of

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>these insurance companies might really be I'm sure they're paying

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:11.720
<v Speaker 1>attention to it, like of course they are. Of course

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>they are. So the biggest UM, the biggest primary insurance

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 1>state farm which is not a public company. H Then

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>there's also a lot of the homes in the state

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>are with the state fund, so that's it's the taxpayers

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially paying for it themselves. There's other names like all state,

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>um chub would be a name a I g. Who

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>would have exposure to maybe commercial properties not not outsized though.

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So um does FEMA have any bearing on this? I mean,

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>do they go in there and and help out to

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>some extent or I think I guess so it will,

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, eventually, depending on how bad it is, It

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't matter dramatically for the insurance companies what what FEMA does.

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>But I guess it all depends on the severity of

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the storm. But what's the big story long term thought

0:28:56.120 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>about the insurance business? Climate change just more and more radical.

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's found more fires, bigger fires, more floods,

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>bigger floods, hurricanes, all that kind of stuff. Yeah, it's

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:11.239
<v Speaker 1>all it's all happening. I mean, um, the reinsurers are

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of the first line in this, so they're the

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>ones that are stepping back and saying these risks are

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>getting too big to take. What probably will happen. We

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>just had a cold today with someone who said there

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>might be more public private partnerships, meaning the insurance just

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>we're just not doing it. And if you want to

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>live close to a wildfire area or you want to

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>live in a hurricane prone area, then the state is

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>going to have to work out some solution with you

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to ultimately fall in taxpayers. But you

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>do see um, uh, these kind of events happening more frequently.

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>We do. I mean, there's no one is saying that

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>country is not happening. I would say one thing, there

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>was a big period of kind of benign weather right

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>before this, and now we're seeing more extreme So could

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we could we be in a mean reversion or could

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>we be in a kind of crazier weather forever? Uh,

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't know. Alright, good stuff. Matthew Palozola,

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligent senior analysts covering the property insurance business, joining

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>us in studio. He does not phone it in, he

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>comes in studio. So we're talking about Hurricane Ian. Obviously

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a big, big, big issue for all the good

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>folks down there in far to to deal with it.

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Looks like it will be a pretty significant storm. But

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>there's also the business end of at the P and

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>l end of it, which is the insurance angle h

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and kind of what is the ensurable losses potential in

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>some of these markets. So guys like Matthew help us

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>out there. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller three. Pet On Ball Sweeney

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio