1 00:00:06,120 --> 00:00:10,680 Speaker 1: Hi, everybody. I'm actually recording this privately rather than doing 2 00:00:10,760 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 1: one because it's late at night. Well not that late, 3 00:00:13,840 --> 00:00:18,600 Speaker 1: but late enough, and I'd rather do the podcast than 4 00:00:18,640 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: not do the podcast. But it's late, and I don't know. 5 00:00:23,560 --> 00:00:25,040 Speaker 1: For some reason, it just made a little more sense 6 00:00:25,079 --> 00:00:27,720 Speaker 1: to me to just record it here and then make 7 00:00:27,760 --> 00:00:29,720 Speaker 1: it public later. Hi. My name is Luke Thomas. This 8 00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:32,440 Speaker 1: is episode I'm sure i think eighty two to eighty 9 00:00:32,440 --> 00:00:35,000 Speaker 1: three of my live chat. Appreciate you guys tuning in. 10 00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:38,080 Speaker 1: I will go for about an hour, maybe a little 11 00:00:38,120 --> 00:00:40,120 Speaker 1: bit less, and I'll get as many of your questions 12 00:00:40,120 --> 00:00:42,440 Speaker 1: as I can in that time. You guys know the 13 00:00:42,520 --> 00:00:45,800 Speaker 1: drill thumbs up on the video hit subscribe. At least 14 00:00:45,840 --> 00:00:47,639 Speaker 1: I'm bringing it to you in some form. Usually when 15 00:00:47,640 --> 00:00:49,839 Speaker 1: there's a big event over the week, especially one for 16 00:00:49,880 --> 00:00:52,839 Speaker 1: Showtime or CBS, I'm not able to do these, but 17 00:00:52,880 --> 00:00:54,360 Speaker 1: because I'm at home, I can at least get some 18 00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:56,840 Speaker 1: version of it in. All right, So without further ado, 19 00:00:56,920 --> 00:01:07,880 Speaker 1: let's get this party started, shall we. All right, and 20 00:01:08,040 --> 00:01:11,120 Speaker 1: we're back, all right, So let me turn this subscribe off. 21 00:01:11,160 --> 00:01:13,479 Speaker 1: I'm not gonna waste any more time. I'm gonna get 22 00:01:13,520 --> 00:01:15,200 Speaker 1: right to it and as you guys know, on the 23 00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:18,200 Speaker 1: community tab on Wednesdays, I put up a thread, you 24 00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:20,520 Speaker 1: guys fill fill it up, and then I react to it. 25 00:01:20,560 --> 00:01:23,759 Speaker 1: So here we go, all right, Question number one, group 26 00:01:23,800 --> 00:01:27,200 Speaker 1: of international MMA fighters you're most excited about, Hi Luke. 27 00:01:27,240 --> 00:01:29,720 Speaker 1: The growth of international MMA has been exceptional these past 28 00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:32,440 Speaker 1: couple of years, with countries that weren't even on the 29 00:01:32,560 --> 00:01:35,640 Speaker 1: map before now being represented on the biggest MMA stage. 30 00:01:36,680 --> 00:01:38,680 Speaker 1: From these teams, if you could pick two out of 31 00:01:38,760 --> 00:01:41,480 Speaker 1: the five, which ones would you pick? And choose? Team 32 00:01:41,720 --> 00:01:48,960 Speaker 1: France Cyril Ghan Menon Fierro Nasura, Diin m Avov, Team Wales, 33 00:01:49,040 --> 00:01:53,040 Speaker 1: Jack Shore, Mason Jones. Just two out of the five? Oh, 34 00:01:53,080 --> 00:01:58,440 Speaker 1: I see, and you got some from Georgia Davolishvili, Tupurya, Gegachakatzi, Kazakhstan, 35 00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:03,160 Speaker 1: Rokmanov Zumagulov, and then Sarah Gey Morozov and then Team 36 00:02:03,200 --> 00:02:07,920 Speaker 1: South Africa Drigis Duplessi, Don Madge and jp is It 37 00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:10,280 Speaker 1: Bays s Byes, I can ever remember how to pronounced it. 38 00:02:10,760 --> 00:02:13,600 Speaker 1: I'm definitely gonna go with Rockmanov, as you guys know him, 39 00:02:13,639 --> 00:02:16,720 Speaker 1: high On Schoffcott Rockmanov. So We'll go with him, and 40 00:02:16,720 --> 00:02:18,919 Speaker 1: then I'll go with Cyril Gone. I think Cyril Gone 41 00:02:19,160 --> 00:02:21,560 Speaker 1: is probably at some point, whether sooner or later, gonna 42 00:02:21,560 --> 00:02:23,880 Speaker 1: wear gold, and I think Rockmanov probably is as well. 43 00:02:24,200 --> 00:02:30,639 Speaker 1: I think those two guys are exceptional. It's funny even 44 00:02:30,639 --> 00:02:32,519 Speaker 1: if the Colombians are not part of your demographic, we 45 00:02:32,639 --> 00:02:35,600 Speaker 1: Chileans are here representing. One of our producers actually looked 46 00:02:35,600 --> 00:02:38,200 Speaker 1: into it. There are more Lithuanians who listened to the 47 00:02:38,240 --> 00:02:41,400 Speaker 1: show than Colombians. I mean, I couldn't show Colombia more 48 00:02:41,480 --> 00:02:44,120 Speaker 1: love and they don't show a lick of it back. 49 00:02:44,240 --> 00:02:48,920 Speaker 1: But what are you gonna do? What is the worst? 50 00:02:48,960 --> 00:02:53,040 Speaker 1: As in darkest trash talk a fighter has said in 51 00:02:53,080 --> 00:02:56,720 Speaker 1: reference to Connor, where even Jones and DC didn't discuss 52 00:02:56,760 --> 00:02:59,120 Speaker 1: dead parents blah blah blah. I mean, on the regional scene, 53 00:02:59,120 --> 00:03:02,960 Speaker 1: I've seen everything. You know, I'm gonna bang your girl, 54 00:03:03,200 --> 00:03:06,160 Speaker 1: which isn't like dark exactly, but like you know, I'll 55 00:03:06,200 --> 00:03:08,919 Speaker 1: kill your family, things like that. I've heard all kinds 56 00:03:08,960 --> 00:03:10,680 Speaker 1: of stuff on the regional scene in terms of like 57 00:03:10,760 --> 00:03:13,880 Speaker 1: high level MMA or even boxing. I've said before the 58 00:03:13,919 --> 00:03:16,320 Speaker 1: stuff Majorga said to a lot of people, including Dale 59 00:03:16,360 --> 00:03:18,120 Speaker 1: Hoyt was pretty fucked up. I'm gonna drink your wife's 60 00:03:18,160 --> 00:03:25,920 Speaker 1: breast milk. That's something, But usually they're all you know, 61 00:03:25,960 --> 00:03:29,880 Speaker 1: and Mike Tyson eat your heart kind of thing, and 62 00:03:29,960 --> 00:03:33,320 Speaker 1: I'll eat your children to Lennox Lewis was pretty bad. 63 00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:35,200 Speaker 1: Those are some of the darker ones that have stood 64 00:03:35,200 --> 00:03:37,160 Speaker 1: out on the regional scene. Though I've heard it all, 65 00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:42,480 Speaker 1: I've heard it all. Why hasn't Belletre ever matched up 66 00:03:42,920 --> 00:03:45,880 Speaker 1: Michael venam Page with Raymond Daniels? Now, what weight class 67 00:03:45,880 --> 00:03:49,960 Speaker 1: does Raymond Daniels compete in in MMA? Is he? I 68 00:03:49,960 --> 00:03:54,080 Speaker 1: don't know? Is he an actual welter weight? Let's see 69 00:03:56,080 --> 00:04:07,000 Speaker 1: he might be so in MMA he is Welterwait, yeah, 70 00:04:07,680 --> 00:04:11,600 Speaker 1: great question. Don't know. You know what I'll ask Bellatore 71 00:04:12,400 --> 00:04:14,720 Speaker 1: I legitimately, I mean, I think MVP has always been 72 00:04:14,760 --> 00:04:18,000 Speaker 1: a little bit more contenderish and Raymond Daniels, you know, 73 00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:20,039 Speaker 1: I think he I don't know what he's doing with 74 00:04:20,080 --> 00:04:24,240 Speaker 1: his MMA career. He's fought for Bellatore four times. He 75 00:04:24,279 --> 00:04:26,039 Speaker 1: fought in Strike Force a way back in two thousand 76 00:04:26,080 --> 00:04:30,000 Speaker 1: and eight in a middleweight bout, and now has fought 77 00:04:30,040 --> 00:04:32,880 Speaker 1: four times for Belatour, once in twenty nineteen, two times 78 00:04:32,920 --> 00:04:36,160 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty, and then once in twenty twenty one 79 00:04:36,279 --> 00:04:38,680 Speaker 1: as early as arrested, said recently as April, which was 80 00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:41,520 Speaker 1: a rematch from his fight in twenty twenty. I don't 81 00:04:41,560 --> 00:04:44,200 Speaker 1: really know, but they're not closely matched in terms of 82 00:04:44,240 --> 00:04:48,200 Speaker 1: like ranking, so maybe that's it. But I'd have to ask, 83 00:04:48,240 --> 00:04:54,400 Speaker 1: it's a great question. Do you think anyone in middleweight 84 00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:57,240 Speaker 1: will be able to keep Izzy down like Yan did? 85 00:04:57,480 --> 00:04:59,440 Speaker 1: It's pretty obvious that no one else is as naturally 86 00:04:59,480 --> 00:05:03,440 Speaker 1: big and strong as Yon at middleweight. Yeah, it's something 87 00:05:03,480 --> 00:05:06,800 Speaker 1: I've thought about. I think if Vittori couldn't do it, 88 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:08,760 Speaker 1: I'm a little bit skeptical that anyone could do it. 89 00:05:08,839 --> 00:05:10,240 Speaker 1: And you can even say, well, well, if Yell, we're 90 00:05:10,240 --> 00:05:11,760 Speaker 1: still there at middleweight, he would have been able to 91 00:05:11,800 --> 00:05:14,320 Speaker 1: do it. But yoel It is not that kind of 92 00:05:14,320 --> 00:05:17,799 Speaker 1: a guy either. He's got great, a super explosive takedowns, 93 00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:20,719 Speaker 1: but he usually uses them for you know, to introduce 94 00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:23,920 Speaker 1: chaos into something, just something disruptive, or like to set 95 00:05:23,960 --> 00:05:26,240 Speaker 1: up strikes off of it. He doesn't use it to 96 00:05:26,279 --> 00:05:28,960 Speaker 1: like hold down, top pressure, ground and pound type. Not 97 00:05:28,960 --> 00:05:30,960 Speaker 1: not not a whole lot obviously, you know, he finished 98 00:05:30,960 --> 00:05:32,920 Speaker 1: the Oldamichida from elbows, but you know, he's not taking 99 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:36,440 Speaker 1: down pass guard typically is that kind of a thing. 100 00:05:37,680 --> 00:05:40,000 Speaker 1: So you know, it wouldn't have been him. The one 101 00:05:40,120 --> 00:05:42,240 Speaker 1: kind of X factor out there. And I don't really 102 00:05:42,320 --> 00:05:44,200 Speaker 1: know if this is even fair to say, because I 103 00:05:44,200 --> 00:05:49,320 Speaker 1: don't really know where he's at coming or going. Would 104 00:05:49,360 --> 00:05:53,240 Speaker 1: maybe be Luke Rockhold. Luke Rockhold's probably got good takedowns. 105 00:05:53,279 --> 00:05:56,080 Speaker 1: I know he's got very good jiu jitsu, really really good. 106 00:05:56,120 --> 00:05:57,880 Speaker 1: I know a few folks that have rolled with him 107 00:05:57,920 --> 00:06:00,400 Speaker 1: have told me he's he's the real deal hole feel 108 00:06:00,440 --> 00:06:03,400 Speaker 1: when it comes to that. So that would be an 109 00:06:03,440 --> 00:06:06,719 Speaker 1: interesting one to introduce. But like Whittaker, you know, former Walterwaite, 110 00:06:06,760 --> 00:06:09,159 Speaker 1: he's probably not going to be that guy. Let me 111 00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:17,159 Speaker 1: look at the rankings here just to see to be clear. Yeah, 112 00:06:17,240 --> 00:06:21,559 Speaker 1: Cannon here, no Paulo Costa, no Ronson, they already fought 113 00:06:22,760 --> 00:06:26,000 Speaker 1: Hermnson would be kind of a maybe there her Manson 114 00:06:26,040 --> 00:06:28,279 Speaker 1: because you know, you go right for it, but you 115 00:06:28,320 --> 00:06:31,680 Speaker 1: know he doesn't rate the title shots. So and then 116 00:06:31,720 --> 00:06:35,120 Speaker 1: after that, the next one would be Chris Widman at twelve, 117 00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:36,520 Speaker 1: and obviously I don't even know if he's gonna fight 118 00:06:36,520 --> 00:06:40,000 Speaker 1: again given some of the issues and difficulties that he's had. 119 00:06:40,080 --> 00:06:43,479 Speaker 1: So so the answer is maybe, but not really. It 120 00:06:43,520 --> 00:06:45,799 Speaker 1: really goes to show again. When I made the last 121 00:06:45,839 --> 00:06:49,440 Speaker 1: video that I made on my personal channel, it was 122 00:06:49,839 --> 00:06:54,520 Speaker 1: about is Raeta Sonya's first MMA loss, and it was 123 00:06:54,520 --> 00:06:57,320 Speaker 1: of course to Jan Blohovich. And then in the course 124 00:06:57,360 --> 00:06:59,800 Speaker 1: of studying it, I only intended to look at the 125 00:06:59,839 --> 00:07:02,679 Speaker 1: tab