WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2020 NFL MegaPod Week 8 Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Check it down Man Now Down Man Thursday Morning Eating

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 1>the Book podcast, Megapod Live once a game from the D.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>We're at the day to day. We're supposed to be

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a circuit. We're at the D because well I don't

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>know the Working as King still a circuit or more

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>more specifically, Mikey is on a schedule today. He's got

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a meeting upstairs to the Deal on the twelfth floor.

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>So we decided, why I push it, Let's just go

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to the D. But you have to you have to

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>go to this meeting here pretty soon. So we're going

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to get all of mike stuff out of the way.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna break forbad a little today, uh, and then

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll do a round table with me, Todd Wishnev and

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>our rotating guest today. You may know him as producing

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>number five from a numbers game and he hosts his

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>own podcast called The Parlay Podcast. Where'd he get that

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>name from? Jeff Parlay? How you doing, Jeff Gil, It's great,

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>great to see everybody, Uh, and now actually knowing Todd,

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 1>what what Todd's came and his mother's attic looks like

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I now actually have a better feel for the podcast today.

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I now actually familiar with all the surroundings that were,

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that that are that are in this podcast today. Jeff,

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>please use the word cork when referring to the attic

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in which he does. Please. All right, mikey, uh. First

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of all, we have a we have a special This

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is lady gentleman, Mike Palm. Now thirty six hours since

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the Grand Circle opening. Mike, here is your introduction from

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the other night. He's a genius of all things. He

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>knows which one is hall and which one's hopes. He

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>knows what they call the coo cools and not just cool.

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>He knows who started the fire, because we didn't start

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the fire. And if we didn't start the fire, who did?

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Was it lightening? He knows, ladies and gentleman the poll

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>reader vice president out of a cloud of smoke, arms

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>raised Mike Palm, everybody. He knows which one is hall

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and which one is oats. Introduced by the Great George

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Shay from the Hot Dog Eating Concepts. They're on Coney Island.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>How you know what, mikey wonderful, busy, busy. There's not

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>enough hours in the day. Gil, I'm sorry, wasn't everything

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you imagine it to be yes and more and you

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>still you still look like you're a little tired from it.

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm exhausted, exhaust I mean there's you wake up, you

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>get two hours sleep, and there's thirty seven emails and

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>eighteen texts and likes, and then you gotta slum with

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>us and do this little picture megapod. Oh, it's nice.

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>It's nice to see Jeff again. And you know, I

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>had I was out on the pool deck yesterday. It

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>was really the first day of stadium swim and I

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>was sitting with a gentleman who was really enjoying the

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>soccer games and and the atmosphere, and the people kept

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>coming up and we hear you on visa and we

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>listened to you on the megapod, and the number one

0:02:54.800 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>question was, well, i'll phrase it, I can't your certain words.

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>But the number one question was tell us about Todd?

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>Is Todd really being Todd when he's on the air,

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And I said, he really is. I mean, that's his

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>genuine self. There's no airs, there's no put on, you know.

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And there was a lot of positive comments about Todd,

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 1>and and then there was something that weren't as as positive.

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I thought well, one guy said he's

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 1>an exhausting listen. I said, well, you know, he's even

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>more exhausting is a friend. But but still he's there.

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>He's Mikeycorn for yourself. There is thank you, Todd. Than

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Chris Felika was on the Number Be the Big One,

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the Big Popcorn Todd. Chris Fliga was on the Numbers

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>game this morning, and then he got the long segment

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Numbers Game. We hadn't had him on the

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>long side of for a long time. The reserved for

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Paul Carr just because, so FeliCa said, I said, it

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>was nice to talk to you on the long side,

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and he goes, yeah, thanks for you know, putting me

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead of prioritizing me, ahead of wishing it. Finally, so

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.119
<v Speaker 1>he's he's He threw a shout out to Todd as well.

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Todd your thoughts, I have listened. When you have as

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>much talent as I do, you're gonna have people sling

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>bows and arrows at you. It happens. You have to

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>be okay with your talent and understand that other people

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>are gonna get jealous. It's the same thing as when

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I was three hundred and thirty pounds and I would

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>walk into a bar and there'll be a hot girl

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>and her boyfriend standing there, and I would walk over

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and we would joke around and laugh. Everybody loves me.

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>It's fantastic. Then I would get to be two hundred pounds,

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>do the exact same thing, and all of a sudden,

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>the dude gets very intimidated because there's a good looking

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>guy standing near his girl. Same story with Mikey Palm.

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>He feels a little threatened by my talent. And it's okay.

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>We just had tipped to him all good. Mike just noted.

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>He's like, yeah, okay, maybe very accurate, very accurate, very accurate.

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like white women have so many gay friends. You know,

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>they're non threatening. It's non threatened. Todd at three thirty

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>was non threatening. You know. People love to have him around.

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>All right. So, uh, because Mike, he's on a schedule,

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>so we hold let's let's let's hold on for the hijinks.

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Um okay. Survivor from three fifty three to three fifty

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe I think that at two of them were

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't put it in the entry. Again, again,

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>how's this, How's it possible? It was almost like a

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>perfect week. But there was nobody, no big upsets that

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>nobody agains one person. One person had the Patriots, that's it.

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Everybody else through. There's somebody I knew that's in the

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>circuit million two that didn't get their five picks in

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. Somebody that I know that was contending. Um,

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>he was contending for quarterly and the second quarter didn't

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>get his five picks. I mean he was like a

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>point and a half out in the second quarter. Brutal.

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Is there any contest that have ever gone down to

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the wire and survivor with like hundreds of people still alive?

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Could happen this year? Could happen. But Thanksgiving, thanks you're

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>saving grace. I never asked you directly, like do you

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>guys look back at that and thank God we have

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>this sink Thanksgiving rule. Well, a lot of people are

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>not do not like it. But I think made the contest.

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Made the contest because you can plan until then, you

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>can plan after. But that's a prayer that day. Um, Okay,

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>by the way, circa everything that it was supposed to be,

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it was awesome. Everybody had a great time. I hope

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>you didn't mind that a lot of us had, you know,

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>regular ties on. It's not a little sore about it,

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>aren't you. I'm upset I never got to see Debra. Yeah,

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I know. I was upset because I want I were

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>there any pictures? Did you take any pictures? We took? No,

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>not there. We took a couple at home. Yeah. Yeah,

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>that's the only thing. No. Everybody looked nice. What a

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>good call to go black tie because when you dress well,

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you feel well. I already got everyone in a good

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>mood being and in black tie and tuxedos and gowns

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and dressed up, and the women had their hair done

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and their makeup and all that. So that's my motto, Mikey,

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>if I dress well, I feel well. That's definitely my motto.

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>How come you never dress well? Because I don't agree

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>with that statement. I'm not Martin Vance, Martin Vance Todd's

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>personal Twitter fashion coach. Uh and Derek was great, great speech,

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>He was all inclusive. Um, it was like a business plan.

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It was perfect. It was one recent host text to

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>me or it's long enough, can you tell Derek, let's

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>get it. I said, very grateful, You're very grateful, welcome

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for everything. You're welcome. You're welcome. You're welcome. Hi, Mikey,

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>without further ado, your three best bets one, two, and three,

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.239
<v Speaker 1>and a brief explanation as to why these are your bets. Okay,

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I like, I'm gonna keep going with these overs. I

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>think the over trends continue. Here's two teams that have

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>bad defenses, the Titans and Bengals. I know it's a

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>high number, fifty three and a half, but I like

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>going over it again. I mean, I think you've seen

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>how bad that Bengals defense is exposed the last couple

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of weeks against the Browns and then against the Colts

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>when they couldn't hold a gift twenty one point lead.

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not I'm not convinced of this Tennessee Titans defense.

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that that that you know, they've they've done

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>well with Tannehill, they've got the most out of them,

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>but they can't get stops either. So I'm gonna go

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>over there my second play. As I'm gonna say this,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the number. What's the number in that one? Mikey? Well,

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I have fifty three and a half and a half,

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>all right there? My second Okay, Todd, I have I've

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>have had two minutes left. I have the Seahawks minus three.

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I think they bound. They bounced back at home against

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the fourth like, look at that's a tough loss. They

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>controlled that whole game. They should have won it. And

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>over it. I mean it was you know, Carol Bozo

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the Carroll uh, you know, finally reared his ugly head there.

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's gotten away with a lot of stuff here.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I still think this this offense is very explosive, and

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the forty Niners are gonna beat will

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>slow them down. I think Seattle is going to get

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>out to a quick start in this game now that

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>they let Russell Wilson throw a forward pass in the

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 1>first half this year. And so I'll lay there is

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>a field goal time. I have it as a field

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>goal reduced juice field goal. And then I this is

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>probably maybe not my third best play, but I was

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>just looking. I really like the Ravens over the Steelers

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.479
<v Speaker 1>this week. This this Steelers defense. I know the rematches

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>on Thanksgiving, uh, but I think this Ravens tea And

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a handful of teams that have a

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>good defense, and they're one of them. Um the Bears

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>are another one. Anyhow, what are we giving him on

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that number? Is it three and a half or four?

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>It's three and a half or four. Yeah, it's close.

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>That's very that's very general. It's very very generous of

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you guys to do that. Um yeah, So I like

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens big this week. I think they crushed the Steelers.

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is a hatred hating game, the rivalry

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and all this uh off to buy. I just think

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that they're there'll be rested. Steelers had a tough game

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in Tennessee that could have went the other way as well.

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Um So, all those are my three picks. I'll have

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>comments on that one later because I think I'll be

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>picking that, but perhaps Todd's running it. Teaser Yeah, teaser

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>packers is my packers is the first part of my

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>teaser packers down to one? That okay with everybody? Can everybody?

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Can everybody agree on that number? Uh one? Green Bay

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and I haven't even boo uh Jesus is a tough one,

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>just making it. How about how about Dolphins plus nine

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>and a half? How about girls team the Miami Dolphins

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to Miami Dolphins. Miami Dolphins. I wasn't ready for my song.

