WEBVTT - The Final Autopsy

0:00:07.565 --> 0:00:15.005
<v Speaker 1>The School of Humans. We found a tape in Ron

0:00:15.045 --> 0:00:19.285
<v Speaker 1>Ward's boxes from two thousand and seven. In it, he's

0:00:19.325 --> 0:00:22.645
<v Speaker 1>reading a letter that his lawyer, Jerry Sallings, had received

0:00:22.685 --> 0:00:26.245
<v Speaker 1>from the Special Prosecutor Tim Williamson. If you and your

0:00:26.285 --> 0:00:30.325
<v Speaker 1>clients do not wish to state to attempt to obtain

0:00:30.445 --> 0:00:35.885
<v Speaker 1>additional forensic evidence to be used in this criminal investigation,

0:00:36.325 --> 0:00:40.245
<v Speaker 1>I suggest you buy your request for any youngty's relief.

0:00:40.845 --> 0:00:43.365
<v Speaker 1>The letter informs him that the state intends to do

0:00:43.445 --> 0:00:47.805
<v Speaker 1>another exhumation and autopsy on Jennie. Great efforts have been

0:00:47.845 --> 0:00:55.085
<v Speaker 1>taken to schedulist exhamation and autopsy. My experts cannot be

0:00:55.205 --> 0:01:00.205
<v Speaker 1>present again for several weeks, and doctor Burnell or whichever

0:01:00.445 --> 0:01:07.525
<v Speaker 1>family medical expert is present and only observed. Now, come on, now,

0:01:08.285 --> 0:01:12.925
<v Speaker 1>Ron is frustrated. He doesn't understand why Tim Williamson doesn't

0:01:12.965 --> 0:01:16.445
<v Speaker 1>trust doctor Burnell's conclusion that Jennie was hit in the

0:01:16.485 --> 0:01:19.885
<v Speaker 1>face with a blunt object, that her death was a homicide.

0:01:20.165 --> 0:01:24.245
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Burnell not just some kind of backyard warm dog.

0:01:24.405 --> 0:01:29.605
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's a high incredible pathologist. Why on earth

0:01:29.725 --> 0:01:35.965
<v Speaker 1>that he wanted to question a renowned pathologists that him

0:01:36.005 --> 0:01:39.285
<v Speaker 1>back here? I have no speculation. The Word family had

0:01:39.365 --> 0:01:43.485
<v Speaker 1>painstakingly had Janie's body exhumed and autopsied a second time.

0:01:44.485 --> 0:01:47.525
<v Speaker 1>Why did Tim Williamson need to do this again? We

0:01:47.645 --> 0:01:52.645
<v Speaker 1>have got to file an injunction. Otherwise we'd be saying

0:01:52.725 --> 0:01:56.405
<v Speaker 1>we didn't believe doctor Buranell. We go along with the state.

0:01:57.325 --> 0:02:00.125
<v Speaker 1>We didn't believe doctor Burnell. We don't want our daughter's

0:02:00.165 --> 0:02:03.805
<v Speaker 1>remains removed and affered with again. No, but we know

0:02:03.885 --> 0:02:09.725
<v Speaker 1>it's it's we can't prevent, but we can in assert. Hey, hey, look,

0:02:10.405 --> 0:02:13.765
<v Speaker 1>we don't agree with this. We agree with doctor Vernell's

0:02:13.805 --> 0:02:17.485
<v Speaker 1>find these and all of the investigation that we've done

0:02:17.485 --> 0:02:21.005
<v Speaker 1>is just born. Now what your excuse? We're not agreeing

0:02:21.405 --> 0:02:25.805
<v Speaker 1>with doctor Vernell. Three years and over ten thousand dollars later,

0:02:26.565 --> 0:02:30.245
<v Speaker 1>Tim Williamson said he did not find any conclusive evidence

0:02:30.485 --> 0:02:34.765
<v Speaker 1>that Janie's death was a homicide. In the end, he

0:02:34.805 --> 0:02:39.165
<v Speaker 1>can't determine anything, So in August of two thousand and seven,

0:02:39.725 --> 0:02:44.445
<v Speaker 1>they exhumed Janey's body one more time for a final autopsy.

0:02:45.845 --> 0:03:23.125
<v Speaker 1>I'm Catherine Townsend and this is hell and gone. Janey's

0:03:23.125 --> 0:03:28.725
<v Speaker 1>third autopsy is a spectacle. With Mike Masterson's columns Arkansas's

0:03:28.765 --> 0:03:32.285
<v Speaker 1>attention is on the case. Everyone is waiting to see

0:03:32.485 --> 0:03:36.205
<v Speaker 1>what will happen this time. Tim Williamson finds an out

0:03:36.245 --> 0:03:39.885
<v Speaker 1>of state pathologist to perform the autopsy. He wants someone

0:03:39.925 --> 0:03:44.805
<v Speaker 1>whose credentials are impeccable, someone who is not controversial, someone

0:03:44.925 --> 0:03:47.605
<v Speaker 1>who can help him convince the Ward family and the

0:03:47.605 --> 0:03:50.685
<v Speaker 1>rest of the state that he is being completely impartial

0:03:51.205 --> 0:03:55.245
<v Speaker 1>the cause of the conflicts and the concerns of the family.

0:03:55.285 --> 0:03:58.845
<v Speaker 1>Of anyone in the state of Arkansas doing this, they

0:03:58.845 --> 0:04:03.285
<v Speaker 1>had questions that everybody's involvement completely. So we were trying

0:04:03.325 --> 0:04:06.565
<v Speaker 1>to stay as independent as possible and give them the

0:04:06.605 --> 0:04:11.445
<v Speaker 1>greatest assurance and afford them the opportunity to know that

0:04:11.485 --> 0:04:15.045
<v Speaker 1>we've done everything we possibly could do to do an independent,

0:04:15.405 --> 0:04:20.965
<v Speaker 1>totally independent, complete review. I got to looking for medical

0:04:21.325 --> 0:04:24.725
<v Speaker 1>examiners or pathologists nationally recognized so that we could bring

0:04:24.765 --> 0:04:28.565
<v Speaker 1>somebody from out of state inn to actually do this investigation.

0:04:28.885 --> 0:04:32.965
<v Speaker 1>And doctor John Plus out of Indianapolis. It was by

0:04:33.045 --> 0:04:37.805
<v Speaker 1>far and above the most appropriate choice. We've had a painstaking,

0:04:37.925 --> 0:04:42.005
<v Speaker 1>step by step process for the exhumation. The family had

0:04:42.005 --> 0:04:45.085
<v Speaker 1>a right to be president as a representative president. We

0:04:45.605 --> 0:04:48.125
<v Speaker 1>did not want anyone saying that we had in any

0:04:48.165 --> 0:04:53.845
<v Speaker 1>way interfered for a manipulated Jamie's body before this could

0:04:53.845 --> 0:04:57.005
<v Speaker 1>be done. So when we had her exumed, there was

0:04:57.005 --> 0:04:59.925
<v Speaker 1>a state police president, law enforcement president and a press

0:04:59.965 --> 0:05:04.485
<v Speaker 1>presence at the cemetery. We transported her to the state

0:05:04.525 --> 0:05:10.085
<v Speaker 1>crime Lab, and because of the family's concerns about they

0:05:10.125 --> 0:05:13.405
<v Speaker 1>were concerned that the crime lab might similar another try

0:05:13.405 --> 0:05:18.085
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate the findings or tasts, or again the body

0:05:18.125 --> 0:05:21.565
<v Speaker 1>before a chance to be examined. We placed her body

0:05:21.605 --> 0:05:25.765
<v Speaker 1>into a sealed, locked room and we sealed it controlled

0:05:25.805 --> 0:05:27.645
<v Speaker 1>access to it. E Woun put a camera in motion

0:05:27.765 --> 0:05:31.365
<v Speaker 1>sens her cameras up. I think they alleviated any concerns

0:05:31.685 --> 0:05:35.965
<v Speaker 1>that might be about any manipulation of any evidence. The

0:05:36.005 --> 0:05:39.485
<v Speaker 1>words make it clear they don't trust Tim Williamson or

0:05:39.565 --> 0:05:42.885
<v Speaker 1>the crime lab. They want to make sure that the

0:05:42.925 --> 0:05:47.685
<v Speaker 1>pathologists selected doctor John Plus will do an accurate autopsy.