downs themselves, what takedowns that folks use and didn't 126 00:07:02,680 --> 00:07:05,400 Speaker 1: have success. But then in the course of watching the 127 00:07:05,400 --> 00:07:08,960 Speaker 1: film about people who did get takedowns on him, you know, 128 00:07:09,040 --> 00:07:11,280 Speaker 1: they were just much less able to keep him down, 129 00:07:11,360 --> 00:07:14,040 Speaker 1: much less able to flatten him out, much less able 130 00:07:14,080 --> 00:07:17,000 Speaker 1: to do anything he was. Adasaania at one hundred and 131 00:07:17,040 --> 00:07:21,200 Speaker 1: eighty five pounds is a dramatically more dynamic grappler, and 132 00:07:21,240 --> 00:07:23,000 Speaker 1: I think partly that speaks to the fact that, you know, 133 00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:26,080 Speaker 1: obviously jiu jitsu is not his first in primary skill set. 134 00:07:26,440 --> 00:07:28,560 Speaker 1: He's worked on it diligently. He's a purple belt under 135 00:07:28,560 --> 00:07:32,720 Speaker 1: Andre Galvaugh. I'm sure he's a legitimate purple belt, and 136 00:07:32,760 --> 00:07:35,600 Speaker 1: he can handle himself quite obviously in MMA and what 137 00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:39,560 Speaker 1: he's been able to show. But but you know, there 138 00:07:39,560 --> 00:07:41,560 Speaker 1: were some limits that once you know there was a 139 00:07:41,560 --> 00:07:43,880 Speaker 1: big weight or at least something of a weight disparity 140 00:07:43,920 --> 00:07:46,600 Speaker 1: introduced Bible Hobich possible hobrich Man, this is the thing 141 00:07:46,600 --> 00:07:48,840 Speaker 1: that everybody sleeps on, and I bring it up for 142 00:07:48,880 --> 00:07:50,840 Speaker 1: his stand up, but it's kind of true about his 143 00:07:50,840 --> 00:07:53,640 Speaker 1: ground as well. When you look at his ground game, 144 00:07:53,680 --> 00:07:55,400 Speaker 1: you don't go, oh, well, he's just a you know, 145 00:07:55,440 --> 00:07:58,920 Speaker 1: an incredible passer. My god, nobody takes the back like John. 146 00:07:59,040 --> 00:08:00,800 Speaker 1: It doesn't really work that way with him. But what 147 00:08:00,840 --> 00:08:03,920 Speaker 1: he does do is really the fundamentals. He's a smash passer. 148 00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:06,760 Speaker 1: He likes to you know, he's not a heavy passer 149 00:08:06,760 --> 00:08:08,880 Speaker 1: in a sense that he's constantly large. To say, he's 150 00:08:08,920 --> 00:08:12,080 Speaker 1: not a continuously aggressive passer. But once he's on top, 151 00:08:12,160 --> 00:08:14,160 Speaker 1: he likes to flatt and he likes to hold. He 152 00:08:14,200 --> 00:08:17,320 Speaker 1: introduces enough damage typically to keep it. But you know, 153 00:08:17,320 --> 00:08:20,680 Speaker 1: it's just a very clever, smart way of winning rounds. 154 00:08:20,680 --> 00:08:22,080 Speaker 1: And if you can put enough to get obviously want 155 00:08:22,080 --> 00:08:24,280 Speaker 1: to fight and you got it there stay out of 156 00:08:24,280 --> 00:08:26,360 Speaker 1: trouble that way. You know, there's just a lot of 157 00:08:26,440 --> 00:08:29,520 Speaker 1: smart things he does that are not They don't pop 158 00:08:29,560 --> 00:08:32,920 Speaker 1: off the screen. His power does when he strikes obviously, okay, 159 00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:35,240 Speaker 1: but that aside, there's a lot of elements to his 160 00:08:35,280 --> 00:08:38,240 Speaker 1: game that don't just like grab you. But then when 161 00:08:38,280 --> 00:08:40,760 Speaker 1: you inventory why he won, you begin to see these 162 00:08:40,800 --> 00:08:44,079 Speaker 1: patterns of just really kind of you know, putting a 163 00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:46,959 Speaker 1: lid on the pot, so to speak, and let it 164 00:08:47,160 --> 00:08:49,960 Speaker 1: just letting the fight simmer in there. And he's the 165 00:08:50,000 --> 00:08:52,439 Speaker 1: one in control of it. It's not you know, it's 166 00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:55,800 Speaker 1: it's not an explosive way typically to win in that 167 00:08:55,960 --> 00:09:00,480 Speaker 1: in that way, but it is effective. It's very effective, 168 00:09:00,520 --> 00:09:07,280 Speaker 1: and he's got it. An interesting question your thoughts on 169 00:09:07,320 --> 00:09:10,760 Speaker 1: the whole Simone Biles Olympic situation. Yeah, it's a fascinating 170 00:09:10,760 --> 00:09:16,920 Speaker 1: one man, because well there's a lot of reasons why 171 00:09:16,920 --> 00:09:19,240 Speaker 1: it's fascinating, right, I mean, and you, Michael Bisping got 172 00:09:19,280 --> 00:09:24,319 Speaker 1: I think criticized for his takes. I listened to them. 173 00:09:24,360 --> 00:09:27,719 Speaker 1: I tried to, you know, for people who've competed in 174 00:09:27,800 --> 00:09:29,319 Speaker 1: sports on a high level, I try to. I try 175 00:09:29,360 --> 00:09:30,800 Speaker 1: to always give them the benefit of the doubt and 176 00:09:30,800 --> 00:09:35,240 Speaker 1: the sense of hearing them out. It was weird too, 177 00:09:35,320 --> 00:09:37,559 Speaker 1: like I bring this up, let me, let me take it. 178 00:09:37,559 --> 00:09:40,199 Speaker 1: There's there's a lot of different competing things here. One 179 00:09:40,200 --> 00:09:42,880 Speaker 1: thing I bring up with UFC all the time because 180 00:09:42,880 --> 00:09:44,040 Speaker 1: I see it all the time, and some of the 181 00:09:44,040 --> 00:09:48,080 Speaker 1: sources that I fought, not sources, but media sites that 182 00:09:48,120 --> 00:09:51,319 Speaker 1: I follow or whatever that are right wing. You get 183 00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:54,800 Speaker 1: you see the UFC getting a lot of high praise 184 00:09:54,880 --> 00:09:59,240 Speaker 1: with them in one direction or the other, either with 185 00:09:59,400 --> 00:10:02,200 Speaker 1: Dana or their product or they're like, you know, we 186 00:10:02,200 --> 00:10:04,440 Speaker 1: don't give a shit about COVID attitude, like whatever it is. 187 00:10:05,559 --> 00:10:07,320 Speaker 1: You see them get a lot of that. Obviously. You know, 188 00:10:07,320 --> 00:10:09,080 Speaker 1: White has spoken on behalf of Trump and he's a 189 00:10:09,080 --> 00:10:11,000 Speaker 1: big fan of him, and blah blah blah. I'm not 190 00:10:11,040 --> 00:10:12,920 Speaker 1: here to make in any way make a judgment about 191 00:10:12,920 --> 00:10:14,880 Speaker 1: the merit stuff it is. There is a conversation to 192 00:10:14,920 --> 00:10:16,560 Speaker 1: be had about that, but that's not what I'm doing here, 193 00:10:16,600 --> 00:10:20,199 Speaker 1: So nobody sweat it one way or the other. And 194 00:10:20,240 --> 00:10:22,280 Speaker 1: then I've noticed that, like there are some leagues or 195 00:10:22,320 --> 00:10:26,560 Speaker 1: some players that get a lot of praise in left 196 00:10:26,559 --> 00:10:29,240 Speaker 1: wing media or you know, I should say, or rather 197 00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:31,680 Speaker 1: at a bare minimum if they're not left wing media, 198 00:10:32,040 --> 00:10:35,480 Speaker 1: or even conservative media media whose audiences are either conservative 199 00:10:35,559 --> 00:10:37,520 Speaker 1: or either a liberal, whatever the case. So there's this 200 00:10:37,640 --> 00:10:40,800 Speaker 1: weird divide that's happening, and some of that you saw here, 201 00:10:40,920 --> 00:10:44,600 Speaker 1: like your Clay Travis's were going after some own biles 202 00:10:44,679 --> 00:10:46,760 Speaker 1: and then you know, on the other side, I mean, 203 00:10:46,800 --> 00:10:48,319 Speaker 1: this was the part that really kind of bothered me 204 00:10:48,360 --> 00:10:50,439 Speaker 1: about the media coverage. It's like, look, here's the basic 205 00:10:50,480 --> 00:10:52,760 Speaker 1: way I look at this, aside from sort of the 206 00:10:52,800 --> 00:10:55,640 Speaker 1: media angle of it, in terms of, you know, what 207 00:10:55,800 --> 00:10:59,240 Speaker 1: sources were saying nice things, what sources were saying bad things. 208 00:11:00,280 --> 00:11:02,480 Speaker 1: Beyond that, though, the thing that got to me was 209 00:11:02,520 --> 00:11:06,760 Speaker 1: like some of the early criticism of her was like 210 00:11:06,960 --> 00:11:10,520 Speaker 1: really moronic. That's not to say there's not a criticism 211 00:11:10,600 --> 00:11:13,400 Speaker 1: to be made, but the ones that they were making, 212 00:11:13,559 --> 00:11:16,560 Speaker 1: like you know, she is, she's not. I saw some 213 00:11:16,559 --> 00:11:19,000 Speaker 1: people be like, she's not the goat. The goat wouldn't 214 00:11:19,040 --> 00:11:21,520 Speaker 1: do this that. I mean, folks like she could have 215 00:11:21,640 --> 00:11:25,440 Speaker 1: never participated in this Olympics ever, and she'd still, like 216 00:11:25,480 --> 00:11:28,120 Speaker 1: by a wide margin, be the best gymnast who ever lived. 217 00:11:28,160 --> 00:11:30,320 Speaker 1: You know, like that's just a silly thing to say. 218 00:11:30,360 --> 00:11:33,680 Speaker 1: That doesn't really hold up. I think everyone's successes and 219 00:11:33,679 --> 00:11:36,319 Speaker 1: everyone's failures all get put on the resume, which I'll 220 00:11:36,320 --> 00:11:38,040 Speaker 1: get through in just a second. But what I mean 221 00:11:38,080 --> 00:11:40,560 Speaker 1: to say is there were some of the early criticisms 222 00:11:40,600 --> 00:11:43,679 Speaker 1: of her that were just totally stupid, and then it 223 00:11:43,800 --> 00:11:50,040 Speaker 1: resulted in this media coverage in response to that that 224 00:11:50,160 --> 00:11:52,440 Speaker 1: was like way over the top. You know, Like she 225 00:11:52,559 --> 00:11:55,920 Speaker 1: has this documentary that was made about her in twenty 226 00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:58,560 Speaker 1: eighteen or twenty nineteen called like Courage to Soar, you know, 227 00:11:58,600 --> 00:12:00,920 Speaker 1: like when she's out there doing big thing, it's all 228 00:12:00,960 --> 00:12:03,920 Speaker 1: a bunch of courage. And then she withdraws from the tournament, 229 00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:10,160 Speaker 1: and then they also label that as heroic. And I'm like, well, 230 00:12:10,240 --> 00:12:12,640 Speaker 1: let me get this straight. If she competes, then she wins, 231 00:12:12,679 --> 00:12:16,600 Speaker 1: it's heroic. If she doesn't compete and doesn't win, that's 232 00:12:16,679 --> 00:12:19,040 Speaker 1: also heroic. I mean, folks, it can only be heroic 233 00:12:19,080 --> 00:12:23,040 Speaker 1: if it's falsifiable under some condition. It can't be both. 234 00:12:23,120 --> 00:12:24,760 Speaker 1: It can't be that. If you compete and you win, 235 00:12:24,800 --> 00:12:27,280 Speaker 1: your heroic, and if you withdraw and you don't compete heroic. 