WEBVTT - Chesa Boudin on Progressive Prosecuting in San Francisco

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Ethan Edelman, and this is Psychoactive, a production

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio and Protozoa Pictures. Psychoactive is the

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>show where we talk about all things drugs. But any

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>views expressed here do not represent those of my Heart Media,

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Protozoa Pictures, or their executives and employees. Indeed, as an

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>inveterate contrarian, I can tell you they may not even

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>represent my own and nothing contained in this show should

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>be used as medical advice or encouragement to use any

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>type of drugs. Hello, Psychoactive listeners. Our guest today is

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Chasa Boudin. Chasa was elected the District Attorney of San

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Francisco in late twenty nineteen, running out of, you know,

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>basically a progressive prosecutor's agenda, and served there for about

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>two and a half years, and then was the subject

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of a well financed and well coordinated recall campaign in

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>California it's one of the states where you can recall politicians,

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen in most states, and landed up losing that.

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>So he is now the x d A. So, Chasa,

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate you're getting on with me now and

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hope this is a good moment when you're not running anything,

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>not in office, to be well be able to talk

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>as freely as possible about all sorts of criminal justice issues. Absolutely,

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to be with you, Ethan, and I've enjoyed

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>listening to your pod in the past and honored to

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>be a guest on the show. So Chisa, I mean,

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>let me get start off by asking you this. You

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>came with a very strong reformist perspective. You were working

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in the public Defender's office. Why was it that you

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>decided to throw your hat in the ring and actually

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>run for, you know, the chief prosecutor job in San

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Francisco when that would be a job that involve putting

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>people behind bars, as I imagine we'll talk about. I

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>grew up visiting my own parents in prison. My dad

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.239
<v Speaker 1>served forty years before he was ultimately released. My mom

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>did twenty two years, and though I don't remember their arrest,

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I was too little. My earliest memories are waiting in

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>lines at prison gates to go through metal detectors and

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to get searched, just to be able to see my parents,

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>just to be able to give them hugs, and so

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>as long as I can remember, I've been impacted by

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and thinking about this country's response to crime and how

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we meet out punishment and what rehabilitation means. And I've

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>been acutely aware of the tremendous carnage that the war

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>on drugs has left in its wake. I've been actively

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>witnessing the racial disparities that our criminal legal system amplifies.

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And when I went to law school, I wanted to

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>try to fight to change that system, the system that

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>had done so little to invest in victims, and it

0:02:56.440 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>was so disinterested in re entry and rehabilitation and was

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 1>so focused on punishment in ways that we're not making

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>our communities safer. And at the time I went to

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>law school, UM prosecutors were really part of the problem.

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>They were a driving force in mass incarceration, in what

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>had led the United States to be the country that

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>embarrassingly leads the world in locking people up. And so

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I became a public defender of after law school. And

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it was only in that context that UM I saw

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>professionally what I'd experienced personally my whole life. And I

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>looked around the country and was witnessing a national movement

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that recognized we can build safety through decarceration and that

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors are a key part of that movement. And it

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>was in that context that I decided to run for

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco District Attorney. I say, you know, yeah, we

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned your parents for our listeners. Chases mother was

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Cathy Budan and his father David Gilbert, and they were

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>part of radical, militant left wing organization of all the

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>weather Underground. And on one day when Chase was just

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a tie Um landed up being connected with members of

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the Black Liberation Army driving a getaway car when an

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>operation happened where two police officers and a BRINX guard

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>were killed. And so, as he said, his parents were

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>sentenced and he was then adopted. I mean his legal

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>guardians were two other well known members of the Weatherman Underground,

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Bill Ayres and Bernardine Dort. So he comes from quite

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>distinguished what might be called radical royalty. In fact, his grandfather,

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Leonard Buddan, was the civil rights and UH civil liberties

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>activists who represented Daniel Ellsberg in the Depending on Paper's case.

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So I have to say there are probably a few

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>other names or families that are as linked to the

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of radical left and contemporary American politics as yours. Well,

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I I didn't live through that whole history, but as

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>you say, um, I have a lot of family members

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>who have been actively involved in politics and in different ways,

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and student organizing and in litigating. And we could go

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>back even further. My grandfather's uncle, Louis Boudin wrote a

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>number of really important scholarly works and books criticizing the

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court's refusal in the nineteen thirties to accept the

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.799
<v Speaker 1>New Deal and the ways in which the Supreme Court

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>was striking down the federal legislative initiative aimed at addressing

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the Great Depression. So yeah, we we have a lot

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of lawyers and scholars in the family, and a lot

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of people who have been very critically involved in responding

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>to fascism and imperialism and racism. And I'm certainly proud

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to have learned from some of the mistakes made along

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, and also to share a commitment to fighting

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to make the world a better place. Now. Were your

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>parents incarcerated in New York State prisons? Yes, both Kathy

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and David served the entirety of their prison sentences in

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>New York State correctional facilities, and so As I recall,

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineties early nine New York State was

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>either first or second among all the states in the

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>country in terms of the proportion of people incarcerated for

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.559
<v Speaker 1>drug law violations. In fact, I think at one point

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in New York it came close to fifty of all

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>new commitments. So I imagine when you went to visit

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>your parents, basically you must have been surrounded by families

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>visiting people who were getting locked up, oftentimes on non violent,

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>low level drug offenses, the notorious Rockefeller drug laws. Yeah,

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I vivid memories of talking to my mother, and you know,

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, I remember many of the women in my

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>mother's prison were there serving time for essentially standing up

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>for themselves in the face of horrific sexual violence and

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 1>domestic violence. But increasingly over the years it was people

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>who were casualties of the War on drugs. And I

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>remember one woman in particular who was one of my

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>mother's best friends in prison and helped teach my mother

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Spanish and inspired me to go to Latin America and

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>learned Spanish. And she was there for many, many, many

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>years because of the role she played as a low

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>level mule for a bigger drug cartel. Another woman, the

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>mother of a close friend of mine who I became

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>friends within the prison visiting room, was serving a many

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>decades long sentence under the Rockefeller drug laws. All of

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>these folks had no violence, no history of violence, no weapons,

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and yet we're filling jails and prisons across New York State.

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, with your mom in the Bedford Hills prisons

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in New York exactly right, Bedford Hills at the time,

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:39.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe still today, but throughout her tenure there was the

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>only maximum security prison for women in New York State,

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and so anyone considered maximum security um and it might

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>seem odd to folks who aren't familiar with the American

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>criminal legal system, but my mother was there serving a

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>sentence for the most serious offense on the books. She

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>had participated it in an armed robbery that left three men,

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>two of them police officers, dead, and though she wasn't

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>personally armed and didn't personally hurt anybody, she was ultimately

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>convicted of murder, and she was in a prison that

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.679
<v Speaker 1>was designed for people who were maximum security. Makes sense,

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>given her charges and the violence in her case, for

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>her to have been in that prison, certainly at the

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>outset of her commitment. But ask yourself, why would a

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>maximum security prison be filled with women serving as long

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>or longer in some instances for entirely non violent drug

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>related offenses. So I mean your you know, your background

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is impressive. I mean Yale Road scholar, Yale Law School.

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>You clerked for Judge Chuck Bryer, the little brother of

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Stephen Bryer, became a public defender, and then

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you get elected, what in your late thirties, to be

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the District Attorney of San Francisco. I remember at the time,

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and I had people close to me who were working

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>closely with you, and everybody was enormously excited. Did you anticipate,

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>um some of the extent of the backlash that would happen?

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember, I think somebody like set up a website

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>like the day after you were elected recall Chasy Bludan,

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>before you've even been inaugurated. But did you anticipate how

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>significant and serious this backlash would be? Certainly we expected

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>pushback and backlash, and folks like Kim Fox and Larry

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Krasner and George Gascon and others who are part of

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>this national movement across the country Rachel Rowlins Marylyn Mosby

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>had given me fair warning after I was elected that

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I would expect this kind of thing. But but no,

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no way until you've lived it and experienced it

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>that you could be fully prepared for the intensity and

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the vitriol and the dishonesty in the attacks. You know,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it would be great if we could have honest policy

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>discussions about climate change, or public schools or the drug war,

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>and we could agree to disagree on some points. We

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>could look at data, and we could let policy and

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>practice and government institutions be driven by honest, nuanced conversations.