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But I'll tell you, but I will tell you. I

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:22.599
<v Speaker 1>think they can hang with the golf ster. Who's you

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have any Thursday night thoughts? Do you tonight? No?

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 1>My Thursday night thoughts are Let's see what stadium swim

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in the sports book looks like for our first NFL game.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm I like the Eagle. You know I always fade

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. There's no number on this game. We don't

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>know who's who's playing quarterback, but I'll probably lay the

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>points with the Eagles when the number comes out. Uh,

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and the game I want nothing to do with. Uh?

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>What was the Eagles one? What category did that fall under? Well?

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I would that would be a play if we had

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a number on it, but it's off the board everywhere.

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I have nine. I have nine all over the place. Yeah, okay, nine,

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 1>I'd late nine. I'd lake ten. Dallas just a random

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>bonus as a thought, one of my fading Dallas. Do

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 1>you like the those hot Todd? I love the Eagles, BABYCC.

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Vinny Malula is starting a quarterback for Dallas. Yeah, Mayula

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Colts Lions. I don't want anything to do with good game.

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Could be a good game and favorite most likely lose outright?

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.599
<v Speaker 1>Favorite most likely to lose outright is none of them? Uh?

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>What is it's? It's only the Packers of the Chiefs.

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Are the Bucks? Uh right? Or the Eagles? But no,

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not losing. Okay, I'll say the Bucks. No not really?

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh what else do I have left here? Green Bay?

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Is it like that? But I like Green you like?

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll say the Road I'll say the road team the

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Bucks there, alright? Or Tampa Bayampa, Tampa Bay could lo

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>they could lose, they could lose. What your official pick

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is they Tampa Bay is the tam most likely to lose.

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you everybody. Sorry to everybody, we didn't get to

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Bay alright, buddy continued success. Say hi to Sean Kavanaugh

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>for me. Take care everyone, Thank you for your use

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>your studio here. Thank you, sir, Mike, paulm everybody. Uh,

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>he's got a thing. He's a very busy man. They

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>just opened a brand new casino for God's sake, So

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>let's give my pass on that. So it's just the

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>three of us, gentlemen. Um Todd is the I want

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the update on on everybody? Please start, yes, please? Okay,

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So last week. The Gilly Ice Man did a great

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>job with a nice two and one to move himself

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to nine eleven and one and teasers win again. Six

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>and one for Gil, Mikey moved to two and one,

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>two and one again, he moved to twelve eight and one.

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Very solid by Mikey, and he's won his teaser. He's

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>also six and one on teasers. And I also had

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a two and one week to move to nine and

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve and my teaser one as well, so I'm also

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>six and one. So all three of us are six

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and one on teasers, which is quite interesting. Why did

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I see that one of us? Someone someone on Twitter

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>logs our picks and he called yours five one and one.

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Did he give you a push on the teaser or something?

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know what why he did that,

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>because easily there were all six of one. All right, um,

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>all right. By the way, Jeff Parlay, the name of

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast is the Parlay Podcast. How's that going for you?

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Going going pretty well? Gil, all things considered? And uh,

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously we're with a book at sports Are app is

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>coming on Sunday, so that that will be a lot

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of fun. But the podcast is going well, and uh,

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'll say this, and I wish Mike was here

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>for this. I missed the hell out of you, Gil.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I missed the hell out of Mike. It was great

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to see Todd a few weeks ago when Todd destroyed

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>me in tennis, which was probably the least surprising result

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of the last six months for anything that has happened

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with any of us, I'll give I'll give u the

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>former big man, some credit on that one there, Todd, Todd,

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>were you down to wait? Wise, I've been. I've been

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>around two forty six for the last three weeks because

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I haven't played tennis once. Because right after I whooped

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>up on Mr Parl's six oh six oh six wine,

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>I knew that was kind. I got one game, Come on,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you gave it to me at the end. I got

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the first I got legitimately the first game we played,

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>six O six or whatever. The bottom line is, he

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 1>got crushed. And after he got crushed, a couple of

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>days later, I got a real bad hamstring injury. So

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been able to play. But I'm still hanging

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>in at around two nice. I'm hanging in right where

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I was too, but starting to eat a little more.

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little worried I might be going to the

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>other direction. Um, all right, parlay you now or either

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of you ever coming back to Las Vegas. Yes, I

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>will be back. I will be back before the end

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I will be back before the end

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Um My, my girlfriend Margaret, who both

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of you know, has a has a physical therapy clinical

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that starts in the new year in Las Vegas. So

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we will definitely be there at the year's end to

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of next year for sure. God, I mean

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know exactly. I don'n't really have any

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>plans right now exactly what's going to happen. I will

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you this. I am enjoying the hell out to

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to do things like betting team totals in

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>game betting all kinds of incredible offerings that they have

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>at FanDuel and draft Kings and this one and that

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>one and the other one, and uh, it's just gonna

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like when I if I come back to Vegas,

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like I'm going back in time. I just totally get it, man,

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I totally get me. For people who are just in

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Vegas all the time and they don't understand the offerings

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that are out there. It's just unbelievable. Yeah, it's uh,

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it's primitive here, it's primitive, and they don't view it

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>as as competition because they think they're their own ecosystem.

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But once one of those operators, let's say it's a

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Draft Kings or whoever shows up. Obviously Circuit does the

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>best job out here by far. But if you if

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>if one of those operators comes in here, I mean,

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody's gonna have to be forced to innovate. It's like,

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>why do I get ahead of that? It's very strange,

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>very strange how the VET operates. And also why not

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>have all the offerings for people? I mean, people love

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to bet when there's things to bet on, yeah, you know,

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's like, yeah, it's it just doesn't make

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>any sense. It's like, you know, they could buy the

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>same service the DraftKings is buying. Right. I don't have

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>an explanation. I really don't. I really there's no good

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>explanation for it. Um. But again, shout out to Matt

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>metcalf in the whole crew at Circle for doing their

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>best to innovate and really running a sports book the

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>way it's supposed to be run. Um, but it's just

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a strange ecosystem, man, for sure, let's do it,

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Ben MGM. I've never been on bet mgm s app.

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Do they have any like different offerings? And they do,

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>but you know, Ben MGM and Ben MGM would even

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>admit this New Jersey is not always the same as Nevada,

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>so sometimes their new Jersey offerings are different or better

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>than Nevada. But I will say this, I will give

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Ben MGM a lot of credit. They sponsor a numbers

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>game too, so let me just be full disclosure here.

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh and DraftKings does sponsor Primetime Action, so I'm not

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>just mentioning them because of that. But Ben MGM did

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a great job through baseball season. I thought here in

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Nevada keeping up like Awards pro when no one else did.

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So they surprise you a lot. They're like, oh wow,

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>you can still bet Corey Seeger, you know, throughout the

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>sixty game season. Um. By the way, Corey Seeger completely

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>trolling me with my m v P picks at thirty

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to one when he got the m v P in

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>both the nlcs of the World Series. But it's it's

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>there's they will surprise you a bet MGM in Nevada.

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes Ben MGM New Jersey will have some great

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>things and we don't have it here, So you know,

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's very it's all very strange still here.

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Just uh, you know, one and a half years after

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the overturning of Pasma. Let's do our picks, boys, because

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I got stuff to say about Survivor and teasers and

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>all that. Well, let's start with our best bets. We'll

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>do one to three here, parlay as all as we

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>start with the guests, what is your number one best

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 1>bet sider total in weekate? Sir? Number one is one

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that Mike picked and I agreed with him on that.

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>The Seattle Seahawks lane three against the San Francisco forty Niners. Uh,

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>it feels too good in all honesty, it feels like

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of an overreaction to what we saw

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>last week. The Niners beat the but Jesus of a

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>New England team that just, let's face it, the Patriots stink.

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 1>That was just the Niners enforced their will on a

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>bad team and and one easily the Seahawks. They controlled

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:15.239
<v Speaker 1>that game. Russell Wilson threw three really bad interceptions that

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>we normally don't see him even make one play like

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>that in the game, and he made three horrible plays

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and they still lost on a field goal in the

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>last minute of overtime and one by the way, Arizona

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>needed a ten point come back in the last five

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>minutes of regulation even get toot So Seattle to me

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>laying only a field goal at home against the Niner

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>team that is still banged up, and a Niner team

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that I'm still not convinced is all that good this

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>year because of those injuries. Out of lay to three

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>very happily with Seattle. Those are three of the worst

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>passes of Russell Wilson's career. That was You're like, oh, wow,

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>he's a human being after all, Todd, your number one,

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 1>my number one pick is going to be. Let me

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>just decide here. I'm gonna go with I'm gonna go

0:18:57.920 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Eagles. Yeah, I'm gonna go with the Eagles.

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Eagle minus nine. Uh. You know, the Cowboys can't cover

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>a game, and I'm always you know, nervous betting in

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the NFL against a team that's never covered. And sooner

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 1>or later they will. I'm sure cover a game, but

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Ben de Nucci, Ben de Nucci, are you serious? This

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>team is incredible. They couldn't protect Andy Dalton. Now they're

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna protect Ben de Nucci. I mean, gives me a break.

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm the Eagles. I'm not saying the Eagles are a

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>great team by any means, but they're mediocre. But they

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 1>should be able to slap the hell out of Ben

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.239
<v Speaker 1>de Nucci, I would think, especially at home. I mean,

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous, and it's not like their defense is any good,

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>So you know, why not late the nine? Give me

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Dallas minus nine. You know, I know it's obvious, I mean,

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Eagles minus nine. I know it's obvious, but uh, I

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>mean I think it's just bend Nucci. Come on, they

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 1>gotta be kidding. Andy Dalton remains in concussion protocol. So

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>as we do this Thursday morning, it is Ben Denucci. Uh.