236 00:12:28,200 --> 00:12:30,760 Speaker 1: So you know, there was just this really over the top, 237 00:12:30,880 --> 00:12:34,240 Speaker 1: quite literally hero worship built into the media coverage that 238 00:12:34,760 --> 00:12:37,280 Speaker 1: I didn't really agree with. This is basically where I 239 00:12:37,320 --> 00:12:45,640 Speaker 1: come down on it. Look, man, I don't really judge 240 00:12:45,679 --> 00:12:48,600 Speaker 1: her for what she did for two reasons or one 241 00:12:48,640 --> 00:12:51,440 Speaker 1: basic reason I would say, which is that if you're 242 00:12:51,480 --> 00:12:55,520 Speaker 1: not feeling it, and if you continue to compete, you 243 00:12:55,640 --> 00:12:58,719 Speaker 1: a could make your team's chances of winning any kind 244 00:12:58,760 --> 00:13:02,880 Speaker 1: of medal, war or B. You could cause injury, and 245 00:13:02,960 --> 00:13:05,160 Speaker 1: the kinds of injuries you can get in gymnastics in 246 00:13:05,200 --> 00:13:07,480 Speaker 1: the particular events that she would have to have done. 247 00:13:08,240 --> 00:13:11,400 Speaker 1: Literally it can result in catastrophic injuries. Like here's the thing, man, 248 00:13:11,559 --> 00:13:14,360 Speaker 1: it's about same rule I apply with fighting I would 249 00:13:14,360 --> 00:13:17,840 Speaker 1: apply with something like that, which is, you only should 250 00:13:17,880 --> 00:13:20,280 Speaker 1: be there if you want to be there. If you 251 00:13:20,400 --> 00:13:22,920 Speaker 1: don't want to be there, either before the fight or 252 00:13:22,960 --> 00:13:25,080 Speaker 1: in the middle of a fight, or before the competition 253 00:13:25,240 --> 00:13:28,480 Speaker 1: or in the middle of a competition, it's too dangerous 254 00:13:28,640 --> 00:13:31,960 Speaker 1: to like arm twist somebody into trying to do it. 255 00:13:32,360 --> 00:13:34,280 Speaker 1: A little bit of go get them, a little bit 256 00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:36,920 Speaker 1: of like you know, the Teddy Atlas or firemen. When 257 00:13:36,920 --> 00:13:40,560 Speaker 1: he was talking to Timothy Bradley Junior in the corner. Yeah, 258 00:13:40,559 --> 00:13:44,360 Speaker 1: a little bit of that definitely can be orient can 259 00:13:44,400 --> 00:13:47,000 Speaker 1: be valuable. But it looked to me like whatever the 260 00:13:47,000 --> 00:13:51,440 Speaker 1: case was, she was probably past any kind of cajoling 261 00:13:51,960 --> 00:13:53,800 Speaker 1: to get back in there. Like she just didn't have 262 00:13:53,880 --> 00:13:56,319 Speaker 1: it that day, and that's okay, dude. Some people just 263 00:13:56,360 --> 00:13:57,640 Speaker 1: don't have it that day. And if you're going to 264 00:13:57,679 --> 00:13:59,640 Speaker 1: get injured or potentially compete and get a really low 265 00:13:59,640 --> 00:14:02,240 Speaker 1: score when the sub who was there could come in 266 00:14:02,280 --> 00:14:04,319 Speaker 1: and take your spot and do better give you a 267 00:14:04,360 --> 00:14:06,920 Speaker 1: team a better chance to win, that's that that is 268 00:14:06,960 --> 00:14:09,240 Speaker 1: the direction you should go. So like, in that sense, 269 00:14:09,280 --> 00:14:11,880 Speaker 1: I don't really have an issue with it. I think 270 00:14:11,920 --> 00:14:16,480 Speaker 1: the other part I would say is, you know, look, man, 271 00:14:17,400 --> 00:14:21,160 Speaker 1: we're talking about the greatest gymnasts who ever lived. She probably, 272 00:14:21,600 --> 00:14:24,240 Speaker 1: you know, in terms of the expectation that she was 273 00:14:24,240 --> 00:14:27,360 Speaker 1: still the best gymnast who could perform, who should have 274 00:14:27,400 --> 00:14:31,960 Speaker 1: won gold. Ultimately the team won silver. You know, you 275 00:14:32,040 --> 00:14:35,560 Speaker 1: can say that her actions cost that team the gold medal. 276 00:14:35,600 --> 00:14:38,520 Speaker 1: And I don't know that that's necessarily true, but let's 277 00:14:38,640 --> 00:14:40,840 Speaker 1: argue for a second that it's true. Let's just claim 278 00:14:40,920 --> 00:14:44,920 Speaker 1: that it's true. Even if it is true. Again, I'm 279 00:14:44,920 --> 00:14:47,040 Speaker 1: gonna go back to it. This is not an ordinary 280 00:14:47,480 --> 00:14:52,720 Speaker 1: even Olympic gymnast. This is the very like, literally far 281 00:14:52,800 --> 00:14:55,840 Speaker 1: and away, the very best to have ever done it. 282 00:14:57,200 --> 00:14:59,840 Speaker 1: In other words, you got less than what you were 283 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:03,600 Speaker 1: expecting for the twenty twenty Olympics, But what about all 284 00:15:03,640 --> 00:15:06,400 Speaker 1: the other competitions where she just blew motherfuckers out of 285 00:15:06,440 --> 00:15:10,040 Speaker 1: the water and just raked home metals individual and then 286 00:15:10,120 --> 00:15:13,960 Speaker 1: lifting her team in other words, in other words, you know, 287 00:15:14,000 --> 00:15:15,640 Speaker 1: if it was like sort of like a maybe you 288 00:15:15,760 --> 00:15:17,920 Speaker 1: just barely made the Olympic team, or you weren't really 289 00:15:18,080 --> 00:15:20,080 Speaker 1: like a clear medal winner and you were fucking up 290 00:15:20,120 --> 00:15:23,280 Speaker 1: mentally and whatnot. Yeah, maybe the judgment should be a 291 00:15:23,280 --> 00:15:25,760 Speaker 1: little bit harsher. But if you've done if you have 292 00:15:25,960 --> 00:15:30,080 Speaker 1: her record of achievement, and she pulls out in what 293 00:15:30,120 --> 00:15:32,360 Speaker 1: I would call, at least from a sporting standpoint, in 294 00:15:32,400 --> 00:15:36,320 Speaker 1: the way which she did it, you know, you know 295 00:15:36,360 --> 00:15:39,920 Speaker 1: before it could have gotten worse. Pretty responsible. I think 296 00:15:39,920 --> 00:15:41,680 Speaker 1: you should let it go. I really do. I think 297 00:15:41,720 --> 00:15:44,080 Speaker 1: you should let it go. Yeah, we're grading her on 298 00:15:44,120 --> 00:15:46,440 Speaker 1: a curve. I think you can argue, oh I did 299 00:15:46,520 --> 00:15:48,040 Speaker 1: by the principle lo of it. Blah blah blah. We're 300 00:15:48,080 --> 00:15:52,120 Speaker 1: grading her on a curve. Okay, we are, But this 301 00:15:52,200 --> 00:15:55,480 Speaker 1: is such an extraordinary case with who we're talking about here. 302 00:15:57,320 --> 00:15:59,800 Speaker 1: Even if you wanted to argue she cost her team 303 00:16:00,040 --> 00:16:06,280 Speaker 1: whatever the metal would have been. She's elevated their performance 304 00:16:06,760 --> 00:16:10,200 Speaker 1: for so many different tournaments in so many different ways 305 00:16:11,000 --> 00:16:13,480 Speaker 1: that I think you can just say, yes, it would 306 00:16:13,520 --> 00:16:16,120 Speaker 1: have been nice if that had not happened. We'll add 307 00:16:16,160 --> 00:16:18,440 Speaker 1: it to her resume again. All your wins and all 308 00:16:18,440 --> 00:16:22,160 Speaker 1: your failures will get added. But in general, the ledger 309 00:16:22,240 --> 00:16:25,800 Speaker 1: is pretty lopsided. Man. There's a bunch of w's here, 310 00:16:25,840 --> 00:16:27,840 Speaker 1: and you know this l okay, you can call it 311 00:16:27,880 --> 00:16:29,440 Speaker 1: an l and there's some other ones there as well. 312 00:16:30,280 --> 00:16:33,360 Speaker 1: Probably along her gymnastics career, doubt she's had a perfect career, 313 00:16:33,520 --> 00:16:36,200 Speaker 1: as good as she has been, and so in that sense, 314 00:16:36,240 --> 00:16:37,520 Speaker 1: I would let it go. I think the only thing 315 00:16:37,560 --> 00:16:40,320 Speaker 1: I would say is it's like people are making her 316 00:16:40,360 --> 00:16:44,640 Speaker 1: situation out to be in the media like above reproach 317 00:16:44,840 --> 00:16:47,040 Speaker 1: or even praiseworthy, and there are parts to do with 318 00:16:47,080 --> 00:16:48,760 Speaker 1: that are praise where they're like, if you don't think 319 00:16:48,800 --> 00:16:51,480 Speaker 1: you have it, save yourself. If you ever situation that 320 00:16:51,560 --> 00:16:55,200 Speaker 1: you know there's a real It's regrettable that it took 321 00:16:55,320 --> 00:16:57,240 Speaker 1: until the Olympics for it to happen, but there's a 322 00:16:57,320 --> 00:17:00,440 Speaker 1: certain level of pragmatism. Once she was in the moment 323 00:17:00,840 --> 00:17:03,720 Speaker 1: to remove herself. There's a certain amount of smarts to it, frankly, 324 00:17:04,240 --> 00:17:06,560 Speaker 1: but like you know, I saw some people being like, oh, well, 325 00:17:06,600 --> 00:17:08,840 Speaker 1: you know what about taking care of your mental health? See, 326 00:17:08,840 --> 00:17:11,120 Speaker 1: this is the part where I everything falls apart from 327 00:17:11,119 --> 00:17:16,000 Speaker 1: me a little bit because I don't know that high 328 00:17:16,080 --> 00:17:21,399 Speaker 1: level achievement in sports, particularly like you know, Olympic World 329 00:17:21,520 --> 00:17:27,600 Speaker 1: Champion for MMA, you know, UFC Beltholder whatever. I don't 330 00:17:27,640 --> 00:17:30,480 Speaker 1: think winning at that level really has anything to do 331 00:17:30,560 --> 00:17:41,080 Speaker 1: with like grounded mental health quite frankly, like everybody who everybody, 332 00:17:41,560 --> 00:17:43,840 Speaker 1: it's too much of a generalization, but I've seen so 333 00:17:44,480 --> 00:17:49,920 Speaker 1: many instances of people taking extraordinary lengths that are not good, 334 00:17:50,200 --> 00:17:52,520 Speaker 1: not merely for their mental health. But like you know, 335 00:17:52,680 --> 00:17:54,359 Speaker 1: this is the sort of argument I have about doping 336 00:17:55,920 --> 00:17:59,000 Speaker 1: as it relates to to USADA in UFC, which is, 337 00:17:59,280 --> 00:18:01,520 Speaker 1: you know, show me the evidence that their introduction made 338 00:18:01,560 --> 00:18:06,480 Speaker 1: fighting any safer. It didn't, right, There's there's zero evidence 339 00:18:06,480 --> 00:18:08,680 Speaker 1: to indicate that fighting isn't and I don't think the 340 00:18:08,720 --> 00:18:10,680 Speaker 1: fans will even want it to be safer. But if anything, 341 00:18:10,680 --> 00:18:14,360 Speaker 1: it's actually gotten more dangerous. I would say over time. Now, 342 00:18:14,560 --> 00:18:16,960 Speaker 1: why do I bring that up? Not about doping exactly, 343 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:20,399 Speaker 1: but I mean to say that you know, look dude, 344 00:18:20,440 --> 00:18:23,479 Speaker 1: like Mma is a particularly egregeous example. But do these 345 00:18:23,480 --> 00:18:28,919 Speaker 1: girls get fucked up from gymnastics, years of broken tibias 346 00:18:28,960 --> 00:18:33,239 Speaker 1: and messed up feet and concussions and separated shoulders and 347 00:18:33,320 --> 00:18:36,840 Speaker 1: cracked ribs and they just get injections and keep going, 348 00:18:36,960 --> 00:18:40,280 Speaker 1: you know, and it's it's just it's constant. I don't 349 00:18:40,280 --> 00:18:42,199 Speaker 1: know if it's even ethical, certainly given some of the 350 00:18:42,240 --> 00:18:44,360 Speaker 1: ages of these gymnasts, not some of them biles per se, 351 00:18:44,400 --> 00:18:46,920 Speaker 1: but some other ones who are like, you know, fourteen, 352 00:18:47,119 --> 00:18:50,000 Speaker 1: sixteen years old. These do these young girls even have 353 00:18:50,160 --> 00:18:52,479 Speaker 1: agency about what they can say yes and what they 354 00:18:52,520 --> 00:18:54,480 Speaker 1: can say no to when they have all these adults 355 00:18:54,880 --> 00:18:57,480 Speaker 1: kind of pressuring them, Like, dude, if you don't want 356 00:18:57,520 --> 00:18:59,199 Speaker 1: to be there and you think you're gonna make it 357 00:18:59,200 --> 00:19:03,560 Speaker 1: worse for your team or potentially yourself, yeah you should withdraw. Obviously, 358 00:19:03,600 --> 00:19:06,399 Speaker 1: there's a broader question about you know, if you you know, 359 00:19:06,440 --> 00:19:08,680 Speaker 1: you're gonna call yourself the goat. And I remember a 360 00:19:08,960 --> 00:19:11,320 Speaker 1: NBC did some interview with her I watched before the Olympics, 361 00:19:11,320 --> 00:19:12,879 Speaker 1: and they're like, can anyone beat you? And he's like, 362 00:19:12,880 --> 00:19:15,359 Speaker 1: I don't know, I don't think so and I'm like, uh, 363 00:19:16,320 --> 00:19:18,680 Speaker 1: you know you maybe maybe don't answer questions that way. 364 00:19:18,840 --> 00:19:20,919 Speaker 1: My only point is I think there's a small amount 365 00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:25,560 Speaker 1: of criticism to offer about, you know, having some awareness 366 00:19:25,600 --> 00:19:27,320 Speaker 1: about what your competitive limits might be. But at the 367 00:19:27,359 --> 00:19:30,960 Speaker 1: same time, everyone again, dude, we're talking about the most 368 00:19:31,000 --> 00:19:35,439 Speaker 1: decorated gymnast ever who has moves named for her, that 369 00:19:35,680 --> 00:19:37,199 Speaker 1: they had to give her the name because no one 370 00:19:37,240 --> 00:19:41,520 Speaker 1: else can even attempt them. She it wasn't her day. 371 00:19:42,200 --> 00:19:45,040 Speaker 1: It wasn't her day. It wasn't her day, and I 372 00:19:45,040 --> 00:19:46,399 Speaker 1: think we should have let that go. I think the 373 00:19:46,440 --> 00:19:50,400 Speaker 1: bigger issue for me, honestly, is the hero worship from 374 00:19:50,400 --> 00:19:55,840 Speaker 1: the media that make any form of critical reflection verboten. 375 00:19:57,000 --> 00:19:59,480 Speaker 1: I'd have much less of an issue if it was like, well, 376 00:19:59,480 --> 00:20:01,440 Speaker 1: there's a little to criticism you could offer here there, 377 00:20:01,480 --> 00:20:03,800 Speaker 1: but any Oligransky thing is probably not all that big. 378 00:20:04,040 --> 00:20:06,040 Speaker 1: And hey, by the way, her career is so distinguished, 379 00:20:06,320 --> 00:20:08,720 Speaker 1: this is a fairly small footnote. Why can't we just 380 00:20:08,760 --> 00:20:12,880 Speaker 1: say that there's this, Oh, she let down America, she's 381 00:20:12,920 --> 00:20:17,000 Speaker 1: a equitter, she's weak, which is just absurd. And then 382 00:20:17,200 --> 00:20:20,440 Speaker 1: on the other side, no, she's a hero. She you know, 383 00:20:20,520 --> 00:20:23,600 Speaker 1: this was a heroic thing she did. No, it's heroic. 