0:05:49.005 --> 0:05:51.845
<v Speaker 1>They asked doctor Barnell to be present, and the autopsy

0:05:51.885 --> 0:05:54.525
<v Speaker 1>had been rescheduled so that he could attend, but at

0:05:54.525 --> 0:05:58.085
<v Speaker 1>the last minute doctor Burnell had a conflict and sent

0:05:58.125 --> 0:06:01.485
<v Speaker 1>a different pathologist to be present for the family. There

0:06:01.485 --> 0:06:05.045
<v Speaker 1>were other people supervising the autopsy as well, including an

0:06:05.085 --> 0:06:10.165
<v Speaker 1>FBI consultant from ABC and a forensic anthropologist. The first

0:06:10.205 --> 0:06:13.165
<v Speaker 1>stop was the University of Arkansas Medical Center, where the

0:06:13.205 --> 0:06:16.445
<v Speaker 1>team put Janey's body through a CT scan to see

0:06:16.445 --> 0:06:20.365
<v Speaker 1>a three D rendering of her skeleton. Then they brought

0:06:20.365 --> 0:06:23.485
<v Speaker 1>the body to the Arkansas Crime Lab where every part

0:06:23.525 --> 0:06:27.485
<v Speaker 1>of the body was dissected. Ron and Mona and their lawyer,

0:06:27.565 --> 0:06:31.005
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Sellings met with doctor Plus and with Tim Williamson

0:06:31.445 --> 0:06:36.725
<v Speaker 1>after they completed the autopsy. Ron recorded the meeting. It

0:06:36.765 --> 0:06:41.405
<v Speaker 1>begins with doctor Plus explaining his results. We went quite

0:06:41.445 --> 0:06:45.365
<v Speaker 1>a bit further than either doctor Malick or doctor Banell

0:06:46.605 --> 0:06:50.085
<v Speaker 1>by literally removing all of the skin from the body

0:06:50.165 --> 0:06:53.605
<v Speaker 1>so that we could see any evidence of hemorrhage in

0:06:53.645 --> 0:06:58.045
<v Speaker 1>the soft tissues around the bond. We had the advantage

0:06:58.125 --> 0:07:02.085
<v Speaker 1>of the three D X ray examination, so we knew

0:07:02.605 --> 0:07:05.325
<v Speaker 1>what all was intact before we really went in there

0:07:05.965 --> 0:07:11.245
<v Speaker 1>to do that. We found bruises or hemorrhages also referred

0:07:11.245 --> 0:07:16.285
<v Speaker 1>to as contusions of the right elbow of the left

0:07:16.325 --> 0:07:21.765
<v Speaker 1>back where doctor Mallick had made his incision. I also

0:07:21.845 --> 0:07:26.845
<v Speaker 1>found multiple small hemorrhages in the eppibilotis and that's where

0:07:27.125 --> 0:07:30.445
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you can get a crouton or a small piece

0:07:30.485 --> 0:07:33.805
<v Speaker 1>of bread caught back in your throat and in the

0:07:33.885 --> 0:07:39.125
<v Speaker 1>trachea ah, And in my experience, hemorrhages of that type

0:07:39.285 --> 0:07:43.085
<v Speaker 1>are seen in people who choke on things. Those are

0:07:43.165 --> 0:07:47.725
<v Speaker 1>basically my findings in the examination and my opinion that

0:07:47.845 --> 0:07:51.885
<v Speaker 1>at some point or another, just prior to her collapse,

0:07:52.685 --> 0:07:57.165
<v Speaker 1>she got something caught in her throat, couldn't breathe couldn't talk,

0:07:58.205 --> 0:08:03.885
<v Speaker 1>and as the oxygen level was reduced, she finally collapsed.

0:08:04.645 --> 0:08:08.125
<v Speaker 1>After all this time, the words get another opinion that

0:08:08.125 --> 0:08:11.485
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense to them. No one ever described her

0:08:11.565 --> 0:08:17.085
<v Speaker 1>daughter as choking and coughing. They said she was run

0:08:17.125 --> 0:08:21.005
<v Speaker 1>on the ground and she would guess, but that was it.

0:08:21.125 --> 0:08:26.685
<v Speaker 1>I didn't ebscribe her cho choking, though, is just an opinion. Officially,

0:08:27.285 --> 0:08:32.045
<v Speaker 1>doctor Plus leaves the cause and manner of death as undetermined.

0:08:32.925 --> 0:08:36.445
<v Speaker 1>He also suggests that Janie could have had a heart arrhythmia.

0:08:37.645 --> 0:08:41.845
<v Speaker 1>After Janie's first and second autopsies, her organs were put

0:08:41.965 --> 0:08:45.725
<v Speaker 1>in a bag inside her abdomen, but doctor Plus couldn't

0:08:45.765 --> 0:08:50.525
<v Speaker 1>make an official diagnosis because Janie's heart was missing. And

0:08:50.645 --> 0:08:55.885
<v Speaker 1>you know what happened to the arm someone probably a

0:08:55.965 --> 0:09:02.005
<v Speaker 1>h person. An envoment must have hand those in those

0:09:02.725 --> 0:09:05.165
<v Speaker 1>That's the only reason I can think of why they

0:09:05.165 --> 0:09:08.605
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be there. Is that normal for a heart to

0:09:08.645 --> 0:09:12.245
<v Speaker 1>be missing when you have the other organs. It's not normal,

0:09:12.685 --> 0:09:15.525
<v Speaker 1>but it happens. I've seen it had a before. Doctor

0:09:15.605 --> 0:09:20.965
<v Speaker 1>Plas also completely disagrees with doctor Manew's most significant findings.

0:09:21.685 --> 0:09:25.725
<v Speaker 1>He says he sees absolutely no evidence of his spinal injury.

0:09:25.965 --> 0:09:29.085
<v Speaker 1>Ron is shocked and pulls out the photos that doctor

0:09:29.125 --> 0:09:35.685
<v Speaker 1>Malik said to him. Photograph sent to doctor Malik himself

0:09:36.885 --> 0:09:41.245
<v Speaker 1>that shows the voter ragmen cut in a levelment deck demand.

0:09:41.965 --> 0:09:47.565
<v Speaker 1>It shows the spinal chord exposed. Did you put jagging torn?

0:09:47.645 --> 0:09:52.845
<v Speaker 1>Did you say that? All? Yes? Okay? And that was

0:09:52.925 --> 0:09:56.845
<v Speaker 1>all done by doctor Malik and his examination of an X.

0:09:58.085 --> 0:10:03.285
<v Speaker 1>There's no evidence of any hemorrhay. I know this looks red,

0:10:04.525 --> 0:10:07.805
<v Speaker 1>and this looked pretty bad when you look at it,

0:10:07.845 --> 0:10:11.565
<v Speaker 1>but there's no hemorrhage there that you would expect to

0:10:11.605 --> 0:10:15.645
<v Speaker 1>see if it were a blunt force injury of any kind.

0:10:15.805 --> 0:10:20.005
<v Speaker 1>And what he made of thought final could conflict. That

0:10:20.165 --> 0:10:24.725
<v Speaker 1>was part of his examination of the body. If not

0:10:25.525 --> 0:10:28.765
<v Speaker 1>anything that was done prior to the autopsy. It's all

0:10:28.845 --> 0:10:32.925
<v Speaker 1>modifications that he has made in his examination on the body.

0:10:33.965 --> 0:10:37.285
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Plus also says he didn't see any evidence of

0:10:37.325 --> 0:10:41.325
<v Speaker 1>abrasions or trauma on Janie's face. When pressed by the

0:10:41.365 --> 0:10:44.805
<v Speaker 1>ward's lawyer, he admits he didn't take any samples from

0:10:44.805 --> 0:10:48.405
<v Speaker 1>the face to look out microscopically. Doctor Plus says it's

0:10:48.405 --> 0:10:51.125
<v Speaker 1>because it wouldn't have made any difference because he didn't

0:10:51.125 --> 0:10:54.125
<v Speaker 1>see any hemorrhaging. Why didn't you tell the samples because

0:10:54.125 --> 0:11:00.405
<v Speaker 1>there was no hemorrhy in associatedation with those areas, kailed

0:11:00.885 --> 0:11:04.285
<v Speaker 1>that there was no underlying hemorrhage, so there was no

0:11:04.365 --> 0:11:07.685
<v Speaker 1>reason to take sections. And again, if for no other

0:11:07.725 --> 0:11:12.085
<v Speaker 1>reason than to discuss the findings that doctor Burnell has, well,

0:11:12.285 --> 0:11:14.365
<v Speaker 1>that would be true, but I don't think it really

0:11:14.365 --> 0:11:18.805
<v Speaker 1>would have made any difference. You understanding interesting? Ron Ward

0:11:18.885 --> 0:11:22.645
<v Speaker 1>again pulls out the photographs that doctor Mallick had given him.