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's a trivia question. By the way, Free boys ready

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>for this, who leads among NFC East quarterbacks who leads

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the division in yards passing this year? Let me guess

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen Jeffrey. My guests would probably be uh, well, no,

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it would be Dak Prescott probably right. Dak Prescott still

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>leads the NFC East in yards passing. Yeah, there there

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>just gives you a sense of a division that the

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Eagles lead to four and one, Cowboys and Washington Football

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Teamers are two and five and their Giants bringing up

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the rear one and six. By the way, there is

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a prop over a DraftKings and we've talked about this

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of weeks. Now, what will the eventual

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>NFC East winner have total wins? And it's at seven

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half. And last week the under was at

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>plus one thirty seven. I was like, go under. This

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>week the under is at plus one oh five. Not

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>quite as much bang for your buck, but still plus money.

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I would still take the under, wouldn't you. I would

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>take under seven because the worst you're gonna happen is

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a push. They're not getting eight because you got all

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>those teams, Eagles, Washington Football Teamers, and Cowboys all would

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>have to go six and three down the stretch. Giants

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>would have to go seven and two. I mean, the

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.679
<v Speaker 1>only scenario schedules. I haven't looked at the schedules, but

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't sdules are difficult to begin with anyway. I

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 1>that's under seven and a half plus money. It feels

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>like a really good bet. They can. They get to

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>beat up on each other, they get they get a

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of inherent winds right within the division, so they

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>do get some wins because they get to play each other.

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>So there's that, but still six and three. The only

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>scenario I can see, and I was saying this this morning,

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is let's say somehow the Cowboys upset the Eagles this week.

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Just play along with me, because you know, the Eagles

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>barely beat the Giants to some say, some would argue

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have. Let's say that Cowboys somehow win and then

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>before the trade deadline they pick up Ryan Fitzpatrick. That's

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the only way I can see it happening. But it's

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>currently constituted. That's an under no doubt to me, I

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>love it under I agree. The other point I was

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>making was I did a little research on this. So

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>if you win the NFC East, you get a home playoff,

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a which is comical to begin with. You also can

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>only pick at best nineteen in the draft, no better

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>than nineteen, and if you don't win the NFC East,

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have a top ten pick. Most likely. Why

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>would you want to win this division? That's a huge

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>gap between ten and nineteen. That's awful anyway, random NFC's thoughts.

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>My number one pick is that I'm gonna debate between

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 1>my three which I like the best. Uh. What I

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>did guessing lines on Monday. We didn't have Chrissy this

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>week because Chrissie tested positive. For those who missed it,

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Chris Andrews tested positive for the coronavirus. The last guy

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>we want to test positive for corona. By the way,

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>he is doing better. He said, I still has coughing, fits,

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>still has some other sort of intestinal stuff going on,

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 1>but he says he's feeling better. We hope to hap

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>him next week. So when we did a bastardized version

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of guessing lines on Monday, this was the line. The

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Baltimore line was the line that I could not understand.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Five and a half. I was like, it's three and

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>a half at worst. Where do they get five and

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a half from? I thought three. I still like Pittsburgh

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>at three and a half, even at four, and obviously

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>even at four, which we're seeing it's sort of toggling

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>between those two. But let's say it's three and a half.

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I like the Pittsburgh Steelers, but I will concede this.

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>It is always favorable in any sport, but certainly in

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the NFL to take a lead early. I don't think

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>there's ever been a matchup where having the lead early

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>will mean more. Baltimore is the quintessential come from a

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>head team. They're a great front running team. They're a

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>terrible come from behind team. They're not constituted with Lamar

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Jackson to come from behind. Conversely, Pittsburgh could not have

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>been more dominant against Tennessee last week. First quarter and

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>change when they were up fourteen to nothing. It was

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>one and sixty total yards to one, and they were

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>dominating the clock. I think the one three and out

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>that Tennessee had only had a minute twenty one. So

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it was this unbelievable dominance at the beginning of the

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>game for Pittsburgh. That was why they held on to

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>win that game against Tennessee because Big Ben had some

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>mistakes at the end of the first half of the

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the game. So for me, this game will

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>be very interesting to see who who starts out on top,

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>because that might dictate the rest of the football game.

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I would imagine it would. So Pittsburgh is

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the pick plus three and a half. I think if

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>they get ahead early, they cover that. If they fall behind,

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you might know very early that it's a bad pick.

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But I'll take Pittsburgh plus the three and a half.

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>You're giving me three and a half as the only

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>undefeated team in the NFL. I will take that three

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half, knowing Baltimore's weakness if they fall behind.

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's my number one pick. Number two, Jeffrey, I'm

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to tonight. I I know going on Thursday

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>night games is usually not a popular move, but Carolina

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>laying only now it's a consensus one and a half.

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Now with Carolina laying that against the Falcons, I'll think

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers very happily laying only one and a half.

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Caroline is going to score thirty points in this game,

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>and the Falcons at this point, even if they have

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a lead in the fourth quarter, there's about a sevent

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a chance they're gonna blow it anyway. So I like Carolina.

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>They're the better football team. The only concern is that

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>deep defense stage, but you don't want I trust Teddy Bridgewater.

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I think d J. Moore and Robby Anderson both have

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 1>huge games against that bad secondary. So I'll take Carolina

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>minus one and a half very happily tonight. Teddy Bridgewater

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday against the Saints, it was twenty seven to

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, which was the eventual final score, but it's

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>four Bridgewater, who was twenty three of twenty eight on

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the game for two fifty two touchdowns, no pick in

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a sack. He had a third and eleven. The Panthers

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.640
<v Speaker 1>had third and eleven at the Saints thirty nine down

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and the play before the two minute warning on third

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and eleven, he takes an eight yard sack and that

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 1>was the That was the game right there, because coming

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>back from the two minute warning break, they attempt a

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>sixty five yard field will attempt from Joey Sly that

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>probably goes sixty three and a half yards and so

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>as long as he learns not to take that sack,

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>uh sky's the limit for Teddy Bridgewater. By the way,

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we did, we didn't do the Thursday night segment because

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>we're all out of We're all fora cocta on the

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>format today. But the only thing that I'm doing tonight

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing a Falcon's over tease. I already put that

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>bed in tease me through the three of the seven.

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Give me the over Falcons over tease, Todd number two.

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>My number two pick is going to be this Chicago

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Bears the Bears. I'm gonna go with the Bears. Uh.

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>You know I was down on the Bears earlier. I

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>kept saying they were a joke. Um. I sort of

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>had a chance to take advantage of that by betting

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the Rams at halftime, and then, like an idiot, I

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>got off of it. But I I didn't like the Bears.

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>But in this spot, I'm gonna take the Bears because

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting four and a half points. And here's the thing.

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think New Orleans is that good, and I

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly don't think they're that good outside on grass there.

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans to me, has always been a turf team.

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>You put Drew Brees on grass and things seem to

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>not go as well for that team historically. Uh, you know,

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the Bears have a real nice defense. It's not like

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the Saints are stopping anybody. Carolina scored a million on

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>him last week. Everybody who played the Saints this year

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>scored a lot of points. If the Saints are going

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to give up points, it's gonna be hard to win

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>by four and a half. And as well as on

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, I don't know that the Saints

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>are gonna go gangbusters on the road in the cold

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago. You know, four and a half is a

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>lot in an NFL game, especially against the team that

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>has a nice defense. Give me the Bears. The Bears

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>plus four and a half. I can't say I expected

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that one, but the Bears plus four and a half.

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, just looking up at the screens, the

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>weekly COVID report, and this has everything to do with

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>people who are in contests, uh, people who are in

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>survivor especially who have to be really aware of of

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>COVID outbreaks and if it might postpone a game because

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of all the contest rules. Uh. The Chargers had one

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>positive COVID test this morning, and apparently the Giants have

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>multiple on their team in the front office, so just

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 1>keep that in mind. UM. Giants scheduled to play the

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Bucks on Monday night. The Charger schedule to play Denver

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in an afternoon game. UH, this coming Sunday, Week number eight,

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>my number two pick is call me crazy. I'll leave

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>some room for you guys. Call me crazy. I'm taking

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 1>the New England Patriots plus three and a half against

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills. And I know the Patriots look like ass.

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>They just look terrible. Um. I shouldn't really diminish very

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>nice looking asses perhaps, but New England plus three and

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a half to me, Buffalo is the most one dimensional

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>team in football, and offensively, uh Josh Allen tucking the

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>ball under and running is by far their best play

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>on offense. And what have we talked about with Bill

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Belichick through the years. The one thing that he is

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>great at is taking away the offense is strength. You're

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna beat me, beat me with other options, not with

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>your best. And I know New England's stats last week,

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>worst start since two thousand now currently first three game

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>losing streaks since two thousand two. Belichick with his worst

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>home loss last week as a Patriot's head coach by

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven points to the Niners. Out gained by two

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>two yards in the first half by the Niners. It's

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the worst first half differential under Belichick ever. But I

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like him against this Bill's offense, which could not get

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>into the end zone against your New York Jets. Jeffrey

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>couldn't get in there. I had Buffalo and survivor one

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of the men who had Buffalo and survivor. And I

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>will say this, on the one hand, it was the

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>least sweat filled one score survivor win ever, survivor advancement ever,

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>because the Jets got four yards of offense four total

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>yards of offense in the second half against the Bills,

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>so it really felt like even though one flukey play

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>could have beaten the Bills, it was never in doubt.

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, did say more about the Jets

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>or did say more about the Bills, I'm not really

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>quite sure. I like the Patriots, and this game is

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>everything for New England. They lose this, their season is done. Zo.

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It's that dire. I'll take the three and a half

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>New England. My second dog of the day is Yeah,

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>no issue with that pick at all. I'm with Todd.

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like the spot for the Patriots the

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>h and also to It's Bell, We've never seen a

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Belichick team in this scenario where their season is on

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the line this early in the year. So I'm getting

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>three and a half against a Buffalo team. Then again,

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>like you said, one dimensional with Alan just really using

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>his feed more than his arm. I have no problem

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>with that, and as I give that pick right up

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>on the screen as if on cue. Julian Edelman will

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>not play this weekend for the Patriots with his knee

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>injury in case there was any doubt about his data,

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So he is, he is out. But I am taking

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots plus three and a half is my number

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>two pick, Jeff number three. I I can't believe I'm

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>doing this on on in public in anything, guys, but

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>my number three pick is the Kansas City Chiefs minus

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and a half against my Jets, because because here's

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the deal. How the Jets scoring more than a touchdown

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in this game, and that's how they have four yards

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of offense like you said against the Bills defense. That

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>let's face, the Bill's defense has not been good this year,

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Jets moved the ball for four American football

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>yards in the second half, which should be impossible at

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the NFL level regardless of how awful you are. And

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City keeping this in mind with Kansas City, the

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Chief's offense last week didn't do a lot against Denver.

