WEBVTT - BI Weekend: US Earnings, Kenvue Deal, Ridesharing Latest 

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio, Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>How do you think the FED is looking at tariffs?

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 2>The uncertainty of terriffs.

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a look at the sectors and how.

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 2>They performed a lot of investors getting whip saled every

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 2>day by news.

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Events, breaking market headlines.

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 4>And corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Could we see a market disruption of market events?

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 2>So people just too exuberant out there?

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 3>You see some so called low quality stocks driving this

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 3>short term rally.

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarletfoo and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and Bloomberg Originals.

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 2>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>business stories impacting Wall Street and global markets.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week, we provide in depth research and

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries are analysts covered worldwide.

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Today, as earning season rolls on, we'll take a look

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>at results from some of the biggest names in food, travel,

0:00:58.280 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and entertainment.

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Plus the cash stock While at Berkshire, Hathway grows through

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 3>a record.

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 2>But first this week, Young Brands launched a strategic review

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 2>for the pizza maker Pizza Hut. This comes after the

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 2>company reported earnings that beat Wall Street estimates. For more,

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 2>we were joined by Michael Halen, Bloomberg Intelligence senior restaurant

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 2>and food service analyst, first to ask Michael for his

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 2>take on the possible sale of Pizza Hut.

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 5>I think this was kind of a long time coming.

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 5>It's really been a drag on the top and bottom

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 5>line growth. Taco Bell is an absolute monster as putting

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 5>up strong unit growth as well as same store sales

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 5>growth quarter after quarter after quarter. KFC has had some

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 5>well documented same store sales issues in the US, but

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 5>that seems to be turning. They had a solid little

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 5>quarter here with flat same store sales versus six straight

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 5>quarters of decline, so that business seems to be accelerating

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 5>a little bit. And KFC unit growth overseas is phenomenal,

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 5>absolutely phenomenal. They crush it overseas. Yeah, So Pizza Hut

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.559
<v Speaker 5>has been this drag on this business for quite some time.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 5>I think the street is is really excited about a

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 5>potential divestiture here.

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Any potential buyers out there that you can identify, No,

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 2>we don't have.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 5>We don't think any of the companies in the public

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 5>market are going to be an acquirer of pizza hut.

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 5>We you know this this thing is, like I said,

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 5>has struggled mightily. I mean we can see pete private equity.

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 5>I think private equity would be a good fit, right,

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 5>because it's going to take you know, management set on

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 5>the call. It might take some of their markets two

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 5>three years to get them back to like their rightful

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 5>position as market leader in those countries they which they

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 5>see as their rightful h you know position. I think

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 5>Dominos would have something to say about that. But you know,

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 5>it's going to take a few years to turn around

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 5>some of these markets, and private equity obviously looking at

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 5>a five to seven year time horizon, would be a

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 5>good fit.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, Mike, let's step back the restaurant space in general,

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 2>getting through you know, earning season here. What are you

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 2>learning about kind of the consumer out there from the

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 2>restaurant perspective.

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 5>We heard from Wingstop and another fast casual chain that's

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 5>struggling also partly been a victim of its own success, right,

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 5>It's absolutely crushed it over the last six years, and

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 5>it's lapping very very strong results from last year, but

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 5>they talked some more about low income consumers and Hispanic

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 5>consumer weakness and it broadening here in the third quarter.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 5>There's some optimism here, I think around the smart kitchens.

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 5>So what's a smart kitchen they're so they're rolling out

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 5>some kitchen technology that's boosting operations. It's speeding up service times,

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:49.119
<v Speaker 5>you know, they're they're putting out consistent ten minute service times,

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 5>which is fifty percent better than they were doing prior.

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 5>Accuracy is better, Food's getting to customers hotter and fresher,

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 5>and people are going to have a better experience. And

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 5>so stores that have had this technology right now, it's

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 5>in about two thirds of the US stores, it's going

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 5>to be in all three thousand by the end of

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 5>the year. But stores that have this equipment and have

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 5>had it the longest are outperforming on same source sales

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 5>by five hundred basis points. So we think that's that's

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 5>why the stock is up so much. People are now

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 5>a little bit more confident in a positive twenty twenty

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 5>six despite the decelerating trends here in the third quarter.

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 2>What's going on on the laborfront for restaurants I think

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 2>quick service restaurants, you know, with the Southern border shut off,

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 2>that was one of the industries that said we may

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 2>have some labor problems associated with that. Have you heard

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 2>from your companies about that?

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, our companies just talk about the fact

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 5>that they use Everify and there and they do everything

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 5>by the book, which you know, I think is predominantly

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 5>the case. The impact that you know you're seeing a

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 5>is with more of the independent restaurants. Okay, then be

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 5>also kind of causes labor costs to go higher here

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 5>for the public chains, right right, they're seeing another four

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 5>to five percent you know, wage rate inflation this year.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 5>That's been pretty common year in and year out since

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 5>the pandemic.