0:11:23.325 --> 0:11:26.085
<v Speaker 1>Ron says, it looks like there's bruising on Janie's face

0:11:26.525 --> 0:11:29.245
<v Speaker 1>and a cut across her nose and blood in her mouth.

0:11:30.605 --> 0:11:35.005
<v Speaker 1>And doctor Plus says this, yeah, and you did not

0:11:35.085 --> 0:11:38.045
<v Speaker 1>see this a braid in the with her nose, And

0:11:39.125 --> 0:11:43.125
<v Speaker 1>I think pecially those blood and there, all right, that's

0:11:43.125 --> 0:11:45.045
<v Speaker 1>what it looks like. Again, I would agree with you.

0:11:45.885 --> 0:11:48.365
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know what this Isn't a little bit

0:11:48.405 --> 0:11:51.685
<v Speaker 1>of blooding are on top of her nose? That's well,

0:11:52.325 --> 0:11:55.485
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that either. You do, Yes, I do

0:11:55.565 --> 0:11:58.685
<v Speaker 1>you know? I saw my daughter. It wasn't no blood

0:11:58.765 --> 0:12:04.645
<v Speaker 1>up here. This meeting gets pretty heated. The words keep

0:12:04.685 --> 0:12:07.365
<v Speaker 1>going back to the photographs they got from doctor Mallet

0:12:07.645 --> 0:12:10.405
<v Speaker 1>and the x rays that they insist were different from

0:12:10.405 --> 0:12:12.645
<v Speaker 1>the ones they saw at the crime lab. And I

0:12:12.685 --> 0:12:14.645
<v Speaker 1>don't know when, and I don't know who was involved,

0:12:15.685 --> 0:12:18.285
<v Speaker 1>but I think sometimes or none of you've gotten the

0:12:18.325 --> 0:12:23.085
<v Speaker 1>wrong idea about what these x rays are. And it

0:12:23.125 --> 0:12:27.245
<v Speaker 1>may be just a misunderstanding. Uh. And I don't know

0:12:27.285 --> 0:12:31.005
<v Speaker 1>who is misunderstanding, but it's hard for me to believe,

0:12:31.125 --> 0:12:38.005
<v Speaker 1>having seen her body and examined her skeleton personally removed

0:12:38.045 --> 0:12:42.205
<v Speaker 1>all the soft tissue, what I see is what what

0:12:42.285 --> 0:12:47.045
<v Speaker 1>I saw, is what these photographs show, and nothing else.

0:12:48.165 --> 0:12:52.245
<v Speaker 1>And there is no there is no injury. I mean,

0:12:52.285 --> 0:12:56.485
<v Speaker 1>we you will accept the fact that I did examine

0:12:56.485 --> 0:13:01.485
<v Speaker 1>her body, is that right? Yes? We did a thought

0:13:01.565 --> 0:13:08.845
<v Speaker 1>feeling about sayin circumstances, right, this is Mona talking. She

0:13:08.965 --> 0:13:13.125
<v Speaker 1>tells Doctor Plas about all the suspicious circumstances around Janie's death,

0:13:13.965 --> 0:13:17.725
<v Speaker 1>but Doctor Plus says the forensic evidence doesn't match what

0:13:17.805 --> 0:13:20.605
<v Speaker 1>she's telling him. People tell me all these things that

0:13:20.765 --> 0:13:23.285
<v Speaker 1>you've just told me. I mean, I'm not ignorant of

0:13:23.325 --> 0:13:26.965
<v Speaker 1>any of these things. People have made statements about this,

0:13:27.685 --> 0:13:33.205
<v Speaker 1>mostly coming from you, Law. But when I look at

0:13:33.245 --> 0:13:37.205
<v Speaker 1>a body, I have to develop my opinions from the

0:13:37.245 --> 0:13:42.645
<v Speaker 1>body as welf, not from what people may feel are

0:13:42.685 --> 0:13:47.605
<v Speaker 1>the circumstances. But I have to look at the body

0:13:48.125 --> 0:13:52.485
<v Speaker 1>and scientifically to make an opinion about what went on.

0:13:54.245 --> 0:14:00.165
<v Speaker 1>And of no injury. There's just not any injury here

0:14:00.885 --> 0:14:08.885
<v Speaker 1>that would have caused your daughter's death. After the meeting

0:14:08.885 --> 0:14:12.165
<v Speaker 1>with Tim Williamson and Doctor Plus, there's a press conference.

0:14:13.045 --> 0:14:17.045
<v Speaker 1>It's packed with news stations from across the state. As

0:14:17.125 --> 0:14:21.765
<v Speaker 1>Ron and Mona leave the press conference, they're surrounded by reporters.

0:14:23.125 --> 0:14:25.605
<v Speaker 1>Ron and Mona are trying to hurry through the interviews

0:14:26.045 --> 0:14:28.885
<v Speaker 1>because they know that Jane's body is being driven away

0:14:29.245 --> 0:14:32.125
<v Speaker 1>back to the cemetery to get reburied. Well, we thought

0:14:32.165 --> 0:14:37.165
<v Speaker 1>they were waiting for us, actually, because we were supposed

0:14:37.205 --> 0:14:41.485
<v Speaker 1>to be there when they reburied her, because the first

0:14:41.525 --> 0:14:46.445
<v Speaker 1>time we got to pray, you know, like a funeral,

0:14:47.085 --> 0:14:51.845
<v Speaker 1>you know, like it was another funeral, and like when

0:14:51.885 --> 0:14:55.325
<v Speaker 1>we had her exhumed, we got to do that. It's

0:14:55.405 --> 0:14:59.085
<v Speaker 1>just so callous, you know, to just do that. It

0:14:59.165 --> 0:15:03.485
<v Speaker 1>meant something. There'd been nothing to them. By the time

0:15:03.525 --> 0:15:07.125
<v Speaker 1>they got to the cemetery, Janie was buried and the

0:15:07.205 --> 0:15:10.765
<v Speaker 1>crew was driving away. They were supposed to have waited

0:15:10.765 --> 0:15:13.125
<v Speaker 1>for the wards so that they could pray as their

0:15:13.205 --> 0:15:15.805
<v Speaker 1>daughter was lowered into the ground for the third time

0:15:17.325 --> 0:15:21.925
<v Speaker 1>once again. Journalist Mike Masterson was outraged at the treatment

0:15:21.965 --> 0:15:25.485
<v Speaker 1>of the Wards and thought the third autopsy was horrific

0:15:25.685 --> 0:15:29.325
<v Speaker 1>and supposedly they just absolutely skinned her. They there's nothing

0:15:29.405 --> 0:15:31.805
<v Speaker 1>left if they wanted to do another autopsy, and that

0:15:31.925 --> 0:15:35.085
<v Speaker 1>was not necessary, but they did it so they made

0:15:35.085 --> 0:15:38.325
<v Speaker 1>sure there wasn't going to be a fourth exhamation. He

0:15:38.445 --> 0:15:42.045
<v Speaker 1>still thinks it's totally illogical that doctor Malick would have

0:15:42.085 --> 0:15:45.005
<v Speaker 1>cut and removed part of Janie's spine instead of it

0:15:45.085 --> 0:15:47.845
<v Speaker 1>being torn from an injury. See Whybret, you reach out

0:15:48.245 --> 0:15:52.085
<v Speaker 1>and tear her spinal cord in the canal. So no,

0:15:52.125 --> 0:15:54.845
<v Speaker 1>it's just all a bunch of words. It's dissemblings. What

0:15:54.925 --> 0:15:57.285
<v Speaker 1>it is, just words to try to fill air and

0:15:57.365 --> 0:16:01.685
<v Speaker 1>try to confuse people. I mean, it didn't confuse me

0:16:01.805 --> 0:16:05.125
<v Speaker 1>at all, and it didn't confuse most of Arkansas, I

0:16:05.125 --> 0:16:09.405
<v Speaker 1>mean around the state today, all these years later, and

0:16:11.085 --> 0:16:14.445
<v Speaker 1>one or two of the questions I'm ask invariably deal

0:16:14.485 --> 0:16:16.885
<v Speaker 1>with Jenny Ward's case. You know, are they ever going

0:16:16.965 --> 0:16:19.725
<v Speaker 1>to do anything with the Jenny Ward case? What about

0:16:19.805 --> 0:16:24.845
<v Speaker 1>Jenny Ward? So it really touched the nerve this whole mess.