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>They scored on a short field at the end with

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>his backups, a pick six and a kick return, So

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>they're coming off a not great offensive performance. A week

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>before they ran all over Buffalo, so Mahomes has not

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.479
<v Speaker 1>had a mahomesy and performance in a while. This feels

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>like Kansas City's up twenty eight nothing immediately, and the

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>only way I'm sweating is if Chad hand He plays

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole second half and scores the Jets a touchdown

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>with a pick six. So I'm I'm doing it. I'm

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>laying in the nineteen and a half with Kansas City.

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's enough. I thought it should have

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>been twenty three, Gill, I really did. I thought there

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>should have been twenty three with Kansas City. So nineteen

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half, I'm getting four and a half better.

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>At four and a half points better than I thought.

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll lay it. I would have guessed twenty one on

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>guessing lines. That would have been my guest twenty one.

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's nine score Kansas City Chiefs twenty six Jet

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>at seven Ye right now totally and Chad Headie throws

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>his pick six with three and a half minutes left. Um,

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>remember last year, similar scenario, Week three Jets lane excuse me,

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Patriots lane twenty and a half against the Jets in

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Week three and the Jets did not have an offensive

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>touchdown but covered because they were covered a fumble on

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a punt in the end zone for a touchdown and

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Jack that resolutely remind me of that game. I had

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Jets under team total ten and a half in that

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>game the Patriots mus twenty and a half and that

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>one and it's thart speaking of speaking of props, that

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>there is an O N sixteen prop out there. There's

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a sixteen and oh but the no is like ridiculously cartoonish,

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>uh cartoonishly used Pittsburgh's not going sixteen. But there's an

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>O N sixteen one that has existed now for a

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. And it existed when the Giants and Falcons

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>were both winless as well, and it was for the

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Jets specifically, or was it all three? I can't remember.

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a Jet specifically at that time,

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>because there was one with all three and I said, well,

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons are gonna win a couple of games, at

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>least a few games, And the Giants were favored that

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>week against Washington. They ended up winning, so it really

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>did come down to the Jets, and you could have

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>gotten them at north of plus seven hundred to go

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>o N sixteen, And I was like, you gotta play that.

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a great you know, it would be a fun bet.

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Not mathematically great, but it's a fun bet for people

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>having if you look at their schedule. It was the

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>second Miami game where you're like, well, if that would

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>be Twah's first game, maybe you could see the Jets

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>winning that game. Uh, now it's plus two thirty five.

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe on the Jets going oh in sixteen, which

0:33:56.360 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>mathematically is a horrible number. However, uh, trying not to

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>be too close to the sun and realize that people

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>just like fun bets sometimes. If you look at the

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Jet schedule, they gotta lose nine more games, um, nine

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>more games or ten more games? What are they? Seven? Yeah?

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And seven nine more games? And you look at the

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>schedule like, where's the loss And the only thing we

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>could come up with was if you bet the plus

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>money on the no, which again mathematically is not great,

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's still a fun bet. Week seventeen might be

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the problem because if New England doesn't have anything to

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>play for. In Week seventeen, maybe they play without any

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>care motivation and the Jets sneak in a win after

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>being oh in fifteen to kill those bets. But other

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>than that, do you see a loss? Would the manual

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>nine team parlay make you even more money if you

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>just bet against the Jets every week on the money?

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>What I'm saying, mathematically, I've said it several times. Mathematically

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>it's terrible bet right plus two thirty five should be

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>way better than that. But some people are like, I

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>don't care. You know, we as we immerse ourselves in gambling,

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we have to realize there's a lot of audience out there.

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>It's just like, I just want fun bets. I just

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>don't see lost. Besides that one Daryl and all honesty,

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 1>where the wind may come from for him? Uh? The

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Bear and I were tweeting back at this a few

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, when it was apparent that this could very

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>easily happen. Week sixteen, the Jets host Cleveland. I could

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 1>very much see a scenario where the Browns need a

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 1>win to stay in the playoffs and the Jets win

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that game just because of course you'll have and also

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to make matters worse on that. I wouldn't be shocked

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Gil if Jacksonville at this point goes one in fifteen

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna have an easier schedule than the Jets.

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So in order for the Jets to get the number

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>one pick and get the rights to Trevor Lawrence, in

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>all likelihood, they gotta go lose out at this point,

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I really do think that, Gil. So there's a lot

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>on the line for the Jets going oh in sixteen,

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>including those bets, which look again, I don't unless of

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Vegas really lays an egg on an east coast trip

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:07.839
<v Speaker 1>in the first week of December. Ah, that week seventeen thing.

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>But Belichick will have this guys ready to play against

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, you know how he hates them. So I

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:14.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't see a win on this schedule

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>at this point. I really don't Where are we, guys,

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of where we are the rotation. Jeff did

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a third pick third, Jeff. Jeff gave three, Mikey gave

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>three me, and you gave to Gil. Okay, so you

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 1>want me to give my third, yes, sir. First of all,

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I want to just say before you give my third

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:31.479
<v Speaker 1>What the hell did Mikey talking about? Is Todd really

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>like that? What do you mean informative and entertaining? Yeah,

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Todd's exactly like that. Informative and entertaining. What the hell

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>are they talking about? I don't know. I don't know.

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, I love you, Toddy. You know what. I'm

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>tired of people. I really am tired of people. Tired

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>of people. People. Didn't you want to say on on

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>one of your first Numbers Game appearances, didn't you? I said?

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>People suck? And I think you responded with people one

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of the worst inventions ever. Terrible inventions. Terrible Anyways, Uh,

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 1>my third pick I am going to go. I'm really

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 1>torn between taking Carolina along with Jeffrey, but since Jeffrey

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>took Carolina, I'm gonna do the other pick that I like,

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>which is the Detroit Motown Lions. Give me the Lions

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>under the Radar. They won for me last week and

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that heartbreaking, crazy like heart attack game with the ridiculous

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley nonsense when I had the plus four at

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.799
<v Speaker 1>halftime and then I had to watch them score when

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>they shouldn't score and get the two point conversion to

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>break my heart, and then come down and get the

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>great catch at the eight r line, and then Matt

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Stafford on the last play playing Matthew Ice. Baby. That's

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Ice, not Maddie Ice, the real Matthew Ice Baby

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Ice Man. Anyways, Lions I think are a little bit

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>better than people realize. Had they beaten the Bears that

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>game earlier in the year, they would have a respectable record.

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the Lions are really not that bad a

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>football team. I think they're pretty decent. And you now

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>have Philly Rivers going on the road. We've all seen

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Philly Rivers before the Philly Rivers show, right, don't you

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>know what this game could look like late? You know,

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers driving down and do does something stupid, and

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you go, nice job betting against phil Rivers.

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Give me Detroit lines. I know Indiapolis is good, but

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>are they Are they really good enough to be laying

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>two and a half minus twenty five? Why the way?

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>What line do you have? The real line is really

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>three for me if you look at the juice. Uh yeah,

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>but it's two and a half extra juice. Okay, fine,

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 1>So I'll just say I don't even care. I don't

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>even need the three. Give me the two and a

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 1>half with the Detroit lines. I'd much rather have the three.

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And if I was playing this for real, I would

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>play play it with the three because you got all

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that juice there. But um, you know, give me the Detrod.

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the culture that good. They should be

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>going on the road, you know, to beat the decent team.

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>The lines are really not that bad. Why were they?

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Why were the Why were the cults so obsessed with

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:01.359
<v Speaker 1>getting Philip was? I know you refused to call him Philip,

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>You going Philip Philly, but like they didn't. They didn't

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.439
<v Speaker 1>even look for anybody Else's like Philip Rivers, that's our guy.

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 1>It's like every sports better was like, why why are

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>you doing this? Why are you doing it? Could be

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>because he won a lot of games against the Colts

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in his career. I remember a bunch of games. I

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you remember this, but when Peyton Manning

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>was with the Colts, they the Chargers played them a

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:25.959
<v Speaker 1>number of times as big dogs and played them very tough.

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that was it. I don't know, because I don't

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>see it. I think he's he's I mean, pass this

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:33.879
<v Speaker 1>time years ago. Let's let's go back to that thing

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about with Todd Gurley again. I'm sure

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody is well aware Todd Gurley with the with the

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Falcons up and there by the way, NFL Films has

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the audio of of Matt Ryan in the huddle saying

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 1>just remember first down and go down, first down and

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>go down, and uh he said, don't score, Yeah, don't score.

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>And Todd Gurley was right next to him. I don't

0:39:58.280 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 1>know if he heard it. I don't even acknowledge that

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>he remembered to split second too late, right, just like

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Devin Ford of Penn State the day before it did

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>against Indiana to put Penn State up twenty to twenty,

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and of course Indiana matriculated down the field, got the

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.359
<v Speaker 1>two point conversion, forced overtime, and wanted on a ridiculously

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>short two point conversion. Uh. The next day Todd Gurley

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>does the same thing in Detroit, goes right downfield, Matt

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.959
<v Speaker 1>Stafford hits t. J. Hockenson at the buzzer, if you will,

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>and then they then they convert a forty eight yard

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 1>extra point after a penalty to beat the Falcons. But

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:31.840
<v Speaker 1>what I was getting at there was the biggest single

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:34.320
<v Speaker 1>thing I think you can talk about with NFL betting

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 1>is and I use the word plinko again, attribute to

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the old prices right game to define a percentage of

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:42.799
<v Speaker 1>these NFL games, and Todd you are very good at

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>pointing out it is a percentage. There is a percentage

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 1>of games that you're not right. If you win, you're

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not wrong if you lose. And last week alone it

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 1>was what Cleveland, Cincinnati, Atlanta, Detroit, What am I forgetting? Uh? Seattle?

