WEBVTT - Fantasy Baseball 2019: Modica Monday, Yordan Alvarez Is Here!

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Listen Don Yeah now welcome app your hot fi gate

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>from that spun fine god bro say Francis pr stand

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a ball, ladies and gentlemen, your BF and with that

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we welcome you inside studio. This is the BFFs. That

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is Frank Stamfell. I am Greg Susman. Fran guess A

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>happy Monday to you, Greg, big weekend. You're Don Alvaret's time,

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Greggy Don Alvarez time. Anybody. My weekend was good and

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>did eat well this weekend? You didn't eat well? Mhmm.

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>We both normally don't eat well on the weekend. Not

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that I normally eat well. I don't ever eat well.

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think my stomach was reacting as well

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>as it used to like I used to just bounce

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>back really easily, Like it loved eating chi Contenders and

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>it loves eating cheese. It didn't love it this weekend. Well,

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what, Gregy, I joke about the age. But

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we're both getting up there a little bit. We are.

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>We're getting to the point where we can't really respond

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and bounce back as well as we used to when

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we used to just eat terrible things all the time. Yeah,

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, I my stomming. I have found ever since

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I started to eat like slightly healthier, it likes not more.

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even joking, like I feel want like some

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>TV twelve Tom Brady diet, but like I feel just

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>like when I eat like really gross stuff, I just

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like pretty bladed. I want to eat like healthier stuff.

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't, dude. I went to a bacon and beer

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>festival on Saturday, so you could just imagine what my

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>day was, like, how was your stomach doing now? It's alright, alright,

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>yeah it's not bad, But I mean Saturday was just

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a complete mess beer bacon obviously, went out to like

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a German bar afterwards, continue drinking, continue eating terribly. Went

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to a beach bar after that, Greg, it was just

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it was a lot of on. She was great, it

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>was also a mess. I had a very adult thing

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>to do, an engagement party on Saturday and Sunday. I

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like you always have engagement parties, no, or some

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of parties. I don't like parties. Yeah, I don't

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:16.399
<v Speaker 1>like parties any great. Um yeah, these back to back

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>days had some good tie on on Saturday night that

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>was good Thai food. Yes, and I saw Rocket Man

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>on Friday. As you know. How was that? Okay, Bob

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>not greatly? Was it better than what was the better? Okay,

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Bohemian Rapsy was better? Personally? Yeah, I mean I don't

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>have much interest in either. And I'll probably watched Bohemian

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Rapsy at some point just because it was like nominated

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>for so many different things, But outside of that, don't

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>really have a ton of interest in either. Well, speaking

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of someone that certainly knows movies because he used to

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>make them, let's talk about Moodico. What's up? Madimo? Helly?

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? Happy Monday to all? I'm and I

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>actually eat whatever the hell I want and my stomach

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>take it whether it likes it or not. I love

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that approach at Live too, And if you follow matt

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>On on Twitter at CTM Baseball, you'll see exactly what

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about, because we get some crazy pictures of chicken,

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>parmer jan pizza, all these crazy kind of Italian foods.

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I honestly love it, Matt. I appreciate you. Thank you, Greg.

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little disappointed that you didn't like Rocket Man.

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen it yet. I do want to see it.

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big Elton John than from the nineteen seventies

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to like early eighties and then after that, you know,

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 1>so in all, honestly, it's weird because right didn't like

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>about Heman Rhapsody was that they didn't like the nitty gritty,

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the drugs, the sacks, the rocket roll right like. It

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>was all kind of like p G. I fied, if

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you will, not that bothered me. But for this they

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>there was the drug use, right like. There was like

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the down in the dumbes depressed Elton John, but there

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't enough like the rise. It was like, all of

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, it was Elton John, snap a finger. He's

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the number one artist in the world and making dollars.

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I was like, wait a minute, I didn't see any

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:02.799
<v Speaker 1>of that. I also hated that none of the music

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>was like even they didn't try to do it chronologically, like, oh,

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>here was his mood when he wrote this song, here

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>was the movie when he did the Tiny Dancer, when

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>he did Rocket had they kind of just played him

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>randomly and I was like, that doesn't make sense, and

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they didn't to justify the scene, and I'm like, but

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>I want to know what was really happening when he

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>was trying to when he met with that song, like

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>he's a really famous song, Like what is it about?

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Did the Game of Thrones writers also

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>make this movie? Greg, I think, to be totally honest

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>with you, I think Benny Off was involved in this movie.

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that might explain why they just accelerated everything.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I might have been seeing things, but I really felt

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, looking at the opening credits, I

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 1>thought I saw Banion's name. To be totally totally honest,

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.799
<v Speaker 1>fact his IMDb here yea it us was fact. Elton

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>John was my favorite guest on The Muppets when I

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>was a kid. Really yep, fun facts. Matt Modika here

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in on Monday R. I appreciate that. No, it doesn't

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>seem like he's anywhere here, all right, So you maybe

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's but maybe there's another benny off. You know,

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>we can we can marry the two together, Greg, there's

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>other benny off. Maybe it wouldn't surprise me. Oh, you

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 1>accelerate a bunch of stuff. You didn't explain anything. It

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds like that's exactly how I felt, all right. Speaking

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of accelerating, you're Don Alvarez accelerating lineups because he's accelerated

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>into the big leagues. He was called up on Sunday

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Homeward in his first game. You want to talk about palooza, Frank,

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm quite sure we had it yesterday. We didn't, Greg,

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.679
<v Speaker 1>It'll be next week really, because he has to play

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>a game. He play a game. He has to play

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a game before he starts for him to be in

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the player pool. So he's not in the NNBC player

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>that's stupid. I assume he's added in a bunch of

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>leagues where um, you don't need a minor league player

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to come up and play a game first. So he's

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>already been stashed everywhere. And everyone's so excited about your

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Don Alvarez, and you're reminded everyone yesterday why we're all

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>so excited about him. Just easy power. If you saw

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that home run his first major league hit, tweeted out yesterday.

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Of course, he hits a home run in his first

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>major league game, and someone tweeted back, well, doesn't actually

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>count if it came off Dylan Bundy, Which is a

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>fair question. But you've seen the pay it's it's it's

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>very easy power. Hits it all the way out to

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>like straightaway center field, maybe off to the left a

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but really easy power. And you look at

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>what he did in the minor leagues this year, three

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty three homers, seventy one Ribbies, seventy one Ribbies and

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>only fifties six games o ps. So I know I

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of fab left. I know Matt

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Modiica doesn't have a lot of fab left. But if

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you were stashing you're Don Alvarez anywhere, you are obviously

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>super super excited to get him into your lineups. Matt,

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>how much do you think you're Don Alvarez is gonna

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>go for next week? I gotta think around that level.

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you have money shaved up at this point,

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>this is what you saved it for. I really can't

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>see someone else that hasn't either been draft did or

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>called up already, you know, with with the fanfare and

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the ability that this man has, and as you said,

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it was on display yesterday. The one guy I think

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that could you know if he gets called up, but

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when that's gonna happen, would be Kyle

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Tucker Chris. He has his power, speed and average that

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>he could hit four. But I'm getting less and less

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>optimistic on his. Uh. Call. But Alvarez, whatever you have,

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I would below the majority of it. I would save myself,

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, somebody to play around with over the next

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of months. Matt, there's someone in our main event

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>league that has nine hundred nineteen dollars left. Do you

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's a great question, Greg, I'll look at it.

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I have to think that, you know, if I had

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>nine dollars, I would see who the next highest was

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that I had been a dollar over that. Greg. This

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>person is in fourteenth place. Uh. He probably doesn't look

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>at his team. Maybe not. Well, it would be great

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>if he got alvage because you know it wouldn't affect us. Frank,

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>how many points are you up these days? I am

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 1>at I'm at one thirteen and a half second places

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>one of seven and a half. So not that you know,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 1>I got my I got my Frankie Mantas in over

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, too great, So uh continuing to crush it

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>man and I picked up Nick Favetta in this league

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>if you remember. So, uh, A lot is going right.