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, Thanks to Michael Halin, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Restaurant

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 2>and Food Service ANLS.

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 3>We move now to earnings from the fast food giant McDonald's.

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 3>The company reported faster than expected US sales growth in

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 3>the third quarter, and this comes as the restaurant looks

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 3>to restore its reputation for affordable meals with new deals

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 3>and promotions. We're joined by Red Brown, Bloomberg News earnings reporter.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 7>I think in the context of the other results that

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 7>we've gotten from a couple of other restaurants. I think

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 7>it's really interesting. During the call, the McDonald's CEO CFO

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 7>really talked about this bifurcation that they've been observing for

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 7>the last two years between higher income diners and lower

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 7>income people, and it seems like that trend is cantinuing, persisting,

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 7>potentially accelerating. It seems like, and specifically what I'm talking

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 7>about is the higher income consumers seem to be coming

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 7>down into McDonald's and shopping a bit more drawn in

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 7>by the value that McDonald's has been pushing over the

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 7>last couple of quarters. And we're seeing that across all

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 7>of the fast food chains that's young as well, and

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 7>also burger king things like that. And then on the

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 7>other side of that, companies like Chipotle and Cava, these

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 7>kind of like middle tier that you know, twenty dollars

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 7>bowls of food are struggling a little bit more. Is

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 7>like people lose interest in that value proposition that they're offering.

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 7>So I think McDonald's, obviously the biggest name in the space,

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 7>really kind of hammers that point home for this earning season,

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 7>and I think that's kind of the thing like the

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 7>main takeaway for me at the moment, And.

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 3>Of course McDonald's is leaning into this idea that it

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 3>offers value at a difficult time for a lot of consumers.

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 3>It's got a lot of deals and promotions to maintain

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 3>that reputation. Does that cost it in any way or

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 3>do the same source of sales kind of back that

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 3>up that this works.

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a little early before they've seen that

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 7>benefit from it quite yet, Like they have seen a

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 7>little bit of pressure on the profitability because the company

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 7>is so committed to this, like getting restoring the value

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 7>reputations kind of the language that they use with their

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 7>customers that they're actually supporting the franchisees. They're giving them marketing,

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 7>they're helping them make up some of that losses that

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 7>they will make they will have from offering these discounts

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 7>on the menu. So McDonald's committed to this. It sounds

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.559
<v Speaker 7>like they're committed to this in the long term because

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 7>they do want to get people back in the stores.

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 7>It doesn't it's kind of remains to be seen whether

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 7>or not the foot traffic is actually benefiting such that

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 7>it is driving the bottom line as well. But they see,

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 7>it is so important to kind of refreshing or kind

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 7>of reintroducing the brand proposition to people that they're willing

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 7>to commit to this. Take a little bit of that

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 7>short term pain for the long term benefits.

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.239
<v Speaker 2>What are they saying about their cost structure here? Actue

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 2>beef prices much higher over the last year or two.

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 2>What are they saying about there's some of their cost

0:07:57.760 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 2>to get sold here.

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 7>Well, the one thing they call it on the cost

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 7>of good soul before we get into the beef issue

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 7>is the marketing, So they are kind of bumping up

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 7>the marketing. They saw around a twenty percent jump in

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 7>their their SGNA expense because of that. But on the

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 7>beef thing, McDonald's is the largest buyer of beef yep,

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 7>so that scale kind of allows them to take it.

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 7>They can take advantage of the scale and and you know,

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 7>and negotiate strong contracts when it comes to beef. Obviously,

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 7>beef inflation has been hitting all of these companies, but

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 7>not in a way that the companies are like outsized.

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 7>Negatively impact thus far, but definitely something to watch as

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 7>the beef prices continue to go higher.

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 3>And the improvement here, especially for its US comparable sales

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 3>really comes at a timely point because for a while

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 3>the company had been laggered when it came to comparable

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 3>sales at least domestically.

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, definitely, And it does speak to the kind of

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 7>strategic changes that they've they've made, like they did act

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 7>maybe a little bit late in the game. Burger King

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 7>has been rolling out their value offerings for a little

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 7>over a year, butmc Donald's has like acted and acted swiftly,

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 7>like you know, it's it's a big deal, I think

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 7>to get the buy in from the franchise ease of McDonald's,

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 7>like they had almost a consensus. It's very rare that

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 7>you see almost like a high ninety percentage of franchisees

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 7>willing to take the prices because they're the ones that

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 7>are dealing with this at the end of the day.

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 7>But I think, you know, McDonald's acting fast, acting boldly

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 7>to kind of get back into the green.

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I've noticed, really really in the last several years, so

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 2>much more technology in the stores, Like you can a

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of them don't even have people practically taking your order.

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 2>It's all done electronically. What are they saying about their

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 2>investments in technology, maybe even AI how's that impacting that business?