0:16:27.285 --> 0:16:40.805
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. Doctor Plus's autopsy didn't provide definitive

0:16:40.805 --> 0:16:45.365
<v Speaker 1>answers to how Janie died. He said she could have choked,

0:16:45.645 --> 0:16:48.485
<v Speaker 1>she could have had a heart problem, and doctor Plus

0:16:48.565 --> 0:16:51.165
<v Speaker 1>seemed pretty convinced that there was no sign of his

0:16:51.245 --> 0:16:54.205
<v Speaker 1>final injury or a blunt forced trauma to the face.

0:16:55.005 --> 0:16:59.805
<v Speaker 1>According to the forensic evidence provided by this autopsy, Jane

0:16:59.925 --> 0:17:03.005
<v Speaker 1>didn't die from falling off the porch. She wasn't hitting

0:17:03.045 --> 0:17:06.325
<v Speaker 1>the face with a baseball bat, didn't run into the

0:17:06.325 --> 0:17:08.805
<v Speaker 1>post and then fall off the porch, as Steve Ward

0:17:08.805 --> 0:17:12.725
<v Speaker 1>had suggested, and she didn't sustain a spinal injury in

0:17:12.765 --> 0:17:14.845
<v Speaker 1>the truck on the bumpy roads. Back to the bank

0:17:14.885 --> 0:17:19.445
<v Speaker 1>parking lot. So with this third autopsy, there is very

0:17:19.485 --> 0:17:23.205
<v Speaker 1>little pointing to homicide in the forensic evidence, but at

0:17:23.205 --> 0:17:27.445
<v Speaker 1>the same time, nothing is definitive about it. Her cause

0:17:27.525 --> 0:17:32.565
<v Speaker 1>and manner of death remain undetermined. This seems incredible to

0:17:32.605 --> 0:17:36.805
<v Speaker 1>have three different autopsies with three completely different results, and

0:17:36.845 --> 0:17:39.565
<v Speaker 1>we needed to know more about how this could be possible.

0:17:40.805 --> 0:17:44.845
<v Speaker 1>We found a forensic pathologist through the College of American Pathologists.

0:17:45.725 --> 0:17:48.765
<v Speaker 1>Her name is Gray Stuke's and she's a board certified

0:17:48.765 --> 0:17:53.565
<v Speaker 1>pathologist and a member of the College's Forensic Pathology Committee.

0:17:53.645 --> 0:17:56.365
<v Speaker 1>We asked her to review the three autopsies. Our job

0:17:56.405 --> 0:18:00.085
<v Speaker 1>as medical examiners is to determine a cause of death

0:18:00.405 --> 0:18:02.445
<v Speaker 1>and usually the manner of death, but that can vary

0:18:02.485 --> 0:18:04.165
<v Speaker 1>by a law depending on the state that you're in.

0:18:04.245 --> 0:18:08.005
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes the coroner makes it distinction. At our autopsy, we

0:18:08.925 --> 0:18:13.365
<v Speaker 1>can see what we see grossly and microscopically, and then

0:18:13.685 --> 0:18:17.205
<v Speaker 1>the cause of death ultimately is our opinion. So in

0:18:17.245 --> 0:18:21.685
<v Speaker 1>these three cases, people looked at the body, drew their

0:18:21.725 --> 0:18:25.525
<v Speaker 1>own conclusions, and then formed their own opinions. I think

0:18:25.645 --> 0:18:29.525
<v Speaker 1>some of the variation in the opinions comes from the

0:18:29.605 --> 0:18:33.165
<v Speaker 1>fact that the body was in different states each time.

0:18:33.485 --> 0:18:37.645
<v Speaker 1>You know, there had been dissections performed on it two

0:18:37.645 --> 0:18:40.725
<v Speaker 1>different times by the time the third autopsy happened. So

0:18:40.765 --> 0:18:46.565
<v Speaker 1>there's substantial autopsy artifact. There's decomposition artifact. You know, there's

0:18:46.645 --> 0:18:50.685
<v Speaker 1>embalming artifact. There are all these factors that could alter

0:18:50.965 --> 0:18:53.845
<v Speaker 1>potentially the way that things look. And then even it

0:18:54.885 --> 0:18:58.565
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone doing their you know, best job at

0:18:58.605 --> 0:19:02.685
<v Speaker 1>an autopsy, there can still be variability in the opinion

0:19:02.765 --> 0:19:07.845
<v Speaker 1>that people draw from those findings. To review the complicated

0:19:07.965 --> 0:19:12.565
<v Speaker 1>history of Janey's autopsies, let's go back to nineteen eighty nine.

0:19:13.005 --> 0:19:18.205
<v Speaker 1>Two days after Jane died, doctor Fowmi Mallick conducted an autopsy.

0:19:18.245 --> 0:19:20.685
<v Speaker 1>He said that the cause of death was a hyper

0:19:20.685 --> 0:19:24.685
<v Speaker 1>extension neck injury from falling off the porch. The manner

0:19:24.725 --> 0:19:29.765
<v Speaker 1>of death was undetermined. Doctor Malick was a controversial figure

0:19:29.805 --> 0:19:34.685
<v Speaker 1>in Arkansas. In nineteen ninety one, he quit amid allegations

0:19:34.725 --> 0:19:38.925
<v Speaker 1>that he bought several autopsies. In nineteen ninety two, two

0:19:39.045 --> 0:19:43.205
<v Speaker 1>out of state pathologists reviewed doctor Malick's work. They didn't

0:19:43.245 --> 0:19:46.205
<v Speaker 1>perform their own autopsy, but they did have access to

0:19:46.245 --> 0:19:49.445
<v Speaker 1>the report, the photos, and the x rays, the ones

0:19:49.445 --> 0:19:51.685
<v Speaker 1>where the side view had a white blob that blocked

0:19:51.685 --> 0:19:54.925
<v Speaker 1>most of Jane's neck. These are also the X rays

0:19:54.965 --> 0:19:57.365
<v Speaker 1>that the words said were different from the ones they

0:19:57.365 --> 0:20:00.925
<v Speaker 1>saw at the crime lab. At the crime lab, they

0:20:00.965 --> 0:20:03.965
<v Speaker 1>insisted that they saw X rays where it was clear

0:20:04.085 --> 0:20:07.005
<v Speaker 1>that Janey had a broken neck, but the pathologists in

0:20:07.085 --> 0:20:10.085
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety two said they were not convinced that Janey

0:20:10.125 --> 0:20:14.005
<v Speaker 1>had his final injury. They also said the X rays

0:20:14.085 --> 0:20:18.205
<v Speaker 1>looked like those of a male skull. They changed Janey's

0:20:18.205 --> 0:20:21.365
<v Speaker 1>death certificate, leaving both the cause of death and the

0:20:21.405 --> 0:20:26.765
<v Speaker 1>manner of death as undetermined. Then doctor Burnell conducted his

0:20:26.805 --> 0:20:30.885
<v Speaker 1>autopsy in two thousand and four, fifteen years after Janey died.

0:20:32.205 --> 0:20:35.245
<v Speaker 1>He also concluded that Janey died from a neck injury

0:20:35.765 --> 0:20:39.125
<v Speaker 1>and had blunt forced trauma to the face. He said

0:20:39.485 --> 0:20:43.005
<v Speaker 1>the manner of death was homicide. Doctor Cox was a

0:20:43.045 --> 0:20:45.845
<v Speaker 1>medical examiner at the crime lab at that time, and

0:20:45.925 --> 0:20:49.525
<v Speaker 1>he wrote a scathing review of doctor Burnell's findings, mostly

0:20:49.565 --> 0:20:53.165
<v Speaker 1>citing the lack of evidence and documentation for doctor Burnell's conclusions.

0:20:54.725 --> 0:20:58.485
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pluss's autopsy was in two thousand and seven, eighteen

0:20:58.565 --> 0:21:03.285
<v Speaker 1>years after Janey died, and after two other autopsies he

0:21:03.405 --> 0:21:06.605
<v Speaker 1>left the death certificate as undetermined in both cause and

0:21:06.685 --> 0:21:09.445
<v Speaker 1>manner of death, and said he saw no evidence of

0:21:09.485 --> 0:21:13.565
<v Speaker 1>a spinal injury. We discussed doctor Cooke's review of doctor

0:21:13.565 --> 0:21:17.885
<v Speaker 1>Burnell's autopsy in episode five. We asked doctor Grace Dukes

0:21:18.005 --> 0:21:21.685
<v Speaker 1>her impressions of that autopsy. Normally, an autopsy, you know,

0:21:21.685 --> 0:21:27.885
<v Speaker 1>would include the external exam, documentation of identifying Marx injuries,

0:21:28.205 --> 0:21:32.045
<v Speaker 1>you know, any sort of distinctive feature. Then you know,

0:21:32.085 --> 0:21:34.485
<v Speaker 1>there would be an internal examination where we examine the organs.