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a lot to complain about right now,

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully I get Aaron Judge and d Gordon back

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and continue to uh, continue to move up the leaderboards. Great,

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>especially in the overall. That's That's what I'm focused on. Now.

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Where are you in the overall? Frankie? Last I checked,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like fifty five out of like five seventy.

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe you have a top ten team right now,

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>right I have? We were third for longest time were

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we're at fifth now with the with the

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>CAO and my solo team is around. Yeah, so right

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>now I'm I'm I'm fifty fifth out of five seventy.

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt does have a fifth place team with Facaro and yeah,

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't see your other team here for now,

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>but YEAHTM that would be twenty nine. So Matt's got

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:18.719
<v Speaker 1>to he's got one in the top five, he's got

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>one in the top thirty, having having himself a season. Yeah,

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and it has been pretty good. The money is low now,

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>so he got it the rest of the way. But

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in all honesty, usually when I get to July, I'm

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty much in this predicament every year. That's the way

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I played. It's not for everyone, but I always hear

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you gotta have your money in order

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to win. That's fallacy as well. It's fallacy mat MAT's

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>always the one that's aggressive early on. He wants to

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 1>have the guy is for as long as possible and

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>he wants to get him going. So, Madame Modica, let's

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>get into the eyes that were available in the player

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>pool yesterday and in the main event and really everywhere.

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>The one thing that I was most interested in was

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>fran Er Valdez given his first star or his la

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>most recent start, I should say for Houston. In the

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>main event, he went for thirty five bucks. In our

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>G S T League he went for a hundred and

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven dollars. Obviously the money is tight, But favor

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of Valden is what do you think about him going forward?

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Look out of the bullpen this year, he made some

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>nice advancements, especially in first pitched strike. I know a

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, you know, have problems with that, uh stat,

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'll say it's predictive. I think there's definitely a correlation.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Though he improved that greatly. The swinging strike has gone

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:35.719
<v Speaker 1>up and the chase rate as well. Now, look it's

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>out of the bullpen, so he does get buoyed by that.

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>But if he if he keeps a rotation spot, then

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>he's obviously an optimal player. You want, look what Wade

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Miley has done this year. Uh so right now he

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>has the spot. I think it's a great boy by

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Frank the thirty five dollars and if you got him,

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.559
<v Speaker 1>you're excited. He actually wasn't purchased by me, Matt Modriga.

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>He he did go for He did go for thirty

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>five bucks. Um, I had a small bid in on him.

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm pretty much not bidding more than like

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>fifteen dollars per player because I have like a hundred

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and twenty dollars left to last me the entire season.

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think for that price. He went for

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty five dollars. In the main event, eighty eight dollars

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Great Fantasy Basic Invitational hundred and twenty seven

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>out of a thousand in g S T. So, you know,

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I could have seen maybe somewhere in between that main

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>event price of thirty five dollars and the Great Fantasy

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>Baseball at eighty eight, But hundred and twenty seven to

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>me is a little bit too steep. I understand that.

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, it seems like everything the Houston Astros touched

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>has turns to gold. Wade Miley has been awesome so

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>far this year as well. And if you look at

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Frank Rivaldez, his numbers really really known for a steep

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 1>ground ball rate throughout every level in the minor league,

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know that he's gonna get a ton

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of strikeouts. He did have seven strikeouts over seven seven

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>endings pitched in his first start, but really really enticed

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>by that ground ball rate. So, you know, even if

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it's only short term, if we get you know, a

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of starts, if he performs well, maybe he sleep

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>stays in the rotation for the Houston Astros. There's also

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a chance that this team is also in on like

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a Madison Bumgarner trade or a Marcus stroman trade, So

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to that. But even if it's only short term,

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I like, uh, I like a let's say, anywhere from

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a four to seven percent bid on fran Valdez something. Yeah,

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I like it too. Yeah, he was not the picture

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I was most interested in last night though. Who was that? Ller?

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Niche Keller? Why that? Why you interested in the pirate? Oh?

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>He's coming off the thirteen strikeout game in the minors.

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy that when he made his debut like

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a week or two ago. Uh, first five batters absolutely

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>lit him up here. Think he r first six batters

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>where he get like six runs in the first thing.

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>After that, he struck out six of the next eleven batterers.

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>He's faced. Look, he's on a he's on a team

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that has a good homeballpark. He's got swinging missed to

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>his game, and if you have realistic expectations, if he

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>pitched to like a three eighty with a strikeout for

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>anywhere more the rest of the see, you know, especially

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in this climate, that's fantastic. Yeah, he is a candidate

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to make a start this week as well. I saw

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>his name mentioned as a potential starter on Wednesday, that's

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Keller. And yeah, you mentioned what he did. You know,

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>since he's gone down his last start out five innings pitched,

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>one hit, three walks, thirteen strikeouts. The outing before that

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>six innings, two earned on two walks, five strikeouts. I

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>do personally have some concern when it comes to the walks.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems like, you know, he struggled with whips so

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>far in his minor league career. So that's why I

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>thought they were gonna be a little bit patient. But

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that the Pirates are in a predicament

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to be patient right now, Greg because the injuries to

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Tyne and and Trevor Williams, everything that's going on

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in that rotation. I think that they just need bodies.

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's why we might see Mitch Keller this week.

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>The strikeout upside is legit, but I do have some

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>concerns when it comes to the wall. Yeah, I think

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it makes I think it makes sense. I think they

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>gotta put him in the rotation and see what they

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>have and and see if they can make a push

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>for one of these wild card spots as we get

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>towards the trade deadlon and ultimately see what the deal

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is with miss Keller and how good he can be.

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>One more picture I want to tell about before we

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>get to the break, and that's Adrian Samson, which like

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a pleat game over the weekend. Sampson playing for Texas.

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Not much notoriety there, but he's pitched well over his

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>over the last month, he's been good. Thirty two dollars

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in the main event, just three bucks in our gs

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>T league. Frank Um Matt, what do you think about

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Sampson. I look, he made me take notice his

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>last five appearance. The last two were starts, but his

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>last five appearance he's pitched five innings in all those games,

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>uh thirty strikeouts to three walks and pitched. So look,

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at everybody. Everybody's an option for me this year.

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, as I mentioned, like pitching is just the

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>aceans have gone wrong. Nothing seems right anymore. So I

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>would definitely be interested in him. Yeah, I think over

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the last five starts you do have to at least

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>take notice to what he's done. I mean I had

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to look him up over the weekend because admittedly, you know,

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of faith in pitchers when they

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>pitched in Texas, but over that span, I mean at

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>one point a last five starts at three point eight

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>four x fips, so not even that is terrible, right

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>around eight and a half case per nine the walks

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>per nine or below one thirty strikeouts to three walks

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>over his last five starts, So that's that's a pretty

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>good ratio here. When he does face Boston in Fenway

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>this week, So I don't really love that start. You know,

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>if Dad Martinez isn't in the lineup for Boston, I

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>like it a little bit more, but overall, still don't

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>love that start at Boston. So I would have, you know,

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>added him a speculative ad here, Greg, but I wouldn't

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>have thrown down too much. And I don't know that

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>i'd have him in my starting line up this week either. Yeah.