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, for McDonald's, like they it was. There's quite a

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 7>bit of talk about their their digital offerings for this quarter.

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 7>All of these companies, so so between McDonald's, Young which

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 7>has KFC, Taco Bell, and a couple other brands under

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 7>that umbrella, are all really pushing the digital for that

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.959
<v Speaker 7>exact reason to get the cost down. You know, McDonald's

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 7>just rolled out their Monopoly program. And when I was

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 7>a kid, Monopoly was the peel off on the cops.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 7>It was very exciting. Now it's completely digital, right, So,

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 7>like that's another way of their kind of drive people

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 7>into the app to beet people to shop through there.

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 7>This is where a lot of promotions are that'll help

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 7>also drive foot traffic. So it's two it's helping in

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 7>two ways. It's helping people get in chop more and

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 7>also helping on the cost front.

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Our Thanks to Red Brown, he is a Bloomberg News

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 3>earnings reporter.

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Moving next to the hospitality industry, this week, Cruse, company

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 2>in the Reach and Cruise line, reported earnings that missed expectations.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 2>For more on this, we were joined by Brian Egger,

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Gaming and lodging analyst.

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 8>People are still cruising, the bookings are higher. I think

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 8>that there was a bit of a change in their

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 8>strategy related to the Norwegian Cruise Line brand, trying to

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 8>get more families and kids and all that could talk

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 8>about that, but that does have some slightly dampiting impact

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 8>on you'll growth for the fourth quarter.

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 3>So this is the idea that they're broadening their customer base,

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 3>not just targeting the super high income consumer, which by

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 3>all accounts is doing just in this economy, whereas the

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 3>lower income consumer and the mass consumer perhaps is struggling

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 3>with rates staying fairly elevated and a lot of question

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 3>marks over their job prospects. What is Norwegian Cruise Lines

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 3>strategy here, certainly compared to its peers like Carnival and

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Royal Caribbean.

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 8>I think it's twofold. I think number one, to try

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 8>to attract more of a family audience, increase the core

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 8>customer base of the Norwegian Cruise Line brand, and also

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 8>by having more shorter duration cruises, maybe with homeports closer

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 8>to where people live, that could result the longer term

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 8>and kind of more efficient operations and some you know,

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 8>more savings on the net cruise costs for net unicost side,

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 8>but it remains to be seen, and I think that's

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 8>why there's a little bit of caution, because the near

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 8>trim effect will be a slightly dampening impact on the

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 8>overall mix of yields. You know, caverns filled with children

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 8>or families may have a slightly lower combined revenue yield

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 8>than a different type of customer.

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Audience, typically the cruiser. They're pretty loyal people, Brian, how

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 2>did they typically react or how did they spend during

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 2>what could be maybe a little bit softer economic environment.

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 8>So if you judge by the current environment, the overall

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 8>bookings pace, I think for the third quarter overall was

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 8>up twenty percent. The out for next year is quite

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 8>good with at least modest field growth, you know, so

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 8>I think we're seeing still a pretty steady pace of

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 8>consumer demand. Obviously, that could always change if we see

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 8>a more severe economic downturn, But the overall pace in

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 8>terms of bookings demand, notwithstanding this kind of tweak and

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 8>marketing strategy, has been quite good.

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Brian Eggert, Bloomberg Intelligence senior gaming and lodging.

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Analysts coming up inside one of the biggest deals of

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 3>the Week, Kimberly clarkbind can you the maker of til

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 3>and All?

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 2>depth research at data on two thousand companies and one

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries.

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 3>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via bi go on the terminal.

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm Scarlett and.

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm Paul Swimming. This is Bloomberg.

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlett Foo and Paul Sweeney

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 2>It was a merger Monday this week in the consumer

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 2>goods space, Kimberly Clark announced plans to by ken View,

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 2>the maker of tile On, in a forty billion dollar

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 2>cash and stock deal.

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 3>A combination would create a company with thirty two billion

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 3>dollars in revenue and become the second biggest seller of

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 3>health and wellness products for more. We were joined by

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Diana Gomez, Bloomberg Intelligence senior equity research analyst.

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 4>So it is surprising in many ways from the perspective

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 4>of Kimberly Clark, I must confess it shows that ken

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 4>View really has a lot of work to do to

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 4>turn around the business since it split from Jane Jay

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 4>about two years ago and the third quarter miss just

0:13:55.559 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 4>added up to a pile of disappointing results. Obviously, there

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 4>there's a ton of law hanging fruit, let's say, in

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 4>terms of efficiencies that can be gained in terms of

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 4>plugging the great iconic, well known trusted brands from Canview

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 4>into Canview's system that is running at a more efficient

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 4>level at the moment, but it will there is septicism

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 4>there because we are talking about revenue synergies as well

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 4>as cost synergies, and this will be quite a complex

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 4>new company. At the point when Kimberly Clark was just

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 4>simplifying as they were, they are aiming to close the

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 4>transaction on their international business that includes segments like tissue

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 4>by mid twenty twenty six, and now this merger expected

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 4>to close around the same time, just seems to complicate

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 4>the picture a little bit. The file andal, yes, and

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 4>we know ow Kenvy has been dealing with some crisis

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 4>in the last months with tailan Ore and then with

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 4>talk all suits outside the.