384 00:20:23,640 --> 00:20:26,119 Speaker 1: I don't know about that. Like, oh, she's advocating for 385 00:20:26,200 --> 00:20:29,199 Speaker 1: mental health. Okay, that's good on a personal level. I 386 00:20:29,200 --> 00:20:31,040 Speaker 1: gotta tell you a lot of these people who win 387 00:20:31,119 --> 00:20:33,960 Speaker 1: medals are fucking sociopaths, because I don't think you can 388 00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:38,199 Speaker 1: win medals necessarily. Some people probably can do it and 389 00:20:38,240 --> 00:20:39,720 Speaker 1: be quite normal, but I bet there's a lot of 390 00:20:39,720 --> 00:20:43,680 Speaker 1: people who have driven themselves to absolutely insane fucking degrees. 391 00:20:43,840 --> 00:20:47,040 Speaker 1: Like you know this idea what I don't. I don't 392 00:20:47,119 --> 00:20:49,359 Speaker 1: it's not clear to me, like it doesn't need to 393 00:20:49,359 --> 00:20:51,520 Speaker 1: be heroic, but it's also not clear to me, like 394 00:20:51,560 --> 00:20:57,760 Speaker 1: what about it would even be heroic? Pragmatic whise Yes, 395 00:20:59,440 --> 00:21:04,800 Speaker 1: unfortunate given the timing, you know, but like heroic, you know, 396 00:21:04,880 --> 00:21:09,439 Speaker 1: running into a burning building is heroic, And even in 397 00:21:09,480 --> 00:21:12,600 Speaker 1: the athletic contest, I think the heroic thing, I'm not 398 00:21:12,600 --> 00:21:16,000 Speaker 1: sure what the heroic thing would have been necessarily. I think, 399 00:21:16,119 --> 00:21:19,199 Speaker 1: you know, sports heroism is pretty limited, quite frankly. And again, 400 00:21:19,520 --> 00:21:22,800 Speaker 1: you know, Carrie Strugg she did something that was sportingly 401 00:21:22,840 --> 00:21:26,920 Speaker 1: heroic but probably terrible for her health, probably long term 402 00:21:26,960 --> 00:21:30,479 Speaker 1: consequences for her mental health. Like at some point, you know, 403 00:21:31,200 --> 00:21:35,000 Speaker 1: people are asking the Olympics to be something it can't be. Oh, 404 00:21:35,040 --> 00:21:37,320 Speaker 1: we should really care about these athletes mental health. Yeah, 405 00:21:37,359 --> 00:21:39,400 Speaker 1: of course, man, I'm not. You know, I don't wish 406 00:21:39,400 --> 00:21:47,840 Speaker 1: them ill, and they're human beings, they're deserving of certain care. 407 00:21:49,160 --> 00:21:54,040 Speaker 1: But we're talking about the most elite end of world athletics. 408 00:21:54,600 --> 00:21:56,960 Speaker 1: You know, what the fuck does mental health got to 409 00:21:56,960 --> 00:22:01,399 Speaker 1: do with that? Not much, not much much. But you 410 00:22:01,400 --> 00:22:03,720 Speaker 1: can't say these things because everyone loses their mind and 411 00:22:03,760 --> 00:22:07,239 Speaker 1: thinks you're attacking are like, it wasn't her day. It 412 00:22:07,280 --> 00:22:11,240 Speaker 1: wasn't her day. Even the goats, even the goats don't 413 00:22:11,240 --> 00:22:14,280 Speaker 1: have what was that play where Brady completely fucked it 414 00:22:14,359 --> 00:22:17,480 Speaker 1: up because he misread what down it was and he 415 00:22:17,560 --> 00:22:20,320 Speaker 1: fucked the whole thing up, Like dude, Even even those 416 00:22:20,359 --> 00:22:23,679 Speaker 1: people have those moments. It happens. It happens, you know, 417 00:22:24,080 --> 00:22:25,560 Speaker 1: And that's different because he was playing the game and 418 00:22:25,640 --> 00:22:30,760 Speaker 1: messed it up. But you know, I just feel like 419 00:22:30,800 --> 00:22:33,560 Speaker 1: there's a there's a there's a small amount of criticism, 420 00:22:34,040 --> 00:22:37,760 Speaker 1: a moderate amount of criticisms that's probably warranted. That wouldn't 421 00:22:37,800 --> 00:22:39,840 Speaker 1: be a big deal, but for the fact that there's 422 00:22:39,880 --> 00:22:43,960 Speaker 1: this media war that makes any kind of like sober 423 00:22:44,000 --> 00:22:50,800 Speaker 1: discussion about it impossible. Why do you think Eastern European 424 00:22:50,840 --> 00:22:53,240 Speaker 1: and Central Asian fighters are starting to become really dominant 425 00:22:53,280 --> 00:22:56,119 Speaker 1: mma and also to an extent boxing, They have long 426 00:22:56,200 --> 00:23:01,040 Speaker 1: histories of it pretty obviously, right, Like someone asked me, 427 00:23:01,200 --> 00:23:03,760 Speaker 1: or someone asked us on I think Monday's episode of 428 00:23:04,480 --> 00:23:08,600 Speaker 1: the show, if muy Thai really goes through with full 429 00:23:08,640 --> 00:23:11,880 Speaker 1: Olympic sanctioning, what countries would dominate? And I got some 430 00:23:11,920 --> 00:23:13,680 Speaker 1: of them right, but I got most of them wrong. 431 00:23:14,560 --> 00:23:16,720 Speaker 1: H And some folks who knew a lot more corrected 432 00:23:16,720 --> 00:23:19,399 Speaker 1: me on social media very kindly. I appreciate it actually, 433 00:23:20,000 --> 00:23:22,879 Speaker 1: And you know, yes, Russia would be big obviously, but 434 00:23:22,920 --> 00:23:28,160 Speaker 1: you know some Ukraine big, Kazakhstan big, France also big. 435 00:23:29,359 --> 00:23:32,439 Speaker 1: But you know, you add in there the sambo that 436 00:23:32,560 --> 00:23:35,639 Speaker 1: runs through there. Judo is big in the Soviet former 437 00:23:35,640 --> 00:23:40,240 Speaker 1: Soviet satellite states, and I was Russia. So you've got 438 00:23:40,280 --> 00:23:42,560 Speaker 1: boxing is big there, You've got wrestling is big. There, 439 00:23:42,600 --> 00:23:45,680 Speaker 1: You've got you know, thaie striking, tie boxing big. There, 440 00:23:46,119 --> 00:23:49,919 Speaker 1: You've got some you got ensembo, judo, wrestling, striking, I 441 00:23:49,920 --> 00:23:53,320 Speaker 1: mean everything everything is big there. It's no wonder that 442 00:23:53,359 --> 00:23:58,400 Speaker 1: they do so well. Quite frankly, on the last live chat, 443 00:23:58,440 --> 00:24:00,280 Speaker 1: you said you guys wouldn't be going back back into 444 00:24:00,320 --> 00:24:02,159 Speaker 1: the studio on a regular basis. At the beginning of 445 00:24:02,200 --> 00:24:04,040 Speaker 1: the lockdowns, you said you couldn't wait to get back 446 00:24:04,040 --> 00:24:07,119 Speaker 1: into the studio to make the show. What changed. I 447 00:24:07,119 --> 00:24:12,280 Speaker 1: don't think anything really changed all that much. It sounds 448 00:24:12,280 --> 00:24:13,879 Speaker 1: like it changed, but not really. It's a bit of 449 00:24:13,920 --> 00:24:17,919 Speaker 1: a work smarter, not harder kind of thing. Listen, that 450 00:24:18,119 --> 00:24:20,320 Speaker 1: year I was hosting the MMA Beat. The MMA Hour 451 00:24:20,600 --> 00:24:24,240 Speaker 1: was one of the just most difficult years of my life. 452 00:24:25,000 --> 00:24:26,800 Speaker 1: You know. I would go to New York. I'd get 453 00:24:26,840 --> 00:24:29,119 Speaker 1: up at four thirty in the morning. On Mondays, I 454 00:24:29,160 --> 00:24:32,359 Speaker 1: would go to New York. I would do Dissected, I 455 00:24:32,400 --> 00:24:35,600 Speaker 1: would do MK. Then I would go into New York City. 456 00:24:35,920 --> 00:24:37,399 Speaker 1: I was in Jersey City before I would go to 457 00:24:37,400 --> 00:24:39,960 Speaker 1: New York City. I would do three hours of radio 458 00:24:40,040 --> 00:24:43,320 Speaker 1: and then I would go at like seven o'clock. I 459 00:24:43,359 --> 00:24:45,600 Speaker 1: would take a Usually my train was at six forty five. 460 00:24:45,640 --> 00:24:48,360 Speaker 1: I take a seven pm train down back to DC. 461 00:24:48,520 --> 00:24:50,440 Speaker 1: It's about three and a half four hours each way 462 00:24:50,520 --> 00:24:52,320 Speaker 1: with no traffic. When I say traffic, I mean on 463 00:24:52,359 --> 00:24:55,520 Speaker 1: the tracks themselves. Obviously, but there would be times whe 464 00:24:55,520 --> 00:24:57,280 Speaker 1: would take five six hours, I wouldn't get home, then 465 00:24:57,280 --> 00:24:58,680 Speaker 1: I'd have to go back and do it all over 466 00:24:58,720 --> 00:25:01,560 Speaker 1: again on Thursday. So I two day break between, and 467 00:25:01,600 --> 00:25:03,320 Speaker 1: then I have a three day break over the weekend, 468 00:25:03,320 --> 00:25:05,000 Speaker 1: and it was just over over. I mean, it was 469 00:25:05,080 --> 00:25:08,040 Speaker 1: so it was so terrible for me. It was so terrible, 470 00:25:08,119 --> 00:25:13,160 Speaker 1: and the pandemic obviously has been, you know, terrible. Lots 471 00:25:13,160 --> 00:25:15,320 Speaker 1: of people have lost their lives and their livelihood and 472 00:25:15,359 --> 00:25:17,639 Speaker 1: everything else. But in the sense that I did not 473 00:25:17,840 --> 00:25:19,639 Speaker 1: have to keep doing that, and of course I had 474 00:25:19,720 --> 00:25:22,200 Speaker 1: left MMA fighting by that point, but I was still 475 00:25:22,200 --> 00:25:28,159 Speaker 1: going up every Monday. By the time, you know, the 476 00:25:28,160 --> 00:25:30,800 Speaker 1: pandemic made me stop that I didn't realize how much 477 00:25:30,800 --> 00:25:34,119 Speaker 1: it was killing me, and so I definitely wanted to 478 00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:36,879 Speaker 1: get back into studio. But then when we did, it 479 00:25:36,960 --> 00:25:39,640 Speaker 1: was like, we don't need to do this every single Monday. 480 00:25:40,560 --> 00:25:43,520 Speaker 1: But here's what we're thinking one to two times a month, yes, 481 00:25:43,640 --> 00:25:46,399 Speaker 1: but not just going up on a Monday, shooting the 482 00:25:46,400 --> 00:25:49,000 Speaker 1: show and then going right back down. What we would 483 00:25:49,000 --> 00:25:51,879 Speaker 1: actually do is go up on a Monday, do the show, 484 00:25:52,359 --> 00:25:55,359 Speaker 1: and then spend several days there and in the course 485 00:25:55,400 --> 00:25:58,320 Speaker 1: of doing it several days, we would spend the rest 486 00:25:58,359 --> 00:26:00,600 Speaker 1: of that Monday and that Tuesday, probably some that Wednesday 487 00:26:00,600 --> 00:26:05,560 Speaker 1: as well, recording all kinds of extra content like that 488 00:26:05,680 --> 00:26:08,120 Speaker 1: resume review is a perfect example that we did for Pitbull, 489 00:26:08,280 --> 00:26:10,800 Speaker 1: which like five people saw. But it is really good 490 00:26:10,840 --> 00:26:12,480 Speaker 1: where we're really proud of it in terms of the 491 00:26:12,520 --> 00:26:18,640 Speaker 1: work itself. And so what I would say is we're 492 00:26:18,640 --> 00:26:20,480 Speaker 1: looking to do something like that, so it just works smarter, 493 00:26:20,640 --> 00:26:22,399 Speaker 1: not harder. We definitely still want to go up. We 494 00:26:22,480 --> 00:26:25,320 Speaker 1: obviously everybody can tell that the show is better when 495 00:26:25,359 --> 00:26:27,679 Speaker 1: we're in studio. We know that. You know that not 496 00:26:27,720 --> 00:26:32,320 Speaker 1: a secret, but you know he has kids, I have 497 00:26:32,359 --> 00:26:36,280 Speaker 1: a daughter. Now, you know, if there's just a regular 498 00:26:36,320 --> 00:26:39,000 Speaker 1: old fight night, doesn't necessarily make a ton of sense 499 00:26:39,040 --> 00:26:41,600 Speaker 1: to spend the money to go up and deal with 500 00:26:41,640 --> 00:26:45,879 Speaker 1: the hassle and do the show. Pick your spots and 501 00:26:45,920 --> 00:26:47,879 Speaker 1: then when they're there, make them count as much as 502 00:26:47,880 --> 00:26:49,760 Speaker 1: you can. That's really so the way we're thinking about it. 503 00:26:52,240 --> 00:26:54,520 Speaker 1: Almost exactly two years ago, you provide a narration for 504 00:26:54,560 --> 00:26:57,600 Speaker 1: a BuzzFeed video showcasing someone with no experience training in 505 00:26:57,760 --> 00:26:59,959 Speaker 1: MMA with the enngle of competing in a sanctioned about 506 00:27:00,560 --> 00:27:02,760 Speaker 1: Have you seen the video in totality? Yes, and if so, 507 00:27:02,800 --> 00:27:05,280 Speaker 1: would you think of it? Yeah, there is this guy, 508 00:27:05,400 --> 00:27:07,680 Speaker 1: this BuzzFeed reporter. He was like making a good faith 509 00:27:07,720 --> 00:27:12,080 Speaker 1: effort at trying to have an amateur fight, and he 510 00:27:12,119 --> 00:27:13,760 Speaker 1: did all the things you guys might imagine. He was 511 00:27:13,800 --> 00:27:15,719 Speaker 1: working on his diet, he was training like a madman, 512 00:27:15,760 --> 00:27:17,919 Speaker 1: he was documenting all of it, you know, and he 513 00:27:18,080 --> 00:27:22,560 Speaker 1: sucked mostly for the as anybody who would trying something 514 00:27:22,600 --> 00:27:24,919 Speaker 1: new and certainly something as difficult. It's fist fighting for 515 00:27:24,960 --> 00:27:30,240 Speaker 1: a living, you know, competitively anyway, and he lost his bout. 516 00:27:30,240 --> 00:27:32,480 Speaker 1: But you know, listen, there's no shame in that. Obviously. 