0:21:34.525 --> 0:21:38.805
<v Speaker 1>Obviously in an embalmed, decomposing body with a bag of

0:21:38.885 --> 0:21:41.605
<v Speaker 1>organs in the abdomen, you know that's going to be limited.

0:21:42.325 --> 0:21:45.285
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, putting in sections for microscopic exam,

0:21:45.365 --> 0:21:48.445
<v Speaker 1>which would also be relatively limited because the tissues will

0:21:48.485 --> 0:21:53.485
<v Speaker 1>be decomposing, and then potentially photographs and X rays, et cetera. So,

0:21:53.765 --> 0:21:58.885
<v Speaker 1>I mean, many of those tasks were performed. I think

0:21:59.365 --> 0:22:03.605
<v Speaker 1>he is a bit more brief in how he documents them.

0:22:04.445 --> 0:22:08.645
<v Speaker 1>It is a significantly you know, more brief report than

0:22:08.765 --> 0:22:13.965
<v Speaker 1>say doctor Plus's report, which is very thorough. But the

0:22:14.045 --> 0:22:19.165
<v Speaker 1>conclusion that the second autopsy came to that this was

0:22:19.205 --> 0:22:22.165
<v Speaker 1>a homicide. You know, if you're going to change a

0:22:22.205 --> 0:22:25.125
<v Speaker 1>manner of death to especially to a homicide where people

0:22:25.125 --> 0:22:29.245
<v Speaker 1>could be prosecuted. I think it's important to do all

0:22:29.285 --> 0:22:33.485
<v Speaker 1>of the documentation of those injuries that you say, you

0:22:33.525 --> 0:22:38.165
<v Speaker 1>know were the lethal injuries causing the death in a homicide.

0:22:38.565 --> 0:22:41.765
<v Speaker 1>And I think some of that isn't isn't present and

0:22:41.925 --> 0:22:45.645
<v Speaker 1>wasn't subject to examination later. You know, doctor Plus couldn't

0:22:45.645 --> 0:22:48.645
<v Speaker 1>go back and look at the photographs and look at

0:22:48.645 --> 0:22:51.245
<v Speaker 1>the detail and the report necessarily and come to that

0:22:51.285 --> 0:22:55.205
<v Speaker 1>same conclusion, and other pathologists couldn't either. Much of doctor

0:22:55.245 --> 0:22:59.365
<v Speaker 1>Plus's autopsy and doctor Barnell's, to an extent, are dedicated

0:22:59.365 --> 0:23:03.725
<v Speaker 1>to autopsy artifact, that is, observations about the changes on

0:23:03.765 --> 0:23:06.725
<v Speaker 1>the body that are due to previous autos, not the

0:23:06.765 --> 0:23:10.645
<v Speaker 1>original injury. And so much of the debate over Jane's

0:23:10.725 --> 0:23:14.165
<v Speaker 1>cause and manner of death has come from observations of

0:23:14.205 --> 0:23:19.365
<v Speaker 1>her face. Ron Wards said he saw bruising, and even

0:23:19.405 --> 0:23:23.405
<v Speaker 1>doctor Plus admitted that according to ron Ward's pictures, it

0:23:23.565 --> 0:23:27.325
<v Speaker 1>did look like Jane had discoloration to her face. But

0:23:27.405 --> 0:23:31.325
<v Speaker 1>there is post mortem lividity. So lividity is the natural

0:23:31.485 --> 0:23:35.125
<v Speaker 1>settling of the blood within the blood vessels after a

0:23:35.165 --> 0:23:38.365
<v Speaker 1>person dies, so everything just sort of, you know, flows

0:23:38.405 --> 0:23:42.405
<v Speaker 1>down to the dependent portions dependent to gravity, and so

0:23:42.645 --> 0:23:45.165
<v Speaker 1>the blood is within those vessels, and then over a

0:23:45.205 --> 0:23:48.045
<v Speaker 1>matter of hours, the blood can lice and link out

0:23:48.045 --> 0:23:51.325
<v Speaker 1>of those vessels and it'll become what we call fixed,

0:23:51.765 --> 0:23:53.805
<v Speaker 1>where you know, when it's just in the vessels, you

0:23:53.805 --> 0:23:55.485
<v Speaker 1>can push on it and you can make a white

0:23:55.485 --> 0:23:58.805
<v Speaker 1>spot on the skin. Once it becomes fixed, well you

0:23:58.805 --> 0:24:01.285
<v Speaker 1>can push on it and it'll it'll stay fixed there.

0:24:02.485 --> 0:24:05.365
<v Speaker 1>So that happens over a matter of hours. Doctor Do

0:24:05.685 --> 0:24:08.245
<v Speaker 1>said it can be hard to tell between injuries and

0:24:08.325 --> 0:24:11.645
<v Speaker 1>libidity because if a body isn't embalmed in a timely

0:24:11.685 --> 0:24:14.925
<v Speaker 1>manner after death, both of these things can cause what

0:24:15.005 --> 0:24:18.565
<v Speaker 1>looks like hemorrhaging under the skin. But in his autopsy,

0:24:19.045 --> 0:24:22.405
<v Speaker 1>doctor Plus said there was no hemorrhaging underneath the surface

0:24:22.405 --> 0:24:25.845
<v Speaker 1>of the face, so it seems that any discoloration on

0:24:25.925 --> 0:24:30.965
<v Speaker 1>Jane's face happened after death. Doctor Plus's other huge finding

0:24:31.405 --> 0:24:34.045
<v Speaker 1>was that doctor Malick had removed part of the spinal cord,

0:24:34.565 --> 0:24:38.405
<v Speaker 1>which doctor Plus said was an unusual autopsy practice, and

0:24:38.445 --> 0:24:43.325
<v Speaker 1>he concluded that there was in fact no spinal injury.

0:24:43.445 --> 0:24:47.005
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Duke said that conclusion seems definitive because of the

0:24:47.085 --> 0:24:50.285
<v Speaker 1>use of the CT scanner. So the CT scan is

0:24:50.765 --> 0:24:55.965
<v Speaker 1>performed at some medical examiner's offices, but it's few. Uh.

0:24:56.085 --> 0:24:59.525
<v Speaker 1>It's helpful because you get an image of the skeleton

0:25:00.125 --> 0:25:03.365
<v Speaker 1>without having to cut it or scrape tissue off. It's

0:25:03.485 --> 0:25:04.965
<v Speaker 1>just as you know, as if you went into a

0:25:04.965 --> 0:25:07.285
<v Speaker 1>hospital and they were imaging you and they could see

0:25:07.325 --> 0:25:10.485
<v Speaker 1>your skeleton and if there was fracture, if there was abnormality,

0:25:11.365 --> 0:25:14.485
<v Speaker 1>and so to have the CT scan of the whole body,

0:25:14.725 --> 0:25:17.925
<v Speaker 1>you know, and show having a radiologist examine it and

0:25:17.965 --> 0:25:21.885
<v Speaker 1>show that there was not trauma there, there were not fractures,

0:25:22.605 --> 0:25:26.125
<v Speaker 1>is very very helpful. Whereas you know, in the first autopsy,

0:25:26.325 --> 0:25:29.445
<v Speaker 1>he was the pathologist was looking at all of these

0:25:29.485 --> 0:25:33.125
<v Speaker 1>and feeling them and you know, I don't know how

0:25:33.205 --> 0:25:35.045
<v Speaker 1>much of the tissue he scraped off or what he

0:25:35.085 --> 0:25:37.845
<v Speaker 1>removed or what he cut, but you know, he came

0:25:37.885 --> 0:25:40.165
<v Speaker 1>to the conclusion that there were fractures there, and then

0:25:40.205 --> 0:25:43.605
<v Speaker 1>the CT scan was able to definitively show that that

0:25:43.725 --> 0:25:47.085
<v Speaker 1>wasn't true. We also asked doctor Dukes about a couple

0:25:47.085 --> 0:25:51.405
<v Speaker 1>of other theories, including the one that Janie drowned. So

0:25:51.765 --> 0:25:54.845
<v Speaker 1>there's a in one of the early reviews of the autopsy,

0:25:54.885 --> 0:25:58.845
<v Speaker 1>there's mention of or and in the investigative reporting there's

0:25:59.165 --> 0:26:02.045
<v Speaker 1>mention of her clothing being wet and there's sand under

0:26:02.045 --> 0:26:06.845
<v Speaker 1>her undergarments, And so I think that's a reason a proposal.