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 3>US as well, So I'm glad you went there. The

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 3>tailan Al situation. The Trump administration has been attacking Thailand

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 3>a overall. Do you think that's something that might complicate

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 3>this deal. Could regulators step in and hold things up

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 3>or raise questions that will just drag things out.

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 4>Quite different questions, I would say, but great questions. So

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 4>in terms of thailan O, the legal risk is there.

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 4>They can View was already fighting in the courts some lawsuits,

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 4>but we now have Texas State wawsuit on top on

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 4>top of it, the Humbroway Quarks price. When we walk

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 4>in terms of for instance, UH and a bit to enterprise,

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 4>you multiple and I'm taking twenty twenty five, twenty six,

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty five, sorry that they will report, so that

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 4>will come at about fourteen times, whereas historic call transactions

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 4>in the consumer health space were in the range of

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 4>sixteen to twenty times. So fourteen times comes built all

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 4>that so really reflecting not only the struggles of can

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 4>View where their organic growth is still declining, but also

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 4>that viability risk with lawsuits that are ongoing. And that's

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 4>a new lawsuits that can be added as well. In

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 4>terms of the say anti trust competition regulatory approval, as

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 4>I see it, they don't really overlap directly, but it

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 4>really depends on a country, region by region basis. Because

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 4>we know the US stands can be very different from

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 4>the European Commission one.

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm should we expect more consolidation and consumer product space?

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Do you think.

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 7>Yes?

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 4>So that's a team that I've been watching very closely. Obviously,

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 4>we had other large former groups with significant consumer health businesses,

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 4>so we are talking not only over the counter medicines

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 4>but also the more personal care that deals with wellness.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Sonofi decided to sell it to private equity, so at

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.479
<v Speaker 4>least for the next few years. That is that buyer

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 4>is still considering while not considering, as management says, puts it.

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 4>But buyer still has their consumer health business and they

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 4>could be walking into either listing it or further consolidation

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 4>within the current employers.

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 3>Our Thanks to Diana Gomez Bloomberg Intelligence here equity research journalists, we.

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Also got earnings in the media space as well.

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 3>Warner Brothers Discovery, the parent of HBO and CNN, reported

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 3>third sales that missed analyst estimates, providing a glimpse into

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 3>the company's businesses as it puts itself up for sale.

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 3>For details, we caught up with KEITHA. Rung Andathan Bloomberg

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 3>intelligence analysts on US media.

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 9>So fundamental Scarlett really don't measure all that much at

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 9>this point. Especially yes, the TV networks business, as we

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 9>know now for many many quarters, has been severely challenged.

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.479
<v Speaker 9>We saw a twenty percent slump in TV advertising, We

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 9>saw a twenty percent decline in TV EBITDA. This was

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 9>kind of well expected, and this really speaks to why

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 9>they need to separate themselves, why they need to separate

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 9>the low growth or rather the no growth TV assets

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 9>from one part from the part of the business that's

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 9>actually growing, which is studio and streaming. That part of

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 9>the business actually posted really good numbers. We saw the

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 9>studio Warner Brothers has actually been having a very very

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 9>successful run in the box office this year. They have

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 9>about a twenty seven percent share of domestic box office

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 9>and we've seen that kind of translate into really strong

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 9>IBIDA numbers. So we saw studio and streaming actually put

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 9>up really really good numbers, and that again speaks to

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 9>why so many different parties, including a Netflix, including a Comcast,

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 9>are interested in going after those studio and streaming assets.

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 9>So right now, again fundamentals don't matter that much. It's

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 9>really all about the M and A.

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 2>And I'm actually surprised KEITHA that maybe we haven't had

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 2>some more news on the MNA front because we've seen,

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, the m and A environment is very very

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 2>active with the market. It's very receptive to m and A.

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Here we have a willing seller in terms of David

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Zaslov and the board of directors here, who do you

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 2>how do you think this is going to play out?

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 2>Is something to make a bid for the entire company

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 2>or just maybe the good pieces for it.