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Who did Seattle play again? Seattle? And the areas, And

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 1>there was a fourth game to which I'm which I'm losing.

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Off the top of my head, I'll check it right now.

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 1>But those games were complete plinko. You were not right.

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted, you were not wrong if you didn't.

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I had it, and I had a few of those games. Um,

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I would even consider oh, New Orleans, Carolina being the

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>fourth of those right. But then there is inevitably a

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>percentage of games where it is not plinko right. If

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 1>you had Washington last week, if you had San Francisco

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 1>last week, those were clearly not that. So the extent

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to which, yeah, the extent to which we can figure

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>out what those games are the better we will be

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 1>as football betters. Now, of course that's easier said than done, right,

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 1>but that's why. So that's why this is such a

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 1>hard sport, because there is inevitably a huge percentage of

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:44.400
<v Speaker 1>games where it's just dude. You know people in contests

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>who like go on these runs of like twenty three

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and two, they're getting the best to all of those.

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:51.919
<v Speaker 1>They're not avoiding all the plinko games, but they're getting

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:56.439
<v Speaker 1>them all to break their way. So index, you've got

0:41:56.440 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a very high PA. That's exactly what I felt. In

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>college football, you have a lower plank Oization index. Therefore

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.320
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be more right sides in the NFL

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 1>because everything is so tight. You've got a very low

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 1>plank Oization index. You've got to be very careful. But

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>um I I just want to know if you guys.

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I saw the replay of that where they had the

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan telling him to go down, and then they

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>showed the play again and I noticed one of the

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 1>guys knew not to tackle him. The other guy it

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:27.319
<v Speaker 1>looks like he he like really did sort of try

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to tackle him, and then and then Girlie like sluffed

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:33.880
<v Speaker 1>him off. And then you know, did the brain fart?

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>But what was that Lions guy doing trying to tackle him?

0:42:38.960 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe Todd he was trying to pay him in

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the think he was tackling. You mean it was pure genius, Todd,

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 1>go GALLAXI oka weak galaxy brain there, Todd Plaza index

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the pc I if drink, if you give me the drink,

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 1>then it must be your drink in front of you

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is the one that I drink. But if you put

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 1>the drink the other thing. But really, maybe you thought

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I thought that that's why you put the drink in

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:07.839
<v Speaker 1>the other drink. That is an excellent That is an

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>excellent portrayal of the great scene from The Princess Bride.

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:14.359
<v Speaker 1>And then he croaks, Yeah, I didn't do it well

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's there. Oh, it's the greatest incompatable. I

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>do not think you're using that word correctly. Uh. My

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:24.439
<v Speaker 1>last one is again it's another stinker. It's a third dog.

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I am taking the Denver broncos it's really uh, it's

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:31.320
<v Speaker 1>really just to play against the Chargers. Being a three

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>point favorite here. Um Denver was terrible against the Chiefs.

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 1>As we pointed out, Chiefs didn't even have to really

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 1>exert themselves at all. They had a kickoff return excuse

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>me that to pick six, they had a kickoff return

0:43:43.760 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown. Yeah, two Denver turnovers led directly to scores,

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>so they didn't have to break a sweat and beat

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in Denver. And by the way, I've said this before,

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>no one loves Drew Lock more than Drew Lock. And

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>when you know, when when Kansas City is up seven

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and nothing and they turned the ball over deep in

0:43:55.840 --> 0:43:58.120
<v Speaker 1>their own territory and you're able to run in from

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a few yards out and make the score or seven

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to six before you miss an extra point, probably stop

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>with the dancing right like, probably not the best move

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Drew Luck. All that said, he has a lock to

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>be in it is. All that said. I'll take Denver

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>plus three because I just don't trust the Chargers in

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 1>any way, and I think they will Anthony Lynn their

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 1>way to defeat in this game. In a week of

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, I mean, the biggest theme in in week

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 1>we probably buried the headline. There's gonna be a lot

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of weather around the country, a lot of inclement weather.

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:30.840
<v Speaker 1>You've got to make sure that it's wind though. You

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 1>gotta make sure it's the type of of inclement weather

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that matters. So you see a lot of these totals

0:44:35.600 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 1>crashing and multiple games this week, and be aware of

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 1>the fact that with them going down, they might just

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 1>be precursors to the same better as taking the over

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:47.240
<v Speaker 1>later in the week when the rest of the public

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 1>catches on. So don't don't necessarily think that it's a

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>but one move and done kind of thing. But I'll

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>take the Broncos here for no other reason than I

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>don't trust the Chargers on the road in Denver in

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>late October, and I don't think the Broncos should be

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a three point dog at home. And I know home

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 1>is in quotes this year against the Charges, I can't

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:09.320
<v Speaker 1>be more impressed with Justin Herbert. But the Chargers managed

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to lose games like this. And you know, speaking of

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers, Todd, that was the famous game, Jeff, I

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>can think you were with us for this one too,

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:19.399
<v Speaker 1>that game against Denver at Denver with Philip Rivers where

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 1>he just threw the ball into the dirt on third

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:24.880
<v Speaker 1>down and Chargers manager, Yeah, figured out a way to

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>lose that game. Denver plus three for me my third

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:30.240
<v Speaker 1>pick by the way, it should have never even gotten

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to that. If you remember that game, it was twenty

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:34.319
<v Speaker 1>six and the third quarter in Philip rivers through an

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 1>interception to I, he makes me so angry. And and

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and last week the Chargers come from ahead, come from

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>behind win against the Jaguars, who are terrible by Gardner Minshew.

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw this news. Gardner Minshew

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 1>admitted just today, I believe it's just today this morning,

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 1>that he has multiple fractures in his throwing hand. The

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars had no idea about this and his status for

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 1>next week. Because the Jaguars don't play this week, his

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 1>status for next week is very much in doubt. So

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.200
<v Speaker 1>they did that. The Chargers did against a Gardner Minshew

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:14.240
<v Speaker 1>impaired Jaguars team almost lost big turnover for the Jaguars

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>late in the third quarter that turned that game and

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:18.560
<v Speaker 1>made it a non sweat in the end for Chargers

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>survivor pickers. Anyway, All right, uh so we are at

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the Todd Did you have anything on Thursday night tonight

0:46:24.200 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 1>or no? I mean, Eileen heavily to Carolina. I agree

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 1>with Jeffrey. First of all, Carolina beat the pants out

0:46:31.000 --> 0:46:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of it Land in the last game. I had the

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:35.680
<v Speaker 1>over in that game and lost because Carolina's defense really

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:39.359
<v Speaker 1>stifled Atlanta. I don't think Julio Jones played in that game.

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he did

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:43.840
<v Speaker 1>not play in that game, so that that is a difference.

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, the Falcons are also a little bit

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>like the the Saints. I don't know if you guys

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean noticed this, but they don't seem to play

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:54.880
<v Speaker 1>as fast and as well on the on grass. I

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't know if the numbers would bear that out,

0:46:57.200 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 1>but it just seems to me that that whenever they

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 1>get on grass, they're just not the same offensive firepower.

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:06.360
<v Speaker 1>So I kind of like Carolina with Jeff as a

0:47:06.400 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 1>bonus pick. Okay uh And then comes to our teaser

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 1>of the week again, as Todd said, we're all six

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and one, me and Mikey. What was Mikey's teaser. Mikey's

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:21.279
<v Speaker 1>teaser last week was Detroit Lions. This week? Oh this week? Yeah,

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>this week, Mikey's teaser was the Green Bay Packers minus

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>one with the Miami Dolphins plus nine and a half

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and to a interesting interesting All right, Jeff, we have

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>done very well on these this year, what is your

0:47:35.440 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>two leg at six point teaser of the week. So

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm with Mike on his first leg. I don't see

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a universe where green Bay doesen't doesn't beat Minnesota by

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>more than a field goal. I mean, they're gonna beat

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 1>him by at least the field goals. So I'll go

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 1>green Bay. I guess we're going with minus one on that, guys,

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:55.839
<v Speaker 1>I guess, uh down from seven, uh, even though there's

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:57.759
<v Speaker 1>a good good amount of six and a half out there.

0:47:57.800 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 1>So if you can get that, obviously get it down

0:47:59.800 --> 0:48:03.239
<v Speaker 1>today half um, and then I'm I'm I'm thinking the

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:05.839
<v Speaker 1>same way gill is on Denver and the Chargers. I'll

0:48:05.880 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>push Denver up through the six and the seven and

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the three up the nine very happily that that is

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>one score game written all over it. So I'll go

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:19.799
<v Speaker 1>green Bay minus one. Denver plus nine will be my teaser. Yeah.

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 1>The only pure Stanford loong teaser legs this week are Atlanta,

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 1>which I get on playing the Atlanta Falcons and the

0:48:27.719 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 1>over Intact in tonight's game, But that's not my teaser

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:31.799
<v Speaker 1>of the week. Uh. And then the only other one

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess is the Raiders. Am I missing anything? Guys?

0:48:36.200 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 1>That sounds correct, Todd, What do you like? I like

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the um I like the Denver Broncos for similar reasons

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:51.399
<v Speaker 1>that you said. I just don't see the Chargers, even

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:53.400
<v Speaker 1>if they can beat the Broncos. I don't see them

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:56.359
<v Speaker 1>blowing out the Broncos, especially after the Broncos had such

0:48:56.400 --> 0:48:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a poor week last week against Kansas City. They're gonna

0:48:59.120 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>be loaded up for air this week against the team. Look,

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:04.520
<v Speaker 1>let's be honest. The Chargers are just an average, mediocre

0:49:04.560 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 1>football team. Sometimes they're gonna look good, sometimes they're gonna

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:09.320
<v Speaker 1>look bad. I don't think they can beat the Broncos

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 1>by more than nine. So give me the Broncos plus

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the nine. And then also give me another team plus

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the nine, and that is the uh what was the

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 1>other one? Oh, San Francisco forty Niners. Give me the

0:49:22.160 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco forty Niners plus the nine. Look, Seattle is good,

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 1>but they don't have any defense, so it's very hard

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to win by margin if you don't have any defense.