517 00:27:33,640 --> 00:27:35,199 Speaker 1: I take my hat off to anybody who tries for 518 00:27:35,240 --> 00:27:36,879 Speaker 1: the most part, and certainly I take my hat off 519 00:27:36,880 --> 00:27:39,360 Speaker 1: to him. And yeah, I thought it was a really honest, 520 00:27:39,920 --> 00:27:42,320 Speaker 1: difficult take, you know, to go and try so hard 521 00:27:42,359 --> 00:27:43,760 Speaker 1: for something, because the guy did put it in an 522 00:27:43,760 --> 00:27:47,600 Speaker 1: absolute ton of effort. He really did. He really tried, 523 00:27:48,320 --> 00:27:50,840 Speaker 1: and you know, he'd made a decent account of himself. 524 00:27:50,960 --> 00:27:53,280 Speaker 1: And he lost in the end. But that's the way 525 00:27:53,280 --> 00:27:55,919 Speaker 1: the fight game goes, right. It's cruel and winning is 526 00:27:55,920 --> 00:27:58,320 Speaker 1: difficult and it takes a lot of courage to show 527 00:27:58,320 --> 00:28:04,000 Speaker 1: that kind of stuff to the world, so he did. Yeah, 528 00:28:04,200 --> 00:28:07,080 Speaker 1: I was. I was frankly honored, he asked me. I 529 00:28:07,119 --> 00:28:13,479 Speaker 1: was honored. He asked me who in the UFC's featherweight 530 00:28:13,520 --> 00:28:15,600 Speaker 1: division would you pick for fun crossover fights? With pit 531 00:28:15,640 --> 00:28:17,600 Speaker 1: Bull and aj McKee. Dude, it's hard to go wrong 532 00:28:17,640 --> 00:28:26,680 Speaker 1: with any of those or take a holloway. Yeah, here, Volkanowski, 533 00:28:26,720 --> 00:28:28,800 Speaker 1: two A. I don't know how like rip roaring those 534 00:28:28,840 --> 00:28:33,439 Speaker 1: would be, but those three would be easy calls. Josh 535 00:28:33,480 --> 00:28:35,919 Speaker 1: Emmett even to an extent, Jeremy Stevens, depending how you 536 00:28:35,920 --> 00:28:40,040 Speaker 1: want to look at it, you couldn't do it. A 537 00:28:40,160 --> 00:28:42,760 Speaker 1: j McKee, whether he wins or loses, is a fun fighter. 538 00:28:43,160 --> 00:28:44,560 Speaker 1: And Pittbull I don't know if he's gonna win this 539 00:28:44,600 --> 00:28:49,760 Speaker 1: weekend or not, but he's an absolutely dominant fighter. It's 540 00:28:50,000 --> 00:28:54,040 Speaker 1: you know, this is like, Hey, which of these girls 541 00:28:54,040 --> 00:28:56,040 Speaker 1: who are tens would you like to date? It's like, 542 00:28:57,440 --> 00:29:00,520 Speaker 1: you know, can you swing a dead cat and get 543 00:29:00,520 --> 00:29:05,960 Speaker 1: an excellent choice? Uh? Luke. You've often noted that you're 544 00:29:06,000 --> 00:29:08,600 Speaker 1: not sure what you said about John Jones that sparked 545 00:29:08,600 --> 00:29:10,840 Speaker 1: his dislike of you, Whilst I can't prove this. I 546 00:29:10,880 --> 00:29:14,320 Speaker 1: recently came across your harshest take I've heard you give 547 00:29:14,360 --> 00:29:15,800 Speaker 1: about him, and I can't help but feel this is 548 00:29:15,840 --> 00:29:18,400 Speaker 1: what may have done it. The following was taken from 549 00:29:18,400 --> 00:29:21,280 Speaker 1: a thirty minute mark of your UFC two hundred post 550 00:29:21,280 --> 00:29:24,840 Speaker 1: fight vid on the MMA Fighting YouTube channel in response 551 00:29:24,840 --> 00:29:27,320 Speaker 1: to him being removed from the card for an antidoping violation. 552 00:29:27,400 --> 00:29:30,880 Speaker 1: I'm paraphrasing the following in good faith. Included the time 553 00:29:30,920 --> 00:29:33,360 Speaker 1: stamp above so you can verify it for yourself. Okay, 554 00:29:35,040 --> 00:29:37,640 Speaker 1: so here's what apparently the quote is. I've not again, 555 00:29:37,680 --> 00:29:41,160 Speaker 1: I've not vetted this, so this is not real. I 556 00:29:41,200 --> 00:29:43,000 Speaker 1: apologize in advance, but I'm going to read it just 557 00:29:43,000 --> 00:29:46,640 Speaker 1: the same quote. He's unbelievable, isn't he? After this one, 558 00:29:46,760 --> 00:29:49,000 Speaker 1: I've fundamentally changed my view about him. For him to 559 00:29:49,040 --> 00:29:51,600 Speaker 1: be as successful as he was for so long, I 560 00:29:51,640 --> 00:29:53,720 Speaker 1: wonder if that was just adberant and what he really 561 00:29:53,800 --> 00:29:56,640 Speaker 1: is is what we're getting now and what we got 562 00:29:56,680 --> 00:29:59,320 Speaker 1: the last few years. I hope that's not true, but 563 00:29:59,400 --> 00:30:02,360 Speaker 1: I'm now going to operate under a jaundiced viewpoint of him. 564 00:30:02,440 --> 00:30:04,600 Speaker 1: After the last to go round and this go round, 565 00:30:05,120 --> 00:30:06,719 Speaker 1: I don't even know what you can say in his 566 00:30:06,760 --> 00:30:11,040 Speaker 1: defense anymore, even if it's accidental, it's just not okay. Yeah, 567 00:30:11,080 --> 00:30:12,840 Speaker 1: I don't really take any of that back. In fact, 568 00:30:12,880 --> 00:30:15,000 Speaker 1: I think it's actually proven to be quite true, at 569 00:30:15,080 --> 00:30:17,920 Speaker 1: least more recently less so. But you know, when he 570 00:30:17,960 --> 00:30:19,480 Speaker 1: comes back and they have to move a whole event 571 00:30:19,480 --> 00:30:25,720 Speaker 1: from Las Vegas to La for him, you know, you 572 00:30:25,800 --> 00:30:29,680 Speaker 1: might be right. That may have done it. I don't know, 573 00:30:30,760 --> 00:30:34,240 Speaker 1: could be, but yeah, if that's it, then for sure 574 00:30:34,280 --> 00:30:39,600 Speaker 1: I don't apologize for it. And again, if that means 575 00:30:39,600 --> 00:30:41,800 Speaker 1: I don't ever get an interview with him again, then 576 00:30:43,240 --> 00:30:48,520 Speaker 1: that's what that means. Top three movie directors of all 577 00:30:48,560 --> 00:30:50,680 Speaker 1: time in order. Number one for me is going to 578 00:30:50,680 --> 00:30:55,960 Speaker 1: be Krosawa forget it easy call pt Anderson. I'd probably 579 00:30:56,000 --> 00:31:04,880 Speaker 1: put two. Three man, that's tougher. That's a tough one 580 00:31:06,160 --> 00:31:13,080 Speaker 1: because Karrasawa and pt Anderson they make uh, you know, 581 00:31:13,280 --> 00:31:17,640 Speaker 1: movies in the sense of, you know, these are not 582 00:31:17,680 --> 00:31:23,840 Speaker 1: the guys who are like innovating on They're not like 583 00:31:23,840 --> 00:31:26,360 Speaker 1: the Wachowski brothers who made The Matrix right, They're not 584 00:31:26,440 --> 00:31:29,760 Speaker 1: doing those kinds of camera tricks. They have other various 585 00:31:29,920 --> 00:31:35,520 Speaker 1: concluding Karsawa very sophisticated ways of making shots and scenes 586 00:31:35,560 --> 00:31:39,160 Speaker 1: look certain ways, with all kinds of incredible knowledge of 587 00:31:39,280 --> 00:31:43,320 Speaker 1: lenses and cameras and lighting and how elements in a 588 00:31:43,400 --> 00:31:47,040 Speaker 1: scene work together, to work with your mind and what 589 00:31:47,080 --> 00:31:52,400 Speaker 1: I mean. They're true talents in every way. Third, I 590 00:31:52,400 --> 00:31:57,320 Speaker 1: would go, see, okay, there you can people have like 591 00:31:57,400 --> 00:31:59,600 Speaker 1: Kubrick Yet I mean, you can't go wrong with kubrick 592 00:32:00,000 --> 00:32:02,600 Speaker 1: O one brother, Scorsese, all of them. I want to 593 00:32:02,640 --> 00:32:08,000 Speaker 1: pick someone who's like, who's the best director at action movies? 594 00:32:08,080 --> 00:32:10,120 Speaker 1: Not just because the movies were good, but because they 595 00:32:10,200 --> 00:32:16,880 Speaker 1: made the action better with you know, you know again, 596 00:32:16,880 --> 00:32:19,040 Speaker 1: the rachow Skier brother is setting up all those cameras 597 00:32:19,040 --> 00:32:21,680 Speaker 1: and then using thing everything three sixty for things like that. 598 00:32:21,960 --> 00:32:24,520 Speaker 1: I don't know who that would be. Frankly, it's out 599 00:32:24,560 --> 00:32:26,760 Speaker 1: you're asking me something I'm out of my depth, but 600 00:32:27,680 --> 00:32:34,160 Speaker 1: I'd be leaning in that direction. There's a boxing question. 601 00:32:34,160 --> 00:32:35,520 Speaker 1: I'm just gonna skip it. Sorry, I don't feel like 602 00:32:35,520 --> 00:32:40,400 Speaker 1: answering it. Sorry, it's a perfectly good question, Dan Hooker, 603 00:32:40,400 --> 00:32:46,160 Speaker 1: I'll skip that one too. In fairness, interesting question. I'll 604 00:32:46,160 --> 00:32:48,160 Speaker 1: answer it the best way I know. How do you 605 00:32:48,200 --> 00:32:51,200 Speaker 1: attribute your being well spoken mostly to reading, or do 606 00:32:51,240 --> 00:32:55,120 Speaker 1: you think a conscious effort has been made to learn 607 00:32:55,160 --> 00:33:01,520 Speaker 1: new words, approve your vocabulary to better express yoursel here's 608 00:33:01,520 --> 00:33:06,400 Speaker 1: a little revelation for you. Up through at least third 609 00:33:06,480 --> 00:33:11,880 Speaker 1: grade or so, maybe even like fifth grade, I had 610 00:33:11,880 --> 00:33:15,840 Speaker 1: a speech impediment. My speech was really slurred. Everything kind 611 00:33:15,840 --> 00:33:18,400 Speaker 1: of fell on top of itself. And some of the 612 00:33:18,400 --> 00:33:26,400 Speaker 1: speech issues were not all that uncommon, even many adolescents 613 00:33:26,600 --> 00:33:29,440 Speaker 1: experienced some form of it. I had a particularly bad one. 614 00:33:29,800 --> 00:33:33,040 Speaker 1: I wouldn't call it severe, but bad, and I had 615 00:33:33,040 --> 00:33:36,760 Speaker 1: to slowly work my way through it, partly through reading, 616 00:33:37,160 --> 00:33:41,360 Speaker 1: partly through conscious effort at getting as many words as 617 00:33:41,360 --> 00:33:44,360 Speaker 1: I could, and then partly for years, this is true, 618 00:33:44,520 --> 00:33:48,280 Speaker 1: years of conscious effort at trying to articulate in a 619 00:33:48,320 --> 00:33:52,120 Speaker 1: way that will slow down enough, that was clear enough, 620 00:33:52,120 --> 00:33:55,600 Speaker 1: concise enough. And I still struggle with all of those things. 621 00:33:57,080 --> 00:34:00,760 Speaker 1: But all of those things working in concert got me 622 00:34:00,800 --> 00:34:03,080 Speaker 1: to a you know, I don't know if I'm exactly 623 00:34:03,080 --> 00:34:05,640 Speaker 1: well spoken. I appreciate the kind words. I'll just say 624 00:34:06,160 --> 00:34:08,640 Speaker 1: got me to a better place is a pretty fair 625 00:34:08,680 --> 00:34:13,319 Speaker 1: way to put it. Yeah, that's what it was. I 626 00:34:13,400 --> 00:34:15,640 Speaker 1: had a hard time speaking. I had a hard time 627 00:34:15,680 --> 00:34:19,200 Speaker 1: making people understand me, and so I wanted to use 628 00:34:19,239 --> 00:34:21,960 Speaker 1: as many tools as I could, including just making basic 629 00:34:22,600 --> 00:34:27,799 Speaker 1: language pronunciation or even enunciation easier to grasp, but then 630 00:34:27,840 --> 00:34:30,879 Speaker 1: on top of that adding layers of nuance that gave 631 00:34:30,920 --> 00:34:35,279 Speaker 1: me greater command of the language. According to the New 632 00:34:35,360 --> 00:34:38,279 Speaker 1: York Times, Olympic weightlift things days are quote numbered due 633 00:34:38,320 --> 00:34:43,359 Speaker 1: to rampant doping. Yes, and corruption among judges. Yes. What's 634 00:34:43,360 --> 00:34:46,759 Speaker 1: your take on this all true? And why would it 635 00:34:46,760 --> 00:34:49,480 Speaker 1: potentially be canceled when sports such as pro boxing have 636 00:34:49,560 --> 00:34:51,520 Speaker 1: had the same issues without being called off in a 637 00:34:51,560 --> 00:34:55,879 Speaker 1: similar manner. Well, remember they threatened wrestling with elimination for 638 00:34:55,920 --> 00:34:58,440 Speaker 1: a variety of reasons, and then wrestling went through a 639 00:34:58,480 --> 00:35:01,960 Speaker 1: series of reformations and they got to keep their spot. 640 00:35:02,200 --> 00:35:04,759 Speaker 1: Of course, the way classes changed and were eliminated to 641 00:35:04,880 --> 00:35:09,239 Speaker 1: some degree, but you know, they've reformed their rules in 642 00:35:09,320 --> 00:35:11,600 Speaker 1: terms of scoring offense, and