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 9>We're having all possible permutations and combinations here, Paul. So

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 9>we know that Paramounts Guidance is actually interested in all

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 9>of the company, including the TV networks. They've already made

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 9>three bids. The highest one was for twenty three and

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 9>a half dollars per share for Warner Brothers Discovery. All

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 9>of that was turned down, so they obviously have to

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 9>come up with a much better offer now. The other bidders,

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 9>and the two that are most often mentioned are Netflix

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 9>and Comcast. They are the ones that are only interested

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 9>in the studio and streaming assets, no interest at all

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 9>in the TV linear network business. We know that Netflix

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 9>has started looking into the books of Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 9>This doesn't necessarily mean that they have to come out

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 9>with a bid. I mean, remember this. You know zaslav Is,

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 9>as you just mentioned, he's a very very tough negotiator.

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 9>He's a deal maker. He is going to make sure

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 9>that they really get paid well for the streaming and

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 9>studio assets if they sell that, and we expect, you know,

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 9>a price tag somewhere in the ballpark of about seventy

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 9>five to eighty billion. So you know, whoever makes a

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 9>big bid has to cough up a huge chunk of

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 9>change for this asset.

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 3>So we keep talking about how it's Netflix, Comcast and

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Paramount Skuidance. Could there be another bidder that emerges from

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 3>the shadows.

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely, I mean you can never rule out big tech.

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 9>You know, Amazon obviously has shown some interest in the past.

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 9>They bought the MGM studio. We're not necessarily sure whether

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 9>they've actually taken a look at the Warner brother assets.

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 9>But again, Scarlett, as you kind of think about the

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 9>whole media landscape and you kind of think about the

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 9>various assets out there, This is kind of a once

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 9>in a lifetime, kind of a generational opportunity for anybody

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 9>who wants to get big in media to really go

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 9>after Warner I mean, they have some of the best

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 9>ip out there. They have a streaming business that has

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 9>performed really well. Hbo Max is a name that resonates

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 9>across the globe. So you know, anybody and everybody should

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 9>really be taking a look at this asset. So I

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 9>wouldn't be surprised if we have some kind of a

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 9>dark horsepitter here.

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 7>Oh.

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to KEITHA. Wrong Andathan Bloomberg Intelligence, US media analyst.

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 3>We also got earnings reports this week from two of

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 3>the world's biggest ride share companies, Uber and Lyft.

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Men Deep Singh Joints is here research head of Bloomberg

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence on tech stories. Talk to us about that segment

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 2>of the economy, the ride sharing, the outsourcing, you know,

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 2>the third party delivery. Are people still spend money on

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 2>that stuff?

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 6>They are and all these companies, I mean, Uver reported

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 6>over twenty percent growth, door Dash reported twenty five percent

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 6>top line growth. Even though the stock reaction was negative,

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 6>that was primarily because they plan to spend more money

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 6>next year on building their tech stack. I think what

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 6>the playbook here is to expand in more geographies as

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 6>well as branch out into other areas of last mile

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 6>delivery and in the case of door Dash, their experimenting

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 6>with you know, delivering food without a career human person involved,

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 6>and also expanding into restaurant point of sale devices. I

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 6>mean they're developing technology where you can pay using a

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 6>DoorDash hardware and point of sale device. So clearly there

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.479
<v Speaker 6>is a lot that these companies are doing beyond you know,

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 6>the original all business that they.

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Have, you know, having you know, when you spend time

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 2>in England and you go pay for meal, the car

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 2>never leaves your presence. They just tap it on some

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 2>machine and ball here. They take it, They put it

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 2>in a little folder, they take it away for five.

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Minutes, and that's what you pay twenty person for.

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 2>You don't know where it's going. And that's what I'm surprised.

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 2>We're so behind here in Yos about that at point.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 3>We've always been kind of behind this, you know that

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 3>that's been our calling card.

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 6>The way to think about it is, there are so

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 6>many legacy systems that anytime you have new technology, even

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 6>everyone is talking about AI agents and whatnot, it has

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 6>to sit on top of a lot of legacy technology.

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 6>And like the promise of AI is it can rewrite

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 6>a lot of that legacy code and migrate into the

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 6>you know, the modern technology. But we have yet to

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 6>come across you know, real proof points of that.

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 3>So when you're talking man Deep, I noticed that you

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 3>talked a lot about how these companies are spending, they're investing,

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 3>and I'm curious about the reception that gets from investors

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 3>because initially in the big AI build up, everyone was

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 3>excited about these plans. But now more and more everyone's like, oh,

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm not so sure that's a great idea that you're

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 3>spending so much, whether it's on AI or whether it's

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 3>on new products and internal platform like it is with

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 3>door Dash. Why do you think investors are now more

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 3>skeptical about this idea of companies spending, Well.

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 6>Just because we've seen you know, Uber and all these

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 6>companies really struggle with free cash flow initially, I mean

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 6>in the zerp era, you know, these companies burned a

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 6>lot of cash. Now they have gotten to a point

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 6>where the business model does generate you know, seven to

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 6>eight billion dollars in free cash flow for Uber and

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 6>even for door Dash it's twenty percent ebit dumb margins.