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the choose our pictures from last

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>week that we talked about that I like better was

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Animal Sanchez for this week, and I took a shot

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>on him over Adrian Sampson. I like that call. I

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>like that. Alright, take a break here, we'll come back

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>with more and that Modica hold up next. Daily Roado

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>dot Com learned for the game's best DFS players. We

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>don't just give you advice. We play every day, all

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>major sports, all year round. We never stop. Industry leading

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>DPS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily rodo

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>dot Com optimizer. In minutes, build an optimized line up

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>for cash games and tourneys. Learn from the game's best

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>DBS players. Join Daily rodo dot com. The following ad

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>contains shocking material. Listener discretion is advised. Is someone in

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>your family playing a dangerous game of Russian Roulette? Over

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>forty three thousand people die a year from drug overdose.

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>A hundred and twenty people a day, five people every hour,

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>one person every twelve minutes. Eight thousand people die every

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>year from alcohol abuse. Over two hundred and forty people

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a day, ten an hour, one person every six minutes.

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Somebody you know, maybe next learn how to help someone

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you love get away from the drugs, alcohol, and bad influences.

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>With the f m l A, people can take a

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>leave of absence from their job and still keep it.

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Call now and learn how we can help you. Eight

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six to one eight

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six to one. That's

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>eight six six four eight four ninet. Do you want

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to risk free wagers up to one thousand dollars? If so,

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>go to points pet dot com forward slash grid. Open

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>yourself up a points pet sports wagering account, Enter the

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>promo code grid and you'll get to risk free bets

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of up to one thousand dollars. In addition to traditional betting,

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>points Pets also offers its own betting concept where customers

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>they're rewarded by how much they win their pet. That's

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>points pet dot Com forward slash Grid. Enter the promo

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>code grid and get your two risk free bets of

0:18:53.400 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>up to one thousand dollars. Today. Continuing on your BF

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>as Frank Stample, Greg Susman hanging out with you alongside

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Maddie mo mat Modica here on a Monday follow him

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>at CCM Baseball on of course, read everything has to

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 1>say on the athletic get to the two star pitchers

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that he liked the best cut a little bit later

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on in the program, but before we continue, I wanna

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>ask him about another picture, Cold Pictures. Actually here he

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>was talking about Mitch Keller, Favor Valadez and Adrian Sampson.

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>But one of the top names I keep seeing is

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Peter Lambert for the Rockies. Letty three bucks. He went

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>four in the main event. I believe that was the

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>second most other than the favor of Valdez. And I

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>don't get it, man. I admittedly I have biased against

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the Rockies. I don't want to do it. It always

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>ends terribly. Why are people so invested in this guy? Well,

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>he came out and he had a great start at

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Wrigley last week. I recommended not to start him this

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>week because he is home versus the same Cubs, and

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>he does get San Diego, which is kind of nice

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>because you can get the strike acts with them, but

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>very much better team. I think it was that initial

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>stock that really turned people's heads. But I think you

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>gotta have the long term view here. I think Matt's

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. Look at that first start what he did

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Cubs seven and he's pitched one er and run,

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>one walk, nine strikeouts. He looked really, really good. It's

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>actually his secondary pitches that he's known for better than

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>his fastball. But two starts this week, in course, he's

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna see the Cubs again, really really good line up,

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's the second time that they're gonna be able

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to see him and then the padres and you look

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>at what he's done his his two stops at Triple

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>A so far this year. In Triple A. Understand it's

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>the PCL. Everybody is mashing this year, but a five

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>point zero seven e r A at one point three

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>one whip last year in the PCL in Triple A

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.199
<v Speaker 1>a five point zero four e r A and eleven

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>starts with a one point five seven whips, So there's

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>not much of a track record here, Greg, I think

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>people were sucked in a little bit by that first start.

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and they see the two starts on the schedule.

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>But I worry man, especially against the Cubs and corps Field. Uh.

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe a spec add in a deeper league.

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that I would have him in

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>my line up this week. Like I said, I wasn't

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>investing in him. I'm not doing the Colorado thing. I

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's worth it. And there's plenty of other

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>guys out there to take a shot on Adrian Sampson

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>being one of them, whether I'm starting in this week

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>or not. I I get too nervous. I said, why

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't I didn't have harmon Marquez. You know me, I

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>drove Kyle Freeland. I didn't do it. I don't. I

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have any shares of those pictures either. And you know,

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Marquez still has been great at times on the road,

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's you know, you have to invest in Marquez

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>as a what to start time, and he's a guy

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that you just really don't feel good about half of

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>his starts when they come in course field. So I

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>can't really have any uh, I can't really have any

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>issue with with saying that great because look at where's

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Freeland right now too? He's in the minor leagues.

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 1>John Gray is is being John Gray's. That's that's kind

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>of the territory that that it comes with when it

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to a rocky starting pictures. Last picture, I really

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>want to mention for you guys here this is for

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>real this time. It's guy Frank Merrill Kelly, who I

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like he's one of these guys this year that

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be on everyone's team exactly. He's on everybody's

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:09.199
<v Speaker 1>team at different times. It's up and down, and up

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and down and up and down. He went this week

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in the main event, he was available, he went for

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt Do you have any confidence Merrill Kelly. Here's you

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>think with Merrill Kelly. I started him on the road

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>at Toronto this weekend and he rewarded me for that.

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I look, I always talk at Toronto. Uh, they pretty

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>much the all season been in the bottom five and

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>striking a percentage and slugging as a team, though the

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>offense is getting better. The thing with Kelly is it's

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>extreme the home away splits. Uh, you know, night and day.

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>He's pitched really well at home and got awful for

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the most part on the road. That does that doesn't

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>add up well this week either because he's at Philadelphia,

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>so just not a good spot to pitching obviously in

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Citizens Bank Park, and you just heard the splits numbers.

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to Merrill Kelly, I think people were

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 1>looking at his last two starts, Greg, and they were

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>both great starts. He went at least seven ending's pitched

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>in both of those games. You know, one one of

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>them he had ten strikeout, zero walks. But it was

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>against the Mets. The Mets lineup that's you know, has

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like Carlos Gomez in it, that had like Aaron Altar

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in their line up last week and then they sent

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>him down and then Toronto where he pits well seven

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's one and run but only three strikeouts against

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the team that strikes out a lot and two walks.

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think Merrill Kelly is a guy that you

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>could stream in the right spot. I remember it was

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:25.120
<v Speaker 1>like a month ago where you know, he's been really inconsistent.

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>I streamed him in a start against the Giants and

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it actually worked out well. So I think you just

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>really gotta be smart about where you pick and choose

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>your spots when it comes to Merrill Kelly. This week

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>at Philadelphia, I can't recommend starting him there. Fair enough

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>in Philadelphias has like a disaster for Merrill Kelly. But

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in the right matchup, in the right location, that's when

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.199
<v Speaker 1>you go and put Kelly in your lineup. Let's get

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>over there. Some of the top hitters that were picked

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>up here this week, and I'll stick with the main

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>event guys. And thirty three dollars was spent on who's

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a Parazza of the Cincinnati Reds. Why are people spending

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>money on Braza mat Look at the hope that he

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>gets a you know, spot, maybe an injury the stolen

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>base upside here. Uh, Scooters should be coming back soon.

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You've got Detrick hitting all these home runs. I don't

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>know where everything fits anymore. I fear for Waker, you know,

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 1>unless he gets going. You know, he started off hot

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>but has been cooled off quite considerably of late. So

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of mounts defeat in Cincinnati. But I

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>got it as a pure, you know, stolen based speculation.

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 1>If an opportunity arose for him and maybe he can

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>capture that again. I think part of the issue for

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Jose Peraza this year he's got a two fourteen batting average.

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>This is an example where launch angle improvement is actually

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>not recommended because Jose parraz is a guy who doesn't

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>hit the ball hard. Is fly ball rate this year

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>is up it's at last year was thirty percent. This

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>year it's so he's hitting the ball in the air more,

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but it just doesn't work for him. He's a thirty

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>percent hard hit rate a season for his career. This

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is the guy that should be trying to hit line drives,

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>hit the ball on the ground. His bab IF this

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>year is twenty nine, So you might look at it

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and say he's been unlucky. But part of that is

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>by his own doing. He's trying to lift the ball

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>more and he's not a guy that should be doing that.