0:26:07.485 --> 0:26:11.605
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately, you know, drowning is a diagnosis of exclusion,

0:26:12.765 --> 0:26:17.685
<v Speaker 1>so it relies heavily on investigative findings, and as far

0:26:17.725 --> 0:26:21.365
<v Speaker 1>as I could tell from what I looked at, investigative

0:26:21.365 --> 0:26:27.085
<v Speaker 1>findings in the interviews don't support that the choking. You know,

0:26:27.285 --> 0:26:30.605
<v Speaker 1>to have a food bullus stuck in your throat and

0:26:30.645 --> 0:26:33.885
<v Speaker 1>you're you know, trying to inhale past it or breathe

0:26:33.885 --> 0:26:36.325
<v Speaker 1>past it in your straining and you're you're increasing the

0:26:36.365 --> 0:26:39.445
<v Speaker 1>pressure in your lungs, in the blood vessels of your lungs,

0:26:40.365 --> 0:26:43.405
<v Speaker 1>in your airways. So you can get those little particual

0:26:43.445 --> 0:26:47.365
<v Speaker 1>hemorrhages in a situation like that. But you know that

0:26:47.365 --> 0:26:52.325
<v Speaker 1>that can happen. It's it's reasonable. Again, you know, nothing

0:26:52.325 --> 0:26:57.445
<v Speaker 1>about the investigation suggests that she was choking. There was

0:26:57.485 --> 0:27:00.805
<v Speaker 1>no food bowlus noted in her airway at the first autopsy.

0:27:01.645 --> 0:27:03.925
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if it were lodged in there, you know,

0:27:04.085 --> 0:27:06.765
<v Speaker 1>in ems didn't suction it out, which is a thing

0:27:06.805 --> 0:27:10.005
<v Speaker 1>that happens too as they're trying to clear the airway.

0:27:10.045 --> 0:27:11.525
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much she was I don't know

0:27:11.565 --> 0:27:15.365
<v Speaker 1>how much resuscitation was done on her. When Kathy, who

0:27:15.445 --> 0:27:18.445
<v Speaker 1>worked at the Ambulance Service, talked with investigators in two

0:27:18.485 --> 0:27:21.925
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven, she said she didn't see anything visibly

0:27:21.965 --> 0:27:25.045
<v Speaker 1>wrong with Janie's spine, and she also said she didn't

0:27:25.045 --> 0:27:28.125
<v Speaker 1>see any blockage in the windpipe, which could have indicated

0:27:28.245 --> 0:27:32.125
<v Speaker 1>that Jennie choked, Which leaves just one more question for

0:27:32.205 --> 0:27:36.925
<v Speaker 1>doctor Duke's Could Janey have had a heart problem? Yeah,

0:27:36.965 --> 0:27:41.205
<v Speaker 1>I think that has to be considered a possibility because

0:27:41.525 --> 0:27:47.005
<v Speaker 1>there are basically negative findings on her. There's the finding

0:27:47.045 --> 0:27:49.325
<v Speaker 1>of the larynx and I don't you know this many

0:27:49.405 --> 0:27:52.285
<v Speaker 1>years later. I don't know if there's something else that

0:27:52.325 --> 0:27:55.165
<v Speaker 1>could cause that or not. But so they're the petiqui

0:27:55.685 --> 0:27:58.565
<v Speaker 1>and then there's the history of the wet clothing in

0:27:58.605 --> 0:28:02.925
<v Speaker 1>the sand, and so there are other possibilities. There's not

0:28:03.485 --> 0:28:07.125
<v Speaker 1>definite proof of any of those scenario. But in terms

0:28:07.165 --> 0:28:11.765
<v Speaker 1>of a cardiac arrhythmia, anytime you have a death, especially

0:28:11.765 --> 0:28:16.525
<v Speaker 1>in a young healthy person with no findings, you have

0:28:16.605 --> 0:28:20.125
<v Speaker 1>to consider that a possibility, just some natural disease process

0:28:20.165 --> 0:28:24.925
<v Speaker 1>where she suddenly, you know, collapsed. Like the ward's lawyer,

0:28:25.005 --> 0:28:29.445
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Sallings said about the investigative evidence, there's really nothing

0:28:29.485 --> 0:28:33.165
<v Speaker 1>more that can be done in the forensic field, and

0:28:33.205 --> 0:28:36.445
<v Speaker 1>that's because of a series of errors that built up

0:28:36.645 --> 0:28:40.205
<v Speaker 1>over time. It started with doctor Mallet, who removed part

0:28:40.205 --> 0:28:44.165
<v Speaker 1>of the spinal cord with no explanation. Jane's fingernails were

0:28:44.205 --> 0:28:49.525
<v Speaker 1>never swabbed, the X rays were either poorly taken or lost. Also,

0:28:49.965 --> 0:28:53.845
<v Speaker 1>doctor Mallet mislabeled his cause of death. He said it

0:28:53.885 --> 0:28:57.245
<v Speaker 1>was a hyper extension injury, but based on his theory

0:28:57.285 --> 0:29:01.245
<v Speaker 1>of how she died falling back in her head snapping forward,

0:29:01.725 --> 0:29:06.125
<v Speaker 1>it's actually a hyperflection injury. Doctor Bonnell's lack of documentation

0:29:06.485 --> 0:29:10.605
<v Speaker 1>made it impossible to understand his findings. He made claims

0:29:10.645 --> 0:29:14.405
<v Speaker 1>that were not backed up by the evidence. His descriptions

0:29:14.405 --> 0:29:17.725
<v Speaker 1>of the injuries were brief, and by the time doctor

0:29:17.765 --> 0:29:24.925
<v Speaker 1>Pluss did his autopsy, Jane's body had significant autopsy artifact. Still,

0:29:25.605 --> 0:29:29.285
<v Speaker 1>because of the CT scan, it seems pretty convincing that

0:29:29.325 --> 0:29:32.805
<v Speaker 1>she didn't have a spinal injury. We'll be right back.

0:29:45.885 --> 0:29:49.605
<v Speaker 1>The third autopsy concludes that there was no injury to

0:29:49.685 --> 0:29:53.605
<v Speaker 1>Janie's spine, but we wanted to go back one more

0:29:53.685 --> 0:29:56.885
<v Speaker 1>time and take another look at the spinal cord because

0:29:56.925 --> 0:29:59.725
<v Speaker 1>that has been the focus of the investigation into Janie's death,

0:30:00.405 --> 0:30:03.525
<v Speaker 1>and with no spinal injury, most of the theories about

0:30:03.525 --> 0:30:07.885
<v Speaker 1>how Janie died don't make any sense. Even doctor Plus

0:30:07.885 --> 0:30:10.805
<v Speaker 1>agreed it is odd that doctor Malick would have removed

0:30:10.845 --> 0:30:14.005
<v Speaker 1>part of the spinal cord in that first autopsy. That

0:30:14.165 --> 0:30:17.005
<v Speaker 1>is not typical, and because that part of the spinal

0:30:17.045 --> 0:30:21.125
<v Speaker 1>cord was removed, neither doctor Burnell nor doctor Plus could

0:30:21.165 --> 0:30:23.645
<v Speaker 1>actually see the part of the spinal cord that would

0:30:23.685 --> 0:30:27.725
<v Speaker 1>have been injured. Unlike the cord, the vertebrae were intact

0:30:28.525 --> 0:30:31.565
<v Speaker 1>and the CT scan in the third autopsy did not

0:30:31.685 --> 0:30:35.205
<v Speaker 1>show any fractures to these bones. When we talked with

0:30:35.245 --> 0:30:39.325
<v Speaker 1>a journalist, Jason Peterson, the reporter who did the demonstration

0:30:39.405 --> 0:30:42.165
<v Speaker 1>of Janie falling off the porch, he brought up one

0:30:42.165 --> 0:30:45.925
<v Speaker 1>more theory that Jane had been injured before the party,

0:30:46.805 --> 0:30:51.405
<v Speaker 1>but that she hadn't collapsed until hours later. Doctor Plus's

0:30:51.445 --> 0:30:54.645
<v Speaker 1>autopsy revealed that Janie did have bruising on her elbow,

0:30:55.005 --> 0:30:57.445
<v Speaker 1>and he did confirm that she had the large bruise

0:30:57.485 --> 0:30:59.685
<v Speaker 1>on her back. Although a lot of people really didn't

0:30:59.725 --> 0:31:01.405
<v Speaker 1>want to talk with me when I called, there were

0:31:01.405 --> 0:31:03.285
<v Speaker 1>some who did, and there were some who were actually

0:31:03.365 --> 0:31:07.805
<v Speaker 1>quite chatty, And one of them was Billy. He was

0:31:07.845 --> 0:31:11.565
<v Speaker 1>one of the three people who said he saw Jane

0:31:11.765 --> 0:31:14.805
<v Speaker 1>fall off the porch, and so I wanted to talk

0:31:14.845 --> 0:31:16.845
<v Speaker 1>to him and see if he had any theories. And

0:31:16.885 --> 0:31:19.205
<v Speaker 1>when I asked him what his theory of what happened was,

0:31:19.925 --> 0:31:22.005
<v Speaker 1>he said, and I'm quoting for my notes here, I

0:31:22.045 --> 0:31:24.485
<v Speaker 1>know she fell off the porch, but I don't think

0:31:24.525 --> 0:31:26.845
<v Speaker 1>the fall killed her. I think she was suffering from

0:31:26.885 --> 0:31:29.525
<v Speaker 1>a previous injury. I think something happened to her either

0:31:29.645 --> 0:31:32.405
<v Speaker 1>hours before or maybe a couple of days before, that

0:31:32.645 --> 0:31:35.645
<v Speaker 1>just caught up with her caused her to fall. And

0:31:35.685 --> 0:31:38.365
<v Speaker 1>then Janie had been at the cabin earlier in the day.