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.599
<v Speaker 1>That is not the way that the world works today,

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>if ever, and instead we are seeing a tremendous amount

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of intentional misinformation, vitriolic attacks. Um, it's a very intentional

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>and explicit and frankly successful part of the broader republican playbook.

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>And we saw Donald Trump and his allies us it

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>extremely effectively for years, and we see it even in

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>deep blue cities like San Francisco as a key part

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of the political discourse and the way in which public

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>perception is shaped about issues like drugs. Now, of course,

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you win office in late nineteen and just a few

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>months later, COVID happens, and the kind of the world

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>is in this bizarre, confused state. People are off the

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>streets in many cities, including my home in New York.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>You see, you know, a disproportion number that people are

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>out in the street to the time where people suffering

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>from mental illness, people are homeless, I mean, a lot

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>of people not feeling safe anymore walking around. This obviously

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 1>has happening in San Francisco, and some months later the

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>killing of George Floyd and the Black Lives Matter protests

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and some of the violence that you know happened during

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that time as well. And then of course you're setting

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>up and running an office when all of a sudden,

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>nobody's coming into the office anymore, and you're all online.

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So what were those first three four or five months

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>like for you? And I was elected in November, I

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't sworn into office until January, almost exactly two months

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>after I was sworn in um the mayor declared a

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>state of emergency and essentially shut down the city, and

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco has been one of the slowest cities in

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the country to reopen. People are still working remotely in

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>higher proportions than in almost any other big city, and

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>so it's had a dramatic impact on our courts. Are

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>courthouse remains partially closed, we never fully reopened, We never

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>got back to full capacity for trying cases. The impact

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of COVID nineteen and the shutdown on crime trends was

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>far more dramatic and long lasting than we initially anticipated.

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 1>UM And, as you pointed out, trying to run an office,

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to shape the culture of an office, trying to

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>do training, trying to build trust and increase moral in

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>an office when you're doing everything over zoom, including new

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:31.199
<v Speaker 1>job interviews and orientations for people you're on boarding, was

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>tremendously challenging. And there's no question that it was a huge,

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>huge obstacle to my ability to build relationships with and

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>trust with some of the constituencies in San Francisco who

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe hadn't supported my election in the first place, but

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in principle agree with the policies we were implementing UM,

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>But we just didn't have any opportunity to get face

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to face in the same room with a lot of

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>people across the city because of the pandemic. Well, I'm curious,

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean you mentioned before Larry Krasny, or the district

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>attorney in Philadelphia who ran on a progressive agenda and

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>they got re elected. And I had him as a

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>guest on Psychoactive last year, and I'm wondering, you know,

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in your office like his, part of what happened was

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>tons of the old time prosecutors in the office left

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>or were fired by you know him or by you.

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>And meanwhile a number of people come in from the

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>public defender's office where you had worked before. I mean,

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>there must have been a massive culture clash when that

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing happens. So can you describe what that

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>was like? What you have to remember is that people

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 1>who have spent five or ten or twenty five years

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of their lives working as district attorneys in a traditional

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>carstoral prosecutor's office, the office that wholeheartedly and enthusiastically waged

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the war on drugs, are not doing it primarily for

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 1>the money. They're not doing it primarily for the glory.

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 1>And so they believe on some core level that what

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they're doing is in the interest of justice and is

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in fact promoting public safety. And so if somebody an

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>outsider like Larry or myself comes along and runs a

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>race in which were openly critical of the War on

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>drugs or of many of the traditional ways that prosecutors

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>have behaved, like seeking convictions at all costs, like covering

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>up police misconduct, like refusing to consider the possibility that

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>people have been wrongfully convicted of crimes and are languishing

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in prisons. Those new approaches that are quintessential parts of

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the progressive prosecutor movement are not going to be well

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>received by folks who have dedicated their lives and their

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>careers to a very different approach to doing the job.

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, there's inevitably a certain degree of distrust

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and disconnect, and bureaucracies are very effective at resisting change,

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>digging their heels in, at simply refusing to follow instructions

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>or new policies. We see it with police departments all

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>across the country when efforts at reform are implemented through

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>state legislation or police commissions or police chiefs. Even and

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly we experienced some very active resistance and sabotage from

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>within our ranks. We also, though, and this is important,

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>we also had a large number of staff who were

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>excited and supportive and embraced the vision who had joined

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the office because it was San Francisco and it was

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>known as a progressive town, and because my predecessor, die

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Gascone had certainly in his later years begun to implement

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reforms that again we see as part

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of the national conversation around progressive prosecutors. And so there

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was a mixed a mixed reception, I would say, a

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of resistance and entrenched hostility. And yet also some

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of the attorneys were and some of the other staff

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>were very open to the ideas um and I learned

0:15:57.040 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount from the people in the office over

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the two and a half years that I had the

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>honor to service district attorney. What do you think in

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>your interactions with the old time prosecutors in your office

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>who remained. Was there anything that you learned from them

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that really changed the way that you thought about criminal

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>justice or about the role of the prosecutors A good

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>away here, I'm talking about the old line prosecutors who

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>chose not to leave. I learned a lot from from

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>some of these folks, and some of them were public

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>supporters of mine in opposition to the recall. Um, some

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of them helped me navigate my first ever grand jury

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>indictment in a homicide case that I present to do

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a grand jury. UM. So you know, there was a

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>lot that I learned from folks both day to day,

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>um nuts and bolts about running the office, about interactions

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>with other agencies like the police and the courts from

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>this side of the aisle. But I think big picture,

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I learned is from these

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>folks and from the job, and you know, is the

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>disconnect between the way the Supreme Court describes the ethical

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and legal obligations of the prosecutor Minister of justice. You know,

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>we have to be um, justice seekers, not conviction seekers.

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're not advocating for a particular party in

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the case. We represent the people, all of the people. UM.

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Either way it's described in Supreme Court opinions and in

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>ethical treatises is very very very far removed from the

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>day to day reality of the political pressures of the job,

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in which there's huge, huge incentive two mitigate political risk

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and and perceive public safety risk by blocking people up

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for as long as possible and doing that without regard

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to evidence or data or justice or even the wishes

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of the victims. And it's easy to see why goodhearted,

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>well intentioned people in this role would naturally lean and

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>skew towards seeking pre child attention. Seeking incarceration and relying

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>on incarceration is a primary response to the tremendously diverse

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 1>array of social problems that get dumped on the criminal

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>legal system. I saw why and how that happens, and

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it made me all the more determined to ensure that

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>my office would not fall victim, would not participate in

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that horrific aberration of justice and of the real constitutional

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>duties of prosecutors. We'll be talking more after we hear

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>this ad reading about what you did, Junior. Two and

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a half years there was a piece in the Atlantic

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and it said Budan has ended cash bail for our listeners,

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 1>basically the practice whereby your ability to get out on

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>bail once you've been arrested depends on whether or not

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you can raise the money or not. Um He has

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>ceased prosecuting cases in which the evidence came from quote

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>unque pretextual traffic stops, such as when a police officer

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>pulls over a car for a broken tail light and

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>ends up booking the driver after founding drugs. He you

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>stopped using enhancements that add years to the sentences of

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>gang members. He quit using the stakes three strikes law.

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>He filed charges against the San Francisco police officer accused

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 1>of brutality. He instituted a commission to identify and overturn

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>wrongful convisitions. He cut the number of young people in

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>car street in half and reduced the pre trial jail population.

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And he also expanded the use of diversion and restorative

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>justice programs. So accurate description of what you did, in

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>fact do while you were there. Um, we did that stuff. Yeah,

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that's all true. We could keep going. Uh, there's a

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of work that I'm that I'm proud of that. Uh.

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>We promised voters in we would work towards and which

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in fact we did work towards. Okay, keep going, what else?

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell me some of the other things so our listeners

0:19:55.680 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>will understand. We launched the Independent Innocence Commission that exonerated

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>a man wrongfully convicted of murder after decades in prison.

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>We created a worker Protection Unit because we recognize that

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>wage theft is causing harm to far far more Americans

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>than most of the property crimes that are traditionally prosecuted.