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 6>So the fact that they're talking about spending again, it

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 6>makes you think Okay, if you're an investor, you waited

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 6>all this while for these companies to get mature and

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 6>you know, start delivering on cash, and now they're talking

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 6>about another investment cycle. And that's where you know, in

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 6>the case of Uber, it's their hand is forced by

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 6>Veimo launching on ten cities and really expanding it potentially Tesla.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 6>I think in the case of DoorDash, they feel, you know,

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 6>making acquisitions will help them expand their geographic footprint, and

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 6>then obviously they want to expand their text tech to

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 6>more areas.

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to man deep Seeing, Bloomberg Intelligence global tech

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.719
<v Speaker 2>research head coming up, Berksher's cash pile sorted almost three

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred and eighty two billion dollars.

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 3>That is a fresh record for Warren Buffett's company will

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 3>bring you details.

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to bloomerg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries.

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 3>You can always access Bloomberg Intelligence via big on the terminal.

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm Scarlet Foo.

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Paul Sweeney, and this is Bloomberg.

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Scarlettfoo and Paul Sweeney on

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Berksher Hathway reported it's cash pile reached over three hundred

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 2>and eighty one billion dollars in the third quarter, a record.

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>This comes as Bercher Hathway declined to buy back its

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 2>own shares for the fit straight quarter.

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 3>So we brought in Matthew Palizola, Bloomber Intelligence, senior analysts

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 3>of P ANDC Insurance. We began by asking Matthew to

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 3>break down Berkshire's most recent quarter.

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 10>The interesting thing is the stock has underperformed the market

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 10>by like thirty percent since Buffett announced that he was

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 10>stepping down in May, and they haven't bought back any

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 10>stock over that entire period.

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Does that turned my mic on? I say, why?

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 10>Yeah? So Buffett used to have a rule when the

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 10>stock was above one point two times priced to book,

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 10>they wouldn't buy it back. They kind of kicked that

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 10>out and they said, we're just going to buy it

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 10>back whenever we see intrinsic value below. So, you know,

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 10>I don't to me it begs question. I mean, maybe

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 10>he sees the stock as kind of fully valued, even down.

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, year to date, even with the lagging performance

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 3>as well. So does that change when Greg Able, the

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 3>handpicked successor to Warren Buffett, takes the reins officially at

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 3>the end of the year.

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 10>You know, Scarlett, he walks a fine line between putting

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 10>some sort of stamp on the company maybe over time,

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 10>and then kind of respecting the ethos of Berkshire and

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 10>how they've operated. I would hope something happens. I mean,

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 10>they did a ten billion dollar deal in the fourth quarter,

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 10>they bought the oxycam business from Occidental. They just don't

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 10>have things that can move the needle very much. Even

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 10>in the quarter, their net stock buys and sells or

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 10>a negative six billion dollars, so they were negative on

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:26.719
<v Speaker 10>other equities as well.

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there were net seller stocks for twelfth straight quarter,

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 3>and that cash and equivalents was at a record high

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 3>at the end of September. Is that a signal that

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 3>they're waiting for the market to tank, that they see

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 3>a correction, Maybe not tank that might be too strong.

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 3>They see a correction or consolidation in the nearer terment

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 3>are ready for it.

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 10>They're always ready for it.

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 10>Buffett has always said, we're not looking to time the market.

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 10>We're just looking for good companies. He's also been you know,

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 10>when I talk to people that the thought is, is

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 10>he just hoarding money for greg Abel and kind of

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 10>setting the company up and just handing it over. He's

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 10>said he's not doing that, so you know, unfortunately I don't.

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 10>They don't talk to investors, so we don't can't really

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 10>pick his brain besides at the annual meeting, so we

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 10>don't exactly know what's going on there. I think he's

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 10>just extra conservative in his old age.

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess. All right, And here's my cynical Wall Street perspective.

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 2>When mister Buffet passes three percent dividend yield, massive stock buyback,

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 2>do you think that's a scenario. I think.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 10>Dividend yield, hopefully you know, some sort of dividend, maybe

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 10>special dividends. The buyback, I think will also kind of

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 10>weigh on what able sees the intrinsic value, So I

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 10>don't I would say probably hopefully dividend. I would say

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 10>maybe more steady buyback. There's also they can't buy back

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 10>a ton of shares on volume, because you know, there's

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 10>rules on how much they can buy back and how

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 10>active they can be in the market, so that limits

0:28:58.800 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 10>them a little bit.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 2>That's planned b get it. Don't you have to split

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 2>the stock like a gajillion to one.

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 10>They have the A shares and the B shares, but

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 10>there's I don't have all the exact roles. But they've

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 10>talked about we can only buy back so much at

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 10>a time. They bought back none. So I think a

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 10>steady buyback plus some returns of capital and forms of

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 10>I would hope special dividends. They maybe they don't want

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 10>to be beholden too a regular quarterly dividend.