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>He's gotta hit line drives, he's gotta hit the ball

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. And I think what Matt said is

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. Scooter Jeannett's coming back. They have Derek Dietrich,

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>they have Jesse Winker, they have and they're trying to

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>find ways to get was a prosit in the lineup Greg,

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>but it's just crowded up in the middle endfield, in

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the outfield. They also have Nick Senzels, so there's a

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of names here. I understand trying to like catch

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>lightning in a bottle, maybe get some stolen basis here

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>last year at twenty three, and that's something that we've

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of always hoped for when it comes to Prazza

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>one or top prospect, But it just seems like it

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>might be one of those lost seasons. There's still a

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>lot left for him, but given the fact that it's

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>as crowded as it is and he just hasn't performed well,

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a lot of faith in j Yeah,

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>we're getting to that point where I'm not having the

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>faith either that I'm not We're not playing a batt

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it leage where it's gonna turn down, And we would

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>joke about that with John Gray all the time, and

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not, I'm not investing. I was for us. I

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I drafted him in a pit league. I got rid

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of water Escobar. I worked out all right, very nice

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>movie Warro Escort. Man, he's he's been one of the

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>on some heroes your Fantasy baseball so far this here,

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we didn't really know what to make of EDWARDO Escobar

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>coming into the year. It seems like he was this

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.239
<v Speaker 1>journeyman kind of broke out a little bit last year

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Twins, hits a lot of doubles. But man,

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>he is putting it all together. He's been one of

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the most phenomenal values in fantasy baseball. The Sea absolutely boring,

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. You're right, You're right, your boring player.

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But he puts up the stats and this is gonna

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>be a third straight season. So yeah, if he if

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>he ends it like to ninety with close to thirty

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>home runs, Matt and really good counting stats for where

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you were getting him, that's a phenomenal season. You don't

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>even have to do that, true. Do you look at

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the guy the other players that went here phrase anyone

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that he wanted to highlight before we move on the

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>two star pitchers. Is none of these guys really exciting anyway? Uh, well,

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that's because you are a delneu De Shields hater for

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason. Greg. But since he's been called back up,

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>he's eleven, has a few stolen bases as well. It

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>seems like Willie Calhoun is getting close. We don't really

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>know exactly when Joey gallow is gonna be back, maybe

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>closer to the All Star breaks. So I think a

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in deeper leagues, star five outfielders, everyone's

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 1>trying to find stolen bases. I've always had faith in

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>de Line of the Shields as a guy who at

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>least someone who is known for his speed. He walks

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and he's always had pretty good plate discipline,

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>not like the Billy Hamilton's of the world and and

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>d Gordon's, where you know they're they're more so free

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>swingers and you try and just put the ball in

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 1>play and get on base. He actually walks a decent amount,

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>so I understand wanted to take a shot there and

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 1>and grab some stolen basses. Uh. Jacoby Jones too. It

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>seems like there's always a stretch out of season where

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you pick up Jacoby Jones and he's playing well, and

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>right now is one of those stretches. Matt, did you

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>have any bids on Jacoby Jones, de line up to

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Shields or or any other hitters here? I know you

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>ended up grabbing Column Moran in the main EVI I mean, look,

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>the Shields was the guy that I would have taken.

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really super high, like you said, He's had

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a good week. He's been in consistent, you know, pretty

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>much his whole career. But the Shields was the one

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>guy out of this group where you can get steals.

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And I would say Gallo comes back maybe like post

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>all star break. I mean maybe if it's sooner, great,

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>But if you own him like I do, I'm expecting

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>postal star break, you don't want to rush back from

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that anyway. It's usually a long term thing. So yeah,

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Shields Moran, he's facing I think a

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>bunch of writings this week too. So I liked him

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and in thirteen bucks, why not? Yeah, Colum Moran. I

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>think in deeper leaves if you needed a corner infielder

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>or utility back. Greg seven games this week for Pittsburgh.

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>All of them come against right handed pitching, so you

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about him sitting out there. So

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I like Colum Moran as well. I was actually the

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>backup bid to Matt Moodique. It was only thirteen bucks.

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I had the backup b what went over twelve? No,

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>No that he won him at third team I had.

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I was back up big at three dollars. Greg. I mean,

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the bottom of the barrel. This is bargain

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>hunting now. And you know, I'll let you know that

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I ended up winning Derek Fisher for three bucks and

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Chessler Cuthbert as my corner. And you asked me that

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>two dollars. I need a corner infielder and I'm not

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>spending money. And you know, he's actually performed well some

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of the some of the stat CAD data that I

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>looked at, so uh, you know, I'm just you know,

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we talked about trying to win it week week, one

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>week at a time, right, So I'm trying to find

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to find a corner infielder here, I end up

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>end up with Chessler Cuthbert. I picked up Ian Kennedyada

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>for twelve bucks. I mean he's the closer for the Royals.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>They don't win a lot of games, but who knows

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>if he'll be there come come to trade deadline. You

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>know people, someone actually dropped Jose Laclerk and Diego Castile

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>in our main event last night, So I'm gonna be

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>interested in you know what those guys go for next week,

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>because I had Steve Tchick as my third closure, so

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you're always kind of trying to find that maybe second

0:29:58.320 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>or third closed or on your team. I also have

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Hicks, I have Herbert as soon as so trying

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to find that third closure. I picked up Ian Kennedy.

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>But uh, I'll be in on the bidding in the

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>for for the clerk next week because it seems like

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>should be hopefully sooner rather than later he gets the

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>closer's job back. You know that. I think they let

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>him pitch to ninth on Friday. He gives up a

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>two run homer, of course, because why he didn't blow

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>us a but pitch to ninth and and did not

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>perform well. So Uh, those are those are a few

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>relievers that I'm looking at. Brandon Workman was picked up

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in my great fantasy based momentational ten dollars. Uh. If

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you can figure out who the Red Sox closure is

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>right now, Greg, I'll give you a prize. No imagine

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is gonna come back to bite them at some point,

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>right Red Sox. I mean it already has plenty of

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>times so far this year. I mean Ryan Brazier start

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>off the year, we thought he was the closer. He

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>blew a bunch of games. He's not being used in

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>high leveage situations anymore. It's been a combination of Workman, Walden. Uh.

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Barnes has been worked in there as well. And

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we just saw Craig Kimberell's sign with the with the

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Cubs. So there are a few names out there

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that maybe they get in on in the trademark it.

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I've heard like Ken Giles name thrown thrown out there,

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Alex colum A. But it seems like, for whatever reason,

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox are are just not being aggressive. I

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's just because they won the World

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Series last year and they were trying to get into

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the luxury tax and just kind of like taking a

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>back seat. I would imagine at some point the Red

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Sox have to be the Red Sox and make a move,

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but as of right now they seem kind of content

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>going with this committee approach. Yeah, there does not seem

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.239
<v Speaker 1>to be then insight you trying to figure out who

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that Red Sox closer is. It's a feel I guess

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>from Alex Cora. Why don't you curse out Alexe core

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>like you do gave Kapitler Because I don't have any

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>shares of the Red Sox guys, so I think that's

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>probably why I have. I have a few Hector Nerras shares,

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and Hector. The thing is, Hector Nerras has performed so well,

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>so I'm really happy to see that. Gabe Kapitler was

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>listening to me earlier on in the season when I

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>started ranting, yelling at him. But look at that, Greg,

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>he goes to Hector Nerras as his closer. He's performing well.

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So another point for Frank. We had a whole bunch

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of teams with seven games this week, including the d Backs,

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the Braves, the Red Sox, the of these, the Rockies.