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>We UM dramatically expanded victim services, including appointing the first

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>ever Chinese speaking head of Victim Services and increasing the

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>number of Chinese speaking staff in our office by over

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 1>fi UM. We expanded victim services into areas that had

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>never gone before to begin offering services to victims of

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>property crime. To UM work in partnership with both private

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>and public stakeholders to create housing for domestic violence survivors,

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for example. And we also really embraced our commitment to

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>preventing crime and being proactive rather than reactive, with cases

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 1>like our groundbreaking lawsuit against the manufact of ghost guns,

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>illegal firearms that are designed to be untraceable and sold

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>on black markets or over the Internet to people who

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>intend to use them to commit crimes. We didn't wait

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>for those crimes to be committed. We filed the major

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit against three of the biggest manufacturers of those guns

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in the nat of California. Now I know that in

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the debate over what was going on leading

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>up to the recall, I mean, you were putting out

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>statistics about in fact, you were charging much more than

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>people said, and other people and and of course you

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>know the stats. Anybody can to some extent manipulated them

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>one way or another. And then with COVID coming in,

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to do, you know, year by year

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>comparisons in any real way. Um, but what's your some

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of your critics, let's start off with um, good old uh,

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>what's her name? Brooke Jenkins? Right? Who worked in your

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>day's office, who left, and who after you were recalled

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Mayor London Breed appointed to be your successor. I mean,

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>sending a pretty clear message that she wanted to put

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 1>a more tough on crime sort of person there. And

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>what she said about you, I'm going to quote Chase

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>has a belief that your approach should be defendant centered.

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Everything should revolve around what's best for the defendants. He's

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>never let go of his role as the public defender.

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>But she said, a prosecutor's primary function as public safety,

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to serve as an advocate of the victim.

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So what was or what it would be a response

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to that? Now? Well, first of all, my office, under

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>my leadership, did more to expand victim services and to

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>increase language access for non English speaking victims than any

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>day in the history of San Francisco, and I am

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>tremendously proud of my record when it comes to advocating

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>for victims personally, meeting with families of homicide victims and

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>more cases than I can count. Asking in every single

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>budget I submitted to the mayor to increase resources for

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>our Victims Services Division is a primary request in my

0:22:55.560 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>budgets every single year. UM. So, clearly what Brooke was

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>saying in that statement was was political. It was designed

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>to attack and to support the recall, and it was

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>part of an effective campaign. The thing that stands out

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>at me more than just the dishonesty and the typical

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:19.959
<v Speaker 1>and traditional dishonesty of um of politics, is that actually

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>our criminal legal system is set up around the defendant.

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's not a choice that I made or one

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.479
<v Speaker 1>that I necessarily even agree with, but the way that

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the system works in this country, going back to our

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Bill of Rights, is that people accused of crimes written

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>into the U. S Constitution in the Bill of Rights,

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:42.239
<v Speaker 1>have civil protections, have rights like speedy trial and right

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to council and the right to confront witnesses against them,

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>have a whole series of rights around which the court

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>processes in this country have been developed over centuries. Victims

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>do not have equivalent rights. They're not even represented in

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>criminal cases. This isn't my interpretation or my view of

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:04.959
<v Speaker 1>how it should work. This is what every single criminal

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>case in the state of California says. It says the

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>people verse the name of the defendant. The victim's name

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is not in the charging document. They're not a party

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to the case. District attorneys have an obligation under state

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>law to provide services and information to victims, and there's

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>no funding that comes with those obligations. I fought every

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>day it was in office to increase funding so we

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>could do a better job communicating with victims, informing them

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>of their rights, empowering them to make their voice heard.

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>But the notion that I am somehow defendant centered and

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that is a criticism of me, is actually just an

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>observation about the way the founding fathers designed our legal system,

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and one that goes back in fact to old England.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>People accused of crime we're facing deprivation of liberty, have

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous number of very strong rights written into our

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>founding document. It is not equivalent. You can't find any

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>equivalent for victims, and maybe that's something we should change.

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But until we do, her criticism is a criticism of

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the system, and it's one that she now is responsible

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>for running. M Okay, well, let's get into specifically the

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>drug issue, which is the main focus of the of

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. You know, one thing San Francisco has had

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to deal with. I mean, on the one hand, there's

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 1>this horrific rate of overdose fatalities, among the highest in

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the country, notwithstanding a whole lot of progressive public health policies.

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Um so, you know, far more people dying of of

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>overdose in recent years in San Francisco than died of COVID. Right. Then, secondly,

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you have an open air drug dealing scene where people

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>can drive through the Tenderloin or some other parts of

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco and they see people openly selling drugs or

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>if you walk down that street, you'll be offered drugs.

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Right now, my understanding is that when it comes to

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the drug dealing piece of this, that you know, significant,

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe half of all the drug dealers, the low level

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:58.360
<v Speaker 1>dealers at least as far as we don't know about

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the higher level dealers, are you know, young guys coming

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 1>out of Central America, mostly Honduran and you know, some

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of them are ourselves even being trafficked into the US.

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And one criticism of you was that you specifically charged

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>many of these low level drug sellers Hondurans who are

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not legally in the country. You charged in in such

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a way as to avoid them being deported and that

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>really piste people off. So tell me more about that. Well, First,

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a slight technical correction. We did not make charges or

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>charging decisions in ways designed to avoid deportation. We charged

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>drug sales cases across the board, regardless of immigration status,

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>based on the facts and the law. One usually violations

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Health and Safety Code for the relevant quantity

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and kinds of drugs. What we did do, and we

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 1>did this consistent with a requirement under state law, was

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>we considered immigration status when negotiating plea deals. And that's

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a requirement of mandate. It comes from California state law

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>predates my tenure. And what that meant is if we

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>were negotiating a plea, which is how n of criminal

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>cases are resolved across the country, and we were aware

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that the person we were negotiating with was not a citizen.

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>We were required to consider their immigration status and to

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>try to mitigate any collateral consequences that the guilty plea

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>would have. As it happens that with standard practice in

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 1>the office before I took over again, because it's a

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>mandate of state law. You are correct that I was

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>attacked viciously by many people, including Brooke, for simply following

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 1>state law and staying the course HIGN policy that had

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>been implemented before my administration. So what do you anticipate

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>she's going to do differently on this? Is she going

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to not follow state law? Is she gonna try to

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>charge people so they are much more likely to get deported?

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? Well, it's not gonna there's no

0:27:56.000 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>way meaningfully to change the charging decisions on the front,

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 1>and except for what she has already done, which I

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>guess is to charge simple possession. Um, we under my

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>administration and frankly under my predecessor in his final years,

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>we're declining to charge virtually all standalone misdemeanor drug possession

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>or paraphernalia charges. The only cases that we filed were

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>felony level possession with intent to sell. Our actual sales,

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>and there's really not a meaningfully different way to charge

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>those cases, but there is a different, meaningfully different way

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate them. And it seems from the tough talk

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and rhetoric thus far that the new administration is determined

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to refuse to consider immigration consequences and to seek convictions

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that will in most cases not actually result in deportation directly,

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>but which will make someone deeport of ball and have

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>grave lifelong consequences for immigration status and adjustment of status

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>without any increased benefit to public safe or other meaningful

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>consequences or sanctions that could possibly serve as a deterrent um.

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>So you know, in some ways, it's funny we're talking

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>about such a tragic topic. As you point out, the

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>overdoses every single day are just devastating San Francisco and

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>really communities across the country. But San Francisco has been

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>hit uniquely hard and and I suppose it's it's the

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>real human tragedy that we're experiencing that we see in

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in certain neighborhoods in our city, Soma and Tenderloin. To

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>be sure, that perhaps justifies in some minds doubling down

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>on the war on drugs. Going back to a policy

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that I think, in our heart of hearts we all

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>know has never worked and will never work. But these

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>conversations and these surges of policing and arrests and pledges

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to be more punitive in response to drug dealing and

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the associated crime and the tenderloin in particular, or not

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>new to San Francisco. In fact, if you go back,

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking actually as we speak right now at a

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>page from the San Francisco Examiner back in in an

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>article about how horrible the tenderline is. And it's describing

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>open drug sales and use. It's describing um people with

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>multiple drug charges back on the streets. It's describing kids

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>witnessing crimes and people saying the tenderloin has never been worse.