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah makes sense. Okay, so that's something we'll watch for

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 3>when that eventually happens. In the meantime, how are the

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 3>businesses of Berkshire Hathway performing, especially insurance?

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so all good.

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 10>In the quarter, the insurance business made much more money

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 10>than the year ago, but that was because they had

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 10>a bunch of large losses in the year ago. They

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 10>also had this favorable reserve development, which means they write

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 10>business and those losses come in better or worse than

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 10>they expect over time, and that was those losses were

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 10>coming in better than they expected. So that is it's

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 10>a good thing, but it's not a super high quality

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 10>source of earnings.

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Beat.

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 10>So the insurance business performed well on those two things,

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 10>which aren't super high quality in my opinion. The underlying

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 10>business and the insurance doing well. The problem is is

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 10>hard for it to get much better next year. The

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 10>underwriting side. The prices in that are going down, so

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 10>I think it's tough to see the insurance underwriting doing

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 10>better next year. It's also tough to see the investments

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 10>doing better next year. And we're talking about really just

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 10>the fixed income investment, so like the equities, who knows

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 10>what happens, but in terms of the interest income, we

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 10>saw that decline in the quarter as well.

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 2>The business fundamentals of the underlying businesses, did they move

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 2>the stock historically? Not really, So it's tough because I

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 2>asked the one fundamental question. That's enough. Let's get back

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 2>to the main point of the story here. It's also

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 2>my job too, But is there an activist investor who's

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 2>ever oh, good question, one word about this company?

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.239
<v Speaker 10>So historically there have been investors very vocal about it.

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 10>I don't have names, but no one's ever been able

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 10>to move the new buffets always the majority shareholder, so

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 10>there's really been no one who's ever been forcing them

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 10>to do anything. And so why would they even listen?

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 3>And can you do that with a company that has

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 3>an A class year and B class year with this

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 3>what is.

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 2>His voting control? I haven't done it, man, I don't.

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 10>I don't, I don't know off the top of my head,

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 10>I thought it was something like sixty percent of the

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 10>shares or something like that, and other insiders will hold more.

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 10>So there's almost no way of wrestling control from him.

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 10>The A shares and the B shares they did so

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 10>the A shares are are several hundred thousand dollars, and

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 10>then they instituted the B shares and they're they're going

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 10>to peg to each other, so they can't.

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 9>You can't.

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:39.479
<v Speaker 10>You couldn't buy up the B shares and kind of

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 10>take control either.

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 3>They've come up with all kinds of rules to make

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 3>sure that all the things you just proposed can't happen.

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 10>He's not a dumb guy.

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, still exactly right. It's been an extraordinary run.

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Is there a sense that the law of large numbers

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 2>over the last several years, if not the last decade,

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 2>is kind of caught up to this name? Yeah for sure.

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 10>I mean they they bought a company for twelve billion

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 10>dollars Allegheny and it barely moves the needle. They bought

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 10>this oxycam for a ten billion, barely moves the needle.

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 10>They bought like twenty billion of Chevron stock two years ago.

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 10>It didn't even come up at the annual meeting. People

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 10>didn't even ask about it. I was sitting there. I

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 10>couldn't believe it, said, no one's going to ask about this. So,

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, there's just things that are are tough for

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 10>them to move. The new from having so much money,

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 10>they're making those investments in Japan, which I think are interesting.

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 10>So they invest in the trading houses in Japan. It's

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 10>hard to for me to know a ton about those businesses.

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 10>Some of them are like mini Berkshires. Maybe this is

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 10>stuff that they kind of do in the future. Also

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 10>the energy business. Greg Abil's an energy guy. Aon is

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 10>an insurance broker. They talked about last week this huge

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 10>opportunity with the hyperscalers, needing, risk transfer services and other things.

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 10>So like those are things that fit right into Berkshi's wheelhouse, right,

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 10>the risk transfer and the energy businesses. So those are

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:56.479
<v Speaker 10>opportunities for them in the future.

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Matthew Paulazola, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior and for

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 3>P and C Insurance.

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 2>We move next to earnings from the entertainment space. This week,

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Spotify reported active users and sales beat expectations in the

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 2>third quarter, but ad.

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Supported revenue declined six percent from a year ago because

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 3>of pricing pressure for more. We were joined by Githa

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Rong Andathan Bloomberg Intelligence analysts on US media.

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 9>I actually like the Spotify numbers, you know, the big

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 9>numbers that we always look for are, of course, the

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 9>user metrics. We want to see them kind of do

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 9>well on both monthly active users, which are basically the

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 9>free listeners, as well as the premium subscribers, which is basically,

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, everyone paying about twelve dollars a month for

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 9>a Spotify subscription, and both those numbers came in well

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 9>ahead of guidance. The other number that we look for

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 9>in Spotify results is gross margin. This has been you know,

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 9>a constant point of debate, but Spotify has done really

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 9>well in terms of expanding their gross margin. They again

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 9>delivered numbers ahead of guidance both for you know, third

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 9>quarter as well as ahead of forecast for the fourth quarter.