0:31:38.645 --> 0:31:40.685
<v Speaker 1>I seem to recall that she had gone down to

0:31:40.725 --> 0:31:43.765
<v Speaker 1>the river to swim. I also remember hearing that the

0:31:43.765 --> 0:31:46.525
<v Speaker 1>guy who drove her down there he was spinning donuts

0:31:46.565 --> 0:31:48.365
<v Speaker 1>and Janie was thrown out of the back of the

0:31:48.405 --> 0:31:51.725
<v Speaker 1>truck and was injured. That way, and maybe she thought

0:31:51.765 --> 0:31:54.565
<v Speaker 1>she was okay but was really injured more seriously than

0:31:54.565 --> 0:31:57.725
<v Speaker 1>she thought. Kids take their trucks down to the Buffalo River,

0:31:57.845 --> 0:31:59.685
<v Speaker 1>which is about two miles from the cabin, all the

0:31:59.685 --> 0:32:02.845
<v Speaker 1>time to do that. And so this is the first

0:32:02.885 --> 0:32:06.245
<v Speaker 1>I heard anything about an earlier trip day to the river,

0:32:06.605 --> 0:32:08.645
<v Speaker 1>and who may have may or may not have been there.

0:32:09.205 --> 0:32:11.765
<v Speaker 1>And so but as I started to think about his

0:32:12.165 --> 0:32:17.325
<v Speaker 1>theory and the physical evidence, you know, she had unexplained

0:32:17.365 --> 0:32:20.685
<v Speaker 1>sand and gravel, and her clothes were wet, I mean

0:32:20.725 --> 0:32:23.685
<v Speaker 1>sand and gravel like under her undergarments, and you know,

0:32:23.805 --> 0:32:26.525
<v Speaker 1>falling out of a truck or another person said there

0:32:26.565 --> 0:32:28.845
<v Speaker 1>was a fight down by the river. You know, those

0:32:29.325 --> 0:32:32.525
<v Speaker 1>those things explained the presence, the unexplained presence of the

0:32:32.565 --> 0:32:35.245
<v Speaker 1>sand and gravel in her you know, under her clothes,

0:32:35.325 --> 0:32:38.085
<v Speaker 1>and why her clothes were wet. If she saw out

0:32:38.085 --> 0:32:40.725
<v Speaker 1>of a moving truck and landing on her head, you know,

0:32:40.805 --> 0:32:43.205
<v Speaker 1>face first, that could explain how her neck could have

0:32:43.245 --> 0:32:47.125
<v Speaker 1>been that badly injured. Now, how you get to that

0:32:47.245 --> 0:32:50.205
<v Speaker 1>middle ground where you're hurt really bad, but you're still

0:32:50.285 --> 0:32:53.365
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a walking wounded. You know, you'd need

0:32:53.405 --> 0:32:56.725
<v Speaker 1>to talk to someone with more medical knowledge than myself

0:32:56.805 --> 0:32:58.805
<v Speaker 1>to see if that's even possible. From what I saw

0:32:58.805 --> 0:33:02.045
<v Speaker 1>in the case file, most of Janie's day appears to

0:33:02.045 --> 0:33:05.605
<v Speaker 1>be accounted for in the investigative evidence she was is

0:33:05.605 --> 0:33:08.245
<v Speaker 1>that her friend Leslie's house, then went to the grocery

0:33:08.245 --> 0:33:10.925
<v Speaker 1>store in the pool hall, and then got picked up

0:33:10.965 --> 0:33:13.645
<v Speaker 1>by Ron to go to the party. So this theory

0:33:13.645 --> 0:33:15.565
<v Speaker 1>that she went down to the river before the party

0:33:15.965 --> 0:33:18.765
<v Speaker 1>seems like a stretch. But I bring it up because

0:33:18.765 --> 0:33:20.805
<v Speaker 1>I did talk to someone who knows a lot about

0:33:20.845 --> 0:33:24.805
<v Speaker 1>spinal injuries. His name is Douglas Cohen, and he's a

0:33:24.845 --> 0:33:29.125
<v Speaker 1>Harvard educated neurosurgeon who operates on catastrophic spinal injuries daily.

0:33:30.525 --> 0:33:32.325
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get to the bottom of all of

0:33:32.325 --> 0:33:36.245
<v Speaker 1>our remaining spinal cord questions. Could Janey have had a

0:33:36.245 --> 0:33:39.285
<v Speaker 1>previous injury that led to her collapse, and is there

0:33:39.325 --> 0:33:41.565
<v Speaker 1>any way she could have had a spinal cord injury

0:33:41.925 --> 0:33:45.725
<v Speaker 1>if the vertebras surrounding the cord weren't broken. I guess

0:33:45.725 --> 0:33:48.565
<v Speaker 1>the first question I would have is having seen the

0:33:48.605 --> 0:33:54.605
<v Speaker 1>autopsy report. Apparently in the first autopsy the cord the

0:33:54.645 --> 0:33:59.365
<v Speaker 1>spinal cord was either taken out or her parents seemed

0:33:59.405 --> 0:34:02.485
<v Speaker 1>to think that the spinal cord was cut by some

0:34:02.525 --> 0:34:04.765
<v Speaker 1>type of injury, but then it didn't break any bones,

0:34:04.805 --> 0:34:07.045
<v Speaker 1>And we're trying to how likely that would be to happen.

0:34:07.605 --> 0:34:11.365
<v Speaker 1>Exceedingly unlikely in a young, healthy, young adult. You can

0:34:11.405 --> 0:34:14.365
<v Speaker 1>see something like that in an infant where the bones

0:34:14.405 --> 0:34:18.725
<v Speaker 1>aren't kind of well formed and there's more cartilaginous connections.

0:34:19.645 --> 0:34:24.685
<v Speaker 1>But I have never seen any direct damage to the

0:34:24.725 --> 0:34:28.005
<v Speaker 1>spinal cord without significant bony damage. That would not be

0:34:28.405 --> 0:34:33.245
<v Speaker 1>your expectation in somebody who was a young adult. Okay,

0:34:33.285 --> 0:34:36.165
<v Speaker 1>so the theory that what about the theory that some

0:34:36.245 --> 0:34:38.965
<v Speaker 1>other people have that earlier in the day she was

0:34:39.005 --> 0:34:42.845
<v Speaker 1>injured and the injury didn't manifest until she just and

0:34:43.125 --> 0:34:46.285
<v Speaker 1>that injury caused her to collapse at the party. You know,

0:34:46.565 --> 0:34:52.845
<v Speaker 1>those things are possible, but to get exceedingly rare. Generally,

0:34:53.005 --> 0:34:56.925
<v Speaker 1>when you have a traumatic injury, you're going to get

0:34:57.245 --> 0:35:02.245
<v Speaker 1>some kind of symptoms, significant complaints, even if you go

0:35:02.325 --> 0:35:05.165
<v Speaker 1>on to develop what is known as an unstable cervical spine,

0:35:05.165 --> 0:35:07.845
<v Speaker 1>which is reason why you know we see him and

0:35:07.965 --> 0:35:12.285
<v Speaker 1>instead of putting hard collars on patients, theoretically you injured

0:35:12.325 --> 0:35:16.445
<v Speaker 1>your spinal the structures so that you have an unstable

0:35:16.725 --> 0:35:19.805
<v Speaker 1>cervical spinal canal even though the spinal cord itself is

0:35:19.805 --> 0:35:23.485
<v Speaker 1>not injured. In theory, that is, a person who without

0:35:23.565 --> 0:35:28.365
<v Speaker 1>proper bracing can go on to develop worsening spinal cord injury.