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>It's pushing for a strategy to flood the zone with

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>police and quoting police officers saying in another two or

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>three years, I do think we'll see some things turn around. Here.

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>We're having exactly the same conversations today as though we

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't try this thirty forty years ago. It's the definition

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of insanity, and sadly it's being um. It's it's tragedies,

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's fear that's being exploited for cynical political gain

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>by folks like Brook Jenkins. M But so I mean,

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.959
<v Speaker 1>let's just open this up bigger jasa when you actually

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>think about what's going on. There's a number of cities

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>around the U. S. And certainly we saw this in

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>other countries. You know, they really did find a way

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of significantly diminishing the open air drug scenes. I mean

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>New York City where I live. Many other places had

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, major open air drug scenes, but those are

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>much less so. San Francisco is a bit distinctive in

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>its being one of a smaller number of cities which

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>still has this open air drug scene. And obviously it

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously has a homelessness issue, like Los Angeles and some

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:31.479
<v Speaker 1>other places with nice weather and liberal governments, you know,

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>where there's a you know, a very substantial homeless population.

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>So before we get to the homelessness one, though, the

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>question is what I mean, if you had more power,

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>if you weren't just a d a, if you were

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the mayor, right, I mean Mayor London. Breed has been

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>generally antagonistic to you. She's been balancing, you know, sounding

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>like a progressive with being quite tough on crime and

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>all this sort of stuff, and she appointed, you know,

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a kind of tough person to be your successor. But

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>if you had, if you were in the mayor's position,

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you can't change state law, you can't

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>change federal law. But what would you be pushing for

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to deal with this open air drug dealing thing? What?

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you think the answer is, Well, first of all,

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>let's be clear, talking quote unquote tough is not the

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing as having effective policies or even being tough.

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>If if we want to be tough on open air

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>drug use, if we want to be tough on overdoses,

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>then we need safe consumption sites and we need treatment

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>on demand. I mean, let's be very very clear. The

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>so called tough approach is actually criminogenic. It's creating crime.

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>We know that. You don't even need to just look

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>at UH narcotics, look at prohibition on alcohol and how

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that played out in this country. It created mafias, it

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>created al capone, It generates a tremendous amount of crime.

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to my father about some of the

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>men who were in prison with him, and some of

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>them who were there for crimes unrelated on the charges

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>themselves to drugs. Were there because they were doing two

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>three robberies a week to pay for their drug abbit.

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>If you understand that addiction is a public health crisis,

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that overdoses and open air drug use our public health crises,

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>then you see that district attorneys and police have a

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>very very limited role to play and responding or solving

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>these problems. Instead, we need to follow the strategies that

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>have been successfully implemented in other parts of the world,

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>places like Portugal, pit places like Vancouver, where you have

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>designated safe consumption sites. And let me tell you why

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that's important. First of all, nobody dies in safe consumption sites.

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Nobody dies of overdoses. In safe consumption sites, you dramatically

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>reduce the human suffering and the loss of life from

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>this addiction epidemic. Second of all, you take some of

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the urban blight and the real devastating experiences that children

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and families with school aged children have stepping over people

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:01.479
<v Speaker 1>who are passed out in the streets, human feces, hypodermic needles,

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and you cansolidate the drug use in a safe, clean

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:10.240
<v Speaker 1>place where it doesn't need to invade the daily lives

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of small business owners. And immigrant families and so on,

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 1>and and third, and this is critical. Safe consumption sites

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>are a place where we can connect people who have

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>substance use disorders with harm reduction services so that when

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>they're ready to engage with strategies to reduce dependence, when

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>they're ready to try and redirect their lives and get

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>housing or employment, they have access to services where they

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 1>can get that help. In San Francisco, there has never

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>been a political commitment from city Hall, not from this

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>mayor prior mayors, to make treatment on demand a reality,

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>or to make safe consumption sites a reality. And until

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>we have housing and treatment, we are always going to

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>be reading those same stories in the San Francisco Examiner,

0:34:56.840 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it's two but on the safe injection site. So

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I think many of our listeners will know because we've

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about this before. There are now dozens of safe

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>injection sites, which are sometimes known as over those prevention centers,

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in dozens of cities around the world, in Europe, in Canada,

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 1>in Australia. There's now one operating above ground in New York,

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and there's even some operating semi below ground in San

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Francisco and some other cities. Right, And the evidence is,

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.800
<v Speaker 1>as Chase has says, right, these are essentially needle exchange

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 1>programs with a bat with a back room and a

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>nurse president where people can safely inject the drugs they

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>brought with them. They're not provided with those drugs. And

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>we know they reduce public new sense when they reduce

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>over those fatalities, effect eliminate over those fatalities. They do

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>all these good things. The question is what's been the

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>problem in San Francisco. I mean, as we speak, right,

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a bill that went through the state of the

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>state legislature. I think it's sitting on Governor Gavin Newsom's desk.

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.399
<v Speaker 1>I have no doubt that he knows it's the right

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 1>thing to do, and I have no doubt that he worries,

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>like hell, how he's going to explain signing that thing

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>into law if in fact he runs for national office.

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So he's in a andry he's going to deal with.

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 1>But the question I'd understand is why didn't London Breed

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>do what de Blasio did, just say go for it.

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:09.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean a few years ago you had to worry

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>about Trump prosecutors, you know, going after you, and they

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>made a big thing of you know, the Trump Justice Department,

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>We're going to go after anybody who approves these safe

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 1>injection sites. But now you have a friendly administration, Biden administration,

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 1>which hasn't said anything on the issue as yet, but

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to go after people. You have a

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 1>friendly guy in the governor's office who's not going to

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>go after people. Why do you think London breed it?

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:34.760
<v Speaker 1>For that matter, some other California mayors just don't proceed

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>now the way that de Blasio did. It's a great question.

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had the answer. It's something that I

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>pushed for and called for every single day I was

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in office. I was urgent our city to move in

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that direction, and I knew what a huge impact it

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>would have had on reducing fail overdoses, on cleaning up

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>parts of the city that were very difficult to live in,

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and there was virtually no action from city Hall. And

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the tremendous frustrations that I have and

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that many San Franciscans have, And and you know, I

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>think in many ways it was a strategic decision because

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it seems have been very effective and useful for the

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>mayor to have an opportunity to blame me for the

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>police department, to blame me and my policies for these

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>age old problems that will never be solved until we

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>invest seriously and the kinds of solutions that we know work.

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>But Chasi on that one. I mean, she's publicly on

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>record of supporting safe injection sites, right, she has the model.

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:32.760
<v Speaker 1>To Blasio, do you understand is there a real legal

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 1>argument or fear? I mean, there already is what a

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>long standing safe injection side in San Francisco, at least

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>one which is sort of operating with the understanding of

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the cops. Everybody knows it's there, right and it's doing

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 1>good work. It's just a matter of doing what they

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:47.800
<v Speaker 1>did in New York and saying, Okay, it's going to

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>be legally sanctioned at this point. But any sense about

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>what would be the argument that her legal counsel or

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 1>anybody else would be telling her why she shouldn't move

0:37:57.440 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 1>forward the way to Blasio, did you know the person

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>who advises the mayor on legal issues and at least

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>formally is the city attorney. The city attorney is normally

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 1>an elected position who represents all the city agencies, including

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the mayor, and if, for example, we were to open

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a safe consumption site, and if the Feds were to

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>come in and try to shut it down, it would

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be the job of the city attorney to defend San

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Francisco against that federal incursion in the courts. The current

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 1>city attorney was appointed by the mayor. It was her pick.

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>If this was a priority for her, if this was

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>something she cared about, certainly it's something that the city

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>attorney would defend her on. It's absolutely puzzling to me

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>why we have not done more on this as a city.

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And I wish that, you know, the district Attorney's obviously

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the budget or the mandate to do these things. It's

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not really what we do. We need the mayor

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Department of Public Health to step up. And

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and mind you, the mayor appoints the head of the

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Department of Public Health, and they have in San Francisco

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a budget that's well over two billion dollars. There's a

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 1>massive budget, tremendous resources available, and it simply has not

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:09.439
<v Speaker 1>been a priority for people in the city. And it's

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to all of our detriment. Well, let's go bigger this.