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't see San Francisco getting spanked in this game.

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be a tight game. Give me

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the Niners plus the nine and Denver plus the nine.

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like that San Francisco Lake Um, by

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the way, says you bring bring up the Chargers Broncos

0:49:46.200 --> 0:49:48.760
<v Speaker 1>again with the other prop that we looked at this morning.

0:49:48.800 --> 0:49:50.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'll usually do props on my show because I

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's kind of it's kind of nonsense radio because

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 1>most people don't bet them. But these are all kind

0:49:56.040 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of cool. This year in the NFL, these season long

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:00.839
<v Speaker 1>ones with the Jets and the NFC East total, there

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:03.800
<v Speaker 1>was another one that was, uh, well, all four teams

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>from you know, make it from a division into the playoffs.

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And they're clearly talking about the NFC West, which has

0:50:09.680 --> 0:50:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the Niners at four and three in last place, and

0:50:12.040 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 1>just like we were talking about with the NFC East,

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:15.880
<v Speaker 1>where there's built in wins against each other, in the

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:18.759
<v Speaker 1>NFC West there's built in losses because they play each other.

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:21.839
<v Speaker 1>But really, if you look at the NFC, what are

0:50:21.880 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the only two like, what are the teams that could

0:50:24.080 --> 0:50:27.640
<v Speaker 1>torpedo that from happening? Because it seems unlikely, but then

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you think, well who could who could ruin this? I

0:50:30.440 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 1>guess New Orleans would be the number one candidate because

0:50:32.640 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans and Tampa whoever wins that division where it

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:38.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't win that division, could could mess that up. Chicago

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:40.400
<v Speaker 1>is the only other one. I don't believe in Chicago,

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. So it's interesting. It was plus three fifty,

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:45.879
<v Speaker 1>by the way, which wasn't nearly enough bang for your

0:50:45.880 --> 0:50:47.840
<v Speaker 1>buck to get all four of those teams. But the

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 1>other one basically betting Arizona versus Chicago versus New Orleans. Yeah,

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Oro or San Francisco. I think San Francisco is going

0:50:56.719 --> 0:51:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to be better than gil Gil. One thing actually that

0:51:00.320 --> 0:51:03.359
<v Speaker 1>up there, San Francisco goes to New Orleans later this year.

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:07.319
<v Speaker 1>That could go a long way towards deciding that prop that. Yeah,

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:09.479
<v Speaker 1>and New Orleans plays Chicago this week, right, so there's

0:51:09.480 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>one more loss for one of those teams. What what

0:51:11.640 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I was really getting at, though, was one that I

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:16.760
<v Speaker 1>couldn't decide on a bet, which was the next coach

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to be fired. So we've already had Bill O'Brien fired

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:22.680
<v Speaker 1>as both the coach and the GM of the Houston Texans,

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and then Dan Quinn got fired from Atlanta. You could

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 1>argue that both of those guys should have been fired

0:51:28.000 --> 0:51:30.479
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago. But then so the new one

0:51:30.560 --> 0:51:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is Adam Gaze is the short shot at plus one hundred,

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and my opinion was, well, they would have fired him already.

0:51:36.360 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 1>They're not gonna fire him. Uh. And then there was

0:51:38.239 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of other people on that list. Mike McCarthy

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:43.279
<v Speaker 1>was sixteen and one, but I'm but over twenty one.

0:51:43.320 --> 0:51:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, well, yeah, but Dad got hurt, so

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if Jerry would do that to him.

0:51:47.440 --> 0:51:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Lynn is sixteen to one. From a football perspective,

0:51:50.320 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you would think Anthony Lynn would be the choice, but

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:55.719
<v Speaker 1>he's teflon, like, they just don't fire him. He's too

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:58.400
<v Speaker 1>nice of a guy, apparently, So I didn't really know.

0:51:58.520 --> 0:52:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Was it Doug Morone and Jack Xonville? Was it someone

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:04.880
<v Speaker 1>like Zimmer in Minnesota who were not thinking about But

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like any of them. I was like, I

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:09.360
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't bet this at all. I'm not sure if you

0:52:09.400 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 1>got someone. Maron's the only name that would make sense.

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:15.720
<v Speaker 1>But they're on the by this week, and they probably

0:52:15.760 --> 0:52:18.480
<v Speaker 1>would have already done it, and they're in a scenario too,

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and look they lose out. They have a real shot

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:23.880
<v Speaker 1>at the number one pick if the Jets win a game,

0:52:24.120 --> 0:52:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville loses out. Jacksonville is getting the first pick because

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:30.160
<v Speaker 1>their schedule will have been easier than the jet schedule,

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So uh, Maron would be the only guy I'd look at.

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I have a hard time seeing Minnesota fire firing Zimmer

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the season. Gil. I just I

0:52:37.200 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 1>just have a hard time seeing that, even though that,

0:52:39.640 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to me is a logical pick. Without that, seasons just

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:44.839
<v Speaker 1>completely fallen. Apart for that, I have a hard time

0:52:44.920 --> 0:52:47.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing anybody fire anyone at this point, for it doesn't

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 1>make any sense does. By the way, Bill Belichick was

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:51.800
<v Speaker 1>included at five one, I was like, that's I don't know,

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not enough. It would need to be five jillions,

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:59.279
<v Speaker 1>five five trillion at least taught any any choice. There

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:01.440
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Zach Tylor was not on that list

0:53:01.880 --> 0:53:07.800
<v Speaker 1>at all. He wasn't even listed. Um, I can't really

0:53:08.160 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>think of anybody that you know, I don't know. I

0:53:11.120 --> 0:53:15.520
<v Speaker 1>just anyway, here's my two team six point teaser. I'm

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:17.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna take the Pittsburgh Steelers, which is consistent with my

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:21.440
<v Speaker 1>first best bet, taking Pittsburgh on the against spread at

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 1>three and a half plus three and a half. I'm

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:25.840
<v Speaker 1>also gonna take yeah, I'm also gonna take Pittsburgh in

0:53:25.880 --> 0:53:27.279
<v Speaker 1>addition to the plus three and a half is one

0:53:27.320 --> 0:53:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of my best bets, plus nine and a half on

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a teaser. Again, I am concerned about the fact that

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the game script of this is going to be very

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:38.879
<v Speaker 1>very uh sort of a portent of things to come.

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:41.920
<v Speaker 1>If Baltimore goes out early, this could go bad. But

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:44.600
<v Speaker 1>if Pittsburgh goes out early, I'm gonna be very comfortable

0:53:44.680 --> 0:53:46.520
<v Speaker 1>with both of these. So Pittsburgh plus nine and a

0:53:46.560 --> 0:53:49.759
<v Speaker 1>half and I'm gonna tease Tennessee down to basically just

0:53:49.800 --> 0:53:54.479
<v Speaker 1>having to win again with with very few Stanford Wong

0:53:55.160 --> 0:53:58.239
<v Speaker 1>pure teaser legs available, I'll take Tennessee down. It's five

0:53:58.280 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half now, so I'm actually taking it, you know,

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:01.960
<v Speaker 1>two plus a half. I get it. I know you're

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:07.319
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to do that, but basically, I'm just having

0:54:07.360 --> 0:54:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee win that football game against Cincinnati. And I'm I'm

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:12.040
<v Speaker 1>all about Joe Burrow and I'm all about the back

0:54:12.080 --> 0:54:14.640
<v Speaker 1>door covers of the Cincinnati Bengals. And what's the stat

0:54:14.719 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Four of their five losses have been by five points

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:20.879
<v Speaker 1>or fewer. Yes, four of their five losses by five

0:54:20.920 --> 0:54:23.919
<v Speaker 1>points or fewer, but Cincinnati's three nineteen and one under

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Zach Taylor. I think it's three twenty in one. So

0:54:26.520 --> 0:54:31.439
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's Pittsburgh and Tennessee as my two leg

0:54:32.120 --> 0:54:35.759
<v Speaker 1>six point teaser, all right, So that for the survivors, Gil,

0:54:35.840 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you still have your second entry going. You want me

0:54:38.120 --> 0:54:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to tell you who you've taken so far? Please tell

0:54:40.760 --> 0:54:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the world who I've taken so far? Okay, so far

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>used the Tennessee Titans, the Cleveland Brianies, the New England Patriots,

0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Baby Buccaneers, Arizona Cardinals, and the Miami Dolphins.

0:54:55.560 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And last week you use Buffalo. So who's it going

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to be? Now? Well, comes down to for me, Uh,

0:55:02.719 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>do I use the Kansas City Chiefs in what amounts

0:55:05.200 --> 0:55:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to a Bingoes free Bingo square against the New York Jets?

0:55:08.800 --> 0:55:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Or am I strategizing and keeping Kansas City for later

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and I gotta keep them later? Now? The answer for

0:55:14.520 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 1>me is the former. I'm playing the Chiefs. I'm using

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs in week number eight. Um, I did not

0:55:20.600 --> 0:55:23.400
<v Speaker 1>script out Survivor in the year of COVID. I think

0:55:23.440 --> 0:55:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a fool's errand to do that. This

0:55:25.160 --> 0:55:27.719
<v Speaker 1>year because you just you worry about postponed games and

0:55:27.719 --> 0:55:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. And again, if the game is

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 1>postponed beyond Tuesday at midnight, your scrid in Survivor. But

0:55:34.520 --> 0:55:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I am not. But but I did. Finally, after week six,

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:39.799
<v Speaker 1>I finally said, all right, let me see we map

0:55:39.920 --> 0:55:44.399
<v Speaker 1>this out. And so I am going to take as

0:55:44.440 --> 0:55:47.040
<v Speaker 1>accordingly according to that grid that I've made, that map

0:55:47.080 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that I've made for myself. I'm gonna take Kansas City

0:55:49.080 --> 0:55:52.360
<v Speaker 1>here against the Jets, the the fade, the Jets strategy.