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>The player at the Cardinals, Rays, and the Rangers. Only

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>five teams that have five games, that's the Giants, Brewers, Astro's, Indians,

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and Reds. I'll throw Kyle Swarber out there as a

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve team added added him in one of my home

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>league's twelve team points leade. They played seven games. He's

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>been actually performing well as the leadoff man for the Cubs,

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and three of those games in Coors Field. If you

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>want cheap exposure, David Bowte might be available in your

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>deep booty as well. So if you want some exposure

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to seven games and some corpse field, uh, I do

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>like some of the Cubs players, Matt. Was there anyone,

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>uh that you that you were trying to add in

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>twelve team leagues? How about any Coss Warber ads? I

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>did not get Schwarber. I'm totally with you. Uh in

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a weekly league, even though there's lefties later on in

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the week, verst the Dodgers and it's uh, you know,

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>he's got real uh kerk Shaw and Hill. I would

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>roll them out just for those coorse games. Uh. Like

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you said, he's hitting much better right now, and him

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and course field teams like the perfect combination. Alright, So

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>so so there you go. There. Um, I'm looking at

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>these teams that have five games, guys, is there anybody

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that's worth Benjamingza probably is a guy, you know, Yeah,

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, honestually throw out the flavor of the week

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>last week? Who I actually picked up Miles Straw that

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>seems like the playing time might be hard to come

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>by and he plays five games this week. Sir, Absolutely,

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>he's a he's on my bench in the main event. Yeah, Christian,

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you're probably gonna bench him. You have five games against

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't. It can't start down. What are we doing?

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing here? What are we doing? What

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>are we doing? You know? I I just picked up

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Derek Fisher in a deeper league, but it seems like

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for the time being, his playing time is pretty safe

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's been leading off, so I need some runs

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>scored in the main event. That's what I was looking at.

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's five games. I think in a twelve team

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>or you might be able to get away from Derek Fisher,

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But in deeper leagues still is leading off for the Astros,

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a that's a profitable position to

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>be in. Definitely, Mike Chef's the guy with the Giants

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>five games this week, probably when your bench probably TV

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>yas man, how is his week this week? I don't know.

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any shares that was his week, Matt.

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea, right, none of us. Yeah, that's fair.

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.799
<v Speaker 1>His grandfather was very good player. He's grand of father. Yeah,

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>very good player. All right, Yeah, great. I think there's

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.319
<v Speaker 1>a good time to to just give a shout out

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to uh David Ortiz and Big Poppy. You know, I

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think that he's listening, obviously, I don't think his

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>family is listening. But obviously what happened last night was crazy.

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>It's tragic, you know, it just goes beyond any like

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>rivalry anything. We're all Yankees fans here, but I love

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Big Poppy, love David Ortizo. Wishing him and his family

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:40.800
<v Speaker 1>all the best. Yeah, I was really sad, man, it

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>was crazy just to hear, like, what's going on? If

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you haven't heard, he was in the Dominican Republic and

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 1>he was he was shot in the back and apparently

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>left through his abdomen. But he seems to be in

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>uh okay condition as of right now. So shout out

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to Big Poppy. Hope everything's all right, Michael Schevski not

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.760
<v Speaker 1>doing much, not doing much, just singles a lot of singles.

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean great, He's a twenty eight year old journeyman

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in the minor leagues, so a lot of outside of

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>his name being Yestremski. I don't know that there's much

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>like there's Mike. That's cool. You know, while we're talking

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.959
<v Speaker 1>about a quasi Red Sox, I guess a little bit here, Greg, Okay,

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>what's this transition? J D. Martinez? If he's on your team,

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 1>are you starting him this rate? That's actually really because

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>he's dealing with the back injury. You know, he hasn't

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 1>been placed on the I L. He's quote day to day,

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't play at all over the weekend. The

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox got swept by the by the Rays, Right

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>he did. I don't know. I don't know who to

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>root for in that scenario, Right, we should be rooted

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 1>for the rais Right, Okay, I agree with you. Let's

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 1>go raise. What do you do with J D. Martinez? Greg?

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:41.359
<v Speaker 1>I think I leave him on the bench. I leave

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 1>him on the bench. He may go on the I L,

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>he might not go on the I R I R L.

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm confused. It's he may go on l he may not.

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 1>To me, it sounds like a disaster. I'm not starring

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>David Tarrantees, I'm not starring J. D. Martinez this week, Matt,

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you think I will not be starting him neither?

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I think yeah. I think it's looking more and more

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 1>apparent that he does spend time on the I L

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:07.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a smart move for the Red Sox

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to make so in weekly leagues. Now he's on my

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's on my bench. Yeah, I agree with that. Obviously,

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 1>if you play in the NFBC format, you could set

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 1>your lineup for hitters on both Monday and Friday. So

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think for this early part of the week. It

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>sucks too, because the Red Sox have seven games this

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>week and they're about to face Texas Rangers pitching. So

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I would have liked to get J. D. Mart martinezn't there,

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>But especially if you play in the NFBC or somewhere

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>where you can set your lineups two times per week. Greig,

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for the hitters, I think, at least for the early

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the week, you gotta have J. D. Martinez

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 1>out of the lineup. We'll take the break here will

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 1>come back. We're over to start pitchers with Maddie Mo

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>as well as hit our our best. That's forever I'm

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna come twenty minutes ago. You have have to rolled on.

0:36:45.920 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>After this, the Fantasy Sports Network is ready to take

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you out to the ball game. Our experts and analysts

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>are following the Boys of Summer through all one and

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty two games of the two thousand nineteen MLB season

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>with the best fantasy baseball analysis in the industry. Catch

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the latest news and notes every day to help you

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>win your fantasy leagues and RDIA best tournaments. Will always

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.240
<v Speaker 1>want you back listening and watching the Fantasy Sports Network

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 1>on the f F and T s Y Radio app

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and the f F and T s Y YouTube channel.

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>The Fantasy Sports Network where we're root root rooting for

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy baseball team. Morie Salad two thousand and fifteen,

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousands and sixteen European Long Drive Tour Champion two

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen, World Number one. Me personally, I keep my

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>game face on me all the time, especially coming out

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of the bucker, leaving the range or leaving the ports.

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? Go to game face grooming dot Com

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.240
<v Speaker 1>from all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs,

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 1>rains make it rain. Is a girl there put together

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a list of dudes and dults fatal party for him.

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Starting off the list, We've got no cigarettes, no alcohol,

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>no strippers, dancers, women at all. Oh yeah, and here's

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the best part about it, no gambling. If you had

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>this list, what kind of part I don't know what

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of bachelor party I would have had. I know

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>for a fact, I would have had a party that

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>set the weddings off weekdays six to nine am Eastern

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>on the fantasy sports networking on your popular podcast providers

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 1>can't get enough Fantasy Football, Rhogo Experts has launched their

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:46.359
<v Speaker 1>NFL three Fantasy Football package, which includes the best math

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>based seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere on the Internet.

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Davis Madig and the Rugo Experts are providing dynasty season

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>long betting, best ball, and Navil draft content every day

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of the year to give you an edge regardless of

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:00.959
<v Speaker 1>what type of fantasy football you play. Safe Timper sending

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:03.320
<v Speaker 1>roto experts dot com with the promo code Evan T

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:07.360
<v Speaker 1>s Y. It's the NFL three fantasy football package only

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>at roto Experts dot com. I think he's not really

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>here's the Undertaker. This is very relevant? Actually is I

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>watched the Undertaker versus Goldberg match. I didn't watch when

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I got home. Not awful, dude, what are we doing?