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when you look with part of what old

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 1>saman in Europe beginning thirty years ago, and they were

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 1>dealing with open air drug scenes and overdose as we

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>were dealing with in the US. They didn't pull back

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.240
<v Speaker 1>all law enforcement. I mean, they still had people getting

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 1>busted and all this sort of thing, but there was

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a high level of coordination between They called it the

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Frankfurt system at one point in the early nineties where

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the mayor would call a meeting every Monday morning with

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the head of prosecution, head of police, head of Housing services,

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:39.439
<v Speaker 1>head of health services, and where if the cops said,

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 1>well we have to crack down on such and such

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a park, We're gonna do it Wednesday morning, somebody from

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Housing services will say, well, wait, wait a second, wait,

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>can you wait till Thursday so that we can make

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:50.959
<v Speaker 1>sure we're set up to receive the people you're gonna

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>be pushing out. But beyond that, they also did things,

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 1>beginning in Switzerland thirty years ago, to start setting up

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 1>heroin maintenance clinics for p both for whom method on

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 1>or drug free treatment was not working. They said, let

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>people come into clinics and get pharmaceutical heroin and they

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>can't take it home, but it will be like a

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>well run method on program, but they can get pharmaceutical heroin.

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>And that thing worked in Switzerland. It's spread to other

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>European countries and to Canada. You know, reduce crime, reduce

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>over those reduced addiction, help people stabilize their lives. And

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>now you see in British Columbia, especially Vancouver, you know

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 1>more and more movement and support by first the provincial

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 1>government and now the national government for what was called

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 1>safe Supply, which is basically a policy that says, you know,

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 1>if people are going to be buying drugs no matter what,

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>from the illicit market, let's allow them to get it

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>instead from illegally regulated source and either they get it

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:46.760
<v Speaker 1>for free or they get it for a few bucks.

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Allowing people to get the drug they want from illegal source.

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Would you support all that sort of stuff. It seems

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.720
<v Speaker 1>they have worked really well in Europe, and I think

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of evidence behind it. And on the

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:02.760
<v Speaker 1>other hand, what we in doing is far more costly,

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>far less humane, and is not working. So yeah, I

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.760
<v Speaker 1>would support those approaches. I think we need a radical

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>rethinking of how we respond to addiction in this country

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and Frankly, I was sorry we didn't have more time

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to try and push those changes. We were continuing to

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>file drug sales cases. In fact, we filed them at

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a higher rate than my predecessor did when the police

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:29.839
<v Speaker 1>brought us family drug arrests. Not because I thought it

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>was in and of itself going to work, but because

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I recognized the need not to simply abandon the field,

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>abandon the space. And it was unfortunate that, as we

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:42.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about a moment ago, the city was not willing

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 1>to do the work on the public health front that

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 1>would have truly been necessary to decrease our reliance on

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>cars roll police responses to these issues that are clearly

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 1>public health issues and that have been dealt with effectively

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in other jurisdictions. Let's take a break here and go

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to an ad If you look at the issue of

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 1>all the drug dealers, if that's not so much a

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>health issue, that's something else. And the question is, if

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you were in charge of the police department, if you

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>were talking to the police chief, I don't know what

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>your relationship with him was, what was like, but what

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 1>would be that your your answer um giving current laws

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:34.399
<v Speaker 1>for that matter, about what to do with that. What

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.720
<v Speaker 1>do you think is actually the optimal answer giving current

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:41.760
<v Speaker 1>laws to dealing you know, with that situation, not the overdose,

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>not the open droid use, but the drug dealing on

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the streets. Well, I think in an ideal world, if

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:50.319
<v Speaker 1>you have the kind of policies you just described, you

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have a market for illegal street drugs because people

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 1>who are seriously dependent on illegal drugs can go and

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>get safe supply somewhere. In an ideal world, the role

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of police is far more limited when it comes to

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of public health crises. They're not responding to

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:14.240
<v Speaker 1>try to reverse overdoses. Instead, they're simply ensuring that people

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>are consuming in the safe consumption stites and not elsewhere.

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But even on safe consumption sites that people who use

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>drugs there have to get them from some place else

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's an illicit source. So, you know, in Switzerland,

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>back in the early nineties, before they started the heroin

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>prescription programs, they had a place that became known as

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Needle Park. It was the plot Spits, a park behind

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 1>the main train station. It was somewhat set off from

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the city and basically at some point

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the city government said, you know what,

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>We're going to let all the drug dealers and all

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the drug users use there in that park, right, and

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:48.759
<v Speaker 1>if they caught people on the streets, they say, get

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:50.799
<v Speaker 1>to that park or we're busting you. And for the

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 1>first year or so year and a half it worked

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>really well. The public health services were there, the drug dealers,

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody could see that, you know, the whole thing was working.

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>And then at some point they just got total, really

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>out of control and they had to shut it down

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:04.839
<v Speaker 1>and start doing something else. I mean, some people thinks

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tenderloins like that, except zillion people drive through the

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Tenderloin all the time. It's highly visible. You know, it's

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing for people who live in San Francisco, not in

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:17.239
<v Speaker 1>those neighborhoods, and it's bad for tourism. It's bad for

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the sense of public order and public safety. I mean,

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>do you think something like that might work in San Francisco? Well,

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they, as you said, I mean, they've essentially

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>done it with the Tenderloine for decades. It's been city

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:33.399
<v Speaker 1>policy and police policy to push open air drug used

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:36.920
<v Speaker 1>into essentially a containment zone. As ironic as it is,

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 1>It's not surprising to anybody who's paid close attention that

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 1>when interim appointed District Attorney Brook Jenkins went to do

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>her big press conference on how she was gonna take

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the war on drugs seriously, she did it in the

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Tenderloine and across the street from a press conference, people

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>were openly using illegal drugs and selling them. The police

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>were there. The police walked by drug sales and drug

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 1>use all day every day in the Tenderloin. And although

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 1>they get a lot of overtime and do a few

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 1>hundred operations a year where they do buy bust, the

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 1>reality is there's virtually no meaningful enforcement efforts. I think

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:21.279
<v Speaker 1>during my administration, police were bringing us on average to

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:26.400
<v Speaker 1>felony drug arrests today in a city where if you

0:45:26.440 --> 0:45:28.319
<v Speaker 1>read the national news and if you spend any time

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Tenderloin, there is a very very real, big problem.

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>You'd think it'd be thousands and thousands of arrests, and

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>instead it's to a day. And and then the notion

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that somehow being tougher quote unquote on the two people

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that the police arrest each day is going to meaningfully

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 1>solve problems that are decades in the making. It's just

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just dishonest. But the Police All Association was saying, well,

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 1>why should we bust them all if you're just giving

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 1>them all the same day release or things like that.

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact, even if they were arresting its thousand, they

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 1>would just be replaced with another thousand. So it seems

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>like an entirely kind of you know, chasing one's tail

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of policy where the whole game seems to be

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:12.839
<v Speaker 1>about who can be blamed for. Was unsightly and not

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 1>working about all this, and you ended up being the

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>guy who got blamed. Well, everybody loves to have a

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 1>place to point the finger. That's that's true just about

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:26.160
<v Speaker 1>anywhere you go in the world. Yeah, So for our listeners,

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 1>just you're aware of what happened in San Francisco was

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a KIPAI started going to recall Chase Uh. It was

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 1>funded by some wealthy folks and Silicon Valley some Republican

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 1>folks as well. You had activists in the Asian American

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 1>community up at arms. You had wealthier people in San Francisco,

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>some people live in the community, and everything started to

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 1>coalesce around Chase of Boudan being the person responsible um,

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:51.920
<v Speaker 1>for all of San Francisco's problems. In fact, it was

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the editorial paget of the San Francisco Examiner

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:57.760
<v Speaker 1>called it the chase of Boudin derangement syndrome, where anything

0:46:57.800 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and everything would be blamed on him. Even in Humboldt County,

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:04.480
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of miles north of San Francisco, the Border of

0:47:04.520 --> 0:47:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Supervisors put out a release blaming Chaser for the fact

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that fentinyl was showing up in Humboldt. Now there was

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:13.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other stuff going on as well, right,

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was COVID and people going crazy. There

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:18.880
<v Speaker 1>was you know, this stuff around defund the police that

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 1>got people's backs up, and a lot of things. But

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:22.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the things you had done were not

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 1>radically different. I mean, but your predecessors, Terrence Hallinan Kamala Harris,

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:30.240
<v Speaker 1>George Gasco, and I've known all of them, they were oftentimes,

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, had had to deal with the same sorts

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of assaults and charges that you had to deal with.