0:55:52.480 --> 0:55:54.920
<v Speaker 1>As I've said, there are many worst strategies and Survivor

0:55:54.960 --> 0:55:57.480
<v Speaker 1>than that. It's Kansas City at home against the Jets,

0:55:57.520 --> 0:55:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen and a half point favorites. I'm not gonna

0:55:59.680 --> 0:56:02.359
<v Speaker 1>think of out of this week Chiefs because I don't.

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:05.160
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that was really interesting what you said

0:56:05.160 --> 0:56:07.799
<v Speaker 1>about the Thanksgiving there's only six teams. There's gonna be

0:56:07.800 --> 0:56:10.160
<v Speaker 1>people that have already used up all six of those teams. Well,

0:56:10.200 --> 0:56:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that's part of circus thing. By the way, if you

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:13.759
<v Speaker 1>look at the Chiefs, just finishing the thought, if you

0:56:13.760 --> 0:56:18.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the Chiefs schedule, there isn't really a completely

0:56:18.080 --> 0:56:20.719
<v Speaker 1>obvious spot to play them again. Some might argue with that,

0:56:21.239 --> 0:56:23.399
<v Speaker 1>and do you really think they're gonna go fifteen and one.

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're gonna lose at some other point. So

0:56:25.480 --> 0:56:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the Chiefs here. That, yeah, the Thanksgiving thing

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:31.080
<v Speaker 1>because of the presence of a team like the Jets,

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 1>because Circa couldn't have anticipated to teams so epically bad

0:56:35.200 --> 0:56:41.880
<v Speaker 1>sorry Jeff, so bad that people would still be around

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:46.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. And it's really not eroding quickly at all.

0:56:46.800 --> 0:56:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So they've got to be thrilled that they have that

0:56:49.160 --> 0:56:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving rule, which is instead of a seventeen week survivor,

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:55.200
<v Speaker 1>it essentially becomes an eighteen week with this mini week

0:56:55.280 --> 0:57:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of Thanksgiving, and the three games are really difficult unless

0:57:00.440 --> 0:57:04.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a major injury to someone very important in one

0:57:04.400 --> 0:57:07.719
<v Speaker 1>of these three games. There is no obvious choice. It's

0:57:07.840 --> 0:57:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Pittsburgh the rematch, It's Dallas Washington the rematch, and

0:57:12.600 --> 0:57:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it's get ready for this the first game that day,

0:57:15.480 --> 0:57:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Houston Detroit. So it's so thanks as you can plan

0:57:20.320 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 1>everything to get to Thanksgiving, and you can sort of

0:57:23.240 --> 0:57:26.480
<v Speaker 1>plan everything until the last week. Week seventeen is always scorely,

0:57:27.080 --> 0:57:30.919
<v Speaker 1>but like Thanksgiving is just a prayer and you have well,

0:57:31.040 --> 0:57:36.040
<v Speaker 1>will you would you? Absolutely? I think they stink. I

0:57:36.080 --> 0:57:39.560
<v Speaker 1>mean I wouldn't say it that quickly, Gail. If we

0:57:39.560 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>were picking that today, if you made me take the

0:57:41.840 --> 0:57:45.280
<v Speaker 1>pick today, I would take Detroit. I would not be

0:57:45.400 --> 0:57:48.440
<v Speaker 1>watching that game to basically that that that's what I

0:57:48.440 --> 0:57:51.800
<v Speaker 1>would do, just because. And this was when remember when

0:57:51.840 --> 0:57:54.440
<v Speaker 1>when the when the schedule was released, we all looked

0:57:54.480 --> 0:57:57.760
<v Speaker 1>at this for this reason, with the with the survivor

0:57:57.760 --> 0:58:00.919
<v Speaker 1>pool a circuit usually Thanksgiving, Gil and we all said,

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:03.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're gonna save the Dallas Cowboys for Thanksgiving

0:58:03.640 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 1>as Washington football team. And now the Cowboys are one

0:58:06.720 --> 0:58:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of the five worst teams in football, so it completely

0:58:09.480 --> 0:58:11.680
<v Speaker 1>again that that day is gonna be h It's gonna

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 1>be a bloody Thanksgiving for folks that are left in

0:58:14.360 --> 0:58:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the pool. But but we you know, that's the thing,

0:58:16.320 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 1>for all these survivor players, including myself, who are still alive,

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you almost have to be okay with losing then, right

0:58:22.840 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's like, well, we knew this was coming. This

0:58:24.880 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 1>was the day where it's sort of just coin flippy.

0:58:27.280 --> 0:58:30.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think you're right now as we stand, Jeff,

0:58:30.440 --> 0:58:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what I'm thinking about too, it's like

0:58:32.800 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Detroit at home short week. Maybe that's the way to

0:58:37.320 --> 0:58:40.040
<v Speaker 1>play it, but that could change, right if uh, you know,

0:58:40.120 --> 0:58:44.320
<v Speaker 1>God gets hurt, Lamar Jackson, Lamar Jackson gets hurt or

0:58:44.360 --> 0:58:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Big Ben gets hurt. I mean, there's so many things

0:58:45.920 --> 0:58:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that can happen between now and then. But imagine if

0:58:48.400 --> 0:58:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Circuit didn't have the Thanksgiving rule. There would be like

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a hundred people get to the finish line I think

0:58:53.840 --> 0:58:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in this season and they never know if another big

0:58:56.560 --> 0:59:00.200
<v Speaker 1>upset is coming that could wipe out Jets would one

0:59:00.240 --> 0:59:04.200
<v Speaker 1>game and half absolutely, But that's the thing. It's like

0:59:05.640 --> 0:59:09.920
<v Speaker 1>there's no sure things, so fading the Jets look at

0:59:10.000 --> 0:59:14.040
<v Speaker 1>some point they might win. Maybe backing the Chiefs like

0:59:14.080 --> 0:59:17.080
<v Speaker 1>saving the Chiefs for another time. I don't know. I

0:59:17.120 --> 0:59:20.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Like they've lost already, right, So as if

0:59:20.520 --> 0:59:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you have a free Bingo square, at least for me,

0:59:22.240 --> 0:59:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm using the Chiefs this week. I have them. I'm

0:59:24.040 --> 0:59:26.880
<v Speaker 1>using them, um. But obviously there's other choices. If you

0:59:26.880 --> 0:59:28.680
<v Speaker 1>have Tampa Bay, a lot of people are gonna pick

0:59:28.720 --> 0:59:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay. But with the Giants outbreak, now will they

0:59:31.680 --> 0:59:34.040
<v Speaker 1>really pick Tampa Bay because you might lose all together?

0:59:34.520 --> 0:59:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Right if the game gets postponed because of the COVID

0:59:36.400 --> 0:59:38.600
<v Speaker 1>outbreak on the Giants, so Tampa Bay looked pretty obvious.

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure you can play that anymore. Will you

0:59:40.520 --> 0:59:44.760
<v Speaker 1>take Philly against Dallas? Philly was another consideration you would, Todd.

0:59:44.880 --> 0:59:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so sure I would. I don't trust. I

0:59:47.720 --> 0:59:51.439
<v Speaker 1>can't stand Dallas. I think they're horrendous and now they're

0:59:51.440 --> 0:59:53.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be even worse. But I don't Philadelphia apparently

0:59:54.000 --> 0:59:58.720
<v Speaker 1>beat the Giants shouldn't have beaten the Giants. This is why, well,

0:59:58.760 --> 1:00:01.040
<v Speaker 1>actually we'll get to it in old bit on on

1:00:01.040 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>one of your last questions, Gil, but Philadelphia should not

1:00:04.920 --> 1:00:08.040
<v Speaker 1>be almost a ten point favorite against anyone at this

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>point and they and they proved that on Thursday night,

1:00:10.920 --> 1:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>where they needed a lot of luck to be the

1:00:13.120 --> 1:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Giant team that I mean, the Giants think there if

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't for the Jets, the Giants who probably be

1:00:18.520 --> 1:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the worst team in the NFL. Right, that's right, with

1:00:20.880 --> 1:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>apologies to the Cowboys, that's right. And if they were

1:00:23.800 --> 1:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>playing an NFL team, I would agree. Unfortunately, they're playing

1:00:27.360 --> 1:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Austin this week with quarterback Ben d Nucci. All I'm

1:00:30.200 --> 1:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>just saying is all I'm saying is Philadelphia. I don't

1:00:32.680 --> 1:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>really trust them against Dallas quite frankly. And you know

1:00:34.920 --> 1:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>what else, I don't trust green Bay hosting Minnesota. It

1:00:39.120 --> 1:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>would not shock me if Minnesota just has this random

1:00:42.640 --> 1:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>game where they beat the you know where they beat

1:00:45.520 --> 1:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the pants off the green Bay defense and score a

1:00:47.880 --> 1:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of points. I don't know. Those are division games

1:00:50.640 --> 1:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that scare me. They might all listen. I say this

1:00:53.200 --> 1:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>every week. These games scare me. But like every one

1:00:55.480 --> 1:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of these seems to come home like there are no

1:00:58.120 --> 1:01:00.919
<v Speaker 1>massive upsets. And so Survivor has three hundred fifty people

1:01:01.000 --> 1:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>left with with eleven weeks of circle left through seven,

1:01:08.280 --> 1:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's special Thanksgiving quirk. Yes, sir, you know one

1:01:11.120 --> 1:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>other good one that I think And I'm not a

1:01:12.680 --> 1:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of picking road teams in the Survivor pool,

1:01:16.280 --> 1:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>but Tennessee against Cincinnati feels pretty good and pretty safe. Also,

1:01:20.080 --> 1:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>just because Cincinnati's defense is horrible and that run defense

1:01:24.560 --> 1:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is especially horrible. That could be a day where Derrick

1:01:27.120 --> 1:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Henry just goes absolutely nuclear 'ar in Tennessee wins a

1:01:29.840 --> 1:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>game and you're not sweating too much. Well, so this

1:01:34.680 --> 1:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>segway is perfectly that we're kind of already answering this

1:01:37.400 --> 1:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the big favorite most likely to lose out right one