0:35:28.645 --> 0:35:31.685
<v Speaker 1>But it is not somebody who will have no complaints

0:35:31.725 --> 0:35:34.485
<v Speaker 1>of pain, who will be up and walking around, who

0:35:34.565 --> 0:35:36.645
<v Speaker 1>will be, you know, feeling well enough to go to

0:35:36.685 --> 0:35:39.365
<v Speaker 1>a party and drink beer. In that circumstance, you can

0:35:39.405 --> 0:35:42.685
<v Speaker 1>have a patient with you know, at landish and almost

0:35:42.685 --> 0:35:46.525
<v Speaker 1>insufferable amounts of neck pain, very difficult to move around,

0:35:47.485 --> 0:35:50.125
<v Speaker 1>great deal of pain literally to get up from a

0:35:50.125 --> 0:35:53.005
<v Speaker 1>seated position, let alone to walk around. So it's not

0:35:53.165 --> 0:35:56.885
<v Speaker 1>something that you would expect to be clinically subtle enough

0:35:57.125 --> 0:35:59.965
<v Speaker 1>for a person to kind of go about is or

0:35:59.965 --> 0:36:01.845
<v Speaker 1>her business for the next several hours and then will

0:36:01.845 --> 0:36:05.405
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden sustain a life ending injury like this.

0:36:05.565 --> 0:36:09.525
<v Speaker 1>That would be very, very unlikely. Is it possible for

0:36:09.965 --> 0:36:13.045
<v Speaker 1>a you know, otherwise healthy teenager to fall of the

0:36:13.085 --> 0:36:15.565
<v Speaker 1>step less than ten inches high in such a way

0:36:15.605 --> 0:36:18.765
<v Speaker 1>that she would sustain this type of entury? Have you

0:36:18.805 --> 0:36:22.165
<v Speaker 1>seen that? Well? What I will tell you is that

0:36:22.525 --> 0:36:28.085
<v Speaker 1>you can yes a fool like that. Generally, although unusually,

0:36:28.325 --> 0:36:32.005
<v Speaker 1>can cause somebody's death. It does not cause somebody's death

0:36:32.005 --> 0:36:35.685
<v Speaker 1>through serviable spine injury. However, that would be exceedingly rare

0:36:36.045 --> 0:36:41.445
<v Speaker 1>and almost unheard of without any significant bony aftermaldies. When

0:36:41.485 --> 0:36:45.565
<v Speaker 1>I operate on, you know, a traumatically injured spinal cord,

0:36:45.965 --> 0:36:48.845
<v Speaker 1>it is looking mess in there. Things are torn and

0:36:48.925 --> 0:36:52.725
<v Speaker 1>bleeding and bones are broken, so it's not something that's subtle.

0:36:53.165 --> 0:36:57.205
<v Speaker 1>What generally kills people when they fall is if they

0:36:57.485 --> 0:37:00.485
<v Speaker 1>fall in a particular fashion, either kind of hitting the

0:37:00.485 --> 0:37:02.405
<v Speaker 1>back of their head or the front of the head,

0:37:02.845 --> 0:37:05.845
<v Speaker 1>they can go on to develop a significant contusive injury

0:37:05.885 --> 0:37:09.725
<v Speaker 1>of the brain increased into cranial pressure, and that can

0:37:09.805 --> 0:37:14.045
<v Speaker 1>potentially cause death. It generally doesn't happen suddenly. It can

0:37:14.165 --> 0:37:17.045
<v Speaker 1>happen suddenly, but at least that would be consistent with

0:37:17.165 --> 0:37:21.845
<v Speaker 1>kind of pathophysiologic processes of which I'm familiar. A person

0:37:22.005 --> 0:37:26.765
<v Speaker 1>falling off a tan inge step, sustaining a hyperflection injury

0:37:26.805 --> 0:37:30.205
<v Speaker 1>with essentially minimal or no bony injury, and then dying

0:37:30.245 --> 0:37:34.165
<v Speaker 1>because of a cervical cord injury. It is, as I

0:37:34.205 --> 0:37:36.165
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in my experience unheard of, at least in the

0:37:36.165 --> 0:37:40.325
<v Speaker 1>clinical setting, right, And what about someone hitting her in

0:37:40.325 --> 0:37:42.605
<v Speaker 1>the face, if that had happened, someone hitting her in

0:37:42.605 --> 0:37:45.645
<v Speaker 1>the face of baseball bat and her dying from that, well,

0:37:46.125 --> 0:37:51.165
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly possible. Again, if you hit somebody hard enough

0:37:51.165 --> 0:37:53.285
<v Speaker 1>in the face and they lose consciousness and fall back

0:37:53.325 --> 0:37:55.485
<v Speaker 1>and hit the back of their head, that also can

0:37:55.565 --> 0:37:58.965
<v Speaker 1>be potentially lethal injury. But you know, you would expect

0:37:59.125 --> 0:38:02.725
<v Speaker 1>a profound amount of contucive injury where the bat made

0:38:02.725 --> 0:38:07.045
<v Speaker 1>contact with the scalp or skull or no eyescke. I

0:38:07.085 --> 0:38:10.525
<v Speaker 1>do recall some mention of some kind of orbital echumoses

0:38:10.605 --> 0:38:14.605
<v Speaker 1>on like the second or third uh what autopsy, And

0:38:14.645 --> 0:38:17.485
<v Speaker 1>I don't recall specifically, But if you hit somebody court

0:38:17.565 --> 0:38:21.805
<v Speaker 1>enough in the face to kill them, you're gonna without

0:38:21.845 --> 0:38:26.045
<v Speaker 1>be too facetious, you're gonna leave a mark. The coroner,

0:38:26.325 --> 0:38:29.165
<v Speaker 1>most of the witnesses of the party, Kathy who worked

0:38:29.165 --> 0:38:33.085
<v Speaker 1>at the ambulance service, and investigator Bill Beach. None of

0:38:33.125 --> 0:38:35.765
<v Speaker 1>these people said they saw obvious injuries on Janey the

0:38:35.845 --> 0:38:38.885
<v Speaker 1>night she died. And no matter how we stretch the

0:38:38.885 --> 0:38:43.525
<v Speaker 1>theories around Janie's death, it seems very unlikely that Jane

0:38:43.605 --> 0:38:46.685
<v Speaker 1>could have died from a spinal injury. That means that

0:38:46.725 --> 0:38:50.925
<v Speaker 1>any evidence that supports doctor Bannell's conclusion of homicide does

0:38:50.965 --> 0:38:55.245
<v Speaker 1>not seem to exist. On June fifth, two thousand and nine,

0:38:55.765 --> 0:38:58.205
<v Speaker 1>the Judge of the Third Division of the Sarcey County

0:38:58.205 --> 0:39:03.325
<v Speaker 1>Court signed an order. It reads, the Special Prosecuting Attorney

0:39:03.445 --> 0:39:06.285
<v Speaker 1>has found no probable cause for the filing of any

0:39:06.285 --> 0:39:09.245
<v Speaker 1>criminal charges as a result of his investigation and the

0:39:09.285 --> 0:39:13.125
<v Speaker 1>forensic reports, nor has he found it necessary to request

0:39:13.165 --> 0:39:16.405
<v Speaker 1>the calling of a grand jury. It is further ordered

0:39:16.765 --> 0:39:21.045
<v Speaker 1>that the Special Prosecutor, Tim Williamson is relieved from any

0:39:21.085 --> 0:39:30.605
<v Speaker 1>further responsibility. I'm Katherine Townsend and this is Helen Gone.

0:39:30.805 --> 0:39:34.085
<v Speaker 1>Helen Gone is a joint production between School of Humans

0:39:34.205 --> 0:39:38.605
<v Speaker 1>and iHeartRadio. It is written and recorded by me. Katherine Townsend.

0:39:39.285 --> 0:39:43.045
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Church and Gabby Watts are our producers and story editors.

0:39:43.805 --> 0:39:47.525
<v Speaker 1>Executive producers are Brandon Barr, Brian Lavin, and L. C.

0:39:47.685 --> 0:39:50.845
<v Speaker 1>Crowley for School of Humans and Connell Byrne and Chuck

0:39:50.885 --> 0:39:55.805
<v Speaker 1>Bryant for iHeart. Our field producer is Miranda Hawkins. Theme

0:39:55.885 --> 0:39:59.645
<v Speaker 1>and original score are by Ben Sale. Available wherever you

0:39:59.685 --> 0:40:03.485
<v Speaker 1>get your music. Please visit us at helen gonpodcast dot

0:40:03.525 --> 0:40:18.685
<v Speaker 1>com or follow us on socialcial media. School of Humans