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But somehow the stuff all stuck with you. Why do

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you think I don't have an answer for you? Um.

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we certainly were living through really unprecedented times.

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 1>The role of social media and shaping public consciousness, the

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 1>resurgence of recalls as a tactic for those who can't

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:59.479
<v Speaker 1>win power through normal elections, the Black Lives Matter movement

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:02.799
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, and a whole series of factors I

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>think shaped the the particular outcome. And I don't I

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 1>don't entirely know. I mean it's I mean, it was

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:14.080
<v Speaker 1>also kind of recall fever, right. You had those folks

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 1>on the on the school board who got recalled, so

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:20.400
<v Speaker 1>there was a whole sense of recall recall. Recall is

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:22.879
<v Speaker 1>something that California has done. I remember when Governor Grey

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Davis got recalled exactly. And that's the key, I mean

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:28.360
<v Speaker 1>for folks who aren't familiar, you know, in many jurisdictions

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in California, where recalls are notoriously easy to get on

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the ballot. If a recall does succeed in getting on

0:48:34.239 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 1>the ballot, then other candidates throw their name in the

0:48:36.840 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 1>ring and get their name listed on the ballot, and

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 1>voters choose not only whether they want to recall, say

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Governor Newsom, but also if the recall succeeds, who do

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 1>they want to replace him? And looking at um Larry

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Elder for example, as the likely replacement for Gavin Newsom

0:48:55.760 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 1>can motivate even people that deeply despise his role as

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:04.400
<v Speaker 1>governor his work as governor to vote against the recall um.

0:49:04.440 --> 0:49:07.360
<v Speaker 1>The same thing is true in other jurisdictions like Los Angeles,

0:49:07.440 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>if there's a recall on the ballot, other candidates for

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the office get their name listed and then voters have

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to choose. In San Francisco, by contrast, where it's very

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:20.759
<v Speaker 1>easy to get on the ballot as a recall, there

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:23.440
<v Speaker 1>are no other candidates, and so the recall against me

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 1>was able to spend unlimited political dollars. They spend more

0:49:26.440 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>than seven million in the end, simply attacking and amplifying

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:37.200
<v Speaker 1>criticisms without ever advancing a single concrete policy proposal or candidate.

0:49:37.440 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, when people pitched reporters on um criticisms

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of some of the people like Brook Jenkins who were

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:48.440
<v Speaker 1>in the running to replace me, if the recall succeeded,

0:49:48.440 --> 0:49:50.439
<v Speaker 1>reporters would say, well, they're not running for office, they're

0:49:50.480 --> 0:49:54.239
<v Speaker 1>not on the ballot. Nobody's interested in this story. It's

0:49:54.280 --> 0:49:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a dynamic which very very few, if any, elected officials

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>could serve. I've imagine if President Biden, for example, had

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to face an upper down vote yes or no. No.

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:10.520
<v Speaker 1>He may well be able to win re election if

0:50:10.560 --> 0:50:16.280
<v Speaker 1>he's running against Donald Trump or Rhonda's antis, but running

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:20.600
<v Speaker 1>against yourself is something that virtually no like an official

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 1>could survive. Yeah, well, okay, so now there's somebody your predecessor,

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:29.640
<v Speaker 1>George Gascon, who's now the district attorney in Los Angeles.

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:31.719
<v Speaker 1>One of the things he said, and tell me if

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:34.279
<v Speaker 1>you think this is fair or not. He goes, this

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is a quote one of the mistakes that chas the

0:50:36.600 --> 0:50:39.600
<v Speaker 1>maide that I learned from it, and he will readily recognize.

0:50:39.640 --> 0:50:41.760
<v Speaker 1>He says, is he was trying to talk to people

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 1>about data. People don't care about data. This is about emotions.

0:50:46.840 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 1>This is about how you perceive and feel, and you

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>cannot use data to deal with feelings. And I think

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that was a failure, and by the time he kind

0:50:54.440 --> 0:50:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of woke up to that, it was too late for him.

0:50:57.320 --> 0:51:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Fair common by George Gascon or not and a great

0:51:00.520 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 1>fair comment. Um. I think it's important to have policies

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that are driven by data, that are informed by data,

0:51:07.080 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that are backed up by evidence and and and grounded

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in research. And as an elected official. It's important to

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 1>meet voters where they're at and to understand that what

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:19.759
<v Speaker 1>they're feeling matters, whether or not it's empirically supported. And

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we spent far too much time and energy showing people's

0:51:22.320 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 1>statistics about crime rates being down by double digits, about

0:51:25.520 --> 0:51:29.800
<v Speaker 1>prosecution rates being up, trying to correct mistakes and in

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in mainstream media coverage about the issues and remind them

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that it's not our decision if somebody is held in

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:38.279
<v Speaker 1>custody pre trial, it's the decision of the judge or

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 1>all the different things, the nuances, and we spent way

0:51:42.120 --> 0:51:44.520
<v Speaker 1>too much time and energy trying to correct the record.

0:51:45.320 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And people needed to know that they were being heard,

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:54.239
<v Speaker 1>that their fears, however connected or disconnected to what you know,

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:57.800
<v Speaker 1>macro level data showed their fears were being listened to

0:51:57.880 --> 0:52:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and taken seriously. And I think that's something we didn't

0:52:00.400 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 1>succeed in doing, even when we tried our best. It

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 1>was something that obviously we didn't get through to enough

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:10.719
<v Speaker 1>people on I'm curious. I mean, when you think I'm

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:13.400
<v Speaker 1>not imagining if you run for office again for this position,

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>let's say next year or some other time in the future,

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:22.920
<v Speaker 1>can you vision yourself getting really outspoken and angry about

0:52:23.080 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 1>some vicious killing, about some homicide, about something in a

0:52:26.640 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 1>way that taps into the anger and frustration that people

0:52:30.120 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 1>who are piste off at their house or you know,

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:35.279
<v Speaker 1>just got broken into, or that their car just got

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:38.160
<v Speaker 1>broken or stolen or whatever. I mean, was that something

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you did? Was it repellent to you to do that?

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think you would do it in the future.

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I did do it, and I wouldn't do it in

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the future. People deserve to be safe and deserve to

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:50.280
<v Speaker 1>feel safe. And when that feeling of safety had violated,

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:53.880
<v Speaker 1>especially with violent crime, it's outrageous, it's offensive, it's harmful,

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:58.279
<v Speaker 1>it's destructive, and we need firm in quick response. We

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>need accountability, We need to ancients. I have absolutely no

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:04.880
<v Speaker 1>qualms or hesitation about saying that, and I said it

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 1>loudly and clearly throughout my administration. But I wouldn't do

0:53:08.040 --> 0:53:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it in ways that undermined the legitimacy of the jury

0:53:13.360 --> 0:53:16.480
<v Speaker 1>trial process, that prejudged the outcome of the case or

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the evidence. You know, there is often a tremendous amount

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:23.439
<v Speaker 1>of political and public pressure after a high profile crime

0:53:23.560 --> 0:53:27.719
<v Speaker 1>occurs to come out and condemn the person that's been

0:53:27.800 --> 0:53:31.359
<v Speaker 1>arrested and commit to punishing them to the fullest extent

0:53:31.400 --> 0:53:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of the law, or what have you. And it's it's

0:53:34.000 --> 0:53:36.760
<v Speaker 1>actually unethical to do that. We don't know the false

0:53:36.800 --> 0:53:39.280
<v Speaker 1>state of the evidence. A jury is going to decide

0:53:39.320 --> 0:53:41.759
<v Speaker 1>whether this is the person and whether a crime was

0:53:41.800 --> 0:53:44.799
<v Speaker 1>actually committed, and so by using the media in a

0:53:44.800 --> 0:53:47.759
<v Speaker 1>way that tells the scales of justice, we violate a