0:33:56.320 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 9>In terms of guidance, so fundamentals seem to be really strong.

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 9>I think the one concern, Paul, that has really kind

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.239
<v Speaker 9>of emerged with Spotify over the past few months is

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 9>pricing power. You know, are they going to keep you know,

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.480
<v Speaker 9>being able to increase prices? And this is something that

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 9>has dominated the conversation for not just Spotify, but of

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 9>course for any streaming company. We've seen Netflix, as you

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 9>just pointed out, demonstrate really good pricing power. I think

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 9>Spotify has very good pricing power as well, but people

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 9>are really waiting for the next big US price hike

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 9>to really gain more confidence in the story.

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:33.879
<v Speaker 2>Keith, what's the competitive landscape for Spotify out there? Because

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 2>as we think about the video business, it's Netflix and

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 2>then a kind of a big drop down to Disney

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 2>and then a bigger drop to kind of everybody else

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 2>fighting it out. What's the landscape for in the audio business.

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 9>It's actually very similar, Paul. In fact, you know, Spotify

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 9>just leads by a wide, wide margin. So if you

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:54.840
<v Speaker 9>just look at both the global audio streaming market in

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 9>terms of subscribers, they have about a thirty three percent

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 9>share globally they have close to almost a forty percent

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 9>and share in the US market, so way ahead of

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.919
<v Speaker 9>their competitors. So obviously gives them a lot of I think,

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 9>you know, again we come back to pricing power. Gives

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 9>them definitely a lot of pricing power in the market.

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 2>So what's on the cost structure for them? What are

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 2>the real levers for them? It seems like you know,

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the I know at Netflix said they got to write big,

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 2>big checks to you know, either license content or you know,

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.280
<v Speaker 2>create their own content. What's it like on the Spotify side.

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you bring up an excellent point, Paul, And this

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 9>has kind of again been one of the pain points

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 9>for Spotify because again, this is a music streaming service.

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:40.760
<v Speaker 9>They don't own any of you know, the music music itself.

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 9>That's all kind of controlled by the labels. And as

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:46.720
<v Speaker 9>you well know, content is king. So this is really

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.280
<v Speaker 9>where Spotify has a lot of trouble because for every

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 9>dollar that they earned, about seventy cents goes back to

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 9>the music label, So they have very little leverage. They've

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 9>been trying to kind of change that whole dynamic, that

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 9>whole equation come up with more of their content. So

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 9>a big investment area for them has been, you know,

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 9>podcast has been audiobooks where they kind of get better,

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 9>you know, profit dynamics. It has worked well. But actually

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 9>one of the things that we're kind of looking for

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 9>next year is we're going to see a step up

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 9>in all of the royalty costs. And that's again something

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.240
<v Speaker 9>that the street and investors are a little bit nervous

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 9>about because we need to see how, you know, Spotify

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 9>kind of manages their whole margin expansion story as those

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 9>royalty costs go up, So the amount that they're paying

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:35.720
<v Speaker 9>all of the music labels, the warners, and the universals

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 9>of the world is going to go up slightly. But

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 9>we still think that they're in good shap. They've been

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 9>adding a ton of new features to all of their tiers.

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:45.399
<v Speaker 9>They're probably going to debut some new tiers. Again. All

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:48.240
<v Speaker 9>of that bills to that whole pricing, power and monetization story.

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.760
<v Speaker 2>And how is Apple as a competitor here, because anytime

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I see a company that's even remotely in competition Apple,

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I get nervous.

0:36:57.680 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 9>So Apple, you know, if you're just kind of looking

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 9>at it, And in terms of share, they are way

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 9>below Spotify, both globally as well as in the US market,

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 9>so not much of a competitor from a share standpoint.

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 9>In fact, they've even priced their products slightly lower. Some

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 9>of the you know, some of the noise around Spotify

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 9>and Apple has been you know in terms of the

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 9>iOS and whether you know, Spotify can kind of get

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 9>better terms and they've managed to do that as well.

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 9>So some of the changes on the iOS system have

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 9>actually helped Spotify in terms of getting a better market

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 9>share and getting better economics. Actually, so Apple Music not

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 9>too much of a worry for Spotify.

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh thanks to Githa Rong and Nottan Bloomberg Intelligence US

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 2>media analyst. That's this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence on

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio, providing in research and data on two thousand

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 2>companies and one hundred and thirty industries.

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 3>And remember you can always access Bloomberg Intelligence via b

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 3>I go on the terminal. I'm Scarlett Foe and.

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 2>All Paul Sweeney. Stay with us. Today's top stories and

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 2>global business headlines are coming up right now.

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 6>Zero