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 1>So I got home? It might have been like those

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>off for a bit, like whose idea? Like is eventually

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in the back saying Undertaker versus Goldberg two guys that

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>are like is an Undertaking near sixty over sixty, goldbergs

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>over fifty years old? Just a mess of a match,

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>O deca. I would assume you were not watching Undertaker

0:39:54.760 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 1>versus Goldberg on Friday takers fIF you four Goldberg is

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>because you know what after the match Undertaken what pissed dude?

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>He was? He was piste? It was bad? Oh god?

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Just is it? I mean, I don't know. I've pretty

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:13.720
<v Speaker 1>much fallen off the map when it comes to watching

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>w W programming, Greg. I still watched n x T Takeovers,

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and I'll watch like a W double or double or nothing.

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I like, you know, big indie shows and stuff for wrestling,

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>But I mean the product that w W is putting

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>out right now, it's just that was so much talent

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and instead of using their younger guys, they're they're putting

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Goldberg and undertaken. So he'll appreciate this today. So I

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>saw the go to Japan. I guess in July. May

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>usually go to Japan July. So they're made event. It's

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>like four heels like Baron Corban and ju McIntyre and

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 1>two other dudes taking on a j styles Luke Gallows,

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Carl Anderson, a fin valor right, so nah, not Finn

0:40:54.040 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>and what we still said, none awesome. It was fit

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a j would have been awesome. But now that he

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 1>was like, what the hell are you guys talking about?

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's transition and move to remind you that

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 1>put your money on your mouth bays take a shot

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>by opening a sports wagering account with FanDuel It's New

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Jersey's largest sports book at the fandel dot com slash grid,

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 1>where you'll receive a free bet. If it's a five

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred bucks, it's a free bet of up to five dollars.

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:25.359
<v Speaker 1>When you open a sports waging account at fandel dot

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:28.800
<v Speaker 1>com slash grid, points brands, game totals, props, parlays, and

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:31.399
<v Speaker 1>in game wagering on college and pro sports and you're

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in control. Go to vandel dot com slash go rid

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and open a new account in your free wager of

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 1>up to five bucks today fanual dot com slash grid

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to start pitchers this week. I mentioned earlier Animal Sanchez

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 1>facing Arizona and tonight facing the White Sox. It's crazy.

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>When I looked at the White Sox, I wanted to

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:52.800
<v Speaker 1>know because Julie has been so good or now the

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Lopez pitch, well, yesterday I guess it was, and I'm like, hey,

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the way it sounds good. Wanted to know whether their

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>record was, I know, like the middle of the pack

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 1>in the central, Like what was the record? I found

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 1>out actually about better record than the Indians, right, two

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 1>games under No, they don't. They're close to it. There

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 1>are two games under five hundred. The Indians are one

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>game over five hundreds, so they're they're close for sure.

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>But I checked on Thursday or Friday they were actually tied.

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh so the White Sox one tune a ROUNDU Julia

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Ronaldo Lopez one of the teams that Animal Sante's faces.

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that game East tonight. I'll start there, Matt,

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about the White Sox going forward,

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and what do you think about Animal Sanchez this week? Uh? Well,

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean the White Sox going forward, their draft picks.

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Seems like he's gonna be ready pretty soon and could

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:42.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, be a very good impact bat for them

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Vaughan. But for this season, it's gonna be interesting

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to see where they go. I gotta think they sell

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>off some pieces that aren't uh you know, you know,

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 1>essential to their growth. Or does the White Sox, you know,

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.399
<v Speaker 1>after getting burned by Manny make a move to try

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and be a player and you know, be in this

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>race at some point. I doubt that. But as you said,

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they played much better than expected. They've got a nice

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:17.360
<v Speaker 1>core here. Geelito's ascension has been fantastic to watch. I

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>remember throwing his name in late on one of the

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>episodes here as a guy to to get and look,

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:28.359
<v Speaker 1>He's seven stars have been phenomenal. Yeah, absolutely, really really

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 1>excited for Lucas Gelto. If only evern all the Lopez

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>can you know, take a little bit of a page

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 1>out of his book. He's just been so inconsistent, Like

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Ronaldo has games where you watch him and and it

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 1>seems like, all right, he's got some he's got some

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 1>legit stuff, and you can get excited about him, and

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>then there's just other starts where it's like two and

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 1>two thirds eight or and runs just completely gets bombed.

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So he's gotta like find some middle ground, he's gotta

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>develop some kind of consistency. But really really excited about

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 1>what Lucas Gilto is doing this hee. I agree with

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Matt anyone that's not really essential to this team moving

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.800
<v Speaker 1>forward up, Like I wouldn't put Jose break you in

0:43:59.880 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that make because I think they still need one veteran

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 1>around to kind of, uh to be like a role

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:07.800
<v Speaker 1>model for these young players, especially for like Eloy Jimenez.

0:44:07.800 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes a lot of sense. And for

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 1>anyone who was freaking out about Eloy Amenez, he's starting

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to come around as well as seventy ft home run,

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>there's an absolute moon rocket. So excited about the White

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Sox moving forward. I don't know that it's gonna be

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>h It's not gonna be this year, Greg, but they

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>still have Dylan ceasing the minor leagues and he's coming soon,

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh excited about him. Excited about their pitching staff

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 1>for the future. As for Annibal Sanchez, before we do that,

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the good news is for the White Sox that they

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:32.880
<v Speaker 1>have some money. Remember, they wanted to spend. They were

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in the mix, so he thought on the name Machado

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 1>on um Bryce Harper maybe, so they were in the

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 1>mixing little bit there. You have money to spend, and

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>White Sox are not that dissimilar from the Padres either. No,

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a really young team to have a good

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:47.800
<v Speaker 1>farm system like I think Machado would have been in

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:50.320
<v Speaker 1>there as well. But I can't really blame someone for

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 1>wanting to be in San Diego. The only reason I

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:53.360
<v Speaker 1>think they could get rid of a brave use that

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:55.719
<v Speaker 1>contract that he's by far, I think making the most

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 1>money on that team. Nobody else really makes anything. I

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>don't believe, so the real in the ground note, I

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:02.280
<v Speaker 1>think they can make a couple of free agent editions

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see the White Sox certainly hand in the

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 1>right direction. Yes they are. But you wanted to know

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>about about animals going up against the White Sox and

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the Diamond Bags two pretty good matchups on paper here,

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox our team that strikes out a decent

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:19.359
<v Speaker 1>amount and the Diamondbacks you know, their offense has been

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:21.439
<v Speaker 1>They've been actually better than I thought they were gonna

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>be this year, but they're actually slowing down a little

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>bit recently. So Animal Santis has actually performed well his

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>past two starts and is coming off the I l

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>six endings, pitched, one hit, one walks, seven k's against

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the Braves and his last time out was against the

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>White Sox five and the third four hits, one and run,

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:40.920
<v Speaker 1>one walks, seven strikeouts. So, uh, I wasn't really on

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>him during draft season. He was someone who like randomly

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:46.719
<v Speaker 1>broke out last year, but I picked him up in

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a few locations and I actually like the matchups a lot.

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you think that? Yeah, no, I think for

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:54.280
<v Speaker 1>this week he stands out as one of the outside

0:45:54.320 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of the obvious, you know, to start guys that are automatics.

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:00.120
<v Speaker 1>He is a guy that stands out, a guy can

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 1>share two weeks ago, picked up another one last week. Uh,

0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:06.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, there really was an opportunity this week that

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 1>ship i'd sailed, So if you got him, you know,

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the last two starts have been good. I expected starts

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:17.440
<v Speaker 1>here and uh, you know he's a guy that you know,

0:46:17.800 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this is I'm the same as Frank. He was intentionally

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of avoided him, but it's coming back. He's been good,

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you gotta put these matchups. Speaking of

0:46:27.440 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>these matchups, Matt, there there was a duo, a tandem

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of teammates that I wanted to ask you about personally

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:35.919
<v Speaker 1>because I have a few shares of them. That's Jose

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Guantana and you Darvish. Morose Gantana has been really consistent

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:42.279
<v Speaker 1>this year. He's someone that I was targeting a lot um.