0:53:47.800 --> 0:53:50.440
<v Speaker 1>core ethical canon. We need to wait and see how

0:53:50.440 --> 0:53:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the case develops. We don't know what the mitigation will be,

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:54.640
<v Speaker 1>or what the defenses will be that will be presented,

0:53:55.440 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and so I think it's a very delicate balancing act

0:53:59.680 --> 0:54:05.239
<v Speaker 1>to represent and and speak the outrage of the community

0:54:05.280 --> 0:54:08.399
<v Speaker 1>and the outrage that I feel personally when looking at

0:54:08.400 --> 0:54:10.680
<v Speaker 1>some of these heinous crimes, but not to do it

0:54:10.680 --> 0:54:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in a way that could lead the defense to get

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 1>my office kicked off the case for being biased, or

0:54:16.600 --> 0:54:20.280
<v Speaker 1>or reversal or a change of venue because we've tainted

0:54:20.280 --> 0:54:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the jury pool case. Apart from all the concerns around

0:54:23.280 --> 0:54:26.319
<v Speaker 1>crime in San Francisco, the issue of homelessness has been

0:54:26.360 --> 0:54:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a huge one and it's apparent to anybody. I mean,

0:54:28.920 --> 0:54:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw it when I was visiting their people who

0:54:31.080 --> 0:54:34.000
<v Speaker 1>live there complained about it, and it seems like when

0:54:34.360 --> 0:54:36.520
<v Speaker 1>people are throwing everything in the kitchen, think at you

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that homelessness was one of the other ones that was.

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:41.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've got a lot of blame for Yes,

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I agree, and we did speak out about the need

0:54:43.760 --> 0:54:47.279
<v Speaker 1>to build housing and to expand shelters, but it's not

0:54:47.400 --> 0:54:49.719
<v Speaker 1>something within the perv of the district attorney. I have

0:54:49.840 --> 0:54:53.560
<v Speaker 1>no mandate or budget or staff to address the issues

0:54:53.760 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of homelessness, and no law in this state or in

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:01.200
<v Speaker 1>this country allows me to jail somebody simply for being

0:55:01.239 --> 0:55:03.880
<v Speaker 1>poor or unhoused, even if I wanted to do it,

0:55:03.960 --> 0:55:05.319
<v Speaker 1>even if I thought it was the right thing to do,

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:09.760
<v Speaker 1>which I don't. No law, no authority, empowers a district

0:55:09.760 --> 0:55:13.440
<v Speaker 1>attorney to deprive someone of liberty because they're homeless. And

0:55:13.480 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 1>so to the the extent that people in this city are

0:55:15.520 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 1>frustrated with visible homelessness and they're looking to the district

0:55:18.560 --> 0:55:21.080
<v Speaker 1>attorney to solve that problem, they're going to be sorely

0:55:21.120 --> 0:55:25.680
<v Speaker 1>disappointed no matter who is named by the mayor in

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the future elected by the people to serve as district attorney.

0:55:29.160 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So chase that the overdose issue. I mean, San Francisco

0:55:33.280 --> 0:55:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is almost notorious in this regard. It's over those fatality

0:55:36.800 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 1>rate is one of the highest in the country. It's

0:55:39.640 --> 0:55:42.080
<v Speaker 1>much higher than the rate of death from COVID over

0:55:42.160 --> 0:55:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the last few years. Uh. Now, this obviously is not

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 1>an issue that falls directly in the responsibility of the

0:55:47.680 --> 0:55:51.920
<v Speaker 1>district attorney. But were you able to do anything about this? Well?

0:55:51.960 --> 0:55:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I did. I'm back in February. I asked the city

0:55:56.520 --> 0:56:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to implement an emergency supplemental budget to create a fentinale

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:05.800
<v Speaker 1>task force that could both provide some staff to my office,

0:56:05.840 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but more importantly resources to our public health partners, because

0:56:10.160 --> 0:56:15.239
<v Speaker 1>we saw the ongoing horrific toll of human lives being

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:18.239
<v Speaker 1>lost overdoses, and we saw that the tools we had

0:56:18.280 --> 0:56:21.719
<v Speaker 1>were totally impotent to address it. And so yes, we

0:56:21.800 --> 0:56:25.440
<v Speaker 1>asked the city to introduce a supplemental emergency budget to

0:56:25.520 --> 0:56:29.440
<v Speaker 1>create a fentinal task force, and um, we didn't even

0:56:29.480 --> 0:56:31.960
<v Speaker 1>get a response from city Hall. You know, this makes

0:56:32.000 --> 0:56:35.240
<v Speaker 1>me think about a coordinator approach that emerged in Europe

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:38.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty years ago, when you really saw harm reduction advancing

0:56:38.480 --> 0:56:40.680
<v Speaker 1>at the municipal level, even in cities that were run

0:56:40.719 --> 0:56:44.520
<v Speaker 1>by conservative politicians, And in Frankfurt was a good model

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:46.840
<v Speaker 1>where you had a major problem with the drug related

0:56:46.880 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 1>street crime and drug related hiv A s and all

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:51.200
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of things, not unlike what you're seeing in

0:56:51.239 --> 0:56:54.960
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. And the mayor convened what he or she

0:56:55.120 --> 0:56:59.279
<v Speaker 1>called the Monday Morning meeting, where the head of prosecution

0:56:59.280 --> 0:57:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and the head of the ops, head of housing, head

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of social welfare, they all were there to kind of

0:57:03.800 --> 0:57:06.879
<v Speaker 1>we deal collectively with how to deal with a multi

0:57:06.920 --> 0:57:10.319
<v Speaker 1>dimensional drug problem. And I wonder, was this something that

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:13.719
<v Speaker 1>was happening in San Francisco that Mayor Breed was orchestrating. Yeah,

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I have no I mean, I have no information suggesting

0:57:15.719 --> 0:57:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that that kind of a meeting occurred. It may have occurred,

0:57:17.560 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but um, you know, they were very happy to blame

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:22.600
<v Speaker 1>me in the District Attorney's office for the problems and

0:57:22.600 --> 0:57:26.320
<v Speaker 1>then exclude us from conversations about solutions, if in fact

0:57:26.400 --> 0:57:28.720
<v Speaker 1>there were conversations at all being had. You know, it

0:57:28.720 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 1>strikes me that in some of the cities where the

0:57:31.120 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 1>progressive prosecutors taking a lot of flak, a lot of

0:57:33.640 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 1>times it's really an issue involving the police more than

0:57:36.280 --> 0:57:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it is the prosecutors, and I think about what happened,

0:57:40.040 --> 0:57:45.280
<v Speaker 1>say in Baltimore after Freddie Gray died, where you had,

0:57:45.520 --> 0:57:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the police basically saying fuck it. You know,

0:57:48.880 --> 0:57:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we're just not gonna put ourselves out there anymore. We're

0:57:51.880 --> 0:57:53.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to come down and respond to crimes the

0:57:53.800 --> 0:57:56.200
<v Speaker 1>way we did before. And I wondered, I mean, did

0:57:56.200 --> 0:57:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you have the same sort of phenomena that happened in

0:57:58.360 --> 0:58:01.720
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Absolutely, we heard stories every single day of

0:58:01.800 --> 0:58:05.240
<v Speaker 1>police officers responding to the scene of a crime and

0:58:05.280 --> 0:58:07.440
<v Speaker 1>talking to a victim and saying to the victim, gosh,

0:58:07.480 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sorry this happened you. I wish we could help,

0:58:10.960 --> 0:58:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know, this just won't prosecute, and then doing

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:17.720
<v Speaker 1>zero follow up investigation. And the data is really telling

0:58:17.880 --> 0:58:20.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look at if you just compare this is

0:58:20.240 --> 0:58:24.480
<v Speaker 1>using police department data, their own statistics, the rate at

0:58:24.480 --> 0:58:27.720
<v Speaker 1>which they solved or cleared cases in the first half

0:58:27.760 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of two during the final months the recall, and you

0:58:31.320 --> 0:58:33.480
<v Speaker 1>compare that with the first half of the year before

0:58:33.520 --> 0:58:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I was the district attorney, the rate at which they

0:58:36.720 --> 0:58:40.120
<v Speaker 1>solved every single category of crime they report data and

0:58:40.160 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 1>fell by high double digits. In fact, the category of