1:01:40.640 --> 1:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of our final two questions, because it really does just

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>come down to the Chiefs nineteen and a half point

1:01:46.560 --> 1:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>favorites against the Jets. We already mentioned the Eagles nine

1:01:50.920 --> 1:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>or eight and a half point favorites against Dallas, Green

1:01:53.880 --> 1:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Bay seven point favorites against Minnesota, and Tampa Bay twelve

1:01:57.720 --> 1:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>point favorites at the Giants, and it's like, who of

1:02:00.520 --> 1:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>those is the most likely to lose out right? Jeff,

1:02:03.640 --> 1:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>your thought again would be who I by default, I

1:02:07.920 --> 1:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>have to take Philadelphia, even though I don't think they're

1:02:10.000 --> 1:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose. It. Just just a bed again. The Cowboys

1:02:13.120 --> 1:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>are all world bad right now. Benda Nucci is a

1:02:16.120 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>fit string NFL quarterback on on normal on a regular

1:02:19.360 --> 1:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>team that is in the Jets of the Cowboys at

1:02:21.120 --> 1:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>this point. But the Eagles are bad. The Eagles are

1:02:24.440 --> 1:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>legitimately bad, and they still might win the NFC East anyway,

1:02:27.440 --> 1:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>but uh, it's well in the realm of possibility that

1:02:31.320 --> 1:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>wins gets the interception bug and all of a sudden

1:02:34.240 --> 1:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got a problem there. So that's the only reason

1:02:36.280 --> 1:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're gonna lose. I think Philly is

1:02:38.320 --> 1:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>more likely to cover than lose. But of all those

1:02:41.040 --> 1:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>other teams, no one else is gonna come close to losing.

1:02:43.480 --> 1:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Tampa is going to destroy the Giants. I

1:02:45.760 --> 1:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>took Kansas City as one of the picks, and I

1:02:47.920 --> 1:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>love Tennessee this week too. So by the fault, that's Philip,

1:02:51.040 --> 1:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and Tennessee is not even part of this because it

1:02:52.800 --> 1:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>fell to five and a half. So five and a half, yeah,

1:02:54.920 --> 1:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and I like green Bay to gil I don't. I

1:02:56.520 --> 1:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with you on that. I think I think

1:02:57.960 --> 1:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota can't give up mode. Well, so Tampa Bay in

1:03:01.280 --> 1:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City are not losing. So it really is a

1:03:04.400 --> 1:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>binary choice, right, it's a choice between It's a choice

1:03:07.600 --> 1:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>between Green Bay and UM and of course Phildelphia. I

1:03:12.400 --> 1:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>mean that it really is, Todd. You're gonna say, then

1:03:14.600 --> 1:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it's green Bay, right, Yeah, I could totally see. Look,

1:03:17.880 --> 1:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Minnesota played good against Seattle. They're not that

1:03:20.840 --> 1:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>bad a team. They could have a great game. Hearon Rodgers,

1:03:23.680 --> 1:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, has a screw up game, and you know

1:03:25.400 --> 1:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it could happen, all right, I would say green Bay,

1:03:27.920 --> 1:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>just I don't know if I would say green Bay.

1:03:29.360 --> 1:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>When I say Green Bay or Philly, you know what

1:03:31.560 --> 1:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say, Philly. Philly by default don't see it happening,

1:03:35.000 --> 1:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>but they would be my choice. And then the final

1:03:37.680 --> 1:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>question if we live in a bizarro world and right

1:03:40.680 --> 1:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>now we don't have any postponements right now, but again,

1:03:43.880 --> 1:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Giants with a little bit of a breakout. But we

1:03:46.440 --> 1:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>have fourteen games in the NFL, four teams on by

1:03:49.840 --> 1:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>UH and those four teams on by are Jacksonville, Arizona, Houston,

1:03:54.880 --> 1:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and Washington. But of the remaining games, fourteen of them

1:03:59.280 --> 1:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we get to is that we have to choose a

1:04:01.080 --> 1:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>side and every single one of them except one. It's

1:04:04.160 --> 1:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a bizarro world where you're forced to make bets one

1:04:07.080 --> 1:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>game where you get a free pass. Jeffrey, what is

1:04:08.960 --> 1:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the game on the side you want no part of? Yeah,

1:04:11.600 --> 1:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I want nothing to do in Las Vegas and Cleveland, no,

1:04:14.360 --> 1:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I have no feel for what Cleveland is

1:04:17.760 --> 1:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>now going to be. With Odell Beckham out, this Baker

1:04:20.600 --> 1:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield actually get better or does that offense regress like

1:04:24.040 --> 1:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it would normally would with an elite talent being out

1:04:26.920 --> 1:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Raiders going to the Eastern time zone and

1:04:30.280 --> 1:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a local one o'clock game ten am for the body clocks,

1:04:33.400 --> 1:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>even though it's a little different this week because of

1:04:35.520 --> 1:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>daylight savings, so really be eleven am for their body clocks.

1:04:39.640 --> 1:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I still don't have a feel at all for these

1:04:42.080 --> 1:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>teams anyway, with all those factors put in. So no,

1:04:45.800 --> 1:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you for Las Vegas and Cleveland. That's as good

1:04:48.120 --> 1:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a choice as any man. Todd, what was Mike's again,

1:04:54.160 --> 1:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis Detroit. I believe it was. Yeah, that's what he Yeah,

1:04:57.280 --> 1:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>he wanted no part of Indianapolis Detroit, Todd, what's yours?

1:05:00.960 --> 1:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to know part of the Rams Miami because

1:05:03.280 --> 1:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know what to a Tagavalo is yet.

1:05:06.440 --> 1:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So I just don't understand that team right now. You know,

1:05:09.200 --> 1:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>with Fitzy, I know exactly what I'm getting. I'm either

1:05:11.840 --> 1:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>getting some compident quarterback or a blow up for interception performance.

1:05:15.680 --> 1:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I'm getting with two. I think

1:05:17.480 --> 1:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it's Indianapolis Detroit for me. I think I agree with

1:05:20.280 --> 1:05:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Mikey and and all these are good choices. You could

1:05:22.920 --> 1:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>pick a lot of these games, but Indianapolis Detroit. I

1:05:27.120 --> 1:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I really understand either of these teams. Like,

1:05:30.960 --> 1:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's like people were all over

1:05:33.280 --> 1:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>they were sweating Indiana's defense. Indianapolis defense was the greatest

1:05:36.480 --> 1:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>thing in the world. They're not that great. And then

1:05:38.600 --> 1:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers can't trust him. And there's Detroit three and three, right,

1:05:41.960 --> 1:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but like we kill Matt Patricia because he's terrible in

1:05:45.000 --> 1:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>game coach, and then what I'm supposed to know what

1:05:48.360 --> 1:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>we're getting with them? Detroit takes a lot of leads

1:05:50.760 --> 1:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and a squandered a lot of leads. I get it.

1:05:52.080 --> 1:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>They came back against the Falcons. Something finally worked out

1:05:54.600 --> 1:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>for them perfectly. But I don't trust them. So I mean,

1:05:57.440 --> 1:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>for me, that game is I could see any outcome,

1:06:00.600 --> 1:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Like if you told me now Indianapolis won by double digits,

1:06:03.160 --> 1:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>if you told me Detroit won by double digits, I

1:06:05.400 --> 1:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>might be surprised by Detroit winning by double digits, but

1:06:07.960 --> 1:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>either way, I could see it happening. Um So, that's

1:06:11.120 --> 1:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the deal. Excellently done, gentlemen. Thank you to Mike Palm

1:06:14.680 --> 1:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>who had to break out of here because he's a

1:06:16.240 --> 1:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>busy man these days. With the Circle opening, maybe next

1:06:19.080 --> 1:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>week we will be at Circa. That will be the hope.

1:06:22.160 --> 1:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Um So, for Mike Palm and Todd, wishing of thank you, gentlemen,

1:06:24.840 --> 1:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Todd from your mother's attic, your mother's cork

1:06:27.680 --> 1:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>addict there in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It's cork, right, Yeah, it's cork.

1:06:32.920 --> 1:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what I thought. It's it's a ginger bread. Uh.

1:06:40.560 --> 1:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And Jeff Parls, who, by the way, I finally said

1:06:43.320 --> 1:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>his name correctly, so because his parents will be upset

1:06:46.040 --> 1:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>with me, I think if I didn't say it. Jeff Pearls,

1:06:47.960 --> 1:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>who affectionately known as Parlay. The Parlay podcasts available. We're

1:06:53.040 --> 1:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>all podcasts are distributed, right, Jeff. Of course, of course

1:06:56.920 --> 1:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna as soon as we're done here, I'm gonna

1:06:58.760 --> 1:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>be riding right into right into one of those as well. So.

1:07:02.680 --> 1:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>But Gil, it's Gil, It's it's it's awesome. Awesome to

1:07:05.680 --> 1:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>see is always awesome to hear you, awesome to uh,

1:07:08.840 --> 1:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>awesome to see how everyone is doing well through these

1:07:11.840 --> 1:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>crazy times. And also to UH again wishing the best

1:07:15.240 --> 1:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>for Chris Andrews. Hope he can get on the men

1:07:17.640 --> 1:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>sooner rather than later, of course, Uh and UH, and

1:07:21.280 --> 1:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>congratulations again to Mike and Derek and the entire team

1:07:24.640 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>over at Circa. I can't wait to see that place

1:07:27.240 --> 1:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>in person. It looks absolutely incredible. It's insane, it's absolutely insane.

1:07:32.120 --> 1:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>The sports Book inside and outside, absolutely insane and uh yes,

1:07:36.520 --> 1:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>very kind of you. Also well wishes from all of

1:07:38.480 --> 1:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>us to Chris Andrews to close the show, who we

1:07:41.440 --> 1:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>hope to have for guessing lines on Monday right here

1:07:43.520 --> 1:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Beating the Book Podcast. Thank you all for listening.

1:07:46.880 --> 1:07:51.959
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with all your bets week eate in the NFL. Yeah,

1:07:52.480 --> 1:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you boys. The Battle Battle b