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 1>It seems like he was priced for profit throughout draft season.

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And then you Darvish has actually showing some signs as

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>past you know, six seven starts, uh the cutter usages

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:52.840
<v Speaker 1>up and it seems like that's actually helped him a

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>decent amount. But two starts for both of these guys,

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:59.240
<v Speaker 1>they're both on the road at Colorado and at the Dodgers.

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:02.440
<v Speaker 1>As of right now, in my fifteen team leagues, I

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>have Jose Kantana in the lineup. In my twelve team leagues,

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I've been able to go in a different direction. And

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 1>speaking of those twelve team leagues, actually have Animal Sanchis

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:14.239
<v Speaker 1>starting over you Darvish right now in one of those leagues, Matt,

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 1>If you own these guys, what are you doing with them?

0:47:16.920 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I agree with everything you just said there. Uh, Sanchez

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 1>would be the preferable start. Cantana's pitched really well, he

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:28.400
<v Speaker 1>really has, uh you, Darvish is a must bench for

0:47:28.480 --> 0:47:30.960
<v Speaker 1>me this week. There's no way he has pitched better.

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>No way, I'm touching him with cores. And he's pitched

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Dodgers before. He's had his problems there as well.

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you gotta totally avoid him in twelve teams.

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:43.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, you probably have a better option than Kntana

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>where you can go a different route fifteen, it's kind

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of tough. I take my chances on him, if you know,

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 1>if I had to and one league, I believe I am.

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's how I would. I would roll with

0:47:54.680 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 1>those three. No, we actually have a decision to make

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Craig because we have Jose Kantana in the lineup right now.

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:03.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a team league. You know, we actually thought our

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:06.359
<v Speaker 1>pitching was a weakness heading into the season for this league,

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's actually turned out to be pretty pretty damn good. Yes,

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>we got some guys on the bench here, so mad

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll just throw this your way, other people might have

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the same issue. We have Jose Kantana in the lineup,

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.720
<v Speaker 1>But would you rather start Pablo Lopez at home against

0:48:18.760 --> 0:48:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the Pirates, Zach Eflyn at home against the Diamondbacks, or

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Nick Pavetta coming off that complete game at the Braves.

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Would you start either of those three pitchers over a

0:48:29.200 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 1>guy like Katana because he has the tough matchups. I

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I would go that route this week unless I really

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 1>just needed to, you know, build some stats. But if

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it one inning can go really wrong at Corps and

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 1>just you know, destroy hope of even that second start,

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 1>which is against the Dodgers, and he's just LeftyA til

0:48:46.840 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I helped him. But I would go with those other

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>three names. I like the matchups they have their Pavetta's

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 1>pitched really well coming there, Lopez seems have figured it out,

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's home, which is a much better picture at

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>home as well. Yeah, so I think we'll end up

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:02.959
<v Speaker 1>benching him Grady after the show. We'll have to figure

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>out who we're getting in there. But those are an

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:06.400
<v Speaker 1>example of three names that if you play in the

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve team league and you have one of those single

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:10.719
<v Speaker 1>starters on your bench, might want to put those guys

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in your lineup over a guy like Katana or Darvish, Matt,

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to leave. But is there anybody else

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that any of these two star pitchers that you really

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>really like or really really don't before we let you go.

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>They're real quick. This one guy to pop down doing

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this this week. It's a guy I wasn't armed coming

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>into the season, hasn't really picked that great. Mike Fulton

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>evits last fourth starts strike outs to one walk. You guys,

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of seven homers. That's been the bugaboo for him.

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:40.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think you're rolling at this week. All right,

0:49:40.080 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 1>there you go. Mike Folton pirates and the Phillies both

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:45.759
<v Speaker 1>starts at home. Mike Fulton evits the guy that you

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 1>gotta put in there to Maddie Mo Matt. We appreciate

0:49:49.040 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the time. Read him at the Athletic, follow him at

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>CCM Baseball. That'll do again next week. You got guys, awesome,

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate it. Okay, with that, we're gonna start off

0:49:57.520 --> 0:50:00.719
<v Speaker 1>YouTube for today. We appreciate you watch joining the show,

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:03.440
<v Speaker 1>listening on the podcast. Obviously, we'll go about another five

0:50:03.640 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>or so minutes. We'll continue on and come up next.

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 1>On the video side, it's out the window with Sean

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Guastamkia Frank. That means the time for our best bets forever.

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Here feeling man, Um, I'm feeling all right. I'm feeling

0:50:17.719 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it right. I believe you. You got it right on

0:50:20.680 --> 0:50:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Friday again? Right? Is that great? Do you have? What

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:24.920
<v Speaker 1>do you have on Friday? We have to go back

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to the tape. I don't even remember. But um, you

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:29.400
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people might be looking at the

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Yankees met tonight Subway series. I don't even know if

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that game is gonna get in because we're supposed to

0:50:33.120 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 1>get rained too, so um, we'll have to pay attention

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to see what's going on. That was one. I'm actually

0:50:40.239 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going back to the well exactly what I did

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:47.719
<v Speaker 1>last week. Joe Musgrove on six. I understand, he's on

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the road. It's at Atlanta. Kevin Gausman sucks, he sucks,

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 1>He's not good. I'm pretty sure it was the same

0:50:54.640 --> 0:50:58.640
<v Speaker 1>exact matchup last week, and Joe Musgrove performed very well

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and they ended up winning a game. I'm going back

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to the well. I'm going back to the well with

0:51:02.960 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Pirates money line plus one six against Kevin Galman. Actually,

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I wrote down on picks last week so I can

0:51:09.640 --> 0:51:12.879
<v Speaker 1>go back see if I could do this. By the way,

0:51:12.920 --> 0:51:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I think for me, the must grow things is a

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 1>no brainer most things, No Brander, that was the one

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that stood out to me as well. That's my favorite pick.

0:51:19.719 --> 0:51:23.360
<v Speaker 1>On Friday. I had over in the Twins and Indians

0:51:24.040 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and that six three, it was nine. What was the

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:32.000
<v Speaker 1>over under? It was all right, wait, Twins and planned Yeah,

0:51:32.480 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it was Twins Tigers that Twins Tigers? Or who the

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Indians were? The Yankees the Indians, and I'm sure it

0:51:38.560 --> 0:51:41.520
<v Speaker 1>was probably did not do Indians Yankees? Who the Yankees? Something?

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Herman did not? You didn't take that game to the

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:49.759
<v Speaker 1>other one, Tigers. I potentially brought up the Indians and

0:51:49.840 --> 0:51:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Yankees game. You're like that, and they didn't. Boy, I

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't do that either, I think I did. I think

0:51:55.120 --> 0:51:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it was the Yankees. Man, Alright, I got that one wrong.

0:51:58.120 --> 0:52:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe I had the Rockies in the it's over

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:02.759
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, and of course the game end

0:52:02.840 --> 0:52:04.839
<v Speaker 1>five to one. I have the Padres as well over

0:52:04.880 --> 0:52:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the Gnats. I got that one right. I got that

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:11.480
<v Speaker 1>one right adres over the Nats. There, you've been pretty hot, right,

0:52:11.480 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you can keep We're both on Joe must Grove tonight,

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:16.879
<v Speaker 1>which means he's bound to get rocked, all right, Rod

0:52:16.920 --> 0:52:19.280
<v Speaker 1>on Joe must Grove, that's the pick for tonight. I also,

0:52:19.680 --> 0:52:23.000
<v Speaker 1>if it gets in. I had the Mets tonight. I

0:52:23.120 --> 0:52:25.319
<v Speaker 1>like the Mets tonight. You like the Mets tonight plus

0:52:25.520 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>one that sixty six with Jason Vargus. Personally, I wouldn't

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:32.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to do it because my fandom. But if

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you have no ties to the Yankees or Mets, I

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:37.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's crazy. Yeah, I like the Mets tonight.