0:58:44.760 --> 0:58:49.560
<v Speaker 1>crime where there police arrest rate fell. The least was

0:58:49.600 --> 0:58:53.200
<v Speaker 1>assaults and that fell by. On the other end of

0:58:53.200 --> 0:58:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum, you've got things like arson, where the rate

0:58:56.080 --> 0:58:59.440
<v Speaker 1>at which police solve those crimes fell by, and it

0:58:59.480 --> 0:59:01.880
<v Speaker 1>was frustrating to see that. UM I had a good

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:04.080
<v Speaker 1>working relationship with the police chief, but I don't believe

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that he controls the department. I don't believe that any

0:59:06.840 --> 0:59:09.160
<v Speaker 1>police chief controls the department in San Francisco. I think

0:59:09.160 --> 0:59:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the police union controls the department in San Francisco. With

0:59:12.920 --> 0:59:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the recall, once you lost. The next morning, I remember

0:59:16.440 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times, the national media coverage. It was

0:59:19.760 --> 0:59:23.800
<v Speaker 1>all about this show is a major transformation and public opinion,

0:59:23.960 --> 0:59:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, public turning against progressive prosecutors. There was a

0:59:27.640 --> 0:59:30.920
<v Speaker 1>piece by Alec Kara katsan As. He's the founder and

0:59:31.000 --> 0:59:35.200
<v Speaker 1>executive director of Civil Rights Corps UM and he critiqued

0:59:35.400 --> 0:59:39.160
<v Speaker 1>this front page story in the New York Times basically

0:59:39.240 --> 0:59:44.120
<v Speaker 1>saying it's bullshit. There is no massive wave against progressive prosecutors.

0:59:44.120 --> 0:59:46.000
<v Speaker 1>In fact, if you look around the state, if you

0:59:46.040 --> 0:59:48.800
<v Speaker 1>look at the race that the Attorney general was in, Robonta,

0:59:48.880 --> 0:59:50.400
<v Speaker 1>who is a progressive if you look at the d

0:59:50.440 --> 0:59:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a's races and Alameda and Contra Acosta counties, um, if

0:59:54.040 --> 0:59:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at other cities that basically the notion that

0:59:57.960 --> 1:00:00.920
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco voters were sending a message that was common

1:00:01.000 --> 1:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>around the rest of the country was basically bullshit. What

1:00:05.000 --> 1:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think? No I would agree? And you know,

1:00:08.840 --> 1:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the the the irony and the dishonesty and the way

1:00:11.560 --> 1:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that the media coverage, I mean it, pundits went such

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a rush to have some sort of national lesson learned

1:00:16.240 --> 1:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>from my recall, which was a tremendously unique in many

1:00:20.160 --> 1:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>ways to a generous kind of a race that's one

1:00:22.880 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of a kind that's not reflective. It wasn't a head

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to head where a you know, a Republican traditional prosecutor

1:00:28.560 --> 1:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>was running against a Democratic reform minded prosecutor. It was,

1:00:33.720 --> 1:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>as I said, a race where it was a yes

1:00:35.320 --> 1:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>or no vote on me. After a two and a

1:00:36.840 --> 1:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>half year period in which we lived through a global pandemic,

1:00:39.760 --> 1:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>we'd uh seen the police department systematically refused to investigate cases,

1:00:44.440 --> 1:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and in which a Republican group of largely Republican funders

1:00:48.240 --> 1:00:51.919
<v Speaker 1>had spent over seven million dollars in attack ads that's

1:00:51.960 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>what it was. It wasn't a head to head, it

1:00:53.520 --> 1:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a traditional election. And then a few weeks later

1:00:58.040 --> 1:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>when Steve Mulroy in Shell County, Memphis, Tennessee, wins a

1:01:02.600 --> 1:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Democrat reformer out an incumbent traditional right wing Republican prosecutor

1:01:09.520 --> 1:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>who had been the d A for something like eight years,

1:01:12.560 --> 1:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>no mention of it in any of the national media.

1:01:14.720 --> 1:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>He won in a landslide against a very traditional police

1:01:18.280 --> 1:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>union back UM old Guard prosecutor. And so you know,

1:01:23.720 --> 1:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that there's a desire for whatever reason, maybe

1:01:27.160 --> 1:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it sells papers, I don't know from many in in

1:01:31.160 --> 1:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media sources to um to undermine the criminal justice

1:01:37.520 --> 1:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>reform movement in this way and to to to amplify

1:01:40.480 --> 1:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>attacks and criticisms, to blame high profile crimes on criminal

1:01:45.360 --> 1:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>justice reform in ways that they never ever do in

1:01:48.720 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictions where you know, we have more traditional punitive and

1:01:52.760 --> 1:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>carstral responses to crimes. I think the movement is growing

1:01:57.400 --> 1:01:59.919
<v Speaker 1>in strengthening, and it's going to keep going for years

1:01:59.920 --> 1:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to coming. It doesn't mean that, like any movement, it

1:02:02.440 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>won't have setbacks. We will will have some high profile

1:02:05.560 --> 1:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>defeats and will continue to grow despite those defeats and setbacks.

1:02:10.320 --> 1:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>So thank you ever so much Chase for taking the

1:02:13.400 --> 1:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>time to be on Psychoactive. I admire your courage in

1:02:16.880 --> 1:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>running for office. I admire the work you did accomplish

1:02:19.560 --> 1:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>while you were districtor in San Francisco, and I very

1:02:22.320 --> 1:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>much hope that we and the voters of San Francisco

1:02:24.800 --> 1:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>will have another opportunity one day to put you back

1:02:27.480 --> 1:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>in office to continue the struggle. Thanks so much for

1:02:30.360 --> 1:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>your work, Ethan, then pleasure to be on the show.

1:02:40.280 --> 1:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>If you're enjoying Psychoactive, please tell your friends about it,

1:02:44.360 --> 1:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>or you can write us a review at Apple Podcasts

1:02:46.680 --> 1:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. We love to hear

1:02:49.440 --> 1:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>from our listeners. If you'd like to share your own stories,

1:02:52.600 --> 1:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>comments and ideas, then leave us a message at one

1:02:55.960 --> 1:03:01.439
<v Speaker 1>eight three three seven seven nine sixty that's eight three

1:03:01.520 --> 1:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>three psycho zero, or you can email us at Psychoactive

1:03:06.080 --> 1:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>at protozoa dot com, or find me on Twitter at

1:03:09.240 --> 1:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Ethan natal Man. You can also find contact information in

1:03:12.680 --> 1:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>our show notes. Psychoactive is a production of I Heart

1:03:16.280 --> 1:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Radio and Protozoa Pictures. It's hosted by me Ethan Nadelman.

1:03:20.920 --> 1:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>It's produced by Noham Osband and Josh Stain. The executive

1:03:24.400 --> 1:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>producers are Dylan Golden, Ari Handel, Elizabeth Geesus and Darren

1:03:28.600 --> 1:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Aronofsky from Protozoa Pictures, Alex Williams and Matt Frederick from

1:03:32.360 --> 1:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio and me Ethan Naedelman. Our music is

1:03:36.280 --> 1:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>by Ari Blucien and a special thanks to ab brios f,

1:03:40.680 --> 1:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Bianca Grimshaw and Robert BB. Next week I'll be talking

1:03:54.880 --> 1:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>with Professor Nancy Campbell, one of America's leading drugs scholars,

1:04:00.040 --> 1:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>who co authored a book called The Narcotic Farm about

1:04:03.000 --> 1:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a remarkable institution that simultaneously punished, treated, and researched drug addicts.

1:04:10.120 --> 1:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>The Narcotic Farm was an attempt to separate out people

1:04:14.520 --> 1:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>whose sole problem was drug addiction, narcotic addiction, and narcotics

1:04:20.840 --> 1:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>was a catch all term at that time that did

1:04:22.960 --> 1:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>refer to both opiates and cocaine, which is a little

1:04:26.520 --> 1:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>bit hard for us to understand because they are drugs

1:04:30.600 --> 1:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that do very different things have very different effects. However,

1:04:34.280 --> 1:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it was basically um what became the illicit market. Subscribe

1:04:40.400 --> 1:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to Cycleactive now see it. Don't miss it