in many ways it's better. Now. 643 00:35:12,640 --> 00:35:15,680 Speaker 1: There's a question about whether the International Weightlifting Federation IWF 644 00:35:15,760 --> 00:35:17,600 Speaker 1: is really up to the task in the way that 645 00:35:18,000 --> 00:35:23,040 Speaker 1: you know, USA Wrestling and other governing bodies were. So 646 00:35:23,160 --> 00:35:25,400 Speaker 1: that's really a part of the bigger problem. But like, 647 00:35:25,760 --> 00:35:30,640 Speaker 1: is doping a major problem in Olympic weightlifting. I mean, 648 00:35:30,840 --> 00:35:34,200 Speaker 1: maybe I might be even under selling it, but there's 649 00:35:34,239 --> 00:35:37,439 Speaker 1: going to be a significant portion of people who win 650 00:35:37,560 --> 00:35:43,319 Speaker 1: medals this Olympic cycle, and then a year two, three, four, 651 00:35:43,840 --> 00:35:46,759 Speaker 1: eight or so from now, you're going to see that 652 00:35:48,280 --> 00:35:51,239 Speaker 1: a bunch of them were fucking cheating, a bunch of them, 653 00:35:51,560 --> 00:35:53,319 Speaker 1: you know. And people have been asking me, and I'm 654 00:35:53,360 --> 00:35:57,080 Speaker 1: not in any way insinuating like I have evidence or proof, 655 00:35:57,480 --> 00:36:00,799 Speaker 1: although historically, even in recent years has had a lot 656 00:36:00,840 --> 00:36:06,440 Speaker 1: of problems with doping, either enforcement or infraction. But have 657 00:36:06,520 --> 00:36:12,360 Speaker 1: you seen their lifters? Like who was it? Was it 658 00:36:12,440 --> 00:36:15,359 Speaker 1: Ge who won seventy three kilos? I think is his name, 659 00:36:15,600 --> 00:36:18,080 Speaker 1: but obviously like you look at luc Cho June, you know, 660 00:36:18,160 --> 00:36:22,760 Speaker 1: these guys are fucking bricked up. Who was the seventy 661 00:36:22,800 --> 00:36:27,600 Speaker 1: three kilo this dude? And he was squat jerking all 662 00:36:27,640 --> 00:36:30,120 Speaker 1: of his finishes in the clean and jerk, like you know, 663 00:36:30,160 --> 00:36:32,799 Speaker 1: he's not splitting his legs, he's just keeping them in 664 00:36:32,880 --> 00:36:36,120 Speaker 1: place and then just easing the weight down to bottom 665 00:36:36,160 --> 00:36:39,040 Speaker 1: position overhead in a squat. I mean, I can't even 666 00:36:39,120 --> 00:36:46,200 Speaker 1: tell you. You have to be so so strong for that, 667 00:36:46,280 --> 00:36:50,520 Speaker 1: you have to be absolutely just out of control, not 668 00:36:50,600 --> 00:36:52,680 Speaker 1: just like strong strong, but like you have to have 669 00:36:52,800 --> 00:36:57,080 Speaker 1: really clear command and balance that. Yeah, no, I got 670 00:36:57,080 --> 00:36:59,640 Speaker 1: his name wrong just a little bit. It's Shiji Yong. 671 00:37:00,040 --> 00:37:04,600 Speaker 1: Shiji Yong was the name, and he is you know again, 672 00:37:04,600 --> 00:37:06,520 Speaker 1: I don't know. I have no idea if he's doping. 673 00:37:06,640 --> 00:37:08,640 Speaker 1: I couldn't possibly tell you. I just mean to say, 674 00:37:08,880 --> 00:37:10,920 Speaker 1: you know, the eye test with them, A lot of 675 00:37:11,320 --> 00:37:13,400 Speaker 1: the dudes who they compete against don't even look a 676 00:37:13,560 --> 00:37:16,200 Speaker 1: third as bricked up as they do. But also, you know, 677 00:37:16,440 --> 00:37:20,600 Speaker 1: China's recruitment of athletes for Olympic Games is second to none, 678 00:37:20,640 --> 00:37:24,040 Speaker 1: and the kind of resources they provide for certain events, 679 00:37:24,080 --> 00:37:26,840 Speaker 1: weightlifting among them, is second to none. Chinese weightlifting in 680 00:37:26,920 --> 00:37:29,600 Speaker 1: terms of best practices is second to none. You know, 681 00:37:29,880 --> 00:37:32,319 Speaker 1: it's this is the thing, This is the problem with 682 00:37:32,440 --> 00:37:36,600 Speaker 1: untangling all of this. Like I saw the economist had 683 00:37:36,719 --> 00:37:42,200 Speaker 1: some fucking absolute zelot in anti doping, and maybe she 684 00:37:42,200 --> 00:37:44,040 Speaker 1: would walk it back if I could really stick it 685 00:37:44,080 --> 00:37:47,680 Speaker 1: to her. What was her name? God, forget her name? 686 00:37:48,800 --> 00:37:50,840 Speaker 1: She told the economists. And the reason I know this 687 00:37:50,920 --> 00:37:53,320 Speaker 1: is because they put up like an audiogram on Twitter, 688 00:37:53,320 --> 00:37:55,680 Speaker 1: where like the image doesn't change, but you can hit 689 00:37:55,680 --> 00:37:59,160 Speaker 1: play and you can listen, and she said, you know, 690 00:37:59,239 --> 00:38:01,840 Speaker 1: with steroid, we know that you can make an average 691 00:38:01,880 --> 00:38:05,640 Speaker 1: athlete a world champion. What the fuck are you talking about? 692 00:38:06,040 --> 00:38:11,280 Speaker 1: Are you out of your mind? What a total lie. Look, 693 00:38:11,600 --> 00:38:14,680 Speaker 1: you don't have to lie about steroids or other performance 694 00:38:14,760 --> 00:38:18,040 Speaker 1: dancing drugs. They work, That's why people take them right, 695 00:38:18,120 --> 00:38:21,239 Speaker 1: They clearly work. Sometimes they take them in ways that 696 00:38:21,280 --> 00:38:24,040 Speaker 1: don't work for them. But you know, listen, there's plenty 697 00:38:24,040 --> 00:38:27,120 Speaker 1: of evidence to suggest the right drug, with the right protocol, 698 00:38:27,160 --> 00:38:29,799 Speaker 1: with the right athlete, can have a very pronounced effect, 699 00:38:30,840 --> 00:38:35,919 Speaker 1: but it doesn't make people superheroes. An average athlete could 700 00:38:35,920 --> 00:38:40,120 Speaker 1: be a world champion in weightlifting. Know the fuck you 701 00:38:40,200 --> 00:38:43,680 Speaker 1: could not. Know the fuck you could not. You could 702 00:38:43,760 --> 00:38:48,040 Speaker 1: not take a strong, good crossfitter, dope them up and 703 00:38:48,040 --> 00:38:51,160 Speaker 1: make them win a gold medal. Not gonna happen. It's 704 00:38:51,200 --> 00:38:54,080 Speaker 1: a complete lie to say something like that. But what 705 00:38:54,120 --> 00:38:57,600 Speaker 1: it can do is if you have two elite lifters 706 00:38:57,960 --> 00:39:00,560 Speaker 1: and one of them gets the sauce, gonna put a 707 00:39:00,560 --> 00:39:02,520 Speaker 1: big gap on the other one. Yeah, for sure you're 708 00:39:02,560 --> 00:39:05,799 Speaker 1: gonna get that. Yes, that is real, That is very real, 709 00:39:05,800 --> 00:39:07,360 Speaker 1: and that's the only real That's the only thing that 710 00:39:07,440 --> 00:39:12,520 Speaker 1: has to matter, you know, but it transforms average athletes. 711 00:39:12,960 --> 00:39:15,200 Speaker 1: I if that was the case, do you know how 712 00:39:15,280 --> 00:39:19,000 Speaker 1: much roids would be coursing through my system right now? 713 00:39:19,600 --> 00:39:22,200 Speaker 1: And how many gold medals I'd have. I'd look like 714 00:39:22,280 --> 00:39:27,160 Speaker 1: fucking slick Rick with my gold medals just dangling. Are 715 00:39:27,200 --> 00:39:32,319 Speaker 1: you kidding me? What a fucking stupid, totally demonstrably false 716 00:39:32,320 --> 00:39:34,920 Speaker 1: thing that's say And the economists reprinted this, I couldn't 717 00:39:34,960 --> 00:39:38,400 Speaker 1: fucking believe it. Uh, you know, just crazy. But this 718 00:39:38,440 --> 00:39:41,160 Speaker 1: is what I'm trying to point out. Like, dude, I 719 00:39:41,200 --> 00:39:43,480 Speaker 1: don't know if any of the Chinese lifters are on something. 720 00:39:43,600 --> 00:39:45,759 Speaker 1: Let's imagine for the sake of argument, that they are. 721 00:39:45,760 --> 00:39:48,399 Speaker 1: We're going to imagine that they are. Yeah, again, they've 722 00:39:48,480 --> 00:39:50,360 Speaker 1: been caught plenty of times in the past. Let's just 723 00:39:50,400 --> 00:39:54,160 Speaker 1: imagine even if you took that away, Dude, they're still 724 00:39:54,200 --> 00:39:58,520 Speaker 1: going to produce elite lifters, many of them across both genders, 725 00:39:58,560 --> 00:40:02,320 Speaker 1: across numerous weight classes now as dominant as they are today. 726 00:40:03,440 --> 00:40:06,600 Speaker 1: Who knows again or under the pretense that they're using. 727 00:40:08,280 --> 00:40:12,480 Speaker 1: But you're still gonna get they're still gonna find out 728 00:40:12,520 --> 00:40:15,279 Speaker 1: of all those kids ages six and seven, they're gonna 729 00:40:15,320 --> 00:40:18,399 Speaker 1: find the standouts. They're gonna give them best practices for 730 00:40:18,480 --> 00:40:20,600 Speaker 1: twenty years, and then they're gonna send them off to 731 00:40:20,640 --> 00:40:24,160 Speaker 1: international competition and they're gonna run over a lot of people. 732 00:40:24,200 --> 00:40:25,960 Speaker 1: And that can be true whether they haven't had a 733 00:40:26,080 --> 00:40:30,200 Speaker 1: drop of anything in their lives. That's the issue. The 734 00:40:30,239 --> 00:40:34,360 Speaker 1: issue is not that it transforms fucking abject losers into winners. 735 00:40:34,880 --> 00:40:37,920 Speaker 1: The problem is that it skews how you understand somewhat 736 00:40:38,000 --> 00:40:39,800 Speaker 1: the middle of the elite pack and then the elite 737 00:40:39,800 --> 00:40:42,440 Speaker 1: pack itself. And again, there's gonna be plenty of cases, 738 00:40:42,480 --> 00:40:44,719 Speaker 1: outlier cases where someone from a B group will be 739 00:40:44,719 --> 00:40:47,359 Speaker 1: able to compete and win in the A group. You know, Yeah, 740 00:40:47,360 --> 00:40:50,400 Speaker 1: I'm sure there's outlier cases where you know, other elite 741 00:40:50,440 --> 00:40:52,560 Speaker 1: lifters have been able to even you know, with a 742 00:40:52,560 --> 00:40:55,239 Speaker 1: big gap, been able to close some significant gaps. But 743 00:40:55,320 --> 00:41:01,200 Speaker 1: like average lifters, what a fucking ridiculous, ridiculous thing to say. 744 00:41:01,200 --> 00:41:04,520 Speaker 1: So to answer your question, listen, this is the problem 745 00:41:04,560 --> 00:41:11,360 Speaker 1: with For me, I'd rather just have weightlifting where you 746 00:41:11,400 --> 00:41:16,080 Speaker 1: can compete in organizations and in tournaments and events where 747 00:41:17,120 --> 00:41:19,640 Speaker 1: doping protocols are enforced. And I'd like to offer the 748 00:41:19,640 --> 00:41:23,280 Speaker 1: alternative to folks who just like to use. Strength sports 749 00:41:23,320 --> 00:41:25,040 Speaker 1: is always going to have a lot of people who 750 00:41:25,080 --> 00:41:27,919 Speaker 1: are gonna want to use because the benefits. And there's 751 00:41:27,920 --> 00:41:29,799 Speaker 1: been some back of the envelope math that it can 752 00:41:29,880 --> 00:41:32,839 Speaker 1: fix your lifts about ten percent. Now that doesn't sound 753 00:41:32,880 --> 00:41:34,600 Speaker 1: like much to the naked eye, but if you bench 754 00:41:34,640 --> 00:41:37,800 Speaker 1: four hundred and then now you can now bench for forty. 755 00:41:38,160 --> 00:41:40,160 Speaker 1: And let's say in your weight class, the guys who 756 00:41:40,160 --> 00:41:43,200 Speaker 1: are leading are around four twenty. Yeah, four forty is 757 00:41:43,480 --> 00:41:48,479 Speaker 1: enough to lap them, you know, get and get big wins. 758 00:41:48,480 --> 00:41:50,359 Speaker 1: So ten percent. Again, it's back of the envelope math 759 00:41:50,360 --> 00:41:52,359 Speaker 1: that a lot more study needs to go into it. 760 00:41:52,800 --> 00:41:57,479 Speaker 1: But I would like to see alternatives offered. I think 761 00:41:57,520 --> 00:42:00,480 Speaker 1: that I really, at the end of the I don't 762 00:42:00,480 --> 00:42:04,840 Speaker 1: really believe you can pull out doping from weightlifting worldwide. 