0:52:37.080 --> 0:52:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's crazy. Have been terrible against lefties, too

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:44.759
<v Speaker 1>awful against left actually pitching relatively well, you know, time

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:47.640
<v Speaker 1>traveling from the eighteenth century or whatever it was. But

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 1>he's pitching well, and the Yankees have not performed well

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:52.359
<v Speaker 1>against left handed pitchings. Yeah, it's if the game gets

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:54.439
<v Speaker 1>in tonight, which is crazy because they're all right handed.

0:52:54.520 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Even though he's back. We're texting yesterday speaking of d D.

0:52:57.120 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 1>That error was awful. That was brutal. Mean, I think

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 1>it was just one of those like shake off the rust,

0:53:02.800 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to the team, but it just seems like

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:06.400
<v Speaker 1>he took his eye off of it and he just

0:53:06.480 --> 0:53:09.920
<v Speaker 1>whipped you just there. So it was so interesting. I

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 1>think it was the inning before there was a hard

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:14.560
<v Speaker 1>hit ball to short and Glabor was still playing short

0:53:14.680 --> 0:53:16.279
<v Speaker 1>and he got down on the knee and like really

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:18.440
<v Speaker 1>made sure he had it. And for the second it

0:53:18.520 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>was I was wow it was played by the Glabor

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 1>because it was a really hard, hard hit. Next hitting

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:27.520
<v Speaker 1>same thing and he totally boots it. What do you

0:53:27.560 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 1>feel about the relief pitch? You're getting a blown save

0:53:30.719 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 1>but being eligible for a win, because I saw people

0:53:34.280 --> 0:53:36.279
<v Speaker 1>chatting about it on Twitter yesterday how it's the most

0:53:36.320 --> 0:53:39.680
<v Speaker 1>egregious thing in baseball. It was egregious new baseball. I mean,

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:43.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of that seems ridiculous. I guess like

0:53:43.560 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a statistical forest though, Like you shouldn't get

0:53:48.200 --> 0:53:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a win for blowing a save. Obviously, No, you shouldn't

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a picture of record, right, like you're the last picture

0:53:54.960 --> 0:53:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in there. They gotta win. On what I was, you

0:53:57.520 --> 0:53:59.960
<v Speaker 1>did enough, you blew the save, but you needn't lose

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the game, especially even for Nanda. Rodney has a lot

0:54:03.600 --> 0:54:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of those wins in his career, especially in the case

0:54:05.239 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of over all the Chapman who like he got out

0:54:07.640 --> 0:54:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of him man, like he got what he needed. Yeah,

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that one like typically if you give up a home

0:54:12.480 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 1>run or something like, you don't deserve it. Like Chapman

0:54:15.000 --> 0:54:17.400
<v Speaker 1>actually didn't deserve the blown saved yesterday. It wasn't his

0:54:17.480 --> 0:54:20.360
<v Speaker 1>fault obviously because of an error. I didn't want to

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:23.160
<v Speaker 1>mention a few of these other two starters. Martine Perez

0:54:23.400 --> 0:54:26.240
<v Speaker 1>has not pitched well recently when he's home versus Seattle

0:54:26.320 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and versus Kansas City. There well, Seattle has emotion home

0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:35.000
<v Speaker 1>runs a month the gym, they're uh, dude everyday. Garnasia

0:54:35.080 --> 0:54:36.839
<v Speaker 1>just continues to get it done home runs are ready,

0:54:36.920 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 1>continues to get it done. Kill the parrot baby, are

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 1>you are you? Are you right? Starting? Martine president cool

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:44.400
<v Speaker 1>with them. Just let you know the marriage is the

0:54:44.440 --> 0:54:46.920
<v Speaker 1>most home runs. Yeah. The Royals have not been good

0:54:46.960 --> 0:54:50.080
<v Speaker 1>against this year. There twenty eight and woble against left

0:54:50.080 --> 0:54:57.360
<v Speaker 1>handed pitching, while the Mariners are so a little bit

0:54:57.400 --> 0:54:59.160
<v Speaker 1>better against left handed pitching. Here, I'm with you. I

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:00.959
<v Speaker 1>think where I own mar team for residm still getting

0:55:01.000 --> 0:55:04.560
<v Speaker 1>him in the line. I just watched before Um Rude

0:55:04.600 --> 0:55:08.399
<v Speaker 1>and Odor still home yesterday. Do you feel like there's

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:10.359
<v Speaker 1>more steels of a home this year than we've seen

0:55:10.400 --> 0:55:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it a long time? Has there been? It just feels

0:55:12.960 --> 0:55:15.680
<v Speaker 1>like it has. I feel like the time three or four,

0:55:16.600 --> 0:55:20.200
<v Speaker 1>there's like a lot Jolean June. I like it. I

0:55:20.520 --> 0:55:23.400
<v Speaker 1>like regressive approach. I love it. I mean, if you

0:55:23.440 --> 0:55:25.480
<v Speaker 1>were watching it, it's there's a lefty on the mountain.

0:55:25.480 --> 0:55:27.239
<v Speaker 1>As soon as he turns to look at first base

0:55:27.320 --> 0:55:29.839
<v Speaker 1>route net Odor just takes off and he's a guy

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:32.000
<v Speaker 1>who like really needs it. I mean he needs anything

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>he could possibly get right now, from a from a

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:38.279
<v Speaker 1>baseball perspective, from a statistical perspective, because it's been a

0:55:38.320 --> 0:55:41.840
<v Speaker 1>really really rough year for Rudinet Odor. But yeah, I

0:55:41.920 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>thought it was an awesome play. Yeah, we really find

0:55:44.600 --> 0:55:47.880
<v Speaker 1>out how many we've had this year. I was Andres

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:51.400
<v Speaker 1>did it? Odor? Did it? Um Laura score Hell did it?

0:55:53.120 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 1>There's three that go in to my immediately. Yeah, I

0:55:55.120 --> 0:55:59.440
<v Speaker 1>think there was. Yeah, so I can't I can't really

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:01.960
<v Speaker 1>find him. I love it, don I'd rather see it more.

0:56:02.360 --> 0:56:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I understand it's like super hard to pull off, and

0:56:04.800 --> 0:56:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you can really only do it against the left handed picture.

0:56:06.920 --> 0:56:09.799
<v Speaker 1>I guess right, but like with Odor, the left news

0:56:09.800 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 1>all the manages staring at first Nace for an hour.

0:56:12.320 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 1>But it was it was interesting though, because like he's

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:16.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at the signs from the catcher, and you saw

0:56:16.719 --> 0:56:18.960
<v Speaker 1>as soon as he looked away from the catcher looked

0:56:18.960 --> 0:56:21.239
<v Speaker 1>at the first basement, Odor just took off like that

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:23.080
<v Speaker 1>was a sign in his head. He's like he looks

0:56:23.120 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the first I'm gone, I'm breaking working one day. Met

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Modica for joining us. Coming up next, as we said

0:56:28.480 --> 0:56:31.960
<v Speaker 1>on the video side shown Guastamakia or at the window,

0:56:32.040 --> 0:56:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Venture will join him as well. Franky Staffe, I'm Grex Susman.

0:56:34.880 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to everybody downstairs, think to everybody that watch, have

0:56:37.200 --> 0:56:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful rest of your day and we'll do it

0:56:39.040 --> 0:56:48.439
<v Speaker 1>all over tomorrow. We hope I couldn't catch the live show.

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Make sure the download our podcast at the v n

0:56:51.560 --> 0:56:53.640
<v Speaker 1>T S Y Sports Network Audio Boom channel