763 00:42:05,280 --> 00:42:08,680 Speaker 1: You know, you can hammer the Americans with USADA waking 764 00:42:08,680 --> 00:42:10,280 Speaker 1: them up at five in the morning if you want, 765 00:42:10,280 --> 00:42:12,279 Speaker 1: But the Georgians are never gonna respect or you know 766 00:42:12,320 --> 00:42:16,279 Speaker 1: whoever they've had doping issues to the Colombians. The Colombians 767 00:42:16,320 --> 00:42:17,959 Speaker 1: were going to be feeled that. I don't know folks 768 00:42:18,040 --> 00:42:20,320 Speaker 1: know this, but in the Western hemisphere this is true. 769 00:42:20,760 --> 00:42:22,680 Speaker 1: The Colombians have one of the better, if not the 770 00:42:22,680 --> 00:42:25,040 Speaker 1: best teams, especially on the women's side. They had so 771 00:42:25,160 --> 00:42:28,879 Speaker 1: many doping infractions. They had eight slots available to send 772 00:42:28,920 --> 00:42:31,000 Speaker 1: to the Olympics. They were only allowed to send uh, 773 00:42:31,120 --> 00:42:34,680 Speaker 1: excuse me three. They were only allowed to send three 774 00:42:34,880 --> 00:42:37,880 Speaker 1: folks to the Olympics, one of which Luis Musquerra just 775 00:42:37,920 --> 00:42:41,400 Speaker 1: won silver. I think, I think in seventy three kilos, 776 00:42:41,440 --> 00:42:44,960 Speaker 1: if I'm not mistaken, that dude's That fucking guy's speed 777 00:42:45,040 --> 00:42:50,560 Speaker 1: under the bar is amazing. Anyway, here's another case of it. 778 00:42:50,800 --> 00:42:54,279 Speaker 1: All the time. I don't really believe. I think it's 779 00:42:54,320 --> 00:42:57,880 Speaker 1: absolutely foolish to believe you can take out performance dancing 780 00:42:57,960 --> 00:43:01,839 Speaker 1: drugs from weightlifting. You can't. I don't. I don't think 781 00:43:01,880 --> 00:43:04,200 Speaker 1: you can. So the best thing I think you can 782 00:43:04,280 --> 00:43:06,120 Speaker 1: do is give the folks who want to use an 783 00:43:06,120 --> 00:43:09,200 Speaker 1: outlet to go use, and then make some rules about 784 00:43:09,280 --> 00:43:10,959 Speaker 1: if you want to go that path. It might limit 785 00:43:11,000 --> 00:43:13,040 Speaker 1: some options about what you can do on the doping 786 00:43:13,160 --> 00:43:16,280 Speaker 1: the antidoping side, and then and then try to adjudicate 787 00:43:16,280 --> 00:43:18,480 Speaker 1: the world that way. That is no solution either. That 788 00:43:18,520 --> 00:43:20,560 Speaker 1: will not fix the problem. You will still have doping. 789 00:43:21,440 --> 00:43:23,440 Speaker 1: It will still be an issue that you have to 790 00:43:23,520 --> 00:43:27,080 Speaker 1: contend with forever as long as it's banned. But I 791 00:43:27,120 --> 00:43:28,800 Speaker 1: tend to think that's a much more realistic one. I 792 00:43:28,840 --> 00:43:30,319 Speaker 1: think that I think it's better for the sport if 793 00:43:30,320 --> 00:43:34,520 Speaker 1: you had for profit. You know, also, this is something 794 00:43:34,520 --> 00:43:37,080 Speaker 1: that the antidoping folks don't want to tell you. If 795 00:43:37,120 --> 00:43:41,960 Speaker 1: you had weightlifting where everyone was allowed or at least 796 00:43:42,000 --> 00:43:43,560 Speaker 1: you know, a lot of to dop is different. You 797 00:43:43,600 --> 00:43:45,840 Speaker 1: just don't test for it, which is what happens in powerlifting, 798 00:43:45,840 --> 00:43:49,880 Speaker 1: and certain federations are tested and untested federations. If you 799 00:43:50,000 --> 00:43:52,520 Speaker 1: had that, frankly, I think that would be a compelling 800 00:43:52,560 --> 00:44:01,359 Speaker 1: alternative to the to the clean stupid term product. You know, 801 00:44:01,600 --> 00:44:04,040 Speaker 1: you now have to compete with folks who don't have 802 00:44:04,080 --> 00:44:06,240 Speaker 1: to worry about getting woken up at six in the morning, 803 00:44:06,239 --> 00:44:08,040 Speaker 1: so they can they can go through and they can 804 00:44:08,160 --> 00:44:13,000 Speaker 1: use what protocol they have, get through training, compete against 805 00:44:13,000 --> 00:44:16,360 Speaker 1: everyone else who's got the exact same opportunities there, and 806 00:44:16,400 --> 00:44:22,319 Speaker 1: I think you can see some herculean lyfts and I 807 00:44:22,320 --> 00:44:27,120 Speaker 1: think I'd be fucking great. Actually. So you know, everyone 808 00:44:27,200 --> 00:44:30,080 Speaker 1: wants to be like, oh, it's a scourge on sports, Well, 809 00:44:31,080 --> 00:44:35,040 Speaker 1: you know, it's here, it's here. I think the best 810 00:44:35,080 --> 00:44:36,600 Speaker 1: thing to do is try to figure out what to 811 00:44:36,640 --> 00:44:40,440 Speaker 1: do about it. If folks don't want to use, and 812 00:44:40,800 --> 00:44:42,600 Speaker 1: they want to be with other people who don't want 813 00:44:42,600 --> 00:44:45,200 Speaker 1: to use, and folks want to watch people who don't use, 814 00:44:45,200 --> 00:44:47,040 Speaker 1: I don't think there's anything wrong with that. I don't 815 00:44:47,040 --> 00:44:48,920 Speaker 1: think there's anything wrong with that. That sounds to me 816 00:44:49,400 --> 00:44:53,719 Speaker 1: entirely reasonable. But it also sounds entirely reasonable to me 817 00:44:53,800 --> 00:44:57,479 Speaker 1: that if people want to use, know how to use, 818 00:45:00,040 --> 00:45:02,520 Speaker 1: and the audience doesn't care, and the stakeholders don't care, 819 00:45:02,520 --> 00:45:05,280 Speaker 1: and we already have evidence of this in Professional Strongman, 820 00:45:06,080 --> 00:45:08,399 Speaker 1: it doesn't ruin sports. I think it actually makes it better. 821 00:45:08,520 --> 00:45:11,160 Speaker 1: It creates for an interesting, compelling product, and I'd be 822 00:45:11,239 --> 00:45:14,879 Speaker 1: totally in favor of it, although obviously if you lost 823 00:45:14,960 --> 00:45:18,359 Speaker 1: Olympic sanctioning, that would look bad too, right, But you know, 824 00:45:18,400 --> 00:45:24,600 Speaker 1: in a different world, That's where I'm at. TJ. I 825 00:45:24,640 --> 00:45:26,880 Speaker 1: think you mean Dilla Shaw has commented a few times 826 00:45:26,920 --> 00:45:29,960 Speaker 1: he didn't quote forget how to cheat, therefore pseudo proving 827 00:45:30,000 --> 00:45:33,120 Speaker 1: that he was clean prior to the Sahudo fight. Do 828 00:45:33,120 --> 00:45:35,920 Speaker 1: you think that he had a system with EPO that 829 00:45:35,960 --> 00:45:38,279 Speaker 1: would go undetected and tests and slipped up somewhere along 830 00:45:38,280 --> 00:45:40,920 Speaker 1: the way, or how do you estimate that process? I 831 00:45:42,280 --> 00:45:46,399 Speaker 1: am skeptical of the claim that the only time he's 832 00:45:46,400 --> 00:45:50,719 Speaker 1: been caught is the only time he's used. But you know, 833 00:45:50,760 --> 00:45:54,760 Speaker 1: you're asking me to speculate on information, or you're asking 834 00:45:54,800 --> 00:45:57,280 Speaker 1: me to speculate and make a conclusion based on information 835 00:45:57,360 --> 00:46:00,400 Speaker 1: I simply do not have and maybe somewhat irrespond possible 836 00:46:00,520 --> 00:46:05,200 Speaker 1: to say anything more, even I can't prove anything, you know, 837 00:46:05,760 --> 00:46:09,560 Speaker 1: as a I'll say this as a general rule, there 838 00:46:09,560 --> 00:46:12,640 Speaker 1: are probably going to be cases where someone who you 839 00:46:12,680 --> 00:46:15,160 Speaker 1: didn't use before tried it, was not good at using. 840 00:46:15,320 --> 00:46:17,720 Speaker 1: And when I say that, I mean getting both benefit 841 00:46:17,719 --> 00:46:19,760 Speaker 1: out of it and then not having it being detected, 842 00:46:20,160 --> 00:46:22,160 Speaker 1: getting caught and then being like the only time and 843 00:46:22,160 --> 00:46:23,920 Speaker 1: they're like, fuck, man, the only time I use I 844 00:46:23,920 --> 00:46:27,000 Speaker 1: got caught. Okay, they're probably I'm sure, I'm sure there 845 00:46:27,000 --> 00:46:29,160 Speaker 1: are cases like that, But I tend to think that 846 00:46:29,239 --> 00:46:31,479 Speaker 1: in general, when you see cases of someone getting caught, 847 00:46:31,520 --> 00:46:34,120 Speaker 1: it's only after amount of time when they got away 848 00:46:34,160 --> 00:46:36,640 Speaker 1: with it before. But that's a general rule. That's not 849 00:46:37,520 --> 00:46:45,520 Speaker 1: how applicable that is here, you know, I I someone says, 850 00:46:46,000 --> 00:46:47,960 Speaker 1: M case Pitbull resume review has pushed me to get 851 00:46:47,960 --> 00:46:52,200 Speaker 1: a showtime sub cool man appreciate that. Uh. If Pitbull 852 00:46:52,280 --> 00:46:53,839 Speaker 1: was to come over to the UFC, which division you'd 853 00:46:53,840 --> 00:46:57,080 Speaker 1: like to see him in? Featherweight? How would you look 854 00:46:57,080 --> 00:46:58,919 Speaker 1: against the top three in that division? I think he's 855 00:46:58,960 --> 00:47:00,799 Speaker 1: capable of beating it any of them. I don't know 856 00:47:00,800 --> 00:47:03,960 Speaker 1: that he would, but the idea that he is out 857 00:47:04,000 --> 00:47:08,600 Speaker 1: of his depth I don't think is true. How did 858 00:47:08,640 --> 00:47:11,520 Speaker 1: you miss mentioning Alexander Emilianenko, the Hua brothers and the 859 00:47:11,560 --> 00:47:13,960 Speaker 1: Naway brothers on the anime siblic quay, Yeah, fucked it up. 860 00:47:14,000 --> 00:47:16,320 Speaker 1: I was. I had not slept hardly at all that 861 00:47:16,320 --> 00:47:18,719 Speaker 1: that morning. I got good sleep this morning, but I 862 00:47:19,440 --> 00:47:29,239 Speaker 1: was bad. Sorry. Before he shot a suspension TJ, I 863 00:47:29,239 --> 00:47:31,000 Speaker 1: talked about possibly going up and fighting by the one 864 00:47:31,080 --> 00:47:33,720 Speaker 1: hundred and forty five pounds belt, assuming he is successful 865 00:47:33,719 --> 00:47:35,560 Speaker 1: in reclaiming the about one hundred and thirty five pounds. 866 00:47:35,560 --> 00:47:36,880 Speaker 1: How do you think he would currently do against the 867 00:47:36,920 --> 00:47:40,280 Speaker 1: Volkanowski or Take or Holloway poorly, at least against Holloway 868 00:47:40,320 --> 00:47:42,200 Speaker 1: and Volkanovski or Take. I don't know. I need to 869 00:47:42,239 --> 00:47:45,040 Speaker 1: see how he looks against Volkanowski, but I suspect even 870 00:47:45,080 --> 00:47:47,640 Speaker 1: against him. It wouldn't be a good a good fight 871 00:47:47,960 --> 00:47:54,719 Speaker 1: for him. Do fighters and people in general have a 872 00:47:54,760 --> 00:47:57,200 Speaker 1: ceiling to how strong their heart can be in regards 873 00:47:57,200 --> 00:48:00,319 Speaker 1: to handling adversity in the cage and in life in general. 874 00:48:00,360 --> 00:48:02,320 Speaker 1: I've heard many say this is almost completely natural and 875 00:48:02,360 --> 00:48:05,200 Speaker 1: a product of upbringing. Habib and Faras have said this, 876 00:48:05,760 --> 00:48:08,160 Speaker 1: and can only be trained to a specific threshold among 877 00:48:08,200 --> 00:48:10,959 Speaker 1: different people. Do you think any amount of training gets 878 00:48:10,960 --> 00:48:18,600 Speaker 1: you Ferguson, Habib or even Hugh hold On, hold on, 879 00:48:18,640 --> 00:48:36,520 Speaker 1: I think this is hold on just checking something. Oh no, 880 00:48:36,840 --> 00:48:42,239 Speaker 1: actually as a real person, Hue Glass Okay, okay, mental toughness. 881 00:48:42,320 --> 00:48:47,840 Speaker 1: So I don't know what the prevailing research is on this. Obviously, 882 00:48:47,880 --> 00:48:53,200 Speaker 1: people who come from let's say difficult or disadvantaged backgrounds 883 00:48:53,239 --> 00:48:58,200 Speaker 1: seemingly have a much higher potential ceiling in terms of 884 00:48:58,280 --> 00:49:03,680 Speaker 1: grit and perseverance. There is that. Is it trainable? I 885 00:49:03,719 --> 00:49:06,080 Speaker 1: don't know, But I can tell you only what I've experienced, 886 00:49:07,000 --> 00:49:11,719 Speaker 1: which is about a decade on and off in MMA 887 00:49:11,800 --> 00:49:16,600 Speaker 1: and PJJ JIMS, and then five years military service and 888 00:49:17,200 --> 00:49:20,560 Speaker 1: various forms of training. Throughout the course of all that. 889 00:49:22,360 --> 00:49:26,400 Speaker 1: There is no doubt in my mind that what I 890 00:49:26,600 --> 00:49:32,080 Speaker 1: thought was an acceptable level of No, there's no doubt 891 00:49:32,080 --> 00:49:33,960 Speaker 1: in my mind that what I thought I could tolerate 892 00:49:34,160 --> 00:49:39,280 Speaker 1: before all of that was completely shattered by those experience, 893 00:49:39,320 --> 00:49:43,600 Speaker 1: the subsequent experiences, military, mma, whatever. There's not a doubt 894 00:49:43,680 --> 00:49:46,279 Speaker 1: in my mind, not even a little bit, that I 895 00:49:46,560 --> 00:49:52,640 Speaker 1: was able to suffer through greater forms of difficulty by 896 00:49:52,760 --> 00:49:55,160 Speaker 1: virtue of that. And that is that she was true 897 00:49:55,160 --> 00:49:57,239 Speaker 1: for sort of non physical tasks. But I think you're 898 00:49:57,280 --> 00:50:00,560 Speaker 1: asking more about, you know, performance in cage and how 899 00:50:00,560 --> 00:50:04,200 Speaker 1: it relates to perseverance even there, and especially there, like 900 00:50:04,320 --> 00:50:09,880 Speaker 1: what injuries I thought counted, how much extra energy I 901 00:50:09,920 --> 00:50:16,279 Speaker 1: could show turning off the parts of your brain that, 902 00:50:16,880 --> 00:50:19,480 Speaker 1: even from an evolutionary standpoint, are quite rational but are 903 00:50:19,560 --> 00:50:22,040 Speaker 1: getting you. Like if you're very, very tired, it is 904 00:50:22,160 --> 00:50:26,279 Speaker 1: rational for your brain to kick in to say, hey, 905 00:50:26,320 --> 00:50:28,920 Speaker 1: maybe you should stop doing this stuff. You know you're tired. 906 00:50:29,000 --> 00:50:32,080 Speaker 1: Quit You have to learn how to turn that off, 907 00:50:32,120 --> 00:50:34,000 Speaker 1: or at least to minimize it as best you can. 908 00:50:34,920 --> 00:50:37,000 Speaker 1: Not a doubt in my mind, not a doubt in 909 00:50:37,040 --> 00:50:41,520 Speaker 1: my mind that I got way better at that relative 910 00:50:41,560 --> 00:50:44,000 Speaker 1: to what I was before it all. The question you 911 00:50:44,000 --> 00:50:49,080 Speaker 1: have to ask yourself is okay you through training, were 912 00:50:49,120 --> 00:50:52,080 Speaker 1: able to reach into a deeper part of yourself to 913 00:50:52,160 --> 00:50:56,640 Speaker 1: get more out of you fair enough, but maybe there's 914 00:50:56,680 --> 00:50:59,960 Speaker 1: just an innate limit that. Yes, you had to get war, 915 00:51:01,160 --> 00:51:02,840 Speaker 1: you had to put in work to get some of 916 00:51:02,880 --> 00:51:09,320 Speaker 1: that out, but you can't fundamentally alter what you are 917 00:51:09,400 --> 00:51:12,240 Speaker 1: born with or what's there by let's say a certain 918 00:51:12,280 --> 00:51:16,520 Speaker 1: age or something, some kind of ceiling that you don't 919 00:51:16,520 --> 00:51:18,799 Speaker 1: think there's a ceiling because oh, I was here now 920 00:51:18,840 --> 00:51:23,120 Speaker 1: I'm here, right, but the ceiling you know, is kind 921 00:51:23,160 --> 00:51:26,279 Speaker 1: of just baked in. Is that the case or is 922 00:51:26,320 --> 00:51:28,359 Speaker 1: it going from here to here to here to hear 923 00:51:28,719 --> 00:51:31,520 Speaker 1: proves that there is no ceiling, right? So the question 924 00:51:31,640 --> 00:51:34,359 Speaker 1: is that, like, yes, do I think mental toughness can 925 00:51:34,400 --> 00:51:38,880 Speaker 1: be trained in certain people who might need it? Absolutely do. 926 00:51:38,920 --> 00:51:40,799 Speaker 1: I think it can be refined even in people who 927 00:51:40,840 --> 00:51:44,960 Speaker 1: have it, and that you know, even they can be 928 00:51:45,080 --> 00:51:48,200 Speaker 1: pushed to extra limits, no doubt about it. I have 929 00:51:48,360 --> 00:51:51,200 Speaker 1: zero doubt that's true. I just don't know what the 930 00:51:51,239 --> 00:51:53,799 Speaker 1: answer is in terms of how much we actually have 931 00:51:54,560 --> 00:51:58,279 Speaker 1: and how static that is before the part where we 932 00:51:58,320 --> 00:52:00,359 Speaker 1: go in trying to make use of what we think 933 00:52:00,400 --> 00:52:11,640 Speaker 1: is there. I don't know the answer to that. M 934 00:52:11,800 --> 00:52:21,440 Speaker 1: hm hmmm. In regards to some of the Olympic sports 935 00:52:21,480 --> 00:52:23,839 Speaker 1: you mentioned you would be watching. What have you thought 936 00:52:23,840 --> 00:52:26,919 Speaker 1: about Japan's dominance in judo this year? Fucking every year, 937 00:52:26,960 --> 00:52:29,319 Speaker 1: but okay, yeah, you're right this year in particular, and 938 00:52:29,640 --> 00:52:33,279 Speaker 1: show hey Ono coming back from almost two year break 939 00:52:33,280 --> 00:52:37,920 Speaker 1: in international competition to just dominate again. I haven't seen him, 940 00:52:37,920 --> 00:52:39,279 Speaker 1: but I saw the two I think it was the 941 00:52:39,320 --> 00:52:42,759 Speaker 1: Abe brother and sister combo, and then two Bamas were 942 00:52:42,840 --> 00:52:48,640 Speaker 1: running over everybody. Yeah, I don't know what would explain 943 00:52:49,040 --> 00:52:53,840 Speaker 1: why Japan has having a particularly pronounced Olympic cycle. Obviously, 944 00:52:54,480 --> 00:52:56,520 Speaker 1: folks who don't know the story, I believe this is right. 945 00:52:56,680 --> 00:52:59,879 Speaker 1: They re or. I think judo was first introduced into 946 00:52:59,880 --> 00:53:03,080 Speaker 1: Themics in nineteen sixty four, and that was the first 947 00:53:03,120 --> 00:53:05,839 Speaker 1: time that they had welcomed Japan sort of back into 948 00:53:05,880 --> 00:53:09,520 Speaker 1: the sporting international community following World War Two. And obviously 949 00:53:10,120 --> 00:53:12,640 Speaker 1: judo was the big one because it is a Japanese 950 00:53:12,680 --> 00:53:15,280 Speaker 1: it is definitionally a Japanese sport. Obviously it has spread 951 00:53:15,280 --> 00:53:17,720 Speaker 1: far beyond. The Koreans are good at it, the Russians 952 00:53:17,719 --> 00:53:19,600 Speaker 1: are good at it, some Americans can be good at 953 00:53:19,640 --> 00:53:21,480 Speaker 1: at the French are very good at it. The Georgians 954 00:53:21,480 --> 00:53:24,319 Speaker 1: are good at it, but it is at its core 955 00:53:24,400 --> 00:53:30,520 Speaker 1: a Japanese invention. And you know, there's a Codacon there 956 00:53:30,520 --> 00:53:35,360 Speaker 1: which is like a Judo university. Really, it's the hollowed 957 00:53:35,400 --> 00:53:37,719 Speaker 1: I mean, it's what you know. Some call it even 958 00:53:37,719 --> 00:53:41,960 Speaker 1: the birthplace of judo. To a degree, they're always going 959 00:53:42,000 --> 00:53:44,560 Speaker 1: to be really good, you know, like that's how important 960 00:53:44,640 --> 00:53:46,920 Speaker 1: judo is to them. So as it relates to this 961 00:53:46,960 --> 00:53:50,000 Speaker 1: particular cycle, I don't know, but when you understand the 962 00:53:50,080 --> 00:53:53,000 Speaker 1: historical gravity of what judo means to the Japanese, you 963 00:53:53,080 --> 00:53:57,239 Speaker 1: begin to you begin to realize that, like, yeah, they 964 00:53:57,239 --> 00:54:00,000 Speaker 1: put they put a ton of resources into making sure 965 00:54:00,120 --> 00:54:18,000 Speaker 1: the people win there. Okay, Joey Jordanson, the ex drummer 966 00:54:18,040 --> 00:54:20,360 Speaker 1: of Slipknot, died recently. Do you like any of the songs? 967 00:54:20,400 --> 00:54:23,600 Speaker 1: I was never like a big Slipknot guy, but for 968 00:54:23,680 --> 00:54:26,839 Speaker 1: sure I've definitely had banged to you know, a few 969 00:54:26,880 --> 00:54:31,600 Speaker 1: of their songs along the way and forty six terrible 970 00:54:32,200 --> 00:54:37,640 Speaker 1: forty seven maybe very young anyway, Luke, would your walkout 971 00:54:37,760 --> 00:54:43,480 Speaker 1: song be in pro boxing or MMA? For years I 972 00:54:43,480 --> 00:54:47,800 Speaker 1: would have said big Mouth strikes again by the Smiths, 973 00:54:48,960 --> 00:54:51,120 Speaker 1: And now I don't know. You know what song I 974 00:54:51,160 --> 00:54:53,719 Speaker 1: heard today. It wasn't all that great, but it was 975 00:54:54,040 --> 00:54:58,520 Speaker 1: perfect for lifting. It was I'm not like the biggest 976 00:54:58,600 --> 00:55:01,319 Speaker 1: ill bill guy take her to leave it, but this 977 00:55:01,440 --> 00:55:07,080 Speaker 1: song it was him and Immortal Technique, and I think 978 00:55:09,440 --> 00:55:16,719 Speaker 1: the lead singer of not soul Fly, but it was 979 00:55:16,760 --> 00:55:22,239 Speaker 1: Max Cavalleira. Fuck Jesus, my brain is not working the Brazilian. 980 00:55:26,840 --> 00:55:31,120 Speaker 1: Uh well, I guess don't. Soul Fly is actually right 981 00:55:31,160 --> 00:55:33,919 Speaker 1: on the money. Sorry, I got it right the first time. 982 00:55:35,880 --> 00:55:39,200 Speaker 1: Uh yeah, Suppultura, it was the one I was thinking 983 00:55:39,239 --> 00:55:41,160 Speaker 1: of in my head. But yes, I guess he is 984 00:55:41,200 --> 00:55:45,600 Speaker 1: with Soulfly anyway, War is my destiny again. It wouldn't 985 00:55:45,600 --> 00:55:48,399 Speaker 1: be my walkout song, but it's fucking good. I kind 986 00:55:48,400 --> 00:55:51,040 Speaker 1: of like the ones that understated a little bit, you know, 987 00:55:51,200 --> 00:56:02,560 Speaker 1: like Robbie Lawler and Dustin Parier's walkout songs. I don't know, man, 988 00:56:03,000 --> 00:56:06,880 Speaker 1: I'm like, I'm really enjoying going through Vinnie Pazzes catalog. 989 00:56:07,000 --> 00:56:14,920 Speaker 1: Cheese Steaks is fucking great one. What's another song I'm 990 00:56:15,160 --> 00:56:19,080 Speaker 1: really loving? Oh, Pistolvania is a great fucking love Pistolvania. 991 00:56:19,719 --> 00:56:22,720 Speaker 1: Who the best motherfucker in the streets that you never heard? 992 00:56:23,920 --> 00:56:29,360 Speaker 1: Was it the four fifth? Uh? Separ Rich ahead and 993 00:56:29,360 --> 00:56:32,440 Speaker 1: at seven's nerves called me Coco be ware, I carry 994 00:56:32,520 --> 00:56:39,279 Speaker 1: several birds. I love that shit, but I still like 995 00:56:39,320 --> 00:56:42,000 Speaker 1: the understated stuff. I don't know. I guess I would 996 00:56:42,040 --> 00:56:44,560 Speaker 1: stick with that for now, but I am looking for 997 00:56:44,719 --> 00:56:46,920 Speaker 1: like an updated how do I answer that question kind 998 00:56:46,920 --> 00:57:00,920 Speaker 1: of song? All right, we'll do one more. Here's a 999 00:57:00,920 --> 00:57:05,279 Speaker 1: good one. If Tyrone beats Jake, do we see I 1000 00:57:05,280 --> 00:57:08,400 Speaker 1: think you mean Tyron, do we see him headlining a 1001 00:57:08,400 --> 00:57:10,480 Speaker 1: belt or card near the end of the year. I 1002 00:57:10,520 --> 00:57:12,400 Speaker 1: don't know if he wants I don't know. I don't know. 1003 00:57:12,960 --> 00:57:14,759 Speaker 1: He had said something in the run up to I 1004 00:57:14,760 --> 00:57:18,800 Speaker 1: think he told Fight Hub TV Tyrone did that. You know, 1005 00:57:18,840 --> 00:57:21,120 Speaker 1: he just wasn't feeling MMA by the time he lost 1006 00:57:21,120 --> 00:57:22,840 Speaker 1: those four and he was trying to train, and he 1007 00:57:22,880 --> 00:57:24,680 Speaker 1: was trying to like will himself through, but he just 1008 00:57:24,680 --> 00:57:27,320 Speaker 1: really couldn't. And you know, the results speak for themselves. 1009 00:57:27,360 --> 00:57:29,160 Speaker 1: Plus he was fighting like really good fighters. You know, 1010 00:57:29,200 --> 00:57:33,640 Speaker 1: he wasn't fighting chumps. I don't know if he goes 1011 00:57:33,640 --> 00:57:36,200 Speaker 1: back to MMA, I really don't. And if he beats Jake, 1012 00:57:37,280 --> 00:57:39,360 Speaker 1: you know, does he have a couple of other big 1013 00:57:39,480 --> 00:57:42,560 Speaker 1: names that he could like get big money off showtime 1014 00:57:42,600 --> 00:57:45,840 Speaker 1: with I don't I don't know, I don't know. You know, 1015 00:57:45,840 --> 00:57:50,320 Speaker 1: if he gets flat lined, which seems unlikely but possible, 1016 00:57:52,720 --> 00:57:55,440 Speaker 1: I tend to think he might hang it up. If 1017 00:57:55,480 --> 00:57:58,919 Speaker 1: he performs ably but loses, that's where he gets kind 1018 00:57:58,960 --> 00:58:00,840 Speaker 1: of dicey. I think if he wins, he and like 1019 00:58:00,880 --> 00:58:03,320 Speaker 1: it looks good, I think I'll stay doing boxing. To 1020 00:58:03,440 --> 00:58:06,040 Speaker 1: be honest with you, I think the training is a 1021 00:58:06,080 --> 00:58:09,680 Speaker 1: little bit easier on him, and again not easy, but 1022 00:58:09,760 --> 00:58:12,520 Speaker 1: like on in terms of injury load, it's it's easier 1023 00:58:13,120 --> 00:58:15,520 Speaker 1: and the money is sick at least in this particular 1024 00:58:15,600 --> 00:58:18,000 Speaker 1: case for him, So I tend to think that's probably 1025 00:58:18,000 --> 00:58:21,080 Speaker 1: more of the direction he'll go. Yeah, all right, let's 1026 00:58:21,080 --> 00:58:23,120 Speaker 1: call a day here. I appreciate everybody who tuned in, 1027 00:58:23,200 --> 00:58:26,840 Speaker 1: thumbs up on the video, hit subscribe, and uh yeah, 1028 00:58:27,040 --> 00:58:29,040 Speaker 1: I would like to do this more a regular time 1029 00:58:29,120 --> 00:58:31,680 Speaker 1: next Thursday, but for now. Next Thursday, by the way, 1030 00:58:31,760 --> 00:58:34,120 Speaker 1: is my birthday, so we'll do one on my birthday. 1031 00:58:34,120 --> 00:58:36,680 Speaker 1: How about that? Until then, thank you guys so much 1032 00:58:36,680 --> 00:58:38,480 Speaker 1: for watching. You want to reach me, email me Luke 1033 00:58:38,520 --> 00:58:43,160 Speaker 1: Thomas newstgmail dot com. And until Next time, stay frost.